{"meta":{"query_hash":"ad1d57e6e186","filters":{"topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies"},"cohort_total":149,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":149,"exported":149,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ad1d57e6e186","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Legal+and+Constitutional+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W101363655","doi":"","title":"Federalism and subsidiarity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; New Federalism; Dual federalism; Cooperative federalism; Political science; Warren Court; Law; Law and economics; Supreme court; Public administration; Sociology; Politics; European union; Economics","score_opus":0.021992192783344956,"score_gpt":0.17038058134228493,"score_spread":0.14838838855893996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W101363655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12495465,0.0010212453,0.0033082666,0.003528207,0.00013764376,0.000027808455,0.0000071806126,0.000026369975,0.8669886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99631506,0.00006210042,0.0002480935,0.00080972264,0.000050892068,0.00000289334,8.1034074e-7,0.000001483079,0.0025089562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997261,0.0000018837459,0.00009189227,0.00010551448,0.0000069528037,0.0000676697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998908,0.000014429651,0.000020866377,0.000044553388,0.0000057386983,0.00002362564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010025727,0.000035471458,0.00008773639,0.000017383916,0.000103253085,0.000031701948,0.000027230206,0.000017741026,0.0001465718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002995104,0.00003320576,0.000016604508,0.000024582228,0.00004907269,0.00006231642,0.000026877193,0.000027122584,0.00032676346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.8634913e-7,0.0000050240633,0.06358028,0.0000016899423,0.00000500761,1.0040142e-7,0.000024421155,3.0300365e-7,0.000001174926,0.9353487,0.00061561767,0.00041710478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015950356,0.000010927642,0.15016557,9.526945e-7,7.23944e-7,0.0000017557487,0.00000599554,0.00024394937,0.000020422136,0.28582054,0.5634829,0.00008676156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047911555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061239996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8713604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000062656463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000014966483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41999924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1123112189","doi":"","title":"Rational Choice and Reasonable Interactions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic interaction; Simple (philosophy); Rational choice theory (criminology); Rational agent; Game theory; Economics; Law and economics; Positive economics; Management science; Microeconomics; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.04293868435832065,"score_gpt":0.25885866885752434,"score_spread":0.2159199844992037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1123112189","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015552846,0.52102494,0.0002270449,0.033878524,0.0002618887,0.00027942946,0.00008432802,0.00004030181,0.44264823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73752487,0.22454134,0.0013183847,0.025954861,0.0009115684,0.00021272883,0.00007378613,0.000018885778,0.009443572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992842,0.000007890832,0.00033315798,0.00022163636,0.00002981331,0.0001232804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963635,0.00004676433,0.00011164924,0.0001225048,0.000027395203,0.00005533923],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016690633,0.00009432243,0.00025573815,0.000020838963,0.00021021266,0.00003660015,0.000076532706,0.000020506746,0.001115413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082927785,0.00008858083,0.00007368449,0.000091205104,0.00009146752,0.0002694692,0.000053413056,0.00010363968,0.0010950887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.6921206e-7,0.000037942576,0.0015044841,0.00012559179,0.00002722446,2.6352095e-7,0.000008304,0.0000020532989,0.0000010726984,0.9872268,0.008759305,0.0023063042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011715734,0.000007005669,0.003997814,0.0002529823,0.000010660439,0.000010156173,9.3627676e-7,0.00004169981,0.0000032201444,0.005368181,0.9900801,0.00011006801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016130864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017608424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049986687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011416883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481964022","doi":"","title":"The New Inequality: Constitutional Democracy and the Problem of Wealth","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Politics; Inequality; Political science; Political economy; Development economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.014256597032519022,"score_gpt":0.22747473205361016,"score_spread":0.21321813502109113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481964022","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10157579,0.3002117,0.3264826,0.13142207,0.00082207564,0.00078952,0.000042733136,0.000037579986,0.13861594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98535997,0.012802508,0.00013548059,0.00021669392,0.0002174343,0.0000016450649,6.120277e-7,0.0000029152402,0.001262769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985445,0.000020081568,0.0005130377,0.00010767591,0.000062164705,0.0007525168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926466,0.00022669628,0.0003379896,0.00007574493,0.000046316978,0.000048621045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004868915,0.00008015,0.00018856244,0.000042590542,0.0008499314,0.00004339113,0.00017087013,0.000030926953,0.000010560001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100046425,0.000046413083,0.00008098334,0.000121625046,0.0009042083,0.000107271124,0.000045923836,0.0006135302,0.000017076587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083226194,0.000011669951,0.010298287,0.0000023229716,0.00012466354,3.3145952e-7,0.00008570387,0.000005421977,0.0000012769027,0.9816663,0.00014616194,0.007574585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009331633,0.00003996926,0.0029795535,0.0000057069956,0.0000073845085,0.00012202586,0.00027870238,0.0000112667185,0.0000044355006,0.9265544,0.06900411,0.000059329384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036395586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007641509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8837842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002066089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009341814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65370715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484547649","doi":"","title":"Reasonable Expectations of Privacy and Novel Search Technologies: An Economic Approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Expectation of privacy; Information privacy; Privacy by Design; Deterrence (psychology); Enforcement; Crime control; Law and economics; Legislature; Business; Deterrence theory; Personally identifiable information; Law enforcement; Economics; Political science; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.029744979834208866,"score_gpt":0.22835273878749324,"score_spread":0.19860775895328436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484547649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7751346,0.008872322,0.0035088581,0.00093847886,0.00012850577,0.00031553375,0.0003890772,0.00016427561,0.21054833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936574,0.0001019468,0.0053565605,0.000025233001,0.00006699701,0.00004656903,0.000025657055,0.000009607427,0.00071004685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905735,0.000005255838,0.00034866543,0.0003491001,0.000031377025,0.00020821932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953395,0.000028214923,0.00011247912,0.00025696974,0.000027013064,0.00004137881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001544992,0.00011318512,0.00026160385,0.00009496383,0.00020512805,0.000060834118,0.000200218,0.00007902085,0.000052502364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031804993,0.00012138908,0.00005011231,0.00011563909,0.00029292534,0.00037422476,0.00011527255,0.000120887125,0.00012932542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005948749,0.000111649955,0.025099177,0.000016980588,0.000023401733,4.3748037e-7,0.00005101911,0.00020453132,0.00007712346,0.97406626,0.00021146837,0.00013203482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003736515,0.00035772854,0.10109353,0.00006292753,0.000036523554,0.000057039713,0.0044203936,0.006898524,0.0034922005,0.5397206,0.3385718,0.0015522431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049612727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026202394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43434563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009265074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003251039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74999934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492361291","doi":"","title":"A Budding Theory of Willful Patent Infringement: Orange Books, Colored Pills, and Greener Verdicts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Business; Liberian dollar; Prescription drug; Advertising; Competition (biology); Patent infringement; Pill; Marketing; Medical prescription; Internet privacy; Intellectual property; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.05949872676928494,"score_gpt":0.19868240652955244,"score_spread":0.1391836797602675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492361291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6962091,0.008131138,0.0048226705,0.00023243338,0.00021550934,0.00015771766,0.000050219624,0.00003100523,0.29015023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977219,0.0004041757,0.00025095214,0.0002589373,0.000038712824,0.000005783534,0.0000025363418,0.000004853976,0.0013121237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993221,0.000003831812,0.0003117633,0.00016790122,0.000030221396,0.00016415033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997027,0.000037858183,0.00010979646,0.00008099994,0.000025519008,0.000043130924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004617446,0.00008409195,0.00019992537,0.000095936586,0.0000926833,0.00001422731,0.00006233226,0.000034242024,0.00015529823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034072666,0.00007609943,0.000042767668,0.00008663365,0.00013065115,0.00010458281,0.00009065339,0.000044013035,0.000037476206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037185142,0.00003549145,0.08984673,0.00001706495,0.000077235796,0.0000032818048,0.00019773844,0.000003880099,0.00002927605,0.9065321,0.00020069601,0.003019335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016454386,0.00018116982,0.68337005,0.00004549391,0.0000234525,0.000005953719,0.00044870985,0.00010832975,0.0009422142,0.11103069,0.20178026,0.00041819835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041209097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007552934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7955014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034949902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006359914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31032446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508246082","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.245115","title":"Shoring Up Chevron: A Defense of Seminole Rock Deference to Agency Regulatory Interpretations","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Chevron (anatomy); Deference; Shoring; Agency (philosophy); Administrative law; Law; Political science; Geology; Archaeology; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.017768272366562567,"score_gpt":0.21259978468343096,"score_spread":0.1948315123168684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508246082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9083713,0.017057743,0.015033719,0.00049556146,0.0002491147,0.00010902223,0.000025025343,0.00002111792,0.058637366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99093574,0.0019964164,0.00009555707,0.000076515156,0.00009278668,0.000008915638,0.0000012989732,0.000008112027,0.0067846654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985909,0.000009292914,0.00042427212,0.00018331372,0.000050287603,0.00074194645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962413,0.00001741448,0.00012623549,0.00012441663,0.000043019445,0.00006479046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039979047,0.0001063277,0.0002194392,0.00011662445,0.00017749233,0.00002443653,0.00019720671,0.000040218376,0.00040733564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004202401,0.00011181709,0.0001211065,0.00018409648,0.000030056977,0.0001655841,0.00002926765,0.00044043025,0.00037505076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037544363,0.00004245107,0.007454151,0.0000059157246,0.00015063329,0.0000010888677,0.0010233037,0.00065831584,0.0000458826,0.96827,0.00017204766,0.02213868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007223277,0.00039224094,0.024573592,0.00009218555,0.000035520763,0.0002090278,0.00095866737,0.00031765603,0.00022167242,0.93296754,0.03898754,0.0005220369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012426348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023898306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0825644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038418456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031480208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48206437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521526324","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2381553","title":"Death and Taxes: The Nature of a Deceased's 'Estate', its Relationship to the Deceased, and Practical Implications for Reassessments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Economics; Estate tax; Business; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Finance; Tax avoidance; Double taxation","score_opus":0.034625908648552986,"score_gpt":0.2896970875809959,"score_spread":0.2550711789324429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521526324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7818808,0.021813016,0.030438133,0.16037786,0.00016032395,0.0012085484,0.00022978074,0.000012294368,0.0038792223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957291,0.00301661,0.00033203236,0.0004232817,0.00008796319,0.00009407639,0.000002529806,0.000005796991,0.00030862045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999134,0.000018743756,0.00024481182,0.00013849282,0.000032208296,0.00043174415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927443,0.00029967865,0.00017169974,0.00010072556,0.000099196055,0.000054293294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007186175,0.00007722907,0.00011897916,0.00004533791,0.00052704825,0.0000814094,0.00009731219,0.00004927856,0.0000069854623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050699577,0.00004825691,0.000043272546,0.00010781823,0.000058721875,0.00020652145,0.000038368056,0.0005497657,0.000013220167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011260077,0.000020548046,0.08094769,0.0000030455872,0.00007673076,5.4749158e-8,0.0000638368,0.000004392779,0.0000035081632,0.91744006,0.00051106804,0.0009177877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002692127,0.00008661201,0.26866412,0.000005569954,0.000019413177,0.000093307026,0.0002562428,0.0000852686,0.000002337419,0.71104646,0.019401798,0.00006967101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011195412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024480597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21384826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012004467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002806735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40536824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525320904","doi":"10.1108/pijpsm.2012.18135caa.003","title":"American Policing at a Crossroads: Unsustainable Policies and The Procedural Justice Alternative","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policing An International Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Open Society Institute; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Procedural justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Public administration; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.03089794433752499,"score_gpt":0.29108795701207085,"score_spread":0.2601900126745459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525320904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672224,0.0004587429,0.00043641505,0.011331529,0.0008501756,0.000086209955,0.000042451033,0.000022845104,0.019549249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99153787,0.00048163682,0.00015798555,0.003987847,0.0026501056,0.000012784417,0.0000028939667,0.000013350911,0.0011555476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882096,0.000034610926,0.0004137693,0.00015976386,0.00012527472,0.00044560427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990275,0.00010907936,0.0004412119,0.0000970825,0.00016205173,0.0001631003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006127529,0.00015403805,0.00025868483,0.00020441569,0.0008453288,0.00032464604,0.00034162277,0.000024978324,0.000039830422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000324696,0.00011604233,0.00008966424,0.00013237505,0.00064531306,0.0007701571,0.00020834863,0.00024021011,0.000054275282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010193102,0.00004361284,0.26094356,0.000005713473,0.00018533709,0.0000033048632,0.009115432,0.00016686755,0.000009626303,0.7285402,0.0004201719,0.00046426913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032912835,0.00012800528,0.8957409,0.00006537751,0.00007937763,0.0019925586,0.0036379702,0.002683409,0.00015620032,0.053818498,0.037813418,0.00059296103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043881815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004490598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67472166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041990654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003606288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9624851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533396565","doi":"","title":"The Economic Consequences and Constitutionality of Administrative Monetary Penalties for Abuse of Dominance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Dominance (genetics); Position (finance); Revenue; Supreme court; Order (exchange); Economics; Competition (biology); Law and economics; Law; Business; Public economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.030624569389452357,"score_gpt":0.24371902218517755,"score_spread":0.2130944527957252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533396565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9378972,0.048891556,0.0021686284,0.002570859,0.00022945326,0.0003369197,0.00018690019,0.000004363522,0.0077141253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862228,0.013262041,0.00012713991,0.000022569637,0.00004691983,0.00002757505,0.0000014596616,0.0000025894878,0.00028690585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989166,0.0000126741215,0.00048928556,0.00012237173,0.000026541025,0.00043252675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921864,0.00015150683,0.00045866112,0.00006913135,0.00007594085,0.000026099058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074011384,0.00008449812,0.0002485646,0.00003428141,0.0002888286,0.000028738175,0.00013893006,0.000030145196,0.000014037988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000558898,0.00006378698,0.00008796159,0.000030765023,0.00149043,0.00020345327,0.000015317733,0.00019788145,0.000009177559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037915666,0.000013996909,0.006754772,0.000008856386,0.00016478672,6.599021e-8,0.00009150054,0.000018274628,0.000020390808,0.9924922,0.000046256537,0.00035097727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043451655,0.0001576403,0.008790869,0.000011548731,0.000009768264,0.000050002913,0.0012161691,0.000093758485,0.00018748855,0.9860929,0.0028662602,0.00008902424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012311635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006613068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048325606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026383356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007990945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5491551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564531687","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4536","title":"The Scales of Injustice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Consequentialism; Injustice; Argument (complex analysis); Retributive justice; Economic Justice; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07080626815006953,"score_gpt":0.26008144673894307,"score_spread":0.18927517858887355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564531687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6519875,0.0075027035,0.0017280795,0.0027290594,0.00089364295,0.00037090428,0.00017056252,0.000032816097,0.33458477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977688,0.00041930852,0.0003038137,0.00024030641,0.0001345501,0.000013203779,8.6592064e-7,0.000006907937,0.0011122478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918216,0.000007207525,0.0004208061,0.00016480779,0.00006543553,0.00015957536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992694,0.00017273577,0.00021410437,0.00020454658,0.000091877235,0.00004732906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018744636,0.000084415056,0.00023654164,0.000077820456,0.00021841482,0.00002100091,0.00044686586,0.00003572015,0.000054636537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003395104,0.0000700739,0.000068884736,0.00022298629,0.00030309067,0.00018125105,0.000182791,0.00007358567,0.00018391579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015844723,0.00016805774,0.09160216,0.00022601684,0.00017332209,0.000007108492,0.00097412185,0.0005969649,0.00016234862,0.89239377,0.012218922,0.0013187414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079010363,0.00020485684,0.74965066,0.000093418355,0.00011051615,0.0000138617215,0.00046017484,0.00022106394,0.002022992,0.013801664,0.23214571,0.00048496074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031079055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030059293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87859213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020683196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029760133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28575307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591510348","doi":"","title":"Election Finance Regulation in Emerging Democracies: Lessons from Canada and the U.S","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Cripple; Campaign finance; Limiting; Competition (biology); Election law; Political science; Democracy; Public administration; Economics; Law and economics; Business; Public economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03296534673834558,"score_gpt":0.26884188232219286,"score_spread":0.23587653558384727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591510348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.882147,0.005234364,0.000039168182,0.009553852,0.0007159317,0.00063023105,0.00025014367,0.000014977972,0.10141432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608281,0.037287544,0.00009187731,0.00012402974,0.0001634959,0.0001909604,0.000037105798,0.000016609281,0.0012602527],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979253,0.00008090327,0.0007392709,0.0007311012,0.00007137564,0.0004520816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988187,0.00042596075,0.00027474575,0.00039478214,0.00004223614,0.000043573848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012373276,0.0002055653,0.00054809666,0.00026036886,0.00029908997,0.00011487121,0.00031186244,0.0001877378,0.00005203777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038316927,0.00020641499,0.00007408507,0.00020200577,0.0003737254,0.000116324176,0.00047528808,0.0009959217,0.0000056406834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004946189,0.00015594074,0.39528912,0.00013281706,0.00033075202,0.00005042634,0.0018715819,0.08251162,0.000007522857,0.34409982,0.0005275641,0.17452821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002007353,0.00001862177,0.53233516,0.0002210741,0.000006748343,0.000006799387,0.0005688649,0.043533023,0.000018134424,0.3194638,0.10115875,0.00066171045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6332903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7817434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1738665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014387156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044678536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8417359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596528684","doi":"","title":"Should Insurance Companies Be Forced to Reimburse Contraceptives Despite Religious Objections","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Actuarial science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05319983612983778,"score_gpt":0.23894469844810223,"score_spread":0.18574486231826445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596528684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66680384,0.002979628,0.006081509,0.013736247,0.0005783289,0.0006159745,0.00015953441,0.00018353254,0.3088614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98814875,0.00024378642,0.0009162198,0.0028102237,0.0000901732,0.00017246445,0.0000042005654,0.000009669154,0.007604532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902594,0.0000059309423,0.0003654621,0.0003053383,0.000036703375,0.0002606022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950516,0.000054249038,0.000085210224,0.00017588456,0.00008295103,0.000096571865],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008418421,0.00014198408,0.00029511173,0.00011641516,0.0002703634,0.00010094448,0.00014085321,0.000053316086,0.0005348482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009442182,0.00013498953,0.00009698147,0.00022673557,0.00012661346,0.00029148042,0.000064555694,0.00010304297,0.0026917155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015402902,0.000076095974,0.065204665,0.00000831918,0.000107225984,0.000001535058,0.0009373529,0.0003664395,0.00011807513,0.8987495,0.033732656,0.00068278564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008432783,0.00019818332,0.49983862,0.0000243109,0.000008180686,0.000010203203,0.0009461344,0.0004278313,0.00029037957,0.0753469,0.421359,0.0007069483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030727321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034284507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8234025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060903512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013136156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606702854","doi":"","title":"The 'Design Sciences' and Constitutional 'Success","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Political science; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Existentialism; Consequentialism; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.02441578566044129,"score_gpt":0.22379436887350748,"score_spread":0.1993785832130662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606702854","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03846369,0.2381202,0.52977157,0.052479576,0.0010848123,0.00033886428,0.000020392594,0.000058013557,0.13966286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988456,0.01022243,0.000109592576,0.00031818426,0.00016918134,0.0000021762057,2.4068018e-7,0.0000014242158,0.00072077435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987226,0.000013750607,0.00022796492,0.00014623535,0.0000510268,0.0008384243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997099,0.0000619209,0.000116837924,0.00004847985,0.000025996082,0.000036846315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018545592,0.000077829645,0.00011280168,0.000051699044,0.0015838806,0.0001643095,0.00019181277,0.000025803807,0.000011836542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008163822,0.000055101347,0.000044572495,0.00013046121,0.0013317659,0.00021504663,0.00001895277,0.00045103618,0.000055036016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008796596,0.000011784604,0.0029934684,2.447851e-7,0.000029319073,7.322585e-7,0.000013429158,0.000047525136,0.0000021705252,0.99296826,0.00013099895,0.003793285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002211264,0.00013608298,0.0028671506,0.0000031939098,0.0000028808076,0.00022634682,0.000079942794,0.00011810778,0.0000036515564,0.9697902,0.026463903,0.000087407716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012786124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015061294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9499923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020193342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055837224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1860694009","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Interpretation and Presidential Powers: The Case of Trinidad and Tobago","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Caribbean dialogue","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Constitution; Presidential system; Governor; Interpretation (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); Political science; Law; Separation of powers; Constitutional interpretation; Law and economics; Economics; Engineering; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.023037259394459633,"score_gpt":0.22238130349095733,"score_spread":0.1993440440964977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1860694009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9517904,0.015900508,0.0028460368,0.00066154276,0.0007302787,0.0001972289,0.0004707441,0.000013144059,0.02739013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995555,0.00011176175,0.00005571152,0.00010098516,0.000120124096,0.000010288073,0.000010422962,0.0000018595377,0.000033308806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953747,0.000012020941,0.00021180761,0.00011193974,0.00001615094,0.00011063645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996826,0.00008722342,0.00009390531,0.000071101036,0.000022810413,0.00004236273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022339325,0.000066614724,0.00014327199,0.00003096665,0.00013490455,0.000026898599,0.000040721356,0.000035375244,0.000027509737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012756152,0.00005505118,0.00003487933,0.00004960941,0.000714789,0.00020557303,0.000065263266,0.000058217363,0.000014420855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013742748,0.00001811462,0.052602075,0.00001084108,0.00004840141,0.0000066065727,0.00088398415,0.0000035668459,0.0000055446567,0.9450312,0.0002765204,0.001099363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004513262,0.0003184914,0.657934,0.000107670654,0.00025089883,0.0029842004,0.004638289,0.001099817,0.0006631983,0.18193914,0.14423889,0.0013121321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066182815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000101097765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7630921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016739776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011351533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.263367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905800883","doi":"","title":"Legal Analysis of Economics: Solving the Problem of Rational Commitment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Normative; Commit; Rational choice theory (criminology); Adjudication; Rational agent; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Preference; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03694648439122424,"score_gpt":0.23426555743910613,"score_spread":0.19731907304788188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905800883","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0400176,0.6021196,0.0019179182,0.02691048,0.00029434904,0.0016811461,0.00090049906,0.00003242508,0.32612595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537252,0.043874357,0.0006483215,0.0015237292,0.000039084753,0.0000611078,0.000041472817,0.0000054494944,0.00008123232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879974,0.000013178231,0.00083248975,0.00019939119,0.000035644058,0.0001195661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991493,0.00004523142,0.00049401674,0.00023263943,0.000050270697,0.000028504292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004622879,0.0001094215,0.00064653554,0.000059426635,0.00012629287,0.000016337615,0.00021538671,0.000026278347,0.00022921972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017662924,0.000082430066,0.00037107573,0.00030557127,0.00022565454,0.00011292316,0.000077570985,0.00007610568,0.000045928515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021409016,0.000077739795,0.0012469749,0.00022920078,0.0007091568,2.0918527e-7,0.00003552261,0.0011250707,0.0000016921472,0.99616116,0.00011279484,0.00029835163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039801287,0.000049112434,0.0058663688,0.0005149152,0.00051316625,0.0000019712916,0.000011329297,0.00012591307,0.00009006458,0.06141085,0.9308075,0.00021079545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007886091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039527676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9347503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008344439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043834505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33614007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1919621670","doi":"10.1080/09332480.2013.794609","title":"Can Tax Deadlines Cause Fatal Mistakes?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CHANCE","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Thursday; Front page; Front (military); History; Computer science; Media studies; Sociology; Geography; Philosophy; Meteorology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0505357169112325,"score_gpt":0.20567702772705448,"score_spread":0.155141310815822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1919621670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8539518,0.011391612,0.001038621,0.012034759,0.0010618971,0.00029381595,0.00042207402,0.00008415798,0.11972125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901691,0.000117076685,0.0001540926,0.00053611223,0.00021018887,0.00006478345,0.000008610946,0.0000059137083,0.008734101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994118,0.0000017656655,0.00018478405,0.0002041247,0.0000191579,0.00017835488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999702,0.0000120611585,0.00007989932,0.00012751429,0.000032449894,0.00004607003],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000037918424,0.000085396925,0.00015331536,0.00003325804,0.000117470874,0.000042788677,0.00010944421,0.000031187777,0.0004281232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042885462,0.00008516868,0.000043108477,0.00008867601,0.000083956926,0.00013677655,0.000024048972,0.000057152414,0.0022620226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040199134,0.000059164326,0.0552449,0.000030787112,0.0000740781,0.000008320995,0.00045684248,0.000011791113,0.00017835556,0.9231752,0.01914354,0.0016129802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077706954,0.000059609156,0.20662016,0.000038826965,0.000007692881,0.000015364094,0.00024418515,0.00043687783,0.0013379696,0.114222296,0.6754388,0.0008011427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015869385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000238947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8089529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038164373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010070184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945383277","doi":"10.3138/jcs.48.3.49","title":"The Dilemma of Positive Rights: Access to Health Care and the <i>Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Charter; Political science; Patient rights; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Law; Law and economics; Health care; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02186579320423833,"score_gpt":0.23511264912724633,"score_spread":0.21324685592300802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1945383277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53382176,0.22910397,0.000039034458,0.1492023,0.0014448586,0.0007837522,0.0010685619,0.0000036437318,0.08453213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974803,0.0012457907,0.00003778372,0.0010774173,0.00011035549,0.000003972248,3.7716384e-7,0.0000027767035,0.00004127359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999172,0.000028644748,0.00046229045,0.00009210217,0.000052424304,0.00019259575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889386,0.0001749922,0.00036325227,0.00008519746,0.00026862166,0.00021410304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051594037,0.000089021756,0.00044364476,0.0002953204,0.0007756869,0.000056687724,0.00017336916,0.000023480989,0.000003209927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010515899,0.000049413786,0.000062376064,0.00016871643,0.0006164444,0.00012227902,0.00004082361,0.00009559134,0.0000015345094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048142338,0.0000050597023,0.012382558,0.000031937816,0.00055437454,0.0000036204945,0.00900657,0.000006943936,2.3853778e-7,0.9616351,0.014871673,0.0014537713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011830549,0.00031516832,0.13893746,0.00014253092,0.00003648677,0.000023586024,0.0014563567,0.0000059450244,0.0000175376,0.06974502,0.7879797,0.00015712174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73544306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9756978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8918901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001461576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015236683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59660345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1948768391","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2012.15.2.277","title":"Ex Ante Fairness in Criminal Law and Procedure","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ex-ante; Supreme court; Discretion; Criminal law; Economics; Law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.026744538418818055,"score_gpt":0.19988365518114282,"score_spread":0.17313911676232477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1948768391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8097848,0.038997546,0.0012202588,0.00055822614,0.0002058911,0.00010388577,0.000009007258,0.000016334157,0.14910401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99490464,0.004216119,0.000049023183,0.00019461336,0.00007888202,0.000004184258,4.886839e-7,0.0000061022793,0.0005459414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987681,0.000006311105,0.00025476163,0.00016271784,0.000025352683,0.0007827436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997872,0.0000065424683,0.00009996953,0.00005029895,0.000018621717,0.000037376365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004999418,0.00009086794,0.00017422723,0.000082523395,0.00013724531,0.000027084532,0.000105621984,0.00004131488,0.000044117267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018897781,0.00008625152,0.000041073083,0.000087202745,0.00010192375,0.00023058582,0.000031718853,0.0005752174,0.000059836486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028946068,0.000040048137,0.0316076,0.000006697703,0.000032801225,0.0000052986315,0.00046070787,5.1971546e-7,0.0000019228364,0.96722037,0.000009571832,0.0005855382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049480115,0.00013555938,0.027498098,0.000013809292,0.0000061563564,0.0003049748,0.00095973595,0.000019271412,0.000012159871,0.96595454,0.0044491854,0.00015171817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005617404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026020491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18511981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020589051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016665863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3517235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W195486235","doi":"","title":"Cutting the Umbilical Cord: The Final Appellate Court in Former British Colonies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Certiorari; Judicial independence; Court of record; Trial court; Court of equity; Majority opinion; High Court; Law of the case; State (computer science); Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.017508219690322246,"score_gpt":0.2043314025590152,"score_spread":0.18682318286869296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W195486235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9388598,0.019412493,0.0007794197,0.020551747,0.0002966369,0.00026160237,0.0000083667965,0.000012947937,0.019816946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913193,0.004678928,0.000012583903,0.00051254977,0.00021649852,0.00002825872,8.504064e-7,0.000007723178,0.0032233035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982071,0.000022627102,0.00040193138,0.000158846,0.000058515685,0.0011510093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957955,0.00008304,0.00017184272,0.00009674722,0.00003937734,0.000029456512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012217324,0.00009882901,0.00018756404,0.000038443668,0.0005869684,0.00021440613,0.00031042963,0.00004581269,0.00018349399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089946836,0.00007039329,0.00010761116,0.00015953717,0.00019792667,0.0002140983,0.00006476085,0.0012009182,0.00042040198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001448827,0.000042487285,0.06600051,0.0000024894912,0.000100692734,0.0000027067704,0.00016192021,0.00005003742,0.0000018724805,0.9166737,0.0016662367,0.015282832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005046374,0.00012313119,0.08757748,0.00001646245,0.0000067211554,0.0006047385,0.00093406346,0.0003849525,0.0000025218048,0.8189018,0.09077537,0.0001681591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034375463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005108402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097771965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036113628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023437463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54035574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983579864","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb01577.x","title":"Independent foundations, public money and public accountability: Whither ministerial responsibility as democratic governance?