{"meta":{"query_hash":"89f55f32de67","filters":{"topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making"},"cohort_total":1053,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":1053,"exported":1053,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/89f55f32de67","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Multi-Criteria+Decision+Making"},"results":[{"id":"W10400430","doi":"","title":"An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach For Supplier Evaluation and Selection in a Steel Manufacturing Company","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Purchasing; Selection (genetic algorithm); Operations research; Process (computing); Supplier relationship management; Analytic network process; Computer science; Hierarchy; Management science; Identification (biology); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Engineering; Operations management; Business; Supply chain management; Supply chain; Marketing; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.17262069852648299,"score_gpt":0.5130553074011904,"score_spread":0.34043460887470745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10400430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83320796,0.00079616817,0.14734605,0.0015076391,0.000059154656,0.0067271423,0.00061253976,0.00026466814,0.009478556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8696507,0.000311196,0.12604798,0.000103367354,0.000017688692,0.0023339235,0.0003806388,0.000023896946,0.0011306499],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98159057,0.014587514,0.00068980275,0.00044071153,0.0020915107,0.00059985596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96786857,0.025156194,0.0016029192,0.00050082,0.0040725996,0.0007988285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018822163,0.0005044799,0.0011308414,0.0047697364,0.002591243,0.0023104951,0.0012120878,0.00070602197,0.003168945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04759615,0.00053453643,0.0007146952,0.005127549,0.00088034576,0.0011068581,0.001664761,0.0013414288,0.00045872398],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022559199,0.003474956,0.20300436,0.0013476391,0.00050190865,0.0015232018,0.042963002,0.05439509,0.0016091333,0.0152106155,0.009660077,0.66405416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080191705,0.0041016727,0.15204786,0.0005700947,0.00028809992,0.0004558133,0.075805694,0.71749943,0.0013125933,0.037935313,0.008984343,0.00019720424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025770884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026746776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025770884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038987796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007258247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09954232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1136911336","doi":"10.5120/21373-3712","title":"On Exponential Fuzzy Measures of Information and Discrimination","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computer Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Exponential function; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.18186498162308196,"score_gpt":0.4235747697518413,"score_spread":0.24170978812875932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1136911336","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070197165,0.0029388762,0.9111503,0.0010324393,0.00022029961,0.00005514538,0.00019033332,0.00009832677,0.01411723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81539536,0.0020283652,0.17816627,0.00038431876,0.00066523394,0.0001741171,0.00027477235,0.000046274625,0.0028652016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99397016,0.0019494618,0.00046115028,0.0009748577,0.0022480106,0.0003963708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746832,0.017371802,0.002515165,0.0017387265,0.0030152234,0.000675817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067975097,0.00094288547,0.0008243898,0.004361496,0.0009636323,0.0029001036,0.0011129407,0.0014735367,0.0016413579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02882435,0.00027718244,0.0009948029,0.0030354748,0.004316499,0.007584351,0.0023160547,0.0024289999,0.00033067467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062870655,0.000042897544,0.00094422576,0.00010914104,0.000032103595,0.00013004513,0.00018732158,0.010202152,0.0019302559,0.95275354,0.0005047872,0.033100598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019382245,0.00015577704,0.0013685155,0.000083595456,0.000025008254,0.00044550988,0.000085096246,0.09209217,0.0019033445,0.9001544,0.003589563,0.00007754355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066312205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028824675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067975097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020761904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008475767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03594911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W128508422","doi":"10.21991/c9tt0p","title":"UNSTABLE FOUNDING: PQ ASSUMPTIONS AND THE INDEPENDENCE PROJECT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Mathematical economics; Political science; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.2382538064546714,"score_gpt":0.39231243156712975,"score_spread":0.15405862511245835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W128508422","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07464477,0.0010257261,0.66011506,0.02394212,0.000538776,0.0004343562,0.00025216525,0.000114161994,0.23893294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438186,0.0003938571,0.043606944,0.0012048522,0.00039522102,0.0005133373,0.00012817448,0.0000869269,0.009852115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97780335,0.010703557,0.0011403775,0.0028683525,0.005219896,0.0022645355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8859009,0.080524914,0.0054193316,0.013430646,0.012058354,0.0026658522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032325596,0.00077143987,0.0020224229,0.0029867725,0.006706032,0.0070172856,0.003318981,0.0045421883,0.010450045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.121154785,0.0009462067,0.0024620618,0.0031956744,0.025232255,0.02022774,0.007871496,0.01398521,0.00081664114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025077989,0.00001896099,0.00021697283,0.000016165737,0.0000073362116,0.000045199697,0.00024832418,0.0006461166,0.000029199877,0.9948797,0.00077696436,0.0030900056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013218527,0.000005522033,0.00009377985,0.0000112627995,0.0000037264697,0.000022126862,0.00005350906,0.0015679459,0.00004452493,0.997523,0.00065638835,0.0000051004213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035647661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002083868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032325596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045417245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00590757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17095613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W130108282","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-41687-3_3","title":"Analytic Hierarchy Process to Improve the Evaluation Process in R&amp;D Management System","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in business information processing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Normalization (sociology); Promotion (chess); Process (computing); Selection (genetic algorithm); Management science; Electric power; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Process management; Work (physics); Quality (philosophy); Operations research; Engineering; Power (physics); Business; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.09545646247321421,"score_gpt":0.3966426795963825,"score_spread":0.3011862171231683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W130108282","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008350198,0.0017435726,0.9822655,0.00064108544,0.00014191573,0.00027997725,0.00018908901,0.00085206825,0.0055366307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.112237826,0.0008304528,0.8842617,0.00016339989,0.00007405423,0.00028549758,0.0003532571,0.00014170255,0.0016520701],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98901576,0.00559159,0.00064259756,0.00052307243,0.0039177216,0.00030934945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99012053,0.005572743,0.00045342318,0.00055015105,0.0031413906,0.00016173918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01028397,0.0009325645,0.0012100771,0.0029277338,0.0014862332,0.0039277957,0.0015519734,0.0010736673,0.0039122733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023972912,0.00049403805,0.0010723441,0.005086903,0.0007472435,0.0036263568,0.00189987,0.0022621353,0.0010205436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021464856,0.00028725617,0.001878436,0.00089611404,0.00026393513,0.00013027713,0.00094632537,0.07101159,0.0037359803,0.07668064,0.014387869,0.8295669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008522951,0.00022040667,0.0020454293,0.00026873584,0.00024915708,0.00007186838,0.0004264604,0.82938755,0.0078701,0.14213176,0.017176807,0.000066518376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009587322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008112678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01028397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019149119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053226086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05438751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W131320508","doi":"10.1023/a:1008712331820","title":"The Condorcet's Jury Theorem in a Bioethical Context: The Dynamics of Group Decision Making","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Hospital for Sick Children","keywords":"Jury; Argument (complex analysis); Axiom; Group decision-making; Voting; Focus group; Politics; Condorcet method; Hierarchy; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Medicine; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05001587489050694,"score_gpt":0.3790026745252,"score_spread":0.328986799634693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W131320508","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028129727,0.007639398,0.39825827,0.22072181,0.002395727,0.00021968782,0.00027874997,0.00009017182,0.3422665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89275753,0.0033013397,0.07125091,0.012977298,0.0029219072,0.0007930037,0.000072599694,0.00011182137,0.015813634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787557,0.012443113,0.00064567744,0.0025553654,0.0044539003,0.0011462438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91692984,0.07320081,0.002245683,0.0032687152,0.003266157,0.001088733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042155083,0.00077410013,0.0025776818,0.0019700704,0.005887353,0.009961875,0.0031475557,0.011900653,0.010960022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10584125,0.0007216202,0.0014017039,0.0021455258,0.04751054,0.019950552,0.004628439,0.013993847,0.0010040107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000686932,0.0000037733855,0.000031861044,0.000011708846,0.000005123046,0.000017334167,0.00020629413,0.00047463784,0.000007944019,0.9973195,0.00093565055,0.0009792629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009282578,0.0000019200475,0.000017446597,0.000013404954,0.0000018806921,0.0000081097,0.000026471058,0.0009115086,0.0000097948805,0.99766976,0.0013267697,0.000003707863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006430591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036859824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042155083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007070176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008567143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22294009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W146859316","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-57311-8_11","title":"Multiple Criteria Subset Selection Under Quantitative and Non-Quantitative Criteria","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Set (abstract data type); Decision maker; Computer science; Operations research; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.12153646939363123,"score_gpt":0.3818581832994145,"score_spread":0.2603217139057833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W146859316","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02007352,0.0010236937,0.96978027,0.00025571923,0.00009292174,0.000110297224,0.00006841062,0.00006138005,0.00853376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3617327,0.0017736176,0.62581986,0.00015534987,0.0004644109,0.000782008,0.00026059526,0.000098081335,0.008913332],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994371,0.0031169588,0.00027237175,0.00032665726,0.0017830892,0.00012999824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925135,0.006098094,0.00030773805,0.00036348173,0.00061648746,0.000100736084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052696606,0.0012173448,0.0019077965,0.00182198,0.00044620645,0.0015569873,0.0009437383,0.0007289262,0.0022418108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008978341,0.0004637546,0.0012817176,0.0023394912,0.0008583148,0.0019805979,0.0013630055,0.0010810086,0.00035800363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003481609,0.00019081135,0.0014897743,0.0012495106,0.00048434042,0.0005630852,0.00038035665,0.28657192,0.012900035,0.22004865,0.006353568,0.4694197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045943856,0.00031526244,0.0010897449,0.00012994956,0.00012282252,0.0004259929,0.00008962249,0.7572739,0.004528444,0.23006468,0.0058793975,0.00003427849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018265845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024608008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052696606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061553967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053694745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027868986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482816600","doi":"","title":"Fuzzy optimization of location decisions in supply chain management","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Conference on Informatics and Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Supply chain; Operations research; Supply chain management; Decision support system; Fuzzy number; Fuzzy set; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.18392264518022497,"score_gpt":0.4036943440207189,"score_spread":0.21977169884049394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482816600","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038987096,0.001018166,0.95421946,0.0005810365,0.00005438502,0.00005640056,0.00006287762,0.00006971769,0.004950908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90615916,0.0009100167,0.0899945,0.00006420086,0.00004730323,0.00009816003,0.000059664726,0.000026431206,0.0026406127],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987357,0.00075622066,0.000038777085,0.00013193849,0.00023085742,0.00010650796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990025,0.00066264626,0.00013155577,0.000029275394,0.00012700363,0.000047074278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022809955,0.0007495893,0.0009790647,0.0009997569,0.0007497329,0.0017219556,0.0008201493,0.0013010342,0.0014644037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037802516,0.0007395617,0.00074693497,0.0011788264,0.0011810339,0.001760133,0.0010735267,0.001089154,0.00017024942],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018918005,0.0000123621085,0.00016378438,0.000022425163,0.000021333872,0.000026326159,0.000027913251,0.9785994,0.00018527775,0.014490945,0.00019040913,0.006240873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051275756,0.000015843963,0.000049800434,0.000008057382,0.000005595276,0.0000043062137,0.000017075821,0.9817438,0.00012041808,0.017765326,0.0002589771,0.00000560132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01112075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071291034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01112075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020862352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00168355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022112012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482842966","doi":"10.1109/ccece.1995.526408","title":"Context dependency of concepts in fuzzy logic","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Dependency (UML); Fuzzy logic; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Meaning (existential); Artificial intelligence; Context model; Epistemology; Object (grammar)","score_opus":0.35823265827435335,"score_gpt":0.4698895724847264,"score_spread":0.11165691421037305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482842966","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029465558,0.006341968,0.9338098,0.0022792295,0.00038503285,0.00013775537,0.00010087784,0.00015753898,0.027322143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59954596,0.0038224456,0.38953593,0.00078662054,0.0007110002,0.00041537665,0.00010199921,0.00006491377,0.005015703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952336,0.002245042,0.00033996673,0.0006913951,0.0012817405,0.00020808878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948426,0.003753438,0.00033284983,0.00033713097,0.0006050689,0.00012896054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006020947,0.00067659555,0.00074088643,0.0023736898,0.002007435,0.0026997663,0.0011124457,0.0015525536,0.0026012373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010911366,0.0007094564,0.0013165007,0.0021249389,0.0059002154,0.0064105606,0.0023722653,0.002851326,0.00035313866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000226783,0.000009601882,0.00016153605,0.000086037275,0.000017821463,0.0001579901,0.000590796,0.00500048,0.0005457458,0.98017144,0.0005322803,0.0127036255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010863959,0.000025055531,0.0001453999,0.000053572032,0.0000197654,0.00009676489,0.000097112024,0.026573684,0.00077790266,0.96429306,0.007885769,0.000021071926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028067452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016857265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006020947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002923661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010021996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031842172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491976532","doi":"10.1002/0470857005.ch7","title":"Selected Issues in the Design of Studies of Interrater Agreement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Robarts Clinical Trials; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Variable (mathematics); Inter-rater reliability; Statistics; Outcome (game theory); Mathematics; Agreement; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Operations research; Linguistics; Philosophy; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.39983498727583877,"score_gpt":0.5120373407877463,"score_spread":0.11220235351190755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491976532","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009638011,0.032625638,0.74268615,0.07991825,0.010238399,0.07209848,0.0019223132,0.0011211861,0.04975166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04172472,0.0074449102,0.7701655,0.0101046935,0.0026659556,0.16167447,0.0005949453,0.00095762016,0.004667152],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.116652876,0.77301776,0.069531254,0.0055335644,0.033381287,0.0018833308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.029727293,0.91598487,0.009417072,0.013676524,0.030448062,0.0007461416],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7883403,0.0024592201,0.005109083,0.01722279,0.008143629,0.015384225,0.008286887,0.0076368703,0.017396258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8981954,0.0049611926,0.005688172,0.02430462,0.012816767,0.013569929,0.008289125,0.011173473,0.004193402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017483567,0.00028784803,0.0054069036,0.033521127,0.0012296757,0.0006693401,0.04659152,0.001749194,0.0010935086,0.24789412,0.089490004,0.57031846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020079806,0.0017821025,0.020720677,0.10532257,0.0022132138,0.0020087734,0.024619928,0.010154968,0.00639116,0.41703892,0.40708923,0.0006504321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033714317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012498153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21165973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014433818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021303944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26101416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497606539","doi":"10.3233/fi-2015-1184","title":"Fast Convergence of Distance-based Inconsistency in Pairwise Comparisons","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fundamenta Informaticae","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Convergence (economics); Mathematics; Algorithm; Computer science; Statistics; Economics","score_opus":0.3388397757513775,"score_gpt":0.43504658380418865,"score_spread":0.09620680805281112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497606539","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012111954,0.00030776166,0.9856017,0.0002174313,0.000042140327,0.00017099972,0.00003408936,0.00014781387,0.0013661621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2653607,0.00023960636,0.7319077,0.00023310339,0.00008017064,0.0007910296,0.00021104273,0.0002154748,0.000961166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9271894,0.04945045,0.0026910868,0.0064673205,0.013105539,0.0010962432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6270665,0.32606855,0.00998113,0.020477502,0.015117698,0.0012886258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05503623,0.0015329593,0.0030991235,0.0038245434,0.0015288222,0.0031705075,0.004537932,0.0019294334,0.0029792928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30573237,0.0012260794,0.0032892756,0.0021823042,0.004612643,0.0067035174,0.0058142156,0.007078205,0.00074648595],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010369814,0.0003269383,0.011645755,0.0016500661,0.0010986492,0.000369921,0.0027646045,0.3418836,0.0061166883,0.36409584,0.0029100422,0.26610085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010574388,0.00047830184,0.002218148,0.00017733102,0.00013155572,0.0004958359,0.0003048888,0.59105086,0.0061092805,0.39582118,0.0029888963,0.000117882606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014471923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083847786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05503623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00229083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025990375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2910629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502626335","doi":"10.1002/9780470974032.ch5","title":"Introduction to Preference Modeling with Binary Fuzzy Relations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Binary relation; Extension (predicate logic); Fuzzy logic; Binary number; Preference; Fuzzy set; Mathematics; Construct (python library); Defuzzification; Theoretical computer science; Set (abstract data type); Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Computer science; Fuzzy classification; Fuzzy number; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics; Arithmetic; Programming language","score_opus":0.17903427038074063,"score_gpt":0.3920448284799496,"score_spread":0.21301055809920896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502626335","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018760776,0.021496832,0.85762024,0.0037517815,0.0012195372,0.00019581139,0.0007762659,0.00034919506,0.112714306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11105617,0.04488793,0.7830646,0.0026766863,0.0034149513,0.000991378,0.0011134702,0.00025148893,0.05254326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984132,0.00058192364,0.0001356181,0.00023709063,0.0005608944,0.00007129139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988715,0.00074675324,0.000059624857,0.00008555124,0.0002002982,0.000036179135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018121619,0.0010344558,0.0008811669,0.0016476773,0.000922577,0.0025640666,0.0011986666,0.0016299356,0.017533485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031657112,0.0006459431,0.0012653219,0.0034003898,0.0018001727,0.0048586093,0.0011993936,0.0040423777,0.0039605335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000098268565,0.000020731164,0.00007231762,0.00024108656,0.000012718207,0.00008717299,0.00027693404,0.0022285192,0.00051404536,0.94430864,0.009538518,0.042689614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007949145,0.000031188058,0.00018378376,0.0002659874,0.000013258111,0.0002912132,0.00006909436,0.012057128,0.00032868527,0.77081084,0.2159116,0.000029374096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022007632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016249121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017533485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016294997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009333325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05865532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515076461","doi":"10.1002/9780470974032.ch9","title":"Group Decision‐Making: Fuzzy Models","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Group decision-making; Group (periodic table); Class (philosophy); Fuzzy logic; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Arbitration; Management science; Preference; Operations research; Process (computing); Decision problem; Decision analysis; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Engineering; Algorithm; Psychology; Social psychology; Statistics","score_opus":0.1657144197880725,"score_gpt":0.43523898000107014,"score_spread":0.26952456021299764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515076461","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013866897,0.013465565,0.8167478,0.0062684026,0.00067755877,0.00016876342,0.00033854216,0.00018261082,0.14828399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73419845,0.020051988,0.19106948,0.0009213311,0.0010933703,0.00070793694,0.0004525433,0.00009368998,0.051411275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984901,0.0008533344,0.000042237494,0.0001493436,0.0003718486,0.00009315332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850476,0.0010367235,0.00012557086,0.00010275767,0.0001654844,0.00006480382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024355415,0.0011053776,0.0011415776,0.0011280203,0.0010302578,0.0035376088,0.001800416,0.0021691106,0.006928762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004747819,0.0003583485,0.00079851307,0.0026124227,0.002228129,0.0029357013,0.0014542893,0.002314853,0.0013369839],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013599631,0.000030726314,0.00020253278,0.000104621664,0.000030278754,0.00008549434,0.00039752477,0.06620879,0.00013495002,0.90952915,0.0045184367,0.018743921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011087768,0.000019767422,0.000114097755,0.00008443835,0.000015669953,0.000049939918,0.0001467112,0.17050332,0.00006993105,0.80918473,0.01978827,0.000011931512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003918522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024042982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006928762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019203027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012310288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023179054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524874296","doi":"10.1007/s11518-013-5213-x","title":"A novel approach to characterizing hesitations in intuitionistic fuzzy numbers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Windsor","keywords":"Operationalization; Novelty; Operator (biology); Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Computer science; Computational intelligence; Artificial intelligence; Management science; Algebra over a field; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Epistemology; Pure mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11185663253253016,"score_gpt":0.3424351018478576,"score_spread":0.23057846931532744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524874296","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041786566,0.00013115846,0.95405185,0.00012425723,0.00005505784,0.0001112478,0.00008868534,0.00018753177,0.0034635297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6451746,0.00012356053,0.35217747,0.00011385796,0.00012699763,0.00017920163,0.00012071852,0.000037067064,0.0019465738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997581,0.00059792434,0.00021637052,0.0004819206,0.00095428963,0.0001684827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99292904,0.00432385,0.00069847144,0.00052132783,0.0012933788,0.0002338771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025214206,0.00077179616,0.000703792,0.002657051,0.000815842,0.0023010965,0.0012078057,0.0009466661,0.0020413967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009666838,0.0003257602,0.0009994092,0.0017212868,0.001750041,0.0036645406,0.0013767206,0.001501336,0.00032215167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008248123,0.0006577504,0.009587351,0.00053102215,0.0002703273,0.0009299137,0.004317917,0.05845631,0.077533506,0.515702,0.0029360952,0.32825303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044281238,0.00041555232,0.0041779834,0.00005780884,0.00010149029,0.0006820077,0.00091792026,0.6987411,0.013540681,0.2765021,0.0046630604,0.0001560227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007205825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002657051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008758878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069311744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013334751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531179027","doi":"10.3233/fun-2007-76402","title":"Fuzzification of Rational and Recognizable Sets","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fundamenta Informaticae","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Waterloo; Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","score_opus":0.20775407789635877,"score_gpt":0.4564450907038856,"score_spread":0.24869101280752684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531179027","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06973936,0.00082595414,0.91912925,0.0003446177,0.00007818959,0.000078838755,0.00006417516,0.00020610234,0.009533494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7202641,0.00074517465,0.2707905,0.0001950076,0.00015616819,0.00014505452,0.00012847026,0.000058196838,0.007517433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729294,0.0005255206,0.00021107454,0.0008385362,0.0008920814,0.0002397872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974668,0.0013675749,0.00030295464,0.0004843612,0.0002983633,0.00007991941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003010246,0.0005360454,0.0007453841,0.0014685106,0.0008263655,0.0028579931,0.0010277036,0.0011325205,0.002335577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006714683,0.0003484426,0.0015646308,0.0005796819,0.004781794,0.004878155,0.0014432204,0.0019692285,0.00032056557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002751448,0.000015045637,0.00029000852,0.000061305545,0.000019023786,0.00019892493,0.0006004934,0.008207838,0.0045546554,0.97425437,0.00009389571,0.01167671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017964514,0.00006571146,0.0004382837,0.00006588917,0.000041972475,0.0002821918,0.00019058211,0.053921968,0.008917306,0.9292379,0.006785015,0.000035352594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092707574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040894133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003010246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013123171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008202396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015919864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531722926","doi":"10.1109/nafips.2001.943631","title":"Expanding the definitions of linguistic hedges","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hedge; Linguistics; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Fuzzy set; Function (biology); Chart; Membership function; Subject (documents); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Natural language processing; Econometrics; Statistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5323758287251212,"score_gpt":0.458153101087518,"score_spread":0.07422272763760324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531722926","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022097882,0.015843945,0.8804809,0.0042151515,0.0009724257,0.00018125329,0.00021171285,0.00014165093,0.075855225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4993641,0.007416115,0.48212186,0.0016209101,0.0009199547,0.00044086104,0.000122062695,0.00010103721,0.007893118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935314,0.0028137795,0.0007329631,0.0009995522,0.0016539781,0.00026826214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935282,0.0039779968,0.0005579034,0.00082387694,0.0009688812,0.00014305166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008397117,0.0010088211,0.0010255445,0.0030400006,0.0016142649,0.0038112935,0.0014705383,0.001922297,0.003227012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013680904,0.0005040125,0.0016738,0.003385358,0.007553673,0.008848769,0.0028704978,0.0041205897,0.000527157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017782642,0.000014706268,0.00012903885,0.00010440262,0.000018974493,0.000062731866,0.00077286793,0.0017305042,0.00043227652,0.9694557,0.00078556425,0.026475431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010800092,0.00005132627,0.00025023578,0.00011619301,0.000022370501,0.00017617288,0.00022972673,0.0063316785,0.00060388667,0.94865566,0.043516815,0.00003517958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083095115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070517266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008397117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018179449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000979675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04440874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532277835","doi":"10.20622/jltaj.7.0_110","title":"A Logistic Regression for Differential Item Functioning Primer","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JLTA Journal Kiyo","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Logistic regression; Primer (cosmetics); Differential (mechanical device); Psychology; Differential item functioning; Statistics; Clinical psychology; Mathematics; Item response theory; Engineering; Psychometrics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.3198356510243979,"score_gpt":0.4789294043517162,"score_spread":0.1590937533273183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532277835","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018730295,0.00076047727,0.98972684,0.0031258108,0.0004206914,0.0004119714,0.0006899506,0.0007813275,0.00220986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04009783,0.00088665826,0.9481215,0.0011302128,0.00052418665,0.0046220566,0.0007347137,0.0004880529,0.0033948333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9275589,0.061931826,0.0023517208,0.0037298587,0.003884411,0.00054329797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8411133,0.13801588,0.005417367,0.008069806,0.006631498,0.00075216993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06290056,0.0022548295,0.0020613796,0.007743708,0.0015767073,0.0033043157,0.004240661,0.0019710718,0.020070536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18196625,0.0013653517,0.0029964207,0.009722598,0.002498418,0.005864232,0.0056658126,0.00807156,0.006375654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025569627,0.0003313326,0.022026867,0.0014417584,0.00085950055,0.0009799891,0.0023176104,0.013118531,0.0014322887,0.5180384,0.067458965,0.37173903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021063461,0.00073544966,0.010303962,0.0015697883,0.00025731162,0.0017998338,0.0016568613,0.27501,0.0024356616,0.49318138,0.21245117,0.00038791803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002108968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017344729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06290056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021182317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041091507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33265394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546994747","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-45224-9_33","title":"Fuzzy Coefficients and Fuzzy Preference Relations in Models of Decision Making","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Preference; Fuzzy number; Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy set operations; Preference relation; Class (philosophy); Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy set; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13188344004692884,"score_gpt":0.3646782975278237,"score_spread":0.23279485748089487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546994747","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030408273,0.00948875,0.928221,0.0023614492,0.00039813918,0.00006619671,0.00016136914,0.0001081718,0.028786644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.679167,0.009522177,0.29414085,0.0002106576,0.0007319821,0.00029917902,0.00026505638,0.00010512452,0.01555798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684286,0.0019952585,0.0001419791,0.00015567827,0.0007153753,0.00014879594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99221134,0.0064229374,0.00031751266,0.00028170334,0.0005964121,0.00017023747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050790994,0.0012474356,0.0012283529,0.002224991,0.00068599195,0.0031813118,0.0013767186,0.0012174404,0.0043438375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020823713,0.00082888006,0.00093607453,0.0040620277,0.0025641248,0.0070482036,0.0011481264,0.00327755,0.0006556323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002641972,0.00001407859,0.00012521859,0.000118177995,0.00002231704,0.000036622616,0.0002599399,0.022287998,0.00019890713,0.95620644,0.0017491062,0.01895477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010225875,0.000012178517,0.00006166686,0.00003554927,0.000012710575,0.000027976617,0.000044689496,0.047459718,0.00008087802,0.95008594,0.002154266,0.000014231002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031604487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032643666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050790994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017771121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010605681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02686119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552477862","doi":"10.1109/icsmc.1988.754267","title":"An approximate reasoning approach for the implementation of an expert system in aggregate production planning","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Expert system; Schema (genetic algorithms); Computer science; Aggregate planning; Legal expert system; Rule of inference; Artificial intelligence; Inference; Fuzzy set; Inference engine; Fuzzy logic; Data mining; Machine learning; Production planning; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.16597671110764287,"score_gpt":0.4719203702397078,"score_spread":0.3059436591320649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552477862","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001449115,0.000026036463,0.9971398,0.000063358726,0.000007902385,0.000047203164,0.000026440752,0.0005120109,0.00072810886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040345326,0.000073911135,0.95874065,0.000045070796,0.000010046264,0.00013501274,0.0000975199,0.00003335562,0.00051911874],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979552,0.0008203758,0.00030117072,0.00022578015,0.00061760336,0.00007987485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968612,0.001539965,0.00022740992,0.00063603185,0.00066123257,0.000074171396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035158994,0.00048030386,0.00060243567,0.00070899614,0.00047110068,0.0021471758,0.0021712356,0.0011242052,0.0050826212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0098172305,0.00042770873,0.0009398548,0.0010311003,0.00085188576,0.00292197,0.0010772116,0.0013758037,0.001159408],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027791856,0.00021124983,0.0019608503,0.0006125239,0.00022721091,0.00047604428,0.0014947768,0.21424626,0.021533953,0.275971,0.004456525,0.4785317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005115249,0.0001803281,0.00038424967,0.00010525098,0.00011266601,0.00041303897,0.0002254897,0.88885695,0.012929078,0.073004045,0.02369191,0.000045893572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002001757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018205122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050826212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006153783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011766758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018594086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562423844","doi":"10.1080/21693277.2014.895689","title":"Integrating fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with PROMETHEE method for total quality management consultant selection","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Production & Manufacturing Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Selection (genetic algorithm); Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Analytic hierarchy process; Quality (philosophy); Hierarchy; Process (computing); Total quality management; Preference; Operations research; Field (mathematics); Management science; Competitive advantage; Rank (graph theory); Process management; Operations management; Engineering; Business; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Marketing; Economics","score_opus":0.2746212959602134,"score_gpt":0.5528846144113772,"score_spread":0.27826331845116375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562423844","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008387337,0.0002626554,0.98683274,0.00020099596,0.00003563846,0.0005360094,0.000049795413,0.0001391292,0.0035558494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13299334,0.0003870867,0.8647838,0.000049645856,0.000036740686,0.0008785273,0.00009209807,0.00002076017,0.0007579737],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98561907,0.008742636,0.00076167483,0.00065646635,0.0038245379,0.0003955434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950492,0.0031357342,0.0004640325,0.00018963561,0.0010507371,0.0001106905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010194566,0.0009113234,0.0011734645,0.0048778863,0.0016482876,0.0028856697,0.0014761554,0.0009151947,0.002611953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015350414,0.0005911449,0.0013434151,0.0049138037,0.000898131,0.0019168804,0.0021285485,0.0013822484,0.00040070675],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000313076,0.00040762345,0.006566455,0.0015055621,0.00033179935,0.0004946798,0.0023576054,0.20274502,0.0055384813,0.12659527,0.0050340206,0.6481104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016457273,0.00041694657,0.0022594023,0.00020587057,0.00014049454,0.00024463874,0.0008590434,0.90929496,0.0034480798,0.072382756,0.010438034,0.00014521125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043581696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004852932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010194566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016418761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005243928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053914666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573897819","doi":"10.1002/9781118162934.ch5","title":"Estimating Proportions, Ratios, and Subpopulation Means","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley series in probability and statistics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Confidence interval; Mathematics; Estimator; Simple random sample; Sample size determination; Population; Sample (material); CDF-based nonparametric confidence interval; Population mean; Sampling (signal processing); Tolerance interval; Econometrics; Computer science; Demography","score_opus":0.10998610961242436,"score_gpt":0.38731080445330884,"score_spread":0.2773246948408845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573897819","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006890938,0.001999901,0.98072296,0.00035120564,0.00008559867,0.00012403197,0.00023821487,0.00023925646,0.009347763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14674568,0.0047329087,0.8422535,0.00020973152,0.00024041664,0.00074350537,0.000710489,0.00020005013,0.004163802],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876837,0.006789134,0.0006463463,0.0015006554,0.0031488254,0.00023128223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810877,0.014009746,0.0019301116,0.0011386594,0.0016986474,0.00013517088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013183689,0.0010052726,0.0010978768,0.004946317,0.00048477584,0.0038959382,0.0019015308,0.0013393487,0.0042455588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087585,0.00046620544,0.0012051333,0.0047153584,0.0015185998,0.0047358274,0.0025746624,0.0017407119,0.0013376597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081069455,0.000069221926,0.009682389,0.00066803704,0.00025640818,0.00015417986,0.00091441255,0.05397906,0.00073036307,0.45865065,0.00658023,0.46823394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025268591,0.00009935875,0.0047039264,0.00039183683,0.00012401085,0.00036046168,0.00059640646,0.1261696,0.0014881424,0.84120363,0.024741637,0.00009556478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019300441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014447729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013183689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011055972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011875859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06972283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574453507","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1479","title":"A Comprehensive Literature Review of the Rank Reversal Phenomenon in the Analytic Hierarchy Process","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Rank (graph theory); Hierarchy; Computer science; Order (exchange); Compromise; Operations research; Process (computing); Management science; Phenomenon; Data science; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Engineering; Social science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.1312149065278208,"score_gpt":0.46536447086928484,"score_spread":0.33414956434146403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574453507","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009957573,0.9904321,0.004176614,0.0013097032,0.00030147482,0.000038475922,0.000040748233,0.0000179674,0.002687144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02253403,0.967747,0.008177688,0.00062898936,0.000354214,0.0000707476,0.00008095264,0.000009377938,0.0003971231],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99136984,0.003942528,0.0010698893,0.0005515033,0.0028995702,0.0001666261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636865,0.027297137,0.002340089,0.0005200168,0.0059318077,0.00022436293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010593019,0.00094900554,0.0018567983,0.014205341,0.0010165181,0.003582212,0.0014589311,0.00174005,0.0030120697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027249284,0.0005716264,0.0012442536,0.023318972,0.0014360407,0.003407684,0.00096392335,0.0014087664,0.0007877057],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000791282,0.0000678094,0.0011610424,0.059836354,0.00031714246,0.00030634963,0.00066073687,0.0018727276,0.0006402127,0.017790103,0.01483349,0.902435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007009925,0.0005313518,0.012314441,0.23734063,0.0021162713,0.0021802622,0.0046795025,0.0073123197,0.0032075816,0.04387735,0.68611974,0.00025053878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033595804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004170169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014205341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002431144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006511783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05602187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587077521","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-70810-0_12","title":"Fuzzy Sensitivity Analysis and Its Application","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in fuzziness and soft computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Choquet integral; Mathematics; Sensitivity (control systems); Fuzzy measure theory; Fuzzy logic; Function (biology); Membership function; Fuzzy set; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.20044532320006067,"score_gpt":0.4249475652389595,"score_spread":0.22450224203889882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587077521","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009526287,0.022833792,0.9033276,0.0017877622,0.00048518425,0.00004611409,0.00009388175,0.00015855522,0.061740767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.752621,0.030827247,0.18521285,0.00064066064,0.0013193007,0.00019572969,0.00010553216,0.00020991782,0.0288678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982634,0.0008735889,0.00007884511,0.00016854586,0.00054564513,0.000069963695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649966,0.002904219,0.00012038123,0.00018117418,0.0002547732,0.00003974407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026393423,0.0011621447,0.001382482,0.0030340638,0.000676261,0.0025221293,0.00087888405,0.0014090731,0.0034455014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008341188,0.0006485522,0.0016389296,0.0030705098,0.0023006322,0.002521609,0.0016057709,0.0023372388,0.00041383968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026137217,0.000043817377,0.0002877984,0.000336021,0.00013440379,0.00018230847,0.00026326982,0.14053184,0.0014125868,0.79314744,0.0026126255,0.061021876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002658263,0.00002088538,0.00026560557,0.00011551401,0.000034103858,0.0001446446,0.00006503261,0.1759755,0.0010253923,0.8123971,0.009918891,0.00003448958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00192617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008846131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034455014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015321473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000674751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013958335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597434037","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-72432-2_83","title":"A Fuzzy Model for Supplier Selection and Development","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in soft computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Fuzzy logic; Base (topology); Computer science; Value (mathematics); Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.1867025491514293,"score_gpt":0.4374200214677522,"score_spread":0.2507174723163229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597434037","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008931843,0.0009902203,0.9551741,0.0012360256,0.00019780548,0.00007643439,0.0005200741,0.0002460274,0.03262759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5245796,0.0031436565,0.39226323,0.00045105224,0.00026501584,0.00065995246,0.00088030513,0.00015383249,0.07760343],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995165,0.00018070047,0.000024500834,0.000084603,0.00014702856,0.000046643283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942756,0.00036946757,0.000037076596,0.00003262812,0.00010260203,0.000030701012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010421651,0.00095025543,0.00096609595,0.0012445576,0.00085230835,0.0021459318,0.0024456729,0.002658354,0.0123296175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022189082,0.0004946386,0.0012798468,0.0021959278,0.0007416179,0.0028253011,0.00082374236,0.0014791102,0.001962894],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056128767,0.00007334933,0.00032773736,0.00012450325,0.000064609,0.00021382535,0.00014809272,0.61979765,0.0008147819,0.31570646,0.006583076,0.056089763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013333694,0.000024408662,0.00010295334,0.000021311249,0.000017754224,0.000060222425,0.000028421624,0.8898619,0.00014322596,0.10521008,0.0044988436,0.000017461343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014756595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012729562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014756595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020535754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016155682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041246653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606276466","doi":"10.1002/atr.1240","title":"Analytic hierarchy process application in selecting the mode of transport for a logistics company","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Flexibility (engineering); Operations research; Analytic network process; Process (computing); Computer science; Reliability (semiconductor); Function (biology); Mode (computer interface); Hierarchy; Selection (genetic algorithm); Rank (graph theory); Transport engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.0795456967117574,"score_gpt":0.4288961698264365,"score_spread":0.34935047311467915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606276466","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21996126,0.0007601251,0.7503924,0.0009604114,0.00012058227,0.0019495424,0.00043162226,0.0004609792,0.02496309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6455592,0.0005123937,0.3506714,0.000045067885,0.000021710015,0.0005794427,0.000210003,0.00001747379,0.0023833832],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967043,0.0022233368,0.00014336342,0.00012707703,0.0006349182,0.00016694135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972771,0.0016212423,0.00017995412,0.000051577732,0.00077944814,0.000090743364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040416135,0.0005805854,0.0004949829,0.0034755412,0.0012468813,0.0017212952,0.00059615145,0.00067880994,0.0038173106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056218384,0.00023673162,0.0006363474,0.003656011,0.0003900959,0.0006713479,0.0010517371,0.000593651,0.00034804986],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008202107,0.0006876125,0.010875668,0.001793493,0.00014747512,0.0016299266,0.005207669,0.41357982,0.013011758,0.05316165,0.0075301775,0.49155453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008708134,0.00045713293,0.0029676633,0.00017111974,0.000094530675,0.0001520994,0.003990911,0.9644407,0.004439181,0.013967965,0.009178437,0.000053138887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064958287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068299947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064958287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017028856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025861987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021374345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1635423263","doi":"10.3968/j.sms.1923845220120502.zr0217","title":"The Membership Relation in Fuzzy Operators","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in mathematical sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Data mining","score_opus":0.5655180574276136,"score_gpt":0.5594364159357887,"score_spread":0.006081641491824885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1635423263","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038776062,0.0067249704,0.84943086,0.0020927982,0.0011087597,0.00011595436,0.00016029469,0.00019578639,0.10139452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7000234,0.0052584503,0.26311913,0.00059319224,0.0010919609,0.00024360248,0.00019214756,0.0001067577,0.029371321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984896,0.00055135123,0.000107174594,0.0002597607,0.00046557543,0.00012656297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986847,0.0007462363,0.00008534099,0.000110040055,0.00031270753,0.000060886257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020080684,0.00048527122,0.0005250408,0.0014261241,0.0013503137,0.0023266852,0.0006180742,0.001255106,0.0040679597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052476735,0.00025875086,0.00064286403,0.0012374193,0.003327527,0.004128381,0.0011182805,0.0021717586,0.0010406481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022939184,0.000010668261,0.000078770136,0.00007822925,0.000008669778,0.00013166215,0.0006596896,0.001790577,0.0027325088,0.97485924,0.001365301,0.018261671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074771337,0.000063565945,0.00026607685,0.000065291926,0.000013290108,0.00030185873,0.00023779295,0.01657438,0.0023338152,0.9520346,0.028075825,0.000026091415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007886044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027980228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040679597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089082075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000490428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013608694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1656365822","doi":"10.5296/jmr.v7i5.8044","title":"Supplier Selection by AHP in KMC Pharmaceutical: Use of GMIBM Method for Inconsistency Adjustment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Operations research; Process (computing); Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.6805957290816683,"score_gpt":0.6244911370580308,"score_spread":0.05610459202363749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1656365822","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012234748,0.0001145379,0.9856926,0.00019035902,0.000038871345,0.00027321684,0.00008820418,0.0002335998,0.0011337458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13763346,0.00010358527,0.86099917,0.00006234359,0.000024725454,0.00043726576,0.00016593262,0.00006494892,0.0005085401],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98991954,0.005561599,0.00073036813,0.0007878841,0.0027072984,0.00029333166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852599,0.010275056,0.0011914761,0.0004308135,0.0026580396,0.00018481073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010876781,0.0007545358,0.0010916537,0.0042599677,0.0016817374,0.0015783972,0.0014466075,0.00076056767,0.002643264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021383163,0.0005778359,0.0015202971,0.0041834256,0.00072300306,0.0011378033,0.0017131257,0.0016837767,0.00023556533],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003828884,0.0003201617,0.009450875,0.0014002464,0.00054753857,0.0005356182,0.0027537392,0.39243948,0.007840058,0.0307076,0.003976063,0.5496458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055678476,0.00013296038,0.001766779,0.00009347682,0.00008152127,0.000101299695,0.00044512117,0.97301435,0.003747812,0.017597146,0.0029142846,0.000049563227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078037768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007295018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010876781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018851463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030675596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057522595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1664278360","doi":"10.3233/fi-2014-1055","title":"On Axiomatization of Inconsistency Indicators for Pairwise Comparisons","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fundamenta Informaticae","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Mathematics; Calculus (dental); Statistics","score_opus":0.13935402150520276,"score_gpt":0.4196155115520413,"score_spread":0.28026149004683854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1664278360","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029004256,0.00049399363,0.98822355,0.0007037838,0.00018303556,0.000118177326,0.0001496912,0.000099337965,0.0071279323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1401562,0.0010350944,0.85345644,0.0009744773,0.00061639544,0.0012689676,0.0007328259,0.00014523098,0.0016143702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9227293,0.043522716,0.0068707108,0.008961472,0.016370542,0.0015452061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88681096,0.08486463,0.0064424817,0.009471732,0.011316541,0.0010937167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050322887,0.0020571249,0.0021857189,0.005933114,0.0031726796,0.005525498,0.004380273,0.0028375348,0.0055904104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08904573,0.0011458095,0.0049750675,0.0068621985,0.01233096,0.015913537,0.0071930964,0.011848967,0.001249422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031453954,0.000028795643,0.0003211815,0.00020603619,0.00007033962,0.00008999965,0.0003342791,0.0044655083,0.00046253152,0.9797997,0.0007465336,0.01344347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002573214,0.00006057024,0.00024399102,0.00010740905,0.000056113866,0.00016919973,0.000090074594,0.016628955,0.0008468596,0.9761705,0.0055460413,0.00005445375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016669323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011156194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050322887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037746835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032162152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26613605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1715258855","doi":"10.1002/atr.183","title":"Evaluating competitiveness using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process—A case study of Chinese airlines","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aviation; Analytic hierarchy process; Competition (biology); Order (exchange); Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Process (computing); International market; Hierarchy; Industrial organization; Business; Computer science; Economics; Engineering; International trade; Finance; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2977553962137875,"score_gpt":0.5151056632014612,"score_spread":0.21735026698767373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1715258855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99581844,0.000075283155,0.001784866,0.00013536942,0.0000039201977,0.00007278443,0.000041966854,0.0000065256895,0.0020608602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99629945,0.00008327949,0.0031595526,0.000009373777,0.0000032240007,0.000034266934,0.000027895374,0.0000022299268,0.00038072665],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803287,0.0011547009,0.00010305919,0.00011796405,0.00034030768,0.00025115052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972898,0.0017227412,0.00023531815,0.000105610576,0.00044302072,0.00020359905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044028102,0.00059612794,0.00050204375,0.0021213405,0.0021541878,0.0015558181,0.0007191652,0.000930033,0.0013720315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004216953,0.0002061312,0.0008067203,0.0030970885,0.0012022262,0.0008334316,0.0007935665,0.0005268315,0.00008305674],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019944934,0.0028410936,0.3119781,0.0012428401,0.000663445,0.029744163,0.053467263,0.35258886,0.014911481,0.051843546,0.0053302646,0.17339444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044631548,0.0024442268,0.18914694,0.0002389663,0.00048459656,0.0013330758,0.09268154,0.67829347,0.01358245,0.010816745,0.010189602,0.00034209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11526405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09080501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11526405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060626375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032611426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2291863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1748305042","doi":"10.1109/isit.2001.936051","title":"Information theory of multirate systems","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Class (philosophy); Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Element (criminal law); Linear system; Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Data mining; Mathematical analysis; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2808656407960777,"score_gpt":0.3975500633487354,"score_spread":0.11668442255265771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1748305042","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005077379,0.0015928092,0.9825727,0.000580647,0.00011547782,0.000031716238,0.00013629522,0.000057677684,0.009835241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75664055,0.0067452677,0.22259086,0.0008897494,0.0012575786,0.00046313347,0.0005948972,0.00009832621,0.0107197575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618775,0.0013101151,0.0002211838,0.00043260344,0.0015244461,0.0003239063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938168,0.003845712,0.00062900997,0.00057146087,0.0009251978,0.00021184766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029666133,0.0011225733,0.0012817413,0.0022098897,0.00080496486,0.0037384948,0.001293432,0.0014501958,0.0030915372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008452542,0.00045464106,0.0010820136,0.0020141113,0.0024864657,0.0039823777,0.002265739,0.0024827833,0.0006359115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023295874,0.000015765152,0.00017935895,0.00011213586,0.000041705323,0.000057897854,0.00007959157,0.0708786,0.0008427303,0.9142363,0.0008972756,0.012635316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000094166335,0.000046167348,0.00019909015,0.0000482811,0.000021142274,0.00004838527,0.000028394365,0.28918096,0.0004969089,0.7060093,0.003879103,0.000032758664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017883615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008745856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037384948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024542501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010176809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017806947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1762037976","doi":"10.3233/fi-2009-126","title":"Pairwise Comparisons Based Non-Numerical Ranking","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fundamenta Informaticae","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Mathematics; Data mining; Statistics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1813216940829353,"score_gpt":0.43770189737751825,"score_spread":0.25638020329458294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1762037976","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028768664,0.00015827731,0.9947009,0.000102476675,0.00005576339,0.00014009187,0.00010931278,0.00011462613,0.0017417364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08421701,0.0002921208,0.9119893,0.00008331041,0.000086085565,0.00064206263,0.0006339588,0.00008396158,0.0019722115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9652352,0.021882905,0.0016837635,0.002270533,0.008369464,0.00055816094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96737623,0.022093277,0.001581872,0.0034173878,0.0050004716,0.0005306785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014889728,0.0013822457,0.00201168,0.0049124355,0.0015032851,0.0038798612,0.0025453158,0.0009143541,0.0054996787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049932506,0.0006005567,0.0022470518,0.004951316,0.0029109698,0.0049283835,0.0037700708,0.0033671933,0.0018928626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023969376,0.000158957,0.0016017263,0.0011105308,0.00025264177,0.00022576771,0.0007714238,0.040870797,0.006179597,0.59185576,0.0040237913,0.35270932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040281884,0.0005234341,0.0016227897,0.0001690471,0.000080390506,0.00029970732,0.00030189176,0.20618744,0.005226966,0.7719028,0.013528949,0.000116301664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007043593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012164244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014889728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015701058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003172007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078745365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1773113936","doi":"10.1609/aimag.v29i4.2203","title":"Elicitation of Factored Utilities","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AI Magazine","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference elicitation; Preference; Conjoint analysis; Expert elicitation; Computer science; Ask price; Management science; Operations research; Data science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.28202048356124104,"score_gpt":0.4436641022537503,"score_spread":0.16164361869250926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1773113936","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05227528,0.00034310992,0.93135506,0.00036250486,0.000035145058,0.0008374044,0.002003767,0.0004348969,0.012352788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42841223,0.00054552517,0.56532663,0.0001458702,0.000035509154,0.0017389178,0.0015085333,0.000083781866,0.0022030126],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824783,0.011036906,0.0010594934,0.0012569736,0.0037306282,0.00043769216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95644116,0.035009947,0.0014737366,0.0032898393,0.0035188284,0.00026650864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011807138,0.0013811318,0.0010747418,0.002548247,0.0004667495,0.0020079212,0.0008224028,0.00081978133,0.0067934254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06417846,0.000374821,0.00085341156,0.003179606,0.0007621287,0.0028213942,0.0018944183,0.0011415232,0.0010364145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011024078,0.0003989956,0.0071801,0.0025181393,0.0002777308,0.00043614383,0.0034379943,0.07307156,0.027646331,0.16182175,0.008137396,0.7139715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026130394,0.0011482438,0.008023739,0.0005910077,0.00018700925,0.0006617894,0.002423105,0.41967952,0.03907829,0.49000922,0.037697624,0.00023914708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007537517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011816449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011807138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010830093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012203495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0624429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179482601","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-0046-2_30","title":"Decision-Making Tool for Produced Water Management","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.18684716226231948,"score_gpt":0.4026614239653433,"score_spread":0.21581426170302384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W179482601","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015994206,0.0022623478,0.90288675,0.0008261351,0.00039929,0.00013231285,0.0006475075,0.0015809074,0.08966533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031139076,0.003162703,0.8816528,0.00033445316,0.00016658273,0.00029909267,0.0011861891,0.0005290468,0.08153006],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916255,0.00020729678,0.000057782156,0.00008940901,0.00044177618,0.000041260362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945444,0.0003603741,0.000019032472,0.00004345252,0.00010281088,0.00001980461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012561171,0.0012981064,0.00089279166,0.0016997593,0.0006483896,0.0032110508,0.0017485115,0.0010591899,0.025135571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018496149,0.0004480153,0.0010206938,0.0021328735,0.0007946793,0.0031325913,0.0010650839,0.0016288668,0.0068874555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052172294,0.000088652894,0.00017150292,0.00070173736,0.00004879698,0.00022246796,0.00034878406,0.022821164,0.0048086364,0.43741548,0.048486535,0.4848342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019294068,0.0000635401,0.0003096002,0.00067647535,0.000049731472,0.0003366778,0.00021181759,0.0998629,0.0066562565,0.47471312,0.4170303,0.00007017584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013458988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021699416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025135571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013081447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012540084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084086895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W180154847","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-73182-5_19","title":"Identifying Aggregation Weights of Decision Criteria: Application of Fuzzy Systems to Wood Product Manufacturing","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in fuzziness and soft computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Innovation Council; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Manufacturing engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.21204777587984114,"score_gpt":0.44806377239753764,"score_spread":0.2360159965176965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W180154847","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0387308,0.0015603229,0.9553331,0.00026821863,0.00006469224,0.00006889094,0.000044159086,0.00006887912,0.0038608732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37317944,0.0015475156,0.6227574,0.000041515686,0.00005927856,0.0000747842,0.00008619001,0.000032004133,0.0022218716],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992136,0.00028863718,0.00006360879,0.000084685766,0.00030029207,0.0000491383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858785,0.0009796272,0.0000972791,0.00005882129,0.00025635865,0.000020018815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027141038,0.0008290582,0.0010055879,0.0016160875,0.00058702356,0.0016669133,0.0008658441,0.0008926559,0.0009894553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007129099,0.00044349633,0.00088258955,0.0027222175,0.0005797714,0.0014080657,0.0009505596,0.0012198073,0.00014194389],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016724969,0.00012029872,0.0023228857,0.00044224187,0.00016065725,0.0001958286,0.0008751885,0.33902058,0.012737377,0.0855568,0.00241806,0.5559829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013603454,0.00007538698,0.0016380115,0.00010151376,0.000059652164,0.00009304168,0.00018357327,0.848851,0.0062742196,0.13970469,0.0029654803,0.00003970119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036211452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040083644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036211452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093429646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007273736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0143536925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1858344456","doi":"","title":"Editorial du numéro spécial sondages","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"French digital mathematics library (Numdam)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04848057010185163,"score_gpt":0.31337130748987735,"score_spread":0.2648907373880257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1858344456","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034556456,0.17468922,0.0015371065,0.060142413,0.7287277,0.000041864067,0.0006694808,0.00023792253,0.03360876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004648864,0.17049818,0.0014582988,0.023042988,0.69376427,0.000119644516,0.001119969,0.00044584353,0.10490194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964018,0.0005546908,0.0005169572,0.0006211596,0.0016899367,0.00021550637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983546,0.0061902953,0.0012452153,0.00078881334,0.007047436,0.0011822676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034916191,0.0020645435,0.0022876184,0.007798019,0.0018139078,0.007511193,0.0023856675,0.0044496446,0.038924627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021075906,0.0010362145,0.0014889367,0.005580952,0.0027132677,0.006371303,0.002314319,0.0065193945,0.018092714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052002186,0.000012078049,0.00011854728,0.00063838915,0.000010845087,0.00007590333,0.000041248015,0.00012564677,0.000092860886,0.0055320705,0.9487556,0.044544727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035283604,0.0000071431077,0.00013608491,0.00050135085,0.000004910393,0.00008176125,0.000021040983,0.000029714876,0.000030926265,0.0007025286,0.9984761,0.0000049136156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053219674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061500184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038924627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049286126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042820694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13021588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W187134083","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-36420-7_5","title":"Fuzzy Based Image Segmentation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in fuzziness and soft computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Defuzzification; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy classification; Pattern recognition (psychology); Fuzzy clustering; Image segmentation; Fuzzy number; Fuzzy set operations; Segmentation; Thresholding; Fuzzy set; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Algorithm; Image (mathematics)","score_opus":0.24178321574548617,"score_gpt":0.4512924607844959,"score_spread":0.20950924503900975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W187134083","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021081494,0.004796556,0.94869405,0.0003654164,0.00018227145,0.00009093314,0.000172691,0.0013817777,0.023234714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27552566,0.004690008,0.68766624,0.00025924665,0.00018799145,0.00007227947,0.00067143183,0.00038856972,0.03053851],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976236,0.000030176314,0.000010192216,0.000065824,0.00010627159,0.000025144074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997702,0.00008096886,0.000015210421,0.000045222325,0.00007505511,0.000013263198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037714306,0.00053711125,0.0009294195,0.0014305259,0.00036826878,0.0015101497,0.0008450405,0.0008654114,0.006400952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007431956,0.00041530706,0.0006556382,0.0013747325,0.00066668517,0.0012570489,0.00053618645,0.000616427,0.0016685614],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024763774,0.000086133514,0.00032928903,0.00030192328,0.000080556616,0.00010817203,0.000112597554,0.06331945,0.11075013,0.04999197,0.0068350206,0.7678371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017273327,0.00012610498,0.002069385,0.00009203997,0.00007939125,0.0004893967,0.00007328254,0.81771237,0.100266986,0.04740908,0.03160851,0.000056234207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026187531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024123266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006400952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078725367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034855193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021413267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1874925508","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1206.5255","title":"Minimax regret based elicitation of generalized additive utilities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Preference elicitation; Minimax; Computer science; Product (mathematics); Preference; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Machine learning; Statistics","score_opus":0.4219303607012453,"score_gpt":0.32364587060569083,"score_spread":0.09828449009555446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1874925508","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01236595,0.00009856508,0.9834886,0.00031419686,0.000015153188,0.00010755682,0.00009183991,0.000104993545,0.003413103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6086552,0.00030543536,0.38727245,0.00027958432,0.00006439742,0.00061072945,0.00033469152,0.0001013104,0.0023760814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98162615,0.0118551385,0.00074723514,0.0015196581,0.003633215,0.0006185251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98430645,0.010629079,0.0010585196,0.0022355146,0.0013134425,0.00045692953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011346268,0.0016035449,0.0019504218,0.0011892873,0.00064104697,0.0031681934,0.0026846551,0.001903068,0.0029767558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03305521,0.000641853,0.0014141337,0.0022966233,0.0020746032,0.005449169,0.003958217,0.003333697,0.00047915353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025676796,0.00022579104,0.0010160767,0.0003307035,0.00015116876,0.00020325137,0.00064999633,0.3030875,0.004257905,0.60179436,0.0028069573,0.0852195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032372867,0.000116410076,0.00020495061,0.00004405583,0.000028542785,0.00007126308,0.000101019774,0.6534619,0.0025426857,0.34193674,0.0014279465,0.00003206802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059493736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007797052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011346268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020517549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015251588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060005486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1896774390","doi":"10.3233/ifs-151827","title":"On single valued neutrosophic relations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"China Postdoctoral Science Foundation; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Relation (database); Mathematics; Kernel (algebra); Inverse; Reflexivity; Algebra over a field; Pure mathematics; Computer science; Data mining; Geometry","score_opus":0.378259058346953,"score_gpt":0.4324759845000078,"score_spread":0.05421692615305479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1896774390","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071919985,0.0037219338,0.8635092,0.0008489962,0.0002286203,0.00012491604,0.0002831005,0.00010745447,0.05925585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.702969,0.0036699504,0.28321448,0.0003425064,0.00035167806,0.0002335428,0.00037280936,0.00003243198,0.008813544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821645,0.00042738765,0.000119432334,0.0003844404,0.00074002397,0.000112145695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990007,0.00041923576,0.00012937833,0.00011148036,0.00028387774,0.000055368866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012990079,0.00057747,0.0005387173,0.0019398431,0.0010692017,0.002148709,0.0005634237,0.00077452516,0.0022460832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032228976,0.00023737915,0.0007348953,0.0023492253,0.0019406629,0.0033717186,0.001210087,0.0013278851,0.0004042585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002297385,0.000012195667,0.00022743897,0.00008418012,0.000016675049,0.0002385041,0.00028912027,0.008187691,0.0023380392,0.9658363,0.00069834513,0.022048585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008344076,0.000032419037,0.00035745164,0.000065445616,0.000016533804,0.00032921636,0.000119560136,0.065176025,0.001338345,0.91924196,0.0132858185,0.00002888173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014499519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009893639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022460832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012021237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007362559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008722067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1932713777","doi":"10.22456/2176-5456.10865","title":"ANÁLISE ECONÔMICA E AMBIENTAL DE SISTEMAS DE TERMINAÇÃO DE SUÍNOS COM A APLICAÇÃO DOS CONJUNTOS FUZZY","year":2009,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Análise Econômica","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Humanities; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07829800755410414,"score_gpt":0.38511079319972885,"score_spread":0.3068127856456247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1932713777","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28434736,0.0013893642,0.70494556,0.00031668696,0.00006211719,0.0001657639,0.0003802821,0.0003933023,0.007999655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8497472,0.0005996027,0.14468218,0.00003207124,0.000016876567,0.00013654106,0.00027027525,0.000047802787,0.0044673844],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986204,0.0003744356,0.00008146397,0.00025186385,0.00057620555,0.00009575396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966987,0.0020552878,0.00029596977,0.0002671835,0.00060719263,0.00007564931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035749427,0.0008623242,0.0012764442,0.002135961,0.0009105682,0.0030756593,0.0010488719,0.001101547,0.0032031578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006981727,0.00050080277,0.002217669,0.0028869966,0.0007777928,0.0021579529,0.00090497255,0.0010066753,0.00041343627],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030920331,0.00010604828,0.009691071,0.00038523495,0.00023193423,0.00010699465,0.00044360702,0.8702506,0.011005571,0.01743994,0.0004568082,0.089573085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010243021,0.00013772264,0.0044110897,0.00003744434,0.00008653407,0.00005740159,0.00020290788,0.9795895,0.00389452,0.010060967,0.0014786591,0.000033022334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012854408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009533938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012854408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020155609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013386842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025559127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W193438231","doi":"","title":"A Multi-granular Linguistic Promethee Model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology Conference","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Computer science; Focus (optics); Term (time); Management science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Operations research; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.19617402689122637,"score_gpt":0.39526408169127614,"score_spread":0.19909005480004976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W193438231","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009131724,0.0003031843,0.9671077,0.0014526473,0.00008201412,0.00013444986,0.00027982343,0.00028889408,0.021219563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39039636,0.000539605,0.5893945,0.00046644235,0.000099350385,0.0005539497,0.00042523985,0.00008455302,0.018040057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983419,0.0006249873,0.00012836137,0.0002789673,0.0005068975,0.00011877658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854517,0.0006976188,0.00015774832,0.0002262873,0.0002472158,0.00012598054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002706393,0.00056708814,0.0007904902,0.0017816027,0.0011228685,0.004373609,0.002204257,0.0022069192,0.0071234177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051594935,0.0005026806,0.0014479134,0.0021970859,0.0021423714,0.005862834,0.0029932829,0.0019707135,0.0012392835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089535475,0.00007555651,0.00032584133,0.00012686805,0.000039005707,0.0004253105,0.00041100566,0.097065054,0.0015137121,0.8719906,0.0019482751,0.025989126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045762434,0.000046450114,0.000109993074,0.000053046784,0.000025039277,0.00021407047,0.000093909155,0.61054623,0.0006217749,0.37768164,0.010528707,0.00003331457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023873071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00182674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071234177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014189266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013579444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023830175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1937408160","doi":"10.1002/atr.206","title":"A fuzzy stochastic approach to the multicriteria selection of an aircraft for regional chartering","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Operations research; Charter; Decision maker; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Decision problem; Core (optical fiber); Management science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm","score_opus":0.1180044243331738,"score_gpt":0.4016931605528231,"score_spread":0.2836887362196493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1937408160","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043163113,0.00028506538,0.9529228,0.0003004637,0.000033977438,0.000047328464,0.000045720943,0.000026672758,0.0031749143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74800056,0.00037193863,0.24931593,0.000055057706,0.00006306693,0.00010590307,0.000064633496,0.000013688619,0.0020091687],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977653,0.0012388881,0.000107820764,0.00025905442,0.0004831229,0.00014589653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977703,0.001416577,0.00028438304,0.000072057745,0.00036106506,0.00009556174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033321562,0.0006401184,0.0009282252,0.0015104393,0.00065315596,0.001641697,0.00076685345,0.00061437854,0.0015096795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004774529,0.00039032806,0.0014458129,0.00096511986,0.0011084857,0.0006885841,0.0009266726,0.0009062488,0.00009041333],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059566082,0.000031853397,0.00080931373,0.00008351303,0.00007348859,0.00014617851,0.00010850546,0.92736316,0.0015143089,0.05284603,0.00029705456,0.016667029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006635974,0.000034634926,0.00028249057,0.000013695694,0.0000128283,0.000030904725,0.000032526354,0.98454535,0.00027315193,0.014244441,0.0005121938,0.000011209271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063245567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006212092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063245567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020849134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001556971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017622292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940310189","doi":"10.1002/atr.1212","title":"Pruning and ranking the Pareto optimal set, application for the dynamic multi‐objective network design problem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Ranking (information retrieval); Pareto principle; Pruning; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Sorting; Multi-objective optimization; Genetic algorithm; Rank (graph theory); Data mining; Operations research; Mathematics; Machine learning; Algorithm","score_opus":0.08946750811913867,"score_gpt":0.39949486570906634,"score_spread":0.31002735758992767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1940310189","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034312904,0.002523933,0.95377743,0.0003588416,0.000099150755,0.00018912004,0.00010941567,0.00022292077,0.008406362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.292466,0.0015692053,0.7021279,0.0001234093,0.000060638235,0.000313736,0.0002519202,0.00008990445,0.002997298],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983991,0.0007094885,0.00010151529,0.00014874597,0.00052438176,0.00011673133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711215,0.0019406496,0.00022067742,0.00011533325,0.00053202506,0.0000790453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031627344,0.0012937395,0.0012522993,0.00273883,0.00091225037,0.0014157271,0.0007512029,0.0010100703,0.0019428743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063092113,0.0005082301,0.0012191852,0.0019755024,0.00072756526,0.00081869075,0.0010903281,0.0015678141,0.00024705566],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056510355,0.000113238704,0.0013958871,0.00042868216,0.00010107029,0.00019642696,0.0001794341,0.8100961,0.0024988158,0.023364976,0.0016976144,0.15987122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019716548,0.00008510294,0.000665557,0.00011781078,0.000037226262,0.00008147225,0.00007043933,0.9762873,0.0019331002,0.015917711,0.004760522,0.000024032423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049706716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048948056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049706716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010739686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015013559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016726375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1942091802","doi":"10.1027/2192-0923/a000045","title":"Assessment of Nontechnical Skills","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Resilience (materials science); Field (mathematics); Fuzzy logic; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Data science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11355651649587742,"score_gpt":0.47780273695628295,"score_spread":0.36424622046040556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1942091802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8926916,0.0011020235,0.06767479,0.00043144115,0.0001377752,0.0006469732,0.0009409321,0.00015896729,0.036215484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822188,0.00037749615,0.014008018,0.000050731553,0.00004241477,0.00016707352,0.00040467997,0.000011133578,0.002719751],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929051,0.0025253326,0.0009516668,0.00048679265,0.0028833356,0.0002478093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966217,0.012900293,0.0073013073,0.0027573812,0.008844661,0.0019793713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056544365,0.0007237059,0.00047379785,0.0030560612,0.00035669524,0.0010620473,0.00060059194,0.00054188893,0.0039673056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033093166,0.00010613749,0.00045742493,0.0011393955,0.00079254626,0.0011107584,0.001147706,0.00056057074,0.0013929503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060456624,0.00064381433,0.42489827,0.0014404496,0.0002390929,0.00037407325,0.0061578657,0.003969842,0.028062591,0.0028827006,0.0021627173,0.52856404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002239211,0.0029428278,0.9531977,0.00038832807,0.00006634254,0.0008163015,0.004451032,0.008340302,0.01266134,0.0059431423,0.011063266,0.000107018706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008425452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017155707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056544365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029507975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006722737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029903889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1942856013","doi":"10.4236/ti.2015.64016","title":"Portfolio Management: Stock Ranking by Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology and Investment","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Portfolio; Stock exchange; Computer science; Operations research; Stock (firearms); Euclidean distance; VIKOR method; Econometrics; Ranking (information retrieval); Project portfolio management; Business; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Economics; Financial economics; Project management; Mathematics; Finance; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Management","score_opus":0.17211226527814563,"score_gpt":0.4615305446653097,"score_spread":0.289418279387164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1942856013","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018445723,0.0017532145,0.97495055,0.00041282488,0.00008122231,0.0003178569,0.00021806228,0.00052623556,0.003294318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48223546,0.0016665463,0.512585,0.0001780357,0.00014454406,0.0006993778,0.0005385981,0.00006658897,0.0018858915],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945761,0.0029064743,0.00038828235,0.0004928988,0.0013967163,0.0002395519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971903,0.0017746972,0.00030540215,0.00009137004,0.0005591572,0.000079063924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006553962,0.0013915515,0.0020876941,0.003919138,0.0006832262,0.00315146,0.0013422085,0.0010775273,0.0030750642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068844496,0.0004974026,0.0016990225,0.0044385903,0.00041363185,0.0017117774,0.001221656,0.0012248829,0.00051616254],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017962234,0.00028079352,0.0041175787,0.00072329777,0.00056637905,0.00013806236,0.00021977547,0.47059402,0.0026836584,0.011108029,0.0026294435,0.50675935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028835508,0.00017542715,0.0010443878,0.0000799521,0.000086461194,0.00004840086,0.00008680183,0.98365015,0.001477373,0.011626951,0.0016620946,0.00003303719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028537456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018194616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006553962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011822974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015494138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034661055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1944080039","doi":"10.1002/qre.1619","title":"Using Fuzzy Cost‐Based FMEA, GRA and Profitability Theory for Minimizing Failures at a Healthcare Diagnosis Service","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality and Reliability Engineering International","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Profitability index; Maximization; Service (business); Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Reliability engineering; Operations research; Failure mode and effects analysis; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations management; Engineering; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Business; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.25734844221832254,"score_gpt":0.45627629831580874,"score_spread":0.1989278560974862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1944080039","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028686054,0.0006628479,0.96583307,0.00027774303,0.000025587558,0.00014167567,0.000036951402,0.000109281544,0.004226802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6792844,0.00074684835,0.31800333,0.00011223647,0.000048085116,0.00029530367,0.00009042895,0.000054401076,0.0013649247],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884593,0.0004628656,0.000041429263,0.00011030874,0.00040393925,0.00013551602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879056,0.0008450875,0.000121624034,0.00002818365,0.00016766501,0.000046925357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021897003,0.001851869,0.0013093157,0.0027212854,0.00057037006,0.0012346674,0.0010485771,0.0012708845,0.0014123289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038402409,0.0005908475,0.0012537517,0.0013324401,0.00083910284,0.0011730599,0.001021167,0.00093679014,0.0001414131],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027166394,0.000044168686,0.00044685625,0.00011324104,0.000046906785,0.000047871963,0.0000513362,0.95959175,0.0012166224,0.01018181,0.00027284859,0.027959486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009916412,0.000069556656,0.00022042243,0.000029012732,0.000033363114,0.00003075252,0.00003199281,0.9896485,0.00074475945,0.008661833,0.00050749397,0.000012401676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055733593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004481502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055733593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024843626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023471888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018025398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945904191","doi":"10.13033/isahp.y2013.019","title":"An Integrated Approach for Prioritizing Projects for Implementation Using AHP","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISAHP proceedings","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Operations research; Engineering","score_opus":0.33007724530122107,"score_gpt":0.5013509574773047,"score_spread":0.17127371217608367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1945904191","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044699972,0.00030694573,0.9887456,0.00043557293,0.00005174668,0.0010643846,0.000106687854,0.00027292766,0.00454618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036974873,0.00027041318,0.96114737,0.000050086706,0.000017302125,0.00080224837,0.00013738615,0.00002707676,0.0005732289],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678293,0.018769132,0.002117986,0.0011917648,0.00937884,0.0007129203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99044305,0.0050721215,0.00072560826,0.00073876954,0.0026748704,0.0003454945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023846067,0.0015674834,0.0015634171,0.0101613095,0.0022663223,0.0054501146,0.0024542313,0.0011429486,0.0040886872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021830227,0.0009242019,0.00196136,0.007987304,0.00163491,0.003743478,0.004081577,0.0019057738,0.00057640264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019304463,0.000463003,0.003146286,0.0025261114,0.0006845534,0.0002777501,0.0045605134,0.12963952,0.005594243,0.12521473,0.005039519,0.7226607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003899213,0.0014357927,0.004495429,0.0025444715,0.000660054,0.00042279728,0.008004493,0.56300825,0.009915831,0.30482972,0.10390693,0.0003863324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044625443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070653334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023846067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032896427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009211411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12611163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963896405","doi":"10.5539/ibr.v7n10p170","title":"Evaluation of Performance Appraisal Methods through Appraisal Errors by Using Fuzzy VIKOR Method","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Performance appraisal; VIKOR method; Rank (graph theory); CLARITY; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Project appraisal; Evaluation methods; Management science; Operations research; Reliability engineering; Mathematics; Management; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Business; Finance; Economics","score_opus":0.564277268446421,"score_gpt":0.6644549475298825,"score_spread":0.10017767908346153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963896405","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26242957,0.002546855,0.7135051,0.0005881136,0.0004380738,0.0025661131,0.00029899005,0.00040146848,0.017225748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.579307,0.00092501234,0.41689125,0.00003651469,0.00006895164,0.0011872416,0.00015034033,0.00004015919,0.0013935929],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.94173455,0.028408095,0.0065679173,0.0015295125,0.02107619,0.0006836793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90781486,0.05692678,0.009474457,0.003256637,0.022055687,0.00047159032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058556687,0.0014093958,0.001349399,0.008708647,0.001289682,0.0036390107,0.0016339258,0.0006597935,0.0018269307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10383427,0.00038744934,0.0010718018,0.0050600274,0.0012067029,0.002215566,0.0013845791,0.0010726582,0.00030423424],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016952141,0.00042944623,0.044908836,0.0042594257,0.00072224054,0.00043994526,0.014058378,0.033082474,0.018018795,0.025673041,0.00396649,0.85274565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006712317,0.0061020395,0.16475745,0.0046334425,0.0015793439,0.001673396,0.023376577,0.6288677,0.061376367,0.0647857,0.040963005,0.0012137969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016250033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020160568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058556687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019028093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025351848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30968106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964351161","doi":"10.1139/l07-006","title":"Project appraisal and selection using the analytic network process","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic network process; Ranking (information retrieval); Selection (genetic algorithm); Process (computing); Project appraisal; Computer science; Operations research; Analytic hierarchy process; Investment (military); Risk analysis (engineering); Scale (ratio); Prioritization; Government (linguistics); Management science; Engineering; Economics; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09130790525709379,"score_gpt":0.39235104559386536,"score_spread":0.3010431403367716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964351161","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016946472,0.0001566943,0.9766892,0.00040157483,0.000025175474,0.00065607735,0.00005463462,0.0000727284,0.0049975417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3655512,0.0006475177,0.6300311,0.00006352546,0.000050083647,0.0014114077,0.00014589017,0.000025495154,0.0020738528],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.986991,0.009182227,0.00039048755,0.00061486143,0.0025468257,0.000274648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906563,0.0068897763,0.00072715693,0.00022853827,0.0013060521,0.0001923021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010596158,0.0014624351,0.0013293567,0.004486578,0.001748568,0.0028914323,0.0012742025,0.0010773275,0.0032301666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021334833,0.00049762055,0.0010352363,0.003485784,0.0012897367,0.0023306834,0.002216453,0.0011437448,0.0003735833],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023565098,0.00019198471,0.0038057682,0.000633717,0.0002657418,0.0006187339,0.0017877228,0.65965503,0.0033177347,0.14139356,0.0021450107,0.18594937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004345832,0.000105267034,0.00054780644,0.000065270404,0.00004207452,0.0000659625,0.00033123238,0.9118753,0.0010543729,0.083290696,0.0025438427,0.000034772063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047618775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004589549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010596158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002958291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036825933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0560385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964390465","doi":"10.1016/j.dss.2007.12.017","title":"Screening in multiple criteria decision analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Support Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Decision analysis; Process (computing); Decision process; Decision support system; Data mining; Operations research; Mathematics; Management science; Engineering; Statistics","score_opus":0.2601201774639123,"score_gpt":0.4353605905976103,"score_spread":0.17524041313369798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964390465","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02420838,0.003259892,0.9644765,0.0011346078,0.00019256672,0.00040816248,0.00010118823,0.00023933998,0.0059793536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53195196,0.0018502022,0.4603446,0.00043494804,0.00017705165,0.0008809211,0.00020134766,0.0000751763,0.004083762],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9616885,0.0317005,0.0010692042,0.0011374538,0.0036697104,0.00073467667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83145124,0.16222495,0.0019277359,0.0011326093,0.002605374,0.00065806037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02390094,0.0020173823,0.0051211044,0.005345509,0.0014323579,0.004233115,0.0019008714,0.0027530456,0.00404737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09251803,0.0015218947,0.0018345988,0.0052314564,0.003260631,0.005047121,0.002290768,0.0028631617,0.00058898056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095742603,0.00087299506,0.0061645703,0.0029311727,0.00055776915,0.0011680317,0.00082073995,0.32891607,0.0010589159,0.25483492,0.0055000256,0.3962174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008187257,0.00019732975,0.00066866336,0.00035695764,0.00011868312,0.00018982879,0.0001228699,0.7371102,0.00086643733,0.2586111,0.001608201,0.00006776544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045262314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034255078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02390094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022138015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038645184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12640178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965340213","doi":"10.1504/ijmcdm.2011.043554","title":"An interactive disaggregation approach inferring the indifference and the preference thresholds of PROMETHEE II","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Econometrics","score_opus":0.2285774795293082,"score_gpt":0.43738638008482406,"score_spread":0.20880890055551585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965340213","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007926755,0.00006583953,0.98767227,0.00017715103,0.00001269449,0.00005825004,0.000073462405,0.00015399592,0.0038595793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24918026,0.0001392606,0.7479485,0.00014014888,0.000028647835,0.00035912223,0.00019423629,0.00007299014,0.0019368528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942141,0.0035031894,0.00024228168,0.0007254828,0.0010252245,0.00028978023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99314195,0.0048809475,0.00040407944,0.00086296804,0.00053919374,0.00017095754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067157773,0.0008931422,0.0012738573,0.0027181997,0.0012796292,0.003893204,0.0018933133,0.0010892645,0.0059750234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020376438,0.00079801254,0.0015799474,0.0025162282,0.0017093722,0.003358629,0.004575165,0.0024407287,0.0008522235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032892663,0.0001336422,0.0031480421,0.00033809314,0.00015425136,0.0003552379,0.0027324453,0.14958648,0.0054133614,0.67357373,0.002722449,0.16151328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033861783,0.000059434944,0.0008769615,0.000071373644,0.00004366663,0.00015529802,0.00026284318,0.6034341,0.0032278816,0.38467303,0.0071056043,0.000055948887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020190561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017156197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067157773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015006027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015602197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035516858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965361736","doi":"10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.05.001","title":"Risk-based decision-making for drilling waste discharges using a fuzzy synthetic evaluation technique","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ocean Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Pollutant; Environmental science; Drilling fluid; Petroleum; Waste management; Fuzzy logic; Submarine pipeline; Analytic hierarchy process; Contamination; Petroleum engineering; Drilling; Risk analysis (engineering); Biochemical engineering; Computer science; Engineering; Operations research; Geology; Business; Chemistry; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07820595990540109,"score_gpt":0.3901473938314483,"score_spread":0.31194143392604723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965361736","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08897097,0.0001451651,0.9089912,0.00016167069,0.000026963007,0.00006988538,0.000033452314,0.000056169585,0.0015445164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8074839,0.000105037885,0.19164868,0.000030579315,0.000021202208,0.00013964582,0.000044708886,0.000019892343,0.000506465],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806815,0.001123878,0.00011402338,0.00011567725,0.00048192032,0.00009647294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947495,0.003935974,0.00029784633,0.000103239276,0.0007787163,0.00013473675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00590873,0.0009905074,0.0012134237,0.0020187525,0.00078307564,0.001622566,0.0007768587,0.0010065146,0.0010388196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009765562,0.00047727523,0.0014475452,0.0011391476,0.0007758762,0.0013666488,0.0009453961,0.0008173664,0.000057461846],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019964269,0.0000720698,0.00065701606,0.0000918074,0.00009292964,0.00008902012,0.00012427986,0.9560929,0.0023174977,0.010899477,0.00020888502,0.029154407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000774865,0.000045484616,0.00009336327,0.0000072557987,0.000015506888,0.000011336256,0.000016072534,0.99587363,0.0005392906,0.0033119558,0.0000712086,0.000007172723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032047248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026231008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00590873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015989046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013481748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031248689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965641112","doi":"10.1007/s11518-014-5259-4","title":"Approaches to improving consistency of interval fuzzy preference relations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Transitive relation; Interval (graph theory); Preference relation; Mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Relation (database); Interval arithmetic; Mathematical optimization; Weak consistency; Construct (python library); Computer science; Algorithm; Data mining; Strong consistency; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.318111477529649,"score_gpt":0.3328493447356811,"score_spread":0.014737867206032096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965641112","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014247145,0.0004854043,0.9838414,0.0001728402,0.000046042893,0.00008098431,0.0000592885,0.00010611394,0.0009605911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23670894,0.00047166008,0.761099,0.00017819228,0.00018186875,0.0002284465,0.0002869095,0.00011699282,0.00072793366],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9718223,0.015709138,0.0019034132,0.002350543,0.0074990354,0.0007156128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9043312,0.068753935,0.0043885848,0.0105971,0.011203432,0.0007257795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03559,0.0012517519,0.0025323986,0.004764574,0.0011845903,0.0038479907,0.0059887716,0.0018249142,0.0026616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.105722815,0.0013839126,0.0030677202,0.0066444515,0.0019508287,0.0064532454,0.0043457416,0.0049248375,0.00039996102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011117551,0.00067062344,0.0068477606,0.0010377241,0.0010916742,0.0003002539,0.001992015,0.24132733,0.005598732,0.263301,0.0026506034,0.47407058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013433053,0.00031549332,0.0010414643,0.0001796535,0.00024409771,0.00012386194,0.00021537521,0.7757363,0.0034651898,0.21643935,0.0020373676,0.00006741846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021304179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019237176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017001363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021245244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1882202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965868368","doi":"10.1109/fskd.2010.5569147","title":"A GIS-based fuzzy aggregation modeling approach for air pollution risk assessment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2010 Seventh International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Fuzzy logic; Air pollution; Computer science; Air quality index; Data mining; Cumulative distribution function; Fuzzy set; Pollution; Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Environmental science; Statistics; Mathematics; Meteorology; Probability density function; Artificial intelligence; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.1436961342723311,"score_gpt":0.41090070292798225,"score_spread":0.2672045686556511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965868368","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005654677,0.00015894727,0.9911963,0.00011113029,0.000021064614,0.000046207482,0.000082350816,0.00015180629,0.0025775132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38021392,0.0008167704,0.61471516,0.00008890542,0.00006464443,0.00039693434,0.00028013604,0.00008216686,0.003341335],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909735,0.00036350524,0.000055233715,0.00012431439,0.0003128663,0.000046730915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923766,0.00039571637,0.00007786293,0.000047355872,0.00021015794,0.000031213458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013851942,0.0011475262,0.00095028355,0.0021994903,0.0007907629,0.0018799352,0.0011537749,0.0009609716,0.002035681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021773994,0.0005063489,0.0019372615,0.0020175434,0.00047467914,0.0016943387,0.0010665988,0.0009907995,0.00034772864],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000231758,0.0000310468,0.0007620799,0.00009988157,0.00010477246,0.0001451044,0.00017154477,0.9381897,0.0015693852,0.028602185,0.0005830217,0.02971816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029880794,0.00001676307,0.00011611057,0.00001296337,0.000020368352,0.00003606497,0.000033367847,0.9883128,0.00030738098,0.009655538,0.0014753029,0.000010376503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011234906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009253768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011234906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016308296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001359175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022339046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966233822","doi":"10.1155/2009/580918","title":"A Binary Intuitionistic Fuzzy Relation: Some New Results, a General Factorization, and Two Properties of Strict Components","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Région Normandie; Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie","keywords":"Mathematics; Transitive relation; Factorization; Fuzzy logic; Characterization (materials science); Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics; Algebra over a field; Combinatorics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.22247487937719446,"score_gpt":0.41635210355933944,"score_spread":0.19387722418214498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966233822","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07963799,0.0015613044,0.8900586,0.00085168466,0.00016587095,0.00014399234,0.00030662198,0.00019595418,0.027078012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6838714,0.0013137254,0.3027748,0.0003963607,0.0003986276,0.00023639762,0.00047327322,0.00010018224,0.010435198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986527,0.00019479243,0.000109661065,0.0004834799,0.00043298022,0.0001264116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885345,0.00032084825,0.00022035578,0.0002272546,0.00024965082,0.0001283446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015529719,0.0008919053,0.0006236013,0.0014938711,0.0011457104,0.0023027807,0.00059475907,0.0008256182,0.004144787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032241878,0.0005485621,0.0017087489,0.0014525605,0.002922174,0.0066059115,0.0015778835,0.0019640836,0.00070580805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007959302,0.00003500291,0.0005792594,0.00016089136,0.000025820313,0.0002916043,0.0009281906,0.0029413984,0.0066216504,0.9616972,0.0011000951,0.025539251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026364287,0.00015992038,0.0013929687,0.00009696156,0.000064481515,0.0011262593,0.0002667678,0.03268455,0.005598726,0.9413554,0.017164,0.000063636995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015128296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010887231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004144787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001068429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008442397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013865709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966343351","doi":"10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00226-0","title":"Combining expert judgment: On the performance of trimmed mean vote aggregation procedures in the presence of strategic voting","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Voting; Computer science; Rank (graph theory); Analytic hierarchy process; Monte Carlo method; Outcome (game theory); Operations research; Range (aeronautics); Econometrics; Management science; Machine learning; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.50191844313981,"score_gpt":0.46403542919210505,"score_spread":0.03788301394770499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966343351","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34806845,0.0017438021,0.6432974,0.00045963598,0.00027123606,0.00023310028,0.00015384596,0.00072103855,0.005051528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76986986,0.00026071368,0.22766913,0.00019524356,0.00018077513,0.00020410425,0.00034164128,0.00014322587,0.0011352254],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.971228,0.022045529,0.000956148,0.0015607682,0.0034958902,0.0007136912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7459491,0.22285415,0.004322573,0.010765129,0.014529484,0.0015794788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04446244,0.0014536378,0.002610638,0.0026630433,0.0017046648,0.002783768,0.0026190085,0.0038563653,0.0023685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1630731,0.0007588208,0.0014761378,0.0032125362,0.0014982525,0.005114967,0.0040903143,0.002336536,0.0006218988],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008044041,0.0006715412,0.013172823,0.000688205,0.0019161368,0.00021749648,0.0019919588,0.34326878,0.004093667,0.016084053,0.0048429235,0.6050083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016470614,0.0005920855,0.0019674536,0.000060752693,0.0002651251,0.000058329366,0.00017890708,0.97907627,0.0026903753,0.014372203,0.00051541184,0.000058375666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028432896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027990618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04446244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007887675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013380686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23514271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966658190","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2013.862111","title":"A Fuzzy Logic Approach to Assess, Manage, and Communicate Carcinogenic Risk","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment An International Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; GRASP; Computer science; Risk assessment; Population; Inference; Risk analysis (engineering); Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Environmental health; Medicine","score_opus":0.3094628405096608,"score_gpt":0.4813147595819541,"score_spread":0.1718519190722933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966658190","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027557272,0.00093562703,0.97123015,0.001507148,0.0001232649,0.00014689924,0.0001363562,0.0002001806,0.022964647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1884866,0.0022658498,0.79707515,0.0006671441,0.00025620495,0.00032917075,0.00016995236,0.00004121391,0.010708651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984048,0.0005389722,0.000114033995,0.00017301894,0.0006721513,0.00009713511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987826,0.0006820253,0.000121837475,0.000069266156,0.0002870288,0.00005729478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025584032,0.0011749913,0.00079127704,0.0032682787,0.0013908275,0.00350216,0.0018884131,0.0017231044,0.00661122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035671499,0.00036855802,0.0013553055,0.0015924347,0.0015039981,0.002993313,0.0012740532,0.0019186126,0.0008786103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009939184,0.00019891956,0.0013179486,0.00044289755,0.00018214098,0.0006319679,0.0007723504,0.11625414,0.005915537,0.7106157,0.0059108646,0.15765816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042788433,0.0002130146,0.0005241416,0.00038884388,0.00014443604,0.00044348155,0.00039621737,0.29548156,0.0033691695,0.6535967,0.04529577,0.00010383098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059472844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006388269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00661122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027710274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026486095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02211678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966971090","doi":"10.3141/1848-18","title":"Multicriteria Project Portfolio Selection: Case Study for Intelligent Transportation Systems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Innovation Council","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Project portfolio management; Integrated project delivery; Agency (philosophy); Risk analysis (engineering); Selection (genetic algorithm); Management science; Computer science; Project management; Business; Engineering; Systems engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.46185720435858973,"score_gpt":0.5493448836013192,"score_spread":0.08748767924272943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966971090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8448647,0.0009914467,0.11320075,0.0019132136,0.000081522725,0.0016696324,0.00051520043,0.00014204142,0.036621533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9058856,0.000693685,0.0870625,0.000096492535,0.000028576696,0.00072779146,0.00022826357,0.000027707685,0.0052493415],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578995,0.002781758,0.00015260137,0.00022403453,0.0006423636,0.00040925413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927142,0.005273112,0.00042432573,0.00038831905,0.0005831322,0.0006168215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048025497,0.00086978375,0.0006500283,0.0014124945,0.002425484,0.0021571622,0.0015449551,0.0027380392,0.0034568696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066380748,0.00036381077,0.0011022174,0.0031744884,0.0012080058,0.0015634998,0.0017646597,0.0015758526,0.00043208685],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016504419,0.007860358,0.040679578,0.0011177011,0.00043809685,0.024951203,0.00560136,0.5740485,0.0052664885,0.11084169,0.012397471,0.21514714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076217606,0.0033653455,0.01702875,0.0002797324,0.00021429794,0.005164807,0.010524466,0.88033813,0.008653166,0.037206016,0.036275197,0.0001880115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006889703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011053594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006889703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022476984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023146602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025398612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967250667","doi":"10.1002/atr.5670430204","title":"Multiple criteria and fuzzy based evaluation of logistics performance for intermodal transportation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Analytic hierarchy process; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Set (abstract data type); Operations research; Process (computing); Computer science; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy transportation; Transport engineering; Fuzzy number; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1370770148434946,"score_gpt":0.4482450739861341,"score_spread":0.3111680591426395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967250667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5999704,0.0013986513,0.37505785,0.0005620558,0.00013694743,0.0003217286,0.0002841191,0.00017856236,0.02208967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97693914,0.000085703025,0.022250926,0.000010711809,0.000010069179,0.00006203616,0.00005271497,0.00000438957,0.00058440014],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914186,0.004768046,0.00029643654,0.00021660929,0.0030519569,0.00024841557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971419,0.0010985781,0.00038296485,0.00010472782,0.0010887431,0.00018301472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005532803,0.0010352313,0.00062294403,0.0044758865,0.00060625246,0.002201573,0.0006558642,0.00071997405,0.002025422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008120951,0.00015289905,0.00068441784,0.0022500844,0.00084694446,0.0010186237,0.0010372763,0.00062077394,0.00017898393],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013885024,0.0006329666,0.021187717,0.000766012,0.0006428742,0.0007331303,0.00081447465,0.68127406,0.024228785,0.066614375,0.003265881,0.19845118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048358175,0.0007305075,0.010148763,0.000121697616,0.00007850452,0.00011179855,0.00056888914,0.96146154,0.007494284,0.01690368,0.0022353295,0.00009664255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034449855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028089683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005532803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027374574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096646603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029260576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968534991","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1530","title":"Decision Support System and Multi‐Criteria Decision Aid: A State of the Art and Perspectives","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Decision support system; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Decision analysis; R-CAST; Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Business decision mapping; Decision engineering; Management science; Evidential reasoning approach; Field (mathematics); Decision problem; Intelligent decision support system; Decision process; Hierarchy; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0863205887052104,"score_gpt":0.40305137990215256,"score_spread":0.31673079119694214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968534991","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013314061,0.72238356,0.17119573,0.020425407,0.0012738397,0.00012000514,0.00012706245,0.00017993116,0.07098044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50070214,0.3200964,0.16476043,0.0033462113,0.0029110508,0.00018160176,0.00020745587,0.000059944596,0.007734835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99105257,0.005388541,0.00043964788,0.00056155934,0.0022669272,0.00029081546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98700804,0.009896432,0.0004986693,0.0003582437,0.001862467,0.0003761856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009846717,0.00076432404,0.0012068168,0.0051376414,0.001027681,0.009008408,0.0018704836,0.003962016,0.005228264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077028535,0.00037637947,0.0007439549,0.007526504,0.0037708678,0.005076512,0.0022369055,0.0026311423,0.0010182521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012986275,0.00026138348,0.0019044084,0.005089647,0.00012083974,0.00046973975,0.0010586012,0.012520249,0.000902167,0.5798619,0.00728923,0.39039192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047670652,0.0003977769,0.0028304246,0.009172973,0.00009578957,0.0010865115,0.0044446313,0.08359479,0.002453957,0.49428594,0.4013777,0.00021171333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021101045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010863537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009846717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027453445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027124214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05207503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968844961","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.06.003","title":"An experimental comparison of fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process for medical decision support systems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy logic; Vagueness; Pairwise comparison; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Machine learning; Mathematics; Operations research","score_opus":0.28532950667754,"score_gpt":0.5852249054278733,"score_spread":0.29989539875033333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968844961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9507468,0.001056887,0.03609093,0.00048311244,0.00028785702,0.0007254684,0.00034970726,0.0001294855,0.010129804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760384,0.00038702256,0.02176509,0.00011118402,0.00005569599,0.000297444,0.00016158706,0.0000246639,0.0011588612],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958467,0.0026890112,0.0002192849,0.00023466905,0.0008912041,0.00011925157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9647544,0.030727847,0.00075940485,0.0011880739,0.0022242335,0.00034606323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007829372,0.0004048551,0.00047867675,0.0010639355,0.0006153352,0.0016505655,0.00091596623,0.0009962142,0.009443428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03935878,0.00019567898,0.00037300857,0.0007308108,0.0008461032,0.0019494412,0.00090949784,0.000609849,0.00052372675],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.117386855,0.024503436,0.016965585,0.006803666,0.0008671807,0.00037484933,0.008277798,0.044398427,0.12441038,0.05214655,0.0038527418,0.6000125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014212566,0.16596554,0.06369211,0.0011949055,0.00290278,0.00081550074,0.009941484,0.4849287,0.1483053,0.08736083,0.02012694,0.00055331487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012854671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008655236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009443428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008002663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009351987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041406155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969150962","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.024","title":"Selection of remedial alternatives for mine sites: A multicriteria decision analysis approach","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Selection (genetic algorithm); Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Probabilistic logic; Task (project management); Remedial education; Decision analysis; Operations research; Rank (graph theory); Site selection; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Systems engineering; Statistics","score_opus":0.07626116973308177,"score_gpt":0.36985292943589615,"score_spread":0.29359175970281437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969150962","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04814742,0.0004931831,0.94711393,0.00062046427,0.000056796347,0.0004449911,0.00010105345,0.00010797415,0.0029142639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51621485,0.0005530514,0.48055038,0.00022231921,0.00012367156,0.0007572558,0.00018844123,0.00007042428,0.001319591],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98784435,0.008022203,0.0006734293,0.0008668255,0.0019468045,0.000646403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830199,0.013773651,0.0013887313,0.00030638807,0.0011297296,0.0003815007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014364617,0.0024488426,0.005659681,0.006957243,0.00128388,0.0055872803,0.0036503705,0.0031747299,0.003812331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024886819,0.0023081375,0.0065679317,0.0033773668,0.0018107988,0.003689111,0.0034017474,0.0026967162,0.0003069645],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003356007,0.0004892274,0.0018798036,0.0004744564,0.00090126815,0.00028795053,0.00028221466,0.9235528,0.0014576975,0.021582795,0.0006590584,0.04809714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004680952,0.0001719772,0.00029336193,0.000052202566,0.00015369958,0.000046494835,0.0000706139,0.9875388,0.00025396273,0.011119694,0.00022326825,0.000029024224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035412211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044443337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014364617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028384093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045067687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075968266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970872931","doi":"10.1016/j.orhc.2013.03.001","title":"Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: A bibliometric analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research for Health Care","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health Research Institute; McMaster University","funders":"Pfizer Canada; Pfizer","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Health care; Decision analysis; Transparency (behavior); Management science; Operations research; Computer science; Medicine; Political science; Economics; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.36062745062823875,"score_gpt":0.6206862944118692,"score_spread":0.2600588437836304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970872931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43094972,0.060717616,0.40927985,0.01534502,0.0007368539,0.003508322,0.005512811,0.00049711886,0.07345265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8047949,0.01002603,0.1819674,0.00023742464,0.00028420196,0.0009007993,0.00084091665,0.000039017294,0.00090938853],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93729985,0.03760208,0.004866683,0.0012024347,0.018439926,0.0005889296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8208432,0.15696286,0.0056467876,0.0031781879,0.012637824,0.000731184],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04367654,0.0009689591,0.00288932,0.06707371,0.0031860296,0.0077087553,0.0012734522,0.0014972884,0.0035032437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18218371,0.00054347975,0.0025524306,0.09527066,0.002276791,0.006157122,0.0033504332,0.0012247878,0.0002757948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005159877,0.00075729453,0.06532871,0.013225129,0.0022438301,0.0002800511,0.0035673163,0.06496916,0.0007746303,0.121144414,0.008907063,0.7182864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000298074,0.00080526085,0.10602655,0.0069575133,0.0033319364,0.00066437,0.012302128,0.5319725,0.0027259816,0.30405864,0.03041251,0.00044445312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012427987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014049327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95632344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00763558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009633844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23098636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971688350","doi":"10.1007/s10661-005-3852-1","title":"Risk-Based Prioritization of Air Pollution Monitoring Using Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation Technique","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Prioritization; Environmental science; Air pollution; Fuzzy logic; Pollution; Ecotoxicology; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental planning; Environmental engineering; Computer science; Engineering; Environmental chemistry; Business; Artificial intelligence; Chemistry; Management science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.09261045424035019,"score_gpt":0.42251732508013023,"score_spread":0.32990687083978004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971688350","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13716319,0.00029187396,0.85946023,0.00018698024,0.000040050716,0.00007006505,0.000053998465,0.00012761078,0.002605976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87061185,0.00009889041,0.12854287,0.000030216526,0.000021602174,0.000075302705,0.00005940216,0.000017581095,0.000542272],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985442,0.0006326039,0.00009731679,0.00009739181,0.0005326912,0.00009577505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793565,0.0011378862,0.0001953792,0.00006747882,0.0005875499,0.00007615982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033758697,0.0008209301,0.0009839414,0.0024080742,0.00060295983,0.0013454638,0.0006905349,0.00060051464,0.0007927158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052925656,0.0003501062,0.0009481175,0.0011156448,0.00046331188,0.0009863183,0.00066508114,0.00039367352,0.00005826592],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043153044,0.0001279958,0.0021250632,0.00016373723,0.0002146523,0.00017472409,0.00015679383,0.88021857,0.013797825,0.013099878,0.0007270464,0.088762075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011161695,0.000047111895,0.00031417861,0.000006958295,0.000029347028,0.000028068285,0.000015774896,0.99483407,0.001684628,0.0028587827,0.00016076605,0.000009175048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029248914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022187382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033758697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001147366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010416221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017853558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974509751","doi":"10.1080/07408170108936863","title":"Application of a weighted sum of order<i>p</i>to distance estimation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIE Transactions","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Mathematics; Generalization; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Goodness of fit; Function (biology); Statistics; Algorithm; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.07808754398730662,"score_gpt":0.40373759060787906,"score_spread":0.32565004662057245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974509751","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026276752,0.0001026791,0.9967769,0.000051225867,0.000024789406,0.000019934145,0.000011436119,0.000026572307,0.00035884834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13144037,0.00044235535,0.86646086,0.00008681944,0.00009061554,0.00022686023,0.000098951496,0.000075814714,0.0010772604],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99126023,0.004385665,0.0006557029,0.0008937248,0.0026175405,0.00018718933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98713267,0.008019393,0.0008711185,0.0009269772,0.0028477933,0.0002020117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0082811825,0.0011749924,0.0014481436,0.0021200518,0.000710146,0.0020339882,0.001989012,0.0012968348,0.0011160318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031939626,0.00051610253,0.0011469098,0.0031779304,0.0023200908,0.0033235839,0.001992723,0.0017323847,0.0004195469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013765006,0.00009725152,0.0020287535,0.00031864108,0.00019448459,0.00020184064,0.00027652236,0.5877457,0.0047604586,0.11544936,0.0014886438,0.28730068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008063746,0.000080855345,0.00026706874,0.000019285677,0.000015249112,0.00007303125,0.000024454734,0.95097256,0.0021066337,0.045086287,0.0013222184,0.000024396591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026748804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017558066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0082811825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011830261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013122339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043795645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974762386","doi":"10.5267/j.ijiec.2010.07.002","title":"Adjusted permutation method for multiple attribute decision making with meta-heuristic solution approaches","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permutation (music); Heuristic; Meta heuristic; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Computer science; Algorithm; Data