{"meta":{"query_hash":"ad1d57e6e186","filters":{"topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies"},"cohort_total":149,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":149,"exported":149,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ad1d57e6e186","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Legal+and+Constitutional+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W101363655","doi":"","title":"Federalism and subsidiarity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; New Federalism; Dual federalism; Cooperative federalism; Political science; Warren Court; Law; Law and economics; Supreme court; Public administration; Sociology; Politics; European union; Economics","score_opus":0.021992192783344956,"score_gpt":0.17038058134228493,"score_spread":0.14838838855893996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W101363655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061344188,0.009510992,0.10096243,0.079888314,0.0010691909,0.000055751163,0.00022494132,0.00011944766,0.74682474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96846884,0.0019992515,0.0071682516,0.004315654,0.0008680076,0.0000971677,0.000072527626,0.000031983614,0.016978297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971685,0.0013272443,0.000095416886,0.0005314884,0.0004444059,0.0004328846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728405,0.001348431,0.00041518043,0.00044556079,0.00034749653,0.00015924152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033695898,0.0002214563,0.00044962138,0.0011154212,0.003742466,0.0042889025,0.0005821632,0.0018582641,0.0073474813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068852087,0.00019313545,0.00062380853,0.0014801479,0.018774949,0.0058761253,0.0030065977,0.0035513125,0.00062579504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010830538,6.4574346e-7,0.00006098857,0.00000203628,6.412769e-7,0.0000024726412,0.00005736191,0.000032873173,0.0000043123173,0.99873,0.0004719918,0.00063557824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069233283,0.000005131515,0.0004427456,0.000018060058,0.0000026357832,0.000019253583,0.00009181131,0.00023269224,0.000038249953,0.9745437,0.02459552,0.000003292395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045964485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003780395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073474813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004348947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003391377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031553984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1123112189","doi":"","title":"Rational Choice and Reasonable Interactions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic interaction; Simple (philosophy); Rational choice theory (criminology); Rational agent; Game theory; Economics; Law and economics; Positive economics; Management science; Microeconomics; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.04293868435832065,"score_gpt":0.25885866885752434,"score_spread":0.2159199844992037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1123112189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09170294,0.010724333,0.19589056,0.06328193,0.0002982471,0.00017639506,0.00030158434,0.00013024916,0.6374938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745662,0.0020548003,0.0100264335,0.0016477617,0.00024947035,0.00013937599,0.000101499674,0.00002578135,0.011188708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928663,0.004426059,0.00019074095,0.00076835026,0.0011456577,0.0006027998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99368036,0.004262759,0.00048063172,0.0007173306,0.000494075,0.00036492108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061890143,0.00045052898,0.000680966,0.0010445074,0.0018399066,0.004961586,0.0009511141,0.0028669802,0.006185736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011219681,0.00021341413,0.0006814139,0.0008943945,0.01160976,0.005072771,0.002121162,0.0027504286,0.0006192506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025953182,0.000004166633,0.00008079321,0.0000069415514,0.000003822136,0.000016780774,0.00008926939,0.0004991701,0.000012144278,0.99796295,0.0004374086,0.0008839769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005063672,0.0000027165472,0.00006602287,0.0000062205277,0.0000015450677,0.000010003483,0.000053267642,0.00059570203,0.000010079903,0.9952714,0.0039766585,0.0000014157625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028230075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018838645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061890143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035670078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020738316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032731056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481964022","doi":"","title":"The New Inequality: Constitutional Democracy and the Problem of Wealth","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Politics; Inequality; Political science; Political economy; Development economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.014256597032519022,"score_gpt":0.22747473205361016,"score_spread":0.21321813502109113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481964022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04237314,0.012153989,0.031195976,0.31565166,0.0024457788,0.00008500844,0.00014151956,0.000099486584,0.5958535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265253,0.003642602,0.005007544,0.02534599,0.0034948124,0.00026776214,0.00007176133,0.00010499266,0.03553932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98772335,0.0066055455,0.0003964764,0.0017438108,0.0019051549,0.0016257368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934024,0.0044529266,0.00048871426,0.00084699213,0.00042992743,0.00037908106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017400008,0.00048294573,0.00072551303,0.0014916308,0.01190818,0.013713701,0.0016532573,0.006264486,0.0069979248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017088257,0.0003902287,0.000509902,0.0016117372,0.06481079,0.016721386,0.010880239,0.014629068,0.0005297273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015415201,0.0000017740656,0.000027824857,0.0000032538017,5.8532385e-7,0.000006954145,0.0004102228,0.00003488705,0.000007807192,0.99806446,0.00058832276,0.00085246074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010344409,0.0000070567976,0.0001062345,0.0000444727,0.0000022659467,0.000015198643,0.0004456428,0.00018163084,0.000058380767,0.96747375,0.031648345,0.0000066039383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00614239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055254065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017400008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0090761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070875036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09202117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484547649","doi":"","title":"Reasonable Expectations of Privacy and Novel Search Technologies: An Economic Approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Expectation of privacy; Information privacy; Privacy by Design; Deterrence (psychology); Enforcement; Crime control; Law and economics; Legislature; Business; Deterrence theory; Personally identifiable information; Law enforcement; Economics; Political science; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.029744979834208866,"score_gpt":0.22835273878749324,"score_spread":0.19860775895328436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484547649","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05315316,0.008308234,0.55875003,0.061311852,0.0002810218,0.00038565032,0.0005053947,0.000118821685,0.31718576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95126134,0.003432993,0.03189512,0.0019898135,0.0004240521,0.00033250457,0.000084400126,0.000038717775,0.010541147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912367,0.0051359143,0.00020380579,0.0006877652,0.0020474128,0.0006883722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693494,0.025595954,0.0016728571,0.0014170571,0.0013719925,0.00059268385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010926269,0.0007372469,0.0011814823,0.002710736,0.0019742786,0.008547235,0.0025019539,0.0055742264,0.0050105555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033678185,0.0006465843,0.0013162926,0.0015488296,0.017178215,0.010459196,0.0027418805,0.0048026233,0.00032375177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075169255,0.00001159274,0.0001417892,0.000016464071,0.0000069366943,0.00002410344,0.00003626062,0.0087369215,0.000021145124,0.98935485,0.00031204353,0.0013305009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015602494,0.00001212926,0.00019904965,0.000037096317,0.0000074284385,0.000025381223,0.00005208371,0.031638812,0.00004652246,0.9652421,0.002708037,0.000015796952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018129613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009896517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018129613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017277492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076644565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12535757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492361291","doi":"","title":"A Budding Theory of Willful Patent Infringement: Orange Books, Colored Pills, and Greener Verdicts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Business; Liberian dollar; Prescription drug; Advertising; Competition (biology); Patent infringement; Pill; Marketing; Medical prescription; Internet privacy; Intellectual property; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.05949872676928494,"score_gpt":0.19868240652955244,"score_spread":0.1391836797602675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492361291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034816347,0.0069005536,0.17942305,0.0982973,0.0009948757,0.00019792402,0.0002451704,0.0001621838,0.67896265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9148503,0.0037525953,0.013750066,0.0095970705,0.0017539578,0.00022698299,0.00006334649,0.00010280091,0.055902954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934477,0.0026490507,0.00029582932,0.0009483661,0.001695706,0.000963354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98041886,0.014065322,0.0015763346,0.0019088316,0.0014802052,0.0005505139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010501908,0.0008744989,0.0010426656,0.0032466208,0.0057569435,0.012392057,0.002891351,0.011864073,0.015192244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026897242,0.00066284364,0.0015508506,0.0018810504,0.048232887,0.022579145,0.0042952113,0.011064665,0.0014129989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001727493,0.0000035141247,0.00004394573,0.000003998991,0.0000014431873,0.00002275552,0.00006648244,0.00017499845,0.000005997182,0.99815124,0.0008719826,0.0006518987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062336007,0.0000040384643,0.00004053766,0.000016680915,0.0000024940505,0.000026645048,0.0000610577,0.0005458662,0.000023131013,0.9951493,0.0041183503,0.0000056002687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005153586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031675429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015192244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063697216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004536788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055540025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508246082","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.245115","title":"Shoring Up Chevron: A Defense of Seminole Rock Deference to Agency Regulatory Interpretations","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Chevron (anatomy); Deference; Shoring; Agency (philosophy); Administrative law; Law; Political science; Geology; Archaeology; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.017768272366562567,"score_gpt":0.21259978468343096,"score_spread":0.1948315123168684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508246082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02871276,0.0022530376,0.10132636,0.21895649,0.002781236,0.00017178786,0.00031599408,0.00043914135,0.64504313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8700116,0.0008890939,0.017046174,0.038323473,0.0029695511,0.0004233513,0.00008296855,0.0004431432,0.069810666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984835,0.0052207904,0.00056751614,0.0037727745,0.0034400627,0.002163746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795044,0.010887823,0.0014974499,0.0043493644,0.0030725207,0.0006885245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015367673,0.00073308224,0.0022549478,0.002595776,0.010746877,0.010505773,0.0046974244,0.018451458,0.018529993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04130398,0.0010468918,0.0017367259,0.0019401754,0.03756589,0.014693627,0.0067034503,0.022441179,0.0035451301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010793827,0.0000038850367,0.000036170713,0.000007864923,0.000004682036,0.00001776671,0.0004508069,0.00006937075,0.000019238572,0.99361634,0.0043780007,0.0013849521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022389997,0.00000685612,0.00006559076,0.000035676792,0.000012440299,0.00002094444,0.00025142476,0.0004895742,0.00012339362,0.9786856,0.02027017,0.000015906558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012196868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011248935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018529993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056990506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008837764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08127296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521526324","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2381553","title":"Death and Taxes: The Nature of a Deceased's 'Estate', its Relationship to the Deceased, and Practical Implications for Reassessments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Economics; Estate tax; Business; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Finance; Tax avoidance; Double taxation","score_opus":0.034625908648552986,"score_gpt":0.2896970875809959,"score_spread":0.2550711789324429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521526324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44825116,0.023142295,0.016795307,0.2036387,0.0016872728,0.000047435544,0.0006544055,0.000021660093,0.3057618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757117,0.0027152253,0.0006417429,0.0016705738,0.00029989154,0.000008154719,0.00004379273,0.000012940181,0.018896064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978528,0.0011053246,0.00011595633,0.00032072252,0.00025928376,0.00034589454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98640037,0.0070302663,0.001772956,0.0018058205,0.0019038572,0.0010866894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041352697,0.00022935052,0.0006414775,0.001019295,0.0044056037,0.008290261,0.0015685465,0.003822996,0.0096034175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037933167,0.00027533658,0.00037287487,0.0016700489,0.016049774,0.012385195,0.002604809,0.007432188,0.00048869726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009935028,0.000034901816,0.0074071568,0.00006010982,0.000014688166,0.0009841018,0.00865541,0.00053465925,0.000051066967,0.9612305,0.0072442144,0.013683784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000120111235,0.00003869968,0.008869368,0.00038529397,0.000022898055,0.0013145392,0.027049113,0.0015082863,0.00026254792,0.91120726,0.049275894,0.000054059154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018489612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028843274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018489612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004074307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026384813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036763966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525320904","doi":"10.1108/pijpsm.2012.18135caa.003","title":"American Policing at a Crossroads: Unsustainable Policies and The Procedural Justice Alternative","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policing An International Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Open Society Institute; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Procedural justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Public administration; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.03089794433752499,"score_gpt":0.29108795701207085,"score_spread":0.2601900126745459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525320904","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1314263,0.005307026,0.05438834,0.41922784,0.0010025566,0.000068623995,0.000090432026,0.00010218483,0.38838673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771293,0.0011761712,0.003710699,0.010115996,0.00039993195,0.000043455173,0.00001860297,0.000028057708,0.0073778224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99038726,0.004712702,0.00024115699,0.0010744437,0.0019507365,0.0016335879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913442,0.003007428,0.0014556291,0.0015812078,0.0014683869,0.0011431916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077610575,0.00034634458,0.0004275167,0.0011974644,0.008040642,0.009993897,0.0015341903,0.0055344324,0.0032750007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015755164,0.00033236592,0.0005004768,0.0014017206,0.028747018,0.006728325,0.004316612,0.0087656,0.0003750431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008808048,0.000033579316,0.00044558482,0.000012429621,0.0000064676556,0.00002419345,0.00085301,0.00062062085,0.00003509849,0.98801917,0.0025206127,0.0074204355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011768529,0.000018818686,0.0014835969,0.00010209383,0.000009827499,0.000022286766,0.0014910349,0.0013552775,0.000084927815,0.96782637,0.027573781,0.000020219177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02726166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030775776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02726166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060582254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011246056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054206014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533396565","doi":"","title":"The Economic Consequences and Constitutionality of Administrative Monetary Penalties for Abuse of Dominance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Dominance (genetics); Position (finance); Revenue; Supreme court; Order (exchange); Economics; Competition (biology); Law and economics; Law; Business; Public economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.030624569389452357,"score_gpt":0.24371902218517755,"score_spread":0.2130944527957252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533396565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12344766,0.0029521848,0.010327708,0.03758214,0.0006774404,0.00020734736,0.0003920158,0.0000946559,0.8243189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97689295,0.00060310704,0.001876901,0.007098142,0.0003084938,0.0001496358,0.000044128104,0.000025881352,0.013000758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.962885,0.011256841,0.002668597,0.0035910876,0.0127273835,0.0068710605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94863105,0.033219244,0.0050333138,0.004354367,0.006979413,0.0017825674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02352932,0.0004642927,0.000798725,0.0021552644,0.009614254,0.014238881,0.0027950834,0.008916873,0.0037360447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07060304,0.00093712704,0.00077260955,0.0019275537,0.025962386,0.004223977,0.004129465,0.011476071,0.0005325018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021573229,0.000026994248,0.0011627884,0.000021830254,0.000009528469,0.00012588744,0.0005750481,0.00044347937,0.00020901827,0.9893902,0.004561459,0.0034521727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028047393,0.00034103237,0.024929276,0.0009718318,0.00026455702,0.00067273283,0.0031231684,0.007049205,0.0030326508,0.75503457,0.2038703,0.00043020444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11001099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14533707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11001099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012660878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0208518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2187413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564531687","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4536","title":"The Scales of Injustice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Consequentialism; Injustice; Argument (complex analysis); Retributive justice; Economic Justice; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07080626815006953,"score_gpt":0.26008144673894307,"score_spread":0.18927517858887355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564531687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21385637,0.008743426,0.044902775,0.03619683,0.0006227884,0.00019674489,0.00062559877,0.00018701032,0.6946685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889072,0.0013200557,0.002483793,0.0008013796,0.00028343566,0.00007956473,0.00007761309,0.000035449044,0.0060115135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993715,0.002032866,0.0003274685,0.0007105753,0.00264366,0.0005705143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98117185,0.0059440057,0.004140151,0.0038124335,0.003062192,0.0018694111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033092047,0.000430986,0.0004114959,0.0043567917,0.001857349,0.006502553,0.0009381633,0.0015682366,0.008385472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028078582,0.00025359602,0.00041119082,0.0024840836,0.017314976,0.007742213,0.007470052,0.0036659215,0.00060197734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034162327,0.000038354727,0.008325692,0.000050365346,0.000026161313,0.00006566249,0.002776045,0.00061355473,0.0001766484,0.96392804,0.0025247564,0.021440573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011896702,0.000062791645,0.047216408,0.00015644445,0.000015892454,0.00026084064,0.0037202253,0.0013925284,0.00016711176,0.9184302,0.028529925,0.000035769004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023770842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001885917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008385472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014901466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02805221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591510348","doi":"","title":"Election Finance Regulation in Emerging Democracies: Lessons from Canada and the U.S","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Cripple; Campaign finance; Limiting; Competition (biology); Election law; Political science; Democracy; Public administration; Economics; Law and economics; Business; Public economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03296534673834558,"score_gpt":0.26884188232219286,"score_spread":0.23587653558384727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591510348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2809676,0.027150102,0.0020651133,0.281351,0.0006046281,0.00015472937,0.006391225,0.00011108162,0.40120456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95360255,0.010638041,0.0007685892,0.00799041,0.00019887673,0.000030061252,0.0011802721,0.00005056108,0.025540711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996711,0.00030097688,0.000064255226,0.00021758769,0.00091137114,0.001794782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920616,0.0018166454,0.0006530064,0.00028451852,0.004086688,0.0010974717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032132324,0.00023902231,0.0006280952,0.002450875,0.008761971,0.0072364383,0.0014796441,0.0017071838,0.010138554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012895642,0.0002091978,0.00044191867,0.005868131,0.005481798,0.0019844463,0.0016038952,0.0037314987,0.0006039767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018516705,0.00013982569,0.11431815,0.0002471397,0.000061559185,0.00043288164,0.013572309,0.0032145649,0.00019541131,0.5513497,0.161182,0.15510134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011532319,0.00007297528,0.39395195,0.0010267202,0.00017258091,0.00012585355,0.031258974,0.0030970662,0.00070625456,0.08446749,0.48485258,0.00015216826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99210256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9444486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05555143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08891706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40305567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596528684","doi":"","title":"Should Insurance Companies Be Forced to Reimburse Contraceptives Despite Religious Objections","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Actuarial science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05319983612983778,"score_gpt":0.23894469844810223,"score_spread":0.18574486231826445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596528684","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020342372,0.011079031,0.00019280407,0.8937701,0.008325364,0.000042440566,0.00015030267,0.00005415191,0.066043526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3067345,0.011355884,0.00038498302,0.5842926,0.019549988,0.00010869223,0.00021570377,0.000057507365,0.07730012],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961462,0.0014301442,0.00020706258,0.00037756164,0.000788962,0.0010499733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843317,0.010107652,0.0014164124,0.000630065,0.0017930403,0.0017210578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008440354,0.00025075895,0.0003733533,0.0006881685,0.005140913,0.0034732907,0.0012939285,0.02162252,0.011671292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048398938,0.00035769062,0.00060365786,0.0003928559,0.0024854029,0.003391767,0.001866521,0.009448876,0.0024357731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012884471,0.00010379615,0.0062387786,0.00010388915,0.00004375997,0.0012802203,0.0024514087,0.00008180742,0.0003683067,0.053787984,0.8939985,0.041412685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094766576,0.00013318108,0.013182338,0.0010430301,0.00010614204,0.0013164184,0.004462274,0.00044330617,0.00060197705,0.017063519,0.9614758,0.00007733804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018330133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02805905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02162252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023778058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0084814215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04463744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606702854","doi":"","title":"The 'Design Sciences' and Constitutional 'Success","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Political science; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Existentialism; Consequentialism; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.02441578566044129,"score_gpt":0.22379436887350748,"score_spread":0.1993785832130662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606702854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090601,0.00806474,0.18608756,0.16164066,0.0011560324,0.0005150063,0.00016244617,0.0001708426,0.5516017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726015,0.0013290481,0.016896136,0.00322591,0.00026379962,0.0003761139,0.000028857388,0.00007115417,0.0052074473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92120117,0.06011862,0.0023504025,0.0032590074,0.010477138,0.0025936035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7815104,0.1913471,0.006405915,0.011159113,0.0066368436,0.0029405125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.096786864,0.0006226642,0.00097411114,0.002208207,0.004899571,0.015738469,0.0016785812,0.0049009877,0.011000413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12925105,0.00053728686,0.0006104419,0.0020425909,0.051322684,0.013520785,0.0067678276,0.006963509,0.0006054957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010850482,0.000021576372,0.00046436908,0.000063243875,0.000007988422,0.000014044673,0.0015001138,0.00037071737,0.000037423542,0.9938735,0.00053840276,0.0030977828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006383517,0.000103069695,0.0011468774,0.00017418517,0.000015291582,0.0000573973,0.0039410307,0.0014248124,0.00044588084,0.9396955,0.0529069,0.000025338924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018585224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015901802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096786864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009277961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073502534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51186395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1860694009","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Interpretation and Presidential Powers: The Case of Trinidad and Tobago","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Caribbean dialogue","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Constitution; Presidential system; Governor; Interpretation (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); Political science; Law; Separation of powers; Constitutional interpretation; Law and economics; Economics; Engineering; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.023037259394459633,"score_gpt":0.22238130349095733,"score_spread":0.1993440440964977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1860694009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60579383,0.0020266233,0.00065900985,0.022261262,0.000074544754,0.000076629185,0.00020398437,0.00003080272,0.36887333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97728354,0.00058720156,0.00026729816,0.0011101009,0.000015126757,0.00005462034,0.00006458844,0.000012635587,0.020604834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830854,0.00053869106,0.000037717156,0.000085584354,0.00020020784,0.0008293171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737,0.0014717492,0.00023846293,0.00015314888,0.00053290365,0.00023373381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019256887,0.0002132809,0.00034727066,0.0016164822,0.008855813,0.005342118,0.0010994022,0.0018736395,0.008557412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063181357,0.00021247954,0.0002299246,0.0035651354,0.008590954,0.0013465105,0.003366038,0.0034063046,0.00017064337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012430578,0.000045258414,0.011170166,0.0001832875,0.000026597572,0.005037441,0.06347317,0.0033396438,0.00042428958,0.88133997,0.014222192,0.02061371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002369636,0.00007308469,0.07964495,0.0012420397,0.00013468022,0.0011734001,0.2469319,0.0043453067,0.00066475326,0.15282068,0.5125329,0.00019934773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73668367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8431714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73668367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035736922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019900303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5297341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905800883","doi":"","title":"Legal Analysis of Economics: Solving the Problem of Rational Commitment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Normative; Commit; Rational choice theory (criminology); Adjudication; Rational agent; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Preference; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03694648439122424,"score_gpt":0.23426555743910613,"score_spread":0.19731907304788188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905800883","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024820887,0.02035613,0.3662077,0.23412186,0.0013692338,0.000087301094,0.000118915435,0.0001751458,0.352743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8893255,0.0126942955,0.06359283,0.010681923,0.0030010254,0.00024084117,0.000095054296,0.00012443803,0.020244109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916203,0.0051098294,0.0002591328,0.0005385361,0.0020221015,0.00045012598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910644,0.0068927924,0.00041367047,0.00060208363,0.000796306,0.00023075282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007873022,0.00039699484,0.00063655176,0.002325699,0.0035115634,0.0064868894,0.0017714401,0.0045270175,0.003616771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013279254,0.0004557506,0.0006783049,0.0014832697,0.025298914,0.009175793,0.0029872186,0.007000616,0.00042460722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.4971677e-7,0.0000021386313,0.000013221989,0.000005779676,9.330219e-7,0.0000063067664,0.00006360892,0.00029772823,0.0000069495018,0.9983735,0.0003886365,0.00084071583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018556744,9.0003414e-7,0.000023466035,0.000013083417,9.712849e-7,0.00000464087,0.00005333487,0.000703246,0.000013728588,0.99312913,0.006054051,0.0000015711564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069757495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004126521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007873022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066652833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073757404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04836029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1919621670","doi":"10.1080/09332480.2013.794609","title":"Can Tax Deadlines Cause Fatal Mistakes?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CHANCE","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Thursday; Front page; Front (military); History; Computer science; Media studies; Sociology; Geography; Philosophy; Meteorology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0505357169112325,"score_gpt":0.20567702772705448,"score_spread":0.155141310815822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1919621670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006415155,0.0023025777,0.0009907647,0.06624689,0.0030845765,0.00004802807,0.0025601576,0.0014081269,0.91694367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06394061,0.0045326105,0.00064994174,0.008622252,0.0012348703,0.000045799075,0.0012165251,0.00063213566,0.91912526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991013,0.0001769849,0.00006078318,0.00012510185,0.0003424283,0.00019345926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948822,0.0017220704,0.0006220801,0.0005727333,0.0013139978,0.00088692916],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00210948,0.00045041624,0.00039556914,0.0019253753,0.003127339,0.0050130826,0.0006907205,0.002655237,0.6672164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013902471,0.00031076156,0.00034228756,0.0020698623,0.0013206688,0.004839426,0.0021456103,0.002427541,0.3921366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036789457,0.000029381563,0.002080039,0.000030988573,0.0000043236337,0.00010438187,0.00014109096,0.00008615436,0.000046362045,0.0057604206,0.8977231,0.09395698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018217073,0.000022024002,0.0059528043,0.0003582857,0.000010257361,0.00034119005,0.0016078803,0.0004476923,0.00016701908,0.008332041,0.9827156,0.000026997908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015407978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023638401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6672164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014805744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018983036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47467536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945383277","doi":"10.3138/jcs.48.3.49","title":"The Dilemma of Positive Rights: Access to Health Care and the <i>Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Charter; Political science; Patient rights; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Law; Law and economics; Health care; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02186579320423833,"score_gpt":0.23511264912724633,"score_spread":0.21324685592300802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1945383277","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018968783,0.011433742,0.00450902,0.65231377,0.000789096,0.000028931063,0.00015978934,0.000024948318,0.31177187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88494295,0.009401603,0.0038420132,0.06917078,0.0009688822,0.000046685847,0.00007695463,0.000046524907,0.031503577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98646355,0.0031907982,0.00023589803,0.0008984215,0.0064299824,0.0027813148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991699,0.0044611855,0.00053044717,0.00043044987,0.001882164,0.0009967192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008375541,0.0003894232,0.0005836886,0.0017378788,0.018265676,0.016585624,0.0027138535,0.0077294796,0.0041517206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015269365,0.0004042265,0.00050615973,0.0024283275,0.06290684,0.00673711,0.003987518,0.010746998,0.00029618858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029139667,0.000002613847,0.00015925127,0.000010524927,0.00000136578,0.000022822494,0.0011177676,0.0000551564,0.000023083063,0.9888487,0.0073512252,0.0024045534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035365603,0.000012398639,0.0034231346,0.00034296565,0.00002113836,0.00010226313,0.006258632,0.0008043792,0.00024950487,0.74048567,0.24819353,0.00007113116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.946539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9485418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9100825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08991746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11953923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6523999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1948768391","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2012.15.2.277","title":"Ex Ante Fairness in Criminal Law and Procedure","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ex-ante; Supreme court; Discretion; Criminal law; Economics; Law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.026744538418818055,"score_gpt":0.19988365518114282,"score_spread":0.17313911676232477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1948768391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092493184,0.0038503974,0.21646293,0.029272744,0.00067968114,0.00015896194,0.0001939376,0.00012999757,0.6567583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9486487,0.00063761475,0.01631777,0.004189557,0.00030789283,0.00023287584,0.00004330094,0.000038009483,0.029584229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873684,0.00609255,0.0005740381,0.0017430404,0.0026029134,0.0016190319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558145,0.00234557,0.00050588435,0.000811062,0.00061613903,0.00013999514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011947535,0.0004150694,0.00044370696,0.0008079015,0.004706083,0.006758081,0.0012518205,0.004081474,0.0033535617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015639156,0.000329918,0.0005923522,0.0006801228,0.01688313,0.006788115,0.004247649,0.0044604135,0.00060439017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057196157,0.0000046559962,0.00016162607,0.0000050644094,0.0000020082316,0.000011414064,0.0002967425,0.00022297211,0.00004642599,0.9962825,0.0002503445,0.0027106076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001221844,0.00003091986,0.00069563196,0.00004052898,0.000008035578,0.000040250183,0.00018980149,0.00088038447,0.00043836652,0.9769232,0.020727161,0.000013429265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057948623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062053483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011947535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004438927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005387393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063185334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W195486235","doi":"","title":"Cutting the Umbilical Cord: The Final Appellate Court in Former British Colonies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Certiorari; Judicial independence; Court of record; Trial court; Court of equity; Majority opinion; High Court; Law of the case; State (computer science); Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.017508219690322246,"score_gpt":0.2043314025590152,"score_spread":0.18682318286869296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W195486235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959311,0.00023215877,0.000041334257,0.00046673513,0.0000046743353,0.000007724984,0.000057603458,0.000001459769,0.0032573096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962054,0.00029122172,0.000088819215,0.00018243578,0.000004157578,0.000005253446,0.000081924496,0.0000044178328,0.0031364125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978676,0.0005177082,0.00013478246,0.00025804015,0.00049136754,0.00073050073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988703,0.0031947617,0.0037604705,0.00045285022,0.0018547225,0.002034168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018459819,0.00014101723,0.00030983266,0.0013227497,0.0034103098,0.0025361353,0.0010063085,0.0009491959,0.0031057529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0096938815,0.00033856087,0.00021504638,0.0028103923,0.002940674,0.00086322165,0.0015390929,0.0017424545,0.00033986996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002642355,0.00039000172,0.8899136,0.00011094624,0.00008441706,0.005335439,0.06388657,0.0011223573,0.0010298657,0.0067292238,0.0048936494,0.026239758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015065243,0.000094181574,0.9324427,0.00015201853,0.000044596338,0.00061095407,0.05620882,0.0008381601,0.0002947951,0.00042107332,0.008840861,0.00003665593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8174142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9288973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8174142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009724691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052406164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3673221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983579864","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb01577.x","title":"Independent foundations, public money and public accountability: Whither ministerial responsibility as democratic governance?