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Publics; Democratic governance; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Humanities; Management; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.04507411630960479,"score_gpt":0.24329975443598095,"score_spread":0.19822563812637617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983579864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7626847,0.0014000006,0.0006352306,0.08062903,0.0011030239,0.00071793824,0.000645642,0.00006541983,0.15211901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99667865,0.000054273925,0.00020603783,0.0010285064,0.00011334919,0.00011116216,0.00010372665,0.000015990432,0.001688292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979372,0.00008466174,0.00067197706,0.0006452637,0.00012079313,0.00054008776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845177,0.00007545857,0.00027788331,0.00040817884,0.00017699102,0.00060970814],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097419525,0.00022475475,0.00030637084,0.0002169949,0.00072525203,0.0010000085,0.00020598657,0.00018266556,0.0016720201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023378297,0.00025960617,0.00007419648,0.00041554403,0.00031774622,0.0013841895,0.000034941982,0.00018201658,0.00027903196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010565477,0.0000673931,0.0922297,0.0000106657235,0.00004154824,0.00000492989,0.00004949836,5.7397287e-8,0.000002890121,0.9059159,0.000979412,0.00068740157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005886146,0.00011685005,0.053223982,0.0000050972017,0.000008171975,0.000059854294,0.0003217766,0.00005718114,0.000010882316,0.10479696,0.84040767,0.00040294504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004206408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83942825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008226366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029481766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985582839","doi":"10.3138/utlj.041813-02ra","title":"Normative jurisprudence and legal realism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal realism; Normative; Legal formalism; Legal positivism; Law; Critical legal studies; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Realism; Sociology; Legal history; Legal research; Epistemology; Comparative law; Philosophy; Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.009558701956465807,"score_gpt":0.16184893777700615,"score_spread":0.15229023582054035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985582839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11858142,0.006384839,0.0015553386,0.0019456748,0.0002053617,0.000074839656,0.000047189973,0.000010097351,0.87119526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968386,0.00096787635,0.0007617848,0.000077486795,0.000037251833,5.5605994e-8,5.041763e-7,0.0000013681565,0.0013150694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969226,0.00000617358,0.000113702,0.000074091404,0.000026069856,0.0000876784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969214,0.000012327991,0.0001370747,0.00004402989,0.00005520111,0.00005922091],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000081815546,0.00004753476,0.00013219554,0.000012321176,0.00032268345,0.000031900756,0.00010283938,0.000025466208,0.0010871692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000068295744,0.000051956315,0.000043626762,0.000011606754,0.00018192337,0.0009638107,0.000056665274,0.00006652186,0.00006701415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071517966,0.0000168439,0.0024618201,0.000004092252,0.000046415127,0.000007604328,0.0007301463,0.0000028566262,0.000006709457,0.99375606,0.0023170218,0.0006432985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092332036,0.000119163626,0.11998918,0.000032695414,0.000014360679,0.00011286392,0.0030724006,0.00016000084,0.000018506194,0.038932852,0.8363804,0.00024422756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14328384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009470229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9548232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009799358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009435969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002648609","doi":"10.1177/0886368703251169","title":"Executive Compensation: Examining an Old Issue from New Perspectives","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Executive compensation; Compensation (psychology); Business; Psychology; Executive functions; Accounting; Cognitive psychology; Process management; Social psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.1015747962184464,"score_gpt":0.26337801512153014,"score_spread":0.16180321890308375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002648609","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0380908,0.8027033,0.0023562296,0.003100532,0.00075216,0.00078412663,0.0001789284,0.0001302049,0.1519037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89049315,0.09820559,0.0037357975,0.0036043653,0.00047383772,0.00005834344,0.00016579579,0.000030900334,0.0032321897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984958,0.00005561814,0.00062278245,0.000539234,0.00008098838,0.00020556978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989854,0.00008932587,0.00035088044,0.00032378422,0.00012316612,0.00012740979],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033597165,0.00021777052,0.00059041893,0.00007648817,0.00025000825,0.00008120634,0.0001861149,0.000058269234,0.0033701388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025779763,0.00023143934,0.000100682926,0.00029963264,0.00007520415,0.0004591476,0.000038484057,0.00013010792,0.0016650981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030449696,0.000058486617,0.005966233,0.000053471354,0.000059705097,0.0000012330567,0.0008512165,0.000047929698,0.0000032306216,0.9843664,0.0023486537,0.0062403525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007928912,0.000104007115,0.08618674,0.0010283908,0.000059642374,0.000010462039,0.0007078657,0.00012810786,0.000043464,0.039220173,0.8710118,0.0007064553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006619329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006859623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94514626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001286556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054301367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013519655","doi":"10.1057/eej.2011.6","title":"Fairness and Tax Policy: A Response to Mankiw's Proposed “Just Deserts”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eastern Economic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Tax policy; Point (geometry); Key (lock); Public economics; Law and economics; Tax reform; Computer science; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.06193552165685705,"score_gpt":0.22974280301205904,"score_spread":0.167807281355202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013519655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96127087,0.00077875267,0.0015635659,0.0036613126,0.00059838797,0.00015225363,0.000080289225,0.00001989447,0.031874686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99361664,0.00007930872,0.0006056521,0.0005739466,0.00039552545,0.000008987209,6.023509e-7,0.000016696942,0.0047026635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988111,0.000025266023,0.0005122252,0.00029119197,0.00002477123,0.00033539248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993249,0.000023704457,0.00023538215,0.00015367185,0.00002405266,0.00023827892],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006079906,0.00016635704,0.0003173664,0.000309513,0.00026083607,0.00015095956,0.00023177637,0.00005692551,0.00050438603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075719705,0.00016738535,0.00008716911,0.00006760701,0.00011867105,0.000362392,0.00014431734,0.00016761602,0.0021248485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017141523,0.00015444087,0.5017466,0.000025736246,0.00037806935,0.000107982545,0.007479342,0.000050342296,0.00007287359,0.478117,0.00202057,0.00813289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029519198,0.0005696195,0.6335497,0.00008403866,0.00002230942,0.0011608857,0.0012751033,0.000404031,0.00020792306,0.12056787,0.23815647,0.0010501257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063213264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001313886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3575491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000251973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121155346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035341587","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n1p40","title":"Modernising the Common Law Offence of Cheating the Public Revenue","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Revenue; Law; Common law; Business; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Accounting","score_opus":0.08898774326635134,"score_gpt":0.25330964868792605,"score_spread":0.1643219054215747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035341587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7797891,0.020633573,0.0007381628,0.032148704,0.0006728819,0.00009501604,0.000120034725,0.000003600769,0.16579896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869525,0.000090186404,0.00008245459,0.00087405974,0.00015579666,4.7625468e-7,1.9700934e-7,0.0000025437382,0.00009901275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994672,0.000014150751,0.00032727688,0.000041993877,0.000046860878,0.000102524944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994214,0.000074460215,0.00030115125,0.000074075746,0.00008294168,0.000045931207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005916362,0.000044457927,0.00016085723,0.000016190856,0.00020154924,0.00005797702,0.00012625828,0.000019255382,0.000002997825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006262847,0.00002622186,0.00004923991,0.00003920592,0.00032565888,0.00012137834,0.000046948662,0.00012035538,0.0000022441286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017567777,0.000012718623,0.0029789961,0.0000053632607,0.000025041767,0.0000011892404,0.00040143516,0.000019105742,0.0000031035881,0.9962278,0.00024012424,0.000083386534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025838806,0.00006477531,0.0019975507,0.000033676402,0.000011478832,0.00006969914,0.00038311796,0.00045492218,0.000054324635,0.7279281,0.26868105,0.000062899446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095891056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013673604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26844093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025667601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027117798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15501742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036943900","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00376.x","title":"The Precautionary Principle in Patent Law: A View from Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Patent law; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Environmental law; Political science; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.057878089722347884,"score_gpt":0.20852316624438047,"score_spread":0.15064507652203257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036943900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44539887,0.15344666,0.00043443777,0.11439619,0.0023037058,0.0007576538,0.00009293263,0.000021375972,0.2831482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930278,0.0016446053,0.000022543334,0.0016815158,0.00013258216,0.0000022240083,6.9407184e-7,0.0000035304859,0.0034844738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990224,0.000046614357,0.0005976832,0.000085184576,0.000079051264,0.00016905896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925244,0.00029829692,0.00022643822,0.00012306553,0.0000617739,0.000038010243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006190377,0.00009426536,0.00022180259,0.000040699444,0.00029183587,0.00003507019,0.00035262908,0.0000151777695,0.00023153832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024903263,0.000039670576,0.00006250949,0.00019923857,0.00011240299,0.00010418746,0.000052996005,0.00029752112,0.000046390523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023859458,0.00082843157,0.0121807195,0.000025608735,0.00089939975,0.00009531158,0.008839635,0.0027460176,0.00013930874,0.6509094,0.2632848,0.057665423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025946414,0.00010167562,0.011289382,0.00005690992,0.000007618172,0.000019304178,0.00010327624,0.0003477059,0.00009532864,0.027688213,0.95992255,0.0001085874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15240309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31195596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69663775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025519237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016968804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85324115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040584697","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0053","title":"Preference, pluralism, and proportionality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Pluralism (philosophy); Proportionality (law); Social choice theory; Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023434782033723903,"score_gpt":0.17786960044065103,"score_spread":0.15443481840692713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040584697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53895235,0.001468344,0.00030687198,0.00078823365,0.0003194382,0.000046508907,0.00006478236,0.00000871702,0.45804474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979928,0.00024678698,0.0008789309,0.000030031453,0.000050479415,2.9957775e-8,0.0000011000967,0.0000011047367,0.000798699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971014,0.0000035320545,0.00010931194,0.00008064861,0.000026909931,0.00006944795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970585,0.000007358034,0.00013474522,0.000048187692,0.00005053746,0.000053291027],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013323629,0.000040560924,0.000111159265,0.000009239434,0.00030028424,0.000015329664,0.00008721383,0.000032836382,0.0013952833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010743982,0.00004335813,0.000042010346,0.000009583876,0.00022644296,0.000338381,0.00004234863,0.00010216383,0.000012558345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011676963,0.000022943654,0.024861174,0.0000029870187,0.000029693218,0.0000029096334,0.00020311172,6.2065084e-7,0.000028339842,0.974164,0.00034211492,0.0003303927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005135834,0.000039357215,0.22650783,0.0000071052696,0.000008538743,0.000040746876,0.00029516546,0.000020509517,0.000016458267,0.04460342,0.7278277,0.00011956179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01842099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025390623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9295606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036173504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013853666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041780458","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2002.tb01855.x","title":"Discretion unbound: Reconciling the Charter and soft law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Charter; Political science; Law; Judicial discretion; Statutory law; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Scrutiny; Law and economics; Sociology; Judicial review","score_opus":0.054217779218901765,"score_gpt":0.194214809239742,"score_spread":0.13999703002084024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041780458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100459,0.007190673,0.004027545,0.3999695,0.00106426,0.00050081173,0.0005198557,0.000072403316,0.48619595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99620193,0.000052749037,0.000023844515,0.0017480232,0.00011941987,0.000021241143,0.000020291294,0.0000041317717,0.0018083767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994477,0.0000062938975,0.00018425469,0.00016718493,0.000021841119,0.00017270312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999667,0.000017130205,0.00006240606,0.000099195364,0.000023770594,0.00013048775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015149007,0.00006787555,0.000084142026,0.00004967915,0.00051480107,0.00024211564,0.0000688385,0.00004534169,0.0006631329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004365453,0.00006116495,0.00002575708,0.00008404802,0.0001599058,0.00032478257,0.0000061099286,0.00007424599,0.00022570751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.3350817e-7,0.0000045370625,0.002230815,0.0000022129036,0.000010219695,0.0000014960975,0.00007782204,1.3373382e-7,3.9854095e-7,0.99487257,0.000858359,0.0019409183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098046854,0.00002714727,0.0023795275,0.0000026921339,0.000002301161,0.000015566437,0.00007611487,0.0012349084,0.0000028194029,0.016636508,0.97941256,0.00011178332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034256442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18177429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97855425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100252495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005349227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83315617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051174690","doi":"10.7202/1027761ar","title":"Marriage, the Law, and Samesex Unions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Balance (ability); Law; Political science; Legal status; Freedom of association; Sociology; Human rights; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.016169986146877754,"score_gpt":0.19028717345955765,"score_spread":0.1741171873126799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051174690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094736405,0.0022280826,0.0023779094,0.009137723,0.0002405189,0.000121004115,0.0000715419,0.000037451395,0.8910494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99547297,0.0002217353,0.00016446131,0.0016215158,0.00020804649,0.000018326127,0.000003819164,0.0000058073465,0.0022833205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999507,0.000009426186,0.0001575684,0.00015804809,0.000013538467,0.00015440788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996653,0.00006566375,0.000059450147,0.00015724596,0.000010324965,0.000041968306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002531688,0.000052060892,0.00014546675,0.000024673649,0.00023105393,0.000047027792,0.00011399997,0.000035435995,0.00007162511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007010145,0.000059038215,0.000047427948,0.00007569304,0.00015477488,0.00006901212,0.000058022462,0.00008786388,0.00024940624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014656868,0.000009055062,0.011245354,0.000009349273,0.000016477212,9.744333e-7,0.00009748292,0.0000089170835,0.000003082772,0.9875827,0.00057524606,0.00044989891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014511426,0.000015711641,0.031125559,0.000009480024,0.000004851674,0.000016610267,0.000029438681,0.0004229077,0.000007568441,0.6761331,0.29198828,0.00010141559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003241863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000106704836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9007366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035677615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005174454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32056957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057193143","doi":"","title":"After Seven Decades of Regulation, Why is the Auditing Profession in Such a Mess?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Audit; Business; Portfolio; Public disclosure; Inside information; Public information; Public relations; Finance; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.011064495105963098,"score_gpt":0.21613460850836497,"score_spread":0.20507011340240186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057193143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96242267,0.015067622,0.0037454686,0.015497526,0.00013710113,0.00012773006,0.000009215456,0.0000062283116,0.0029864172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979728,0.0012451481,0.00005046451,0.00029088123,0.0001017502,0.000012510118,7.141124e-7,0.0000053255344,0.00032039083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988822,0.00001365887,0.0003809274,0.0001196437,0.000049307557,0.0005543176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996051,0.000021139604,0.00024400135,0.000075879856,0.00003763374,0.00001625174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008908261,0.00007456292,0.00015692029,0.00009262558,0.00016304397,0.000019963216,0.00012891168,0.000042630672,0.000051512783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050190345,0.000055541164,0.000073818264,0.00019861352,0.00006510697,0.00018397157,0.000032233525,0.0005228743,0.000025717665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031134066,0.00003884835,0.068701,0.000006415442,0.00006189164,9.614112e-7,0.0012933894,0.0001326011,0.000012256876,0.9285083,0.00006909378,0.001144114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045810925,0.000035940626,0.053456407,0.000047852216,0.000004082469,0.000030128074,0.00073969923,0.000018885947,0.0000806374,0.9408058,0.0042421683,0.00008027432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029972562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010760289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035550125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045682432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003206659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22716577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059400667","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2873","title":"The importance of being earnest: Two notions of internalization","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Sanctions; Preference; Social psychology; Internalization; Opposition (politics); Incentive; Perception; Psychology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Microeconomics; Politics","score_opus":0.026071572934634694,"score_gpt":0.20431550783055463,"score_spread":0.17824393489591994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059400667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3523566,0.010396094,0.02245774,0.0009115455,0.0006308298,0.00008443446,0.000057740024,0.0000071524664,0.61309785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988817,0.00038816527,0.00031824087,0.000009688421,0.000027149204,1.9132395e-8,6.0601093e-7,0.0000012128728,0.0003732228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996706,0.000007721132,0.00018447413,0.00004540574,0.00003776145,0.000054036613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940455,0.000017070759,0.0003565406,0.000057478886,0.00013406412,0.000030269443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022072493,0.000031579555,0.00011711846,0.0000114812565,0.00016833736,0.0000061565183,0.00014032297,0.000014120911,0.00008617372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029198009,0.000029620476,0.00006493286,0.000021719527,0.00017072688,0.00023246052,0.000041997737,0.000038536866,0.0000030132874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020522146,0.000020763477,0.09255333,0.0000029528444,0.00005094206,0.0000012622878,0.0007438733,0.00012865699,0.000005771719,0.9061259,0.00020526747,0.00014073969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041769054,0.00041522534,0.14411514,0.00018618254,0.00008814438,0.00005855039,0.010800453,0.0013101916,0.00028892266,0.26560742,0.5725651,0.0003877962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014132918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02045133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6465251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009915764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021767893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090208598","doi":"10.1177/0038038512450804","title":"Privacy as a Human Right: A Sociological Theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Brandeis University","keywords":"Sociology; Relevance (law); The Right to Privacy; Right to privacy; Supreme court; Human rights; Law; Sociology of law; Character (mathematics); Sociological theory; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05944698384741469,"score_gpt":0.2746551609278512,"score_spread":0.2152081770804365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090208598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7711263,0.009993551,0.0002320477,0.0016386326,0.0003984096,0.00007242384,0.00002058189,0.000048674505,0.21646944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99559915,0.000048766204,0.00007570675,0.0011786757,0.00048613184,0.00003531311,0.000010478484,0.0000052267255,0.0025605625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991826,0.000044826345,0.00023689354,0.00018329799,0.00001352955,0.00033885415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961805,0.0001017751,0.00010072009,0.00011033674,0.000011785088,0.00005730312],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005144683,0.00009788382,0.00026207257,0.00003577368,0.00032552393,0.0000078852045,0.0001433262,0.00016568175,0.0023336394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000145741,0.00008307962,0.00011753396,0.00003282867,0.0007548169,0.00009245154,0.00010583309,0.00017729483,0.004650531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045182205,0.000055168257,0.11854896,0.0000019958218,0.00005425209,0.0000012113019,0.0015168362,1.4528256e-7,0.000015415322,0.878796,0.00096188625,0.000043608117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015371546,0.000040086026,0.0685704,7.963945e-7,0.0000032243547,0.000005350106,0.00010475509,5.796266e-7,0.0000049942373,0.7572558,0.17375596,0.00010438568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004576537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.7125225e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2244729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006233973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010857699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101118422","doi":"10.1007/s11127-010-9594-9","title":"The price of transparency: do campaign finance disclosure laws discourage political participation by citizens’ groups?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Campaign finance; Public finance; Politics; Finance; Business; Economics; Accounting; Public economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.022371215061731124,"score_gpt":0.2341445634591671,"score_spread":0.21177334839743597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101118422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8379041,0.002584351,0.0016397974,0.031762365,0.0008785038,0.00027619302,0.00074750907,0.000046015164,0.124161184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986067,0.00012767574,0.00004388694,0.00019395421,0.00018595209,0.000085080756,0.000020408788,0.000009063557,0.0007272895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987115,0.000015621592,0.00048380013,0.00027583702,0.000081246304,0.00043194057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991523,0.00021709302,0.0001989296,0.00027172416,0.000066928325,0.00009305039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038310786,0.00013123547,0.00024008218,0.00003645874,0.00034424564,0.00012338819,0.00029592475,0.00007456068,0.00013124994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043755106,0.00010169093,0.00009754352,0.00023929689,0.00037905123,0.00030455293,0.000045514542,0.0002376626,0.000060606224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044653298,0.00008671851,0.07627517,0.000011031057,0.000028391809,2.4988978e-7,0.0001394893,0.0000011217735,0.000048879887,0.9213896,0.0016565303,0.00035835247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005696741,0.000048342143,0.32851282,0.00001095663,0.000013419131,0.0000026557248,0.000110725516,0.00025896452,0.00011180493,0.11837141,0.55166626,0.00032297117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034774875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045564087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8030182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037476453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040645085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41468358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108032207","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1907450","title":"The FTC, IP, and SSOs: Government Hold-Up Replacing Private Coordination","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.019770639648380477,"score_gpt":0.18264407671305682,"score_spread":0.16287343706467636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108032207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8478602,0.051453177,0.0108696595,0.0049385987,0.0011993361,0.000244228,0.000020675987,0.000036357284,0.08337773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868296,0.0088245645,0.000030505696,0.0000780504,0.00010811745,0.000006574371,3.751177e-7,0.000006267723,0.0041159936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988059,0.000010885276,0.00028106058,0.00014949021,0.000058576006,0.0006941021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960995,0.000024905732,0.0002213255,0.00008903568,0.000020720532,0.00003409213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011951375,0.00008642074,0.00012417957,0.000023544431,0.0006193312,0.00006817069,0.00012837793,0.000030368867,0.00001903567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008397048,0.00006644004,0.000052208445,0.00006642366,0.00008110967,0.00019488888,0.00005340685,0.00045580554,0.000045113626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024374003,0.000013270379,0.017469201,0.0000013958321,0.00009984178,6.684735e-7,0.00016146626,7.086904e-7,0.00000876797,0.97629523,0.00007747294,0.0058475994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005081875,0.000132758,0.028517138,0.000008723177,0.000010695463,0.00011359034,0.00065405446,0.000079112324,0.00006193826,0.9080216,0.06174002,0.00015217299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009355837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015730005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1389693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054582185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008284655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47634575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113529582","doi":"10.1023/a:1023639521374","title":"Constitutional Design for a Rent Seeking Society: The Voting Rule Choice Revisited","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Constitution; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Economics; Constitutional amendment; Law and economics; Rent-seeking; Law; Political science; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.0678599396383057,"score_gpt":0.2569127034808392,"score_spread":0.18905276384253353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113529582","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023878255,0.002684785,0.5947558,0.008210364,0.0005531661,0.0006913916,0.00045459118,0.00007170423,0.39233935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98550206,0.000012578774,0.0058066375,0.0073865373,0.00054769684,0.00031432544,0.000052729523,0.000008587729,0.00036882542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977702,0.000041928542,0.00079357246,0.000577417,0.0000683752,0.0007484978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810684,0.0010739184,0.00021862118,0.0002133519,0.000174879,0.00021238162],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094616046,0.00027540952,0.00044325067,0.00005442606,0.0013113363,0.00017431559,0.0002570771,0.00012815344,0.00036225954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011615378,0.00024894564,0.00041419332,0.00017433126,0.004389139,0.00033568486,0.000069997,0.00025599977,0.00042398667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000864142,0.000066065695,0.00517811,0.000030373129,0.00017903252,0.0000013213261,0.000015632622,0.0003574926,0.0000038999524,0.99011064,0.0040199654,0.000028806997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057485554,0.00001869713,0.00033477083,0.000027114198,0.000022894907,0.000042951513,0.000038858543,0.00247948,0.000038518465,0.4058707,0.5902722,0.0002789536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027561704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012682784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9852633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042586395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048177468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117394527","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5850.2005.00006.x","title":"Changing Revenue Policy in the United States: An Overview of the Record and Perennial Puzzles","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Budgeting &amp Finance","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Quarter (Canadian coin); Nothing; State (computer science); Revenue center; Economics; Tax revenue; Public economics; Government (linguistics); Fair share; Business; Economic policy; Finance; History","score_opus":0.09275192381125652,"score_gpt":0.2763864857368789,"score_spread":0.18363456192562239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117394527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622424,0.0076761334,0.00007658227,0.027140742,0.00010688565,0.00013756116,0.00011349035,0.000010801239,0.0024953955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937635,0.0037416671,0.00023141532,0.0015351446,0.00022073231,0.000028218812,0.000012361638,0.0000069868124,0.00045997783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908924,0.00004572556,0.0003444271,0.0002091556,0.0000453567,0.0002660993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994087,0.000076076474,0.00023980676,0.00022420613,0.00003267745,0.000018538074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008523961,0.000102483646,0.00019707947,0.00019077102,0.0002549832,0.00006791215,0.00030028095,0.000040323815,0.000010808147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036769526,0.000075421405,0.000047940157,0.00089803536,0.00016013726,0.00021984884,0.000114037706,0.00015398368,0.000013707456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073845304,0.00010162109,0.09888044,0.00005972869,0.000016125043,6.32509e-7,0.006993398,0.00015969253,0.000002986224,0.866773,0.0007325622,0.026272414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022940975,0.00001407831,0.12158092,0.000063983665,0.0000019877573,0.000005420512,0.00027337036,0.0005910998,0.000003884363,0.012450195,0.8646521,0.00013352673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023612042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00147896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86391956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005321332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003326013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.356945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121324705","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.428241","title":"Enforced Standards Versus Evolution by General Acceptance: A Comparative Study of E-Commerce Privacy Disclosure and Practice in the U.S. and the U.K.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"E-commerce; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Business; Psychology; Accounting; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.023450281772255516,"score_gpt":0.2811300410800985,"score_spread":0.257679759307843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121324705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94678193,0.034751203,0.0008708875,0.001563207,0.000087397435,0.00029959576,0.000015917218,0.000002246375,0.015627611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925427,0.0072639612,0.000013627088,0.000049814276,0.000030739648,0.000014624846,6.3196353e-7,0.0000030456133,0.00008088937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886537,0.00018636031,0.00031155525,0.00013592737,0.00009481976,0.0004059683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992985,0.0002839024,0.00025592837,0.00009012457,0.00005463493,0.00001692256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031577055,0.00009591848,0.0002428701,0.000040390176,0.00030469423,0.00005725756,0.00013390747,0.000025316982,0.0000058437977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004169618,0.00005894002,0.000033407836,0.0001613196,0.00019447615,0.00026113837,0.00002889993,0.0005945793,9.187423e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005402294,0.000113272086,0.012693809,0.0000016287893,0.00018886017,4.050961e-7,0.005963092,0.000023422615,0.0000018239994,0.9800202,0.000111710295,0.0003415442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.038572323,0.0028930665,0.07623651,0.000022415916,0.00018061715,0.0005069534,0.22869535,0.0003048418,0.0000071647096,0.55164975,0.10032663,0.0006043784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046371727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008784775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42837045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003043636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021422957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25831845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123486218","doi":"","title":"The Role of Intention in Distinguishing Employees from Independent Contractors","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Business; Law; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.032696474242162904,"score_gpt":0.26985830672821964,"score_spread":0.23716183248605674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123486218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8580656,0.0033201037,0.000010485656,0.0002498275,0.0007001443,0.0003983567,0.00024990115,0.00001382635,0.13699172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99274653,0.006580238,0.000055156564,0.00001851109,0.00017195755,0.00013646901,0.000045059813,0.000022746033,0.00022332637],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974091,0.000097981036,0.0012216128,0.0006791555,0.00009694555,0.0004952189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979236,0.0008568154,0.0005373422,0.00052812503,0.00008511149,0.000068986235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022255247,0.00022129795,0.0006745043,0.00032186633,0.00019107129,0.00018249678,0.0007179374,0.0002823779,0.000030989842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016533573,0.00021293006,0.00019345839,0.0000979018,0.0004286644,0.00009933751,0.000974299,0.0012871403,0.000020913541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084217594,0.00016388501,0.82755375,0.000041083003,0.00016274194,0.000005096307,0.0005433053,0.0016799795,0.00001379038,0.110104546,0.000010025936,0.059637558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079443434,0.00006521646,0.5366664,0.00035263324,0.0000059570702,9.796609e-7,0.0013588651,0.006447836,0.00009467119,0.38703683,0.06666523,0.00051096914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071084187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006377202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2908874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007159343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012818896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133095213","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1090581","title":"Response to FAF Exposure Draft on Proposed Changes to Oversight, Structure, and Operations of the FAF, FASB, and GASB","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Voting; Financial accounting; Business; Relevance (law); Foundation (evidence); Accounting standard; Actuarial science; Finance; Political science; Accounting information system; Law","score_opus":0.014001133375461603,"score_gpt":0.19308119189143175,"score_spread":0.17908005851597014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133095213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833989,0.002574931,0.00027795308,0.012878524,0.00010945584,0.00016817119,0.0000549442,0.00000434888,0.00053275784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969384,0.00087753235,0.00008024811,0.00068068865,0.00006201092,0.000003509178,4.8317224e-7,0.000005627244,0.0013514677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991614,0.00002412017,0.00017867202,0.00016029058,0.000053393265,0.00042208747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997217,0.000027095602,0.00006188306,0.00009274679,0.00003805551,0.00005850975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031664578,0.00009431515,0.00016511242,0.0001101601,0.00045654512,0.000027998502,0.00010939736,0.000035185112,0.000017469278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010588254,0.00006906933,0.000033625638,0.00014749872,0.00008094136,0.00007323761,0.00005592172,0.0003100543,0.000006352839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045712944,0.000046796493,0.022713041,0.0000051585343,0.00015142615,0.000003499009,0.002211335,0.00025454484,0.0018249226,0.97106117,0.0003178321,0.00095315726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045152227,0.0062153894,0.55001795,0.00010892603,0.000054401782,0.0015001555,0.0025276784,0.00009386651,0.006602262,0.23387772,0.19333577,0.0011506454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000087281274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010204717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73718345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017638711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002238445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35114223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142191510","doi":"","title":"Remedies Before Administrative Tribunals: What Can Be Learned from the Common Law?