mining","score_opus":0.3602411809738339,"score_gpt":0.42686041763592053,"score_spread":0.06661923666208663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974762386","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018895867,0.0001618045,0.996962,0.000048587808,0.00002402774,0.000041462958,0.000012180987,0.000073223644,0.0007871536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11205027,0.00031253576,0.88601905,0.00005820592,0.000046815912,0.00037651978,0.00008556092,0.000058728656,0.0009922417],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973455,0.0016819604,0.000106365485,0.00015303577,0.00063738035,0.0000756753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820626,0.0012617719,0.00010473088,0.00014186327,0.00024832285,0.000037096892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031086153,0.001058014,0.0010784453,0.001386289,0.0005161643,0.0009442703,0.0016684001,0.0009446406,0.0026978422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005654793,0.00053354277,0.0012415141,0.0020013198,0.0006609814,0.0011641613,0.0009422945,0.0013799085,0.0005046646],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009154223,0.00008240675,0.00039880574,0.00022879175,0.00017535481,0.00010349556,0.00007224438,0.7527676,0.0018904126,0.04441714,0.0011823145,0.19858992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001832308,0.00004630042,0.000054710956,0.000010125183,0.000012704815,0.0000288619,0.0000076057613,0.97767156,0.0006253544,0.020081269,0.0014334408,0.000009677691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013534185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011914053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031086153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071702385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016001862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016440153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975078995","doi":"10.1016/j.fss.2014.03.016","title":"Building consensus in group decision making with an allocation of information granularity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fuzzy Sets and Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":217,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Federación Española de Enfermedades Raras","keywords":"Group decision-making; Preference relation; Granularity; Granular computing; Pairwise comparison; Mathematics; Preference; Group (periodic table); Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Data mining; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Rough set; Statistics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0687755994867641,"score_gpt":0.37269147805551567,"score_spread":0.3039158785687516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975078995","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019142903,0.00011004398,0.97916335,0.0001943432,0.000020914895,0.00005306718,0.00001294866,0.000052400228,0.0012500484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6092487,0.0001687194,0.38931757,0.000080418205,0.00004697342,0.00029140478,0.000045232653,0.000034265853,0.00076673296],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889249,0.0070736455,0.0006299662,0.0011803156,0.001649237,0.00054188585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96758646,0.02707634,0.0011766733,0.0023771634,0.0012710454,0.00051238394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016500382,0.0008219202,0.002481874,0.0019154432,0.0012626769,0.0027003798,0.0017053012,0.0019494847,0.0018380712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040739227,0.0009149331,0.0013258903,0.002095129,0.0034660464,0.005622558,0.0053677596,0.002663512,0.0002432832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003176796,0.00013148399,0.0007546722,0.00028000312,0.00018751984,0.00011385242,0.0008247734,0.7406797,0.0024868997,0.17744096,0.0005645572,0.076217905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043004857,0.00007526563,0.00012908688,0.000035011384,0.000034580164,0.000013417145,0.00009762573,0.79115105,0.0009701684,0.2070029,0.00042896208,0.000018886522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012096502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076911924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016500382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001659974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014390305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087263405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975571906","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.045","title":"Corrigenda to: “Fuzzy multi-objective programming for supplier selection and risk modeling: A possibility approach” [EJOR 200 (3) (2010) 774–787]","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; Operations research; Fuzzy logic; Engineering; Management; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.525967632192277,"score_gpt":0.4832156842686499,"score_spread":0.04275194792362713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975571906","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026333868,0.020058306,0.02186998,0.14385936,0.7577666,0.00025646205,0.0071404506,0.0016804081,0.044735007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09035693,0.02922594,0.024466792,0.04757388,0.13979535,0.00054892345,0.0077487687,0.0018735583,0.6584099],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974721,0.0007131062,0.00023829093,0.00040406417,0.0009100149,0.00026239615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849128,0.0027363943,0.0003267359,0.00071451964,0.011012351,0.00029724007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002357041,0.0024002746,0.0031279353,0.0046633496,0.00221519,0.0026857366,0.0034418523,0.0043256204,0.1647927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022178657,0.00074104074,0.0030506486,0.0059251883,0.000954835,0.0029080855,0.0023446968,0.0026972434,0.044119593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058522135,0.000018207924,0.00018462347,0.00028229467,0.000055614266,0.00029818705,0.000062871186,0.0009349903,0.00013778335,0.0045880196,0.9791404,0.014238461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010337375,0.000075688076,0.005314662,0.00049636245,0.00035724076,0.00077221944,0.00033221138,0.016432188,0.002400931,0.018930446,0.9545679,0.00021683768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065835774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067262575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1647927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039410843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022590992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5512865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976254691","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2011.06.008","title":"A fuzzy TOPSIS method to rank effective fuel reduction factors: A case study of aviation companies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Aviation; Rank (graph theory); Reduction (mathematics); Fuzzy logic; Business; Computer science; Operations management; Operations research; Fuel efficiency; Statistics; Automotive engineering; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.17942958861924732,"score_gpt":0.4295110950940349,"score_spread":0.25008150647478755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976254691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7545493,0.001027918,0.2255108,0.00076980155,0.00006201368,0.0011331333,0.00032531153,0.00009531739,0.016526371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8298881,0.0005363205,0.16675285,0.000034888624,0.00001189613,0.00030667812,0.00010844898,0.000012526686,0.0023482656],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730194,0.0016448223,0.00016766677,0.00013788276,0.0006001825,0.00014751202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99613994,0.0029446958,0.00013789283,0.00009573261,0.0005532371,0.0001285702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049344697,0.0010934658,0.0012572914,0.0034869367,0.0024384672,0.0021216907,0.0010977068,0.0014807838,0.0034026597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005859836,0.00040704082,0.0015014489,0.004345496,0.000842174,0.0010740719,0.00085348473,0.0009765765,0.0002499867],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018035154,0.0029964638,0.02703665,0.00261846,0.0008470458,0.009373448,0.017788358,0.34944865,0.027587984,0.04033704,0.004820767,0.51534164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000384621,0.0017744737,0.015433158,0.00025642817,0.00042586212,0.0009291231,0.014992756,0.9399029,0.010273887,0.009422196,0.0059674154,0.00023723485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015805168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023339067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015805168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020149096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021144152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03142631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978426251","doi":"10.1016/j.camwa.2003.02.014","title":"Inequalities involving moments of a continuous random variable defined over a finite interval","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Mathematics with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Random variable; Interval (graph theory); Regular polygon; Variable (mathematics); Identity (music); Mathematical analysis; Distribution (mathematics); Applied mathematics; Combinatorics; Statistics; Geometry","score_opus":0.08565301244689039,"score_gpt":0.3569250059200481,"score_spread":0.2712719934731577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978426251","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07109918,0.0026562216,0.9182683,0.0013324408,0.00019144667,0.000040659008,0.00029173956,0.00010352357,0.006016386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9214584,0.0018664995,0.07301455,0.00023918183,0.00061203865,0.00018751374,0.00023809125,0.000083753665,0.002299996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940102,0.0027223646,0.00043216159,0.00080374535,0.0014215992,0.0006099377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90377975,0.08557248,0.005835023,0.0013663783,0.0023590275,0.0010872793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008464435,0.0015819133,0.002489351,0.0028501467,0.00055488484,0.004808639,0.002340157,0.002188138,0.0028672295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043913953,0.0007738641,0.0017443274,0.0030035246,0.0039790445,0.0062574456,0.0019004921,0.0031738288,0.00021798418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004308382,0.000050796112,0.0018706684,0.0005126533,0.00024895463,0.0010491982,0.00042984093,0.141019,0.005720886,0.83729964,0.00080374966,0.0105636995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003648331,0.000098507386,0.0015562368,0.00014051874,0.00010670689,0.00037481348,0.000093695504,0.6550066,0.0017670128,0.33975914,0.0009857373,0.00007452162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015246724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094844913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008464435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032296237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011229411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044764757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978559040","doi":"10.1007/s00500-008-0334-8","title":"Fuzzy relational clustering based on comparing two proximity matrices with utilization of particle swarm optimization","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fuzzy clustering; Cluster analysis; Data mining; FLAME clustering; Feature vector; Relational database; Feature (linguistics); Pattern recognition (psychology); Basis (linear algebra); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; CURE data clustering algorithm","score_opus":0.24861642227261144,"score_gpt":0.39451261898608037,"score_spread":0.14589619671346893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978559040","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014535536,0.0000809257,0.98416877,0.000044236425,0.000026413918,0.0000738176,0.000020065962,0.00010787814,0.0009422288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30685222,0.00013735025,0.6919109,0.000027034856,0.000028021463,0.00016601988,0.00011231484,0.00004286619,0.0007232388],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984937,0.0004201586,0.0001153449,0.00030294133,0.0005972284,0.000070715796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983171,0.0008263601,0.00015465966,0.00014151375,0.0005018388,0.000058448462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018591984,0.00080152316,0.0014554018,0.0026398594,0.0011608656,0.0020715334,0.0012824154,0.00082966784,0.0014912284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006224925,0.00047278387,0.0010878723,0.0025441088,0.00080874533,0.0018950846,0.0012749619,0.0006479847,0.00029991413],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038089108,0.0002741916,0.0025362088,0.000428547,0.00034247406,0.00014677855,0.00069937564,0.48298043,0.013556032,0.04891696,0.0018082984,0.4479298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013977813,0.000054458535,0.00048920454,0.0000116748815,0.000042188134,0.00004262092,0.000053673422,0.9909474,0.0018213261,0.0060954033,0.00040826184,0.00001974985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058078268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034773727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058078268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008258157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011753096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011548042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978732933","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2007.11.010","title":"On the order of the preference intensities in fuzzy AHP","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy logic; Order (exchange); Hierarchy; Interval (graph theory); Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Meaning (existential); Computer science; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Psychology; Economics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.2686471704798677,"score_gpt":0.34375703543343794,"score_spread":0.07510986495357025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978732933","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08888397,0.0004244048,0.8971846,0.0005072361,0.00008133385,0.00022487258,0.0001314884,0.00010261951,0.012459505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64759386,0.00035169712,0.3494803,0.00012569614,0.00006167537,0.00019899296,0.00013918336,0.00006572889,0.0019827757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940247,0.00327271,0.0003791178,0.0002474947,0.0017074773,0.0003686134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97867954,0.0168573,0.00058373465,0.000851112,0.0025491498,0.0004791451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010383487,0.0005836213,0.000962809,0.00174931,0.0013276828,0.0029463924,0.0009797832,0.0006425569,0.003273037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030033547,0.00059105316,0.00073925796,0.002800501,0.0018043442,0.0035969263,0.0012976946,0.00268937,0.0003715023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007575228,0.00026648137,0.003265727,0.0005907242,0.00011058031,0.000223833,0.0015696342,0.17093213,0.008385425,0.6361514,0.002096533,0.17564999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007597773,0.00020650426,0.0013957378,0.000100656835,0.000040287603,0.00006356604,0.0002777233,0.5873407,0.0036055832,0.40508768,0.0017351618,0.00007038629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032049625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002594268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010383487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014878928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017605452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05491376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979683159","doi":"10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.11.010","title":"Using AHP and Dempster–Shafer theory for evaluating sustainable transport solutions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Modelling & Software","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":224,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Sustainability; Dempster–Shafer theory; Measure (data warehouse); Sustainable transport; Computer science; Intelligent transportation system; Process (computing); Operations research; Engineering; Transport engineering; Data mining","score_opus":0.5116639428476715,"score_gpt":0.41634163864533724,"score_spread":0.09532230420233423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979683159","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11547615,0.00090662227,0.8747007,0.00029405966,0.00015322599,0.00045655138,0.0001788911,0.0001252492,0.0077085905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68507063,0.0006015162,0.31259996,0.00006027131,0.000050263374,0.00043657646,0.00015529025,0.00003270382,0.0009927668],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916721,0.0044884416,0.0004247179,0.00024476516,0.002888883,0.00028109175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98727477,0.01037988,0.00055300415,0.00028705542,0.0013575926,0.00014765374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009040808,0.0012980698,0.0016978775,0.007227212,0.0012403145,0.002215812,0.0010976044,0.00132548,0.0019641977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018220443,0.0007332402,0.0020120179,0.005630746,0.001143979,0.0025335732,0.0014803411,0.0012982287,0.00013536245],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018317884,0.00016127304,0.0014767547,0.00038800604,0.00038028037,0.0001108739,0.00017964818,0.88139737,0.0011270335,0.02123344,0.00040487817,0.092957236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024219415,0.00008577934,0.00038406494,0.000034932546,0.000047563197,0.00001755519,0.00008010098,0.97873735,0.00064293045,0.019547584,0.00037215318,0.000025762825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01033988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010668036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01033988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033406485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002984009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04781288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980254685","doi":"10.1007/s11518-009-5120-3","title":"A DEA-TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision analysis in emergency management","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Data envelopment analysis; Ideal solution; Similarity (geometry); Operations research; Computer science; Emergency management; Data mining; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Engineering; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.09403456684396475,"score_gpt":0.42729844764311337,"score_spread":0.3332638807991486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980254685","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00351645,0.00038430915,0.99333054,0.00010728781,0.000107728985,0.00019791767,0.000118174605,0.00023732915,0.0020002315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050454214,0.0005036054,0.94623595,0.00005847095,0.00003413346,0.00052102265,0.00020053601,0.000051713887,0.0019403131],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99387276,0.0027466158,0.0005356177,0.00037744702,0.0022970827,0.00017053114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962745,0.0021370547,0.00014886179,0.0001778478,0.0012016221,0.0000602058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045685307,0.001499363,0.0025696615,0.0030527143,0.0013765784,0.002122141,0.0016937854,0.0012291687,0.0052711805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084581105,0.00078832154,0.0022517273,0.004467642,0.00061542756,0.001847951,0.0016488198,0.0020331077,0.0012538054],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022213635,0.00032073198,0.0009855141,0.0013624553,0.0006358924,0.00036029174,0.00038521067,0.10557718,0.011255676,0.03425949,0.004868561,0.8397668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014611271,0.00052875205,0.0024606555,0.00026888133,0.0004057152,0.00068428926,0.00034358777,0.9126931,0.008994929,0.049467795,0.023781039,0.00022518041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003850093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068585468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052711805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010571631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029058782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024160981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981218150","doi":"10.1155/jamds/2006/10936","title":"Using different ELECTRE methods in strategic planning in the presence of human behavioral resistance","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"ELECTRE; Resistance (ecology); Strategic planning; Computer science; Reliability (semiconductor); Management science; Sample (material); Operations research; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Mathematics; Marketing; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.4290296135856393,"score_gpt":0.55143862231194,"score_spread":0.12240900872630067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981218150","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13867617,0.00036074893,0.8508352,0.00048678307,0.000033687378,0.0003792904,0.000103019,0.00016088372,0.0089642005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5508588,0.00031684493,0.44622475,0.00008611027,0.000008178801,0.00051965215,0.000096734046,0.000036024976,0.0018527932],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99219877,0.0061899,0.00031652697,0.00034751595,0.0008168584,0.00013042377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96887815,0.028332017,0.000814682,0.0009313517,0.0009056288,0.00013815243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010869653,0.0010358598,0.0009811892,0.0036806064,0.0004679655,0.0021061893,0.0011588892,0.0007120985,0.0028599247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025186319,0.00058166985,0.0011940281,0.0031173711,0.001454943,0.0028480429,0.0019101223,0.0012523725,0.00026560912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006833312,0.00042189186,0.012561743,0.00093447167,0.0004805727,0.00027928076,0.0026790113,0.44680074,0.0021778587,0.10760405,0.00060987007,0.42476708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001320854,0.00084195967,0.005021646,0.00016988446,0.00014025383,0.00027738605,0.0023501734,0.8949544,0.0031660933,0.089493275,0.0033250807,0.00012778248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022502248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043173744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010869653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016983439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094482966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057484925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981458722","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2013.09.032","title":"Effective factors on optimizing banks’ balance sheet using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Balance sheet; Process (computing); Balance (ability); Hierarchy; Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Business; Operations research; Operations management; Risk analysis (engineering); Reliability engineering; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Accounting; Economics; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.09086192275176207,"score_gpt":0.39774858422490744,"score_spread":0.30688666147314536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981458722","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48342326,0.00074711296,0.49311912,0.0008316239,0.000060696624,0.00063104904,0.00020841567,0.00015700908,0.020821711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9172777,0.000270626,0.0814696,0.00002460667,0.000012822583,0.00012040356,0.00006931063,0.000007798776,0.0007472114],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793434,0.0008378573,0.000094805,0.00011049116,0.00079984136,0.00022275512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984528,0.00084772735,0.00015871561,0.000041128864,0.00043579433,0.00006393534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028840757,0.0007280161,0.00058834796,0.0024550485,0.0010415656,0.0022088953,0.00047866828,0.0006718839,0.00212577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053997966,0.000304505,0.0009894044,0.0018964623,0.00046871192,0.0012130932,0.0007857693,0.0005280735,0.00015217022],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060619006,0.00047551148,0.017067147,0.0010302057,0.0002831648,0.00045864534,0.0026728422,0.6803037,0.01441157,0.04685722,0.0032134089,0.2326204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078024954,0.00049199705,0.0079720095,0.00018622066,0.00021876255,0.000082709106,0.0013820213,0.9519825,0.007858882,0.026533863,0.0031351415,0.000077872784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077522206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005863423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077522206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016913314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028078156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015414178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982108162","doi":"10.1007/bf02941128","title":"Multiple criteria analysis in the context of information imperfections: Processing of additional information","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Information processing; Process (computing); Computational intelligence; Order (exchange); Adaptation (eye); Bayesian probability; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Psychology","score_opus":0.21571481054599323,"score_gpt":0.5078727336886218,"score_spread":0.2921579231426286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982108162","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054565255,0.0012672207,0.9385818,0.001350423,0.00011813806,0.00013050143,0.00006844463,0.000060140417,0.003858005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72584856,0.0010496989,0.2713601,0.00019659268,0.00026999912,0.00023500473,0.00007351557,0.000042016054,0.0009245216],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.982128,0.011671436,0.0007120226,0.0012784003,0.00358155,0.0006284779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.892518,0.09299294,0.005009332,0.003414802,0.005067346,0.0009975651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02253808,0.001616349,0.0036729607,0.0024320418,0.0012783488,0.0065564928,0.0021643087,0.0025842981,0.0026184919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08102563,0.00096650014,0.0016189922,0.0034674432,0.0029125633,0.007452544,0.0030949204,0.0029884211,0.00018291501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010882952,0.00043247183,0.0030145927,0.0015928051,0.0009206219,0.001139443,0.0017629266,0.59314656,0.005349385,0.19796884,0.0018601588,0.19172388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004713111,0.00012861965,0.00093159685,0.00010601203,0.0001064628,0.000086423315,0.00019693103,0.8068311,0.0013973427,0.18941003,0.00068420253,0.000074174524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021317708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019820489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02253808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018710304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00251309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11919421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982554723","doi":"10.1007/s11135-005-2177-z","title":"On scales and decision-making based on arithmetic mean","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality & Quantity","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Rank (graph theory); Ordinal Scale; Statistics; Scale (ratio); Ordinal data; Invariant (physics); Arithmetic; Combinatorics; Geography","score_opus":0.20780224574529943,"score_gpt":0.4999843682384996,"score_spread":0.2921821224932002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982554723","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020674238,0.0017566785,0.965453,0.0008610401,0.00021211935,0.000076208664,0.000055544806,0.00008594944,0.010825105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5143262,0.0014070767,0.48077437,0.0002644124,0.00036958448,0.00039745614,0.00008686445,0.00007521407,0.0022988075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848905,0.011126655,0.0005262262,0.0010419369,0.0020613633,0.0003533687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9380602,0.05725318,0.0011821048,0.0013081868,0.001905621,0.00029066688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020506581,0.0010644469,0.0019278179,0.002272736,0.001084807,0.0036833494,0.0017233694,0.0015256432,0.004132763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05289898,0.0005721808,0.0018645675,0.0035314185,0.0056604207,0.0063226633,0.0022307625,0.002386082,0.00036293504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001635058,0.000061851344,0.0007570937,0.0002532135,0.0001507542,0.000068052635,0.00050851266,0.11034901,0.0003975573,0.81817144,0.0011240831,0.067994945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019066805,0.00006377934,0.00042722037,0.000052140087,0.000031467254,0.000021568116,0.000072205046,0.16723165,0.000188955,0.8307804,0.0010733182,0.00003816255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020767616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001311122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020506581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002130261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012117766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10845041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982593074","doi":"10.1002/atr.5670430403","title":"Multi‐criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Sustainability; Sustainable development; Transport engineering; Environmental economics; Capital city; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Environmental planning; Business; Geography; Engineering; Economics; Political science; Economic geography","score_opus":0.08049463660307374,"score_gpt":0.4443412971117286,"score_spread":0.3638466605086549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982593074","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01421243,0.00009803089,0.9814503,0.00008080113,0.000023285354,0.0007163504,0.00013909551,0.00014526863,0.0031343987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14437343,0.00007288803,0.85305506,0.00002361364,0.000008046497,0.0015916567,0.00013839503,0.000033772758,0.0007031565],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893987,0.0063971365,0.00059772877,0.00044300806,0.0029029846,0.00026041784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99149245,0.004961063,0.00061843876,0.00034316874,0.0024455204,0.00013941857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011933629,0.0014412331,0.0013091161,0.0055863583,0.0015816166,0.002191563,0.0012500563,0.000776169,0.005611457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015312543,0.00053702085,0.0020211567,0.0041096914,0.0011515646,0.0011812504,0.0017315181,0.0015540171,0.0005120575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005795575,0.0006737584,0.0045728902,0.0018995577,0.0008469021,0.00066715444,0.0024200438,0.40343517,0.02767253,0.13255058,0.004928147,0.4197537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013515986,0.0006898693,0.003409697,0.00036593477,0.0002246026,0.0002138665,0.00080966204,0.9029945,0.014536813,0.06423437,0.012216237,0.00016912392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003070082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037515801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011933629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020940835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004149681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06311178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982708235","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2005.04.003","title":"Bayesian framework for managing preferences in decision-making","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Optimal decision; Decision field theory; Process (computing); Bayesian probability; Computer science; Influence diagram; Order (exchange); Decision-making; Point (geometry); Operations research; Bayesian inference; Decision analysis; Decision theory; Management science; Expected utility hypothesis; Risk analysis (engineering); Business decision mapping; Economics; Decision support system; Evidential reasoning approach; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Business; Microeconomics; Decision tree; Operations management; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.037273345592700895,"score_gpt":0.35751172362130756,"score_spread":0.32023837802860666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982708235","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025500003,0.00038624703,0.9940917,0.00052669144,0.00003452913,0.000040483847,0.000076798395,0.000054978056,0.0022385763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30536157,0.0017790567,0.685419,0.0005167676,0.0004060858,0.00081449904,0.00037353463,0.00009742983,0.0052319537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847387,0.00995981,0.0006647667,0.0010412565,0.0029627192,0.0006327331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96873146,0.025878426,0.001295807,0.0011089334,0.0022249287,0.000760467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017817402,0.0018922645,0.0034368394,0.0031895936,0.0013884928,0.0049012247,0.0038558943,0.003741423,0.005873808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049245223,0.0020839712,0.0025581818,0.0038725866,0.0030724092,0.008940641,0.0026660871,0.0051426617,0.0009790382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103861195,0.00012188538,0.0005757279,0.00022454356,0.00024281192,0.00017440968,0.00032737764,0.24315774,0.00034720355,0.7157897,0.001793895,0.037140936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038788636,0.000030377594,0.00013671671,0.00004634982,0.00005644122,0.000043756543,0.00002970734,0.36030835,0.00010223002,0.6378045,0.0013657169,0.00003707271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073383055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008120233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017817402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037430478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002713399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094228566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982902830","doi":"10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000576","title":"Fuzzy-Based Life-Cycle Cost Model for Decision Making under Subjectivity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Construction Engineering and Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy set; Operations research; Monte Carlo method; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.07605789002646528,"score_gpt":0.3634604772301947,"score_spread":0.2874025872037294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982902830","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010450458,0.00029675287,0.97869086,0.00028228268,0.00004445699,0.00012115243,0.000248785,0.0001184541,0.009746864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8018942,0.0011706259,0.17901978,0.00017634478,0.00009632911,0.0009979347,0.0006194173,0.00008936454,0.015935974],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988803,0.00036959007,0.00005443334,0.00016645915,0.000390302,0.00013887651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991271,0.0004749649,0.00011622151,0.000040878673,0.00019961785,0.00004116186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019333554,0.001160124,0.0014256401,0.0014136491,0.0007833794,0.0021314593,0.003545526,0.002212245,0.0048295157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031136244,0.00064117985,0.0016754303,0.0019819867,0.0008380294,0.0021939394,0.000946007,0.0019516309,0.00066870166],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009395903,0.000010721007,0.00009433573,0.000023980425,0.000013029975,0.00004822588,0.000023818735,0.96004176,0.00018273183,0.03604705,0.00022078797,0.0032842113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029985188,0.000007340226,0.00003943579,0.000004901696,0.00000548107,0.000012499407,0.0000051189363,0.9903196,0.000055016117,0.008979187,0.00056265085,0.000005788004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015046168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008966066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015046168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003168594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024131967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02991718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983282077","doi":"10.7202/1024716ar","title":"Soixante ans de bons et mauvais usages du alpha de Cronbach","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Mesure et évaluation en éducation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cronbach's alpha; Humanities; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.19206239762359342,"score_gpt":0.48661287604327613,"score_spread":0.29455047841968274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983282077","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17378731,0.16218428,0.32321578,0.029302208,0.023325693,0.0008678468,0.007835802,0.003035086,0.27644596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60226727,0.053261284,0.27338833,0.004484409,0.0051419246,0.0027583533,0.0056397673,0.0020739543,0.050984655],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9574358,0.02147313,0.0058344915,0.002822327,0.011674994,0.00075922755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90350604,0.063027464,0.0068330085,0.0061698216,0.019465206,0.0009984936],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040916447,0.001779223,0.001151851,0.010712909,0.0018510267,0.004639586,0.0011232065,0.0015175084,0.006708192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12991136,0.00081214716,0.0016108619,0.010840378,0.0038594368,0.0052131573,0.0020909163,0.0036803302,0.0033621902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005538275,0.00017913457,0.024939151,0.002310754,0.00084425864,0.00028958605,0.015348484,0.0013234044,0.0037192702,0.17949717,0.12095521,0.6500398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009524375,0.00055320526,0.062085614,0.0044529513,0.0005646203,0.0020854655,0.010749947,0.0028128114,0.0055630207,0.102698974,0.8078856,0.00045259675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003936048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004720992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95908356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027469662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002302774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21638942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983614277","doi":"10.1142/s0218488509006133","title":"FUZZY LINGUISTIC MODELING OF EASE OF DOING BUSINESS INDICATORS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Usability; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy set; Work (physics); Commercial bank; Management science; Operations research; Econometrics; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Business; Mathematics; Engineering; Finance; Programming language","score_opus":0.07427835441846567,"score_gpt":0.3901058830018992,"score_spread":0.31582752858343355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983614277","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07240365,0.00025628248,0.8908698,0.0007494427,0.000087886656,0.00014564928,0.00027671026,0.00015177502,0.03505874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7973436,0.00026405556,0.19700313,0.000052927637,0.00004314821,0.00016436931,0.00013794475,0.000025962347,0.0049648774],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869317,0.0005401278,0.00007855797,0.00010984826,0.00048741177,0.000090883994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972861,0.0014399645,0.00038481096,0.00017155767,0.0006050013,0.0001125927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023349859,0.00048735048,0.00035673234,0.0025093094,0.0007418314,0.0026032757,0.00092552946,0.0006785784,0.00228743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006796791,0.00020840624,0.00065131753,0.001823209,0.0010489323,0.002059302,0.0007971962,0.0007321903,0.00027326483],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007586473,0.00009145624,0.0025586395,0.00009829204,0.00003351284,0.00023785916,0.00072422635,0.5330213,0.0021578912,0.41304845,0.0014360073,0.04651659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011728048,0.000037493366,0.0007757035,0.00002875325,0.000016194354,0.00004109124,0.00014617738,0.92889434,0.0007603102,0.066034906,0.0032264916,0.000026843974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072433925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068944064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072433925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017802463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013077286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014402449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983736256","doi":"10.1115/1.2956997","title":"Evaluating Supplier Performance Using DEA and Piecewise Triangular Fuzzy AHP","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Weighting; Analytic hierarchy process; Pairwise comparison; Data envelopment analysis; Mathematical optimization; Decision maker; Rank (graph theory); Piecewise; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Operations research; Range (aeronautics); Mathematics; Data mining; Statistics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.14220267586811555,"score_gpt":0.4152977015131001,"score_spread":0.27309502564498456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983736256","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05525557,0.0003715457,0.93858963,0.000103629165,0.000031692096,0.00022195626,0.00012493365,0.00016553277,0.0051355157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65006554,0.00044332957,0.34773174,0.000029136701,0.000021056203,0.0003141064,0.00018592326,0.000025558198,0.0011836145],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647385,0.0013798247,0.0002523362,0.0002404984,0.0014691934,0.00018434606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972844,0.0014625182,0.00033683967,0.00009763874,0.00075622584,0.000062421306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003561981,0.0011581177,0.00093164574,0.003514089,0.0006950986,0.0016415189,0.0009813627,0.0006989484,0.0013473211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006453353,0.00042469957,0.0012447947,0.0038588904,0.00040029557,0.001182758,0.0011895519,0.0007493154,0.00017625371],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012839148,0.00008544107,0.002413861,0.00037792642,0.0001387969,0.00014855017,0.00028876928,0.85745645,0.006152761,0.010431068,0.00056815834,0.12180977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066822317,0.000050989,0.00044799494,0.000016203398,0.00001774692,0.000018015326,0.00007431375,0.9953589,0.0016073601,0.001944062,0.0004394992,0.000018259907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007036227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005069251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007036227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013411875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016549109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01883781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985369104","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.022","title":"An interactive method for dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Closeness; Ranking (information retrieval); Group decision-making; Aggregate (composite); Operator (biology); Computer science; Measure (data warehouse); TOPSIS; Mathematics; Group (periodic table); Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Operations research; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.157470969285867,"score_gpt":0.47660617450754156,"score_spread":0.31913520522167454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985369104","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010924654,0.000021020489,0.9974589,0.000022927179,0.000017458753,0.000033771423,0.000019902085,0.00017338002,0.001160226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059220176,0.00005336208,0.9378352,0.000059939637,0.00003239069,0.0003184594,0.00009555563,0.00012309471,0.0022617846],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977551,0.00086354464,0.000106129046,0.00031857894,0.0008175837,0.0001390296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621445,0.0027027586,0.000108828506,0.00029066193,0.00054749794,0.00013591076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030451212,0.0008871863,0.0012208051,0.0012587646,0.0009412621,0.0013422039,0.0024599535,0.0011178236,0.013496169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005883046,0.0005641378,0.0014855292,0.0014189448,0.0009214709,0.0016448668,0.0027409496,0.0017194739,0.0015708348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060476165,0.00045182533,0.0007412603,0.0005522723,0.00030097654,0.0003941184,0.0009961657,0.15335105,0.013815739,0.15843223,0.0071563055,0.6632033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007890935,0.000118737786,0.0002655359,0.000044558703,0.00006635802,0.00013042886,0.00006128663,0.9466369,0.0029745447,0.04158086,0.007991001,0.000050956107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020483444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030942352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013496169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007252168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013136031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045149148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986355995","doi":"10.1504/ijmdm.2008.019361","title":"Hierarchical alternatives in Multi Criteria Decision Making","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Structuring; Computer science; Management science; Operations research; Decision analysis; Fuzzy logic; Risk analysis (engineering); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.17649775624336914,"score_gpt":0.475308037549923,"score_spread":0.29881028130655385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986355995","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063664117,0.009998707,0.9673684,0.0009350913,0.00023481874,0.00018106872,0.000075348486,0.00007361497,0.014766552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34135932,0.009809886,0.643019,0.0003372451,0.00046630847,0.0006572549,0.00017782857,0.00004775677,0.0041254335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98036504,0.014798248,0.00049338804,0.00056035764,0.0033550707,0.00042788062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99414647,0.004583235,0.0003014435,0.0002103163,0.00062254374,0.00013589405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01078379,0.0014184855,0.0014974994,0.002803304,0.001165036,0.002681377,0.001341135,0.0017498453,0.0036576686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012239372,0.0005209893,0.0010539663,0.0052784337,0.003261631,0.0028798704,0.00206095,0.0021345161,0.00061050645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042960877,0.000036251422,0.00022586528,0.00052825175,0.000073657975,0.00016337063,0.00043386256,0.14220138,0.0004516765,0.79741627,0.0021225782,0.056303896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035139285,0.00006090947,0.00013597487,0.00020628668,0.000028038068,0.000043884458,0.00013249242,0.23581025,0.0003251879,0.7542629,0.008925525,0.00003345457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039336486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040551275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01078379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002615364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018972831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057030797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W198665938","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4419-5904-1_13","title":"Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Geographic Information Systems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Geographic information system; Decision analysis; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Decision support system; Management science; Data science; Operations research; Geography; Data mining; Engineering; Cartography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12451266957402835,"score_gpt":0.48473791706653624,"score_spread":0.3602252474925079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W198665938","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003870946,0.06464349,0.83822984,0.004812603,0.0014637839,0.0001561761,0.00033334765,0.00025120846,0.08623857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18389674,0.06257049,0.6766804,0.0013390445,0.002248803,0.0007431797,0.0009455587,0.00025545782,0.07132029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971826,0.0014182075,0.00014808182,0.00016050492,0.0010231008,0.00006739428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99623704,0.0031193565,0.0001306566,0.00012838669,0.0003527247,0.000031851665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002512877,0.0015647373,0.0014916401,0.002285683,0.00044070667,0.002963298,0.0011020803,0.0015152502,0.007954835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005785126,0.0006274069,0.0008655116,0.0046730493,0.0015821477,0.0032728098,0.00096842385,0.0020238785,0.0013957934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003445246,0.00006974192,0.0003374891,0.0012450591,0.0001797302,0.00015431482,0.00022823898,0.08574377,0.0006114601,0.5553364,0.038638666,0.31742063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014978133,0.000030230354,0.00037083804,0.000343438,0.000037473463,0.00011952701,0.00012939353,0.13277814,0.0004786121,0.80036396,0.0652955,0.000037829264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00254908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032261529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007954835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020461776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011202369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026611567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986720858","doi":"10.1108/03684920810884379","title":"The grey extent analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kybernetes","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Terminology; Set (abstract data type); Cybernetics; Decision analysis; Grey literature; Artificial intelligence; Grey relational analysis; Domain (mathematical analysis); Originality; Data mining; Operations research; Mathematics; Statistics; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.21927293139337553,"score_gpt":0.420582969650471,"score_spread":0.20131003825709545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986720858","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012771012,0.0009408167,0.9525867,0.00087650114,0.00010592469,0.00018141369,0.00014041363,0.000107631655,0.03228956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54749966,0.0016064146,0.4419989,0.00025880785,0.00016927498,0.00032006868,0.00013885194,0.00007267004,0.007935363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969729,0.0011123562,0.00014961054,0.00044877766,0.0011602729,0.00015598467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968363,0.0018900053,0.00030497162,0.00036670887,0.00049442524,0.00010757481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036729698,0.000653246,0.0009182509,0.0034171669,0.0010348147,0.0034040941,0.0011037551,0.0010513228,0.0062770075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009106509,0.00028876247,0.0016005444,0.00216208,0.0043226946,0.004573669,0.002726992,0.0017422505,0.00058031955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003406238,0.000017612057,0.0009560372,0.00024239607,0.000056024623,0.00012519352,0.00057661074,0.027508067,0.0022645798,0.8921346,0.0014640188,0.07462077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015501646,0.00006132354,0.0014625562,0.00017491171,0.000046822573,0.00021369608,0.00038157206,0.095969185,0.001819273,0.87885,0.020960256,0.000044941953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023322294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016019731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062770075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021254425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022700962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020998657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986891604","doi":"10.1081/ese-120004517","title":"USING MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS FOR SUPPORTING DECISIONS OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Solid waste management; Decision analysis; Computer science; Business; Process management; Operations management; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Management science; Waste management; Municipal solid waste; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.37281816411526253,"score_gpt":0.506573838305495,"score_spread":0.13375567419023243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986891604","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06884677,0.0056507117,0.8889051,0.0022604698,0.00021050102,0.0012346257,0.00038976318,0.00045098402,0.032051094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3749776,0.002423083,0.6202395,0.00016000798,0.000067482484,0.0004768597,0.0001889994,0.000030120429,0.0014363064],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807358,0.014305373,0.0006850975,0.00033584764,0.003657861,0.0002800642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98793155,0.009627855,0.00067718455,0.00032020517,0.0012047353,0.00023833329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011501875,0.0017540024,0.0015118618,0.0075963777,0.0015351314,0.0037596263,0.0011091591,0.0011690452,0.0036743574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019944748,0.00047077506,0.001112812,0.0046642236,0.0014760696,0.0021433441,0.0017831936,0.0011056351,0.00058287417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053524406,0.00037501127,0.0041535683,0.0022968797,0.00066212896,0.00066262775,0.0010218356,0.27923056,0.010122332,0.0528008,0.0038082893,0.64433074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029898548,0.0012794208,0.0042859237,0.0013331966,0.0004055212,0.00045194651,0.0023771196,0.74639606,0.016972594,0.17946663,0.046362285,0.00037029633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045926794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011430391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011501875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020731338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037685689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060828447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987852976","doi":"10.1155/2012/824265","title":"Evaluating Projects Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision Making","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Mathematics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Group decision-making; Selection (genetic algorithm); TOPSIS; Aggregate (composite); Operator (biology); Computer science; Operations research; Group (periodic table); Fuzzy logic; Score; Mathematics; Management science; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Engineering","score_opus":0.28568189037158653,"score_gpt":0.4824104865515948,"score_spread":0.19672859618000826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987852976","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047884863,0.00034633925,0.94320166,0.00030527596,0.00004361442,0.00019620622,0.00005571394,0.00007945393,0.007886871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.744573,0.00057782175,0.2531025,0.000067364774,0.00005585801,0.00031115176,0.00008408921,0.000013964768,0.0012142716],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933775,0.0027013484,0.00039339977,0.00038158058,0.0028645906,0.0002816643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685425,0.0016934022,0.00040367854,0.00016054651,0.00072105956,0.00016711463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062678885,0.0013217536,0.0015809053,0.0025359483,0.0007363685,0.0026262465,0.001210114,0.0010219291,0.0017994872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008752054,0.00041864722,0.0015727264,0.0019390908,0.0012871798,0.0028957522,0.0012608046,0.0008342893,0.00021932847],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030204534,0.00023374181,0.003091965,0.00085952575,0.00041091884,0.00052301784,0.0014709107,0.675292,0.0048059304,0.17906728,0.0015877883,0.13235487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004840685,0.00028012626,0.0009098055,0.00009158689,0.00009724505,0.00012561951,0.00023040426,0.89645845,0.0015590229,0.098481506,0.001639282,0.00007853845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020163753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019385472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062678885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017055545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019685435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03314817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988053681","doi":"10.4018/ijfsa.2012100105","title":"Multiple Criteria Inventory Classification Under Fuzzy Environment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science; Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Delphi; Delphi method; Computer science; Inventory control; Analytic hierarchy process; Defuzzification; Control (management); Operations research; Data mining; Fuzzy number; Fuzzy set; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1886390029659752,"score_gpt":0.4216619886678649,"score_spread":0.23302298570188973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988053681","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08982043,0.0004308047,0.895418,0.00065254205,0.00010844004,0.0012616095,0.00044243722,0.00024008189,0.011625594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49765816,0.00035739783,0.4977441,0.000087157576,0.000058669273,0.000999592,0.00046123023,0.000028689814,0.0026049607],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861389,0.0054885447,0.0015209115,0.0008725676,0.005128753,0.00085034757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99113876,0.003672076,0.0010694261,0.00055380707,0.003272675,0.00029324513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00869985,0.0009183445,0.0011908256,0.0048917704,0.001813514,0.0039140224,0.0012910793,0.0011265911,0.0022529038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013165469,0.0003830403,0.0013788135,0.0049666287,0.0011317811,0.0023803806,0.0013597596,0.0011448571,0.00028359474],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005641398,0.00049125863,0.01698049,0.0014883104,0.00033781005,0.0015265528,0.0034883276,0.40346822,0.011832837,0.15552717,0.0073457607,0.39694905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056496407,0.00022008263,0.004273231,0.0002214471,0.000077120894,0.00021059232,0.0010778328,0.9184837,0.0040341117,0.064302266,0.0069467276,0.00009639146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006186408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036515254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00869985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035197674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035055932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04600978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988428279","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.03.005","title":"Supplier selection-order allocation: A two-stage multiple criteria dynamic programming approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Production Economics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Group for Research in Decision Analysis","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Analytic hierarchy process; Supply chain; Selection (genetic algorithm); Operations research; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical optimization; Dynamic programming; Order (exchange); Supply chain management; Process (computing); Function (biology); Business; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.14827880180868658,"score_gpt":0.4015870338649926,"score_spread":0.25330823205630604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988428279","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011995082,0.00023727283,0.9816476,0.0003939143,0.00007242164,0.00031169032,0.00010720529,0.00014240273,0.0050924164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51680344,0.0006203427,0.4650192,0.00032546217,0.00018703146,0.002184456,0.0002771127,0.00021438254,0.01436858],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99576026,0.0024235945,0.00015216273,0.0005305372,0.0006336466,0.0004997884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99620664,0.0028516436,0.00024538985,0.00007458161,0.00042331364,0.00019835788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057652434,0.0030200693,0.0059530693,0.0029981835,0.0014718489,0.004940816,0.0049317824,0.0057661836,0.009919855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006352879,0.003576863,0.0037163396,0.003502054,0.0015864515,0.0031333505,0.0028241405,0.0031468407,0.00080876186],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006866968,0.00009781697,0.00014899539,0.00011260178,0.00007291281,0.00008735671,0.00004460417,0.98746395,0.0002729217,0.0055188457,0.00032686975,0.0057843877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028387838,0.00005332043,0.00005269767,0.000011944097,0.000024728242,0.000011381844,0.000015865999,0.9966625,0.00012360563,0.0028234469,0.00017711699,0.00001504217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012268565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01069686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012268565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035916872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049006594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033185184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990582411","doi":"10.1002/atr.5670370203","title":"A fuzzy method for predicting the demand for rail freight transportation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hong Kong Polytechnic University; China Railway","keywords":"Process (computing); Fuzzy logic; Transport engineering; Operations research; Order (exchange); Computer science; Demand forecasting; Fuzzy transportation; Rail freight transport; Fuzzy set; Engineering; Fuzzy number; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08742433542409689,"score_gpt":0.42017335063951083,"score_spread":0.33274901521541395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990582411","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20146225,0.00044109763,0.7931914,0.00024454223,0.00008188304,0.000108190085,0.00025886882,0.00054891245,0.0036628328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9320485,0.0001084665,0.06636634,0.000029056542,0.000021820699,0.000078357254,0.00010150573,0.000008494732,0.0012375438],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962664,0.00011974441,0.000023112318,0.000069369926,0.00012301761,0.000038086368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912745,0.0005258836,0.000056379726,0.000023314155,0.00023644076,0.000030603092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009878625,0.00044306405,0.00057054707,0.0011960281,0.00037093498,0.0008203959,0.0005732775,0.000979704,0.0018027887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025457663,0.00027006224,0.0005383357,0.000685189,0.0002178934,0.0004788408,0.00022341147,0.0006048618,0.00025604208],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032818233,0.00016789862,0.0039858813,0.00008763743,0.00007327047,0.00011883687,0.00006831345,0.83433694,0.006837775,0.0016066488,0.00060861825,0.1517799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044972467,0.000019829315,0.0002453674,0.000002972683,0.0000038099447,0.0000055211403,0.0000055508804,0.9992059,0.00029941302,0.00014540339,0.00005794447,0.0000038347507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02179822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012887251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02179822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075257465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080079446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04334271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990582448","doi":"10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.07.070","title":"A monotonicity property of the composition of regularized and inverted-regularized gamma functions with applications","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Mathematics; Axiom; Property (philosophy); Probabilistic logic; Gamma function; Applied mathematics; Pure mathematics; Mathematical economics; Mathematical analysis; Statistics; Geometry","score_opus":0.06492159536846621,"score_gpt":0.32569839787040405,"score_spread":0.26077680250193785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990582448","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1561179,0.00089395774,0.82309914,0.00083626463,0.00012644398,0.000071215814,0.00009350436,0.00020636953,0.018555177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7468532,0.0011055802,0.24294555,0.00035028826,0.00035986988,0.00017872555,0.00019389321,0.00024374502,0.0077692172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754095,0.0009946936,0.00013720516,0.0005481017,0.00054636307,0.00023265892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98466325,0.009307208,0.0010650255,0.0012372304,0.0030608987,0.00066636153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005233879,0.00077178876,0.0011883022,0.0015484699,0.0009452835,0.0025381336,0.0013276505,0.0012052038,0.0031223244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028305825,0.0006902056,0.0014299804,0.0011063146,0.0034267907,0.0052666995,0.0021653415,0.0028456403,0.00048166854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039298908,0.00014418707,0.0027558361,0.0002693466,0.00009881888,0.0006591605,0.00076992484,0.01687088,0.020957995,0.8831246,0.0018805871,0.0720756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058163983,0.00026505732,0.001978049,0.00009059999,0.00009645836,0.0023773082,0.00039244464,0.3070736,0.011777983,0.66916096,0.006643265,0.00008602082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000785099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004345139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005233879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006751405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012416283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027679741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990842140","doi":"10.5220/0005282203180323","title":"Information Fusion for Semi-supervised Cluster Labelings","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Cluster (spacecraft); Fusion; Information fusion; Sensor fusion; Artificial intelligence; Information retrieval; Computer network","score_opus":0.24437138128378422,"score_gpt":0.4302128668071964,"score_spread":0.18584148552341218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990842140","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069830026,0.0003883275,0.9912184,0.00013286514,0.000036746318,0.00009178887,0.00016298937,0.00035576327,0.00063021615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37643188,0.000356175,0.6193924,0.00018912721,0.00018256485,0.00045110183,0.0016109471,0.00016130139,0.0012245257],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875609,0.0058726626,0.0010077207,0.0018711081,0.0031346402,0.00055296824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97669697,0.015860235,0.0012851078,0.002275411,0.0034395864,0.00044273667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014589837,0.0016469134,0.004520528,0.0057444894,0.002216589,0.003893811,0.0038319463,0.002640594,0.0027764959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029985603,0.0011362311,0.0031076355,0.004611743,0.0018841783,0.003564209,0.0037184267,0.0028465632,0.0010535682],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008752171,0.00037708943,0.0019095362,0.0008358033,0.0008732403,0.0001877145,0.00056183856,0.42206904,0.005524902,0.026013887,0.0068970216,0.53387475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021171016,0.00007644901,0.00040620685,0.000051802184,0.00007233237,0.000040103525,0.000045670822,0.9615421,0.0017656267,0.03528213,0.0006621611,0.000034264012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004460513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004894204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014589837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019698162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026872135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077159345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991271986","doi":"10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000334","title":"Fuzzy Preference Relations Consensus Approach to Reduce Conflicts on Shared Responsibilities in the Owner Managing Contractor Delivery System","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Construction Engineering and Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Task (project management); Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Process (computing); Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Similarity (geometry); Work (physics); Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.16484555668427497,"score_gpt":0.31109013383897843,"score_spread":0.14624457715470346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991271986","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01668425,0.00013825293,0.9792493,0.0001405173,0.000017947319,0.00010072504,0.000021044787,0.00011377214,0.0035341347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5742745,0.00029075774,0.42033002,0.0001036018,0.000038389226,0.00027057648,0.00012499171,0.000053381234,0.004513758],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99464804,0.0023134649,0.000280309,0.0006164176,0.0017948872,0.00034682965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736077,0.0010365524,0.0002594247,0.00020276904,0.000977937,0.00016257112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050009624,0.0008061546,0.00094210514,0.0014638158,0.0014766642,0.001392384,0.0017019064,0.0009490801,0.0028148901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006820695,0.00047001638,0.0011420621,0.0014398476,0.00078488316,0.0028001387,0.0015375196,0.0012705795,0.00042798338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027559703,0.00026248855,0.0018906541,0.00037228016,0.00019711281,0.00045868862,0.0019143777,0.58689034,0.009438048,0.13210763,0.0031093692,0.26308343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038214617,0.00013932808,0.00038755508,0.000024217248,0.000051861414,0.0001114916,0.00034357276,0.9516188,0.003216694,0.039632794,0.0043961504,0.00003926707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070953337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051763994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070953337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019302481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029901182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026447952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992359248","doi":"10.1109/tsmc.2014.2387096","title":"Grey-Based Preference in a Graph Model for Conflict Resolution With Multiple Decision Makers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Royal Society of Canada","keywords":"Preference; Conflict resolution; Graph; Computer science; Operations research; Mathematics; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Statistics; Political science; Theoretical computer science","score_opus":0.25647598924318715,"score_gpt":0.3571632700916665,"score_spread":0.10068728084847933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992359248","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006212038,0.0002160413,0.9852899,0.0003706916,0.000044500277,0.000047050635,0.00009381905,0.00005643896,0.0076696067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6393722,0.0011632273,0.34413671,0.00037905484,0.000119679746,0.0004907669,0.00031324383,0.00009125052,0.013933819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793124,0.0012326277,0.00007390041,0.00026296265,0.00036789567,0.0001313398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834,0.0010795699,0.00016178311,0.00009898907,0.00019772332,0.0001220011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024392176,0.0012105919,0.0013655612,0.0015372275,0.00082557095,0.0021910395,0.0022473778,0.0017529423,0.005875415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039986996,0.00045818795,0.001769838,0.002517411,0.002152278,0.0034751939,0.0016665848,0.0022809424,0.00069543783],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037573438,0.000022453463,0.00016979608,0.00007849805,0.00004737681,0.00017308738,0.00024123432,0.44163603,0.0009231156,0.54783237,0.0009884845,0.007849914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001769762,0.000026367668,0.000068058805,0.000013034865,0.000016860891,0.000038255417,0.00004403356,0.7297893,0.00016029667,0.26778966,0.0020161495,0.000020280671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053266645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005997785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005875415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025869885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014614837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019655228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992765578","doi":"10.3166/ria.21.521-554","title":"Diagrammes d'influence possibilistes","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d intelligence artificielle","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"PID controller; Pessimism; Computer science; Semantics (computer science); Variable (mathematics); Binary decision diagram; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Programming language; Engineering","score_opus":0.15598960908337145,"score_gpt":0.41992491043742436,"score_spread":0.2639353013540529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992765578","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020226216,0.0009415878,0.95737904,0.0005432628,0.0001893834,0.00011256017,0.00036585843,0.00050534756,0.019736767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4903448,0.002282803,0.4888547,0.00029218744,0.00031080775,0.0007130123,0.0007589821,0.00036025597,0.016082538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929675,0.0032270397,0.00022272242,0.000908649,0.0022966356,0.0003774168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944049,0.004062516,0.00027068076,0.00030049708,0.00072340097,0.0002381316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004733605,0.0023081682,0.0015257914,0.0030433221,0.002140471,0.005881849,0.0015031792,0.0025918335,0.009139731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0142965745,0.0009987763,0.0031489925,0.002147976,0.0037640205,0.004516899,0.0020700318,0.0052569434,0.002026386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001888419,0.00006274834,0.00065481407,0.00018097971,0.00007853281,0.00043279887,0.00058297743,0.043175463,0.0022369996,0.91419864,0.0017252136,0.036482032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019739696,0.00010376784,0.00075656135,0.00012091298,0.00006775808,0.0005241027,0.00027123027,0.31330836,0.0045718327,0.6319171,0.04805822,0.00010273747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008891011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006007171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009139731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033477717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014455175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030575395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992899512","doi":"10.1142/s0219622006001939","title":"ELICITING RATIO PREFERENCES FOR THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS WITH VISUAL INTERFACES: A NEW MODE OF PREFERENCE MEASUREMENT","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Analytic hierarchy process; Preference; Computer science; Class (philosophy); Hierarchy; Mode (computer interface); Process (computing); Visualization; Artificial intelligence; Human–computer interaction; Machine learning; Statistics; Operations research; Mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.09765658181990433,"score_gpt":0.41821899852792305,"score_spread":0.3205624167080187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992899512","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028588943,0.000091585,0.9656438,0.00014032624,0.0000736753,0.000749281,0.00019605082,0.0006732577,0.0038430474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13873355,0.00012466361,0.85787743,0.00010932767,0.00004862169,0.002147102,0.0001543646,0.00010814138,0.00069673394],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97427726,0.017216953,0.001066659,0.0012550158,0.00588898,0.00029515158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.946786,0.04031026,0.00316576,0.00432083,0.0047453493,0.0006718383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015784709,0.0013139741,0.0008876032,0.002472422,0.0004580716,0.0031188207,0.0014928898,0.0012016859,0.005070897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08042757,0.00040271765,0.00067709124,0.0023155524,0.0012551299,0.004687679,0.002736808,0.0015195784,0.0011698278],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024736014,0.0011405743,0.006274233,0.0018282811,0.00024125542,0.000113837275,0.0067169797,0.00635324,0.10017382,0.07500484,0.0045188395,0.7951605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001980046,0.008542425,0.026484558,0.0009028695,0.0003982023,0.0010567115,0.0044839736,0.42499918,0.14885615,0.34449005,0.036337856,0.0014679839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000355503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044555872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015784709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000534129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079013925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08347851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993766766","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.018","title":"Worker deployment in dual resource constrained systems with a task-type factor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Forgetting; Software deployment; Dual (grammatical number); Task (project management); Computer science; Cognition; Resource (disambiguation); Cognitive resource theory; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.34763784107776896,"score_gpt":0.47826450210505894,"score_spread":0.13062666102728998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993766766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80074346,0.00023170364,0.19502006,0.00046258356,0.0000882772,0.00023437945,0.00013164985,0.00018334354,0.0029045842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903549,0.000033904384,0.008438407,0.000022176355,0.000016632306,0.000064555374,0.00003295792,0.000017969462,0.001018541],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969938,0.0011757454,0.00012842995,0.0005032803,0.0002487733,0.0009499069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880531,0.008193575,0.0008318855,0.0005020743,0.0007592744,0.0016601216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042369333,0.0012321157,0.0024925119,0.00089832314,0.0012869113,0.0025068878,0.0018899217,0.0023927516,0.003882141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010330268,0.0012560071,0.0008115291,0.0008939408,0.0011402984,0.002409761,0.0022466774,0.0014576231,0.00043071495],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027815143,0.00042904489,0.003824679,0.00018153248,0.00010948785,0.00050683285,0.00021564361,0.96747833,0.0037220013,0.0028861521,0.00067956466,0.017185263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006190106,0.00027933117,0.001436129,0.000008865247,0.000034783137,0.000044768956,0.00017678255,0.99505,0.0006032379,0.002125386,0.0001556746,0.00002315305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067041907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004707843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067041907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011581122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012296559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022407353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994621692","doi":"10.1016/s0024-3795(03)00476-2","title":"Max-algebra and pairwise comparison matrices","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linear Algebra and its Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Mathematics; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Transitive relation; Reciprocal; Ranking (information retrieval); Matrix (chemical analysis); Pairwise comparison; Linear algebra; Measure (data warehouse); Combinatorics; Generalized eigenvector; Symmetric matrix; Statistics; Computer science; Geometry","score_opus":0.11474213028846718,"score_gpt":0.4074115333315407,"score_spread":0.2926694030430735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994621692","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058156652,0.002089661,0.9840052,0.00054842426,0.00013855351,0.00004319079,0.00019219564,0.00012404042,0.007043186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35053387,0.0043868306,0.62901443,0.00066472735,0.0011208208,0.00073880615,0.0007630598,0.0002058338,0.012571647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898038,0.007012182,0.00040476077,0.001021898,0.0014992813,0.00025813023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784546,0.016575823,0.0015453224,0.0012554764,0.0017438187,0.00042498272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009579922,0.0013818634,0.0024188648,0.0025213643,0.0014907633,0.0031726542,0.00238284,0.0011887669,0.008920721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024713114,0.00076482166,0.0017444721,0.00599313,0.0033468062,0.0074979025,0.0024669876,0.0030674154,0.001533182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006061533,0.000078074874,0.00016760644,0.00020489657,0.00007149067,0.00004247125,0.00015195097,0.022502808,0.00038141463,0.9214889,0.0026974198,0.052152336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062169397,0.000027157972,0.00007274216,0.000018702374,0.000010397354,0.00003049908,0.000020406947,0.03270214,0.00016784578,0.96518564,0.0017428956,0.00001530357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013115817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011426862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009579922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001592493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018018468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050664127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995092728","doi":"10.1016/j.aml.2010.11.027","title":"Possibilistic moment generating functions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Mathematics Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Moment (physics); Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Calculus (dental); Classical mechanics","score_opus":0.09442892526223753,"score_gpt":0.3687028719135113,"score_spread":0.2742739466512738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995092728","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023471417,0.0006245688,0.9609919,0.00064167404,0.000076510776,0.00007761661,0.00038804978,0.00021612275,0.013512233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8216445,0.0015056988,0.15799375,0.0002742267,0.0004115335,0.0005895285,0.00060469186,0.00013756238,0.016838579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986149,0.0007001961,0.000049538317,0.00016797303,0.0003608507,0.00010655044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852196,0.012196859,0.0008692156,0.0006971433,0.00080901437,0.00020823425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036450012,0.0010688723,0.001237193,0.0025251543,0.0005260459,0.0021518008,0.0014824239,0.001444315,0.0152954785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018792927,0.0005926518,0.0013524076,0.0018571013,0.0013130516,0.0033538805,0.0010382487,0.0018953931,0.0013656094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042814714,0.000026816077,0.0002616788,0.00008828042,0.000044049026,0.000106649946,0.00008951599,0.057055466,0.00045359286,0.92358434,0.0015223271,0.016724402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011264562,0.000025218349,0.00030516897,0.00003814432,0.000021438816,0.00014560483,0.000020441636,0.29403916,0.00034072838,0.70332336,0.0016953453,0.000034050085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041352402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039561422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0152954785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092673226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060819567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05116844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995228626","doi":"10.1142/s0219622013500235","title":"BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING WITH COMBINED STATES UNDER IMPERFECT INFORMATION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Perfect information; Computer science; Altruism (biology); Mathematical economics; Prospect theory; Set (abstract data type); Decision theory; Management science; Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03096550631684129,"score_gpt":0.38515809046619964,"score_spread":0.35419258414935834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995228626","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35246724,0.00055325194,0.63855493,0.00083797006,0.0000519492,0.000121676785,0.00011426977,0.00006918364,0.0072295526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684973,0.00021739893,0.030015035,0.000045707482,0.00002617251,0.000091077985,0.000057083973,0.000007568635,0.0010426396],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949936,0.002853171,0.00023451878,0.00068246585,0.00075603236,0.00048028483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98933595,0.008122442,0.001054283,0.00038600384,0.0007142921,0.0003869913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007769412,0.00092440535,0.0015967176,0.0012343209,0.00075214024,0.003540913,0.0011005967,0.0014526988,0.0017004173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014956532,0.00054743624,0.0015276471,0.0012229333,0.002056062,0.003585525,0.0021721388,0.0014970567,0.0001221273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039790105,0.00015770493,0.005622513,0.0002219756,0.00034733175,0.00056087226,0.00057889975,0.78245825,0.0015805274,0.18685275,0.0003703367,0.020850914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025393503,0.00008623648,0.0012343279,0.000024261379,0.0000752145,0.000040158993,0.00011350208,0.9120228,0.00036928148,0.08571385,0.00026038752,0.000034542274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040416517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002257306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007769412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022696748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014095012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041089058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995911512","doi":"10.1007/s00500-007-0227-2","title":"Building ensemble classifiers using belief functions and OWA operators","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Artificial intelligence; Cascading classifiers; Dempster–Shafer theory; Classifier (UML); Random subspace method; Computer science; Machine learning; Operator (biology); Flexibility (engineering); Combing; Process (computing); Ensemble learning; Pattern recognition (psychology); Mathematics","score_opus":0.17283470466359524,"score_gpt":0.43552304892081956,"score_spread":0.2626883442572243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995911512","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012165286,0.00015212952,0.9868521,0.000052713778,0.00003130076,0.000027456415,0.000027713671,0.00018104687,0.00051020033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3733021,0.00030076865,0.624077,0.000115057876,0.00009273842,0.00025466902,0.00028259517,0.00010248588,0.0014725525],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987503,0.00036619758,0.000119052704,0.00022192966,0.0004127216,0.00012979853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960387,0.0024122668,0.00018692632,0.00026944227,0.00097112654,0.00012155514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042159064,0.0010089235,0.0024369182,0.0023729773,0.00079690345,0.0017217998,0.0014443569,0.0014698257,0.001598486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008393167,0.0009535576,0.0018535851,0.0014284858,0.00047224114,0.0030793282,0.0019892382,0.0018247954,0.0006100821],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016635879,0.00016274284,0.002318676,0.00012612714,0.00037308488,0.00008158911,0.0001416496,0.4742007,0.003936905,0.014892537,0.0021606844,0.501439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004754332,0.000016421845,0.000105947714,0.000008845448,0.000023944765,0.000008767503,0.000010015791,0.9910068,0.0006794811,0.007923014,0.00020611122,0.0000059376134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021678868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020787062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042159064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056362245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088496675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02229613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996483892","doi":"10.1108/13598540810860958","title":"An integrated approach for supplier selection and purchasing decisions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supply Chain Management An International Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Purchasing; Supplier evaluation; Selection (genetic algorithm); Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Supplier relationship management; Flexibility (engineering); Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Process management; Purchasing management; Operations research; Hierarchy; Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Business; Supply chain management; Supply chain; Marketing; Economics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.12267005243676266,"score_gpt":0.4025641343434532,"score_spread":0.2798940819066905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996483892","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004830141,0.000870952,0.9646627,0.0011669071,0.00008354631,0.00032152134,0.00012950214,0.00014155543,0.027793264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17185144,0.0018779427,0.8166956,0.00034915042,0.0000934485,0.0006526047,0.0002314395,0.000054578562,0.008193862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927965,0.003909707,0.00030461667,0.00057878677,0.002201422,0.000208967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783915,0.0012493969,0.00023173208,0.00014525757,0.0004574925,0.00007700193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004317784,0.0013442303,0.0011381843,0.0032888441,0.0010664561,0.004446397,0.0018937682,0.0015903481,0.009856746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062399637,0.000775623,0.0016057297,0.006094439,0.0012207795,0.0037402534,0.002776863,0.002216006,0.0014160912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006627291,0.00025724675,0.0025084817,0.0009409085,0.00034819864,0.00042947123,0.0016178917,0.26573905,0.0018051546,0.42157304,0.0058398307,0.2988744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054352,0.00030062077,0.0013565517,0.0006555665,0.00020136872,0.00036003935,0.0015124518,0.6456462,0.000964246,0.30062288,0.048237815,0.000087846645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053721857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009849922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009856746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035567721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005492451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032974064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996724954","doi":"10.1139/l10-125","title":"Optimum compromise among environmental dispute issues using attitude based negotiation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Compromise; Management science; Computer science; Conflict resolution; Negotiation theory; Dispute resolution; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Process management; Environmental economics; Business; Economics; Engineering; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11232384661077671,"score_gpt":0.308599199578136,"score_spread":0.19627535296735926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996724954","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021578439,0.00016002725,0.9696978,0.000177799,0.000039161616,0.00011298531,0.0000069907965,0.00005207066,0.008174808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5753525,0.0003236024,0.42055124,0.00008954885,0.00005558687,0.00044562574,0.000031886106,0.00004074711,0.003109264],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995693,0.0025043236,0.00016056224,0.00024680796,0.0011652574,0.00023008583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970913,0.0021104624,0.000286604,0.000095352196,0.0002660594,0.00015026664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042708414,0.00079336046,0.0009666079,0.0014311867,0.0011337645,0.002407346,0.0013510643,0.0017917508,0.003504326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009403843,0.00042846694,0.00086069846,0.0012144609,0.0012685541,0.0028913706,0.002595964,0.0011959751,0.00043887776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020805994,0.0002137931,0.0009231534,0.00028057024,0.00012137313,0.00043267864,0.0015412355,0.60853285,0.0068813474,0.21671408,0.0014471713,0.16270377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004806926,0.0001915108,0.00017406269,0.000039516566,0.00003111622,0.00012625563,0.00024993872,0.93297553,0.0012248628,0.06250845,0.0023990138,0.000031635118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057507795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008282946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042708414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008521991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009767105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022586584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997028947","doi":"10.1016/j.jmva.2010.06.011","title":"Concordance measures for multivariate non-continuous random vectors","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multivariate Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Multivariate statistics; Concordance; Statistics; Multivariate random variable; Econometrics; Applied mathematics; Random variable; Medicine","score_opus":0.07226283315383185,"score_gpt":0.40979021674881344,"score_spread":0.3375273835949816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997028947","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09216316,0.0014007536,0.8989485,0.0004967953,0.0000917968,0.00020345626,0.0004505561,0.00020854663,0.006036422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7511036,0.0011011652,0.24183063,0.00024005894,0.00040881187,0.00071438606,0.0013829387,0.00016717918,0.0030511837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9655136,0.017921574,0.0025909976,0.0030809878,0.009790234,0.001102642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63320947,0.31851816,0.016347634,0.0151123,0.014206191,0.0026062296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033715013,0.0009243059,0.0028635592,0.008675793,0.0014120787,0.0060580387,0.0030408462,0.0022425638,0.0033923588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20045264,0.0009770873,0.001915621,0.005757268,0.0043406235,0.0062910886,0.0035063832,0.0028479467,0.0003952585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041781768,0.00015197363,0.014033692,0.00082580827,0.0006179517,0.00038206603,0.00090004405,0.08754337,0.0017097499,0.7744509,0.0025931022,0.116373576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043034437,0.00017292029,0.008694925,0.00028810362,0.0001109303,0.00034566649,0.00020224413,0.44131532,0.0012817001,0.54576176,0.0016628513,0.00012048147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001691354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001504523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033715013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002779356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001782955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17830414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997488976","doi":"10.1117/12.487366","title":"Combining belief functions and fuzzy membership functions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Membership function; Computer science; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy logic; Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Fuzzy classification; Fuzzy number; Defuzzification; Artificial intelligence; Belief structure; Discernment; Algorithm; Data mining; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05463836777368518,"score_gpt":0.30735780865805606,"score_spread":0.25271944088437087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997488976","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043080226,0.00045425477,0.9928677,0.00022091136,0.00002760777,0.000023243994,0.000021605558,0.000087196204,0.0019895046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40750766,0.0013805026,0.58721834,0.0002908565,0.00025873035,0.00019276247,0.00015086225,0.00007891146,0.002921443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936907,0.0026156064,0.00036991047,0.000774758,0.0021505174,0.00039849206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905868,0.0064494275,0.0005866083,0.0008790874,0.001308437,0.00018966707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011143084,0.0015162944,0.0015711854,0.004149273,0.00084933103,0.004706813,0.0023432851,0.0022834647,0.00177546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020477137,0.0009339939,0.0016892127,0.00266459,0.0030158411,0.008837158,0.0028915752,0.0025398254,0.00059574284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016466896,0.00007575657,0.00092068734,0.00025857426,0.00022812224,0.0003037033,0.0007063502,0.27471948,0.0028444529,0.54739505,0.001065403,0.17131774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022002036,0.000069996044,0.0003473252,0.00006960204,0.000067728906,0.000098935576,0.00014844272,0.50859636,0.0020950935,0.4847394,0.0036743467,0.00007084011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025345543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019176259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011143084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022245466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009709764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058930993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997837824","doi":"10.1016/j.fiae.2015.01.004","title":"Hybrid Multi-attribute Decision Making Method of Electric Coal Procurement in Industry","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fuzzy Information and Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Procurement; Computer science; Coal; Operations research; Data mining; Business; Industrial engineering; Mathematics; Engineering; Marketing; Waste management","score_opus":0.05808942066513499,"score_gpt":0.3652076226331706,"score_spread":0.3071182019680356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997837824","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010524285,0.0004327876,0.98628545,0.0001924673,0.0000442714,0.00010452865,0.000037474387,0.00007178971,0.0023068988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49526417,0.0007121481,0.50066596,0.00011336521,0.00007172063,0.000459035,0.00013034575,0.000027094753,0.0025562053],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996077,0.0020194722,0.00023262344,0.00045281227,0.0010364975,0.0001815944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987601,0.0006984541,0.000085687934,0.000050369108,0.0003204984,0.00008484695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040092287,0.0009372275,0.001282375,0.001365952,0.0010896003,0.0019312083,0.0014315507,0.00083967077,0.0027456237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030732825,0.00045531176,0.0016004819,0.0018413108,0.00068095047,0.0015777638,0.0012718012,0.0011986694,0.00027117945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024455643,0.0002476134,0.002645311,0.0006997515,0.00048409804,0.00041381677,0.0008215394,0.68981576,0.00477268,0.05880698,0.0022860444,0.23876184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002357215,0.00011398862,0.00035659445,0.0000349761,0.000054309072,0.000067147164,0.00013705887,0.97486454,0.0011446942,0.021513445,0.0016621705,0.000027413942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022753845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019368245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040092287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001309029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016443885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0212031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998164572","doi":"10.1142/s0217595908001754","title":"EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF DERIVING PRIORITY VECTORS FROM RECIPROCAL PAIRWISE COMPARISON MATRICES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asia Pacific Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Reciprocal; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.3130313125483327,"score_gpt":0.5174707121392591,"score_spread":0.20443939959092639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998164572","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022493465,0.00033656802,0.9753327,0.00004775783,0.000014188709,0.00014740865,0.000049904214,0.00013462656,0.0014434853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31769255,0.00044613107,0.6804755,0.000037954862,0.00005120958,0.0004268481,0.0003043293,0.000077230856,0.00048824673],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751898,0.017041495,0.0007965595,0.0012941262,0.00530842,0.00036964443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.884441,0.10094115,0.00409469,0.002595767,0.007486481,0.00044082478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02067163,0.0015205098,0.0014622589,0.007125405,0.00053152867,0.0015024587,0.0014978581,0.0008494371,0.0033232966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.110808454,0.0005306911,0.0012982115,0.0026800793,0.0012053095,0.003122354,0.0014250306,0.0011270521,0.0005816532],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079777633,0.0003075162,0.006500667,0.0012508649,0.0005009875,0.00008645714,0.00041482373,0.33037427,0.0061635184,0.04968344,0.0011286945,0.60279113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088258545,0.0006506583,0.002773694,0.00008490065,0.00014620202,0.00017114278,0.00015910192,0.96683246,0.007922744,0.02011487,0.0009935144,0.00006241803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015926636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010972688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02067163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013850076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017400915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10932338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998366350","doi":"10.1007/s00477-006-0042-9","title":"Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":211,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Pairwise comparison; Vagueness; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Analytic network process; Selection (genetic algorithm); Structuring; Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.07732360547300776,"score_gpt":0.45869907033359353,"score_spread":0.38137546486058577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998366350","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009240699,0.00015666346,0.98852044,0.00009341617,0.000025093874,0.00013374614,0.00004124331,0.00011942939,0.0016692268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31179366,0.00023340789,0.6868544,0.00005581211,0.00003398963,0.00032643907,0.00008732235,0.000034125882,0.0005808688],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99516124,0.002018781,0.00030479845,0.00023222412,0.002011672,0.0002713748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741,0.0015823746,0.00017243855,0.00009952453,0.00064192485,0.00009370942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005380504,0.001103395,0.0021243526,0.0025736915,0.0013840023,0.002265697,0.0014970852,0.0012886494,0.0017002521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009153429,0.0006744662,0.0020417308,0.0023258086,0.00081649254,0.0019763035,0.0019366402,0.0013382911,0.00021221634],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002176612,0.00020672861,0.0006536761,0.0005673344,0.00028750903,0.0002438115,0.00070851867,0.76610726,0.0052965875,0.037815318,0.001407591,0.18648803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037258134,0.00006951468,0.00015662509,0.000042658772,0.000057795638,0.00003991215,0.0000750633,0.96651053,0.0019085627,0.030355781,0.00071915943,0.000027095737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073323483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005317022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073323483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018250308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002785185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028455138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998567267","doi":"10.1155/2013/873534","title":"Evaluation of Cost-Effectiveness Criteria in Supply Chain Management: Case Study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Decision Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; TOPSIS; Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Ideal solution; Fuzzy logic; Supply chain; Operations research; Analytic hierarchy process; Supply chain management; Key (lock); Rank (graph theory); Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.2838102840121579,"score_gpt":0.5561547781598669,"score_spread":0.272344494147709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998567267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9509416,0.00096903375,0.033726886,0.0004759189,0.00004077338,0.00068469805,0.0001964962,0.000050391536,0.012914063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97199076,0.00047679304,0.025983976,0.00002510938,0.000014577112,0.00018617058,0.00007548927,0.000008650172,0.0012383865],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955947,0.002629237,0.00019205197,0.00015642823,0.0010315774,0.00039604638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926933,0.0052965274,0.00042171092,0.0002523389,0.00095296314,0.00038310894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004932613,0.0010217733,0.00070707174,0.0032617967,0.0019966539,0.002482122,0.001188708,0.0026578407,0.002614511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0079754405,0.00033898946,0.0009059125,0.0044742106,0.0010912016,0.0017795363,0.0014874672,0.0010218595,0.00022202522],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023688914,0.006893151,0.06218737,0.00306874,0.00046224546,0.016963175,0.0055261604,0.595434,0.017506227,0.054298624,0.004312094,0.23097943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004388607,0.005319995,0.024967294,0.0006405958,0.00043023855,0.0027780978,0.0144036915,0.89007473,0.031650294,0.014930051,0.014144261,0.0002219133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005699424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070556863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005699424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035598695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016885985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02608645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998582508","doi":"10.1061/41109(373)85","title":"Assessment of Responsibilities of Project Teams for Owner Managing Contractor Tasks-A Fuzzy Consensus Approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Natural Resources; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Preference; Integrated project delivery; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Project stakeholder; Project team; Project management; Engineering management; Project management triangle; Operations research; Knowledge management; Project charter; Process management; Business; Engineering; Systems engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15813250498798012,"score_gpt":0.47024707111826514,"score_spread":0.312114566130285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998582508","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049538366,0.0001465915,0.94524115,0.00026817239,0.000025342088,0.00013577321,0.0000246153,0.00006856258,0.0045515103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68922734,0.00018493942,0.30828753,0.00005189518,0.00003079882,0.00022260538,0.00006540176,0.000030431205,0.0018990542],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99359095,0.0025293024,0.00041526425,0.00067897467,0.0023931772,0.0003923487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914016,0.0040785847,0.000729004,0.00028791794,0.0029567336,0.0005461738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0107360035,0.0009321008,0.0010808515,0.0049370155,0.0019908738,0.002162143,0.0015687206,0.0012581839,0.0017245363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016000308,0.0006348493,0.0012790705,0.0015351416,0.0012967662,0.0027719846,0.0017089002,0.000939259,0.00024333656],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004284776,0.00028283714,0.007085006,0.0004918482,0.0003872948,0.0005576173,0.0035750095,0.6413606,0.011119376,0.09393604,0.00195826,0.23881765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042416297,0.00013264635,0.00153504,0.000074989155,0.00008592148,0.00012685069,0.0012377986,0.94584614,0.0034600594,0.04562034,0.0017614926,0.0000763596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004792194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036327958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0107360035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026243464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003001943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056778073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998589625","doi":"10.2298/yjor0802205h","title":"A group decision-making aggregation process","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Yugoslav journal of operations research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Aggregate (composite); Computer science; Group decision-making; Process (computing); Granularity; Artificial intelligence; Representation (politics); Homogeneous; Interval (graph theory); Frame (networking); Decision problem; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Linguistics; Management science; Fuzzy logic; Algorithm; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.39996342744973434,"score_gpt":0.5749928622698741,"score_spread":0.17502943482013977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998589625","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02061299,0.0003336175,0.9653428,0.0008932299,0.00008719664,0.00065171847,0.00013522421,0.00020121616,0.011741991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42356974,0.00070461055,0.5649427,0.00024078244,0.0001856999,0.00097693,0.0003605927,0.000051329967,0.008967568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99304575,0.0034621763,0.00039799346,0.0010859093,0.0016030872,0.00040501056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963257,0.0021941813,0.00027281605,0.0003593789,0.00064773235,0.00020018288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007960312,0.0012098333,0.0015850073,0.0020060255,0.0022212595,0.0039576944,0.0016511156,0.0018992417,0.008348744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008754904,0.00041275896,0.0016843852,0.0034482842,0.0015287459,0.003156592,0.0035174,0.0016871579,0.0013040676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003283128,0.00033700909,0.0029478772,0.0006345419,0.00044111704,0.0011113789,0.004559646,0.3281267,0.0044990014,0.45069227,0.0056143845,0.20070778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000659395,0.00027694085,0.00057708746,0.00012050538,0.00015666196,0.00020027015,0.00062764034,0.6666578,0.0020594269,0.31416726,0.015028134,0.00006233567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023736153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015270334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008348744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001410744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002651619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04209864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999584965","doi":"10.1007/s11192-014-1258-y","title":"On the quality evaluation of scientific entities in Poland supported by consistency-driven pairwise comparisons method","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Dalhousie University; Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanislawa Staszica; Politechnika Wrocławska; Fayetteville State University; Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Ranking (information retrieval); Consistency (knowledge bases); Focus (optics); Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Parametric statistics; Quality (philosophy); Event (particle physics); Information retrieval; Operations research; Management science; Data mining; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.49126161277195085,"score_gpt":0.5458934524210635,"score_spread":0.05463183964911261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999584965","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26716575,0.001297175,0.7205546,0.00053646654,0.000058626883,0.00074951426,0.0003493589,0.00012854168,0.009159996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68798023,0.00042214364,0.31031498,0.000043453758,0.000031550724,0.00039667526,0.00027311454,0.000026929949,0.00051097653],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.95991075,0.025526207,0.002017331,0.0020868536,0.009837492,0.0006215136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9398295,0.042238187,0.0048417826,0.0022955604,0.010175833,0.00061920314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03399259,0.0008493925,0.0011455166,0.009602674,0.0012115943,0.0032744438,0.0014525778,0.0009305262,0.0016094369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08249019,0.00031215537,0.001135555,0.009682064,0.0014508809,0.0027768973,0.0025932784,0.00091565744,0.00019693455],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015962542,0.0005042755,0.04208766,0.0029499165,0.0010885902,0.0004893781,0.0048168055,0.10330575,0.008729585,0.088754356,0.0031016034,0.7425758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025988722,0.0015387723,0.056017105,0.00070759055,0.0008129501,0.0006165158,0.004258954,0.8009073,0.015987385,0.109720156,0.0088446755,0.00032870434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024043955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025955627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99039733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022912202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029695004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17977214},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1999696793","doi":"10.1504/ijetm.2006.008251","title":"Integrating multicriteria analysis and geographic information systems: the ordered weighted averaging (OWA) approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Generality; Geographic information system; Watershed; Computer science; Order (exchange); Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Mathematics; Machine learning; Geography; Remote sensing","score_opus":0.01811798581924258,"score_gpt":0.3016312710785656,"score_spread":0.283513285259323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999696793","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00441034,0.0008237274,0.9917713,0.0002456624,0.000034512494,0.00006703814,0.000040555275,0.00012814853,0.0024787681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14640994,0.0012652427,0.8506446,0.000106369,0.00010137872,0.00013600118,0.00011104445,0.00005585785,0.0011695708],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917142,0.0045814295,0.0004103267,0.0005290009,0.0024913682,0.00027366227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580294,0.0023536487,0.00037143828,0.00037332633,0.0009961432,0.00010253006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054713576,0.0011457807,0.0014615601,0.004637411,0.00080452894,0.0037068427,0.001011076,0.0007930555,0.001155533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011966769,0.00056236435,0.0011809529,0.0073350384,0.0012039326,0.0034147534,0.0027137734,0.0012132914,0.00025413168],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000734699,0.00012952505,0.0047459807,0.000514339,0.00090953876,0.00025805688,0.00069786387,0.18563087,0.0038381654,0.122289725,0.0023405827,0.67857194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021871221,0.00017078096,0.0029428478,0.00016599607,0.0003181514,0.00021707799,0.00040311107,0.74382484,0.0028730528,0.23218732,0.016757693,0.000117348376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011720372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020089189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011720372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015278442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030751547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02893567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000556665","doi":"10.1109/ifsa-nafips.2013.6608567","title":"Quantitative and qualitative risk in EPCM projects using fuzzy set theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Risk management; Representation (politics); Defuzzification; Risk analysis (engineering); Data mining; Fuzzy number; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.45915058715897084,"score_gpt":0.544240917563822,"score_spread":0.08509033040485114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000556665","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037764564,0.0003891384,0.9542262,0.00023456292,0.00003093295,0.00020313708,0.000056302986,0.000060073842,0.0070350957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68522966,0.00069019635,0.31157836,0.00004399628,0.000038039165,0.00039609225,0.00008296965,0.000020686151,0.001920006],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938636,0.0033661188,0.0003522997,0.00033751753,0.001867325,0.00021308291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545825,0.0032340174,0.00042916564,0.0001583125,0.0006366094,0.00008360291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006787286,0.001063941,0.00080972316,0.0045096558,0.0010078816,0.0037035,0.0012051901,0.0010085832,0.0017738062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008949278,0.00041426084,0.0020172803,0.0028002877,0.001684856,0.002758669,0.0017335254,0.0013523631,0.00015346783],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021018318,0.00020063107,0.005606689,0.0004764247,0.00014289777,0.0004730626,0.0022983663,0.6670127,0.006864832,0.18881215,0.0009304053,0.12697166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000221949,0.00015304961,0.0022392091,0.00020570421,0.00006087446,0.00015625634,0.0010351154,0.9126583,0.0028597426,0.07827524,0.0022532973,0.000081127204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054359953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037327858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006787286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031603256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019515696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03589505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001021886","doi":"10.1016/j.ins.2012.05.011","title":"Multiple stages grey target decision making method with incomplete weight based on multi-granularity linguistic label","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Granularity; Computer science; Group decision-making; Harmony (color); Artificial intelligence; Set (abstract data type); Data mining; Mathematics","score_opus":0.17949086061932573,"score_gpt":0.44996152980473914,"score_spread":0.2704706691854134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001021886","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012218671,0.00007918454,0.9863007,0.00008142635,0.000026271902,0.000076136654,0.000029796947,0.000097041135,0.0010907627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4409945,0.00016579316,0.55489504,0.00007599103,0.0000509863,0.0005703645,0.0001672829,0.00007832351,0.0030017484],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954549,0.0017909106,0.000375645,0.00079982687,0.001271081,0.00030761072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959239,0.002486587,0.0002449653,0.00020159004,0.00097616494,0.0001668571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053557665,0.0014045321,0.0024642607,0.002819293,0.0017879434,0.0028635443,0.0023560757,0.0021006134,0.0035591996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075720507,0.0009779442,0.0022115777,0.0027923444,0.0013717271,0.004313287,0.0027168102,0.0017627749,0.0003249203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00097452494,0.00028963617,0.0020311736,0.0009689932,0.00041852743,0.00040247623,0.001346306,0.65045494,0.012302745,0.10186274,0.0022418874,0.22670604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035306726,0.00007850311,0.00019400303,0.000028743149,0.000085340056,0.00002336835,0.000053712334,0.97669286,0.0018998018,0.020391071,0.00048635012,0.000030896597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038259046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003284734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053557665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020235837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028591023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028324306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001032047","doi":"10.1007/s003550200174","title":"Decomposition properties of dual choice functionals","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Dual (grammatical number); Decomposition; Property (philosophy); Gini coefficient; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Lebesgue measure; Inequality; Economics; Pure mathematics; Lebesgue integration; Mathematical analysis; Economic inequality; Computer science","score_opus":0.1697533057765701,"score_gpt":0.4131884010774077,"score_spread":0.24343509530083757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001032047","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08004914,0.0007341863,0.89406055,0.0010805702,0.00006814469,0.00006530128,0.00022748152,0.00006575046,0.023648906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8229817,0.0015131204,0.15632905,0.00033425423,0.00017977816,0.0005095232,0.00062111096,0.00023297925,0.017298639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830014,0.0009470522,0.00006501137,0.00018118435,0.0003015059,0.00020514496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939418,0.004065212,0.000391784,0.00045389804,0.00074377394,0.00040353555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052105715,0.0011575756,0.0011492972,0.0023596855,0.0006958913,0.003212121,0.0007724447,0.00093938294,0.0066280873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013619708,0.0007866214,0.0015033861,0.0013672301,0.0022305802,0.0045459415,0.0024318716,0.0026180095,0.00054427056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005005792,0.000030265768,0.00031147618,0.000048708946,0.00002253223,0.000024071136,0.00013937664,0.0055482253,0.00073942903,0.9858547,0.0007836842,0.006447474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011415821,0.000013158239,0.00015274505,0.000022951921,0.000010048147,0.000026330825,0.000044094446,0.053911414,0.00022707478,0.9447237,0.0008506316,0.0000063649177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008487425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055839133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066280873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016667902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001072946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027556479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001706241","doi":"10.1109/icsssm.2011.5959466","title":"A case-based distance approach to multiple criteria ranking","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Judgement; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Preference; Decision maker; Preference elicitation; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Machine learning; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.44873064836478144,"score_gpt":0.42665204722790356,"score_spread":0.022078601136877873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001706241","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004871322,0.0001405302,0.9944798,0.00013981303,0.0000580739,0.00013499561,0.000024182822,0.00005600706,0.00447942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026302243,0.00028741374,0.9698103,0.00007963309,0.000060734557,0.00041528273,0.00007260875,0.0000488352,0.002922966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887096,0.005879082,0.0006312163,0.0006871829,0.0038030893,0.0002898818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941947,0.002874392,0.00036844023,0.0006342821,0.0016903143,0.00023788473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006059911,0.0016232367,0.0019625179,0.006195673,0.0019514182,0.0031771315,0.003822909,0.0022054822,0.011121777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015589149,0.0005514446,0.0018684133,0.005927789,0.0020084488,0.0036255112,0.0040255417,0.003165657,0.002368357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003181964,0.00010351869,0.00036736488,0.00034457757,0.00011091306,0.0003344659,0.00035339917,0.12853271,0.0015232894,0.6490675,0.005687255,0.2135432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036869278,0.0001903701,0.00025633484,0.00013046485,0.00004104632,0.00076333777,0.00020750819,0.45265606,0.0014958754,0.49661613,0.047489546,0.00011651799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021528546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002210852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011121777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024453076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027993652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037206054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003788892","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2007.05.003","title":"Ecological viability assessment: A fuzzy multiple-attribute analysis with respect to three classes of ordering techniques","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Informatics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Ecology; Computer science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Biology","score_opus":0.14100990142041844,"score_gpt":0.43434756388934304,"score_spread":0.29333766246892456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003788892","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07315083,0.00049607304,0.91952384,0.00028756703,0.000045100493,0.00024469188,0.00019378556,0.00009943692,0.0059587127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47005263,0.00054064405,0.5274072,0.000061276995,0.00008605798,0.0004132465,0.00021082287,0.000057136487,0.0011709019],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936766,0.0023371046,0.0004958252,0.0003789155,0.0028299743,0.00028153075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99154246,0.005011248,0.0008824424,0.0006485745,0.001530692,0.0003844759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008404767,0.0011132265,0.001297746,0.0061366903,0.0011075077,0.0038078858,0.0012966834,0.0008704329,0.0015383331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016307471,0.00031821913,0.001910456,0.005900084,0.0018316227,0.003585195,0.0015809964,0.0015508669,0.00023879725],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005047464,0.00071314775,0.018217934,0.0009983447,0.00048397828,0.00022065818,0.0015999005,0.13831127,0.017400721,0.3084728,0.0020828375,0.51099366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008310487,0.0009354046,0.01221774,0.00022845808,0.00037261928,0.000417606,0.0010032696,0.68423086,0.008563422,0.2862431,0.0055274633,0.00017697667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017999378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015842151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008404767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014084345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019063461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04444915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004529322","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v1n2p39","title":"UrusSisa: An Intelligent System for Integrated Solid Waste Management","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Ranking (information retrieval); Incineration; Municipal solid waste; Structuring; Solid waste management; Process (computing); Computer science; Waste management; Environmental science; Business; Operations research; Engineering","score_opus":0.08607993894304547,"score_gpt":0.3904468486243401,"score_spread":0.30436690968129465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004529322","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025026524,0.0010344542,0.7942151,0.00027522116,0.00022078594,0.001028728,0.0020387063,0.16284022,0.013320228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33442456,0.0010742521,0.6340419,0.00057548954,0.0001148259,0.0018862613,0.0053855223,0.0016538912,0.020843348],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991842,0.00014112836,0.000088532586,0.00017354102,0.000343395,0.00006921224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995234,0.00013165275,0.00006262012,0.00008586971,0.00014345608,0.00005299444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009768626,0.0011062546,0.001255109,0.0012927516,0.0005258905,0.0014462653,0.0017036556,0.0009801455,0.01240051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016877138,0.00043699643,0.0006282655,0.0009249948,0.0003905607,0.0015733457,0.0014744365,0.00085048383,0.0049272054],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023548107,0.0008281557,0.0042614383,0.0014501337,0.00037044057,0.0007895764,0.0007648193,0.04384459,0.089381844,0.011249709,0.049823057,0.79488146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052056153,0.0011071854,0.0055266116,0.00027188356,0.0004794396,0.0010113508,0.00018614196,0.71176875,0.09393848,0.010355526,0.17455988,0.00027421542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015497243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013247983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01240051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059456663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095138606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04148382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004774753","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.11.001","title":"Prioritizing groundwater remediation policies: A fuzzy compatibility analysis decision aid","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"First Nations University of Canada; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibility (geochemistry); Environmental remediation; Prioritization; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Fuzzy logic; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Environmental science; Groundwater remediation; Operations research; Engineering; Management science; Contamination; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.045238416675836134,"score_gpt":0.34469910660215086,"score_spread":0.29946068992631475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004774753","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12774941,0.00016285307,0.85970736,0.0011230927,0.00007191478,0.00031194623,0.00020586027,0.0004238333,0.0102437325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5637515,0.0001176578,0.43429178,0.00013432573,0.000053938707,0.0001922911,0.00011859778,0.000032191903,0.0013076207],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767834,0.0009731196,0.00016864527,0.00019944402,0.00084341184,0.00013698453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955153,0.0031811807,0.00029125597,0.00009897084,0.0006995074,0.00021382903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052842507,0.000975825,0.0015576443,0.0038782435,0.0011101903,0.0028721003,0.0011714598,0.0014065271,0.004196324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010036087,0.00064633606,0.001026746,0.0019379937,0.000656594,0.002422742,0.0017697909,0.0010689613,0.00035214308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019514896,0.00080575753,0.009064685,0.00039587182,0.00041250655,0.0004738828,0.00057733693,0.4527784,0.01438281,0.06653669,0.005975719,0.44664487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011683983,0.00022178754,0.00066757994,0.000026322818,0.00011442499,0.00008438159,0.000083945524,0.9788784,0.002476335,0.015806817,0.0014892583,0.00003391997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002525779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039018516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052842507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013247309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026810379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027946115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004796239","doi":"10.1117/12.850287","title":"Fusion of ESM reports through Dempster-Shafer and Dezert-Smarandache theories","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Dempster–Shafer theory; Computer science; Certainty; Reliability (semiconductor); Sensor fusion; Discernment; Artificial intelligence; Stability (learning theory); Data mining; Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03443946214259947,"score_gpt":0.3163495933652446,"score_spread":0.28191013122264513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004796239","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029480949,0.0007077064,0.96530837,0.0005794647,0.00007381319,0.00014056059,0.00013610262,0.00015582812,0.0034172498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62990594,0.0008727684,0.3664049,0.00019375616,0.00013337446,0.00027997082,0.0002690387,0.00004691171,0.0018934443],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842046,0.005983537,0.0014477847,0.0016685878,0.006140227,0.0005551475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95179725,0.03257179,0.0054847384,0.005229949,0.0043816185,0.00053468964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028058229,0.0019325598,0.0026563066,0.0079951165,0.0013557612,0.0055193705,0.0034319272,0.0027672946,0.0025971753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0846989,0.00090150815,0.0022499315,0.004659684,0.0034944373,0.009308539,0.004649634,0.0026756641,0.0006141145],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059850985,0.0001245106,0.0038389328,0.0004973594,0.00045157777,0.0004944169,0.0010910843,0.4334645,0.0019009714,0.39261365,0.0013560079,0.16356854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003965942,0.00019134935,0.0010468984,0.0001345025,0.00009925739,0.00018884089,0.00022027768,0.66284096,0.004135863,0.32936484,0.0016366191,0.00010100129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017045116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013501716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028058229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029187473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020460512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14838791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005675282","doi":"10.1504/ijgenvi.2009.026943","title":"A hybrid approach based on AHP and belief theory for evaluating sustainable transportation solutions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Global Environmental Issues","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Measure (data warehouse); Sustainability; Computer science; Sustainable transport; Sustainable development; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Data mining; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.08175655292375629,"score_gpt":0.4270558997635028,"score_spread":0.3452993468397465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005675282","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005439935,0.00022155735,0.99216324,0.00020395913,0.000033382657,0.00020978648,0.000051511826,0.00011745676,0.0015591583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17913337,0.0002568263,0.8192357,0.0000812933,0.000040506704,0.00055682065,0.00009728115,0.000028068933,0.0005701667],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896248,0.0053907475,0.00055856607,0.00047676507,0.0036204522,0.00032862296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934976,0.004415228,0.0003254249,0.00024016204,0.0013535095,0.00016805217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009844397,0.0014718146,0.001796362,0.0066010063,0.0013607051,0.0029142962,0.0022709009,0.0011964496,0.0019810956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012278462,0.00068634085,0.001954665,0.004143616,0.0011987169,0.0025361846,0.0023315107,0.0016927135,0.00024038534],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025601833,0.00040439647,0.0024381555,0.0011947104,0.000996694,0.00030201138,0.0011485419,0.54216075,0.0048809284,0.10748347,0.0021142715,0.33662006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007155065,0.0001916238,0.00042849564,0.00014027799,0.00015234064,0.000070306996,0.00033889312,0.93012947,0.0016529199,0.06461408,0.0021295766,0.00008035217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006948134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008255877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009844397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002747545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031992337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05206275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006028659","doi":"10.1007/s10845-007-0041-9","title":"Supply chain management: a modular Fuzzy Inference System approach in supplier selection for new product development","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Purchasing; Supply chain management; Supplier relationship management; Selection (genetic algorithm); Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Modular design; Product (mathematics); Fuzzy logic; Supply chain risk management; New product development; Risk analysis (engineering); Fuzzy set; Production (economics); Operations research; Business; Service management; Engineering; Operations management; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.10229501066072949,"score_gpt":0.3690147285769138,"score_spread":0.2667197179161843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006028659","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039443888,0.0001873246,0.95824444,0.00013427876,0.000031577667,0.000087132714,0.000055305965,0.00025704643,0.0015590729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6864036,0.0001663242,0.31181455,0.000056788176,0.000046546407,0.00012281358,0.00009173957,0.000029037164,0.0012686487],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993492,0.00023736426,0.000056659075,0.00011523033,0.00018714632,0.000054344182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991442,0.00051437115,0.00009372502,0.00004391241,0.00017811445,0.000025677029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022388499,0.00050589564,0.00071403786,0.0009395284,0.00064506003,0.0012751975,0.0012778522,0.0009558872,0.0027828233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034871073,0.00039772215,0.0008154487,0.0009007663,0.0003519452,0.0016104524,0.0007071209,0.00065418205,0.0002880627],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035376695,0.00024101998,0.0021066512,0.00016783022,0.0002114743,0.00016948287,0.00023226219,0.7247149,0.0067849807,0.014098929,0.0011286811,0.2497901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018861487,0.000034628647,0.00023748627,0.0000074835584,0.000037165293,0.00001022852,0.000013349553,0.9952915,0.00081140816,0.0033522486,0.00017873144,0.0000069254784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006768549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006691745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006768549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000980501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011700697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013458312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006630049","doi":"10.1016/j.patcog.2007.11.003","title":"Interval-valued versus intuitionistic fuzzy sets: Isomorphism versus semantics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pattern Recognition","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Isomorphism (crystallography); Mathematics; Data envelopment analysis; Interval (graph theory); Basis (linear algebra); Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Construct (python library); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Statistics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.32102553031339476,"score_gpt":0.4471084197928867,"score_spread":0.12608288947949192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006630049","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09824923,0.0069241966,0.84539425,0.005876506,0.00045461964,0.00008982145,0.0002600592,0.0001252966,0.042626094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8554271,0.0028661727,0.1383307,0.00047212516,0.00047184227,0.00014974845,0.00018989755,0.000029980807,0.00206246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739647,0.0013371984,0.00022468185,0.00037025107,0.00054626155,0.00012513934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99140793,0.0062823715,0.00067512906,0.0006551752,0.0006501553,0.00032927035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048317686,0.0004681176,0.0010934002,0.0017406498,0.0007170328,0.0048727253,0.0011193586,0.0012506233,0.0035472193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013479538,0.00026601792,0.0010597439,0.002361728,0.0060915397,0.00894477,0.0016152997,0.0018557169,0.00029352028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004793152,0.000036637062,0.00051544735,0.00014074656,0.00003292608,0.00006756244,0.0007012737,0.0015828161,0.00034795533,0.9670254,0.00040384082,0.029097365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001503702,0.00003241792,0.00036315073,0.00007724522,0.00002855899,0.00010389714,0.0003498445,0.007379407,0.00020752108,0.9893667,0.0020605866,0.000015556943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005952127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004132452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048727253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010981545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010764535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025553167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007530081","doi":"10.1139/l10-048","title":"Hybrid fuzzy MADM project-selection model for diversified construction companies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Selection (genetic algorithm); Project portfolio management; Operations research; Portfolio; Decision model; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Project management; Diversification (marketing strategy); Decision-making models; Engineering; Business; Systems engineering; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.085513856419204,"score_gpt":0.3188441407637208,"score_spread":0.2333302843445168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007530081","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2733632,0.00043072953,0.7155257,0.0005052583,0.000060202976,0.00029492064,0.00031629382,0.00022895724,0.009274724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94352084,0.00018459675,0.05070798,0.00004484196,0.000018975334,0.0003230759,0.00015085643,0.00001594589,0.005032895],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872655,0.0006249384,0.000057568923,0.00018172458,0.00023427795,0.00017485268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985985,0.0008924544,0.00015921346,0.000035461893,0.00023415209,0.00008020153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002992829,0.0008537173,0.0011953481,0.0014112009,0.0008402426,0.0020381224,0.0017454878,0.001333062,0.0033792483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028710137,0.00067068567,0.0012926427,0.0011503258,0.0006856318,0.00094613817,0.00088675745,0.0010264668,0.00032172474],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075794305,0.000042733045,0.0009179515,0.00002827263,0.00004485844,0.00009955792,0.00008354932,0.9873552,0.0004038806,0.0049679796,0.00013664392,0.0058436063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071178674,0.000022193257,0.00015891671,0.0000026464038,0.000006543369,0.00000892178,0.000013777334,0.99841166,0.000056178695,0.001203892,0.000103053186,0.000005049452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017010847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0135912895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017010847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031708134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014304202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03382367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008037386","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2009.06.026","title":"Robustness