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Publics; Democratic governance; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Humanities; Management; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.04507411630960479,"score_gpt":0.24329975443598095,"score_spread":0.19822563812637617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983579864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13683476,0.013947091,0.05357143,0.25719953,0.0014247972,0.00010192569,0.00006345783,0.00017587766,0.5366812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98630524,0.0010234996,0.002203151,0.0023302285,0.00024590595,0.000049318518,0.000008581437,0.000020023768,0.007814182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808065,0.013059322,0.0004644005,0.0010171827,0.002797286,0.0018551571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853291,0.007907832,0.002514162,0.0013925697,0.0013494688,0.0015069257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014014857,0.00034913258,0.00036533203,0.0018692877,0.00582869,0.014986882,0.0012900825,0.004677012,0.004036302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021871364,0.00034367084,0.00048576176,0.0023328941,0.032080326,0.012249846,0.008046007,0.006247248,0.00039845952],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015728974,0.000015171366,0.0005782734,0.000024572868,0.000004028098,0.000023573017,0.0025383874,0.0002831846,0.000045253266,0.9889466,0.0014940009,0.0060311654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004080281,0.000056856712,0.002321986,0.0003053049,0.000021418295,0.00009292874,0.0039688656,0.0015196054,0.00034994297,0.8962118,0.09507852,0.000031931097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007419873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072721937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011883665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011887265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08622241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985582839","doi":"10.3138/utlj.041813-02ra","title":"Normative jurisprudence and legal realism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal realism; Normative; Legal formalism; Legal positivism; Law; Critical legal studies; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Realism; Sociology; Legal history; Legal research; Epistemology; Comparative law; Philosophy; Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.009558701956465807,"score_gpt":0.16184893777700615,"score_spread":0.15229023582054035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985582839","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009845915,0.40174097,0.04720347,0.14636691,0.004184095,0.00005500802,0.000083477404,0.00007237097,0.3904477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58110166,0.29174453,0.019916244,0.0342972,0.019133277,0.0003670749,0.00018546882,0.00019017389,0.053064406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965725,0.0017698788,0.00011960601,0.0003185329,0.0010087125,0.0002107632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953968,0.0037387996,0.00020549292,0.00018796726,0.00035629803,0.00011455458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034279567,0.0004737791,0.0006675925,0.002565723,0.0024103918,0.0052621225,0.0011220991,0.003906441,0.002713323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005680803,0.00031087268,0.00034363367,0.0021737982,0.023554703,0.007173088,0.0021031888,0.0050181015,0.0006026918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.1609245e-7,0.0000021948993,0.00001589263,0.0000332228,8.0570004e-7,0.000012301666,0.00031530386,0.00007297193,0.000014337748,0.9964766,0.001316007,0.0017397736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022157553,0.000003853309,0.000098205564,0.00030729026,0.000001904567,0.0000457267,0.00034847742,0.00019114181,0.000032923555,0.8653415,0.133622,0.0000049051578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031103815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028479765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00612366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00612366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031782084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044430494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002648609","doi":"10.1177/0886368703251169","title":"Executive Compensation: Examining an Old Issue from New Perspectives","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Executive compensation; Compensation (psychology); Business; Psychology; Executive functions; Accounting; Cognitive psychology; Process management; Social psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.1015747962184464,"score_gpt":0.26337801512153014,"score_spread":0.16180321890308375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002648609","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010599386,0.2754672,0.004491265,0.64686775,0.011103993,0.000009969857,0.000058201404,0.000015871718,0.0513863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41952404,0.27826363,0.0040740767,0.14034362,0.14014949,0.00005515853,0.00010290004,0.00010434082,0.017382784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612963,0.0016105549,0.00021701142,0.00045809938,0.0011869848,0.00039770064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542369,0.036210977,0.0020108134,0.0011872221,0.004957621,0.0013963996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009847029,0.0004490697,0.0008490769,0.006007558,0.0038303758,0.0144764045,0.0014892479,0.011743854,0.005577685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02174843,0.00041696028,0.0006276969,0.0045153126,0.01922787,0.02749734,0.0021976805,0.011941475,0.0006383653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000341659,0.000101908554,0.0015018446,0.0004108478,0.000024761419,0.00025451,0.0025161493,0.00029934914,0.00019308513,0.85500306,0.06668586,0.07297448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024935476,0.00005316743,0.0073489654,0.0021567214,0.000050961207,0.00051919,0.006673758,0.00086988014,0.00019419056,0.5078869,0.47417232,0.00004906714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032197698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010697633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144764045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004696479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00439616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052076697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013519655","doi":"10.1057/eej.2011.6","title":"Fairness and Tax Policy: A Response to Mankiw's Proposed “Just Deserts”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eastern Economic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Tax policy; Point (geometry); Key (lock); Public economics; Law and economics; Tax reform; Computer science; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.06193552165685705,"score_gpt":0.22974280301205904,"score_spread":0.167807281355202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013519655","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034199715,0.0017868394,0.020249587,0.8141573,0.0041946704,0.00010720363,0.00010957792,0.00009834893,0.12509681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73226374,0.0005596661,0.006423798,0.22258766,0.0036939795,0.00023850294,0.00003296799,0.00015708106,0.03404256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782366,0.009503799,0.00080849486,0.0032901461,0.0048887064,0.0032722629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692802,0.018088253,0.0024796736,0.0032313387,0.004729373,0.0021912705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026628124,0.00065302,0.0013977116,0.001768367,0.012745687,0.013910181,0.003468361,0.034756735,0.006060026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062476493,0.0007329978,0.0015134261,0.0016747636,0.037369765,0.012618198,0.008002188,0.037474565,0.00059877575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001870102,0.000016775864,0.00016829523,0.00001050559,0.00000964759,0.00002781548,0.0010107844,0.0001650519,0.000055786495,0.9811297,0.015647024,0.0017398949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074262374,0.000016622469,0.00049188605,0.00007128107,0.000022182925,0.000026402586,0.0008263242,0.0008292902,0.00027479426,0.94784874,0.04948134,0.000036913818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022288373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033045717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034756735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013427667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017148372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14082468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035341587","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n1p40","title":"Modernising the Common Law Offence of Cheating the Public Revenue","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Revenue; Law; Common law; Business; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Accounting","score_opus":0.08898774326635134,"score_gpt":0.25330964868792605,"score_spread":0.1643219054215747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035341587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05047712,0.004327339,0.06442792,0.054047927,0.001951277,0.00011399824,0.00018083154,0.0002987711,0.8241748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87789804,0.0015696072,0.008125131,0.015468245,0.0012615739,0.000119561606,0.00006342388,0.00010966076,0.09538479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870063,0.0031983713,0.00056590256,0.0023126462,0.0047687776,0.0021479402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893077,0.0052020503,0.0010077041,0.0025946815,0.0015017623,0.00038606426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007456983,0.0006002955,0.00048231037,0.0023306056,0.004928498,0.009280123,0.0022193494,0.012983886,0.0079016825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025328381,0.0005382241,0.00091205817,0.0012971096,0.030136857,0.010366854,0.004870557,0.016880708,0.0018171403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006697619,0.000013417888,0.00016800224,0.000011464806,0.0000031018792,0.00008465926,0.00059451023,0.00015853507,0.00015099718,0.9891935,0.0044375733,0.0051774615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031672844,0.000098284,0.001461526,0.00038987256,0.000033713415,0.0005440893,0.00064559135,0.0019872542,0.002197695,0.73342246,0.25908768,0.00010015998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027017578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021111071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027017578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066754604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007386043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053720653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036943900","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00376.x","title":"The Precautionary Principle in Patent Law: A View from Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Patent law; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Environmental law; Political science; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.057878089722347884,"score_gpt":0.20852316624438047,"score_spread":0.15064507652203257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036943900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054878425,0.07638465,0.0072754486,0.34676826,0.00077825197,0.000092486844,0.00055489887,0.000088674744,0.5131788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85025877,0.07154051,0.0065804822,0.03103059,0.00063131435,0.00005119426,0.00017404495,0.000056587167,0.03967647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523747,0.00041627823,0.00014998399,0.00047285535,0.0025630156,0.0011604191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99305105,0.002747701,0.00035334058,0.00021521962,0.0031001396,0.00053255487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029127614,0.00037929055,0.00062523107,0.0043435427,0.013601879,0.010711171,0.0020767162,0.0060635945,0.0033504122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011547879,0.0004188027,0.00069476716,0.0064974385,0.019337298,0.0040644202,0.001863511,0.005700597,0.00027101996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000159249,0.0000098888995,0.0007607491,0.00010329747,0.000008908157,0.00023152644,0.0020317796,0.0010167664,0.00016536399,0.9662014,0.012537999,0.016916366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000460369,0.00003723811,0.010374114,0.0008737873,0.00009630998,0.00025496242,0.0050496934,0.0036489477,0.0006935264,0.48578587,0.49293932,0.00020014691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99032366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14867258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14867258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16838211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040584697","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0053","title":"Preference, pluralism, and proportionality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Pluralism (philosophy); Proportionality (law); Social choice theory; Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023434782033723903,"score_gpt":0.17786960044065103,"score_spread":0.15443481840692713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040584697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09132369,0.009110309,0.14389497,0.04967421,0.0009981765,0.000099974706,0.00007809053,0.00007497627,0.7047456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660763,0.0011886379,0.010334677,0.0019655575,0.000510077,0.00007372138,0.00002093251,0.000034817665,0.0197952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878946,0.007103936,0.00038645105,0.0011439961,0.0026714175,0.00079953007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99263316,0.0044338694,0.0006749939,0.0007988054,0.0008804462,0.0005786679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009619659,0.000419105,0.00065616204,0.0011798234,0.0041176714,0.0055281087,0.0008437908,0.0017393758,0.004521303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016046401,0.00032800023,0.0006370652,0.0016819839,0.022376867,0.0077099996,0.0042131385,0.0035615137,0.00042234542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008705956,0.000007873162,0.00009229936,0.000013188788,0.000004766205,0.000024667757,0.0007123124,0.00023272779,0.000035268946,0.99414223,0.00086338294,0.0038626762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064238807,0.000005732167,0.000088617475,0.000010173439,0.000002149167,0.000027518048,0.00020507573,0.00029729045,0.000027111786,0.99133563,0.007990304,0.0000038179473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032428196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002844109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009619659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040753675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020442652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050874174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041780458","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2002.tb01855.x","title":"Discretion unbound: Reconciling the Charter and soft law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Charter; Political science; Law; Judicial discretion; Statutory law; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Scrutiny; Law and economics; Sociology; Judicial review","score_opus":0.054217779218901765,"score_gpt":0.194214809239742,"score_spread":0.13999703002084024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041780458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14040922,0.005029608,0.2271801,0.087307535,0.0018987072,0.00023375689,0.00007886462,0.00037566447,0.5374866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777435,0.00045692743,0.007678784,0.00473205,0.00040934185,0.00007507335,0.000013745057,0.00005716336,0.008833293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9718302,0.01191763,0.0012027648,0.003361086,0.008276006,0.003412261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9702369,0.019245801,0.0025272267,0.0039974772,0.0027567183,0.0012359504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02422079,0.00045705837,0.0009738773,0.002596259,0.006840722,0.016098674,0.0029371742,0.008852357,0.004147504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038669564,0.00055021,0.0010384446,0.0014901061,0.053643886,0.013951092,0.013659297,0.01242712,0.00049667916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010390604,0.00000974892,0.000102875034,0.000012337383,0.0000029738849,0.00006958749,0.00095555687,0.00038879228,0.000107199725,0.99503505,0.00053410506,0.0027713787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003197687,0.000041614676,0.0003584491,0.00021336513,0.00001891092,0.00005373053,0.0007796928,0.0022206414,0.000645811,0.97065735,0.024936123,0.000042366508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00868143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009601224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010379367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014866107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12809336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051174690","doi":"10.7202/1027761ar","title":"Marriage, the Law, and Samesex Unions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Balance (ability); Law; Political science; Legal status; Freedom of association; Sociology; Human rights; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.016169986146877754,"score_gpt":0.19028717345955765,"score_spread":0.1741171873126799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051174690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31522158,0.13599649,0.0061106607,0.15001188,0.00069928536,0.000026072907,0.0002001585,0.000020181407,0.3917137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96037954,0.021350894,0.00041808304,0.003334633,0.0006989897,0.00001668119,0.000041924508,0.000009089875,0.013750228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998696,0.00066383654,0.000043012893,0.000114718765,0.00027609768,0.00020633473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652463,0.0020979384,0.00076814333,0.00013395232,0.00020602495,0.00026935118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020226345,0.0001300839,0.00034480964,0.0012357344,0.002712064,0.0040193065,0.00046289494,0.0021406605,0.010668504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054865186,0.00014559897,0.00021993283,0.0022280992,0.009385255,0.0033901797,0.0019663724,0.0019102368,0.00039370183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075545286,0.000029377607,0.0021737805,0.000023239423,0.0000025992874,0.00006741064,0.00050741807,0.0001777788,0.000014133624,0.9908981,0.0013255064,0.004773041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021473903,0.000040914405,0.0098184515,0.0004511915,0.00000981866,0.00015126058,0.004447738,0.0006342017,0.000057089575,0.9131195,0.07123118,0.000017103173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018922834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022407431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018922834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035661976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028547826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037625372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057193143","doi":"","title":"After Seven Decades of Regulation, Why is the Auditing Profession in Such a Mess?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Audit; Business; Portfolio; Public disclosure; Inside information; Public information; Public relations; Finance; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.011064495105963098,"score_gpt":0.21613460850836497,"score_spread":0.20507011340240186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057193143","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011653687,0.020832032,0.015299868,0.8978321,0.013378927,0.00005976694,0.00014348942,0.0002511528,0.04054886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30007014,0.020383097,0.0115996655,0.5830068,0.016786605,0.00022333674,0.00021081271,0.00040265537,0.06731688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97966754,0.00583106,0.0010136482,0.0035799237,0.007940855,0.0019669358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9320853,0.029365016,0.0047740256,0.008526783,0.02044417,0.0048047444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03011635,0.0005490245,0.00085484434,0.0018841164,0.007532379,0.012192737,0.0018421935,0.010745899,0.006281018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0589754,0.00058387115,0.0010039145,0.0023973386,0.027808022,0.012430409,0.0059631234,0.020954017,0.0033936114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017508634,0.00015955057,0.0036561582,0.00025953268,0.00004723251,0.00019178817,0.0048048617,0.00051401736,0.0010778033,0.6788801,0.21212307,0.09811076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043439777,0.00008413732,0.0034814852,0.0011338344,0.000017767701,0.00014836475,0.0041412143,0.00051735714,0.00054469635,0.21949267,0.7702718,0.0001231076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009644445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008891628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03011635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074254377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008975973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15927237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059400667","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2873","title":"The importance of being earnest: Two notions of internalization","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Sanctions; Preference; Social psychology; Internalization; Opposition (politics); Incentive; Perception; Psychology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Microeconomics; Politics","score_opus":0.026071572934634694,"score_gpt":0.20431550783055463,"score_spread":0.17824393489591994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059400667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41632617,0.0015757455,0.07087405,0.010095185,0.00023666034,0.00017801543,0.00011361348,0.000094625466,0.500506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99217075,0.00020812747,0.004484551,0.00041299104,0.000028762035,0.00009323923,0.000023424638,0.00003070121,0.0025475328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851804,0.007750546,0.0006068625,0.0017036931,0.0035817164,0.0011767697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819287,0.007836699,0.0028725343,0.004775804,0.0014433037,0.0011429782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006187569,0.0006262837,0.00069482974,0.0011849469,0.0028066037,0.0061533656,0.0018197275,0.0027588974,0.0046931305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016301256,0.00058974815,0.0009805771,0.00093318213,0.036441892,0.011115213,0.009103953,0.00587661,0.00038177805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012390783,0.00020412626,0.0070417286,0.00018025697,0.000047013244,0.00016776292,0.047601778,0.00058365037,0.0017125979,0.92261046,0.00049997994,0.019226704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008748139,0.00040971956,0.031991035,0.00047569658,0.00012145925,0.001167202,0.03689494,0.0035976258,0.0025911392,0.8828979,0.039579906,0.00018588766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019334401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013385708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006187569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026714874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018152965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032723427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090208598","doi":"10.1177/0038038512450804","title":"Privacy as a Human Right: A Sociological Theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Brandeis University","keywords":"Sociology; Relevance (law); The Right to Privacy; Right to privacy; Supreme court; Human rights; Law; Sociology of law; Character (mathematics); Sociological theory; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05944698384741469,"score_gpt":0.2746551609278512,"score_spread":0.2152081770804365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090208598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042916194,0.014150843,0.22114663,0.18914965,0.00096685527,0.00017044149,0.0002358638,0.00009467717,0.5311689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9604424,0.0048420243,0.018840987,0.0069203433,0.0011701101,0.0002475255,0.00006593932,0.00004990227,0.007420732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926715,0.0044375076,0.00024328717,0.0007998993,0.0012548069,0.00059301767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98664385,0.010612989,0.00064221234,0.0010890872,0.000576258,0.00043570512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010118202,0.0006027226,0.0008588163,0.0035718358,0.007016867,0.010827434,0.001877167,0.006505064,0.0040652524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009027661,0.00047492172,0.00091900927,0.0022914784,0.09023618,0.01836864,0.0064645833,0.006703568,0.00043129365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.676587e-7,0.0000019793904,0.000030306399,0.000005291004,7.379996e-7,0.000011760927,0.0005451907,0.000077757264,0.000006286262,0.99883085,0.00013474155,0.0003543133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003925876,0.000004925115,0.00006371157,0.000034170418,0.0000013981761,0.000036191177,0.00062580087,0.00025302224,0.000020765747,0.9891775,0.009774527,0.0000040560903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003974072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002524512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010827434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008000743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052108755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05804974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101118422","doi":"10.1007/s11127-010-9594-9","title":"The price of transparency: do campaign finance disclosure laws discourage political participation by citizens’ groups?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Campaign finance; Public finance; Politics; Finance; Business; Economics; Accounting; Public economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.022371215061731124,"score_gpt":0.2341445634591671,"score_spread":0.21177334839743597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101118422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70790637,0.0017735572,0.0049710074,0.17593805,0.0005242712,0.000073853895,0.00038444815,0.000048567083,0.10837978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99511933,0.00014731346,0.00016439505,0.0030659721,0.00025175998,0.000012823085,0.000018932686,0.000007511958,0.0012120409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928328,0.0035257144,0.00023371709,0.0006229193,0.001523049,0.0012618827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75248355,0.19293043,0.042894088,0.0049660522,0.004079575,0.002646344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01094798,0.00022621317,0.00074177055,0.0008815335,0.0016386681,0.0051746904,0.0011251051,0.005713143,0.013807411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.111925915,0.0004553806,0.00048936007,0.001044286,0.0072183255,0.0062872022,0.0015429828,0.006405369,0.0007076241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002227805,0.0016583864,0.14712788,0.00053852226,0.0006351224,0.000757011,0.0065422594,0.0040969765,0.002181428,0.71025926,0.04031629,0.08365896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015138815,0.00059509167,0.2586035,0.000444987,0.0009119715,0.00034992312,0.007981412,0.015851388,0.0068209544,0.65398043,0.052782588,0.00016401958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006306889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006305906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013807411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019142476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002899603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057899177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108032207","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1907450","title":"The FTC, IP, and SSOs: Government Hold-Up Replacing Private Coordination","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.019770639648380477,"score_gpt":0.18264407671305682,"score_spread":0.16287343706467636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108032207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33928236,0.003097366,0.04296677,0.08630295,0.00075806235,0.000068735266,0.0010047742,0.00078636047,0.52573264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863253,0.0002709859,0.0009167978,0.0012052177,0.00023494072,0.000018051269,0.00003031313,0.00007277729,0.010925712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724966,0.00087984337,0.0001013929,0.0006340306,0.00045259454,0.00068242504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893783,0.005273285,0.0018048785,0.0020922185,0.00055248744,0.0008988605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034811886,0.00039392486,0.0009372114,0.00091541617,0.0028116833,0.009853047,0.0013615432,0.0071821706,0.030257804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018100502,0.00040163455,0.0006263995,0.001868552,0.009286626,0.01565383,0.0032719653,0.006074228,0.0013494485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118108524,0.000017099817,0.0014545509,0.000024629067,0.00001291481,0.00008271325,0.00029986067,0.0014874968,0.00011236671,0.97588307,0.008694586,0.011812582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095299394,0.000063977204,0.0025310763,0.00007349075,0.00006371843,0.000116002084,0.0010295826,0.004433759,0.000758538,0.96046674,0.030329691,0.000038099857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0144624775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011605821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030257804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045048543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057052285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101222396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113529582","doi":"10.1023/a:1023639521374","title":"Constitutional Design for a Rent Seeking Society: The Voting Rule Choice Revisited","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Constitution; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Economics; Constitutional amendment; Law and economics; Rent-seeking; Law; Political science; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.0678599396383057,"score_gpt":0.2569127034808392,"score_spread":0.18905276384253353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113529582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2593524,0.001698996,0.26529458,0.09798836,0.0007924749,0.00027323104,0.0004617053,0.00017072032,0.37396765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97585684,0.0003352878,0.011169345,0.0014197838,0.000412482,0.00010997412,0.00004870968,0.000060309372,0.0105872145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920596,0.004027293,0.00028937188,0.001115936,0.001351415,0.0011564458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98713315,0.006868001,0.0009490345,0.0022921397,0.0016486425,0.0011090905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011567419,0.00040456458,0.001669623,0.0013353551,0.004276726,0.009390939,0.002763707,0.0059289583,0.016680378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027909085,0.0005389939,0.0010209875,0.001557898,0.014301321,0.008940963,0.0019805385,0.0062548546,0.0010545001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051040356,0.0000077673985,0.000063856234,0.000008958972,0.0000036384515,0.000008794946,0.000078525714,0.0002802938,0.000057217825,0.99759513,0.00058096903,0.0013098347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012099913,0.000006667992,0.0001327857,0.000008190959,0.000004703017,0.000013248307,0.00008827603,0.002127637,0.000078036195,0.99550796,0.0020145234,0.0000058865535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003086712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038806277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016680378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004439612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003967428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06117505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117394527","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5850.2005.00006.x","title":"Changing Revenue Policy in the United States: An Overview of the Record and Perennial Puzzles","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Budgeting &amp Finance","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Quarter (Canadian coin); Nothing; State (computer science); Revenue center; Economics; Tax revenue; Public economics; Government (linguistics); Fair share; Business; Economic policy; Finance; History","score_opus":0.09275192381125652,"score_gpt":0.2763864857368789,"score_spread":0.18363456192562239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117394527","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030607663,0.78633195,0.000976828,0.11296987,0.0024592632,0.000020451103,0.0005420678,0.000059519763,0.066032395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17562693,0.79964435,0.0015195224,0.014154049,0.003078759,0.000027010507,0.0007093605,0.000038335347,0.0052017146],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987657,0.0004562343,0.000115945484,0.00011951469,0.00038111932,0.0001615363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771523,0.0011773454,0.00030508803,0.000074728894,0.00057347177,0.00015414658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023664492,0.00030853832,0.00032990696,0.0047681867,0.0014027489,0.0076088794,0.00059061695,0.0019400711,0.0028683178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038825118,0.00029092425,0.00027926764,0.0107522365,0.0020692507,0.0057830997,0.0012256795,0.0025864756,0.00036211478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009242532,0.00019407489,0.019150088,0.0024225495,0.00008131288,0.00028411965,0.0028931214,0.0023516582,0.00036579545,0.32864627,0.21469781,0.4288208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011160878,0.00006617632,0.04184813,0.003423923,0.000052111438,0.00022227353,0.005637407,0.0007687296,0.00021174688,0.05168933,0.89602274,0.000046248555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01933637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03276783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01933637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00662571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003737774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048073113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121324705","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.428241","title":"Enforced Standards Versus Evolution by General Acceptance: A Comparative Study of E-Commerce Privacy Disclosure and Practice in the U.S. and the U.K.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"E-commerce; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Business; Psychology; Accounting; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.023450281772255516,"score_gpt":0.2811300410800985,"score_spread":0.257679759307843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121324705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.986326,0.0008656116,0.0002115084,0.0022172614,0.000010362005,0.000014642231,0.0000789992,0.000003417587,0.0102722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992392,0.00020660352,0.000052404208,0.00016861492,0.0000034929824,0.000003525559,0.000024554754,0.0000029445632,0.00029875894],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.992427,0.0036949518,0.00058631273,0.00049145066,0.0018733132,0.0009270827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9289496,0.0356278,0.02138573,0.0034528337,0.008482366,0.002101602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070930193,0.000078270525,0.00024207306,0.0018962268,0.0014444586,0.0037577352,0.0007147725,0.0013112357,0.0036478303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043663736,0.00020740241,0.00035096015,0.005426591,0.004330079,0.004661692,0.002646533,0.0018272471,0.00033595908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015795084,0.00072363927,0.7557104,0.00020350328,0.00020304772,0.0004018524,0.0713724,0.001387713,0.0006804098,0.072236605,0.0041893795,0.09131153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007712065,0.00039175633,0.91060424,0.00016965742,0.00007969258,0.00021652426,0.07092374,0.0010001415,0.00044381243,0.006840919,0.009199713,0.00005269016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04899518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09547333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04899518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004646058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043000677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09741998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123486218","doi":"","title":"The Role of Intention in Distinguishing Employees from Independent Contractors","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Business; Law; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.032696474242162904,"score_gpt":0.26985830672821964,"score_spread":0.23716183248605674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123486218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5873636,0.0033229839,0.061326344,0.045897998,0.0006995592,0.00025177683,0.00010577757,0.000079821875,0.3009521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908971,0.00026193916,0.0029238139,0.0024922707,0.000098053475,0.00005121118,0.000016822698,0.00002004646,0.0032388787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98143905,0.009886125,0.0013694126,0.0013873074,0.0037058992,0.0022122045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9375076,0.047793757,0.00417975,0.0035322483,0.0041443324,0.002842265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024940973,0.0002711254,0.00044215293,0.0027689307,0.0050266534,0.008697581,0.0012409225,0.0037509028,0.0025824194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04683174,0.00040841592,0.00088138145,0.001375752,0.023323528,0.008370418,0.005156939,0.0064028986,0.00047178287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009708278,0.00006490977,0.02501415,0.00006290682,0.000020685242,0.00048610024,0.011960248,0.00016870756,0.00034462966,0.9336727,0.0021822443,0.025925664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005830236,0.00023584103,0.03530578,0.000928797,0.00014352388,0.001997158,0.03321097,0.0032389958,0.003171166,0.8811636,0.04035184,0.00019404454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044841124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006130464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024940973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002015394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040946486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13190204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133095213","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1090581","title":"Response to FAF Exposure Draft on Proposed Changes to Oversight, Structure, and Operations of the FAF, FASB, and GASB","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Voting; Financial accounting; Business; Relevance (law); Foundation (evidence); Accounting standard; Actuarial science; Finance; Political science; Accounting information system; Law","score_opus":0.014001133375461603,"score_gpt":0.19308119189143175,"score_spread":0.17908005851597014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133095213","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073382296,0.0020440794,0.003921076,0.8730011,0.059003275,0.0010559798,0.004199636,0.00088743615,0.048549317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022123251,0.00072735915,0.00349975,0.8589989,0.019567149,0.0015311709,0.0009628622,0.00029359365,0.09229597],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9569711,0.0076937536,0.0042522084,0.004586542,0.01787914,0.0086172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9041555,0.05401414,0.005422444,0.0041507795,0.027876398,0.0043806615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048591927,0.002708191,0.0030151242,0.0044891518,0.011542564,0.01826471,0.0077989968,0.17184426,0.01556895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16659047,0.0033071546,0.004923326,0.0029144594,0.006048494,0.0063014165,0.00522259,0.055443823,0.009537416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022566444,0.00015169535,0.0007516963,0.00012492361,0.000051337138,0.0004968037,0.0007379683,0.0007697249,0.0007877173,0.01918286,0.97027844,0.00644119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003206577,0.00017602963,0.0066263312,0.0006722784,0.00012925285,0.00016359735,0.00093226566,0.0011780031,0.0014364928,0.012910657,0.97512543,0.00032899994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11235537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092818566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17184426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029038386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03668254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25698173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142191510","doi":"","title":"Remedies Before Administrative Tribunals: What Can Be Learned from the Common Law?