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Remedial education; Legislation; Analogy; Administrative law; Law; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.045556024657146255,"score_gpt":0.2572902917776262,"score_spread":0.21173426712047994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142191510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86106133,0.027322171,0.00016107806,0.097869515,0.0014384651,0.00016654904,0.00018143404,0.000031340518,0.011768119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98963994,0.00737697,0.0000217509,0.0012211367,0.00067468965,0.000010503579,0.000017793356,0.00001035226,0.0010268709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983383,0.000024895084,0.00039037192,0.00021621387,0.00007351765,0.00095672533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932927,0.000109024724,0.0002697608,0.0001756072,0.000052919462,0.00006340567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010220429,0.00015267803,0.00028376642,0.000033067932,0.0007625099,0.0002610595,0.00036164062,0.00008109566,0.00014285493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010129819,0.00011092369,0.000148302,0.00010403713,0.00031990488,0.00038724073,0.00005776723,0.0020300862,0.00007330571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003420305,0.00003157459,0.0075488496,7.116198e-7,0.00022651743,0.0000024217263,0.00078167056,0.0000011645667,0.000014829842,0.9873476,0.00019843486,0.003812009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003820218,0.00014860382,0.004400023,0.000010136929,0.000014532644,0.000055289474,0.003818495,0.000010675087,0.000053444106,0.8695429,0.121426634,0.0001372278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016241354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11186892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1285786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002424539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004434908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90433717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166152439","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-679x.2004.00163.x","title":"Enforced Standards Versus Evolution by General Acceptance: A Comparative Study of E‐Commerce Privacy Disclosure and Practice in the United States and the United Kingdom","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Accounting Research","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Government (linguistics); Business; Information privacy; European union; Accounting; E-commerce; Privacy policy; Good faith; FTC Fair Information Practice; Personally identifiable information; Faith; Information privacy law; Political science; Law; International trade","score_opus":0.12606191022701932,"score_gpt":0.39453882601923024,"score_spread":0.2684769157922109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166152439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924122,0.001883593,0.00012575873,0.0041383724,0.000059933926,0.0002799257,0.00002671851,0.0000017831399,0.0010717104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876386,0.0010305553,0.0000546987,0.00006224449,0.00006461104,0.0000075691746,0.0000034657562,0.0000040468663,0.00000895533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985567,0.000253287,0.0005318228,0.00012662532,0.00033625666,0.00019536245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970709,0.0016643051,0.0004734377,0.000111142755,0.0006538571,0.000026365678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066467654,0.0000894066,0.0002936493,0.0003618398,0.00039095094,0.0001893168,0.00027069656,0.000033538847,0.000005016077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023179867,0.00005400834,0.000032426822,0.00096872455,0.0004772364,0.0004672994,0.00013716766,0.0005688092,6.798714e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012767563,0.0015328062,0.27175647,0.00009419339,0.0011712993,0.00003548986,0.12786974,0.008560516,0.00008931077,0.57254505,0.003119919,0.0004576423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05635795,0.0036428852,0.49601132,0.000316345,0.00013573117,0.00014899563,0.28339142,0.004048004,0.0000419184,0.037664406,0.117662646,0.0005783734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009396092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023572764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53488064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001951525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089535766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202214160","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005476","title":"Private Property and Tax Policy in a Libertarian World: A Critical Review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tax policy; Law and economics; Economics; Tax reform; Public economics","score_opus":0.07894097353695297,"score_gpt":0.31361371317780035,"score_spread":0.2346727396408474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202214160","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000012177268,0.96742404,0.000008098892,0.0063492367,0.00023066389,0.00026992956,0.00016234847,0.0000026407624,0.025551856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00038571435,0.9957266,0.0002637347,0.0018327571,0.00048235068,0.00002345525,0.0000024212814,0.00002133864,0.0012616669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976228,0.000050753566,0.0014808207,0.0003198356,0.00006389714,0.0004619277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984721,0.00010739011,0.0005752653,0.00020517936,0.00006659555,0.000573469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006535264,0.00030643758,0.0018721893,0.00067380874,0.00016418115,0.00013042423,0.00048285056,0.00013185643,0.0001921497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006432474,0.00023084303,0.00030824612,0.0006221538,0.00045821068,0.00035477942,0.00005116874,0.0006867076,0.00012757166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013801849,0.00001615161,0.0001472145,0.0059689325,0.00006495058,0.00027229395,0.00005059967,2.2291415e-7,2.504889e-9,0.8455943,0.00196801,0.14591594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089927766,0.000028367056,0.00006280923,0.03456197,0.00006531194,0.000371322,9.025483e-7,5.235762e-7,1.1222279e-8,0.0047199796,0.9598202,0.00027867037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024519902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09405098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9578522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058737415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017683551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9819759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W224819031","doi":"","title":"On Estimating Disparity and Inferring Causation: Sur-Reply to the U.S. Sentencing Commission Staff","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Causation; Political science; Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Law; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.02644004181901276,"score_gpt":0.2250482988728123,"score_spread":0.19860825705379953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W224819031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93535054,0.00080694305,0.0045179515,0.014300196,0.000577609,0.00040701605,0.000037641836,0.00006499691,0.043937113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99601656,0.000014447434,0.0010761084,0.0021318512,0.00015779941,0.00004805046,0.0000034183327,0.0000070337555,0.0005447284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992132,0.000012995729,0.00028184737,0.0002493255,0.000053349202,0.00018927988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943715,0.00012144912,0.00009582501,0.00019195044,0.000042563697,0.000111046946],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025783826,0.00011296732,0.00017704084,0.000034779387,0.0005897371,0.00019764391,0.00011547093,0.000029827826,0.00021909682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000401461,0.00008925984,0.000035997455,0.0001032955,0.00006144637,0.000297628,0.00013884298,0.00016439697,0.00082917017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006839228,0.000047704867,0.07979477,0.000028247174,0.000035012756,0.0000017642259,0.00034425696,0.0025336652,0.00001712854,0.9079224,0.006610347,0.002657851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008919351,0.0001894171,0.4621362,0.00027450026,0.00001433777,0.00000929887,0.00034022235,0.023763577,0.00012758053,0.1021212,0.4093808,0.00075092114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017310686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082593487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8058012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007498493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012238276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256615650","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006615","title":"Existence and Justification Conditions of Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Morality; Legal positivism; Law; Value (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Legal realism; Philosophy; Legal profession; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.04854953337624345,"score_gpt":0.23808984571901748,"score_spread":0.18954031234277402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256615650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4059886,0.030678524,0.0012156824,0.0024943487,0.0010499682,0.00016248866,0.00041650012,0.000006365781,0.5579875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872285,0.000167088,0.00059384824,0.00030264264,0.000032160417,0.0000018688298,9.685227e-7,0.000003436119,0.00017514973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930835,0.00001063261,0.00040804513,0.00010337248,0.000033024175,0.00013658515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992689,0.00003715535,0.00029138883,0.000091709895,0.00011989868,0.00019097331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002544901,0.00006511605,0.0001955158,0.00007857591,0.00021257039,0.000036587742,0.000120899866,0.000037109912,0.00012063772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009884814,0.00006908323,0.000050862753,0.00008804885,0.00052657386,0.00025752097,0.000005017724,0.00009882342,0.000024971148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012763152,0.0000073246974,0.005622116,0.000011445549,0.000018324336,0.00001085788,0.0001922154,0.00000879747,0.000022274922,0.99391776,0.000158119,0.00002949988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003472627,0.00009327324,0.025427917,0.00010654745,0.000023883771,0.00019873407,0.00013092396,0.0000104683695,0.00069641595,0.40854564,0.56420624,0.00021267135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076826573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009851957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5927342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006274243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017755073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263008586","doi":"","title":"You Can't Pay Them Enough: Subsidies, Environmental Law and Social Norms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Public economics; Context (archaeology); Economics; Climate change; Social norms approach; Law and economics; Reputation; Environmental law; Social value orientations; Government (linguistics); Positive economics; Political science; Normative; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.009461731095218032,"score_gpt":0.16060782825658879,"score_spread":0.15114609716137076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263008586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8075728,0.03955411,0.0008385242,0.012728238,0.00055511796,0.0001945459,0.00026973675,0.000048941383,0.138238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992977,0.0030098762,0.000016710417,0.00027291907,0.0004988631,0.0000045027655,0.00001211713,0.000010400675,0.003197602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985216,0.000007925816,0.0002840164,0.00018393919,0.00004865592,0.0009538155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997589,0.000010767434,0.00014601555,0.000050489456,0.000006202375,0.00002762352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035644078,0.00012830662,0.00020641167,0.000033977947,0.0006503718,0.000062345825,0.000107077605,0.00005534047,0.00007549068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000030613849,0.00010455828,0.00008690861,0.000042963744,0.00019513983,0.00014917392,0.000043039287,0.00058936066,0.00011432832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009844154,0.00004459458,0.02683699,0.0000017448882,0.00007826665,0.0000022898107,0.0001207206,0.0000019743384,0.000017136135,0.9720831,0.00009691445,0.00070640404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005769992,0.000055744258,0.011641546,0.0000018031647,0.000010442404,0.00017184236,0.0004626871,0.0000060747343,0.000030080273,0.8436084,0.14322518,0.00020923586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015305808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026713945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18540423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005976057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010967166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50021994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265435883","doi":"","title":"The Interstate Commerce Commission - Disintegration of an American Legal Institution","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Commission; Supreme court; Mandate; Public interest; Public administration","score_opus":0.011476383747259327,"score_gpt":0.21571131441137417,"score_spread":0.20423493066411486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265435883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9344164,0.003984357,0.02212086,0.0091584725,0.00041112181,0.00018532576,0.000014003455,0.000017590584,0.029691868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99659413,0.0021125735,0.000048348727,0.00005919079,0.000077742116,0.000006687635,0.0000038780404,0.000004989801,0.0010924406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988919,0.000027326454,0.00037243354,0.00010865704,0.000044923054,0.00055475393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994273,0.000031889565,0.00032542087,0.00010966559,0.00006132182,0.00004437204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058922,0.0000869354,0.00016303537,0.000058543632,0.0004946091,0.0000992397,0.00020779755,0.00002011936,0.000023949797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006146287,0.000060412174,0.00007489891,0.000106045605,0.0002909988,0.0005377747,0.000029382856,0.0005318262,0.00007584429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002201288,0.000040174058,0.0035596336,0.000001028129,0.00005245807,1.4240081e-7,0.00008541569,0.00002318263,0.000024618941,0.96179336,0.00011740983,0.034280553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000568011,0.00090484094,0.026823413,0.000020681711,0.00001145151,0.000096161966,0.004267735,0.0016227537,0.00007189121,0.8655614,0.09981346,0.0002381556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047288164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00299626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09969605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038990242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000181131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7148588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266900508","doi":"","title":"The Case for 'Reverse Depreciation' of Reclamation Costs","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Land reclamation; Taxpayer; Depreciation (economics); Business; Taxable income; Investment (military); Finance; Public economics; Economics; Accounting; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.015313865636641139,"score_gpt":0.21468760054061178,"score_spread":0.19937373490397065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266900508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66557616,0.051164396,0.23988983,0.018761875,0.0015077529,0.000773441,0.00013434207,0.000032623302,0.022159586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960733,0.0031922208,0.00013555642,0.000045824458,0.00012249846,0.000012067613,0.0000017048325,0.000004052381,0.0004127953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991504,0.0000055590326,0.00029163554,0.000078302895,0.000021286929,0.00045283785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995544,0.00005164441,0.0002500715,0.000060564304,0.000065882545,0.000017449162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093859667,0.00005131733,0.00010201797,0.0000399237,0.00047926445,0.000027009713,0.00008426468,0.00002717093,0.0000044116746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001572683,0.000041054627,0.00008562312,0.0000804008,0.000046950772,0.0001321284,0.000010859024,0.00022117936,0.000022869677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017829321,0.000016501994,0.0007158162,0.0000018085725,0.00007631954,0.0000014182301,0.000050284296,0.000119057775,0.0000030888561,0.9931007,0.0000540182,0.005843143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006673444,0.00008357313,0.0003496314,0.000005036081,0.0000073387673,0.00043684308,0.00042641643,0.000040613562,0.000036933634,0.9810089,0.016876275,0.000061109364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032262254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022089267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33049712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008270518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003162099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3686163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267573330","doi":"","title":"I Think, Therefore I Am; I Feel, Therefore I Am Taxed: Descartes, Tort Reform, and the Civil Rights Tax Relief Act","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Harm; Statutory law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Common law; Economics; Liability; History","score_opus":0.012003888679175513,"score_gpt":0.1666365700383039,"score_spread":0.1546326813591284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267573330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39667484,0.0035988702,0.00023324802,0.0020066483,0.00022720688,0.00024886578,0.000112852875,0.00006784849,0.5968296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9520035,0.00019922176,0.0001192231,0.00011945737,0.0001814222,6.3541864e-7,0.000009478515,0.0000112995685,0.04735578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988676,0.000014727768,0.00031722954,0.00040363314,0.00012295427,0.00027389498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990296,0.000049061506,0.00035856888,0.0003611754,0.00006252491,0.00013910272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013821688,0.00022624299,0.0004378815,0.000082529885,0.00069387397,0.00013264547,0.0004232928,0.0001301409,0.00007365041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002189411,0.0001763597,0.00023620634,0.0001634052,0.00066601456,0.0011453587,0.0002323121,0.00020181324,0.000115336974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005932119,0.00034853813,0.03359938,0.000048279686,0.00085014006,0.00006587163,0.0081826225,0.000088880166,0.00002441111,0.9352499,0.012890334,0.008058416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047162846,0.0003630853,0.08970084,0.00012928952,0.00009582254,0.00014000344,0.004394023,0.00044657095,0.0001566325,0.1026305,0.79636,0.0008669262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004535505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013640168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8326194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003218877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007589835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71917397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278978939","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2693826","title":"The Death of Rules and Standards","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.024244085465677453,"score_gpt":0.2261757750307114,"score_spread":0.20193168956503393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278978939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5005007,0.33114174,0.007884327,0.0059948624,0.00048024487,0.000099435914,0.000096650045,0.000013390544,0.15378866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866423,0.0125690065,0.000027662618,0.00002219454,0.0000772376,0.00000125866,2.4203024e-7,0.0000028364825,0.0006572402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992287,0.000006720566,0.00019360392,0.00006463986,0.00006109642,0.0004452073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969923,0.000020611993,0.00011803476,0.00004784099,0.00007994615,0.00003432433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001987912,0.0000472188,0.00011174943,0.000026666808,0.00018784474,0.000031885203,0.00008842792,0.00001748917,0.0000037243742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014882472,0.000032714084,0.000035163517,0.000030400059,0.00008813087,0.000077532706,0.000027711427,0.00026444285,0.00001136917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015896667,0.0000064160668,0.019645266,7.498787e-7,0.0000633601,2.690244e-7,0.000050105733,0.0000023784614,3.631498e-7,0.97806287,0.00009916672,0.0020531323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025015732,0.00008444315,0.0026238107,0.0000024211422,0.000003022312,0.000050286606,0.00026591515,0.000012907507,0.0000036157983,0.8876879,0.108974084,0.000041397347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001534684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016080242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48614162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003780977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063687604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14447689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281570989","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2732045","title":"The Questionable Presupposition Underlying Hartian Accounts of Legal Facts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.021776296486158017,"score_gpt":0.22379497044714206,"score_spread":0.20201867396098405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281570989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7058816,0.062366642,0.09877945,0.045803986,0.0018810349,0.00043403878,0.00014704489,0.00007009092,0.08463614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913223,0.0044895196,0.000014958973,0.000044422097,0.0001014047,0.0000050856497,7.327337e-7,0.000005426216,0.0040161773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998766,0.000013327126,0.00031548462,0.000113940994,0.00005469145,0.00073657255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995478,0.000053701366,0.00022832451,0.00008448222,0.000056777535,0.000028947557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082018104,0.00007379039,0.0001223409,0.00004941814,0.00044509294,0.00005862871,0.00016300865,0.000032384323,0.000035539757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000863498,0.000045482328,0.00007784127,0.00006971015,0.00009971958,0.00040981534,0.000026436253,0.00026486564,0.0001201629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020344762,0.000017072984,0.005734207,0.0000015015816,0.000091324946,3.9693705e-7,0.000018636125,0.000007383541,0.00011588648,0.9889051,0.00012074688,0.0049674083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004208364,0.00009787501,0.010254018,0.000022244058,0.00000628656,0.000059514372,0.0001368795,0.000014515452,0.00017256069,0.92528605,0.0634312,0.00009800851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024590304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043264034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2854407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050917285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038127552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.342334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338462943","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2760381","title":"The Interaction of Exhaustion and the General Law: A Reply to Duffy and Hynes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.011536165021637004,"score_gpt":0.21204169633916245,"score_spread":0.20050553131752544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338462943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91161215,0.025306499,0.004485983,0.050750986,0.00036852108,0.0001469859,0.000008424901,0.00000705289,0.0073134066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986564,0.011771027,0.0000124904045,0.00026556966,0.00013400744,0.0000060441857,8.911945e-8,0.0000025967192,0.001244186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993718,0.000013869321,0.00020406644,0.0000877168,0.000023360783,0.00029918685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996908,0.000079301484,0.00012739148,0.00005643096,0.000027041357,0.000019066478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009212577,0.000049070775,0.00010203257,0.000025751238,0.0003103551,0.00003891417,0.00006177289,0.000013795264,0.000004219542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087253844,0.00002307474,0.000033635068,0.000038023933,0.0001719161,0.00011937281,0.000033725428,0.00016438801,0.000008974732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008961029,0.000004107282,0.0021061727,8.0368477e-7,0.000055727178,8.978233e-8,0.00007035043,0.0000018339216,0.000029546794,0.98921555,0.0000664182,0.008359791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076987833,0.00010171541,0.004321565,0.000012369143,0.000007971462,0.00011074007,0.0002516788,0.000030944382,0.000046657155,0.9140006,0.080284216,0.00006171142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044786406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052415766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0802178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010461946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042736207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23870318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W234804708","doi":"","title":"Offences Against Future Generations: A Critical Look at the Jodoin/Saito Proposal and a Suggestion for Future Thought","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01981906543283801,"score_gpt":0.21905092911796767,"score_spread":0.19923186368512966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W234804708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45866886,0.39128718,0.03160802,0.09360751,0.004798916,0.0012029596,0.00026907207,0.00008357006,0.018473895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684043,0.023283418,0.0010743923,0.0005922633,0.004071988,0.000078301506,0.000010821404,0.00001578219,0.002468749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867487,0.000022606348,0.00029510783,0.00021874771,0.000049728904,0.0007389251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962366,0.000039433362,0.00012454599,0.00008860243,0.00007302527,0.00005075324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077466184,0.00012947827,0.00017701175,0.000053734344,0.001010056,0.000077645884,0.00013945668,0.000080904065,0.000057805228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073627896,0.000088450506,0.000102358856,0.00009076314,0.00019836328,0.00024061758,0.000042503194,0.0005148605,0.000032820004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047078804,0.000037109476,0.0029811612,0.000006782611,0.000088664325,0.0000010586645,0.00030723622,0.0000022698007,0.000009910404,0.9907137,0.00061775796,0.0051872805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006129979,0.00032442922,0.005129362,0.000013697076,0.000035101068,0.00029708087,0.0030043244,0.00017966497,0.00004561535,0.84352064,0.14656693,0.00027013992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003875831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001602881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5097354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002689535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036667555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7768636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2390795542","doi":"10.1017/cls.2016.10","title":"The High Cost of Transferring the Dream","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal doctrine; Doctrine; Tribunal; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Debt; Tax law; Law; Business; Sociology; Tax reform","score_opus":0.018753087874295676,"score_gpt":0.202733606679625,"score_spread":0.18398051880532934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2390795542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87090224,0.012016366,0.00097037194,0.0576557,0.0016810824,0.00028442746,0.000777456,0.0000059392846,0.05570641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996071,0.001357662,0.000025501235,0.00142976,0.00016060464,0.0000048349343,7.434685e-7,0.000008320045,0.0009415836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990964,0.000015642177,0.00042973817,0.00011287012,0.000023656687,0.00032170583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990341,0.00021914898,0.0002265746,0.00012512247,0.000105483596,0.00028955285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078850845,0.000095756426,0.00027315994,0.000022452941,0.00063905545,0.00005165494,0.00025126152,0.000062299,0.00004609316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083581894,0.000059038124,0.00023779745,0.00007924459,0.00072217174,0.00014697373,0.000011653475,0.00016755679,0.000002949999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026821479,0.0000028303584,0.0011964355,0.000009208495,0.00014039344,0.0000055767896,0.0027087794,0.0000050744566,0.0000070373053,0.99354935,0.00065800763,0.0017146216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095025235,0.00010013908,0.014091319,0.00012652026,0.00004257787,0.00011038308,0.0030629295,0.000017373799,0.000039748164,0.19133608,0.789877,0.0002456831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049494512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35363424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80221325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029781164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025057275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.956835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2411352128","doi":"","title":"Law and Economics Scholarship and Supreme Court Antitrust Jurisprudence, 1950–2010","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Scholarship; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.024950205899817366,"score_gpt":0.21822918354453733,"score_spread":0.19327897764471996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2411352128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85006446,0.007725193,0.0001230805,0.004999746,0.0007274094,0.00020657522,0.00038786526,0.00006895825,0.13569671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99302965,0.0025377576,0.00042385113,0.0017586396,0.00022991882,0.000019809462,0.0000038504295,0.000017403503,0.0019791285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986757,0.000013309608,0.00041511044,0.00051986444,0.000038623246,0.00033735915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992552,0.00008214687,0.0001496227,0.00026467524,0.000039423576,0.00020896885],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039007104,0.00020440896,0.00037656384,0.00006711103,0.00041454934,0.00022850289,0.00019044192,0.00012825028,0.0003036311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007818332,0.00017773281,0.0000670728,0.00007154357,0.00059407856,0.0009464428,0.00018667446,0.00018387732,0.0009053492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013614988,0.000020081014,0.18568748,0.000011853498,0.00004038028,0.0000031519064,0.000015580374,5.77311e-7,0.00003148684,0.813526,0.00039754016,0.00025230256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010246477,0.00005802528,0.16850947,0.0000493116,0.000012421998,0.000022155136,0.000013242571,0.00001201681,0.00021972645,0.18591127,0.6437297,0.00043803596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001262113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015968287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6433321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007345546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026494987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461149247","doi":"","title":"Human Rights and the Policing of Disorder in Public Spaces","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02305741844153766,"score_gpt":0.20192985586138154,"score_spread":0.17887243741984388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461149247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.949712,0.009603263,0.00024807392,0.0009991847,0.0000494732,0.000050842238,0.0000018766441,0.0000031208785,0.039332207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987515,0.00072368514,0.000009449245,0.000026959982,0.00004181503,0.0000027970923,1.7008882e-7,0.000002720608,0.00044087635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991384,0.000013395081,0.00024900198,0.00008155513,0.00002142338,0.00049620937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997517,0.000013222757,0.0001509359,0.00005268293,0.000014688651,0.000016777303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008097215,0.00005762376,0.00016768892,0.00010310762,0.00022395623,0.000021337419,0.00011236357,0.00002188905,0.000029844787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000173996,0.00003865706,0.000044846976,0.00010203993,0.00019389718,0.00013727244,0.000031104344,0.00036286417,0.000007259039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007233404,0.00002089535,0.12523118,0.0000011869772,0.0000466379,2.078133e-7,0.00041355638,5.8422876e-7,4.988858e-7,0.8741015,0.0000045470533,0.00017194025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075134035,0.000038244827,0.048293006,0.0000042680563,0.0000029079517,0.000020345902,0.00029186995,0.000010552985,0.000002324806,0.94834954,0.0021815216,0.00005408834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009518974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016955134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076938175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008489711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006112124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99707675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469581622","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2782419","title":"Unequal Access: Making Sense of EI Eligibility Rules and How to Improve Them","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Brain Institute; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Computer science; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Computer security","score_opus":0.031692075028454066,"score_gpt":0.2564811905166368,"score_spread":0.22478911548818276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469581622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97433084,0.00426838,0.011422681,0.0056628846,0.00016529458,0.00008636476,0.00006839874,0.0000098787905,0.0039852858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966546,0.0024628304,0.00008848789,0.00009178754,0.00014047537,0.0000037078817,2.4262246e-7,0.0000062298877,0.00055161206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878633,0.00001219227,0.00025155052,0.00020907652,0.00004227295,0.00069859467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999533,0.0000550362,0.00021222752,0.00010510054,0.00004990859,0.000044719975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008779464,0.0000992899,0.00023369423,0.000069280635,0.00013287971,0.000059737897,0.00013669844,0.000038311482,0.000024272213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018398708,0.00007074627,0.000073201285,0.00007637104,0.000086657725,0.00027798468,0.00010225949,0.000235134,0.00003985511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040012288,0.000021434866,0.04346221,0.0000064125097,0.00010372491,0.0000011198922,0.00007561217,9.80495e-7,0.00018550639,0.9421013,0.00003772797,0.013963953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005663099,0.00015911798,0.015825942,0.000031144504,0.000009222287,0.000061744555,0.00023661346,0.000010740293,0.00026106552,0.9742408,0.008409955,0.00018733785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060444778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015897995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0321395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024320076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018982323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2884949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25215918","doi":"","title":"Requiem for Regulation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; State (computer science); Scope (computer science); Private rights; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Property rights; Law and economics; Power (physics); Economics; Business","score_opus":0.03853676507875877,"score_gpt":0.20040230475542375,"score_spread":0.16186553967666498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25215918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006043381,0.00024354603,0.24497208,0.002469583,0.0002453543,0.000085505315,0.000014832822,0.000031910204,0.7458938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987499,0.0000054835286,0.0020555288,0.00035651526,0.00012355707,0.00001801402,0.00000475336,0.00000218434,0.009934974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997185,9.0444973e-7,0.00011696166,0.000093942595,0.00000638362,0.00006332424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998645,0.000021487347,0.000035834488,0.00005324872,0.000012902812,0.000011988924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012175481,0.000028914701,0.00007253797,0.000021456926,0.000073373005,0.000012772699,0.00003182561,0.000016353772,0.00016211394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054797994,0.000027813987,0.00003377442,0.000029758172,0.000019064859,0.00006558209,0.000009425945,0.000010977189,0.00036518706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021621445,0.0000048773727,0.0038401359,0.0000025714367,0.0000051855363,5.798305e-9,0.000009727582,0.000010883416,0.0000047089975,0.991652,0.0034701466,0.0009975826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012175114,0.000013680703,0.0134644415,7.545931e-7,5.54474e-7,1.5220462e-7,0.0000022255317,0.0014136615,0.00003084597,0.40236253,0.58254784,0.00004154033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033711214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008189874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9814556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000127480625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000018383614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46938625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600943488","doi":"","title":"The Role of Apex Courts in Federal Systems: Beyond the Law/Politics Dichotomy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Apex (geometry); Political science; Law; Relation (database); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.009660259449531689,"score_gpt":0.20559414604971457,"score_spread":0.19593388660018288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600943488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47890514,0.17043747,0.0003142865,0.0093406355,0.0012866636,0.00036908666,0.000053745498,0.000012116615,0.33928087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937099,0.0045738555,0.0000022343877,0.000073983625,0.00025461102,0.000010966489,4.795174e-7,0.0000061688665,0.0013677573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852973,0.000019411676,0.0003942186,0.00010915951,0.00006063267,0.00088684907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921864,0.000064040956,0.0004203891,0.00022621894,0.000042538977,0.00002816907],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013341171,0.00009015183,0.00020014463,0.000029807072,0.0017022273,0.00026048857,0.0004981581,0.00003974951,0.000004608244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007747378,0.000056780467,0.000089671186,0.000028143497,0.0003151744,0.00017072729,0.00007023493,0.0006793427,0.000028725068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072318476,0.000018044613,0.03940097,0.0000019587173,0.00008846208,8.131348e-7,0.00008239507,0.000019009787,0.0000017237589,0.95995086,0.00004068707,0.00038782615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003064573,0.000038890586,0.00852953,0.000009691189,0.000003920344,0.000049342027,0.00089120684,0.00015247175,0.000007944845,0.8959651,0.093966715,0.000078728626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026503063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029084147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5148048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034143837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028905537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602708680","doi":"","title":"Deadly Discounts: How Reimportation Jeopardizes the Safety of the U.S. Pharmaceutical Drug Supply under the Federal Trade Commission Amendment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Business; Amendment; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.03250537453556199,"score_gpt":0.24646849448406435,"score_spread":0.21396311994850237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602708680","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1738465,0.005304374,0.0026099936,0.71185255,0.00062601035,0.000676227,0.00020432308,0.00003033106,0.10484966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940337,0.00040415104,0.00006402273,0.0022386564,0.00013035789,0.00002292672,0.0000051041784,0.0000053603803,0.003095727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991928,0.00003299009,0.0003439422,0.00016765407,0.00009244471,0.00017018302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994835,0.000110148525,0.00016469494,0.00019717413,0.000014510587,0.000029958212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038038366,0.0001147555,0.00017055296,0.000016214157,0.0006323949,0.00007929547,0.00027223703,0.000027489414,0.0002509508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019872721,0.000052035375,0.00013974837,0.00010827715,0.00030724634,0.00016345557,0.00008104386,0.00016497432,0.000031025487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034566903,0.000084486484,0.025090333,0.0000062758136,0.00009624891,1.6691001e-7,0.00053200946,0.0003752847,0.0000441139,0.9557289,0.016877882,0.0011297435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007662975,0.000017017197,0.2388847,0.000017202261,0.000027318158,0.000004836336,0.0016484288,0.0010391226,0.0016001421,0.016461853,0.73934203,0.00019104869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018519239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002917167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93926704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009170959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026743548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48639342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624899232","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0023","title":"States of Emergency","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Legislature; Principle of legality; State of emergency; State (computer science); Constitutional theory; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Politics; Law and economics; Phenomenon; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Sociology; Democracy; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07127432804805992,"score_gpt":0.24292732138496992,"score_spread":0.17165299333691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624899232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019041111,0.118096374,0.0002681953,0.00015446707,0.002495038,0.00006338237,0.0010559082,0.000014424183,0.8776618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04396367,0.4061183,0.00016426748,0.000054451964,0.0006682968,0.00002405761,0.00025455785,0.000016263231,0.54873616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990126,0.0000031410432,0.00055921,0.00019404649,0.000032528347,0.00019848348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942636,0.000014920419,0.00032655595,0.00014848224,0.00004046244,0.000043191543],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009625155,0.00014964568,0.00047772357,0.0001029042,0.000049873932,0.000006203406,0.0001540849,0.00013125452,0.009783403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022891425,0.00013496795,0.00016338447,0.00009829231,0.000048175723,0.00008203962,0.000089942296,0.00013212133,0.0015457128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019061896,0.000053585463,0.017243514,0.00013750023,0.00014722788,2.397867e-7,0.000049219012,6.2648354e-7,1.33314675e-8,0.6320529,0.34812364,0.0021896036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006031909,0.000012426247,0.002814448,0.000022425771,0.000009645025,3.0584582e-7,0.000016231066,0.0000027406152,0.0000020708308,0.04566613,0.9512208,0.00017246201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008424391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037137954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60309714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003768242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025062509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780154711","doi":"","title":"The Rank-Order Method for Appellate Subset Selection","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Rank (graph theory); Set (abstract data type); Order (exchange); Random assignment; Law; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Economic Justice; Outlier; Political science; Mathematics; Business; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.022070758406200926,"score_gpt":0.2617362908625423,"score_spread":0.23966553245634137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780154711","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011706156,0.030614587,0.88192904,0.0268811,0.0018745653,0.0004723943,0.000046970483,0.000038244663,0.046436924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97512233,0.010049722,0.001089863,0.00017386109,0.0007257368,0.000030113155,0.000002166745,0.00001644711,0.012789758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845785,0.000012887119,0.0002807836,0.00016781627,0.000034632656,0.0010460218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930876,0.00006404678,0.00036670483,0.00014647337,0.00008193423,0.000032064152],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022891343,0.0000992229,0.00017441328,0.00003888054,0.003058436,0.00028136506,0.00033078875,0.000047863232,0.000016093663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023841154,0.000075239004,0.00013804616,0.00004941724,0.00007678384,0.0002039202,0.000035320412,0.000544805,0.000093479925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044121076,0.0000115832645,0.004067406,0.0000017288519,0.00019591242,1.4470412e-7,0.000022692682,0.000030708747,0.0000070234537,0.9808833,0.0005084355,0.0142269395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005021782,0.00006737829,0.0019320044,0.0000023873513,0.0000095159985,0.00005292669,0.000059991064,0.0007254923,0.000021455106,0.725239,0.2712882,0.00009949106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024060234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014723572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96341616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031755085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029390267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99823946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796386235","doi":"10.29173/alr1371","title":"Economic Instruments and the Kyoto Protocol: Can Parliament Implement Emissions Trading without Provincial Co-operation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Jurisdiction; Kyoto Protocol; Treaty; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Emissions trading; Legislation; Economics; Opposition (politics); Public administration; Law; Business; Political science; Greenhouse gas; Politics","score_opus":0.04095168421376772,"score_gpt":0.2715737244063203,"score_spread":0.2306220401925526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796386235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016153926,0.038972896,0.00004612099,0.07245632,0.0005373599,0.1323341,0.0003695383,0.000060496346,0.7390692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94127107,0.0076111625,0.000055186756,0.0049804533,0.00014184183,0.04457722,0.000018748817,0.000014989737,0.0013293063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998945,0.000026818441,0.00054866227,0.00026639033,0.000033437907,0.00017966385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952364,0.00003782873,0.00020255843,0.00016603456,0.0000068324766,0.000063081476],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002917353,0.00014316507,0.0003819053,0.000016043956,0.00041572464,0.00007892215,0.000117992306,0.00002520312,0.001306134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026453388,0.000099722674,0.000081741455,0.000029641335,0.00012514222,0.0001427682,0.000052262778,0.000076966135,0.00027188353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075448656,0.000031696334,0.0099609,0.00021375457,0.00006083631,2.3517997e-7,0.00015652392,5.854807e-7,3.7377544e-7,0.98287815,0.0032450233,0.0034443606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010811924,0.000031837295,0.00042500516,0.00020972601,0.000020275664,0.0000059908475,0.0000065077656,0.00033368816,0.000007790615,0.002094216,0.9956256,0.00015815065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008221865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045642084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9923806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001291395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017531513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803046184","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/dwus4","title":"Consumer Privacy in a Behavioral World","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Consumer privacy; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Consumer protection; The Internet; Information overload; Business; Private information retrieval; Consumer law; Advertising; Computer security; Computer science; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04729736856716322,"score_gpt":0.23927737656460452,"score_spread":0.1919800079974413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803046184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6155127,0.00079003384,0.000022877646,0.00049461477,0.0001836586,0.000082377504,0.000010702582,0.000013632964,0.38288936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751767,0.000022700218,0.00016498538,0.000269946,0.0000139323265,0.00001082243,0.0000019305676,0.0000029150049,0.024336064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995141,0.0000016818009,0.00019466752,0.00015438408,0.000012902457,0.00012227579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998342,0.000010597921,0.000035976227,0.00009382716,0.0000064760848,0.000018939676],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000068124136,0.000053528016,0.00014682981,0.00010954901,0.000020671956,0.000017731862,0.00007324448,0.00001769907,0.002667331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005660833,0.0000528435,0.000036243688,0.00015209055,0.00003147694,0.000110353554,0.000048169477,0.000060198487,0.006075097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020290695,0.000031022835,0.5540096,0.0000014678761,0.000003269621,9.225767e-7,0.000032565044,0.0000011953688,0.0000017563573,0.44535148,0.0004241346,0.00014057012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051105546,0.000016411384,0.44750866,0.000006018123,9.986547e-7,9.4731155e-7,0.000023818262,0.00005176927,0.00001882122,0.019081827,0.5326283,0.0001514047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012797453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000424775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53220415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040460185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008511007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99824435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28393280","doi":"10.1007/s10858-017-0109-6","title":"The Rule of Reason Re-Examined","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biomolecular NMR","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development","keywords":"Rule of reason; Economic Justice; Law; Section (typography); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Supreme court; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.024643719437867858,"score_gpt":0.22301513117275643,"score_spread":0.19837141173488856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28393280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7209291,0.15979949,0.0099893,0.0065948353,0.0017245163,0.00013409164,0.000045233992,0.000009218115,0.10077423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854887,0.0005808356,0.0003306472,0.000097074946,0.00016631052,7.398761e-7,4.1913668e-7,0.0000040654863,0.00027104505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932617,0.000010747517,0.0004265977,0.000047126916,0.000052639076,0.00013670074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992882,0.000037280737,0.0004624297,0.0000986248,0.00006429624,0.000049141396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005806348,0.000056220833,0.00018134972,0.000058389385,0.00008971715,0.000016291942,0.00014326967,0.000029588466,0.000033570148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016425338,0.00003925396,0.00014203007,0.00011755281,0.00009418113,0.000114850045,0.000033296394,0.00007152484,0.00004601388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013745295,0.00034817107,0.078889266,0.000029948618,0.0006579187,0.000022043081,0.0008017689,0.000013967412,0.0046124444,0.90097296,0.0056710034,0.007843054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068393984,0.00016412923,0.10186468,0.00003606159,0.000028632414,0.00007445284,0.00015750888,0.000030464824,0.0070298016,0.0140600195,0.8757006,0.00016970294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030614847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012989083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88691294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031789947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016095377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.160073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W287095879","doi":"","title":"The Philosophy of Law and Economics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Freedom of contract; Doctrine; Privity of contract; Law and economics; Law; Freedom of choice; Economics; Political science; Business; Exclusion clause; Contract management; Management","score_opus":0.017123894255801037,"score_gpt":0.1735082307026005,"score_spread":0.15638433644679944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W287095879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21316923,0.0055595003,0.000031265758,0.0026074976,0.00011272824,0.00010663921,0.0031935896,0.000046364592,0.7751732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984577,0.00016861236,0.00008423602,0.00042020055,0.00013230772,0.000008436338,0.000057808218,0.000014761605,0.0006559536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991412,0.0000052257424,0.0004342192,0.00021409297,0.000024368233,0.00018085413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953264,0.000087575136,0.0001634513,0.00015627735,0.000010241627,0.000049786635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000094530165,0.00012230538,0.00020380969,0.000040478073,0.00024037763,0.00044070542,0.00018734505,0.000050863273,0.000041126128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002447997,0.0001006479,0.00009079718,0.000082378145,0.00038767446,0.001226329,0.0001441991,0.000111379086,0.0005053358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001427043,0.000029142526,0.09114052,0.000008729811,0.00002114585,7.9247906e-7,0.0000025570466,0.0000031293405,7.436856e-7,0.9082046,0.0003055604,0.00026875874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012878934,0.000012460518,0.007078291,0.0000049506216,0.0000013764135,0.0000016369505,0.0000018863448,0.000011626593,0.000058907583,0.5474487,0.44516337,0.000088043154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026244214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000039643155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78528845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012894608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013298613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6495238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892375663","doi":"10.1089/elj.2018.0512","title":"Campaign Finance Regulation in North America: An Institutional Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Supreme court; Political science; Agency (philosophy); Election law; Scholarship; Democracy; Public administration; Commission; Language change; Political economy; Law; Economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.018745244676774186,"score_gpt":0.2508199610559309,"score_spread":0.23207471637915672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892375663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8538392,0.0014466298,0.0029898717,0.0030776514,0.0004231148,0.000104373576,0.00015518935,0.00002407221,0.1379399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99643165,0.00047496252,0.00031980773,0.0009163015,0.0015315654,0.000005316291,0.000008462933,0.000006800317,0.00030513905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991166,0.000020407557,0.00033276353,0.00020010798,0.00004973018,0.00028036366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949676,0.000016628399,0.00016570334,0.00007573654,0.00015135923,0.00009379303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013011722,0.0001141195,0.00018435899,0.00025004105,0.0009269211,0.00010670847,0.00007337778,0.00005082274,0.00004900304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008205416,0.00011856304,0.000044655542,0.0003182019,0.00047376167,0.00045891784,0.000023474733,0.00019465672,0.00008807035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012447929,0.000050603634,0.0067236554,0.000002164612,0.000017347995,0.00000225207,0.00074157113,0.000064711334,0.0000024973226,0.991552,0.00007380166,0.00075697456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040887593,0.00028403857,0.19631422,0.000011096443,0.0000036744352,0.00014825075,0.00018830088,0.0007060824,0.000019413374,0.614495,0.18722214,0.00019894833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013483756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005073315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37705702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044666074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111584966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99308556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911880519","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0118","title":"Nothing to hide, but something to lose","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Argument (complex analysis); Dimension (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014755831856533263,"score_gpt":0.17889282991633443,"score_spread":0.16413699805980117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911880519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36393657,0.0016131371,0.006174259,0.0030446819,0.00080907973,0.00013542252,0.000059365255,0.000016199829,0.62421125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910299,0.00007328795,0.0041438807,0.0006800726,0.00008274383,4.3191896e-8,4.2991883e-7,0.0000037677396,0.0039858487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949235,0.0000061370047,0.00015878255,0.00014017818,0.00004959819,0.0001529567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995875,0.0000219448,0.00011580458,0.00009297801,0.000057352107,0.00012446234],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021746386,0.00006659028,0.0002095864,0.000042540254,0.00028583623,0.000032477023,0.00022804282,0.000034504854,0.0014847508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023476732,0.000080404134,0.00009596584,0.00003560632,0.000031395906,0.00048182084,0.00012970796,0.0000972844,0.0006912657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006461497,0.00004094224,0.0084536625,0.000011098852,0.0001012062,0.000017261955,0.0046749082,0.0004458103,0.00017039737,0.9833593,0.0014268252,0.0012339985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005464356,0.00012840163,0.010853584,0.00004896032,0.000008172106,0.000014347091,0.0025126499,0.00004574284,0.00005859026,0.00437784,0.9811947,0.00021059578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036810007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006928404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97976786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032410328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016887461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912097679","doi":"","title":"\"Providing Essential Services of Reasonable Quality to All Canadians\": Understanding Section 36(1)(c) of the Constitution Act, 1982","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Underpinning; Law; Section (typography); Order (exchange); Political science; Quality (philosophy); Sanitation; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.110776023013309,"score_gpt":0.2567147494172821,"score_spread":0.14593872640397312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912097679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6199445,0.0050305175,0.033920094,0.0055545433,0.004766537,0.0013288527,0.001178791,0.000113529226,0.32816264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899536,0.000078792385,0.00034186512,0.00017990633,0.00017293243,0.000020131494,0.000018515904,0.0000061488695,0.00018634133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985008,0.000041372532,0.00074611703,0.00034420288,0.000111627676,0.00025584546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884033,0.00007488322,0.0004930465,0.00028927415,0.00016201986,0.00014042636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063892576,0.00017490955,0.00044335713,0.00016983903,0.0003271186,0.00004645045,0.00029112803,0.00010540134,0.000031240128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025821192,0.00016488432,0.0001575377,0.00045527023,0.0005973641,0.00031141008,0.00013350144,0.00012620288,0.000026273437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050212002,0.00006241543,0.029841065,0.00017095465,0.00012238794,0.0000014799222,0.00085608626,0.0038049568,0.0003643429,0.964469,0.00023183295,0.000025234922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006383837,0.0004361976,0.035806403,0.0029848542,0.00044396234,0.00021521962,0.029945122,0.0036214073,0.010365046,0.22456895,0.6822702,0.0029587888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02903495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013913887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7399001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059138023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041052568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97743076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948973771","doi":"","title":"IS THERE A DOCTRINE OF CANADIAN PUBLIC UTILITY LAW","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Constraint (computer-aided design); Law and economics; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Value (mathematics); Law; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.10538407743938027,"score_gpt":0.23896358984151944,"score_spread":0.13357951240213917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948973771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013685249,0.2785824,0.0000051809197,0.076173075,0.00011002366,0.0002477019,0.0003876575,0.000005429585,0.64312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96781194,0.017007848,0.000015548207,0.0142378425,0.000044623896,0.000008134499,0.000007459481,0.0000054240422,0.00086119305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990478,0.000011277105,0.00038669282,0.00016093034,0.000033113436,0.00036016316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991526,0.000023222841,0.00010653796,0.00030790377,0.00006029073,0.0003494311],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010700634,0.000096021584,0.0003016126,0.0001644948,0.0003330069,0.000023970433,0.00028916897,0.000041097486,0.002772626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008540215,0.000076068885,0.00011304616,0.0005299834,0.00020551862,0.00007209752,0.00001885043,0.00011408851,0.00075011165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.9115508e-7,0.000003160518,0.0074172295,0.0001043679,0.000032340555,0.000004177639,0.000028000883,2.0110514e-8,2.9470476e-8,0.9811298,0.009176487,0.0021039974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050179293,0.000005420319,0.022399642,0.000094926734,0.000007315308,0.0000044203657,0.00000586518,0.0000014264414,0.000002034915,0.009921937,0.96741825,0.00008860083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9711113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97120786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002516718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038656936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99813896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964194326","doi":"","title":"GIFTING CULTURAL PROPERTY IN CANADA: TESTING A TAX EXPENDITURE","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public economics; Cultural property; Property tax; Business; Incentive; Statutory law; Valuation (finance); Income tax; International taxation; Law and economics; Double taxation; Tax reform; Indirect tax; Accounting; Economics; Law; Cultural heritage; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.07746631787845992,"score_gpt":0.22097048995628793,"score_spread":0.143504172077828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964194326","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012702588,0.48572227,0.000009831798,0.046062227,0.00047661198,0.00080904755,0.00016004828,0.000016116259,0.45404127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880447,0.0026893034,0.00009036759,0.0077648642,0.00011134546,0.000021925533,0.0000055520627,0.0000067673736,0.0012652198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911535,0.000009734302,0.0003524067,0.00015679418,0.00003313148,0.00033260084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958885,0.000036196154,0.000099939585,0.00012486045,0.000028556222,0.00012162485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061013194,0.00009554775,0.00024406987,0.000035131117,0.00029065993,0.000023131397,0.00019320208,0.000020680842,0.00017079762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003539152,0.000057472575,0.000034616784,0.00024566083,0.0000484661,0.00007188756,0.000023304847,0.00016679263,0.00015564803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037056718,0.00001435806,0.34043565,0.0008644209,0.0000839293,0.00029009674,0.00052556396,0.000026218207,0.0000028247828,0.5055358,0.09889866,0.05331879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057625177,0.0000029850587,0.041365363,0.00043595975,0.0000033278202,0.000018126984,0.000055287113,0.000023075527,6.1131976e-7,0.0004249091,0.95748043,0.00013228467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99858916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012902686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078914996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33740073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965444922","doi":"","title":"Turning Standards into Rules — Part 5: Weighing the Factors in Capital Gains vs. Ordinary Income Decisions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Real estate; Capital (architecture); Capital gain; Actuarial science; Economics; Paragraph; Asset (computer security); Income tax; Business; Public economics; Finance; Law; Political science; Macroeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03369103313678516,"score_gpt":0.2807263382973368,"score_spread":0.2470353051605516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965444922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96226484,0.0023803893,0.00020432404,0.0015930681,0.00057339,0.0001243633,0.00006413917,0.000023844153,0.03277163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803376,0.00023878225,0.00013181515,0.00010093081,0.00006458431,0.0000111179115,0.0000071152062,0.0000093654235,0.0014025375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991538,0.000014743776,0.00027890268,0.00024767197,0.00007667621,0.00022823727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993971,0.00022723615,0.00010838135,0.00019504108,0.00003003101,0.000042226413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042944195,0.00012787669,0.00026757715,0.000105324914,0.0002375994,0.00006758295,0.00020127623,0.000051642204,0.00040925835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026652342,0.00009656183,0.00008223004,0.00017822169,0.00008977596,0.00018839288,0.00017410665,0.00021195937,0.00046005868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021673111,0.000030537787,0.73707265,0.000008817875,0.000041046602,0.000005829269,0.0074053654,0.00025287102,0.00001076035,0.2542283,0.00062869693,0.00029346492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057708536,0.00008721303,0.573075,0.00010057962,0.000005163061,0.0000027584413,0.0047781332,0.0003095654,0.000035838373,0.04417732,0.3764754,0.00037596046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020911077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004251521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37584668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022379393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049043643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5913277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972050110","doi":"","title":"Turning Standards into Rules Part 4: Machine Learning and Economic Substance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Database transaction; Intuition; Revenue; Directive; Statute; Substance over form; Transaction cost; Harmonization; Public economics; Law and economics; Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Law; Computer science; Political science; Accounting; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.021939649906569575,"score_gpt":0.26574098683937625,"score_spread":0.24380133693280667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972050110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85288745,0.018334478,0.001249362,0.0014953539,0.00044072495,0.000071638446,0.000091287104,0.00006699384,0.12536271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938291,0.0011010063,0.000513037,0.000095586045,0.0002915934,0.0000065476065,0.000006759079,0.000010032449,0.004146374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993203,0.000007930326,0.00019814588,0.00026483703,0.000027767446,0.00018099837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968886,0.000032363067,0.00011613178,0.000081560356,0.00002900078,0.00005210554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003188591,0.00010815464,0.00021285715,0.000053792748,0.00034519538,0.00006297323,0.00007056021,0.00003730056,0.00067517953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006584994,0.00011373369,0.000034337016,0.000045590346,0.00023886195,0.0001264305,0.000054431828,0.00011412555,0.00053137343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060849485,0.000019641266,0.2341392,0.000026539314,0.00011183291,0.0000048676384,0.0056418283,0.000043228763,0.000054174674,0.7534033,0.003297528,0.0031969945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033367288,0.0000705096,0.009234844,0.000018302382,0.0000040121868,0.0000044150133,0.00019821526,0.0007625348,0.00013480449,0.015319958,0.9737013,0.00021741661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011044827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008050144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9704038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012752603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022552942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7392742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994188556","doi":"10.3386/w14276","title":"Affirmative Action in Law School Admissions: What Do Racial Preferences Do?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.5118614761099449,"score_gpt":0.49358282683711363,"score_spread":0.018278649272831293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994188556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047410466,0.048592895,0.0000037473042,0.0012678211,0.0014503291,0.0006758696,0.000432823,0.00001755592,0.9428179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88740116,0.10645231,0.00007499636,0.000056409972,0.0010327951,0.00027972407,0.00025537793,0.000024438375,0.004422758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967925,0.00009496988,0.0013730252,0.00075278076,0.0005500584,0.0004366762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734145,0.00058013643,0.0006898209,0.00024774208,0.00091490167,0.00022597032],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00311252,0.0002765098,0.0008385888,0.0012264322,0.00035978117,0.0002468918,0.0005063128,0.00046975884,0.0030398306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027963964,0.0002932666,0.00023499464,0.0003340286,0.0006584017,0.0012789152,0.000244205,0.0010615826,0.0012363669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084012136,0.00016582594,0.0030556177,0.00011026193,0.00020903983,0.000005723198,0.00025658452,0.0002437908,0.0000017608118,0.9689921,0.024685249,0.0021900323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053185585,0.00007834743,0.002693376,0.0003860178,0.000003894994,0.0000147478095,0.00034983555,0.000056279077,0.000026740996,0.62876624,0.36675915,0.00033353965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044765864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010825067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93839514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003133877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043303627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011121208","doi":"10.1111/ablj.12154","title":"NAFTA 2.0 and LGBTQ Employment Discrimination","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Business Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Mandate; Supreme court; Employment discrimination; Lesbian; Transgender; Political science; Queer; Law; Unintended consequences; Federal law; Gender identity; Sociology; Gender studies; Legislation","score_opus":0.03736024636792676,"score_gpt":0.2129796824239586,"score_spread":0.17561943605603184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011121208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63523513,0.011568667,0.02853274,0.17850915,0.0010695836,0.00026132585,0.00013945381,0.0000979622,0.14458598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99585146,0.000678303,0.00042218,0.0027142118,0.00027262556,0.0000037318714,0.0000025169998,0.0000069461057,0.000048038215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994095,0.0000065175605,0.00025134682,0.0001568028,0.0000398072,0.00013604884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995791,0.00001292011,0.00021071204,0.00004509567,0.000057666522,0.00009454863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007832231,0.00008654482,0.00021517479,0.000032163014,0.00030771946,0.00010526013,0.00008257357,0.000012247568,0.00007569142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004926438,0.00008016178,0.0000356632,0.00021808322,0.00030209773,0.00024840658,0.00005477885,0.00009870566,0.000075091084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025394671,0.000042682754,0.032203775,0.000012763862,0.000068876776,0.000018852277,0.00045546456,0.000055526383,0.00001803354,0.95298094,0.0009366086,0.01318106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007687724,0.00016140057,0.3600982,0.000026415988,0.000022796608,0.00012594178,0.0006272677,0.00037428472,0.000024183622,0.021111814,0.6162395,0.00041941437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013042772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007845859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93186915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033278822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012188988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32689026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011555336","doi":"10.29173/alr2597","title":"The Economics of Canadian Anti-Discrimination Laws","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Atlantic School of Theology","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Redistribution (election); Politics; Welfare; Law and economics; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Political science; Law; Statement (logic); Public economics","score_opus":0.0556861440749085,"score_gpt":0.21083253266137705,"score_spread":0.15514638858646856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011555336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018700453,0.19992521,0.000009115659,0.10795725,0.00019596356,0.00026154672,0.000076590026,0.000005095302,0.6896992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8089681,0.17891484,0.000027000526,0.011595247,0.000058699487,0.000018608374,0.000013624765,0.000006448933,0.00039739086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935406,0.00000700198,0.00036367396,0.00013964812,0.000011624472,0.00012396189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995718,0.00006157435,0.00014776646,0.0001211904,0.000022525412,0.000075157186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013447893,0.000069438145,0.00025893393,0.000020837235,0.00016841448,0.00002007111,0.00016648258,0.000020825875,0.000114247894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012778398,0.000055663684,0.00008937788,0.00016625713,0.00009861757,0.0000955565,0.000028458557,0.000047115107,0.0004757041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.8005813e-7,0.0000031711543,0.0007799787,0.0001385408,0.000025455238,1.8390624e-7,0.000036620746,0.000002202858,1.8657073e-7,0.99515736,0.0030758558,0.000779989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049943475,0.000011097879,0.00069116545,0.00007622889,0.000009873519,8.0624574e-7,0.000004539383,0.000032116815,0.000006553314,0.004837678,0.9942069,0.0000731204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24402274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3014741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028232962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033560675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76101136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014448542","doi":"10.21991/cf29392","title":"Seeing