and information levels in case-based multiple criteria sorting","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Decision maker; Sorting; Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Weighting; Dimension (graph theory); Preference; Decision problem; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Mathematics; Statistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.4283008890905909,"score_gpt":0.514680344923909,"score_spread":0.08637945583331813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008037386","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28629807,0.0009447108,0.70423126,0.0013582446,0.00006495401,0.00026119463,0.00031230837,0.00034042718,0.0061888234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9231136,0.0001589776,0.07547683,0.00013298716,0.00007797793,0.00014465483,0.00025068497,0.0000697798,0.0005745407],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9711783,0.016437227,0.0025156785,0.0021832364,0.00637235,0.0013132328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46605298,0.50041664,0.013588114,0.010305832,0.0076647345,0.0019717012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051781118,0.0013517889,0.0033198916,0.008385991,0.0016061844,0.007693248,0.00286059,0.0038947097,0.0034597388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26881558,0.0015744824,0.0029141228,0.004735299,0.0044645574,0.010561236,0.0045595774,0.0031104763,0.0003770767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004087332,0.0006464247,0.0111091435,0.00080627477,0.0008680024,0.00046088206,0.000914915,0.73077816,0.0044071637,0.14616945,0.0009801275,0.098772205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012966787,0.00048299783,0.003488513,0.00013611435,0.00022832853,0.00010833463,0.00013268716,0.8100322,0.0023818384,0.18250404,0.00026429497,0.000111109395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019904266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006717655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051781118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031548415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014523538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.273848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008052156","doi":"10.1023/b:grup.0000042894.00775.75","title":"A Distance-Based Collective Preorder Integrating the Relative Importance of the Group's Members","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Preorder; Mathematics; Partially ordered set; Group (periodic table); Measure (data warehouse); Divergence (linguistics); Order (exchange); Set (abstract data type); Binary relation; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.055850662149653174,"score_gpt":0.3506103197598169,"score_spread":0.2947596576101637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008052156","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060136978,0.0002974452,0.92436546,0.00055034325,0.00019297992,0.00038365467,0.0001361049,0.0002267949,0.013710321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5190612,0.0002593168,0.47146276,0.00013815571,0.00018150579,0.0005841833,0.00018343546,0.000077266006,0.008052206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903674,0.0027991661,0.0007719154,0.00081719714,0.004754384,0.0004899063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855532,0.0074375006,0.0012713165,0.0012427663,0.0033556258,0.0011395725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007870922,0.00119554,0.0019829622,0.0043904954,0.002438168,0.0052812863,0.002467104,0.0018317892,0.004504974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017098544,0.0005322714,0.0010895457,0.0029353243,0.0031548608,0.007374756,0.0028640507,0.002427086,0.0007759036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008602569,0.0008341256,0.0053480216,0.0009794473,0.00024209534,0.0002879832,0.0024062782,0.1791944,0.014615868,0.5003585,0.0042446326,0.29062852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011224128,0.0020620197,0.004285684,0.00022978113,0.00020568045,0.00036865092,0.001354022,0.6855339,0.007915623,0.2879424,0.009724217,0.0002658004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023332937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004727061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007870922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003161188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045720474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041625917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008174695","doi":"10.1080/03052151003702596","title":"Development of an inexact fuzzy flexible programming approach for environmental pollution control","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Optimization","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture; Ministry of Environment; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Control (management); Constraint (computer-aided design); Function (biology); Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04690611919664643,"score_gpt":0.32222912352543454,"score_spread":0.2753230043287881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008174695","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004359899,0.000084246996,0.99396175,0.000063417465,0.000015613077,0.000022086002,0.000013850808,0.000035742472,0.0014433556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48231292,0.0005252588,0.5121526,0.00013344054,0.00007987531,0.00045950818,0.000114688555,0.00006181522,0.0041599246],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993585,0.00022444577,0.000032063486,0.00010976306,0.0002104094,0.00006490359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993981,0.00032392013,0.00006722251,0.0000333333,0.00014878606,0.000028637925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013435341,0.0010477514,0.0009847798,0.00067546195,0.0005123189,0.001216684,0.0012436083,0.00133483,0.0023147904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018904471,0.00052300043,0.0011678966,0.00068013027,0.0007326123,0.00083174097,0.001318744,0.0015007248,0.0001998842],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010185199,0.000015163604,0.00009052085,0.000034378096,0.000013444616,0.00004564319,0.000027372245,0.97960633,0.00064261607,0.008559051,0.00014059844,0.010814615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015875517,0.000010036938,0.000013767046,0.0000031931334,0.0000022450906,0.0000036336476,0.000003410216,0.99820566,0.00008787341,0.0014996525,0.00016711504,0.0000019738097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064633368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035487015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064633368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000767049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013258196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012851477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008215735","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2015.4.005","title":"Optimization of warehouse location through fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Warehouse; Computer science; Operations research; Data mining; Operations management; Engineering; Business; Artificial intelligence; Marketing","score_opus":0.3066329103357908,"score_gpt":0.5300495736940826,"score_spread":0.22341666335829174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008215735","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008354364,0.00034422879,0.9886325,0.00012265125,0.000026480888,0.00013077006,0.000036840178,0.000059189973,0.0022929597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45053732,0.00064975896,0.5460125,0.000081688595,0.000044969558,0.0007471786,0.00010281253,0.000038179838,0.0017855589],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.997647,0.001149236,0.00014245372,0.00020074162,0.000668441,0.0001920097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980459,0.0013334786,0.00016678675,0.000037619164,0.00035260688,0.0000635052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049276794,0.0013339359,0.0017550813,0.0019961218,0.0010434347,0.00236269,0.001644016,0.0016106733,0.0023879951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004006958,0.00079417776,0.0017899852,0.0018479589,0.0008197622,0.0011063231,0.0012843185,0.0012124815,0.00022687284],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004430258,0.0000433531,0.00023530099,0.00013392823,0.000048613492,0.00005547405,0.000083937724,0.97170603,0.000837275,0.0065412833,0.00025613396,0.020014372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010597706,0.00003465244,0.00005073193,0.000022006401,0.00001117452,0.000007161445,0.0000218501,0.99632865,0.0003279512,0.0028648432,0.0003118345,0.000008563922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063940194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005474205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063940194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001988376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022746257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026060402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009365437","doi":"10.3166/rig.23.125-144","title":"Web-based PPGIS and multicriteria decision analysis. A case study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de géomatique","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Public participation GIS; World Wide Web; Web application; Geographic information system; Geography; Data science; Cartography; GIS and public health","score_opus":0.09055416664057227,"score_gpt":0.41196531105976014,"score_spread":0.3214111444191879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009365437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65683824,0.0020501034,0.256657,0.0027424586,0.00019228483,0.0010597201,0.001751848,0.0021741723,0.07653419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8633698,0.0007262876,0.12687382,0.00014913849,0.000036989357,0.00031625174,0.00041890476,0.00021226873,0.007896611],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971523,0.0018674426,0.0001295155,0.00018305589,0.0005227114,0.00014495547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934369,0.005190571,0.00020280704,0.00045277944,0.00048695164,0.0002299589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035029624,0.0005348741,0.0005140589,0.0016348236,0.0009921229,0.0035358155,0.0013608679,0.00186197,0.009401214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008031672,0.00040815867,0.0008058839,0.0039786687,0.0009091062,0.0023494477,0.0017987167,0.0010064226,0.0013792916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020193807,0.0033144744,0.02886359,0.0014398986,0.00028077865,0.011899747,0.0036985157,0.24691913,0.0064838557,0.04270581,0.017363615,0.6350112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038830625,0.0010651185,0.02095293,0.0003788509,0.00023739264,0.006182089,0.005734549,0.850172,0.008447376,0.04811357,0.05816054,0.00016736271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009107967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010615918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009401214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014839175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018498438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031450152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010360766","doi":"10.1109/ifsa-nafips.2013.6608603","title":"Mean-value-based decision-theoretic shadowed sets","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fuzzy set; Generalization; Extension (predicate logic); Universe; Membership function; Decision theory; Computer science; Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Decision model; Function (biology); Fuzzy logic; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.10225075428613438,"score_gpt":0.41000518418736004,"score_spread":0.30775442990122565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010360766","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015382522,0.00013549018,0.98176724,0.0001331019,0.000018906403,0.000028036771,0.00004545539,0.00004954718,0.0024397722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77653307,0.0002591345,0.22070529,0.000074534146,0.000036191086,0.00012121253,0.00011576299,0.000031752836,0.0021230232],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967648,0.0011121903,0.00015283642,0.0005071425,0.00123062,0.00023244797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972045,0.0014793444,0.000273902,0.00037894663,0.0005166434,0.0001466977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032405576,0.0008013452,0.001188952,0.0012146102,0.0005553034,0.002740434,0.0021464415,0.0009021762,0.0020154554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007533963,0.00046946693,0.0014080683,0.0013516073,0.0022720117,0.0035858217,0.0017891804,0.001610434,0.00024306499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006167439,0.000033517237,0.0006125244,0.0000731328,0.000055920988,0.00010695638,0.00021149019,0.57697994,0.0018537446,0.39345315,0.00050321623,0.026054686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049086584,0.000021630232,0.000112697235,0.000010612677,0.00001014994,0.000027391381,0.00002094082,0.88943064,0.0006151414,0.10909728,0.0006346258,0.00001393392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023619877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014810249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032405576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031604683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010621328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02293086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011472225","doi":"10.1093/jigpal/jzr018","title":"On a pairwise comparison-based consistent non-numerical ranking","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logic Journal of IGPL","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada); McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Ranking (information retrieval); Consistency (knowledge bases); Computer science; Raw data; Data mining; Mathematics; Statistics; Information retrieval; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.4303626006008418,"score_gpt":0.4459707455965455,"score_spread":0.015608144995703677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011472225","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064961836,0.000053933534,0.9904772,0.00033207735,0.000023330571,0.00007159943,0.000117740565,0.00009268943,0.0023352632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18372099,0.00016614974,0.81132627,0.00029061578,0.00008080413,0.00039547344,0.0004983872,0.00012451639,0.0033967823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98128533,0.010652238,0.0005901222,0.0021131807,0.004884844,0.00047419278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97508156,0.015708879,0.0019218427,0.0036372198,0.0031890243,0.00046147124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012320295,0.0007701666,0.0015185045,0.0024158268,0.001260131,0.004016536,0.00356572,0.0017296654,0.0066191796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03857167,0.0006278058,0.001350877,0.00418308,0.0036917988,0.005986456,0.002915836,0.0027799413,0.0013170451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016466978,0.00012872847,0.0010162698,0.00022774264,0.00010254695,0.0001394318,0.00023854118,0.17052107,0.001734078,0.7425351,0.0033162362,0.07987561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004661911,0.00016327208,0.00043152322,0.00005107817,0.000030390618,0.00010815291,0.000046610658,0.5433419,0.0010957252,0.45108393,0.0035578301,0.000043049313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021621964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019397776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012320295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019813303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026371516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0651567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012323948","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.071","title":"Supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy SWOT analysis and fuzzy linear programming","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":263,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"SWOT analysis; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Vagueness; Operations research; Selection (genetic algorithm); Context analysis; Order (exchange); Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Business; Mathematics; Marketing; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.0424467241313793,"score_gpt":0.3690723420025249,"score_spread":0.32662561787114563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012323948","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048259765,0.00013736628,0.94543123,0.0001136681,0.000037980953,0.00020273814,0.000103532904,0.00011592018,0.0055977665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7470037,0.00018926109,0.24950668,0.00004369467,0.000027634756,0.00023101101,0.00014036536,0.000051089504,0.0028065713],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972978,0.0011881447,0.00011502737,0.0002164387,0.00095376093,0.00022885698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970475,0.00190962,0.00027149377,0.00009742572,0.00059875066,0.00007524134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032614246,0.0012004474,0.0024991694,0.003640353,0.0011491232,0.0026805764,0.001227494,0.0010751411,0.004315204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005788657,0.0010808186,0.0019690767,0.0046618534,0.00084582315,0.0023317325,0.0008290668,0.00066046603,0.00038894833],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027215484,0.00009054287,0.0014582758,0.00031253602,0.00014056383,0.00019437789,0.00018796162,0.8946857,0.002534744,0.024463378,0.0011671832,0.07449258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000859955,0.000041009847,0.00030033034,0.000011286026,0.000020510039,0.000021434134,0.000036922367,0.98982936,0.00053748454,0.008961301,0.00021962245,0.0000121713965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009382657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00956654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009382657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021175323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025360074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018656075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013043413","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.032","title":"A general decomposition approach for multi-criteria decision trees","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Victoria; Université du Québec à Rimouski; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Weighted sum model; Lexicographical order; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; ELECTRE; Mathematics; Decomposition; Computer science; Weighting; Set (abstract data type); Decision analysis; Influence diagram; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.5542226438846996,"score_gpt":0.5734047981644698,"score_spread":0.019182154279770214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013043413","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004933437,0.000106607265,0.9986578,0.00004873037,0.000017143726,0.000025212146,0.00003378797,0.000034677778,0.0005826485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036193725,0.00043526394,0.9610015,0.00008921753,0.00008351427,0.00027636628,0.00023730315,0.000085970925,0.0015972523],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.997042,0.0014348313,0.00020462807,0.00033668845,0.0007703653,0.0002115322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977118,0.0013510004,0.000106668005,0.00025001887,0.0004772768,0.00010316348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040998105,0.0015520059,0.002008506,0.0019060948,0.0007490002,0.002266222,0.0018944569,0.0014137722,0.0054813796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006154103,0.0009890656,0.0039563617,0.0033030123,0.00082593324,0.002674855,0.0020158428,0.0030837492,0.0015878842],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073429444,0.00014394181,0.00055070716,0.0006367142,0.00028844166,0.00023008419,0.00038207465,0.40317222,0.0048574763,0.34134802,0.006492714,0.24182409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021038411,0.000044700348,0.00018071164,0.00010924336,0.00007154448,0.000113823495,0.000032353648,0.68728113,0.0005299209,0.30595213,0.005636158,0.000027201304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002085336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002788653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054813796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011354802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016631024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021682143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013260682","doi":"10.1007/s12205-013-0411-0","title":"A fuzzy AHP model for assessing the condition of metro stations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy logic; Quality (philosophy); Transit (satellite); Computer science; Operations research; Transport engineering; Process (computing); Engineering; Reliability engineering; Public transport; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.12427317067512261,"score_gpt":0.4198605440069919,"score_spread":0.2955873733318693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013260682","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18550059,0.00034804645,0.8016567,0.00047623736,0.00010138268,0.0002816685,0.00068768894,0.00029381967,0.010653873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.948972,0.000121628866,0.048828974,0.000036125137,0.000021701338,0.00017980828,0.00018594271,0.000010834099,0.0016429492],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923956,0.0003041099,0.000047938818,0.0000950911,0.00019691687,0.00011646161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902415,0.00057766907,0.00007416289,0.000029927389,0.00023817332,0.000055887147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015097096,0.0006064117,0.0009129929,0.0011744776,0.0008181495,0.0015382826,0.0016445905,0.0013154573,0.0031697673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021501868,0.00041752568,0.000857349,0.0014629944,0.0004058691,0.00095069874,0.00073538395,0.00084181415,0.00023982265],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063925145,0.000047592013,0.00071519613,0.000045816003,0.00004012499,0.000071625,0.000057524976,0.98390806,0.00042179954,0.0024431252,0.00028524455,0.011900008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050118447,0.000018415061,0.000119981465,0.0000038503813,0.0000070638307,0.0000060919183,0.000021715117,0.99867934,0.000066393906,0.0009853145,0.0000827421,0.0000041463986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025351128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017779924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025351128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015560694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019304041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05040717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013797480","doi":"10.1016/j.mcm.2008.06.018","title":"A decision-based approach for measuring human behavioral resistance to organizational change in strategic planning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical and Computer Modelling","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Rolls-Royce (Canada); McGill University; Okanagan University College","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Computer science; TOPSIS; Operations research; Set (abstract data type); Entropy (arrow of time); Decision support system; Decision-making models; Management science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.5571783693988129,"score_gpt":0.4225920584366995,"score_spread":0.13458631096211343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013797480","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36255908,0.00027220967,0.6261988,0.00027881833,0.0000890857,0.0010452224,0.00051284494,0.00029633957,0.008747564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8102168,0.00008347614,0.18803985,0.000053726537,0.000010043332,0.00073571637,0.00018136337,0.00001970205,0.0006592957],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943051,0.0034653768,0.00029448397,0.00033019352,0.0014196335,0.0001853308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98597544,0.011618089,0.00082228455,0.00037473955,0.00090150064,0.00030797435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054440903,0.0009981213,0.0008311397,0.003406643,0.00072736735,0.0019581825,0.0010312643,0.0012578269,0.0027880522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019260777,0.00044677933,0.0009254691,0.0028246483,0.0012202716,0.0016730608,0.0011779234,0.0010122466,0.00030090768],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002446705,0.0024528191,0.05350707,0.0010482322,0.0009862897,0.00024164132,0.0019968073,0.51836485,0.023050565,0.06273945,0.0017326248,0.33143288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097490585,0.001012658,0.01397592,0.000049925216,0.00013608122,0.00008647415,0.00043939785,0.95800734,0.004489847,0.020590395,0.001002596,0.00011192475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046059242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052820104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054440903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001955667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001541344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028791487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014723695","doi":"10.1007/s11135-005-1608-1","title":"Fuzziness and Bias in Decision-Making Processes Using an Arithmetic Mean Criterion","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality & Quantity","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Rank (graph theory); Statistics; Arithmetic; Relevance (law); Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.4619010324932535,"score_gpt":0.5345543617826892,"score_spread":0.07265332928943574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014723695","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12592217,0.00043916842,0.8709375,0.0003802705,0.000053351552,0.00007863582,0.000032649812,0.00010310728,0.0020532159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7720778,0.00013812477,0.22701305,0.00006409747,0.00005267161,0.0001505744,0.000034592136,0.000032117834,0.0004371255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846355,0.008331748,0.0011133226,0.0012217693,0.0043320386,0.00036563267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8526333,0.13412486,0.0036492082,0.0033024426,0.0057255966,0.0005645787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027488178,0.0006261882,0.001601892,0.0028658884,0.0009574713,0.0033887413,0.0011427446,0.0013567603,0.0010426055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1047659,0.0004522887,0.001252205,0.0023295626,0.002642114,0.0042091333,0.0020498303,0.0016367284,0.000096232994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016414843,0.00024613412,0.016489826,0.00090743275,0.00090412825,0.00023922585,0.0023090716,0.3393002,0.008004297,0.38943285,0.0008022662,0.23972312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006322314,0.00029247915,0.0042285835,0.00009183775,0.00014710297,0.00008243132,0.00014802431,0.7417805,0.002828199,0.24971014,0.00053301203,0.00009451582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001376878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013174603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027488178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020677862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019371049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1453731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014768551","doi":"10.5539/jmr.v1n1p14","title":"The Correlation between Variate-Values and Ranks in Samples from Complete Fourth Power Exponential Distribution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematics Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Random variate; Statistics; Distribution (mathematics); Sample (material); Exponential distribution; Correlation; Normal distribution; Exponential function; Mathematical analysis; Random variable; Geometry","score_opus":0.3891997240526778,"score_gpt":0.5060612482754168,"score_spread":0.11686152422273899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014768551","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32469139,0.00083216623,0.6705326,0.0003094499,0.000065547945,0.00016871095,0.00033100558,0.00024342384,0.0028257554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93490654,0.0005276353,0.06092379,0.00015215066,0.00009330243,0.0002247194,0.0010225215,0.0000684137,0.0020808452],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98553,0.005264941,0.0007327518,0.0021761141,0.005450664,0.0008454182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8820167,0.08972011,0.008045962,0.009461421,0.009785741,0.00097008725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015758913,0.0008149073,0.0013620491,0.0023005612,0.0005904515,0.0019480786,0.0012704844,0.0011434174,0.0031316364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10272078,0.00049259304,0.000904992,0.0020065287,0.0029284563,0.0031696802,0.0021123004,0.0019378915,0.00073028693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019426681,0.0004602283,0.25870782,0.00083559495,0.00090156886,0.0019092987,0.0020331067,0.26647404,0.008606789,0.14278068,0.0033647479,0.31198353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010934334,0.0007467744,0.108846806,0.00015789288,0.0001770613,0.0014891747,0.0006754605,0.73541534,0.007935739,0.14037941,0.0038258538,0.00024106323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010269764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009481803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015758913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001062527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010006059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083342135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014840831","doi":"10.5539/jms.v3n1p129","title":"Ranking and Investigation of Voice of Customer Index by Applying AHP Method in Local Management of Tehran Metropolis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management and Sustainability","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Voice of the customer; Computer science; Analytic hierarchy process; Process (computing); Key (lock); Fuzzy logic; Index (typography); Macro; Marketing; Business; Knowledge management; Management science; Process management; Operations research; Customer retention; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Service quality","score_opus":0.053692211235881505,"score_gpt":0.4009693725836481,"score_spread":0.3472771613477666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014840831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934157,0.0000876182,0.0020629514,0.00026822064,0.000012853612,0.00009928244,0.000120581484,0.00002190798,0.003910851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996808,0.000057583733,0.0021505058,0.000015300982,0.000006429798,0.000028813938,0.000075358475,0.0000033235733,0.0008546338],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890304,0.0003643182,0.000081492624,0.00009174547,0.00037048003,0.00018900787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842227,0.0005975116,0.00019571715,0.000044199034,0.0005545766,0.00018583448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015928971,0.00022961176,0.00026864646,0.0036570323,0.0014300054,0.0013603716,0.0005996961,0.00038420325,0.0026849906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023501653,0.00014710303,0.0004341934,0.0025656023,0.00056142895,0.00056981633,0.0006661771,0.00043049327,0.00016829163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010346642,0.0013689052,0.5623262,0.0010394009,0.00042008955,0.005447585,0.043077577,0.0538682,0.010246263,0.013825394,0.009827664,0.2975181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008322891,0.0011609441,0.60773873,0.00019297321,0.00021246965,0.00051933463,0.19437657,0.1759962,0.0048464425,0.003449445,0.011283917,0.0001397041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024672702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03991676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024672702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028352288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001673138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04905814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014956237","doi":"10.1080/00273171.2013.751295","title":"Abstract: RMSEA With Nonnormal Data: A Comparison of Two Robust Corrections","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multivariate Behavioral Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Structural equation modeling; Computer science; Statistics; Econometrics; Data mining; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8249248068608278,"score_gpt":0.6416101974285493,"score_spread":0.1833146094322785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014956237","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23697844,0.012908432,0.7250947,0.0021100529,0.0021890812,0.0011390109,0.0057309833,0.0038336436,0.01001569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.693403,0.0017311589,0.29396683,0.00076431053,0.0001826565,0.0012959747,0.0041360403,0.0018211721,0.0026987325],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9737595,0.014706448,0.002462568,0.0028533833,0.005869119,0.00034908095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8257537,0.12537009,0.0096213715,0.020347,0.018111492,0.0007962819],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03540337,0.0016087076,0.0017149551,0.003582569,0.0010006083,0.0018330023,0.0036034847,0.001547038,0.0057784715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21704894,0.0005215433,0.002682655,0.0060527003,0.0015070926,0.003098735,0.0021550786,0.0024607552,0.0016997748],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004261624,0.0011376877,0.07368728,0.003792862,0.006305508,0.00038905055,0.0031618671,0.10266922,0.0055092108,0.019192623,0.037407707,0.74248534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012271024,0.004184806,0.30863124,0.004099409,0.0043430817,0.0022780271,0.0038035093,0.53478163,0.02150467,0.056043707,0.0581079,0.0009949028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006100632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077438103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9645966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014050383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020569214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18723315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015245164","doi":"10.1016/s0024-3795(00)00328-1","title":"Linear operators preserving directional majorization","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linear Algebra and its Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Majorization; Mathematics; Characterization (materials science); Linear map; Linear operators; Multivariate statistics; Combinatorics; Linear algebra; Discrete mathematics; Algebra over a field; Pure mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Statistics","score_opus":0.10304078550378461,"score_gpt":0.40117280347206835,"score_spread":0.29813201796828376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015245164","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021831175,0.0003625967,0.96829826,0.00042012404,0.00010052492,0.000036231653,0.00008092185,0.000117014664,0.008753082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6444903,0.001631467,0.3295762,0.0006850346,0.00057174976,0.0003201722,0.00020435009,0.00026093714,0.022259789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977654,0.0009934664,0.00011050006,0.00044801805,0.0004997993,0.00018275998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99622726,0.0019986604,0.00048514854,0.00038660018,0.00067480747,0.00022759824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003943196,0.0011036362,0.0010943073,0.0014005196,0.00060814637,0.0021474578,0.00087742234,0.0007309682,0.003123215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060044923,0.0005078643,0.0012106069,0.0017131257,0.0027632997,0.0036251405,0.0021167092,0.0027317565,0.00064737606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090250054,0.00006840823,0.00012368997,0.000102366044,0.00003287491,0.00006862451,0.00015839045,0.008848602,0.0060334513,0.9446191,0.001435414,0.038418867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031785938,0.00021908885,0.00027655278,0.000024999797,0.000035450506,0.00022010977,0.00008392596,0.09774014,0.0051018945,0.8913585,0.0048648603,0.00004263752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047845254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031686045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003943196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072215265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010567633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020853817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017677001","doi":"10.1002/atr.173","title":"Solving the logistic problems with optimal resource assignment using fuzzy logic methods","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Resource (disambiguation); Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Operations research; Basis (linear algebra); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.318050227655786,"score_gpt":0.45301919153637465,"score_spread":0.13496896388058865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017677001","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013362246,0.00025527706,0.983937,0.00014313424,0.000014000755,0.000066073015,0.000032229742,0.000056721827,0.0021332402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41153625,0.0005678968,0.5848911,0.00007212707,0.00006678467,0.00040477584,0.000103136306,0.000032920045,0.0023250496],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990324,0.00047047975,0.0000566085,0.00009892254,0.00022435906,0.00011726455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909306,0.0006754755,0.000079597216,0.000022600858,0.00009966984,0.000029579467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002045173,0.0009397061,0.0015020152,0.0013826342,0.0007085979,0.0017753392,0.0011658419,0.0015446866,0.0026909437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002978412,0.0006483081,0.0012942578,0.0013583493,0.00075819413,0.00098623,0.0010755755,0.0010185539,0.00026205738],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032854787,0.000032488373,0.00014901558,0.000077453056,0.000026423542,0.000056486733,0.00005330804,0.97006077,0.0004609475,0.007926032,0.00024718032,0.020877017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001704127,0.000021692866,0.000041489002,0.000010571431,0.000008852427,0.000013726319,0.000026375437,0.98894006,0.0002624495,0.010379679,0.00027168228,0.0000063665816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071858773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005109408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071858773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013008757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024940772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014288127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019495791","doi":"10.1504/ijleg.2012.050208","title":"Integrating fuzzy Delphi with graph theory and matrix methods for evaluation of hazardous industrial waste transportation firm","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Logistics Economics and Globalisation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hazardous waste; Delphi method; Fuzzy logic; Delphi; Automotive industry; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Operations research; Engineering; Waste management; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.23793551428735132,"score_gpt":0.48544277936784547,"score_spread":0.24750726508049414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019495791","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20496504,0.0012355201,0.7466124,0.0023132255,0.000121975354,0.0035479693,0.00020239822,0.000103352424,0.040898126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68962264,0.0006996773,0.30639106,0.00012728473,0.000020011232,0.0015477114,0.000057031866,0.000009969264,0.0015246888],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792796,0.01686688,0.0005329662,0.0003433821,0.0024711513,0.0005060418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99319434,0.0048523154,0.00032453288,0.00016825373,0.0012840434,0.00017646667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013273425,0.001084636,0.0007281659,0.00485106,0.0020207018,0.0026959595,0.00089845277,0.00073492154,0.002621112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011135304,0.0005940124,0.00093007454,0.0033776797,0.0014077754,0.0021309543,0.002674421,0.0009675638,0.00014293322],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006722651,0.0007739664,0.010609597,0.0027515213,0.00048503382,0.00079666736,0.017043456,0.26765206,0.008127925,0.2631921,0.0053713056,0.42252406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002355508,0.0012575559,0.0089966515,0.0008866379,0.00026247735,0.00040138263,0.030447248,0.738542,0.006478179,0.19391058,0.018227942,0.00035376317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007331883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011611949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013273425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004575028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006019583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07019746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020917347","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v2n2p12","title":"Analysis of Possibility Theory for Reasoning under Uncertainty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Probability theory; Possibility theory; Computer science; Probability distribution; Work (physics); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Data mining; Economics","score_opus":0.09719863822900844,"score_gpt":0.42891075100200504,"score_spread":0.3317121127729966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020917347","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009907452,0.0033667819,0.9486439,0.003662714,0.00021215313,0.000082191495,0.00017285308,0.00008684829,0.033865064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72920686,0.0043831565,0.2556563,0.0007630977,0.0010922606,0.0005547049,0.0003875344,0.00007829247,0.007877821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888102,0.005549187,0.0006055855,0.0008771946,0.0036706196,0.00048716096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9723805,0.023073494,0.0013146371,0.0008525326,0.0019294332,0.00044942176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0102043,0.0010131838,0.0012416218,0.004969254,0.0020665664,0.0060620485,0.00178116,0.0020233642,0.007445863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023175325,0.00051033986,0.0034393945,0.0030329635,0.006838083,0.007742162,0.002940343,0.0037273564,0.00072014285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008243486,0.0000067566225,0.0001180391,0.000069472386,0.000028000963,0.00007185158,0.00014180073,0.0075175404,0.000085830565,0.9874358,0.00035766826,0.0041590496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029143794,0.000008558439,0.0000605187,0.000033115564,0.000008087141,0.000038108297,0.000043703,0.021997418,0.000056870125,0.97627425,0.0014670915,0.000009308651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014167015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000737992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0102043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037255152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021538353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053966165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022293262","doi":"10.1016/j.disc.2007.12.052","title":"The effect of redundancy on probability bounds","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discrete Mathematics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Upper and lower bounds; Redundancy (engineering); Combinatorics; Event (particle physics); Discrete mathematics; Linear programming; Value (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1438625415616749,"score_gpt":0.4155693470029621,"score_spread":0.2717068054412872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022293262","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20229775,0.0063630175,0.7570441,0.0047858404,0.00039471494,0.000080947306,0.0004387631,0.00052318844,0.028071675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9247878,0.001468966,0.07039531,0.0004801811,0.00051118626,0.00008649746,0.0001361136,0.00017995256,0.0019539422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9670807,0.021150427,0.0013408037,0.0025833996,0.006117823,0.0017268847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.327299,0.62510073,0.010411882,0.02799581,0.00780439,0.0013880881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036533,0.0015161999,0.003399012,0.0031045675,0.0013018877,0.0043199435,0.0032747127,0.0037616522,0.0055036023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30188867,0.001863611,0.0016651693,0.0025925327,0.0048622442,0.01126618,0.0046907724,0.00404217,0.00056986115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019450667,0.00021679624,0.00548198,0.00076145947,0.00045302245,0.00080499385,0.000680734,0.44327122,0.002763754,0.4480018,0.0036846169,0.09193453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011707244,0.00030965643,0.0027281183,0.00019488727,0.00028793735,0.00046960998,0.000105478655,0.5514129,0.0024301936,0.4404688,0.0013763527,0.00009908605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014442723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087897823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016793165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001239986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19320726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024299646","doi":"10.1046/j.1369-7412.2003.02051.x","title":"Report of the Editors—2003","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2055125847740503,"score_gpt":0.4490292947868261,"score_spread":0.24351671001277583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024299646","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078550004,0.009336076,0.0012904122,0.057005208,0.89213085,0.00054845004,0.0016788101,0.00039576148,0.036829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0073486376,0.023131294,0.0037323195,0.043998335,0.5901484,0.001348829,0.0039569554,0.00071863586,0.3256166],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812189,0.001972534,0.0025722648,0.0015853685,0.011611604,0.0010392646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8953446,0.0076866113,0.007235154,0.0042785453,0.07477249,0.010682597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020228779,0.0025147554,0.0016800786,0.0052240496,0.0029328468,0.010876062,0.0037552053,0.0059373644,0.0706257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055362225,0.00096192246,0.0017270254,0.0030613656,0.00088096206,0.0037302189,0.0027389042,0.0053943573,0.072341405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006997612,0.000027366532,0.0002155739,0.00025806107,0.00001114954,0.000075371485,0.000023563096,0.000039751027,0.00018157488,0.00024484796,0.98113877,0.017714044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019849162,0.00003485624,0.00064895354,0.0002691729,0.0000151849845,0.00008432567,0.00006082115,0.00010984745,0.00026125828,0.0002601752,0.9982211,0.000014334345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025166483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038256557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0706257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032575268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00993329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2362665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025737436","doi":"10.12735/jbm.v3i4p01","title":"Solving Decision Problems with Dependent Criteria by New Fuzzy Multicriteria Method in Excel","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business & Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Microsoft excel; Operations research; Management science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.07174768916914814,"score_gpt":0.3912651087474044,"score_spread":0.31951741957825625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025737436","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011454682,0.00008410039,0.9978098,0.000027715836,0.000016806978,0.00004795018,0.000016009457,0.000081678256,0.0007704308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028341556,0.00014738218,0.9707639,0.000026471458,0.00001682898,0.00023685896,0.000046296893,0.000027829296,0.00039279973],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973152,0.0012903834,0.00025899682,0.0002650561,0.0007505766,0.00011980958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984053,0.0010202347,0.000103162754,0.000088232046,0.00033067982,0.000052468946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003759164,0.001248714,0.0014764393,0.0021772606,0.0007170174,0.0017968016,0.0016771387,0.0010918431,0.002988086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004246486,0.0006799819,0.001981323,0.0020231071,0.00051917,0.001188567,0.001762009,0.0016145977,0.00059040816],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001852816,0.00027124613,0.0015049496,0.001397489,0.0004091468,0.00054266636,0.0008194338,0.4384349,0.012353244,0.1215429,0.0029929953,0.4195458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064944004,0.000113322276,0.00023001342,0.000117258525,0.00007400758,0.00017457429,0.00006726338,0.9610204,0.00351759,0.026036516,0.008545836,0.000038175265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014502137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013702419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003759164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006285689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013866422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019880593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026792038","doi":"10.1016/j.matdes.2004.10.027","title":"A material selection model based on the concept of multiple attribute decision making","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Materials & Design (1980-2015)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":217,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Universidade de Coimbra","keywords":"ELECTRE; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ranking (information retrieval); Material selection; Computer science; Operations research; Rank (graph theory); Process engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Materials science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.15376400102729973,"score_gpt":0.3909698871581196,"score_spread":0.23720588613081986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026792038","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024830854,0.0003292488,0.9661638,0.00053387263,0.00007985478,0.00021877841,0.00015287168,0.00012575314,0.0075650606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49654257,0.0008419301,0.4931252,0.00021930168,0.00009782337,0.0009572399,0.00030365627,0.000057085337,0.007855158],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768496,0.0012260146,0.000085841835,0.00028262302,0.0005814762,0.00013904819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749506,0.0019048783,0.00015284619,0.000063208536,0.0002712222,0.000112807626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039130705,0.0010821621,0.0015220765,0.0021377942,0.0009071014,0.002971917,0.0021085918,0.0016194507,0.0059690475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004354767,0.00047730573,0.0017634974,0.0027474796,0.0010311868,0.0028931277,0.0011247344,0.0016183301,0.0006888437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012587056,0.00031054518,0.0015416036,0.00025703662,0.00016209349,0.0001446442,0.00026420047,0.70863277,0.0011582793,0.21292648,0.0019914561,0.0724851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031828404,0.00012705332,0.00034706102,0.00003410325,0.000039423107,0.000050293445,0.000041790354,0.9220261,0.00024195666,0.0752863,0.0017402181,0.000033825112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034085407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042070993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059690475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022369153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025342782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020694554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029286738","doi":"10.1037/1082-989x.13.2.150","title":"Constrained versus unconstrained estimation in structural equation modeling.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Methods","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; U.S. Social Security Administration","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Structural equation modeling; Estimation; Computer science; Boundary (topology); Estimation theory; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Algorithm; Econometrics; Statistics","score_opus":0.6554148748889531,"score_gpt":0.6096974645123965,"score_spread":0.04571741037655663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029286738","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004291513,0.0069326838,0.9824751,0.0018030852,0.00026811144,0.0002999314,0.00022038768,0.00017823538,0.0035308807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13598987,0.005653211,0.8533287,0.0009443987,0.00031688495,0.001709162,0.00053636933,0.00017816843,0.0013431292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9043054,0.08509116,0.002013033,0.0034576664,0.0046769464,0.0004558936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86929816,0.1195292,0.003838587,0.004852864,0.0020131364,0.00046806774],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054231856,0.0023690534,0.002443939,0.0042402963,0.0012878297,0.0036951785,0.0031996304,0.002528737,0.00593804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16843502,0.0014974352,0.0026351595,0.006762929,0.0044680554,0.0065282397,0.00480052,0.004917375,0.0010473287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001563198,0.00016332614,0.004858998,0.0013669914,0.0012064036,0.0001408784,0.0014590232,0.028667213,0.00030118818,0.7037962,0.00588019,0.25200325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007580518,0.0001272958,0.0019172496,0.00077052094,0.0002225456,0.00012415125,0.00033685748,0.13401538,0.0004004404,0.8466357,0.015284545,0.00008947354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003333553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058303922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9457681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020282161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029528965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28680885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030382769","doi":"10.1037/1082-989x.9.4.453","title":"Comparative Judgments as an Alternative to Ratings: Identifying the Scale Origin.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Methods","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Scale (ratio); Interpretation (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Econometrics; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6618471505924736,"score_gpt":0.6779126136633634,"score_spread":0.01606546307088985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030382769","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03175964,0.004785122,0.91418993,0.002316348,0.0015143732,0.00067334465,0.00021185022,0.00038818785,0.04416116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4134102,0.0013375459,0.58016914,0.0007491649,0.0005400408,0.001087048,0.00014173824,0.00021382658,0.0023512784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.83182025,0.13256961,0.004181996,0.005171276,0.025509203,0.00074760785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77109385,0.17121242,0.014033383,0.02206479,0.019391738,0.0022037914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07342554,0.0013412379,0.0017258173,0.0054909126,0.002190784,0.008165446,0.002216762,0.00238187,0.0063551785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31866306,0.0006542254,0.0012141151,0.007908806,0.009073892,0.011199323,0.005235143,0.004922394,0.0011143151],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051079196,0.00025093384,0.004776176,0.0024856897,0.00047656495,0.00031937408,0.016446803,0.0023260978,0.005466904,0.65417147,0.0061793835,0.30658993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023594812,0.000875074,0.012726869,0.0011678892,0.00020699714,0.0011423168,0.007529882,0.033626456,0.0047554793,0.89064294,0.046684097,0.00040606374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011835994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021674258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07342554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019391665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022960377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38831604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030580634","doi":"10.1007/s00291-009-0192-5","title":"Deriving a minimum distance-based collective preorder: a binary mathematical programming approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OR Spectrum","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Preorder; Binary relation; Transitive relation; Mathematics; Linear programming; Ranking (information retrieval); Binary number; Preference; Computer science; Combinatorics; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Discrete mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.09501258977061526,"score_gpt":0.3844359962684172,"score_spread":0.2894234064978019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030580634","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048125447,0.000062066945,0.99183476,0.0002085624,0.000024872505,0.000028945016,0.0000233835,0.000019313911,0.0029855403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23606306,0.0003479038,0.7565985,0.00022337135,0.00015975935,0.00039103997,0.00013651005,0.00010508375,0.005974729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697065,0.0012708821,0.00018469142,0.00039791025,0.0009874236,0.00018850484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993884,0.0042631486,0.0004799808,0.00037896747,0.0007307604,0.00026303335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048806695,0.0011717761,0.0019232589,0.0028889878,0.0012062863,0.0033410217,0.0026146949,0.0020357226,0.0042720237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011569404,0.0008817557,0.0020719967,0.0021905869,0.0026893918,0.0060287514,0.003233523,0.0037587336,0.0006186267],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004696631,0.00014106276,0.00035295467,0.0002139212,0.00006397897,0.000082652936,0.0002494199,0.23782153,0.0016728046,0.7242762,0.0015238585,0.03355462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009319641,0.00005893684,0.0001035817,0.00004557697,0.000016768701,0.000036600228,0.000052711122,0.595573,0.00062748353,0.40220985,0.0012458519,0.000020283107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009635933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012673157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048806695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021875438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021267007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025811732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031854568","doi":"10.5539/emr.v3n1p41","title":"Decision Making Planning: The Meta-decision Approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Management Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Business decision mapping; Decision engineering; Decision analysis; Computer science; Key (lock); R-CAST; Context (archaeology); Decision-making; Management science; Decision quality; Decision maker; Selection (genetic algorithm); Quality (philosophy); Order (exchange); Process management; Decision support system; Knowledge management; Operations management; Business; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4269448877115149,"score_gpt":0.5100664203085764,"score_spread":0.08312153259706151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031854568","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004414935,0.0026819722,0.9553283,0.004824696,0.00014433375,0.00035079243,0.00017343953,0.00012155073,0.03195989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28162384,0.0033389772,0.70937073,0.0006447345,0.00022618045,0.00094352517,0.00026192405,0.00009463314,0.0034955177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98804957,0.008080656,0.00065121864,0.00092395477,0.0017147093,0.00057991303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98627615,0.010079928,0.0009266615,0.001082651,0.0009829842,0.00065159117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01527447,0.0020455983,0.0019197848,0.0046960427,0.0021142864,0.011129505,0.004633825,0.0031102218,0.0077456795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016083032,0.0012397593,0.0033633602,0.0050656185,0.007731191,0.009226563,0.0040688044,0.0046261046,0.00096171984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003327297,0.00006174696,0.0005054473,0.00037493723,0.00019329919,0.00016978012,0.0007041903,0.07137054,0.00027110457,0.89991903,0.0010342462,0.025362309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023966822,0.000036828296,0.00015767122,0.00028210093,0.000072379546,0.00006650725,0.00041806197,0.0747908,0.00035278895,0.9130893,0.010675424,0.000034260964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037063514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048478334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01527447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007942588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007956878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08078003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032296889","doi":"10.1016/j.knosys.2014.09.007","title":"D-CFPR: D numbers extended consistent fuzzy preference relations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge-Based Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Transitive relation; Pairwise comparison; Preference relation; Preference; Relation (database); Property (philosophy); Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Decision maker; Mathematics; Fuzzy number; Preference theory; Analytic hierarchy process; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Operations research; Fuzzy set; Statistics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.21190392102305172,"score_gpt":0.39655298727541527,"score_spread":0.18464906625236355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032296889","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066027036,0.00032717388,0.9870969,0.00024660424,0.00010522732,0.000082265906,0.00055854826,0.00029239376,0.004688172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20459653,0.00051564776,0.7883613,0.0004889818,0.000128675,0.0003902241,0.0010429985,0.00011487336,0.004360806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969112,0.001099795,0.00026802556,0.000719431,0.00086755946,0.00013408969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555814,0.0025466615,0.00036912292,0.00064900296,0.00073400873,0.0001430405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030897728,0.0007953266,0.0007205808,0.0018648178,0.00049322896,0.002208909,0.0012891833,0.0010808962,0.0068438067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011245583,0.00036122312,0.00092414644,0.0029188932,0.0010494931,0.0040407884,0.0016114733,0.0017668288,0.0014733193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004272464,0.0001007265,0.00071292097,0.0005094657,0.00006146481,0.0003166891,0.0003447786,0.03892631,0.006602451,0.63102216,0.007764521,0.31321123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009062291,0.0002189642,0.0005147311,0.000121106554,0.000044196204,0.0005106114,0.000104633415,0.249567,0.0045477543,0.711317,0.03288248,0.000080835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017285838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011002666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068438067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009854907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001029666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0228948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033144398","doi":"10.1007/s13198-014-0218-5","title":"A new method in failure mode and effects analysis based on evidential reasoning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ranking (information retrieval); Failure mode and effects analysis; Ideal solution; Aggregate (composite); Data mining; Similarity (geometry); Fuzzy logic; Rank (graph theory); Evidential reasoning approach; Preference; Computer science; Construct (python library); Risk analysis (engineering); Mathematics; Reliability engineering; Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Engineering; Decision support system; Statistics","score_opus":0.01913411995386418,"score_gpt":0.36752070088458966,"score_spread":0.3483865809307255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033144398","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005206854,0.00008409293,0.9987503,0.000031614887,0.000024721978,0.00002068875,0.000014998413,0.00006922337,0.00048361733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07316864,0.0002945143,0.92429453,0.000105946114,0.00010929221,0.00020405548,0.000101412086,0.00006571616,0.0016558786],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636334,0.001281718,0.00028428226,0.0005886919,0.0013708692,0.0001111641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99575543,0.0029200548,0.00020967459,0.00041281644,0.0006170518,0.00008505295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038051323,0.0012049284,0.0017081902,0.0026868926,0.0009918583,0.0020848657,0.0023798575,0.0015001699,0.0037268605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008220129,0.00062684325,0.0021819263,0.0015919086,0.0012984885,0.003250019,0.0021922742,0.0027075615,0.00080764556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018804478,0.00030003636,0.0012502286,0.0006622431,0.00036742561,0.00035743313,0.0005057053,0.16072294,0.01277976,0.2989972,0.003725736,0.52014333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030078794,0.000078821664,0.00027015517,0.000054732718,0.000091852664,0.00018965239,0.000025589767,0.8692822,0.0020207376,0.1232516,0.004661977,0.000042597727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013459495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001145976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038051323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006979529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015396967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02012372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033834766","doi":"10.1287/opre.2015.1350","title":"Multiattribute Utility Functions Satisfying Mutual Preferential Independence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation; Ryerson University; University of Southern California; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Function (biology); Univariate; Isoelastic utility; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematics; Complement (music); Mathematical economics; Nonparametric statistics; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Multivariate statistics","score_opus":0.8056785903405422,"score_gpt":0.6029653570957907,"score_spread":0.20271323324475155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033834766","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030101614,0.00010216454,0.9645921,0.00023917314,0.000011366466,0.00008063879,0.00016612225,0.000081554026,0.0046251956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6694793,0.00034294385,0.32579756,0.00017851926,0.000080960024,0.00054996903,0.00033098905,0.000079591984,0.0031601966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886779,0.0058808583,0.000658824,0.0012387317,0.0028516992,0.0006919169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750401,0.017613783,0.0018378135,0.0028875307,0.0020442936,0.00057656533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012187989,0.0010972725,0.0017002051,0.0018871354,0.00078669534,0.0026725803,0.0014053984,0.0013276455,0.002420003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031447228,0.00070319965,0.0020933233,0.0026259392,0.0021942945,0.005500738,0.002713452,0.0033275636,0.0007511342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009572793,0.00014101199,0.0030791012,0.0001316435,0.000118677446,0.00032407793,0.0005650872,0.13013531,0.002522456,0.8003528,0.0013231928,0.061210953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022908738,0.00009611415,0.0017972044,0.000040616138,0.000022338229,0.00028489553,0.000079361926,0.40868354,0.0014329355,0.585233,0.002264057,0.000043106298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007838267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005364441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012187989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015158426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012933864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034245711","doi":"10.1007/s11518-012-5187-0","title":"A hierarchical multiple criteria model for eliciting relative preferences in conflict situations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"ELECTRE; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Decision maker; Preference; Operations research; Preference elicitation; Decision analysis; Computer science; Management science; Welfare economics; Mathematics; Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.2641984379784243,"score_gpt":0.4192187492878798,"score_spread":0.15502031130945548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034245711","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042512346,0.00017111882,0.95264065,0.0002640229,0.000026390522,0.00030641627,0.00020711403,0.00015659885,0.0037152648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5615852,0.00018086331,0.43513757,0.00009347811,0.000025529234,0.0007563446,0.0002463309,0.000038348488,0.0019363381],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946538,0.0034527646,0.0002822681,0.00036323807,0.00092382217,0.00032403952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888469,0.009324241,0.000497999,0.00026295715,0.0008176602,0.00025019934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006380816,0.0010596561,0.0014033052,0.0021788194,0.0009940142,0.0022205694,0.0021764114,0.0015416023,0.0053354357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014258995,0.00084089214,0.0015285085,0.0026230286,0.0009211681,0.002383525,0.0014613047,0.0013415797,0.0005102166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039057154,0.00027562346,0.0022914198,0.00042086074,0.0002605281,0.00038991595,0.0009879194,0.85855395,0.0027658797,0.07686559,0.0014589243,0.055338763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049377435,0.00008497276,0.00039932632,0.000026332122,0.000044661923,0.000031424606,0.000072328694,0.977104,0.00023774858,0.021547958,0.00037498318,0.000026936961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011533389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015007133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011533389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027389366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024967538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03374535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034702618","doi":"10.1007/s13198-011-0053-x","title":"An aggregative fuzzy risk analysis for flood incident management","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Flood myth; Vagueness; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk management; Warrant; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Event (particle physics); Emergency management; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Business; Geography; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06556668452597818,"score_gpt":0.3513108961894646,"score_spread":0.2857442116634864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034702618","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047947716,0.00032170187,0.9490194,0.00013133873,0.0000422229,0.00006326981,0.00008334159,0.00010683285,0.0022841827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8022925,0.0003644572,0.1949005,0.000046051304,0.000081886785,0.0001260356,0.00014176145,0.00003960311,0.0020071757],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811625,0.0006975776,0.00011705338,0.0001600864,0.00075593474,0.00015308803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779934,0.0012497184,0.00018321695,0.000118491575,0.0005706633,0.00007857753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042174137,0.00093742664,0.0012794385,0.0029791528,0.00087862625,0.0022101756,0.0011223246,0.0006856952,0.0019002671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005142611,0.00041854643,0.0015645898,0.0020149758,0.00056237745,0.0020328464,0.0012734024,0.0010501447,0.00016061412],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028969086,0.0001785183,0.0031526044,0.00023514961,0.00040278354,0.00030643475,0.00035383657,0.7771425,0.005219299,0.058361758,0.0016978115,0.15265961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050918384,0.000066138025,0.0005310649,0.000015718495,0.000053361167,0.000037113343,0.00004457017,0.9864629,0.00055433897,0.011843515,0.0003709816,0.0000151775475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002999257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002345885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042174137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012774409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012508698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022304118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035652047","doi":"10.1007/bf02294375","title":"A Multistage Ranking Model","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychometrika","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Generalization; Rank (graph theory); Matrix (chemical analysis); Set (abstract data type); Maximum likelihood; Statistics; Mathematics; Matrix model; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.31298334782580056,"score_gpt":0.4913522313636971,"score_spread":0.17836888353789654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035652047","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049946364,0.00063735485,0.9128892,0.0019469237,0.00013237109,0.0004757429,0.0015654597,0.00041740708,0.031989206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.756629,0.0010000664,0.16420239,0.0005711359,0.00017898997,0.000939234,0.0011585566,0.00013477361,0.07518585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956726,0.002161707,0.00019524162,0.0008921214,0.00063981436,0.000438636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99622935,0.0022331474,0.00042386158,0.00034791802,0.0005564713,0.00020924151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053701657,0.0010552598,0.001712864,0.0016844952,0.0009269353,0.0032050535,0.0038650339,0.0024241565,0.024219722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008019262,0.00081233797,0.0016803682,0.0022358012,0.0011465068,0.0042792507,0.0014201481,0.0019402881,0.0048990394],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002770144,0.00033093092,0.004868554,0.00035423756,0.0003315877,0.00046790362,0.0008101676,0.36214897,0.0012404007,0.54159653,0.007372827,0.08020084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078698664,0.00024027351,0.0017490225,0.000047632882,0.000102638776,0.00027899182,0.00014948974,0.7567267,0.00030923812,0.23156263,0.008681781,0.00007297035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051259683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005818318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024219722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016717185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001235156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08102304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035937534","doi":"10.1504/ijmdm.2006.009144","title":"Multi-criteria optimisation of budgeting decisions by telecommunication service providers in a simulation game","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Computer science; Operations research; Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Mathematical optimization; Service (business); Production (economics); Service provider; Microeconomics; Business; Economics; Mathematics; Marketing","score_opus":0.09997363985255961,"score_gpt":0.43443225982949524,"score_spread":0.3344586199769356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035937534","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09318247,0.00023190779,0.8955385,0.0008676615,0.000042053573,0.00020116704,0.000173161,0.0001311663,0.009631908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90968853,0.00023232852,0.08448062,0.00009743815,0.000020485788,0.00039917036,0.00010016673,0.000040713432,0.004940523],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979425,0.0013482491,0.00006305827,0.00020397356,0.00022577061,0.00021646173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996976,0.0021944204,0.0002763623,0.000070175854,0.00021460769,0.00026844567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028010642,0.0012965328,0.0017086368,0.0007559396,0.00069658103,0.002410871,0.0015091441,0.0021517538,0.0029510397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005306922,0.0008534571,0.001153019,0.00096322654,0.0014930754,0.0016717846,0.0014467521,0.0015510854,0.00026327546],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035234636,0.000013257014,0.00012549365,0.000010740198,0.0000112991665,0.000033255357,0.000028172575,0.9897041,0.00013877334,0.008983547,0.00007120776,0.0008449134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014578596,0.000015505282,0.00003139205,0.00000383305,0.0000045018155,0.0000048175484,0.000009176297,0.996523,0.0000639564,0.0031927468,0.00013172379,0.0000048486418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014699276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009245714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014699276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034139613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026273732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029227436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036776481","doi":"10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00366-6","title":"Fuzzy interval and semi-orders","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.5111493511154003,"score_gpt":0.5116162654155219,"score_spread":0.0004669143001215792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036776481","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15637678,0.022974823,0.71107846,0.0036432738,0.0012543991,0.000100156736,0.0009117379,0.00020769986,0.103452735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8538036,0.008398293,0.11370071,0.00028778103,0.0009336787,0.00014077805,0.00050828693,0.000049437636,0.022177547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988065,0.00038772103,0.00010271415,0.000119266115,0.00051582325,0.000068010886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958181,0.0028452447,0.0003900406,0.00024796368,0.00051625236,0.00018235199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002203825,0.00066296465,0.001054257,0.0018294654,0.00079359114,0.0032238108,0.00065859634,0.0009586338,0.0058423337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007458705,0.00039770812,0.0007153268,0.002617142,0.002473269,0.0052383095,0.0007089981,0.0016168784,0.0005641962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005427154,0.00002640568,0.00020855918,0.00010158268,0.000017107339,0.00010128019,0.00027204724,0.009468141,0.00040239768,0.97681344,0.001140199,0.011394441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012636078,0.000022282264,0.00025214738,0.000024456787,0.000009754194,0.00007460667,0.00008815647,0.024312736,0.000113503345,0.9709726,0.0041055335,0.000011477674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002972533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021622262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058423337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016467724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009456735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019544542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036898970","doi":"10.1007/s10700-007-9023-9","title":"Application of possibility theory to investment decisions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Fuzzy number; Vagueness; Mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Mathematical optimization; Defuzzification; Variance (accounting); Fuzzy set; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.10882845701213807,"score_gpt":0.40253814367714735,"score_spread":0.2937096866650093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036898970","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033483107,0.011633229,0.89613676,0.0055471943,0.00036636804,0.000073761585,0.00011859682,0.0000771817,0.05256386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8477285,0.005807936,0.13990137,0.00022955777,0.0007140021,0.0001965985,0.000058268517,0.000023504113,0.0053404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971712,0.0019108636,0.000101896054,0.00014429628,0.0005640621,0.00010766146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985358,0.0133897895,0.00035488224,0.0002653035,0.0004706859,0.00016130203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040950337,0.000856957,0.0012641232,0.0026121445,0.0011971918,0.0028029215,0.0012317965,0.001720896,0.0041857087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015518627,0.0006008344,0.0016563343,0.002175784,0.00395043,0.0032657243,0.001604717,0.0021908905,0.00021652713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003988815,0.0000264709,0.0003139514,0.00014940556,0.00007377457,0.00016309982,0.00018443247,0.07303722,0.00016856597,0.9060058,0.000821912,0.0190155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009799523,0.0000103751345,0.00009384956,0.000028231603,0.00000951888,0.000031207186,0.000029180848,0.05041905,0.00003908271,0.948268,0.001051352,0.000010462183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00220831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019258098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041857087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020259444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011317024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02165687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036961948","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.026","title":"Fuzzy multi-objective programming for supplier selection and risk modeling: A possibility approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":216,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Supply chain; Programming paradigm; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Business","score_opus":0.37158248385785386,"score_gpt":0.5019066362398276,"score_spread":0.1303241523819737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036961948","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012629384,0.0005958822,0.9828266,0.00032750415,0.00003646769,0.00005961774,0.000046282552,0.0000418436,0.00343649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6697042,0.0013047063,0.3236784,0.000102194055,0.00014848288,0.00051212945,0.000091202994,0.000049706516,0.0044089914],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973677,0.0016644247,0.00010402688,0.00020026766,0.00053814024,0.00012545561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942345,0.0049853628,0.0002570293,0.000099114426,0.00028825202,0.0001357399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048256987,0.0017499712,0.0020922062,0.002924142,0.0013090539,0.0033410378,0.002614747,0.0026968122,0.0031413976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009129907,0.0015270176,0.0032866003,0.0029098822,0.0016587039,0.0035627848,0.0020338015,0.0021316225,0.00022579214],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007433409,0.0000779932,0.00029845856,0.00016207254,0.00014805463,0.00019718839,0.000104488325,0.9158629,0.00040127573,0.07002663,0.00038096224,0.012265723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009572382,0.00002661004,0.00006946839,0.000019785524,0.000026317386,0.000026587972,0.000020211502,0.96863335,0.000094584924,0.03087687,0.00018108256,0.000015526162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004310765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039754026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048256987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020041056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014894812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02552104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037177172","doi":"10.1109/kamw.2008.4810684","title":"Application of Supplier Selection Based on the AHP Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Supply chain; Supplier relationship management; Supply chain management; Supplier evaluation; Operations research; Business; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.1420033843258951,"score_gpt":0.39657436260722595,"score_spread":0.25457097828133085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037177172","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00618807,0.0008977905,0.9780792,0.00048668435,0.00018166288,0.00042146005,0.000080800135,0.0002406392,0.013423671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2817118,0.0018753373,0.71211433,0.00018019316,0.00017104478,0.00055304525,0.0001590246,0.000053687214,0.003181628],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900434,0.0046276134,0.0004413382,0.00043134368,0.0042362483,0.00022001631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964844,0.002115925,0.00016336254,0.00013572749,0.0010251764,0.00007541509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004709063,0.000772381,0.001020526,0.0041707535,0.0016557289,0.0016952043,0.0009758738,0.0006432082,0.0034215217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084830215,0.00035392566,0.000989731,0.0050055203,0.00090695795,0.0011994026,0.0015566108,0.0010545217,0.0004821258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017115833,0.00018299183,0.0027451278,0.0016509902,0.0004960113,0.0008253121,0.0018188719,0.13760906,0.0074218046,0.13388367,0.006615628,0.70657927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017129045,0.00040374728,0.0026447808,0.00075911626,0.0002762345,0.00089817116,0.0012438665,0.7062917,0.013601552,0.22449592,0.049036663,0.00017697166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022317076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022522758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004709063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013236968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024129488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024904191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037408989","doi":"10.1054/ebog.2002.0050","title":"Paired comparisons in contingency tables – the McNemar chi-square test","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence-based obstetrics and gynecology/Evidence-based obstetrics & gynecology","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"McNemar's test; Contingency table; Chi-square test; Square (algebra); Test (biology); Statistics; Mathematics; Arithmetic; Biology","score_opus":0.2658759836901109,"score_gpt":0.3693335582877599,"score_spread":0.10345757459764898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037408989","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31526682,0.008169414,0.6081711,0.0026253324,0.0066817645,0.011907059,0.018266415,0.0031237889,0.025788313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5970608,0.0012217248,0.3769447,0.0006703711,0.00088959874,0.013659224,0.005129829,0.00058980094,0.0038340152],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8763694,0.082201384,0.011207523,0.012805607,0.015353649,0.0020624653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5703726,0.3845383,0.012809059,0.021865834,0.008609978,0.0018042246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06283717,0.0015197861,0.0058368277,0.0052506486,0.0015077565,0.0033217934,0.003942691,0.0025187836,0.026062857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2717123,0.001058975,0.0024578632,0.005695477,0.0037667307,0.004207701,0.0022771095,0.0062448415,0.001992431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.040246677,0.0049499245,0.20201987,0.0162877,0.031335495,0.004478386,0.007119854,0.028652932,0.0070949644,0.07833139,0.10162646,0.4778563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006528095,0.042786717,0.30036902,0.0060508926,0.008256891,0.012012698,0.017668024,0.21487303,0.01379286,0.21203096,0.16407059,0.001560105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086577307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008856855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06283717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010741231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019320474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33231866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037839513","doi":"10.5539/cis.v2n3p24","title":"Fuzzy Evaluation of Weapons System","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer and Information Science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Ranking (information retrieval); Data mining; Decision maker; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy set operations; Domain (mathematical analysis); Fuzzy number; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Fuzzy set; Operations research; Mathematics","score_opus":0.16318679674454326,"score_gpt":0.43280231033919886,"score_spread":0.26961551359465563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037839513","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10974537,0.0023796319,0.8531305,0.00057708216,0.00020092176,0.00015324044,0.000164469,0.00016562006,0.03348313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8743122,0.00079359947,0.12080152,0.00005267165,0.000054986096,0.00006468524,0.0000884878,0.000016221587,0.0038155073],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975419,0.00093131495,0.00013403794,0.00020156086,0.0010732574,0.000118032935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984097,0.0006436728,0.00013956292,0.00007347375,0.0006797065,0.00005387099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029319713,0.0006494843,0.0006682369,0.0025576137,0.00060819386,0.002083198,0.00056512374,0.0006487163,0.001982967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061776396,0.00014883677,0.00067488995,0.0011551122,0.0007804939,0.0017619914,0.0006328678,0.0005567404,0.00027054801],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000388309,0.00011194632,0.006270601,0.00062745874,0.00023034847,0.00032888763,0.0007115948,0.37665704,0.016129235,0.27810133,0.002842763,0.3176004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000319659,0.0004271471,0.0038960027,0.00014294106,0.00009495702,0.00021598817,0.00031223043,0.88405764,0.010896163,0.08731948,0.0124907615,0.00011473245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035185516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031249821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035185516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015682456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000686576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01550591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038150931","doi":"10.1016/j.rec.2013.11.016","title":"The Transitive Property Across Randomized Controlled Trials: If B Is Better Than A, and C Is Better Than B, Will C Be Better Than A?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Analytic hierarchy process; Ranking (information retrieval); Transitive relation; Scale (ratio); Computer science; Index (typography); Consistency index; Mathematics; Data mining; Statistics; Econometrics; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Geography","score_opus":0.09649057952489576,"score_gpt":0.4000157167710439,"score_spread":0.30352513724614816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038150931","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011722021,0.80643,0.13609627,0.018983485,0.008559794,0.0048373723,0.0031154128,0.00033595122,0.009919748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4560178,0.30985382,0.17350383,0.032798655,0.0077716326,0.015018691,0.0024335806,0.0003844664,0.0022175242],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6247697,0.29093978,0.049725056,0.014135068,0.019188689,0.0012417877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.31091654,0.6371161,0.033092972,0.013663002,0.0042025503,0.0010088505],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24271789,0.0031369706,0.021575723,0.0036013061,0.0011259516,0.0055188234,0.005198322,0.0064360136,0.009289949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47965896,0.0017382518,0.020720262,0.0045511555,0.0056376057,0.008848843,0.0029244425,0.009851847,0.0007226549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017002657,0.0003232797,0.004381851,0.32052654,0.22821566,0.00052697194,0.0009051934,0.009534353,0.0009382516,0.084373906,0.012769287,0.32050198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03728789,0.0071463995,0.009904993,0.11143226,0.28211716,0.0029697441,0.0006029669,0.023524502,0.0030142826,0.46711332,0.054367654,0.000518793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001473783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018765052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75728214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038253267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067866594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93386364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038605293","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2011.05.001","title":"An integrated framework for cost- benefit analysis in road safety projects using AHP method","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Transport engineering; Business; Operations management; Operations research; Engineering","score_opus":0.2731837750424491,"score_gpt":0.47491781460656757,"score_spread":0.20173403956411845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038605293","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022379055,0.00011685959,0.9949293,0.00013850039,0.00001601524,0.00020795435,0.00006753652,0.00007964679,0.0022062808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11585448,0.00030972518,0.8816753,0.00003669366,0.000025107209,0.0009988582,0.00014333427,0.00003052729,0.0009259684],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583685,0.0024546129,0.00019097766,0.00019633972,0.0011427427,0.00017842375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983096,0.0010608358,0.00009740385,0.00006651722,0.00040073262,0.000064977095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067029777,0.0012246637,0.0011328765,0.0033736967,0.0011166125,0.002561993,0.0022189957,0.0012367576,0.00390625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056165843,0.00064300897,0.0015177744,0.0034432244,0.00084564055,0.0016787817,0.0017037757,0.0015107817,0.0003574786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004106121,0.00012113126,0.0004678889,0.00034522984,0.00012669811,0.00026670756,0.00044978736,0.7649409,0.0013750884,0.14693679,0.0017608729,0.08316791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039233404,0.000051392577,0.00016515015,0.00008226377,0.000040073734,0.000047361096,0.00015986245,0.9318971,0.00037827753,0.06284916,0.0042616026,0.000028494798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009126509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009029086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009126509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027648415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004346798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035449147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039311731","doi":"10.1016/j.ins.2011.11.027","title":"Fuzzy logic-based generalized decision theory with imperfect information","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer science; Optimal decision; Decision theory; Decision field theory; Perfect information; Decision analysis; Fuzzy logic; Imperfect; Decision rule; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Causal decision theory; Decision model; Evidential decision theory; Evidential reasoning approach; Decision tree; Business decision mapping; Artificial intelligence; Decision support system; Mathematical economics; Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.18508030816902768,"score_gpt":0.3921880118241548,"score_spread":0.20710770365512712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039311731","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014468186,0.000666276,0.98057324,0.00052123726,0.000087487715,0.00005390938,0.00008910016,0.0000662409,0.003474319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7373012,0.0010849412,0.2573187,0.0003033741,0.00021672528,0.000263868,0.00024575225,0.000042104322,0.0032232732],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99083734,0.005133344,0.00045583333,0.0009558942,0.002153427,0.00046421937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884919,0.008747163,0.0008538235,0.0005676728,0.0010989202,0.0002404392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0095376,0.0017994101,0.0047302498,0.0023397906,0.0010043446,0.00487273,0.0028116275,0.0021068286,0.0023941852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017414877,0.0010245972,0.0023306622,0.0029493526,0.0040234737,0.0049950224,0.0023057756,0.0026645674,0.00031334985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001249794,0.00005915709,0.00032524145,0.00026489169,0.00025720499,0.00025321427,0.00018527264,0.5858869,0.00041394934,0.39292085,0.000726076,0.018582253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030518797,0.0000347461,0.000086887405,0.000031375457,0.00004222887,0.000026563455,0.000018346858,0.67090195,0.00013214778,0.32827246,0.00039846325,0.000024327252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004898614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036447605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0095376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004074965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028343485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050440192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039740526","doi":"10.1007/s10700-004-4202-4","title":"Bi-matrix Games with Fuzzy Goals and Fuzzy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Defuzzification; Mathematics; Fuzzy associative matrix; Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy number; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set operations; Constraint (computer-aided design); Fuzzy classification; Matrix (chemical analysis); Equivalence (formal languages); Fuzzy set; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.05404689167150874,"score_gpt":0.37818962076453067,"score_spread":0.32414272909302194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039740526","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039818916,0.0007022558,0.8947514,0.0026872251,0.00024122922,0.00026807043,0.00026133942,0.00008079666,0.061188754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8348943,0.0008405324,0.13668498,0.00046796372,0.00017410067,0.0008528656,0.00015441935,0.000032643457,0.025898216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944812,0.0036760727,0.0001883757,0.00030899874,0.0009951362,0.00035025633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948466,0.0036325615,0.0004110498,0.00023225877,0.00044432687,0.0004332144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051984666,0.0023225602,0.0018938358,0.0014093475,0.001219648,0.003946888,0.0019766309,0.0030111235,0.0064766975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010945951,0.0009037193,0.00114625,0.001984523,0.0029281753,0.0047078026,0.0029110084,0.0031739392,0.00063695596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008056219,0.000052452924,0.00011250232,0.00008373653,0.000048461916,0.00013518006,0.00017531912,0.06794403,0.0003366655,0.9244981,0.0013047174,0.005228263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059866692,0.00006526423,0.000084076135,0.00002610117,0.00002105081,0.00007196675,0.00009919049,0.2645875,0.00014509828,0.73305815,0.0017560846,0.00002565689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047757663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003875139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064766975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026498088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018613152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027492404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040404944","doi":"10.1155/2014/459375","title":"Cloud Service Selection Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Scientific World JOURNAL","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":185,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Universiti Malaya; Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Cloud computing; Computer science; Scalability; Service (business); Selection (genetic algorithm); Provisioning; Taxonomy (biology); Data science; Management science; Operations research; Database; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.3311839264977251,"score_gpt":0.5105724779710321,"score_spread":0.179388551473307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040404944","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010066409,0.38948318,0.57727176,0.0028640316,0.0004379758,0.0008283925,0.0003431825,0.00022329288,0.018481897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28509,0.31376773,0.39619416,0.0006062946,0.00057490007,0.0007375758,0.0005803127,0.000048632603,0.0024004183],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936459,0.0030935798,0.00051483506,0.00052854576,0.0020056532,0.000211574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947653,0.0040189023,0.00034098286,0.00009664424,0.00070869504,0.00006950973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005593287,0.0019482075,0.0029157973,0.008488606,0.0007664856,0.002931492,0.0021472147,0.001292133,0.0020547358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009283683,0.000651971,0.0028361483,0.009777101,0.00076322135,0.001749598,0.0012952924,0.0016380722,0.00048267946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109196706,0.00026780902,0.0032335762,0.013247203,0.0012800883,0.00031547056,0.00031302508,0.15533723,0.0012291602,0.054726254,0.0061565884,0.76378447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015095176,0.0005265316,0.004923336,0.009136193,0.001519774,0.0013194882,0.0010803629,0.70658857,0.0036562937,0.16565068,0.10516999,0.00027782182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004639861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062911627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008488606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033291709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034427617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029580474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040692760","doi":"10.1007/s10661-007-9715-1","title":"Development of a landfill model to prioritize design and operating objectives","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Ranking (information retrieval); Delphi method; Process (computing); Delphi; Engineering; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Operations research; Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.15015013456131002,"score_gpt":0.4334789253459293,"score_spread":0.28332879078461926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040692760","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08230279,0.00009843855,0.9015175,0.00044585334,0.000032980046,0.00024019837,0.00067192834,0.00092168985,0.013768678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6962333,0.00014683444,0.29582262,0.0000705925,0.0000111961235,0.0005930778,0.0005868101,0.00010855656,0.006426969],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998248,0.000052691827,0.000008236715,0.000028344306,0.0000579362,0.000028048622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996766,0.00016300035,0.000026414571,0.00002047375,0.00008983297,0.000023624232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058586174,0.0006411285,0.0007598023,0.0006491934,0.00054828875,0.0011536838,0.0013034137,0.0012522157,0.004114497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011713833,0.00044298213,0.0008007106,0.0005471465,0.00037367753,0.0009084299,0.0005596592,0.00071558665,0.0004615566],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116129,0.000016608685,0.00022036038,0.000013076013,0.0000081887165,0.000027537628,0.000011368939,0.99236554,0.00034660497,0.003146147,0.00017843097,0.0036545799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050344706,0.00000646757,0.000028884642,0.0000019647625,0.0000037224454,0.0000036299784,0.0000048255615,0.9983853,0.00018452202,0.0011243257,0.00024882305,0.0000024428368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0252755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019638035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0252755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012093955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029858723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05025673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040833276","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2013.01.006","title":"A proof for the positive definiteness of the Jaccard index matrix","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Jaccard index; Mathematics; Positive definiteness; Matrix (chemical analysis); Positive-definite matrix; Distance matrix; Metric (unit); Combinatorics; Euclidean distance; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics; Statistics; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors","score_opus":0.07018941519558516,"score_gpt":0.4050584867001693,"score_spread":0.3348690715045841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040833276","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060488796,0.0010210406,0.9753879,0.0018958463,0.00062340294,0.00008084845,0.0002530494,0.00018444724,0.014504545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3350433,0.002812854,0.6460418,0.0027396532,0.002958892,0.0005521629,0.0005358617,0.00037673162,0.008938617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993883,0.0019331533,0.00037262417,0.0011984658,0.0023188372,0.00029385914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95033586,0.033741236,0.0023326452,0.0038192482,0.008604182,0.0011668695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006811082,0.0013899714,0.0013806124,0.004081302,0.0018536574,0.003925711,0.0021318174,0.0022442024,0.012146518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06483332,0.0009114419,0.0016963166,0.0036737358,0.0057672258,0.006988593,0.0040476103,0.0067168972,0.0026692778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005112164,0.00009523811,0.0005855016,0.00035069726,0.000060959537,0.0003957197,0.0003899567,0.0063283583,0.0057699727,0.9277881,0.009530549,0.048653845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002986096,0.0000660094,0.00081664015,0.000105229126,0.000030542717,0.0006860757,0.0000909874,0.05156148,0.0019697174,0.9354197,0.009132253,0.00009143729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010999092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008883926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012146518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011616455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018616944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040634096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041316656","doi":"10.1504/ijdats.2015.067700","title":"Selection of hazardous industrial waste transportation firm using extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hazardous waste; Fuzzy logic; Selection (genetic algorithm); Site selection; Fuzzy set; VIKOR method; Process (computing); Computer science; Waste management; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.38138470809794883,"score_gpt":0.5034303262233883,"score_spread":0.12204561812543951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041316656","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096825466,0.0003251862,0.89811254,0.00024664702,0.000030292464,0.00019205977,0.00008163926,0.000080901715,0.0041052285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8330546,0.00042754097,0.16180299,0.00006822809,0.00003181816,0.00041782047,0.00016980669,0.000025192474,0.004002081],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989856,0.00043452272,0.00005146251,0.00015648436,0.00023236476,0.0001395843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989058,0.0006352919,0.00014130029,0.000029081373,0.00022300087,0.00006549921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018141001,0.00094669854,0.0016327772,0.0014777312,0.00074450986,0.0019259069,0.0016755316,0.0014230696,0.0022324147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002146795,0.00057103887,0.0013384905,0.0011684352,0.0005525008,0.0011301603,0.0009469321,0.0007702649,0.00020578771],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004131294,0.000042231422,0.0011339063,0.00006677749,0.000041404324,0.00016811474,0.00007561961,0.9803869,0.0010125759,0.004132295,0.00024034451,0.012658509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000505665,0.000017646733,0.000110595436,0.0000041084095,0.0000056213166,0.000015048431,0.000015026074,0.99891806,0.00009501709,0.0007321008,0.00007632835,0.0000052676005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009844923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006835531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009844923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014726992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016919296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019575238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041377425","doi":"10.1016/j.cageo.2009.05.011","title":"Using the fuzzy majority approach for GIS-based multicriteria group decision-making","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Geosciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Group decision-making; Operationalization; Decision maker; Fuzzy logic; Group (periodic table); Computer science; Data mining; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1901081355967842,"score_gpt":0.4395995889815037,"score_spread":0.2494914533847195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041377425","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013631171,0.00013682438,0.9839288,0.00012559196,0.000044273238,0.000057772548,0.000022125254,0.000088400804,0.0019650967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40015107,0.00020257579,0.5979114,0.000089980625,0.000059000384,0.00021320028,0.00006725729,0.000047534453,0.0012578884],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546117,0.0023508738,0.00027540687,0.00036512874,0.0013640203,0.00018337813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960443,0.0026303036,0.0001937369,0.00021932716,0.0008297257,0.000082578415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054767835,0.0009214472,0.0018793778,0.0015008993,0.0014598345,0.002083868,0.0014806011,0.0010483954,0.0023166377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011174774,0.00048145902,0.0013009859,0.0014367083,0.00080868986,0.0019721668,0.0016919441,0.0010384045,0.00042158755],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044024666,0.00012610751,0.0014724487,0.00043331215,0.0005328298,0.000267073,0.0006282926,0.58051777,0.0065304874,0.044632338,0.0015006354,0.3629184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027340386,0.0000872521,0.00021609172,0.000033314893,0.00006451907,0.000047989823,0.0001080422,0.95873225,0.0022516353,0.03708846,0.0013142261,0.000028811844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034388897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004073307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054767835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083104975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013042209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02896434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041505992","doi":"10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602040","title":"Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process &amp; the analytic network process","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Operational Research Society","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Balanced scorecard; Analytic network process; Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Performance measurement; Process (computing); Process management; Dependency (UML); Set (abstract data type); Scarcity; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Business; Engineering; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Marketing","score_opus":0.4029990021949929,"score_gpt":0.5727073674400269,"score_spread":0.16970836524503402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041505992","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056404066,0.00019293095,0.9871126,0.00072492735,0.000057583355,0.0005102211,0.000052439093,0.00013438983,0.0055744867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06550056,0.00024017265,0.9331109,0.000076483484,0.000028742637,0.00043553713,0.00008205049,0.00002871223,0.000496831],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.94406694,0.03657792,0.0031030793,0.0018205035,0.013689222,0.0007422966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785019,0.012340141,0.002190173,0.0015332684,0.0049915886,0.00044295986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038307283,0.0012741139,0.0013759225,0.005083663,0.0018748402,0.0073803887,0.0018583331,0.0015801145,0.0020432237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05856464,0.00061702216,0.0008442336,0.0072292173,0.0031546087,0.006749559,0.004358107,0.0022548223,0.00050134485],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107241765,0.00016440124,0.0023335519,0.0006418363,0.00015575188,0.00019589711,0.0023127857,0.08471906,0.0026029872,0.41439828,0.0037180095,0.48865026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014826383,0.0003702531,0.0017447878,0.0005268431,0.00009225967,0.00012585675,0.0013221179,0.3774578,0.0043699765,0.57992893,0.033760764,0.00015203477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041834316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036830434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038307283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040807514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008445252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2025907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041702587","doi":"10.1002/env.595","title":"On some aspects of data integration techniques with environmental applications","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmetrics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Judgement; Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Data integration; Phrase; Environmental pollution; Operations research; Management science; Data mining; Environmental science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Environmental protection; Artificial intelligence; Geography; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.1661904549501696,"score_gpt":0.3949134972519556,"score_spread":0.22872304230178603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041702587","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009207755,0.0048080636,0.975771,0.0045209224,0.00022085739,0.00022844803,0.00006323628,0.00040943339,0.004770176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.066751495,0.0022018978,0.928379,0.00046234,0.0002897475,0.0003381881,0.00013811528,0.00013651009,0.0013026313],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9507776,0.03339023,0.0030708672,0.0017905011,0.010312115,0.0006587074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84604925,0.12249236,0.0040074773,0.008069359,0.018450828,0.00093075837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.067469664,0.0016302281,0.0014626866,0.006822394,0.0016062518,0.009911133,0.003504556,0.0033751158,0.00369525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16492417,0.0012627575,0.002503543,0.022130221,0.004166828,0.011675225,0.0062833754,0.005757443,0.0011587059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036181533,0.00027380756,0.006657475,0.00090645504,0.0003410926,0.0005433559,0.0018442405,0.042635914,0.0026064396,0.34217912,0.0064038145,0.59524643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007586895,0.0002073407,0.002728533,0.00070306595,0.00016925721,0.0006376507,0.0011912952,0.5505637,0.007829569,0.388968,0.046780683,0.00014495476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003719471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002097098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067469664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018918946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020056274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35681796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043020814","doi":"10.1007/s10479-008-0410-6","title":"A confidence voting process for ranking problems based on support vector machines","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Operations Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Support vector machine; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Ranking SVM; Voting; Machine learning; Rank (graph theory); Artificial intelligence; Process (computing); Theory of computation; Data mining; Task (project management); Algorithm; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.7667455877346339,"score_gpt":0.6232891373877681,"score_spread":0.14345645034686572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043020814","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007851444,0.00013325876,0.9913119,0.00012201113,0.000038113787,0.00006435828,0.00002583196,0.00011894175,0.00033410778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33466572,0.00019197438,0.6623509,0.00014796059,0.00023271494,0.0003671401,0.00033929828,0.000107122556,0.0015971288],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829763,0.008945653,0.0013437389,0.001580708,0.0042789257,0.00087471324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95278794,0.032424215,0.0019157685,0.0029813545,0.008826132,0.0010645504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023336697,0.001029107,0.003648971,0.002915183,0.0013385116,0.0031089878,0.0047310493,0.0029611445,0.00337859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060439695,0.0009139738,0.0020563556,0.0035342267,0.0018619143,0.0049163857,0.0035340185,0.0047310516,0.00072534714],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085342425,0.0004432069,0.0029069073,0.00035394458,0.00032701693,0.00016839075,0.00045919293,0.36509025,0.0037711514,0.081522,0.0044901245,0.5396144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041253395,0.00010118825,0.00021354711,0.000019936837,0.000030092242,0.000019055022,0.0000162994,0.9767041,0.0009454084,0.021381238,0.00050910865,0.0000186668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023820333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018461717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023336697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010222417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018665112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123417735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044037236","doi":"10.1139/l06-116","title":"Primary influential factors in the management of public transportation projects in Taiwan","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Procurement; Government (linguistics); Index (typography); Analytic hierarchy process; Business; Scope (computer science); Order (exchange); Fuzzy logic; Transport engineering; Operations management; Operations research; Economics; Engineering; Marketing; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.08281028345691342,"score_gpt":0.3176001494296663,"score_spread":0.23478986597275286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044037236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99161303,0.0002929454,0.0035845558,0.0002101584,0.0000060131365,0.00007005531,0.000033489105,0.000012147541,0.00417761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893683,0.000096745855,0.00074150506,0.0000049699324,0.0000030122005,0.000010489407,0.000016110016,0.000001224497,0.00018906007],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972524,0.00090810674,0.00020557485,0.00014207185,0.001075737,0.00041609714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931161,0.002879301,0.0015489648,0.00014756797,0.0015102156,0.0007979305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002343739,0.00031847256,0.00023875694,0.0025749197,0.001177169,0.001708666,0.00027990658,0.0003456624,0.00086692057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008926499,0.00017732954,0.00032328267,0.0016907349,0.00059715577,0.0005151822,0.0008602877,0.0003882304,0.00006876038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017784865,0.00036816776,0.82497776,0.00038728828,0.00022983762,0.0018878243,0.005788627,0.020811345,0.0043985294,0.006642931,0.001023339,0.13330656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018616896,0.00026416668,0.94458985,0.00015097465,0.0001619388,0.00041619616,0.010312966,0.032640107,0.0023750889,0.0046232776,0.004390556,0.000056225614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010883149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020833544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010883149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026846908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032392503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021639585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044423959","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2007.10.009","title":"Performance evaluation: An integrated method using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy preference relations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Data envelopment analysis; Preference; Preference relation; Ranking (information retrieval); Relation (database); Fuzzy logic; Preference learning; Rank (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Computer science; Mathematics; Decision maker; Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.8028777714725182,"score_gpt":0.6170902791930558,"score_spread":0.18578749227946234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044423959","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017878752,0.00029067305,0.9784863,0.00008132353,0.000024878318,0.00017181502,0.00008395816,0.00027358206,0.0027086628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3597074,0.00045354373,0.63787025,0.00003114048,0.000032130887,0.00044081677,0.00018549425,0.00009491447,0.001184452],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895963,0.0043420484,0.0006368237,0.0004133619,0.004677895,0.0003334871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99421716,0.0032801027,0.00053232815,0.0004507267,0.0013745542,0.00014508519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0102277715,0.0022966757,0.0029958624,0.009034612,0.0010907956,0.0044685327,0.0011010917,0.001364078,0.002788954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015504617,0.00076861883,0.0020273197,0.009780343,0.0008712399,0.0042731697,0.002299923,0.0011782858,0.0007364026],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062257244,0.000635717,0.0051946756,0.0012640483,0.0007127278,0.0001559001,0.00092974736,0.256565,0.013457112,0.06223723,0.0021530646,0.65607214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068811234,0.0004932579,0.0030889257,0.0001505308,0.00028404337,0.00015406366,0.00034472882,0.9491018,0.012759574,0.030150926,0.0032508965,0.00015245008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001959287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015104071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0102277715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017310295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026697144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05409026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046090861","doi":"10.1016/s0888-613x(00)00033-5","title":"Probabilistic satisfiability with imprecise probabilities","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Satisfiability; Probabilistic logic; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Mathematics; Computer science; Algorithm; Discrete mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.05687405436042048,"score_gpt":0.37496030330461827,"score_spread":0.3180862489441978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046090861","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030246338,0.0008609479,0.96192133,0.0018757608,0.00008742953,0.0000796102,0.0002553449,0.00013595958,0.0045373095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72546303,0.0015098806,0.26939917,0.00044965633,0.0004170799,0.00027271398,0.000593934,0.00007208436,0.0018224451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98481756,0.007122644,0.0012626405,0.0013462122,0.0047780173,0.00067295047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93849635,0.05439698,0.0023880436,0.0027077012,0.0016279343,0.00038299206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010381551,0.001214679,0.0023363293,0.0030672767,0.001148744,0.0055885655,0.0027458954,0.0029674247,0.003910187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07846018,0.002183109,0.0032731318,0.0040112208,0.004562736,0.014427944,0.0037278489,0.004632602,0.00037388972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020136852,0.000079263824,0.0012873478,0.00054311927,0.0002834462,0.00076909905,0.0005227625,0.46379098,0.0006075658,0.49338785,0.0018059091,0.036721263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000353689,0.000016336526,0.00015032777,0.000053081487,0.000051944506,0.0001245174,0.000057225614,0.3549188,0.00033705946,0.64363515,0.00059831515,0.000021780172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034252848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025121362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010381551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023412458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015224542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054903567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046510303","doi":"10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2006)132:12(2027)","title":"Optimal Seismic Design Considering Risk Attitude, Societal Tolerable Risk Level, and Life Quality Criterion","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Structural Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Decision maker; Risk analysis (engineering); Seismic risk; Optimal design; Risk-seeking; Expected utility hypothesis; Function (biology); Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Optimal decision; Decision analysis; Actuarial science; Operations research; Economics; Mathematics; Engineering; Business; Statistics; Decision tree; Data mining; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.1482095887073355,"score_gpt":0.38371141406870546,"score_spread":0.23550182536136996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046510303","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1903439,0.0002013146,0.8007728,0.00027945684,0.000013520412,0.00010767838,0.000048879527,0.000046464298,0.0081860265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91854906,0.00011169601,0.08018837,0.000034263026,0.000008287858,0.000102492246,0.000031683376,0.000014070319,0.00096006476],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977169,0.0011751761,0.00008864411,0.00020635883,0.0005472934,0.00026558927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981804,0.001057951,0.00024349958,0.00010079681,0.00032557783,0.00009181041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030630208,0.00081439153,0.00076473533,0.0009972678,0.00033339954,0.0011541827,0.0005941332,0.0011554688,0.0013904553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005943799,0.00035879854,0.0006342893,0.00045723794,0.0008635128,0.0010707709,0.00097476057,0.000552291,0.00016815674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001537982,0.000074066746,0.0015880906,0.00008986554,0.000038336304,0.000100401136,0.000096530894,0.9263777,0.004782469,0.040232565,0.00027103187,0.026195113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048179143,0.00024391086,0.000974792,0.000032152187,0.00003814851,0.000070037684,0.00014071302,0.95310515,0.0029178367,0.041743506,0.0006614995,0.000024068226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009502713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009231468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030630208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009732841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011739497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016198993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047478120","doi":"10.4018/ijpmat.2012010104","title":"Selection of Concrete Production Facility Location Integrating Fuzzy AHP with TOPSIS Method","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Productivity Management and Assessment Technologies","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Analytic hierarchy process; Ideal solution; Facility location problem; Production (economics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Delphi method; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Operations research; Delphi; Decision model; Site selection; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Economics","score_opus":0.09645552508550574,"score_gpt":0.4356868303556376,"score_spread":0.33923130527013184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047478120","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038190093,0.0001803676,0.9551868,0.00010344077,0.00004425227,0.0009243425,0.00017176986,0.0002931371,0.0049056853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3150008,0.00034534925,0.68220854,0.000023564578,0.000016130756,0.0007638456,0.00019836033,0.000024634732,0.001418719],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631065,0.0013885513,0.00025820205,0.0001690326,0.0016349044,0.00023872113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985423,0.00062818005,0.00014605456,0.000066756955,0.0005605827,0.000056235902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036384095,0.001115707,0.0014244567,0.0040813177,0.0016542021,0.0016975721,0.0012326867,0.00067548093,0.0030751093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040111006,0.00050175335,0.0014132431,0.0037715987,0.00054817484,0.0008769676,0.0011868746,0.00062156195,0.00038267113],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040375453,0.000301499,0.0026678478,0.0017767004,0.00030915628,0.00083191827,0.0012737273,0.63606805,0.031774696,0.020830229,0.0027588443,0.30100366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078079815,0.00021260456,0.0008172315,0.000107068045,0.00009302463,0.00012059631,0.0005920417,0.9730769,0.011472587,0.010427102,0.0029301862,0.000072559254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008612029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00902534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008612029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013499118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033247531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019241989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047651186","doi":"10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00102-3","title":"Fuzzy versions of the covering circle problem","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Center (category theory); Mathematical optimization; Plane (geometry); Fuzzy set; Fuzzy number; Polynomial; Computer science; Geometry; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.45987380977741976,"score_gpt":0.4781812495719007,"score_spread":0.018307439794480962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047651186","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14826664,0.0013581024,0.8077226,0.0022389176,0.00022303037,0.00008621447,0.00044757666,0.00010139982,0.039555587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8789326,0.001034226,0.10494469,0.00022694864,0.00038197546,0.000118436714,0.00055153016,0.00006973327,0.013739805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821067,0.000936241,0.0000696537,0.00024638392,0.0003699453,0.00016713436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99465793,0.0034753357,0.00043488183,0.00049211405,0.00056882383,0.0003708881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027226794,0.00063646655,0.0010589705,0.0010764247,0.00055440725,0.0023740174,0.0011813146,0.0017056211,0.0062811663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012466589,0.00030548492,0.0007783318,0.0015495502,0.0012135012,0.0036312859,0.0012425149,0.0015369656,0.00034160918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001809284,0.000058277295,0.00038036142,0.000115392795,0.00006369417,0.00015565382,0.00016797382,0.13150126,0.0007491768,0.83880913,0.004257734,0.023560382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028899005,0.000035835015,0.00028285815,0.00001672961,0.000013067358,0.000086931024,0.000052183867,0.40851882,0.00036196364,0.58788466,0.00269791,0.000020164349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013256428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006509741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062811663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010782388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069698214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021012604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048824771","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.045","title":"A holistic approach for optimal design of air quality monitoring network expansion in an urban area","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atmospheric Environment","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Air quality index; Fuzzy logic; Environmental science; Analytic hierarchy process; Pollutant; Hierarchy; Population; Environmental engineering; Computer science; Statistics; Operations research; Data mining; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Meteorology; Mathematics; Geography; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2616768790814322,"score_gpt":0.4057418220766598,"score_spread":0.1440649429952276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048824771","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043322187,0.00031068234,0.95039487,0.00023707299,0.000027477183,0.00011537235,0.00008089814,0.000116369076,0.0053950823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.782729,0.0003469063,0.21481551,0.000090031244,0.00003993821,0.00027823527,0.00008700533,0.000055260727,0.0015580689],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983845,0.00069988705,0.000057186313,0.00021218558,0.00040520667,0.00024105835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921334,0.00039950805,0.00009596124,0.000041265608,0.00016760535,0.000082265644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002397829,0.0013159717,0.002159397,0.0017269456,0.0007191731,0.0025190054,0.0015666246,0.001710717,0.0024610548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036697062,0.0012730871,0.0014608561,0.0015827662,0.00088546355,0.0015967572,0.0021521407,0.0008595577,0.0001667092],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002755814,0.000021922791,0.00021542698,0.000035091103,0.0000476925,0.00004953072,0.000023648867,0.9843779,0.001013674,0.002322787,0.0001297937,0.01173489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009210707,0.00003858559,0.00019647961,0.0000074386057,0.00002866013,0.000015490572,0.000027628761,0.996555,0.00022759604,0.0027260692,0.00016001459,0.000007869715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057085915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007983469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057085915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019665079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002246188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014268041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049279861","doi":"10.1006/mssp.2000.1395","title":"USING FUZZY LINGUISTICS TO SELECT OPTIMUM MAINTENANCE AND CONDITION MONITORING STRATEGIES","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Selection (genetic algorithm); Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Engineering; Management science; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.18901971035501325,"score_gpt":0.42999697653673036,"score_spread":0.2409772661817171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049279861","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14033556,0.00025050523,0.84997493,0.0005210122,0.00003737181,0.00017854515,0.00011095111,0.00037873763,0.008212427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60021347,0.00011013566,0.39830658,0.00007124692,0.000026531477,0.00018882994,0.00010125486,0.000044677465,0.00093726075],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989858,0.00046027175,0.00010434681,0.00012904491,0.00025900448,0.00006144356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496764,0.003550111,0.000314694,0.00012291997,0.0009659115,0.000078687386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002868941,0.0006384687,0.0007301115,0.0029274402,0.00111885,0.0019265063,0.0006478266,0.0007334876,0.0021642952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012425465,0.0003314214,0.000667407,0.0009779768,0.0008157584,0.0022210293,0.00069287245,0.0005843357,0.00028075837],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010780573,0.00037068257,0.0072501553,0.0007451812,0.00028795318,0.00046705417,0.0030638005,0.28255662,0.01977709,0.11378949,0.0041608517,0.5664531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009173488,0.00016962476,0.0010251579,0.00008226262,0.000106344734,0.000059465463,0.0005203669,0.9184905,0.0060041356,0.071554564,0.001855758,0.000040061866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024980106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043031313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029274402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014258702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015761977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015172541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050122359","doi":"10.1080/07408170802322630","title":"Probability, chance and the probability of chance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIE Transactions","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ryerson University","keywords":"Hierarchy; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Meaning (existential); Construct (python library); Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.32897376990663646,"score_gpt":0.3929668566305833,"score_spread":0.06399308672394682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050122359","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020298025,0.049459875,0.70997924,0.06388618,0.002875244,0.000121724064,0.00051936024,0.00016065157,0.15269968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86654824,0.018814191,0.094347276,0.0047675353,0.005023041,0.0004530966,0.00017669606,0.00010027459,0.009769728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98593223,0.008480109,0.00066352024,0.0016864398,0.0026126243,0.000625154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684427,0.026154982,0.0021514706,0.0012545822,0.0013038818,0.0006924434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013868082,0.0012039101,0.0015054761,0.003949543,0.0033041432,0.0090377,0.0022266665,0.0048292265,0.005698132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035990864,0.00057494314,0.0013721008,0.0033409551,0.031593613,0.014636458,0.0040286784,0.0056222407,0.00065388874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007604061,0.0000020740542,0.00009858482,0.00003825044,0.000007716063,0.000028104389,0.00020804867,0.0007646803,0.000020715705,0.9959085,0.0005107095,0.0024050674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034176667,0.000009425787,0.00012956138,0.00006467332,0.0000064560695,0.000051957893,0.000120604964,0.0011549178,0.000034293273,0.99132055,0.0070929895,0.000011079536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003164369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021238392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013868082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004815917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00245535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07334226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051202478","doi":"10.4102/jtscm.v7i1.87","title":"Supplier evaluation: The first step in effective sourcing","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Transport Canada","funders":"Univerzita Pardubice","keywords":"Purchasing; Business; Quality (philosophy); Process management; Supplier evaluation; Supplier relationship management; Marketing; Selection (genetic algorithm); Strategic sourcing; Risk analysis (engineering); Supply chain; Operations management; Industrial organization; Computer science; Supply chain management; Strategic planning; Economics","score_opus":0.045252099504200755,"score_gpt":0.33734875129946656,"score_spread":0.2920966517952658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051202478","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035962176,0.013822943,0.67491555,0.046293464,0.001850416,0.004762823,0.00046178343,0.0018970126,0.22003372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25057954,0.008099398,0.70298636,0.004468979,0.00078816625,0.0019056542,0.00054802245,0.0007155383,0.029908452],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94347245,0.021561332,0.0025986868,0.0015733239,0.029072663,0.0017215498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93819314,0.03238289,0.0036048896,0.0034399377,0.019347675,0.0030315176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06628935,0.0017716569,0.0026701526,0.0054368046,0.006134887,0.016380223,0.0027921454,0.003936327,0.013393064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06416831,0.0011851591,0.0010169515,0.0040647928,0.0039004083,0.012306192,0.0063255248,0.0059610456,0.00680946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032504086,0.00079048466,0.0062102,0.0031844503,0.00018029107,0.0005598056,0.0094316555,0.0034337987,0.009300569,0.14545801,0.047997553,0.77312815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019670748,0.0021818297,0.016185855,0.008158665,0.0002677171,0.0013572492,0.022345956,0.018036239,0.028855529,0.4285479,0.47316447,0.00070192985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029819869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026735005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06628935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005432572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025223248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3505758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053481674","doi":"10.1068/a35156","title":"GIS–Multicriteria Evaluation with Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA): Case Study of Developing Watershed Management Strategies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning A Economy and Space","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fanshawe College; Toronto and Region Conservation Authority; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Parameterized complexity; Watershed; Function (biology); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Transformation (genetics); Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Machine