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Remedial education; Legislation; Analogy; Administrative law; Law; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.045556024657146255,"score_gpt":0.2572902917776262,"score_spread":0.21173426712047994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142191510","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0339973,0.0272436,0.12669325,0.53159493,0.0066903243,0.0003221306,0.0002828627,0.0003929962,0.27278256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83300364,0.0108664865,0.03182638,0.08417989,0.0055477773,0.00037366853,0.00018020849,0.0002711265,0.03375085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.961627,0.012102684,0.0023489369,0.0056009307,0.011670125,0.006650211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9277455,0.0445648,0.0061922288,0.010622238,0.0077937543,0.003081455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035735168,0.0007252663,0.0018139957,0.0025624633,0.009482466,0.02112104,0.006981198,0.023183746,0.01370976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1252499,0.0007912891,0.0018117627,0.0024791874,0.045331568,0.03866221,0.008976609,0.020897213,0.0023211795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010688106,0.000028587529,0.00027259885,0.00007288826,0.00001219866,0.00008760482,0.0006250147,0.0004104329,0.00007317815,0.9806394,0.006696655,0.011070725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004270444,0.00006067662,0.0013049826,0.00068101013,0.000036424914,0.00014163398,0.0015185206,0.0012115422,0.00040467823,0.89103764,0.103487745,0.000072489755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025402734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024031293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035735168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00936841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028608928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18898791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166152439","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-679x.2004.00163.x","title":"Enforced Standards Versus Evolution by General Acceptance: A Comparative Study of E‐Commerce Privacy Disclosure and Practice in the United States and the United Kingdom","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Accounting Research","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Government (linguistics); Business; Information privacy; European union; Accounting; E-commerce; Privacy policy; Good faith; FTC Fair Information Practice; Personally identifiable information; Faith; Information privacy law; Political science; Law; International trade","score_opus":0.12606191022701932,"score_gpt":0.39453882601923024,"score_spread":0.2684769157922109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166152439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957202,0.0007192735,0.00005884662,0.00037624105,0.0000053762083,0.0000060164416,0.00006033832,0.00000152099,0.0030522502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994766,0.00021537527,0.000025428051,0.00006130829,0.0000021144288,0.0000034168286,0.00004032669,0.0000021178394,0.000173283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911323,0.004563138,0.0010902896,0.00044296886,0.0018291227,0.00094216067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9387042,0.026255561,0.01977762,0.0026504926,0.010850606,0.0017615883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050430303,0.000105947285,0.00044705713,0.002484156,0.0011695141,0.0041717375,0.00050859095,0.0008692043,0.0029636023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035396434,0.00027679818,0.00035310685,0.005172521,0.002746022,0.0027528587,0.0031065412,0.0008370014,0.00025998088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088365056,0.00017395034,0.8277931,0.00029123644,0.0001704772,0.0008144654,0.12766731,0.00042034304,0.0009625667,0.0072118603,0.001360904,0.0322501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018915756,0.00015864031,0.9103218,0.00018540016,0.000032019292,0.0003073358,0.082518265,0.000236128,0.00025632014,0.00030684908,0.0056173243,0.000041019124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09259441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12222338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09259441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004667118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016694671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18411094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202214160","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005476","title":"Private Property and Tax Policy in a Libertarian World: A Critical Review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tax policy; Law and economics; Economics; Tax reform; Public economics","score_opus":0.07894097353695297,"score_gpt":0.31361371317780035,"score_spread":0.2346727396408474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202214160","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013867351,0.9951408,0.00009849097,0.002406226,0.0001493994,0.0000032997564,0.000007738918,0.000001622108,0.0020537837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003083901,0.99563897,0.00012146789,0.00058138877,0.00023972215,0.0000063844814,0.000012957243,0.0000017668367,0.00031341732],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905616,0.00036175802,0.0000700882,0.00012990739,0.00032523792,0.00005693464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960502,0.0026820023,0.00020935656,0.00007224978,0.0009246516,0.00006166769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023476568,0.0005414196,0.0011796795,0.006443824,0.0010591445,0.002857584,0.000873198,0.0026650513,0.0025944097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060353843,0.0005678924,0.00047995738,0.009931026,0.003089432,0.0045842254,0.00087999227,0.0024829106,0.00087193795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006691507,0.00009576443,0.0010044591,0.01753642,0.00016120757,0.00035462252,0.0011388273,0.001754416,0.00025887572,0.2370115,0.14975423,0.5908627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010628944,0.00002721038,0.0015752758,0.017752176,0.00007848859,0.00021342249,0.0006970834,0.00022997495,0.00014702669,0.027118629,0.9521282,0.000021803065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017416548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019543542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017416548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050970344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007610233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0369817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W224819031","doi":"","title":"On Estimating Disparity and Inferring Causation: Sur-Reply to the U.S. Sentencing Commission Staff","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Causation; Political science; Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Law; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.02644004181901276,"score_gpt":0.2250482988728123,"score_spread":0.19860825705379953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W224819031","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017157139,0.0020032404,0.0030426185,0.9875103,0.004010653,0.000015973317,0.00011231973,0.00002484617,0.0015642832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11648481,0.005336451,0.012409696,0.83432806,0.02762937,0.0003209871,0.00020987488,0.00012659603,0.00315415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9037624,0.07140043,0.0046904436,0.006010814,0.012625952,0.0015100386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.37187546,0.5822945,0.008780096,0.0097042825,0.023829622,0.0035160445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10372916,0.0009154353,0.002273122,0.0036482583,0.00819931,0.008263208,0.005170784,0.024451997,0.0032939154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45424855,0.0009757878,0.0015639196,0.0063527497,0.02220758,0.01135923,0.0064022345,0.042802595,0.0015320516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085732536,0.000058008212,0.00454498,0.00020213594,0.00009676369,0.00025385487,0.006793796,0.00072153803,0.000055556007,0.14600067,0.80987394,0.031312924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033672905,0.0001890261,0.011364292,0.002900004,0.00020399103,0.0005864597,0.021775719,0.009734329,0.001006699,0.49187642,0.45955378,0.00047257182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02885088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021713624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10372916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005943125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010544517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54857874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256615650","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006615","title":"Existence and Justification Conditions of Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Morality; Legal positivism; Law; Value (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Legal realism; Philosophy; Legal profession; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.04854953337624345,"score_gpt":0.23808984571901748,"score_spread":0.18954031234277402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256615650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03547703,0.0038530265,0.11034785,0.029411146,0.0008364585,0.00024185606,0.00047877728,0.00022481804,0.81912905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91928416,0.0019390612,0.04745775,0.002866974,0.0010347194,0.0007040639,0.00049499824,0.00012513653,0.026093114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859569,0.003943065,0.0011947731,0.0034570158,0.0037305413,0.0017177272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812351,0.010337595,0.0014973772,0.0023214933,0.0036463419,0.00096205703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011666639,0.00043185172,0.0010143225,0.0034681037,0.005853728,0.009696056,0.0014949768,0.0065768366,0.011836907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022740116,0.00076943514,0.001286559,0.001193762,0.03250236,0.013593239,0.006039462,0.008131048,0.0017747222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018095744,0.000003994041,0.00007338383,0.000011385237,0.000001569528,0.0000091380225,0.00014802256,0.0000404398,0.000039665723,0.99850863,0.00033347923,0.0008284133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020021624,0.000008650776,0.0002824494,0.00006713107,0.000006593684,0.000052443822,0.00024027357,0.0004617172,0.0002464061,0.97895324,0.019649081,0.000012040059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026551397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022441435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011836907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056921784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00796667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061699808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263008586","doi":"","title":"You Can't Pay Them Enough: Subsidies, Environmental Law and Social Norms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Public economics; Context (archaeology); Economics; Climate change; Social norms approach; Law and economics; Reputation; Environmental law; Social value orientations; Government (linguistics); Positive economics; Political science; Normative; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.009461731095218032,"score_gpt":0.16060782825658879,"score_spread":0.15114609716137076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263008586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52639186,0.0056337286,0.012931047,0.14888331,0.00030226607,0.000050518433,0.00015474258,0.000056776,0.30559576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940341,0.00064646296,0.00070440857,0.0016845397,0.00007619189,0.000018614892,0.000011887722,0.000010128581,0.0028135637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959455,0.0024369033,0.0000999767,0.00030293918,0.00077252986,0.0004421131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98283744,0.011732755,0.0027489995,0.0006501441,0.0013121554,0.0007185275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005483811,0.00017061945,0.0003466359,0.0008426479,0.0021890511,0.005099772,0.00064639427,0.0028374107,0.0044742487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019263033,0.00016008249,0.00030646243,0.0012137509,0.016167702,0.005775384,0.0019932333,0.002316132,0.00030239913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023926705,0.000058995778,0.0027218834,0.000024058018,0.0000074190993,0.000057848683,0.0011007324,0.0008913667,0.00009061815,0.9868456,0.0018948128,0.0062828055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003305276,0.00003409338,0.006010438,0.0000880434,0.000013908175,0.000049963084,0.002017499,0.0018765583,0.000178837,0.97426003,0.015414406,0.00002312541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008146148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00689282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008146148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005136477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004080893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037267923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265435883","doi":"","title":"The Interstate Commerce Commission - Disintegration of an American Legal Institution","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Commission; Supreme court; Mandate; Public interest; Public administration","score_opus":0.011476383747259327,"score_gpt":0.21571131441137417,"score_spread":0.20423493066411486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265435883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037626605,0.021361547,0.0041676955,0.3291059,0.008660709,0.00005028449,0.00017839271,0.00021696574,0.598632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66859996,0.013311811,0.0060221697,0.15030928,0.005516988,0.00011479742,0.00023055445,0.00019926259,0.15569519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99005276,0.0024345051,0.0003444674,0.0013326533,0.0039716233,0.0018639289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903667,0.0020067475,0.00074388855,0.0010518843,0.0030760823,0.002754674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008468559,0.0002305566,0.0003110559,0.0019497436,0.010891324,0.022220787,0.0009704109,0.0065385154,0.005970496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012319478,0.000372683,0.00041274953,0.0026830724,0.02138396,0.009801557,0.004790486,0.010970664,0.0011051091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009665106,0.000015232923,0.0008542558,0.000015295664,0.000003625068,0.00004701033,0.001740344,0.000049548173,0.000054028118,0.9274023,0.05693613,0.012872512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000084732565,0.000014917688,0.0021890998,0.00015047018,0.000009454475,0.00006880019,0.0024496748,0.00018058042,0.000092040595,0.05589452,0.9389177,0.000024405595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09253498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11476722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09253498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016613295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034911253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18399274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266900508","doi":"","title":"The Case for 'Reverse Depreciation' of Reclamation Costs","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Land reclamation; Taxpayer; Depreciation (economics); Business; Taxable income; Investment (military); Finance; Public economics; Economics; Accounting; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.015313865636641139,"score_gpt":0.21468760054061178,"score_spread":0.19937373490397065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266900508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07444739,0.0040816925,0.0432042,0.06980634,0.0014605216,0.000266176,0.00059257384,0.00042763716,0.8057134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7874384,0.0025559806,0.013018307,0.032325726,0.0019683028,0.00039106596,0.0003280414,0.00052089366,0.1614534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98493665,0.0018409259,0.00087785296,0.0030638895,0.0062020696,0.0030785534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758078,0.0075347708,0.0034665414,0.006276288,0.0059574936,0.0009571811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00926674,0.0010209064,0.0011062303,0.0022212826,0.0032621298,0.009530057,0.004299192,0.013555625,0.013633142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034139242,0.0012967688,0.002767343,0.0013893414,0.008666488,0.014562365,0.0048712157,0.013822919,0.0035997082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091676186,0.000060837334,0.0019522923,0.000124706,0.000039044204,0.0008947969,0.0006361683,0.0009519233,0.00054390857,0.957198,0.018218432,0.019288093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017803202,0.0002275323,0.008856309,0.0011307806,0.00011642601,0.0037502558,0.0011185219,0.0027616862,0.0031637584,0.31050158,0.6679641,0.00023098233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015542042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010773447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015542042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063003567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007536252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049007773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267573330","doi":"","title":"I Think, Therefore I Am; I Feel, Therefore I Am Taxed: Descartes, Tort Reform, and the Civil Rights Tax Relief Act","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Harm; Statutory law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Common law; Economics; Liability; History","score_opus":0.012003888679175513,"score_gpt":0.1666365700383039,"score_spread":0.1546326813591284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267573330","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07731193,0.021239005,0.0037327167,0.4603198,0.0007998661,0.000029656994,0.000077216624,0.00003423612,0.43645558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93590593,0.0072133113,0.00090289704,0.013368759,0.0007717141,0.000035805206,0.000025945505,0.000018425386,0.04175724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983779,0.0009769456,0.00003009211,0.00010942616,0.00030999005,0.0001955385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842393,0.00095816,0.00018287939,0.00011329214,0.00020567664,0.000115967945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022750879,0.00015779004,0.00021423268,0.0009261708,0.0049792165,0.0056640427,0.00046098165,0.0031191541,0.0036950184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045546307,0.00013297623,0.00014756186,0.0010060646,0.017917823,0.003606068,0.0017704277,0.0032234278,0.00044081232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046961545,0.000009324291,0.0003675543,0.000008638573,0.0000011050508,0.000050244125,0.0022051479,0.000143112,0.000017696571,0.9830535,0.009874098,0.0042648064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015699447,0.000018562087,0.0024688018,0.00016075741,0.000009488674,0.00008096337,0.0074494397,0.00056596997,0.00022752302,0.7219846,0.2669993,0.000018767052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03637074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03021073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03637074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066137947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045511555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07231808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278978939","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2693826","title":"The Death of Rules and Standards","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.024244085465677453,"score_gpt":0.2261757750307114,"score_spread":0.20193168956503393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278978939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062224902,0.0088808965,0.031003376,0.29815158,0.004782321,0.000068139845,0.00044013417,0.00013473714,0.5943139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8548011,0.0019567756,0.0037875082,0.024314912,0.003172712,0.00009470784,0.00012222373,0.00022332708,0.111526735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928519,0.0032105169,0.00025810243,0.0010423764,0.0018864,0.00075065513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756728,0.012048845,0.0013987911,0.005164523,0.004339543,0.0013756112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011257207,0.0003330774,0.0009884915,0.0016684717,0.004703566,0.008517337,0.0011106594,0.007101396,0.008845666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043339457,0.0004899227,0.00057036977,0.0011872465,0.037410025,0.013577897,0.0041662264,0.015173108,0.0014510964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063943803,0.0000036302806,0.00007677608,0.0000037604282,0.0000024935875,0.000011227518,0.00040100623,0.00006699691,0.000011182627,0.9921117,0.0047175656,0.0025872337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008526895,0.000004692098,0.00016440747,0.000020792952,0.0000019701367,0.000017679076,0.00025932552,0.00014961106,0.000039216386,0.964731,0.03459615,0.0000065576414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010129169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006568209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011257207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051717428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004923172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05953449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281570989","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2732045","title":"The Questionable Presupposition Underlying Hartian Accounts of Legal Facts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.021776296486158017,"score_gpt":0.22379497044714206,"score_spread":0.20201867396098405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281570989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08047611,0.0048900153,0.22618882,0.2556679,0.0034539693,0.00018537948,0.001771092,0.00046195925,0.42690468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571325,0.0009873873,0.013674554,0.010082585,0.003256662,0.000110263005,0.00014626028,0.00008704663,0.01452273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935446,0.0023787194,0.0003860131,0.001251741,0.0017842258,0.0006548613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9674421,0.020898668,0.0025390456,0.0049760006,0.003466858,0.0006773031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091257235,0.00041638018,0.0011446074,0.0026398983,0.0042389096,0.0068064234,0.0037049043,0.008367225,0.014505869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040586427,0.00084258657,0.00082345435,0.0024682165,0.033568706,0.020223511,0.0030640443,0.009078789,0.0023965908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010274612,0.0000048401266,0.000082403676,0.000015199917,0.000006134912,0.000021017575,0.00028072437,0.00011919175,0.000012877287,0.996101,0.0020373361,0.0013089834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006813507,0.000003237578,0.000062771935,0.00000918206,0.0000039859824,0.000017303157,0.00007067694,0.00032724784,0.000031928255,0.9957776,0.003684788,0.0000044541584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00583579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049572093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014505869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038608506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028326414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048526943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338462943","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2760381","title":"The Interaction of Exhaustion and the General Law: A Reply to Duffy and Hynes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.011536165021637004,"score_gpt":0.21204169633916245,"score_spread":0.20050553131752544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338462943","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038026762,0.0056670737,0.0001356853,0.9914206,0.0011917815,0.0000013138396,0.000021045202,0.0000029671487,0.0011792653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038820494,0.010232766,0.0004174538,0.9131519,0.032801487,0.000030709452,0.000036753354,0.00005232779,0.004456005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99504024,0.0025026447,0.0002589564,0.0010218394,0.00076169835,0.0004146696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91957384,0.071894474,0.0020750412,0.0017000234,0.0031424204,0.0016142199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010849727,0.00070785114,0.0026012734,0.0018741578,0.0058179763,0.008541383,0.0042328336,0.05339353,0.009887956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043542992,0.0007514242,0.0011019947,0.0034501432,0.024060924,0.024255577,0.0060213637,0.044434182,0.0027832072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000735304,0.00004002379,0.00045434394,0.00014602697,0.000038232218,0.0001759682,0.002172536,0.00016222983,0.00004070206,0.24615653,0.74396884,0.0065710386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011028663,0.000021212989,0.001358867,0.0006924359,0.000037214337,0.0002153003,0.0039118677,0.0004905952,0.00018397231,0.56964046,0.4232324,0.0001053476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01201568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011809781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05339353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005137712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005151902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057379544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W234804708","doi":"","title":"Offences Against Future Generations: A Critical Look at the Jodoin/Saito Proposal and a Suggestion for Future Thought","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01981906543283801,"score_gpt":0.21905092911796767,"score_spread":0.19923186368512966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W234804708","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012619164,0.010387454,0.0066404403,0.85109943,0.006647305,0.000068423695,0.00008268418,0.00002840827,0.11242667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5164284,0.01411911,0.0072359378,0.38270557,0.023276197,0.00041627872,0.00007727329,0.00015047744,0.055590767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99361897,0.0028323536,0.00028433916,0.0009327355,0.0013121517,0.0010193672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801981,0.014473378,0.00090436963,0.0009031044,0.0027656218,0.0007553932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017454125,0.00069265784,0.0011887788,0.0034872103,0.010435785,0.008860658,0.0058457083,0.038782455,0.008746174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036657676,0.00053512194,0.0011747999,0.0025711786,0.03325606,0.014543306,0.0031697901,0.02687445,0.0010678341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015642812,0.000020180947,0.00026081427,0.000051254574,0.000008704858,0.00021198955,0.0024776822,0.000115312236,0.000049229173,0.96384954,0.028312983,0.00462664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003444615,0.000028014647,0.00080735376,0.0009130879,0.000034933855,0.0004364748,0.0064090374,0.0007251518,0.0001909871,0.83896095,0.15139607,0.0000634456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017146034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030808408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038782455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060720406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008291857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09230739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2390795542","doi":"10.1017/cls.2016.10","title":"The High Cost of Transferring the Dream","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal doctrine; Doctrine; Tribunal; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Debt; Tax law; Law; Business; Sociology; Tax reform","score_opus":0.018753087874295676,"score_gpt":0.202733606679625,"score_spread":0.18398051880532934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2390795542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020676244,0.003188686,0.040921114,0.34993693,0.004127163,0.00033397978,0.000635306,0.00058168004,0.5795989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75269186,0.0066502653,0.033119835,0.051831093,0.004652845,0.00067952933,0.0008363903,0.00071949966,0.14881861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792311,0.009950781,0.00082218443,0.0020063878,0.0064337905,0.0015558181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8836102,0.05807088,0.0030433424,0.040410016,0.011282,0.0035836634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030737724,0.00050899514,0.000906859,0.0032252378,0.006427378,0.014778498,0.004642617,0.007881579,0.08003631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14727144,0.0007323414,0.0011321396,0.002018404,0.02098131,0.035668004,0.013706949,0.010914124,0.01774465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033869357,0.00006167824,0.000596252,0.000108699096,0.000013461922,0.0003365051,0.0023756044,0.00048405898,0.00013003577,0.8627904,0.06305694,0.070012465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027657601,0.000035715286,0.0007371936,0.00077889743,0.000016215969,0.00048810095,0.006821276,0.00091500086,0.00028861634,0.67508525,0.3147544,0.000051743296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008790743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005512407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99120927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004859633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00921545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26774812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2411352128","doi":"","title":"Law and Economics Scholarship and Supreme Court Antitrust Jurisprudence, 1950–2010","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Scholarship; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.024950205899817366,"score_gpt":0.21822918354453733,"score_spread":0.19327897764471996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2411352128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05499306,0.09732167,0.0021823437,0.157368,0.003352679,0.000045510762,0.0002527163,0.000036821028,0.6844471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7705039,0.03838178,0.0013968031,0.05216609,0.0045713005,0.00011017785,0.00019965932,0.00007909941,0.13259119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750096,0.0006674884,0.0001234223,0.0005022591,0.0007301551,0.00047570266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960968,0.0023146525,0.00039340442,0.000220393,0.00062493805,0.00034985744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038432172,0.00039583942,0.00032691102,0.0025147675,0.009694485,0.010400464,0.0008950876,0.009324898,0.0051859776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010792953,0.000515628,0.00041138273,0.003271805,0.026918698,0.0071613854,0.0031432363,0.010752129,0.0008377774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009165378,0.000023733042,0.0003834074,0.000020217989,0.0000037167688,0.000070471135,0.0025069492,0.00013711961,0.000054523483,0.9713757,0.019214954,0.0062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002563854,0.000033436474,0.007745153,0.00074546546,0.000019115536,0.00012929167,0.0026848724,0.0005333193,0.00028821253,0.3564883,0.6312657,0.00004148042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11178733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15538196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11178733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035305876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01695633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25616324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461149247","doi":"","title":"Human Rights and the Policing of Disorder in Public Spaces","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02305741844153766,"score_gpt":0.20192985586138154,"score_spread":0.17887243741984388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461149247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7241357,0.0007624978,0.021819947,0.018947296,0.00011633641,0.000079492514,0.00032393856,0.000069338304,0.23374543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770206,0.00006819696,0.00017890018,0.000093355025,0.00003883516,0.0000066108882,0.000010649625,0.0000042029815,0.0018971172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970921,0.001132879,0.00008973267,0.00024130213,0.00033705749,0.0011068123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859693,0.006485397,0.0041057062,0.0013760087,0.00081532425,0.0012482522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022345379,0.00015110345,0.0004941916,0.0016793676,0.0030153634,0.0056992536,0.0007558182,0.001999063,0.008820759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014861568,0.0002143191,0.0003766905,0.0014867285,0.01594276,0.003596298,0.00268831,0.0014058314,0.0003710756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009979586,0.00006525415,0.01926392,0.00003414503,0.000027280017,0.00017726417,0.0033465545,0.0053962027,0.0001968493,0.95909816,0.0033337667,0.008960799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050187624,0.000058978894,0.020403277,0.000077758945,0.000024584328,0.00010419736,0.012202323,0.0069930856,0.00036424317,0.944658,0.01503366,0.000029799567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0286373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027509496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0286373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040358747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033041541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05694121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469581622","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2782419","title":"Unequal Access: Making Sense of EI Eligibility Rules and How to Improve Them","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Brain Institute; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Computer science; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Computer security","score_opus":0.031692075028454066,"score_gpt":0.2564811905166368,"score_spread":0.22478911548818276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469581622","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29524615,0.0030415778,0.36131212,0.08641127,0.0014945173,0.00046792228,0.0010216016,0.0006262796,0.2503785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644141,0.0006700232,0.02656637,0.0023332287,0.00038638376,0.0001619207,0.0001384564,0.00017186995,0.0051576924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9733714,0.014084858,0.0022381477,0.0032324193,0.004357942,0.0027152651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8396595,0.1201278,0.010081584,0.017294046,0.008625892,0.0042111706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041321207,0.0006016696,0.0018025511,0.0032847468,0.004206786,0.016049294,0.0039417357,0.0047906865,0.023970647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22934069,0.00079057534,0.0010325914,0.0041532763,0.011325008,0.034961723,0.008366971,0.008971699,0.0013724713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011543761,0.0001492669,0.010530606,0.0001058049,0.000057876423,0.00019600603,0.0032660507,0.0033447626,0.0002927109,0.91219985,0.005321824,0.064419776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022102495,0.000019239678,0.0022506854,0.00010188297,0.000027320255,0.000043534703,0.0021291438,0.00717302,0.00022678975,0.98279667,0.00517888,0.000030799856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070757386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072298776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041321207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026979374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054488126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25215918","doi":"","title":"Requiem for Regulation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; State (computer science); Scope (computer science); Private rights; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Property rights; Law and economics; Power (physics); Economics; Business","score_opus":0.03853676507875877,"score_gpt":0.20040230475542375,"score_spread":0.16186553967666498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25215918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008819251,0.0053038504,0.018868204,0.338917,0.01363615,0.0002683569,0.0004900591,0.00043662186,0.6132605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36515713,0.0038385252,0.016945727,0.41610357,0.014775756,0.00091060955,0.0007827224,0.00037039747,0.18111558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98046714,0.0034015223,0.0011679606,0.0031472773,0.009413676,0.0024023482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833429,0.007699514,0.0011002487,0.0028577032,0.00408898,0.00091060926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011530557,0.0004388811,0.00081966067,0.0009800867,0.0054017636,0.008633524,0.0024899796,0.017927753,0.014355809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032346137,0.00055036944,0.0016272801,0.0005505337,0.010488483,0.0072479886,0.003472992,0.017779173,0.005265131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008439169,0.000021880938,0.00017849379,0.000023256312,0.0000033956164,0.00007925798,0.00022986345,0.000082931205,0.00020728285,0.9481653,0.047612853,0.0033870253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027512042,0.000052837855,0.0006507767,0.00028711985,0.00001224502,0.00018020853,0.00036925293,0.00036712785,0.00052118197,0.3093258,0.6881769,0.000028973252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010026716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010182698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017927753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00435038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014402209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0609802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600943488","doi":"","title":"The