Double: Peace, Order, and Good Government, and the Impact of Federal Greenhouse Emissions Legislation on Provincial Jurisdiction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Legislation; Greenhouse gas; Federalism; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Public administration; Cooperative federalism; Order (exchange); Parliament; Politics; Economics; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.02374672746555814,"score_gpt":0.22877400903918657,"score_spread":0.20502728157362843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014448542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35300627,0.018172132,0.1626831,0.055401824,0.0019578768,0.00392776,0.0064510573,0.00037777756,0.3980222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833566,0.00039441997,0.00023468632,0.00059111335,0.00017126361,0.000062974075,0.000041915075,0.000009724514,0.0001582546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981379,0.000029610144,0.00072569086,0.0005289626,0.00019976606,0.0003780653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892527,0.00014923241,0.00042662924,0.00017330424,0.00013050744,0.00019505518],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003040952,0.00031778583,0.00051824626,0.00008749683,0.0014576522,0.00013404872,0.00016514749,0.00013841684,0.000069510315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040151132,0.00024742525,0.0002112114,0.00032673602,0.0039247023,0.00061049213,0.00021049829,0.00030096498,0.00004254005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065472204,0.00007991553,0.09211965,0.00001921418,0.00019257233,0.0000035247863,0.00018648987,0.0011506949,0.000038248945,0.90372425,0.0013900701,0.00044065283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.08431494,0.0029012917,0.15574148,0.0009596031,0.0005182319,0.0009641739,0.0044130646,0.07884858,0.0007871525,0.27503964,0.3906044,0.0049074395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007727574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000096856646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64532936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002050887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038661476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034690477","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190922771.001.0001","title":"City, State","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stalemate; Megacity; Constitutionalism; State (computer science); Political science; City-state; Urbanization; Population; Constitutional law; Pace; Law; Political economy; Geography; Sociology; Economy; Economic growth; Politics; Economics; Demography; Democracy","score_opus":0.0592733040141126,"score_gpt":0.1902316670155419,"score_spread":0.1309583630014293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034690477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000033364415,0.0042307237,0.0006556712,0.0019209998,0.00035597236,0.00008268098,0.00048033756,0.000056285924,0.99221396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001466658,0.0006000355,0.00009748942,0.0015959204,0.00025997477,0.00000779155,0.000045603254,0.0000129813025,0.99591357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992221,0.0000010408431,0.00032227312,0.00030110523,0.000024515079,0.00012896804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996588,0.000014972233,0.00014590127,0.00010839065,0.00001626717,0.000055641005],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005095528,0.00014799446,0.00037650773,0.000054889035,0.00006936805,0.000041885753,0.00015229739,0.00007801504,0.0026621888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017976712,0.00015294967,0.00013341208,0.000036294055,0.000081505146,0.00005457398,0.00014096868,0.00018068783,0.012821305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001466221,0.0000041918584,0.00025338557,0.000012271071,0.00006741828,0.000005592561,0.00001987657,7.747148e-7,1.7008936e-8,0.72381777,0.275605,0.00021220684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005491242,0.000009927222,0.00011885396,0.000004795618,0.0000020704788,5.939979e-7,5.7040916e-7,0.0000059745275,4.6196763e-7,0.36389512,0.6357725,0.000134191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007670646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026064861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36016753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001057767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007066755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99824953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046221960","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3269525","title":"Online Appendix: A Theory of Social License When Regulatory Pressure is Jointly Produced by an EPA and an NGO","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"License; Social pressure; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01592670055162058,"score_gpt":0.2267856167984923,"score_spread":0.21085891624687172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046221960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809918,0.014633517,0.00044130543,0.0016104872,0.0001309521,0.000116367606,0.0002062674,0.000012923159,0.0018563911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99618065,0.00077670126,0.00005019985,0.00020854686,0.0007419333,0.0000027506474,0.0000122049905,0.000013739551,0.0020132859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998512,0.00006218352,0.00036914265,0.00028415924,0.000060999002,0.00071146915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993884,0.000014354457,0.00030324346,0.00014056366,0.00008527531,0.00006813835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015462036,0.000134299,0.0002884954,0.00008323643,0.00048393008,0.00003974199,0.00018071212,0.0000777859,0.00028391293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047448844,0.00012842998,0.00006938032,0.000072581206,0.0002937016,0.00035949543,0.0000452135,0.00065346283,0.000039254504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013829277,0.00027039493,0.004012111,0.000009192473,0.00035012438,4.7166077e-7,0.0025238772,4.1933725e-7,0.0004065658,0.98498076,0.0009683219,0.006339446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010488237,0.0009969005,0.0102850385,0.000011836956,0.000053922995,0.00007377294,0.0015771708,0.00008544929,0.0005659231,0.90128595,0.08367899,0.0003362033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001087411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002474901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083694816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012413555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028763467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5237223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110152378","doi":"10.1017/s0021855320000285","title":"Constitutional Impediments to the Effective Review of Tax Cases in Nigeria by a Specialized Tax Court: Lessons from the United States and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Context (archaeology); Constitutional court; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.022276913061680857,"score_gpt":0.23470757408565937,"score_spread":0.2124306610239785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110152378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5548181,0.10358379,0.00042427194,0.3191857,0.00065673306,0.00089793844,0.013782221,0.0000047167687,0.0066465535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98626477,0.005345254,0.00003204019,0.0082109375,0.00011238119,0.000007987709,0.000011992714,0.000002283406,0.000012356114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922603,0.00004527848,0.00045166165,0.00009611758,0.00008228963,0.00009859691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900645,0.0003963672,0.00038497,0.000054874366,0.00008584932,0.00007147759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002742157,0.00008263674,0.00034915897,0.000018683468,0.00011382716,0.000020614032,0.00015117537,0.000014067486,0.00006789353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003693571,0.000051552895,0.000048919424,0.00021516846,0.00030403855,0.000059597915,0.000051007057,0.00012776506,0.0000027457133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035665528,0.00012312643,0.03999984,0.00017665596,0.0007771926,0.00011184248,0.0022248281,0.00025208187,0.000041931104,0.5472892,0.40823886,0.0004078046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052773213,0.00009501524,0.0049869684,0.00031134233,0.000022970606,0.0000139020485,0.00056009425,0.000014361674,0.00003194264,0.0012950123,0.99204856,0.00009208218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.346056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16570927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58380973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010764992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013108678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84951437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121595661","doi":"","title":"Benefit Taxes and User Fees in Theory and Practice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Public economics; Government (linguistics); Revenue; Public finance; Economics; Argument (complex analysis); Tax revenue; Tax deferral; Accountability; User fee; Government revenue; Business; Finance; Law and economics; Tax reform; Macroeconomics; Law; State income tax; Political science","score_opus":0.0209125658503367,"score_gpt":0.21175192829797274,"score_spread":0.19083936244763602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121595661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41855085,0.0001943581,0.0004650758,0.001151843,0.00007903981,0.00020962166,0.00008510676,0.00003372872,0.57923037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90132403,0.09771588,0.00060347357,0.00023134158,0.000024137787,0.0000016120886,0.00000210011,0.0000059120166,0.0000915199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940985,0.000018662477,0.000120719415,0.00027213016,0.000023772898,0.00015486842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996423,0.00013057838,0.000081672784,0.00008809937,0.000023889865,0.00003346044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024307215,0.00010467895,0.00017178664,0.002163761,0.0001355565,0.000040608247,0.00008423953,0.000053578977,0.000010429487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016384922,0.00011650159,0.000027755008,0.0012172294,0.00014410232,0.0005965313,0.00013264091,0.00010112075,0.000020573229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010430077,0.00007668486,0.010490435,0.000013434556,0.000045979392,0.000047644764,0.002193361,0.000018364866,5.672801e-7,0.9856494,0.000007971253,0.0013518744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009850389,0.00005062778,0.00963164,0.000019594054,0.0000126476225,0.00001734057,0.0009708876,0.0000037922036,0.000010749747,0.0018121153,0.98631096,0.00017459354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05335122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011514479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.986303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111919486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046618632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9529526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122021206","doi":"10.21991/c9f37p","title":"SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS? LESSONS FROM SOUTH AFRICA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social rights; Political science; Development economics; Economic growth; Human rights; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07820777877036614,"score_gpt":0.2358387415988572,"score_spread":0.15763096282849107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122021206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031101221,0.010391954,0.06605152,0.009798464,0.0032651064,0.00076259614,0.0074491934,0.0004181716,0.87076175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99735606,0.00006129742,0.0010119563,0.0004446396,0.0002667619,0.0001041095,0.0001100897,0.000012739244,0.00063237356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973427,0.000022612587,0.0008796009,0.0009080726,0.00010582143,0.0007411672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895084,0.00007476715,0.00037348387,0.0002838932,0.00008166734,0.00023534668],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022636852,0.00043617914,0.00064971315,0.00027431193,0.0021603745,0.00012708243,0.0003615935,0.0002583289,0.0012823192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007461787,0.0004615322,0.00028292986,0.00018151004,0.0058642076,0.0008002037,0.0003070237,0.00030395042,0.0022875185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005654575,0.00009193016,0.046342727,0.0000064015576,0.0002423332,0.00001789589,0.00067026174,0.000013368713,0.000006623278,0.94893897,0.00348429,0.00012868561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014381799,0.000041665557,0.009271244,0.00003235156,0.000050176266,0.000049357728,0.00060438865,0.00025827045,0.00006616716,0.6555934,0.33184162,0.0007531729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015626587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002942642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96625483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027837275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032485512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122387600","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1272493","title":"The Easy Core Case for Judicial Review","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Judicial review; Grievance; Law and economics; Political science; Judicial deference; Democracy; Judicial activism; Law; Deference; Sociology","score_opus":0.05361012014729367,"score_gpt":0.26258916562326273,"score_spread":0.20897904547596907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122387600","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001902894,0.96437645,0.0075265965,0.007965434,0.0019574838,0.0006866545,0.00021797702,0.000024013656,0.015342493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19633223,0.7985449,0.00004227043,0.0005899113,0.001299736,0.00011350987,0.000014074456,0.000020356763,0.0030430064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974624,0.000015402935,0.00074613077,0.00031460752,0.000058431848,0.0014030595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988031,0.00009131473,0.00069431454,0.00023104751,0.00012165103,0.00005858878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018286476,0.00022747909,0.0005313662,0.000059037466,0.00129443,0.00007586593,0.00040740432,0.00012564157,0.000016224001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029916628,0.00017737478,0.0004949976,0.00008277091,0.00013280511,0.00006186146,0.00018655385,0.0022312005,0.00009457604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020905702,0.000023760475,0.00025373316,0.00008712146,0.00042165673,0.00004180049,0.000022499993,0.000028055925,4.019615e-8,0.9872924,0.006136786,0.005671258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020820324,0.000055077453,0.00002650821,0.00013076926,0.000033488028,0.0034878734,0.000032669304,0.000052303516,1.3571604e-7,0.6236663,0.37212697,0.00017969891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003159486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009326613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3659902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009600183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015809772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99558395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122820070","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1286","title":"Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Democracy; Original jurisdiction; Certiorari; Court of equity; Court of record; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.02751140719575689,"score_gpt":0.2368840862889685,"score_spread":0.2093726790932116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122820070","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017423744,0.48512617,0.0016676626,0.044947397,0.0008728546,0.0022511627,0.0002049398,0.00019747451,0.46298996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9034039,0.073074326,0.00045779935,0.013070322,0.00090123585,0.0006881487,0.00008213939,0.00007268282,0.008249458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797827,0.000047182304,0.0008705052,0.00050142006,0.00015301224,0.00044961149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872285,0.00007633729,0.00039293652,0.0005637461,0.0001386346,0.00010546733],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013932218,0.00029748763,0.000753594,0.000038306607,0.0005419142,0.000074487194,0.0005047939,0.0000708997,0.0017242483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023496768,0.00021250165,0.0002556059,0.00020760366,0.0002645038,0.00029159334,0.00013461975,0.00021946584,0.0046290164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009879781,0.00008576936,0.0012152047,0.0014812066,0.0001571704,0.0000024213869,0.00006533151,0.000015404417,0.0000018990847,0.89449024,0.10055529,0.0019201874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028799608,0.0000634058,0.00022766794,0.000812796,0.00006086117,0.000012180194,0.00001508831,0.0001328554,0.000011634006,0.044455826,0.9536089,0.00031082032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002318349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001399639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9016615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015902118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068178255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122972675","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0007","title":"The Vertical Restraints Paradox: Justifying the Different Legal Treatment of Price and Non-Price Vertical Restraints","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vertical restraints; Rule of reason; Resale price maintenance; Supreme court; Competition (biology); Subject (documents); Economics; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.031081620689989327,"score_gpt":0.20533742162380983,"score_spread":0.1742558009338205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122972675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94513947,0.003994189,0.0006191435,0.0017812864,0.00020701921,0.00010245022,0.000022537766,0.0000047263993,0.048129197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951524,0.004421279,0.0000887999,0.000022656228,0.000060625,1.9329376e-7,4.7562702e-7,0.0000027853816,0.0002507517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993417,0.00002293456,0.00023514156,0.00013083052,0.000079142585,0.00019019487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995162,0.00013446719,0.000090389265,0.00012157361,0.000046529596,0.0000908549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013028023,0.000096885255,0.00023135472,0.000011702263,0.0011204645,0.000022878114,0.00019198161,0.0000423299,0.00009050039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003431612,0.00006519156,0.00011561211,0.000022924882,0.0008112448,0.00018646638,0.0000649777,0.00010081234,0.0000063473703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004549651,0.00039632764,0.023949893,0.000015795642,0.0004957204,0.0001270537,0.0038801667,0.00003377433,0.00007470299,0.96847755,0.00050306314,0.0015909867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023596047,0.0005802511,0.87130123,0.00004173366,0.000081481274,0.0002540727,0.002577555,0.00049152056,0.00011136212,0.0032795225,0.118687175,0.00023451664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072784787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030417237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96519804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026112105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034701225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123224081","doi":"10.11575/sppp.v8i0.42525","title":"The Problem with the Low-Tax Backlash: Rethinking Corporate Tax Policies to Adjust for Uneven Reputational Risks","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Backlash; Corporate tax; Business; Tax policy; Tax avoidance; Double taxation; Economics; Public economics; Tax reform; Accounting; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.11396053482097146,"score_gpt":0.31649309551687826,"score_spread":0.2025325606959068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123224081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60720223,0.00070009293,0.00019145696,0.07097853,0.00048792435,0.0025721763,0.0007907659,0.00003867819,0.31703812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98603624,0.0012343178,0.0009101172,0.00037352572,0.00028162493,0.0005989085,0.000011183997,0.000026641412,0.010527449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983487,0.00003810274,0.00046627587,0.00047771196,0.00008758563,0.0005815931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979847,0.0006636655,0.00048619526,0.00062532997,0.00015081008,0.00008931115],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025011073,0.00016429533,0.0002840465,0.00011567823,0.002880581,0.00059805816,0.0008458493,0.000079255384,0.000016542495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062798936,0.000113217284,0.000094734205,0.00010539546,0.000923914,0.00025213812,0.000325869,0.00037534494,0.000055400043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032111004,0.00007003414,0.04925024,0.00004376426,0.00022671229,0.0000061958904,0.0014739347,0.0056280787,0.000013469721,0.90552884,0.0022179547,0.035219636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013091195,0.00027775715,0.1499094,0.000108997,0.0000078563435,0.000010971261,0.0014480418,0.0022628263,0.00007055254,0.16707416,0.676998,0.00052225904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077747006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004010355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7384547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003206707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019578118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99841756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123523432","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4498","title":"NEITHER FISH NOR FOWL: ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGES IN THE MODERN ADMINISTRATIVE STATE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Adjudication; Appeal; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Law; Power (physics); Accountability; State (computer science); Separation of powers; Administration (probate law); Independence (probability theory); Politics; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.10596558408195621,"score_gpt":0.31663987585797604,"score_spread":0.21067429177601982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123523432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7256456,0.00016181967,0.00035203923,0.006323654,0.0003530663,0.00048625178,0.0005287702,0.000018305333,0.26613048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965869,0.000019389241,0.0003207422,0.0016649411,0.00015129536,0.00007168214,0.0000048862867,0.000011037412,0.0011690792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894434,0.000017274639,0.00041786255,0.0003079235,0.00008048502,0.0002321397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924976,0.00017358163,0.00020264467,0.00024703797,0.00006704104,0.000059931263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002988449,0.00015305684,0.0002852586,0.00010524802,0.0001004695,0.00012419802,0.0005760846,0.000060569026,0.00024619795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023024218,0.00012717927,0.00006745325,0.00023610452,0.00018330885,0.00035144118,0.000112315,0.00027633813,0.00014490105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062495953,0.0011990365,0.30209038,0.000292904,0.0003542842,0.000082858765,0.024610694,0.00044891878,0.0005390811,0.6509141,0.013952839,0.004889986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010289503,0.00035586068,0.86332,0.000048878326,0.000059656184,0.000008837767,0.0012083404,0.00042895315,0.0009521411,0.05767652,0.07429979,0.0006120524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033588693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017228805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5932375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023259392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000078823985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51862204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123639769","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2012.15.2.277","title":"<i>Ex ante</i> Fairness in Criminal Law and Procedure","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ex-ante; Supreme court; Discretion; Criminal law; Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.06051355066028592,"score_gpt":0.2621809337231436,"score_spread":0.2016673830628577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123639769","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009439287,0.7188013,0.000060985465,0.002223822,0.00025477898,0.00032423396,0.00003358993,0.000025046702,0.26883695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93471736,0.05102387,0.0003711398,0.012934324,0.0002992347,0.000041252468,0.000009399689,0.000014482712,0.00058892416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987814,0.000014543579,0.00049780903,0.00029369097,0.000052484706,0.0003600608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995037,0.000028302915,0.0001393239,0.00015444413,0.000024513127,0.00014972163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003571012,0.00019070684,0.00054817816,0.00003371371,0.00012764659,0.000037793998,0.00013693541,0.00005793791,0.00020264364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004838739,0.00017682336,0.00009108104,0.0001425309,0.00018164916,0.00044376004,0.00008707757,0.00016339104,0.0004476001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000093258805,0.00006475638,0.0028980402,0.0020390102,0.000012884788,0.0000046581963,0.00017421806,1.3325707e-7,0.0000012512556,0.991313,0.0017554031,0.0017273171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028645576,0.000044075015,0.004808455,0.0010049628,0.00006601075,0.00007437033,0.00004172811,0.0000022588058,0.000012814432,0.010266704,0.98311037,0.0002818024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019254169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042801708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98135495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052754553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002670711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72106475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123802554","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2008.00351.x","title":"A Canadian Copyright Narrative","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Normative; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Liability; Subject (documents); Sociology; Work (physics); Political science; Public relations; Law; History; Computer science; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05369986895425746,"score_gpt":0.1999083986745747,"score_spread":0.14620852972031723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123802554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1958465,0.016140418,0.00076504424,0.034977295,0.0013098927,0.0002667789,0.000033910324,0.000016627833,0.75064355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640164,0.0005435471,0.000053386022,0.0011495579,0.00018843726,0.0000014647097,3.3669724e-7,0.000005976836,0.034040924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992292,0.000027636455,0.00043491245,0.00007463764,0.000049293532,0.00018435474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993733,0.00011361226,0.00019381948,0.0000917343,0.00012370535,0.00010378521],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004048334,0.00009468165,0.00024482788,0.00020749825,0.00053169805,0.000017507959,0.0002841276,0.000020628162,0.0026829946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003261372,0.000044846565,0.00009485187,0.00030808905,0.00025057833,0.00015738391,0.000030610994,0.0002801603,0.0006240411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028656714,0.00010575148,0.0048673814,0.000007212563,0.00044319697,0.0000690428,0.054085486,0.0001261587,0.00003020746,0.033064198,0.90615857,0.000756233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023530223,0.00014336647,0.00087302754,0.000019555193,0.0000074575096,0.00032186706,0.00050902297,0.00013363757,0.00017491098,0.004547974,0.9929051,0.00012881409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030027404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024008255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7681699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002262523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022113854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99822867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124174232","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhs002","title":"THE FTC, IP, AND SSOS: GOVERNMENT HOLD-UP REPLACING PRIVATE COORDINATION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Damages; Intellectual property; Context (archaeology); Business; Competition (biology); Law and economics; Commission; Incentive; Patent infringement; Government (linguistics); Industrial organization; Economics; Public economics; Marketing; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.018894525867776197,"score_gpt":0.1958500298451659,"score_spread":0.17695550397738968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124174232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.909973,0.006706522,0.0016546521,0.0064734225,0.0025896966,0.00013029242,0.00006706531,0.0000109501525,0.07239437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664825,0.0018773425,0.00021971841,0.0004227102,0.00042635447,0.0000037294606,0.0000015491572,0.000007182776,0.00039317997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990389,0.000013640415,0.00063475606,0.00009624629,0.000040465467,0.0001759957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894065,0.00010126315,0.0007391061,0.00010064082,0.000041540734,0.000076825825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084514735,0.00009360492,0.00023735991,0.000027768747,0.00036288647,0.00012461642,0.000109972694,0.000039028768,0.000041100044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053401815,0.00008228585,0.00009008061,0.00003584065,0.00013961185,0.0006535568,0.000057015306,0.0001322061,0.00004554933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026774935,0.00002828719,0.011170626,0.0000055787655,0.00006605108,3.4767774e-7,0.000094042836,0.00005202772,0.00001239276,0.9878341,0.00021972132,0.0004900387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000669741,0.00006456176,0.029316323,0.000024391884,0.000014918165,0.000071751994,0.00015874037,0.00023010337,0.0001691205,0.078326955,0.89079535,0.00015803718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017326445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016725007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90950716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024582056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012042407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33555195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124708831","doi":"","title":"Female Justices, Feminism, and the Politics of Judicial Appointment: A Re-Examination","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Feminism; Law; Politics; Sociology; Empirical research; Judicial restraint; Political science; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.02773671338730788,"score_gpt":0.2202374845159424,"score_spread":0.19250077112863453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124708831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12217934,0.0043919017,0.0019982832,0.0037441074,0.00012368031,0.00016338205,0.00003942071,0.000015572421,0.8673443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974688,0.00026719176,0.00019116186,0.0006031773,0.00008177449,0.0000041891026,0.0000023971727,0.0000015599904,0.0013797447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952936,0.0000065352615,0.00023951921,0.000108738706,0.000024425883,0.000091397065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972576,0.000054562235,0.000109001514,0.00007137771,0.000020958278,0.00001835094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025981854,0.000054051656,0.00016238519,0.000039456245,0.00013059087,0.000017862043,0.000057444166,0.000025232075,0.00007021223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006160917,0.000039993916,0.000034384328,0.000071829556,0.00019632773,0.00006335024,0.000023566487,0.000038161845,0.000021554453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067744495,0.000026701267,0.0009924817,0.0000057134816,0.000014405495,2.886217e-7,0.0006278958,0.0000027969736,9.662061e-7,0.99635416,0.000116332565,0.0018514898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033675777,0.000258064,0.2073761,0.000026020194,0.00005426816,0.000007079543,0.0021760215,0.0014892654,0.00021217758,0.7353667,0.049351472,0.0003152722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018990082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011345607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87528944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017319984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008207382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16309045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124769274","doi":"10.21991/c99h4f","title":"IMPOVERISHMENT OF THE LAW BY THE LAW: A CRITIQUE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S VISION OF THE RULE OF LAW AND THE FEDERAL PRINCIPLE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020277116185443533,"score_gpt":0.22294320126077405,"score_spread":0.20266608507533052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124769274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24347661,0.014695048,0.003986567,0.030454135,0.0040286737,0.0032416452,0.006193792,0.000039733623,0.6938838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966438,0.00015079099,0.000111821355,0.002723528,0.000042859418,0.00007529913,0.000007946375,0.0000073021447,0.00023667724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779594,0.00010383942,0.0011364453,0.00034253293,0.0002681554,0.00035307652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791163,0.00017545804,0.00090583105,0.00069416367,0.00026127664,0.00005163314],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070257386,0.00027212527,0.0005521189,0.00003333895,0.0017461048,0.000036332287,0.0008997539,0.00013646283,0.000069937276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001866921,0.00013119087,0.00052762125,0.00025309558,0.02490647,0.00029815786,0.0008382596,0.00028683868,0.0000056999625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009928055,0.00016313796,0.020718696,0.000043872416,0.00018914626,2.3676292e-7,0.0002980023,0.00012593731,0.00023263278,0.97719276,0.00092159724,0.000014722888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054073213,0.00014585372,0.024426177,0.0005432886,0.00020463388,0.0001384207,0.0010356056,0.00055842067,0.02595444,0.61805725,0.32288706,0.0006415023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060304175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010090792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75316715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009609258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034765585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124799479","doi":"","title":"The Identifiability Bias in Environmental Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identifiability; Lawmaking; Law and economics; Doctrine; Environmental law; Common law; Political science; Law; Public economics; Economics; Legislature","score_opus":0.044115932583019,"score_gpt":0.21183736787476437,"score_spread":0.16772143529174538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124799479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48029462,0.0016461012,0.00031512705,0.0007425843,0.00023960076,0.00007067178,0.000014724171,0.000009513544,0.51666707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973456,0.00006682694,0.000030086003,0.00024318846,0.00002708988,0.000003914499,0.0000011161645,0.0000015870577,0.0022805913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994812,0.0000028999996,0.00024323339,0.00012174351,0.000017521106,0.00013339291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997754,0.00007735567,0.00003601349,0.00009217162,0.0000014647725,0.000017591972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000727828,0.000041272957,0.00007171043,0.000016990603,0.00015996034,0.00002691935,0.00007763674,0.00001869042,0.00017513841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025024092,0.000030808063,0.000035903002,0.000047735753,0.00018899732,0.00007709767,0.00004437525,0.000050933326,0.0006947969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030000049,0.000022065742,0.21245623,4.800957e-7,0.0000041728185,8.809213e-7,0.000028227703,0.0000014224892,0.0000029156008,0.78699005,0.000077243596,0.00041329474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001260926,0.0000058014675,0.513747,6.9895026e-7,3.6911464e-7,7.6066794e-7,0.00010966022,0.000018183171,0.000090271926,0.13019839,0.355637,0.00006575219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010893178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002470363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6567917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007227528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001966833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.893044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124916167","doi":"","title":"Clarifying the Matter: Modernizing Peace, Order, and Good Government in the \"Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act\" Appeals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Federalism; Constitution; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Separation of powers; Jurisdiction; Parliament; Commerce Clause; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03183355028587525,"score_gpt":0.20068434169436386,"score_spread":0.1688507914084886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124916167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33226016,0.026407225,0.19149673,0.20424534,0.0005008553,0.0018265,0.0006480948,0.00013263221,0.24248244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99452794,0.00061564904,0.00046871544,0.0039905338,0.0001920918,0.000061140556,0.000010800326,0.000007173555,0.0001259681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891156,0.000033568944,0.00040937038,0.0003018578,0.00012326785,0.00022038349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944943,0.00014009916,0.00019503318,0.00012554182,0.000043006625,0.00004690418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006011187,0.00012912646,0.00020168995,0.000051134608,0.00053234724,0.00011727345,0.00021925427,0.00007252547,0.000037358917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035427563,0.00011328847,0.0000611079,0.0003437548,0.000209158,0.00025487356,0.00007903299,0.00028316712,0.00011535795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001054248,0.000045636643,0.05711899,0.000040016428,0.000035324516,0.0000055568676,0.0013134582,0.0034376516,0.000019703071,0.9371505,0.00030600966,0.0005166431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041317134,0.00012701971,0.3748477,0.00037298878,0.00010840526,0.00047633218,0.0044561676,0.115850344,0.000058052374,0.2265852,0.27159804,0.0013880222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017925413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010074934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71056527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003245006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007335682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.461977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125313674","doi":"","title":"Shortening Agency and Judicial Vacancies through Filibuster Reform? an Examination of Confirmation Rates and Delays from 1981 to 2014","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Political science; Law; Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Nomination; Administrative law; Voting; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; Public