learning; Algorithm","score_opus":0.10047772021626743,"score_gpt":0.347490874293913,"score_spread":0.24701315407764557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053481674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7350256,0.000443678,0.24626516,0.0005579537,0.0000138271125,0.0008721271,0.00024761233,0.00026343454,0.016310612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7565444,0.00022192388,0.24152192,0.000022847673,0.000004279453,0.00023669364,0.00012599713,0.000030812356,0.0012911689],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964281,0.0022627306,0.00012679139,0.00016309584,0.0007714693,0.0002479079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970126,0.0019389853,0.00021987564,0.00019196651,0.00049476314,0.00014180814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047142217,0.0009078489,0.00070319633,0.001926014,0.0013257937,0.0014367083,0.0009700033,0.0011636512,0.001369964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007077973,0.0003656146,0.0007314779,0.004216635,0.0013518578,0.0015336359,0.0010786883,0.00063812657,0.0001223399],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030756817,0.0006601794,0.014848315,0.00046721898,0.00014724441,0.0025029797,0.0018892111,0.712896,0.0059556556,0.03307266,0.0015638962,0.2256891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018502682,0.00065265305,0.008324564,0.000081324,0.00009431239,0.00060273736,0.0026952187,0.944595,0.017572895,0.016701913,0.008410837,0.0000835697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041361146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074093975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041361146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043946016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042929114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08224082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053585552","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.02.015","title":"Aggregation of fuzzy views of a large number of stakeholders for multi-objective flood management decision-making","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Flood myth; Fuzzy set; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Operations research; Value (mathematics); Management science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Geography; Engineering; Machine learning","score_opus":0.130756900421959,"score_gpt":0.4103394159219969,"score_spread":0.2795825155000379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053585552","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40829638,0.00039355925,0.58739096,0.000503985,0.000048588183,0.00021071154,0.00021486825,0.0001105389,0.002830413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88384336,0.00011736342,0.11544288,0.000029474324,0.000022338574,0.00015130533,0.00017076082,0.000009575101,0.00021283716],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957979,0.0022547941,0.00028398438,0.0001672272,0.0012622654,0.00023392109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932035,0.0043562343,0.0006088011,0.00041269828,0.00095878623,0.00045988982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009619681,0.0006893707,0.0010491572,0.0029145663,0.0010587748,0.0019001168,0.0007139781,0.0009298557,0.0010583743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0117795635,0.00047448688,0.0013483173,0.0020263302,0.00053490466,0.0029647565,0.0017680968,0.00096949696,0.00013288345],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018899477,0.00079771265,0.02467931,0.0007518571,0.0012647922,0.0011309226,0.00393692,0.56942886,0.044775747,0.026271814,0.0030648357,0.32200724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004458898,0.00024221266,0.006415078,0.00008059305,0.00025094807,0.00008332765,0.0013766304,0.9548901,0.0057586874,0.029789744,0.0010099942,0.00005806499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015011559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031850608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009619681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009385304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086508825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050874352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053901450","doi":"10.7771/1932-6246.1152","title":"On Evaluating Human Problem Solving of Computationally Hard Problems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Problem Solving","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Perception; Computational problem; Computational complexity theory; Euclidean geometry; Cognition; Computational model; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive science; Mathematics; Algorithm; Psychology","score_opus":0.20577325479371772,"score_gpt":0.4290050318615999,"score_spread":0.22323177706788216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053901450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7724397,0.008995779,0.11731678,0.0036765644,0.00049064704,0.0007949467,0.000850446,0.000541814,0.094893314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95736957,0.0018587031,0.036236268,0.0005343871,0.00012324395,0.00046682023,0.00074222905,0.0000967602,0.002571962],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97877,0.01392874,0.0010937721,0.0019663908,0.003694369,0.0005466829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88045645,0.097540066,0.008888046,0.004506604,0.0061663087,0.0024425685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0128453225,0.001601947,0.0010704895,0.0030979074,0.000989033,0.0040515796,0.0012735497,0.0023123447,0.0055940747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14885294,0.0003311097,0.0008219473,0.0022648522,0.003429164,0.0051206285,0.0026225345,0.0015903679,0.0011264811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002860605,0.0017744808,0.18730026,0.00377293,0.0016118395,0.0005815103,0.014122491,0.15123709,0.010467763,0.1034838,0.024503067,0.4982841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046256284,0.0052357735,0.24601957,0.0013860848,0.00031696074,0.0012403255,0.011950971,0.35465795,0.007305088,0.33031952,0.040492237,0.0006129251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002239978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019327813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0128453225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014917473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008032218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06793338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054219113","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.005","title":"Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":318,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; TOPSIS; Computer science; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Fuzzy logic; Risk analysis (engineering); Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Process (computing); Sustainable transport; Operations research; Business; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.16140854590010217,"score_gpt":0.4177091967761213,"score_spread":0.2563006508760191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054219113","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2216764,0.0019046024,0.75854313,0.0003135668,0.00017223894,0.0004041381,0.00016780308,0.00027018055,0.016547836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84504724,0.0006337521,0.15299045,0.000020790416,0.000022564125,0.000094377596,0.000046148434,0.000013129745,0.0011315969],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945844,0.0028799262,0.00029116904,0.00016019194,0.0019184189,0.00016601961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961345,0.0024967364,0.00017273222,0.000113344315,0.0010039265,0.00007869602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054295515,0.00093831355,0.0014257262,0.0042534056,0.0011368684,0.0021569242,0.0006960592,0.00075178733,0.0018192097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009519253,0.00034294854,0.0010503263,0.0041707195,0.000604908,0.0011487298,0.00076012063,0.0007229187,0.00018750005],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007525119,0.00031646978,0.007844256,0.0010513479,0.00088598003,0.0005451966,0.00085546524,0.4290133,0.01671256,0.0209415,0.0011617469,0.5199196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049668568,0.0006461125,0.004418212,0.00008340606,0.00030397353,0.00017127005,0.00046922648,0.9714087,0.006296628,0.014513976,0.0015569596,0.000081826394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008718177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009568144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008718177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014723893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016144924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028714538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054685447","doi":"10.4236/ti.2010.14032","title":"An Application of Fuzzy Set Theory to the Weighted Average Cost of Capital and Capital Structure Decision","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology and Investment","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Weighted average cost of capital; Cost of capital; Economics; Capital structure; Cost of equity; Fuzzy logic; Tax shield; Ranking (information retrieval); Econometrics; Debt; Microeconomics; Actuarial science; Computer science; Finance; Tax reform; Public economics; Financial capital; Capital formation; State income tax; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.023118803139394815,"score_gpt":0.34218128912441725,"score_spread":0.31906248598502246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054685447","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069719916,0.0007786249,0.9845442,0.000471798,0.000120297074,0.000054873115,0.000045514586,0.0000245596,0.0069880774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48281124,0.0023114474,0.5102406,0.00018827793,0.0002814688,0.00023563644,0.00008903345,0.000034895005,0.003807347],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820507,0.0007651039,0.000093577204,0.0001835465,0.0006586519,0.00009410809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757534,0.0017133787,0.00021878623,0.00008457046,0.0003562343,0.00005160546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026404434,0.0008995373,0.001072717,0.002203393,0.0007782402,0.0024096328,0.0011858083,0.0012516417,0.0027009577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007150754,0.0004206109,0.0013327181,0.0024712603,0.0015350824,0.0027919647,0.0009495975,0.0017328004,0.00017558779],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027687678,0.000041021172,0.0005932128,0.00015010373,0.00007269724,0.00014251303,0.00011056604,0.57401085,0.0006216853,0.36914268,0.0011598234,0.053927116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009374222,0.000042066233,0.00029666582,0.000049668957,0.000022666858,0.00006485774,0.00003839445,0.7209892,0.00048085765,0.27474117,0.0032317962,0.000033388707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058666593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005191084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058666593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003026537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016524736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021959126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054694737","doi":"10.1139/x05-243","title":"The risk of decision making with incomplete criteria weight information","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rank (graph theory); Complete information; Function (biology); Value of information; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Preference; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Order (exchange); Mathematics; Statistics; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Economics","score_opus":0.1175053867331432,"score_gpt":0.4321114113883499,"score_spread":0.3146060246552067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054694737","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16615745,0.0029680915,0.81196964,0.0056581665,0.00013161867,0.000430498,0.0003964247,0.0002472484,0.012040839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83923256,0.0012796809,0.15625122,0.0005048709,0.00011200959,0.000567193,0.00019253156,0.00006886103,0.0017910481],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93716425,0.03928444,0.0032540606,0.0031055424,0.015536651,0.0016551594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6654053,0.28973296,0.018826999,0.01693503,0.007985852,0.001113809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06938092,0.0018447285,0.0034795513,0.0033533627,0.0016684303,0.0044632014,0.0023456393,0.0040623904,0.0036153141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21296854,0.0017624091,0.0025948703,0.0031992914,0.0041330634,0.008353274,0.0044531208,0.0066386973,0.0005220404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012982765,0.00024486426,0.011693317,0.0012809223,0.0010370921,0.0014130851,0.0029658205,0.6392128,0.0020706058,0.23652442,0.0018789629,0.10037987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001904562,0.00040196563,0.0036879338,0.0005711139,0.0003418458,0.0008349448,0.00082972815,0.44762722,0.0020986148,0.53941244,0.003791454,0.00021229454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024967515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002161282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06938092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033547988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028529763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36692572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055303544","doi":"10.1002/cjce.20497","title":"A decision support tool formulti‐pollutants reduction incement industry using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Pollutant; Cement kiln; Environmental science; Reduction (mathematics); Weighting; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Waste management; Process engineering; Computer science; Environmental engineering; Engineering; Kiln; Operations research; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.15164026447459525,"score_gpt":0.3609260470483504,"score_spread":0.20928578257375516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055303544","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021766001,0.00016419699,0.97015846,0.00048011547,0.000034899593,0.0008715742,0.00073598087,0.0020939826,0.0036948055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1592873,0.00012734316,0.838121,0.00008090132,0.000016261913,0.0009304375,0.00054274604,0.00003830429,0.0008558188],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651563,0.0017621444,0.00036231807,0.0002474655,0.0009436668,0.00016876083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927362,0.005328673,0.00044367957,0.00017101978,0.0011384767,0.00018200968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058750277,0.0013663619,0.0011832088,0.0031814368,0.001426946,0.0025214003,0.0014317033,0.0011915802,0.0065434054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086002555,0.00064617,0.0013593095,0.001877318,0.0004980495,0.0011914014,0.0016205274,0.0013958765,0.0007034061],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056198775,0.0007766388,0.0031702458,0.002206514,0.00040733675,0.00088046223,0.0016053227,0.56539094,0.013830726,0.028055869,0.007195048,0.37591898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017648959,0.00019196938,0.00047552044,0.0001914507,0.00007840997,0.00007581672,0.000382728,0.9764965,0.003710475,0.012658066,0.0055273077,0.000035181667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008402228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007577908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008402228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016528787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029102364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03107047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056733560","doi":"10.1007/s12403-011-0041-z","title":"Fuzzy Based Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals Introduced into the Marine Environment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Exposure and Health","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Cumulative distribution function; Risk assessment; Fuzzy logic; Human health; Percentile; Health risk assessment; Environmental science; Mercury (programming language); Arsenic; Cadmium; Fuzzy set; Risk analysis (engineering); Probabilistic risk assessment; Computer science; Environmental health; Statistics; Mathematics; Probability density function; Business; Medicine; Materials science; Metallurgy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.30819859095035923,"score_gpt":0.46515540980304454,"score_spread":0.1569568188526853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056733560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.716933,0.0009577848,0.27691928,0.00041176844,0.00005152766,0.00009829626,0.00023328034,0.00008523651,0.004309843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98493505,0.00015065026,0.014217941,0.000025935906,0.000011333606,0.000024687914,0.00005951754,0.0000025140855,0.00057226897],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927706,0.0003123653,0.000042221513,0.000051402567,0.0002578402,0.00005929713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990663,0.0005901026,0.00010978184,0.000020922798,0.00016720075,0.00004571982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017812526,0.000620096,0.00057241047,0.0015535761,0.0003162056,0.0012338373,0.0006853705,0.00087416655,0.00082748604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024443355,0.0002198255,0.0008379475,0.000513981,0.00041669264,0.00049697823,0.0005060182,0.00035455008,0.00004720465],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009328316,0.0002538352,0.010653596,0.00026449087,0.00038395615,0.00040502622,0.00015074231,0.92167336,0.011679092,0.005510752,0.000425171,0.04766718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033125933,0.00034983474,0.0036700442,0.00002727998,0.00012124662,0.00010888333,0.00010935307,0.98402816,0.0042910585,0.006901168,0.00032779574,0.00003206569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005789052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004655607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005789052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012725276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051775883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01151067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056811939","doi":"10.1016/j.camwa.2010.04.043","title":"Fuzzy multiattribute grey related analysis using DEA","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Mathematics with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Data envelopment analysis; Rank (graph theory); Decision maker; Fuzzy logic; Interval (graph theory); Mathematics; Representation (politics); Preference; Data mining; Set (abstract data type); Focus (optics); Fuzzy set; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.10299578657480575,"score_gpt":0.3980462549984113,"score_spread":0.29505046842360555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056811939","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008075131,0.00013052412,0.99011594,0.000030868316,0.000019448122,0.00003448375,0.00004240599,0.000049403792,0.001501858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48785976,0.00048414798,0.5061589,0.00005458703,0.00004007121,0.00026003574,0.00027133804,0.00008666498,0.0047845435],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990758,0.00043709026,0.000059079346,0.00012480647,0.0002432993,0.00005995971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986877,0.0008357527,0.00006286832,0.00009163405,0.00029741268,0.000024633915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019529131,0.0006975862,0.0013502159,0.0017522125,0.00070672313,0.001567673,0.0007881532,0.00065447483,0.002746525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040673497,0.00032366105,0.0015758234,0.0021025273,0.0004402731,0.0013296189,0.00085482403,0.0009235194,0.0004302818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007809649,0.0000877125,0.000652226,0.00017765518,0.00017486469,0.00011473693,0.00012387814,0.76514727,0.0041475054,0.10075383,0.00075390737,0.12778832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001994183,0.000012200403,0.00010040503,0.0000072519274,0.000016729973,0.0000127991,0.000010625329,0.9841366,0.00070091296,0.014431861,0.00056167797,0.0000069338025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003197812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022682413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003197812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008991324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007919921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010328114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058343295","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvrad.2006.03.002","title":"Fuzzy rule-based modelling for human health risk from naturally occurring radioactive materials in produced water","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Radioactivity","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Human health; Dilution; Produced water; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy rule; Seawater; Pollutant; Fuzzy set; Environmental engineering; Computer science; Ecology; Biology; Environmental health","score_opus":0.07110085100246108,"score_gpt":0.3585448419880275,"score_spread":0.2874439909855664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058343295","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30994135,0.00054967427,0.6810556,0.00034224216,0.00008128027,0.00013128451,0.00039887542,0.0002558862,0.0072437925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97094595,0.00019817986,0.025949158,0.000028057102,0.000011004056,0.00008079956,0.00012417306,0.000016241178,0.0026464066],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936074,0.00024316316,0.00003972074,0.00009945326,0.00017467779,0.000082312785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821305,0.0013523225,0.00012383652,0.000047466932,0.00022007068,0.00004324977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014956411,0.00067725003,0.0010657969,0.00081700267,0.00054112554,0.0018280883,0.001650391,0.0019863585,0.0022168094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033251354,0.0005030137,0.001386427,0.00079835637,0.00076415803,0.0011904989,0.00046463474,0.0007254664,0.00029266687],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000402915,0.000018035256,0.00022636526,0.000019662237,0.000017752496,0.00008560621,0.000027783335,0.9954922,0.0004212187,0.0014642256,0.000056224384,0.0021305536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046228497,0.000013773839,0.000082344086,0.0000028345637,0.000008809769,0.000009693767,0.0000067345572,0.9984963,0.00017640117,0.0011442329,0.00004975519,0.0000045748125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024590906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011618715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024590906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016534833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010699603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048895538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058693307","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2004.07.007","title":"Matrix games with fuzzy goals and fuzzy payoffs","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Omega","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Defuzzification; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy associative matrix; Fuzzy number; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy set operations; Fuzzy classification; Matrix (chemical analysis); Fuzzy mathematics; Dual (grammatical number); Computer science; Fuzzy set; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07725751484461374,"score_gpt":0.3920464369452687,"score_spread":0.31478892210065496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058693307","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062397435,0.00037044735,0.8967577,0.0020512356,0.00012264763,0.00024306198,0.00018652105,0.000095094074,0.037775774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8267067,0.0004899377,0.15463074,0.00031787244,0.00013752705,0.000770231,0.00010240407,0.000029886123,0.016814651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99434423,0.004022277,0.00017915663,0.0003649666,0.0008276048,0.00026179067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98959106,0.008604601,0.0005726392,0.00028017463,0.00048518958,0.0004663507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054929773,0.0020179073,0.0016343716,0.0014124836,0.0008819847,0.0031411408,0.0015336082,0.0025123537,0.0053432914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015900973,0.00073076657,0.000982146,0.0013905341,0.0024236515,0.0049736584,0.0025060186,0.0025329466,0.00054450304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013007723,0.0000685948,0.00016433145,0.00010000999,0.0000564689,0.0001676001,0.00022571624,0.080394424,0.0005126034,0.9071249,0.0011148358,0.009940456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007714177,0.00010428843,0.00009045497,0.000027881402,0.000023174398,0.00006808159,0.00009275357,0.24992622,0.00021442313,0.74782926,0.0015245612,0.000021732787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015613292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015766579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054929773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022322065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012005521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029049933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059097960","doi":"10.1007/s00158-004-0473-1","title":"The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a case study in gear material selection","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":284,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Normalization (sociology); Ideal solution; Entropy (arrow of time); Computer science; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Mathematics; Operations research","score_opus":0.05644978036009427,"score_gpt":0.37785953383137466,"score_spread":0.32140975347128037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059097960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78723156,0.00063492346,0.20214462,0.0010141042,0.000082291655,0.0002090278,0.000081261285,0.00018363229,0.008418552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93930596,0.00017601674,0.059434343,0.00006207366,0.000019255545,0.00011958851,0.000039376955,0.000037324255,0.0008059871],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97769666,0.01860212,0.00066295563,0.0006901571,0.0018550871,0.0004929843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72027344,0.25793678,0.0070492374,0.004329777,0.009050856,0.0013599033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052390397,0.0011188996,0.0016172925,0.0010490393,0.0018343716,0.003954861,0.0017100386,0.0017817807,0.0015803966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13814776,0.0005929507,0.0010135309,0.0011863229,0.0034924154,0.005743912,0.0022054843,0.002584041,0.00019297953],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00219091,0.0014715065,0.0156219,0.00040031163,0.0001803102,0.00045278372,0.0019045526,0.7910845,0.003432629,0.08183488,0.00085341965,0.10057223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058965226,0.00050938275,0.0017234037,0.00005024326,0.00007535864,0.000068739915,0.00058479124,0.9599742,0.0031732726,0.033259284,0.00047016377,0.000052181487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064246836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006368393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052390397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031845311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00317124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27707022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059475558","doi":"10.1109/iccas.2013.6703983","title":"A probabilistic partial order theory approach to IT infrastructure selection for Smart Grid","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Probabilistic logic; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Selection (genetic algorithm); Smart grid; Grid; Monte Carlo method; Mathematical optimization; Order (exchange); Operations research; Data mining; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10320061303703809,"score_gpt":0.3852777438641382,"score_spread":0.2820771308271001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059475558","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002223514,0.00038352853,0.9939615,0.00026257185,0.000038425354,0.000032796343,0.000042932083,0.000028368418,0.003026369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42825615,0.0024742621,0.5616196,0.00027685036,0.00034513552,0.00044172266,0.00022675416,0.00005207056,0.006307494],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978346,0.0011584043,0.0000882378,0.0001633999,0.00065989984,0.00009539672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979235,0.0015561333,0.0001487151,0.000073425785,0.00024363944,0.00005454387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024026085,0.00086925516,0.0010397582,0.0017382164,0.00073344813,0.0018774353,0.001109147,0.00088266016,0.0031483804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038338217,0.000471811,0.0014714783,0.0021561894,0.0014964176,0.0019784085,0.0008527815,0.001468735,0.0003672764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019755953,0.000050618226,0.0004854266,0.00023022179,0.0000714552,0.00020599882,0.00013306589,0.60392314,0.0007280622,0.36111608,0.0013270682,0.0317091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009313245,0.000054749195,0.00015109444,0.000029712193,0.000018130786,0.00006257673,0.000040020695,0.80561817,0.00021739387,0.19119173,0.002586671,0.000020469071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004032212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049735117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004032212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017515351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018511191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012708366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059605406","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2013.10.012","title":"A construction of sound semantic linguistic scales using 4-tuple representation of term semantics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Semantics (computer science); Computer science; Vagueness; Computational semantics; Representation (politics); Natural language processing; Well-founded semantics; Interpretation (philosophy); Rule-based machine translation; Operational semantics; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Denotational semantics; Programming language; Fuzzy logic","score_opus":0.1128497310563939,"score_gpt":0.4294184621617268,"score_spread":0.3165687311053329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059605406","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009218509,0.00012507978,0.98695487,0.00019001547,0.00007576357,0.00012035919,0.0004541083,0.00082846166,0.002032791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12724757,0.00012942619,0.87061954,0.00008492617,0.000036189333,0.00024818434,0.00072204036,0.00013358277,0.000778569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696475,0.0007951387,0.0005698039,0.0005596127,0.0009140145,0.0001967016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632746,0.0013160924,0.00032183007,0.0008023665,0.0010059335,0.00022628593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028710915,0.00065439,0.001267996,0.0034985093,0.0011166906,0.0039321226,0.0016045971,0.0011022593,0.004589335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011814228,0.00073363085,0.0024603163,0.0038984742,0.0016780834,0.0065354095,0.0032996188,0.001953877,0.0013412227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029079846,0.00017710854,0.0019281015,0.000488781,0.0001298443,0.00040270117,0.0017401627,0.027987147,0.013317903,0.70879817,0.006065302,0.23867399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051085113,0.00019152105,0.0010150139,0.0001830554,0.00015980253,0.00024046682,0.00088925986,0.31138292,0.008492907,0.6536467,0.02363031,0.00011695127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030583094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002226998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004589335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010171303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017314604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015352905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060439701","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.518-523.2054","title":"A Multi-Objective Optimal Model for a Petroleum-Contaminated Aquifer Groundwater Remediation in Western Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advanced materials research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University","keywords":"Environmental remediation; Aquifer; Groundwater; Groundwater remediation; Environmental science; Environmental engineering; Groundwater pollution; Petroleum; Weighting; Contaminated groundwater; Contamination; Waste management; Petroleum engineering; Engineering; Geology; Geotechnical engineering","score_opus":0.2548039161903148,"score_gpt":0.48523795855789004,"score_spread":0.23043404236757525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060439701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7219137,0.00066766376,0.25268203,0.00092708616,0.000061920495,0.0003245126,0.0008783119,0.0003249815,0.0222198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777608,0.00019843139,0.015634408,0.000040647796,0.000005793976,0.00012409799,0.00017674001,0.0000189517,0.0060401806],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983966,0.000040110514,0.0000063065186,0.000028449098,0.000034083812,0.00005140434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998209,0.0000716889,0.000018380284,0.000004373526,0.00006668599,0.00001793031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046450322,0.0007781361,0.0005799267,0.00058740017,0.0009512809,0.0013481869,0.0010204265,0.0012187643,0.0019013851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062777323,0.0004271281,0.00062826136,0.00051729043,0.00062399526,0.00037067203,0.00053532084,0.00075355894,0.00012337929],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001351914,0.00000853915,0.000321676,0.000009452797,0.000004528418,0.000023668295,0.0000091329675,0.9979705,0.00018831244,0.00039416438,0.00006788485,0.0009885783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005189275,0.00000877446,0.00017036629,0.0000018814911,0.0000036595363,0.0000017853416,0.000016847502,0.99943954,0.000098582954,0.00013927014,0.00011111115,0.0000028463285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52623725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37664998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061914907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006460101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75773627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060589859","doi":"10.1007/s00500-013-1156-x","title":"Consistency test and weight generation for additive interval fuzzy preference relations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Preference relation; Mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Consistency (knowledge bases); Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy set; Relation (database); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.20318961715067518,"score_gpt":0.38184498292484337,"score_spread":0.17865536577416818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060589859","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054506395,0.00013081277,0.94287086,0.00013866705,0.000041787396,0.00013366586,0.00010534434,0.00015327685,0.0019192516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5354119,0.000101938924,0.46231422,0.00008627607,0.00007248129,0.00027130413,0.0004618552,0.000111379726,0.0011685728],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98832613,0.00573188,0.0006966861,0.0012567108,0.0035833116,0.00040527794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9407393,0.045662493,0.002011698,0.0048760194,0.006086265,0.00062437874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015705029,0.000776905,0.0013427397,0.0037260659,0.0009827764,0.002688117,0.002842933,0.0015132157,0.0031569474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085747175,0.00072191155,0.0016718243,0.0032903668,0.001572862,0.0035545488,0.002323871,0.0021219049,0.0003821414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027740702,0.0007270955,0.013770669,0.00062740606,0.000570534,0.00043564406,0.0009940801,0.14991964,0.010393886,0.27272886,0.003950894,0.54310715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013047806,0.00030492153,0.0017998237,0.000083400824,0.00010071474,0.00016479821,0.000103581006,0.87715465,0.0057025137,0.113574356,0.00083287247,0.000047786987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00113211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073571125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015705029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093974825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016084074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083057165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061482987","doi":"10.1142/s0219622013500168","title":"MEASURING SENSITIVITY OF PROCUREMENT DECISIONS USING SUPERIORITY AND INFERIORITY RANKING","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Weighting; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Analytic hierarchy process; Procurement; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Operations research; Robustness (evolution); Process (computing); Sensitivity (control systems); Risk analysis (engineering); Selection (genetic algorithm); Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.10627533535594497,"score_gpt":0.39069276635476474,"score_spread":0.2844174309988198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061482987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5590381,0.0011820961,0.40950748,0.00059625256,0.00019022966,0.0016116486,0.0007075062,0.00034853062,0.026818167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9289007,0.00035106155,0.06939766,0.00007370063,0.000040359548,0.00034811205,0.00026884678,0.000025835012,0.0005937634],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9478837,0.024143437,0.004521871,0.0029179791,0.019017477,0.0015154715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86355484,0.104581475,0.015044799,0.0060331444,0.009970469,0.000815238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0408951,0.0015957693,0.0019419324,0.012100819,0.0011517522,0.004463432,0.0011848791,0.0012632633,0.0034283202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09728901,0.0005484502,0.0026237622,0.006991354,0.0018591904,0.0036712284,0.0028615817,0.0014144407,0.00035861146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013661495,0.0008665103,0.15553713,0.0019639598,0.0027892462,0.0011863643,0.0026731119,0.51409674,0.012208886,0.03631386,0.0018973512,0.26910073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012912102,0.0030854868,0.10258948,0.00046220087,0.0011139694,0.0013128021,0.0044016833,0.7820452,0.01917788,0.07894697,0.0060578207,0.0006772901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019654012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00163416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0408951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025530315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002110232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21627659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061574106","doi":"10.1142/s0219622012400032","title":"DECISION THEORY WITH IMPRECISE PROBABILITIES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Expected utility hypothesis; Decision theory; Optimal decision; Representation (politics); Decision rule; Fuzzy measure theory; Function (biology); Decision analysis; Fuzzy set; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy number; Mathematical economics; Decision tree; Statistics","score_opus":0.03434845697427742,"score_gpt":0.38500317149417534,"score_spread":0.35065471451989794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061574106","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060987403,0.0062144445,0.9648585,0.0020143471,0.00020641259,0.00006948341,0.00017428857,0.000063410815,0.020300403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60304683,0.016152024,0.36812913,0.0008307454,0.0014471996,0.0006409694,0.0003794913,0.00006341296,0.009310076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892152,0.005741874,0.00058037625,0.0009939665,0.003018291,0.00045033108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98766345,0.010013103,0.00065449957,0.00065161625,0.0008169223,0.00020044071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008640175,0.0015576532,0.0019949833,0.0030100613,0.0011075626,0.0058801854,0.0019702173,0.0020569782,0.0038303414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016469866,0.00076221215,0.0020775374,0.0033102839,0.0067981915,0.0068357713,0.0025077763,0.0044786474,0.00080487743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007204896,0.000007468707,0.00006768048,0.00008483983,0.000023499997,0.000046950918,0.00008230325,0.02757203,0.00005310539,0.9662099,0.00039652013,0.0054485584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007013905,0.000009923467,0.00003722246,0.00004407236,0.00000891329,0.000032351618,0.00001989874,0.040323496,0.000045090153,0.9568336,0.002629274,0.000009086376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019714395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010230775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008640175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037555406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019166368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045694113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062779375","doi":"10.1007/s13198-014-0317-3","title":"Ranking discrete fuzzy linguistic performance based on TODIM method","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Acronym; Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Measure (data warehouse); Data mining; Dominance (genetics); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03542793253985094,"score_gpt":0.3550992380942538,"score_spread":0.3196713055544029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062779375","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042180516,0.0004638734,0.95113194,0.00013097071,0.00010546136,0.00010655849,0.00013897182,0.00027222343,0.005469389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72755915,0.00033303647,0.2687526,0.00006261384,0.000057338195,0.00025311214,0.00032364912,0.00006083367,0.0025977343],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763334,0.000856434,0.00017999283,0.00023508491,0.00090056815,0.00019472912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803954,0.0007787389,0.00014764434,0.000118873955,0.0008418175,0.00007330978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023964948,0.00063912134,0.001438484,0.0031884569,0.00060514436,0.0017521014,0.0008807426,0.00060987583,0.0028532804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051859873,0.00016950544,0.0009508957,0.0020189977,0.00043258758,0.00084094587,0.00091619755,0.00051250454,0.00037930935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045500923,0.00022149034,0.0039002642,0.0007260013,0.00028810874,0.000120519864,0.0001536286,0.41279182,0.00973461,0.04195804,0.004020046,0.5256304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014987814,0.00020107439,0.00087775994,0.000030192601,0.000047326896,0.000048400918,0.00006270471,0.98880553,0.0031229963,0.0051644756,0.0015957862,0.000028776369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027808852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021294684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031884569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001063485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012736741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012674034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062816298","doi":"10.1117/12.544033","title":"&lt;title&gt;Conjunctive and disjunctive combination rules of evidence&lt;/title&gt;","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Computer science; Dempster–Shafer theory; Rule-based system; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06432828963124687,"score_gpt":0.3236814838545431,"score_spread":0.2593531942232962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062816298","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060472484,0.012517638,0.7827663,0.009677908,0.0049151615,0.0011261232,0.0015357397,0.0009607431,0.18045317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12651454,0.009750319,0.8140682,0.0038791245,0.0030023942,0.0010597571,0.001748856,0.0005539412,0.039422896],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98451936,0.006642302,0.0017879149,0.0012216014,0.005588828,0.00023991686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92817026,0.052854292,0.0026769054,0.005114679,0.010514707,0.0006691479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0182309,0.00089412736,0.001334136,0.0046995874,0.0012457536,0.0050731753,0.0022618587,0.0018683884,0.03306321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077033356,0.0006098275,0.00116961,0.0053208973,0.0028367795,0.006011774,0.0017850345,0.002541805,0.0130729815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044227272,0.00008690626,0.0020601142,0.0014334304,0.00017834081,0.0005757126,0.00033532057,0.004267225,0.0025557536,0.32716087,0.057106055,0.6037979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013240974,0.00022102946,0.0022499117,0.0016325109,0.00021851147,0.0015421745,0.00046468465,0.047868233,0.01039277,0.62515885,0.3099368,0.00018213491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016033273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028295035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03306321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015125896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012407404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110607445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063373779","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.018","title":"Risk analysis in a linguistic environment: A fuzzy evidential reasoning-based approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Dempster–Shafer theory; Domain (mathematical analysis); Component (thermodynamics); Evidential reasoning approach; Task (project management); Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Set (abstract data type); Artificial intelligence; Risk analysis (engineering); Machine learning; Data mining; Natural language processing; Decision support system; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1018287816704744,"score_gpt":0.35755053417064053,"score_spread":0.25572175250016616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063373779","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049768933,0.00033786567,0.9920501,0.00035686663,0.000031224274,0.000027070848,0.00001725852,0.00002477033,0.002177894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4212665,0.0010078908,0.5752121,0.00020615484,0.0002510971,0.00016684216,0.000059591446,0.000033158904,0.0017965754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485415,0.0025444627,0.00036695317,0.00043175888,0.0016323415,0.00017042285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99378335,0.0044195084,0.0006399428,0.0002971776,0.0006945818,0.0001653984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009380397,0.001352921,0.002093685,0.0035989883,0.001283245,0.0049059107,0.0031439401,0.002199054,0.0024798645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015187537,0.000693578,0.002565762,0.0018726136,0.002796114,0.0053703063,0.0026159014,0.0023331793,0.00036614126],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009794454,0.00028282832,0.0009752339,0.00047243186,0.00044691982,0.00062744855,0.0008306645,0.44356126,0.0027327647,0.47117096,0.0012495994,0.07755191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020738084,0.000068180285,0.00021023731,0.000088225956,0.00011557105,0.000114363465,0.00011729366,0.63705885,0.00059733086,0.36053926,0.0010216715,0.00004835384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012799803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014027768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009380397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014342217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016470483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049608886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W206403711","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4419-5904-1_11","title":"Multiple Criteria Approaches to Group Decision and Negotiation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Decision analysis; Management science; Group decision-making; Decision support system; Evidential reasoning approach; Business decision mapping; Computer science; Knowledge management; Operations research; Psychology; Political science; Engineering; Social psychology; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.37829558305425853,"score_gpt":0.5046880960873662,"score_spread":0.12639251303310767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W206403711","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026969232,0.008169326,0.92309356,0.0018505276,0.0006015457,0.00013262648,0.00006148225,0.00009145778,0.06330254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23034695,0.010833299,0.6940536,0.0004978799,0.0009807199,0.001131793,0.0002072887,0.00015522601,0.061793245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99484175,0.0030789527,0.00018763434,0.00019929238,0.001535376,0.00015709313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99408466,0.004943496,0.00018786812,0.0002311148,0.00045661992,0.0000963757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005053425,0.0018037114,0.0013695596,0.0024476817,0.0012496695,0.0030437561,0.002475251,0.002109705,0.012333758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009819947,0.00074299594,0.0011647624,0.004095158,0.0025960626,0.0043164007,0.0018829089,0.0028658502,0.0013040818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027071348,0.000053036696,0.00008498016,0.0003461747,0.00008278549,0.00010584649,0.0005090428,0.03914731,0.00023192912,0.8514875,0.008151174,0.0997731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016132528,0.000017663722,0.000046790483,0.000093941984,0.000021119527,0.00005324214,0.00012703212,0.06484801,0.00015772598,0.91634053,0.018261153,0.000016759359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016608752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002470239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012333758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00229643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011698445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04126048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064327603","doi":"10.1016/j.fss.2014.02.011","title":"Fuzzy option prioritization for the graph model for conflict resolution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fuzzy Sets and Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Preference; Mathematics; Truth value; Prioritization; Fuzzy number; Fuzzy set operations; Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy set; Computer science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Management science; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.23180018433127048,"score_gpt":0.41183564864490874,"score_spread":0.18003546431363826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064327603","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012897629,0.00021473972,0.9787244,0.00042159948,0.000048784048,0.00008399862,0.00020284705,0.000100543635,0.0073053255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5553772,0.00062132167,0.42965353,0.0002516989,0.00010205931,0.00041699305,0.00053261186,0.00014099113,0.0129036475],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985134,0.000894253,0.000044397242,0.00018427629,0.00024477404,0.00011891747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980958,0.0014541913,0.00009528383,0.000081278275,0.00016566258,0.00010784034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027079736,0.0012992567,0.0016109002,0.0018991692,0.0008131616,0.002752653,0.0022683137,0.0019327832,0.010188972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058110743,0.0005626538,0.0015867437,0.0024077296,0.0013226054,0.0038698502,0.0014409511,0.0022581501,0.000925716],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100117344,0.00006635661,0.00020919627,0.00009839368,0.00006409967,0.000098769655,0.00009830524,0.6891691,0.0005718069,0.2876648,0.001784962,0.020074015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000142190565,0.0000128045795,0.000036289315,0.000009079434,0.000013626453,0.000014522904,0.000014243622,0.88635945,0.0000752605,0.11281661,0.00062320684,0.000010677385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009745418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009835041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010188972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024760491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019576242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034085512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064426717","doi":"10.1109/tsmca.2007.902629","title":"Multiple-Criteria Sorting Using Case-Based Distance Models With an Application in Water Resources Management","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sorting; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Sorting algorithm; Preference; Mathematical optimization; Euclidean distance; Operations research; Mathematics; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.11403042951475459,"score_gpt":0.3519835730918985,"score_spread":0.2379531435771439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064426717","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005822567,0.00031693917,0.98858553,0.0002972437,0.000043410168,0.00021563281,0.0000658879,0.000063446736,0.004589289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18671879,0.0010862238,0.8061096,0.000114372015,0.00004806944,0.0010208372,0.00023138136,0.000045309593,0.0046254126],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965264,0.0018857006,0.00020374084,0.0002696529,0.00093269575,0.00018179521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952838,0.0032571084,0.00037775355,0.00020283693,0.0007202326,0.0001583296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003912097,0.0015400046,0.0014495337,0.0028153933,0.0014920052,0.0026200388,0.0023628585,0.002000342,0.005053871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010492775,0.00062253274,0.0021591377,0.006061577,0.0015078785,0.0029942023,0.0017633262,0.0021947215,0.00052536145],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027206002,0.00012758332,0.00067706703,0.00012102881,0.000065062406,0.00016921267,0.0002476692,0.74643314,0.00032832156,0.20604032,0.0012530759,0.044510245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000152334,0.000048818525,0.00012618284,0.000033033244,0.0000141185465,0.000049971026,0.00007602672,0.9274977,0.00018832988,0.06867491,0.0032497968,0.000025887395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012725475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012111151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012725475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041906927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028958102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03040576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065350968","doi":"10.2495/sdp-v2-n4-387-407","title":"A review of the contribution of multi-criteria analysis to the evaluation process of transportation projects","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Dimension (graph theory); Selection (genetic algorithm); Sustainable transport; Computer science; Environmental impact assessment; Management science; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Transport engineering; Engineering; Business; Sustainability; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.24823790363699433,"score_gpt":0.5222405823136386,"score_spread":0.27400267867664424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065350968","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000572077,0.98910224,0.0061114435,0.00044621946,0.00017213466,0.00002813974,0.000020412635,0.000010901876,0.0035363324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01008109,0.9775925,0.011106616,0.00017204879,0.0002112949,0.000047073932,0.000036826437,0.000007933058,0.00074461824],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519485,0.0016919913,0.00059965625,0.00034419636,0.0020523132,0.000116938616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884652,0.007524031,0.0007313355,0.00019134338,0.002917474,0.00017070823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061948863,0.0010917094,0.001983608,0.0076245107,0.00067303533,0.002410324,0.0015921762,0.0015114321,0.0023786102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009377478,0.0006030612,0.0008989918,0.012615602,0.0011006811,0.0022271918,0.0006447275,0.0011768972,0.00093222415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052877942,0.00009987384,0.00059030496,0.029793246,0.00015877301,0.00030702903,0.00038209851,0.0046296157,0.0010591142,0.016934138,0.007234924,0.93875796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033435885,0.00037192067,0.0050902264,0.032169554,0.0003368802,0.001932839,0.0009448292,0.004426347,0.0030681936,0.030698877,0.92074144,0.0001854136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044430173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060366257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076245107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023843606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037272323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03276211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066559002","doi":"10.1115/detc2007-34870","title":"Evaluating Supplier Involvement Using DEA and Piecewise Triangular Fuzzy AHP","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Weighting; Analytic hierarchy process; Pairwise comparison; Data envelopment analysis; Decision maker; Mathematical optimization; Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Piecewise; Fuzzy logic; Set (abstract data type); Range (aeronautics); Operations research; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematics; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.49664884068855303,"score_gpt":0.5460707992017163,"score_spread":0.04942195851316328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066559002","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064921126,0.00032472133,0.92981327,0.00009433213,0.00002798181,0.00022644082,0.00010807272,0.00010870886,0.004375422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.674276,0.00040227867,0.32362196,0.000025146492,0.000018887526,0.00031454815,0.00015781759,0.000019961308,0.0011633278],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961504,0.0015700671,0.00026396874,0.00023414676,0.0015810055,0.00020036232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658513,0.0020092365,0.00040579838,0.00010198563,0.00080295297,0.00009485975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037625942,0.0011298519,0.00096957874,0.0033576156,0.0007280719,0.0016052679,0.0009369816,0.0006956599,0.0013333757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069468245,0.00041976615,0.0011914024,0.0036522266,0.00043802868,0.0012161006,0.0013328849,0.0007437574,0.00013651335],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021095728,0.00013224831,0.00429568,0.0005323095,0.0002034212,0.00025952022,0.00047643183,0.81962615,0.008318733,0.014670589,0.0006262173,0.15064777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008851391,0.00006694292,0.0007369462,0.000021420725,0.000025693545,0.000027148872,0.000110259556,0.9939942,0.0018699158,0.002561963,0.0005551354,0.000021643007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058844094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047651194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058844094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013314836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016644512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019898713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067647807","doi":"10.1142/s021759591100303x","title":"MULTIPLE CRITERIA ANALYSIS FOR EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SYSTEM RISK","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asia Pacific Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Outsourcing; Enterprise resource planning; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Information system; Identification (biology); Set (abstract data type); Information technology; Process management; Business; Knowledge management; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.5045986172732625,"score_gpt":0.5336432032935186,"score_spread":0.029044586020256058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067647807","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0716967,0.003528308,0.9001246,0.00063826103,0.00017513637,0.0022790094,0.00047683678,0.00023006338,0.020851018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5231895,0.0011316696,0.47090533,0.000090872694,0.000074832365,0.00231197,0.0003419229,0.000060065817,0.0018937717],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9602207,0.028229618,0.0015531752,0.0007252858,0.008564998,0.0007061402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96344405,0.029148072,0.0016711213,0.00066282775,0.004502228,0.0005718192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022587596,0.0026375568,0.0022693833,0.012526534,0.0016193751,0.0038124544,0.0013967421,0.0017445942,0.0050154408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043487523,0.0005326533,0.002885357,0.008567707,0.0013105683,0.0019781082,0.002055799,0.002043525,0.00033639578],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088650966,0.00058785075,0.010955686,0.0022775596,0.0017091702,0.0006385144,0.0015948062,0.60195345,0.0054535167,0.11768564,0.0043267272,0.25193056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008679234,0.0007917163,0.0038953777,0.00034963587,0.0002171097,0.0001296624,0.0007622736,0.95157355,0.001279955,0.03702647,0.0037651164,0.00012223596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042415974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004015744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022587596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047517437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038212894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11945605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068959684","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2011.02.014","title":"Possibilistic regression analysis of influential factors for occupational health and safety management systems","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Safety Science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Occupational safety and health; Regression analysis; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Injury prevention; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Environmental health; Computer science; Medicine; Machine learning","score_opus":0.24691288770888695,"score_gpt":0.4607089107667947,"score_spread":0.21379602305790776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068959684","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15486982,0.000358012,0.8414785,0.00031528532,0.0000382687,0.0002315855,0.00018301621,0.00019658417,0.0023289756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92463136,0.00019393295,0.07341631,0.000030069434,0.000027749174,0.00025912022,0.00019729057,0.000047938636,0.0011961617],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.989641,0.007146415,0.0003880952,0.0008280955,0.00149109,0.00050529285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9344621,0.059436817,0.0017438071,0.0008261936,0.0029376317,0.000593464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017630145,0.0017275236,0.0020865758,0.0050928504,0.0014655552,0.0030605202,0.002739721,0.0015829094,0.004472433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061501853,0.0013111907,0.0034619544,0.0023062122,0.0014104552,0.0027338462,0.0017664866,0.0019035275,0.00040681288],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005106693,0.00021562702,0.0051160282,0.00030728956,0.00045983668,0.00019834166,0.00021744591,0.9357515,0.0013514218,0.030577868,0.00041039067,0.02488367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009591652,0.000060247923,0.0005804348,0.000011138158,0.000048281006,0.000016679327,0.000024028177,0.9924816,0.00023015839,0.0064430786,0.00007987058,0.000014940579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007973265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051095313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017630145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022599653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025569508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093238235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068999475","doi":"10.1108/14714170310814882","title":"A decision support tool for construction bidding","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Construction Innovation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"National Science Council","keywords":"Bidding; Markup language; Computer science; Procurement; Analytic hierarchy process; Decision support system; Construct (python library); Process (computing); Construction bidding; Decision analysis; Decision maker; Decision model; Operations research; Systems engineering; Project management; Engineering; Business; Data mining; Machine learning; XML; Pre-construction services; Marketing; Economics; Project planning; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.15195144566880608,"score_gpt":0.424987364207631,"score_spread":0.2730359185388249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068999475","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007172878,0.00008910566,0.981751,0.00037720107,0.00004622538,0.0001810156,0.0006051845,0.002469713,0.0073075555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19291422,0.00021426848,0.79904586,0.00014968653,0.000038694638,0.00062164885,0.0010202748,0.00020565436,0.00578969],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887925,0.00046833692,0.000086302774,0.00009368078,0.0004183992,0.00005391396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973367,0.0019163192,0.00016122658,0.00015836366,0.0003486063,0.00007885993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002395747,0.00081427314,0.00068391,0.001322564,0.0006156849,0.0022158057,0.001379113,0.0014217111,0.015983537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00692024,0.00042663506,0.0007719086,0.0011241806,0.0003414156,0.0020384241,0.0010132003,0.001144626,0.0032131486],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002690559,0.00028384585,0.0013441156,0.000344058,0.0000683462,0.00049402076,0.00036140106,0.55727786,0.0037508893,0.16004948,0.019168494,0.25658852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004492901,0.000052801108,0.00012530883,0.000036819936,0.000013674518,0.00008288888,0.00003311414,0.96011597,0.0009515033,0.021991123,0.016532125,0.000019740268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022687237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020581167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015983537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010338554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001248626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053470314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069928593","doi":"10.1155/2014/697085","title":"Mehar Methods for Fuzzy Optimal Solution and Sensitivity Analysis of Fuzzy Linear Programming with Symmetric Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Problems in Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Linear programming; Fuzzy number; Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Sensitivity (control systems); Algorithm; Computer science; Fuzzy set; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.07227195991487365,"score_gpt":0.3893664908525233,"score_spread":0.3170945309376496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069928593","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013002192,0.00090692745,0.9956548,0.00009202856,0.000053904692,0.000029358887,0.000014489058,0.00003371147,0.0019145386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16026926,0.0031275146,0.8295104,0.00019562668,0.00026333763,0.0004441177,0.00008148543,0.00011230307,0.0059959665],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731207,0.0015654339,0.00011508014,0.00024204502,0.0006648615,0.00010060948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976186,0.001813708,0.00012757495,0.000089960464,0.00032153158,0.000028485236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037339616,0.0011646647,0.0016510456,0.002033671,0.0007121704,0.0012274149,0.0015791917,0.0012988057,0.0031681107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048969635,0.000685773,0.0023881781,0.0015343985,0.0013168833,0.0017537404,0.0014650509,0.003264261,0.00048466472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011759538,0.00008257551,0.00027299757,0.0010145766,0.00029077975,0.00018298264,0.00033178064,0.52088577,0.008397521,0.3308385,0.0023640578,0.13522083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000971087,0.000040634073,0.00007278368,0.00004371444,0.000025679554,0.000036334673,0.00002495786,0.9486286,0.0017809122,0.046687093,0.0026221036,0.000027465614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015314514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015992061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037339616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086927216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010048039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019747317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070643863","doi":"10.2174/1874243200802010001","title":"Comparing Fundamentals of Additive and Multiplicative Aggregation in Ratio Scale Multi-Criteria Decision Making","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Open Operational Research Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiplicative function; Scale (ratio); Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.5287487243992995,"score_gpt":0.5713813408843038,"score_spread":0.04263261648500427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070643863","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013931777,0.0009384325,0.97285146,0.0004773668,0.000120895835,0.00009452228,0.000036287744,0.000109730194,0.011439608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.388978,0.0012579598,0.6073286,0.00024278917,0.00026624138,0.0003985648,0.00007901651,0.00006985816,0.0013789413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97001046,0.01835581,0.0013796721,0.0018960562,0.0077879727,0.000570011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96627563,0.024737954,0.0023295644,0.003056919,0.0032634758,0.00033645757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02181024,0.0012884511,0.0014878935,0.00284173,0.0008263194,0.004981277,0.0019417283,0.0012812958,0.00245804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05427902,0.00073475874,0.0022233878,0.0036216234,0.0038489082,0.0069342037,0.002835211,0.002492302,0.0007359519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103199796,0.000070627066,0.0011478084,0.0003492423,0.00020048567,0.00011565548,0.000810334,0.07141747,0.0011519778,0.83192545,0.0011887092,0.09151912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040881045,0.00020227891,0.0010247814,0.00010727236,0.00008467802,0.00018782033,0.00021642516,0.27051032,0.0013686817,0.7201639,0.006008796,0.00008413586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014127796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011157198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02181024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017728152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011072647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11534494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072154622","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.04.014","title":"Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of disinfection by-products—a risk-based indexing system","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Haloacetic acids; Chloramine; Chlorine; Fuzzy logic; Disinfectant; Environmental science; Risk assessment; Environmental chemistry; Water treatment; Environmental engineering; Computer science; Chemistry; Artificial intelligence; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.06524766010393328,"score_gpt":0.3440693890118531,"score_spread":0.2788217289079198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072154622","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3654827,0.00055371784,0.62328064,0.0003471301,0.00009166438,0.00047980394,0.0008347198,0.0009230919,0.008006607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89155614,0.00013861002,0.10601943,0.000038399357,0.000040738836,0.00015664016,0.000617188,0.000024366904,0.0014084472],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817336,0.0004461053,0.00022718195,0.00024875574,0.0007982218,0.00010640972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727505,0.0008241771,0.0002689652,0.00019594189,0.0012571731,0.00017867735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032186755,0.0007059473,0.0011372204,0.004327362,0.00097047526,0.0023682602,0.0010069679,0.00083741423,0.0019955062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059955767,0.00020862036,0.00085301476,0.0019787457,0.00062988675,0.0016036716,0.0010171415,0.00035963702,0.0003492962],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003935758,0.0010864069,0.017194094,0.00066007534,0.0003383923,0.00032319475,0.000532144,0.30847466,0.038852412,0.019399231,0.0038276624,0.60537595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059125952,0.00043872456,0.0029466574,0.000028111448,0.00013577192,0.000098707715,0.00009828407,0.982142,0.008131929,0.0045890133,0.0012913699,0.000040233663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038905405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026310945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004327362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016850855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015206785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017022192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072340100","doi":"10.1007/s00521-006-0025-2","title":"A fuzzy set based solution method for multiobjective optimal design problem of mechanical and structural systems using functional-link net","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neural Computing and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Net (polyhedron); Computational Science and Engineering; Mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Fuzzy set; Multi-objective optimization; Membership function; Link (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Artificial intelligence; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.19431396899316467,"score_gpt":0.4286550812729684,"score_spread":0.23434111227980375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072340100","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030655016,0.00007150547,0.99510324,0.00003919002,0.000024909672,0.000040375748,0.000010878525,0.00006552062,0.0015788211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17486857,0.00016302889,0.8203654,0.000097234406,0.000053245923,0.00050191965,0.00006507869,0.00006209539,0.0038234268],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996313,0.00012641367,0.000020621155,0.00005037719,0.00014401168,0.000027245951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948263,0.00029167027,0.000035210494,0.00001701912,0.00015025745,0.000023162935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018949405,0.0009478137,0.0011925198,0.0012574082,0.0007477949,0.0010180692,0.0014560194,0.0021315953,0.0036971644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017090052,0.0006480894,0.0009992132,0.00081444974,0.000576228,0.00087467104,0.0008724249,0.0009940336,0.00044794544],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006381557,0.00007694171,0.00016080104,0.00016282783,0.000060252103,0.00006896734,0.000080117425,0.886405,0.004011344,0.012565044,0.00078062044,0.095564336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000089100495,0.000029792305,0.000032000724,0.000010543575,0.000008950111,0.000009348754,0.000004761521,0.99797314,0.00035907194,0.0011290072,0.00042966983,0.000004796015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004305508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004168488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004305508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007989937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009791533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012368202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072348410","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2011.07.006","title":"Distances in evidence theory: Comprehensive survey and generalizations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Class (philosophy); Fuzzy set; Fuzzy logic; Trigonometric functions; Possibility theory; Mathematics; Base (topology); Function (biology); Artificial intelligence; Data mining","score_opus":0.3666811522813856,"score_gpt":0.4523683107298756,"score_spread":0.08568715844849001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072348410","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0543662,0.6257202,0.29607362,0.010908205,0.00027454205,0.00011026562,0.00057921745,0.000098337216,0.011869419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5572056,0.3088809,0.12779088,0.0010081076,0.0024026602,0.0002094034,0.00096207875,0.0000850493,0.0014552836],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98268235,0.007882087,0.0020166128,0.0019863725,0.0050063813,0.00042609588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.737027,0.24078648,0.0043491405,0.007052694,0.009390503,0.0013941614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027845625,0.001345442,0.004068748,0.018240644,0.0016389092,0.007251709,0.0027209944,0.0028026924,0.0030900605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12394811,0.0015615647,0.0021337587,0.020951258,0.0069541344,0.021747958,0.00465119,0.004731709,0.00038377038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025132502,0.00021189581,0.023947386,0.005063239,0.0009776473,0.00018132293,0.0010001292,0.023386465,0.00025039655,0.445229,0.0061325636,0.49336872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039541756,0.00016952187,0.006440344,0.0011496624,0.00034259708,0.0005786856,0.00048811073,0.03161801,0.00029984015,0.9410359,0.01776454,0.000073229174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031693953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023094027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027845625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035598695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028271782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14726347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073365598","doi":"10.1007/s00267-009-9368-7","title":"A Comparative Approach for Ranking Contaminated Sites Based on the Risk Assessment Paradigm Using Fuzzy PROMETHEE","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Hydrogeology; Data mining; Preference; Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Mathematics; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.1791033922679441,"score_gpt":0.4064058025187661,"score_spread":0.227302410250822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073365598","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023240589,0.0006576668,0.961672,0.00041120112,0.000047976202,0.00014960463,0.000102855396,0.000074864365,0.013643239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34942827,0.0005154411,0.6470639,0.00009167314,0.000027821106,0.000244423,0.00013128715,0.000023958219,0.0024731478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512947,0.0023666336,0.00023732083,0.00028344133,0.0018136465,0.0001694736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99606055,0.0023726078,0.00022020977,0.0002905541,0.0009416297,0.00011444964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009466078,0.0008662925,0.0013106151,0.007042223,0.0013583035,0.0031556468,0.0024114614,0.0012919311,0.0048517464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013259893,0.0005110141,0.0014589966,0.0043407064,0.0014464471,0.0042609554,0.0021783249,0.0012838825,0.00035584834],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037888056,0.00021146282,0.0023129636,0.00077076326,0.00029735232,0.00032810884,0.000614854,0.18880503,0.006274056,0.4644288,0.002119002,0.33345875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007790468,0.0005978186,0.0020759916,0.00027370936,0.0002421096,0.0005889233,0.0006003221,0.6390226,0.0049557644,0.34089807,0.010537207,0.00012950235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019497372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035869754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009466078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021250157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022573725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073530979","doi":"10.2495/sdp-v7-n4-397-411","title":"Mathematical clustering integrated with swot analysis as a tool for design of sustainable development strategies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SWOT analysis; Cluster analysis; Scope (computer science); Strategic planning; Sustainable development; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Process management; Operations research; Management science; Business; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.09861162550982534,"score_gpt":0.38778515366584715,"score_spread":0.2891735281560218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073530979","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006537642,0.00013146666,0.98748463,0.00019671426,0.000034099998,0.0002666587,0.00014202752,0.00036246577,0.0048441966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07005407,0.00018930336,0.92793936,0.00003916269,0.000012492211,0.00048400438,0.00022604525,0.00009510169,0.00096059975],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99496955,0.0025680696,0.00036802652,0.00039296746,0.0015083966,0.0001930497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499524,0.0030240216,0.000569407,0.00039743268,0.00088961114,0.0001242249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056768158,0.0017082561,0.0013554023,0.007563835,0.0015202188,0.003987626,0.0016791917,0.00092871534,0.005010522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01015038,0.0010034709,0.0020290792,0.0058249417,0.0017163386,0.0027226098,0.0022463172,0.0012149648,0.0008796125],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014025945,0.00016845444,0.0026187117,0.0011787164,0.0003283683,0.000350757,0.0016423893,0.5228085,0.00485257,0.19900481,0.0041157673,0.2627908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002974452,0.00013900264,0.001473564,0.0002301008,0.000060462662,0.00011620775,0.0011844925,0.8552085,0.0032637448,0.121905774,0.016296014,0.00009240307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051310873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060649533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007563835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033060499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003878306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030022264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074185717","doi":"10.1007/s11336-003-1089-x","title":"On a Test of Dimensionality in Redundancy Analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychometrika","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Curse of dimensionality; Redundancy (engineering); Monte Carlo method; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Variable (mathematics); Econometrics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.18223473110744776,"score_gpt":0.4824809735464235,"score_spread":0.30024624243897574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074185717","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14399174,0.002099773,0.82347316,0.007363558,0.00075156003,0.0010138028,0.0007791193,0.0003658918,0.02016146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7458356,0.00065080135,0.24691445,0.001807566,0.00074670935,0.0021915103,0.0006211083,0.00013341961,0.0010988764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8248544,0.14172429,0.004653165,0.007721914,0.019477988,0.0015683158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3503039,0.5989828,0.00988412,0.025126137,0.014052939,0.0016501207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11045967,0.0017745652,0.00377371,0.005579253,0.0035916702,0.004408432,0.0030133286,0.003622498,0.0053780647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5181696,0.0006030515,0.004297308,0.005898591,0.015153861,0.008102275,0.006950477,0.0050092335,0.0008618006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026680734,0.0005275621,0.03811664,0.0010851724,0.0022948675,0.0008980011,0.0025613417,0.03098454,0.002040861,0.6952099,0.008652431,0.21496052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007426198,0.0026648303,0.016987992,0.00054042356,0.000345816,0.0008509701,0.00086046715,0.155342,0.0024083587,0.8114078,0.0075400947,0.00030862732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013640443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048713683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11045967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021251796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032173344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58417356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074338258","doi":"10.1007/s10726-015-9438-6","title":"An Acceptable Consistency-Based Framework for Group Decision Making with Intuitionistic Preference Relations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Group decision-making; Preference; Context (archaeology); Group (periodic table); Aggregate (composite); Consistency index; Computer science; Operator (biology); Mathematics; Decision maker; Mathematical economics; Operations research; Econometrics; Information retrieval; Data mining; Statistics; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2063661242382024,"score_gpt":0.42159254124492884,"score_spread":0.21522641700672646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074338258","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031689447,0.00014487698,0.98966146,0.000823423,0.0000627885,0.00010520862,0.00005138037,0.000054500844,0.0059274132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26546195,0.00025894953,0.7296212,0.00048865954,0.00025444498,0.0010753277,0.00019242508,0.000084159255,0.0025629273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96141917,0.023366421,0.0023424616,0.0025195172,0.009219421,0.0011329317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95715165,0.02742735,0.0024404489,0.0046277936,0.007448029,0.0009047254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03366566,0.0016929625,0.002457108,0.0035938672,0.0027834915,0.007398387,0.005955262,0.004160744,0.004743471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074191764,0.0013818601,0.0037271068,0.004332452,0.00673281,0.010200481,0.005968728,0.006474525,0.0010204708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038627,0.00003876339,0.00018859252,0.00009352912,0.000048487247,0.00007051739,0.00035205405,0.01158181,0.00021237154,0.9779081,0.00075321697,0.0087139085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003403827,0.000044009408,0.00008833901,0.000051717867,0.000032538945,0.000060488186,0.00007480258,0.06728133,0.00023922403,0.9299945,0.0020689878,0.000029976742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019402428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014294166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03366566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003087431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004697233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17804313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074391778","doi":"10.4018/ijfsa.2013070104","title":"Integrating Modified Delphi with Fuzzy AHP for Concrete Production Facility Location Selection","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Facility location problem; Selection (genetic algorithm); Production (economics); Fuzzy logic; Delphi method; Delphi; Computer science; Operations research; Sensitivity (control systems); Site selection; Process (computing); Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.09303836793593682,"score_gpt":0.38488719484511935,"score_spread":0.2918488269091825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074391778","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025695123,0.00017267239,0.96902406,0.0001574155,0.000028591916,0.0007811949,0.000056067984,0.000090123074,0.003994806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34393865,0.00026337738,0.6535464,0.00006858793,0.000019627434,0.001102608,0.00007930719,0.000024468749,0.00095695077],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929196,0.004674122,0.00029785724,0.00029275345,0.0014345236,0.0003812123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641067,0.0025021357,0.0002451505,0.00015185638,0.0005766487,0.00011349181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008510828,0.0012869647,0.0014566086,0.0028547728,0.0014829378,0.0014876752,0.001527685,0.0009815327,0.0028945368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008199887,0.0009974802,0.0015758069,0.0024414037,0.0007833753,0.0012379416,0.002929182,0.0010621459,0.00022347432],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022427786,0.00021611541,0.0011422371,0.0006659329,0.00024348895,0.00038025383,0.0010212207,0.86365145,0.005104602,0.024110708,0.000928936,0.102310754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003203074,0.00014503591,0.00026190755,0.00004793046,0.000036143978,0.000059348775,0.00027329038,0.98310745,0.0012448202,0.013535121,0.0012166487,0.00004014755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00750273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008561577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008510828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019428374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031881942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04501009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074970886","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.027","title":"A mathematical programming approach to multi-attribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessment information","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province","keywords":"Closeness; Ideal solution; TOPSIS; Ranking (information retrieval); Interval (graph theory); Mathematics; Ideal (ethics); Mathematical optimization; Preference; Data mining; Quadratic programming; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Statistics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.16468750489868944,"score_gpt":0.4165273526632113,"score_spread":0.25183984776452184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074970886","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078857515,0.00020542805,0.997241,0.00023758275,0.000025825553,0.000023686183,0.00002166501,0.000020758007,0.0014355392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09608662,0.0009533225,0.8994261,0.00020990364,0.00018778103,0.00039302884,0.00007537091,0.00003871516,0.0026291797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586123,0.0020364088,0.00029463897,0.0005011371,0.0011595153,0.00014706871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946267,0.004282744,0.00032250833,0.00017901007,0.00047102594,0.00011795789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062913205,0.0016020393,0.0022972461,0.0022345176,0.0009790064,0.0046853214,0.003137649,0.0020899156,0.003157719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0108156325,0.0012901212,0.0029288854,0.0030273225,0.0027482233,0.0053928406,0.002310838,0.003844238,0.00062514556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004112509,0.000111674824,0.00019690744,0.00037242981,0.00014241996,0.0001924024,0.00032343133,0.21068299,0.0010482519,0.7420839,0.0016880039,0.043116428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016744523,0.00005779746,0.00009565975,0.00008307798,0.00005312246,0.000092045804,0.000033568107,0.58481276,0.00039587956,0.41183025,0.0024844918,0.00004460733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019217035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020210298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062913205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024716705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021724931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033272028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075339582","doi":"10.1260/095830508784641354","title":"Nuclear Waste Management at the Interface of Science and Policy: The Canadian Experience","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energy & Environment","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Face (sociological concept); Process (computing); Radioactive waste; Risk analysis (engineering); Political science; Business; Management science; Engineering; Computer science; Sociology; Waste management; Social science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0640388254368276,"score_gpt":0.34144224551660135,"score_spread":0.27740342007977375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075339582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2737638,0.07866461,0.006560119,0.27246052,0.0011705538,0.0002316321,0.00080497644,0.0001248281,0.36621892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8749013,0.057607163,0.0055985823,0.010077444,0.00013383976,0.00006393891,0.00022071748,0.00010953122,0.051287573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871723,0.002791341,0.0002931191,0.0005118994,0.0067149727,0.0025164357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989085,0.003325482,0.00033497487,0.00028919452,0.0047524087,0.0022129342],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008748489,0.0005050665,0.0008260648,0.0018210729,0.022972165,0.009652309,0.002412749,0.0028276236,0.0046959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013862625,0.0005133589,0.00061445555,0.01014992,0.012028849,0.0033955327,0.0038058734,0.0044415346,0.00032793675],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003809681,0.00039176535,0.014946596,0.00165644,0.00009930918,0.003214339,0.13780893,0.008033644,0.002264056,0.47624677,0.105474755,0.24948233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040611078,0.000111419155,0.013469202,0.0007328014,0.00004434256,0.00044385952,0.08568096,0.0015662314,0.001293879,0.016305065,0.8801601,0.00015158308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99757093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97702783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21534258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33176365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9100914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076058259","doi":"10.1007/s13198-014-0323-5","title":"Fault tree analysis based on TOPSIS and triangular fuzzy number","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fault tree analysis; TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Fuzzy logic; Similarity (geometry); Computer science; Fuzzy number; Data mining; Fault (geology); Preference; Tree (set theory); Mathematics; Algorithm; Reliability engineering; Fuzzy set; Statistics; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.029547865177115183,"score_gpt":0.33339983226708764,"score_spread":0.3038519670899725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076058259","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058195215,0.00037984972,0.93466663,0.00019338113,0.000070726404,0.00025834944,0.00034645645,0.00037651617,0.005512855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7614328,0.00042473272,0.23600239,0.000031796197,0.000029080154,0.00017046802,0.00047597848,0.000024607714,0.001408122],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974437,0.000613643,0.00018593052,0.00024068978,0.0013340315,0.00018208356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974564,0.0013255737,0.00020043032,0.00008922842,0.0008654326,0.00006300989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016589803,0.0007399268,0.0013013788,0.00523636,0.0011406858,0.0020183818,0.0008815096,0.0006029736,0.0038905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053686993,0.0002355222,0.0015237274,0.0041516223,0.0004793406,0.0019006685,0.00057493494,0.0006969971,0.00032447022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044952543,0.00019800832,0.008827217,0.0011990945,0.0004887043,0.00067206234,0.0007769584,0.500698,0.011077512,0.051151454,0.003984423,0.4204771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020185777,0.00016844124,0.0022685484,0.00005067691,0.00014279943,0.00017678048,0.00027710604,0.96968937,0.002396685,0.023525389,0.0012422856,0.0000418194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010349435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069814133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010349435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016148023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022714313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020578384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076491140","doi":"10.1007/s00357-014-9155-x","title":"Globally Optimal Clusterwise Regression By Column Generation Enhanced with Heuristics, Sequencing and Ending Subset Optimization","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Classification","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Column generation; Heuristic; Column (typography); Branch and bound; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Combinatorial optimization; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.1351499648291038,"score_gpt":0.3820421806903929,"score_spread":0.24689221586128912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076491140","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018286904,0.000205713,0.978749,0.00013034702,0.00006416808,0.0000975305,0.00015547386,0.0012163436,0.001094466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23376624,0.00013110874,0.7608936,0.00018620736,0.000084959036,0.00034643683,0.0010551207,0.0005558269,0.0029806057],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987319,0.00064192474,0.00005572654,0.00022070983,0.00018782343,0.0001619198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955688,0.0029914936,0.00018799132,0.00037906325,0.0007276248,0.0001449681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021839973,0.0020161518,0.0026650997,0.0017807548,0.0009433406,0.0013452049,0.0019185991,0.0015585448,0.0043752124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064016734,0.001010106,0.0015249627,0.0020881272,0.0008501657,0.0014031229,0.0012497731,0.002104302,0.0013847314],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038432088,0.00022696957,0.0006043737,0.0001475334,0.00009821097,0.000087017324,0.00006937302,0.843175,0.0043720626,0.005517576,0.0056362334,0.13968132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013544917,0.000034053122,0.000054291188,0.0000040207447,0.000010922463,0.000007873429,0.000006820094,0.99701023,0.00089746906,0.0017890047,0.00016571407,0.0000060579505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007223477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008555426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007223477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071149034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028964682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014636576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077209233","doi":"10.1109/imcsit.2008.4747232","title":"Assessing the properties of the World Health Organization&amp;#x2019;s Quality of Life Index","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the International Multiconference on Computer Science and Information Technology","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Pairwise comparison; Consistency (knowledge bases); Quality (philosophy); Measure (data warehouse); Quality of life (healthcare); Computer science; Internal consistency; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Psychometrics; Epistemology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.18460621159546894,"score_gpt":0.3987868709908195,"score_spread":0.21418065939535055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077209233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67791796,0.0018627192,0.279794,0.0022304973,0.00028319674,0.0019145665,0.003650611,0.000137953,0.032208506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88470113,0.00037996864,0.11048122,0.00016167527,0.00006718214,0.0016345724,0.0020170968,0.000038292525,0.00051882066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9520027,0.031360924,0.004477582,0.0018156867,0.00980505,0.0005380628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8690715,0.09644708,0.010680284,0.009862996,0.013370971,0.0005671641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06460483,0.0004191959,0.0006636891,0.004957388,0.00069708447,0.0018334341,0.0009888663,0.00064776733,0.0014374597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18370827,0.00020604827,0.0018707277,0.005700902,0.0009881073,0.0021916702,0.002315288,0.0009782126,0.0002883031],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048666372,0.00029780722,0.6276166,0.00072919053,0.0012298598,0.000052756535,0.0015193144,0.007565924,0.0013751542,0.019708829,0.0028795248,0.3365383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024550388,0.004249541,0.8640811,0.0010849284,0.0009560118,0.00045858682,0.0038006112,0.06276741,0.006015726,0.039036166,0.01703925,0.00026514078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015037534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019398024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06460483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013533513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019476394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34166712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078620473","doi":"10.1007/s00477-007-0197-z","title":"Environmental decision-making under uncertainty using intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IF-AHP)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":197,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Analytic hierarchy process; Ambiguity; Pairwise comparison; Computer science; Fuzzy set; Premise; Fuzzy logic; Structuring; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11046025992988158,"score_gpt":0.48909179708163797,"score_spread":0.3786315371517564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078620473","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011460942,0.00013379201,0.98618305,0.00010435684,0.000028646999,0.000099909215,0.00004883235,0.00009073937,0.0018498197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41652116,0.00024086823,0.5822263,0.000057431367,0.00003598833,0.00029433402,0.00008981614,0.000024247662,0.0005098439],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.996302,0.0015146885,0.0002519484,0.00019542765,0.0014919159,0.00024392887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777967,0.0014355595,0.00014211524,0.0000834379,0.00047434313,0.00008488865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004447026,0.000800944,0.0018429487,0.0015442277,0.0014144004,0.0022159722,0.0012179497,0.0011554005,0.0014060964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074636275,0.0005860321,0.0018156966,0.0018410778,0.000933558,0.0017290439,0.0015366253,0.0014762621,0.00015497395],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015807839,0.00013707839,0.000634297,0.0005862507,0.00022957077,0.00026521413,0.0007232115,0.8327939,0.004075768,0.05913051,0.0011097325,0.10015642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028478527,0.00005001704,0.00014193602,0.00003557539,0.000043646694,0.00003101124,0.000071207556,0.9551654,0.0011199445,0.04272445,0.00056634645,0.000022034703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063748537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004646424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063748537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015093883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027395308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023518384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078701858","doi":"10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.063","title":"Uncertainty propagation in environmental decision making using random sets","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Procedia Environmental Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Uncertainty quantification; Probability density function; Set (abstract data type); Propagation of uncertainty; Mathematics; Interpretation (philosophy); Uncertainty theory; Random variable; Computer science; Probability distribution; Possibility theory; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.07350891885830818,"score_gpt":0.38254968572687187,"score_spread":0.3090407668685637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078701858","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020765914,0.00032498103,0.97571903,0.00038495942,0.000039685223,0.00006479204,0.000033724085,0.00005240118,0.002614519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79551554,0.0007273808,0.201468,0.00013346078,0.00013339538,0.00033343455,0.00007702007,0.000038961207,0.0015728493],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843575,0.010165917,0.0007179853,0.0012282467,0.0030206467,0.0005096107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9323966,0.060119506,0.0035622267,0.0012816448,0.0022790032,0.0003610182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018819574,0.0012317125,0.0018251011,0.0040415423,0.0010548945,0.004288872,0.0017257925,0.0015833088,0.0015593293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047863178,0.00097489665,0.0019289303,0.0032868406,0.0041804593,0.0053368127,0.0026681495,0.002259643,0.00018884966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040638155,0.000023760447,0.00045165455,0.00007889143,0.000083167026,0.00017516808,0.00015932116,0.74203956,0.0002579973,0.24468711,0.00018964693,0.011813111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009537558,0.000025374082,0.00012583642,0.00003773426,0.000019316474,0.00003296609,0.00003280589,0.8262454,0.00021400576,0.17292926,0.00030296846,0.000024828996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037895741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001772298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018819574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002991786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012649628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09952861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078824956","doi":"10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2004)10:4(149)","title":"Fuzzy-Based Method to Evaluate Soil Corrosivity for Prediction of Water Main Deterioration","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Infrastructure Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Soil resistivity; Corrosion; Fuzzy logic; Soil science; Matrix (chemical analysis); Environmental science; Electrical resistivity and conductivity; Engineering; Computer science; Chemistry; Metallurgy; Artificial intelligence; Materials science","score_opus":0.08922411392218882,"score_gpt":0.41203675684281427,"score_spread":0.32281264292062545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078824956","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078684,0.0002569283,0.91733193,0.00009054918,0.000056534034,0.00017490769,0.00021624475,0.00055945833,0.0026294433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72855884,0.00017980658,0.26927093,0.0000415258,0.00002702607,0.0001849188,0.00019610416,0.000013276191,0.0015276927],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999271,0.00019761198,0.000056996058,0.000098437915,0.00033514836,0.00004096316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984609,0.0007264267,0.00016519599,0.000046717494,0.0005422348,0.000058483143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011955315,0.0007927857,0.0007886667,0.0023793639,0.00041635951,0.0008059665,0.00090552197,0.0007827575,0.0016950794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035945042,0.00027870692,0.0007207859,0.0009829712,0.00033656755,0.000660013,0.00031100077,0.00050932297,0.00043012202],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005955254,0.0005740736,0.023179734,0.00050501205,0.00035989966,0.00030719972,0.00029697004,0.41143143,0.035525445,0.004588134,0.0024887442,0.5201478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001577781,0.00015270991,0.0034234263,0.000022396001,0.000033225744,0.00008221083,0.000044703815,0.9909071,0.0038538238,0.0009242872,0.00049858703,0.000041860476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005638403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070367563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005638403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007043784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068300916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011211157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078950005","doi":"10.1007/s11518-006-5010-x","title":"An effective multiple criteria approach to infrastructure reconstruction in devastated countries","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Process (computing); Agency (philosophy); International development; Business; Management science; Process management; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Engineering; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03177364974170264,"score_gpt":0.32818681516034426,"score_spread":0.2964131654186416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078950005","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.107523926,0.0010145745,0.8756672,0.0017113292,0.00015895479,0.000426344,0.00022894665,0.00016635968,0.013102378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8127769,0.00049024844,0.1832941,0.00014586361,0.000083791834,0.00036684994,0.00010883615,0.00004821788,0.0026851376],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934162,0.0046855756,0.00026609184,0.00040332196,0.00078052527,0.00044824276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99405766,0.0044810064,0.00037392604,0.00013111901,0.00072059705,0.00023577666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007970956,0.0016029892,0.0028690854,0.004520402,0.0017893771,0.0048487466,0.0029290623,0.0037523091,0.0032864425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0125964675,0.0013549196,0.0018533734,0.0034157091,0.0018441053,0.0026257257,0.002510853,0.0019256199,0.00013830749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067034736,0.00007128832,0.000476516,0.00009908415,0.00016024812,0.00022464224,0.000113396614,0.96604455,0.00020828325,0.015901994,0.000559537,0.016073463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003251015,0.000058964746,0.0002723885,0.00003332306,0.000064170345,0.00003317498,0.0001548974,0.97786635,0.0001764507,0.02074331,0.00054283405,0.0000217296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016764963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017264584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016764963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047418857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004243191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042154968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079360386","doi":"10.1016/j.ins.2013.08.029","title":"Distance-based consensus models for fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Preference; Multiplicative function; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Index (typography); Mathematics; Group decision-making; Preference relation; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.33695011655872775,"score_gpt":0.4166686395739496,"score_spread":0.07971852301522186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079360386","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024415562,0.00033720443,0.9702251,0.00036146614,0.00004880035,0.00006613647,0.0000736064,0.000058301248,0.0044138455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8026159,0.00073945994,0.18062349,0.00013745751,0.00012389483,0.00037377622,0.00026789017,0.000081772734,0.015036476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994429,0.0031649934,0.00026664833,0.0007321429,0.0010403487,0.00036692494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982206,0.013215738,0.0011593279,0.00074530224,0.002198667,0.00047498135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010251684,0.0015521167,0.0029730573,0.0023446488,0.0011411482,0.003548715,0.004610181,0.002535718,0.0061557246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026063506,0.00092556607,0.002168835,0.002884808,0.002512435,0.007810448,0.0025807421,0.0028510874,0.0008474677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012070958,0.00006771032,0.0003497751,0.0001484565,0.00011857178,0.00007515563,0.00038054437,0.4789283,0.00043129802,0.4992828,0.00083360093,0.019263122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001451876,0.000028364637,0.00007717517,0.000010948231,0.000017391667,0.00001528432,0.00003482408,0.84527075,0.00008862965,0.15409966,0.00032525908,0.000017161254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005599698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004198006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010251684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034252407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016933461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054216743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079396854","doi":"10.2478/v10209-011-0002-0","title":"Integrating imperfection of information into the promethee multicriteria decision aid methods: a general framework","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Perfect information; Limit (mathematics); Complete information; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Possibility theory; Decision theory; Decision analysis; Operations research; Fuzzy set; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.11736168307707921,"score_gpt":0.5092099071067949,"score_spread":0.3918482240297157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079396854","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012682673,0.00040161604,0.9954086,0.00046168952,0.00002880473,0.00004735335,0.000024468718,0.000024650588,0.0023345586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17593451,0.0010552589,0.8198174,0.000256653,0.00019011633,0.00040938807,0.000066548666,0.00003829668,0.0022317856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836337,0.010635644,0.00085705926,0.0011607656,0.003227624,0.0004852678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816109,0.013686334,0.0011083657,0.0013563154,0.0018156102,0.00042249204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024630122,0.0018604766,0.0024690116,0.0040216683,0.0011909741,0.006501389,0.0039642486,0.002578849,0.002746607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03196565,0.001350423,0.002299037,0.00298553,0.0069539626,0.007220988,0.0061897035,0.0042549907,0.00057427253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026871578,0.00003556702,0.00035027816,0.00018525605,0.00008706956,0.00015595734,0.00027245656,0.12028834,0.00027991616,0.84984666,0.0007077871,0.027763901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019086818,0.00003975057,0.000102838705,0.00013306415,0.000037868926,0.00008910735,0.000058814807,0.3847372,0.00027752237,0.6106548,0.0038083838,0.000041669566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021794143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018375462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024630122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029922442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034872666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13025802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079633282","doi":"10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.04.037","title":"On the fundamental convergence in the (C) mean in problems of information fusion","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province; Department of Education of Hebei Province; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Choquet integral; Mathematics; Interpretation (philosophy); Measurable function; Convergence (economics); Context (archaeology); Measure (data warehouse); Information fusion; Sensor fusion; Function (biology); Fusion; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Data mining","score_opus":0.09021557867794605,"score_gpt":0.38744784525325554,"score_spread":0.2972322665753095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079633282","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015471931,0.006190209,0.9591358,0.0050483327,0.00074476085,0.000053449294,0.00010245713,0.000070913215,0.013182199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60651886,0.019325556,0.34855554,0.0044045486,0.006183486,0.0006708958,0.0003741173,0.0005420447,0.013424932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926311,0.004602551,0.00036435534,0.00084389036,0.0012152606,0.0003429402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90230143,0.08591301,0.002164113,0.0019073203,0.0065014376,0.0012127082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030492945,0.0017953448,0.0026939334,0.0037309937,0.0020679238,0.004385619,0.0032316889,0.0054055746,0.0029910551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09707581,0.0010030107,0.0030430402,0.003969603,0.010612553,0.013489124,0.0067266333,0.008053145,0.00045844857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006269607,0.000023199136,0.00027785904,0.00025193344,0.000050058024,0.000067246256,0.0002510386,0.028182669,0.00046780516,0.9599157,0.0019382166,0.008511525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013765684,0.00004368309,0.00023313751,0.00008824732,0.000027809247,0.000075674085,0.00005959637,0.19604646,0.00028400565,0.8014234,0.0016592357,0.000045093988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00291477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013498468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030492945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029293003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002624989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16126406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079838695","doi":"10.1002/int.20072","title":"An approach to measure the robustness of fuzzy reasoning","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy control system; Machine learning","score_opus":0.18220406777295975,"score_gpt":0.427996754052197,"score_spread":0.24579268627923725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079838695","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01442476,0.00082888943,0.97996646,0.0003231461,0.000093202056,0.00013889263,0.0001283915,0.0001835358,0.0039126403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5567278,0.00087363704,0.4395096,0.0003392581,0.0003893098,0.00044889053,0.0002463828,0.00008682667,0.001378266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875738,0.0043010158,0.001164577,0.0017298562,0.0048780954,0.00035264235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9659751,0.023405083,0.003914382,0.0033665986,0.0028784678,0.00046033156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011992477,0.0017840186,0.001322819,0.006661509,0.00081786106,0.003704107,0.0022489533,0.0027490533,0.0019585653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043678522,0.00052766624,0.002868776,0.0031263002,0.003852795,0.0067925146,0.0031242676,0.003156709,0.00045538577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000557758,0.00024956267,0.0059039886,0.00089452666,0.0014013684,0.000601689,0.0012380165,0.2550244,0.041978482,0.5317086,0.0015494355,0.1588921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003776892,0.00062957476,0.0050109685,0.0001948557,0.00022275196,0.00069080904,0.00028494513,0.5636491,0.0233018,0.39957282,0.006187233,0.000217427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053640903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023055881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011992477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018595257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006755408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06342298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079965034","doi":"10.1016/j.ins.2012.05.005","title":"Ranking multi-attribute alternatives on the basis of linguistic labels in group decisions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología; World Anti-Doping Agency","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Consistency (knowledge bases); Computer science; Group decision-making; Set (abstract data type); Context (archaeology); Point (geometry); Group (periodic table); Artificial intelligence; Basis (linear algebra); Domain (mathematical analysis); Machine learning; Natural language processing; Data mining; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4291475758097598,"score_gpt":0.4805225757641095,"score_spread":0.05137499995434969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079965034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5068943,0.0020778885,0.47420755,0.003983134,0.00034701495,0.0007505427,0.00043678802,0.0002011561,0.011101615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83999556,0.0003678952,0.1577443,0.00016594915,0.000113835114,0.00041784314,0.00021681115,0.000027272063,0.0009506134],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760985,0.018333567,0.00082261785,0.0006072578,0.0036388903,0.0004991048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95763975,0.03663044,0.0016279415,0.0007632944,0.0025025778,0.00083607103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018719468,0.0011136609,0.0018407992,0.0054126396,0.0018422717,0.005193944,0.0014090992,0.002064185,0.0027239397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051132225,0.00036730475,0.0012451877,0.0032632062,0.003021613,0.004527742,0.0021064228,0.0026997663,0.0004141483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004905794,0.0022813843,0.018580023,0.0024155537,0.0009582684,0.00067755533,0.0048401114,0.33202282,0.006255102,0.18974091,0.0069960714,0.43032634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028565835,0.0008308024,0.00392349,0.0004357876,0.00022557344,0.00007924779,0.001884281,0.65981543,0.002635897,0.32756633,0.002146131,0.00017133019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015705768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002591704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018719468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024375755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021320041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0989992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079985367","doi":"10.1109/icsmc.2012.6378264","title":"Fuzzy truth values in option prioritization for preference elicitation in the Graph Model","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Ground truth; Lexicographical order; Fuzzy logic; Preference elicitation; Truth value; Prioritization; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Management science; Economics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.4616835742829895,"score_gpt":0.48067405383970135,"score_spread":0.018990479556711848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079985367","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027545511,0.000048197508,0.99456984,0.00016661531,0.000014315105,0.0000879377,0.000051636333,0.00006002277,0.0022467286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13015041,0.0001812945,0.8673309,0.000095892574,0.000030392619,0.0005047125,0.00015751123,0.000044375956,0.00150448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916888,0.0057426314,0.00032225196,0.0006561679,0.0012902648,0.00029990415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859993,0.01203851,0.00050700817,0.00053080876,0.0006618486,0.00026256024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009475589,0.0016200021,0.0014472378,0.0035855186,0.0015465955,0.003921022,0.0023423901,0.0021136617,0.0070000454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022621512,0.00093495415,0.0023959544,0.0051439432,0.0043175956,0.00766309,0.002836975,0.0034842568,0.00090135145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089092566,0.00006928532,0.00026186212,0.00021667806,0.000052282794,0.00020089978,0.0008243115,0.21024857,0.0013245284,0.73808384,0.0012029264,0.04742578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029985573,0.000035921417,0.000058929574,0.000054328662,0.000021744701,0.000047387115,0.00015030883,0.49437904,0.0006209142,0.5024504,0.0021062877,0.000044694738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050572264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061898124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009475589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040473314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003032492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050112307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080615800","doi":"10.1016/j.cor.2005.03.026","title":"Multiple criteria classification with an application in water resources planning","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Operations Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Decision maker; Sorting; Flexibility (engineering); Computer science; Preference; Mathematical optimization; Focus (optics); Operations research; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Data mining; Management science; Algorithm; Statistics","score_opus":0.3784046552194981,"score_gpt":0.529481337178887,"score_spread":0.1510766819593889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080615800","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014777164,0.0012839412,0.9771228,0.00066572643,0.0003509847,0.00016382775,0.00012665277,0.00033088212,0.0051780567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16202082,0.00083803985,0.83217674,0.00018107721,0.00021876267,0.00039434215,0.000116562536,0.00010254961,0.003951124],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596405,0.0021427243,0.0003005211,0.0003269828,0.0011046875,0.00016108899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98535734,0.011386037,0.00049634575,0.0004372252,0.0020852522,0.00023781249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060209185,0.001287563,0.0023645768,0.003842082,0.0020707499,0.0021847915,0.0015422954,0.0020037757,0.0057223816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020474674,0.0006568231,0.0023545339,0.0090048155,0.0012800113,0.002290939,0.0017021487,0.0031574727,0.0008413294],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027389,0.00039628427,0.0025270353,0.00081232074,0.00025457004,0.00047551215,0.00060127396,0.19723244,0.0026376988,0.09692182,0.009615122,0.688252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041271196,0.00013139959,0.0010814363,0.000104867446,0.000096444375,0.00015917132,0.0001258192,0.8869525,0.0012158916,0.10447827,0.0055611725,0.000051881572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006369981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004291697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006369981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013816922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012875152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031842053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082558248","doi":"10.1037/a0020143","title":"Expected versus observed information in SEM with incomplete normal and nonnormal data.