Role of Apex Courts in Federal Systems: Beyond the Law/Politics Dichotomy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Apex (geometry); Political science; Law; Relation (database); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.009660259449531689,"score_gpt":0.20559414604971457,"score_spread":0.19593388660018288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600943488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39356294,0.009515146,0.09652541,0.057055842,0.00052340707,0.00009112416,0.000108333435,0.00015252677,0.44246522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943984,0.00046351124,0.0019763694,0.00070298265,0.000121670404,0.000018686718,0.0000073791657,0.000011343216,0.0022995526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99196714,0.0035173951,0.00030435904,0.00094224315,0.00179125,0.001477579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842694,0.008311067,0.0017625765,0.0024654884,0.0016782254,0.0015132027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010526271,0.00015072686,0.000599525,0.0018224024,0.006862637,0.014825246,0.0011176473,0.0033334089,0.0045092017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020147061,0.00030840098,0.00052651647,0.0014955265,0.019892633,0.010937301,0.006896891,0.0050186873,0.00046398188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054270918,0.0000032959413,0.00057786464,0.00000849184,0.0000027128615,0.000026503732,0.0006594964,0.00018680481,0.000064329026,0.9952793,0.00020783179,0.0029780653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019356658,0.00002807656,0.0024663305,0.00009285474,0.000017718121,0.00007347908,0.0015639118,0.0015313538,0.0003947028,0.9754304,0.018364513,0.000017313903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003229117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033300505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014825246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054635815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053967983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05566889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602708680","doi":"","title":"Deadly Discounts: How Reimportation Jeopardizes the Safety of the U.S. Pharmaceutical Drug Supply under the Federal Trade Commission Amendment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Business; Amendment; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.03250537453556199,"score_gpt":0.24646849448406435,"score_spread":0.21396311994850237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602708680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19395548,0.0031457976,0.013026499,0.1230231,0.0011195312,0.00016165551,0.0003890323,0.00017758294,0.6650014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94724107,0.001259,0.0020506561,0.014942721,0.0005488777,0.000051690033,0.00006770168,0.00008108209,0.03375706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992461,0.003511156,0.0002750331,0.0007420687,0.0017832933,0.0012274022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97285426,0.017209686,0.0024959883,0.0030933016,0.003440573,0.0009062529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014609923,0.00039590284,0.00051791704,0.0011991789,0.006755572,0.011674097,0.0019819348,0.00801908,0.013247769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042458378,0.00034191526,0.0008704379,0.0012372194,0.009045663,0.009785414,0.0036649427,0.007920567,0.0010152904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006586081,0.000061819905,0.0024338402,0.000021305583,0.000022678421,0.0003762426,0.0021194073,0.0010017933,0.00017369678,0.953709,0.027525492,0.012488834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012196827,0.00013499729,0.003820186,0.00021149768,0.00015072279,0.00046819958,0.0045288694,0.005273498,0.0010706724,0.77298015,0.21113844,0.000100825695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028935203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026611192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028935203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054354896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006462406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07726556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624899232","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0023","title":"States of Emergency","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Legislature; Principle of legality; State of emergency; State (computer science); Constitutional theory; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Politics; Law and economics; Phenomenon; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Sociology; Democracy; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07127432804805992,"score_gpt":0.24292732138496992,"score_spread":0.17165299333691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624899232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004317499,0.003250039,0.0035601305,0.014297969,0.0013739455,0.000051640665,0.0010907301,0.00014821574,0.9719097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45971227,0.008070681,0.005167312,0.02002886,0.0016530645,0.00032430902,0.0023112537,0.00020692137,0.5025254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983675,0.0004070401,0.00011518083,0.0003225678,0.00033374544,0.0004539938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864787,0.0004453675,0.0001756937,0.00026553916,0.00030717946,0.0001583787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012735529,0.00034356554,0.00032547646,0.00097060186,0.0035929538,0.005870576,0.0006709356,0.0024652,0.09597287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004710735,0.00022417856,0.00046035743,0.0015701574,0.003104017,0.00530279,0.0038740123,0.003045328,0.0083056195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008886847,0.000003893325,0.00020003962,0.000035083693,0.000002042529,0.000054680902,0.00046130462,0.00008189825,0.000027650165,0.93949944,0.049712535,0.009912553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043445602,0.000008723324,0.00048369574,0.00012141383,0.0000029497078,0.00012386272,0.0006067213,0.00008010826,0.00005665675,0.078374974,0.92012656,0.00001005433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067144865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008606966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09597287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028517735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032387685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3210612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780154711","doi":"","title":"The Rank-Order Method for Appellate Subset Selection","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Rank (graph theory); Set (abstract data type); Order (exchange); Random assignment; Law; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Economic Justice; Outlier; Political science; Mathematics; Business; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.022070758406200926,"score_gpt":0.2617362908625423,"score_spread":0.23966553245634137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780154711","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002273751,0.0003212307,0.9909388,0.00036488732,0.00012927443,0.000603175,0.000518584,0.00045992548,0.0043903645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056508526,0.00043514062,0.9306638,0.00029775326,0.00035536627,0.0023085354,0.0017107389,0.00035050453,0.007369619],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96782815,0.022353688,0.0010636513,0.0027432384,0.005508158,0.0005031434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9501954,0.03475948,0.0019739668,0.007199966,0.0052995184,0.0005716614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023087598,0.0013823517,0.0020871467,0.005003806,0.0022996878,0.0035036816,0.0023405189,0.001514278,0.0184302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08273254,0.00083772955,0.0016639552,0.006127501,0.0021211477,0.0028237537,0.002304225,0.004114278,0.0066021103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003752512,0.00022720211,0.007630143,0.0005098804,0.00031969303,0.00024018734,0.0007780326,0.036371805,0.0012880638,0.32674256,0.05673773,0.56877947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043067368,0.00038433293,0.0047197696,0.0002483701,0.00016750183,0.0005851222,0.00051926903,0.3850672,0.0033604396,0.48422325,0.120104,0.00019006383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034985926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060027135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023087598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016845337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052409396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12210041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796386235","doi":"10.29173/alr1371","title":"Economic Instruments and the Kyoto Protocol: Can Parliament Implement Emissions Trading without Provincial Co-operation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Jurisdiction; Kyoto Protocol; Treaty; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Emissions trading; Legislation; Economics; Opposition (politics); Public administration; Law; Business; Political science; Greenhouse gas; Politics","score_opus":0.04095168421376772,"score_gpt":0.2715737244063203,"score_spread":0.2306220401925526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796386235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07832632,0.033461276,0.012383613,0.11625821,0.00090735423,0.00013470615,0.00030573204,0.00007916994,0.7581436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94486254,0.011363897,0.0031633687,0.010520235,0.00038008764,0.00009399579,0.000106106454,0.000031846175,0.029477997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99122894,0.0029472744,0.00032884063,0.000529635,0.0034973356,0.0014679928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934268,0.0038330045,0.0007059326,0.0004701157,0.0013192261,0.00024488367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008285958,0.00017322673,0.00037206995,0.0014196727,0.0032955958,0.0047493814,0.0009170404,0.0038264443,0.0028455807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022513315,0.0002513655,0.00035802324,0.002009928,0.00596045,0.0031296217,0.0011451511,0.0030509038,0.00056156574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018029798,0.00000851613,0.00045743707,0.00004974428,0.000007705923,0.000037858077,0.00021539522,0.0004651838,0.00011945649,0.9853758,0.0038660963,0.009378914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007787558,0.00005423262,0.008179177,0.00029238523,0.000046013287,0.000080611484,0.00057912624,0.001469796,0.0007351091,0.73583615,0.25259817,0.000051385996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09148983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10933848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90851015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009661365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01686526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18191457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803046184","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/dwus4","title":"Consumer Privacy in a Behavioral World","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Consumer privacy; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Consumer protection; The Internet; Information overload; Business; Private information retrieval; Consumer law; Advertising; Computer security; Computer science; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04729736856716322,"score_gpt":0.23927737656460452,"score_spread":0.1919800079974413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803046184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4213042,0.0045288284,0.055410262,0.15944692,0.00039819744,0.00009716251,0.000806991,0.00009576001,0.35791177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98826224,0.00061886077,0.002283144,0.0047871065,0.00015151667,0.00003936572,0.00007247635,0.000014261521,0.0037710627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451005,0.0030492165,0.00012112496,0.0005928146,0.0013432569,0.00038353604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98855466,0.0057687806,0.002087025,0.0018408587,0.0013230788,0.0004255616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00580434,0.00022029759,0.00026899503,0.00068151526,0.0015381998,0.0058132512,0.000488727,0.0020972516,0.0049966886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01898609,0.00017821946,0.00033670667,0.00094035635,0.006209173,0.005258295,0.0021951287,0.002981319,0.00040143475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036477762,0.00006304306,0.010424139,0.000034327604,0.000027003649,0.00008417827,0.0017625855,0.0012679021,0.0003104382,0.97026855,0.0030331977,0.012688129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034063138,0.00010067533,0.014735113,0.00013668372,0.00003740826,0.00018784768,0.0027358576,0.005970211,0.0007425383,0.8999109,0.075363286,0.00004541416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004277605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028707038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058132512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028901005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014907435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03069669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28393280","doi":"10.1007/s10858-017-0109-6","title":"The Rule of Reason Re-Examined","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biomolecular NMR","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development","keywords":"Rule of reason; Economic Justice; Law; Section (typography); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Supreme court; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.024643719437867858,"score_gpt":0.22301513117275643,"score_spread":0.19837141173488856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28393280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036927823,0.002978192,0.19159389,0.02066517,0.004108427,0.00029535094,0.0006614377,0.0006960452,0.7420738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6984398,0.001411469,0.06765273,0.0043443562,0.0008145003,0.000253116,0.0005487794,0.00037476682,0.22616048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954058,0.0006672823,0.0003663019,0.0019582913,0.0011650436,0.00043730694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994131,0.0013443928,0.00045858676,0.0024473465,0.0013620534,0.00025657794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031931326,0.00056932104,0.0007880263,0.0013131972,0.0024442817,0.0055700676,0.0020494773,0.0031598208,0.030483374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0116213225,0.00039088918,0.0012047504,0.00076747005,0.008578207,0.006288176,0.0026019325,0.0044727856,0.007043237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025691921,0.000013493628,0.00047370634,0.000049824135,0.00001960456,0.00016746175,0.00034656023,0.0002578954,0.0005908003,0.9800413,0.0039395955,0.014074214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023968181,0.00003489948,0.0008486181,0.00011299768,0.000039943825,0.00050422584,0.00046092278,0.002299704,0.0020031056,0.81825644,0.17537643,0.000038756774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032358724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033860821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030483374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026973651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035153683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10197699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W287095879","doi":"","title":"The Philosophy of Law and Economics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Freedom of contract; Doctrine; Privity of contract; Law and economics; Law; Freedom of choice; Economics; Political science; Business; Exclusion clause; Contract management; Management","score_opus":0.017123894255801037,"score_gpt":0.1735082307026005,"score_spread":0.15638433644679944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W287095879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031471285,0.08357233,0.02165498,0.0825004,0.0016991253,0.00006789727,0.00035871685,0.00016990474,0.8068295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5769216,0.08656711,0.026178533,0.025852278,0.006917257,0.000587091,0.00045999198,0.00034876633,0.27616745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680734,0.0017721007,0.0001225238,0.00045370014,0.00064195984,0.00020246665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970687,0.0018127877,0.00018599433,0.00037204663,0.0003795583,0.00018099125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027963559,0.00082034117,0.0009849122,0.0015083402,0.0033743843,0.009100048,0.0011196603,0.0038594569,0.013104426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035624043,0.0005385266,0.0006523308,0.0016822562,0.022458382,0.007406813,0.0023278943,0.007122113,0.003687201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003001168,0.000006922117,0.000053727577,0.00003815743,0.0000046664486,0.000016011154,0.00035808567,0.00012391999,0.000026476944,0.98252857,0.012894379,0.00394603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008436584,0.0000095365,0.00012641771,0.00020098206,0.0000031865866,0.000038642724,0.00032347164,0.00030859566,0.000022112905,0.80921084,0.18974218,0.000005537978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004146088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028250553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013104426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077335583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005522575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056111097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892375663","doi":"10.1089/elj.2018.0512","title":"Campaign Finance Regulation in North America: An Institutional Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Supreme court; Political science; Agency (philosophy); Election law; Scholarship; Democracy; Public administration; Commission; Language change; Political economy; Law; Economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.018745244676774186,"score_gpt":0.2508199610559309,"score_spread":0.23207471637915672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892375663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1312342,0.01776571,0.002954605,0.12593354,0.00034506695,0.00008740874,0.00033558553,0.000098890974,0.72124505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9475157,0.012867281,0.0015975677,0.012656496,0.00036183948,0.00015220359,0.00016167261,0.000031726053,0.02465555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997465,0.00063893874,0.00006543943,0.00029106817,0.0004685542,0.0010710174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581146,0.0014266603,0.00072674686,0.00024759292,0.0012145224,0.0005730799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022702646,0.0002438519,0.0003642213,0.002602919,0.010119319,0.01436303,0.0016770206,0.0033957441,0.006025666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039850664,0.00037129872,0.00037158997,0.0034322536,0.012291723,0.0035912541,0.0028520161,0.0037944592,0.00022719344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014503128,0.000083711,0.007740485,0.00009969609,0.000023155475,0.00036485086,0.01183965,0.001133732,0.00024485073,0.94993705,0.011573379,0.016944941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004204546,0.00006982384,0.08402315,0.001533424,0.00011466917,0.00029288835,0.06037736,0.0022140667,0.00074151333,0.12374835,0.7266663,0.00017647372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63864815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71067923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63864815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04093486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04106938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7269598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911880519","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0118","title":"Nothing to hide, but something to lose","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Argument (complex analysis); Dimension (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014755831856533263,"score_gpt":0.17889282991633443,"score_spread":0.16413699805980117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911880519","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043331683,0.0064669806,0.038598478,0.48644784,0.0026946487,0.00004470166,0.0002589638,0.00013093319,0.4220257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8467233,0.002370154,0.0033868295,0.086211346,0.0014258963,0.000060428836,0.00008980383,0.00012573367,0.059606444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99225545,0.0036403744,0.00020743583,0.0011325877,0.0019793166,0.00078477873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913003,0.0046231905,0.0010076528,0.0018663247,0.0007372111,0.00046540215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072856457,0.00039475283,0.00054087676,0.0004984651,0.004774284,0.006363091,0.0009942974,0.0065709194,0.010307093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019413523,0.0003407266,0.0005096496,0.0004823044,0.040142573,0.015900273,0.0053546643,0.008614253,0.0025884458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032376236,0.00001493475,0.0004913258,0.000050599017,0.000020733896,0.00014775268,0.0039445907,0.00009098378,0.00018849364,0.9651281,0.022055129,0.0078349635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019586212,0.000044241293,0.0006353987,0.00024990243,0.000023665034,0.0007677698,0.0036913396,0.00023332975,0.0006396513,0.7320877,0.26156715,0.000040417377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017475211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017171941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010307093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018875756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018819487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03853059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912097679","doi":"","title":"\"Providing Essential Services of Reasonable Quality to All Canadians\": Understanding Section 36(1)(c) of the Constitution Act, 1982","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Underpinning; Law; Section (typography); Order (exchange); Political science; Quality (philosophy); Sanitation; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.110776023013309,"score_gpt":0.2567147494172821,"score_spread":0.14593872640397312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912097679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13994019,0.00799796,0.006246895,0.33500937,0.00082115806,0.00017813542,0.0025637108,0.00009518004,0.50714743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8928618,0.0038804542,0.005150125,0.05163337,0.00033156533,0.00012230384,0.0003085353,0.000027754155,0.04568409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945005,0.00076757144,0.00016929414,0.0003903155,0.0022785072,0.0018938585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581146,0.0016342349,0.00048614724,0.00024240032,0.001341575,0.000484239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004167196,0.00026248698,0.0003081641,0.0014694793,0.010878325,0.0073411446,0.0014251046,0.00692496,0.0034256198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014012359,0.00034442198,0.0003980195,0.0021552683,0.015412558,0.002462931,0.0020171134,0.004409259,0.00031030417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007139335,0.000009618301,0.0015699245,0.000031165582,0.0000030837014,0.00007636141,0.0033891455,0.00033060138,0.000111369234,0.9706826,0.020439725,0.0033493096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006893958,0.000053995827,0.04426704,0.00080862065,0.00007155563,0.00021400819,0.014583041,0.0025363707,0.000837011,0.3187214,0.6176099,0.00022812425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9653881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97612584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046188444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046188444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13443024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33512217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948973771","doi":"","title":"IS THERE A DOCTRINE OF CANADIAN PUBLIC UTILITY LAW","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Constraint (computer-aided design); Law and economics; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Value (mathematics); Law; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.10538407743938027,"score_gpt":0.23896358984151944,"score_spread":0.13357951240213917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948973771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0106702605,0.0058513135,0.016875014,0.23103687,0.0016248132,0.00009038864,0.0005876719,0.00018065723,0.73308295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7698396,0.006726978,0.017605865,0.07973861,0.0013624899,0.00014554612,0.00052910164,0.00020013774,0.1238517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841971,0.0014829874,0.00037166075,0.0019655519,0.008403564,0.0035791027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845803,0.0033188567,0.00086858444,0.0013400707,0.008304211,0.0015879956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009556804,0.00043148422,0.0011551798,0.00260349,0.015856743,0.012722217,0.004049543,0.008866116,0.013358912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030963808,0.0005844808,0.0009587557,0.003640223,0.024562396,0.008186578,0.0030172952,0.0075570126,0.0021409763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004629638,0.0000033018414,0.00023921323,0.000021907657,0.0000030181761,0.000029462268,0.00041573925,0.00006373708,0.00004061584,0.98282444,0.011995623,0.0043583997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031045358,0.000012699489,0.0025362454,0.00041299133,0.000035196615,0.00013344263,0.0012469363,0.000954723,0.0002761334,0.49705157,0.49721467,0.00009446332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9002245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8899156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09977549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07313483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13165058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53063285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964194326","doi":"","title":"GIFTING CULTURAL PROPERTY IN CANADA: TESTING A TAX EXPENDITURE","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public economics; Cultural property; Property tax; Business; Incentive; Statutory law; Valuation (finance); Income tax; International taxation; Law and economics; Double taxation; Tax reform; Indirect tax; Accounting; Economics; Law; Cultural heritage; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.07746631787845992,"score_gpt":0.22097048995628793,"score_spread":0.143504172077828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964194326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5244768,0.029254576,0.0018857499,0.06260497,0.0007071818,0.0005491623,0.00839354,0.00007536692,0.37205255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95828867,0.009789035,0.0011014539,0.0036759502,0.0001412203,0.00006842859,0.001560768,0.00003061665,0.025343897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866122,0.0010610813,0.00037261785,0.0005746493,0.008159209,0.0032202739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93754447,0.013804844,0.0037114187,0.0016386568,0.04031806,0.0029825214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009842149,0.00034318073,0.000886148,0.0062950356,0.008609465,0.0067785643,0.0025441803,0.0015614786,0.00608049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054460794,0.00038509446,0.00068006356,0.013503147,0.0046930504,0.0020858708,0.0020136924,0.0032095553,0.000313839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044353906,0.00025866373,0.19795157,0.0006987938,0.00030603568,0.000758344,0.0075004282,0.004033968,0.00022370179,0.57310635,0.12836955,0.08634908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033916713,0.00024960056,0.53459114,0.0017597228,0.0010979767,0.0002728319,0.020619227,0.01036064,0.0014206509,0.028110696,0.40090892,0.00026943051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99831295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28029346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9666955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965444922","doi":"","title":"Turning Standards into Rules — Part 5: Weighing the Factors in Capital Gains vs. Ordinary Income Decisions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Real estate; Capital (architecture); Capital gain; Actuarial science; Economics; Paragraph; Asset (computer security); Income tax; Business; Public economics; Finance; Law; Political science; Macroeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03369103313678516,"score_gpt":0.2807263382973368,"score_spread":0.2470353051605516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965444922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09077271,0.009358061,0.12265052,0.03396279,0.0015372603,0.00041989397,0.0014245883,0.00018197786,0.7396922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9405647,0.003183859,0.018910155,0.0027180589,0.00070147804,0.00016783773,0.0004046041,0.00021714784,0.033132188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99078953,0.0047156117,0.0004080555,0.00079547765,0.0026745766,0.00061666657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9645912,0.02347145,0.0037960927,0.0030836004,0.0042742197,0.00078336074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010515741,0.0005689614,0.00065489195,0.002733412,0.0015201949,0.0113486955,0.0010830371,0.0019759792,0.022730177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0495628,0.00041530648,0.0009169229,0.0029638095,0.0077953595,0.0072941543,0.0024274832,0.0043890867,0.002104291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004487598,0.000028151799,0.002799319,0.00005283529,0.000030166319,0.000023541907,0.0005015601,0.0020078158,0.00013996428,0.9545583,0.012680004,0.027133401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010912078,0.000036829635,0.007111797,0.00030326901,0.00004107217,0.000025178368,0.0008130642,0.0031657235,0.0006201772,0.9616135,0.026232747,0.00002582661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0087992195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01085133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022730177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039014996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037261685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07603997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972050110","doi":"","title":"Turning Standards into Rules Part 4: Machine Learning and Economic Substance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Database transaction; Intuition; Revenue; Directive; Statute; Substance over form; Transaction cost; Harmonization; Public economics; Law and economics; Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Law; Computer science; Political science; Accounting; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.021939649906569575,"score_gpt":0.26574098683937625,"score_spread":0.24380133693280667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972050110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011459992,0.020046407,0.4472276,0.0655336,0.0024543314,0.00014504982,0.0019876938,0.0006630326,0.45048228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6185714,0.029297339,0.17596826,0.008642139,0.005249075,0.00055085646,0.0029660063,0.0011056811,0.15764926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965934,0.0016404864,0.0002949577,0.00045340555,0.0008564074,0.00016117372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898559,0.0057333875,0.00067058054,0.0021936093,0.0013935121,0.0001530927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003838503,0.0005532607,0.0005740517,0.0020331813,0.0008632096,0.007237329,0.0009823607,0.0017853668,0.025246607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022592358,0.0004330561,0.0007204301,0.0028071976,0.005286735,0.006895383,0.0015595381,0.005254981,0.0053245025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011528803,0.00001906026,0.0005220229,0.00005691525,0.000014473617,0.000019589994,0.00011481495,0.0035519733,0.00012892274,0.9194594,0.027434992,0.048666324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039255506,0.0000079158435,0.000455473,0.00014737993,0.000005854265,0.000018312305,0.000046910445,0.0051296283,0.0002994198,0.9484472,0.04542947,0.000008463814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043759583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030266908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025246607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019979712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019498912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08445835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994188556","doi":"10.3386/w14276","title":"Affirmative Action in Law School Admissions: What Do Racial Preferences Do?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.5118614761099449,"score_gpt":0.49358282683711363,"score_spread":0.018278649272831293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994188556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5006937,0.006704297,0.0021949601,0.31424126,0.000796731,0.00011814487,0.00050665723,0.000022141845,0.17472212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98418856,0.0013142,0.00024644763,0.009358063,0.00074957305,0.000085353866,0.000088231915,0.0000091267,0.003960419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.982093,0.009924733,0.00045535062,0.0008717268,0.0034116106,0.0032436938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9622306,0.018111572,0.007505148,0.0010925686,0.0034360776,0.007624082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020077448,0.00023518155,0.00058181904,0.0017169507,0.006761475,0.00826983,0.0012731325,0.0044468828,0.014410123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077368945,0.00028006194,0.00060346693,0.002785087,0.007896716,0.0070678503,0.005253299,0.0063248985,0.0013611089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083737064,0.002250077,0.315131,0.000260029,0.00014985063,0.00040171965,0.030363487,0.0012640435,0.0003830707,0.42143914,0.050054077,0.17746615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002480765,0.00044699703,0.4091524,0.00080001616,0.00014130163,0.00019394874,0.045085836,0.0015713355,0.0007382052,0.48203555,0.059470274,0.000116139134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027761899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048999336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027761899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065028737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008398205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106180966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011121208","doi":"10.1111/ablj.12154","title":"NAFTA 2.0 and LGBTQ Employment Discrimination","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Business Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Mandate; Supreme court; Employment discrimination; Lesbian; Transgender; Political science; Queer; Law; Unintended consequences; Federal law; Gender identity; Sociology; Gender studies; Legislation","score_opus":0.03736024636792676,"score_gpt":0.2129796824239586,"score_spread":0.17561943605603184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011121208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11735678,0.008723191,0.0023861232,0.120726064,0.0011939243,0.00004982129,0.0006857327,0.00008279143,0.74879557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8451295,0.004153983,0.0013421427,0.0668788,0.0010165687,0.00023494696,0.0003159259,0.000061855106,0.080866344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543935,0.0014421786,0.0001659984,0.00050973217,0.0009605643,0.0014821304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951454,0.0027319712,0.00086577656,0.00030938655,0.00070408155,0.0002433447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005163418,0.00027726515,0.0003133433,0.0018320665,0.00819436,0.0062046195,0.0008741128,0.01077543,0.010815317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0098085245,0.00031812387,0.0005845073,0.001784952,0.0062596546,0.0027511208,0.00287333,0.0044921082,0.0011904059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025327545,0.00003773519,0.003562007,0.000036557394,0.000007974607,0.00032862317,0.0019558147,0.00014039082,0.00023982163,0.9608877,0.023881884,0.008896168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060843606,0.00010067986,0.026959177,0.0010354209,0.00008735356,0.0004985981,0.0048403554,0.00084358297,0.000951001,0.28364274,0.6808757,0.00010448065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12245597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.161738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12245597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006331786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0094136875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24348634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011555336","doi":"10.29173/alr2597","title":"The Economics of Canadian Anti-Discrimination Laws","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Atlantic School of Theology","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Redistribution (election); Politics; Welfare; Law and economics; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Political science; Law; Statement (logic); Public economics","score_opus":0.0556861440749085,"score_gpt":0.21083253266137705,"score_spread":0.15514638858646856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011555336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03914664,0.010804145,0.0023845145,0.06373612,0.0002900569,0.00006452034,0.0009426828,0.000057032856,0.8825744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.869243,0.011332508,0.0011973755,0.005699563,0.00027680176,0.000048286984,0.00023217154,0.00003171761,0.11193854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708706,0.00029570784,0.00003227524,0.0001741136,0.0015543932,0.0008563973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997497,0.0006841023,0.00015362847,0.000108012915,0.001265441,0.00029179626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016212991,0.00033294086,0.00037135606,0.0026719817,0.0057154894,0.0066910475,0.0009783324,0.00275063,0.012158648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006191728,0.00033489295,0.0003928053,0.0024822708,0.006384844,0.0013711309,0.0011060628,0.0020578015,0.0004639901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009837997,0.0000106498155,0.00072095793,0.00002499097,0.0000048547568,0.000048099653,0.00015401417,0.0015856024,0.000057639983,0.9723555,0.018228708,0.00679921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050595267,0.000027492904,0.02187439,0.0003905894,0.000057006127,0.00012126205,0.0013782848,0.009232878,0.00027479065,0.470058,0.49643937,0.00009531347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96782523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9701868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11401893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11401893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07060916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82726914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014448542","doi":"10.21991/cf29392","title":"Seeing Double: Peace, Order, and