administration; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.07302038904737562,"score_gpt":0.24959935877138076,"score_spread":0.17657896972400514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125313674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94515026,0.0015381298,0.0059610927,0.00032626963,0.00010573075,0.00009139982,0.000080998485,0.0000118184025,0.046734326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978494,0.00014012237,0.0015506416,0.00019750356,0.00006010087,0.000008939698,0.000027085474,0.0000031867153,0.00016303675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994704,0.000007751149,0.00025151088,0.0001607931,0.000029566827,0.000079969046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973893,0.000014575207,0.00008328561,0.00006013419,0.00005809011,0.00004497717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018555476,0.00006864848,0.00016859394,0.00004752195,0.00006764367,0.00003159672,0.000038565424,0.00003721922,0.000057009045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030866067,0.00006309287,0.000012039012,0.000055963214,0.000061915984,0.0004998268,0.000045424655,0.00003013051,0.000023740551],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057323145,0.000051096897,0.09742146,0.000024772351,0.00009153404,0.0000013795602,0.012266942,0.000050392184,0.00025913425,0.87297,0.0015203103,0.015285678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007048309,0.00024622004,0.9150596,0.000019600053,0.000015602804,0.0000026436437,0.0022827946,0.0028406137,0.0008518265,0.06700332,0.010677784,0.00029511433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057179835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004291202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8176382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003490264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010492204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8643919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125947738","doi":"","title":"Protecting Taxpayers and the Environment Through Reform of Canada's Offshore Liability Regime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Strict liability; Liability; Statute; Business; Context (archaeology); Legal liability; Law; Mens rea; Culpability; Damages; Law and economics; Economics; Criminal law; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.008534184536167782,"score_gpt":0.16270915131409458,"score_spread":0.1541749667779268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125947738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8578425,0.030854376,0.0025908113,0.040336464,0.00022436633,0.0007369307,0.000019119345,0.000010478686,0.067384936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682814,0.0019075008,0.00005348487,0.000095828815,0.000053490894,0.00002347759,3.3132736e-7,0.0000044014164,0.0010333654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988158,0.000020008098,0.0003394925,0.00013510021,0.000054986507,0.000634636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953794,0.000033766817,0.00027271773,0.00010780124,0.000020747233,0.000027035434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011491212,0.000084954365,0.00021076787,0.000015800892,0.0003551266,0.000022217198,0.00012716181,0.00002724062,0.000053299835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006853876,0.000056326688,0.00005745255,0.000048194066,0.00021662943,0.0001423271,0.0000500042,0.00064330077,0.000009069783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016436345,0.000013291493,0.004665922,0.000006012746,0.000118106305,1.8464974e-7,0.00020884741,0.000018765246,0.0000035230532,0.9936411,0.00006127176,0.0012465562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007043422,0.00006770613,0.008802598,0.000007974292,0.000007688305,0.000041752013,0.002799301,0.00009969646,0.000038023572,0.9679533,0.019356461,0.00012112482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28109208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07730577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2037863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011599738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043060316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93953097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126132474","doi":"10.32920/24653406.v1","title":"Why Michigan v. EPA Requires that the Meaning of the Cost/Rationality Nexus Be Clarified","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Discretion; Law and economics; Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Implicit cost; Set (abstract data type); Nexus (standard); Order (exchange); Economics; Law; Total cost; Political science; Microeconomics; Finance; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12750039501887458,"score_gpt":0.24936204848478846,"score_spread":0.12186165346591388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126132474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1983641,0.0013586486,0.0011864821,0.10936503,0.0012595818,0.00050981063,0.00035588833,0.00007236435,0.68752813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926395,0.00005211553,0.000031708878,0.0030710362,0.00006592563,0.000024148247,0.000007925071,0.0000041607245,0.004103477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935836,0.00001702503,0.0002662478,0.00016152136,0.000059381757,0.00013743885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947405,0.00012699928,0.00014140375,0.00021049479,0.000030008201,0.000017017242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041838188,0.00007518886,0.00014815199,0.000032671138,0.00036684898,0.00003900716,0.00024457354,0.00003928737,0.00031649493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013094928,0.000044772645,0.0001078027,0.0002783809,0.00020902892,0.00011567783,0.00014360824,0.00009952362,0.00012467953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049561327,0.000010866766,0.028439488,0.000004306752,0.00004525663,2.4369874e-7,0.00040890687,0.00008398579,0.000016818956,0.96484643,0.006024783,0.000113954724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023303617,0.000012993403,0.17223519,0.000008199323,0.000007654128,0.0000015988179,0.000625868,0.0007903382,0.00051703345,0.2986992,0.52672964,0.00013922004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010752722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001021005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7942754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018215836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019417965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34653974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133444857","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3726262","title":"The Precedential Effects of the Supreme Court's Emergency Stays","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.011171086464146074,"score_gpt":0.19287332008065675,"score_spread":0.18170223361651067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133444857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67122716,0.19204907,0.0176249,0.06691339,0.006498678,0.0008511564,0.000062779705,0.00005159824,0.044721305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98763776,0.011003343,0.000003791048,0.00009869839,0.0003127657,0.000005100134,3.165541e-7,0.000006390675,0.00093182345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874866,0.0000227347,0.00035232733,0.00011973672,0.000067790774,0.0006887635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995267,0.000036123856,0.0002632284,0.000097615644,0.000038891263,0.000037472888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045309955,0.00008577371,0.00015319158,0.000015443451,0.0004950705,0.00002776917,0.00038541458,0.000028989592,0.000043425458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018945838,0.00005319724,0.00017981959,0.00015191456,0.000084056854,0.00009313145,0.00008206483,0.0006158733,0.00005880814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020540316,0.00001968174,0.013635484,0.0000091928205,0.00021326682,3.0682384e-7,0.00016185886,0.00002360638,0.00005040271,0.9837905,0.001089672,0.0009854642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080162345,0.00025900375,0.020943012,0.000013026829,0.000037972335,0.000027487133,0.00036680824,0.00017502112,0.00041862027,0.84417576,0.13257481,0.00020687294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008024292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023825312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31641063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014639719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024224796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3807732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137803152","doi":"","title":"The 'Individualistic' Approach to Arbitrariness, Overbreadth, and Gross Disproportionality","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Individualism; Supreme court; Criticism; Law; Economic Justice; Constitutional law; Political science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027487399436807797,"score_gpt":0.23440848125079575,"score_spread":0.20692108181398794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137803152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49890342,0.045280118,0.042206805,0.03392647,0.001785163,0.000647372,0.00024097478,0.00005742566,0.37695226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946001,0.002501314,0.00008153164,0.00014651631,0.00030648804,0.000014690932,0.0000025214915,0.0000066515404,0.0023401517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985348,0.0000085061465,0.00029730223,0.00021269592,0.00006615801,0.0008805173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993698,0.000024472794,0.0002737408,0.00021980342,0.000039654642,0.00007253484],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014789121,0.00010763756,0.00017527965,0.000028019786,0.0025934414,0.0004728009,0.0003754871,0.000034891407,0.0000053033077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023134469,0.00007900475,0.000069545385,0.000037312442,0.00025412458,0.00024185862,0.00014269727,0.00055206014,0.00004764631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001377896,0.0000306575,0.053913545,0.000002573402,0.00010922967,5.5609934e-7,0.000036257574,0.0000032171909,6.159767e-7,0.9439168,0.00012985933,0.0018429088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002015017,0.000024929363,0.2457333,0.000002672164,0.0000071434542,0.000083725354,0.00009235115,0.00002267902,9.741059e-7,0.71479404,0.03893129,0.00010537263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057300006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004917914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49569672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019399603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021813132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141045409","doi":"","title":"Unfair Subsidies and Countervailing Duties","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chapters","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Business; International trade; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.03230534366253399,"score_gpt":0.19611897871548717,"score_spread":0.16381363505295318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141045409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83934695,0.015404674,0.001354635,0.0010977142,0.0004621819,0.00005832131,0.000027934002,0.000042499134,0.14220509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998396,0.00036754156,0.00010411739,0.00031395906,0.00006555824,0.0000019335143,0.0000012811862,0.0000035236665,0.00074608775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995476,7.550212e-7,0.00016587082,0.00013596754,0.000015300197,0.00013447956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983495,0.000023432764,0.00004781855,0.00005236413,0.0000112013195,0.000030220148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019061773,0.00006300386,0.00011991179,0.00005577995,0.00012326709,0.000024022287,0.000042934684,0.00002288503,0.000054301825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019427103,0.00006417933,0.000029666084,0.000039763847,0.00015744011,0.00010138363,0.00003435076,0.000041073825,0.00011766275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008188097,0.0000068985423,0.094297074,0.000010431489,0.00002815911,0.00000459315,0.00081655796,0.0000019411084,0.000011291579,0.9037639,0.00012435863,0.00092663226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008387724,0.00008602022,0.27288786,0.000048577793,0.000010166666,0.000024013212,0.0034147408,0.00018419628,0.0005266603,0.11264204,0.60871273,0.0006242082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001895368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000087845496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79112184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023478042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002407359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26171574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153612497","doi":"","title":"Climate Change, Constitutions, and Courts: The Reference re Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act and Beyond","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Appeal; Politics; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02235181953559653,"score_gpt":0.2143249446311711,"score_spread":0.19197312509557457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153612497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85931563,0.08102643,0.00058852544,0.012762611,0.00042200074,0.00037909474,0.0000709236,0.00003614678,0.04539863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93499345,0.06418961,0.000023159897,0.00041353135,0.00013221503,0.0000074902287,0.000002094419,0.000006163603,0.00023227122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986816,0.000016899308,0.00026267496,0.00020377655,0.000046898953,0.0007881386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995898,0.000030822128,0.00020070218,0.00010312773,0.00003144871,0.00004412402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000900515,0.000118064054,0.00019417318,0.00008183238,0.00059431803,0.000092426024,0.00010393171,0.000052661908,0.000026129686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003501437,0.000090338035,0.000037596375,0.0000935769,0.00017981857,0.00034858793,0.00007246096,0.0006541543,0.00007595154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017395263,0.000013873303,0.04529601,0.0000062642207,0.0000512895,8.317415e-7,0.00015452129,0.0000032180985,0.000005033244,0.94991744,0.000031885425,0.0045022657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014873755,0.00042459051,0.06460454,0.00007954183,0.000047682654,0.0008307516,0.001895684,0.0003176321,0.0000067047104,0.8686556,0.06118655,0.00046330655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000184589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045400017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08126177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024351107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001476529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4571074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169633878","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3855619","title":"Understanding Chilling Effects","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Normative; Conformity; Empirical research; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Positive economics; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13614961571252307,"score_gpt":0.2403606638520999,"score_spread":0.10421104813957682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169633878","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037320642,0.7166167,0.0029322973,0.0046776026,0.000385145,0.00013373264,0.000020353866,0.000027783964,0.2748332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7609485,0.22564074,0.0006557917,0.011041055,0.0002305834,0.00005685931,0.000029880599,0.000019202986,0.0013774231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992519,0.000012672084,0.00029879657,0.00024715203,0.000027873431,0.00016159518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964,0.000050534927,0.0000883269,0.00016126504,0.00002028876,0.000039594433],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019849068,0.00009854897,0.00037215996,0.000015882571,0.0001896237,0.00003212245,0.000076902994,0.000027522849,0.0004916594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007184212,0.00009800037,0.00013026016,0.000149985,0.000058774305,0.00011558826,0.000057177436,0.000074821255,0.0012806798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.8107007e-7,0.000017653445,0.0007923749,0.0009481811,0.000036671747,0.000021230322,0.000008927224,7.3205166e-7,0.0000026628163,0.99630624,0.0015768635,0.00028809588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011467643,0.0000072853277,0.00032092573,0.0010373165,0.000017608256,0.00001929901,0.000003649513,0.000008979262,0.00005161437,0.053053547,0.9452017,0.00016338329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056219047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003034774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94362485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084587664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012619411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182654442","doi":"","title":"Traders of the Lost Ark: Rediscovering a Moral and Economic Case for Free Trade","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free trade; Public good; Government (linguistics); Politics; Context (archaeology); International trade; Political science; International free trade agreement; Economics; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.022300973480597855,"score_gpt":0.208688038113507,"score_spread":0.18638706463290916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182654442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802803,0.0067514866,0.0020074034,0.0047976733,0.00048616983,0.00015220381,0.00014755738,0.000004739765,0.0053724702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860716,0.0006571583,0.00006670145,0.00006926999,0.0003452729,0.000003646182,3.3553863e-7,0.0000070320575,0.00024343639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998996,0.0000055140704,0.00028157802,0.00013396838,0.000017450897,0.00056548434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964917,0.000023567396,0.00018722528,0.00010408157,0.000008063139,0.000027888518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042527326,0.00008149715,0.0001718865,0.000044220124,0.0002742701,0.00002912422,0.00015603384,0.000032846878,0.000015509191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037104644,0.00006614825,0.0001095101,0.00004169743,0.00022889329,0.00014728362,0.00003993629,0.0002643226,0.0000058676706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038123762,0.000013540316,0.006237157,0.00000609452,0.00013530825,0.0000015240421,0.00018767419,0.000013693002,0.000015860867,0.9925266,0.000236644,0.00058780983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012922164,0.00028862365,0.0060735564,0.000013517499,0.000024780735,0.0018756429,0.00084072596,0.0004978634,0.00014433282,0.97710294,0.011675233,0.00017055053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002719065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002193927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01832685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002824274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023311857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26974472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188167197","doi":"10.1007/s11127-012-9990-4","title":"Constitutional effectiveness","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.06670611532849748,"score_gpt":0.24040009625988817,"score_spread":0.1736939809313907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188167197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10256389,0.0098588355,0.009067074,0.0030977922,0.0020542825,0.00017537277,0.00014824871,0.00010419924,0.8729303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986052,0.000019886073,0.000084130326,0.00042808923,0.0004608779,0.00004675089,0.0000124683875,0.0000028293769,0.0003397988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935114,0.000010956797,0.0001736223,0.0001503648,0.000033291628,0.00028062434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957913,0.00012175576,0.000064489795,0.00010012863,0.00003354415,0.000100956604],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040358733,0.00008231158,0.00015679334,0.00004684529,0.0001942827,0.000046209716,0.000104300656,0.000039752213,0.0005665907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033929266,0.00008424462,0.00006328349,0.00017292537,0.00029775457,0.0005622605,0.00005963258,0.00008029747,0.0021227906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011113747,0.000049298804,0.3802165,0.00000574568,0.000024636905,1.3306747e-7,0.0000122205465,9.2229834e-7,0.0000023340767,0.6189986,0.0004599979,0.00022853221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001816609,0.0000037437032,0.3292855,0.0000024219917,0.0000014384423,0.000004731426,0.0000030957265,0.0000060129078,0.000011534571,0.005723163,0.6646862,0.000090490495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011631877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000058624046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8960413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009828155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021452724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W319139452","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Litigation Against Institutions: Remedies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.022861919059754342,"score_gpt":0.22423926960249055,"score_spread":0.2013773505427362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W319139452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50786465,0.018735362,0.04195099,0.011626867,0.0054927533,0.0003204691,0.0001376422,0.00015512676,0.41371614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941857,0.0033571958,0.00027475745,0.00035795532,0.00075733813,0.000014818109,0.00001789766,0.0000050972158,0.0010292293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981854,0.0000091585325,0.00046508622,0.00022409504,0.00007830042,0.0010379377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944323,0.000028327597,0.00022296284,0.00012232408,0.00010327444,0.000079851685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010556035,0.00014040187,0.0002077802,0.0001148167,0.00077084784,0.000086167114,0.00020799514,0.00009130936,0.00010823236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032218185,0.00013952974,0.00013167282,0.00018245599,0.00080420735,0.0004708709,0.000040404375,0.0016039298,0.00059208367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075934736,0.00004310415,0.0106100645,0.0000023059195,0.000099851,0.000002172645,0.00004059653,0.00003760759,0.000104324245,0.9869798,0.00015833738,0.0019142618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041783543,0.000034752386,0.0019673835,0.000008504975,0.00000592641,0.00020049515,0.00015477823,0.000035885045,0.000035509474,0.73242444,0.26453453,0.00017992445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052868814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006937414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48632106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042080606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00121203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7610235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191517068","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes 2021-58 Athletes 4 Athletes Foundation v Canada (National Revenue)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Athletes; Appeal; Amateur; Law; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Medicine; Physical therapy","score_opus":0.016502157946786274,"score_gpt":0.1878505371925571,"score_spread":0.17134837924577082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191517068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.954842,0.001206083,0.00091015885,0.013250661,0.00027771504,0.00011245408,0.0006753039,0.000040785137,0.028684877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959979,0.00027792642,0.0011536139,0.00006560265,0.000035017438,6.944971e-7,0.000028035107,0.0000042575075,0.0024369718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992687,0.0000080752625,0.00019379136,0.00030501283,0.000060766295,0.00016362006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993844,0.00005133015,0.0001692763,0.00017335317,0.00018712203,0.0000344944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010688369,0.00010212777,0.00024151652,0.00014756179,0.00028221842,0.00001430298,0.00016261429,0.00010863916,0.0005745699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025276144,0.00013237071,0.00006912923,0.00029747654,0.00020756412,0.00013654855,0.00018639119,0.00015289565,0.00011457645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019288977,0.000099087585,0.19706835,0.000031885444,0.00024115153,0.0012005542,0.00009047929,0.000055312088,0.00012915402,0.789189,0.003714546,0.008161179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080718705,0.000028632927,0.04985648,0.000056136603,0.000024624916,0.00021185711,0.0005499806,0.00015427964,0.0009497697,0.043491323,0.9035216,0.0003481192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12728317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22618435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89980704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021741398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000286162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8785283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193286643","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3522915","title":"Seeing Double: Peace, Order, and Good Government, and the Impact of Federal Greenhouse Gas Emissions Legislation on Provincial Jurisdiction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Jurisdiction; Greenhouse gas; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Business; Political science; Natural resource economics; Public administration; Law; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.014496922445731406,"score_gpt":0.2183991655407009,"score_spread":0.20390224309496952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193286643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.968535,0.009470735,0.003381252,0.0049724565,0.00007828811,0.0002107597,0.00004431091,0.000013428645,0.013293775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932594,0.0062213605,0.000013898476,0.000056932844,0.00020025445,0.0000035587543,0.0000012365216,0.000006755291,0.00023664706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913114,0.000015620713,0.00026181326,0.00014247878,0.00006558569,0.0003833422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996059,0.000029173012,0.0002469039,0.00004382714,0.00002245519,0.000051723524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043548152,0.00009818206,0.00019144712,0.000024799128,0.00040005668,0.0000653037,0.00006226078,0.000035587447,0.00001018302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006331715,0.00006836945,0.00007276114,0.000103058876,0.00009192663,0.00018548206,0.000037506274,0.0004995616,0.0000035715107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082100346,0.000057668214,0.057388026,0.000006431916,0.00028863054,8.2684755e-7,0.00076349144,0.00019786767,0.000038302922,0.934317,0.00017575425,0.0059450143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03817623,0.006564661,0.15138744,0.00013073279,0.00019281468,0.0005902804,0.0032033264,0.019170372,0.00015553116,0.7479145,0.031200238,0.001313847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068794825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031373402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18640245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002976916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002388057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3076953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194627635","doi":"","title":"Kawhi Leonard, other Toronto Raptors stars' tax bills among worst in the NBA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FOXBusiness","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01652034865814967,"score_gpt":0.1903744110699494,"score_spread":0.17385406241179974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194627635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.888341,0.003407393,0.00010141593,0.0013326098,0.00087887334,0.00028895325,0.000090289024,0.000019489567,0.10553997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99595785,0.00009586595,0.000027919259,0.0005946287,0.00014893436,0.00003847189,0.000006603696,0.000011241963,0.0031184799],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999128,0.000012729889,0.0003004968,0.0002728662,0.000054646393,0.00023126489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953383,0.000047356814,0.000118589065,0.00024846787,0.000029576138,0.00002217406],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030609802,0.00013479771,0.0002613317,0.000053882763,0.000091561735,0.0000635015,0.00026767206,0.00006320007,0.0011841567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003276688,0.00010113584,0.00007604502,0.00024161654,0.00010459652,0.0003595795,0.000056091467,0.00009094303,0.0008377295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021800239,0.000076714954,0.7705911,0.00001839499,0.000036632944,0.0000035966762,0.0009196602,0.00010128883,0.000005386766,0.22526067,0.0025700012,0.0003947428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046269083,0.000017382057,0.6400105,0.000022403898,0.000002901205,0.0000013472556,0.00037526677,0.000077566525,0.000005330716,0.0033959912,0.35541752,0.00021113837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0126515245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049887197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35284755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011090569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001795217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213369703","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2021.69.3.pf.ledressay","title":"Policy Forum: In Defence of the First Nations Fiscal Management Act","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Taxpayer; Supreme court; Debt; Business; Public administration; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.014909454404842693,"score_gpt":0.1778680228958802,"score_spread":0.1629585684910375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213369703","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19383705,0.0053449804,0.00023267869,0.43886042,0.0021238443,0.00043627195,0.001926343,0.000011531574,0.35722688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843672,0.00041007827,0.00013172685,0.0010009405,0.0001533796,0.000019786366,0.0000064445103,0.000011092365,0.013899345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986591,0.00001452273,0.00049640203,0.00023583419,0.00003591413,0.00055826275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904794,0.000045057066,0.00021119835,0.0002660015,0.00007234887,0.0003574424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021109545,0.00012598424,0.00026005434,0.00053672324,0.0005430461,0.000055110577,0.00038141664,0.00007219515,0.00023286477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038998306,0.0001263,0.00015654575,0.0010882034,0.00010360637,0.00014218812,0.000072863535,0.00027206636,0.000035793164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027005292,0.000032963922,0.2870769,0.000058370624,0.000097474556,0.0002660884,0.00059561664,0.0004990111,0.0000012335759,0.70019233,0.009908662,0.0012686141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044784637,0.0000155499,0.32788014,0.00017380515,0.000011134942,0.0002880813,0.000430045,0.00009490372,0.000015945501,0.038076986,0.63231957,0.00024600726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18403353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.804457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014868968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038577677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82140005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214990654","doi":"","title":"The Death of the Tariff: A Review of the Tax Court's Discretionary Approach to Costs Awards","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; Pace; Economic Justice; Tax reform; Jurisprudence; Administration (probate law); Law and economics; Business; Ad valorem tax; Political science; Law; Public economics; Economics","score_opus":0.030136224375903044,"score_gpt":0.25126339989205226,"score_spread":0.22112717551614922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214990654","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000011445458,0.975586,0.0005304918,0.005028683,0.0003491523,0.00069315336,0.00025645155,0.000003400532,0.017551517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007771045,0.99749386,0.000017074542,0.00029691312,0.00023111429,0.00006680291,0.000006622915,0.000018869296,0.0010916613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975468,0.00012843996,0.0011363149,0.00026183887,0.00017640162,0.00075024064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796265,0.00009395582,0.0014049328,0.00039274673,0.0000934292,0.000052284293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018965573,0.0002682031,0.0012307325,0.00004431199,0.00052400597,0.00003167399,0.0013413616,0.00009264893,0.000012227291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003827552,0.00012332454,0.0011177645,0.00047806065,0.00020471553,0.000055381097,0.0003282594,0.0017874009,0.000029050176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036900688,0.000032795404,0.00011704994,0.0019347692,0.000510629,1.6638505e-7,0.0000141070395,0.0000013812601,1.0191002e-8,0.9299111,0.0011288769,0.06634546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007612414,0.00004069386,0.000090158035,0.0059490865,0.00019295585,0.00013117852,0.00003134667,0.0000025645954,6.032006e-8,0.043582506,0.9497615,0.00014183858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014203534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042013304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9486326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010389453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025171468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77654666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W405642559","doi":"10.7202/028861ar","title":"Compulsory Conciliation in Canada: Do We Need It?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Proposition; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Arbitration; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03947447185840714,"score_gpt":0.19924264033332517,"score_spread":0.15976816847491804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W405642559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45667863,0.031577043,0.0011365631,0.14151837,0.0006865481,0.0003993917,0.0002647928,0.000049000093,0.36768964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683756,0.00042935455,0.00012570599,0.00031598375,0.00010101046,0.000012913912,0.000011500031,0.0000041721787,0.002161795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992671,0.000007952884,0.00038587378,0.00015834131,0.00003920634,0.00014154249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966484,0.00007326216,0.00010984074,0.00009316771,0.000024043024,0.000034839257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010731634,0.00007847662,0.00015335235,0.00010992737,0.00013395814,0.000018436485,0.00007764786,0.00007633036,0.00048534534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080611026,0.00009006426,0.000026752972,0.00028973486,0.00004049227,0.00014886168,0.000026207512,0.00019945501,0.00033450074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042846323,0.000037650898,0.35464203,0.000001027976,0.000030252131,0.0000022482993,0.00041822658,0.013663329,8.3648274e-7,0.5880124,0.03533769,0.007850022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035747985,0.000004990347,0.05449053,0.000018038409,0.0000021427877,0.0000012853139,0.0006836716,0.0027770496,0.000008788865,0.00394731,0.9375692,0.00013951535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2939861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3812748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9022315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007417714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041188003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7107153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206727474","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83872-0_7","title":"Judicial Nominations and Trump’s Complicated Relationship with the Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Studies in US Elections","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Political science; Victory; Law; Judicial independence; Administration (probate law); Balance (ability); Democracy; Judicial review; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; History","score_opus":0.08795475852345698,"score_gpt":0.2587547444624251,"score_spread":0.1707999859389681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206727474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008768235,0.023061192,0.00014410904,0.008231286,0.00038910922,0.0005556791,0.00035545847,0.000050768813,0.9663356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955687,0.0039282264,0.00006139538,0.00040905297,0.00016780283,0.00042690075,0.00005054321,0.000031019103,0.039238047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988663,0.0000135783375,0.0004197369,0.0004203937,0.00006853086,0.00021145398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908817,0.00031887673,0.00028101716,0.00019564659,0.000086485765,0.000029782383],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022317734,0.00024256292,0.00046362463,0.00028592584,0.0017222228,0.000032867378,0.00013058198,0.00008162081,0.00017479037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000858012,0.00020787398,0.00008276481,0.00018277581,0.000812974,0.00003420668,0.00014424183,0.0005787789,0.000059861693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011156781,0.000012257751,0.009796415,0.000011539393,0.00034880306,0.0000043055134,0.0004931161,0.000056895926,8.661345e-8,0.9869847,0.0022015488,0.00007912821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031077702,0.0000907659,0.047109284,0.000030543673,0.000068479785,0.000030401021,0.00018333145,0.000027880329,1.5944859e-7,0.5200897,0.43174034,0.00031835114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031878505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030109189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9548102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034417163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004490531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231746259","doi":"10.4324/9780203583937-18","title":"Keying on Federal Systems with Weak Keystone Constitutions: The Role of Private Versus Public Forest Ownership in U.S. and Canadian Law and Policy Summary of U.S. and Canadian Constitutional Impacts on Global Climate","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.029857785793076526,"score_gpt":0.2108360997781124,"score_spread":0.1809783139850359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231746259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009334241,0.00608489,0.000005542618,0.0015840811,0.00013331987,0.0004334007,0.002503063,0.000008006986,0.9799135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99782795,0.000999449,0.000013314178,0.0003886489,0.00007094694,0.000015340709,0.00005234772,0.000009169735,0.0006228194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986214,0.000013018869,0.00049169094,0.00037224675,0.00008216285,0.00041946437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901325,0.00011246362,0.00028388333,0.00017902178,0.000065032924,0.00034632706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029832672,0.0002949804,0.00057964964,0.00043167116,0.000457804,0.00012454829,0.00012057529,0.00019945863,0.000013897081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000728199,0.00022653239,0.000045053148,0.00008766794,0.0026732155,0.00012293464,0.000056212208,0.00021346209,0.000008641342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076231125,0.0000069206517,0.061830554,0.000062395695,0.00013553088,0.0000056547915,0.00002388994,0.00006599584,9.581675e-8,0.9376358,0.00004193375,0.00011503339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004872173,0.000845911,0.06594185,0.001799205,0.00007055373,0.00017600677,0.00039417853,0.00046593873,0.0000023367957,0.13473354,0.7892701,0.0014282216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8129451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95032835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98849374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063044816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00099052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98495734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238091227","doi":"10.22215/etd/2009-09272","title":"The role of hard law in the WTO and China in regulating economic transactions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"China; Political science; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.010275607685525115,"score_gpt":0.19879674683334414,"score_spread":0.18852113914781904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238091227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43864736,0.010421252,0.000013313482,0.00088164466,0.00016635786,0.0002246282,0.00004899513,0.000005837628,0.54959065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722606,0.0008698671,0.000031005704,0.00004535114,0.000023947843,0.00002783658,0.000016430997,0.000004120202,0.0017553682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992867,0.000009547872,0.00041555785,0.00016279476,0.00001722106,0.00010817872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996744,0.000061197316,0.00014933561,0.000101247555,0.0000050654503,0.000008795563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024358806,0.0000989393,0.00022988649,0.00006793326,0.00016493382,0.000043619748,0.00012173194,0.0000699784,0.00003062786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007757639,0.00006803197,0.000060688646,0.00006218279,0.00005861418,0.000087618646,0.0000031680377,0.00015508836,0.000009760668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015112024,0.000019591836,0.0029869638,0.000008482573,0.000017190352,1.9205926e-7,0.00094638066,0.00010664508,0.0000020721486,0.98931634,0.000015618254,0.0065654353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036054663,0.000033937795,0.61539483,0.00004774814,0.000008582924,0.0000020033485,0.0031708851,0.0008401014,0.00008854403,0.34560904,0.03421882,0.0002249806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007035181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06549115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6437073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045776906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014907372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239875842","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3951197","title":"The Costs of Mistakes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.014055934848406495,"score_gpt":0.1978197360517889,"score_spread":0.1837638012033824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239875842","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20230806,0.48740482,0.008487825,0.0154686505,0.001155879,0.00009476249,0.00004348516,0.000017907345,0.28501862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98236203,0.012775167,0.000017764834,0.00006203022,0.00009911077,0.0000014931009,7.7885517e-7,0.0000032562064,0.0046783444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990682,0.0000091211,0.00024862518,0.000080672944,0.00002989684,0.0005635014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996608,0.00004160178,0.00014108844,0.00007677915,0.000060722352,0.000018999597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005864364,0.000048029793,0.00011657834,0.000018748775,0.00027985248,0.000033523218,0.00011647123,0.000019263214,0.000029273737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011207621,0.000036783647,0.000088437824,0.00009592904,0.0000751381,0.00005675819,0.000015417902,0.00036441695,0.000055182798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005884808,0.000016421549,0.0047988105,9.089938e-7,0.0001079589,0.0000013588481,0.000026034686,0.0000043567993,0.000014110103,0.99131477,0.00014245794,0.003566912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024013956,0.000038416856,0.0021529428,0.000005970822,0.000004603146,0.00012644174,0.00087218836,0.000013125611,0.00010416671,0.8464304,0.14994134,0.000070255395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006583724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006194011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.780054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028300562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046505829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21524274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240900943","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.177","title":"PREFERENCE, PLURALISM, AND PROPORTIONALITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Pluralism (philosophy); Proportionality (law); Social choice theory; Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023434782033723903,"score_gpt":0.17786960044065103,"score_spread":0.15443481840692713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240900943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53895235,0.001468344,0.00030687198,0.00078823365,0.0003194382,0.000046508907,0.00006478236,0.00000871702,0.45804474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979928,0.00024678698,0.0008789309,0.000030031453,0.000050479415,2.9957775e-8,0.0000011000967,0.0000011047367,0.000798699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971014,0.0000035320545,0.00010931194,0.00008064861,0.000026909931,0.00006944795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970585,0.000007358034,0.00013474522,0.000048187692,0.00005053746,0.000053291027],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013323629,0.000040560924,0.000111159265,0.000009239434,0.00030028424,0.000015329664,0.00008721383,0.000032836382,0.0013952833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010743982,0.00004335813,0.000042010346,0.000009583876,0.00022644296,0.000338381,0.00004234863,0.00010216383,0.000012558345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011676963,0.000022943654,0.024861174,0.0000029870187,0.000029693218,0.0000029096334,0.00020311172,6.2065084e-7,0.000028339842,0.974164,0.00034211492,0.0003303927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005135834,0.000039357215,0.22650783,0.0000071052696,0.000008538743,0.000040746876,0.00029516546,0.000020509517,0.000016458267,0.04460342,0.7278277,0.00011956179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01842099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025390623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9295606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036173504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013853666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246890151","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.317","title":"THE VERTICAL RESTRAINTS PARADOX: JUSTIFYING THE DIFFERENT LEGAL TREATMENT OF PRICE AND NON-PRICE VERTICAL RESTRAINTS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vertical restraints; Rule of reason; Resale price maintenance; Supreme court; Competition (biology); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.031081620689989327,"score_gpt":0.20533742162380983,"score_spread":0.1742558009338205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246890151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94513947,0.003994189,0.0006191435,0.0017812864,0.00020701921,0.00010245022,0.000022537766,0.0000047263993,0.048129197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951524,0.004421279,0.0000887999,0.000022656228,0.000060625,1.9329376e-7,4.7562702e-7,0.0000027853816,0.0002507517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993417,0.00002293456,0.00023514156,0.00013083052,0.000079142585,0.00019019487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995162,0.00013446719,0.000090389265,0.00012157361,0.000046529596,0.0000908549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013028023,0.000096885255,0.00023135472,0.000011702263,0.0011204645,0.000022878114,0.00019198161,0.0000423299,0.00009050039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003431612,0.00006519156,0.00011561211,0.000022924882,0.0008112448,0.00018646638,0.0000649777,0.00010081234,0.0000063473703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004549651,0.00039632764,0.023949893,0.000015795642,0.0004957204,0.0001270537,0.0038801667,0.00003377433,0.00007470299,0.96847755,0.00050306314,0.0015909867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023596047,0.0005802511,0.87130123,0.00004173366,0.000081481274,0.0002540727,0.002577555,0.00049152056,0.00011136212,0.0032795225,0.118687175,0.00023451664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072784787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030417237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96519804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026112105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034701225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247022395","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198790952.003.0040","title":"Environmental Taxation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental tax; Public economics; CITES; Direct tax; Environmental law; Tax deferral; Economics; Double taxation; International taxation; Incentive; Business; Tax reform; Political science; State income tax; Law; Gross income; Market economy","score_opus":0.025220127388390575,"score_gpt":0.15307971173881937,"score_spread":0.1278595843504288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247022395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016195829,0.0005332974,0.00019799634,0.000024862093,0.00023595213,0.00016949244,0.00080414495,0.00002724562,0.99784505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020567533,0.0005732034,0.000042841046,0.000053146,0.00006640824,3.6060422e-7,0.000047157057,0.000013612655,0.9786357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937016,0.0000021443955,0.00015459624,0.00030869545,0.000039287366,0.00012508924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993799,0.000012354365,0.0003757958,0.00018573889,0.0000068583413,0.00003936545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000036681282,0.0001678414,0.0002648454,0.00008638344,0.000133539,0.000019530273,0.00018134479,0.00017020077,0.00026058848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002312937,0.00021621879,0.00014651859,0.000002293624,0.0001290203,0.00008193354,0.00018135068,0.00016758443,0.00011790053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015643587,0.0000059591353,0.00017727289,0.000012474796,0.000105721054,0.000009489857,0.00004103039,0.0000050003555,8.464346e-7,0.99790823,0.00092104834,0.00079725066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025720126,0.000022572809,0.0002975437,0.000015673477,0.000019878004,0.0000015415649,0.000007729317,0.000016137865,0.000003948349,0.0077431467,0.99136555,0.00024904753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000555719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005589707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99044454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001991552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018177014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8817146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248178802","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511754456.013","title":"United States – Preliminary Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada: What is a Subsidy?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Subsidy; Pulp and paper industry; Agricultural economics; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02125862261501185,"score_gpt":0.1728134672367563,"score_spread":0.15155484462174446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248178802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077205882,0.0020688432,0.00042720654,0.00074075063,0.00025566606,0.0005265253,0.0046251463,0.00006842784,0.9835668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020737596,0.00069358497,0.00017618753,0.00091304677,0.00013829212,0.0000041193025,0.00041004358,0.000040587343,0.9768866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986264,0.000011037603,0.0002954912,0.00065655774,0.0001205179,0.00028999627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989388,0.00008769604,0.00029414153,0.00035540087,0.00015455495,0.00016941637],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006135093,0.00036409934,0.0004921117,0.00026393888,0.00027500736,0.00011409292,0.00033729733,0.0001812761,0.000043788925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000865966,0.000429893,0.0001037305,0.000029792769,0.0001547672,0.00025458864,0.00023620808,0.00027485253,0.000044225977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053715345,0.000028514845,0.00025121355,0.00006047595,0.00059538666,0.00051037554,0.0005243884,0.00010105447,7.952885e-7,0.93956494,0.05557361,0.0022520744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005352578,0.000099238336,0.00077191344,0.00021002426,0.000084623505,0.0000065826252,0.00014083798,0.00016811176,0.000038333503,0.00011969089,0.99722445,0.0006009577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36330965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0443468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9416508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085930503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021479646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252950258","doi":"10.1108/s1059-433720140000065015","title":"Editorial Board","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Politics; State (computer science); Sociology; Publishing; Political science","score_opus":0.021292962736405956,"score_gpt":0.21045226505618064,"score_spread":0.18915930231977468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252950258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000038093065,0.0031390593,0.0009497475,0.00037777566,0.31030393,0.000056130695,0.00022825247,0.000015549123,0.68492573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001994451,0.0007098368,0.000082648476,0.00044480312,0.27624348,0.000030757335,0.00008739989,0.000014992013,0.72039163],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989998,0.0000042295646,0.00038851114,0.00036002113,0.000040455914,0.00020703133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995041,0.000028730197,0.00019238637,0.00018676581,0.00003786224,0.000050195027],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013253037,0.00018639352,0.0005045367,0.0000878594,0.00012135975,0.000072985255,0.0002074464,0.00028469315,0.014822636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040377985,0.00018119578,0.00016812277,0.000066674125,0.00008653151,0.000059916954,0.000095144685,0.00023710348,0.29516512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027875892,0.000009146243,0.00003679593,0.000012694575,0.000045724217,1.03834104e-7,0.0000051433094,0.000004199051,7.3525754e-8,0.28670445,0.71312857,0.00005031271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017618132,0.000020729343,0.000025184178,0.000008692743,0.0000032917567,2.6842426e-7,0.0000016921341,0.000005749699,0.0000015921778,0.009394904,0.99010146,0.00026024965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089560763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023151752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2803425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007123867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033951634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98607796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281252944","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac008","title":"Using Criminal Law to Fight Corruption: The Potential, Risks, and Limitations of Operation Car Wash (<i>Lava Jato</i>)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Language change; Jurisprudence; Cognitive reframing; Law; Politics; Political science; Scope (computer science); Lava; Criminal law; Organised crime; State (computer science); Relation (database); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.21081420278299623,"score_gpt":0.32044446383525477,"score_spread":0.10963026105225854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281252944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.975303,0.0033616428,0.009321622,0.004164078,0.00018193397,0.00007678278,0.000043638713,0.0000021858207,0.007545135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969649,0.00035049315,0.0011942189,0.0013219696,0.000116781484,0.0000016085651,0.0000012988963,0.0000033088224,0.00004547068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992649,0.00007422249,0.00040742877,0.00009481037,0.00006576409,0.00009289023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989831,0.00016785807,0.00046051055,0.00010356274,0.0002441006,0.00004087991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023431728,0.00008128515,0.00034538563,0.000029627541,0.0003711243,0.00006673653,0.00012766256,0.000009302847,0.000020336363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017587501,0.000053828735,0.0000824882,0.000184492,0.00064875395,0.00016896249,0.000052782663,0.00012218523,0.000011955398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063036125,0.000044433556,0.0003827089,0.0000028420766,0.00014722321,0.000004131711,0.002684568,0.008187252,0.0009609912,0.98704207,0.00022509955,0.00025566647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040481957,0.003846437,0.2049665,0.00040895378,0.0011190684,0.002067053,0.075519174,0.015944239,0.017565424,0.34015194,0.33262837,0.0017346545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032611977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016366008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6468901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031941152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043700857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28544256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312039672","doi":"10.18601/16571959.n34.02","title":"El Agotamiento de los derechos de autor como un remedio","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016809518598629874,"score_gpt":0.2389227136066448,"score_spread":0.22211319500801494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312039672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.965548,0.010434082,0.00046284153,0.0012655626,0.0019691375,0.0006841428,0.0021728189,0.00010615048,0.017357258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99469864,0.0017044572,0.00047379767,0.00051782274,0.0010284156,0.00030187695,0.0000824819,0.00004409772,0.0011483976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760073,0.00019979273,0.0008309473,0.0005834339,0.00013810085,0.00064696185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893034,0.00006553131,0.0004536295,0.00034554172,0.00004912787,0.00015581197],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010507837,0.0003258947,0.0006642041,0.00014931899,0.00086500985,0.00056360365,0.0005221956,0.0001433182,0.0022102841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014805648,0.00037145542,0.00022060025,0.0002762708,0.00025835313,0.00017948008,0.00064761343,0.0003831027,0.00030517697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026121386,0.00039195793,0.06582585,0.0006329519,0.00029227033,0.00011067207,0.0007759384,0.000042948617,0.0006267541,0.9255187,0.0032098307,0.0023109445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011653587,0.00019626592,0.018622084,0.00011889043,0.000054090196,0.000092566515,0.0000914832,0.00023290022,0.00032910216,0.0054533156,0.97310024,0.0005436801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045378495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000039238585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9698904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009841246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003402792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319986827","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4344790","title":"A Commentary on Stephen Tierney's 'The Federal Contract'","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.018451255284872986,"score_gpt":0.21529729305867945,"score_spread":0.19684603777380646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319986827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5878382,0.019181771,0.0018245586,0.28195852,0.0024916346,0.00048578408,0.00013705014,0.00018621585,0.10589632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98782253,0.0029334284,0.0000035149874,0.0050335014,0.00053403317,0.000011371754,0.000006332359,0.000009856661,0.0036454464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983987,0.000017237886,0.00027588222,0.00014885025,0.000057562174,0.0011017756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996453,0.00006170035,0.00013488502,0.000100318815,0.000017231274,0.000040573563],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001003854,0.000105507555,0.00017325248,0.00007964542,0.0006368689,0.000087874345,0.00021965025,0.00003386759,0.000075383505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035440004,0.00008050895,0.000120906254,0.00016690615,0.00007200999,0.00011532816,0.000043569824,0.0009013082,0.001293251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030205925,0.000033713026,0.012513654,0.0000011685225,0.00021219206,0.000004815564,0.00010133479,0.00005197363,0.0000014617748,0.96609694,0.018018855,0.0029336722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006939195,0.00018188673,0.011858453,0.000007391145,0.0000062604972,0.000054476703,0.0004356246,0.00018014846,0.0000038004714,0.70198715,0.28443527,0.0001556017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034798452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041521667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39998436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005077925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014392436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386271801","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x23001140","title":"Unpacking the nudge muddle","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Unpacking; Autonomy; Nudge theory; Frame (networking); Raising (metalworking); State (computer science); Psychology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Behavioural economics; Economics; Political science; Positive economics; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.18857706828346532,"score_gpt":0.2947006606526957,"score_spread":0.10612359236923036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386271801","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016077971,0.0027396297,0.00001090914,0.96551895,0.0010608418,0.00013590459,0.00023128741,0.00005468242,0.014169849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09562725,0.00039035923,0.00009449947,0.8638044,0.0027162223,0.0001037147,0.00004728415,0.000026457494,0.037189815],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988939,0.000013017057,0.00026219152,0.00043565698,0.00008982435,0.00030536935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956554,0.00012562194,0.00015003436,0.0001207006,0.00001522576,0.000022852886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051097583,0.00015629362,0.00025014483,0.00010486143,0.00084394676,0.00028104478,0.0003754279,0.00014102612,0.00009400692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039972154,0.00010255945,0.000091770096,0.00034888825,0.0010822582,0.0001503664,0.0001809866,0.00038360478,0.00042507783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.5393202e-7,0.000008216104,0.008870704,0.000009065023,0.000008004926,0.00002508999,0.00017939087,6.4637385e-7,0.000001020279,0.03615055,0.95362425,0.0011226049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053336687,0.000039660554,0.005579554,0.000011932324,0.0000059881177,0.0000075239036,0.00009331141,0.000013898377,0.0000013034343,0.020923337,0.9730778,0.00019238285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011692878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000707349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10171453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021544318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030283349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6491041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386489613","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3744","title":"Law &amp; Leviathan: Redeeming the Administrative State by Cass R. Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Constitution; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Bureaucracy; Separation of powers; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Administrative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.051863275447990166,"score_gpt":0.23485964965212572,"score_spread":0.18299637420413556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386489613","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0322571,0.0163104,0.00037234888,0.007875501,0.0007505143,0.0001813115,0.0008971292,0.000023631392,0.94133204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958135,0.00032899188,0.00010941812,0.00088904216,0.000118171476,0.000021633374,0.00001127557,0.000011098688,0.0026969095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989667,0.000047309557,0.00039543194,0.00022917536,0.00008953161,0.00027184412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994062,0.000064939646,0.0002771679,0.00012851795,0.000028178325,0.000094973526],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005932582,0.0001369698,0.00024019132,0.00002721303,0.0024688456,0.00021523949,0.00021888578,0.000025868629,0.000471856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002152363,0.00011757048,0.00008830261,0.00009000883,0.0002561521,0.00022547854,0.00017023754,0.0004589548,0.00005261458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025937601,0.000044961624,0.0010361185,0.0000041370668,0.00008977764,0.000025440706,0.00057312805,0.000037658974,0.000033270993,0.99486405,0.003065618,0.00019990384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005167819,0.00010834278,0.00042512457,0.000009438198,0.000010802245,0.00037944107,0.0004520626,0.000034726214,0.000054036962,0.17117141,0.8266199,0.0002179184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011423819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022411529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96355635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012771132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030973653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388146795","doi":"10.24124/c677/20191518","title":"The Effect of Trudeau’s New Senate Selection Process in Perspective: The Senate’s Review of Commons Bills, 1997-2019","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Legislation; Legislature; Commons; Legislative process; House of Representatives; Government (linguistics); Political science; Select committee; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.017774292803406828,"score_gpt":0.27657113025121527,"score_spread":0.25879683744780846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388146795","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037781463,0.8801622,0.000004289907,0.08835316,0.0001401886,0.00047332825,0.00009630737,0.00000421094,0.026988175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86678654,0.1306666,0.000004745519,0.0023150332,0.000033189095,0.000022500226,0.0000017716907,0.0000036777465,0.00016591806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985758,0.00006657079,0.00046438238,0.00024684885,0.00009476883,0.0005516396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905,0.00013761329,0.00013169432,0.00020640546,0.00016934422,0.00030491073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018612138,0.0000994464,0.0004410984,0.00006515761,0.0002527786,0.000026133772,0.00034041505,0.00002488654,0.00005883561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029447211,0.000058836005,0.000112649315,0.00156209,0.0007433154,0.00010804763,0.000040581483,0.00015089435,0.00003611136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.4727476e-7,0.000005658352,0.0026092962,0.0018296784,0.000010040666,0.0000015811033,0.000019427276,4.666141e-7,0.0000021573999,0.9932716,0.0011722557,0.001077192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005689807,0.0002016791,0.031623676,0.037401,0.00013164945,0.00015115998,0.00021394507,0.0001045983,0.0015350244,0.09441091,0.8329852,0.00067217555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078925826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0390005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8988607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006387677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001610898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97853523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388477453","doi":"10.53095/88975019","title":"Economic Freedom of North America 2023 Full Dataset","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic freedom; Index of Economic Freedom; Payroll; Index (typography); Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Investment (military); Economics; Economic growth; Business; Economic policy; Political science; Law; Politics; Market economy","score_opus":0.09410896982138024,"score_gpt":0.27082184837407675,"score_spread":0.17671287855269652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388477453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012144239,0.0055636195,0.0002508026,0.00054267433,0.004864106,0.00028949027,0.24782333,0.000084557054,0.739367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11501714,0.18686914,0.0021801635,0.0010698498,0.009852678,0.00069792196,0.1879294,0.00048219445,0.4959015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796265,0.0000050877343,0.0010805872,0.0005859551,0.000081272614,0.0002844412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846345,0.00007579123,0.0008242402,0.00050204725,0.000063576925,0.000070878246],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000264551,0.00027275155,0.001002059,0.00028416497,0.00009417921,0.00003317234,0.00040570885,0.00013015092,0.002294677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012983632,0.00028307625,0.00025127878,0.00019562631,0.00026942743,0.00011238749,0.00034616454,0.00021775864,0.016407488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007834745,0.000034319342,0.016105853,0.00010501777,0.0004547972,0.000010646179,0.000009834237,0.00023816274,6.6182956e-8,0.0154921245,0.96653515,0.0010062051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012422312,0.000043557848,0.01825876,0.000018146557,0.000021203612,0.0000046384425,0.000010122884,0.00006753663,3.9303228e-7,0.0012078823,0.9799153,0.00032820491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027759135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010245471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24346548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029316815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036579338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388478180","doi":"10.53095/88975016","title":"Economic Freedom of North America 2023 U.S. Edition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic freedom; Index of Economic Freedom; Index (typography); Payroll; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Freedom of information; Economics; Investment (military); Economic growth; Economic policy; Business; Political science; Law; Politics; Market economy; Accounting","score_opus":0.07074158212859458,"score_gpt":0.25154770029946444,"score_spread":0.18080611817086986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388478180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013278623,0.0032986875,0.00043709791,0.0004942722,0.007573509,0.00020654952,0.007826416,0.00009313518,0.9787425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3411069,0.11313933,0.0008717866,0.00039483345,0.013558668,0.0004929084,0.006333019,0.00025020036,0.52385235],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829817,0.0000040896834,0.00093391445,0.00045563153,0.00007936897,0.00022884317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987396,0.000059213475,0.0007767604,0.00027521112,0.00009681507,0.000052403295],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021690612,0.0002224096,0.0008177787,0.000291111,0.00009061318,0.00002522435,0.00022615113,0.00013675542,0.0018195717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011840581,0.00023720672,0.00031002855,0.000186968,0.0002208056,0.000109195935,0.00015379257,0.00018972227,0.010305386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067506394,0.000051587358,0.044439387,0.00016333166,0.0005383534,0.000008188523,0.00002478434,0.000473218,1.00875475e-7,0.0564301,0.89503115,0.0028330435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010941525,0.000035483634,0.07152841,0.000025658162,0.000016356486,0.0000024084552,0.000010606505,0.00006616658,0.0000010354454,0.004049304,0.9238766,0.0002785977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017068388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038683622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4548901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003764956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031946762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388522666","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4589547","title":"Foxes, Henhouses, and the Constitutional Guarantee of Judicial Review: Re-Evaluating Crevier","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Judicial review; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03902906693454574,"score_gpt":0.2698272884683029,"score_spread":0.23079822153375715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388522666","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0252092,0.9367784,0.0014702622,0.016503423,0.0005662546,0.0004093579,0.00006945812,0.000031783766,0.018961828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59463036,0.40411207,0.000028449072,0.0003694985,0.00020925142,0.000014766589,0.0000039832707,0.000005210557,0.0006264067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984081,0.000048975246,0.0006030913,0.00016598223,0.00009722721,0.0006766182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930984,0.00012793232,0.00036572784,0.000100548474,0.00007388897,0.000022076385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046563167,0.00010804843,0.0004132475,0.00008084617,0.00041997895,0.000023666722,0.00017103447,0.000032994543,0.00006145284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056093204,0.00007868206,0.0001572077,0.0002920162,0.0007429032,0.000119003176,0.00006764159,0.00057090644,0.000121072946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031113766,0.0000100674715,0.0019942992,0.000034165863,0.00016338361,7.274842e-7,0.000042979373,0.00001043545,0.0000025466206,0.9927389,0.0015454434,0.0034259493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010608657,0.00008044615,0.0012117582,0.00021647851,0.00004915848,0.00007588442,0.00013965818,0.00013108795,0.0000020336952,0.91949177,0.077404976,0.00013588664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013713524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008125638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5694212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014762294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000534508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3230181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391917408","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4712033","title":"Time to Reboot: The Federal Zev Mandate Requires Flexibility","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Reboot; Mandate; Flexibility (engineering); Business; Operating system; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01990571559332819,"score_gpt":0.2319325540593694,"score_spread":0.21202683846604123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391917408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39821434,0.15674323,0.012100788,0.12355638,0.0024243665,0.00065403315,0.00016956963,0.00027178574,0.3058655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611127,0.0013063431,0.000020755322,0.00052050437,0.00052747194,0.000010241585,0.0000021190451,0.00001142055,0.03648848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983196,0.000017118015,0.00034232042,0.00025381765,0.000055143075,0.0010119873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996823,0.000039225884,0.00005915294,0.00014022551,0.00002491849,0.00005417912],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016291522,0.00011715401,0.00017928168,0.00007831449,0.00049630407,0.00024934832,0.0002482043,0.000037145568,0.00042894096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000068008914,0.000083482526,0.00014638883,0.00018046377,0.00009860639,0.00020809859,0.00007469986,0.0007985781,0.005142818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002301023,0.000015017448,0.00037389586,0.000004494538,0.00017350308,0.00000417701,0.0001462285,0.00004412442,0.000010118226,0.98922867,0.0033129444,0.0066638445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093953924,0.00008399677,0.00062709197,0.000012726774,0.000005679557,0.00010803003,0.00007635735,0.00019889194,0.0000075021094,0.61754626,0.38112372,0.000115828414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012238078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021831045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56289834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000651187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038325947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395036906","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2024.72.1.pf.farrar","title":"Policy Forum: Using Retributive Justice To Ensure Public Trust in Canada's Tax System","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Retributive justice; Economic Justice; Business; Law and economics; Public administration; Political science; Public relations; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.028951140835770703,"score_gpt":0.1963999068894374,"score_spread":0.1674487660536667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395036906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51387936,0.02113683,0.0017374931,0.33728784,0.012631486,0.0011413903,0.03216192,0.00008159507,0.079942055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99215037,0.00007868805,0.00014542934,0.0013358298,0.0010257832,0.000024807987,0.000023742688,0.000040619627,0.0051747276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695426,0.00003474779,0.00082076417,0.00053900765,0.00007048621,0.0015807026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721754,0.00007105113,0.0001874553,0.00026828272,0.00016580042,0.002089883],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053162134,0.00030071827,0.0005790325,0.0015772119,0.00061749114,0.00034487026,0.00045624012,0.00014904937,0.00017089584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006952964,0.0003502616,0.00013527418,0.0019106752,0.00006654005,0.00033896518,0.000059347265,0.00069526385,0.00011180662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013479111,0.000013921371,0.052190095,0.0003921937,0.0003092196,0.00526551,0.0012059268,0.0015604504,0.000006793061,0.8043135,0.13060667,0.004122248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037026234,0.00005276815,0.019303093,0.0005403915,0.000044491502,0.0017140264,0.003506186,0.0051590884,0.0000053351528,0.0044203503,0.9640703,0.0008137151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99779934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8334636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025272196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076998845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399922939","doi":"10.1093/9780198921677.001.0001","title":"Deference in Human Rights Adjudication","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Deference; Human rights; Political science; Law and economics; Judicial deference; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03876829653038397,"score_gpt":0.21970123454788443,"score_spread":0.18093293801750046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399922939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012669862,0.0077900193,0.00008268966,0.00025231944,0.0002877561,0.000104583065,0.000100016616,0.000041682953,0.9912142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.112285435,0.00009439912,0.000032399108,0.00008050491,0.00015699766,0.000030311126,0.00007715387,0.000008696702,0.8872341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990867,0.0000020415039,0.00040060582,0.00036025638,0.000026047866,0.00012434396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997063,0.000016186466,0.00009997521,0.00013946816,0.0000136976005,0.000024367679],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010653306,0.00014033262,0.00029718145,0.00023277069,0.00008975857,0.00004326681,0.00014223372,0.00016667848,0.0010921638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000057899692,0.00013675197,0.00008282472,0.00007390115,0.0000805775,0.000066985725,0.00007154514,0.00026349945,0.0073733167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.4308026e-7,0.000010372134,0.00023831331,0.000025776031,0.000026742639,0.000004983865,0.000028094712,9.1370555e-7,1.0499001e-7,0.95267946,0.04692501,0.00005969573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036909616,0.00000542654,0.00043329352,0.00003768053,0.0000023309115,4.759372e-7,5.1015246e-7,0.0000066330704,7.818628e-7,0.50033337,0.49903834,0.00010424986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075665873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013404493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4523461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002531245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003724986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400676643","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2024.07.004","title":"Blindingly