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Methods","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Statistic; Standard error; Fisher information; Test statistic; Missing data; Computation; Mathematics; Maximum likelihood; Information Criteria; Structural equation modeling; Computer science; Econometrics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Algorithm; Model selection","score_opus":0.6072341590302414,"score_gpt":0.5821967672574048,"score_spread":0.025037391772836592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082558248","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053736594,0.0031512782,0.9187319,0.0026573979,0.0005696927,0.0011772271,0.0012235921,0.0006334215,0.018118856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4933541,0.0012018876,0.49893132,0.0011395632,0.00022399871,0.0027820852,0.0007916381,0.00027147625,0.0013038998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.72483647,0.23297776,0.010095154,0.008837804,0.022185626,0.0010671258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.28864318,0.6654857,0.015772697,0.021054937,0.00830013,0.00074335176],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1311796,0.001251234,0.0022236905,0.003352824,0.0011409259,0.0049839555,0.0019145119,0.0028182585,0.007649312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5441467,0.0009851317,0.003160847,0.004787784,0.005653372,0.00912087,0.0035178845,0.0038693193,0.0007397527],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021279226,0.00060145353,0.0358272,0.005648759,0.0023602662,0.00069627224,0.0052954373,0.048743255,0.0014301301,0.5241476,0.0076210164,0.36550054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005136588,0.0020242208,0.032871313,0.0028517519,0.0010337909,0.0008915576,0.0019828156,0.14783175,0.0069691376,0.782364,0.02025053,0.00041552156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009931509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017523917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8688204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024593228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002784086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6937523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082600934","doi":"10.1109/jsyst.2014.2344635","title":"Multicriteria Decision-Making Methodology for Systems Engineering","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Systems Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Computer science; Stakeholder; Preference; Decision maker; Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Decision analysis; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Management science; Operations research; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Statistics","score_opus":0.27726922992670816,"score_gpt":0.47271214035952897,"score_spread":0.1954429104328208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082600934","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033774736,0.00040600845,0.9976547,0.00008443986,0.000042653308,0.00010365361,0.000012682241,0.000041567015,0.0013164362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038405698,0.0007977636,0.95861095,0.000108417524,0.000111044166,0.0007235629,0.000055447184,0.000041028314,0.0011460448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98689306,0.008091672,0.0007193667,0.0008999368,0.0030159906,0.00037994282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954312,0.0028919657,0.0004001923,0.00029266803,0.0008674106,0.000116600415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012006734,0.002572906,0.0026938464,0.0035689115,0.0015068351,0.00337969,0.0030283616,0.0016814283,0.0046393834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009614527,0.0008852105,0.0036645965,0.0038070905,0.0021702626,0.0021413513,0.002678046,0.0039128643,0.0012323175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000598757,0.000109540844,0.00042484576,0.0011604589,0.0003135575,0.00022826986,0.00045948217,0.3054357,0.0027598103,0.5485373,0.0024095345,0.13810158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003988723,0.0001866526,0.00016287225,0.00029306367,0.00009109212,0.00014904563,0.000090666756,0.6852495,0.001821054,0.29367867,0.018164255,0.00007323648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016146132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016404432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012006734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031004616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036228884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06349844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082627727","doi":"10.1109/icsmc.2006.384523","title":"A Flexible Multiple Criteria Sorting Method with Application in Inventory Management","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sorting; Flexibility (engineering); Computer science; Decision maker; Inventory management; Sorting algorithm; Card sorting; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Data mining; Operations management; Algorithm; Engineering; Mathematics; Systems engineering; Statistics","score_opus":0.12009739149438316,"score_gpt":0.4463184851782772,"score_spread":0.32622109368389407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082627727","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018509643,0.00021542108,0.9959266,0.00008315763,0.000057606332,0.00016603136,0.000031249816,0.00023349219,0.0014355737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025533965,0.000220653,0.97267365,0.00007012856,0.00003792132,0.00028391098,0.000050056526,0.00006621049,0.0010634746],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99218446,0.0033737707,0.00046036794,0.0005774588,0.003165757,0.00023833742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952943,0.002995264,0.00033182008,0.00031823086,0.0009093938,0.00015092304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070991335,0.0018972423,0.0021204131,0.0053761033,0.00234826,0.0019634585,0.0019142166,0.001979274,0.0061813113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012234266,0.00089963234,0.0019900836,0.009167725,0.0019301644,0.0023894543,0.0018920357,0.002006582,0.0013020843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028585707,0.00021236349,0.0007024446,0.0007354082,0.00017548139,0.0004930794,0.00065974024,0.17543954,0.009402585,0.07622092,0.0039897105,0.7316829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016588943,0.00038129417,0.0007474696,0.00024002053,0.00008627703,0.00052202516,0.00018086279,0.8457265,0.0065404135,0.11691857,0.028234193,0.0002564863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030107084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030294978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070991335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010664928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021136717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03754425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084559331","doi":"10.1016/j.mcm.2010.10.001","title":"An extreme-distance approach to multiple criteria ranking","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical and Computer Modelling","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ranking (information retrieval); Normalization (sociology); Ideal solution; Extreme point; Mathematics; Computer science; Ideal (ethics); Algorithm; Monotonic function; Flexibility (engineering); Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Operations research","score_opus":0.24054947075698732,"score_gpt":0.38410560949186706,"score_spread":0.14355613873487974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084559331","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001299961,0.00021429472,0.99689496,0.000101125304,0.000029841514,0.000020864707,0.000018289811,0.000022897199,0.0013978377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1459688,0.00073976855,0.8480087,0.00014393478,0.00016946597,0.00031087451,0.00015379515,0.00007418333,0.0044304687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907742,0.0055736597,0.0003704654,0.0004645248,0.0025869966,0.00023011945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925954,0.00538145,0.00026267604,0.00042128604,0.0011639498,0.00017529914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074719726,0.0013070905,0.0027684213,0.003575247,0.0012078327,0.0029761812,0.003933806,0.00201643,0.004243656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01805233,0.0007624679,0.0021783402,0.0048226337,0.002424251,0.0035223723,0.0032223035,0.0035242792,0.0006348711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076044016,0.00013152818,0.00042392354,0.00035840634,0.00026209292,0.0001311972,0.0002661629,0.40640932,0.0007000725,0.46702918,0.0023834968,0.12182863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022007105,0.00007823387,0.00019729273,0.00004734953,0.00003312583,0.00006513486,0.00004396645,0.5441615,0.0002508037,0.4518325,0.0032338665,0.000034218905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002333477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021732666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074719726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016868575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014176435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03951609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085161477","doi":"10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01331.x","title":"Decision Making Under Uncertainty—An Example for Seismic Risk Management","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Heuristic; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Fuzzy logic; Process (computing); Computer science; Risk management; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.13553129021999794,"score_gpt":0.434459157924852,"score_spread":0.2989278677048541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085161477","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075580426,0.0035547102,0.844791,0.009147583,0.0001861093,0.00019447735,0.00010722815,0.000100458965,0.06633798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7317016,0.0026773207,0.26026988,0.00023900562,0.00014420091,0.00015582248,0.000040105864,0.000029422386,0.0047425744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967303,0.0022846125,0.000074266194,0.00011947195,0.0006348942,0.00015651139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655664,0.0028343182,0.00014700672,0.00009604468,0.00024592993,0.00012010498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037185433,0.0008125567,0.0007687726,0.0011944353,0.001955717,0.0019612685,0.0008547401,0.002481591,0.0022106753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063207974,0.00021943137,0.00095373247,0.0015507436,0.0023139315,0.0015906867,0.0019963868,0.002518296,0.00020674393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011580259,0.00010771787,0.0006032096,0.00022238327,0.00008014201,0.0017117313,0.00096134696,0.30642766,0.0011306218,0.6397851,0.0025579578,0.046296354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035475157,0.00008754825,0.0003166009,0.0001076902,0.000028423974,0.00038561,0.0007037578,0.37179118,0.00078055396,0.6133839,0.012337068,0.000042208216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017828319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002053991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037185433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017565767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011595893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019665778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085806531","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.007","title":"An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiattribute group decision making framework with incomplete preference over alternatives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Group decision-making; Preference; Ranking (information retrieval); Consistency (knowledge bases); Mathematics; Interval (graph theory); Group (periodic table); Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.15263580729946172,"score_gpt":0.4350878121505095,"score_spread":0.2824520048510478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085806531","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073583936,0.00022858042,0.98840886,0.0002560104,0.00002872365,0.000050637464,0.00005601273,0.000046109893,0.0035666714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3490641,0.00041481564,0.6479076,0.00013249672,0.00006711137,0.00022894688,0.00012626994,0.00002245286,0.0020361403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955048,0.00228834,0.00023044704,0.0004907397,0.0012522278,0.00023344203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982552,0.00082536094,0.00019778649,0.00014126713,0.00040360642,0.00017677803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064759464,0.0012307925,0.0015669103,0.0022250756,0.0009264232,0.003629399,0.0026358652,0.0018305035,0.0029411593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054954393,0.0005946009,0.0020055014,0.0028814264,0.0018374074,0.0038861558,0.0022311108,0.0019355604,0.0004428895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015713762,0.00017882792,0.00054703915,0.0003773935,0.0002115934,0.00039907172,0.0007454903,0.20043363,0.0025499146,0.7389264,0.0017848794,0.053688638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061646744,0.00015645228,0.00029748434,0.0001219663,0.00012110674,0.00018105908,0.0001569188,0.6092047,0.00075273844,0.38474214,0.004125215,0.00007853009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018786131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024986216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064759464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020319335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021905329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03424847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086262313","doi":"10.1002/int.20491","title":"Evidential reasoning using extended fuzzy Dempster-Shafer theory for handling various facets of information deficiency","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Vagueness; Dempster–Shafer theory; Fuzzy logic; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Ambiguity; Belief structure; Ignorance; Fuzzy set operations; Fuzzy set; Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2264374948042466,"score_gpt":0.4315268378480013,"score_spread":0.20508934304375467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086262313","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075931237,0.0005108421,0.9896131,0.00026578954,0.000026972279,0.000041655498,0.000021263051,0.000023951307,0.0019033159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4872857,0.0012341277,0.509728,0.00015816173,0.00014028637,0.00021022197,0.00008231484,0.00001408926,0.0011470515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99530125,0.0021861175,0.00042759237,0.00038382868,0.0015596248,0.0001415168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99056727,0.0067250854,0.0008832163,0.00078895513,0.000888493,0.00014696411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012966541,0.0013750532,0.0018027794,0.003880482,0.0009780243,0.0028977243,0.0020061207,0.0019804274,0.001509466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023320042,0.00058398856,0.0021810576,0.0026332901,0.0027877898,0.0061194478,0.0026518698,0.002272868,0.00021570454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007815871,0.00006181353,0.00090149965,0.00042022337,0.00023392521,0.000607556,0.0006913715,0.28175107,0.0016942652,0.65156746,0.0007934699,0.06119908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031868338,0.000053585914,0.0002040703,0.00008063624,0.000059900565,0.0001637913,0.00007533145,0.5298533,0.0008964569,0.46722367,0.0013177786,0.000039647097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001375521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014639087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012966541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019008078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012819513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06857443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086917595","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.039","title":"An OWA-TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Decision maker; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Extreme point; Robustness (evolution); Similarity (geometry); Ideal (ethics); Data mining; Mathematics; Operations research; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10219207783045593,"score_gpt":0.4924242896579465,"score_spread":0.39023221182749057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086917595","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025575238,0.00039529378,0.9924555,0.00008625167,0.00013685346,0.0002236718,0.00013081134,0.0002778148,0.0037362026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04111115,0.0005149024,0.95464045,0.00006329857,0.0000449057,0.0005861896,0.00020856471,0.00006320977,0.0027673664],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99190134,0.0028166103,0.0006422045,0.0004326517,0.0039590867,0.00024812893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728525,0.0013068465,0.000119364166,0.00016104708,0.00106132,0.00006626544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004294031,0.001484367,0.002720865,0.005634909,0.0015995167,0.0029276714,0.001487822,0.0011462064,0.007955798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0089194905,0.0006976284,0.0029942465,0.007703932,0.0007423738,0.002166602,0.001977792,0.0016311776,0.0018722839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016411746,0.00024143222,0.0009054092,0.0015564973,0.00059788616,0.00020764761,0.00036254487,0.03675151,0.007852859,0.041597787,0.004961778,0.9048005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016194576,0.00065819744,0.0037543294,0.0006339398,0.0007560339,0.0008462617,0.00060068927,0.80034834,0.0113733215,0.13506857,0.045442477,0.0003558645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040529114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065563126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007955798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010741538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035384463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026614785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086961297","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2014.10.025","title":"A multi-step goal programming approach for group decision making with incomplete interval additive reciprocal comparison matrices","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Multiplicative function; Interval (graph theory); Reciprocal; Mathematics; Goal programming; Mathematical optimization; Linear programming; Logarithm; Group (periodic table); Preference; Constraint (computer-aided design); Group decision-making; Statistics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.3359376798616845,"score_gpt":0.5029340869811448,"score_spread":0.16699640711946034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086961297","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018146667,0.000026756252,0.99727196,0.0000367188,0.000008028813,0.000031067648,0.0000125798,0.000031782838,0.00076632295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11626163,0.00010649708,0.88129365,0.000060393166,0.000025055664,0.00042873385,0.0000677567,0.000050178493,0.0017061046],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752015,0.0014476347,0.00009527592,0.00027483268,0.0005231276,0.00013904164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746954,0.0018533563,0.00011763355,0.000077554556,0.00039112644,0.000090907444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041413736,0.0012386782,0.0016324556,0.0011979013,0.0006612448,0.0017966246,0.0022699048,0.0014538947,0.0035431231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005365367,0.0007533051,0.0017658813,0.0012860163,0.00075557875,0.0017565566,0.0021014323,0.002083855,0.0005047219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009461612,0.0002073484,0.00023101934,0.0002368481,0.00011462568,0.00010427316,0.00023407668,0.86526746,0.0017604908,0.06589037,0.0008832517,0.06497569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000097139055,0.00006870952,0.000036045993,0.000013943618,0.00001733072,0.000013700553,0.00001788795,0.9852385,0.00033313545,0.013870681,0.0003695435,0.000010863818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034084497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003848892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041413736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001057216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002022702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021901965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088771538","doi":"10.12817/17018285.35.1.27702301","title":"Contractor Selection Using an Integrated AHP and TOPSIS Model","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Implementation of the Inuvialuit Final Agreement, annual review","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Analytic hierarchy process; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Operations research; Model selection; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2932139079858163,"score_gpt":0.5057798991610472,"score_spread":0.21256599117523084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088771538","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121674865,0.0009986453,0.8452978,0.0010492941,0.00018634016,0.008109248,0.0014046063,0.0005473401,0.020731818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36886406,0.0012832081,0.62045366,0.00011894186,0.000041694067,0.004000957,0.0011419263,0.00005500264,0.0040405327],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98523915,0.008907261,0.0011406742,0.0005533377,0.0036260283,0.0005335256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98960555,0.0069912984,0.0005571913,0.00021732351,0.002394562,0.0002341651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015045985,0.0015293224,0.002239504,0.006988441,0.0019984713,0.0043081804,0.0018015134,0.0010700302,0.010420255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018251663,0.000960508,0.0029507563,0.010626185,0.00069085974,0.0017535783,0.002086279,0.0014105083,0.00093179883],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011022331,0.00081041147,0.008927156,0.0043249093,0.0014164681,0.00080799405,0.002633815,0.4959967,0.0028016488,0.02500365,0.0074655795,0.44870943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034161244,0.00087985414,0.0033994718,0.0006383905,0.00044579484,0.00014479742,0.0028732298,0.9636074,0.0016060503,0.01668955,0.009250744,0.00012303985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01733226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01909987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01733226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032310637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009733259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079571724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091777784","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2010.01.007","title":"Designing fuzzy expert system for creating and ranking of tourism scenarios using fuzzy AHP method","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Fuzzy logic; Analytic hierarchy process; Tourism; Data mining; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.10783311169030448,"score_gpt":0.4111417289800539,"score_spread":0.30330861728974945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091777784","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03272165,0.000060675808,0.959367,0.00021995504,0.00002873901,0.000965243,0.00031354054,0.0009306007,0.0053925053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16936608,0.00008362955,0.8286149,0.00004087203,0.000009819593,0.00064360705,0.00027911685,0.000027891341,0.0009341588],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898285,0.0004428275,0.000115534865,0.00012278864,0.00024074299,0.00009517317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819934,0.00082971406,0.000118974654,0.00009380558,0.0006659889,0.000092108676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00359913,0.00082446716,0.0008628392,0.0027615551,0.0013273578,0.0018187785,0.0012779065,0.001149294,0.005476698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006073865,0.00060407026,0.00073195976,0.0016483613,0.00039559198,0.0015537123,0.0011081162,0.0007913935,0.0007872629],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038711834,0.00047797945,0.0036095511,0.0010136109,0.00021293925,0.0008193657,0.0022164816,0.58425546,0.022314094,0.020993585,0.006586351,0.35711354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009128002,0.0000815213,0.0004108067,0.00007965436,0.000044610977,0.00007875992,0.0005021059,0.98284537,0.0054126414,0.00686202,0.0035509681,0.00004014806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056022583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068355217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056022583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010196344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021703092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019034266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092187058","doi":"10.1504/ijise.2009.022370","title":"Multi-attribute selection method for materials handling equipment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2659002990323945,"score_gpt":0.44409008950146245,"score_spread":0.17818979046906797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092187058","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016787764,0.00026263876,0.9807751,0.00016926306,0.000059565915,0.00033557395,0.00023110645,0.00019800657,0.0011808464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21780346,0.0002119043,0.7788555,0.00006584377,0.00005759769,0.0010328168,0.00049565895,0.000043543736,0.0014337137],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929006,0.0036219328,0.00050945673,0.0005941309,0.0021511882,0.00022269382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913271,0.006353099,0.00040216974,0.00022877046,0.0014724975,0.00021640948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061811036,0.0009823602,0.0017733697,0.005211689,0.0009746278,0.0017927376,0.001401619,0.0008629453,0.004667428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010662501,0.0004082795,0.0020778398,0.0044057523,0.00051478436,0.0013261649,0.0011709956,0.0013432852,0.00056049676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057412015,0.000586586,0.0063986653,0.0011239944,0.0007730181,0.00040908967,0.0007394288,0.1998505,0.0076260082,0.018434359,0.0043865126,0.7590977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104298786,0.00038270326,0.003078031,0.000082443265,0.0001332753,0.0002581011,0.0002431457,0.97419226,0.002695606,0.013554087,0.005203159,0.00007280527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016918281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016414485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061811036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012523261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016350291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032689214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092687580","doi":"10.1115/imece2005-82999","title":"Assessing the Sustainability of Technological Developments: An Alternative Approach of Selecting Indicators in the Case of Offshore Operations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Ranking (information retrieval); Process (computing); Performance indicator; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Sustainable development; Economic indicator; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental economics; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.17351227162388574,"score_gpt":0.48503077840151015,"score_spread":0.3115185067776244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092687580","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17536794,0.0012243341,0.7952283,0.0022727277,0.00016873234,0.00068785076,0.00036196562,0.00014151349,0.024546674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48203367,0.00060496654,0.5151164,0.000115957104,0.000037071484,0.00042559495,0.00013516405,0.000029453993,0.0015017054],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98677003,0.008099391,0.0008934848,0.0005833847,0.0032428228,0.00041090578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98687464,0.007428193,0.0014978776,0.00075206044,0.0031599398,0.00028736165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009985913,0.0016989309,0.0012791632,0.013271484,0.0016821761,0.0054926206,0.0014549403,0.0016925564,0.0023101752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02794285,0.00044065437,0.0016389748,0.010945398,0.002647928,0.0035647952,0.002612537,0.0015354647,0.00036751703],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087692676,0.0006301262,0.049430672,0.002364976,0.0007691982,0.0027045761,0.013713731,0.10142779,0.0197409,0.24896,0.003519024,0.55586207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028044527,0.0016550327,0.060116943,0.0014621228,0.0010501819,0.0026482304,0.023831973,0.46594152,0.037574567,0.35079333,0.05383308,0.0008126151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003918675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005906232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013271484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020016418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033537643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052811146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093227692","doi":"10.1109/lescpe.2006.280385","title":"A Swarm Optimizer Based on Multi-Criterion Decision Making, part I: Theoretical investigation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Swarm behaviour; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Group decision-making; Fuzzy set; Set (abstract data type); Fitness function; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Process (computing); Measure (data warehouse); Space (punctuation); Function (biology); Fuzzy logic; Swarm intelligence; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Particle swarm optimization; Genetic algorithm","score_opus":0.11141626822670549,"score_gpt":0.40447031607419465,"score_spread":0.2930540478474892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093227692","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044382056,0.002209149,0.9824493,0.00038433194,0.00009867892,0.000045342953,0.00001853899,0.000039349805,0.010317175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3990434,0.005406898,0.5847177,0.00024347242,0.0002992549,0.0003532606,0.000104523075,0.000060718958,0.009770713],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992466,0.0002889359,0.000039981693,0.00010005871,0.00029612763,0.000028313545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996557,0.00019915022,0.000030190624,0.00002108009,0.00007897819,0.000014835133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015007842,0.00071822724,0.00096141297,0.00063071935,0.00047943497,0.0014091402,0.00072188466,0.001097286,0.0014333063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014857387,0.0003317195,0.0008716904,0.00083174335,0.0011455658,0.001259909,0.0007419491,0.0011802202,0.00030745246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041706564,0.00005599823,0.0007390036,0.00037287464,0.00011521517,0.00022086939,0.0002339447,0.52153707,0.0027739094,0.39042827,0.0020918548,0.08138921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012357973,0.00007986357,0.00018096979,0.00005250864,0.000017963537,0.00006489142,0.00001595058,0.9450539,0.00064538245,0.04793237,0.005928118,0.00001580488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015937074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070428546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0015937074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008218846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006865433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007937014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093302391","doi":"10.1016/j.fss.2013.06.009","title":"A fuzzy reliability assessment of basic events of fault trees through qualitative data processing","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fuzzy Sets and Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Probabilistic logic; Event (particle physics); Computer science; Reliability engineering; Fuzzy logic; Data mining; Fault tree analysis; Construct (python library); Nuclear power plant; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Power (physics); Engineering","score_opus":0.313984957500451,"score_gpt":0.5096674684749564,"score_spread":0.19568251097450534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093302391","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13922873,0.00015710534,0.8583808,0.000078194615,0.000013777668,0.00014000022,0.00026402014,0.00020108533,0.0015362744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86390287,0.00009682571,0.13544962,0.00000972099,0.000011647336,0.0000759877,0.00016894774,0.000014352095,0.00027000296],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861395,0.00045814124,0.00008966271,0.00015833088,0.0005917798,0.00008813567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995533,0.002256047,0.00045772936,0.0002633567,0.0013541693,0.00013559285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030249832,0.00057851285,0.0006272003,0.0031743043,0.0005200092,0.0015765527,0.0006755064,0.00060991297,0.0009068672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009039677,0.00029192897,0.000768383,0.0013892236,0.000640256,0.0015900271,0.0006261763,0.00044970002,0.00014535178],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010464211,0.00018258186,0.015849888,0.0008067153,0.00020453172,0.0004123891,0.0013239526,0.57086617,0.06039128,0.03057835,0.0013156919,0.31702211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020983369,0.00030210966,0.0059429016,0.000065748645,0.00008278626,0.000139142,0.00022904368,0.9646739,0.010955565,0.016880235,0.0006535434,0.000054113287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002074096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001297971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031743043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071581756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091267895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015997827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095391785","doi":"10.1007/s11518-010-5152-8","title":"Notes on “Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making method based on a novel accuracy function under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Function (biology); Membership function; Fuzzy number; Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy set operations; Fuzzy set; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.08332589426152424,"score_gpt":0.3789849579519154,"score_spread":0.29565906369039113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095391785","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041054576,0.0012848609,0.9869892,0.0011439967,0.00093923026,0.00003916428,0.00004352647,0.00008845549,0.0053661154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28513792,0.002294315,0.699002,0.0012063533,0.00193992,0.00013010991,0.00013407103,0.00009338615,0.010061961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878925,0.00043822586,0.00011990373,0.00024133993,0.00036351496,0.000047834477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859196,0.00080100336,0.00005183665,0.00009898554,0.0004227689,0.00003357753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027326555,0.00046841288,0.0006960827,0.0007523187,0.00049222034,0.0010912265,0.0012695488,0.0012456765,0.0033803596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039227232,0.0001995774,0.0010416936,0.0010938304,0.0013722752,0.0016914633,0.00053373864,0.0013255437,0.00049713196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005081558,0.000104084145,0.0010362603,0.0008106178,0.0003043267,0.00058718974,0.0006483641,0.08699236,0.010934537,0.67416316,0.019110488,0.20480043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060141898,0.0002803875,0.0013130531,0.00011497339,0.00020543649,0.000527353,0.000099358185,0.5787405,0.013074451,0.3706931,0.03469196,0.00019939683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016682865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013061147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033803596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084065745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005364287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014451802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095402609","doi":"10.1142/s0218539305001835","title":"GROUP-BASED FAILURE EFFECTS ANALYSIS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Reliability engineering; Fuzzy logic; Group (periodic table); Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Business","score_opus":0.04913327075008194,"score_gpt":0.3992706961747649,"score_spread":0.35013742542468296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095402609","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010083684,0.00021007084,0.9851459,0.000056132765,0.000040448387,0.00006846792,0.000050271807,0.0001662225,0.0041788714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67280036,0.0005714108,0.31722984,0.00009600303,0.00012374218,0.00028668714,0.0002613127,0.00011679943,0.008513866],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983475,0.0005273572,0.00003697935,0.00018056335,0.000798778,0.000108729415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988187,0.0006587674,0.00010377713,0.00010968306,0.00027280944,0.00003615539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018590956,0.0012306232,0.0012385307,0.0024897996,0.00063996343,0.0008269784,0.0015041707,0.0011289733,0.006238128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030967146,0.0002717833,0.0017632458,0.00091936224,0.000629123,0.0009822494,0.0009502795,0.0007132877,0.0005350138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053223797,0.00005450223,0.00081513094,0.00012268992,0.00012586573,0.0001002283,0.000107207765,0.88675517,0.0024807276,0.029082527,0.0009131289,0.07938963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010410329,0.0000769948,0.00046476407,0.000015776799,0.00004876686,0.000051354986,0.0000239097,0.9797035,0.0012187506,0.015832953,0.002533326,0.000019459538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039497023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00191588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006238128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055472093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000614176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020868659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097096836","doi":"10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(2007)23:4(200)","title":"Project Delivery System Selection under Uncertainty: Multicriteria Multilevel Decision Aid Model","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management in Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Operations research; Selection (genetic algorithm); Benchmark (surveying); Rank (graph theory); Process (computing); Interval (graph theory); Linear programming; Hierarchy; Set (abstract data type); Goal programming; Task (project management); Management science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Systems engineering","score_opus":0.10108751359006338,"score_gpt":0.3838952219365119,"score_spread":0.2828077083464485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097096836","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1281525,0.00051645807,0.85363525,0.0014608377,0.00006484707,0.00028558707,0.00054168084,0.0004229459,0.014919953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9230839,0.00045244786,0.07034741,0.00011902117,0.000047864476,0.00041100365,0.000233602,0.000030200588,0.005274516],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983021,0.0007876245,0.00007299604,0.00018879007,0.00040490265,0.00024364241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977392,0.0013617896,0.0003360549,0.00006375124,0.0003678766,0.00013135723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026558987,0.00078025594,0.0015121266,0.0015086484,0.0008279458,0.0026642352,0.0021374116,0.0018696213,0.005305497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045038583,0.00066068856,0.0013270704,0.0016307863,0.0008547878,0.0015587296,0.0016528063,0.0016736446,0.00051535433],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058767797,0.000042338343,0.0007214025,0.000046491416,0.000046000107,0.00011875657,0.000081422884,0.9826985,0.0004066569,0.010313943,0.00030084993,0.0051648733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008547751,0.000020453841,0.00011089143,0.0000041544354,0.0000092424025,0.0000075581697,0.0000113064825,0.99773717,0.00004230732,0.0019102296,0.00013353731,0.0000046561113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012994998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009070081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012994998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024414246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015852789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025838733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097955291","doi":"10.1016/s0377-2217(00)00040-0","title":"Project evaluation and selection in a network of collaboration: A consensual disaggregation multi-criterion approach","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Operations research; Management science; Resentment; Project management; Process management; Business; Economics; Political science; Management; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.5159412359458836,"score_gpt":0.5604851938150975,"score_spread":0.044543957869213946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097955291","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09140543,0.00050448935,0.9003447,0.00041866416,0.000025848496,0.000384208,0.00016113764,0.00012158749,0.0066339746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61078787,0.00031996518,0.386672,0.000073813826,0.00002797081,0.00047992467,0.000218279,0.000042783642,0.0013774169],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746943,0.01803097,0.00096637465,0.0012422218,0.003962703,0.0011034409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822645,0.011885145,0.0014808513,0.0012872512,0.0023693484,0.0007128938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01862031,0.0011082059,0.0029900982,0.00841355,0.0018318065,0.004980972,0.0015870059,0.0018373819,0.0020041934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027168948,0.00079017045,0.0019420709,0.008561212,0.0016753761,0.004880894,0.0048213727,0.00113346,0.00023163584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004623451,0.00037219535,0.017301176,0.0007482174,0.000976756,0.00041349736,0.002272005,0.63344675,0.0030730304,0.109832115,0.0015131107,0.2295888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036600002,0.0001646382,0.0041092485,0.000100827114,0.00021372497,0.000115226394,0.0006835323,0.8998146,0.0007429957,0.09207536,0.0018990656,0.00004423261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006826043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073534064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01862031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028802676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004149141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0984748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100508930","doi":"10.1155/2012/204864","title":"Excluded-Mean-Variance Neural Decision Analyzer for Qualitative Group Decision Making","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Variance (accounting); Weighting; Group decision-making; Cognition; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Group (periodic table); Process (computing); Management science; Decision field theory; Machine learning; Decision engineering; Psychology; Business decision mapping; Social psychology; Decision support system; Engineering; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.14808606265887442,"score_gpt":0.5026450969207286,"score_spread":0.35455903426185414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100508930","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014032227,0.000050310216,0.98403776,0.00009140088,0.000014456079,0.00007225668,0.000038535687,0.00024945525,0.0014134996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.414134,0.00007965651,0.5840978,0.000110198685,0.000027584403,0.0003530258,0.00012711667,0.000054620134,0.0010159306],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961808,0.0021489887,0.0002577364,0.00035836722,0.0009092798,0.00014492696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99266666,0.0053985347,0.00041497097,0.00027994864,0.0011036424,0.0001362491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072560874,0.0007669857,0.0008804544,0.0018823956,0.00086256175,0.0018712718,0.0010415819,0.0010452176,0.0038532089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020343302,0.00031126713,0.00086862844,0.0013221508,0.0011576926,0.001997011,0.0012833012,0.0015288746,0.00043500896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089830806,0.00028617666,0.0040619094,0.00027636118,0.00025878413,0.00024815561,0.0006325717,0.5261124,0.0069959005,0.1571425,0.0017562591,0.3013308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013247345,0.000034461846,0.00021185064,0.000011464305,0.000013639462,0.000019977195,0.000018834147,0.9757755,0.0010825525,0.022482209,0.00032419,0.000012170797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022708424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026717593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072560874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014971409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015756508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038374305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100610104","doi":"10.1109/nafips.1996.534749","title":"The Archimedean assumption in fuzzy set theory","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Fuzzy set; Set theory; Axiom; Mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Perspective (graphical); Axiom of choice; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy mathematics; Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory; Fuzzy set operations; Discrete mathematics; Algebra over a field; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Pure mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.33430289212640163,"score_gpt":0.44887415103180245,"score_spread":0.11457125890540082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100610104","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024813259,0.035326097,0.5930877,0.032796293,0.0047536185,0.00012301172,0.0001909317,0.0001427048,0.30876637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74918956,0.028805628,0.18403779,0.0054494194,0.004762233,0.00033356278,0.00017810658,0.000053221982,0.027190506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968438,0.0012881871,0.00017452372,0.00035495166,0.0011634423,0.00017504796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995249,0.0034477967,0.00025516082,0.00041619313,0.00053371297,0.00009821914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057699685,0.0005621513,0.00089438807,0.0015317359,0.002483974,0.004301799,0.0013691181,0.002800999,0.003169472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009926554,0.00032810908,0.0006847594,0.0020786556,0.012997024,0.006447852,0.0017487128,0.0042328937,0.00096591597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006211431,0.000004564046,0.000043628857,0.00003341104,0.0000032111616,0.000043990374,0.00014600749,0.00038268394,0.00008304171,0.99258363,0.0008806206,0.0057889647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020650753,0.000009332942,0.00006377544,0.00004701192,0.0000030703313,0.00006535741,0.00007590035,0.0009447628,0.00012856298,0.98630315,0.012349982,0.000007077346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010400598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008326422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057699685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00206982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019988413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030514896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100635022","doi":"10.1109/icsmc.2009.5346034","title":"Fuzzy preferences in conflict resolution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Preference; Preference relation; Conflict resolution; Computer science; Decision maker; Order (exchange); Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy set operations; Resolution (logic); Fuzzy set; Mathematics; Operations research; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.31432403089435124,"score_gpt":0.46584851532891436,"score_spread":0.15152448443456312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100635022","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01372582,0.062973425,0.7971163,0.007674291,0.0008662244,0.00016076471,0.00010865506,0.00007930156,0.117295265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6037257,0.05543763,0.32128114,0.0019783038,0.0017787032,0.00063484185,0.00019125907,0.000060052418,0.014912338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99256927,0.0051045446,0.00028817845,0.00041536972,0.0012765782,0.00034599358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939956,0.0045849876,0.0003833899,0.00024375926,0.00061081175,0.00018145083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008900373,0.0010606095,0.0011169731,0.0028479358,0.0015455332,0.0035620942,0.0012973747,0.0017682204,0.0042647338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011080026,0.0005125644,0.0009849853,0.0048206015,0.0047339513,0.0065197404,0.0021027615,0.002648782,0.0008325164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019491014,0.000018595034,0.00010035923,0.00024128416,0.000026931506,0.00008527,0.00064670393,0.006406904,0.00016139838,0.95569414,0.0016484173,0.0349507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013594733,0.000026411295,0.00008530615,0.00015911652,0.000014029487,0.0001021996,0.00029890734,0.010501486,0.00017337436,0.9713705,0.017237462,0.000017570961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011971507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096869696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008900373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023893144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014116734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047070265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101001634","doi":"10.1002/mcda.313","title":"A new rank correlation coefficient with application to the consensus ranking problem","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of National Defence","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Metric (unit); Rank correlation; Mathematics; Correlation coefficient; Distance correlation; Statistics; Correlation; Measure (data warehouse); Combinatorics; Computer science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Random variable","score_opus":0.0879760005428058,"score_gpt":0.3877226847301167,"score_spread":0.2997466841873109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101001634","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008796794,0.00079968525,0.98509717,0.0005507923,0.00012341989,0.00007958803,0.00008341901,0.00012296498,0.0043462133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38602015,0.0015821578,0.605919,0.0003050297,0.000525793,0.00047962333,0.00036104445,0.000236255,0.0045710253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806363,0.010998756,0.00074790465,0.0014585519,0.0054599238,0.00069852395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553467,0.030379856,0.0034521783,0.0016822712,0.008247184,0.00089175306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01732893,0.0014990446,0.002400687,0.0050968486,0.0013352036,0.0041487664,0.0020984185,0.0024351242,0.0029319588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06037899,0.0006569652,0.0011973623,0.0068139345,0.0029059527,0.0053861537,0.0031374893,0.0032822778,0.0007875106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016210036,0.00011220967,0.0034659065,0.00041657846,0.0002080722,0.00034756496,0.00035628854,0.38213357,0.0015895787,0.42195937,0.011046866,0.17820184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029972003,0.00010997693,0.0006576289,0.00006872789,0.00004446191,0.00017998095,0.00009102377,0.870308,0.0011586461,0.12122984,0.006052483,0.00006922928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034408446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002485359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01732893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030229248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034583271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09164524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101635255","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2012.11.001","title":"A COPRAS-F base multi-criteria group decision making approach for site selection of wind farm","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Site selection; Base (topology); Group decision-making; Operations research; Group (periodic table); Computer science; Operations management; Engineering; Business; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.15230158126076904,"score_gpt":0.43487255549208775,"score_spread":0.2825709742313187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101635255","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014880284,0.0003492657,0.97988254,0.00030083733,0.000053182634,0.00035221607,0.00006884425,0.00007432631,0.004038472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37483153,0.0005167417,0.6210175,0.0001636848,0.00006870746,0.0010390314,0.00016134317,0.000034834058,0.0021665571],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965228,0.0022808085,0.0001564794,0.0002850453,0.0005594777,0.00019537573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979722,0.001287526,0.00015979791,0.0000551953,0.0004125991,0.00011267704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00425219,0.0015685307,0.0018509061,0.0019051869,0.0013449327,0.0020961862,0.0016523927,0.0017275482,0.003113725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049453406,0.00068145583,0.0017535682,0.0014056526,0.00078892533,0.0010150868,0.0013457099,0.0017254329,0.00041053005],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016024044,0.00016814237,0.00071770063,0.00041945194,0.00019899686,0.00037848926,0.00037078952,0.8841541,0.0017045381,0.020178674,0.0020930795,0.0894559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025155165,0.0001456363,0.00017109263,0.000045384262,0.00003343497,0.00004651798,0.00007821524,0.98912114,0.00046089885,0.008571288,0.0012808052,0.000020418069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006044519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065660966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006044519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017962962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00239397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022487998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101950038","doi":"10.1080/15732479.2013.795978","title":"A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":427,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Management science; Decision analysis; Computer science; Stakeholder; Decision support system; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Operations research; Business; Mathematics; Data mining; Political science","score_opus":0.07641263583973068,"score_gpt":0.47756758657355797,"score_spread":0.4011549507338273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101950038","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024918147,0.9892736,0.007045666,0.0004621163,0.00021323682,0.00004446418,0.00006384817,0.000016582315,0.0026313437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045366427,0.9799794,0.014171663,0.00026427134,0.00018087687,0.00007629684,0.00009533567,0.0000082391625,0.0006872252],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997437,0.000847165,0.0004142205,0.0002566027,0.0009712229,0.0000737374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99458116,0.003948341,0.00039801528,0.00010819379,0.00088770053,0.000076540295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038602033,0.0017386674,0.0020983936,0.0063943285,0.0006088742,0.0017531042,0.0019310915,0.0018485008,0.005116238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064129448,0.00069575245,0.001812858,0.011206554,0.0008449266,0.00202617,0.0008619981,0.0015367863,0.0015323843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050073642,0.000103662125,0.00042329959,0.06345349,0.00027699338,0.00021148927,0.00020948715,0.0039841505,0.00079538935,0.013890403,0.014063833,0.9025377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044358683,0.00026246297,0.0031254794,0.04784488,0.0006782925,0.0012251815,0.00047560682,0.004214057,0.0015128814,0.027882323,0.9125636,0.00017080826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032021806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057599815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063943285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018946897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033228274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020414948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102220958","doi":"10.1109/icsmc.1997.625769","title":"On the role of fuzzy decision support for risk communication among stakeholders","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Process (computing); Management science; Public participation; Decision support system; Fuzzy logic; Knowledge management; Process management; Business; Engineering; Public relations; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2837418475621151,"score_gpt":0.3942114800675809,"score_spread":0.11046963250546576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102220958","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11568577,0.0013991687,0.7939421,0.007300513,0.00020859097,0.00026753359,0.00009363383,0.00023065344,0.08087206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8652761,0.00057030004,0.13030808,0.00023999161,0.00008390829,0.00015233758,0.000036461606,0.000021184287,0.0033115766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954384,0.0027273123,0.00020059907,0.0002429055,0.0011004714,0.00029035436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97855777,0.016637493,0.0009585248,0.00082751364,0.002447583,0.00057113415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009980248,0.00065134553,0.0004719448,0.0020044567,0.0031058695,0.005912417,0.001286714,0.0024379638,0.00606354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026327373,0.00035895043,0.00063631823,0.0013164544,0.0034689954,0.005667263,0.0018983361,0.0013096818,0.00063450966],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000676828,0.00016000532,0.0021267056,0.0004418895,0.000082147875,0.0010839151,0.006643145,0.12711649,0.006175032,0.6514709,0.0033235783,0.20069937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010481008,0.0002235764,0.0010939767,0.0003785614,0.00008655086,0.00031627907,0.003193433,0.4336258,0.0039511896,0.54208875,0.014789475,0.00014755888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006910576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004203064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009980248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025726242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002622455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052781224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102808370","doi":"10.1504/ijep.2010.034236","title":"A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis approach for the management of petroleum-contaminated sites","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Environment and Pollution","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Remedial education; Remedial action; Ranking (information retrieval); Fuzzy logic; Stakeholder; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Environmental remediation; Site selection; Rank (graph theory); Selection (genetic algorithm); Contaminated land; Computer science; Fuzzy set; Analytic hierarchy process; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Engineering; Mathematics; Contamination; Machine learning; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0702390078454856,"score_gpt":0.3805419968063846,"score_spread":0.31030298896089903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102808370","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026590372,0.0005361188,0.99332327,0.0002718679,0.000050467122,0.00022704933,0.000063370564,0.00005895007,0.0028098212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10492734,0.000671545,0.8924115,0.00012560592,0.00005655734,0.0006385225,0.000080082245,0.000021895774,0.0010670024],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509686,0.0024315354,0.00028540642,0.000293719,0.0017499409,0.00014244317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979042,0.001289521,0.00017943233,0.00006729104,0.0004665399,0.00009309244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053034215,0.0017249237,0.0017394737,0.00468714,0.0017552461,0.0030399226,0.0022889748,0.0018489434,0.003320387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006113161,0.0006971389,0.002359452,0.0025624048,0.0011502579,0.0019312679,0.0018169873,0.0020896858,0.00039314057],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074387885,0.00021248123,0.0009092027,0.00093897054,0.0003934836,0.0003839683,0.00047271015,0.70243514,0.0049988604,0.1030381,0.0023029563,0.18383974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032062457,0.00017269325,0.00031736807,0.0001899827,0.00009508004,0.00015704404,0.00017691996,0.92750514,0.001310827,0.062417086,0.007550662,0.00007515556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004536138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007822596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053034215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031465148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038911337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028047562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103654611","doi":"10.1142/s0217595914500249","title":"IMPROVING CONSISTENCY EVALUATION IN FUZZY MULTI-ATTRIBUTE PAIRWISE COMPARISON-BASED DECISION-MAKING METHODS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asia Pacific Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Natural Resources; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Consistency (knowledge bases); Vagueness; Computer science; Data mining; Fuzzy logic; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy set; Reliability (semiconductor); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.40707566053770367,"score_gpt":0.5853305995668792,"score_spread":0.1782549390291755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103654611","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009037234,0.00030990998,0.98978406,0.00006160131,0.000031204538,0.0001229937,0.000025993544,0.000098872624,0.0005281692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17297041,0.00022696683,0.8257801,0.000060116887,0.00005098411,0.00041660917,0.00012566904,0.00007095298,0.00029814275],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9610442,0.023028884,0.0025077264,0.0026040087,0.010165673,0.00064960984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93596584,0.048342835,0.0033436345,0.0027712856,0.009067972,0.00050846045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045709234,0.0017737293,0.0034089163,0.0049060015,0.0016873345,0.0031612753,0.0041560545,0.001923959,0.0017674901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08702414,0.0010954787,0.0027872755,0.0052841324,0.001559008,0.003785853,0.0037438339,0.0033387851,0.00033698315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006459983,0.0003478322,0.0074926,0.0014389222,0.0011814018,0.0003933453,0.0015577374,0.5376955,0.0054354095,0.05143807,0.001377181,0.39099604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063931235,0.00026514026,0.0010168315,0.000114524315,0.00012723534,0.00009967008,0.00011665154,0.9580546,0.0031987622,0.03564505,0.0012373393,0.00006029807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001712732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012304971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045709234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018771599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025674405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24173647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103850933","doi":"10.5555/2627435.2638572","title":"New learning methods for supervised and unsupervised preference aggregation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Preference learning; Machine learning; Pairwise comparison; Artificial intelligence; Aggregation problem; Ranking (information retrieval); Learning to rank; Metric (unit); Rank (graph theory); Preference; Data mining; Mathematics","score_opus":0.30229447550536825,"score_gpt":0.48594451812783274,"score_spread":0.18365004262246448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103850933","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001579201,0.00009045707,0.99756014,0.00007049427,0.000015055474,0.000031582906,0.000051750558,0.00016088267,0.000440396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16097695,0.00030925914,0.8335618,0.0002613087,0.0002639765,0.00040493326,0.0006497083,0.00016722544,0.0034049537],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525744,0.0020380884,0.000301642,0.0009793232,0.0012223821,0.00020110444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910529,0.0050028255,0.0008371499,0.0016968064,0.0012104731,0.00019981858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059106485,0.0011188559,0.0015146434,0.0020837025,0.0007277147,0.0014186118,0.0025657574,0.001438843,0.0029999472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015972404,0.00075997505,0.0017708787,0.0030541818,0.0011403435,0.0038315386,0.0023122455,0.0028492257,0.0010468219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011132624,0.00025892694,0.0023121855,0.0003050652,0.00023794599,0.00009292514,0.00029674132,0.34461775,0.0020913314,0.11002292,0.006849323,0.5328036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015508704,0.000027502248,0.00025569127,0.000015894266,0.000012173385,0.000036822927,0.000016424206,0.9503424,0.0005233434,0.047275346,0.0014645342,0.000014357986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025590714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049376944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059106485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013566744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016003477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03125888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105708415","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2014.11.002","title":"An IF-DEMATEL-AHP based on Triangular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers (TIFNs)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Computer science; Mathematics; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.17930850185769223,"score_gpt":0.4522364387003911,"score_spread":0.2729279368426989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105708415","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020272313,0.00007400013,0.9947803,0.000088606175,0.00004722788,0.00020067494,0.000078810146,0.0000958925,0.0026071817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09539263,0.00017338237,0.90251386,0.00007217142,0.00003567229,0.0006507369,0.00018292738,0.000028978035,0.00094975356],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965288,0.0013714788,0.0002947069,0.0003784108,0.0012321263,0.00019439428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842775,0.000729365,0.00012249836,0.000099150086,0.00056867505,0.000052568546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038209665,0.0010774349,0.0011476825,0.0022964801,0.0014276842,0.001736335,0.0017505835,0.0009943879,0.0041338406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006464788,0.0004782886,0.0016220487,0.0021156783,0.0009082414,0.001642571,0.0014573954,0.0013490039,0.0004871085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002021677,0.00016211739,0.0013388251,0.001221862,0.00018985617,0.00039703745,0.0009133707,0.5498488,0.0056447135,0.11755945,0.006630307,0.31589147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004332146,0.00008657251,0.00024062418,0.00010763832,0.00003596157,0.00011762256,0.00014120791,0.95336735,0.0019787091,0.037749466,0.0060904343,0.000041096904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067336457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005669537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067336457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018555032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030987673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020207465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105751906","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2014.8.005","title":"Six sigma project selections using fuzzy network-analysis and fuzzy MADM","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Sigma; Six Sigma; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Operations management; Physics","score_opus":0.11810101469923473,"score_gpt":0.4205184614535507,"score_spread":0.302417446754316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105751906","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11982797,0.00026044622,0.8685083,0.0003426331,0.00006435746,0.00083085155,0.00033454588,0.00049936405,0.009331548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38615602,0.00026105298,0.61034673,0.00003074476,0.000020471325,0.0005964827,0.0004274667,0.00004083434,0.0021201589],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970572,0.0010639769,0.00027234678,0.00029505108,0.0011413977,0.00017005033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668854,0.0016036644,0.0003080959,0.00010688032,0.0011742197,0.000118567994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004122451,0.00085071276,0.0008295316,0.0064954665,0.0013709905,0.0024101175,0.00076543377,0.00059064873,0.0033456122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078048995,0.00043667102,0.0011580482,0.0033174923,0.00034214076,0.0012776246,0.0009669067,0.0006867756,0.00037186034],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006996549,0.00029581878,0.0153488405,0.0008306239,0.00022146179,0.0004238396,0.0017792443,0.23890172,0.008168991,0.035182606,0.0035988456,0.69454837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006683092,0.00026140697,0.0041665058,0.00015091867,0.00010824436,0.0001368384,0.0012456231,0.9599749,0.007044009,0.021110384,0.0056423238,0.00009206173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004614007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006845969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064954665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021999988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018343026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021801889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106539056","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2012.09.029","title":"A hybrid TOPSIS-BSC method for strategic planning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brainstorming; TOPSIS; Computer science; Balanced scorecard; Process management; Productivity; Production (economics); Business; Knowledge management; Marketing; Operations research; Economics","score_opus":0.2708061301953391,"score_gpt":0.47985064680768635,"score_spread":0.20904451661234724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106539056","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041314634,0.0002953895,0.98249567,0.00030443445,0.00008894088,0.001311644,0.00054530194,0.00069729745,0.010129831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049285002,0.0003098732,0.9459518,0.000048963408,0.000012494346,0.0016123223,0.00053859106,0.000055430344,0.0021854262],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929737,0.0036653422,0.00051911175,0.00040310287,0.0022453843,0.00019346335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713564,0.0016351219,0.000157559,0.000116172516,0.0008905086,0.00006494898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047849836,0.00207219,0.0014484484,0.006619292,0.0020634406,0.0036441877,0.0018778105,0.0011393146,0.012426348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063147023,0.00084032543,0.0019429623,0.010022343,0.00086113566,0.0012783501,0.0015014317,0.0018115712,0.0019790141],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002024893,0.00027240624,0.0020656134,0.0027307994,0.0006861612,0.0005902755,0.0021726035,0.1627127,0.0059365155,0.092774294,0.021350147,0.7085061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024237267,0.00035758002,0.0022848605,0.0006721934,0.00025713455,0.00047932137,0.0023092453,0.84227896,0.0041122837,0.081834726,0.06497307,0.00019835532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01694299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025025055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01694299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003317535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077281115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041570246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106865515","doi":"10.1109/icsmc.1994.399948","title":"An integrative approach to water treatment technology selection","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"National Center For Environmental Assessment","keywords":"Decision maker; Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Simple (philosophy); Scale (ratio); Process (computing); Control (management); Management science; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.19677437361918573,"score_gpt":0.42889329668476694,"score_spread":0.2321189230655812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106865515","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018475408,0.0020799309,0.81889665,0.0033302198,0.00012141938,0.00039072396,0.00018612268,0.00031167513,0.15620779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36342385,0.0034249143,0.61018103,0.0007589151,0.00020249617,0.0010008579,0.0004328428,0.00019990391,0.020375175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970794,0.0012912353,0.0001226709,0.0003979969,0.00094441493,0.00016433414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866366,0.00065340823,0.00012190793,0.00015909226,0.0003173171,0.00008463197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003838474,0.0011737305,0.0011964057,0.003902995,0.0012799571,0.0049111326,0.002123261,0.0010701254,0.012645114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044432175,0.00048722603,0.001777739,0.0039116545,0.0021981962,0.0033084517,0.003411571,0.0013351039,0.001149357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081121674,0.00021991221,0.0026348839,0.0005580004,0.0003649017,0.00030661543,0.0012874469,0.055497114,0.0028850057,0.67105913,0.0052538025,0.2598521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006563801,0.00023142442,0.0024697292,0.0003758238,0.00023662414,0.00032738756,0.0014405625,0.13848038,0.0027142472,0.78213954,0.07144653,0.00007216718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015654177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003619977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012645114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002765174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025614738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04230213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108077701","doi":"10.1145/1807342.1807377","title":"Assessing regret-based preference elicitation with the UTPREF recommendation system","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Preference elicitation; Preference; Computer science; Recommender system; Human–computer interaction; Information retrieval; Machine learning; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.33851455019534976,"score_gpt":0.4569454429002859,"score_spread":0.11843089270493612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108077701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9246698,0.00011839004,0.07118752,0.00024684865,0.000014586595,0.00033108323,0.00034745864,0.0004318745,0.002652478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93934655,0.000063828986,0.05912006,0.00009664241,0.000011772018,0.0003663778,0.0003754237,0.000033016826,0.0005863074],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97499895,0.019158365,0.0014577924,0.0010280695,0.0029553927,0.00040156252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78121257,0.1937765,0.008164826,0.010123272,0.005984043,0.0007388675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022733543,0.00083293783,0.0011855136,0.0008755782,0.0006248769,0.001683865,0.0010276071,0.0017620483,0.0029818548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14059614,0.00041682651,0.00093226554,0.0009786801,0.0006226499,0.0023365973,0.0013454292,0.001599136,0.00065108767],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0133407,0.0060770456,0.19575866,0.0022428436,0.0011775611,0.00077666575,0.013195835,0.29138705,0.026609292,0.012105633,0.0073722154,0.4299565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060113845,0.005386967,0.081365645,0.00013655917,0.00020524727,0.0005704647,0.0019500918,0.8789825,0.01854517,0.008152495,0.0037551112,0.00034859157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002469378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024789176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022733543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015051414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008195419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12022787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108269192","doi":"10.5430/air.v4n1p36","title":"A fuzzy method for the selection of customized equipment suppliers in the public sector","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rank (graph theory); Selection (genetic algorithm); Process (computing); Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Legislation; Variable (mathematics); Risk analysis (engineering); Simple (philosophy); Public sector; Operations research; Industrial engineering; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Business; Mathematics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.782315716405534,"score_gpt":0.6155236739752322,"score_spread":0.16679204243030177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108269192","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022709468,0.00027624416,0.9682225,0.00019692825,0.00010802557,0.00057359226,0.00012171138,0.00016624555,0.0076254257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1105783,0.00013748826,0.8860147,0.000025836085,0.000014888461,0.0003180872,0.00005713245,0.000012309067,0.0028413192],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99474853,0.0024134608,0.00029575656,0.00049765577,0.0018956411,0.00014893715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952937,0.0028768466,0.00028950511,0.00025100043,0.0011559924,0.00013291852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060541523,0.0007056218,0.0005735707,0.003829239,0.0015535583,0.0017427572,0.00097654155,0.00072442007,0.0063693896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011341032,0.00032402689,0.0008057538,0.0025925622,0.0011844063,0.0014708542,0.00080967136,0.0008851422,0.0006673969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004959937,0.00021530986,0.004449136,0.00049277255,0.00008659326,0.00029707604,0.0014145941,0.043017164,0.014844336,0.08317471,0.0038832563,0.847629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025934266,0.0006263644,0.011484317,0.000437316,0.00013332158,0.0008506178,0.001918885,0.8524058,0.020575652,0.071089804,0.039888132,0.00033053433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007869842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012234307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007869842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024192121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029710906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032017767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109767557","doi":"10.1109/ccece.2005.1557396","title":"Using prediction to provide decision support for the elicitation of user preferences","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Preference elicitation; Preference; Computer science; Variety (cybernetics); Set (abstract data type); Value (mathematics); Software; Decision model; Decision support system; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Human–computer interaction; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2980406422548634,"score_gpt":0.47045745393054283,"score_spread":0.17241681167567946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109767557","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10264618,0.00017182868,0.8907201,0.00043297783,0.000051514646,0.0001391028,0.00031155386,0.0012867269,0.004240054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7521094,0.00014326611,0.2458801,0.00012918671,0.000024658772,0.00016313871,0.00044239595,0.000046326037,0.0010615286],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973943,0.0014266908,0.00014828454,0.00029336914,0.0006178505,0.00011957754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97887117,0.017505778,0.00073456473,0.001069263,0.0016405117,0.00017865634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049034716,0.0011629941,0.00085602095,0.0011317801,0.00040259268,0.0011158723,0.0009437739,0.0011923227,0.0031782812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020280426,0.00033377256,0.00060094893,0.0012719319,0.00039211524,0.0025983946,0.00083285134,0.0016705252,0.00071022316],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009917896,0.000602516,0.010690004,0.00029964896,0.0001283172,0.00029540536,0.00050378067,0.5025588,0.009746737,0.009551755,0.002947178,0.46168414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001471492,0.00007513822,0.0006718757,0.000013461408,0.000009864981,0.000029866434,0.000030288169,0.99030215,0.0031849984,0.00527479,0.0003754071,0.000017480268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031999028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00418057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049034716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000853926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058072153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025932312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110429564","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2013.03.002","title":"Ranking fuzzy numbers using preference ratio: A utility function approach","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Ranking (information retrieval); Fuzzy logic; Function (biology); Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Biology","score_opus":0.2690731524055651,"score_gpt":0.4019182344897164,"score_spread":0.1328450820841513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110429564","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056247343,0.0012966847,0.9859688,0.00030234555,0.00012859554,0.000084584055,0.00004255986,0.000105345294,0.0064464374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35670963,0.0030093219,0.6343581,0.00013572196,0.00036411546,0.00034150577,0.0001096823,0.00009017231,0.0048817247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934809,0.003928558,0.00029338023,0.00033567104,0.0017569156,0.0002045844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673754,0.0019334847,0.00024625318,0.0002291485,0.00072670885,0.00012691111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006092683,0.001303546,0.0015090842,0.0029913767,0.00057411054,0.0033833135,0.0015281324,0.0010949606,0.003440881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01174418,0.0002887347,0.0011279855,0.0032683315,0.0011206532,0.0054333378,0.0012427114,0.0013309416,0.0010175762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024089185,0.00014934389,0.0011773533,0.00089040666,0.00025334692,0.00037559337,0.0006091998,0.07968769,0.0067340704,0.5515843,0.0050189635,0.35327888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081198654,0.0005679164,0.0012742493,0.00027072543,0.00018718706,0.0008562516,0.00035901737,0.58809155,0.00712748,0.37178773,0.029180769,0.00021589382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005847993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046238754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006092683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011314955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008059542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032221556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111302207","doi":"","title":"Dempster-Shafer Theory: Combination of Information Using Contextual Knowledge","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"viXra","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada; Thales (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Dempster–Shafer theory; Credibility; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Process (computing); Sensor fusion; Information fusion; Information overload; Set (abstract data type); Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.18370517993054294,"score_gpt":0.45128659486374206,"score_spread":0.2675814149331991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111302207","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015875963,0.0021218236,0.97492594,0.0008612182,0.00007712305,0.00012676805,0.00006169709,0.000075272,0.005874096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75359744,0.0028490168,0.24076936,0.00028307494,0.00030210082,0.00039755608,0.00010826455,0.000035068028,0.0016580746],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843891,0.009192098,0.0007856129,0.001207877,0.0039320528,0.00049313373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97392356,0.020656219,0.0017049785,0.0012419713,0.0021394962,0.00033386966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014915721,0.0019295454,0.0029833736,0.005320259,0.0011781467,0.0040886835,0.0025127563,0.0028345427,0.0034465005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033962127,0.0008536865,0.0020060283,0.0054675476,0.0036689602,0.006862933,0.0034075833,0.0023672655,0.0004444291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025533594,0.000116203264,0.0016949459,0.0008602782,0.00065566244,0.0006562862,0.00058024167,0.4990773,0.0011829515,0.40585956,0.0017891102,0.08727209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031279702,0.00011601388,0.00050886587,0.00014925629,0.00012267914,0.0001668293,0.00011017829,0.6349591,0.0009990288,0.36137205,0.0013936897,0.00007099988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017366466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010551423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014915721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003041549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001449524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07888281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112159579","doi":"10.1109/robot.1993.291899","title":"Goal-driven task assignment and sensor control in multi-sensor systems: a multicriteria approach","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Computer science; Wireless sensor network; Control (management); Key (lock); State (computer science); Artificial intelligence; Control engineering; Engineering; Computer security; Computer network; Systems engineering; Algorithm","score_opus":0.1988764767369621,"score_gpt":0.3782822345453619,"score_spread":0.17940575780839982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112159579","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018410716,0.0004935517,0.9938642,0.0004239766,0.000045241057,0.000052282627,0.0000196523,0.000036584464,0.0032234592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47810552,0.001800114,0.50991684,0.0004978393,0.00027568254,0.0008955329,0.00015812588,0.00012767452,0.008222665],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960854,0.002013045,0.00020043258,0.00049934024,0.0008423636,0.00035938958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979663,0.0010435755,0.0002816688,0.00012826169,0.0004288089,0.00015142495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041810586,0.0015021918,0.0017103178,0.0012730178,0.00086122804,0.003339866,0.0024702908,0.0020523847,0.0035444146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048671886,0.0009618193,0.0016629077,0.0016067136,0.0023354436,0.0028558632,0.002215521,0.0022061844,0.00057371997],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004595511,0.000052422452,0.0002143771,0.0001654104,0.000102733175,0.00014189554,0.00018542566,0.8215137,0.00077836367,0.15467724,0.0011433345,0.020979188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018158036,0.000045212786,0.00010106773,0.000031745738,0.00001790481,0.000028709796,0.000044486027,0.91687727,0.00028909772,0.080290996,0.0022387304,0.000016690918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053719315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042223693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053719315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031448517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024667305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022817552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112179347","doi":"10.5267/j.ijiec.2011.05.002","title":"A comparative study on the ranking performance of some multi-criteria decision-making methods for industrial robot selection","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); TOPSIS; Robot; Selection (genetic algorithm); Industrial robot; Production (economics); Industrial production; Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Operations research; Range (aeronautics); Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.43056819319393175,"score_gpt":0.5038414020667886,"score_spread":0.07327320887285688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112179347","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36152008,0.011554639,0.59671605,0.0007069252,0.0002952059,0.0007843597,0.0005362117,0.0005385815,0.027347997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6508119,0.002485843,0.3443735,0.00006986587,0.00004173382,0.00031456695,0.00029843085,0.000039459577,0.0015646758],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915399,0.0048824665,0.00044854946,0.00025476032,0.0026405214,0.00023381354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868274,0.009772958,0.00047679472,0.00045728683,0.002253625,0.00021197344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010841522,0.0014495262,0.0012156091,0.005415099,0.00079106924,0.0014633469,0.0009325712,0.00085407577,0.0021967168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014640749,0.0002825015,0.0012257945,0.0046867603,0.00044386808,0.00088266144,0.0006450935,0.0006780945,0.00032683252],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011589777,0.0005652892,0.0068219188,0.0029278041,0.00060446264,0.00017321762,0.00075083383,0.15284084,0.00517024,0.0076588006,0.002683219,0.81864446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027550495,0.0024875428,0.017558997,0.0005804872,0.0004678704,0.00039216492,0.0016678625,0.94462836,0.012879648,0.009614505,0.009249636,0.00019740534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030480116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043711225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010841522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011774175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008866582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057336092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114035178","doi":"10.1002/mcda.463","title":"Multi‐Criteria Ratios: What is the Unit?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Unit (ring theory); Measure (data warehouse); Scale (ratio); Hierarchy; Level of measurement; Analytic hierarchy process; Mathematics; Statistics; Process (computing); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Data mining; Economics; Mathematics education; Physics","score_opus":0.3085612410334271,"score_gpt":0.467014015663691,"score_spread":0.15845277463026392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114035178","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08177929,0.012634648,0.79178774,0.011237501,0.0014770014,0.00035943455,0.00035040212,0.00040415666,0.099969774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82600284,0.0013331306,0.1696201,0.0005275325,0.0004735476,0.00033648673,0.00008913723,0.000098403,0.0015188487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9598188,0.02462591,0.0022434893,0.0022438422,0.01043721,0.00063072925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9354247,0.042685706,0.007120564,0.0046521067,0.008862303,0.0012546453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024415797,0.0010446511,0.0018082373,0.0048245536,0.0011504189,0.009222048,0.0027978548,0.0014561531,0.0065120235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12777749,0.0004326686,0.00097126607,0.0053127618,0.00723514,0.010791773,0.0033322165,0.0027977722,0.0009192707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010173127,0.00005021642,0.0016424388,0.00072255766,0.00015854045,0.000094869734,0.0012791766,0.0037685577,0.00067129644,0.87669337,0.0029055676,0.11191166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027441214,0.00017503044,0.0019705382,0.00077357114,0.00007857097,0.00013667012,0.0013615832,0.023146506,0.0013742116,0.9562083,0.014673671,0.00007376281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006721055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004202674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024415797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002921931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013628405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12912458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115532981","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2013.04.003","title":"A multiple criteria decision making technique for supplier selection and inventory management strategy: A case of multi-product and multi-supplier problem","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Product (mathematics); Supplier evaluation; Operations research; Supplier relationship management; Business; Supply chain management; Inventory management; Operations management; Supply chain; Process management; Computer science; Management science; Marketing; Engineering; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10158084519327044,"score_gpt":0.4076160951121164,"score_spread":0.30603524991884595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115532981","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016124804,0.00043702364,0.9764923,0.0004999573,0.000054535794,0.0001644136,0.00005585405,0.000043514738,0.006127646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5264795,0.00056234596,0.4684268,0.00010949639,0.00006641488,0.00037801138,0.00007759689,0.000024905583,0.0038749713],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969965,0.0016479843,0.00012601892,0.00025795656,0.0008017224,0.00016976244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985373,0.0009865687,0.00014853093,0.000061127306,0.00018464148,0.00008177679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003977788,0.0012459091,0.0013180362,0.0016555561,0.0012496171,0.0018358758,0.0014998806,0.0022872048,0.0024095112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038442637,0.00054636446,0.0015421588,0.002588697,0.0010200022,0.0014095167,0.001172785,0.0015127714,0.00022581925],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011720692,0.00013973529,0.0007618808,0.00045661125,0.00014263463,0.0010098643,0.0002729468,0.8624934,0.0036752466,0.07781266,0.0017719539,0.051345862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019769375,0.00009344303,0.00014040724,0.00003393205,0.000032968903,0.00015526095,0.00006893534,0.9811528,0.0008720225,0.015562667,0.0018492909,0.000018574427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029049735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025450215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003977788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015653626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016459198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021036804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115966971","doi":"10.1139/f03-149","title":"A simulation study of impacts of error structure on modeling stockrecruitment data using generalized linear models","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Luonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; International Social Science Council","keywords":"Outlier; Statistics; Mathematics; Log-normal distribution; Linear model; Generalized linear model; Computer science; Algorithm; Econometrics; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.5681736802477407,"score_gpt":0.4708458043947748,"score_spread":0.09732787585296593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115966971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95775914,0.0002033482,0.03997477,0.00023072516,0.000015453037,0.00011043941,0.00024096662,0.0001047263,0.0013605108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828787,0.000120282566,0.016215919,0.00002796431,0.000003945855,0.00010569322,0.00023138533,0.000014019107,0.00040210562],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950263,0.0037638962,0.00020086014,0.00029411947,0.0003733286,0.00034157393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8763752,0.112844914,0.0037276943,0.002325315,0.004048205,0.000678737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01624832,0.00087078504,0.00091340614,0.0012821436,0.00076585734,0.0010878537,0.0011488687,0.0014152027,0.0009987626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039467786,0.000561403,0.0015062891,0.0015502645,0.00085273845,0.0014415502,0.00095285196,0.0016703503,0.00010594163],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013647765,0.00008442108,0.006514454,0.000029750912,0.000043975622,0.00006347866,0.00005996024,0.98928857,0.00015866828,0.001267817,0.00008907353,0.002263395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019996609,0.0001473689,0.0011493659,0.000008629584,0.000021465201,0.000012001666,0.000040919007,0.99773127,0.00025918693,0.0005392878,0.00005784025,0.0000126103305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04897659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02855046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04897659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002978881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017672487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09738302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116373013","doi":"10.1142/s0218488514500238","title":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods Based on Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Interval (graph theory); Score; Fuzzy set; Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Point (geometry); Fuzzy number; Group decision-making; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.12541475223291962,"score_gpt":0.47904099677915557,"score_spread":0.3536262445462359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116373013","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015478439,0.0005347448,0.9963367,0.000076852484,0.000027956396,0.00008713446,0.000022451364,0.00004513037,0.001321228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.120533675,0.001131126,0.8769007,0.00007558785,0.000084251595,0.00047922527,0.00008478405,0.00003071753,0.0006799732],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910657,0.0044659,0.0006108396,0.0006825816,0.0029945131,0.00018051114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99423283,0.0039755334,0.0005095651,0.0002533036,0.00091183686,0.00011696938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010629353,0.0023237076,0.002688562,0.0038678655,0.00096602825,0.0031707936,0.0029093386,0.0012035983,0.002190609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013001417,0.00073125697,0.0027836147,0.0033996708,0.0018920178,0.0033723821,0.0018671491,0.002728311,0.00046550712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010224659,0.0001789001,0.00085120735,0.0015446822,0.0006304268,0.00029475224,0.00089115935,0.41451856,0.0031758633,0.38991928,0.0019891518,0.18590377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049132996,0.00011004676,0.00029253287,0.00021629491,0.000102735714,0.00010588363,0.000102360755,0.7500039,0.0014173709,0.24395953,0.003555029,0.000085314794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014211622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015730829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010629353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022789682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020492228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056214094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116421317","doi":"10.5539/mas.v7n6p42","title":"A New Ranking of Environmental Performance Index Using Weighted Correlation Coefficient in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: A Case of ASEAN Countries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Analytic hierarchy process; Index (typography); Hierarchy; Sustainability; Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Weighted arithmetic mean; Correlation coefficient; Statistics; Computer science; Econometrics; Operations research; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05255095735560748,"score_gpt":0.33359843017793933,"score_spread":0.28104747282233183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116421317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59070784,0.0008713821,0.36978638,0.00096207357,0.000096486634,0.00042492276,0.00068657624,0.00011121145,0.036353253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9139815,0.0003470106,0.08367092,0.000021396538,0.000013762596,0.00011492596,0.00018820076,0.0000070132296,0.0016553544],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974285,0.0009144397,0.00027178018,0.00021371062,0.00093372475,0.00023778107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982297,0.0006093544,0.00019762154,0.0000860334,0.00078611984,0.0000912212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030165208,0.00072769326,0.00054202165,0.004185349,0.0014336393,0.0024927848,0.00067343755,0.000762031,0.0013269907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039365045,0.00021540961,0.0011243776,0.004374324,0.00087903277,0.0014266064,0.0009128494,0.00064899115,0.00011830348],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005178147,0.00035851836,0.039680578,0.000814917,0.0003943435,0.007538957,0.0033593697,0.53149027,0.012402461,0.17291315,0.0070621604,0.22346747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004598764,0.0003245445,0.018651636,0.00014269416,0.00017768162,0.000912295,0.002489664,0.9366506,0.004559359,0.02871193,0.007153386,0.00018024954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020817554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015522589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020817554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026496728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016147278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041392744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119279466","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548477.003.0023","title":"Interpersonal Comparisons of Well‐Being","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Notation; Interpersonal communication; Focus (optics); Rank (graph theory); Social choice theory; Management science; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Economics; Arithmetic; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12443642806060252,"score_gpt":0.32915540506698115,"score_spread":0.20471897700637864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119279466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.111298904,0.013069859,0.08606987,0.007913798,0.00059689215,0.00010546448,0.0003118602,0.000059342332,0.78057396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98581207,0.0020165911,0.0064232666,0.00024709819,0.00021305053,0.00007794071,0.000067797555,0.000016207125,0.005125895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99012345,0.0070434217,0.00019700605,0.00051684823,0.0018735683,0.00024575717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98905444,0.007950166,0.00096038345,0.0005350235,0.0011370069,0.00036302485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066949246,0.0004092968,0.00045103088,0.0020839493,0.0007014912,0.004361825,0.00046418604,0.0006529217,0.010427309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016197287,0.00008782912,0.00029934823,0.0020802151,0.004249877,0.0036792012,0.0020056101,0.0013334963,0.0003822172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034759618,0.000032663662,0.0013004623,0.0001403159,0.00005436372,0.000031295964,0.0017318641,0.0013416135,0.00021366299,0.9440737,0.0022274803,0.048817884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008453192,0.000092525894,0.008165332,0.0003113988,0.000029028477,0.000072264455,0.002695653,0.003322238,0.00033999525,0.9560859,0.028848302,0.000028901743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050245115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038114094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010427309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016743133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041471166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03540659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121347402","doi":"10.1016/j.mcm.2011.03.026","title":"An LP-based inconsistency monitoring of pairwise comparison matrices","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical and Computer Modelling","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hungarian Scientific Research Fund","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Consistency (knowledge bases); Decision maker; Matrix (chemical analysis); Process (computing); Linear programming; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Statistics; Discrete mathematics; Operations research","score_opus":0.3771253653367559,"score_gpt":0.4049673486431912,"score_spread":0.027841983306435336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121347402","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073191803,0.00009767859,0.99176335,0.000073467614,0.0000151004815,0.000051297022,0.00006784193,0.00019905406,0.00041303097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2557858,0.000120677294,0.7427698,0.00008129939,0.00006131524,0.00027237265,0.00033150308,0.000075975106,0.0005012985],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876802,0.0062446073,0.0008974067,0.0019324829,0.0029007683,0.00034450032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626703,0.024817998,0.0027282184,0.0021577517,0.007093636,0.00053210335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010923517,0.0011442067,0.0019136581,0.0037956815,0.00072989415,0.0028171584,0.0030716092,0.0015174045,0.0020993992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05740981,0.0007615747,0.0011252199,0.003365133,0.0011991988,0.0044530192,0.0024787853,0.0022534311,0.00047324196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012800631,0.00033833977,0.005507298,0.0008245079,0.00052166515,0.00020489488,0.00065057917,0.25048137,0.01426191,0.029396445,0.0031207525,0.69341207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025734736,0.00018865042,0.0006494712,0.00003938667,0.00006173036,0.00009693922,0.000041243704,0.9816259,0.0031476931,0.013579275,0.00051249214,0.00003140793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033391884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00195273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010923517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011652058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020307899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057769775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121521241","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2012.05.017","title":"Application of integrated fuzzy VIKOR &amp; AHP methodology to contractor ranking","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"VIKOR method; Ranking (information retrieval); Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Operations management; Business; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.24149158768656792,"score_gpt":0.45943332646471374,"score_spread":0.21794173877814582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121521241","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010300681,0.00028470685,0.9850258,0.00012946535,0.000038495255,0.00023151758,0.00008079512,0.000110641515,0.0037978967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23689064,0.00029662906,0.7612357,0.00003799952,0.000024313385,0.00037474345,0.00013974145,0.000030606792,0.00096967333],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930184,0.0037124963,0.00031992258,0.0002910282,0.0023651696,0.00029297112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717796,0.0016069892,0.00019714693,0.00012437352,0.0008186864,0.000074943586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005097288,0.0007260764,0.0012300061,0.0045402115,0.0013396868,0.0020136703,0.0015234265,0.0007009823,0.0022753403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084799975,0.0004937224,0.0010325935,0.0043964796,0.00073926506,0.0011183327,0.0015066736,0.0010046436,0.00023364478],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013242615,0.0001616855,0.0014192065,0.0006042278,0.00032944212,0.00029463644,0.00064372865,0.5338921,0.0028105343,0.06522569,0.002614289,0.39187202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003331695,0.00010626008,0.00061283953,0.00007094781,0.000041837946,0.000076743396,0.00015967949,0.9639698,0.0011669568,0.030594857,0.0031346516,0.00003198259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075698695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00881727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075698695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015412743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030960683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026957333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122562586","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2014.9.002","title":"Ranking banks using K-Means and Grey relational method","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Grey relational analysis; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Business; Information retrieval; Statistics; Operations management; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.15971688081868615,"score_gpt":0.42419405451862746,"score_spread":0.2644771736999413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122562586","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05484532,0.0005107225,0.93976814,0.00024492794,0.000041265743,0.0003052314,0.00022073061,0.00032257164,0.003741206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5435063,0.00052297453,0.45404106,0.00005069911,0.000028841707,0.0002927417,0.00027315345,0.0000376996,0.001246525],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679464,0.0012564226,0.0002606256,0.00036637473,0.001150737,0.00017125528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794644,0.0011889774,0.00020359579,0.00010089888,0.0005048498,0.000055257817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024083308,0.00081413233,0.0016276079,0.0045302548,0.0009115899,0.0022250747,0.0011529214,0.00083728385,0.0022370515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074091763,0.00042209425,0.0013109347,0.004288416,0.00067576556,0.0015588038,0.00090664823,0.00073758356,0.00044260372],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025444312,0.000149167,0.005744958,0.00064444286,0.0004372353,0.0001673948,0.00084496685,0.6272663,0.005881336,0.02644482,0.0026796863,0.32948524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020498434,0.0000746345,0.0018262329,0.000038627775,0.000057139627,0.000035220062,0.00022403049,0.98051536,0.0017307403,0.014341864,0.0010925442,0.000043101314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014304184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010956207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014304184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001658344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019352362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028441846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124224259","doi":"10.7202/602101ar","title":"Méthode multicritère de sélection de portefeuilles indiciels internationaux","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"ELECTRE; Humanities; Art; Mathematics; Operations research","score_opus":0.2922755039864101,"score_gpt":0.4437043881035094,"score_spread":0.15142888411709926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124224259","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017154269,0.0003038533,0.9804826,0.00007267478,0.00003901548,0.00017476288,0.00018071207,0.0004608452,0.001131358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.086740956,0.00017875548,0.90955764,0.00004054067,0.000028512555,0.00036874178,0.00041632884,0.00013757305,0.002530898],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961361,0.0015362077,0.00031515313,0.00084710564,0.00091921055,0.00024614428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923138,0.0044281436,0.00041733362,0.00082237954,0.0018876905,0.00013065938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052649886,0.0015722722,0.002334556,0.0030226805,0.00090711826,0.0021026954,0.0016521032,0.0010613909,0.0060660974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113600595,0.0007272082,0.002420581,0.0024358938,0.0007033967,0.0010718533,0.0016174635,0.0021203777,0.0011341539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005787541,0.00021158752,0.007111028,0.00066750887,0.00053418503,0.00025808453,0.00056554296,0.13970809,0.020076795,0.014795518,0.002116405,0.81337655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021987133,0.00067359436,0.011285592,0.00028102213,0.00035436248,0.00062994706,0.00038416157,0.9066098,0.04102795,0.013716755,0.02462656,0.00019044291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005662319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061018723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060660974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008732179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017948439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02784425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124417247","doi":"10.1080/03155986.2000.11732409","title":"Web-Hipre: Global Decision Support By Value Tree And AHP Analysis","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFOR Information Systems and Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":232,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Java applet; Decision tree; Decision support system; Weighting; Analytic hierarchy process; Decision analysis; Java; World Wide Web; Data mining; Operations research; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13128930946826559,"score_gpt":0.46974114308174525,"score_spread":0.33845183361347964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124417247","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030015747,0.00036303213,0.96830606,0.0003629122,0.00011239896,0.0002448762,0.001996417,0.016754927,0.008857868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055589385,0.00050547405,0.93105704,0.0002065632,0.00009358729,0.00051047024,0.0048270593,0.0020403939,0.005170033],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743253,0.0011364587,0.00019604799,0.00021004296,0.00089035253,0.00013458038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700373,0.0018603622,0.00015689046,0.00030022775,0.00055567204,0.00012316447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035052835,0.001091322,0.001457705,0.0034273881,0.00066345575,0.0027079952,0.0014101343,0.0012178863,0.02759334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072817495,0.00061810634,0.0011295602,0.0037766672,0.0006142331,0.0028090335,0.0025551904,0.0015346229,0.008345335],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059864105,0.00029852815,0.00091287034,0.0011903747,0.00026416444,0.00043082412,0.00040049903,0.066975705,0.004346259,0.04943782,0.07174163,0.8034027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042091045,0.00018721016,0.0017875343,0.00042904768,0.0001495987,0.00038298615,0.00028868177,0.72728175,0.01072359,0.14732677,0.11086673,0.00015522134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026902272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029023269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02759334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063260307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014632306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09230894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124550544","doi":"10.5267/j.uscm.2015.3.005","title":"A fuzzy NSGA-II for supplier selection and multi-product allocation order","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uncertain Supply Chain Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Order (exchange); Product (mathematics); Fuzzy logic; Business; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Operations management; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Finance","score_opus":0.1414846766775028,"score_gpt":0.392104034269217,"score_spread":0.2506193575917142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124550544","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048786253,0.00055082556,0.93686765,0.00036373927,0.00014590776,0.00063503743,0.0001744458,0.00034737913,0.012128777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.543257,0.00054639415,0.44476628,0.00023595123,0.00003278438,0.0015662593,0.00034508415,0.000051419178,0.009198739],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913496,0.0004628256,0.00004229905,0.000055545876,0.00022335877,0.00008113501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954295,0.00022223672,0.000038857386,0.000024042984,0.00013737554,0.000034546174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017045335,0.001138513,0.0008360035,0.0009904475,0.0008554563,0.0010131636,0.001279837,0.0011679862,0.0028696968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002195254,0.00051206065,0.00088234653,0.0012743524,0.00049878424,0.00055826973,0.00073936157,0.0010028124,0.0004474033],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000525429,0.0000484082,0.00030999116,0.0000873142,0.000032335505,0.000051901046,0.000053675878,0.9711146,0.0008699557,0.0054398063,0.00091698475,0.021022562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015951682,0.000054594177,0.00010311794,0.000015023581,0.000007902736,0.000011538221,0.00001721608,0.99713254,0.0003206252,0.0013629475,0.0009519482,0.000006558449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020614807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019317484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020614807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018118506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003376412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040989637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124607184","doi":"10.1109/fuzzy.2010.5584875","title":"Context-aware collective decision making based on fuzzy outranking","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Context (archaeology); Group decision-making; Data mining; Fuzzy set; Wireless sensor network; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11497292910111187,"score_gpt":0.42655134362367686,"score_spread":0.31157841452256496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124607184","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049267076,0.00016445115,0.9476792,0.00023263386,0.000044843597,0.00006315745,0.000034545108,0.00010035282,0.0024137346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9005864,0.00014321282,0.09772396,0.00006854213,0.00006864091,0.00010744441,0.000062941304,0.000019835092,0.0012189703],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668163,0.0013960698,0.00021111661,0.00046479463,0.0009432697,0.0003031018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566144,0.0025267296,0.0005846989,0.00023033828,0.00069801905,0.00029874896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039680596,0.0010416121,0.0022853338,0.0014066616,0.0011409454,0.0022144187,0.0012743361,0.0010021868,0.0014397303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007652885,0.0004676304,0.001014714,0.0010672519,0.0016632116,0.0024734442,0.0016254978,0.0011308603,0.00015934555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012695865,0.000069890186,0.0007027882,0.000081355734,0.00012616867,0.00015149947,0.00024024764,0.9221918,0.0021559983,0.042809185,0.00044265788,0.030901406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016948214,0.000054153912,0.00011275133,0.00000795144,0.000014085539,0.000015588535,0.000021504915,0.9665727,0.00047526797,0.0325018,0.00019317526,0.00001405977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057898923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004669154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057898923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015719907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014827077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020985365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124840018","doi":"10.1186/1478-7547-12-22","title":"Does technique matter; a pilot study exploring weighting techniques for a multi-criteria decision support framework","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Pairwise comparison; Ranking (information retrieval); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Discriminative model; Medicine; Decision analysis; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Operations research; Machine learning","score_opus":0.17661719660475264,"score_gpt":0.4334441959963984,"score_spread":0.25682699939164577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124840018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9115735,0.0004732749,0.07457943,0.0008346811,0.00010257132,0.0053511215,0.00007858328,0.00006697678,0.0069398563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8719111,0.00035352827,0.122883715,0.00022375713,0.000030377743,0.0039920704,0.0000448841,0.000043894226,0.00051664555],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9239939,0.06512076,0.0026364955,0.0016957988,0.005654777,0.00089819083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.52817637,0.4339423,0.010810068,0.008068159,0.016947659,0.0020555116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15790375,0.0006456674,0.00085677,0.0017174638,0.0018778999,0.004077853,0.001961443,0.0013385275,0.0037323213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3069491,0.00057986256,0.0013985717,0.0024489884,0.0022371567,0.004368154,0.0023377824,0.0027491723,0.00038143207],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006693525,0.01149672,0.051947456,0.006867357,0.00060616835,0.0006754724,0.16162589,0.014887478,0.0069960677,0.027747462,0.0026527727,0.70780367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011698225,0.11497688,0.15565418,0.008621734,0.0029696834,0.0016957183,0.18908352,0.3529674,0.014951502,0.0771186,0.06895425,0.0013082755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002222327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031874808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15790375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004216753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004560586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8350848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128709426","doi":"10.1109/ccece.1997.608357","title":"A fuzzy expert system for optimizing pipeline operation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Expert system; Knowledge base; Pipeline (software); Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Legal expert system; Data mining; Knowledge-based systems; Fuzzy control system; Fuzzy set operations; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Operating system","score_opus":0.3118172738105328,"score_gpt":0.4340577489937295,"score_spread":0.1222404751831967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128709426","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053718593,0.00019654597,0.98988956,0.00012415508,0.00004252778,0.000131062,0.000074009586,0.00080364273,0.0033666126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1548754,0.0004034509,0.8388452,0.00012659297,0.000045193814,0.0003604751,0.00026052224,0.000050556297,0.0050326334],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994221,0.00015542778,0.00004569442,0.00009696988,0.00024349414,0.00003628258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992907,0.00023231674,0.00003985341,0.00004510362,0.00036045702,0.00003141158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011856598,0.00059599837,0.0007937828,0.00063914846,0.00060342695,0.00084408204,0.0009812523,0.0012821173,0.0029342682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002531033,0.00029678416,0.00047084774,0.0004925787,0.00026406712,0.0008471645,0.00046513567,0.00076258567,0.00088887865],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019977537,0.00014973889,0.0007120782,0.00039859832,0.00007280771,0.00039774584,0.00026668934,0.4211567,0.033659164,0.017020423,0.008210862,0.5177554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065435925,0.0001145045,0.0003467647,0.000046567086,0.00003906396,0.0001507633,0.000034143693,0.9710249,0.008432169,0.0052510523,0.014456048,0.000038605507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004116559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046429853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004116559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055234047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015364732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00981611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129477164","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2014.6.003","title":"A hybrid MCDM framework combined with DEMATEL-based ANP to evaluate enterprise technological innovation capabilities assessment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Process management; Business; Management science; Computer science; Knowledge management; Systems engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Operations research","score_opus":0.07667450131332787,"score_gpt":0.4199866977427127,"score_spread":0.3433121964293848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129477164","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053781965,0.00014546745,0.9892264,0.0002169059,0.000021964164,0.00039150668,0.0001444019,0.000073564384,0.0044015595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1403183,0.00024157239,0.8572359,0.0000688489,0.00001531829,0.0011203967,0.00015919156,0.000017470113,0.00082300085],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945845,0.0034648452,0.00026621937,0.00030090814,0.0012232739,0.00016042097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966972,0.0021415334,0.00026021866,0.00013858118,0.00067671796,0.00008576437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073894137,0.0012948458,0.0012191945,0.0062844087,0.0013284304,0.0024825376,0.0015118222,0.001126068,0.0031175814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008803466,0.0005063892,0.0013379068,0.0045959614,0.0010588085,0.0013693841,0.0021048656,0.0012044843,0.00024268871],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010490506,0.00020078129,0.0026445528,0.0013050598,0.00023534254,0.00033541108,0.0007479327,0.6529054,0.0046424833,0.16143139,0.0027641188,0.17268258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033608707,0.00009536531,0.00057917746,0.00015339577,0.00004697406,0.00007382583,0.00031405417,0.9294668,0.0011700118,0.062000174,0.006026871,0.00003969648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068631214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010923059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073894137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032758946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032614325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039079428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129765181","doi":"10.1002/atr.120","title":"Evaluating prioritization of ASEAN highway network development using a fuzzy multiple attribute decision making method","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prioritization; Transport engineering; Investment (military); Process (computing); Computer science; Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy logic; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Business; Operations research; Politics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Process management","score_opus":0.1641275345976328,"score_gpt":0.48668481349211473,"score_spread":0.32255727889448194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129765181","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47954023,0.0005076186,0.51074904,0.0004887063,0.000049587587,0.0010376435,0.00058041397,0.00013980907,0.0069069313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7429696,0.00016102963,0.2553433,0.000040057723,0.000014947451,0.00045699044,0.00025184551,0.000008957209,0.00075329107],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99407345,0.0040882113,0.0003051848,0.00029967754,0.0009686108,0.00026493176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903414,0.007057204,0.00058531447,0.00015819089,0.0015232268,0.00033463645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00940479,0.0012608147,0.0009943694,0.004578221,0.0011246299,0.0025956058,0.0008955682,0.000819132,0.002535648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011179723,0.00043281462,0.0012130389,0.002568122,0.00060164125,0.0012301193,0.001024039,0.0010118585,0.0001510356],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007909958,0.0006265986,0.016107202,0.00062751153,0.00044390798,0.00047881863,0.0008852254,0.7803701,0.004309769,0.018039133,0.001567187,0.17575352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004768173,0.00019922941,0.0016254903,0.000048426096,0.000051888353,0.000029601826,0.00035502936,0.98909914,0.0016499035,0.0061658975,0.00069981476,0.000027957863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009712433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008683047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009712433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036710873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04973787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129889618","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-3995.2009.00712.x","title":"Product selection in Internet business: a fuzzy approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Transactions in Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Product (mathematics); Computer science; The Internet; Selection (genetic algorithm); Preference; Measure (data warehouse); Voice of the customer; Fuzzy number; Fuzzy set; Data mining; Operations research; Mathematics; Marketing; Business; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Customer retention; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.3582427661661622,"score_gpt":0.5301359036092756,"score_spread":0.17189313744311346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129889618","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09607643,0.0020090104,0.87094593,0.0009248413,0.00010511744,0.0002383588,0.00011741571,0.00008114291,0.029501759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78604823,0.0011724817,0.20686403,0.00010195584,0.00010193816,0.00017963724,0.00006518662,0.00001618239,0.005450365],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988175,0.00054108776,0.000049526498,0.000095410665,0.00044047323,0.000056040062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989066,0.0006974382,0.00008184754,0.00002813445,0.00022500765,0.00006095917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014527348,0.00048220673,0.00065731024,0.0035249186,0.0009490923,0.0019048859,0.0009836138,0.0008420969,0.0032478522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022774835,0.0003046833,0.0008691988,0.0021271391,0.0010555896,0.0010626845,0.00054927863,0.00050276594,0.00026647255],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017896622,0.00025214753,0.0035438982,0.0004252258,0.0001821903,0.00083324185,0.00038377353,0.6773076,0.0038871656,0.15278696,0.0023069824,0.1579118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002406243,0.000080448044,0.00086320785,0.000069082416,0.000036210942,0.0000969153,0.00013979261,0.949811,0.0006269585,0.045661595,0.002567034,0.000023635355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058933673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005144363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058933673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019231363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008637284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013953328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131633350","doi":"10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2007)133:2(95)","title":"Water Quality Index: A Fuzzy River-Pollution Decision Support Expert System","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"First Nations University of Canada; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Decision support system; Water quality; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Water resources; Index (typography); Fuzzy logic; Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy set; Plan (archaeology); Expert system; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Data mining; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Business","score_opus":0.09964000818914102,"score_gpt":0.3992645464836652,"score_spread":0.2996245382945242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131633350","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049159914,0.00023006427,0.92576975,0.0003710624,0.00008165276,0.00074306777,0.0021648547,0.012781203,0.008698463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48128584,0.0002691042,0.50914735,0.0002564344,0.000055148736,0.00087899755,0.0027946394,0.00010633016,0.0052061994],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993999,0.00013595374,0.00008939393,0.000125305,0.00021107531,0.000038352195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994822,0.00018003378,0.000046249857,0.000036891473,0.00021220345,0.00004241253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010391392,0.0006495614,0.00085331884,0.0012387737,0.00050061353,0.0013498752,0.0011462026,0.00086617045,0.006588371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002723116,0.00019524363,0.00044181736,0.0008596437,0.00024006334,0.0010023118,0.0007986173,0.0005384363,0.0016204054],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013166702,0.00079340016,0.0074698306,0.00082864775,0.00024626215,0.0007768621,0.00049954077,0.250811,0.027777998,0.007707963,0.019504445,0.6822674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096260716,0.00013782321,0.0012052752,0.000027871882,0.000042970674,0.00010877051,0.000042860498,0.9856558,0.005450242,0.0026994795,0.004499021,0.000033522003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050321105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004200905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006588371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008143818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008813668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022040308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131846481","doi":"10.1155/2013/874805","title":"A Hybrid Stochastic-Interval Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritizing the Strategies of Reusing Treated Wastewater","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Problems in Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China; United Nations Development Programme; United Nations","keywords":"Reuse; Landscaping; Analytic hierarchy process; Interval (graph theory); Process (computing); Computer science; Lexicographical order; Operations research; Engineering; Mathematics; Waste management","score_opus":0.08914447505457057,"score_gpt":0.35284219344159556,"score_spread":0.263697718387025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131846481","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065806746,0.00016579541,0.99163604,0.00011783179,0.000015840651,0.00005605901,0.000029284254,0.00006108277,0.001337405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4126498,0.0004528363,0.5853835,0.00009442496,0.000059494323,0.0003584875,0.00012642001,0.000027451964,0.00084752945],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966949,0.001676604,0.0001742233,0.00022641255,0.0010836166,0.00014423192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981811,0.0011678645,0.00019409957,0.0000581661,0.00032130233,0.000077581986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003609052,0.0010493781,0.0012659577,0.0026391714,0.00059009006,0.0015903481,0.0017381172,0.0009630669,0.0011819736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052197296,0.0005035513,0.0014892302,0.0019095952,0.0006712401,0.0013703698,0.0012431156,0.00094457984,0.0001672137],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006475415,0.000101423655,0.0010868129,0.00038734212,0.00021017513,0.00014278931,0.0003695236,0.85260165,0.0024405553,0.046594925,0.0006721558,0.0953278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013209742,0.000075378724,0.00015691647,0.000020867117,0.000028969882,0.000027082873,0.000051756913,0.980149,0.00034443507,0.018365506,0.0007505589,0.000016383336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043388726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004246651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043388726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001274625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023890168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019086719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132475085","doi":"10.1007/s00477-006-0044-7","title":"Investigating evidential reasoning for the interpretation of microbial water quality in a distribution network","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Bayesian network; Dempster–Shafer theory; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy logic; Bayesian probability; Sensor fusion; Uncertain data; Data mining; Quality (philosophy); Water quality; Interpretation (philosophy); Machine learning; Mathematics; Ecology","score_opus":0.1058617582412894,"score_gpt":0.4721240382860874,"score_spread":0.366262280044798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132475085","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16124143,0.0003632429,0.8316265,0.00215222,0.00003909824,0.00003909134,0.00007235527,0.000049639828,0.004416496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92051107,0.00015546953,0.07855985,0.00008048327,0.000041631738,0.0000371948,0.00005429145,0.000017382801,0.00054258195],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965193,0.002407787,0.00018371841,0.00030101315,0.00042850766,0.0001596082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95389867,0.04203392,0.0019097483,0.00083771884,0.0009880149,0.00033192986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010188866,0.0006912503,0.00082805037,0.00089302094,0.0009519115,0.0035956057,0.0017892155,0.0019201831,0.0019409993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05116878,0.0005375594,0.0013891674,0.0008134073,0.003112822,0.0053200163,0.0018914156,0.0026779962,0.000090784735],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001286016,0.00006342825,0.001855656,0.00012176383,0.00010150334,0.00025603632,0.0006933,0.6281857,0.00072020496,0.3552522,0.0003352605,0.012286355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017008888,0.000014901821,0.00016221785,0.00001403044,0.000014801442,0.000017346574,0.00007114205,0.7541279,0.00017266488,0.24517818,0.00020088106,0.000008894202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050290246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004057566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010188866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025025418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015206113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053884506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132665835","doi":"10.1109/tsmca.2003.817050","title":"Fuzzy compromise programming for group decision making","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction","keywords":"Compromise; Group decision-making; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Management science; Operations research; Mathematics; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1142543872834285,"score_gpt":0.36542250718888547,"score_spread":0.25116811990545695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132665835","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001346049,0.0008238774,0.9931631,0.00023756242,0.000041498788,0.000048869922,0.000018852086,0.00004075054,0.0042795264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22797686,0.0027388912,0.75958997,0.00025506056,0.00021604965,0.0011726152,0.00015744336,0.00010935423,0.0077836094],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546355,0.0027964334,0.00015294408,0.00036537377,0.001006239,0.00021545176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970348,0.0023836712,0.0001491346,0.00007055902,0.00028251883,0.000079350786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065124803,0.0020304932,0.002315581,0.0015434523,0.0011740061,0.0027839139,0.0017859567,0.0027810838,0.0044012475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007879815,0.0007208964,0.0014870904,0.002898105,0.002223077,0.0021584856,0.002673615,0.0034557562,0.00085759413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005454733,0.000050182774,0.00012050041,0.00025320362,0.00009209432,0.00012568272,0.00028573617,0.73871976,0.0005913593,0.21843323,0.0016778581,0.039595813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017507535,0.000039597642,0.000032283937,0.000047531357,0.00001536329,0.00002512224,0.00003565901,0.8526982,0.0002235014,0.14350423,0.003345914,0.000014982746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026100904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017589914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065124803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002700936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021173016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03444171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132765709","doi":"10.1002/mcda.431","title":"Correcting illegitimate rank reversals: proper adjustment of criteria weights prevent alleged AHP intransitivity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Multiplicative function; Normalization (sociology); Rank (graph theory); Mathematical economics; Axiom; Mathematics; Computer science; Econometrics; Combinatorics; Sociology","score_opus":0.1482708187361641,"score_gpt":0.4239214852747871,"score_spread":0.275650666538623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132765709","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05808642,0.00031488645,0.92251956,0.0042881994,0.00037393693,0.0002750176,0.000069549,0.0006054737,0.013466981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7014097,0.00012557203,0.29568774,0.00083185016,0.00011487127,0.00019425213,0.000038176022,0.00013346972,0.0014643489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9627181,0.02114704,0.0026877406,0.0025916519,0.009860464,0.0009948534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8556951,0.08754947,0.013982578,0.027451575,0.0142504815,0.0010707695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04085971,0.00072147755,0.0010323785,0.0012976101,0.0011091558,0.0029851173,0.0020850245,0.0014840312,0.002746633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22305742,0.00067498256,0.0007062989,0.0013192571,0.0046859127,0.0043913503,0.0032264735,0.0038787718,0.0007991715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008233694,0.0003673546,0.0061460505,0.00067044335,0.00027149307,0.0005589842,0.003105847,0.056498494,0.013329345,0.5008336,0.009471187,0.40792385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023611712,0.00040739917,0.0036099595,0.00031351816,0.00009048882,0.00031737325,0.00079858315,0.19347471,0.024020031,0.7583271,0.018246002,0.00015857386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088849966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008680517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04085971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013310157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026993821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21608943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133898577","doi":"10.5267/j.ijiec.2012.03.001","title":"A MOORA based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for supply chain strategy selection","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Fuzzy logic; Selection (genetic algorithm); Decision-making models; Computer science; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Operations management; Mathematics; Engineering; Business; Artificial intelligence; Marketing","score_opus":0.19528734980773046,"score_gpt":0.42431736159426153,"score_spread":0.22903001178653107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133898577","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004396897,0.0002875992,0.99247193,0.00009914964,0.000027787706,0.00016690805,0.00004776176,0.000091545684,0.0024104258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1570931,0.00054810627,0.8397928,0.000088547225,0.000042068732,0.00081403414,0.0001288427,0.000034925666,0.0014575021],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704856,0.0015408002,0.00016973939,0.00024490166,0.00083486136,0.00016115248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984282,0.00095386256,0.00012297751,0.00005033451,0.00038602215,0.000058672616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00383804,0.001308524,0.0019060241,0.0037651025,0.0012584147,0.0024283829,0.001606411,0.0014864879,0.004481929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051948335,0.0007746443,0.0023715093,0.0027545677,0.00079424854,0.0013046738,0.0014626712,0.0013354612,0.00042020893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018335725,0.00016140858,0.0012538778,0.0007461393,0.00045778177,0.0002902978,0.00039413912,0.69417995,0.0041648746,0.056095086,0.0022590128,0.23981403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003306288,0.00014134617,0.00033635565,0.00008002114,0.000067793604,0.00008803829,0.0000813652,0.980565,0.00087901996,0.013936523,0.0037547601,0.000036589492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059197783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064728293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059197783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016902819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022690229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020297766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134126590","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2011.04.007","title":"Quality management systems selection using FAHP and mixed integer programming","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Integer programming; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Integer (computer science); Operations management; Operations research; Quality management; Process management; Mathematical optimization; Business; Management system; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Economics; Programming language","score_opus":0.2793413850779067,"score_gpt":0.4234263511213649,"score_spread":0.14408496604345822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134126590","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065926863,0.00009732975,0.9906635,0.00016838755,0.000017054386,0.00009786456,0.000033632412,0.000048164908,0.0022812076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4101044,0.0002616128,0.58577573,0.00013272736,0.00008720843,0.00062674657,0.000119349366,0.00003239276,0.0028598972],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639136,0.002429817,0.000118937794,0.00028351106,0.0005308542,0.00024558825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972,0.0021954721,0.00023257453,0.00006259563,0.00023120278,0.000078227895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045633423,0.0012310575,0.0012109287,0.0019451391,0.00062184304,0.0021561289,0.0015348976,0.0012516862,0.0024860224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056775752,0.0005842808,0.0013274609,0.00164188,0.0007334582,0.0016619888,0.0010855969,0.0012268557,0.00018487604],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050166353,0.000106433436,0.00075972587,0.00016407052,0.000086592016,0.00009324033,0.000097128766,0.9036285,0.0007304331,0.053091668,0.00060447544,0.04058746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006829452,0.000044557626,0.00007537123,0.000011377206,0.00000916945,0.000012470179,0.000020781303,0.9886901,0.0001904843,0.010564502,0.00036844538,0.000005993411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039231963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037833955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045633423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016307909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017171378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024133563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136050606","doi":"10.1080/13658810600661508","title":"GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Geographical Information Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Decision analysis; Geographic information system; Computer science; Decision support system; Geography; Data science; Operations research; Management science; Data mining; Engineering; Cartography; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.0503917347026865,"score_gpt":0.37732404296219807,"score_spread":0.3269323082595116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136050606","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019569706,0.843045,0.10289864,0.008557837,0.0005944263,0.00019368288,0.0003248094,0.00016677394,0.024649197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16095649,0.74299145,0.0915888,0.0012813978,0.000989472,0.00019352284,0.00047185467,0.000058546135,0.0014684723],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914316,0.004169592,0.000668156,0.0006053117,0.0029381292,0.00018715707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96158415,0.032072842,0.0013836243,0.00044491186,0.004247989,0.00026656233],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011198483,0.0012379799,0.002199033,0.013011013,0.0008306757,0.004628235,0.0019805017,0.0016081976,0.0034162253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019737994,0.00062428013,0.0015162302,0.022019306,0.0014927414,0.0038435787,0.0010462068,0.0011875853,0.00082009734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011118085,0.0002286275,0.0066686897,0.022039777,0.00051576475,0.00037306885,0.00076677935,0.021432748,0.0006482513,0.03645139,0.009052148,0.90171164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013696977,0.0009988087,0.029734906,0.036127467,0.0010752415,0.0035425236,0.010652781,0.117014036,0.00412227,0.19826096,0.5979409,0.00039306565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033814362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047759567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98698896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027884394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003256564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05922389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137450455","doi":"10.1016/j.inffus.2011.09.003","title":"A granulation of linguistic information in AHP decision-making problems","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Fusion","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Pairwise comparison; Computer science; Particle swarm optimization; Granulation; Decision problem; Reciprocal; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Mathematics; Machine learning; Engineering; Algorithm","score_opus":0.10707023688806125,"score_gpt":0.3686217968211876,"score_spread":0.2615515599331264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137450455","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01223523,0.00031320317,0.9857906,0.00033354538,0.00004702389,0.000093440874,0.000082981634,0.00007713149,0.0010268616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3332291,0.0004252657,0.66488826,0.0001514551,0.000121176454,0.00037015456,0.00017823286,0.000055042678,0.00058129925],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927053,0.0034789052,0.00086132926,0.0004257087,0.0022269685,0.00030186115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98074085,0.014339012,0.0009065106,0.0015554196,0.002219484,0.00023873184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012589388,0.0007154128,0.0022851601,0.0030891604,0.0011871798,0.0033240467,0.0012182072,0.0013574738,0.0017181507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027127743,0.0006843448,0.0018761586,0.0041686622,0.0022839145,0.004188522,0.0030457436,0.0020833148,0.00020931911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007647521,0.00029217388,0.001520828,0.0013739568,0.00032897628,0.0003625107,0.0019456852,0.3883691,0.011665231,0.2562696,0.00246159,0.3346456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005435669,0.00019355053,0.00058655586,0.00018090977,0.00010233116,0.00007651769,0.00016247142,0.8278659,0.002774561,0.16627935,0.001667294,0.000056278786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019296252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012182501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012589388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010263284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015501354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06657982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137531066","doi":"10.1142/s0219198915400071","title":"Mixed Solution Strategy for MCGDM Problems Using Entropy/Cross Entropy in Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Group decision-making; Mathematics; Entropy (arrow of time); Weight; Mathematical optimization; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Computer science; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.25819470629256136,"score_gpt":0.4441788702775555,"score_spread":0.18598416398499412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137531066","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008347007,0.00022690675,0.9893227,0.000109969544,0.0000145349795,0.00006478051,0.000014692155,0.00001887343,0.001880385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47439677,0.00053589384,0.5217299,0.0001335618,0.000053711185,0.00060065713,0.00009564778,0.000032399974,0.0024214678],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974112,0.0014075122,0.00015964017,0.00027868227,0.0005942976,0.0001486549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981585,0.001315047,0.00017085345,0.00005684032,0.00021414441,0.00008458142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00439486,0.001559385,0.0015821515,0.0019215671,0.0007704716,0.0020246762,0.0014134672,0.0016670672,0.0019537543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005233643,0.0005353382,0.0017422878,0.0015233749,0.0012923706,0.0020870524,0.002275221,0.0014892565,0.00017671414],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100266196,0.00009371148,0.0010882159,0.0003579555,0.00027009493,0.00024989157,0.0003947102,0.69029766,0.002689033,0.23935619,0.0008563902,0.06424587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014542456,0.00007314126,0.00012498736,0.00003113253,0.000027303251,0.00003640907,0.00003432007,0.94705117,0.00046743223,0.051623754,0.0004968388,0.000019022007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019607926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015667224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00439486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018400853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013874652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023242533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138556501","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-24855-2_75","title":"On Naïve Crossover Biases with Reproduction for Simple Solutions to Classification Problems","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Crossover; Computer science; Simple (philosophy); Reproduction; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Biology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Genetics","score_opus":0.24845640802621244,"score_gpt":0.4061652919485467,"score_spread":0.1577088839223343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138556501","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08032225,0.0018959467,0.8948755,0.0011667518,0.00025670795,0.00021971637,0.0001242236,0.00067639886,0.020462502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61422026,0.0009387035,0.36918205,0.00075206894,0.00047921514,0.00036632575,0.0002473799,0.0004212788,0.01339276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972458,0.0015880193,0.000110228066,0.00035344655,0.00054657366,0.00015589617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668599,0.028513314,0.0006730212,0.0027956327,0.0008312874,0.000326887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077480576,0.0006723448,0.0012994187,0.0011816516,0.00064604566,0.0018286261,0.0024275803,0.002082488,0.008619223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053903922,0.00048439592,0.0010833188,0.001355232,0.0025394885,0.0036508802,0.0024370318,0.0028313394,0.00058644137],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044210977,0.00019050708,0.0025172345,0.00044323888,0.00012646616,0.00025108116,0.00053183996,0.13991107,0.004175788,0.44844896,0.0074637984,0.39549783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019503519,0.00014154702,0.00087570824,0.000090993235,0.000058526013,0.00021608964,0.000047438953,0.4028963,0.0013227756,0.5913431,0.0027779173,0.000034450586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092427415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009406467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008619223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010010784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005868854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040976107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138895464","doi":"10.1109/gsis.2011.6044129","title":"Influence factors analysis of online auditing performance assessment based on AHP and GIA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Audit; Computer science; Hierarchy; Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Accounting; Operations research; Mathematics; Business","score_opus":0.24493046808087363,"score_gpt":0.44568777320847436,"score_spread":0.20075730512760073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138895464","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081667416,0.00013887178,0.9131562,0.00013539504,0.000027363321,0.00057632965,0.00007829355,0.00029449668,0.0039256825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7057063,0.00016894867,0.29286772,0.000022935059,0.000021966292,0.00050984276,0.0001554,0.0000415576,0.0005053534],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98581785,0.0071063973,0.00068682,0.00057900837,0.00518709,0.00062298495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988602,0.0074832034,0.00082747935,0.000425773,0.0023841262,0.00027756818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009531534,0.0012561388,0.001214269,0.0064721582,0.0011505225,0.0020119692,0.000891489,0.00043891082,0.0013594119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019358858,0.0004793347,0.0020431187,0.0040454064,0.0011135776,0.0015937459,0.0016817885,0.0010367577,0.00012521567],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039653946,0.00038471693,0.017179094,0.0009447845,0.0005284372,0.00045257647,0.0027204084,0.5973193,0.009484949,0.035753682,0.001321952,0.33351365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045111556,0.00017225214,0.0034345111,0.000057299963,0.000096937765,0.00005574392,0.0004992092,0.97716343,0.004182188,0.013326391,0.000912943,0.000053897114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008624113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004922709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009531534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021880402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036200702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050408125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139377411","doi":"10.1109/fuzz.2001.1008855","title":"Fuzzy entropy: a brief survey","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Randomness; Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Fuzzy set; Joint entropy; Entropy (arrow of time); Vagueness; Mathematics; Fuzzy number; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set operations; Information diagram; Defuzzification; Fuzzy classification; Fuzzy measure theory; Probabilistic logic; Data mining; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Principle of maximum entropy; Maximum entropy thermodynamics; Joint quantum entropy; Statistics; Physics","score_opus":0.379553425103814,"score_gpt":0.4312292821626859,"score_spread":0.0516758570588719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139377411","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011608954,0.79172844,0.13891555,0.0024762908,0.0013697441,0.000050277915,0.00045926077,0.00014123332,0.05325027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22125962,0.7124649,0.050262593,0.00074738794,0.0077535613,0.00013786538,0.0006409976,0.00007261823,0.006660447],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898034,0.00026007704,0.0000932075,0.00015768409,0.00045468204,0.000053965512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984112,0.0011968844,0.0000851829,0.00007396289,0.00019710988,0.000035586203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015023971,0.0008335977,0.0014233786,0.0062757013,0.0007016681,0.002242613,0.00076317304,0.0010593795,0.0026354427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003214768,0.00042474346,0.0008748615,0.0058704955,0.0012336881,0.0038582417,0.001115324,0.001145969,0.0007049799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010626766,0.00009880196,0.0028379585,0.003089871,0.00016566506,0.00032002188,0.00039374502,0.016501553,0.0013749796,0.41267532,0.014649842,0.54778606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001901659,0.00022564664,0.005017324,0.0014029156,0.00013455653,0.0018281625,0.0002613794,0.038328886,0.0016025644,0.6769517,0.27407897,0.00014896152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084669725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004476123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062757013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008638181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005134764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008816481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140441806","doi":"10.5267/j.ijiec.2011.09.007","title":"Multiple