Good Government, and the Impact of Federal Greenhouse Emissions Legislation on Provincial Jurisdiction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Legislation; Greenhouse gas; Federalism; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Public administration; Cooperative federalism; Order (exchange); Parliament; Politics; Economics; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.02374672746555814,"score_gpt":0.22877400903918657,"score_spread":0.20502728157362843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014448542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16192108,0.0039506317,0.0145029705,0.17892794,0.0005527588,0.000055910783,0.00023539655,0.00007258185,0.63978064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814208,0.00061538303,0.0012196872,0.006242816,0.00006527827,0.000016629909,0.0000224451,0.000016124824,0.010380856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918669,0.0021632926,0.00017535668,0.0007758738,0.0027002157,0.0023184144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325234,0.0036575426,0.00045451548,0.0003838511,0.0018552315,0.00039644697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053565977,0.00020263618,0.00030025686,0.0010413085,0.016231012,0.013065921,0.0017601288,0.0038728,0.0036964302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015744112,0.00025392752,0.00043986746,0.0014588882,0.042862926,0.005313261,0.004008018,0.0066012503,0.0001892567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050329522,0.0000022468907,0.0005411969,0.00000785931,0.0000016351732,0.000045662593,0.0036456957,0.0001828175,0.000048602713,0.99130356,0.002257612,0.0019581488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003368385,0.00002563043,0.011580637,0.00029774566,0.00007090049,0.00010881486,0.026780024,0.0027631796,0.0015921842,0.78948504,0.16716792,0.000094197996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86755806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92001563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13244194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067625426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06949101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49065912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034690477","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190922771.001.0001","title":"City, State","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stalemate; Megacity; Constitutionalism; State (computer science); Political science; City-state; Urbanization; Population; Constitutional law; Pace; Law; Political economy; Geography; Sociology; Economy; Economic growth; Politics; Economics; Demography; Democracy","score_opus":0.0592733040141126,"score_gpt":0.1902316670155419,"score_spread":0.1309583630014293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034690477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044562892,0.0023763906,0.00035330767,0.0016440867,0.0006168527,0.000021787539,0.0016776235,0.00008751353,0.9927769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013439184,0.00373695,0.00035210545,0.000621351,0.00017360425,0.0000523706,0.0019879013,0.000079157675,0.9795574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976915,0.000040154646,0.000009863715,0.000060229442,0.00007766711,0.000042818694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998863,0.000015579886,0.000008648495,0.000015000473,0.000050073915,0.000024342273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001089876,0.00046777236,0.000288746,0.0009765727,0.0016818542,0.0047931853,0.000508918,0.00088198594,0.21736704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004783403,0.00020204407,0.0001760572,0.003216778,0.00089076255,0.0031243241,0.0015606744,0.0014074402,0.077806056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007809764,0.000011970798,0.00030850433,0.0000772978,0.0000017294585,0.000051572573,0.00037072526,0.00013204227,0.000046775585,0.2637818,0.67008764,0.065122165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011105128,0.0000020116386,0.0002111459,0.000031863216,5.629754e-7,0.000021666441,0.00014382499,0.000028554761,0.000013314056,0.005007489,0.9945372,0.0000013341147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016768359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028550599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21736704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020565307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017532654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7271652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046221960","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3269525","title":"Online Appendix: A Theory of Social License When Regulatory Pressure is Jointly Produced by an EPA and an NGO","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"License; Social pressure; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01592670055162058,"score_gpt":0.2267856167984923,"score_spread":0.21085891624687172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046221960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047161696,0.0007658194,0.09424482,0.019642247,0.0016401078,0.0005010762,0.081149824,0.0007500856,0.7965899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15895826,0.0020773544,0.07367548,0.006702055,0.0020643496,0.0016530633,0.031275894,0.00058845466,0.72300524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924076,0.00014706216,0.000063033935,0.000119540295,0.0003150056,0.00011473132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943197,0.0033451116,0.00031022105,0.0004135283,0.0014336605,0.00017783535],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093328353,0.000606078,0.00086487434,0.0019341359,0.0014271798,0.0022019162,0.0019576233,0.0050123073,0.42491427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008582072,0.00059122185,0.0010535853,0.0029818874,0.00086657365,0.0032033557,0.00095144904,0.0022366385,0.08498089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008409188,0.00006408086,0.00041721502,0.000091155816,0.0000075294047,0.00017463595,0.00008606632,0.0029820995,0.000074818156,0.54603314,0.4381572,0.011903601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036673893,0.000014398362,0.0009614386,0.00012844849,0.000013220253,0.00034242054,0.0002062827,0.008458921,0.00023387201,0.7353316,0.25423273,0.000040089693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015044678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014814247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42491427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028675583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034560894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82028997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110152378","doi":"10.1017/s0021855320000285","title":"Constitutional Impediments to the Effective Review of Tax Cases in Nigeria by a Specialized Tax Court: Lessons from the United States and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Context (archaeology); Constitutional court; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.022276913061680857,"score_gpt":0.23470757408565937,"score_spread":0.2124306610239785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110152378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71754867,0.0028531058,0.001913303,0.070887566,0.00029489066,0.00042502844,0.00024725826,0.00006878822,0.20576149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864857,0.0010252394,0.0012597857,0.004122807,0.00003177775,0.00004072871,0.000053169926,0.000016118898,0.0069645904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98255825,0.0031131078,0.0007917217,0.0011710433,0.0053717163,0.0069941827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9279615,0.0292266,0.0033909865,0.0023948373,0.025249455,0.011776533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016810384,0.00019855796,0.00045464362,0.0022503692,0.028126072,0.012124887,0.0022722257,0.003837143,0.0045290617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05277686,0.00065038964,0.00036113153,0.002668869,0.008340352,0.0022974636,0.0041368725,0.0057879323,0.00023872577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007021224,0.0008660597,0.1308155,0.00042704714,0.00023537136,0.00930157,0.07332863,0.0076109963,0.003906305,0.56828797,0.07233426,0.13218418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006514709,0.00039906957,0.25869885,0.0019210953,0.0004896852,0.0020613873,0.21669707,0.013257394,0.0046747597,0.050317835,0.44986624,0.00096515025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98191524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09867374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09867374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2183834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7159314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121595661","doi":"","title":"Benefit Taxes and User Fees in Theory and Practice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Public economics; Government (linguistics); Revenue; Public finance; Economics; Argument (complex analysis); Tax revenue; Tax deferral; Accountability; User fee; Government revenue; Business; Finance; Law and economics; Tax reform; Macroeconomics; Law; State income tax; Political science","score_opus":0.0209125658503367,"score_gpt":0.21175192829797274,"score_spread":0.19083936244763602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121595661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07483764,0.022902934,0.2048794,0.07469578,0.000677668,0.00018587452,0.00021285555,0.00019128018,0.62141657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946387,0.006029135,0.023648398,0.0034956257,0.0004687003,0.00017577605,0.00006316276,0.000050229733,0.01968208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98517424,0.008547749,0.0006281683,0.0012178376,0.003422021,0.0010099295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812525,0.013361274,0.0014560645,0.0020278292,0.0015374816,0.00036483214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101095615,0.00046692972,0.0007139253,0.003639227,0.0034963193,0.011826905,0.0013705872,0.0054051005,0.006831903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033860806,0.0005135136,0.0005315654,0.0045351456,0.026415959,0.014738879,0.003241933,0.0047766045,0.000628586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001973048,0.0000056615017,0.0002142504,0.00001140792,0.0000011425532,0.000008837531,0.00020559624,0.00040674143,0.00000887542,0.99606735,0.0004825565,0.0025855724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007724754,0.000012571991,0.00051741506,0.00011769103,0.0000037029713,0.00003521359,0.00058939896,0.0015082464,0.00009382994,0.9644363,0.032666907,0.0000111086765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017264025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016824229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017264025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01299391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076890117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09427786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122021206","doi":"10.21991/c9f37p","title":"SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS? LESSONS FROM SOUTH AFRICA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social rights; Political science; Development economics; Economic growth; Human rights; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07820777877036614,"score_gpt":0.2358387415988572,"score_spread":0.15763096282849107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122021206","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13254324,0.12297148,0.002474607,0.39555898,0.0010552076,0.00009214596,0.00020279671,0.00002070434,0.34508085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.903722,0.069425955,0.0010448229,0.013134825,0.0004441818,0.00006581158,0.00005450127,0.0000302305,0.012077673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988965,0.00043182803,0.00004930326,0.00007206632,0.0001057063,0.00044460615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99512804,0.003770664,0.0002494775,0.00015392835,0.000370363,0.00032747758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033022042,0.0006390269,0.000841497,0.001588173,0.0042306837,0.005294738,0.00074383826,0.002732683,0.010189058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068942956,0.00029362607,0.0003762207,0.0026561776,0.009323035,0.009984738,0.0049945177,0.005018897,0.0003673053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013123237,0.00008653415,0.00256178,0.0011606121,0.000047202448,0.003784291,0.061249945,0.0010134118,0.0005487522,0.81550443,0.015981862,0.09792993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009200482,0.00006279703,0.008449169,0.006085052,0.00008971066,0.0011074219,0.11001888,0.00048641552,0.0007005699,0.559375,0.313473,0.00005997623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06405371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08237856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06405371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00818198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009239641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12736177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122387600","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1272493","title":"The Easy Core Case for Judicial Review","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Judicial review; Grievance; Law and economics; Political science; Judicial deference; Democracy; Judicial activism; Law; Deference; Sociology","score_opus":0.05361012014729367,"score_gpt":0.26258916562326273,"score_spread":0.20897904547596907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122387600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060269,0.003140914,0.040477246,0.21426627,0.0018630086,0.0002929391,0.00041431058,0.00024680182,0.6790295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8867487,0.00094561296,0.006566672,0.03894472,0.0043563913,0.00033558032,0.00010366368,0.00024533275,0.06175346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97987145,0.0073154145,0.0006846569,0.0034442837,0.00498482,0.0036994119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91489744,0.055256303,0.0043494916,0.012086005,0.007986142,0.0054246206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022117672,0.00040764926,0.0017591245,0.003041643,0.0063594263,0.011851277,0.0025793936,0.016858067,0.031093093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12594098,0.0007562649,0.00094429957,0.0016423707,0.016020644,0.01695029,0.007395117,0.013234026,0.0037476914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003645849,0.00001724463,0.00032510998,0.00002944111,0.000010260333,0.00016249696,0.00024773643,0.000120966106,0.000065673434,0.97578883,0.01847592,0.004719774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069268215,0.000013065279,0.00049028406,0.00007346232,0.00001355406,0.00018028976,0.00019271544,0.0005822939,0.00013883236,0.9649205,0.03330804,0.00001761519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004192261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005418886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031093093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003945684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007913661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11697084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122820070","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1286","title":"Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Democracy; Original jurisdiction; Certiorari; Court of equity; Court of record; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.02751140719575689,"score_gpt":0.2368840862889685,"score_spread":0.2093726790932116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122820070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.837136,0.006953913,0.011523003,0.03380373,0.002341204,0.0014010959,0.0050290725,0.0005611264,0.10125085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667574,0.0021847119,0.00578954,0.002562882,0.00066084956,0.0003577297,0.0022898118,0.000103231505,0.019293875],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97094226,0.005897115,0.0026822572,0.0017118537,0.014117468,0.0046490086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9291733,0.019425958,0.017680734,0.0046538967,0.023871073,0.005195098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0332319,0.00020799391,0.00047737037,0.0052007586,0.0060760076,0.00958782,0.0014292717,0.0016810626,0.0018496185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09059632,0.0008228763,0.0005879275,0.010256944,0.0026417018,0.004273748,0.004319482,0.0052042087,0.00060900685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006016212,0.0009407041,0.3126011,0.0008710418,0.00014559817,0.0011356671,0.047777697,0.005706156,0.0035783995,0.087794736,0.085274026,0.45357338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046157264,0.0004743442,0.65394646,0.00047258477,0.000049587285,0.00022613353,0.017087037,0.0025401101,0.0025453637,0.0046176687,0.31778735,0.00020727285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11682278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22140925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11682278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026144847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039343458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23228562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122972675","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0007","title":"The Vertical Restraints Paradox: Justifying the Different Legal Treatment of Price and Non-Price Vertical Restraints","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vertical restraints; Rule of reason; Resale price maintenance; Supreme court; Competition (biology); Subject (documents); Economics; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.031081620689989327,"score_gpt":0.20533742162380983,"score_spread":0.1742558009338205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122972675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09965426,0.005883127,0.1683787,0.116507374,0.0015208668,0.00012794866,0.00029910737,0.0002512087,0.6073775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9491246,0.0018408427,0.014563633,0.0134080835,0.0013519876,0.00018565594,0.00009400728,0.00013376147,0.019297507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914056,0.0022203824,0.0005010965,0.0011831326,0.0037002438,0.0009895832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98867875,0.0063761636,0.0013097427,0.0017649079,0.0014379681,0.0004323748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077070817,0.0005881562,0.00094138726,0.0018555411,0.0034180295,0.007548967,0.0039044172,0.011462274,0.004938011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020138977,0.00059321465,0.001760309,0.001350666,0.02416508,0.01179525,0.0055586374,0.0134921195,0.00092721847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026043374,0.0000038931876,0.000040568648,0.000006703681,0.000001660178,0.000031942276,0.00008193505,0.00009835592,0.000041760777,0.99870145,0.00044692442,0.00054208183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024578081,0.000008962248,0.00017583474,0.000056492747,0.000005975795,0.00005357463,0.00013553275,0.0017915278,0.00014740226,0.9892687,0.008317489,0.000013985949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061126826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011462274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048310603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040759385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123224081","doi":"10.11575/sppp.v8i0.42525","title":"The Problem with the Low-Tax Backlash: Rethinking Corporate Tax Policies to Adjust for Uneven Reputational Risks","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Backlash; Corporate tax; Business; Tax policy; Tax avoidance; Double taxation; Economics; Public economics; Tax reform; Accounting; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.11396053482097146,"score_gpt":0.31649309551687826,"score_spread":0.2025325606959068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123224081","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.145365,0.0056809946,0.12877245,0.4240254,0.006270535,0.00043163472,0.00021042618,0.0031810908,0.28606248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88379234,0.0013871362,0.02725839,0.055929534,0.0011429347,0.00018033812,0.00008020105,0.0008303366,0.029398838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883482,0.004409505,0.000467761,0.0017316246,0.0031641119,0.0018788831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95769984,0.015597027,0.003984409,0.008755478,0.0103187775,0.003644475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019406797,0.0006587263,0.0005207599,0.0022572319,0.0086465115,0.014534822,0.0027005433,0.0069717797,0.009303751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08078907,0.00056300097,0.0007754904,0.001310157,0.00981382,0.017462501,0.0061660456,0.014913871,0.0037202572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017271073,0.00048806553,0.013360882,0.00017840041,0.00014814195,0.0004714575,0.012126098,0.007815914,0.0030199103,0.553734,0.18494414,0.22354025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012699071,0.00029464776,0.010700812,0.00082389434,0.00014680733,0.00043427278,0.010044795,0.012997678,0.0048524057,0.4781966,0.48097664,0.00040445448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017543484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019188084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019406797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008128483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011325083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10263419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123523432","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4498","title":"NEITHER FISH NOR FOWL: ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGES IN THE MODERN ADMINISTRATIVE STATE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Adjudication; Appeal; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Law; Power (physics); Accountability; State (computer science); Separation of powers; Administration (probate law); Independence (probability theory); Politics; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.10596558408195621,"score_gpt":0.31663987585797604,"score_spread":0.21067429177601982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123523432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06783969,0.020865489,0.011501295,0.23623283,0.0020127955,0.00004293844,0.00010707766,0.00006491307,0.6613331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86692524,0.007198367,0.0030454404,0.026584385,0.0018578573,0.00006940515,0.000047546993,0.000062016756,0.0942097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99552995,0.0019280416,0.00014177656,0.0006467378,0.0010248172,0.00072871195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953578,0.002521743,0.0004021543,0.00042826682,0.0008313305,0.00045876225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069154575,0.0001282397,0.00028154833,0.001084152,0.008577542,0.009609271,0.0007085709,0.0043964107,0.0065899966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014072985,0.00041638772,0.00025448448,0.0011669041,0.02088993,0.012460861,0.002849759,0.0067586154,0.0011158219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000763014,0.000005544521,0.0005459587,0.000008531947,0.000001413817,0.000018760828,0.001629976,0.00005484759,0.00003156988,0.9800496,0.010783701,0.0068624387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022676302,0.000040835916,0.0025113295,0.0002068693,0.000010270686,0.000065014836,0.0030235632,0.0003981734,0.00016990904,0.48338854,0.5101196,0.000043245578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040323265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06786304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040323265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008228093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077845315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08017713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123639769","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2012.15.2.277","title":"<i>Ex ante</i> Fairness in Criminal Law and Procedure","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ex-ante; Supreme court; Discretion; Criminal law; Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.06051355066028592,"score_gpt":0.2621809337231436,"score_spread":0.2016673830628577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123639769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09548839,0.002306236,0.1805807,0.060844194,0.0007797132,0.00015958173,0.0002904153,0.00018206755,0.65936863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94501615,0.00051434484,0.020915456,0.010448589,0.0004180097,0.00022546083,0.00006938714,0.000037848455,0.022354597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928235,0.00315796,0.00039656786,0.00091135653,0.0016163288,0.0010942778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964747,0.0015079075,0.00057322974,0.0008263179,0.000489258,0.00012850038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009443112,0.00033183527,0.00031158273,0.00060496357,0.0037415312,0.0068317926,0.0012281956,0.003949507,0.0028143253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01026979,0.00029215947,0.0005508696,0.00057646475,0.015166782,0.00488205,0.0030567253,0.0040737037,0.00064068934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008922295,0.000008317596,0.00038855145,0.000009060649,0.0000030758824,0.000015776062,0.00041935255,0.00020452253,0.00011215806,0.99401337,0.0010643143,0.003752542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018375502,0.000055856886,0.0023327381,0.00007072632,0.00001444672,0.00010689147,0.00036679945,0.0012767126,0.0010491586,0.95746213,0.03722107,0.00002504095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048944736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054605743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009443112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003100282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004171603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049940586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123802554","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2008.00351.x","title":"A Canadian Copyright Narrative","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Normative; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Liability; Subject (documents); Sociology; Work (physics); Political science; Public relations; Law; History; Computer science; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05369986895425746,"score_gpt":0.1999083986745747,"score_spread":0.14620852972031723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123802554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022520067,0.016538851,0.0018988843,0.15667528,0.0017955684,0.000059833867,0.0014990672,0.00010927845,0.79890317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49396142,0.01714051,0.0029561422,0.01893198,0.00063613645,0.00006943924,0.00069018785,0.00015369961,0.4654605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535346,0.00043463262,0.00008593126,0.0005113808,0.0026290412,0.0009856112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99488455,0.0009976792,0.00019367879,0.00032414155,0.0027225823,0.00087736093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002858519,0.0005101716,0.00038186755,0.002580136,0.020572321,0.014135923,0.0014709592,0.003407546,0.019718712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011484961,0.00027595263,0.00037888542,0.0049563716,0.012550522,0.0035510173,0.002298793,0.0033009239,0.0012882586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001436254,0.0000056532062,0.00049277913,0.000045942204,0.0000035759515,0.00012363792,0.0037742497,0.000197067,0.000077238525,0.85057735,0.13015166,0.014536549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004397535,0.00000423169,0.0013511076,0.00010528781,0.000006092925,0.000055696102,0.0026758313,0.00027222364,0.000073089344,0.023387793,0.9720386,0.000025597237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9835343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1420858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1420858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17693047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99505883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124174232","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhs002","title":"THE FTC, IP, AND SSOS: GOVERNMENT HOLD-UP REPLACING PRIVATE COORDINATION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Damages; Intellectual property; Context (archaeology); Business; Competition (biology); Law and economics; Commission; Incentive; Patent infringement; Government (linguistics); Industrial organization; Economics; Public economics; Marketing; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.018894525867776197,"score_gpt":0.1958500298451659,"score_spread":0.17695550397738968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124174232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0630285,0.005081804,0.054877687,0.22324668,0.0015501198,0.00012910417,0.00011261354,0.00034617382,0.65162736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9206717,0.001084344,0.008226382,0.031484928,0.0013307821,0.00017249097,0.00004421139,0.000101010926,0.03688413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97676396,0.0066980757,0.0008830997,0.0035773304,0.008368822,0.0037086788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779669,0.0111182565,0.0019791687,0.004827384,0.002795448,0.0013127897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01417136,0.0005932367,0.000691973,0.0016770533,0.007480248,0.016932763,0.0022690583,0.023169141,0.0065372707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029066134,0.0004960525,0.0014000282,0.00192146,0.03276988,0.014569798,0.0076765646,0.015968911,0.0006917046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000101584465,0.000007717519,0.00017689574,0.000009423932,0.00000307632,0.00004371284,0.00023458984,0.00023121577,0.000052614127,0.9903668,0.0041783187,0.004685557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004861911,0.000081528524,0.0015312345,0.00021314109,0.000030568503,0.00015636564,0.00073861936,0.0027159788,0.000662894,0.8295827,0.1641596,0.00007888334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028192978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019743478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028192978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018706031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017006492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1357224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124708831","doi":"","title":"Female Justices, Feminism, and the Politics of Judicial Appointment: A Re-Examination","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Feminism; Law; Politics; Sociology; Empirical research; Judicial restraint; Political science; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.02773671338730788,"score_gpt":0.2202374845159424,"score_spread":0.19250077112863453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124708831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13530141,0.113008484,0.0022845427,0.2478597,0.0027295211,0.000019222169,0.00008968569,0.000016531118,0.4986908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93956494,0.01956595,0.0003106618,0.011073402,0.0030911234,0.000017224402,0.000021568747,0.000042824842,0.026312325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929703,0.003570919,0.00013350575,0.00091859687,0.0012614017,0.0011453622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99424356,0.004343302,0.00043186807,0.00017393555,0.00041636848,0.00039088132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006043551,0.0003344912,0.000591639,0.0020525164,0.008894428,0.009800419,0.0011561222,0.003221008,0.0069365194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064078546,0.00028689674,0.0003874235,0.0017273542,0.022894852,0.006978977,0.002937209,0.006218345,0.00052121084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026997894,0.0000328204,0.0027532694,0.00009516573,0.000007247698,0.00030249258,0.04947559,0.00005719314,0.00015688722,0.9108846,0.01046153,0.025746167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015576428,0.00006902194,0.017421488,0.0014224472,0.000017184148,0.0004472628,0.08542831,0.0002968717,0.00037346766,0.12391889,0.7705509,0.000038630387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0268752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051708587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0268752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010200211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045269253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07400811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124769274","doi":"10.21991/c99h4f","title":"IMPOVERISHMENT OF THE LAW BY THE LAW: A CRITIQUE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S VISION OF THE RULE OF LAW AND THE FEDERAL PRINCIPLE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020277116185443533,"score_gpt":0.22294320126077405,"score_spread":0.20266608507533052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124769274","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012037358,0.015443078,0.019308627,0.85773253,0.0028663112,0.000044340515,0.0000911023,0.000050678995,0.09242592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6836146,0.008345529,0.010271527,0.26366937,0.016090564,0.00035386314,0.00007434151,0.0002927798,0.017287362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95441705,0.022494981,0.0025624854,0.0057351775,0.011785992,0.003004332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9092636,0.073519275,0.0034202088,0.0047505316,0.0072746663,0.0017717252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043067466,0.0007660303,0.0034334997,0.004101343,0.012184487,0.01686126,0.006133878,0.045067474,0.0032228213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0766063,0.0014804834,0.0024293452,0.003616443,0.091105804,0.018141309,0.0062972945,0.051629085,0.00078335963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010627837,0.000014714006,0.000078770085,0.000021103127,0.000009316053,0.000031123716,0.0012639354,0.00017691893,0.000019736497,0.99001116,0.0065463693,0.0018162236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024157713,0.00001005017,0.00019298535,0.0001143143,0.0000102279855,0.000034822653,0.00033548925,0.00035512692,0.000059951813,0.9700917,0.02874904,0.000022203783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034609437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023506273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96539056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020143032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022584375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22776526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124799479","doi":"","title":"The Identifiability Bias in Environmental Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identifiability; Lawmaking; Law and economics; Doctrine; Environmental law; Common law; Political science; Law; Public economics; Economics; Legislature","score_opus":0.044115932583019,"score_gpt":0.21183736787476437,"score_spread":0.16772143529174538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124799479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032252893,0.013666858,0.2134743,0.30715656,0.003100098,0.00031777576,0.0016530962,0.00040671087,0.4279717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8709005,0.004553254,0.032419797,0.059116933,0.004949914,0.00064532174,0.0004015074,0.0002876509,0.02672506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93407613,0.0418627,0.0022197848,0.009587738,0.009396306,0.0028573226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7141457,0.24069557,0.008288003,0.022571845,0.012793684,0.0015051136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07631566,0.0007418861,0.0017274726,0.0025854474,0.005738019,0.009965643,0.0031258927,0.01155015,0.019112581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1911618,0.0009428225,0.0016428814,0.0024019068,0.041162778,0.020915529,0.005827679,0.015478449,0.0015710233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014504817,0.000010980284,0.0006434516,0.00005148376,0.000030414465,0.00008056276,0.00038434783,0.0005065966,0.000024717072,0.98805153,0.005608858,0.004592548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016077878,0.000008522463,0.0002479575,0.0000856781,0.000010514578,0.000041581916,0.00012673094,0.0010182229,0.00006422393,0.9862168,0.012148304,0.00001549832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009671368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054063895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07631566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075675836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40360057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124916167","doi":"","title":"Clarifying the Matter: Modernizing Peace, Order, and Good Government in the \"Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act\" Appeals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Federalism; Constitution; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Separation of powers; Jurisdiction; Parliament; Commerce Clause; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03183355028587525,"score_gpt":0.20068434169436386,"score_spread":0.1688507914084886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124916167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09569808,0.0070128883,0.024115933,0.30178705,0.0022135978,0.00018149648,0.0001395843,0.00015670493,0.5686948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92203784,0.001602988,0.003782738,0.048165306,0.0009803715,0.0000679032,0.000036805068,0.00007071888,0.02325542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98572046,0.004028878,0.00038039777,0.0011596682,0.0050976817,0.003612957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892385,0.007621704,0.00038689008,0.00042560243,0.0018291218,0.0004981306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013511922,0.00037973718,0.0005475899,0.0017407674,0.02301,0.0182729,0.0030072408,0.015921468,0.0034492824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029754255,0.0005866273,0.000626627,0.0021801477,0.044451173,0.008984087,0.006098137,0.020211874,0.0004569327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057903712,0.000005414774,0.00023843748,0.000008450174,0.0000026289426,0.0001528438,0.007183718,0.00011874688,0.00012084138,0.9838007,0.0056674774,0.0026950096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044664735,0.000025243547,0.0024736756,0.00026801325,0.000058074802,0.00016290683,0.01604573,0.0019765187,0.0008450765,0.6668739,0.3110919,0.00013426547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6385495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74537724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94555527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054444738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06038446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7271583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125313674","doi":"","title":"Shortening Agency and Judicial Vacancies through Filibuster Reform? an Examination of Confirmation Rates and Delays from 1981 to 2014","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Political science; Law; Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Nomination; Administrative law; Voting; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; Public