transparent – anonymity in an era of openness: a reply to Cardini","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Australian Research Council; Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada","keywords":"Anonymity; Openness to experience; Internet privacy; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Computer security; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06232772901103905,"score_gpt":0.2792305639629643,"score_spread":0.21690283495192525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400676643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46521613,0.0053357915,0.0001805763,0.4968077,0.004597565,0.00059411145,0.0017987814,0.000081323255,0.025388012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716381,0.00008217362,0.00011641224,0.026152287,0.0005229795,0.00021369423,0.00024375747,0.00002291852,0.001007684],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977067,0.0000561805,0.00096575974,0.0007859413,0.000057888483,0.00042750034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993423,0.000059022695,0.00022484611,0.00030047738,0.00003484958,0.00003850579],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004992367,0.0002618017,0.0009141428,0.0012394144,0.00005688986,0.000023560046,0.00030800345,0.00050977146,0.00023571034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050054183,0.00029981844,0.0001786488,0.00086778624,0.00014998035,0.00018302786,0.00009428122,0.0011494705,0.00024168649],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012844749,0.00036364832,0.6338782,0.0002025518,0.00022858202,0.0002843642,0.0012737885,0.0014900313,0.0000037678976,0.038523268,0.32180333,0.0018200622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062136864,0.00027377365,0.7348405,0.00010572455,0.000028791923,0.000008864532,0.00003767725,0.00024489372,0.000002590952,0.011751675,0.2516775,0.000406584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025034111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009873593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.506422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091931777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007711084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401809788","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v13i1.70911","title":"Mandatory Mask ByLaws: Consideration Beyond Exemption for Persons with Disabilities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.09281925096524928,"score_gpt":0.26491568400371646,"score_spread":0.17209643303846717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401809788","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056841105,0.0015742866,0.03519238,0.72810435,0.00011924922,0.0012184934,0.0026096308,0.00018474615,0.17415573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99405736,0.000040558247,0.0006948168,0.002302017,0.0003266438,0.00040394606,0.00009421338,0.000012448937,0.002067983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990178,0.000022777887,0.00040195655,0.00025768095,0.00006554458,0.00023429337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989745,0.0001675451,0.0002549255,0.00027848568,0.00017199696,0.00015257078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036526262,0.0001202705,0.00022211114,0.00015328295,0.00044753466,0.00018715822,0.00027450692,0.000047163296,0.00034726606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018285502,0.00009466984,0.00010137552,0.00048249244,0.00046299002,0.0007310666,0.000058840546,0.00010910063,0.00015662058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008651896,0.00004309841,0.024786254,0.000019965142,0.000082965795,1.3475277e-8,0.0005948537,0.000012616365,0.000015070813,0.9582487,0.016046695,0.00014116694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001210007,0.00019627305,0.068457425,0.000009296686,0.00003665527,0.0000061386354,0.003017678,0.0006443321,0.000051609077,0.19004846,0.73594195,0.00038018875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031208762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009239507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9372163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106336236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033650955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38605243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404667689","doi":"10.1017/s1049096524000660","title":"The Decriminalization of Abortion in Latin America: A Tale of Gradual Judicialization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Decriminalization; Abortion; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Political science; Latin Americans; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.0384592475274011,"score_gpt":0.28415668204555034,"score_spread":0.24569743451814924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404667689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9220751,0.0021875757,0.015775492,0.004262661,0.00067454844,0.00020242373,0.00012980912,0.000030685358,0.054661725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956244,0.00007549909,0.000086382446,0.000117261414,0.00006211217,0.000006889188,0.000003820573,0.0000035031405,0.00008209303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988364,0.000010034035,0.0004811438,0.00017419203,0.00010976853,0.0003884446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999543,0.00011604869,0.00008227846,0.00009760326,0.000087012246,0.000074066455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003927857,0.00006265584,0.00015061775,0.00016277799,0.0001382087,0.000045895315,0.00014786918,0.000026760212,0.00001319735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006698154,0.000051880143,0.000042938253,0.0006704422,0.0015516958,0.0001664526,0.00004974368,0.000057849094,0.000020094292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013023396,0.000028459635,0.01695847,0.000022858787,0.0000036871884,5.234655e-7,0.0002994612,0.000025612386,0.0000483618,0.9822949,0.000021840691,0.0002945201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008160922,0.000054878907,0.12905589,0.000048415666,0.000007625736,0.0000018657623,0.00034057375,0.0072658462,0.0011046914,0.8563367,0.0056026075,0.000099257144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028365527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004971672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12595816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001888283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018117546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57172877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411054569","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0077","title":"Constitutional silence, section 36, and public services on Indian reserves","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Section (typography); Political science; Law; Business; Art; Advertising; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.013415727894647027,"score_gpt":0.18240255632641983,"score_spread":0.1689868284317728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411054569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23717445,0.0050086426,0.00051584473,0.0016606051,0.0005555832,0.00005490991,0.00008598722,0.000012358321,0.7549316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820954,0.0008208235,0.00014314924,0.000104732215,0.000055549932,7.0500754e-8,0.0000023995394,7.173228e-7,0.000663029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996179,0.000010023377,0.00012375669,0.00011470329,0.00003544158,0.000098187396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969804,0.00002136602,0.00011817673,0.00005253721,0.000060119506,0.00004974841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001276755,0.0000563881,0.00013132337,0.000041282456,0.00067838194,0.000043666987,0.00011989666,0.000046469002,0.00038935224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000100997095,0.00006415979,0.00005045366,0.000039380142,0.00041153448,0.00053926447,0.000057247933,0.00009244132,0.000010187512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003724075,0.000040164974,0.030585617,0.000016658147,0.00008209817,0.0000058212718,0.00020722531,0.000019171823,0.0000023743225,0.96826017,0.00037474342,0.00036873517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011382974,0.00011484321,0.13640851,0.00011901009,0.000015190848,0.000029739336,0.0045027,0.00007815588,0.000012799859,0.030728227,0.8266753,0.00017724841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020937841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017178383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93753195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001656708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030093432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9855818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413372890","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhaf023","title":"Consumer Privacy and Anticompetitive Exclusion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Internet privacy; Consumer privacy; Law and economics; Information privacy; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.016622445873949336,"score_gpt":0.2186018105545711,"score_spread":0.20197936468062175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413372890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69370174,0.00711393,0.0042720735,0.0063846027,0.0013797532,0.00013006869,0.00007995936,0.000015098936,0.28692275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99445003,0.003032098,0.00082600204,0.0012436371,0.00011159409,0.0000019572062,0.0000028191505,0.000005258219,0.00032661215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901134,0.000012209306,0.0006839168,0.00015000768,0.000018776087,0.00012376628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922144,0.00008429668,0.0004523845,0.00009565626,0.000092103546,0.000054118027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029371472,0.00010613389,0.00039348484,0.00014965837,0.00019546454,0.00008264619,0.00012756612,0.000053248084,0.0001353532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003954017,0.0001136325,0.00010930849,0.00006889219,0.00024375923,0.00034746813,0.00009711057,0.00014457398,0.00005627272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030190278,0.000052158968,0.013089048,0.000016322127,0.00009384131,0.0000029145967,0.00006166352,0.000039169914,0.000013653667,0.98615026,0.00017048387,0.000280299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096974365,0.00005655612,0.026087226,0.000076183635,0.000017265858,0.000041664825,0.00006073234,0.00013692782,0.0001332162,0.33533758,0.63693917,0.00014370939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045711495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022111613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6508127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010444556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004688034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4633799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414528786","doi":"10.53555/sfs.v10i1.2008","title":"Analysis Of The Controversial Provisions Of Anti-conversion Ordinance In Recent Years","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Magistrate; Bad faith; Witness; Declaration; Undue influence; Self-incrimination; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.1034170627603832,"score_gpt":0.24834420991159742,"score_spread":0.14492714715121421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414528786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99388987,0.0009415934,0.000034571916,0.001115806,0.00042876604,0.000042688444,0.000045477158,4.5891295e-7,0.003500766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991616,0.00067186257,0.000041478903,0.000044613418,0.000004608911,4.3484764e-7,2.874145e-7,5.600885e-7,0.000074558906],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991333,0.000044311375,0.0005702297,0.00009221426,0.00007469379,0.00008525112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916846,0.00017693153,0.0004938057,0.00006423078,0.000086969,0.00000963497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016630334,0.000042544478,0.0003676708,0.00040178746,0.000051141687,0.000014631339,0.0002836179,0.000025311643,0.00003605137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006689392,0.000031486194,0.00010045721,0.002451289,0.00048357574,0.00020800078,0.000065527565,0.00008030467,3.6689295e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026437081,0.000048841568,0.99299777,0.000004825537,0.000056571524,6.8945536e-7,0.00013889819,0.00075970206,0.000012828909,0.0054874336,0.00022498563,0.00024099695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024858932,0.00003595423,0.99492383,0.000033116667,0.000010702044,1.9886993e-7,0.00015838379,0.00009597243,0.000046991463,0.00091097015,0.00350369,0.000031602798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027430325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019927747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052717226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054404074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012761418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4146663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W639320128","doi":"","title":"Economic and legal analyses of trade policy and institutions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Blackwell eBooks","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free trade; Political science; International trade law; Law; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.069168866136693,"score_gpt":0.27763923643680405,"score_spread":0.20847037030011106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W639320128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012659548,0.010375286,0.000044066557,0.00047358562,0.00011597212,0.00016443185,0.00076923345,0.000021176003,0.9867703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3193527,0.0035663066,0.0002171842,0.00055426144,0.0011707275,0.000023140077,0.000045597186,0.000036205853,0.67503387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987565,0.0000057333536,0.00060247217,0.00040642277,0.000029859748,0.00019899402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931335,0.000047563888,0.00034571596,0.00019207867,0.000010402832,0.00009088695],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010300209,0.0002617429,0.000667228,0.00036055472,0.00015453805,0.000055480825,0.00012626302,0.00019027287,0.00006139597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021848045,0.00028484137,0.00014372816,0.000022404987,0.00082135515,0.000099872304,0.00012135125,0.00018845573,0.00009352998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007668385,0.000011581887,0.00012139089,0.000055910634,0.0002089686,0.0000034707205,0.00006394462,0.000023778397,0.0000030592712,0.9935079,0.004263215,0.0017291155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035152334,0.00003753416,0.0006994965,0.000041876538,0.000047619018,0.000018197876,0.000007927224,0.000035048753,0.000028207167,0.04434571,0.9540886,0.00029822628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069203076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003283491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9498254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021408852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044998628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6945806566","doi":"10.25959/23240630","title":"A basic economic case for reordering the patent market with gain-based remedies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UTAS Research Repository","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Patent law; Blame; Patent troll; Opportunism; Government (linguistics); Tort; Punitive damages; Patent Act","score_opus":0.1234505245975828,"score_gpt":0.3131231704723479,"score_spread":0.1896726458747651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6945806566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2158467,0.019040542,0.000099292636,0.0015030076,0.002676901,0.0023794607,0.0006441375,0.0000703701,0.7577396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91492003,0.000322692,0.0000968916,0.000033800592,0.00065634644,0.0012535551,0.000121344914,0.000049179922,0.08254617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819714,0.000054563887,0.00049090333,0.0006291225,0.00012919976,0.0004990592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981744,0.0004253869,0.00041951812,0.00066648674,0.00022387375,0.00009028189],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014184406,0.0002501347,0.0004407288,0.00024847442,0.002443883,0.00042156922,0.00047849715,0.0001604989,0.00007900926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030219057,0.00019129642,0.00019172688,0.00006226471,0.00040778905,0.00012988987,0.00005051881,0.0005087505,0.00007478536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012060821,0.0010309765,0.042204767,0.0080524385,0.0072905584,0.011173112,0.007437185,0.0020797872,0.00040743907,0.5416289,0.33921453,0.027419481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020386442,0.0006683111,0.010362019,0.0006859411,0.0000868308,0.0003742801,0.0023123226,0.0048136623,0.0016194346,0.009693466,0.9661808,0.0011643008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039690426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003301955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6990733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044225986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045496534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6964767617","doi":"10.25959/23240630.v1","title":"A basic economic case for reordering the patent market with gain-based remedies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Patent law; Blame; Patent troll; Opportunism; Government (linguistics); Tort; Punitive damages; Patent Act","score_opus":0.0965410293197438,"score_gpt":0.24310402823664265,"score_spread":0.14656299891689883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6964767617","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034646865,0.009809268,0.000008374646,0.0008169577,0.00093294063,0.0015680691,0.67167646,0.00007637644,0.31164688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75062203,0.00012476383,0.00014234873,0.00045445748,0.0010505699,0.006471907,0.18650551,0.00012727505,0.054501154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990194,0.0000053977615,0.0003146377,0.00039618555,0.000028968276,0.00023541492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883074,0.00014682359,0.0005614884,0.00035121897,0.000069984024,0.00003973232],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010425329,0.00024240465,0.0003664277,0.000075397475,0.00073827,0.00018928558,0.00028155168,0.00011712119,0.023573065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037534937,0.00018856367,0.00017112806,0.00002564207,0.000021962329,0.00009787598,0.00002442434,0.00015768976,0.0006643193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051618053,0.0000671849,0.00071767357,0.0023299695,0.0007534761,0.00036214644,0.0006182345,0.0004287187,6.666045e-7,0.009689561,0.97866255,0.0058536534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006219585,0.000072088376,0.002719691,0.0011866749,0.000028912662,0.0000327488,0.00020791483,0.0010844581,0.000036339618,0.0011858519,0.9923393,0.00048402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002627169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003376165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74715734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012841471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000144092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97731954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990170516","doi":"","title":"A Contribution to Both Legal History and Constitutional Theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutional economics; Constitutional theory; Obligation; Constitutional right; Constitutional law; Politics; Bill of rights; Statutory law","score_opus":0.026476677363459364,"score_gpt":0.21508143675327226,"score_spread":0.18860475938981291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990170516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12595882,0.057283264,0.04048139,0.0055447156,0.003563538,0.0006947223,0.0006354435,0.00022019999,0.7656179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99242026,0.00003939816,0.00035593085,0.0032139053,0.0002561806,0.000043468863,0.000016910655,0.000005658049,0.0036482762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907887,0.000020240543,0.00029506502,0.00031269295,0.000062811276,0.00023029253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993744,0.000040116556,0.0000867612,0.00013786282,0.00008209386,0.00027876848],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005506495,0.00013065967,0.00025628664,0.00006893135,0.00017117054,0.000055271586,0.00010758142,0.00006592552,0.0003076377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036163098,0.000138021,0.00005561113,0.00007812744,0.0009654906,0.0003436757,0.00008945133,0.00013592308,0.0014666033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050591567,0.000033256278,0.007565173,0.0000039132674,0.00003669706,0.000007688383,0.000053023945,0.00001918541,0.000010746292,0.98123986,0.010925351,0.000054501077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063264434,0.000047426445,0.003599704,0.000011446611,0.000005390757,0.000016769074,0.00002295687,0.000017265782,0.000014374374,0.12464323,0.870806,0.00018280096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000527205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009224377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86646146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004988812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014322842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017733514","doi":"","title":"Bird TakeâDeath Trade","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rulemaking; Treaty; Wildlife; Externality; Resource (disambiguation); Service (business); Superfund; Natural resource","score_opus":0.034691070834234346,"score_gpt":0.205780884027707,"score_spread":0.17108981319347266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017733514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19288363,0.0032396852,0.00030922517,0.014189646,0.00073631865,0.00029226122,0.0072029997,0.0009205341,0.7802257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960649,0.000075048876,0.00020465624,0.0007758849,0.00026485662,0.000018787321,0.00003978297,0.000061349245,0.0024947084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998703,0.000005722,0.00043423212,0.0004302974,0.000065542015,0.00036119853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989856,0.00003222826,0.00027773264,0.00051979895,0.0000071316945,0.00017753278],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000112973394,0.00021584949,0.0003281678,0.00009182869,0.00073679595,0.0024700062,0.0006989286,0.00010127017,0.00054290064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027180882,0.00021268641,0.00020389244,0.00008556114,0.00024956668,0.004393609,0.0002869801,0.00025823343,0.018967854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016335855,0.00007021339,0.58620954,0.000011029035,0.000044844495,0.000018863044,0.000008676411,7.8088374e-7,0.0000023045307,0.40838772,0.0031672218,0.0020624737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032690886,0.0000240427,0.1512838,0.000016818834,0.0000030168285,0.0000053789363,0.000004953489,0.000016441543,0.0000597465,0.13553181,0.71244943,0.0002776483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029205765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004068887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8031813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028778744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031097756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99856555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023848835","doi":"","title":"Pondering Conscience: Civil Disobedience in American Law and Same-Sex Dissent in the ELCA","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Protestantism; State (computer science); Legislature; Polity; Separation of church and state; Marriage law; Constitution; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.018447400862188115,"score_gpt":0.23616336741699515,"score_spread":0.21771596655480702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023848835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8398283,0.0022286265,0.00011300418,0.001615324,0.00014385568,0.00013859644,0.000019620576,0.000014276143,0.15589838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707234,0.00021586973,0.00011410437,0.002361297,0.000058898917,0.000018330702,0.0000013745768,0.0000044241037,0.00015334573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890685,0.000012573763,0.00035119546,0.0003228303,0.000066431094,0.00034010774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954426,0.00012186945,0.00009497672,0.00015872263,0.00000972509,0.0000704243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008029,0.000114138624,0.00022977857,0.000073457246,0.00021333102,0.00009566,0.0002299278,0.000028088754,0.00004181875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008129903,0.00009585585,0.000035380133,0.0004025728,0.0008544769,0.00025177948,0.000092699534,0.00020620135,0.00007169861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052884,0.000037999027,0.23198162,0.0000049430705,0.0000033968909,0.00001386078,0.00055945484,0.000013807734,0.000016530328,0.76694417,0.00002546525,0.00039344898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006316628,0.00008408718,0.77321255,0.000050581,0.0000029178348,0.000018747016,0.0031964832,0.00013252861,0.00007617783,0.095789365,0.12640554,0.00039935106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01468668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6711548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007850482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013417933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99187464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093594253","doi":"","title":"A Senate Bill relating to the requirement that the chief appraiser of an appraisal district provide an estimate of taxable value and related assistance to certain taxing units.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Portal to Texas History (University of North Texas)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taxable income; Value (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization","score_opus":0.03490247088126159,"score_gpt":0.21944355264236912,"score_spread":0.18454108176110753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093594253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32961318,0.006511359,0.002271091,0.0025427437,0.0010899623,0.002379909,0.0015351549,0.00012446695,0.65393215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8988198,0.00012117916,0.0011440122,0.00017793615,0.00008246751,0.000003400127,0.000050860817,0.00008561661,0.099514745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857473,0.000062628445,0.00042728163,0.00046944033,0.0001808502,0.00028508913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807745,0.00008298712,0.0010109709,0.00061156147,0.00007807592,0.00013896122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007773921,0.0002675565,0.00054987735,0.0002720464,0.0003079711,0.000011481569,0.0007273114,0.00010660773,0.00025712853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104311934,0.00019284483,0.00010664292,0.0005591795,0.00044597522,0.00019286115,0.0002883611,0.0002332564,0.00003537054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011634415,0.0010530512,0.35493156,0.00089228037,0.002730455,0.00015674449,0.02206398,0.010844982,0.000025999556,0.43668804,0.15212215,0.017327314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032336195,0.00020899816,0.18880002,0.00015375773,0.000095839685,0.000006296498,0.0005915321,0.00027443847,0.0000034539833,0.00011822978,0.8090515,0.00037252528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022616843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018556226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6569294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022425024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010638683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095144061","doi":"","title":"TBestDB: a taxonomically broad database of expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Nucleic Acids Res","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"GenBank; Expressed sequence tag; Sequence (biology); Sequence database; Synonym (taxonomy); Indel; Sequence analysis; RefSeq","score_opus":0.05877513885353277,"score_gpt":0.24404460054669977,"score_spread":0.185269461693167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095144061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7173006,0.0022771335,0.014239818,0.0007796783,0.00032234276,0.00022850955,0.0005617878,0.000076521574,0.2642136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99156064,0.00022740902,0.0063671893,0.00038964997,0.00008607252,0.000012123962,0.000016671529,0.0000091581005,0.0013310728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987034,0.0000052621585,0.00061469444,0.0003498886,0.00004633892,0.0002803907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992733,0.0000803416,0.00020675997,0.0003038829,0.000049118273,0.000086573615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043161106,0.00013945762,0.00031985357,0.00012802199,0.00010560277,0.000027716966,0.00027268322,0.00006210833,0.00059927953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014707347,0.00013809999,0.000097576325,0.00018623838,0.00026925918,0.00030585984,0.00014648463,0.000107634296,0.00050754764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006174034,0.00012752424,0.04945478,0.000033292323,0.000058906557,0.000012282788,0.00009317557,0.000015744927,0.004449682,0.9424948,0.0021641254,0.0010339399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022898363,0.00025317524,0.14216207,0.00012939962,0.000026855278,0.000022157237,0.00036784925,0.0005724456,0.021698005,0.048582293,0.7826418,0.0012541133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013343745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014592457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8939125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066026616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003490545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65616906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095384439","doi":"","title":"OUTREACH Geoscape: Lessons Learned from 15 Years of","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Geological survey; Climate change; Term (time)","score_opus":0.08637819811235493,"score_gpt":0.241869960040386,"score_spread":0.15549176192803105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095384439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5610089,0.0033291297,0.0043277266,0.016350945,0.00040275443,0.0000841975,0.00088915107,0.000054112123,0.41355312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900304,0.00040656092,0.00026209868,0.000111193316,0.00004985179,0.0000045392385,0.00000321713,0.0000039219512,0.009128195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949384,0.0000028829843,0.00020703152,0.00017299848,0.000019934523,0.00010331947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996978,0.000056902667,0.00007965353,0.0001253743,0.000014208181,0.00002603617],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000069779635,0.000052057036,0.00017523317,0.00004110292,0.000029267532,0.000007606321,0.0000962729,0.000033817356,0.0013889984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005855392,0.000040879993,0.00006508038,0.000054921922,0.00008513756,0.000080650694,0.000050429448,0.000025819385,0.0015771086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006448698,0.00003580178,0.050935246,0.0000013335452,0.000056221998,9.4287753e-7,0.000052475803,6.113431e-7,0.00016254398,0.92223257,0.00173891,0.024776895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006490024,0.000023995512,0.28049925,0.000013309858,0.000005217904,3.834716e-7,0.000038089074,0.000010436918,0.0004577205,0.26706484,0.45106956,0.00016819611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001700778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009890988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6551677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000207212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009755171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133094328","doi":"","title":"The Rule of Ordinary People: The Case for a Sortition-Based Democracy without Elections","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Democracy; Blueprint; Legislature; Politics; Representative democracy; Selection (genetic algorithm); Position (finance); Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.024083675676495296,"score_gpt":0.29726696903710226,"score_spread":0.273183293360607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133094328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72410655,0.10956647,0.01140299,0.07017923,0.0111744255,0.0053160847,0.002294085,0.00015015532,0.06581003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960587,0.0013042034,0.00015585979,0.00013940535,0.00030754815,0.00084019935,0.00017269858,0.000043095417,0.036449946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809086,0.000028303906,0.00086365425,0.0005369966,0.00007565431,0.0004045442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997633,0.00086559256,0.0007234952,0.00040972035,0.00030722457,0.00006096153],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054462,0.0003589768,0.00057121617,0.00016776701,0.0030307549,0.00023034839,0.0003072169,0.00019237492,0.00016921984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038151472,0.00026012558,0.0005568125,0.000684666,0.0003106046,0.00010283461,0.000051172778,0.0004328882,0.00017136309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011542226,0.00044537504,0.0047323885,0.0017955336,0.0020542615,0.00006163145,0.015641334,0.0015359519,0.000039433868,0.95891905,0.009952504,0.0036683348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049534207,0.0011538126,0.017050676,0.001110011,0.002137486,0.0005753615,0.05316704,0.075408354,0.0005335482,0.27272397,0.5685713,0.0026149957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004255868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007650929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6861951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016903091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004739951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139364753","doi":"","title":"A Federal Bill, With Commentary, to Allow Choice in Auto Insurance","year":2001,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Insurance policy; General insurance; Casualty insurance; Government (linguistics); Life insurance","score_opus":0.025348110380862245,"score_gpt":0.20060140828247855,"score_spread":0.1752532979016163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139364753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9035657,0.0009553214,0.00089261495,0.049482044,0.00038307722,0.0007702074,0.00034366624,0.000039241808,0.043568138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99428505,0.00048351462,0.0007599258,0.0017005492,0.00006104143,0.000004586003,0.000014322728,0.00002546603,0.002665522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977743,0.00007431787,0.00055931427,0.00081420166,0.00013173105,0.00064612855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830407,0.0003249812,0.00043198816,0.00051791035,0.0001409565,0.00028006546],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040342094,0.0003980321,0.0010864224,0.000531206,0.00081061816,0.000116591924,0.0008737725,0.00015854988,0.0009492336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009363196,0.00041204307,0.00020238318,0.0013077988,0.0005636108,0.0010192352,0.0005447711,0.0004067994,0.000420462],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072079303,0.0007315563,0.9609919,0.00004723108,0.00043835386,0.00023657198,0.003134343,0.00054419687,0.000010594115,0.026998606,0.0042971806,0.0018486391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042895954,0.00077753345,0.61959094,0.00030087118,0.000043398,0.000039971168,0.004092667,0.00053640525,0.000013839193,0.0012044812,0.36827257,0.00083773513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0736107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13044894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3639754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046099012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014114598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W750697888","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139179058.002","title":"Defining deference","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04229301769344377,"score_gpt":0.17480897773692627,"score_spread":0.1325159600434825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W750697888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000043415726,0.008507787,0.0003741268,0.000019829176,0.0003199442,0.000114025956,0.0008542953,0.00006487568,0.9897017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021813385,0.00056925125,0.0000906042,0.00007631937,0.000118389944,7.4514577e-7,0.000035239427,0.000019893883,0.97727615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910873,0.00000395987,0.00021816546,0.00036776974,0.000044476794,0.00025691005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992931,0.000034110715,0.00026132326,0.00025647017,0.000046570723,0.00010840887],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008299396,0.00024413803,0.0004061389,0.00012739253,0.00024068812,0.00003184024,0.00029160612,0.00021714663,0.00003602568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000102476715,0.0003166366,0.00019016954,0.0000060231005,0.00022793977,0.000108855886,0.00030400214,0.0002994661,0.0007228528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012163128,0.000005303252,0.00012491304,0.000024319248,0.0001249485,0.000023174516,0.000024652285,6.085985e-7,2.7653084e-7,0.9905307,0.008553496,0.00057540194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020198782,0.000012621627,0.00017163205,0.000044544766,0.000040297284,0.0000059828644,0.000007061893,0.000004902939,0.0000071706236,0.0006013061,0.99852765,0.0003748409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026905222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024193212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98997414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017269443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003502837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95009408","doi":"10.21991/c9gm3n","title":"Guiding the Governor General’s Prerogatives: Constitutional Convention Versus an Apolitical Decision Rule","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Governor; Rule of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Physics; Sociology; Politics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.10650583399817165,"score_gpt":0.2607975038834354,"score_spread":0.15429166988526377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W95009408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031019166,0.004858882,0.3290075,0.004778684,0.0095634945,0.0013764258,0.0028073194,0.0004453184,0.6161432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924417,0.0001552567,0.004410274,0.001141732,0.00048540914,0.00025892,0.00028207153,0.000019005973,0.0008056405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574906,0.000079952755,0.0014799049,0.001143574,0.00040440075,0.0011431214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975398,0.00034195188,0.00052231905,0.00069326354,0.00047182362,0.000430848],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081844354,0.0006320565,0.0006997421,0.00031032518,0.003143176,0.00022701327,0.0008502889,0.00032308584,0.0017405368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010318757,0.0005436424,0.00047858388,0.00058115274,0.016292213,0.0019065137,0.00039918022,0.00041265265,0.002249997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032927643,0.00036937607,0.022352992,0.000013040928,0.00030868,0.000025916801,0.00012559483,0.00017937325,0.000035229186,0.9727232,0.0031363792,0.00040096822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005026134,0.00029842267,0.006699379,0.00015140818,0.00012470597,0.00034175196,0.0014363426,0.0019727806,0.0003519367,0.59704673,0.38525277,0.0012976336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004935761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015555664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9614225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065321056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009941404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}