criteria inventory classification using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy logic; Analytic network process; Process (computing); Computer science; Hierarchy; Reliability engineering; Data mining; Mathematics; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.41533767895052937,"score_gpt":0.4431844964219827,"score_spread":0.027846817471453345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140441806","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0119360285,0.00031174024,0.9843381,0.00019705719,0.000037089816,0.00083228626,0.0001109223,0.00027014734,0.0019667114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15121113,0.0003662494,0.8460813,0.00004776198,0.000043905668,0.0009965912,0.00033661412,0.000039597282,0.00087689736],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.985062,0.006554906,0.0014296566,0.00082626654,0.005517487,0.0006096381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98986244,0.0050460254,0.0010943905,0.00042130754,0.0033193184,0.00025654805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011814161,0.0013987062,0.0026121568,0.0077085695,0.0021464683,0.0045351777,0.0020578366,0.0011306222,0.002951441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019707449,0.00075095496,0.0020548443,0.007203016,0.0010513389,0.0026540314,0.0016167276,0.0019088727,0.0004887494],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030811812,0.0004287431,0.0059489193,0.0013931409,0.00044724546,0.0004308565,0.0021834795,0.3974656,0.005497015,0.05995349,0.0044077206,0.52153563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004735249,0.00016366605,0.0011686533,0.00014058824,0.00006461975,0.000048052563,0.00029626625,0.9556095,0.0016172474,0.03780858,0.0029761607,0.000059205806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011442764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006975164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011814161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003937518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056153936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062480032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141216217","doi":"10.1007/s10800-007-9366-5","title":"On the potential utility of 2 × 2 contingency tables in electrochemical engineering","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Electrochemistry","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Contingency table; Categorical variable; McNemar's test; Test (biology); Computer science; Statistics; Electrolysis; Operations research; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.026796569566623334,"score_gpt":0.3221789939692702,"score_spread":0.29538242440264684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141216217","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17875811,0.0050580706,0.8025544,0.0014170276,0.00031204947,0.00020270795,0.0011348238,0.00034776956,0.010214949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8594816,0.0010757805,0.13777538,0.00016329887,0.00014725864,0.0001215865,0.00028605288,0.000041429113,0.00090758165],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99534374,0.0037882456,0.00014220228,0.00019566691,0.000407401,0.00012274979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91223156,0.08481248,0.00078865327,0.00085749675,0.0010742974,0.0002355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072169867,0.00086788705,0.001237549,0.0019112035,0.00047191538,0.0020835656,0.0009531361,0.00075027783,0.0039535477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040813748,0.00047860056,0.00071197667,0.0024346136,0.0010695588,0.00289769,0.0008634634,0.0012598898,0.00019727285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000833592,0.00013794155,0.004570054,0.0003590509,0.00024670322,0.00023088597,0.00014678888,0.78108734,0.0003697261,0.103331245,0.0027418805,0.1059448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005121714,0.00013205163,0.0007305207,0.00006684282,0.000058541358,0.00006543798,0.00004467434,0.87175834,0.00018500055,0.12638034,0.00049818703,0.000028813707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00306622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024844797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072169867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083857967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006728092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038167536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142839836","doi":"10.1109/icsmc.1997.638325","title":"Synthesizing decision-makers' preferences by taking into account their relative importance","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Preorder; Intersection (aeronautics); Ranking (information retrieval); Context (archaeology); Group decision-making; Factor (programming language); Computer science; Decision theory; Group (periodic table); Mathematics; Operations research; Social psychology; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Statistics; Engineering; Discrete mathematics; Transport engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.16603006883506394,"score_gpt":0.3873069297304101,"score_spread":0.22127686089534615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142839836","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.110089704,0.000744878,0.8767302,0.0007143382,0.000114929855,0.00038538946,0.00019998547,0.0001685843,0.010852091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52438533,0.000771043,0.47254062,0.00008962687,0.00009666376,0.00036503872,0.00025592116,0.00006838118,0.0014272965],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99203473,0.0043647415,0.00079886755,0.00047117326,0.0020695403,0.00026091127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860664,0.0100049665,0.0009228489,0.0008535308,0.0018795737,0.00027265734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126636075,0.0018002129,0.002359195,0.005181197,0.00077894394,0.004340014,0.0009374691,0.0008079873,0.002304975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030213198,0.00047476555,0.00093288615,0.0042126966,0.00078401086,0.0037290761,0.0015624528,0.0016160557,0.0005446354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054620666,0.00043657995,0.009905302,0.0019925768,0.0006447319,0.00032928225,0.0039275903,0.08804486,0.015387708,0.07434053,0.0025609434,0.80188364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018402074,0.00075760705,0.009462915,0.0006709207,0.0007412023,0.00027511656,0.0053466847,0.40334776,0.02020295,0.54031473,0.01835682,0.00033931236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079288665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002356411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0126636075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011001723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018886962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066972315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144037545","doi":"10.1002/mcda.319","title":"Modelling risk and uncertainty with the analytic hierarchy process","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Outcome (game theory); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Process (computing); Risk assessment; Hierarchy; Operations research; Management science; Engineering; Mathematics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Business","score_opus":0.14435394909451676,"score_gpt":0.40505969313201007,"score_spread":0.2607057440374933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144037545","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039460426,0.0005119509,0.99272305,0.00051454577,0.000028407125,0.00010103813,0.00003070942,0.00006055882,0.0020836971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25835055,0.0012480522,0.7387911,0.00013581397,0.0001238654,0.00038412042,0.000089680274,0.000027781176,0.00084902893],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.976185,0.015596376,0.0008360265,0.0006128593,0.0063702404,0.0003995241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980948,0.0153069105,0.0013215003,0.0006779354,0.00140525,0.0003404445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019392725,0.00122995,0.0015269258,0.0034259814,0.0013074391,0.0049518025,0.0021865426,0.0015973025,0.0017152041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02849346,0.00063895085,0.001561886,0.0033486406,0.0032611862,0.0037852023,0.0035876145,0.0026432439,0.00031309933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008334227,0.00009345614,0.0008689973,0.00052515615,0.0002770469,0.00028655602,0.0011957148,0.53461945,0.0010214113,0.3694647,0.0013609573,0.09020322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037693408,0.00006250326,0.00015842602,0.00013225632,0.000040394414,0.00004474146,0.00015332055,0.56622845,0.0004544688,0.42883164,0.0038180326,0.000038069335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040362985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027445992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019392725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002466815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037008354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102559805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144464691","doi":"10.1002/mcda.430","title":"Non‐discriminating criteria in the AHP: removal and rank reversal","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Weighting; Analytic hierarchy process; Normalization (sociology); Rank (graph theory); Decision maker; Hierarchy; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Operations research; Combinatorics; Medicine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.185032763567161,"score_gpt":0.45121314796121614,"score_spread":0.2661803843940551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144464691","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04466407,0.0004056002,0.94989216,0.00043209366,0.00007118475,0.00036589202,0.000032265536,0.00015118248,0.0039855735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44671407,0.00016252241,0.55105174,0.00013283947,0.000055035835,0.00028760996,0.00006844697,0.00006580667,0.001461985],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96795726,0.016693486,0.0015328105,0.00072305475,0.012455739,0.00063766626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680038,0.022189131,0.0024652039,0.002760018,0.00414854,0.0004332164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024631558,0.0010515908,0.0020221919,0.0025625217,0.001242744,0.0028362991,0.0024871035,0.0012165966,0.0015703584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0508872,0.00068293425,0.0016561608,0.0029429456,0.002584684,0.002275313,0.0029171088,0.0037191564,0.00045882392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062449387,0.00050537474,0.0024155627,0.0011928113,0.00034366938,0.0004444699,0.0012604919,0.34843114,0.017085703,0.17147775,0.0018086708,0.45440987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010243498,0.00022937312,0.00075827737,0.00011868169,0.000080337675,0.00012110063,0.00016117496,0.8861139,0.009858572,0.09888625,0.0034865923,0.00008330669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019265376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017661202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024631558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015424782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023304005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13026571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146584594","doi":"10.1109/icif.2003.177364","title":"A generalized belief fusion algorithm","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Dempster–Shafer theory; Sensor fusion; Algorithm; Computer science; Fusion; Representation (politics); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.17471429684682868,"score_gpt":0.4296671016823233,"score_spread":0.25495280483549465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146584594","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012196209,0.00027109432,0.9962149,0.00015333945,0.00004678587,0.000051337352,0.000042008676,0.00020324794,0.0017975612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10937938,0.0007163681,0.8846866,0.00026449386,0.00012610569,0.0003192487,0.0002806609,0.00007287927,0.0041542435],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732226,0.0010352895,0.00016191161,0.00048832747,0.00084133045,0.00015082526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984415,0.0007385701,0.000102304024,0.00016908038,0.00049988617,0.000048609818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004005259,0.0011559157,0.0017058314,0.001668335,0.0009399224,0.0024833183,0.002494622,0.0023204596,0.005866128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067949244,0.00047126308,0.0015316475,0.0022207596,0.0010058552,0.0026637046,0.002620647,0.0018115289,0.0017809625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012411666,0.000059067544,0.00056410313,0.0002488184,0.00022650269,0.00012717383,0.00022390077,0.31522745,0.0017595037,0.13766626,0.005854361,0.5379188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032306747,0.00005406478,0.0001463154,0.000041422674,0.000052512445,0.00010164301,0.000032356143,0.90443367,0.0008816996,0.085830115,0.008370456,0.000023447354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004401494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027501592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005866128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011997798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019671305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02118206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146889409","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2011.09.009","title":"A new approach to analyze strategy map using an integrated BSC and FUZZY DEMATEL","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Islamic Azad University","keywords":"Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Process management; Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence; Business","score_opus":0.26829895501911916,"score_gpt":0.39911223458871936,"score_spread":0.1308132795696002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146889409","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021177556,0.000050400522,0.99603564,0.00005353516,0.000013349129,0.00008746316,0.00006822846,0.0001716245,0.0014020448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06114067,0.00010026874,0.9373998,0.000042948726,0.000019822004,0.00028690032,0.00015704914,0.000048615144,0.00080401177],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983188,0.00041142275,0.00013484854,0.00020017514,0.0008327716,0.000102031125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768925,0.001018896,0.00019249014,0.00014911812,0.0008720762,0.0000783364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025466296,0.0012325429,0.0011894426,0.0088864695,0.0010803852,0.0022697689,0.0014193417,0.000999534,0.0047599277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005812041,0.000575948,0.0013926817,0.004899202,0.0011177927,0.0027419573,0.001490444,0.0013251777,0.00084437046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012770994,0.00017705862,0.0027933642,0.0005001816,0.00017805496,0.00024176453,0.00089967455,0.29347628,0.009363445,0.13775793,0.00353197,0.55095255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016730013,0.000053260286,0.00051775563,0.000033876968,0.000026750373,0.00006282338,0.00012661851,0.96740025,0.0017908931,0.025842294,0.0040857038,0.000043096337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012905131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009462278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012905131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023566072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020448666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025660038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147084878","doi":"10.1109/tic-sth.2009.5444357","title":"Alternatives prioritization tool for sustainable urban energy management","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lambton College","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Analytic hierarchy process; Prioritization; Sustainability; Process (computing); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Set (abstract data type); Field (mathematics); Management science; Process management; Operations research; Engineering; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07142781193409307,"score_gpt":0.407881499882592,"score_spread":0.3364536879484989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147084878","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003260801,0.00048294873,0.97818404,0.00056305627,0.00012824257,0.00045889927,0.0010723027,0.0026143426,0.013235408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027064962,0.00022517596,0.9684515,0.0001094291,0.000027215454,0.0005703114,0.0008363215,0.00016719269,0.0025479198],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594206,0.0019848184,0.000315108,0.00019968259,0.0014119938,0.00014628023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952685,0.0034413305,0.00022018664,0.00028331255,0.00065013906,0.00013637556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056650606,0.0016134568,0.0009616493,0.0058600027,0.0012921029,0.0028718342,0.0015394159,0.0011270489,0.02483706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0129200285,0.00055349275,0.0014216229,0.0045580002,0.0006925536,0.0031864902,0.001838002,0.0019563688,0.0030170928],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038815482,0.00027462028,0.0008992768,0.0015507977,0.0002155027,0.0006125708,0.00077031984,0.078531496,0.0071359486,0.30260432,0.033674646,0.5733424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020012796,0.0003148548,0.0008894487,0.00081474666,0.00014093539,0.00052575587,0.00062732847,0.38419813,0.010336247,0.36426166,0.23752499,0.00016568406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018314265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023849653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02483706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013233173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019227071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08308822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148315227","doi":"10.1109/isuma.1993.366733","title":"Inference and decision analysis based on imprecise probability and likelihoods","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"1993 (2nd) International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Computer science; Decision theory; Evidential reasoning approach; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Decision analysis; Dempster–Shafer theory; Fiducial inference; Causal inference; Data mining; Decision support system; Mathematics; Frequentist inference; Statistics; Bayesian inference; Business decision mapping; Bayesian probability","score_opus":0.08557977547680105,"score_gpt":0.36924567858605417,"score_spread":0.2836659031092531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148315227","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036506199,0.0034185187,0.9811705,0.003524931,0.0002101149,0.00004593559,0.00011024411,0.00010935999,0.007759823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39539784,0.010866704,0.5811156,0.0017626117,0.0020778845,0.0004357313,0.00039425792,0.00015540277,0.0077940333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97805756,0.0126134725,0.0011879941,0.002107719,0.0054744044,0.0005588202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93022746,0.06165646,0.002876497,0.0021564853,0.0025940917,0.0004889667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021299655,0.0016432249,0.00231256,0.006201936,0.0012151726,0.009710742,0.0021740785,0.0027547851,0.0047982153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07764453,0.0011376402,0.0026944666,0.0049869004,0.009188358,0.009868927,0.0035958758,0.004458045,0.000979298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005313884,0.000026706897,0.0005608228,0.00017536481,0.00014694173,0.00013237986,0.0002709754,0.10079751,0.00011164291,0.860964,0.0018597014,0.0349009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010292586,0.000011147474,0.00011706036,0.000066454406,0.000022772118,0.000042723103,0.00003867898,0.10833905,0.00012675229,0.8877857,0.0034159322,0.000023425246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035231756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002136329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021299655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055003334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024043736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11264473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149290637","doi":"10.1002/ieam.72","title":"Incorporating linguistic, probabilistic, and possibilistic information in a risk-based approach for ranking contaminated sites","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Ranking (information retrieval); Representation (politics); Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Fuzzy logic; Preference; Data mining; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Prioritization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Operations research; Management science; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.036274353660531534,"score_gpt":0.3402910859262888,"score_spread":0.30401673226575726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149290637","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012162346,0.00041462487,0.98400426,0.00028329602,0.000014949301,0.00015855422,0.000054787506,0.00007118303,0.0028359985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19582023,0.00043682888,0.80241495,0.00006888742,0.000028640628,0.00038911804,0.00008616128,0.000018333356,0.00073683774],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881912,0.006945456,0.0007428565,0.0005264211,0.0033282468,0.00026579367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99217093,0.005162525,0.0009477509,0.00054238277,0.0010146814,0.00016171097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009618874,0.0017691979,0.0012358521,0.008348701,0.0012977899,0.004802899,0.0017347835,0.001527008,0.0014973546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016695887,0.0011569125,0.0020482382,0.0037880715,0.0019088881,0.005450006,0.0028940523,0.001646962,0.00029531223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026466243,0.00035689512,0.003812064,0.00079089554,0.0004955802,0.0005685047,0.0014981518,0.46165833,0.00787493,0.18987343,0.0009680778,0.3318385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007272224,0.00041622404,0.002544276,0.00032039787,0.00041138433,0.0006329037,0.00079761865,0.70848346,0.0061810813,0.27356654,0.0062702573,0.0003031163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021646195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00523996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009618874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025113858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036570914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05087012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149322410","doi":"10.1109/icsmc.1994.399949","title":"Resolution of complex decision making situations","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Resolution (logic); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.46925315991557315,"score_gpt":0.47985984545999566,"score_spread":0.010606685544422512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149322410","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08151569,0.0013786413,0.8797347,0.0035262334,0.00017284772,0.00078198174,0.00020648571,0.00037865518,0.032304797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46297038,0.0007359729,0.5309672,0.00031603893,0.00013485459,0.00082759536,0.00028248693,0.000067597946,0.0036978873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9715276,0.01953571,0.0012348016,0.0025011234,0.0040007764,0.0012000144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9453627,0.046298213,0.0028321524,0.002610532,0.0016840802,0.0012122296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019601164,0.0015728298,0.0021488369,0.0020444647,0.0032251456,0.008233847,0.0031801397,0.0040039425,0.009539339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07014133,0.0010773066,0.0023172991,0.002356931,0.0036873748,0.007470685,0.010768276,0.0046544606,0.00076012895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028065906,0.0002708073,0.0022164895,0.0011604835,0.0002757399,0.0018665896,0.0060150083,0.23114146,0.0020571698,0.6111019,0.0044838353,0.13912988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001000147,0.00014432793,0.00054584467,0.0002919558,0.00006262289,0.0005480623,0.0024404083,0.37319258,0.0011845791,0.60518,0.01622062,0.00008894559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017570098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022481317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019601164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002525505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026751831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10366213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151039721","doi":"10.1109/nafips.2004.1336247","title":"Preliminary hazard analysis for the design alternatives based on fuzzy methodology","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Annual Meeting of the Fuzzy Information, 2004. Processing NAFIPS '04.","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Polytechnique Montréal","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Maintainability; Operability; Computer science; Hazard; Ranking (information retrieval); Reliability engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Engineering","score_opus":0.17537804519322708,"score_gpt":0.4083853243582305,"score_spread":0.2330072791650034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151039721","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013038373,0.0001569098,0.98063827,0.00006725386,0.000016127447,0.00026179044,0.000060838815,0.00007553281,0.005685046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3155816,0.00035867005,0.67852414,0.00004575894,0.000031009207,0.00084015646,0.00017580483,0.000039643608,0.004403254],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975684,0.00097079895,0.000096468786,0.0001429204,0.001085775,0.00013562659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638593,0.0026504486,0.00016652903,0.00010736338,0.0006435755,0.000046181307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004568956,0.00090581324,0.0007519274,0.0038238044,0.0007821334,0.0021913408,0.0009237244,0.0007107926,0.009458699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0097098695,0.00037813903,0.0016230188,0.001812457,0.00080907333,0.0015841126,0.0006668227,0.0009005179,0.00054370874],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023060058,0.00014976616,0.001313769,0.00069433823,0.00010541788,0.00025690222,0.0007199348,0.4794207,0.00841742,0.2559232,0.0018344187,0.25093353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041321964,0.00044519667,0.0009921207,0.00013038352,0.00007216321,0.0001335967,0.00025828223,0.87113476,0.0041672755,0.11345455,0.0091143325,0.000056013854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024900981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002441448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009458699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019778493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020090232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031642497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151713426","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00052.x","title":"Using the Attribute Hierarchy Method to Identify and Interpret Cognitive Skills that Produce Group Differences","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Educational Measurement","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Set (abstract data type); Task (project management); Hierarchy; Test (biology); Psychology; Group (periodic table); Sample (material); Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.5348286662951659,"score_gpt":0.5307739533614363,"score_spread":0.0040547129337296095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151713426","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.378914,0.00023988898,0.6132509,0.00039086945,0.00011946127,0.00049817987,0.0004610039,0.0006888352,0.005436854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8218656,0.000081908765,0.17659323,0.00011258934,0.00004095327,0.00046843334,0.0002750712,0.00007128829,0.00049094507],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451584,0.0029409016,0.00033104932,0.00057408714,0.0014336945,0.00020445914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.960232,0.032294642,0.0025602384,0.0023934406,0.002076738,0.00044302223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011288782,0.0008653685,0.0007057085,0.0045355735,0.0006938365,0.0014564458,0.00060995866,0.00069249317,0.0032534145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044530302,0.0001861182,0.0010025306,0.0026446606,0.0011902086,0.0019555981,0.0013604078,0.0012109309,0.00038889027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011167696,0.00081621436,0.40011486,0.00046914065,0.0012056201,0.0003757548,0.008261373,0.016235504,0.018690795,0.043269653,0.0024310988,0.50701326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034238488,0.0023182004,0.53121156,0.0002804834,0.0005271959,0.0012036613,0.004940471,0.23576303,0.016370157,0.20030694,0.006448251,0.00028768744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017199231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010116753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011288782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005730412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071067986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059701502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152117099","doi":"10.3968/j.sms.1923845220120502.zrzx1","title":"A New Class of Continuous Fuzzy Operators Located Within the Probability Operators","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in mathematical sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Operator (biology); Class (philosophy); Operator theory; Algebra over a field; Pure mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2967569824237837,"score_gpt":0.47290382087443966,"score_spread":0.17614683845065598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152117099","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034571633,0.0010535803,0.94399357,0.00057291763,0.00031223535,0.00007020885,0.00008296477,0.00019939734,0.019143566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6624505,0.0017671181,0.32149956,0.0006230396,0.0008355817,0.00025363723,0.00017400426,0.00014062351,0.0122559145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985461,0.00028976172,0.00009082331,0.00033930136,0.00061532913,0.00011874956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986539,0.0005743072,0.0001515657,0.00010677575,0.0003813146,0.00013209437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015774417,0.00066940987,0.00087995705,0.0019656015,0.0011859213,0.0022719286,0.0008847551,0.0010408424,0.003385398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002808187,0.00025608993,0.0013395796,0.0011211743,0.0027321046,0.004025553,0.0014731213,0.0022009506,0.00042160624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012534283,0.00005271373,0.00046307,0.00017224271,0.000038367434,0.00027412034,0.0003238974,0.009133054,0.01592643,0.9136305,0.0019608992,0.057899438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011313192,0.0003170906,0.00078707177,0.00009946128,0.000060626106,0.00085916725,0.0002590186,0.21550944,0.012254938,0.73755497,0.032059357,0.00012574128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009445777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039957458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003385398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007675579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010907177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0113253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153650307","doi":"10.5267/j.ijiec.2010.03.001","title":"A Portfolio Selection Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Case Study of Iranian pharmaceutical industry","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Selection (genetic algorithm); Portfolio; Fuzzy logic; Pharmaceutical industry; Business; Analytic network process; Process (computing); Computer science; Manufacturing engineering; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Engineering; Operations research; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Financial economics; Pharmacology; Medicine","score_opus":0.21256274235994413,"score_gpt":0.4761484495239577,"score_spread":0.2635857071640135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153650307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95578176,0.0005406386,0.036697656,0.00056190527,0.00001836587,0.00022765728,0.00008113005,0.000047649115,0.0060432637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966282,0.00032232777,0.032142423,0.00002745611,0.000013285038,0.000056543613,0.000037740738,0.0000051458287,0.0011131534],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999074,0.000530904,0.0000351085,0.00005221562,0.000195323,0.00011243445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984763,0.0010736135,0.000108011576,0.00006116276,0.00014431604,0.00013666957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018765106,0.0006075601,0.0005853438,0.0011949604,0.0017397394,0.0011521243,0.00094185333,0.0021758387,0.0016598683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024394498,0.0002497761,0.0007631843,0.001735065,0.0006976061,0.0008160959,0.0008505069,0.00064914336,0.00013430406],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009355048,0.0022459514,0.023319999,0.00066944544,0.00025353706,0.01701982,0.003474836,0.7807642,0.00998341,0.022317478,0.0030126525,0.13600305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038661587,0.0012071894,0.008391711,0.000048176375,0.00011446325,0.0014545944,0.0031303973,0.96742845,0.0051704464,0.007622148,0.0049782223,0.00006763032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010257438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01211348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010257438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010866206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011938239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020395458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158441049","doi":"10.1109/icsmc.1995.537996","title":"Improving preference elicitation for decision support systems","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Preference elicitation; Preference; Computer science; Decision support system; Decision analysis; Decision maker; Decision theory; Management science; Decision engineering; Evidential reasoning approach; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Artificial intelligence; Business decision mapping; Machine learning; Operations research; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.4099952571700195,"score_gpt":0.4326845453189184,"score_spread":0.022689288148898923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158441049","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051990026,0.00027150632,0.99205315,0.00017837889,0.000028269083,0.00028675768,0.00006445126,0.00038854632,0.0015299753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08660263,0.0003971517,0.9108195,0.00013584971,0.000040873314,0.00076241454,0.0002931646,0.00009275956,0.0008557747],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9360136,0.047509998,0.0031814473,0.0017490102,0.010689965,0.00085599726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90181243,0.07688833,0.0022108543,0.0060549635,0.012389506,0.0006439601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030345324,0.0021069038,0.0019548705,0.0029474783,0.0013487256,0.0033762162,0.0018887968,0.0019842074,0.0060219574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11543699,0.0009973785,0.001959439,0.0035115585,0.001205283,0.005015162,0.005455294,0.0028366784,0.0018049292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012303161,0.00047348416,0.001654367,0.0022646594,0.00035921365,0.00025127473,0.0033427358,0.11142806,0.011191308,0.07922717,0.005117191,0.7834602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044026648,0.0006381255,0.001154846,0.00043286206,0.0002004379,0.00028730056,0.00079811574,0.79119945,0.015932735,0.16963409,0.019054988,0.00022677245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00224991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020690616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030345324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018952226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024451413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1604833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158804518","doi":"10.1007/s00477-007-0151-0","title":"Developing environmental indices using fuzzy numbers ordered weighted averaging (FN-OWA) operators","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Operator (biology); Flexibility (engineering); Mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Bounded function; Computational intelligence; Sensitivity (control systems); Mathematical optimization; Aggregate (composite); Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.1559393681804658,"score_gpt":0.4760399851654836,"score_spread":0.3201006169850178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158804518","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009638189,0.00008427584,0.989792,0.000013007187,0.000014980577,0.000017325516,0.000016314885,0.00004066601,0.00038326165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14255661,0.00015272436,0.85651827,0.000018875699,0.000022524137,0.00009477283,0.00008915846,0.000032455115,0.0005146282],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876875,0.00035863835,0.00013851607,0.00016892687,0.00048083568,0.000084353676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854124,0.0006450521,0.00013769789,0.00007858858,0.00054104207,0.00005641138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003244731,0.0008275321,0.000933658,0.0017190491,0.00033795866,0.0012328858,0.0008813953,0.00056285557,0.0006476806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052654757,0.00028653428,0.0012262721,0.0018545251,0.00042687997,0.0018783701,0.00090522657,0.0008022254,0.00014857347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012485415,0.000105193394,0.001855609,0.00028072982,0.00024513097,0.00011171869,0.00018217906,0.4774595,0.018462364,0.045195766,0.0010793721,0.45489752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006399664,0.00006306822,0.0003422336,0.000012153883,0.0000370783,0.000032998632,0.000021913927,0.97948223,0.0038791408,0.015382034,0.00072599074,0.000014699776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024968951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022711006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003244731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000489522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009405781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017159939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158849492","doi":"10.1109/icsmc.1997.626196","title":"Representing ordinal preferences in the decision support system GMCR II","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Lexicographical order; Preference; Preference elicitation; Computer science; Decision maker; Set (abstract data type); Rank (graph theory); Operations research; Decision support system; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Statistics","score_opus":0.3072436899686738,"score_gpt":0.4296634740516145,"score_spread":0.12241978408294069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158849492","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023907501,0.0001305371,0.96333414,0.00049115764,0.000051623283,0.00029698026,0.0009243892,0.0028969804,0.007966784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19970216,0.00015009694,0.7958555,0.00021601266,0.000030611292,0.0005086719,0.0009096737,0.00009794156,0.0025292712],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967403,0.001749129,0.00031317328,0.00033264302,0.00072778313,0.00013691916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698025,0.0020345852,0.00023949037,0.000322589,0.00033708813,0.00008606463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032928623,0.0008023588,0.00069394923,0.0013277417,0.0006278223,0.00355503,0.00097428885,0.00091482676,0.0071282354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0094617875,0.0004021249,0.0006705943,0.0017527229,0.0006323071,0.0031289628,0.0018265522,0.0015493924,0.001738127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069551467,0.00020855972,0.0019375002,0.00047255162,0.00008225071,0.0006567481,0.001473525,0.43768936,0.007281327,0.24672782,0.010075073,0.2926998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009269395,0.0001261815,0.00028185645,0.00007642136,0.000022704104,0.00012854926,0.00018808163,0.8673992,0.0027444134,0.10846369,0.020426448,0.000049744787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002339152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019748707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071282354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009858599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010112966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023846328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159818811","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2013.01.001","title":"An application of multiple attribute group decision making in ranking investors’ concerns: A case study of Tehran Stock Exchange","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Group decision-making; Stock exchange; Ranking (information retrieval); Business; Stock (firearms); Computer science; Group (periodic table); Econometrics; Operations research; Actuarial science; Finance; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Mathematics; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.13589518315208823,"score_gpt":0.4143469686395374,"score_spread":0.2784517854874492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159818811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98706716,0.00013354619,0.009228003,0.0004505064,0.000015005476,0.00020235305,0.00007308376,0.00001782529,0.002812536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752601,0.00010143864,0.023551872,0.000042980424,0.000012860049,0.00006782935,0.0000703816,0.0000044713133,0.0008880499],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961462,0.0026575106,0.00017134033,0.00021670997,0.0004933903,0.00031477367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99263823,0.005700554,0.00043552957,0.00023621817,0.00055496686,0.0004344114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073684654,0.0006852023,0.00056396605,0.0018731188,0.0022548598,0.0017656628,0.0010756365,0.0017492257,0.0018087314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078016426,0.00020786744,0.0007583263,0.0017076985,0.0010002704,0.0014888452,0.0010502927,0.0010925486,0.00012599347],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004510553,0.009446841,0.33336776,0.0010619987,0.0006942929,0.031688586,0.037379198,0.19769692,0.01242394,0.033719905,0.0062214658,0.33178857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074223883,0.0034020222,0.10658553,0.00019197015,0.0003532318,0.0026271848,0.0671535,0.77523553,0.013141237,0.017817887,0.012530037,0.00021966014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00951247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014075626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00951247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021413055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014326477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038968623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160110807","doi":"10.5267/j.uscm.2013.09.004","title":"Ranking important factors influencing organizational strategy in selecting distribution channels with the approach of FMCDM","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uncertain Supply Chain Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Business; Distribution (mathematics); Marketing; Process management; Industrial organization; Operations management; Statistics; Knowledge management; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.050523632317541686,"score_gpt":0.31079214594525745,"score_spread":0.26026851362771575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160110807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7814636,0.00053597783,0.19896328,0.0007973968,0.00005043564,0.0016417069,0.00022132945,0.00004772118,0.016278572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9203511,0.00017291009,0.078498684,0.00003697037,0.0000075684948,0.00040729396,0.00007052418,0.000004221571,0.00045072217],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931584,0.00410623,0.00034620473,0.00023478043,0.0014747233,0.00067967596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880945,0.008820716,0.00089150964,0.00014160089,0.0017511117,0.00030056087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007917712,0.0009654201,0.00070802245,0.0076981015,0.0015526311,0.0034340005,0.00050596776,0.0009436853,0.0028543686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019229375,0.00033781657,0.001085283,0.00399199,0.0009625596,0.0013855472,0.0011533145,0.0006609622,0.00018059862],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012132694,0.0014387397,0.21676359,0.002630411,0.0010653484,0.0015092111,0.010492499,0.19032596,0.012575098,0.06799381,0.0024247067,0.4915673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036006572,0.0022361104,0.15538844,0.0011935007,0.0009157121,0.00055693975,0.04680178,0.71192235,0.010388625,0.059951723,0.009902148,0.00038266522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005708527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076600043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007917712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038791997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036008593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041873395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160368919","doi":"10.1109/iis.1997.645236","title":"A competitive tendering strategy model and software system based on fuzzy set theory","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Procurement; Margin (machine learning); Fuzzy set; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Competitive advantage; Operations research; Software; Sample (material); Industrial engineering; Business; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Marketing","score_opus":0.23986113328195655,"score_gpt":0.37988445164592627,"score_spread":0.14002331836396972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160368919","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02463371,0.00019262283,0.95607644,0.00042794397,0.000039989434,0.00025181277,0.00011110496,0.0001906145,0.018075712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5527314,0.00037873504,0.43805328,0.0000929341,0.00003410693,0.0006723388,0.00021801163,0.000040276842,0.0077788355],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990146,0.00039699447,0.000048717706,0.00010365345,0.00036633183,0.00006967039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992767,0.0003992656,0.00006685156,0.000030726493,0.00017866961,0.000047830814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015107263,0.0006172645,0.00050308474,0.0011480242,0.0006969875,0.0020758011,0.0015699818,0.0013045073,0.003873619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022241697,0.00035437572,0.00073068886,0.0011173968,0.0010338061,0.0015961461,0.00061387924,0.00068600045,0.00048989564],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007402177,0.00008933056,0.0005413713,0.0000940486,0.000034188157,0.00022231461,0.0002811658,0.7649308,0.0018717315,0.19910812,0.0014642858,0.031288724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022779737,0.00006945755,0.00013229273,0.000017147935,0.000010607948,0.000050425293,0.00004476569,0.9722049,0.00035819516,0.024334354,0.0027389755,0.000015959977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008858288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057897246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008858288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024378956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023440653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017688215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160777395","doi":"10.1002/atr.5670430206","title":"The multi‐actor, multi‐criteria analysis methodology (MAMCA) for the evaluation of transport projects: Theory and practice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":213,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Management science; Computer science; Process management; Order (exchange); Evaluation methods; Inclusion (mineral); Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Engineering; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.4136676087511625,"score_gpt":0.5639888913116063,"score_spread":0.15032128256044386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160777395","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064301128,0.0016339764,0.9834293,0.00087639084,0.00007698791,0.0005207378,0.000045889497,0.00008178144,0.006904773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17533618,0.00091012445,0.8212397,0.00013484733,0.000039694296,0.0015377961,0.000039191422,0.00003616807,0.00072634284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95167124,0.038760204,0.0013986571,0.001367444,0.006370405,0.0004319769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95985216,0.03148478,0.00204695,0.0013716811,0.0046324315,0.0006120255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03558928,0.0016110529,0.0016750713,0.008150931,0.001920534,0.0052715004,0.0022169782,0.0024725937,0.0029907892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03469304,0.00068889454,0.0019265927,0.0051336945,0.0061891903,0.003254602,0.0028645631,0.0022925918,0.00041447018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013609785,0.00021496136,0.0029525778,0.0034573276,0.00048029752,0.00034337313,0.003976613,0.14709675,0.0040520006,0.61049044,0.003754927,0.22304465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011492078,0.0003368959,0.0014531574,0.0024410654,0.00013148131,0.00028911227,0.002656812,0.4217588,0.0029343574,0.5375792,0.030139584,0.00016466602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022169119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019689717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03558928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005174536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00700292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18821633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162747772","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2013.08.004","title":"An application of fuzzy TOPSIS on ranking products: A case study of faucet devices","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Fuzzy logic; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Engineering; Operations research; Environmental economics; Business; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.11709217856637183,"score_gpt":0.43658216096258995,"score_spread":0.3194899823962181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162747772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9670838,0.0003566495,0.019498765,0.00042807456,0.000027270511,0.00043125567,0.00015590109,0.000054467648,0.01196373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95695126,0.0002526805,0.038722754,0.000029608258,0.000006315943,0.00006266251,0.000070102426,0.000012082461,0.0038925915],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981036,0.00088753854,0.00008001026,0.00015380813,0.0005937168,0.00018127174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784315,0.0014733309,0.00013124594,0.00013764363,0.00027239643,0.00014221593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026249243,0.00077403814,0.0005698264,0.002628332,0.0039323694,0.0020210096,0.0012923386,0.002119253,0.0029482548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034095629,0.00024973444,0.0010838303,0.0024978349,0.0013492666,0.0013964083,0.0008832508,0.0007808253,0.00031311216],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026115805,0.0052501885,0.07549517,0.0022941844,0.00046329905,0.101075865,0.045474444,0.16333924,0.07622714,0.033287317,0.007858598,0.4866229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077467784,0.010428432,0.14816962,0.0010729653,0.00072283123,0.022950273,0.17806984,0.42807862,0.10060518,0.0235777,0.08480648,0.00074340036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015259236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031774916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015259236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020933284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001325427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03034085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164812711","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2013.05.013","title":"An application of AHP method for ranking administrative headquarters of the state welfare in Iran","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Ranking (information retrieval); Welfare; State (computer science); Computer science; Operations research; Business; Operations management; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Engineering; Law; Algorithm","score_opus":0.11418600729424269,"score_gpt":0.44851359684375586,"score_spread":0.33432758954951314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164812711","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1896687,0.0006949924,0.7915154,0.0008973316,0.00017269693,0.0027080926,0.0010361254,0.00059168227,0.012715004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5591582,0.00032732706,0.43809417,0.000051091985,0.000028842784,0.0008745036,0.0004958139,0.000025690711,0.00094430946],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925127,0.004241354,0.0004528123,0.000384795,0.0020404258,0.00036798164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953134,0.0024401739,0.0003666817,0.00015464894,0.0015866255,0.00013849032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007860358,0.00082807324,0.0008615789,0.0055920114,0.0017940806,0.002031803,0.0011753221,0.0005284897,0.002430469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107002165,0.0004117949,0.0009883624,0.005055842,0.0005850783,0.0010124877,0.0012321942,0.00074672676,0.00018852168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004635272,0.0005235088,0.020429669,0.0015354642,0.0005547345,0.0005291552,0.0026072373,0.29973146,0.0036596593,0.023535443,0.007478568,0.63895154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022623301,0.0005186754,0.014699785,0.000254716,0.00018967032,0.00014942768,0.0042999545,0.93695503,0.003498548,0.02844075,0.010650987,0.0001162424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014626676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015964432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014626676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026508537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058850483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041570067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165134748","doi":"10.1142/s0219622015500029","title":"An Innovative Fuzzy-Neural Decision Analyzer for Qualitative Group Decision Making","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Weighting; Group decision-making; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Variance (accounting); Decision field theory; Management science; Fuzzy logic; Cognition; Machine learning; Decision engineering; Group (periodic table); Process (computing); Business decision mapping; Knowledge management; Decision support system; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.1167932036771711,"score_gpt":0.5013667480096065,"score_spread":0.38457354433243535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165134748","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01343976,0.00007155116,0.9828535,0.00011274079,0.000032226686,0.00016669257,0.000105869374,0.00071446056,0.002503198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23887603,0.00009592952,0.7586603,0.00013927519,0.000027895285,0.00033575133,0.00016710504,0.00005462392,0.0016430618],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983342,0.00064683997,0.00012498291,0.00021066815,0.00060147047,0.00008183325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978745,0.0012248876,0.00014800885,0.000098239434,0.00057382317,0.0000805942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003914946,0.00077842013,0.00076428906,0.0017769294,0.000813596,0.0016246019,0.0010444098,0.0009572114,0.005017397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075308825,0.00026985348,0.0006085481,0.0014944487,0.0005545272,0.00194563,0.0010966737,0.0009109826,0.00068768207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012622317,0.0005451934,0.0039551007,0.0004938189,0.00020649334,0.0003399273,0.0006638212,0.27544728,0.021571118,0.08878919,0.005331454,0.6013944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003487543,0.000071499024,0.00039328946,0.000022545244,0.00003021771,0.00005359515,0.00004021801,0.9801769,0.0043317867,0.013023803,0.0018002276,0.000020900437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024963145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00355672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005017397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011822579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015510005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020704508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165884388","doi":"10.1007/s11269-015-0982-2","title":"Sustainability Evaluation of Surface Water Quality Management Options in Developing Countries: Multicriteria Analysis Using Fuzzy UTASTAR Method","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Resources Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"European Social Fund","keywords":"Sustainability; Ranking (information retrieval); Environmental economics; Quality (philosophy); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Fuzzy logic; Developing country; Environmental resource management; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Business; Environmental science; Operations research; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.3003390668515622,"score_gpt":0.5048816733350623,"score_spread":0.2045426064835001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165884388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6752122,0.00047833816,0.32070524,0.00013040211,0.000018770412,0.000098911376,0.00017629463,0.0000664813,0.0031134044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95900667,0.00016987525,0.04035879,0.000011036596,0.000005021491,0.000057737256,0.00007524457,0.000008540385,0.00030704396],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985293,0.0008837114,0.000092348666,0.00012588833,0.00023502376,0.0001337439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756026,0.0018082965,0.00023668597,0.00007785709,0.00027403526,0.00004296619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041530537,0.00062037556,0.001205143,0.0029913338,0.0005195336,0.0015868457,0.0007110613,0.0006360442,0.0009799462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004685012,0.0003317328,0.002261979,0.0018993665,0.00044336193,0.0010895967,0.00075330114,0.00046333196,0.000046634887],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031932766,0.00022207513,0.010479772,0.0002702119,0.00054716953,0.00033133777,0.00018514397,0.9168633,0.0050474987,0.012143071,0.00035781972,0.05323334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007235601,0.00007709765,0.0020840864,0.000013879979,0.00008163086,0.000029984327,0.000106243366,0.99461323,0.0007695973,0.0020964162,0.00010680128,0.000013812593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042650052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001149207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009496988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021963716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167451609","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2014.03.036","title":"A new distance measure including the weak preference relation: Application to the multiple criteria aggregation procedure for mixed evaluations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Ottawa; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Preference; Ambiguity; Relation (database); Preference relation; Mathematics; Computer science; Econometrics; Statistics; Data mining","score_opus":0.49120252718623775,"score_gpt":0.522083046585105,"score_spread":0.030880519398867212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167451609","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005431766,0.00028442292,0.9934028,0.00008675261,0.00008155034,0.00005681979,0.000040114668,0.0000661258,0.00054954085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1024379,0.00028371002,0.8957626,0.00006747926,0.0001294845,0.00028738438,0.0001180356,0.000086617074,0.0008268867],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894481,0.00514752,0.001020739,0.0008303212,0.0033744837,0.00017887255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98307747,0.010099771,0.0009786439,0.0013262231,0.004097894,0.00042001368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011998297,0.0011860975,0.0027351948,0.004405903,0.0010606768,0.0030102662,0.0018635455,0.0017636879,0.0018919988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031030502,0.000515317,0.002267224,0.0048524714,0.0012527914,0.004509463,0.0032025608,0.0027910038,0.00043742658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037262973,0.00040473032,0.0022693512,0.0010331841,0.0007819564,0.00016802353,0.00055148464,0.08460604,0.012951452,0.14915964,0.003325507,0.74437594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083594416,0.00088010373,0.0027033333,0.00016474184,0.00029278974,0.00040659794,0.00012920516,0.88049555,0.0051123523,0.10284251,0.0066747437,0.00021445363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012572663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012693222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011998297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013462706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023705235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06345379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168741091","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2014.6.025","title":"Positioning business in uncertain conditions by weighting a competitive profile matrix using the fuzzy DEMATEL","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Matrix (chemical analysis); Process management; Competitive advantage; Operations research; Operations management; Business; Industrial engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Marketing; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.05972685628253475,"score_gpt":0.3920997227010021,"score_spread":0.3323728664184673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168741091","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039450523,0.00012927988,0.95409256,0.00018624225,0.00002086235,0.00009642762,0.00005064639,0.00004815368,0.005925425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68523943,0.00026688795,0.31166884,0.000047682464,0.00002201263,0.00017666782,0.00007685038,0.000016919279,0.0024847707],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986701,0.0003820976,0.00008178813,0.00017929624,0.0005878127,0.00009898026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905854,0.00044120057,0.00015831998,0.00004397955,0.0002519835,0.00004602868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020362467,0.00067706255,0.0005985541,0.0018804248,0.00088757946,0.0021535358,0.00095333735,0.00071871234,0.0016071023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032283326,0.00031662403,0.00076829514,0.0017207438,0.0008223895,0.0021673497,0.0011492393,0.0006928044,0.00020075345],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016809924,0.00009572464,0.0037029267,0.00024465108,0.00009352197,0.0005178212,0.00081039756,0.7096171,0.009995491,0.12616499,0.0009894875,0.14759979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000919252,0.00007426911,0.0007220607,0.00002429397,0.000020434294,0.00009957858,0.00015451535,0.96565163,0.0012907514,0.030269276,0.0016503752,0.000033636294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059300116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061548054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059300116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024378747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093298126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017688096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170055089","doi":"10.1109/nafips.2008.4531232","title":"Supplier selection in a multi-item/multi-supplier environment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Simplicity; Decision maker; Process (computing); Piecewise linear function; Fuzzy logic; Function (biology); Piecewise; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2526306514334037,"score_gpt":0.4074819493622696,"score_spread":0.15485129792886593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170055089","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108453006,0.00091625587,0.8783111,0.0012052286,0.00006313471,0.00015900092,0.000115038325,0.00011544651,0.010661729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8848818,0.0006563736,0.109767124,0.00012028548,0.00005193509,0.000101562146,0.00005775,0.000019403486,0.004343836],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965127,0.002076321,0.000111825066,0.0003784915,0.00064782467,0.00027288473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975368,0.0016516739,0.00027539453,0.00009910885,0.00023937739,0.00019761473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035720055,0.0006945394,0.0013013701,0.0011475633,0.0013650443,0.0021167074,0.0015215027,0.0021820737,0.0031515262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004302398,0.0005835323,0.000824576,0.0021219088,0.0009896471,0.0022868032,0.0015393023,0.0011675656,0.0004537842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031276597,0.0001917985,0.0032314805,0.00041561245,0.00019125895,0.0032704,0.00049920933,0.82284415,0.0053179646,0.101585634,0.0017167819,0.06042293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003667232,0.00016744455,0.00079784886,0.000045351087,0.000054330452,0.00037026644,0.00035659864,0.94327277,0.0013625335,0.05141968,0.0020700013,0.000046426114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002674453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029512404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035720055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014228148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010712551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018890798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172492066","doi":"10.5539/ibr.v8n12p116","title":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach Regarding the Choice of University for Postgraduate Studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Process (computing); Mathematics education; Multiple choice; Management science; Hierarchy; Computer science; Operations research; Mathematics; Significant difference; Statistics; Economics","score_opus":0.706344727077157,"score_gpt":0.5908819768861009,"score_spread":0.11546275019105612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172492066","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032305397,0.0024323175,0.9218357,0.004852146,0.00036309994,0.0032649415,0.0003539092,0.00014716314,0.034445282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32383874,0.0016884822,0.6671,0.00051750406,0.00016803453,0.002076032,0.00027242486,0.000036445173,0.0043021943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.96643674,0.022040848,0.0020215886,0.0016269084,0.006777389,0.0010966408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865303,0.009265931,0.0008831193,0.00026944434,0.0023087705,0.0007424726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024708476,0.0019956972,0.0024115234,0.0062011187,0.0037530668,0.009389725,0.004163748,0.0033546982,0.0056543774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015498233,0.0008193912,0.002652768,0.0062215403,0.0035136265,0.004092217,0.004058077,0.0030830633,0.0005793226],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082634744,0.0011473262,0.006162374,0.007836923,0.0012127677,0.002884111,0.014916757,0.26617256,0.010313253,0.44672057,0.009838673,0.23196837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003232429,0.0015930707,0.0041891304,0.0027571875,0.0005279421,0.00083738036,0.019380298,0.37743253,0.0069995443,0.52525765,0.06012183,0.0005802865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035289077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049344394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024708476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00720436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011222777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13067251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175072366","doi":"10.3233/ifs-151824","title":"A new correlation measure of the intuitionistic fuzzy sets","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Variance (accounting); Degree (music); Measure (data warehouse); Correlation coefficient; Covariance; Set (abstract data type); Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy set; Correlation; Discrete mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Applied mathematics; Algorithm; Statistics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Data mining; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.23434218761821018,"score_gpt":0.403434585436611,"score_spread":0.1690923978184008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175072366","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035786618,0.0011457041,0.9514519,0.00029510894,0.0002173413,0.0000900538,0.0001885609,0.0002954514,0.010529316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7244715,0.0009905122,0.27104002,0.0002060285,0.00039439797,0.0003100571,0.0003871218,0.0000916576,0.0021086296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922869,0.0015404973,0.0006506303,0.0012725288,0.0038439853,0.00040547407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911895,0.0036321017,0.0013402051,0.0009062619,0.002538133,0.00039387343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042547346,0.0009239466,0.00092212396,0.004740147,0.0010708368,0.0030143745,0.0013210443,0.0010304477,0.0018198574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01870869,0.0004019348,0.0013249448,0.003430075,0.0019696662,0.0057211253,0.0019223155,0.0015382876,0.00035666398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003497026,0.00015385698,0.012738375,0.000806682,0.00047981116,0.0006653563,0.001478549,0.05967203,0.016008645,0.66492283,0.0049252547,0.23779888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008642239,0.0004692269,0.0171985,0.00034835728,0.00040069208,0.0018433672,0.00063443335,0.5541107,0.016929174,0.37833825,0.02921935,0.0004215373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00098287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064175454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004740147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018565862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016136687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022501409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176008306","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2015.11.011","title":"Green supplier development program selection using NGT and VIKOR under fuzzy environment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":286,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Fuzzy logic; Supplier evaluation; Supply chain; Context (archaeology); VIKOR method; Nominal group technique; Computer science; Supply chain management; Selection (genetic algorithm); Operations research; Process management; Operations management; Business; Knowledge management; Engineering; Marketing; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.29140014769329575,"score_gpt":0.36379688516589376,"score_spread":0.072396737472598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176008306","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39865142,0.00044826086,0.58495456,0.00027887328,0.000060050756,0.0002226497,0.00019504748,0.0004227567,0.014766421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90550387,0.00015182362,0.09171304,0.00002881165,0.000014841437,0.00009905541,0.000115934694,0.000021290623,0.0023513366],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990331,0.00031036927,0.000044702443,0.00011908561,0.00037359569,0.00011919855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910563,0.00049594225,0.000091513946,0.000032828757,0.0002295845,0.000044495104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011566426,0.0005103365,0.0008598476,0.0022106436,0.00069369766,0.0010513834,0.00067825575,0.0005338671,0.0016299628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002334747,0.00025537724,0.0010019758,0.0016467755,0.00032217472,0.00088365236,0.00051276817,0.00030661965,0.00012989402],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041920925,0.00019975545,0.006973085,0.0003191307,0.00013434103,0.0002877867,0.00015604043,0.80682045,0.0068683107,0.009992294,0.0013867139,0.16644295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001540305,0.00007596353,0.0011307355,0.000010859953,0.00003633498,0.000049787322,0.00005474903,0.9953768,0.0012940421,0.001578394,0.00036580637,0.000011045626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006423722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005343013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006423722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010037515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013648389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01277262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176298331","doi":"","title":"Non-discriminating criteria in the AHP : Removal and rank reversal:","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TNO Repository","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Weighting; Rank (graph theory); Hierarchy; Decision maker; Computer science; Process (computing); Mathematics; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Statistics; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Combinatorics; Law","score_opus":0.1051973419243996,"score_gpt":0.4099888715115206,"score_spread":0.30479152958712097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176298331","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019391177,0.00032487733,0.9740087,0.0005906762,0.00009956127,0.00045223907,0.00006949953,0.00023559824,0.004827595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23049538,0.00020890971,0.76586986,0.0001923449,0.00006263628,0.00041077114,0.00015255167,0.000118009564,0.00248949],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9646908,0.014985409,0.0022452255,0.0012779605,0.015950037,0.0008504742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9716341,0.015697304,0.0026313497,0.0041036555,0.005485417,0.0004481958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021989081,0.0011835553,0.0016125382,0.0031164389,0.0014545108,0.003893463,0.0027349007,0.0016006945,0.0025098454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05283047,0.00058620755,0.0017137285,0.0043557677,0.0032103367,0.003167439,0.003457785,0.004467969,0.0010750986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005384423,0.00047995275,0.0036560043,0.0016945157,0.00028289668,0.00042061755,0.0030446588,0.08284569,0.020789308,0.26628253,0.0036252532,0.61634016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020185218,0.0005672674,0.0030744225,0.00044205194,0.00017965789,0.00055325124,0.0008964221,0.5629322,0.041345052,0.3610343,0.02846243,0.0003112136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002198033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003275765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021989081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001471193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031732256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11629075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178867840","doi":"10.14864/softscis.2008.0.1580.0","title":"Sensitivity Analysis of Differentiation of the Choquet Integral as an Aggregation Function","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SCIS & ISIS SCIS & ISIS 2008","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sensitivity (control systems); Choquet integral; Mathematics; Function (biology); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Engineering; Fuzzy logic","score_opus":0.1036303395214878,"score_gpt":0.37503701468078243,"score_spread":0.2714066751592946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178867840","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2927927,0.0014935816,0.69476455,0.0004911683,0.00010361184,0.00011334933,0.00006980273,0.00010345594,0.010067779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837679,0.00021837626,0.015114283,0.000031774205,0.000019890278,0.00002747003,0.000023970526,0.000020391033,0.00077588635],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660254,0.002111792,0.00009943305,0.0003312653,0.0006177234,0.000237148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98725826,0.0108201625,0.00047096165,0.00040352007,0.0008941596,0.00015289377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008035589,0.00086911354,0.0014466977,0.0024175178,0.0006296436,0.0023372076,0.0008039472,0.0011573425,0.0010351322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022440713,0.0005692396,0.0018095692,0.0015493878,0.0015977328,0.0019151743,0.001697068,0.0012353795,0.00008017696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003093898,0.00005570788,0.0016168631,0.0001622815,0.00023560625,0.00025235215,0.0001886062,0.89680827,0.007961735,0.080061845,0.00028377585,0.012063627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052530463,0.00003337513,0.00045283794,0.000011719214,0.000032097836,0.00003877066,0.000017495817,0.98498833,0.0009469594,0.01331919,0.00013458094,0.000019287365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036369541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011196705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008035589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024931463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010618258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04249674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183032399","doi":"10.13033/isahp.y2009.049","title":"Fewer Comparisons - Efficiency via Sufficient Redundancy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISAHP proceedings","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Coding (social sciences); Consistency (knowledge bases); Data mining; Rank (graph theory); Information retrieval; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13553194722132117,"score_gpt":0.4194253039738546,"score_spread":0.2838933567525334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183032399","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054017972,0.0011090942,0.92623556,0.003807363,0.0003521939,0.0012907631,0.0002500232,0.0009322669,0.012004857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26106358,0.00031637758,0.7338995,0.0008434122,0.00022638547,0.0011075226,0.00026978212,0.00016459374,0.002108825],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93835294,0.040360082,0.0029941457,0.0029837673,0.014568713,0.00074034964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8454409,0.0975179,0.010987273,0.031790487,0.013293067,0.0009702778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03818855,0.001664166,0.0024736947,0.0023950394,0.0017962159,0.0027588697,0.0037602729,0.0014087196,0.00363612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106407665,0.0007995013,0.0018681127,0.0027058264,0.0025362498,0.0052614915,0.0037402217,0.0032575564,0.001178836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020144868,0.0009084248,0.005688492,0.0029010891,0.0006561475,0.0007038703,0.0037888086,0.06930909,0.01966707,0.18105026,0.011691312,0.701621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011091097,0.002720202,0.008365012,0.0013209931,0.0006563957,0.0014639277,0.0019574822,0.2823915,0.02525592,0.62357575,0.05089684,0.00028694107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010922482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001632137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03818855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001572543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005204774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20196277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184884018","doi":"10.3233/ifs-141336","title":"Coalition fuzzy stability analysis in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Stability (learning theory); Preference; Generalization; Computer science; Fuzzy set operations; Conflict resolution; Fuzzy number; Mathematical optimization; Defuzzification; Mathematics; Fuzzy set; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Statistics","score_opus":0.46748785611861243,"score_gpt":0.458149252828932,"score_spread":0.009338603289680447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184884018","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057385225,0.0003021861,0.9299697,0.0004565812,0.00003674081,0.000048929505,0.00010498754,0.000066693676,0.011628984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9458209,0.00029816016,0.04910607,0.000065564964,0.000034917794,0.00010131675,0.00009067876,0.000032312688,0.00445006],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929094,0.00037826356,0.000019490028,0.000093613984,0.00015350152,0.000064076085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988675,0.0006653977,0.00014748989,0.000056385383,0.00018632757,0.00007689245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015555514,0.00060369645,0.00065355294,0.0015417484,0.00075703714,0.0014926454,0.0011048081,0.0007733687,0.0030879737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032449965,0.00019577154,0.00091662066,0.0012510641,0.0015432017,0.0017346605,0.0011803467,0.0008676164,0.000246744],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033014723,0.000018142802,0.00033934342,0.000034758305,0.000036509162,0.00011017256,0.000119366254,0.51838356,0.00074633374,0.47391525,0.0008056673,0.005457928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003796906,0.0000071552113,0.000057597605,0.000004208435,0.0000046556747,0.0000106604,0.00003259722,0.8784682,0.00007166928,0.12093893,0.0003949649,0.0000054818233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008872198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006121229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008872198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002060598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011313106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017641127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207562886","doi":"10.1016/b978-044451891-0/50054-5","title":"ELICITATION METHODS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Membership function; Fuzzy set; Mathematics; Context (archaeology); Point (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.17252610313381758,"score_gpt":0.461008948218877,"score_spread":0.2884828450850594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2207562886","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020257735,0.0015858454,0.8510066,0.00035793535,0.00021080897,0.0008246747,0.0012212289,0.0019445366,0.14082259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022259386,0.003023373,0.7341633,0.00041508733,0.00010710296,0.0025653737,0.0036220464,0.000870138,0.23297416],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972639,0.0008439073,0.00021252429,0.0003621813,0.0012239112,0.00009354097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975448,0.0014456618,0.000053897726,0.000512116,0.00040643886,0.00003708476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002492812,0.0013012487,0.0010644936,0.002729597,0.0009952044,0.0025122042,0.0015147121,0.0010645259,0.086751804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058861948,0.00078705896,0.00084913603,0.0032528131,0.0005902548,0.0022786127,0.002427293,0.0013590506,0.033617213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003925593,0.000058836347,0.0001572758,0.00078354444,0.000020683541,0.000046816807,0.000426354,0.0013441202,0.0060418705,0.044155933,0.029103428,0.91782194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045291472,0.000079921214,0.000980595,0.00080547814,0.000051453393,0.0004764431,0.00048405744,0.018017856,0.022461912,0.12830035,0.8282405,0.000056092496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008936159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015672432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086751804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007081112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011791105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2902137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215641263","doi":"10.1155/2015/976742","title":"Supplier Evaluation Process by Pairwise Comparisons","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Problems in Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Bidding; Consistency (knowledge bases); Procurement; Service (business); Process (computing); Supplier evaluation; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Viewpoints; Operations research; Business; Process management; Marketing; Mathematics; Supply chain management; Supply chain; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.25654635449315755,"score_gpt":0.43353891474332934,"score_spread":0.1769925602501718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215641263","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017963236,0.0003686406,0.97142136,0.0006456152,0.00010914985,0.001613481,0.000110978406,0.00017758449,0.007589996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16078986,0.0003034077,0.8342349,0.00013311811,0.00009396582,0.0016686611,0.00021478385,0.00008095927,0.002480344],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9032697,0.06747947,0.005006343,0.005513633,0.017364472,0.0013662494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9063159,0.05658145,0.006013724,0.004731523,0.025002228,0.0013551703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07103299,0.0021684214,0.0025896574,0.0071089785,0.0024212203,0.005760438,0.0033152164,0.0018548684,0.0088653695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12621251,0.0008851599,0.0026129098,0.0068192934,0.00246224,0.007360953,0.005405375,0.0032379758,0.0018622412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006741924,0.0004982335,0.009198659,0.0017202565,0.0007758382,0.00046327,0.00545251,0.05919254,0.005911121,0.1893374,0.005536289,0.7212397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031010184,0.0021788217,0.007668791,0.0007270334,0.00056801055,0.0005968566,0.0040944396,0.39272994,0.014469533,0.5426953,0.03355814,0.0004030271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00181149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021290227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07103299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026583918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066116676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37566286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220135156","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.10.021","title":"Corrigendum to “A 35-item version of the caring dimensions inventory (CDI-35): multivariate analysis and application to a longitudinal study involving student nurses” [Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 38 (5) (2001) 511–521]","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Varimax rotation; CLARITY; Decimal; Principal component analysis; Multivariate statistics; Table (database); Psychology; Cronbach's alpha; Multivariate analysis; Statistics; Arithmetic; Mathematics; Psychometrics; Computer science; Clinical psychology; Data mining","score_opus":0.23013524937300991,"score_gpt":0.5073013280030103,"score_spread":0.2771660786300004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220135156","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021834127,0.00097515056,0.00063763995,0.06790662,0.92682296,0.00007489937,0.00088989455,0.00029020183,0.0021842418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012978925,0.008963697,0.005154488,0.3061929,0.35131073,0.00087551866,0.0053347806,0.0010712869,0.30811766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99358845,0.0013822888,0.0014978625,0.0006446436,0.0023742688,0.0005125675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9534639,0.011363672,0.0022748075,0.0016907996,0.029939054,0.0012677509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047392314,0.00256259,0.0030088266,0.004169779,0.0037799878,0.0030509373,0.0040563988,0.00679402,0.07124203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08894133,0.0014869743,0.0030627802,0.003117306,0.0022347027,0.002234573,0.0039434377,0.008937279,0.046147507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014639524,0.000013363729,0.00009076231,0.00006980111,0.000009728014,0.00020862505,0.000030348585,0.000036985246,0.00002435175,0.00018586701,0.99591225,0.0034033016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005095558,0.000054670483,0.0025201938,0.00045120984,0.00005031527,0.0005345757,0.00022515979,0.00043366922,0.00028047842,0.0010829052,0.99422944,0.000086397595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05258558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06736032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07124203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004732253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059761335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23832834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220965481","doi":"10.5539/enrr.v6n1p13","title":"Conceptual Framework for Collaboratively Managing Coupled Human and Natural Systems under Climate Change Uncertainty","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Visitor pattern; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Operations research; Environmental science; Engineering","score_opus":0.33575334498960785,"score_gpt":0.47488402366078614,"score_spread":0.1391306786711783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220965481","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003501891,0.0004212081,0.9790708,0.001288004,0.000066727094,0.0002472129,0.00014155969,0.00014764686,0.015114844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29439712,0.0011570302,0.69744533,0.00030222515,0.00012583392,0.001573441,0.00030934456,0.00004643519,0.004643152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997718,0.0009170179,0.00015233691,0.0003830732,0.00060433353,0.00022526413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985379,0.0006509728,0.00020837806,0.00010103737,0.00027380465,0.00022790543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045739487,0.0013718284,0.0009523981,0.0018584251,0.0018784112,0.005021733,0.0047947825,0.0030755233,0.00480876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030911241,0.0005342723,0.0017359549,0.002222895,0.0037027558,0.0033795505,0.00422105,0.002145103,0.0005183964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014616768,0.000057850142,0.00034850457,0.00016118477,0.000046682522,0.00027423733,0.00038945756,0.35060126,0.00045963927,0.6316911,0.0013530334,0.0146024935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000386093,0.000078922596,0.00018791572,0.00014207112,0.000038523383,0.00011207977,0.0004618856,0.6749058,0.00025074184,0.30228618,0.021450229,0.00004709076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020781271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014002601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020781271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048030834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008154609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041320622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2223814162","doi":"","title":"Special Track on Uncertain Reasoning","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Florida AI Research Society","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Variety (cybernetics); Track (disk drive); Complete information; Perception; Reasoning system; Opportunistic reasoning; Robotics; Range (aeronautics); Model-based reasoning; Robot; Management science; Data science; Machine learning; Cognitive science; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Psychology; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5868464215815185,"score_gpt":0.5358296476192724,"score_spread":0.05101677396224602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2223814162","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018955645,0.0885062,0.02899035,0.08819563,0.5271485,0.00035185998,0.0012684423,0.00070391234,0.2629395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020668581,0.062247716,0.008413896,0.011869094,0.5112118,0.0003211398,0.0018255704,0.00088526757,0.38255695],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996491,0.0006493495,0.00022555857,0.0007685578,0.0014497231,0.00041580663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98680615,0.0035685082,0.00045894898,0.0009858669,0.0049077333,0.003272891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051452196,0.0020993273,0.0022871154,0.0036161316,0.0037621954,0.0076994244,0.0020678667,0.004381977,0.1084444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010829037,0.000664002,0.0022319942,0.0037991034,0.0016140761,0.008291602,0.0046295486,0.007911688,0.03792493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007151411,0.000058725618,0.00019908576,0.00028914504,0.000022912367,0.00009580896,0.000083086954,0.00038398764,0.00030593204,0.019790802,0.90043265,0.07826625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013798866,0.00007664154,0.00036006985,0.00033898803,0.000021557255,0.00017719879,0.0000706447,0.00085069897,0.0002104412,0.017816925,0.98003805,0.00002500032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022231466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045393924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1084444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037166553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029668193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36278266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234061177","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1351359","title":"Dynamic Vendor Selection using the FAHP Approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Vendor; Selection (genetic algorithm); Supply chain; Operations research; General partnership; Computer science; Supply chain management; Dynamic capabilities; Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy logic; Operations management; Business; Engineering; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Knowledge management; Finance","score_opus":0.13243261870587453,"score_gpt":0.4000170627863494,"score_spread":0.2675844440804749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234061177","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03826057,0.0003230928,0.9440284,0.0007409957,0.00007318171,0.00026320995,0.0002225717,0.00021949604,0.0158684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7213586,0.00029301015,0.26972994,0.00017791093,0.00011568474,0.00046372146,0.00023742244,0.000060673312,0.0075630425],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970536,0.0015747801,0.000062792635,0.00036178908,0.0005798261,0.0003672505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99607533,0.0031890655,0.00016127671,0.00013952251,0.00031027634,0.00012454964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033779524,0.0009911588,0.0023696688,0.0042456714,0.0013491766,0.002798407,0.002487598,0.0024723704,0.0098378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074634794,0.0008787835,0.0017526337,0.0030219003,0.00080536224,0.0028454522,0.001529505,0.0014645429,0.0005800207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014388764,0.00018495988,0.001331689,0.00017633887,0.00025686948,0.00026995482,0.00013498584,0.80833757,0.0006803223,0.04590796,0.00275058,0.13982482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019814013,0.00007972925,0.00034014377,0.000022557211,0.000030867915,0.000068963214,0.00005633205,0.9634426,0.00015076748,0.034751467,0.0010159322,0.00002070039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007746889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063724527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0098378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001944014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022115991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032910764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243012570","doi":"10.1109/iesm.2015.7380173","title":"Risk-based decision making framework for prioritizing patients' access to healthcare services by considering uncertainties","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Prioritization; Equity (law); Risk analysis (engineering); Variety (cybernetics); Computer science; Health care; Order (exchange); Actuarial science; Operations research; Business; Medicine; Process management; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.21375324239533014,"score_gpt":0.4853679133585912,"score_spread":0.2716146709632611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243012570","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015375996,0.0006072298,0.9763532,0.0011015175,0.00009232665,0.0002128398,0.00015445269,0.00009249691,0.006009847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6673426,0.00088257174,0.3273676,0.0002611862,0.0001575681,0.0006621463,0.0002409963,0.000037328067,0.0030479026],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99429554,0.0032280507,0.0002791119,0.0004817861,0.0012433232,0.00047215828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99595994,0.0024860497,0.00041468177,0.000088761764,0.0007284732,0.0003220042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008968088,0.0021948977,0.0018243922,0.0030551634,0.0013830925,0.003916626,0.0022343062,0.0022138362,0.003201304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007122211,0.0007880316,0.00203652,0.0018664472,0.0016041251,0.002528569,0.0024742987,0.0023562887,0.00026238288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006170643,0.00005656801,0.0006266201,0.000102560756,0.00010611035,0.00019486141,0.0001905545,0.93336797,0.00046655687,0.05315115,0.0007661732,0.010909132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030852607,0.00005581621,0.00021394786,0.000047565896,0.000050876133,0.00004692117,0.00013026934,0.9583502,0.00021228188,0.039806105,0.001022335,0.000032823955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009730336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008623376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009730336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045824065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064552156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04742831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254536653","doi":"","title":"Possibility Supported TOPSIS Model with Application to Vendor Selection Problem in Supply Chain Management","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ASAC","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain management; Supply chain; Vendor; TOPSIS; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Operations management; Operations research; Business; Economics; Engineering; Marketing; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05984414422945085,"score_gpt":0.3920593190814973,"score_spread":0.3322151748520465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254536653","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05051923,0.00039034046,0.9408064,0.00046525427,0.00007653939,0.00025375327,0.00015107282,0.0002709221,0.0070664515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.693342,0.00041661135,0.3033374,0.00005580943,0.000034252476,0.00046043925,0.0001707389,0.000030968622,0.0021518401],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588335,0.0023520254,0.00021026724,0.00022194102,0.0011926517,0.00013986901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99426717,0.004503766,0.00019607399,0.00010615861,0.00081832317,0.000108599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033496132,0.0010551824,0.00128695,0.0031446351,0.0019090872,0.002956965,0.0016227228,0.001485798,0.003982877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007285579,0.0005276177,0.001962739,0.0047615026,0.0009440181,0.0021909007,0.0013612496,0.0016473454,0.0003269771],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005182082,0.00032638828,0.0042202775,0.0010037229,0.00059478794,0.001354072,0.001250232,0.666862,0.0038522712,0.10347735,0.0035709955,0.21296968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059657203,0.00017480363,0.000830084,0.00006436275,0.0001263496,0.00019603684,0.00026539646,0.9554266,0.0006140412,0.04104538,0.0011442598,0.000053009986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007704654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075902003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007704654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017620753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026771177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01771468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264174219","doi":"10.1115/imece2014-40444","title":"A Decision Model for Selecting the Optimum Oil Production Profile Using Multi Criteria Decision Making and Social Choice Theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Production (economics); Statistic; Computer science; Decision-making models; Selection (genetic algorithm); Decision model; Group decision-making; Operations research; Field (mathematics); Oil production; Oil field; Management science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Machine learning; Statistics; Economics; Petroleum engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.2340970270092838,"score_gpt":0.47368035759104293,"score_spread":0.23958333058175912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264174219","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022445181,0.00013103793,0.9714475,0.00048514086,0.000036208294,0.00033464516,0.00013753248,0.000105405874,0.0048771803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50694174,0.00035495876,0.48740336,0.00010745371,0.000033399825,0.0013217088,0.00026883904,0.000033161687,0.003535405],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721247,0.0015161457,0.00014072539,0.00029058763,0.0006475609,0.00019249984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982279,0.0011793656,0.00015982606,0.000048244212,0.00029243727,0.00009229667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045715184,0.0012678354,0.0013597433,0.002541713,0.0015780658,0.0028474526,0.0017018433,0.002000798,0.004257889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004830905,0.00058933016,0.0014095146,0.0023073556,0.00094326556,0.0025942149,0.0013806446,0.0015276668,0.00046663897],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010018264,0.000156813,0.0013878965,0.00024792747,0.000086580054,0.00023337052,0.0003359283,0.9158782,0.0015071006,0.046715613,0.0011614211,0.032189038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003367523,0.000084510124,0.00024002638,0.000031474072,0.00002576779,0.000039997532,0.00012751485,0.98091644,0.00042326507,0.01703411,0.0010153882,0.000027761233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066832905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007916308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066832905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027777215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037857327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024176776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270320935","doi":"10.1287/ijoc.2015.0671","title":"Robust Critical Node Selection by Benders Decomposition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFORMS journal on computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Robust optimization; Mathematical optimization; Benders' decomposition; Selection (genetic algorithm); Oracle; Node (physics); Computer science; Robustness (evolution); Set (abstract data type); Optimization problem; Cutting-plane method; Mathematics; Integer programming; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.14663306970124196,"score_gpt":0.4327073187144121,"score_spread":0.28607424901317013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270320935","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012599956,0.00028792195,0.98348075,0.00014234209,0.000033610435,0.0001734524,0.00016801663,0.00017539562,0.0029385972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4066407,0.00076743064,0.5855449,0.00019052371,0.00008181392,0.0007971957,0.00092654506,0.00024433836,0.0048065865],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860066,0.0006275698,0.000065015745,0.0002464421,0.0003017339,0.00015859096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998447,0.0010051786,0.00020451876,0.00007838648,0.00019026626,0.00007464483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002706,0.0020986032,0.0018508249,0.0020191646,0.00069208187,0.0015034612,0.0011145943,0.0013733213,0.005159635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044046124,0.00092062674,0.0016951486,0.0015932886,0.000846855,0.0016377588,0.0014432969,0.0016184312,0.0006277592],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006236467,0.00003198996,0.00027688764,0.000078004916,0.000038745082,0.00007062349,0.000036075355,0.96301746,0.0009325431,0.012411997,0.0012263643,0.021816846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001776504,0.000042335356,0.00007913971,0.000015902458,0.000013609359,0.000029624598,0.000025148736,0.98046297,0.00044262284,0.017946694,0.0009155859,0.0000086251475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003372964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025921243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005159635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012697502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018516645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01726073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270529708","doi":"10.1080/18756891.2016.1146530","title":"Multi-attribute group decision making based on Choquet integral under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Government of Jiangsu Province; Southeast University; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Choquet integral; Mathematics; Group (periodic table); Group decision-making; Fuzzy logic; Interval (graph theory); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.15173072666253756,"score_gpt":0.4281086759379553,"score_spread":0.27637794927541776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270529708","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061889202,0.00016289747,0.99250257,0.000078164805,0.000018995894,0.000024851208,0.000007513498,0.000025847328,0.0009901889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4729452,0.00049110583,0.5250121,0.00009714214,0.000081857754,0.00019458652,0.000049230086,0.00002539143,0.0011033822],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658847,0.001400079,0.00019978512,0.00048284422,0.001150815,0.00017792624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984504,0.0009185759,0.00014818738,0.00008142984,0.00032363273,0.00007778964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044962107,0.0010666538,0.0016670062,0.0015664047,0.00088139577,0.0019913313,0.001568601,0.0011337488,0.0011935107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058033434,0.0004595643,0.0018852719,0.0014839161,0.0016121783,0.0038411224,0.0016287302,0.0016110583,0.00015148589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013191934,0.00012799432,0.0011960721,0.00042264906,0.00030948437,0.00033054478,0.0010997772,0.51134866,0.0053371876,0.38713208,0.0009272356,0.091636404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023605968,0.000066884946,0.00017280965,0.000028435372,0.000047075235,0.00007530734,0.00006988403,0.8892393,0.00091745786,0.108417444,0.00089751056,0.000044127333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016658922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011838508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044962107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014488864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014681875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023778558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271687561","doi":"10.5539/mas.v10n2p1","title":"The Relationship between Dimensions of Health Related Quality of Life and Health Conditions among Elderly People: A Fuzzy Linear Regression Approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality of life (healthcare); Linear regression; Bayesian multivariate linear regression; Fuzzy logic; Stepwise regression; Multivariate statistics; Regression analysis; Regression; Mathematics; Statistics; Medicine; Gerontology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.4636738784191036,"score_gpt":0.4842022302276603,"score_spread":0.020528351808556666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271687561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7220109,0.0006108998,0.2720922,0.0008164287,0.000046615452,0.00019601577,0.00039028854,0.00012953517,0.0037070797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96711373,0.00022621462,0.031482045,0.000031063264,0.000014039751,0.00010238113,0.00014214712,0.000005829955,0.0008825001],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855655,0.00078466703,0.00007481231,0.00021497988,0.0002812495,0.00008775638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966779,0.0025446261,0.00029791956,0.000080715334,0.00034161727,0.000057323643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003124259,0.00051971164,0.00044379133,0.0017148245,0.0004905786,0.0010901303,0.0008366219,0.00056619075,0.0018054112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064850734,0.00020776084,0.0012866809,0.0010907141,0.0003889357,0.00072043046,0.0004683321,0.00085717713,0.00022884637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008770877,0.00085536286,0.316404,0.0006026451,0.0013247179,0.0013389535,0.0039400333,0.42312136,0.009451977,0.028872328,0.0017222944,0.2114892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018061928,0.00040687333,0.04323598,0.000055433717,0.000158252,0.00018700282,0.0007687514,0.94618624,0.0011246654,0.0070781093,0.000725373,0.000055170123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011303651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075050523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011303651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011240173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008389589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02247572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276034082","doi":"10.3233/ifs-151640","title":"Modified difference-index based ranking bilinear programming approach to solving bimatrix games with payoffs of trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematics; Bilinear interpolation; Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy logic; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.16936566069307082,"score_gpt":0.375828775173058,"score_spread":0.2064631144799872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276034082","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005818325,0.00010362497,0.99180835,0.0000859132,0.000031435404,0.000056557947,0.00001560892,0.000024567804,0.0020555907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3648638,0.00039246428,0.6276747,0.00012654731,0.000053752403,0.0005594018,0.000077374825,0.00006107592,0.0061908476],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980702,0.00090809335,0.00010273862,0.00025274433,0.0004891425,0.00017709199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986796,0.00075767824,0.00007698128,0.000052423035,0.000338104,0.00009518811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031483863,0.001022831,0.0017724533,0.0010470318,0.0007915689,0.0018232117,0.0018767589,0.0011243155,0.003821088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003211805,0.0006110388,0.0013935806,0.0009653544,0.0011422095,0.0021087686,0.0019939428,0.0022670298,0.0003281488],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013514348,0.00015288385,0.00045542183,0.0003320627,0.000084531515,0.0001468927,0.00026925336,0.8017035,0.0051606996,0.14251648,0.0010657371,0.047977395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009744217,0.00005247072,0.000036701033,0.000007570451,0.0000074470995,0.000015665766,0.000020873204,0.9848542,0.00049865304,0.01396665,0.0005186135,0.000011314684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003200216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028027296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003821088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012914164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024872713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016650498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277377986","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-49619-0_1","title":"Pairwise Comparisons Rating Scale Paradox","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Normalization (sociology); Computer science; Rating scale; Scale (ratio); Statistics; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Cartography","score_opus":0.11996272760090089,"score_gpt":0.3812480764788608,"score_spread":0.2612853488779599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277377986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093983784,0.0047817486,0.42554864,0.02353415,0.0025144704,0.000456487,0.0005409107,0.00053144654,0.44810843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8595238,0.0011221153,0.10506948,0.0024563104,0.0006814566,0.00056320895,0.00026202554,0.00014025765,0.03018137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97760576,0.0130589735,0.00097556354,0.001514444,0.006445958,0.00039936774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9366658,0.048866153,0.0017543104,0.006713227,0.005030368,0.0009701971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018631049,0.00091818965,0.0013684481,0.0018612038,0.001656466,0.0039418424,0.0022903006,0.0027467848,0.016250392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11991064,0.00040885614,0.0010682956,0.0020170156,0.004960623,0.00843185,0.0037460024,0.0052249837,0.0017905555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014028467,0.00008010503,0.00034105842,0.00014454385,0.000055482364,0.00013620399,0.00038179726,0.0012376774,0.00070598186,0.9224273,0.009951564,0.06439812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000400344,0.000040290673,0.00033548387,0.000039255418,0.000020220257,0.00020525455,0.00015741854,0.005533244,0.00038601385,0.98640895,0.0068133348,0.000020373369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038325434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031463077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018631049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001748523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001087593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098531604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277408430","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2015.12.001","title":"Application of the ROV method for the selection of cutting fluids","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Selection (genetic algorithm); Remotely operated underwater vehicle; Machining; Computer science; Range (aeronautics); Operations research; Management science; Engineering; Industrial engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mechanical engineering; Robot","score_opus":0.17648700338030923,"score_gpt":0.47909072768804223,"score_spread":0.30260372430773297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277408430","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014835005,0.00056138454,0.9792996,0.00011570902,0.00005269821,0.00023335622,0.000056840432,0.00012352028,0.0047218846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20776024,0.00043663636,0.78969806,0.00005034113,0.00001791717,0.0003624461,0.00009535518,0.00004610178,0.0015329316],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99153465,0.004457221,0.00032285368,0.0005511575,0.0029277352,0.000206491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959766,0.002596785,0.00037686105,0.00023098475,0.00074614154,0.000072668576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005687501,0.001019415,0.0015633247,0.0057286713,0.0009476493,0.001693833,0.0015778646,0.0010853497,0.0026031728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113866525,0.00049372896,0.0013569865,0.0029256302,0.000901223,0.0009893388,0.0013092365,0.00091247674,0.00036405885],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002020254,0.00018294553,0.003231585,0.0010187061,0.00033067423,0.00035754117,0.0007009328,0.4180152,0.015497247,0.048375852,0.0018701615,0.5102171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005960841,0.00039407564,0.0016181703,0.00018351665,0.000076534765,0.00034665596,0.00032079624,0.95158464,0.009426128,0.0255029,0.010346215,0.00014075702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035481178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046328637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057286713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010695512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016319738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030078769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281858122","doi":"10.1002/tee.22224","title":"Design of a qualitative classification model through fuzzy support vector machine with type‐2 fuzzy expected regression classifier preset","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Defuzzification; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Data mining; Classifier (UML); Support vector machine; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy classification; Machine learning; Complement (music); Curse of dimensionality; Pattern recognition (psychology); Mathematics; Fuzzy number","score_opus":0.17139251804646338,"score_gpt":0.3958187057598448,"score_spread":0.2244261877133814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281858122","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010299805,0.000070867325,0.98839766,0.000135897,0.000022784341,0.000053022388,0.00003006455,0.00043808643,0.000551768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6220604,0.00017113046,0.37423936,0.00017236825,0.000047629925,0.00042503275,0.00022278492,0.00006529383,0.0025959378],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921465,0.00015386191,0.000051567273,0.00021360816,0.00028068328,0.00008560243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992781,0.00021365818,0.0001014217,0.000055066346,0.00031175916,0.00004004019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013730623,0.00077958783,0.0009543452,0.0007863576,0.00043651494,0.0012181939,0.0015157668,0.0010513053,0.0016770989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023919267,0.00038266912,0.0009551534,0.00043942028,0.00059056375,0.0013772118,0.0007081426,0.0011962177,0.0005527889],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019163352,0.00012871924,0.0028437504,0.00021729154,0.000087442924,0.00019370022,0.00020587016,0.673777,0.023505267,0.01683126,0.0024532855,0.2795649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028295851,0.000021111813,0.000094232964,0.000004541513,0.00000471847,0.000013112261,0.0000070137235,0.9968604,0.0013766775,0.0013434812,0.00026691103,0.0000051017946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026499336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014685721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026499336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087325874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011270264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0072615743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285984299","doi":"10.32738/jeppm.201301.0004","title":" Integrating Fuzzy Delphi with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process for Multiple Criteria Inventory Classification","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Engineering Project and Production Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Delphi; Delphi method; Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Inventory control; Defuzzification; Operations research; Hierarchy; Data mining; Control (management); Fuzzy set operations; Fuzzy classification; Fuzzy number; Fuzzy set; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.14472210481686584,"score_gpt":0.3964950399810489,"score_spread":0.2517729351641831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285984299","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016147038,0.00023762896,0.975957,0.0003149856,0.000030310352,0.0028510257,0.00008518764,0.00011905421,0.0042579044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10237584,0.00022014706,0.8943409,0.000054217402,0.000020100828,0.0024176256,0.00009282004,0.000017193297,0.00046119528],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.953823,0.033968426,0.0023774225,0.0011973943,0.0076520066,0.0009818267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98213434,0.012413983,0.0010872597,0.00071669725,0.0033271513,0.0003204999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03386676,0.0016301094,0.001813627,0.008517808,0.0031500345,0.003643793,0.0018753695,0.0012004913,0.0033187163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0309148,0.0013097747,0.0019464327,0.0058836867,0.0018313237,0.0027300566,0.0039625242,0.0019485414,0.00037560918],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005138938,0.0008772256,0.007164881,0.0038044758,0.000659601,0.00083717704,0.016152801,0.23478487,0.011244369,0.1425905,0.005034275,0.576336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023353299,0.00079297967,0.0036155418,0.0008678508,0.00018481577,0.0003383194,0.005893343,0.7981081,0.005657898,0.17107129,0.012893813,0.00034253713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055713514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075709512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03386676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037653833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008433229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17910671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290739108","doi":"","title":"Fuzzy logic based IEDSSs for environmental risk assessment and management","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ScholarsArchive  (Brigham Young University)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Ontario Innovation Trust","keywords":"Decision support system; Risk analysis (engineering); Identification (biology); Computer science; Risk assessment; Environmental resource management; Fuzzy logic; Water Framework Directive; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Business; Water quality; Data mining; Ecology","score_opus":0.05484577151606644,"score_gpt":0.3493229100338336,"score_spread":0.29447713851776713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290739108","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00470901,0.0013594211,0.9602859,0.0010111915,0.00017039782,0.0002311312,0.00065013743,0.0006415152,0.030941283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22654697,0.0037687388,0.74245745,0.0007500727,0.00025724166,0.0006889704,0.0016028079,0.000090585294,0.023837179],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985512,0.00046708598,0.0001417347,0.00015188118,0.0006154289,0.000072585535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988488,0.000563309,0.00012646224,0.00008532498,0.0003368749,0.000039196653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022192209,0.0007300155,0.0006803643,0.002207418,0.0005788258,0.0035707685,0.0016128822,0.0011394481,0.008157892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003238394,0.00024801743,0.001433165,0.0014395898,0.00080401584,0.0015220853,0.0012458753,0.0012613307,0.0016390512],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008241132,0.00017403952,0.00188038,0.00041764884,0.00017644597,0.00036955473,0.0002260961,0.36032218,0.0028047333,0.35526842,0.010221011,0.26805708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026579186,0.00008415007,0.00042884174,0.00021077936,0.000045737903,0.00011673559,0.00017677572,0.80278665,0.0012208943,0.15268046,0.042181008,0.000041478364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00860263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009046531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00860263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024936753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015998267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027290821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290775975","doi":"10.3982/te2446","title":"Ranking by rating","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Monotonic function; Axiom; Mathematics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Separable space; Rank (graph theory); Invariant (physics); Set (abstract data type); Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.08400881393084295,"score_gpt":0.4043908392695632,"score_spread":0.3203820253387203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290775975","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008350851,0.0015074346,0.9136361,0.0016275824,0.00047640916,0.0010916343,0.001038125,0.001639514,0.07063234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16920744,0.0021518255,0.78946275,0.00053226156,0.0004045357,0.0010962313,0.0028230937,0.00056192133,0.033760026],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697454,0.016602589,0.0018081693,0.002858822,0.008232225,0.0007528322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97121316,0.010450455,0.0019199518,0.009669677,0.00581168,0.0009350197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011968776,0.0020352285,0.0026596729,0.00357122,0.0012245872,0.0060821064,0.002294366,0.0013659761,0.036838904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04542511,0.0005102708,0.0014237163,0.004569004,0.0018797929,0.0052344003,0.0029856577,0.0018463088,0.014777241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020579882,0.00023614334,0.002861474,0.0011520485,0.00028937493,0.00010881852,0.00052059034,0.0138843255,0.0030128653,0.3483942,0.051531788,0.57780254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016601903,0.0008580066,0.004268415,0.00058421976,0.00022507638,0.00089228654,0.001011765,0.114980794,0.00737307,0.5275765,0.3417367,0.00032703605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017078553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021644968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036838904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017066353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025272535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123238444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293876277","doi":"","title":"Review of Hierarchies in distributed decision making by Christoph Schneeweiss, Springer-Verlag 1999","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Operations research; Management science; Engineering","score_opus":0.07464876199888366,"score_gpt":0.4089937494732942,"score_spread":0.33434498747441055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293876277","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016667106,0.9849747,0.0066161617,0.004839218,0.0010413475,0.0000075800604,0.000028500133,0.000011612605,0.002314173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008083286,0.97869736,0.0060984753,0.0020145953,0.002699588,0.00002823889,0.00007093259,0.000022037231,0.0022855406],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876475,0.00042482704,0.0001246009,0.00020022962,0.00042100114,0.00006460678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950412,0.0031847463,0.00017025783,0.00014696528,0.001303288,0.00015370369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003482724,0.0012066534,0.0018431277,0.0033779608,0.0006070669,0.0026593213,0.0017661916,0.0022089006,0.004835037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006384127,0.0006962758,0.0004995722,0.007941566,0.0027078306,0.0056178626,0.0013970288,0.0032663734,0.0023674436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103255086,0.00009595912,0.0003300217,0.00862044,0.00012772548,0.0001448822,0.00034695043,0.0059313304,0.0006094794,0.122534506,0.16474497,0.6964106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035351528,0.000060506936,0.00067328743,0.0034510074,0.00007881341,0.00036331735,0.00019843585,0.0024977485,0.0004372658,0.090041816,0.9021151,0.00004731712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007138039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062180324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007138039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029057858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031690309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021083057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297557019","doi":"","title":"Processing additional information in a multiple criteria decision context in the presence of information imperfections","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Computer science; Information processing; Psychology; Geography; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.12556601375891377,"score_gpt":0.38872724580211887,"score_spread":0.2631612320432051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297557019","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020006163,0.00037409196,0.9775578,0.0003109268,0.00006539688,0.00016634984,0.000040175317,0.00012305107,0.0013560115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33313957,0.0005689816,0.66428995,0.0001616277,0.00020146626,0.00037741073,0.00011028801,0.000036797832,0.0011138949],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816306,0.011077101,0.001079058,0.0013648203,0.0043129423,0.0005354672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779032,0.016038166,0.0015519505,0.0014651202,0.0026288133,0.00041275437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014875098,0.0011250708,0.0023111964,0.0019527661,0.0012917178,0.0034122763,0.0024234692,0.002496811,0.002353188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035721518,0.00079704355,0.0017305672,0.0018888328,0.002535683,0.0062851673,0.003187658,0.002860772,0.0003634582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010060787,0.00032368515,0.0025210863,0.0014444833,0.00038536912,0.0021405753,0.0029003113,0.30045253,0.010109059,0.2879796,0.0026604016,0.3880768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109735935,0.00038271613,0.0013368701,0.0001886074,0.00018568563,0.00041168858,0.00022918337,0.7555721,0.0052827215,0.233262,0.002832764,0.0002061149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002098159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020824366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014875098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001122638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020995352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298215527","doi":"","title":"Design of Balanced MBA Student Teams","year":2002,"lang":"sl","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Norm (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Metaheuristic; Population; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.2459472081228475,"score_gpt":0.4339504140081208,"score_spread":0.18800320588527328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298215527","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17065212,0.0003062341,0.81341094,0.0003095781,0.00018266885,0.0022227003,0.00019680778,0.00046957936,0.012249302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63923967,0.00016175391,0.35071087,0.00010629802,0.000060227067,0.0033526928,0.000207606,0.00009216134,0.0060686967],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622416,0.0022904982,0.00013852214,0.00051763793,0.00047913723,0.00035005587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958165,0.0011628108,0.00064187736,0.00033594476,0.0008755365,0.001167407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031889887,0.0006504736,0.0009281854,0.000872183,0.00081247,0.0015688855,0.001721585,0.00086269865,0.0065884264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007940281,0.0005746865,0.00047587813,0.0004572076,0.0004940901,0.00082444015,0.0019163961,0.00078446674,0.0018004744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043695313,0.0022269865,0.01270246,0.0007111861,0.0002885188,0.0003310963,0.001784012,0.31682602,0.027800966,0.053003047,0.0068926513,0.5730636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011925448,0.0060739648,0.0041165557,0.000119950084,0.00013911043,0.000246328,0.0012899957,0.9098081,0.014420598,0.030493947,0.032031983,0.00006700152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066550885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082292565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065884264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007996758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012733999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022040486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300705701","doi":"10.1115/imece2014-40442","title":"Fuzzy Decision Making for Conceptual Design of a Visual Servoing System Using Mechatronic Multi-Criteria Profile (MMP)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mechatronics; Visual servoing; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Conceptual design; Relevance (law); Artificial intelligence; Control engineering; Robot; Engineering; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.24814219266925008,"score_gpt":0.4635283123284509,"score_spread":0.2153861196592008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300705701","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03444341,0.00013458478,0.96284664,0.00012983046,0.0000162857,0.00018884618,0.000023403483,0.000044609948,0.002172309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75603807,0.00017570547,0.24226981,0.000047329104,0.000016391215,0.0004433048,0.000050353472,0.000013245633,0.00094590173],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777055,0.0010899802,0.00012809913,0.0001940736,0.00068579905,0.0001314378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984566,0.00089600205,0.000161894,0.00004809474,0.00036555572,0.00007194506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043082074,0.0010013598,0.00071052276,0.0009998021,0.0007421156,0.0019720306,0.00076617044,0.0011141548,0.0014773231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004954456,0.0004456216,0.001194065,0.0005526672,0.00068085536,0.0010078835,0.0008853168,0.0010196606,0.00016171872],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015120747,0.000095794036,0.00073494815,0.00028631755,0.00007195857,0.00019075771,0.000397374,0.9134284,0.0074592135,0.022141187,0.00030268918,0.054740094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022328584,0.00018499867,0.00026948482,0.00004512998,0.00002847675,0.000028470044,0.000090897236,0.98519105,0.002264336,0.011145096,0.00071196636,0.000017774246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021662773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001982652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043082074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017882158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019212625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022784233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303465671","doi":"10.13033/isahp.y2001.011","title":"A Unit Interpretation of Multi-Criteria Ratios","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISAHP proceedings","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Unit (ring theory); Scale (ratio); Computer science; Interpretation (philosophy); Level of measurement; Statistics; Mathematics; Data mining; Physics","score_opus":0.21009493508118504,"score_gpt":0.45467429760913175,"score_spread":0.2445793625279467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303465671","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015814904,0.0026576484,0.90128845,0.0018679759,0.000785126,0.00014159472,0.00023339147,0.00042589701,0.076785125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57609123,0.0007919112,0.4181938,0.000513154,0.00044448636,0.00036709858,0.00012469667,0.00017372421,0.00330003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98162454,0.010393194,0.0013231735,0.0014075589,0.0048273373,0.0004242282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980352,0.011127699,0.0021148669,0.0024016765,0.0036043671,0.00039940962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012113645,0.0013488509,0.0009819644,0.0053720665,0.001198262,0.006740848,0.0018927824,0.0012480875,0.007959675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048329096,0.0004301319,0.0013367771,0.004101004,0.005682482,0.006848852,0.0027171243,0.0024829297,0.0011048686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073654046,0.000022943426,0.0004521329,0.00032011955,0.00005459876,0.00007847771,0.000861,0.002955771,0.0009452015,0.9380129,0.0016610872,0.054562196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041266747,0.00022158895,0.0010793243,0.0003119611,0.00006439217,0.00029517576,0.0006893962,0.02253748,0.0024092789,0.9438419,0.02842861,0.00007966581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051772135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036790562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012113645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018638666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080297794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06406385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319924054","doi":"10.5267/j.uscm.2016.2.002","title":"An alternative approach based on Fuzzy PROMETHEE method for the supplier selection problem","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uncertain Supply Chain Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal solution; ELECTRE; TOPSIS; Ranking (information retrieval); Preference; Selection (genetic algorithm); Fuzzy logic; Mathematical optimization; Similarity (geometry); Computer science; Order (exchange); Computation; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Data mining; Mathematics; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Statistics; Economics","score_opus":0.1000856694894587,"score_gpt":0.40409322599334724,"score_spread":0.30400755650388855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319924054","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007945429,0.00031007396,0.9960932,0.00018027387,0.00005826172,0.000053618525,0.000019422916,0.000041036248,0.0024494145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06801625,0.001062715,0.92438924,0.00021646969,0.00014777231,0.00053280283,0.00010893066,0.00006720707,0.005458574],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954602,0.002511443,0.00020604057,0.00042512245,0.001256783,0.00014037928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808747,0.0012312444,0.00009758959,0.000113253955,0.00041010883,0.000060368362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003758953,0.0013705636,0.0015612147,0.0034087934,0.00097127666,0.002073563,0.0025195803,0.0024642504,0.008296058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005223673,0.00060600234,0.0023385286,0.0032313322,0.0010244801,0.002822837,0.0017061163,0.0022162537,0.0015567851],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017992656,0.0002696578,0.00076940167,0.0013525195,0.0003244196,0.000519085,0.00055271643,0.20918863,0.005832404,0.3293742,0.007814223,0.44382277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084789484,0.0002208583,0.0002657417,0.00015077353,0.00007303945,0.00048292967,0.00015492151,0.8550539,0.0021725586,0.113531105,0.027708206,0.00010122146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013064202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00158934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008296058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009226477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001641701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027753055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322670925","doi":"","title":"Factor Analysis and Methods of Supplier Selection","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Judgement; Variance (accounting); Analytic hierarchy process; Factor (programming language); Risk analysis (engineering); Variation (astronomy); Operations research; Machine learning; Mathematics; Business","score_opus":0.18615754575636018,"score_gpt":0.5260220398191843,"score_spread":0.3398644940628241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322670925","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009971673,0.005084028,0.9835005,0.00081351155,0.000302235,0.00044062396,0.00030756745,0.00024831723,0.008306206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05305763,0.010974124,0.92701674,0.00042635624,0.0007462425,0.0026430818,0.00063286076,0.00015069626,0.004352281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697806,0.021294262,0.0012419429,0.0022466783,0.00499333,0.0004432006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96966255,0.023869194,0.0020988306,0.0017186668,0.0024368744,0.00021379405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02181322,0.0037271597,0.0026527694,0.011015752,0.0016152199,0.0041858996,0.0020739804,0.0020560543,0.010673105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04658337,0.0009742382,0.0027948085,0.016619826,0.0041096387,0.004106098,0.0028789572,0.002847863,0.0034376937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077895806,0.00008148127,0.0019148922,0.0020490778,0.0005255781,0.00022814564,0.0011627169,0.03485677,0.00073711626,0.5108625,0.012670822,0.43483296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006387024,0.00012510958,0.0017799278,0.00089052634,0.0001254379,0.00036058528,0.00068108214,0.052674152,0.0007178697,0.8580972,0.08433918,0.00014510518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030474104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025115795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02181322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024046998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004033989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11536068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326950447","doi":"10.1115/detc2014-34586","title":"Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives in Engineering Design","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Arrow; Rationality; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Mathematical economics; Impossibility; Independence (probability theory); Mathematical proof; CLARITY; Irrationality; Transitive relation; Property (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Function (biology); Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Epistemology; Computer science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social choice theory; Mathematics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law; Combinatorics; Statistics","score_opus":0.1890909222691749,"score_gpt":0.4162373690075236,"score_spread":0.22714644673834872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326950447","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013508505,0.002610039,0.947013,0.004406485,0.0002383648,0.00014275895,0.00004495414,0.00006828217,0.03196759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60225904,0.0029172527,0.38624406,0.0014595183,0.00044918637,0.001136292,0.00008878199,0.000068639245,0.005377221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.942561,0.038535345,0.00327096,0.0040658596,0.010591232,0.000975569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93159056,0.055861067,0.0031544238,0.0048680073,0.0037084993,0.0008174668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046889987,0.0015343146,0.0019848845,0.0046964036,0.0035576595,0.0056482228,0.0018925115,0.0032572157,0.0027939887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052621044,0.0012651496,0.0028440794,0.0030657724,0.017294137,0.00932529,0.005043858,0.006815116,0.00054982683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033785793,0.000024523164,0.00030300135,0.00013211874,0.00004501613,0.000065948305,0.00028246926,0.013114587,0.00019426497,0.97164977,0.00041153867,0.01374298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001897076,0.000034411318,0.00008021063,0.000065860644,0.00001594331,0.00003711533,0.00004949968,0.012062598,0.00026393597,0.98403406,0.0033176718,0.000019692541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014068037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011497516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046889987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036985222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005064456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24798095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329341924","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1568","title":"Deflecting