administration; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.07302038904737562,"score_gpt":0.24959935877138076,"score_spread":0.17657896972400514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125313674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809445,0.0018781757,0.00043269614,0.0038577665,0.00012736452,0.00005592478,0.0017677537,0.000056225268,0.010879661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99367046,0.0007104425,0.00015746508,0.00036759055,0.00017774703,0.000052109277,0.0014306628,0.000034679077,0.003398832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908674,0.0012934682,0.00094500027,0.0011356908,0.0030918068,0.0026666718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9100967,0.016491149,0.050503116,0.0028089937,0.014390093,0.0057099415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009897573,0.0002509644,0.0004686447,0.0036081327,0.0021297652,0.0039357943,0.0016044115,0.0010353142,0.0066413265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07274806,0.00041466346,0.0005884312,0.0056270226,0.0014551842,0.0033865033,0.0026235152,0.0028328584,0.0015785295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051626586,0.00023872186,0.900043,0.0002319067,0.00010816027,0.00046882933,0.0065037366,0.0011962873,0.000501047,0.0044613695,0.012851721,0.07287887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019061357,0.00019489124,0.9732876,0.00012519136,0.000031808024,0.00014033433,0.0063920515,0.00033278443,0.00038620978,0.00029989114,0.01875446,0.000035705398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062864415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07489597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062864415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005709672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00625057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12499702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125947738","doi":"","title":"Protecting Taxpayers and the Environment Through Reform of Canada's Offshore Liability Regime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Strict liability; Liability; Statute; Business; Context (archaeology); Legal liability; Law; Mens rea; Culpability; Damages; Law and economics; Economics; Criminal law; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.008534184536167782,"score_gpt":0.16270915131409458,"score_spread":0.1541749667779268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125947738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028445417,0.011989563,0.0065729246,0.058006287,0.0016416453,0.00048561805,0.0036727914,0.00034245232,0.8888433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36239985,0.029535154,0.017077345,0.02825989,0.00096618704,0.0003826017,0.003165598,0.00023392354,0.5579794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808204,0.00013475487,0.00005227722,0.00014261456,0.0010262198,0.00056220783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997724,0.00027541156,0.000106076055,0.000113138674,0.0014119251,0.0003694507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011651841,0.00030585035,0.00021381944,0.0016600601,0.006726124,0.0059067355,0.0011345954,0.0021701718,0.012992058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003398403,0.00021358166,0.00027611208,0.0031956073,0.0029416976,0.0016139423,0.0017241127,0.0022651043,0.0016768554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032069172,0.00005338034,0.0044599394,0.00022421598,0.0000044231133,0.00025007068,0.002589798,0.0009230076,0.00068472367,0.64819163,0.24778812,0.09479864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000096745425,0.000017545368,0.011992074,0.0006794743,0.000007470718,0.00009398586,0.0018430621,0.0006301565,0.00040921723,0.014447892,0.969829,0.000040426014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9546251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9657954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04537487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037956666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10388056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27539623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126132474","doi":"10.32920/24653406.v1","title":"Why Michigan v. EPA Requires that the Meaning of the Cost/Rationality Nexus Be Clarified","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Discretion; Law and economics; Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Implicit cost; Set (abstract data type); Nexus (standard); Order (exchange); Economics; Law; Total cost; Political science; Microeconomics; Finance; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12750039501887458,"score_gpt":0.24936204848478846,"score_spread":0.12186165346591388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126132474","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025761347,0.002532342,0.011843211,0.5667866,0.0010952223,0.000060484235,0.00032122908,0.00017279097,0.39142683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66209495,0.0019619418,0.008831721,0.2762358,0.0014903202,0.00028445173,0.00018063134,0.00020479398,0.048715424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99162275,0.002535567,0.00022460525,0.0012394537,0.0030994029,0.0012782795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943843,0.0028007943,0.0003860832,0.00042052404,0.0016019539,0.00040636404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076733613,0.00045118245,0.0004736753,0.00097632996,0.006416385,0.0082521485,0.0023962294,0.017671155,0.008543854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016767675,0.00059238804,0.000756316,0.00085469167,0.014947598,0.012449823,0.003991552,0.015184811,0.0018824645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008569296,0.000007113077,0.00022990734,0.000015463867,0.000006092231,0.00007656035,0.0004172355,0.0001212221,0.00015102932,0.9689848,0.027197262,0.0027847483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004184943,0.000034401724,0.0014227714,0.00023215397,0.000030702377,0.00019607223,0.0009896776,0.0009341959,0.00089114736,0.75754184,0.23759967,0.00008559164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046137534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053050783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046137534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007916746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008698732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091737986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133444857","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3726262","title":"The Precedential Effects of the Supreme Court's Emergency Stays","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.011171086464146074,"score_gpt":0.19287332008065675,"score_spread":0.18170223361651067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133444857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7114834,0.0012893211,0.0020041598,0.021966053,0.00042891302,0.000054258893,0.00066746934,0.000066656256,0.26203975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99320364,0.00013448631,0.000062700914,0.0007135355,0.00012999009,0.0000061488963,0.000038264683,0.000008868626,0.005702359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574345,0.0010049038,0.00013226677,0.00045856813,0.0009469742,0.0017138193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630796,0.02626538,0.0032845123,0.0013987855,0.0023805515,0.0035912206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005065494,0.00023619412,0.0010091119,0.001364633,0.004037387,0.0068268124,0.0020103718,0.004979743,0.031652994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043500554,0.0004361024,0.000582797,0.0015063881,0.0040463745,0.0032492187,0.0021712305,0.007047937,0.0011451778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019987798,0.0008240203,0.017252939,0.00008995881,0.00016642874,0.001897665,0.0019828943,0.014368862,0.0016531787,0.9040364,0.032283135,0.023445707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012078136,0.0011502337,0.13691086,0.00021498204,0.0007293881,0.0005021123,0.011948351,0.027042305,0.0025065425,0.77002025,0.047484703,0.00028247293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042173732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07324076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042173732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055430573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005919837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1058898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137803152","doi":"","title":"The 'Individualistic' Approach to Arbitrariness, Overbreadth, and Gross Disproportionality","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Individualism; Supreme court; Criticism; Law; Economic Justice; Constitutional law; Political science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027487399436807797,"score_gpt":0.23440848125079575,"score_spread":0.20692108181398794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137803152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045356505,0.003525774,0.18874426,0.070862226,0.002151056,0.00022348668,0.000262175,0.00016148682,0.68871295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89290875,0.0010401321,0.027977958,0.030900085,0.001202345,0.00031136323,0.000058094465,0.00007266408,0.045528527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865333,0.0035679091,0.0005638559,0.0017676485,0.005473328,0.002093902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948349,0.0023715026,0.0006213479,0.00075440295,0.0011295654,0.0002882281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011564482,0.00073095394,0.0006936484,0.0016788881,0.0072487164,0.008949946,0.0030368909,0.0061558676,0.003070279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012497789,0.00048243706,0.0011961204,0.0012181916,0.047328025,0.004549421,0.0055167535,0.0112046795,0.0005491428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027622539,0.0000026870084,0.00007425591,0.0000050667627,0.0000027511464,0.000013013001,0.00030538152,0.00004305352,0.000038228518,0.99750996,0.0010728721,0.0009299915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015994829,0.000022934139,0.0006278204,0.000060429753,0.000020609814,0.00011833704,0.00026680864,0.0006147177,0.0006727203,0.93599373,0.061546892,0.000038840404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040047597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06927038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040047597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010235821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010403065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079628944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141045409","doi":"","title":"Unfair Subsidies and Countervailing Duties","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chapters","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Business; International trade; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.03230534366253399,"score_gpt":0.19611897871548717,"score_spread":0.16381363505295318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141045409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010790473,0.019300025,0.013677156,0.020314353,0.0010471499,0.000055095494,0.00010979411,0.000057937712,0.93464804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6425048,0.03740165,0.008391549,0.013022637,0.0026355744,0.00030327626,0.00016109276,0.00015815784,0.29542133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635905,0.0010560618,0.00013802553,0.00041080976,0.0013944552,0.00064164546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963291,0.002306681,0.0003830799,0.00044457163,0.00043491597,0.0001016412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028586932,0.0005630393,0.00077677215,0.001496414,0.0028444417,0.008340884,0.0013431829,0.0054214746,0.025389332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086916005,0.00039415926,0.00057516043,0.002174847,0.010824202,0.0064751143,0.0025938177,0.0057526925,0.0020914245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000295588,0.0000049033656,0.000026173278,0.000017295455,0.0000016019794,0.000012074267,0.00008067744,0.00016470507,0.000033420627,0.99217844,0.0037496714,0.0037281027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006367177,0.000010115074,0.00035009772,0.0001816278,0.0000057540533,0.00008118259,0.00016773348,0.0003694498,0.00016000311,0.9148015,0.08385831,0.00000790763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031280466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032448296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025389332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045048418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035495549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084935844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153612497","doi":"","title":"Climate Change, Constitutions, and Courts: The Reference re Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act and Beyond","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Appeal; Politics; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02235181953559653,"score_gpt":0.2143249446311711,"score_spread":0.19197312509557457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153612497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06428696,0.018252686,0.0041521513,0.29699308,0.001572013,0.000120453944,0.0005276608,0.000087911016,0.6140071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84452987,0.006980456,0.0023142751,0.079371266,0.00078396715,0.00013492611,0.00020988443,0.000060087383,0.06561527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98411673,0.0034332029,0.0003702317,0.0014762579,0.0057831444,0.004820383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821639,0.009017196,0.0005768372,0.00092553085,0.006155219,0.0011612645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008469439,0.00040933306,0.0006754967,0.0024585382,0.024347309,0.020896113,0.0030230023,0.011064295,0.0046760174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019825866,0.00075044273,0.00087123615,0.0043575694,0.029981783,0.005102812,0.0039225346,0.01319263,0.00048984407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055993282,0.0000059391296,0.0004431848,0.000016749538,0.00000638869,0.00010356362,0.0021734715,0.00026668925,0.000099811245,0.9832796,0.010984936,0.0026139678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007390155,0.000034363282,0.009415873,0.000651684,0.00011163219,0.00012686335,0.010782433,0.0020137178,0.00075110194,0.44568205,0.5300904,0.00026604038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96128494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9784122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13064677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13064677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18644811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94791305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169633878","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3855619","title":"Understanding Chilling Effects","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Normative; Conformity; Empirical research; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Positive economics; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13614961571252307,"score_gpt":0.2403606638520999,"score_spread":0.10421104813957682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169633878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0658061,0.0322462,0.066596024,0.1092081,0.0015896861,0.00009638894,0.0008944952,0.00045434514,0.7231086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8902621,0.013136062,0.0046067582,0.013696447,0.0016596577,0.00008560471,0.00027076842,0.0003066023,0.07597603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975726,0.0006685365,0.000076945544,0.00041556897,0.0007824575,0.00048383547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98070407,0.012861215,0.0010688303,0.0020382132,0.0025580872,0.0007696924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005388878,0.00043932354,0.00095728063,0.0027940723,0.0021402368,0.0061907982,0.0014938526,0.0034062816,0.025786744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025374914,0.00042636957,0.00060339697,0.0017625073,0.007070802,0.0072810636,0.0017305095,0.0060213692,0.0016196474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011959652,0.000021439419,0.0013756263,0.000048454473,0.000017015478,0.00007977341,0.0002677249,0.0014717977,0.00010162283,0.9611415,0.020547716,0.014915375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000957899,0.00001130137,0.002005151,0.00011172161,0.000031721782,0.000033648594,0.0002425038,0.0026837403,0.00020942312,0.943972,0.050675597,0.000013583376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033883438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041085064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033883438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046723126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049160332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086265326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182654442","doi":"","title":"Traders of the Lost Ark: Rediscovering a Moral and Economic Case for Free Trade","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free trade; Public good; Government (linguistics); Politics; Context (archaeology); International trade; Political science; International free trade agreement; Economics; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.022300973480597855,"score_gpt":0.208688038113507,"score_spread":0.18638706463290916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182654442","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070546135,0.012955161,0.018028572,0.5277877,0.0031084933,0.000035957746,0.00003501956,0.00009790692,0.36740506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87105906,0.004588893,0.0030053582,0.047748473,0.0017466994,0.000060155675,0.000025001207,0.00021412697,0.07155234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921559,0.0046198615,0.00016546964,0.0006986148,0.0011716272,0.0011885171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99290836,0.004699376,0.00044198008,0.00070349104,0.0005272109,0.0007196782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01120666,0.0004335127,0.0006722894,0.0010685317,0.013465628,0.024246776,0.0016388835,0.011894711,0.0051210946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01318877,0.0003888925,0.00054079166,0.0010018818,0.060262676,0.028280621,0.011827753,0.0209188,0.0009583694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012125412,0.0000085404745,0.00010244911,0.0000109005605,0.0000014344108,0.000112709386,0.008606758,0.0000881323,0.000039268132,0.9836373,0.00543288,0.0019475535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001722002,0.000016286042,0.0001063674,0.00014931073,0.000004869248,0.00014117108,0.013671919,0.00055981404,0.00018912302,0.79422617,0.1908916,0.000026148567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060911207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005412583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024246776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007129025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075974483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059267163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188167197","doi":"10.1007/s11127-012-9990-4","title":"Constitutional effectiveness","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.06670611532849748,"score_gpt":0.24040009625988817,"score_spread":0.1736939809313907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188167197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028400412,0.0009604797,0.0134087,0.003943674,0.00023193157,0.00021460374,0.00078930124,0.0001701594,0.9518809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89784133,0.00088979147,0.005629767,0.0021543258,0.00060377736,0.0002878673,0.000797007,0.0002561959,0.09153989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802343,0.006141553,0.0009206191,0.0028440845,0.0075365305,0.0023229164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9593555,0.020844206,0.0026663123,0.009804961,0.005260023,0.0020690232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013088593,0.0006961421,0.0013402043,0.0051182336,0.0031621289,0.009764852,0.0016571869,0.0024636316,0.11148673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062279068,0.00046442705,0.0010736673,0.0023639514,0.0059640897,0.007837714,0.003130141,0.0036760247,0.008509432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046065114,0.00006809631,0.0012175922,0.000090052046,0.000035492154,0.00003992207,0.00031032437,0.0004704304,0.0003492896,0.9668319,0.0057163155,0.024824534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008536869,0.00014682444,0.008400538,0.00019660794,0.00019789577,0.00031723606,0.0016332926,0.0025470431,0.0032338214,0.8009955,0.18220729,0.000038611823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022879785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022261834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11148673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004371772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039773537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37296027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W319139452","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Litigation Against Institutions: Remedies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.022861919059754342,"score_gpt":0.22423926960249055,"score_spread":0.2013773505427362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W319139452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06997576,0.008555896,0.06443238,0.26286024,0.0035964234,0.0005920383,0.00044294368,0.00058720354,0.5889572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92848486,0.0021871058,0.008289613,0.02088831,0.0043978193,0.00030770406,0.000091160444,0.00008693522,0.03526648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.969277,0.009294592,0.0019863239,0.0045079235,0.008847424,0.006086707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8985948,0.07515871,0.007834551,0.009396092,0.006683382,0.002332555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02303398,0.0008733252,0.0014108199,0.0047989343,0.008806454,0.014964698,0.0055133146,0.034006536,0.021847228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13638435,0.0011014154,0.0015485582,0.0033754364,0.014411091,0.013869947,0.0072967587,0.019571986,0.0019682017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034888086,0.00010008027,0.00055807794,0.00006928162,0.000032409454,0.00028600628,0.00049557205,0.00038147558,0.00016045074,0.97117597,0.016299218,0.010406698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022459206,0.00008295915,0.0015237759,0.00039270354,0.00021995544,0.00038365432,0.001266686,0.0040405416,0.00087380916,0.94489515,0.046024635,0.000071566836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063077346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077018323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034006536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005353499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011852406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121816754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191517068","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes 2021-58 Athletes 4 Athletes Foundation v Canada (National Revenue)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Athletes; Appeal; Amateur; Law; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Medicine; Physical therapy","score_opus":0.016502157946786274,"score_gpt":0.1878505371925571,"score_spread":0.17134837924577082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191517068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008125466,0.0011667949,0.0005007089,0.0509574,0.0012118005,0.0002704707,0.0044578607,0.00014440478,0.9331651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06241863,0.00075302506,0.000665811,0.056297738,0.00035153027,0.000228104,0.0014651022,0.00009060994,0.8777295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455714,0.00025880773,0.00012620211,0.00041586874,0.0027971661,0.0018448564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967218,0.0005444103,0.00008051232,0.00011084759,0.002017353,0.0005251094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017845945,0.00057093624,0.00043114237,0.0018937214,0.018435704,0.005984666,0.0023882212,0.012911718,0.048883665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066602025,0.0008742203,0.0008214422,0.0020027356,0.0028799784,0.0014810447,0.001892569,0.006849507,0.010787707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032176733,0.0000482472,0.001659951,0.000042255604,0.000008272421,0.0004470031,0.0010322988,0.00014492676,0.00018769606,0.11238749,0.87776464,0.006245114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003719216,0.000022443299,0.0063898773,0.00023672327,0.000026973212,0.00017032369,0.0021105988,0.00028765472,0.00040596662,0.006279851,0.98398006,0.000052341424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9631587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98660094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048883665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03506864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08969091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25444198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193286643","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3522915","title":"Seeing Double: Peace, Order, and Good Government, and the Impact of Federal Greenhouse Gas Emissions Legislation on Provincial Jurisdiction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Jurisdiction; Greenhouse gas; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Business; Political science; Natural resource economics; Public administration; Law; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.014496922445731406,"score_gpt":0.2183991655407009,"score_spread":0.20390224309496952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193286643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83216876,0.0014866089,0.0013013124,0.04912985,0.00009621597,0.000019677753,0.0005507471,0.00002175376,0.115225025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977143,0.00016233526,0.000045335742,0.0002505616,0.000022270948,0.0000020770422,0.000027367701,0.0000030235774,0.0017728515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997407,0.00055491476,0.00006887139,0.00017132766,0.0004555337,0.0013423887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98726547,0.006377873,0.0027466032,0.00043235853,0.0017599345,0.001417839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023648716,0.000119970944,0.0004534158,0.00063895877,0.0030339903,0.005984263,0.00090709585,0.0016493127,0.0112396525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020218018,0.00014345412,0.00045077168,0.001596853,0.0054913885,0.00308505,0.0022094094,0.00352551,0.00029198296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060869975,0.00020862903,0.086507164,0.000087274944,0.00014369076,0.00040553714,0.005064549,0.008029636,0.00048653202,0.8691498,0.011974589,0.017333865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023523746,0.00019833064,0.2405728,0.0001719771,0.000510027,0.00014268159,0.024262963,0.010949381,0.0018641907,0.68182284,0.03916555,0.00010412598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53765744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68433386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98678815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013211832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021678727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9301308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194627635","doi":"","title":"Kawhi Leonard, other Toronto Raptors stars' tax bills among worst in the NBA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FOXBusiness","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01652034865814967,"score_gpt":0.1903744110699494,"score_spread":0.17385406241179974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194627635","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045610175,0.025144847,0.0012227304,0.4660493,0.008442113,0.0001331438,0.0037662827,0.0002611598,0.44937018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10093671,0.006215835,0.00057397154,0.03622591,0.000821938,0.000052717598,0.00052037823,0.00017072116,0.85448194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999246,0.000107031294,0.000031429383,0.0001313906,0.00022138834,0.00026267712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820065,0.00046296994,0.0001151001,0.00006280543,0.0005781465,0.0005803362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012003108,0.00025485258,0.00031438403,0.0011677081,0.01083154,0.003761491,0.0006584611,0.002837713,0.03853286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048460304,0.00029237935,0.00018061999,0.0015060067,0.0011099586,0.0018148066,0.00087829266,0.0039696144,0.0047839484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016766704,0.000011384435,0.0034344515,0.00002460387,0.000004642861,0.00010326836,0.0011125283,0.00006757066,0.00009630581,0.019401187,0.96403885,0.01168841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008408432,0.000007345298,0.0125868935,0.0000625695,0.000010072074,0.00005372262,0.0043208525,0.00014287226,0.00026721245,0.0022100399,0.98029834,0.00003162762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5731193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8622977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42688072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012531094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009787577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8587894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213369703","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2021.69.3.pf.ledressay","title":"Policy Forum: In Defence of the First Nations Fiscal Management Act","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Taxpayer; Supreme court; Debt; Business; Public administration; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.014909454404842693,"score_gpt":0.1778680228958802,"score_spread":0.1629585684910375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213369703","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051232325,0.01447276,0.000981305,0.55677605,0.015357435,0.00036000166,0.004097742,0.0003088874,0.40252265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050624933,0.004905644,0.0038791685,0.23499252,0.0024638784,0.00065330125,0.0016707978,0.0002033324,0.70060635],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99427265,0.00073312287,0.00031069902,0.00046985527,0.002641448,0.0015721552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99441516,0.0019521947,0.00037380448,0.0003422942,0.0019469925,0.0009696084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007927464,0.0008850971,0.0008480597,0.0016958129,0.008336381,0.012422884,0.0032282947,0.030785393,0.01726447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022064539,0.00056237855,0.0008371773,0.002053043,0.0032914414,0.0037471557,0.002944065,0.012500048,0.0064697578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046066536,0.000060764698,0.000699149,0.00011034422,0.000007698792,0.00035055852,0.0009259619,0.00017782697,0.00033934796,0.24391168,0.73800546,0.015365122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014532553,0.0000062343356,0.0012238005,0.00015781446,0.000003927693,0.000033505155,0.00024013099,0.00009899889,0.000095131065,0.0039065843,0.9942041,0.000015292628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.526997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.486386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47300297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0218392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09594389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9515772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214990654","doi":"","title":"The Death of the Tariff: A Review of the Tax Court's Discretionary Approach to Costs Awards","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; Pace; Economic Justice; Tax reform; Jurisprudence; Administration (probate law); Law and economics; Business; Ad valorem tax; Political science; Law; Public economics; Economics","score_opus":0.030136224375903044,"score_gpt":0.25126339989205226,"score_spread":0.22112717551614922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214990654","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025840427,0.88248736,0.0029093735,0.04407562,0.0034058394,0.000042725274,0.00007401751,0.000034670007,0.064386286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050913606,0.89603174,0.0018161711,0.035130974,0.0059023597,0.000042994936,0.00011457729,0.00006187717,0.009985674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98401076,0.0030805366,0.0012586965,0.0012342652,0.009130976,0.0012848312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97612643,0.013689772,0.0013533799,0.00039037978,0.007879284,0.0005607258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012772432,0.0006121612,0.0010110154,0.009354481,0.005984833,0.011245171,0.0035941217,0.009991005,0.0021020682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0285733,0.00086919306,0.0011774416,0.012939978,0.015063555,0.0065872907,0.0017493989,0.010991079,0.00060861284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002227326,0.000082146275,0.0009800389,0.0022599453,0.000039264818,0.00043499807,0.0020378327,0.001347152,0.0002364447,0.66476786,0.11313175,0.21466027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009607565,0.000050689785,0.0039569777,0.0065152403,0.000048805523,0.000542386,0.0009743834,0.00053584366,0.00016711104,0.026200766,0.9609111,0.00008707623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38415876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47910908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38415876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044087786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05672645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76384544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W405642559","doi":"10.7202/028861ar","title":"Compulsory Conciliation in Canada: Do We Need It?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Proposition; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Arbitration; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03947447185840714,"score_gpt":0.19924264033332517,"score_spread":0.15976816847491804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W405642559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43349957,0.012071065,0.0046090544,0.33126444,0.0011206615,0.0003969015,0.002252902,0.0002034639,0.21458192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483011,0.0026474127,0.0017959414,0.02560965,0.00020228585,0.000063482265,0.0003082097,0.000040146155,0.021031864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791966,0.002072095,0.00055161177,0.0012534807,0.007793527,0.009132582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9604333,0.008672881,0.00409956,0.0018311597,0.016404105,0.008558965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009226141,0.00026495985,0.00073679,0.0019717538,0.015133123,0.007546823,0.0035447092,0.0055812774,0.010972341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045062333,0.00044795807,0.00063697115,0.0040666386,0.008155296,0.0035567416,0.003473819,0.006061793,0.00045644317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002791968,0.00026871485,0.07649687,0.00056825014,0.00022741985,0.0006455688,0.006514284,0.0037715125,0.00056400977,0.71077055,0.10754508,0.0923485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000634319,0.00034293366,0.24458572,0.0017190415,0.00062683295,0.0005633325,0.026230182,0.007206312,0.0026948312,0.15286174,0.56200266,0.0005321509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9829284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99170625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0926505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0926505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3300865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6722296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206727474","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83872-0_7","title":"Judicial Nominations and Trump’s Complicated Relationship with the Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Studies in US Elections","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Political science; Victory; Law; Judicial independence; Administration (probate law); Balance (ability); Democracy; Judicial review; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; History","score_opus":0.08795475852345698,"score_gpt":0.2587547444624251,"score_spread":0.1707999859389681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206727474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0385557,0.0052216873,0.006398627,0.091975756,0.0009084842,0.000029101602,0.00017335775,0.00003973077,0.85669744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8851101,0.0019109232,0.0021656696,0.0091045275,0.0019380695,0.00008647919,0.00008017201,0.00013045968,0.09947358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935301,0.003603301,0.00013369865,0.0005686196,0.001024608,0.0011397282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863215,0.009738314,0.0011186092,0.00068532856,0.0014687984,0.00066741946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005611731,0.00025311753,0.0004512289,0.0025099386,0.009375901,0.010868509,0.0017168222,0.004489936,0.015444492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033202723,0.0005476995,0.0002757096,0.004700422,0.01067594,0.008764378,0.002582735,0.007908257,0.0014998398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004957051,0.000009032993,0.0003471794,0.0000063534867,0.0000019070499,0.000038566377,0.0012808033,0.000072299146,0.000014217522,0.9719595,0.018793004,0.0074721966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012221629,0.000014928397,0.0031682712,0.00011117127,0.0000069862313,0.00008997654,0.0032973755,0.00059382396,0.00013528994,0.76694626,0.22559738,0.000026284668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014519729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03872994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015444492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004246847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032536665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051666975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231746259","doi":"10.4324/9780203583937-18","title":"Keying on Federal Systems with Weak Keystone Constitutions: The Role of Private Versus Public Forest Ownership in U.S. and Canadian Law and Policy Summary of U.S. and Canadian Constitutional Impacts on Global Climate","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.029857785793076526,"score_gpt":0.2108360997781124,"score_spread":0.1809783139850359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231746259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029245015,0.006889039,0.0068907477,0.058945835,0.00055034657,0.000072651186,0.0005723752,0.000097273114,0.8967368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83376473,0.0070593595,0.0036694515,0.008963891,0.00032768183,0.000067021254,0.00030697518,0.00010218546,0.14573872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974643,0.00034241675,0.00006425915,0.00025958155,0.00091761665,0.0009518981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972452,0.0007832935,0.00012272174,0.0003567466,0.0012671222,0.00022491187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033458204,0.00026578899,0.00028099804,0.0011953054,0.006588389,0.0071677375,0.0013164135,0.0020489108,0.008554537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009281959,0.00031917743,0.00042359837,0.0018088028,0.010308012,0.004244607,0.0016074659,0.0035953617,0.00088155956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004772359,0.0000020192067,0.00026887772,0.0000108848535,0.0000030205056,0.000013074812,0.00053115847,0.00031998087,0.00007335476,0.9752085,0.01723294,0.0063315597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023971214,0.000012577344,0.006234966,0.00030729026,0.000053633277,0.00004172457,0.0018827581,0.0015787152,0.0008341429,0.5388414,0.4501379,0.000050887895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83549786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91175365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9560812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043918774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065092094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3309418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238091227","doi":"10.22215/etd/2009-09272","title":"The role of hard law in the WTO and China in regulating economic transactions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"China; Political science; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.010275607685525115,"score_gpt":0.19879674683334414,"score_spread":0.18852113914781904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238091227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7059723,0.003330286,0.0062932996,0.026511101,0.00028729058,0.00020026298,0.0002369651,0.00003675818,0.25713164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865458,0.00037236922,0.00040872424,0.001134046,0.0001152442,0.00004029807,0.00002441662,0.0000116537785,0.011347358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965223,0.0010493664,0.00020342004,0.00046947828,0.0008642957,0.00089113455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906234,0.004326173,0.0017195746,0.0010237054,0.0013617037,0.0009454121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006765444,0.00029637612,0.0004162178,0.0022372205,0.0033745512,0.007648385,0.00092951156,0.0023713051,0.0067653474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013125248,0.00029129616,0.00034607027,0.0019933528,0.013554873,0.004403864,0.0025021716,0.003404089,0.00028114757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001033933,0.00003861087,0.019679604,0.000054786964,0.000040466934,0.00025357938,0.0035005852,0.0012549923,0.0008132963,0.9530455,0.002770908,0.018444248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002082502,0.00021625022,0.1747307,0.00073197193,0.00016787207,0.0001482007,0.0068538426,0.009761366,0.0036196401,0.7119686,0.09144325,0.00015004206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04903571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06549041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04903571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011413533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01226102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09750056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239875842","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3951197","title":"The Costs of Mistakes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.014055934848406495,"score_gpt":0.1978197360517889,"score_spread":0.1837638012033824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239875842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30609617,0.003603533,0.028473314,0.06514922,0.0006907479,0.000109694105,0.0011009588,0.00033998067,0.59443647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708409,0.0008186568,0.0011964496,0.0012039859,0.0003047403,0.00003976612,0.00010188402,0.00007170603,0.025422009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923758,0.002798833,0.00048457622,0.00093496486,0.002238285,0.0011676612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8642407,0.088319026,0.016818551,0.015960507,0.010217904,0.004443374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064237155,0.0004455001,0.0008412901,0.0022038806,0.002478578,0.007081134,0.001110047,0.0050604306,0.045504957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09523868,0.000557769,0.0005124467,0.0019039478,0.0057701846,0.009693936,0.0032111804,0.0037853408,0.0038158223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005577851,0.0002219226,0.039765015,0.0002570883,0.0001656392,0.0016469733,0.00431347,0.012600836,0.00042192623,0.7989512,0.044814862,0.09628343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006148937,0.00006968243,0.012079287,0.00018041045,0.00007787736,0.0008411452,0.0045178686,0.0074713943,0.00039690777,0.94059604,0.033655588,0.000052240073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041683693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005273689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045504957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002441679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002524949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15222925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240900943","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.177","title":"PREFERENCE, PLURALISM, AND PROPORTIONALITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Pluralism (philosophy); Proportionality (law); Social choice theory; Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023434782033723903,"score_gpt":0.17786960044065103,"score_spread":0.15443481840692713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240900943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09132369,0.009110309,0.14389497,0.04967421,0.0009981765,0.000099974706,0.00007809053,0.00007497627,0.7047456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660763,0.0011886379,0.010334677,0.0019655575,0.000510077,0.00007372138,0.00002093251,0.000034817665,0.0197952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878946,0.007103936,0.00038645105,0.0011439961,0.0026714175,0.00079953007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99263316,0.0044338694,0.0006749939,0.0007988054,0.0008804462,0.0005786679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009619659,0.000419105,0.00065616204,0.0011798234,0.0041176714,0.0055281087,0.0008437908,0.0017393758,0.004521303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016046401,0.00032800023,0.0006370652,0.0016819839,0.022376867,0.0077099996,0.0042131385,0.0035615137,0.00042234542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008705956,0.000007873162,0.00009229936,0.000013188788,0.000004766205,0.000024667757,0.0007123124,0.00023272779,0.000035268946,0.99414223,0.00086338294,0.0038626762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064238807,0.000005732167,0.000088617475,0.000010173439,0.000002149167,0.000027518048,0.00020507573,0.00029729045,0.000027111786,0.99133563,0.007990304,0.0000038179473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032428196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002844109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009619659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040753675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020442652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050874174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246890151","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.317","title":"THE VERTICAL RESTRAINTS PARADOX: JUSTIFYING THE DIFFERENT LEGAL TREATMENT OF PRICE AND NON-PRICE VERTICAL RESTRAINTS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vertical restraints; Rule of reason; Resale price maintenance; Supreme court; Competition (biology); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.031081620689989327,"score_gpt":0.20533742162380983,"score_spread":0.1742558009338205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246890151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09965426,0.005883127,0.1683787,0.116507374,0.0015208668,0.00012794866,0.00029910737,0.0002512087,0.6073775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9491246,0.0018408427,0.014563633,0.0134080835,0.0013519876,0.00018565594,0.00009400728,0.00013376147,0.019297507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914056,0.0022203824,0.0005010965,0.0011831326,0.0037002438,0.0009895832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98867875,0.0063761636,0.0013097427,0.0017649079,0.0014379681,0.0004323748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077070817,0.0005881562,0.00094138726,0.0018555411,0.0034180295,0.007548967,0.0039044172,0.011462274,0.004938011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020138977,0.00059321465,0.001760309,0.001350666,0.02416508,0.01179525,0.0055586374,0.0134921195,0.00092721847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026043374,0.0000038931876,0.000040568648,0.000006703681,0.000001660178,0.000031942276,0.00008193505,0.00009835592,0.000041760777,0.99870145,0.00044692442,0.00054208183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024578081,0.000008962248,0.00017583474,0.000056492747,0.000005975795,0.00005357463,0.00013553275,0.0017915278,0.00014740226,0.9892687,0.008317489,0.000013985949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061126826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011462274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048310603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040759385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247022395","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198790952.003.0040","title":"Environmental Taxation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental tax; Public economics; CITES; Direct tax; Environmental law; Tax deferral; Economics; Double taxation; International taxation; Incentive; Business; Tax reform; Political science; State income tax; Law; Gross income; Market economy","score_opus":0.025220127388390575,"score_gpt":0.15307971173881937,"score_spread":0.1278595843504288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247022395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017762639,0.0040422785,0.0020297626,0.0024021897,0.00023447568,0.000016417122,0.00028901355,0.000045754932,0.9891639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15838753,0.01668861,0.0034203557,0.0026831988,0.0005631318,0.000072821174,0.0012884937,0.00015250508,0.8167433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921787,0.00013118956,0.00002910736,0.00010164836,0.00044466442,0.00007560091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993507,0.00017504324,0.000049037084,0.00013352958,0.00025226476,0.000039293394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063942844,0.0002817938,0.00026342084,0.001430989,0.0011816123,0.0038436702,0.00063487864,0.0011340707,0.061763566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021886576,0.00017099599,0.00026449974,0.0019505334,0.0011822539,0.0022482772,0.0011424256,0.001513927,0.0116604045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004556305,0.000009101367,0.00011485282,0.00004767316,0.0000018376617,0.000027679742,0.00009813423,0.0003818025,0.00006680396,0.9441485,0.025252169,0.029846909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024727872,0.0000043084124,0.00027014967,0.00017568684,0.0000023899377,0.00006906542,0.00010019981,0.00019902745,0.00018101464,0.069035195,0.92995673,0.0000036485944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004769832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005411033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061763566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027758228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023660294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20661974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248178802","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511754456.013","title":"United States – Preliminary Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada: What is a Subsidy?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Subsidy; Pulp and paper industry; Agricultural economics; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02125862261501185,"score_gpt":0.1728134672367563,"score_spread":0.15155484462174446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248178802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057162974,0.009313495,0.0021246981,0.051901974,0.0010256345,0.00024275378,0.0024133923,0.00018771479,0.87562734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4822764,0.0069939434,0.0056237746,0.039596822,0.00027047616,0.00018553369,0.0015358557,0.000084634376,0.4634325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766856,0.00013780512,0.00007742894,0.0002154602,0.0011535009,0.00074723404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977063,0.00042696556,0.0000750215,0.00009485106,0.0014965798,0.00020021018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017176152,0.00028100153,0.0003285141,0.0017406414,0.006925734,0.004758191,0.0013438674,0.003451768,0.0071433913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035302942,0.00039650453,0.00036122606,0.001881927,0.0022020433,0.0011699415,0.00071954675,0.0033246155,0.00087382423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053729156,0.00006759074,0.0037698406,0.00012721094,0.000013103124,0.0006963549,0.0029530304,0.000554378,0.0012349967,0.7395791,0.21601169,0.034938987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018563558,0.000020590063,0.013606211,0.00024429525,0.000024990484,0.00014526534,0.0010968222,0.0004070409,0.0012070223,0.012277947,0.97089845,0.00005279689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9553442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97603434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0446558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038631503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09951593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28029245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252950258","doi":"10.1108/s1059-433720140000065015","title":"Editorial Board","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Politics; State (computer science); Sociology; Publishing; Political science","score_opus":0.021292962736405956,"score_gpt":0.21045226505618064,"score_spread":0.18915930231977468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252950258","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024458472,0.008534269,0.0011370662,0.04577592,0.76158434,0.00032956066,0.0016068843,0.0012253553,0.17956202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030247741,0.008951444,0.0010890272,0.02196969,0.2721956,0.00034150342,0.0023570897,0.0011993514,0.68887156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920447,0.00090893544,0.0007721697,0.001225926,0.0044268165,0.00062149955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700795,0.0026393079,0.001659838,0.002204898,0.020084826,0.0033317266],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062824404,0.002193831,0.0017613708,0.006282393,0.004622793,0.015524805,0.0031277998,0.0061072186,0.39190906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034824684,0.0007217341,0.0012965347,0.0038407044,0.0015524264,0.0069841305,0.0035018988,0.005097523,0.37637317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005509822,0.0000043077457,0.000019004274,0.0000786811,0.0000016025186,0.000013018578,0.000015028198,0.000008353817,0.00004035459,0.0006086368,0.9840094,0.015196164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043980626,0.0000048252673,0.00007055144,0.00012049624,0.0000025382208,0.000021323605,0.00003279792,0.000022908893,0.00003331108,0.0005014984,0.99918157,0.0000038126761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001845135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002553368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60809094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033657136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062220055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8673679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281252944","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac008","title":"Using Criminal Law to Fight Corruption: The Potential, Risks, and Limitations of Operation Car Wash (<i>Lava Jato</i>)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Language change; Jurisprudence; Cognitive reframing; Law; Politics; Political science; Scope (computer science); Lava; Criminal law; Organised crime; State (computer science); Relation (database); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.21081420278299623,"score_gpt":0.32044446383525477,"score_spread":0.10963026105225854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281252944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36430666,0.007777046,0.010484387,0.10424325,0.00032508702,0.0001444342,0.000049838873,0.0000584753,0.5126108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99233377,0.0005154472,0.0007296877,0.0022117642,0.000047442125,0.000020840967,0.000004458886,0.0000064909577,0.0041301674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936516,0.0034456823,0.00016060067,0.00045180556,0.0012700951,0.0010201962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859029,0.008963547,0.0015780206,0.0011542699,0.0017648166,0.00063640793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009514119,0.00030104685,0.00035673537,0.0017840721,0.0053646057,0.008141569,0.0012588444,0.0046432866,0.0030156332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016685063,0.0002420103,0.00043174674,0.0008073759,0.01767026,0.0030498945,0.0036503477,0.0041433643,0.00020832637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024934634,0.000087492874,0.009829025,0.00008950273,0.000024863397,0.0006134651,0.004463586,0.001008263,0.0005324903,0.9589724,0.004690807,0.019663261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009373163,0.00040732912,0.035656355,0.0032624996,0.0003246458,0.0015413751,0.03372306,0.020486018,0.005258856,0.6044566,0.29454786,0.00024168669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053810146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09578424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053810146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006192729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077564246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106993854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312039672","doi":"10.18601/16571959.n34.02","title":"El Agotamiento de los derechos de autor como un remedio","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016809518598629874,"score_gpt":0.2389227136066448,"score_spread":0.22211319500801494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312039672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079228446,0.009111501,0.06582403,0.040588334,0.0012873186,0.00013082202,0.00012330306,0.000361029,0.8033453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9092755,0.0032309813,0.011662829,0.007729721,0.0009376808,0.00014531217,0.000057732155,0.00014926818,0.06681094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857135,0.005561091,0.0008489907,0.002102485,0.0046783197,0.0010957229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98238844,0.006413388,0.0021590984,0.0055506607,0.0029010305,0.0005872945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009181835,0.0006315765,0.0006546354,0.002162743,0.0044572917,0.009150494,0.0030622622,0.006847694,0.007523616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01960395,0.0005546089,0.0008120458,0.0010751084,0.04088487,0.00905963,0.0059563825,0.0073416866,0.0016319442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000973085,0.000010870456,0.0003362132,0.00005230289,0.0000048588104,0.00015185334,0.0026240319,0.00013764031,0.0004862666,0.9895018,0.0012025919,0.005481965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035159435,0.00009148227,0.0026070024,0.00066209113,0.00005685081,0.0009345583,0.0054262225,0.0008987869,0.0035611123,0.7480929,0.23755257,0.000081297134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040003066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005839717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009181835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00351151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060936357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04855883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319986827","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4344790","title":"A Commentary on Stephen Tierney's 'The Federal Contract'","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.018451255284872986,"score_gpt":0.21529729305867945,"score_spread":0.19684603777380646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319986827","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020531444,0.002301329,0.00016319324,0.96415985,0.029020442,0.000008131091,0.000075725766,0.000011982847,0.004054128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029309543,0.0006123262,0.00011992371,0.9733027,0.016411291,0.000025171488,0.000013380671,0.000040128325,0.006544167],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747214,0.0070002154,0.0019311935,0.004122053,0.00809752,0.004127599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9157734,0.06769509,0.0023608936,0.002001367,0.00869603,0.0034732306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022659482,0.0017574389,0.0032413644,0.0032357248,0.01598737,0.018832134,0.0089596575,0.14787285,0.009262209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10346841,0.0023984325,0.002861795,0.004401498,0.023640983,0.014447661,0.006536605,0.12099862,0.004427268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002075693,0.000006257643,0.000037467133,0.000042736974,0.000011417374,0.0001254369,0.000770883,0.000036053407,0.00004063692,0.042612888,0.95500845,0.0012869524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065855376,0.000016796972,0.00053184596,0.0007353382,0.00005193408,0.00013453573,0.0014116407,0.0001587114,0.0002495269,0.040861696,0.9556715,0.00011075678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1378773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19681682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14787285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018969344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022834832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27414948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386271801","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x23001140","title":"Unpacking the nudge muddle","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Unpacking; Autonomy; Nudge theory; Frame (networking); Raising (metalworking); State (computer science); Psychology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Behavioural economics; Economics; Political science; Positive economics; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.18857706828346532,"score_gpt":0.2947006606526957,"score_spread":0.10612359236923036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386271801","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020186622,0.0016700897,0.0031371603,0.9485497,0.0046381406,0.00002544547,0.000039181512,0.000051848594,0.039869744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043114007,0.0006678474,0.002170433,0.91399574,0.0068057026,0.00009324421,0.000017850769,0.00007216123,0.03306309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.985148,0.0055485773,0.0007949698,0.0021689495,0.0047631282,0.0015764483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765228,0.017553553,0.00078366,0.0017830381,0.0019507668,0.0014061577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022908447,0.0005918367,0.0011456748,0.0006528467,0.007030559,0.00941154,0.0024274706,0.06062512,0.005240271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045002546,0.0007692211,0.001109381,0.0005317529,0.021642836,0.011898607,0.00708377,0.05865933,0.0023624047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006163335,0.000041002822,0.0005357938,0.000039279195,0.000016853364,0.00074641005,0.0013195436,0.00021936944,0.00034144736,0.6925001,0.28929844,0.014880018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007418012,0.00005125313,0.00049072655,0.00023034531,0.000013144402,0.00057254126,0.00071950624,0.0009505211,0.0003603975,0.27197617,0.7244994,0.00006167186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010464226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027321223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06062512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007014472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010034841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12115288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386489613","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3744","title":"Law &amp; Leviathan: Redeeming the Administrative State by Cass R. Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Constitution; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Bureaucracy; Separation of powers; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Administrative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.051863275447990166,"score_gpt":0.23485964965212572,"score_spread":0.18299637420413556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386489613","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004639382,0.02587091,0.0015012313,0.80909526,0.0035800226,0.000018181277,0.000044631026,0.000060463917,0.15518996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3800539,0.012298348,0.0030330445,0.4141127,0.0066555194,0.00019518369,0.000051741423,0.00014714281,0.18345238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960238,0.0020335724,0.000117827905,0.00059698476,0.0007978853,0.0004299485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995874,0.0028907133,0.0002945669,0.00016506507,0.00050166907,0.00027399423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004394372,0.00044683195,0.00037436013,0.0009563859,0.008844286,0.011207532,0.001511212,0.01274826,0.003264064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012840577,0.00036462914,0.00042692843,0.0007987025,0.018753791,0.006200707,0.0027033275,0.0144985365,0.00095886167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010539949,0.000011850971,0.00020524785,0.000024642533,0.0000026096016,0.00008548646,0.0021039087,0.00009279583,0.000074509306,0.8133082,0.17930725,0.0047728815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014026119,0.000016941205,0.0007922431,0.00040673572,0.000009937817,0.00011494723,0.002389281,0.00037349144,0.00023936508,0.21980715,0.7757808,0.00005498061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.103855796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01295373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010890148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13511693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388146795","doi":"10.24124/c677/20191518","title":"The Effect of Trudeau’s New Senate Selection Process in Perspective: The Senate’s Review of Commons Bills, 1997-2019","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Legislation; Legislature; Commons; Legislative process; House of Representatives; Government (linguistics); Political science; Select committee; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.017774292803406828,"score_gpt":0.27657113025121527,"score_spread":0.25879683744780846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388146795","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23580486,0.06883232,0.0031754181,0.38322738,0.0057991445,0.0004260663,0.0054479535,0.00017517462,0.29711178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8613885,0.01584713,0.0016172456,0.07834892,0.0026444304,0.00038428046,0.0010796906,0.00026074785,0.03842901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9424824,0.024419392,0.003250156,0.004155404,0.019684358,0.0060082497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8180303,0.09283636,0.0152865555,0.0064972066,0.061210528,0.0061390894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.074836105,0.0004387303,0.0011184814,0.008313435,0.008850316,0.013107416,0.0016867627,0.003865937,0.0064881737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13030447,0.00085485657,0.0011255383,0.014378031,0.0069002463,0.005310543,0.0039307037,0.005898009,0.0011841857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007404068,0.00010862116,0.067371875,0.0014644809,0.0006304745,0.0014872531,0.021409787,0.0015199609,0.0011752396,0.47032818,0.3625604,0.071203366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009854749,0.00018812594,0.15911493,0.0010207766,0.00025240623,0.0002619838,0.0070143235,0.0004619055,0.0016903037,0.008599426,0.8211353,0.00016202335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3226986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48523042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030950107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048504077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64164054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388477453","doi":"10.53095/88975019","title":"Economic Freedom of North America 2023 Full Dataset","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic freedom; Index of Economic Freedom; Payroll; Index (typography); Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Investment (military); Economics; Economic growth; Business; Economic policy; Political science; Law; Politics; Market economy","score_opus":0.09410896982138024,"score_gpt":0.27082184837407675,"score_spread":0.17671287855269652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388477453","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000814361,0.000073790936,0.000061754385,0.00017056834,0.000026041958,0.000014727045,0.9973333,0.00005731754,0.001448223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018700991,0.000063219995,0.00017503093,0.000068379086,0.000016683238,0.00015085474,0.9963961,0.000020121119,0.0012394679],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989329,0.00018163875,0.00013063599,0.00024597647,0.00033855392,0.00017032411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99585813,0.0008295077,0.0006228373,0.00051960035,0.001890531,0.000279376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009716816,0.0008765352,0.0008952304,0.0031815958,0.0009131804,0.0020912166,0.0015454361,0.0010683317,0.03720033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006161416,0.0005113057,0.00058400247,0.0073462296,0.0002503791,0.0009754322,0.0013406913,0.0017083676,0.030377096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027501355,0.000030676994,0.0058272197,0.00011506523,0.000020273625,0.000028183778,0.000030277639,0.0002236609,0.000022920507,0.0006287368,0.9908117,0.0022337537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016018611,0.000017746082,0.05701014,0.00026913738,0.00002603612,0.00007061844,0.00034625948,0.00070558727,0.00016427189,0.0011287099,0.9400644,0.000036856793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11373606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13018157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88626397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020175828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031057142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22614807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388478180","doi":"10.53095/88975016","title":"Economic Freedom of North America 2023 U.S. Edition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic freedom; Index of Economic Freedom; Index (typography); Payroll; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Freedom of information; Economics; Investment (military); Economic growth; Economic policy; Business; Political science; Law; Politics; Market economy; Accounting","score_opus":0.07074158212859458,"score_gpt":0.25154770029946444,"score_spread":0.18080611817086986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388478180","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048502726,0.008214146,0.0020543004,0.005760225,0.0032870846,0.00046838511,0.59498775,0.0006532047,0.3797246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04204956,0.021166604,0.0075179157,0.0030324848,0.0013710047,0.0028262537,0.58007264,0.00093921483,0.34102434],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998329,0.00014921502,0.00012334077,0.00015289127,0.0010213424,0.00022424193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573565,0.0006207464,0.0004381499,0.00032339577,0.0026690434,0.00021304538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018610947,0.0012859134,0.0006793448,0.004542152,0.0011579121,0.0039397646,0.00091665995,0.0010653898,0.04002265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050731082,0.00052383286,0.0006096558,0.014894165,0.00053186034,0.0024460778,0.0012498386,0.0029430757,0.020430831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019031382,0.000034972036,0.0022780374,0.00010953997,0.000008429321,0.000028068196,0.00007271829,0.00019787137,0.000041807816,0.008374415,0.9709001,0.01793509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010047335,0.000012437178,0.028510205,0.0002681397,0.000007795422,0.000033833818,0.00017056713,0.00013517131,0.00011265911,0.0025904542,0.9681271,0.000021604179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18374833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15062776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18374833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005246257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011637468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36535758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388522666","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4589547","title":"Foxes, Henhouses, and the Constitutional Guarantee of Judicial Review: Re-Evaluating Crevier","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Judicial review; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03902906693454574,"score_gpt":0.2698272884683029,"score_spread":0.23079822153375715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388522666","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031737015,0.029420728,0.010921404,0.6148103,0.0023042457,0.0001379605,0.00028588166,0.00014304965,0.31023943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82999474,0.008972789,0.005861527,0.099835485,0.0051020114,0.00029872495,0.00009093479,0.00021952945,0.049624346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768034,0.0109872185,0.000987037,0.0038437296,0.0041935607,0.003185055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8410587,0.1304576,0.004862134,0.009529197,0.011267215,0.002825211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04668328,0.00059169455,0.0018946356,0.00290507,0.009579746,0.011784787,0.0035228643,0.021604253,0.018826105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16331866,0.0008470628,0.0009246062,0.0026608165,0.023149408,0.016328406,0.0047731493,0.012099611,0.0018826975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009692675,0.000024489116,0.00065615796,0.00005689369,0.000023312787,0.00006305694,0.0007577109,0.00045642027,0.00003141947,0.9549616,0.036606472,0.0062655383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017326267,0.000034548757,0.0012137903,0.0003354807,0.000101400154,0.00006484518,0.0008030525,0.0011819766,0.00029586605,0.89799005,0.09774018,0.00006543147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04419028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04696431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04668328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009502668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017679881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24688774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391917408","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4712033","title":"Time to Reboot: The Federal Zev Mandate Requires Flexibility","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Reboot; Mandate; Flexibility (engineering); Business; Operating system; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01990571559332819,"score_gpt":0.2319325540593694,"score_spread":0.21202683846604123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391917408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.154218,0.0013097213,0.022803431,0.07323611,0.0017399995,0.00023644298,0.001166392,0.0006954185,0.7445944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.924473,0.00017239353,0.0024517477,0.016015505,0.00040702143,0.00015757908,0.00017195429,0.00030160102,0.055849195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98854697,0.0021312218,0.00045123106,0.0023672779,0.0024692456,0.0040339474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850381,0.00827128,0.0011575471,0.0031311577,0.001391974,0.0010099281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012540059,0.00039462902,0.0013013033,0.0011510063,0.0050819702,0.009849773,0.0026176611,0.01347486,0.025897166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03440653,0.0008431415,0.0012425032,0.0009882969,0.004432538,0.006350739,0.0043709814,0.012476197,0.0051295515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017228612,0.000046000547,0.0012260427,0.000030100935,0.000027013793,0.00014894501,0.0007926862,0.0010919672,0.0011182628,0.9646329,0.022999438,0.0077143316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018848144,0.00013572845,0.007781062,0.00021961385,0.00009005244,0.00022986402,0.001831914,0.0031120814,0.002907336,0.72845864,0.25488132,0.0001638391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0188398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028825786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025897166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005101505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008796941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086634696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395036906","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2024.72.1.pf.farrar","title":"Policy Forum: Using Retributive Justice To Ensure Public Trust in Canada's Tax System","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Retributive justice; Economic Justice; Business; Law and economics; Public administration; Political science; Public relations; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.028951140835770703,"score_gpt":0.1963999068894374,"score_spread":0.1674487660536667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395036906","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032704163,0.002966241,0.0023039898,0.8480544,0.0012859378,0.00039882108,0.0008049549,0.00023841999,0.11124316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74531025,0.004006729,0.009259872,0.14318709,0.0007278024,0.00027433244,0.00041790743,0.00013032326,0.0966856],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905213,0.0020477613,0.0001847971,0.0004972582,0.0026950652,0.0040538884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9617776,0.008096314,0.0017446635,0.0012465687,0.014837433,0.012297433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0111372005,0.00028683056,0.00037562315,0.0018921396,0.01777467,0.011471468,0.0028388451,0.008861638,0.011763372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03640227,0.00032291148,0.0004754662,0.0020325554,0.0057043657,0.00434425,0.002994964,0.004681556,0.0006287993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104340324,0.00025273598,0.024029188,0.0003256757,0.000053174503,0.0004332822,0.009035816,0.0018423927,0.0006967963,0.2478195,0.620563,0.094844215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018790501,0.00014281951,0.06411513,0.000705476,0.00012087113,0.00011794285,0.018019598,0.006666591,0.0014061503,0.026869494,0.8813856,0.00026239132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9854887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87365556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12634444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.45100182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9166974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399922939","doi":"10.1093/9780198921677.001.0001","title":"Deference in Human Rights Adjudication","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Deference; Human rights; Political science; Law and economics; Judicial deference; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03876829653038397,"score_gpt":0.21970123454788443,"score_spread":0.18093293801750046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399922939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061150968,0.01142795,0.36542684,0.04029651,0.0035036115,0.00055064296,0.00016635122,0.00032283692,0.5171543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8892437,0.0025937355,0.050994363,0.00614656,0.0012824961,0.00025825738,0.000077855555,0.00010254427,0.04930046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95007795,0.03194313,0.0018060171,0.0020514047,0.012276209,0.0018453393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9246496,0.06059835,0.0021919662,0.0051056496,0.006814369,0.0006400942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026536506,0.0003667023,0.0007457685,0.0020310036,0.003319885,0.00857792,0.0021619762,0.0034240982,0.004142215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077896394,0.0006349313,0.0007893656,0.0014311138,0.015725039,0.007106942,0.0063776,0.0063152323,0.0008573001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035433182,0.000020722957,0.00019907182,0.00008044418,0.000008356654,0.00011357676,0.0019873434,0.0007769606,0.00027697964,0.9703015,0.0048045195,0.021395147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053849464,0.000112129426,0.00054108276,0.0006053508,0.000029841256,0.00015644157,0.001079853,0.0050369706,0.0015157567,0.87670296,0.114114806,0.000050973485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031318525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029273457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026536506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004729994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046767676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14034015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400676643","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2024.07.004","title":"Blindingly transparent – anonymity in an era of openness: a reply to Cardini","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Australian Research Council; Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada","keywords":"Anonymity; Openness to experience; Internet privacy; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Computer security; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06232772901103905,"score_gpt":0.2792305639629643,"score_spread":0.21690283495192525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400676643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045003675,0.0007950358,0.00011156509,0.991487,0.0035362132,0.0000072978605,0.000014586238,0.0000092228265,0.003588983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050506177,0.00027801126,0.00008536062,0.9857385,0.0042431494,0.000021203163,0.0000034736095,0.000019005396,0.0045607323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890188,0.0042258957,0.0006410904,0.0019946601,0.002047494,0.002072065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96223766,0.029419737,0.0012891666,0.0012007861,0.0030321463,0.0028204792],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016607042,0.0008323515,0.0018498808,0.00092133443,0.0123597095,0.014328603,0.0032575948,0.13287316,0.008056243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051944878,0.0011177826,0.0012958051,0.00097162795,0.018655512,0.019394116,0.006530736,0.09778787,0.0037316636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068108144,0.000022649028,0.00035427656,0.00006826674,0.000019798345,0.0007718293,0.0029549485,0.00006528038,0.00017542159,0.08247813,0.90891665,0.0041045975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100697616,0.000034863144,0.00095312635,0.00064135186,0.000036719575,0.00047900336,0.005044435,0.00039956786,0.00035548487,0.09280383,0.8989246,0.00022626972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022584796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032466747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00793466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013523495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0878275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401809788","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v13i1.70911","title":"Mandatory Mask ByLaws: Consideration Beyond Exemption for Persons with Disabilities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.09281925096524928,"score_gpt":0.26491568400371646,"score_spread":0.17209643303846717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401809788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024533506,0.0059597776,0.009348351,0.338405,0.0052387156,0.00085789006,0.0007871855,0.00087396987,0.61399555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29143575,0.0077482793,0.025486916,0.30672097,0.0035877053,0.0012414065,0.001027687,0.0005425468,0.3622088],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97195655,0.005841861,0.0023706076,0.0014406008,0.012905246,0.0054850793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94319654,0.022783326,0.0034507713,0.005723957,0.019787665,0.0050577805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02007601,0.0006393276,0.00064354454,0.0016284682,0.010667084,0.009753685,0.0042928383,0.01408555,0.014376902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058837153,0.0008930929,0.0009936587,0.001154457,0.008081297,0.005994429,0.005452532,0.00991587,0.0037739035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057994905,0.00020558393,0.0053331912,0.00045346282,0.000015477577,0.0017618844,0.0069906265,0.0005463672,0.0020037927,0.3729356,0.51665246,0.09304361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003520095,0.000083202525,0.0068070698,0.0017101462,0.000028028184,0.0009177292,0.0040362687,0.00059386756,0.0010170346,0.025284726,0.9593958,0.00009080725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38301426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4682236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38301426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013510842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.102199614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76156974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404667689","doi":"10.1017/s1049096524000660","title":"The Decriminalization of Abortion in Latin America: A Tale of Gradual Judicialization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Decriminalization; Abortion; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Political science; Latin Americans; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.0384592475274011,"score_gpt":0.28415668204555034,"score_spread":0.24569743451814924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404667689","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22816467,0.043372314,0.018406997,0.39230028,0.0008162164,0.00013774086,0.0001596866,0.00010518952,0.3165369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635354,0.008637589,0.0033916004,0.015687035,0.00070504536,0.00006645442,0.00004080246,0.000043611726,0.007892422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99461186,0.0028931452,0.00016785535,0.0005619269,0.001061164,0.0007040682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902126,0.0052773193,0.0014714855,0.0011717895,0.0015421616,0.00032469982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012552506,0.00016347218,0.0002926786,0.0015558589,0.0039994214,0.007683738,0.0008640935,0.0027042557,0.0011994108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015427782,0.0002423576,0.0003980717,0.0013431124,0.033438515,0.0040916433,0.004018379,0.00635014,0.00011340618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028296125,0.000023626835,0.0029188343,0.00007807299,0.000016060661,0.00022744025,0.007832039,0.00056956586,0.0005428557,0.962012,0.0043518078,0.021399347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008065902,0.00007439038,0.017017242,0.0007988108,0.000031122636,0.00033576484,0.010265716,0.0010817855,0.0018267122,0.5743047,0.39407554,0.00010757105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020808775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018780444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020808775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011356215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076269535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08239555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411054569","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0077","title":"Constitutional silence, section 36, and public services on Indian reserves","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Section (typography); Political science; Law; Business; Art; Advertising; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.013415727894647027,"score_gpt":0.18240255632641983,"score_spread":0.1689868284317728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411054569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10291836,0.0054388214,0.008198904,0.22471574,0.0014300075,0.00011233708,0.0011141552,0.00022057779,0.65585107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89011675,0.0016088927,0.0026257704,0.047163613,0.00042446057,0.000083388324,0.00026660072,0.000095104755,0.05761548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841941,0.0020221183,0.00062477967,0.0016619492,0.0065419455,0.00495519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904987,0.0034799362,0.0005412621,0.00093319325,0.003353961,0.0011928725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009312124,0.00038789486,0.00054360175,0.0015752555,0.01576594,0.009709168,0.0026644368,0.0062268167,0.006021438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018244106,0.0005009422,0.00064031547,0.002217934,0.030090664,0.0036052573,0.00449486,0.011473734,0.00050096796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008317817,0.000004383257,0.00032353448,0.000014548579,0.0000032979133,0.000065239525,0.0025841903,0.000131839,0.00013602585,0.9848369,0.0089547,0.0029370782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054289543,0.00004924721,0.01212674,0.0006413633,0.00007188233,0.0002469053,0.012664409,0.0010580806,0.0012607593,0.32151482,0.6500299,0.00028160037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9277356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9208619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9277356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.064397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11218141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46723515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413372890","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhaf023","title":"Consumer Privacy and Anticompetitive Exclusion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Internet privacy; Consumer privacy; Law and economics; Information privacy; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.016622445873949336,"score_gpt":0.2186018105545711,"score_spread":0.20197936468062175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413372890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15385841,0.0013264787,0.04847273,0.03821402,0.00024417602,0.0001342116,0.00014183954,0.00008654154,0.7575216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799091,0.0002304914,0.00247086,0.004478002,0.00015512893,0.00008852891,0.000023343944,0.000024780657,0.012619671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98237854,0.0071270806,0.00072453,0.0022591213,0.0056406143,0.0018700626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97307265,0.015569982,0.0025059422,0.005118378,0.003025545,0.0007076502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010306802,0.00027634093,0.0007772141,0.0012672142,0.005804964,0.006846643,0.0015255815,0.0071415813,0.006937432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018655019,0.00040283782,0.0010681633,0.0012155981,0.029234927,0.0066477475,0.005933974,0.0093279425,0.00079811894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013560811,0.000017484861,0.00048325062,0.00001027197,0.000004208301,0.0001312597,0.0004724223,0.00012986951,0.00012020889,0.9960557,0.00078884215,0.0017729452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030246701,0.00004642113,0.0013318288,0.000098566095,0.000015858122,0.00028162863,0.0005929651,0.0014966079,0.00082684285,0.96504474,0.03020785,0.000026378371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045247427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042913323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010306802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004383739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030363912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05450827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414528786","doi":"10.53555/sfs.v10i1.2008","title":"Analysis Of The Controversial Provisions Of Anti-conversion Ordinance In Recent Years","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Magistrate; Bad faith; Witness; Declaration; Undue influence; Self-incrimination; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.1034170627603832,"score_gpt":0.24834420991159742,"score_spread":0.14492714715121421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414528786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4996658,0.014063926,0.005106101,0.04038411,0.0020115904,0.00026659574,0.0016237606,0.000054455828,0.4368237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90433306,0.006241132,0.0016553069,0.0153475255,0.0010610566,0.00010635838,0.0006097879,0.00004716992,0.070598684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911596,0.0012890832,0.0004844345,0.0007530954,0.0044837096,0.0018299607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808215,0.009086015,0.004250773,0.000679794,0.0045531457,0.0006088998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00948088,0.00021176843,0.0004055966,0.0040063737,0.0050704014,0.0071792775,0.0021697176,0.0055054897,0.0058797025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025153672,0.0004877767,0.0007585811,0.0066692727,0.0030705857,0.0026456157,0.0014187808,0.006518956,0.000530018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015639672,0.00030248563,0.022070082,0.0002351441,0.00008445423,0.0012839908,0.006410089,0.002121822,0.00084641983,0.8983372,0.035519823,0.032632068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005872799,0.00023895354,0.17652616,0.0006732995,0.00020161859,0.00044088167,0.0144955395,0.004081401,0.00187271,0.04432851,0.7569169,0.00016531446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07525038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14377655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07525038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010917475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009127802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14962476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W639320128","doi":"","title":"Economic and legal analyses of trade policy and institutions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Blackwell eBooks","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free trade; Political science; International trade law; Law; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.069168866136693,"score_gpt":0.27763923643680405,"score_spread":0.20847037030011106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W639320128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005513316,0.02894723,0.015661664,0.044483397,0.00068300107,0.00004876747,0.00091509375,0.00006537126,0.9036822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.652534,0.05988082,0.016611198,0.0048454064,0.004041019,0.00034342316,0.0014386625,0.000121167104,0.26018426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835336,0.0006699485,0.00007001499,0.00017627636,0.0005644352,0.00016599144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716103,0.001628568,0.00028603774,0.00027217413,0.0005507258,0.00010148256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016374338,0.00046503881,0.00032468094,0.0031350353,0.002416398,0.0066157156,0.0006201087,0.0014200939,0.030222524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040467973,0.00025264375,0.0003983304,0.005135061,0.00607504,0.0047026863,0.0013737077,0.0018974926,0.0028684582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015897959,0.000005680538,0.000105517625,0.00001782144,0.0000016882763,0.00000721872,0.00007960605,0.0005875683,0.000013804754,0.9885938,0.0067071216,0.0038786372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025282666,0.0000036097472,0.00074484677,0.00016327329,0.0000045119305,0.000019864086,0.00031279784,0.0011625779,0.000056550452,0.8517321,0.1457906,0.0000066384737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075545954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005893211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030222524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008386154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032269242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10110444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6945806566","doi":"10.25959/23240630","title":"A basic economic case for reordering the patent market with gain-based remedies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UTAS Research Repository","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Patent law; Blame; Patent troll; Opportunism; Government (linguistics); Tort; Punitive damages; Patent Act","score_opus":0.1234505245975828,"score_gpt":0.3131231704723479,"score_spread":0.1896726458747651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6945806566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034265023,0.0039743558,0.054669306,0.13044035,0.000848455,0.00029000727,0.00028218777,0.00024024592,0.77499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8929562,0.0019350502,0.013386041,0.025593748,0.0019434278,0.0005073895,0.000060407576,0.00015428483,0.06346341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892163,0.0030985053,0.0003326859,0.0023012776,0.0031672535,0.0018839629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984295,0.008707949,0.0012353532,0.0035967047,0.0013644686,0.0008005012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014085503,0.00074924075,0.0014763275,0.002387892,0.0050020614,0.01328906,0.003338771,0.020052861,0.018617589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034195762,0.00080098107,0.0021135642,0.0010185814,0.031375393,0.020211555,0.006264224,0.011834415,0.0024052693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001402902,0.000011047456,0.00005714456,0.00001367842,0.0000039280894,0.000054709923,0.00005872049,0.0003071823,0.00007664587,0.99607456,0.0022600174,0.0010682894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057777484,0.000027181344,0.00015426928,0.00004909997,0.000009920733,0.00007887649,0.000072082585,0.0012360795,0.00015483513,0.9742002,0.023943245,0.000016404043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038950264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027071508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020052861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066512404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068832887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07449216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6964767617","doi":"10.25959/23240630.v1","title":"A basic economic case for reordering the patent market with gain-based remedies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Patent law; Blame; Patent troll; Opportunism; Government (linguistics); Tort; Punitive damages; Patent Act","score_opus":0.0965410293197438,"score_gpt":0.24310402823664265,"score_spread":0.14656299891689883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6964767617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034265023,0.0039743558,0.054669306,0.13044035,0.000848455,0.00029000727,0.00028218777,0.00024024592,0.77499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8929562,0.0019350502,0.013386041,0.025593748,0.0019434278,0.0005073895,0.000060407576,0.00015428483,0.06346341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892163,0.0030985053,0.0003326859,0.0023012776,0.0031672535,0.0018839629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984295,0.008707949,0.0012353532,0.0035967047,0.0013644686,0.0008005012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014085503,0.00074924075,0.0014763275,0.002387892,0.0050020614,0.01328906,0.003338771,0.020052861,0.018617589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034195762,0.00080098107,0.0021135642,0.0010185814,0.031375393,0.020211555,0.006264224,0.011834415,0.0024052693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001402902,0.000011047456,0.00005714456,0.00001367842,0.0000039280894,0.000054709923,0.00005872049,0.0003071823,0.00007664587,0.99607456,0.0022600174,0.0010682894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057777484,0.000027181344,0.00015426928,0.00004909997,0.000009920733,0.00007887649,0.000072082585,0.0012360795,0.00015483513,0.9742002,0.023943245,0.000016404043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038950264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027071508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020052861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066512404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068832887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07449216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990170516","doi":"","title":"A Contribution to Both Legal History and Constitutional Theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutional economics; Constitutional theory; Obligation; Constitutional right; Constitutional law; Politics; Bill of rights; Statutory law","score_opus":0.026476677363459364,"score_gpt":0.21508143675327226,"score_spread":0.18860475938981291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990170516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010458319,0.031353146,0.03120133,0.24328008,0.0047216634,0.000036795747,0.00022302548,0.00011200861,0.67861366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73011285,0.027754087,0.017492918,0.050015204,0.023099352,0.0002097474,0.00038919353,0.00028454623,0.15064213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598974,0.00216346,0.00012526866,0.00055314763,0.0007595512,0.0004088685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882541,0.008611327,0.00050499936,0.0012093597,0.0008758463,0.0005443598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040159402,0.00035818305,0.0005486327,0.0027266818,0.006223619,0.008308381,0.002086982,0.00570148,0.024376828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009726266,0.0003222171,0.00066181883,0.002624788,0.030014554,0.017104771,0.0045730066,0.008842088,0.002110683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016698203,0.0000058892933,0.00008935579,0.000017994342,0.0000011946524,0.000022711733,0.0006400765,0.000058869824,0.0000072825355,0.9904019,0.0054062963,0.0033467542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004641816,0.0000055759187,0.00018473784,0.00014582336,0.0000022820063,0.000070659495,0.0008956606,0.00018550882,0.000030858984,0.8139129,0.1845535,0.000007943782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057552345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068431557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024376828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006851362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047479635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08154863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017733514","doi":"","title":"Bird TakeâDeath Trade","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rulemaking; Treaty; Wildlife; Externality; Resource (disambiguation); Service (business); Superfund; Natural resource","score_opus":0.034691070834234346,"score_gpt":0.205780884027707,"score_spread":0.17108981319347266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017733514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006785703,0.00089487346,0.00033385446,0.002096382,0.000663884,0.000040573977,0.0007019935,0.00019985005,0.988283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029255,0.00095304,0.00048501525,0.002389184,0.00021003063,0.000028072323,0.0013170153,0.00010428811,0.9652584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996068,0.000029627774,0.00000960573,0.00008999029,0.00018210309,0.000081860315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969757,0.00003172071,0.000025831485,0.00004490477,0.000102155376,0.000097869306],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029229798,0.00037703305,0.00021075622,0.0011273115,0.0026108266,0.0031730975,0.0005894967,0.0014088718,0.30472514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005240226,0.00024191847,0.00035230743,0.0008820393,0.00069890445,0.0020143269,0.0015687764,0.0018578662,0.08161844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012412197,0.00020417428,0.0063668336,0.00020908071,0.000016631186,0.00058205734,0.0008028707,0.00008066086,0.0015393522,0.091160245,0.6791614,0.21975254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040544573,0.000019646513,0.0027590196,0.000036283265,0.0000023053599,0.00014625127,0.00019436811,0.000042512584,0.0001006303,0.00062927656,0.9960621,0.0000035733028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011926103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037222978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30472514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011666401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018184952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023848835","doi":"","title":"Pondering Conscience: Civil Disobedience in American Law and Same-Sex Dissent in the ELCA","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Protestantism; State (computer science); Legislature; Polity; Separation of church and state; Marriage law; Constitution; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.018447400862188115,"score_gpt":0.23616336741699515,"score_spread":0.21771596655480702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023848835","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27542865,0.0038576524,0.0014537289,0.3598836,0.0017271881,0.000044085737,0.000025118074,0.00004637543,0.3575337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9174363,0.0007193835,0.00027309716,0.067163534,0.0006743906,0.00003669025,0.0000072353027,0.00002294531,0.013666481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921129,0.0034641032,0.00020602644,0.00083632994,0.000990551,0.0023902073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98740315,0.008543916,0.000644316,0.00046027126,0.0010197501,0.0019285831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014378638,0.0002340722,0.0004037955,0.0015945717,0.038467057,0.014136157,0.0018895322,0.013214468,0.0045204535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018389236,0.00042841383,0.00045095864,0.0009209013,0.055113133,0.0079857735,0.0098981485,0.024892846,0.00034438717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038232974,0.00015284777,0.003392318,0.00002534426,0.000014511919,0.001586877,0.11030758,0.00013096975,0.00024956962,0.8380962,0.034399405,0.011606138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013896204,0.00006261211,0.008633443,0.0004128204,0.000049113554,0.0005742419,0.17675276,0.0011702486,0.00069963123,0.4586689,0.3526448,0.00019248099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07372347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13075194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07372347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01103343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009820517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14658868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093594253","doi":"","title":"A Senate Bill relating to the requirement that the chief appraiser of an appraisal district provide an estimate of taxable value and related assistance to certain taxing units.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Portal to Texas History (University of North Texas)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taxable income; Value (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization","score_opus":0.03490247088126159,"score_gpt":0.21944355264236912,"score_spread":0.18454108176110753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093594253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024354856,0.00055553403,0.00066339155,0.006140136,0.00077102345,0.00025201144,0.009559924,0.000549488,0.97907305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009030679,0.0006981802,0.00092106854,0.00421309,0.00025642055,0.00023824125,0.002438232,0.00019502292,0.98200905],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849415,0.00019998876,0.0000920513,0.00016573121,0.0007576748,0.00029045626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973349,0.00039064066,0.00014163688,0.00018323144,0.0017478806,0.0002017317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013296783,0.0007293789,0.00044854064,0.001868223,0.0039579705,0.004542173,0.0010130174,0.004377799,0.12895729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004214297,0.00065877306,0.0005169932,0.0022515592,0.0012143072,0.0017606784,0.0014694338,0.004748712,0.08275754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022106027,0.000041795847,0.00034853548,0.000037211594,0.000003205878,0.00009806193,0.000113251685,0.00009986671,0.00020094846,0.03828936,0.95423454,0.0065110563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023082786,0.000020729867,0.0032311967,0.000072999,0.0000089376845,0.00008620551,0.00023009784,0.0001311428,0.00037839956,0.0028665978,0.99292666,0.000023989596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.092748225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17854455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12895729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040067486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009687767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43140513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095144061","doi":"","title":"TBestDB: a taxonomically broad database of expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Nucleic Acids Res","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"GenBank; Expressed sequence tag; Sequence (biology); Sequence database; Synonym (taxonomy); Indel; Sequence analysis; RefSeq","score_opus":0.05877513885353277,"score_gpt":0.24404460054669977,"score_spread":0.185269461693167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095144061","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005280461,0.001783885,0.022987308,0.0002727244,0.00021794494,0.00013669702,0.94576454,0.01597904,0.007577278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027970956,0.0007495431,0.013561611,0.00008642706,0.000022704913,0.00017199518,0.9793098,0.00084386626,0.002456954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885,0.00013783273,0.00024023696,0.00027963228,0.00031657855,0.00017569054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982071,0.00037795329,0.00028835962,0.00034629024,0.0004746448,0.00030562902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019017932,0.00178391,0.0025049532,0.006341139,0.001483396,0.0037435421,0.0034955714,0.0013765207,0.028913694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030957167,0.0011363708,0.0013977608,0.009158853,0.0003800856,0.0022498737,0.0021448764,0.002509659,0.036535442],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019108343,0.0003073318,0.004785113,0.0040956223,0.00031874434,0.00074444484,0.0004256536,0.0022008067,0.07949379,0.0072072987,0.78761035,0.11089992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025208853,0.0001486429,0.0098022865,0.0004568971,0.00021798015,0.00084551045,0.00027580385,0.0034947179,0.022448681,0.005150834,0.9567619,0.00014464937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053334977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004677649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028913694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009861689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027985945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095384439","doi":"","title":"OUTREACH Geoscape: Lessons Learned from 15 Years of","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Geological survey; Climate change; Term (time)","score_opus":0.08637819811235493,"score_gpt":0.241869960040386,"score_spread":0.15549176192803105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095384439","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019722186,0.05746523,0.0082287965,0.7381408,0.009855876,0.00015737046,0.00090284063,0.0007756269,0.16475117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37867016,0.13632812,0.034612704,0.16426408,0.005372134,0.0008401195,0.0035177157,0.0018953485,0.27449965],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99527115,0.0023143138,0.00014818551,0.00033288114,0.0010162002,0.0009172981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761252,0.009422124,0.00039921972,0.0011028289,0.0042638807,0.008686734],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019455701,0.0005079449,0.00051736366,0.0012535792,0.0060074665,0.009324009,0.0030719377,0.004105778,0.024944177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025496146,0.00033867906,0.00039317936,0.0021376752,0.005512386,0.015112663,0.008466257,0.007691846,0.0050238403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005231845,0.00026523447,0.0015024355,0.00039167126,0.000007598352,0.00024663226,0.013153315,0.00026586722,0.00005913611,0.049600247,0.64427656,0.29017898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001710096,0.000044667413,0.0015037971,0.001238451,0.0000043652944,0.00011050263,0.017019587,0.00012069729,0.00011351293,0.024082297,0.95571905,0.000025880156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04361793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11585661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9750558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00805305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024893247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102892816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133094328","doi":"","title":"The Rule of Ordinary People: The Case for a Sortition-Based Democracy without Elections","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Democracy; Blueprint; Legislature; Politics; Representative democracy; Selection (genetic algorithm); Position (finance); Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.024083675676495296,"score_gpt":0.29726696903710226,"score_spread":0.273183293360607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133094328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08000914,0.0023596894,0.088302456,0.20034043,0.0012682416,0.00016681121,0.00018829264,0.00014004348,0.6272249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437784,0.00085152703,0.010589288,0.012969083,0.0007602157,0.00024694856,0.000065995635,0.00008017965,0.03065828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816488,0.009219696,0.00043387857,0.0032911259,0.0033167377,0.00208971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836602,0.007952745,0.001547316,0.0039663487,0.0016274813,0.0012460193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01779481,0.00026316504,0.0008331672,0.0010405693,0.006117256,0.00979391,0.0014751997,0.004551728,0.0064649107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029200228,0.0003867755,0.00082531216,0.001035076,0.028674375,0.009590338,0.003994207,0.0087596355,0.00147839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004461073,0.000005666479,0.00014019235,0.000005808634,0.000002596053,0.000012575997,0.00022236223,0.00013931311,0.000010266639,0.9972996,0.0009382736,0.0012188384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016459686,0.000009926844,0.00023260884,0.000023432356,0.0000034814211,0.000024723222,0.00019046094,0.00047054378,0.000048867045,0.9785689,0.020405315,0.0000052735954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039147157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035088982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01779481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037098462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051285317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09410906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139364753","doi":"","title":"A Federal Bill, With Commentary, to Allow Choice in Auto Insurance","year":2001,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut)","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Insurance policy; General insurance; Casualty insurance; Government (linguistics); Life insurance","score_opus":0.025348110380862245,"score_gpt":0.20060140828247855,"score_spread":0.1752532979016163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139364753","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011701346,0.00734579,0.00062714383,0.8512356,0.036288425,0.000126133,0.0010701233,0.00028156547,0.101854995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004094296,0.0006021334,0.00029848513,0.9567585,0.006763779,0.00015821087,0.00008457626,0.000046073263,0.031194039],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899194,0.0019027478,0.0008044775,0.0014541007,0.003553789,0.002365437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98985493,0.006728201,0.0004493904,0.0005240618,0.0018892988,0.0005541586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008860356,0.001962006,0.0012142573,0.0018334097,0.01332745,0.008416968,0.007758597,0.12260336,0.014980547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022009775,0.0020465546,0.0039904905,0.0018957983,0.007561573,0.006796588,0.00390568,0.044943374,0.009192343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000191281,0.000024249672,0.00010961422,0.00005033536,0.000008800483,0.00011988069,0.0004114212,0.00006441068,0.00006976633,0.041337,0.9550909,0.002694448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008877468,0.00003523593,0.0020011722,0.00050609186,0.00004981998,0.000114938084,0.00050056126,0.00021613896,0.00014675339,0.014377967,0.98186505,0.000097458535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18175915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31233716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18175915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010937947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017038696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3614024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W750697888","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139179058.002","title":"Defining deference","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04229301769344377,"score_gpt":0.17480897773692627,"score_spread":0.1325159600434825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W750697888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010153645,0.015202915,0.034406595,0.012124856,0.0011694466,0.000037199417,0.00013214865,0.00007432015,0.92669886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6801521,0.0054156105,0.010390241,0.005809723,0.0018216363,0.00023126577,0.00019219333,0.0002874054,0.29569975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997207,0.0011665296,0.00011547465,0.00058554456,0.00056625664,0.00035932395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981206,0.00089144777,0.00012297457,0.00034335515,0.00036435292,0.00015723317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031342427,0.00068789837,0.00073847995,0.0026327556,0.004591736,0.008260543,0.0013388896,0.003220486,0.01705067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008507168,0.0004788716,0.00038236135,0.0017383379,0.018189667,0.009761672,0.003986282,0.0054616365,0.0028446203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002116711,0.00000287211,0.000029205583,0.000005817856,5.29152e-7,0.00001452013,0.0005618488,0.000021318676,0.000020438056,0.9949432,0.0018360312,0.0025621234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030585275,0.0000048887155,0.00010263394,0.000061686136,0.0000025226177,0.000052551728,0.00047322363,0.0000982469,0.00006456204,0.9098,0.089331895,0.000004668949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047304276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004603172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01705067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038150884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020724533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057040215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95009408","doi":"10.21991/c9gm3n","title":"Guiding the Governor General’s Prerogatives: Constitutional Convention Versus an Apolitical Decision Rule","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Governor; Rule of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Physics; Sociology; Politics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.10650583399817165,"score_gpt":0.2607975038834354,"score_spread":0.15429166988526377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W95009408","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062423408,0.0031797332,0.06734508,0.48864558,0.0065016146,0.0006524326,0.0003997448,0.0002586007,0.37059382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81877285,0.0010183869,0.029532338,0.09109838,0.0036852364,0.00073888025,0.00011280877,0.00025154036,0.054789457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93790495,0.025989333,0.004883307,0.008458796,0.011612524,0.011151132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94047844,0.03896049,0.0036808942,0.0038328995,0.008453512,0.0045937304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07640944,0.001031937,0.0025755824,0.0023052907,0.01473424,0.025900394,0.006433718,0.039664842,0.0094195325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11108641,0.0018454187,0.0016335937,0.0018748394,0.025920851,0.0171602,0.0065893135,0.037146762,0.002122246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003587599,0.000058516456,0.00022570272,0.00002303136,0.000022977325,0.00006962414,0.0008496331,0.00047214827,0.0001894265,0.98207897,0.012723501,0.0032505486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028954653,0.00008675046,0.00084215164,0.00018531401,0.000060057453,0.00006586373,0.001049539,0.0031151907,0.0011873434,0.9133424,0.07956684,0.0002089832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03759132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041587293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96240866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015932865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04414407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40409654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}