Arrow by Aggregating Rankings of Multiple Correlated Criteria According to Borda","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Arrow; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Social choice theory; Voting; Impossibility; Outcome (game theory); Computer science; Rank (graph theory); Schedule; Variable (mathematics); Probabilistic logic; Selection (genetic algorithm); Aggregation problem; Mathematical economics; Random variable; Econometrics; Operations research; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.1101495497017367,"score_gpt":0.4429899879139542,"score_spread":0.33284043821221754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329341924","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03899962,0.0015293036,0.9409062,0.0015522856,0.00021978059,0.000286349,0.00016908438,0.0002959192,0.016041437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7119045,0.0008410131,0.28316066,0.00035930224,0.00022981585,0.0004847045,0.00023641193,0.00008669508,0.0026968995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9425417,0.04253471,0.0020352947,0.003061774,0.0086042285,0.0012221932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9612297,0.026197117,0.0030456658,0.0053643966,0.0034208873,0.0007422598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04048054,0.001489555,0.0032337522,0.007008324,0.0019711338,0.008145142,0.0021531906,0.0018792724,0.0035011584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054414686,0.00088703126,0.0030463778,0.007434106,0.006050945,0.0071798516,0.004678133,0.0033957455,0.00046949025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027281366,0.00006379571,0.002562163,0.0005156376,0.0006680504,0.00010320697,0.0006497767,0.13204253,0.0006430389,0.7476322,0.0031218235,0.111725025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005132795,0.00020451368,0.0015381989,0.00016155222,0.00017645136,0.00006184793,0.0002383183,0.3127383,0.000784822,0.6780979,0.0058368333,0.00010997537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033801445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003098483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04048054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005155933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003217894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21408409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329809230","doi":"10.1061/40972(311)118","title":"Assessment of Soil Vulnerability to Heavy-Metal Contamination Using Hierarchical Fuzzy Inference System","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GeoCongress 2008","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Brownfield; Environmental remediation; Environmental science; Vulnerability (computing); Fuzzy inference system; Contamination; Fuzzy logic; Topsoil; Work (physics); Identification (biology); Computer science; Environmental planning; Risk analysis (engineering); Civil engineering; Engineering; Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system; Business; Fuzzy control system; Computer security; Soil water; Ecology","score_opus":0.17755811357924345,"score_gpt":0.44781507377703805,"score_spread":0.2702569601977946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329809230","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43448055,0.00021398468,0.56083834,0.00011898234,0.000016190263,0.00014529069,0.00023470227,0.00048396824,0.0034679156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407442,0.00006849321,0.058609385,0.000011876926,0.000004851297,0.000054314358,0.00008822508,0.000003540326,0.00041501084],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995454,0.00015184532,0.000041592484,0.00006553433,0.00014153069,0.00005403178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991357,0.0005914321,0.00007003244,0.00001979565,0.00015568614,0.000027476515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011818835,0.00041327652,0.0005128674,0.00095490366,0.00047634786,0.0008025385,0.000492728,0.0005627791,0.0012041052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023908482,0.00020434319,0.0006143891,0.00051387714,0.00022689492,0.00054743467,0.00037339033,0.00025411398,0.00011927024],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050567667,0.00015456353,0.015190858,0.00026753775,0.00019944977,0.000315787,0.00041476695,0.84796,0.012700018,0.0038968932,0.00059308513,0.11780132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012383083,0.00006583543,0.0015352701,0.000008288956,0.000030992345,0.0000138401865,0.00004007702,0.99604994,0.0011973595,0.0009373044,0.000099196965,0.0000095605765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017129008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013993011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017129008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010423576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009475793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03405863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332048266","doi":"10.3166/jesa.44.463-477","title":"Pertinence des possibilités pour la fusion de données dans un modèle d'analyse multicritère hiérarchique. Application à la reconnaissance de zone prioritaire en ingénierie de l'environnement","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05483141917269992,"score_gpt":0.339529242252336,"score_spread":0.2846978230796361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332048266","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076753214,0.0010808248,0.91856277,0.00053042936,0.000040541156,0.000104217586,0.00015185885,0.0003065171,0.0024697387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78324544,0.0007240503,0.21362916,0.000056077963,0.000039429895,0.0002490554,0.00017170185,0.00006841066,0.0018166731],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99167293,0.0029261755,0.0006294274,0.001147648,0.0032553724,0.00036853124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97208065,0.022738898,0.0014327471,0.0008700649,0.0025507377,0.00032681072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014499354,0.0017636906,0.0017460771,0.005067066,0.0015187401,0.0062523684,0.0019139623,0.0027610562,0.003163957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04366465,0.0014313298,0.0031892676,0.0031881686,0.0024499027,0.006155678,0.0039590797,0.002171838,0.0003433139],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083639147,0.00020177134,0.0071849716,0.0008651366,0.0004973883,0.0005924844,0.0016137329,0.7963149,0.015128586,0.045161862,0.00055408094,0.13104868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021584481,0.00017061438,0.0018546839,0.00010966741,0.00012311614,0.00020599502,0.00016949425,0.97415763,0.0050349445,0.017279495,0.0008151458,0.00005773002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008124286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005710487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014499354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025477854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017625953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07668084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338059998","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4471-6778-5_1","title":"A Multicriteria Multistep Approach for Evaluating Supplier Quality in Large Data Sets","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer series in reliability engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Outsourcing; Purchasing; Procurement; Business; Quality (philosophy); Industrial organization; Supplier relationship management; Process management; Purchasing decision; Operations management; Operations research; Marketing; Supply chain; Supply chain management; Engineering","score_opus":0.360504467377929,"score_gpt":0.4772084031996464,"score_spread":0.1167039358217174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338059998","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044387183,0.00009593026,0.9947707,0.000043855325,0.00001363468,0.0000882422,0.000049924503,0.00013149869,0.0003674624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0972708,0.00014101056,0.900189,0.00007623064,0.0000515761,0.000608309,0.00023511433,0.00008400707,0.0013439823],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426126,0.0036581634,0.00034989914,0.00067263236,0.0008448068,0.00021316572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835212,0.014238882,0.0004899674,0.00047544664,0.001101464,0.00017295209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008878964,0.0015322056,0.0024776326,0.0028366675,0.0009651262,0.0019266272,0.0027352013,0.0018739998,0.003334675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01541354,0.0013177897,0.003174383,0.0028638737,0.0009670735,0.0018374546,0.0028941748,0.002362028,0.00061314047],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001884605,0.00025893585,0.002279597,0.0002841189,0.0005747334,0.0001941877,0.0002264893,0.79333764,0.0027441338,0.014258466,0.0012598704,0.18439336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008126081,0.00005621484,0.00022749366,0.0000089194955,0.000023558061,0.000019005098,0.00002080731,0.99369484,0.00034547076,0.0053677782,0.00021475455,0.000012963553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072531505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011209583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008878964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011232786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021366735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046957016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338203239","doi":"10.3233/ifs-162134","title":"A note on “Ranking generalized exponential trapezoidal fuzzy numbers based on variance”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy number; Mathematics; Ranking (information retrieval); Fuzzy mathematics; Exponential function; Fuzzy logic; Variance (accounting); Applied mathematics; Statistics; Fuzzy set; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.11810132892926754,"score_gpt":0.39031801354291307,"score_spread":0.2722166846136455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338203239","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009513042,0.005958983,0.9575192,0.002284596,0.0054685753,0.000106643274,0.00021288388,0.0003269639,0.018609151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26448694,0.0055303667,0.70655864,0.0027226573,0.0049602827,0.00020783154,0.0005574039,0.00020947318,0.014766468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956672,0.0017001429,0.0002681935,0.00051407795,0.0016671367,0.00018310988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689984,0.0013097783,0.00016161906,0.00031377503,0.0012212656,0.00009368891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036709602,0.00075630704,0.001008663,0.00165635,0.00089780585,0.0019494263,0.00081294664,0.0007114273,0.0031626776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00762024,0.0002278288,0.001275167,0.0021142452,0.0018087237,0.0018366624,0.0009973894,0.0020103748,0.0008121205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005610304,0.00008961952,0.0019312338,0.00095241086,0.00033652625,0.0007866252,0.0006002428,0.030607684,0.02065447,0.49250552,0.068236545,0.3827381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009241022,0.0010155184,0.0061201327,0.0004063352,0.00028227118,0.00096263643,0.0003906093,0.14230002,0.018610988,0.5936831,0.23574026,0.00039580907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001999456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027889435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036709602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008981417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010650905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019414127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338465037","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2016.2.003","title":"Integration of MACBETH and COPRAS methods to select air compressor for a textile company","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Gas compressor; Textile; Analytic hierarchy process; Operations research; Rank (graph theory); Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Spinning; Air compressor; Process (computing); Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.19196844601964744,"score_gpt":0.5186438174194843,"score_spread":0.3266753713998368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338465037","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015805256,0.00115208,0.9749835,0.00024608514,0.00009005031,0.00044721866,0.00005778855,0.00011864114,0.0070993607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2638758,0.0014080171,0.7311127,0.00014578647,0.00009837369,0.00078496535,0.0000869342,0.000050879895,0.002436626],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911109,0.0050116666,0.00043083637,0.00046924682,0.0027290243,0.00024831502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99363434,0.0041064583,0.0006032121,0.00018085286,0.0013726249,0.00010246779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060485797,0.0015890555,0.001605693,0.005814177,0.000874015,0.002267991,0.0010112451,0.0009260671,0.0026634904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011854857,0.0005494627,0.0015270124,0.0038074523,0.0010714546,0.0013786842,0.0014239197,0.0012678119,0.0003200019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003245163,0.00043007397,0.0029977295,0.0015521286,0.00043789734,0.00050131977,0.00091067766,0.46870142,0.006207775,0.10942336,0.0037933683,0.4047197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038465834,0.00031411953,0.0013823792,0.00013177848,0.00010043148,0.00016955484,0.00021899799,0.9690308,0.00207597,0.020397048,0.0060739974,0.0000664469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050009317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00645531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060485797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017013695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022655819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031988323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338759220","doi":"10.6000/2371-1647.2016.02.02","title":"Multicriteria Model for the Choice of Best Battery Provider","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advances in Management Sciences & Information Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"ELECTRE; Order (exchange); Operations research; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Decision maker; Analytic hierarchy process; Decision model; Process (computing); Battery (electricity); Fuzzy logic; Decision-making models; Management science; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Business; Economics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.16136908221321702,"score_gpt":0.4469880630565602,"score_spread":0.28561898084334314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338759220","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06938202,0.0009862335,0.8974644,0.002006214,0.00015325882,0.0004084424,0.00055677834,0.00017749281,0.028865138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84352857,0.0009775666,0.12741315,0.00027774269,0.000097127675,0.0005930519,0.0003700844,0.0000562474,0.026686428],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970042,0.001586401,0.00011913768,0.0004661894,0.0004091511,0.00041490878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963797,0.0023706658,0.00049047795,0.00012615517,0.00042878377,0.00020431864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005478534,0.0012536108,0.0018935439,0.001798024,0.0008777509,0.0038833346,0.0026427398,0.0026740015,0.00966702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070562945,0.00083812716,0.001676572,0.0018666418,0.001628455,0.0020557793,0.0016959227,0.0026487894,0.0015360957],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014491216,0.00006629844,0.00075105525,0.000072673,0.00009182777,0.0002560281,0.00020822762,0.8868067,0.00048551185,0.1032381,0.00081136514,0.007067225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024305496,0.000040798488,0.0001338831,0.000014803652,0.000018170052,0.00003563615,0.00004199221,0.98273426,0.00007818342,0.01608908,0.00077201874,0.000016864755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010141774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007155532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010141774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033362568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020751345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032339394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340412044","doi":"10.1515/jisys-2015-0108","title":"A New Method for Solving Single- and Multi-Objective Capacitated Solid Minimum Cost Flow Problems under Uncertainty","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy logic; Confusion; Fuzzy set operations; Fuzzy set; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy number; Mathematics; Computer science; Object (grammar); Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Defuzzification; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.35071404994243155,"score_gpt":0.463409400171676,"score_spread":0.11269535022924443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340412044","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050144675,0.00011682933,0.99335396,0.000049248116,0.000021907912,0.000040314724,0.00001631365,0.00006027386,0.0013266195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3431171,0.00030672693,0.6529511,0.00007381088,0.000075570184,0.00042012316,0.00015053627,0.000059573664,0.0028454189],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995117,0.00012720852,0.000031493706,0.000074761774,0.0001956355,0.000059154525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993857,0.00033479897,0.000047192145,0.000025448713,0.00017582635,0.000031049287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001209626,0.0009285432,0.0012683844,0.0012198037,0.00057618046,0.0008541503,0.001297324,0.0010647303,0.002848242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018377221,0.00053037,0.0009790885,0.001012046,0.00049306115,0.00096562563,0.0009421679,0.0008950292,0.00022183795],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005826237,0.000045036955,0.0003386319,0.00018612477,0.00004173596,0.00008599426,0.00009087673,0.89006245,0.0021352237,0.015514799,0.0009862371,0.09045464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005846344,0.000015143134,0.000035503468,0.0000062846416,0.0000044546596,0.000011343814,0.0000061764777,0.9973429,0.00019237377,0.0019401234,0.00043612163,0.000003764657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004854837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039400943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004854837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006455766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013139053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009653151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340938217","doi":"10.3138/infor.53.2.68","title":"A Synthesis of Information Imperfection Representations for Decision Aid","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFOR Information Systems and Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Wilfrid Laurier University; Université Laval; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Rotation formalisms in three dimensions; Representation (politics); Computer science; Fuzzy set; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy logic; Quality (philosophy); Possibility theory; Decision theory; Process (computing); Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Epistemology; Programming language","score_opus":0.3133133209081262,"score_gpt":0.51133571328008,"score_spread":0.1980223923719538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340938217","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068523507,0.010755118,0.94799566,0.0035965624,0.00040621063,0.00020961034,0.0003960156,0.00025799457,0.029530508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27544788,0.015089778,0.7014653,0.000613693,0.00047975546,0.0007708457,0.0007301855,0.00010831844,0.00529422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699366,0.0014972263,0.0003740138,0.0002267203,0.0007528849,0.00015549437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942292,0.003917454,0.00043243097,0.00048471123,0.00080526905,0.00013086777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051330035,0.0013987261,0.0013488118,0.0038171497,0.0009851247,0.008325162,0.0017187339,0.0019081396,0.00803665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01670132,0.0004917083,0.0013966004,0.0041692783,0.0018631819,0.008848935,0.0027689664,0.0022363374,0.0011828042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044449444,0.000032534244,0.0001881603,0.00069193804,0.00004359853,0.00018314926,0.0006186026,0.024687028,0.00040549706,0.90673256,0.002548228,0.06382428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012780888,0.0000690238,0.00017943462,0.0009496971,0.00008261312,0.000170919,0.00061252824,0.13309526,0.0007005413,0.83480924,0.029266326,0.00005166465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012129563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092486833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008325162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020672057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023300527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02714622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342702586","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2015-0154","title":"Risk identification and assessment for engineering procurement construction management projects using fuzzy set theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk management; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy logic; Procurement; Set (abstract data type); Engineering; Computer science; Remedial education; Remedial action; Operations research; Mathematics; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07816769146154005,"score_gpt":0.3442681336861668,"score_spread":0.26610044222462675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342702586","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019452091,0.00021626889,0.9776754,0.00012826284,0.000009673558,0.00008884651,0.000020422985,0.000041012077,0.0023680849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6174497,0.0005558069,0.37992853,0.00003552626,0.000026255222,0.0003279214,0.00005761567,0.000018684497,0.0015999943],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962381,0.0018513596,0.00016268884,0.00017339918,0.001422947,0.0001514041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995956,0.0029467645,0.00034434002,0.000105068866,0.00057292613,0.00007483834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00542639,0.0008637568,0.0007784995,0.003399217,0.000822335,0.0020078945,0.00093891803,0.0008241648,0.001117105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007981154,0.00042680738,0.0011814535,0.0014231679,0.0010206457,0.0019960848,0.0013217435,0.0009377875,0.00012657073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011417956,0.00010497328,0.0031255495,0.00027007944,0.00009017964,0.0001691365,0.00071978295,0.77456886,0.0036541834,0.08468698,0.00072840054,0.1317676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012123492,0.000076772994,0.00078871765,0.00005448321,0.000021739801,0.00006058804,0.00025721264,0.9487084,0.0013069587,0.047643956,0.0010326051,0.00003644455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041013993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033125721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00542639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002540728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022310142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028697848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343846868","doi":"10.1109/tfuzz.2015.2500273","title":"On Pythagorean and Complex Fuzzy Set Operations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":175,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Office of Naval Research; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pythagorean theorem; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set operations; Mathematics; Generalization; Fuzzy number; Fuzzy set; Distributive property; Algebra over a field; Fuzzy classification; Defuzzification; Negation; Artificial intelligence; Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Computer science; Theoretical computer science; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.31816313744138586,"score_gpt":0.41844866978440426,"score_spread":0.1002855323430184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343846868","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1860704,0.012828993,0.62731385,0.007578526,0.0008196989,0.00014932305,0.00036818098,0.00012841173,0.16474262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82543683,0.0045939535,0.15704818,0.0008110132,0.00090239255,0.0002651576,0.00015470563,0.000040671574,0.010747023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781656,0.0008580944,0.00014639378,0.00037523874,0.00063068,0.00017303313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798834,0.0010812632,0.00029546185,0.00019686244,0.00027285106,0.00016523406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00296252,0.000617886,0.0007300413,0.002370831,0.0018982792,0.0037837874,0.00081088324,0.0009895227,0.0025964787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053744414,0.00030588536,0.0009494333,0.0023396148,0.010961733,0.008579359,0.0035040746,0.002702497,0.00041631723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009930145,0.0000055096334,0.000072012124,0.00001816679,0.0000027076767,0.000063152336,0.00021434769,0.0008880416,0.000188377,0.9950781,0.00022465845,0.0032350586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007400173,0.000015737054,0.00014922959,0.000026431124,0.000002967725,0.00011848568,0.00014895418,0.005365563,0.00016161532,0.9867916,0.0071988264,0.0000132126825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016097234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087205175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037837874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021738985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095060136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01577282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345960756","doi":"10.1016/j.ins.2016.04.030","title":"Multiobjective and multiattribute decision making in a fuzzy environment and their power engineering applications","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais","keywords":"Generalization; Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy logic; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Fuzzy set; Preference; Multi-objective optimization; Set (abstract data type); Stochastic game; Mathematics; Operations research; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.05008706050285229,"score_gpt":0.34644579308378726,"score_spread":0.296358732580935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345960756","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089086354,0.003396632,0.8936645,0.0009978502,0.00014876242,0.000075507916,0.00012879362,0.00004385038,0.0124577265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7239176,0.002473662,0.26823008,0.00010859114,0.00017195752,0.0001662033,0.00007315663,0.00002201325,0.004836654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975084,0.0012840687,0.00013200527,0.00022053534,0.00073126785,0.00012367927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893629,0.008984883,0.0006769212,0.00020358333,0.00056610233,0.00020562357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006238636,0.0007927276,0.0012044143,0.0022282328,0.0008935022,0.0030691847,0.0009790019,0.0013167966,0.0022664021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015372369,0.00042653183,0.0011759138,0.0034466886,0.0021949771,0.00412149,0.0010522453,0.0014971658,0.0001594965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012254143,0.00015373716,0.0020865675,0.00039111444,0.00018740569,0.0004206948,0.00068428926,0.2819078,0.0011924922,0.6405261,0.0011101759,0.07121707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012428141,0.00006583358,0.001050315,0.00007491484,0.000037380356,0.00012149376,0.0003046234,0.43701217,0.00047944876,0.5591249,0.0016768337,0.00003971835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015985697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018295428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006238636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015327439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067807996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032993495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2366265013","doi":"","title":"The Optimality Conditions and the Maximum Entropy Method for the Generalized Multiobjective Minmax Problem","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CAE (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Principle of maximum entropy; Entropy (arrow of time); Entropy maximization; Point (geometry); Limit (mathematics); Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Statistics","score_opus":0.11718198270180322,"score_gpt":0.46617263446322255,"score_spread":0.3489906517614193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2366265013","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010011614,0.000686122,0.982453,0.00029259495,0.00006154344,0.00006301468,0.00006764255,0.000037941933,0.006326467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5132265,0.0024585454,0.4749527,0.00030468515,0.0004886786,0.0006736728,0.000453,0.00019265887,0.0072495346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862254,0.0006202157,0.00007469,0.00019169443,0.0003834764,0.00010751853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740547,0.0018620536,0.00019654662,0.000088425906,0.00037680974,0.00007074079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003444632,0.0010212901,0.0012046793,0.0011929264,0.000557044,0.0013410948,0.00086666946,0.0011498202,0.004026253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009003246,0.00042941739,0.0009658966,0.00071106193,0.0017899248,0.0025492848,0.0016044198,0.0022719316,0.0005130686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014643781,0.000058621987,0.000541896,0.0005556918,0.00007131972,0.0002348769,0.00021120465,0.3427436,0.0070615485,0.5899597,0.002997787,0.055417296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002144004,0.00009306932,0.0003345995,0.00009501,0.000021169513,0.000107973945,0.000038000933,0.8101326,0.0026228323,0.18362048,0.0028809626,0.00003188293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008481757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006033392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004026253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009883653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010967959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018217146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W238643563","doi":"","title":"About Business Decision Making by A Consistency-Driven Pairwise Comparisons Method","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Computer Science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Consistency (knowledge bases); Computer science; Brainstorming; Reliability (semiconductor); Delphi method; Data mining; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08291203717107162,"score_gpt":0.41959060370120055,"score_spread":0.33667856653012895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W238643563","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001652264,0.00012359541,0.99467456,0.00040590492,0.00007454052,0.0006141628,0.00006947457,0.00007214573,0.0023133135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023001116,0.00014206544,0.9749093,0.0001230227,0.00006399167,0.0013165768,0.00009337508,0.00003659607,0.00031402637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7860344,0.17994937,0.0084677385,0.007914321,0.01636577,0.0012684014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77984285,0.191104,0.006638326,0.0084040435,0.012999314,0.0010115026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13202415,0.0027714611,0.003133486,0.0072655836,0.003110213,0.008614668,0.005635647,0.003603466,0.011640123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19858411,0.0014494723,0.0054020733,0.009339411,0.007376819,0.009389694,0.0058165835,0.007421727,0.0018219721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035528056,0.00033240346,0.0017948109,0.0023283786,0.0010538669,0.00033912394,0.0050589857,0.08011517,0.0014838651,0.6089089,0.004256899,0.29397228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016849345,0.0003101665,0.000544864,0.0005662578,0.00018198135,0.00020602634,0.0011619055,0.14487375,0.0013754016,0.8356575,0.014801203,0.00015253882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018904444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019079009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13202415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050144177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008936877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6982188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2396310064","doi":"10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.038","title":"Type-2 fuzzy multi-objective DEA model: An application to sustainable supplier evaluation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Data envelopment analysis; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Supplier evaluation; Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy set; Operations research; Supply chain management; Supply chain; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Business","score_opus":0.11221715860242036,"score_gpt":0.4228131959430572,"score_spread":0.31059603734063684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2396310064","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06933259,0.00064940384,0.914843,0.00037522148,0.000105547704,0.00018723405,0.0003194469,0.00017078381,0.014016759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7824326,0.0006780206,0.2068714,0.00009578302,0.00004276322,0.00043689256,0.00019469552,0.00005133207,0.009196586],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993839,0.000342991,0.000027688991,0.00006935242,0.00013135749,0.000044716606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887305,0.00077067607,0.00007788746,0.000030512923,0.0002079413,0.00003993215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001948991,0.0010430203,0.0013866712,0.0008967248,0.00068084954,0.0019964324,0.0013995956,0.0018070594,0.0035398516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024653045,0.0004045798,0.0011767409,0.0015850208,0.00036277418,0.0011507515,0.0007046427,0.0012341671,0.00034008516],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055430562,0.00005863412,0.00029922128,0.00006778275,0.00005984368,0.00008003236,0.0000337478,0.97995275,0.00054676813,0.0068491492,0.00028279953,0.011713909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004468087,0.000018595098,0.000077667784,0.000004951002,0.000007422305,0.000008124735,0.000007399145,0.99816775,0.0001098967,0.0014319023,0.00015589499,0.000005927914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076474734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008977883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076474734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014303316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001084218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01520592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398076896","doi":"10.1080/03155986.2004.11732690","title":"Screening Alternatives In Multiple Criteria Subset Selection","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFOR Information Systems and Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Knapsack problem; Selection (genetic algorithm); Mathematical optimization; Class (philosophy); Extension (predicate logic); Continuous knapsack problem; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Mathematics; Relation (database); Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Data mining","score_opus":0.38303774514768574,"score_gpt":0.5150064264165563,"score_spread":0.1319686812688705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398076896","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007967034,0.0010433933,0.987599,0.00017556056,0.000034049357,0.00018814862,0.00003733753,0.000084327636,0.0028710838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16980568,0.0017600654,0.8244661,0.00013575474,0.00009954579,0.0009507721,0.00015079783,0.000051678067,0.002579618],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879288,0.008827122,0.00029341455,0.00044822326,0.0022924116,0.00021015617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98473996,0.013028581,0.0006310851,0.0004209162,0.0010212712,0.00015814643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007143259,0.0016425881,0.0017586037,0.0042228363,0.00084929017,0.0015388583,0.0010707644,0.0011853306,0.003231417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02099963,0.00066313555,0.0012574088,0.004792551,0.0018347445,0.0019403389,0.0016015086,0.0013824978,0.0004963254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027950393,0.00021530075,0.0014577184,0.0011750056,0.00020324458,0.00048308232,0.00070574804,0.39233676,0.0049872776,0.13996208,0.0029761344,0.45521814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009094704,0.00039352625,0.0005752181,0.0003183146,0.00008935057,0.00023858107,0.00016352569,0.83318704,0.0046349275,0.1520183,0.008228583,0.00006168063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001082477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001468168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007143259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085912086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013838486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037777603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398526858","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2016.05.027","title":"A hybrid intelligent fuzzy predictive model with simulation for supplier evaluation and selection","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system; Artificial neural network; Data mining; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Neuro-fuzzy; Fuzzy logic; Selection (genetic algorithm); Parametric statistics; Supplier evaluation; Perceptron; Process (computing); Sensitivity (control systems); Supply chain management; Supply chain; Fuzzy control system; Engineering","score_opus":0.13728538443372967,"score_gpt":0.4290438737337837,"score_spread":0.29175848930005405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398526858","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045015063,0.00028466378,0.945351,0.00020535383,0.00006794116,0.00007358244,0.00014782339,0.0006230254,0.008231509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91378355,0.00025457513,0.081922695,0.00008104115,0.00003333941,0.00022786869,0.00016622666,0.000054077434,0.003476681],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995962,0.00015472113,0.000022798373,0.000068003545,0.000118510405,0.00003979559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992687,0.00047016842,0.000059155143,0.000041673193,0.00013114858,0.000029034094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009178608,0.0006480088,0.001361127,0.0010331401,0.00072631385,0.0013892342,0.0017536074,0.0019299173,0.0031191823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021341264,0.00064310647,0.0009723345,0.0013562475,0.00047588244,0.0014343371,0.0007747761,0.0007967557,0.0004849119],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029579787,0.000024287669,0.00016689861,0.000014773985,0.00001607552,0.000029210063,0.000014325638,0.9913071,0.00021437994,0.0020276404,0.0001479259,0.0060078404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025779857,0.000004557905,0.00001910834,0.0000011696919,0.0000028808124,0.0000025938155,0.0000011256951,0.99950755,0.000049471793,0.00035928396,0.000048089012,0.0000017476959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017082507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009072948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017082507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010965457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012666453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033966184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404307579","doi":"","title":"The Development of an AI Journal Ranking List Based on the Revealed Preference Approach.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Information retrieval; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14688502714850607,"score_gpt":0.3729769606911954,"score_spread":0.22609193354268933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404307579","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16387978,0.001692781,0.79373527,0.0016605112,0.00047287124,0.0038661729,0.0047021043,0.0016646219,0.028325876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2521559,0.00046798564,0.7406354,0.00011094833,0.000102795835,0.0012219911,0.002505679,0.0000607811,0.0027385494],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99173766,0.0034770889,0.0006076114,0.00032281753,0.003606691,0.00024820014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776808,0.0069634705,0.001961564,0.0009024812,0.011860312,0.0006313883],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008261121,0.00084407034,0.0008414449,0.01687105,0.0015059025,0.003758039,0.00094949745,0.0005892832,0.0036131472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031702988,0.00038037574,0.00096439826,0.010474872,0.0003653611,0.0029142948,0.0010357295,0.00082287943,0.0019053174],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000402999,0.0006745958,0.04774342,0.0015148574,0.0005322952,0.00030105456,0.0012123714,0.013647682,0.009684641,0.021814821,0.022244861,0.8802263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005309456,0.004202121,0.12930919,0.00085919356,0.0011782133,0.0016820525,0.006470154,0.6409838,0.042968933,0.06698358,0.103723235,0.001108619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049096993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011108679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99173886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018125777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049151257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04368949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406779531","doi":"10.1145/2897683.2897685","title":"An empirical investigation of the evaluators' scoring of vendors' responses to an RFP of a large healthcare system","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Diversity (politics); Computer science; Empirical research; Empirical evidence; Request for proposal; Health care; Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Marketing; Business; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.30013067794977033,"score_gpt":0.5235592150727814,"score_spread":0.22342853712301103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2406779531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99415815,0.000081611644,0.0035563803,0.00013578488,0.000013538074,0.00013270382,0.00006726142,0.000009841995,0.0018447426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953336,0.000043490276,0.004017589,0.000072889976,0.00001680702,0.00014410912,0.00009996837,0.000008673114,0.00026279423],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8334476,0.13377301,0.009117039,0.0068132123,0.014747709,0.002101395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2897847,0.61833745,0.039543774,0.015724659,0.033948414,0.002661034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.106217265,0.00054138683,0.0005055811,0.002872711,0.0017420779,0.002086814,0.0012964631,0.0012676156,0.0015834107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36487618,0.00037238892,0.0005988588,0.0029140234,0.0024440575,0.0022782115,0.0018391616,0.0013111806,0.00048369044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018036533,0.00226131,0.8158982,0.0011744405,0.0006480739,0.0005388508,0.071971744,0.0040196693,0.0045153713,0.0015624226,0.002184201,0.09342208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027393881,0.005850416,0.8603083,0.0005610074,0.00022934965,0.00093299174,0.08643614,0.027795028,0.008390078,0.0025060833,0.0064623645,0.0002542078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017467039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031666695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106217265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018850644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014822453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5617373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2409900688","doi":"10.1007/s11518-015-5282-0","title":"Option prioritization for unknown preference","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Centre for International Governance Innovation; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Prioritization; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Operations research; Graph; Management science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Microeconomics; Economics; Theoretical computer science","score_opus":0.3475162782607092,"score_gpt":0.4047256789177087,"score_spread":0.05720940065699953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2409900688","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067344815,0.0008081362,0.92012465,0.0007967013,0.00012193018,0.00029686803,0.00021215917,0.00018869917,0.0101060765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66519904,0.00044727026,0.32847843,0.00019277284,0.0001619077,0.00036815653,0.0002661798,0.00009808152,0.004788183],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99047405,0.005516336,0.00048086466,0.0007915086,0.002075099,0.0006620698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97376275,0.022521565,0.0006720538,0.0009881642,0.0014339266,0.0006215162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013194909,0.0014058321,0.0026793939,0.0038581444,0.0009961919,0.0037755428,0.0025543459,0.0018189083,0.0075034043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032176275,0.0009874819,0.0019524039,0.0033794874,0.0013183779,0.0052136173,0.0025144694,0.0030401496,0.00050642376],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015107008,0.0007558501,0.0032406452,0.0015967095,0.00078565924,0.00056905666,0.00072643725,0.3217719,0.0040693865,0.3270953,0.005993379,0.33188498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010251853,0.00020290891,0.00060922466,0.00010099952,0.00011417676,0.00012122774,0.00010893908,0.7843851,0.000854412,0.2120833,0.0012703831,0.00004686761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018987176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018288192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013194909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020908655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019120615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06978214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2410612669","doi":"10.4315/0362-028x-71.11.2323","title":"Choices, Choices: The Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to a Food Safety Decision-Making Problem","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Food Protection","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; Public Health Agency of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Risk analysis (engineering); Psychological intervention; Stakeholder; Food safety; Intervention (counseling); Process (computing); Computer science; Management science; Balance (ability); Decision analysis; Process management; Operations research; Business; Economics; Public relations; Psychology; Engineering; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.12516317914873565,"score_gpt":0.39923762975122973,"score_spread":0.2740744506024941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2410612669","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08239706,0.0022695183,0.9014071,0.0030879667,0.0002849103,0.0008370218,0.00022007826,0.000080753445,0.009415688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60601676,0.0013573508,0.38920245,0.00029055096,0.00015512265,0.0008760473,0.00012208389,0.00005172552,0.0019279696],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98269546,0.014252627,0.00049258344,0.00073461875,0.0013789348,0.00044575834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9430778,0.054104928,0.0008711464,0.00036017768,0.00084482203,0.0007411035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0168916,0.0024446948,0.0031083168,0.0035309603,0.0021209205,0.0044112774,0.002148248,0.00386881,0.003894111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039844368,0.0012139555,0.0029928603,0.0038203495,0.0038289297,0.0035626802,0.0033686468,0.0044506844,0.00024039565],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068842893,0.00059260236,0.002745436,0.00094200386,0.0006041244,0.00068772386,0.0011721654,0.775928,0.0006864641,0.14323995,0.0021611443,0.070551954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012771995,0.00027783166,0.0004834996,0.00013127149,0.00011530363,0.00010476691,0.0003537224,0.8281402,0.00023720422,0.16852823,0.0014242233,0.00007602195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067416327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058805025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0168916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003097078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004240979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0893324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412692381","doi":"10.1016/j.dss.2016.06.003","title":"A new dynamic integrated framework for surgical patients' prioritization considering risks and uncertainties","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Support Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Regret; Prioritization; Analytic hierarchy process; Process (computing); Fuzzy logic; Hierarchy; Computer science; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations management; Management science; Medicine; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.13830822048098548,"score_gpt":0.4252479379827924,"score_spread":0.2869397175018069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412692381","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00403393,0.00016322147,0.9914227,0.0005155073,0.00005783716,0.00007769055,0.00014084009,0.00016929347,0.0034188556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27563965,0.00040707912,0.7193582,0.00025695885,0.00013236812,0.00045578263,0.0005146495,0.0000698293,0.0031655456],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966215,0.0011587649,0.0002603898,0.0005502845,0.0011020094,0.0003069833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807894,0.0007530772,0.00021760992,0.00011115169,0.00062853826,0.00021061368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045800605,0.0013514014,0.0015718985,0.0024978635,0.0008913913,0.004766594,0.0028499814,0.0018090784,0.0039952868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052641598,0.00066171575,0.0014808077,0.0025997865,0.00095021154,0.0034922613,0.0030479738,0.0015916289,0.00050515216],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008382464,0.0001421201,0.0009842621,0.00016349283,0.00022053534,0.00024877407,0.00025942503,0.76509124,0.0012788333,0.1522729,0.0030998385,0.07615478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001914616,0.000034985147,0.00016696403,0.000028756214,0.000050153307,0.00004167176,0.000051546165,0.9533052,0.00020093146,0.043226056,0.0028526639,0.000021981434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01066717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013151883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01066717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002846915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054850955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024222016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2428516962","doi":"10.5539/mas.v10n10p37","title":"Identifying and Ranking Factors Influencing on Investor Attraction in Golestan Province by Means of Fuzzy Multi-Index Decision-Making (FAHP)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Ranking (information retrieval); Business; Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Obstacle; Fuzzy logic; Marketing; Computer science; Industrial organization; Finance; Operations research; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10307890495361184,"score_gpt":0.38587072768187364,"score_spread":0.2827918227282618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2428516962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927527,0.0001547408,0.0043692817,0.0002684735,0.000009695625,0.000109652035,0.00014696983,0.0000142830495,0.0021742797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921544,0.00015714599,0.0068320273,0.000020565372,0.000005831914,0.000044450913,0.00015189975,0.0000016437939,0.00063211477],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999092,0.00032474715,0.000070508926,0.00006309534,0.00023191218,0.00021783059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853563,0.00076490856,0.00023939437,0.000023083636,0.00033061544,0.00010648104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019751808,0.00038449455,0.0004943454,0.0025193612,0.00089692266,0.0017603792,0.00036421974,0.00042947286,0.0015410087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002482448,0.00018917822,0.00071812246,0.0017935195,0.00043186406,0.0003804133,0.0006190756,0.00034737313,0.000076644625],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074681855,0.00063976226,0.72072524,0.00085858133,0.0003938418,0.0022631348,0.0037940303,0.10581349,0.005466291,0.004637175,0.0022900435,0.15237167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092160866,0.0011893875,0.5386915,0.0004436715,0.0004031593,0.00046760007,0.030016381,0.4126768,0.004971841,0.005984724,0.004900846,0.00016186324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037110858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056274116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037110858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002185957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029990845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073789716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2438776784","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2016.3.002","title":"A comparative study for the agricultural tractor selection problem","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tractor; Selection (genetic algorithm); Agriculture; Agricultural engineering; Engineering; Operations research; Business; Computer science; Geography; Artificial intelligence; Automotive engineering","score_opus":0.21439670759491997,"score_gpt":0.46172489514205584,"score_spread":0.24732818754713587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2438776784","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14426373,0.021904154,0.58702016,0.0039033864,0.0007747091,0.00072308164,0.0005473043,0.00015707823,0.24070635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68667823,0.014630693,0.25581497,0.00055317784,0.0007832271,0.0005259747,0.0011534814,0.0001756066,0.039684664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.996073,0.0025577962,0.00012571263,0.00031398004,0.0006401864,0.00028931044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878321,0.01018254,0.00033868366,0.00029389828,0.0009501799,0.00040260993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046256543,0.0010629623,0.0012355108,0.003493521,0.0015872356,0.0031901984,0.0013458796,0.0022312817,0.02033675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018670786,0.0002759847,0.00223746,0.004710232,0.0009525493,0.0038924576,0.0016357974,0.0015609768,0.0009848014],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009708418,0.0008933712,0.0059160655,0.0020430817,0.00033719302,0.0011208763,0.0008389773,0.30684626,0.0018489953,0.3663818,0.020844221,0.29195836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008747041,0.0012181989,0.0046581174,0.00046899775,0.0002015298,0.0010689727,0.0016315883,0.8126173,0.00090570655,0.13730446,0.039757773,0.0000798284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004712282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043924404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02033675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025467372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014480347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06803322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463846279","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v8n7p304","title":"Performance Assessment of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REIT) Listed in BIST Via Different Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Real estate investment trust; Real estate; Ranking (information retrieval); Order (exchange); Business; Preference; Finance; Investment (military); Actuarial science; Accounting; Economics; Computer science; Operations research; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.13771021400656547,"score_gpt":0.47676876554326686,"score_spread":0.3390585515367014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463846279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929357,0.00021328838,0.0036306723,0.00010457177,0.000007358824,0.000061842205,0.00037257408,0.0000088188235,0.0026651032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953192,0.00010257236,0.0037264712,0.000004872103,0.0000049580863,0.000025119301,0.00029919785,0.0000013261966,0.0005163054],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780244,0.0008086493,0.00028436317,0.00014393272,0.0007742024,0.00018639409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966294,0.0011970613,0.0009547146,0.000083494066,0.00089944527,0.00023576885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003013634,0.0004418083,0.00037064604,0.0038092192,0.00036291667,0.0019102297,0.00030282064,0.00040786035,0.0011224877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046159565,0.00012917329,0.0006997975,0.0029243117,0.0002688758,0.00077836076,0.0007319347,0.0002593021,0.0001628376],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010971731,0.0005612259,0.73116153,0.00049841526,0.00036103048,0.0010780955,0.0023060483,0.07824063,0.0056047156,0.0037218619,0.0018200254,0.17354926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048212936,0.0017320503,0.6234901,0.00023480097,0.00025255102,0.00045295776,0.012692316,0.34721556,0.008203105,0.0022235874,0.0033086569,0.00014604241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058439206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012591154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058439206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018726598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070265104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015937865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465555842","doi":"10.1080/18756891.2016.1204111","title":"An Interpretable Logical Theory: The case of Compensatory Fuzzy Logic","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretability; Fuzzy logic; Non-classical logic; Logical consequence; Natural language; Computer science; Logical connective; Logical framework; Mathematics; Natural deduction; Artificial intelligence; Natural (archaeology); Programming language","score_opus":0.1648336511681643,"score_gpt":0.4599324850344296,"score_spread":0.29509883386626523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465555842","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04652256,0.0016298055,0.8779688,0.00390597,0.00036705352,0.00014873914,0.00013003481,0.00016380165,0.06916327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7817736,0.0007980989,0.20973866,0.00074036134,0.00046808633,0.00025040403,0.00012609936,0.000050831975,0.0060538463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994835,0.002006698,0.00041416285,0.0005850957,0.0018177221,0.0003413321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99548256,0.0022928368,0.0005374346,0.0007047495,0.00079218636,0.00019031964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060167597,0.0008935227,0.00074608193,0.0025751158,0.0015100561,0.0043970137,0.001417296,0.0024445131,0.0027243595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009801446,0.00036901014,0.0017187208,0.0012812836,0.009107112,0.008540833,0.0029405206,0.0031145066,0.00032878324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009776572,0.000008821555,0.00010058764,0.000031362164,0.000011521432,0.00027618493,0.0003189096,0.0012352855,0.0004742031,0.9954756,0.00014709016,0.0019107196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014766318,0.000025813622,0.00009854887,0.00004353651,0.000022899068,0.00027331934,0.00016476389,0.00992092,0.000688067,0.9834657,0.005265638,0.000016165897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008195774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005792986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060167597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016877813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012193356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03182006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469901295","doi":"10.7202/1036553ar","title":"Le réalisme avec degrés de certitude","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Mesure et évaluation en éducation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.22909351329972677,"score_gpt":0.4790106904087647,"score_spread":0.24991717710903794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469901295","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02357693,0.0014739495,0.9148023,0.0024623328,0.00025872554,0.00024599046,0.00037100294,0.0006488341,0.056159955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.486132,0.0009514104,0.49401593,0.0008145605,0.00027575623,0.0009172334,0.0005074435,0.0004950348,0.015890608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9449785,0.027009418,0.0028681075,0.0075014923,0.016528612,0.0011139276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9059462,0.065523505,0.0071902345,0.010516883,0.009784054,0.001039175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02780302,0.0017247349,0.0011272813,0.004253355,0.0017941789,0.008703338,0.00224098,0.0024903896,0.011953166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12281916,0.0012699516,0.002317017,0.002721473,0.010906374,0.012040317,0.006242925,0.005559589,0.0025007627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022835791,0.000050710474,0.0053751753,0.00073452736,0.000113745584,0.000102214304,0.005146518,0.010191316,0.0032398175,0.8959819,0.0020936574,0.07674197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085420674,0.00025891152,0.008096779,0.0009588807,0.000143677,0.0005722049,0.0020745085,0.03672046,0.008462437,0.8593907,0.08300136,0.00023473075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059703523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045065847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02780302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004963399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039595743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14703816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2471730685","doi":"10.5539/ass.v12n7p159","title":"Rating Effective Factors on Motivating Employees for Job Persistence by Using Fuzzy AHP Method: A Case Study among the Employees of the Deqat Khodro Kousha (IPACO) Company","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); Analytic hierarchy process; Work (physics); Psychology; Field (mathematics); Human resource management; Business; Knowledge management; Computer science; Operations research; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.18114647615637242,"score_gpt":0.4493855655999921,"score_spread":0.2682390894436197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2471730685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976876,0.000070521775,0.0012491513,0.00013543208,0.0000044925805,0.00010055258,0.0000127632375,0.0000024045262,0.0007371694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943704,0.00015492072,0.004889761,0.000030902956,0.00000603641,0.00006927855,0.000014426687,0.0000018757064,0.000462467],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766386,0.0013815878,0.00013489767,0.00011574779,0.00039702887,0.0003069093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949942,0.003369577,0.00039798356,0.00015452121,0.00068704004,0.00039678105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051355874,0.000333472,0.00041528587,0.0014908968,0.0031416262,0.0013693509,0.0006422499,0.0009967649,0.0011200182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053326203,0.00023068306,0.00064080686,0.0010635093,0.00072987017,0.0007116741,0.00080276304,0.0008236431,0.00009817913],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014424027,0.017123846,0.34059954,0.0021500522,0.00031390318,0.02413635,0.24878645,0.012490322,0.02083352,0.004684429,0.0029752157,0.32446396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021049465,0.007248622,0.25369537,0.0006346736,0.00034886383,0.0036776746,0.66730905,0.040618014,0.0150942,0.0023660942,0.008508951,0.00028796765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047399984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010528783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051355874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013339848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015006971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02715987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477525550","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-11128-5_175","title":"A Decision-Support System for Expecting Mothers and Obstetricians","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Decision support system; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04391576739953259,"score_gpt":0.3219562739232103,"score_spread":0.27804050652367773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477525550","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11693317,0.0017616766,0.79426247,0.00507442,0.0011237497,0.001160054,0.006293063,0.028880952,0.04451043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.358124,0.0011594226,0.59761053,0.0013721124,0.00020820217,0.0009215934,0.0062016766,0.00040847695,0.033994004],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997329,0.000080705046,0.00003594623,0.000047514775,0.00007619417,0.000026727417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929166,0.00051486574,0.000022658058,0.000023135199,0.000082023595,0.00006559391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008017875,0.00055948156,0.00048161022,0.00051828765,0.00048362932,0.0015070897,0.0009314309,0.0009504048,0.014661642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018502726,0.00021816591,0.0003509951,0.0003920048,0.00012346367,0.00094012346,0.0008428443,0.00057667494,0.0026281257],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010985706,0.0007270262,0.004818134,0.00054256886,0.00011254114,0.0018369649,0.00082111,0.03199575,0.01266742,0.009569799,0.09596245,0.8398478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005388505,0.00051464763,0.0066041807,0.00043078407,0.0001835745,0.0016091762,0.00095647847,0.77618647,0.022243345,0.028869282,0.16172239,0.00014083658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018354353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019005355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014661642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037414534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087021856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049048066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479225632","doi":"10.1201/b18155","title":"Application of Fuzzy Logic to Social Choice Theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Social choice theory; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.2581563993835416,"score_gpt":0.47382488869625505,"score_spread":0.21566848931271343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2479225632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038017211,0.052750815,0.2851328,0.018651342,0.002749047,0.00013632742,0.00025525142,0.00018139229,0.63634145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31838483,0.08918957,0.25985923,0.006748255,0.0041936296,0.00054491387,0.00046230183,0.00020391926,0.32041338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985545,0.0006076444,0.000057783844,0.00011031727,0.00061086955,0.00005884188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990395,0.00076484727,0.000025025169,0.000036981342,0.000108332846,0.00002527374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018801473,0.00068893825,0.0006110062,0.0014118528,0.0010520753,0.0025365069,0.00070083333,0.0011683906,0.008423668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00259889,0.00029553755,0.00077322166,0.0015209536,0.003958046,0.0023143596,0.0012101008,0.0026310233,0.0015574901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065383824,0.000012065212,0.00004117644,0.0001191656,0.000016205848,0.00006769014,0.00022558172,0.0040088384,0.00011586056,0.9423901,0.016647905,0.036348883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048214124,0.000008165699,0.000056619003,0.0001326011,0.0000039333586,0.000044976798,0.00006280238,0.004217844,0.00010742821,0.91188896,0.083462484,0.000009335515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002703146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027885695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008423668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031103091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014426599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028179944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2484023053","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2015.06.021","title":"Ordered visibility graph weighted averaging aggregation operator: A methodology based on network analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Visibility; Visibility graph; Graph; Operator (biology); Network analysis; Computer science; Mathematics; Data mining; Algorithm; Combinatorics; Geography; Engineering; Geometry; Meteorology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.33051434060490315,"score_gpt":0.3980206330240795,"score_spread":0.06750629241917633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2484023053","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033856004,0.00006139019,0.99548304,0.00003646202,0.00002136799,0.000031652537,0.00003788927,0.000101351216,0.0008412811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23271476,0.00030655498,0.76381344,0.00006292227,0.0001148525,0.00019315587,0.00028794922,0.00015311687,0.0023532165],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785894,0.00072804285,0.000127788,0.0003830013,0.0007616505,0.00014060273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973356,0.0011624437,0.00028610745,0.000352463,0.00075185794,0.00011152808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021706747,0.0008719945,0.0012416585,0.0029587438,0.0008213714,0.0018858686,0.0015907162,0.00067645503,0.0019559294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060028783,0.00033433182,0.0012969725,0.003484825,0.0007590291,0.0028467649,0.0014216527,0.0009875905,0.00025017577],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015179103,0.00015950446,0.0015906196,0.00037260496,0.00028241676,0.00018832812,0.00038352108,0.3331429,0.010799846,0.27836055,0.0040378096,0.3705301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000877704,0.000059898044,0.0004343103,0.000019368406,0.00007828683,0.00006158443,0.000053911248,0.9126119,0.002777144,0.0803597,0.003509441,0.000025772393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004324405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005156327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004324405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009439232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015175664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011479795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489035058","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-5202-6.ch091","title":"Fuzzy Scale Table","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Scale (ratio); Computer science; Geography; Data mining; Cartography","score_opus":0.09818952545542352,"score_gpt":0.3670586611264631,"score_spread":0.2688691356710396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489035058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011393493,0.0014524743,0.2501248,0.001615873,0.0013480443,0.0011023296,0.081262745,0.006359484,0.64534074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24985777,0.002211986,0.35526386,0.0006579326,0.0003553639,0.001469655,0.066286765,0.0012223986,0.32267424],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963677,0.00005231728,0.00003104607,0.000058540518,0.00019453563,0.000026735299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992574,0.00028156047,0.000024854035,0.000089367546,0.0003171595,0.00002958075],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003940454,0.0005440802,0.0005597237,0.0018368108,0.0006398244,0.0019596256,0.0007925172,0.0005692629,0.32980362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034928522,0.00020261356,0.00039246227,0.0025354947,0.0001752013,0.0011563066,0.00047433897,0.00066038105,0.06956913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028479384,0.00007916808,0.0010525371,0.00071188004,0.000032378604,0.00024203747,0.00017864331,0.0060104136,0.0041442635,0.04823908,0.33682498,0.60219985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012612087,0.000182328,0.004250795,0.000446707,0.000051381252,0.0006773422,0.0006953986,0.051386867,0.006526606,0.0844337,0.8511123,0.00011044207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035489087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040928074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32980362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006043455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061681576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9559538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493963530","doi":"10.1007/b138793","title":"Advances in Ranking and Selection, Multiple Comparisons, and Reliability","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Birkhäuser Boston eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Selection (genetic algorithm); Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Statistics; Reliability engineering; Machine learning; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.08085539091591783,"score_gpt":0.38182864810628336,"score_spread":0.30097325719036555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493963530","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012176197,0.36022934,0.52418774,0.008537028,0.004044496,0.00027083282,0.00046495025,0.0007148197,0.100333184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031364843,0.32321587,0.58039635,0.0043098144,0.008314344,0.0012162657,0.0010377212,0.0006541668,0.049490765],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818108,0.010513545,0.0008020121,0.001140361,0.005471806,0.00026157458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96799135,0.02756471,0.000596982,0.0010278445,0.0026510365,0.00016809258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015554897,0.0025336647,0.0025871561,0.00499091,0.000993965,0.0047563757,0.0028242734,0.0021914023,0.016046884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02903959,0.0010134416,0.0017826554,0.009602511,0.004511679,0.005799334,0.002143795,0.0050015585,0.007826957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000493603,0.00006344054,0.0004900452,0.0033191903,0.00019806442,0.00013303613,0.00048319873,0.008450394,0.0003762558,0.31601363,0.11592032,0.55450314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011857783,0.00007023524,0.00083988905,0.0011272621,0.00006073788,0.000301674,0.00017860642,0.008038823,0.0004244247,0.68819404,0.30069628,0.000056159108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018163387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002528908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016046884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003307142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00260733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08226311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497844642","doi":"10.1007/b137280","title":"Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Satisfiability; Theoretical computer science; Boolean satisfiability problem; Algorithm; Programming language","score_opus":0.08053416493871743,"score_gpt":0.38604253884329964,"score_spread":0.3055083739045822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497844642","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004793418,0.025597654,0.8603061,0.00440338,0.0008139191,0.00009044381,0.0003281438,0.00035727653,0.103309646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28526706,0.043387882,0.6209358,0.00231823,0.0036485244,0.00059151265,0.001106125,0.00035244587,0.042392433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971769,0.0009790789,0.0001972699,0.00036377573,0.0011383516,0.00014464569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99146444,0.0068494435,0.00026712206,0.0007196782,0.00057524524,0.00012411992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026094601,0.0014620064,0.0016260729,0.0034633148,0.0009426298,0.0041542547,0.002677966,0.002160737,0.011076453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013045313,0.0010393878,0.0018020442,0.0049683047,0.004479145,0.006157364,0.002346596,0.004697884,0.0018378113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013818172,0.000029598967,0.00024233208,0.00017282231,0.000025699064,0.000074158175,0.000082237006,0.012155529,0.0003312284,0.89385,0.0070447824,0.085977755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035384498,0.0000061525207,0.00006153415,0.00004279363,0.0000071912414,0.00008500343,0.00001450489,0.020956518,0.0001421217,0.9719221,0.006751486,0.0000070625283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018863425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013739628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011076453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020317596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014570229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03705442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503755108","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511615887.008","title":"Index Models and Other Semiparametric Specifications","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Semiparametric model; Semiparametric regression; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Programming language; Nonparametric statistics","score_opus":0.2894649717596145,"score_gpt":0.3275965262868706,"score_spread":0.038131554527256084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503755108","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007459029,0.0035029452,0.880075,0.0032429975,0.00022334234,0.00016617397,0.0064553567,0.001208024,0.09766703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5328693,0.013418041,0.23579773,0.0023990471,0.0010316628,0.0017079896,0.015208094,0.0015212877,0.19604684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700886,0.0014878304,0.00015693212,0.0003979873,0.0007431739,0.00020522947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98930347,0.007749839,0.00078538986,0.0013259297,0.0006697486,0.00016557635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066667865,0.0013924576,0.0016421151,0.0020460093,0.0005302939,0.003829863,0.002685656,0.0020704297,0.044010114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025832662,0.0006027587,0.0022919506,0.005119212,0.0011021364,0.00500416,0.0017124899,0.0030336096,0.009082998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005455121,0.000072558796,0.0011791082,0.0003186464,0.00011848167,0.00011396217,0.00012126202,0.048005354,0.00014207623,0.86550325,0.02812935,0.05624135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025855374,0.00003457127,0.00054337666,0.000103439656,0.00004879149,0.00010172007,0.0000472444,0.09713576,0.00016252232,0.8783249,0.023440005,0.000031868203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032308763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004622334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044010114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020850443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012728883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14722848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506545887","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1561","title":"A Topsis‐Based Approach for Prioritized Aggregation in Multi‐Criteria Decision‐Making Problems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Aggregation problem; TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Similarity (geometry); Preference; Ideal (ethics); Process (computing); Data mining; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.1951479152644342,"score_gpt":0.4618738228182196,"score_spread":0.2667259075537854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506545887","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041956226,0.0006778055,0.98823744,0.0003492463,0.00009436455,0.00032635863,0.000063584346,0.0001577436,0.005897884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16732623,0.0011249128,0.82861596,0.00013963551,0.00007410174,0.00060296565,0.0001444353,0.000039551054,0.0019322889],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902142,0.0050415355,0.00069217436,0.000464557,0.0033259494,0.00026147199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718696,0.0014347812,0.00022082661,0.00010670334,0.00094754825,0.00010311668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007856748,0.0018132488,0.0020293002,0.004854256,0.0018245477,0.004470241,0.002169763,0.0013272245,0.004621389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067154025,0.00078854425,0.0027321035,0.005915475,0.001323032,0.0016935242,0.0021888607,0.002296372,0.00063419796],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000169403,0.00027381475,0.0012167798,0.0022203005,0.00097537803,0.0010813576,0.0016992872,0.5482943,0.0085902875,0.1382295,0.0058813817,0.29136822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000534677,0.00018924533,0.0005958184,0.00028275186,0.00023063827,0.00023109645,0.000446232,0.8972466,0.0018530822,0.08789743,0.010888292,0.00008541067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006257618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007518337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007856748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027795369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039422917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041550934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507495592","doi":"10.1177/1555343416661889","title":"Judgment Analysis in a Dynamic Multitask Environment: Capturing Nonlinear Policies Using Decision Trees","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Thales (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Decision tree; Computer science; Machine learning; Heuristics; Artificial intelligence; Bootstrapping (finance); Data mining; Decision tree learning; Decision support system; Incremental decision tree; Decision rule; Task (project management); Econometrics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04999714675743787,"score_gpt":0.36857287522802185,"score_spread":0.31857572847058396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507495592","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20606191,0.00011136812,0.7914699,0.0002419607,0.000025414216,0.00012390656,0.0001463983,0.00047690826,0.0013421837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7930167,0.00007935703,0.20605052,0.000084952095,0.000015165384,0.00012298842,0.00021249136,0.000045010664,0.00037293043],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974439,0.0014387243,0.00015766844,0.0004702424,0.00035770863,0.00013181586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733695,0.020877028,0.0019846822,0.001856245,0.0014054157,0.00050719676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059273113,0.0007152137,0.0010281189,0.0012279933,0.0006114143,0.0016130204,0.0011484846,0.0008700561,0.0010922499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034406647,0.00036869984,0.0007626728,0.0011672137,0.0007369565,0.002966468,0.00084789656,0.0019121479,0.00037039138],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043988728,0.0005485614,0.02287209,0.00020773908,0.00016740146,0.00015671895,0.0012502442,0.74164265,0.004349094,0.013467054,0.0015097068,0.21338889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007885211,0.000037339338,0.0014979808,0.000010713808,0.0000073088786,0.000012351206,0.00005300976,0.9859577,0.0007225778,0.0114383,0.00024014,0.0000146496395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006685871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058745653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006685871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012678071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015904028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031346977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512546698","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-35132-2_3","title":"Multi-criteria Decision Making Approaches to Prioritize Surgical Patients","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer proceedings in mathematics & statistics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"U.S. National Library of Medicine","keywords":"Prioritization; Analytic hierarchy process; Robustness (evolution); Analytic network process; Computer science; Elective surgery; Operations research; Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); Medicine; Engineering; Surgery","score_opus":0.2579038576039041,"score_gpt":0.3960299230137856,"score_spread":0.13812606540988148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512546698","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027095468,0.0041564894,0.97151834,0.0015941772,0.00027373244,0.00014940667,0.00011104273,0.000075372685,0.019411959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14454025,0.0046019335,0.8408285,0.00052944804,0.00033325297,0.000610854,0.0002571421,0.000075109034,0.008223538],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994406,0.0032659478,0.00029054438,0.00028945965,0.0015762965,0.00017175467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934378,0.005238485,0.00029440253,0.00013442492,0.00071661815,0.00017828392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008193526,0.0022236798,0.001384167,0.0027323035,0.00078346377,0.0034849672,0.0023173299,0.0015156355,0.0070709465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106022945,0.0005371071,0.0016629874,0.0031696334,0.0010700919,0.0019819573,0.0022079782,0.0026899893,0.0009818405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012536957,0.00022044546,0.00078651594,0.0013687267,0.00046629572,0.00024286819,0.00070735277,0.29048818,0.0015873216,0.31678545,0.018581528,0.36864004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044290508,0.00014208732,0.00045211118,0.00062727655,0.00009610936,0.00017901529,0.00036575043,0.45418236,0.0009137519,0.51906097,0.023863846,0.00007246736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014310742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030230023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008193526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002084328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019946177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04333198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512642358","doi":"10.3390/ijerph13090896","title":"Medical Waste Disposal Method Selection Based on a Hierarchical Decision Model with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Relations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Government of Jiangsu Province; Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province; Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Preference; Fuzzy logic; Group decision-making; Selection (genetic algorithm); Operations research; Computer science; Aggregate (composite); Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.17207882685699882,"score_gpt":0.4986400533022056,"score_spread":0.3265612264452068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512642358","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05419914,0.00019003975,0.94070417,0.00038568382,0.000024311774,0.0002051084,0.00011129282,0.000113513524,0.004066786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7173597,0.00022583776,0.2799424,0.00008999696,0.00004197811,0.0003030845,0.00015774033,0.000014028691,0.001865152],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536127,0.0017077279,0.000383708,0.0006694559,0.0014673871,0.00041035924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977234,0.0011792772,0.00039571777,0.000086766726,0.0004222918,0.00019253859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039397725,0.0010666385,0.0011904195,0.0023455468,0.0010902892,0.0027495367,0.001674024,0.0011256809,0.0023915488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045362865,0.0005527462,0.001945754,0.0017606105,0.0012781321,0.0025442506,0.0016645335,0.0012294867,0.00022800502],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002382992,0.00022097476,0.004290758,0.00031129195,0.00019096378,0.0003946432,0.000749871,0.82834417,0.0044431225,0.109489955,0.001165849,0.0501601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023156568,0.00008617316,0.00051733886,0.000016781565,0.000042081356,0.000041366093,0.000062239145,0.97998995,0.0003879176,0.018404795,0.00040076097,0.000027396469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008312099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009210227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008312099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030806283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027591465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022351563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523549523","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1573","title":"A Fuzzy Topsis Method for Prioritized Aggregation in Multi‐Criteria Decision Making Problems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Operations research; Decision-making models; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.17861781636905597,"score_gpt":0.4952328943117909,"score_spread":0.3166150779427349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523549523","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044703046,0.00045809825,0.99003893,0.00018156605,0.00009835153,0.0003981731,0.000065456414,0.00014968925,0.0041393507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12604131,0.00064068503,0.8704709,0.00005667238,0.00006172079,0.00085463986,0.0001269415,0.000035954345,0.001711223],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98778397,0.007121844,0.0007768958,0.000552016,0.0034969565,0.0002683449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961217,0.0020297451,0.00029499977,0.00014019941,0.0013159774,0.000097383636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00848179,0.0019246596,0.0016995498,0.005720838,0.0017150849,0.0036834702,0.0018674539,0.0012153867,0.005481234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009749731,0.00064034626,0.0024561628,0.0061577787,0.0010872771,0.001768372,0.0016997554,0.00192937,0.0007177602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027971127,0.00029051813,0.0016180491,0.0025287576,0.0010770536,0.0010649575,0.003011176,0.37124845,0.012068098,0.15832403,0.0072168563,0.4412723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007340881,0.0002452193,0.0008437896,0.00032342447,0.00021059524,0.00022469116,0.0006453294,0.9182941,0.0026007758,0.06511496,0.011319288,0.000104459905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006369395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061386507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00848179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024865593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004339997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04485649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524399577","doi":"10.1515/amcs-2016-0050","title":"The limit of inconsistency reduction in pairwise comparisons","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Mathematics; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Matrix (chemical analysis); Limit (mathematics); Convergence (economics); Reduction (mathematics); Distance matrix; Interpretation (philosophy); Principal component analysis; Geometric mean; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Combinatorics; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Geometry; Physics","score_opus":0.09947078667601113,"score_gpt":0.37973487877768614,"score_spread":0.280264092101675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524399577","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048907176,0.00029387616,0.9448595,0.0005042925,0.00004734081,0.00014984408,0.00009842163,0.00024169673,0.0048978613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58656454,0.00027684338,0.40845215,0.00038050464,0.00013022091,0.00092939683,0.00029306122,0.00024887215,0.002724367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9358112,0.031512853,0.003191415,0.009566051,0.017978294,0.0019401785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7407888,0.18870184,0.016246019,0.021630425,0.029316615,0.0033163629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041520264,0.000957902,0.0024098265,0.00587184,0.0016322947,0.004168522,0.004260267,0.0015639829,0.0050523295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22808962,0.0010381265,0.0027325738,0.0033579844,0.008825351,0.008279785,0.007766197,0.0062487694,0.00078931975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031146652,0.00016786263,0.005089153,0.00052522327,0.0003472252,0.00043194377,0.00157531,0.033553675,0.0043599736,0.88272685,0.0017110015,0.06920037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003528916,0.00021415482,0.001679175,0.00010748783,0.000056006826,0.00033010787,0.00028844093,0.1630272,0.0035429695,0.82874876,0.0018955334,0.00007485913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010694248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004236016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041520264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021210073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020088837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2195828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530559092","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.087","title":"Validation of a decision support tool for wastewater treatment selection","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Retrofitting; Ranking (information retrieval); Decision support system; Process (computing); Selection (genetic algorithm); Engineering; Work (physics); Key (lock); Task (project management); Computer science; Operations research; Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); Systems engineering; Data mining; Machine learning; Business","score_opus":0.06457565602682185,"score_gpt":0.35460587208541383,"score_spread":0.29003021605859197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530559092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6073839,0.00014136892,0.3738788,0.0005294251,0.00015451742,0.0012501661,0.0022013744,0.009201565,0.0052589257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7299263,0.00004776794,0.26685414,0.00009004862,0.0000143533325,0.00048645854,0.0016752906,0.0001321965,0.000773342],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.997081,0.0012150927,0.00036001063,0.00023412736,0.0009929535,0.00011671962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774361,0.01658281,0.00067125546,0.0012724653,0.0036737805,0.00036356866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007837098,0.0010126724,0.000735767,0.002475518,0.0005424641,0.0020876245,0.0013272453,0.0014086008,0.0046156365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024366748,0.00037820445,0.00062263303,0.0011823575,0.00035433058,0.0012341911,0.0011865909,0.0005638849,0.0009039544],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048235636,0.004450435,0.033497248,0.0013197741,0.00064092403,0.0007729096,0.0008676863,0.20983595,0.05609917,0.0067911074,0.009299586,0.6716017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057773315,0.0009496782,0.006648761,0.00015954621,0.00017198393,0.00016026707,0.00020420189,0.9529604,0.031151092,0.002447122,0.0045051095,0.00006408186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018575734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012562985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007837098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065046304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019724634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041447043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531668889","doi":"10.21314/jor.2016.340","title":"A fuzzy data envelopment analysis model for evaluating the efficiency of socially responsible and conventional mutual funds","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Risk","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Data envelopment analysis; Equity (law); Credibility; Transparency (behavior); Business; Fuzzy logic; Mutual fund; Accounting; Mutual information; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Finance; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.44461776048610036,"score_gpt":0.51871623586,"score_spread":0.07409847537389969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531668889","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2691463,0.0005007154,0.7231213,0.00046072798,0.000024531077,0.00011247337,0.00015219822,0.000089930385,0.0063918275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98424214,0.00009811352,0.014875358,0.000012258525,0.000004298545,0.000069761125,0.000030848154,0.0000045133934,0.0006627212],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974196,0.0015634213,0.00013123051,0.00020071634,0.00045433504,0.00023073291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966214,0.0023648937,0.0003704518,0.00015707547,0.000399621,0.00008651498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046906164,0.00068704237,0.0008650866,0.0015552812,0.00041539833,0.002186764,0.00078811904,0.0011829231,0.0010838149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01025284,0.00028259016,0.0010709332,0.0014019982,0.0008595326,0.0014854309,0.000799763,0.0007137549,0.000115149254],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043701053,0.00003015768,0.0014407107,0.00003213739,0.000043526445,0.00005617189,0.00009770315,0.9548613,0.0005359548,0.037343696,0.00012997346,0.005384957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026831083,0.000018795688,0.00026096535,0.000007952206,0.000006932467,0.0000066654643,0.000024927373,0.9940048,0.00019472266,0.005315817,0.00014943622,0.0000063802418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009759155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002839412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009759155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031213167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015206633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024806678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532304798","doi":"10.1108/k-10-2015-0271","title":"An extension on PROMETHEE based on the typical hesitant fuzzy sets to solve multi-attribute decision-making problem","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kybernetes","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Extension (predicate logic); Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Group decision-making; Fuzzy logic; Basis (linear algebra); Fuzzy set; Cybernetics; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14946970322657174,"score_gpt":0.4230236505847302,"score_spread":0.2735539473581584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532304798","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037639346,0.00018505527,0.99200726,0.00019446464,0.000046027453,0.00011700656,0.00002213087,0.000037217225,0.0036269643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24039896,0.0005211058,0.754745,0.00021425456,0.00009043422,0.00055016764,0.00006490466,0.00003415086,0.0033810271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99352336,0.0036701933,0.0004398911,0.00064414664,0.00153294,0.00018941326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953235,0.0030238526,0.00028070377,0.00034927757,0.0009021557,0.00012052512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0088267345,0.0010641965,0.0014529168,0.0021409467,0.0011267762,0.0022264386,0.0016003981,0.0012455259,0.0034565313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011242016,0.00044840854,0.0020589463,0.0021243365,0.0019338018,0.0039816382,0.0024492107,0.002408127,0.00046974065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002042517,0.00023935968,0.0016066575,0.00095879374,0.00031520476,0.0005820504,0.0015194102,0.24597333,0.0036263175,0.48317856,0.0029670307,0.25882903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052870007,0.00026410437,0.0005029253,0.00017856974,0.00007105243,0.00043217366,0.00029247408,0.6718327,0.002921535,0.31120995,0.012155181,0.00008649269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000896387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009854265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0088267345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00111222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025167381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046680808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546754844","doi":"10.5539/mas.v11n1p180","title":"Evaluation of Hazardous Waste Management by Using VIKOR: A Case Study of USA States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hazardous waste; Agency (philosophy); Environmental planning; Judgement; Business; Waste management; Environmental science; Engineering; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.27700943808499606,"score_gpt":0.46221213238216874,"score_spread":0.18520269429717268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546754844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918006,0.00012942772,0.001604247,0.00019291406,0.0000051625198,0.00008739521,0.000058751637,0.000008380707,0.0061130943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933223,0.00028811392,0.003825851,0.00002886908,0.000003009504,0.000046492136,0.00005591899,0.0000067495794,0.0024225824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985942,0.0008529067,0.00005096736,0.000070362184,0.00024035576,0.00019115047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989568,0.00054962735,0.00014225549,0.000055866487,0.00018805216,0.00010735417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017491715,0.00039782588,0.00031183028,0.0016275476,0.0020793641,0.0018537218,0.0008468759,0.0012329222,0.0015430363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017400855,0.00021153131,0.0006365748,0.0021451632,0.00093929796,0.0009482215,0.001104513,0.0006309914,0.00013175949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020892248,0.010534725,0.2784117,0.0017439196,0.00055159343,0.07653162,0.039623618,0.27608478,0.029865123,0.07150502,0.010097032,0.20296171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031275785,0.0068951184,0.18237728,0.00075938326,0.00065871555,0.007754168,0.2749388,0.3981008,0.043511823,0.017292237,0.0669983,0.0004005844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01801151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01801151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002982405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015448043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03581333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549381068","doi":"10.3233/fi-2016-1389","title":"Efficacy Analysis of Ratios from Pairwise Comparisons","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fundamenta Informaticae","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Benchmark (surveying); Mathematics; Matrix (chemical analysis); Decision maker; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Statistics; Geometric mean; Algorithm; Operations research; Geography","score_opus":0.23427430563419635,"score_gpt":0.43911681770958916,"score_spread":0.2048425120753928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549381068","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029428463,0.0018141626,0.952568,0.0003151478,0.00019276563,0.00085379195,0.0007295957,0.00056018523,0.013537944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63185364,0.0011576627,0.35996592,0.00026895548,0.00037106778,0.0022464958,0.001557679,0.0004678513,0.0021106885],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.8763173,0.08620128,0.005191458,0.0076999217,0.023450311,0.0011396394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4934137,0.45470643,0.013483348,0.020864353,0.016561396,0.00097075454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10980748,0.002263875,0.0029109812,0.011110717,0.001069353,0.0032934225,0.0025993513,0.0016770661,0.009792704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3623287,0.0007487822,0.0031945838,0.0042736772,0.0039389418,0.0058420845,0.003118665,0.0025746613,0.0014393198],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003690675,0.00045509016,0.026139421,0.0038771154,0.0025598188,0.00038043648,0.0012208847,0.17044492,0.0049362886,0.23128606,0.00703618,0.5479731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051927747,0.0057398393,0.02292116,0.00104285,0.0023794477,0.0014408104,0.0009844715,0.6369234,0.026817122,0.27919704,0.021720398,0.0003142964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040259882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029910632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10980748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018207497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019111526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58072436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551970201","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2016.11.001","title":"Application of fuzzy TOPSIS and generalized Choquet integral methods to select the best supplier","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Choquet integral; TOPSIS; Fuzzy logic; Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy measure theory; Mathematics; Computer science; Operations research; Fuzzy set; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy number","score_opus":0.10075064061080001,"score_gpt":0.46752433738770943,"score_spread":0.3667736967769094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2551970201","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028993692,0.002400222,0.95293915,0.00034877443,0.00016419866,0.00040818658,0.00006359782,0.0001529544,0.014529185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46785513,0.0023706493,0.52567655,0.000082467945,0.000057489437,0.00036798257,0.00008015089,0.000025890733,0.0034836717],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954959,0.0018854041,0.00024365478,0.00029736964,0.0019074621,0.00017026221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987067,0.0006961707,0.00011460441,0.000043552514,0.00040356856,0.00003531315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033506828,0.000948459,0.0013528817,0.003658518,0.0010641422,0.0019425241,0.00095964817,0.00080803665,0.0022035984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005205223,0.0003559452,0.0013638274,0.0040377574,0.00074822723,0.0010504778,0.0012621497,0.00075980887,0.00024310974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031269967,0.00023969321,0.0023716406,0.002154414,0.0006929479,0.0007355037,0.0018891324,0.31629196,0.010855231,0.08100157,0.003072087,0.58038306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000851865,0.0004409938,0.0019579662,0.00024259299,0.00026629327,0.00037016455,0.00093295734,0.9294829,0.0057104663,0.050456908,0.009931321,0.0001223174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053089107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005941762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053089107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012367712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002264153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017720342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553981758","doi":"10.1007/s10726-016-9515-5","title":"Group Decision Methodology to Support Watershed Committees in Choosing Among Combinations of Alternatives","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Centre for International Governance Innovation; Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Voting; Group decision-making; Computer science; Rank (graph theory); Preference; Context (archaeology); Compromise; Operations research; Management science; Group (periodic table); Process (computing); Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.19367032027145675,"score_gpt":0.4408018048375745,"score_spread":0.24713148456611772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553981758","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010091616,0.000049799455,0.98750883,0.00020138644,0.00005060197,0.00013717863,0.000018320285,0.000094284194,0.0018479034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20814013,0.000096119016,0.7888618,0.00015784524,0.000048997277,0.00063057104,0.0000696067,0.00004807108,0.0019469243],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542433,0.003452842,0.0001307258,0.00021275159,0.0006415156,0.00013780796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987631,0.010277143,0.00040997204,0.0003547532,0.00097648636,0.0003505986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009571914,0.0007612108,0.0010820295,0.0019333739,0.0013809366,0.0014800867,0.0015674902,0.0016633571,0.008753229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017186139,0.00046351636,0.0010572064,0.0016727764,0.0009169211,0.0024294655,0.0019711787,0.0019957912,0.00074162846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003791633,0.0007593539,0.0019465783,0.00037673482,0.00033715766,0.00032570306,0.0012113437,0.5306459,0.004111697,0.15806715,0.00463096,0.2972081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067812594,0.00015895322,0.00014472565,0.000037365015,0.00004097616,0.000039850143,0.0001667031,0.93643177,0.001031451,0.058669623,0.003193265,0.000017475892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014670925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026161787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009571914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010262023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019194513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05062169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2558728866","doi":"10.6000/2371-1647.2016.02.09","title":"Application of Wald Function to OR and AND Fuzzy Operations in No- Data Problems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advances in Management Sciences & Information Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Fuzzy measure theory; Fuzzy number; Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Bayes' theorem; Membership function; Fuzzy logic; Extension (predicate logic); Fuzzy set; Fuzzy mathematics; Function (biology); Applied mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Statistics; Bayesian probability","score_opus":0.10794154236081656,"score_gpt":0.41669732666875564,"score_spread":0.3087557843079391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2558728866","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013479032,0.0015645415,0.97474515,0.0018141358,0.0001243118,0.00005027146,0.000056022476,0.000036366288,0.008130187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61739904,0.0032998954,0.3720978,0.00071188924,0.00069423113,0.00036580808,0.00013040043,0.000066846376,0.005234071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919808,0.0049597803,0.00047109122,0.00068883406,0.0015600815,0.00033940407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98311317,0.01391112,0.0009156156,0.0006847717,0.0010159783,0.00035929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01755409,0.0012059365,0.0019293571,0.0028519335,0.0012054512,0.0039795944,0.0014790115,0.0019132467,0.002590117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0424126,0.00060033926,0.0018479166,0.002668186,0.005772688,0.008529668,0.0029396706,0.0031063538,0.0003163413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019456182,0.000012528356,0.0003617583,0.0000685383,0.000034981203,0.00011259972,0.00012373761,0.019383233,0.00017364208,0.966569,0.000507763,0.012632707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007861893,0.000017357495,0.00017461288,0.0000315267,0.000012940728,0.000047838275,0.000039252416,0.08264873,0.00017786572,0.9156251,0.0011994395,0.000017618817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015684523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010313061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01755409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026058126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021322973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09283602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560090465","doi":"","title":"AN ARC MODEL FOR RANKING DATA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Statistics; Exponential smoothing; Econometrics; Arc (geometry); Distance decay; Mathematics; Computer science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Geography","score_opus":0.6787978265990308,"score_gpt":0.5725554796900866,"score_spread":0.10624234690894419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560090465","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011123494,0.00088105723,0.9823283,0.0007109246,0.00007301212,0.00006643957,0.000825159,0.00042546898,0.0035663324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54460055,0.002802446,0.42334938,0.00048729268,0.00036997316,0.00062957726,0.0034172998,0.0003015627,0.024041966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948807,0.002447079,0.00039737555,0.00088912074,0.0011705415,0.00021508301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903486,0.006540942,0.0008832521,0.0009295839,0.0010656116,0.00023212843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005607712,0.001065733,0.001343557,0.0027647165,0.0005023257,0.002860746,0.0022917849,0.0013905002,0.0060249064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017139124,0.00046440095,0.0014427698,0.005663202,0.0009127033,0.006481437,0.0011558342,0.002003138,0.0018351376],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016753716,0.00008546464,0.003173485,0.00040122212,0.00022480587,0.00027177864,0.00029435055,0.4317081,0.0009583807,0.44568938,0.007645106,0.10938033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016613067,0.00009020639,0.0004622989,0.00001984493,0.00003757275,0.000101451275,0.000030393525,0.8475037,0.00021300893,0.14638984,0.005107449,0.000027629689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045927693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003950663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060249064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015446424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009458754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029656768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561419563","doi":"10.1142/s0219622017500079","title":"A Hybrid of Genetic Algorithm and Evidential Reasoning for Optimal Design of Project Scheduling: A Systematic Negotiation Framework for Multiple Decision-Makers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Negotiation; Rationality; Scheduling (production processes); Operations research; Schedule; Benchmark (surveying); Management science; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05196861853259304,"score_gpt":0.39753111416711073,"score_spread":0.3455624956345177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561419563","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002305673,0.000044835168,0.9966271,0.00007253028,0.000008269788,0.00003686932,0.0000054237134,0.000037529055,0.0008618118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19876216,0.0001586038,0.79947025,0.00008497144,0.000029601588,0.00035298135,0.000037248585,0.000028896156,0.0010752701],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828476,0.00092381675,0.00007811749,0.0001815164,0.00043378043,0.00009800633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986444,0.00095055177,0.00011194315,0.000078173216,0.00017085839,0.0000440964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037448565,0.0010420325,0.001249748,0.0012760971,0.0007119492,0.0013926487,0.0021108766,0.0015543685,0.001775569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042240634,0.00063923653,0.0014084713,0.0010881724,0.0013578178,0.0015756035,0.0014186976,0.0015034826,0.00022988777],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026535397,0.00004929682,0.00020980669,0.00006679083,0.00004529554,0.00006820052,0.00012633929,0.9126823,0.0009884539,0.053445175,0.00030429845,0.031987514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000123221,0.000023253611,0.000020701194,0.000010489995,0.000009096871,0.000011151472,0.000009645751,0.9866274,0.00017012081,0.012677482,0.00042243462,0.000005928673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044057127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00428755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044057127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012111247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003139602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019804955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571511741","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-1848-8.ch009","title":"Application of Fuzzy Soft Set in Patients' Prioritization","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Prioritization; Equity (law); Economic shortage; Risk analysis (engineering); Health care; Quality (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy logic; Business; Patient safety; Computer science; Operations management; Medicine; Process management; Engineering; Economics; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07539593202969343,"score_gpt":0.3908870764064883,"score_spread":0.3154911443767949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571511741","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010486109,0.0074022803,0.8712958,0.0039229514,0.0011515563,0.00026563145,0.00023198039,0.00030301863,0.10494071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36966434,0.008061694,0.5735257,0.0013282369,0.0006830537,0.0003105432,0.00031045137,0.000073670526,0.046042316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885905,0.00040128597,0.00007822791,0.00016834546,0.00041487752,0.00007825283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993962,0.0003673101,0.000040387335,0.000027584932,0.00013044356,0.000038039518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016635489,0.0007426091,0.0005704285,0.0015677491,0.0009407243,0.002242296,0.0009620439,0.0010874439,0.0070514013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002244326,0.00024601835,0.0008598771,0.0017656158,0.0013213501,0.0020187122,0.0013626524,0.0017143486,0.0009342907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010723667,0.0000955569,0.0009215353,0.00055472885,0.00006288963,0.00038198946,0.0010481835,0.045457326,0.003567639,0.63440883,0.017949082,0.29544502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033894412,0.0001441005,0.001092098,0.0005094269,0.00008155908,0.0005788158,0.00093400595,0.27173063,0.0048275725,0.60389805,0.11607179,0.00009796418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033667965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033380506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070514013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024574099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017894683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023589313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2577996632","doi":"10.1155/2017/7131094","title":"ELECTRE I Based Relevance Decision-Makers Feedback to the Location Selection of Distribution Centers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"ELECTRE; Selection (genetic algorithm); Relevance (law); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Operations research; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Weighting; Decision model; Data mining; Machine learning; Engineering","score_opus":0.0398290221872849,"score_gpt":0.3777202454212289,"score_spread":0.337891223233944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2577996632","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.111489445,0.00025795843,0.87483335,0.0010289942,0.00009936025,0.0003823861,0.000119748285,0.0002573991,0.011531462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87212765,0.00014014046,0.12576915,0.00011399425,0.000033551565,0.00018519688,0.00007017813,0.000024883475,0.001535298],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99462587,0.0030061502,0.00028398848,0.000563281,0.0012545148,0.00026627106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99089557,0.0060135103,0.00088227296,0.00028807632,0.0017117276,0.00020882045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069452487,0.00093660224,0.0011541459,0.0016885913,0.0011032809,0.0021020002,0.001167945,0.0010895696,0.0028453993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023440778,0.0004074682,0.00069765403,0.0014444491,0.00076014164,0.0018813127,0.0021243012,0.0011125496,0.00029087657],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012840212,0.0004949819,0.008406098,0.0006897221,0.00018140157,0.0016808587,0.0026076252,0.5535334,0.014055912,0.030024448,0.0037812148,0.3832604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011613399,0.00029901275,0.0020199178,0.000069448826,0.00007145622,0.00025380077,0.000862809,0.9643782,0.006788201,0.022151226,0.0029088177,0.0000810211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012446808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014663775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069452487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010931882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017272326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03673047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580250936","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-52624-9_3","title":"Multi-criteria Group Decision Making with Private and Shared Criteria: An Experiment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in business information processing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Group decision-making; Group (periodic table); Business; Computer science; Psychology; Chemistry; Social psychology; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.09556319334381827,"score_gpt":0.399532197920571,"score_spread":0.3039690045767527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580250936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785604,0.00015658537,0.015881624,0.00019084712,0.00016483568,0.0013010193,0.00025587677,0.00007683957,0.0034119994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95039994,0.00017387385,0.04297146,0.00017146608,0.00009073336,0.0030173687,0.0003704328,0.000051904564,0.0027527164],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914683,0.0056349053,0.00046917165,0.0008852649,0.001058984,0.0004832539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90085185,0.089855716,0.0014856564,0.004270038,0.0015780891,0.0019587073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015917046,0.0019390899,0.0032945136,0.00072833075,0.0016550015,0.0024281577,0.0028747946,0.0042664474,0.008634075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03986618,0.0009833557,0.0021440417,0.0011822303,0.0024074065,0.0037617274,0.002286997,0.0035192838,0.00086564315],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.25457203,0.2230484,0.011670944,0.0057843053,0.0030741147,0.0015608039,0.00957105,0.2501516,0.047441725,0.03808576,0.005128959,0.14991038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07119099,0.25538146,0.009282613,0.00040011152,0.0017445539,0.00043698176,0.0033675698,0.56605417,0.032078873,0.05389318,0.005601796,0.0005677536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016960633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090276916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015917046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008747727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021252655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08417839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587039444","doi":"10.1504/ijids.2017.10003123","title":"Location of a new banking agency in Sfax: a multi-criteria approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Profitability index; Agency (philosophy); Order (exchange); Ranking (information retrieval); Business; Promotion (chess); Preference; Finance; Carry (investment); Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.23514636215074103,"score_gpt":0.4878328639404198,"score_spread":0.2526865017896788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587039444","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09424923,0.0010789812,0.8891,0.0012773992,0.00007896024,0.0009204676,0.00047115647,0.00010340882,0.012720333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6768574,0.00080019434,0.317721,0.00012999856,0.00006214225,0.0008154718,0.00035949092,0.000030725496,0.0032235933],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946096,0.0033968731,0.0002614628,0.00057706976,0.00066825526,0.0004867646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969602,0.0019001584,0.0002649625,0.00007393546,0.00048780098,0.00031303993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004586552,0.0017186963,0.0019347463,0.0056400793,0.0016396497,0.006061031,0.0022123514,0.0030764416,0.0043051443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057304474,0.0010105391,0.0024334616,0.004260783,0.0013649558,0.0026762064,0.0029841224,0.0016339903,0.00032869924],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033434317,0.00041577412,0.0065229554,0.0010131747,0.00053417904,0.00089010096,0.0007646662,0.87776136,0.0024466892,0.04528515,0.0017332573,0.062298354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004504556,0.00023568513,0.0015239131,0.00015364446,0.00014942819,0.00012789915,0.0008686333,0.9723433,0.00048004717,0.021883152,0.002136103,0.000053192885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007883574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008016907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007883574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00436186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031095908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031647623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587306239","doi":"10.23977/jaip.2016.11003","title":"New Distance Measures on Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Their Application in Pattern Recognition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence Practice","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Vagueness; Fuzzy logic; Dual (grammatical number); Ambiguity; Distance measures; Fuzzy set; Extension (predicate logic); Computer science; Measure (data warehouse); Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Mathematics; Pattern recognition (psychology)","score_opus":0.25541220896012995,"score_gpt":0.44057954882375866,"score_spread":0.1851673398636287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587306239","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025078965,0.0012671964,0.9699121,0.00018405273,0.00009723087,0.000059911457,0.00005287117,0.00007238206,0.0032752578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5262332,0.0011335777,0.46985587,0.00012426589,0.00017548466,0.00022700458,0.00015033019,0.000036416735,0.0020639033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995174,0.0015044572,0.0007028438,0.0008560489,0.0015917269,0.00017101745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949309,0.0025166648,0.00071565364,0.0004018517,0.001206893,0.00022791311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041826232,0.00094341516,0.0011263062,0.0044958116,0.0008135263,0.0027348513,0.0013908889,0.0012526417,0.0011627321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013422065,0.00035687725,0.001223887,0.0031532415,0.002459497,0.0050116917,0.0024483826,0.0016338978,0.00023573585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027359815,0.00010636293,0.0028309927,0.00052497984,0.00028865153,0.00043855215,0.0011080793,0.131876,0.009612674,0.6269367,0.0014422208,0.22456115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033899374,0.00024722784,0.0014240702,0.000115015704,0.00007261494,0.0005994479,0.0003953109,0.66490495,0.0074727037,0.31614944,0.008435998,0.00014926356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071970135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003455138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044958116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014668313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007233687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022120059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588703081","doi":"10.1109/nafips.2016.7851611","title":"A combined fuzzy aggregation and consensus process for Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making problems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Group decision-making; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Computer science; Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Selection (genetic algorithm); Artificial intelligence; Management science; Data mining; Engineering","score_opus":0.21535489401146865,"score_gpt":0.45381903809747176,"score_spread":0.2384641440860031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588703081","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004551965,0.000098118566,0.99329257,0.00014898732,0.000020182883,0.00008758462,0.000012161259,0.000041424715,0.0017469755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23730911,0.00021599159,0.7598306,0.00008225431,0.000046890702,0.00038074073,0.000055303888,0.000029355822,0.0020497001],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906199,0.005135228,0.000467651,0.001024616,0.002414423,0.0003381944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938638,0.003907479,0.00036993378,0.00030567293,0.0013386728,0.00021445988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012158018,0.0009903748,0.0014490237,0.0019006288,0.0017240479,0.0024862245,0.0018459468,0.0025181905,0.0029622556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013930732,0.0005578192,0.0018228231,0.002476862,0.00193177,0.003303226,0.0034558661,0.0024779637,0.0004391477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001264569,0.00014281571,0.0010093891,0.000385222,0.00018818336,0.00054790213,0.0017455055,0.62904793,0.0042358125,0.25476974,0.0014151762,0.106385835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002726624,0.00010844908,0.00015414678,0.00005216899,0.000032542168,0.00006607237,0.00010848725,0.9175884,0.0013049385,0.078014195,0.002512138,0.000031126077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024614823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022419025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012158018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016407297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027985799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06429851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599685465","doi":"10.20381/ruor-16282","title":"Detecting DIF in polytomous items: An empirical comparison of the ordinal logistic regression, logistic discriminant function analysis, Mantel, and Generalized Mantel-Haenszel procedures.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polytomous Rasch model; Logistic regression; Discriminant function analysis; Ordered logit; Statistics; Ordinal regression; Mathematics; Econometrics; Ordinal data; Linear discriminant analysis; Item response theory; Psychometrics","score_opus":0.07146919139122176,"score_gpt":0.3402948891894433,"score_spread":0.2688256977982215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599685465","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.480168,0.0036161023,0.50412357,0.001159107,0.00038242617,0.0020207935,0.0005747591,0.00061556423,0.007339649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7137488,0.000742018,0.28234628,0.00020547504,0.000061323306,0.0018431563,0.0003347909,0.000112926115,0.0006052032],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.8164975,0.16066341,0.0048434427,0.005587636,0.011807645,0.00060042355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39427596,0.5554491,0.01991519,0.016824536,0.012514784,0.0010204182],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19189969,0.0012676766,0.0012191178,0.0061652362,0.00087801105,0.0017794949,0.0020990907,0.0011095242,0.0015062626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.50371826,0.0005963802,0.002118664,0.005822841,0.0033116546,0.003968617,0.0030892557,0.0025301436,0.0005008216],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036125279,0.000836451,0.40731525,0.001763986,0.004702507,0.00034538962,0.008001073,0.0111839175,0.0021675683,0.039502833,0.003569957,0.51699847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011248214,0.007895528,0.58362126,0.0015047509,0.0018191044,0.0025480818,0.010078589,0.2788296,0.0056618047,0.090105526,0.01599577,0.00081522204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018078139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027113187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19189969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016965144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001923809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99653155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600235221","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2017.2.003","title":"Fuzzy multi-attribute decision making evaluation of e-learning websites using FAHP, COPRAS, VIKOR, WDBA","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"VIKOR method; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Process management; Operations management; Artificial intelligence; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.3280926096670405,"score_gpt":0.5160570119454856,"score_spread":0.18796440227844508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600235221","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13213599,0.00051059277,0.8613963,0.0002955754,0.000044887303,0.00033659072,0.000122047175,0.000094286916,0.0050636358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77267456,0.0003027925,0.22555266,0.000038658174,0.000020192625,0.00035243208,0.000094096504,0.000009992043,0.00095454237],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610955,0.0021197475,0.00018675483,0.00029280773,0.0010696044,0.00022148095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970319,0.0021362037,0.00024328253,0.0000829741,0.00040147573,0.00010407412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055285883,0.0009241711,0.0011790858,0.0031564,0.00087975373,0.0026192563,0.001145445,0.00080883165,0.0014616625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008396529,0.0003787729,0.0016812065,0.0022809913,0.0006393952,0.001632035,0.0010735941,0.0010169618,0.0001355217],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002092655,0.000305069,0.0064208894,0.00050236925,0.00030042385,0.0002817708,0.00053598697,0.83755934,0.0028437497,0.028834151,0.00080113637,0.12140589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001141581,0.00012968104,0.00092854205,0.000030787494,0.000033581906,0.0000322813,0.00014373875,0.9898241,0.00074419146,0.007646769,0.00045235854,0.000022569597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005636379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004920311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005636379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022301334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018173999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029238284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603267616","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2017.2.002","title":"Extended TOPSIS model for solving multi-attribute decision making problems in engineering","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Decision-making models; Computer science; Management science; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.20134691678107472,"score_gpt":0.4435977494744929,"score_spread":0.24225083269341816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603267616","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032690598,0.0006157152,0.9914688,0.00024594046,0.00006827443,0.00019201213,0.00011604649,0.00013017566,0.0038940532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2731991,0.0019197802,0.718697,0.00019123695,0.00012504614,0.001327721,0.00047863185,0.000047031182,0.004014306],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99259067,0.00359993,0.00048004766,0.0005425382,0.0025079104,0.00027885288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811125,0.0009968255,0.00019393113,0.000091127426,0.00054518325,0.00006167502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059946673,0.0024649163,0.0018479694,0.0027373377,0.0011215433,0.0030356178,0.0027750838,0.0013275709,0.0056622056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00466211,0.00051991607,0.0029906884,0.0044112355,0.00088455115,0.0025293916,0.0016265026,0.0026512835,0.0014458086],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012327843,0.00019677266,0.001260849,0.001996071,0.0011506608,0.00069846347,0.0010199766,0.5321958,0.0033416774,0.20816325,0.004637062,0.24521609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047736572,0.00022959337,0.00058298814,0.00017707523,0.00014433409,0.00021734022,0.00028160872,0.815281,0.0008658063,0.17289168,0.0091958335,0.00008490379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004781658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004194194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059946673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022418555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027512112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031703174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604577833","doi":"10.3390/en10040447","title":"Hybridising Human Judgment, AHP, Grey Theory, and Fuzzy Expert Systems for Candidate Well Selection in Fractured Reservoirs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energies","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Southwest Petroleum University; State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy logic; Hydraulic fracturing; Selection (genetic algorithm); Hierarchy; Process (computing); Computer science; Data mining; Engineering; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Petroleum engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.12031973385185718,"score_gpt":0.4335901784563225,"score_spread":0.3132704446044653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604577833","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19692913,0.0002204529,0.79966515,0.00026139186,0.00003861127,0.0002682304,0.00005264515,0.00019196069,0.0023725082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75906706,0.00010378312,0.24003503,0.00005134301,0.000016916683,0.0001401499,0.000046608115,0.000012658163,0.00052645383],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707437,0.0017915793,0.00015979673,0.00022071536,0.000619318,0.00013432566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942854,0.004226385,0.00032629725,0.00018155704,0.00080008997,0.00018022835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005610254,0.00065211754,0.0009129851,0.002313849,0.0010825183,0.0013928136,0.00076402,0.00091047806,0.0010135445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107489,0.00041287858,0.0007411096,0.0014065866,0.0006988059,0.0013505914,0.0012259837,0.0007006226,0.00012875347],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047084733,0.0004180772,0.0069760215,0.0004166592,0.00023381457,0.00032517774,0.0021740068,0.76467234,0.008775969,0.0088505,0.00073876086,0.20594785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026094109,0.00010092257,0.0008950872,0.000021351832,0.000027041822,0.00002148491,0.00026781697,0.9921874,0.0014149302,0.004668226,0.00034217827,0.000027495766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011260137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015807327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011260137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001425199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023585677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029670238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604906089","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2018.01.004","title":"Inconsistency of special cases of pairwise comparisons matrices","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Mathematics; Invertible matrix; Circulant matrix; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Consistency (knowledge bases); Matrix (chemical analysis); Toeplitz matrix; Cover (algebra); Measure (data warehouse); Rank (graph theory); Statistics; Combinatorics; Applied mathematics; Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.13443245569129514,"score_gpt":0.4303325898739738,"score_spread":0.2959001341826787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604906089","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084435605,0.00072273583,0.9081039,0.0008751202,0.000091026785,0.00014910258,0.00038392592,0.00020655013,0.005031886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70312405,0.00035819242,0.29371724,0.00023231066,0.00019483018,0.00036389247,0.000892135,0.00010799741,0.0010094546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9466466,0.025598643,0.0047838925,0.007496053,0.013662051,0.0018127626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6568066,0.29800877,0.015163656,0.015645765,0.0128242895,0.0015509335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029757531,0.0011350455,0.0025619345,0.0062735844,0.0017682726,0.0051337117,0.0052442267,0.0033138713,0.004546584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2654008,0.0020481856,0.002819136,0.007196925,0.0046874587,0.010131736,0.0038556694,0.003998971,0.0003663745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014583716,0.00028417143,0.018885516,0.0013346879,0.0012738426,0.003460775,0.0030246302,0.16652796,0.0025549955,0.66720915,0.0060035964,0.12798233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008931155,0.00007487237,0.0014707015,0.00011028441,0.00017029022,0.0014035701,0.00029063903,0.29430252,0.0014800617,0.6992198,0.0013245236,0.00006342046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00261733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016064324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029757531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023066204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014466207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15737474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606626141","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v6n3p157","title":"A Parametric Test to Discriminate Between a Linear Regression Model and a Linear Latent Growth Model","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Test statistic; Linear model; Statistics; Asymptotic distribution; F-test; Covariance matrix; Linear regression; Generalized linear model; Statistical hypothesis testing; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.24309946223594164,"score_gpt":0.4617293714860008,"score_spread":0.21862990925005915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606626141","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11260896,0.00044965875,0.8744899,0.0016720055,0.0004480424,0.00044790676,0.0011337949,0.0011565711,0.0075932834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80784845,0.0001614288,0.18725425,0.00051129435,0.00028570244,0.0012688076,0.0012694767,0.00017410642,0.0012263991],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96089095,0.026571946,0.0022370107,0.004260785,0.005041831,0.0009975325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72598153,0.25324664,0.0056484654,0.01026598,0.0035837363,0.0012736286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03641307,0.0013662636,0.0022425,0.003689616,0.0009940834,0.002178559,0.0031488666,0.004617032,0.009653581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20869124,0.00044545764,0.0024121315,0.0024413909,0.0042285766,0.003975431,0.002676923,0.004216785,0.0013866845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039321412,0.0020813604,0.1373257,0.0020608536,0.004348998,0.0023872226,0.0020796424,0.06974959,0.012642383,0.25156084,0.018890632,0.49294055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054069376,0.0067338734,0.06662318,0.0006239107,0.00064182526,0.0029521512,0.0020241404,0.6503687,0.013525117,0.24327914,0.012220445,0.00046688796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058830786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003226373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03641307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009117407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002181945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19257301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607078933","doi":"10.1590/0102-778632120160045","title":"Decisão em Condições de Incerteza Meteorológica e Proteção de Infraestruturas no Centro de Lançamento de Alcântara","year":2017,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Humanities; Mathematics; Geography; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10647796868912832,"score_gpt":0.40858949929583577,"score_spread":0.3021115306067075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607078933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99437153,0.00014948039,0.003441465,0.000049051374,0.0000031398372,0.00001264914,0.00022601255,0.00007702658,0.001669701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787235,0.00006212448,0.0015652113,0.000004852624,0.0000013073757,0.0000060149036,0.00011063635,0.0000059064905,0.0003715794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937576,0.000071714676,0.00004325124,0.000180169,0.0002511565,0.00007798718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701464,0.0010536473,0.0006979695,0.00026182045,0.00081461726,0.00015728438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007354383,0.00033733144,0.00032477718,0.0009972764,0.00048246255,0.001599519,0.0003957087,0.0004479446,0.0017246824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028800073,0.00028828825,0.0002814764,0.0012562034,0.00047308777,0.00072590064,0.00050284667,0.00032959576,0.00032918376],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056017865,0.000064667285,0.85704404,0.00021158114,0.000096356176,0.00039514693,0.0015732069,0.019932741,0.07569924,0.00090322545,0.0003575639,0.04316205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012335846,0.00025700466,0.918686,0.00004588584,0.00010120705,0.00031144283,0.003266739,0.03777825,0.035340447,0.0010762297,0.003066715,0.00005780953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028664676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048518483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028664676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010762038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008639358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05699569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609326230","doi":"10.1016/j.ins.2017.04.037","title":"Choquet based TOPSIS and TODIM for dynamic and heterogeneous decision making with criteria interaction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"TOPSIS; Acronym; Dynamic decision-making; Computer science; Group decision-making; Choquet integral; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Identification (biology); Set (abstract data type); Management science; Preference; Operations research; Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.14997180895682222,"score_gpt":0.4917454530510231,"score_spread":0.34177364409420086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609326230","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020992942,0.00074396416,0.97276354,0.00018889512,0.00013131436,0.00020126025,0.000103858685,0.00010937531,0.004764864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42691225,0.00076995627,0.5681703,0.000094267256,0.00007797678,0.0008094946,0.00022425165,0.000053100182,0.0028884143],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99285275,0.0038314802,0.00038306433,0.00055533356,0.0020647396,0.0003125927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99370897,0.00400768,0.0003171978,0.00034139658,0.0014866727,0.00013809641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071452917,0.0011656504,0.0026630003,0.004893331,0.0012308413,0.0029847925,0.0023673465,0.0013601481,0.0032265673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017937325,0.00054277596,0.0030901397,0.0046332045,0.0010489074,0.0019571697,0.0027597554,0.0015080839,0.00047493534],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004601616,0.00035857904,0.0023000403,0.0016328862,0.0011643183,0.00040955187,0.0008605137,0.3494812,0.003506181,0.28252783,0.002614764,0.354684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028576429,0.00018410388,0.0005453107,0.000082719314,0.00013131,0.000078075245,0.00014990967,0.92257214,0.00059219194,0.07405968,0.0015229482,0.000053059244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055875746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006132091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071452917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022208008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034325207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03778833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611027742","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2017.4.002","title":"A TOPSIS method based on intuitionistic fuzzy values: a case study of North African airports","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Computer science; Mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.15694179782703394,"score_gpt":0.44562159761563946,"score_spread":0.28867979978860553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611027742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73823917,0.0011001067,0.22804882,0.001216518,0.000093329814,0.0009927343,0.00019779526,0.00008390159,0.030027542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86897385,0.0006869279,0.12763117,0.000026062846,0.000007684702,0.00017389993,0.00004001663,0.000009003772,0.0024514995],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697495,0.0019958036,0.00014334013,0.00014582684,0.0006014643,0.00013860223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981811,0.0012294232,0.00013815115,0.00008752609,0.0002810596,0.00008275013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033497533,0.00077207823,0.000666265,0.001779799,0.0030334047,0.0022827988,0.00073441427,0.0012764789,0.0020440659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038953847,0.00033757353,0.0007945789,0.0026733656,0.0011128341,0.0015990203,0.00094110565,0.00091074954,0.00019499581],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011718979,0.0013656333,0.027884265,0.0034360415,0.00048737225,0.044132333,0.06149117,0.27092773,0.034175504,0.11976807,0.005040715,0.4301193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044027713,0.0022528272,0.03964808,0.001636679,0.0006205037,0.011092575,0.11299293,0.6783993,0.03095056,0.047998935,0.073354654,0.00061261875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010600383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018346574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010600383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018311432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019965388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021077394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611658389","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.079","title":"The impacts of decision uncertainty on municipal solid waste management","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Harvard Kennedy School","keywords":"Risk analysis (engineering); Process (computing); Outcome (game theory); Reliability (semiconductor); Analytic hierarchy process; Cost–benefit analysis; Decision analysis; Municipal solid waste; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Hierarchy; Computer science; Management science; Business; Engineering; Economics; Waste management; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07063605964198492,"score_gpt":0.39641981430539913,"score_spread":0.3257837546634142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611658389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9566266,0.0017770729,0.024164319,0.004184268,0.00015315345,0.000053269923,0.00019795878,0.000037206955,0.012806082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988016,0.00012234117,0.000847382,0.00004523223,0.000018647941,0.00000613727,0.000017644525,0.0000040544496,0.00013696124],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.990303,0.005458305,0.00039089954,0.00037797133,0.0022264405,0.0012433903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8675396,0.12216693,0.0050225183,0.0008022701,0.0035419753,0.00092665234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015039528,0.00056573574,0.0008670643,0.0015140653,0.0012690139,0.004511645,0.000807666,0.002069876,0.001958573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07307402,0.00046429023,0.00084998156,0.0014125112,0.0017756078,0.0037307702,0.0018271505,0.002056603,0.00009906975],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014990772,0.00032561528,0.023502422,0.00027072197,0.0003012147,0.0007930674,0.00048839574,0.89723355,0.0013855183,0.037454437,0.0010459488,0.03569994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006910966,0.0005759487,0.018197585,0.00013860496,0.00020180638,0.0001696998,0.0021998975,0.8444253,0.0023845802,0.13004962,0.0014405084,0.00014723989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006196519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060432986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015039528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004210721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021903182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07953763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612176865","doi":"","title":"Some Operations on Fuzzy Hypergraphs.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.13257204763143965,"score_gpt":0.4130417413109911,"score_spread":0.28046969367955144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612176865","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033455778,0.005913134,0.84957314,0.0035715096,0.0005338244,0.00021270713,0.0014141641,0.0002585279,0.10506731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46320584,0.00678691,0.48308802,0.0010112433,0.0011748759,0.00074950635,0.0012249441,0.00018770585,0.042570863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976076,0.0011662651,0.00021108717,0.00034062171,0.0005348138,0.00013965987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946896,0.003746905,0.0003858378,0.00042322162,0.0004888143,0.0002656956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033283937,0.00096447545,0.00094650325,0.0034330706,0.0013385364,0.004515664,0.0010570135,0.0011338524,0.012847348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008374717,0.0005435013,0.0016294073,0.0048186393,0.0029405262,0.0070984517,0.0018722089,0.0029951122,0.0018421393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020845842,0.000021179307,0.000106579304,0.00010469456,0.00002560654,0.00005549426,0.00013332303,0.0052408893,0.00022926503,0.9693383,0.0030250505,0.02169883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009242001,0.000016345628,0.00012042267,0.000059879287,0.000014541096,0.00007435366,0.00006172423,0.017913308,0.00019725006,0.9744485,0.007071491,0.0000129324035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015312947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001839975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012847348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028146626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010640951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042978585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613952510","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-57819-4_20","title":"Consistency Analysis of City Indicator Data","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Data quality; Econometrics; Statistics; Data mining; Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Operations management","score_opus":0.15215907543233126,"score_gpt":0.3938466536321735,"score_spread":0.24168757819984227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613952510","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09550084,0.0013044581,0.89591545,0.0006196701,0.00013264024,0.0001539574,0.0022607527,0.00068809406,0.00342415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7045098,0.00069551583,0.27963907,0.00020009832,0.00026685107,0.00034160956,0.011589641,0.0007492107,0.002008247],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.971848,0.016087418,0.0021156596,0.0037116802,0.005292726,0.0009444555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87205225,0.092901096,0.006192474,0.016400198,0.011883038,0.0005709085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032631278,0.0007738457,0.0019106461,0.007899096,0.0011315952,0.0046497686,0.0039902953,0.0016435737,0.0025185319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14572881,0.0013156733,0.0028539342,0.013567694,0.0016657186,0.004736205,0.0036619352,0.002859135,0.00057622744],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016745225,0.00031224507,0.18015501,0.0010136776,0.0028671823,0.00047939373,0.0010776607,0.21568856,0.004672142,0.17228068,0.013290627,0.4064884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007485194,0.00015699584,0.034289747,0.00021948153,0.00038318653,0.00028511873,0.00041276403,0.80180603,0.006567826,0.14890978,0.006810694,0.00008343348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004850694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044672666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032631278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018711488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024772368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17257273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615276204","doi":"10.1504/ijlsm.2017.10005115","title":"A hybrid approach based on BOCR and fuzzy MULTIMOORA for logistics service provider selection","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Robustness (evolution); Service provider; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Service (business); Business; Machine learning; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.21379709089444252,"score_gpt":0.4299609266409029,"score_spread":0.2161638357464604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615276204","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011945447,0.00029071316,0.98380834,0.00020290309,0.000040733852,0.0002963028,0.00010125296,0.00020533772,0.0031090286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26246405,0.00020374387,0.7340897,0.0001603477,0.000054133838,0.00057216355,0.00023319884,0.00006204333,0.002160608],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897155,0.004927101,0.00060492207,0.0013912605,0.0027084886,0.0006526682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99309087,0.0041693435,0.0007073443,0.00046113887,0.0013026155,0.000268712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008164346,0.0016659985,0.0027050662,0.008275992,0.0015365514,0.0030321607,0.0028008816,0.0018583711,0.005625558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009560519,0.001023648,0.0036429309,0.004787984,0.0009635322,0.0025164688,0.003134356,0.0016665395,0.0008271758],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003249307,0.00042108388,0.0045004413,0.0008636468,0.00088875304,0.00050154486,0.0005976963,0.57007796,0.0072738286,0.039989416,0.0026994485,0.37186125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003235448,0.00016740499,0.0006526785,0.000051910913,0.0001185848,0.00013396525,0.0001502145,0.9834141,0.0011933704,0.012301043,0.0017231583,0.00006113486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072673447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077085514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008275992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021035732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026433193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043177724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617524550","doi":"10.4018/ijdsst.2017100101","title":"A Recommender System Based on Multi-Criteria Aggregation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"International Journal of Decision Support System Technology","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Recommender system; Computer science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.17050831726550267,"score_gpt":0.4657868332620165,"score_spread":0.2952785159965138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617524550","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011215401,0.0013040303,0.97534966,0.0006282744,0.00030908457,0.00032405937,0.00039703865,0.0014023504,0.009070031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20398179,0.0014862478,0.7821628,0.00031438147,0.00028322503,0.00049473107,0.00095240766,0.00011164923,0.010212894],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715495,0.0010486736,0.00025168646,0.00050554145,0.00092036655,0.00011881074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976846,0.0007566975,0.000121990095,0.00038501466,0.00091697153,0.00013465394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031404647,0.00090480316,0.0018469829,0.0017569779,0.0013566421,0.0024946255,0.0012745169,0.0019694853,0.0056480537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065378775,0.00044269738,0.0017373313,0.0020909382,0.00041462312,0.0015210499,0.0012404303,0.0013514792,0.0024970022],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045155085,0.0002975514,0.0042647826,0.00094511156,0.0012210815,0.0010871063,0.0005965401,0.23981702,0.018145943,0.0765831,0.030890822,0.62569934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014494472,0.00030313432,0.0014202782,0.00013360869,0.0003809907,0.00065218564,0.0000996563,0.91306686,0.0057406323,0.032538325,0.04536269,0.0001566473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065045343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007153927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065045343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006623199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013382981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018894613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618162153","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2017.05.057","title":"Bi-level plant selection and production allocation model under type-2 fuzzy demand","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Selection (genetic algorithm); Production (economics); Fuzzy logic; Parametric statistics; Decision maker; Degree (music); Computer science; Type (biology); Fuzzy number; Parametric programming; Sensitivity (control systems); Order (exchange); Mathematics; Operations research; Fuzzy set; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.24455221418933454,"score_gpt":0.41841449824012295,"score_spread":0.1738622840507884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618162153","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35899436,0.0007555544,0.61143893,0.0013493927,0.0002103639,0.00023289112,0.0016190211,0.00052674796,0.024872627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97716343,0.00019068245,0.010772363,0.00005680565,0.000027938717,0.00015688298,0.00023164894,0.00003317447,0.011367],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990339,0.00029609908,0.00003860676,0.00023039247,0.00017279296,0.00022821051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852306,0.0008147546,0.00018301688,0.000059558824,0.0002732809,0.0001462943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015712455,0.0012054151,0.002466441,0.0010117467,0.0010470389,0.0026032336,0.0022100916,0.00323742,0.0066797906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001979548,0.001279703,0.0013097236,0.002103343,0.000994395,0.0017967647,0.0013608321,0.0015280101,0.0007254142],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100880614,0.000043841086,0.0004199933,0.000063451065,0.000041326803,0.00016108673,0.0000347357,0.9926398,0.00068887376,0.0034097917,0.00031949516,0.0020768377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071262357,0.000017837408,0.00015637447,0.000001965116,0.000008717834,0.000009320095,0.000010295686,0.9989164,0.000059423113,0.00075353734,0.00005268705,0.0000064167966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016978543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009795682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016978543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019475095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011491621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033759415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618664687","doi":"10.3758/s13428-017-0898-2","title":"Scoring best-worst data in unbalanced many-item designs, with applications to crowdsourcing semantic judgments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavior Research Methods","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Crowdsourcing; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Rank (graph theory); Scaling; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Scoring rule; Machine learning; Data mining; Quality (philosophy); Information retrieval; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8789947781800274,"score_gpt":0.7240679895118148,"score_spread":0.15492678866821252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618664687","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09411725,0.00063828466,0.89841706,0.00053808145,0.00033819606,0.0021509572,0.0005444325,0.00089737435,0.0023584315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3825931,0.00015374996,0.6103179,0.00029565283,0.00017477636,0.0040903995,0.0011974854,0.00025442484,0.0009225649],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7003267,0.26524287,0.0069308565,0.016150104,0.0100342315,0.0013152993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2824127,0.6634079,0.011052042,0.031165976,0.009726428,0.0022349502],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21904995,0.0040768096,0.0063290056,0.0046851435,0.004283062,0.00647405,0.006368466,0.0055992254,0.005490639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5381021,0.0024471544,0.0051806387,0.0047824862,0.008037642,0.00556168,0.009930083,0.0053711133,0.000993141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020048887,0.0043284507,0.05817139,0.004687018,0.0069063343,0.0006883458,0.01451839,0.23922983,0.0053995703,0.12278692,0.010089386,0.51314545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020664185,0.0019192635,0.010522701,0.00050645316,0.0010013276,0.0001903494,0.0015581211,0.7195421,0.002375032,0.25553143,0.004445189,0.00034157792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002607078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003968242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21904995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002589496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028709457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9630504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619302272","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0177695","title":"A new weighting factor in combining belief function","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Weighting; A-weighting; Entropy (arrow of time); Dempster–Shafer theory; Computer science; Data mining; Function (biology); Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.40873004690049736,"score_gpt":0.40698995588615466,"score_spread":0.0017400910143426929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619302272","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009016447,0.0006784394,0.9888102,0.00010129185,0.000064735905,0.000063942905,0.000042665655,0.000088557266,0.0011336129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32725754,0.0011795807,0.6689922,0.000114825445,0.00023793452,0.00039048484,0.00021928085,0.00006656186,0.0015414768],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940585,0.0016730191,0.0007963832,0.0009460744,0.002243524,0.0002824979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99413645,0.002787712,0.0004685953,0.0004754932,0.001966508,0.00016518458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066044596,0.0015111206,0.0014333574,0.00407723,0.0006886074,0.0023243532,0.0021137875,0.0017127506,0.0019233156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022859316,0.000527162,0.0014634897,0.0036353632,0.001023234,0.0061644884,0.002388201,0.0013972357,0.00038349754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003368674,0.00013277454,0.004131826,0.0008876976,0.0005323258,0.00028110677,0.00052244734,0.1837653,0.014579963,0.10902372,0.0019432637,0.6838626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006335617,0.00033459367,0.001987328,0.00018410893,0.0003560512,0.00046686362,0.0001324497,0.9009815,0.0071242508,0.08046059,0.0077604996,0.00014843399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016694139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010743431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066044596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010312785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011060365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034928143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624594480","doi":"","title":"Characterization of bi-intuitionistic validity through resource games","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Prevention of Organ Failure","funders":"","keywords":"Characterization (materials science); Computer science; Resource (disambiguation); Materials science; Nanotechnology","score_opus":0.13674842936142664,"score_gpt":0.33929027856351,"score_spread":0.20254184920208337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624594480","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18081634,0.00048396768,0.77712375,0.0036708508,0.0000985018,0.00047844468,0.0006397656,0.0002737782,0.036414534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9400922,0.0002568705,0.05552372,0.00044191536,0.0001244401,0.00039297642,0.00036918724,0.00009389075,0.0027049126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9659594,0.015837185,0.002181063,0.0045740353,0.008112988,0.0033353034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7591256,0.20120643,0.011205225,0.011262489,0.011018099,0.0061821383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026462931,0.0017803267,0.0039725965,0.005213306,0.0033651586,0.009856667,0.004551799,0.003450297,0.0069013936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15456116,0.0017609047,0.004367621,0.0042981245,0.013671211,0.016887937,0.008768841,0.008045542,0.00045864005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026705727,0.00011867163,0.0015941708,0.00021896523,0.00015092666,0.00013473353,0.00075545197,0.022960154,0.0005681379,0.96719176,0.0006898282,0.0053501925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039486342,0.000048399936,0.00034450553,0.00004393172,0.000030281955,0.00005119326,0.00010416896,0.08596621,0.00028800045,0.91265357,0.00039452748,0.00003560238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003916352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022529392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026462931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005916928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056431713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13995099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2627426069","doi":"10.3390/w9060443","title":"Evaluation of Groundwater Remediation Technologies Based on Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approaches","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Key Research and Development Program of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ranking (information retrieval); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ideal solution; Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Production (economics); Fuzzy logic; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Environmental economics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.4524002275397686,"score_gpt":0.46423536252828573,"score_spread":0.011835134988517126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2627426069","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18297341,0.0014321096,0.80592567,0.00048648694,0.000053835665,0.00047810178,0.00020799378,0.00014540054,0.0082969405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8780234,0.00050200144,0.12026998,0.00004680665,0.000020242427,0.00029766237,0.00011034892,0.000009823415,0.00071975926],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646556,0.0015597898,0.00024615572,0.0002302176,0.0012236207,0.00027466728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818474,0.0011291022,0.00015808996,0.000032909098,0.00041385202,0.00008124986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046009817,0.0014018134,0.001418995,0.0059898216,0.0010260508,0.0025074757,0.0010180334,0.0010307344,0.001447914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051309047,0.00045038923,0.0021057273,0.0026569737,0.00062986393,0.0015304659,0.0009403555,0.0006010363,0.00008790218],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016031669,0.00016625477,0.0037607295,0.00036424925,0.00027523335,0.0001566521,0.00023386635,0.9195185,0.0031096581,0.012206741,0.00054161454,0.059506286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001686809,0.000116058756,0.00069649867,0.00003368007,0.00006155463,0.000021894146,0.00012659097,0.99284345,0.00088736904,0.004817717,0.00035433445,0.000023913743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0094468985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0081009455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0094468985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034598408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002173005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025103033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735437445","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2017.07.006","title":"Coimplications derived from pseudo-uninorms on a complete lattice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Negation; Mathematics; Residual; Fuzzy logic; Generalization; Lattice (music); Closure (psychology); Binary number; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics; Algebra over a field; Algorithm; Arithmetic; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Programming language","score_opus":0.19185337084846327,"score_gpt":0.44685181280097014,"score_spread":0.25499844195250687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735437445","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068465054,0.00024107973,0.91708696,0.00038671933,0.00014832547,0.00006146082,0.00025933757,0.0003806991,0.012970398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58681667,0.0002664912,0.40409517,0.00036483037,0.00019448556,0.00020153602,0.0008048435,0.00031492225,0.006940945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945327,0.0019111402,0.0005139503,0.00074433535,0.0017655026,0.0005322709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98237944,0.011223832,0.0009664192,0.0024090935,0.002441154,0.00058015017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004829944,0.00065410195,0.0013117621,0.0022641497,0.0017684578,0.0036192413,0.001842927,0.0014758328,0.0044873236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02083408,0.0007544222,0.0023418474,0.002688167,0.0035953529,0.0057060644,0.0025549985,0.003704517,0.00065255276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020165303,0.00008021464,0.00074479927,0.00010912113,0.000050574046,0.00048049234,0.00036127117,0.032181818,0.0016506589,0.9301106,0.0014759733,0.032552805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021960035,0.00004068279,0.00011588741,0.000035249952,0.000026439038,0.0002851571,0.00010778084,0.114808366,0.002049375,0.88044715,0.0020361347,0.000025683432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015212036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016847926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004829944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013321185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014254649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02554351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737092689","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-63546-0_13","title":"Building a Shared Model for Multi-criteria Group Decision Making","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in business information processing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs","keywords":"Structuring; Group decision-making; Computer science; Process (computing); Rank (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Preference; Order (exchange); Group (periodic table); Function (biology); Operations research; Decision analysis; Management science; Process management; Knowledge management; Engineering; Geography; Psychology; Mathematics; Political science; Business; Social psychology; Statistics","score_opus":0.1752126568947567,"score_gpt":0.4329886314525491,"score_spread":0.25777597455779244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737092689","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003409082,0.00004085584,0.99474996,0.00014564689,0.000016527949,0.00004026818,0.00004680577,0.00012613827,0.0014247225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18047109,0.00013436176,0.8154703,0.000115563045,0.000035422523,0.0004845071,0.00039724028,0.00014228102,0.0027492922],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568117,0.002168948,0.00031987502,0.0005794553,0.00097570557,0.0002748513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99505025,0.0028010604,0.00023986252,0.000901326,0.0007826854,0.0002248114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056818672,0.001046308,0.001842391,0.0011751055,0.0013004037,0.0033297436,0.0038712844,0.0022675358,0.0055331415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012908752,0.0010129652,0.0034315197,0.0019503448,0.0013951875,0.006263046,0.0061715473,0.003355051,0.0013412507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072300914,0.00012079659,0.00077507837,0.00013155471,0.00021272927,0.00018336905,0.00041514428,0.7656831,0.00089967455,0.15970704,0.0017067329,0.07009246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008643971,0.000023510109,0.000054300133,0.000016171196,0.000025182382,0.000022296997,0.000033781704,0.8906026,0.000245138,0.10773434,0.001222097,0.0000120090945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060258806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060258806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018905902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032651364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030048966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740458485","doi":"","title":"FUZZY SETS IN HIERARCHICAL BAYES AND ROBUST BAYES INFERENCE","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bayes' theorem; Bayes' rule; Artificial intelligence; Bayes factor; Mathematics; Membership function; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy inference; Function (biology); Data mining; Computer science; Fuzzy set; Machine learning; Bayesian probability; Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system; Fuzzy control system","score_opus":0.1860007740435033,"score_gpt":0.43519175780645536,"score_spread":0.24919098376295207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740458485","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045153284,0.007989434,0.973784,0.0026663058,0.00026370637,0.0000652187,0.00011594159,0.00012403808,0.010475875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3531598,0.0069051506,0.6309888,0.00078208937,0.0016291891,0.00036087516,0.00022238426,0.00011103256,0.0058406913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98644686,0.009388883,0.0005556391,0.0009424938,0.0023933465,0.000272729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97329855,0.02297926,0.0011409257,0.0009290329,0.0014454585,0.0002068691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020305216,0.0008210466,0.001737056,0.0037644212,0.0010554956,0.0036212658,0.0016882088,0.0021550427,0.0036154753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04085713,0.00067574915,0.0014853991,0.002503619,0.0041048327,0.003907081,0.0016035158,0.0026583665,0.0006588688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027566846,0.000016661877,0.00037540548,0.00019773425,0.000119670935,0.00014325809,0.00030188073,0.06315481,0.00011102024,0.87979347,0.002351505,0.05340709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007994033,0.0000072780813,0.0001304908,0.000074312215,0.000017770448,0.000031614996,0.000036155383,0.08679325,0.00007784445,0.910397,0.0024113858,0.0000150364895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072022798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004924323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020305216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030553858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017943726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107385516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742500246","doi":"10.1007/s40815-017-0355-5","title":"Generalized Choquet Integral for Face Recognition","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Narodowym Centrum Nauki; Narodowe Centrum Nauki","keywords":"Choquet integral; Generalization; Face (sociological concept); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Context (archaeology); Fuzzy measure theory; Mathematics; Dempster–Shafer theory; Simple (philosophy); Sign (mathematics); Pattern recognition (psychology); Machine learning; Membership function; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set","score_opus":0.3484998648532807,"score_gpt":0.49631607827056123,"score_spread":0.14781621341728052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742500246","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0082857115,0.0013814261,0.9867286,0.00016644209,0.00011883502,0.000026910568,0.000019910223,0.00006126245,0.003210921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.523473,0.0023986732,0.46870402,0.00025322128,0.0004157136,0.000162853,0.00010315203,0.00007133469,0.0044179996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893075,0.00035277562,0.00005106731,0.00018142196,0.00041229965,0.0000716725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929535,0.00033647215,0.00006271837,0.00006275318,0.00021122943,0.00003158222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020409652,0.0005556634,0.0009801969,0.0009936568,0.00038179476,0.0013066349,0.0008454705,0.0009804771,0.0017057557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035195583,0.00015686834,0.0010031889,0.0008941333,0.0008769037,0.0014723191,0.0008137748,0.0011756506,0.0004173848],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026217694,0.000095843425,0.0007107846,0.0004417636,0.00015699764,0.00023797371,0.00024719455,0.2367772,0.023034925,0.49373633,0.0022637458,0.2420351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007772376,0.000048871723,0.00020583006,0.000016906328,0.000019038736,0.00009222003,0.000025277155,0.8911377,0.0018757546,0.10422961,0.0023160842,0.000024900344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077060156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043073957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020409652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007463202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005693964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010793805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748330406","doi":"10.1007/s00477-017-1449-1","title":"Evaluating water reuse applications under uncertainty: generalized intuitionistic fuzzy-based approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities","keywords":"Reuse; Computational intelligence; Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Similarity (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Water resources; Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.3539786874314594,"score_gpt":0.5496613964404757,"score_spread":0.19568270900901635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748330406","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06468772,0.0006509312,0.928166,0.00035093943,0.000046889356,0.00011137872,0.00010533486,0.000089889814,0.0057908935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8839554,0.00040739027,0.11462097,0.00006778328,0.00004516955,0.00011230735,0.00007477944,0.000014382416,0.0007017399],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963715,0.0011279061,0.0002552784,0.0003008841,0.0016542906,0.00029009848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671644,0.0019972746,0.00037773114,0.00014486653,0.00061951915,0.00014419941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004702178,0.0016711679,0.0022441093,0.004000639,0.0008091932,0.0037014892,0.0020823565,0.0018832998,0.0015111673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008228125,0.00068756443,0.0025144133,0.0021737837,0.0016189072,0.0029830474,0.0014885021,0.0010557572,0.00013024054],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001019705,0.000106125415,0.0009807226,0.00026664409,0.0002416856,0.00025174549,0.00016859813,0.9306702,0.0024457849,0.03560429,0.00050721766,0.028654998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011431884,0.000059590086,0.00032935102,0.000034627406,0.000056183268,0.000045303364,0.00005561685,0.9647748,0.0005229899,0.033857856,0.00022176433,0.000030430154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005363904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004944996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005363904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025781242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002020643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024867833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751599672","doi":"10.21078/jssi-2017-128-20","title":"On Consistency in AHP and Fuzzy AHP","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"系统科学与信息学报(英文)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Pairwise comparison; Group decision-making; Consistency (knowledge bases); Fuzzy logic; Vagueness; Transitive relation; Computer science; Mathematics; Fuzzy set; Reciprocal; Fuzzy number; Operations research; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.29204548579561235,"score_gpt":0.4878765098276091,"score_spread":0.19583102403199676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751599672","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011337374,0.00093812327,0.98182195,0.00062064675,0.00012519391,0.00012799301,0.00004421612,0.000048276033,0.00493627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5020296,0.00077244325,0.49509847,0.000228122,0.00029287185,0.00041359648,0.00012218406,0.000070603055,0.00097211736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.939844,0.039459895,0.0022384815,0.0025006658,0.015020803,0.0009360829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9048216,0.07437764,0.00462725,0.003939392,0.011628323,0.0006059244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057140283,0.0008970081,0.0015891931,0.0036719437,0.0015935358,0.0037130113,0.0023216244,0.0014271357,0.0017556805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.101230726,0.00059953076,0.0015945847,0.004847192,0.0052685686,0.0038910839,0.0035806685,0.0036576698,0.00024665063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018190415,0.00006947817,0.0019223759,0.00046201452,0.00027860902,0.00021217541,0.00086686783,0.19981988,0.0007881544,0.7364025,0.001180621,0.05781543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004948121,0.00012103207,0.00049995515,0.00025166152,0.000057600344,0.00010123561,0.00024390951,0.4207201,0.0012266384,0.5729968,0.0036819351,0.00004962842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021931108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010157335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057140283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026380282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002982578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30219024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754105644","doi":"10.13033/ijahp.v9i2.502","title":"Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM 2017) International Conference Held for a Second Time in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Operations research; Library science; Sociology; Management; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.13321561184082426,"score_gpt":0.4605337223762568,"score_spread":0.3273181105354325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754105644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039201353,0.13918597,0.18088198,0.13380313,0.06711487,0.002571735,0.011572202,0.0022245287,0.42344418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2053023,0.09278793,0.1914336,0.004304734,0.004712442,0.0008515225,0.008622212,0.0010281111,0.49095717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994423,0.00074803206,0.00022966397,0.0003997586,0.0036264847,0.00057312683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907154,0.0004475857,0.00015941424,0.00026513723,0.0069844197,0.0014279535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0097009195,0.0012754295,0.0013820134,0.0029477754,0.0042599253,0.0062837265,0.0018003072,0.0019161471,0.020710498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062122894,0.0006397655,0.0012075411,0.003667674,0.0035600604,0.0012959532,0.003165094,0.003984909,0.004265066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021330093,0.00014022757,0.0017651543,0.00048190064,0.00009936826,0.0003555731,0.00056771695,0.0066595674,0.002982757,0.021833934,0.73025215,0.23464833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021313203,0.00005165994,0.002122002,0.00040070008,0.000020292291,0.00006956446,0.0006602938,0.0039472734,0.0024164028,0.005367762,0.984855,0.000067825065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.533945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.659542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46605498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029596848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08154311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93759936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755179399","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v9n10p107","title":"Applicability of Fuzzy TOPSIS Method in Optimal Portfolio Selection and an Application in BIST","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Portfolio; Fuzzy logic; Selection (genetic algorithm); Revenue; Actuarial science; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Investment (military); Operations research; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Financial economics; Finance; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08935590639768262,"score_gpt":0.44179954324909637,"score_spread":0.3524436368514138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755179399","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025092034,0.00246389,0.9552662,0.0005050625,0.00013036608,0.00039366056,0.00008760197,0.00015443545,0.015906705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5459532,0.003196157,0.44663784,0.00012647714,0.000078553465,0.0004742208,0.00011427293,0.000023537314,0.003395734],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931405,0.0034353319,0.00039139946,0.0004677278,0.0023296438,0.00023539025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780685,0.0012664269,0.00015994815,0.00010247845,0.00059852644,0.0000656727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053346236,0.0011564663,0.0011657242,0.0042237365,0.0011242074,0.002858598,0.00092977594,0.0011309206,0.0036227887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063320505,0.00043363665,0.001537964,0.0044855196,0.0010912421,0.0015372289,0.0011684028,0.001030545,0.00045020206],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031795513,0.0002785133,0.006357171,0.0015953351,0.00056568196,0.001059901,0.0018725937,0.25663242,0.011380223,0.089002,0.0029805081,0.62795776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000966224,0.0007685406,0.005039996,0.0005311805,0.00024409161,0.0008375017,0.0015857713,0.8832678,0.0068061496,0.08577666,0.0148674585,0.00017813456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052660475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004837077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053346236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014872384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024215705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028212547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758633778","doi":"10.1016/j.knosys.2017.09.027","title":"Time-aware trustworthiness ranking prediction for cloud services using interval neutrosophic set and ELECTRE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge-Based Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China; Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province","keywords":"ELECTRE; Cloud computing; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Data mining; Interval (graph theory); Quality of service; Set (abstract data type); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Quality (philosophy); Service (business); Identification (biology); Operations research; Trustworthiness; Artificial intelligence; Computer security; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15947998694366833,"score_gpt":0.4189039404754824,"score_spread":0.2594239535318141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758633778","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30714017,0.0003809204,0.6885351,0.00032871639,0.00007366591,0.00008266186,0.00020518547,0.00016726398,0.0030862545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715565,0.00007902969,0.027849143,0.000014703684,0.000013673199,0.000030271507,0.00009061309,0.00000564814,0.00036056133],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990839,0.00024054632,0.00007800739,0.0001509128,0.00035292696,0.00009370211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792683,0.0013109876,0.00020462343,0.00007450968,0.00039540307,0.00008766449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015053169,0.00056916283,0.000764461,0.001980479,0.00055451796,0.0013666423,0.0006803793,0.00060767325,0.0008159171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005141547,0.00022557865,0.0008157413,0.0011606296,0.00034882667,0.0015761399,0.000611144,0.00067219493,0.00009648734],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033378348,0.0002469992,0.010963545,0.00015038703,0.00021221447,0.00022258957,0.00014847869,0.875263,0.0039081564,0.009636117,0.001110149,0.09780458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030912379,0.000023768876,0.00075442635,0.0000050941017,0.000012223436,0.000013455863,0.000020832087,0.9966719,0.00038416358,0.0020430074,0.000061096616,0.0000067988076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005036596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036682351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005036596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010530113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007506912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010014534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761500406","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2017.10008341","title":"An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach for risk evaluation of new product in a pipe industry","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy logic; Ranking (information retrieval); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Product (mathematics); New product development; Fuzzy number; Computer science; Engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Reliability engineering; Data mining; Fuzzy set; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Business","score_opus":0.3365760225838111,"score_gpt":0.5020920421712596,"score_spread":0.1655160195874485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761500406","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04085943,0.00038874376,0.95308846,0.00021760554,0.000036528618,0.0003088006,0.00012116898,0.00007009934,0.0049092253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4689212,0.00040561103,0.52901685,0.000040532508,0.000015060248,0.00037971587,0.00008994485,0.000010660206,0.0011203808],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978702,0.0010267233,0.00009770792,0.000117210606,0.0007888033,0.00009936916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911577,0.00048370502,0.000077154145,0.00003607372,0.0002478565,0.000039464543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029642393,0.0007252628,0.0010310742,0.0032188625,0.0008816583,0.0014574358,0.0010382473,0.001067044,0.0017492541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036477179,0.0005035479,0.0012398219,0.002162743,0.0005169804,0.0008618737,0.0012468315,0.0007477044,0.000113393864],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025041692,0.00029331283,0.0039283317,0.0008076798,0.00031792748,0.00047609687,0.00073754584,0.78715324,0.009147492,0.04458665,0.0012040744,0.15109716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028929706,0.00015217003,0.0007941877,0.00005996553,0.000057194684,0.0000814259,0.00022062326,0.98447025,0.0012756834,0.010860845,0.0019711826,0.000027541886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073222374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011142779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073222374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018387387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020812142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015676618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762332651","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v6n6p120","title":"A New Method for Logistic Model Assessment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Logistic regression; Logistic function; Estimator; Perspective (graphical); Logistic distribution; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.365015334350475,"score_gpt":0.5749946933260269,"score_spread":0.20997935897555192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762332651","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007787043,0.00020807942,0.9976271,0.00013717855,0.00009057442,0.00008939361,0.00009202813,0.00019637348,0.0007805434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039473124,0.0005609992,0.95514566,0.00026314476,0.00035304241,0.0009684807,0.0005807453,0.00029929547,0.002355635],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97840285,0.012858819,0.0010431339,0.001972671,0.0053654322,0.00035706116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581155,0.030766968,0.0020763434,0.003159701,0.005303239,0.0005781283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016392943,0.0018893057,0.0017535316,0.006711742,0.0010475577,0.0036180513,0.0030115931,0.0023963763,0.008058084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088011526,0.0007547292,0.0024243987,0.0034720004,0.0018780867,0.0049986993,0.0057161455,0.0053551244,0.0021442233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030606816,0.00022018811,0.008296593,0.00081014074,0.0005580423,0.00053108035,0.0006438244,0.05245949,0.0041998997,0.33820564,0.015213191,0.57855576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017094266,0.00040739618,0.0024597617,0.00027376335,0.00017241093,0.0013006674,0.00017013143,0.5639738,0.0027688146,0.38128424,0.046808958,0.0002091659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013856244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009075523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016392943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010918862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025731751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086695194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766074309","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2017.10.009","title":"On the α(u,v)-symmetric implicational method for R- and (S, N)-implications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Modus ponens; Mathematics; Degree (music); Fuzzy logic; Applied mathematics; Calculus (dental); Algebra over a field; Computer science; Pure mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Medicine","score_opus":0.19533100653653104,"score_gpt":0.5023377517108347,"score_spread":0.3070067451743037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766074309","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036380622,0.00010797993,0.9936458,0.00016548515,0.000043252294,0.00005292493,0.000036547273,0.000076527336,0.0022333541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10802482,0.00016716414,0.8880605,0.00020244114,0.00011370408,0.00014136727,0.00011489856,0.000090651585,0.0030845061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614966,0.0017981292,0.00026462338,0.00045137975,0.0011669465,0.00016926628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917578,0.0055928496,0.00025452193,0.0008231979,0.0013174684,0.0002540176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066547664,0.00060645415,0.000997609,0.001710563,0.0008702882,0.0019731245,0.0024570813,0.0011400986,0.008997054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01790219,0.0004850807,0.0016655965,0.0012834222,0.0016167308,0.0037520968,0.0027894631,0.0030941835,0.0011089245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003812406,0.00023566809,0.0009771036,0.00039568075,0.00012106796,0.00018111386,0.00043711826,0.047300685,0.006551012,0.54917216,0.0040323674,0.3902148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058906404,0.00010999226,0.00027932774,0.00007200313,0.000055722125,0.00013095018,0.00009918189,0.59668916,0.002662803,0.3952602,0.0045527327,0.00002904427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001970493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031131818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008997054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011866693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023460067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03519422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766822640","doi":"10.5539/jms.v7n4p51","title":"Assessment of the Sustainability of Countries at Worldwide","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management and Sustainability","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ranking (information retrieval); Analytic hierarchy process; Sustainability; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Preference; Ideal solution; Rank (graph theory); Sustainable development; Similarity (geometry); Order (exchange); Environmental economics; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Business; Operations research; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Ecology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05332888756885869,"score_gpt":0.42741865460664447,"score_spread":0.3740897670377858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766822640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5692804,0.018724471,0.057270847,0.003099155,0.0003235607,0.00030828756,0.013544781,0.0008130239,0.3366354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97074014,0.0041821343,0.011909442,0.00008452196,0.000031654567,0.0001112511,0.0028794145,0.00006581598,0.009995632],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768853,0.00070183893,0.00015196066,0.00024234038,0.0009919377,0.00022337263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812466,0.00022217994,0.00054087356,0.0001741582,0.00081469753,0.00012343212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025827105,0.00091139367,0.000427032,0.010410195,0.000609203,0.0045475815,0.00042182938,0.0006440099,0.0060081733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004488815,0.0001792331,0.0006638548,0.01267817,0.00050916645,0.002716136,0.0029918558,0.00046697268,0.0014108858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018562611,0.000118869146,0.21335208,0.0013321019,0.0012233723,0.0012456186,0.0017030167,0.02624985,0.008194415,0.060320385,0.012708519,0.6733662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019648896,0.00046354395,0.5413627,0.0029045057,0.00075554114,0.002296466,0.014994266,0.019304348,0.013371284,0.06386364,0.34043354,0.00023047933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003580859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004208446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010410195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018053441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001441787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020099342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770998086","doi":"10.1142/s0218488517500441","title":"A Novel Decision Support Framework for Computing Expected Utilities from Linguistic Evaluations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Computer science; Variety (cybernetics); Function (biology); Product (mathematics); Bayesian probability; Bayesian network; Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Mathematics","score_opus":0.21483914902813486,"score_gpt":0.4935405764734487,"score_spread":0.2787014274453138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770998086","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036339343,0.00007474176,0.99535686,0.00010780297,0.00001271471,0.00004260091,0.000051279687,0.00011402247,0.0006060942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26074147,0.00025105439,0.7366782,0.00012257956,0.00007806402,0.00039986635,0.0002777573,0.000069189184,0.0013818411],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711144,0.0013301843,0.00018481901,0.00038483052,0.0008112617,0.00017743606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942192,0.0040417705,0.0004050597,0.00021650559,0.00093777775,0.00017967391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005661774,0.0012576915,0.0016518036,0.0018546581,0.0006559051,0.0030550153,0.0024630597,0.0015009722,0.0038852808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018162232,0.0005710987,0.0012554611,0.0019614785,0.00084406394,0.0030258577,0.0020371906,0.0022066976,0.0005663114],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011845642,0.000118970645,0.0010798014,0.00016690989,0.00010495198,0.00014554696,0.00019334632,0.7878449,0.0012030813,0.09680667,0.0013252259,0.11089211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000101069445,0.000027135535,0.000093719114,0.000013236475,0.0000134046795,0.000017383243,0.000011786087,0.97730947,0.0002680982,0.021736184,0.00048924686,0.00001017865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056782397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051525915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056782397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018716059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023986197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029942691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773445483","doi":"10.1109/smc.2017.8122783","title":"A fuzzy AHP and GIS-based approach to prioritize utility-scale solar PV sites in Saudi Arabia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Photovoltaic system; Geographic information system; Scale (ratio); Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Site selection; Solar energy; Solar power; Operations research; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Environmental economics; Reliability engineering; Power (physics); Geography; Remote sensing; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Cartography","score_opus":0.19579235119042634,"score_gpt":0.41723399838132885,"score_spread":0.2214416471909025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773445483","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33857894,0.0005604168,0.6438823,0.00065004744,0.00006167043,0.0008806312,0.00082787866,0.00029510027,0.014263029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7836724,0.00024511945,0.21422008,0.00003935857,0.000011631785,0.00024202657,0.00032044813,0.00001573704,0.0012332828],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893636,0.0005521747,0.00007506901,0.000078732286,0.00025181024,0.00010584429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989512,0.0005045303,0.00009959565,0.00003330861,0.00034197193,0.00006939575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018656532,0.00076599966,0.0005799311,0.0028776708,0.0009319303,0.0015807517,0.0009199599,0.00056444143,0.0024461057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002662851,0.00041857894,0.0008627693,0.0022521333,0.00044578532,0.00079805776,0.0009928232,0.0004961097,0.00016182578],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020163355,0.00015598486,0.005618659,0.0003762887,0.00015696004,0.00048422773,0.00049186585,0.8917655,0.0024840112,0.012379076,0.0015011653,0.08438463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019986595,0.00005044248,0.0009169872,0.00003515359,0.00002526504,0.000040390478,0.0005318492,0.9928382,0.0007166491,0.0035565326,0.0012536951,0.000014941031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030087449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030100677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030087449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002475612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029951576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059824646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776366897","doi":"10.3233/jifs-17508","title":"Optimal decision for a fuzzy supply chain with shrinkage under VaR criterion","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Radio-frequency identification; Product (mathematics); Operations research; Identification (biology); Shrinkage; Optimal decision; Space (punctuation); Mathematical optimization; Decision model; Business; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Marketing; Machine learning; Decision tree; Computer security","score_opus":0.13054913234671375,"score_gpt":0.4116630204726166,"score_spread":0.2811138881259029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776366897","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17363851,0.00035127316,0.82065964,0.00057864,0.000029888599,0.00009977729,0.0000855042,0.0000887089,0.004468055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96297884,0.00023188327,0.033558924,0.00006676646,0.000032864617,0.00010040072,0.00006384549,0.000020316027,0.0029462832],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977399,0.00090447365,0.000078989295,0.0005841854,0.0003580039,0.00033443066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970987,0.0018267636,0.00044226172,0.000093145834,0.00036567566,0.00017354451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032790583,0.0011944586,0.0018035743,0.0009659317,0.00084161194,0.0024039298,0.0010402948,0.0022946203,0.0022732615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047481437,0.000819784,0.0012125185,0.00081764255,0.0016768018,0.002580428,0.0014060155,0.0017973755,0.00023591505],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014023183,0.000051941726,0.0006500259,0.00008424512,0.00005380259,0.00014442162,0.00015053521,0.9715226,0.0019120947,0.017230693,0.00022537253,0.007833947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026895412,0.000101384874,0.00024971343,0.000011777861,0.000024738729,0.000025817058,0.000050870345,0.9842956,0.0005644135,0.014441573,0.0001862681,0.000020935146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004696711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021897263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004696711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002231531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016356169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017341554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778314461","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2017.12.001","title":"Axiomatization of inconsistency indicators for pairwise comparisons","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Axiom; Triad (sociology); Matrix (chemical analysis); Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Psychology; Chemistry; Geometry","score_opus":0.15471137677210525,"score_gpt":0.46520151206064325,"score_spread":0.31049013528853797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778314461","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00423844,0.000191896,0.9913257,0.00061591435,0.000090653724,0.00010173438,0.00024842046,0.0001900355,0.0029971558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16055702,0.00037142838,0.83499426,0.0005519861,0.0003209767,0.00064017886,0.0012195928,0.00012509822,0.0012194664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9515008,0.020998264,0.0064831036,0.0066879625,0.012758285,0.0015716787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87506497,0.08803745,0.005931972,0.013916525,0.015354703,0.0016944624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030853305,0.001661794,0.0022053742,0.007098314,0.0022839794,0.0076020877,0.006475032,0.0034316205,0.005720274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.107037775,0.0015992715,0.006089144,0.0074990415,0.006455108,0.015094482,0.007725699,0.010696668,0.0010507266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011137244,0.00008956873,0.001038179,0.00040561997,0.00022474048,0.0002119462,0.0004813008,0.014437669,0.0010582929,0.93708754,0.002304841,0.042548884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047776448,0.000048788166,0.0002807608,0.00010870784,0.00014982522,0.00028730376,0.00011999079,0.06850006,0.0016150037,0.9256833,0.003108591,0.000049871083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021817882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018443685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030853305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036421814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037415114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1631698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778776359","doi":"10.5430/ijfr.v9n1p132","title":"Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model Evaluating the Performance of Vietnamese Commercial Banks","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Financial Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vietnamese; Analytic hierarchy process; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Computer science; Rank (graph theory); TOPSIS; Fuzzy logic; Ideal solution; Process (computing); Decision-making models; Operations research; Hierarchy; Preference; Order (exchange); Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Business; Mathematics; Statistics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.5291383708662041,"score_gpt":0.6335163545237871,"score_spread":0.104377983657583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778776359","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4157029,0.0022252959,0.5272742,0.0027808445,0.0002261136,0.0012385655,0.0014522416,0.00027036754,0.0488295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611173,0.0006717621,0.033396415,0.000049561055,0.000029059409,0.00039351324,0.00019376329,0.000006239295,0.004142279],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985879,0.0006713039,0.00009243181,0.00020479335,0.00026952484,0.00017407558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988661,0.00058992807,0.00012808971,0.000018766792,0.00029562076,0.00010145454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021910528,0.0009590143,0.00082783296,0.0015850848,0.00107492,0.0026640124,0.0016263756,0.0012265466,0.0038388057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002135332,0.00042078554,0.00082145986,0.0014312364,0.0006357939,0.0008866958,0.0009768974,0.0008208921,0.00022122668],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013250462,0.0001391776,0.004186772,0.000321623,0.0001344586,0.0007864416,0.0006342931,0.95458084,0.0011038161,0.020385334,0.0011057801,0.016488949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020056194,0.00008116866,0.00075052056,0.000037938495,0.000041488733,0.000043091208,0.00021507789,0.9939855,0.00020920968,0.0038915116,0.00070909335,0.000015346382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024212403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016600672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024212403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035773371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035843416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04814291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780521829","doi":"10.3390/su10010014","title":"Sustainable Decision-Making in Civil Engineering, Construction and Building Technology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainability","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":214,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Feng Chia University; Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi; Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; National Central University; Yildiz Teknik Üniversitesi; Gaziosmanpasa Üniversitesi; Korea University; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Chongqing Jiaotong University; Korea Environment Institute; Isfahan University of Technology; Tsinghua University; Heriot-Watt University; Klaipedos Universitetas; Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee; Politechnika Poznańska; Akdeniz Üniversitesi; Kocaeli Üniversitesi; Beijing University of Technology; George Mason University; Concordia University; Beijing Normal University; Yonsei University; Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Cairo University; Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research; East Carolina University; Université Laval; Firat Üniversitesi; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Imperial College London; Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur; Asian Institute of Technology; Dalian University of Technology; Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur; Indian Institute of Science","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Management science; Decision analysis; Computer science; Publishing; Engineering; Engineering management; Operations research; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.026029339629224164,"score_gpt":0.3920856375640207,"score_spread":0.36605629793479655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780521829","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04292462,0.5258202,0.30355132,0.019879427,0.0021123353,0.00059973367,0.00050248014,0.00015409825,0.10445593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52312845,0.3119202,0.1549236,0.0018886903,0.0007209859,0.0004962404,0.0003902273,0.0000550432,0.006476669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98607045,0.008425034,0.0009691995,0.001046728,0.0030399836,0.0004486157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853827,0.012220617,0.0008784319,0.00034078225,0.0010104906,0.00016703802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010275797,0.0012147467,0.0020048935,0.0068114693,0.0015455289,0.008098198,0.0015679962,0.0033334214,0.0031965463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012511296,0.00042931054,0.0014791961,0.0106550995,0.0042504417,0.0039979876,0.002432596,0.0019291515,0.0005400255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102106744,0.0001705138,0.0042288103,0.020469332,0.0006255008,0.0006308779,0.0021835333,0.03466014,0.0021939564,0.46993554,0.0067968224,0.45800292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000351081,0.00029698934,0.0066125807,0.019817887,0.00046920928,0.00082182145,0.008827657,0.03598295,0.0065868637,0.6420268,0.27828944,0.00023265518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030156216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056889947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010275797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004420365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006404234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054344237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782750676","doi":"10.13033/ijahp.v9i3.532","title":"SAATY 1977: THE BUILDING BLOCKS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ingenuity; Pairwise comparison; Computer science; Analytic hierarchy process; Consistency (knowledge bases); Face (sociological concept); Creativity; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.14416248344002502,"score_gpt":0.48824833989368654,"score_spread":0.3440858564536615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782750676","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041128495,0.016064188,0.8118676,0.007678427,0.0023050278,0.0010335823,0.0020157502,0.0011837197,0.1537389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050104175,0.0146382535,0.9033091,0.0016275075,0.00083636126,0.0015571659,0.0019073047,0.0007458062,0.025274398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579775,0.0018110487,0.00038537322,0.0006746818,0.0011596781,0.0001715485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947431,0.002915366,0.0002668903,0.0005498353,0.0013021003,0.00022264881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007724032,0.00190385,0.0010981607,0.0075600995,0.0027020976,0.0074593825,0.001904062,0.0018818643,0.01886831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012662547,0.0012451427,0.0016916655,0.009279715,0.0064689484,0.005717075,0.0029260821,0.004131217,0.01261287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059005073,0.000046415094,0.0005352414,0.0005657035,0.0000550057,0.00009793575,0.0009435264,0.0067104707,0.00029254195,0.80569524,0.026364155,0.15863478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014486529,0.00006284457,0.00045437276,0.00069863535,0.000033981993,0.00015861883,0.0002746742,0.009456625,0.00058017316,0.6023209,0.38587722,0.00006743338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009082741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008046528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01886831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052779033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006438502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06312072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791609342","doi":"10.3233/jifs-17783","title":"Robust linear programming with IT2 rough coefficients","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Xiamen University of Technology","keywords":"Linear programming; Interval (graph theory); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Interval arithmetic; Rough set; Algorithm; Computer science; Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.23622260147959986,"score_gpt":0.4107337179791979,"score_spread":0.17451111649959802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791609342","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004949339,0.00011167228,0.9931497,0.000053785265,0.000016397637,0.000018180324,0.00002287734,0.000052106512,0.0016259559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46366125,0.0007036911,0.5312087,0.00009954397,0.00013423419,0.00025382623,0.00027868772,0.00013465872,0.003525341],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884796,0.0004220936,0.000054205873,0.00018512356,0.0003897404,0.00010092022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989899,0.0006214563,0.000112842616,0.000057334008,0.00018412489,0.000034272056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011826324,0.0010421735,0.00089922023,0.00060329924,0.00022838709,0.0012803382,0.00069007376,0.0006674016,0.0018261691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038351226,0.00042132463,0.0011307008,0.0009277398,0.0004866087,0.0010046494,0.001060308,0.0017664133,0.00046873718],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006696765,0.00002233259,0.00018542827,0.00017028548,0.00004241863,0.00010284353,0.00006329133,0.91303086,0.003863588,0.04248123,0.0008538596,0.039116886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008074229,0.000048809463,0.000044634868,0.000009346345,0.000008879789,0.000027109567,0.000008595669,0.99101627,0.00089352095,0.0071399547,0.00078607915,0.0000087810495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017965527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008745881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018261691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042025177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081569154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0062544346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791960931","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v7n2p58","title":"The Analysis of The Effects of Variables Used in the Formation of PISA Scores on Job Index Values for OECD Member States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Logistic regression; Psychology; Ordered logit; Regression analysis; Quality (philosophy); Variables; Working life; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Applied psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07254295534939867,"score_gpt":0.45856189545825454,"score_spread":0.38601894010885585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791960931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99011505,0.00031808924,0.001835979,0.00015131061,0.000053683958,0.000093082956,0.0022925525,0.000025807269,0.0051144958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943439,0.00015153416,0.0009996125,0.00002395509,0.000019580571,0.00018108611,0.002917725,0.000014937738,0.0013477812],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924132,0.0048726453,0.00048742088,0.00051114557,0.0010293872,0.00068615604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.950679,0.03880697,0.0055192686,0.0011852265,0.0031096365,0.0006998741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013502303,0.0007234901,0.0007555327,0.0037535625,0.0005004532,0.0022100084,0.0004958986,0.0004112508,0.0034611123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027978068,0.00020760341,0.0020906904,0.005311457,0.0008787957,0.00087156036,0.001622044,0.0016389334,0.0006052647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004523454,0.00015178125,0.98708236,0.00008090638,0.0005778899,0.00010021256,0.0006490935,0.00240234,0.00019652257,0.0008818541,0.00070445193,0.0067203343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075006487,0.00044098607,0.99129385,0.000037083322,0.00023938128,0.000037306763,0.0020658306,0.0035765823,0.0003832671,0.00025878497,0.0016398743,0.000019561508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022285905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015636308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022285905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011926561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020316357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071407855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792808093","doi":"10.2316/journal.201.2018.1.201-2794","title":"NEW INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SIMILARITY AND DISTANCE MEASURES APPLIED TO MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mechatronic systems and control","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Group decision-making; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08055923575179251,"score_gpt":0.3823263054858851,"score_spread":0.30176706973409256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792808093","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015589699,0.001073406,0.98033327,0.00021133575,0.00016913922,0.000087415094,0.000057910907,0.000056971337,0.0024207798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38245824,0.00089594146,0.61428505,0.00012585474,0.00022891039,0.00034345748,0.00014503914,0.00004336497,0.001474113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905929,0.0033475817,0.0010323542,0.0008347572,0.0039249873,0.00026750646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98644197,0.008226525,0.0010655429,0.00076806324,0.0029873822,0.00051063043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009490311,0.001082868,0.0019638229,0.0043341187,0.0009397818,0.0038530475,0.0026863078,0.001674558,0.0015672484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026855085,0.0005791735,0.0020411955,0.004001502,0.002348794,0.00569562,0.0026829385,0.0029288616,0.00021830824],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037585135,0.00037670755,0.0025834756,0.0009627852,0.00058991276,0.0003516056,0.0011435925,0.14673352,0.0044717407,0.61414075,0.0021777072,0.22609241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005465871,0.00035512345,0.0017750046,0.00015117308,0.00014127506,0.00030947872,0.00019740315,0.70021665,0.0016097217,0.29151043,0.0035270248,0.00015208422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015587624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014236295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009490311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00258697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020044118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05019015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794751958","doi":"10.3390/math6040050","title":"Credibility Measure for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Variables","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Measure (data warehouse); Fuzzy logic; Entropy (arrow of time); Fuzzy measure theory; Mathematics; Computer science; Credibility theory; Fuzzy set; Data mining; Econometrics; Fuzzy number; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology","score_opus":0.32507210867183456,"score_gpt":0.4627973603501779,"score_spread":0.13772525167834332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794751958","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011125391,0.0016639497,0.9700687,0.0012575458,0.00022474873,0.000052693442,0.00013219063,0.000107567226,0.015367219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65431535,0.0027136381,0.33668357,0.0005634845,0.0010463602,0.00038034335,0.00030766486,0.000098262004,0.00389138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99003017,0.0034008338,0.0007203023,0.0010912234,0.0043746857,0.00038276135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982621,0.0117979,0.0017026867,0.0012680775,0.0021420054,0.00046835453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008508414,0.0010037319,0.0011768333,0.00407937,0.001408356,0.004581732,0.0015892696,0.0022984333,0.0024745278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037461076,0.00036468287,0.0012821711,0.0029144525,0.0058312193,0.009171516,0.0025180539,0.0040108836,0.0004674539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028254031,0.0000118193275,0.00017633276,0.000113448616,0.000030121988,0.00009000546,0.00025617634,0.007620362,0.00077505247,0.97953415,0.0007286696,0.010635545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016618036,0.00002806002,0.00021390988,0.000093950985,0.000020588832,0.0002084034,0.00006592939,0.036230907,0.0009332731,0.95605236,0.006101634,0.000034319517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004999552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025917924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008508414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024189856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011469672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044997334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795096716","doi":"10.1016/j.artmed.2018.03.003","title":"Pharmacological therapy selection of type 2 diabetes based on the SWARA and modified MULTIMOORA methods under a fuzzy environment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Tehran","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Fuzzy logic; Selection (genetic algorithm); Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics","score_opus":0.43533933666657654,"score_gpt":0.52508268059044,"score_spread":0.08974334392386352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795096716","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11035106,0.00093291426,0.88548213,0.00033153663,0.000119329976,0.00015304047,0.00009473064,0.00009069284,0.0024446142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6380987,0.00046077455,0.35878012,0.000114289134,0.00009733488,0.0003260343,0.00014106836,0.000029675643,0.0019519941],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980787,0.0009488724,0.00017888393,0.0002129699,0.0004475382,0.0001331196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975817,0.0017320041,0.00015484418,0.000062037194,0.00039771904,0.00007174574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002881781,0.0007480241,0.0016321104,0.002163317,0.0006775684,0.0011297916,0.0014290812,0.0009868094,0.0016306372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044387733,0.0004583795,0.0024218836,0.001015566,0.00045701477,0.0010209569,0.00076658133,0.00067351427,0.00011957178],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006933681,0.00048524552,0.0072562452,0.000669789,0.0011614544,0.00036770632,0.0003157074,0.68490505,0.007086678,0.017770158,0.001393706,0.2778949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027753455,0.00013169533,0.00087740517,0.00001997097,0.00011199425,0.000057285302,0.000033932425,0.9946795,0.0007422006,0.002972861,0.0003220208,0.000023439792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036158466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037021257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036158466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005871774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012390215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01524049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799882389","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2004-0033","title":"REVIEW OF EVALUATION METHODS AND AN IMPROVED METHOD FOR DECISION-MAKING","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Pairwise comparison; Computer science; Matrix (chemical analysis); Mathematical optimization; Data mining; A-weighting; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09907102214280351,"score_gpt":0.47304152518753434,"score_spread":0.37397050304473084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799882389","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018059815,0.40263468,0.5655312,0.008435346,0.0038518878,0.00056282687,0.0002008983,0.000332759,0.016644426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03506592,0.2182012,0.73468953,0.0017069787,0.0029978442,0.0016194737,0.00026196608,0.00018317776,0.0052738767],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9062025,0.056191627,0.006371991,0.00298503,0.027736919,0.0005119296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91989386,0.056018054,0.0028403709,0.0022211045,0.018571079,0.00045541624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044484574,0.00225341,0.0030389994,0.016325006,0.0015111645,0.0055491696,0.0027589314,0.0026976962,0.0037985565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08087558,0.0010298922,0.0018302421,0.014632332,0.0037011711,0.007445173,0.0017892213,0.003046615,0.0016633304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007410771,0.000083346014,0.00049015455,0.012790799,0.00018852088,0.00011955971,0.00059169164,0.0055731367,0.00057051587,0.18280785,0.021986885,0.7747234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009577787,0.0002488614,0.00239272,0.019545972,0.0002909698,0.00064896594,0.00074597035,0.02686664,0.002745896,0.27971253,0.6663248,0.00038087508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036764822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003781099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044484574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007676597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007372303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23525971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800627592","doi":"10.1002/int.21995","title":"Generating Z-number based on OWA weights using maximum entropy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Decision maker; Principle of maximum entropy; Entropy (arrow of time); Mathematics; Preference; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Operations research; Statistics","score_opus":0.17793564038136858,"score_gpt":0.4494769802438753,"score_spread":0.2715413398625067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800627592","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008438814,0.000117478136,0.9898863,0.00005925803,0.00003346163,0.000054234766,0.000028903229,0.000108319065,0.0012733125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33651766,0.0003940214,0.66028416,0.00008563645,0.00008038028,0.00035332114,0.00021121191,0.00012985796,0.0019437964],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775547,0.00077657995,0.00017786266,0.00034751263,0.0007814911,0.00016124382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656653,0.002056388,0.00028630375,0.0003297225,0.0006655155,0.0000954825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027524685,0.0011667056,0.0011704235,0.0025198825,0.00091993087,0.0014984201,0.0009955695,0.00074320554,0.0036063248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011520861,0.00041166772,0.0010947906,0.001907161,0.00095396925,0.0037206092,0.0015404578,0.0009664048,0.00072683825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003883049,0.000120912206,0.002549923,0.0005209615,0.00014458041,0.00026301024,0.00041765926,0.30164337,0.020477552,0.13115077,0.002342008,0.539981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039862527,0.00010959556,0.00076561235,0.00006317946,0.000047382142,0.00015271966,0.00007013038,0.89013016,0.007934263,0.09746593,0.0031582823,0.000062879946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079219707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064702384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036063248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069486117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077159976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014556587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801046428","doi":"10.1007/s00163-018-0287-6","title":"Multi-criteria fuzzy decision support for conceptual evaluation in design of mechatronic systems: a quadrotor design case study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Engineering Design","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Choquet integral; Conceptual design; Mechatronics; Fuzzy logic; Engineering design process; Computer science; Process (computing); Control engineering; Artificial intelligence; Systems engineering; Engineering; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.6249602979431499,"score_gpt":0.5550364995416687,"score_spread":0.06992379840148122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801046428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73912555,0.0005388414,0.24595042,0.00055630517,0.000050997678,0.0004943105,0.00017702294,0.00010818812,0.012998315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92805034,0.00011266823,0.070616476,0.000015454307,0.0000061865194,0.00007131879,0.00004443492,0.000010569186,0.0010725998],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983381,0.0009989755,0.00007089437,0.00010291949,0.0003698463,0.00011920564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99550205,0.0036229545,0.00017497512,0.00014061015,0.00038128492,0.00017816028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033073497,0.0009325503,0.0007994754,0.0012423937,0.00096021104,0.0016082099,0.00096205814,0.0017425101,0.0024397562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054069874,0.00031465088,0.0008375763,0.00091439625,0.000715243,0.00097426196,0.00084155466,0.0006571875,0.00014078131],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016111421,0.0015023331,0.006111471,0.000676847,0.00016761894,0.0030571362,0.001112929,0.8173461,0.016825495,0.028644279,0.0011711632,0.12177347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012691265,0.0007098751,0.0014547609,0.00004331509,0.000054546097,0.00023932809,0.00039628803,0.9860102,0.0054037035,0.0039100866,0.0016172945,0.000033636166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003480866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042819986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003480866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015298497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008862139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017491102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809153559","doi":"10.1007/s00500-018-3329-0","title":"An optimal model using data envelopment analysis for uncertainty metrics in reliability","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Data envelopment analysis; Computer science; Objectivity (philosophy); Fuzzy logic; Data mining; Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy set; Reliability engineering; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.4501072843372604,"score_gpt":0.5176887427594439,"score_spread":0.0675814584221835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809153559","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020942131,0.00026069215,0.97448593,0.0003754484,0.000031512554,0.000052622832,0.000105803236,0.00008168514,0.0036641802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8027333,0.00046136073,0.19307403,0.0000824992,0.000031348063,0.00027040645,0.00016704886,0.000076462675,0.003103521],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.998502,0.0007695971,0.00007215557,0.00020536127,0.00032294675,0.00012798149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984546,0.0010391679,0.00011159009,0.00006946179,0.00027867066,0.000046467256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00293038,0.0008320739,0.0016578774,0.0014389786,0.00072252785,0.0029759961,0.0013315033,0.0018223701,0.002228222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055870684,0.00072427304,0.0014556936,0.0016177223,0.00093493005,0.0022581427,0.001185417,0.0015470757,0.00027840203],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009218178,0.000011417319,0.00008194382,0.000020814874,0.000010464978,0.000018682851,0.000021394086,0.9825714,0.00015288767,0.013983352,0.00013301734,0.0029854286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015656361,0.000004963018,0.000020076046,0.0000044630096,0.00000387461,0.0000029386435,0.000004943886,0.99447423,0.00006241256,0.005306943,0.000110428584,0.0000031524396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015409887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007380487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015409887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028979683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038183443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030640364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809461226","doi":"10.1109/tcyb.2018.2842073","title":"A Consistency and Consensus-Based Goal Programming Method for Group Decision-Making With Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Multiplicative Preference Relations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Multiplicative function; Group decision-making; Preference; Interval (graph theory); Local consistency; Linear programming; Degree (music); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Group (periodic table); Mathematics; Goal programming; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Combinatorics; Psychology","score_opus":0.11173249897419271,"score_gpt":0.4091233970274718,"score_spread":0.2973908980532791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809461226","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011496365,0.000033735552,0.9982351,0.000038078535,0.0000080724,0.000020821246,0.000007815619,0.000034161323,0.0004724425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13478063,0.0001742645,0.8630382,0.000078304234,0.000046071025,0.0004189933,0.00009986223,0.0000626692,0.0013009562],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714285,0.0012773934,0.00014206856,0.00046230562,0.00083190884,0.00014340066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997635,0.0013440753,0.00022557323,0.00011280108,0.00059580733,0.000086730586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049188775,0.0014044264,0.0014736132,0.0012728586,0.0008299177,0.0016435245,0.002306471,0.0011205086,0.0017056884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006774421,0.00064660405,0.0015556107,0.001973393,0.0011678899,0.0019991696,0.002135207,0.0028707695,0.0003277349],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010718268,0.00011529979,0.00075475936,0.00028787958,0.00017313403,0.00013251562,0.00045915323,0.7182489,0.0028150615,0.1459662,0.0018155497,0.1291243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017685516,0.00005313354,0.000060822407,0.000015342863,0.000023290975,0.000024308125,0.000021720512,0.9728075,0.0005861782,0.025417373,0.0009591559,0.00001335961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028640549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018607865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049188775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013623533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024702004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026013792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2845366390","doi":"10.1016/j.knosys.2018.07.005","title":"Assessment for hierarchical medical policy proposals using hesitant fuzzy linguistic analytic network process","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge-Based Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Construct (python library); Computer science; Analytic network process; Relation (database); Fuzzy logic; Process (computing); Multiplicative function; Control (management); Operations research; Analytic hierarchy process; Order (exchange); Data mining; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.16329035779766796,"score_gpt":0.5076158952248309,"score_spread":0.3443255374271629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2845366390","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13521235,0.00023426484,0.8540047,0.0013523787,0.00009555024,0.000566665,0.00020722892,0.00017644376,0.0081504565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8444197,0.00016232526,0.15286261,0.000092599235,0.000047540292,0.00043913422,0.00010952161,0.000020824884,0.0018457703],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99342006,0.0035741925,0.00030627043,0.0006240378,0.0017086272,0.00036675355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754165,0.019261833,0.0015714739,0.00046483145,0.0026066415,0.00067871064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01414956,0.0009778528,0.0012627858,0.0045984318,0.001770057,0.004685541,0.0018133087,0.0026414758,0.0064865113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043337617,0.00061108195,0.0011934737,0.002479743,0.0015873059,0.0053268136,0.0025922577,0.0018327684,0.00036486826],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031114745,0.00017973296,0.0026212677,0.00029664056,0.00016842583,0.0002745796,0.0007702754,0.8261455,0.00095481856,0.120645545,0.0011836543,0.04644845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019696015,0.00006202153,0.0003142575,0.00003168408,0.000030386826,0.000015616115,0.00015406749,0.95720375,0.0003893477,0.04138164,0.00037711978,0.000020418343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004781987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004582071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01414956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047977073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004685372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07483095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884596285","doi":"10.1109/tcyb.2018.2853722","title":"Flexibility Degree of Fuzzy Numbers and its Implication to a Group-Decision-Making Model","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Multiplicative function; Mathematics; Flexibility (engineering); Reciprocal; Fuzzy logic; Pairwise comparison; Degree (music); Fuzzy number; Mathematical optimization; Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy set; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.17061109123959195,"score_gpt":0.42481455686331404,"score_spread":0.2542034656237221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884596285","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05578321,0.00055089634,0.9265603,0.0007781207,0.00007070826,0.00006997138,0.00007609851,0.0000625897,0.016048145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93318486,0.00036953532,0.06380586,0.000055597517,0.00005107197,0.000095539464,0.000038454386,0.0000090722115,0.0023899246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805474,0.00085658906,0.000081992875,0.0002463901,0.00056213164,0.0001980988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985322,0.00092073204,0.00018866439,0.000097208766,0.00014070806,0.00012054592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026362462,0.0008463338,0.0007478469,0.0012156965,0.0009178411,0.002039383,0.0011196603,0.0011873352,0.0020413615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052772877,0.00025452886,0.001054899,0.0014599041,0.002452685,0.001968239,0.0016869499,0.0014636263,0.00021143514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053624382,0.000028733244,0.0006967243,0.000065574575,0.000050383707,0.0003413516,0.0003766127,0.47539237,0.0010456367,0.50865835,0.00041164577,0.0128789935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013906657,0.000046424848,0.00025492816,0.000017972865,0.000015952319,0.000080369624,0.00007764814,0.74852824,0.00024512789,0.24957876,0.001114815,0.000025915526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003108763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016863004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003108763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016573793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009185318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013941944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886110736","doi":"10.3233/jifs-169717","title":"Dynamic interval-valued intuitionistic normal fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multi-attribute decision-making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Mathematics; Interval (graph theory); Mathematical optimization; Entropy (arrow of time); Fuzzy logic; Score; Computer science; Data mining; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.08552965137951622,"score_gpt":0.40634616837282894,"score_spread":0.3208165169933127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886110736","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046452843,0.0003180427,0.99386567,0.00006708918,0.000034098797,0.000027819564,0.0000122740685,0.00003996119,0.0009897194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31515247,0.0010194228,0.68221897,0.00006668069,0.00010762564,0.00023045449,0.00006662576,0.000037804442,0.0010999738],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967264,0.0013048344,0.00027255178,0.00046498133,0.0011097138,0.00012144434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972102,0.0017073526,0.00031220834,0.00016388208,0.0005220205,0.0000843472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004360597,0.0012146737,0.0010296647,0.001392504,0.00064363895,0.0017398619,0.001236007,0.00070914003,0.0010447043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008242964,0.00036158296,0.0016443814,0.0023047961,0.0015144179,0.0030317097,0.0012720816,0.002306569,0.00017477365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010848291,0.0001100136,0.0011107908,0.00041580515,0.0001701094,0.00035082392,0.00097075605,0.44165823,0.0074500083,0.35127085,0.0012495335,0.19513457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007831663,0.000067248955,0.00021239686,0.000030619976,0.000024088095,0.000102624785,0.00006733926,0.8884114,0.00139551,0.10823482,0.0014078429,0.000038232945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015658872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011212656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004360597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012676995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011968582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023061335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886260485","doi":"10.1002/tqem.21560","title":"The comparison of a revised Leopold matrix and fuzzy methods in environmental impact assessment, a case study: The construction of Al‐A'amiriya residential complex, Baghdad, Iraq","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Quality Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Weighting; Matrix (chemical analysis); Environmental impact assessment; Computer science; Operations research; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.2477413759880455,"score_gpt":0.5870958877912247,"score_spread":0.3393545118031792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886260485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.855093,0.00080270873,0.12893629,0.00080805254,0.00007772733,0.0007240864,0.00024386826,0.00008019749,0.013233982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87633955,0.00036911172,0.12198195,0.00003659402,0.00001275034,0.00020479881,0.00007204839,0.0000101550995,0.0009730593],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911088,0.0064191353,0.0003604466,0.0003688335,0.0015795478,0.0001632747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794774,0.014081127,0.0009217774,0.0005384842,0.0046919524,0.00028930177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009950102,0.0005580319,0.00041283134,0.0045304354,0.0009165905,0.0021134184,0.00078441587,0.00063942844,0.0014648337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021351406,0.00023447249,0.0005020689,0.0028059538,0.000977512,0.0010220406,0.0011830194,0.0005458273,0.00014868302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015453448,0.0014156147,0.07043998,0.0015420492,0.00028495133,0.0018509779,0.015896669,0.2667491,0.010718735,0.03371884,0.0030912198,0.59274644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015801827,0.0014218059,0.0631385,0.00032251704,0.00014426005,0.0005855937,0.021071872,0.88892424,0.005715385,0.00933457,0.008973086,0.00021015272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025659215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033335548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025659215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032327042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015941277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05262178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893690280","doi":"10.1111/itor.12598","title":"Techniques to model uncertain input data of multi‐criteria decision‐making problems: a literature review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Transactions in Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ambiguity; Randomness; Computer science; Uncertain data; Uncertainty analysis; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy logic; Data mining; Dempster–Shafer theory; Uncertainty quantification; Uncertainty theory; Decision analysis; Management science; Operations research; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Machine learning; Statistics","score_opus":0.6858293864569663,"score_gpt":0.6579447337881719,"score_spread":0.027884652668794474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893690280","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019285107,0.9373221,0.054296453,0.0010173053,0.00027290254,0.000090380665,0.00008803133,0.00005476869,0.004929497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036601447,0.9191952,0.04259724,0.00024053999,0.00040052301,0.00011637513,0.00014720303,0.000019809417,0.00068173214],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787164,0.0007773499,0.00027556345,0.00021903537,0.0007880616,0.000068324705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99241066,0.0059346515,0.00040859144,0.00017379699,0.0010223171,0.000050034196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035395157,0.001327227,0.001709994,0.00511828,0.00047331213,0.0020903572,0.001847754,0.0014056715,0.0026098993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008647856,0.0005412347,0.0016080644,0.008731531,0.00072425924,0.0023234864,0.0008461391,0.0013784952,0.0005829958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057890167,0.00014127427,0.0013373354,0.041308578,0.00051190774,0.00039484422,0.0005494022,0.024200402,0.0009086879,0.04874862,0.008387808,0.87345314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006708157,0.00039205,0.0058062677,0.07668366,0.00202721,0.003166685,0.0023617386,0.1089021,0.004279273,0.12704635,0.6689083,0.00035926438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026860726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029476744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00511828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001096177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022883236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018718958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895275520","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78743-868-220181003","title":"Fuzzy Arithmetic Operations: Theory and Applications in Construction Engineering and Management","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy number; Algebraic operation; Mathematics; Arithmetic; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set operations; Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Algebra over a field; Defuzzification; Fuzzy mathematics; Fuzzy control system; Algebraic number; Fuzzy set; Algorithm; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.06081764060383258,"score_gpt":0.3464109798056574,"score_spread":0.2855933392018248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895275520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046358323,0.112135,0.40964508,0.003495094,0.003539991,0.00018855165,0.00029163764,0.00063248846,0.4654363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12681834,0.17997055,0.42796946,0.0017779934,0.0037504248,0.00051924173,0.0006835896,0.00049574865,0.25801468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937004,0.00009458415,0.00004164364,0.00007782031,0.0003846504,0.000031197058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995152,0.0002596122,0.000027567992,0.000045247667,0.00013162155,0.00002077465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069578824,0.0010841184,0.0006754343,0.001612728,0.0010038399,0.002963956,0.0009822677,0.0010744731,0.01195164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015000405,0.000364556,0.00066541944,0.0034115273,0.0018108712,0.0034964222,0.0011120262,0.0023630485,0.0037196213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021490487,0.000028875727,0.00009970163,0.0006559881,0.000013984446,0.000100735364,0.00047545665,0.007185973,0.0018010477,0.6612092,0.03915987,0.28924763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072521625,0.000040473933,0.00031840146,0.00050534384,0.000014167961,0.00035612952,0.0002505688,0.012657263,0.0014430449,0.44847465,0.53589815,0.000034536748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00138167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013888017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01195164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013560706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001106769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03998226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897196044","doi":"10.3233/jifs-181040","title":"Mehar ranking method for comparing connection numbers and its application in decision making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Connection (principal bundle); Computer science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.17364681924644967,"score_gpt":0.4735386290932824,"score_spread":0.2998918098468327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897196044","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013576737,0.0028622837,0.9707902,0.000686239,0.0003778829,0.00030488602,0.0001968175,0.00033988533,0.010865041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18020077,0.0012501188,0.8136111,0.00014984731,0.00017870862,0.00040928394,0.00017896241,0.00006688625,0.0039542643],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905751,0.0044176457,0.00052904745,0.0008447381,0.00332193,0.00031150642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99203545,0.00504096,0.0003874312,0.00032475014,0.0020486864,0.00016272254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004569069,0.0012431944,0.0017319395,0.0069021285,0.0015776422,0.0024616658,0.0016522156,0.0012847492,0.0053473325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0131083485,0.00038914394,0.0015267776,0.0061838315,0.0012519272,0.0024722714,0.0013878854,0.00204984,0.0010238118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022419485,0.00015041442,0.0018013883,0.001078717,0.0003138585,0.00021428554,0.00044046013,0.059968762,0.005630451,0.11875932,0.00819874,0.8032193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009943165,0.00072138116,0.0041102767,0.00023820931,0.00021897873,0.00071475,0.00050922745,0.7942247,0.009066036,0.15609993,0.0336653,0.0003318353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002232316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00271931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069021285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015616963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015406786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024163842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898707181","doi":"10.1186/s12911-018-0663-1","title":"Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: a systematic review of the main characteristics and methodological steps","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Health informatics; Decision analysis; Management science; Health care; Data science; Systematic review; Computer science; MEDLINE; Medicine; Operations research; Public health; Nursing; Engineering; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.29167503205589534,"score_gpt":0.5327586909619075,"score_spread":0.2410836589060122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898707181","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006165437,0.9966364,0.0010904106,0.00042792372,0.000109529035,0.00074236473,0.000115155155,0.0000063230627,0.0002553723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016325407,0.96879536,0.011956465,0.00043161062,0.00009839276,0.002125171,0.00016191544,0.000008263811,0.00009741278],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.94142413,0.029093264,0.01717673,0.0026606985,0.009004286,0.0006409435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.848973,0.1252591,0.011641898,0.002554279,0.010922037,0.0006497705],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05705588,0.0023594666,0.0080359625,0.028076252,0.0018883133,0.006168793,0.003027668,0.002800148,0.0023298895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11521043,0.0016786508,0.009067647,0.030718792,0.0023586203,0.0050540483,0.002920388,0.0022238991,0.0002574869],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110469235,0.00006560789,0.0014657485,0.8420351,0.0031957256,0.000117358715,0.00095806003,0.00043818698,0.00016800138,0.0024031042,0.0012714269,0.14777122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001019309,0.00020338265,0.0024856993,0.9512095,0.012967815,0.000399947,0.0012060733,0.00049147586,0.0003317578,0.001877667,0.028656228,0.00006849552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009922655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027124682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9429441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009538861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03824092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30174392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899368363","doi":"10.3233/jifs-181393","title":"Novel correlation coefficients for hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to supplier selection and medical diagnosis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Vagueness; Correlation; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Computer science; Correlation coefficient; Selection (genetic algorithm); Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.11128089054361293,"score_gpt":0.4055835028874477,"score_spread":0.2943026123438348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899368363","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016412014,0.00080780755,0.9787248,0.00024340748,0.00010860907,0.0001020314,0.000071406845,0.000077143704,0.0034527034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62125975,0.0016215965,0.37414706,0.00015496816,0.00021175154,0.00050970085,0.00018678654,0.000059658785,0.0018488658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917406,0.004451183,0.0005909814,0.0009342016,0.0019610177,0.00032201936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97720724,0.01519351,0.002307759,0.00119997,0.0037498763,0.0003416726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010298314,0.0012046804,0.0011018498,0.003994651,0.0009118102,0.0024503353,0.0013762291,0.0011118001,0.0025809654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042008158,0.00048010403,0.0012428393,0.0047811065,0.0020876315,0.004047055,0.0020797797,0.0019743247,0.00043795918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020358324,0.00009314037,0.0048524938,0.000502406,0.00030652207,0.0004546784,0.0009182917,0.21458355,0.002982609,0.6119631,0.003507274,0.15963227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003630827,0.00019825621,0.0021725926,0.00015437174,0.00013858688,0.00051282946,0.00040186662,0.81264627,0.0032195488,0.17343862,0.006926992,0.00015368914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014788229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011967535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010298314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001910236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017933054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054463327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899867401","doi":"10.5539/jmr.v11n2p114","title":"Overlap Coefficients Based on Kullback-Leibler of Two Normal Densities: Equal Means Case","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematics Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Measure (data warehouse); Divergence (linguistics); Kullback–Leibler divergence; Lambda; Similarity (geometry); Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Applied mathematics; Statistical physics; Physics; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.4076687693057556,"score_gpt":0.5486514598628397,"score_spread":0.14098269055708412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899867401","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051463548,0.0010790684,0.9441493,0.00019899254,0.0000455715,0.000075997465,0.00007594038,0.00014875465,0.0027627903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7218403,0.00083891116,0.27501383,0.00013464315,0.00013867891,0.00028178995,0.0002103727,0.00009251285,0.0014489411],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98993814,0.00399402,0.0006668925,0.0011797921,0.003678804,0.0005423717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97370285,0.02026271,0.001577087,0.0016041821,0.0023076318,0.0005454291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012003357,0.0010109257,0.0018296709,0.0033082,0.0008461322,0.0031212084,0.0018257934,0.0016572295,0.0016273933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049434815,0.00037756754,0.0010319336,0.002221791,0.0027409343,0.006350384,0.0036150718,0.0017661192,0.0003768392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010469817,0.00022540629,0.01125473,0.000536833,0.0004063509,0.0004970792,0.0006811486,0.3236506,0.0063113812,0.323115,0.002616446,0.32965806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034361325,0.00019916086,0.0021223992,0.000073921015,0.00006749387,0.00053114374,0.00014751001,0.88125634,0.004458771,0.109450065,0.001541923,0.00011684704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002036113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010085482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012003357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014281301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014351235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063480616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900552345","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-6062-5.ch015","title":"Type-One Fuzzy Logic for Quantitatively Defining Imprecise Linguistic Terms in Politics and Public Policy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in human and social aspects of technology book series","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy set; Class (philosophy); Presidential system; Mathematical economics; Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Ask price; Moderation; Politics; Domain of discourse; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Fuzzy number; Linguistics; Political science; Economics; Law; Statistics; Philosophy; Economy","score_opus":0.09654572988309607,"score_gpt":0.4113362838685937,"score_spread":0.31479055398549766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900552345","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033470679,0.027875014,0.7995883,0.0061096,0.0017596552,0.00014094368,0.00047472242,0.00024577594,0.160459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16291273,0.025393946,0.7489622,0.0033339707,0.0020067948,0.00065584155,0.000705119,0.00019489505,0.055834454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684274,0.0012793238,0.00022600214,0.00030120905,0.0012577324,0.00009296265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975878,0.0017688567,0.00012476115,0.00013108765,0.000350872,0.00003673593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004051351,0.0011602676,0.00069741573,0.0025928137,0.0012038976,0.004738505,0.0016162667,0.0016544327,0.00609029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006806159,0.0005072905,0.0010449437,0.0036133204,0.004451986,0.008473693,0.0013287682,0.0042538033,0.0018344205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016803851,0.000012739494,0.00006522126,0.00019723197,0.000011197227,0.000071502276,0.00048162002,0.0038961333,0.0004017014,0.9456204,0.007973913,0.041251544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062926483,0.000012686769,0.000094504525,0.00029961098,0.000013593378,0.00010016903,0.00023586341,0.014313264,0.00048056422,0.91810775,0.066308774,0.000026959973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003542527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033329227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00609029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043818164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001481503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031792462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900639259","doi":"10.1080/0305215x.2018.1536753","title":"Inexact rough-interval type-2 fuzzy stochastic optimization model supporting municipal solid waste management under uncertainty","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Optimization","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Henan University; Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Interval (graph theory); Municipal solid waste; Fuzzy logic; Type (biology); Mathematical optimization; Solid waste management; Mathematics; Computer science; Waste management; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Geology","score_opus":0.08180019776179873,"score_gpt":0.3792532534148086,"score_spread":0.29745305565300983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900639259","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04551581,0.00021024431,0.9506263,0.00022034509,0.000045888068,0.00003587497,0.0000862321,0.000085484375,0.00317375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95686984,0.0002489327,0.040021535,0.00004823875,0.000036422665,0.00012431634,0.00010274645,0.000018313242,0.0025297198],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992091,0.00030012897,0.000036028203,0.00013162191,0.00021952565,0.00010364734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912447,0.00046285696,0.00016947057,0.00003728651,0.00016198514,0.00004398069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011680957,0.00092018774,0.0012415118,0.0005652401,0.0004569146,0.0017945025,0.0010778239,0.001454887,0.001309413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020184808,0.0005358497,0.0011367908,0.0006663866,0.0007550202,0.0010761761,0.0008929163,0.0011634512,0.0001269234],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011850784,0.0000064455326,0.00010815694,0.000015622685,0.000009247197,0.000036735957,0.000009443856,0.995889,0.00016254406,0.002296036,0.00005122125,0.0014036765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014390786,0.000006014315,0.000025598005,0.0000012173763,0.0000021067842,0.000003249608,0.0000032418293,0.99913836,0.000043212436,0.0007344741,0.000039353064,0.0000017449489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00826408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047029993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00826408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092467625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014581416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016431928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900831024","doi":"10.19080/bboaj.2018.07.555726","title":"An Illustration of Obtaining p-values and Confidence Intervals Through the Use of The Significance Function","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidence interval; Function (biology); Statistics; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.6047185087150978,"score_gpt":0.5465635396379601,"score_spread":0.058154969077137686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900831024","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026941295,0.00022211713,0.9915485,0.00045572172,0.00008330831,0.00006245427,0.00017852822,0.0011899987,0.003565396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05851894,0.00022635404,0.93935895,0.00016061532,0.000041201067,0.00016779867,0.00013955352,0.00029997138,0.0010866394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99306303,0.0048018727,0.00044313856,0.0003603806,0.0011152418,0.00021634996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96165234,0.0341762,0.00066776975,0.0018907796,0.0014612316,0.00015173893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011618654,0.0014300933,0.0011834042,0.0045547644,0.000904639,0.002811475,0.0020925128,0.0028745173,0.012821999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05351853,0.0005549941,0.0014886063,0.004202036,0.0017752547,0.0017700157,0.0020186557,0.0038112083,0.0024242995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080435135,0.00029716102,0.003024162,0.0010109076,0.00024751085,0.0019587397,0.001060148,0.055632137,0.010973903,0.50107265,0.019197399,0.40472096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004159959,0.0004534308,0.0033285052,0.00037989943,0.00016305772,0.0029108394,0.0003520037,0.41173613,0.020143995,0.5228216,0.037039626,0.00025492985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002605649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018975222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012821999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058045425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013682207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06144607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901229908","doi":"10.1007/s10726-018-9597-3","title":"A Value-Focused Multiple Participant-Multiple Criteria (MPMC) Decision Support Approach for Public Policy Formulation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Decision support system; Management science; Participant observation; Value (mathematics); Policy analysis; Public policy; Computer science; Operations research; Actuarial science; Economics; Sociology; Data mining; Political science; Engineering; Machine learning; Public administration","score_opus":0.2638552533490503,"score_gpt":0.4288093007490322,"score_spread":0.16495404739998187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901229908","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029942458,0.000100344136,0.9916291,0.00071855215,0.000048237285,0.00018364408,0.00003649008,0.000063243475,0.0042260787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23007125,0.00021122495,0.7661803,0.00028663076,0.00010504769,0.0009532297,0.0000792448,0.00003959393,0.0020734752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899192,0.0069453563,0.00027611348,0.00054314645,0.0020068279,0.00030935457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98746383,0.0100500025,0.0004951941,0.00033601405,0.001248437,0.0004063865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012886019,0.0010969834,0.0017638861,0.0026481636,0.0017008408,0.0037107752,0.003527702,0.0030930147,0.008249179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024793787,0.0007686627,0.0015708595,0.002641232,0.0019123525,0.004548521,0.003961497,0.0032609103,0.0006294585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014534473,0.00034669135,0.0006297396,0.00047124177,0.00018519333,0.00027630237,0.00087252347,0.4106661,0.0010211656,0.43421176,0.0033707465,0.14780325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042998006,0.00009324596,0.000072381554,0.00007648983,0.000039185426,0.000044006214,0.00014619606,0.78253955,0.0003257861,0.2128298,0.003764245,0.000026084956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003583761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005018468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012886019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028948078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053196205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06814861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901863061","doi":"10.3846/jeelm.2018.6122","title":"A GROUP DECISION-MAKING MODEL FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANS SELECTION BASED ON INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Science Foundation","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Selection (genetic algorithm); Group decision-making; Computer science; Operations research; Set (abstract data type); Order (exchange); Preference; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Management science; Measure (data warehouse); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Engineering; Business; Statistics; Psychology","score_opus":0.028968940413784762,"score_gpt":0.2981393068373497,"score_spread":0.2691703664235649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901863061","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018175561,0.00035256663,0.9731462,0.00047652042,0.0000661018,0.00022351331,0.00011326132,0.000112323985,0.007333894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73218185,0.0009369878,0.25997937,0.00018588107,0.0000764652,0.0011757417,0.0002143207,0.000021705364,0.005227736],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.998052,0.0008197995,0.000110548244,0.00034032235,0.0005068796,0.00017055556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990318,0.0005019522,0.00013361816,0.000029162948,0.00022985123,0.00007369418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003021663,0.0016494761,0.0014764569,0.0014271906,0.0014977555,0.0024535672,0.002586376,0.0022625679,0.0043491162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002965216,0.00057879224,0.0015172347,0.001634012,0.0011421291,0.0023870096,0.0012809115,0.0016624652,0.00048000363],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102083206,0.00009795269,0.0007689213,0.0002264908,0.00010332456,0.0003834277,0.0005312404,0.90611494,0.0012745265,0.06646959,0.0011653043,0.022762164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039153754,0.0000899324,0.00016072216,0.000023749652,0.000035997207,0.000057396464,0.000062268045,0.9783378,0.0001965095,0.020108042,0.0008595379,0.000028889779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00855027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006910871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00855027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028061527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025548793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020360172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904665170","doi":"10.18438/eblip29499","title":"Increasing Objectivity in eResource Selection Using a Priority Matrix","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fanshawe College","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Operations research; Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08346774208920808,"score_gpt":0.41143055518043586,"score_spread":0.32796281309122777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904665170","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0394545,0.0004928077,0.95223343,0.0009355513,0.00011742856,0.00054793473,0.00010492381,0.00029065122,0.0058228816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28825164,0.00025259773,0.7095271,0.00021192666,0.00010402243,0.00057702564,0.00011761839,0.00008729245,0.0008707964],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.87435627,0.086720884,0.009279254,0.0063739135,0.021879295,0.001390314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46342874,0.4754258,0.013533335,0.019652583,0.026022794,0.0019368349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12045058,0.0016515558,0.0027342685,0.011164473,0.0024077902,0.009782434,0.0035132759,0.0026771137,0.004857678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35310975,0.0016841096,0.002932717,0.007394998,0.0029637432,0.011055371,0.008398681,0.0044994047,0.00052500877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026986958,0.0009640793,0.01474477,0.004361031,0.0014106246,0.00029935592,0.006203639,0.08034562,0.008655102,0.14977735,0.0027973284,0.7277424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008472974,0.0014047304,0.007989072,0.0015303278,0.00094335625,0.00037061053,0.0017392196,0.58153296,0.010929175,0.384313,0.008101076,0.00029912783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026294896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002651855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12045058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029536197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004239962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6370112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904758104","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.204","title":"Risk assessment based on fuzzy synthetic evaluation method","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Science of The Total Environment","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre; Department for International Development; Department for International Development, UK Government; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Computer science; Sensitivity (control systems); Vulnerability (computing); Fuzzy logic; Risk assessment; Data mining; Domain (mathematical analysis); Risk analysis (engineering); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.11311221385683493,"score_gpt":0.436124024419019,"score_spread":0.3230118105621841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904758104","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031200746,0.0004541574,0.963044,0.0001442095,0.00006653661,0.00007862578,0.0000529786,0.00009129035,0.0048675276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7362488,0.0004589819,0.26114452,0.000054530723,0.000063268446,0.00021002715,0.00012488611,0.00003928517,0.0016557146],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975116,0.0012804753,0.00014043495,0.00017559172,0.00079164834,0.00010031303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700963,0.0017646455,0.00015795551,0.00009210705,0.0008791268,0.00009646239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037541098,0.00089935045,0.0011295386,0.003340628,0.0009171133,0.0018520763,0.00079438934,0.0007971264,0.0021874125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006383746,0.00026985863,0.0012538603,0.0016101052,0.00071859005,0.0014305714,0.00082006137,0.00058595557,0.00012902853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002801977,0.000111733265,0.0017173771,0.00037364458,0.00020433536,0.00017971364,0.00021164156,0.8080046,0.0047283485,0.07296142,0.001441642,0.1097854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012188473,0.000058443333,0.00024478752,0.000021971728,0.000028191494,0.0000555264,0.000031339227,0.98623383,0.00069045165,0.011918597,0.0006833497,0.000021436099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002519802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014279895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037541098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012642292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013963385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01985389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904945528","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33014570","title":"Cost-Sensitive Learning to Rank","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Rank (graph theory); Learning to rank; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.31424019844457085,"score_gpt":0.43772003951743144,"score_spread":0.12347984107286059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904945528","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013242366,0.00076459115,0.98076594,0.001297995,0.00014082651,0.00017700835,0.00037879418,0.00035004714,0.0028822997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7428138,0.0011777042,0.2449093,0.0011442875,0.000669557,0.0005697884,0.0013051671,0.00015603422,0.007254279],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917088,0.0045176153,0.0003504898,0.0011317284,0.001620208,0.00067114364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97517043,0.01749791,0.0018712594,0.0019743245,0.0027929693,0.0006930322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008877902,0.0022346228,0.003244503,0.0019108178,0.00076502754,0.0032140452,0.0029677856,0.00244721,0.0054016816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029365243,0.00054224546,0.00093247916,0.002895565,0.0018177293,0.0032868953,0.0017354725,0.0031907642,0.0012350954],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017946631,0.00030753762,0.0015609242,0.00028290992,0.0001525697,0.000100043435,0.000060644183,0.8214194,0.00074408925,0.046059873,0.012355997,0.11677653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023547118,0.00009672048,0.00016635857,0.000014163272,0.000016580396,0.000027318652,0.00000987396,0.96354455,0.00031267197,0.035105754,0.00066832924,0.000014153469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00418748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004547525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008877902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020844054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028304388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046951413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906464943","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2018.11.004","title":"Improvement of risk assessment in the FMEA using nonlinear model, revised fuzzy TOPSIS, and support vector machine","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Support vector machine; Fuzzy logic; TOPSIS; Nonlinear system; Failure mode and effects analysis; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Operations research; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.19547187587628792,"score_gpt":0.44433330237842705,"score_spread":0.24886142650213913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906464943","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11563184,0.00049976166,0.88079613,0.0001494018,0.000036806294,0.00009879095,0.000029356745,0.0001689989,0.0025888712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8649611,0.00023599663,0.13386893,0.000025332716,0.000018910176,0.00008042417,0.000049191996,0.000020436577,0.00073975313],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978496,0.0008792416,0.00013369341,0.00022414386,0.0007507535,0.0001626626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982268,0.00091151067,0.00016388168,0.000086758206,0.0005680636,0.000042986452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032309222,0.0011812791,0.0011628446,0.0017504883,0.0006469455,0.0014224174,0.00092846225,0.000757838,0.0010436589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056535676,0.0003144068,0.0012620391,0.0010376781,0.0003636421,0.0017775359,0.0010207818,0.00079974096,0.000115365336],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002545944,0.00034100286,0.0049547344,0.00042878755,0.0003070065,0.0001662057,0.00031375553,0.67873013,0.007849995,0.006671267,0.0006792011,0.29930335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014283422,0.00023468524,0.001397548,0.000027286333,0.000079049045,0.000047308884,0.00007363953,0.9937277,0.0014778114,0.0026112485,0.00029055335,0.000018869388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00608674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004996871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00608674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008715592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019075078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017086983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907890578","doi":"10.18026/cbayarsos.505987","title":"APPLICATION OF COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT SELECTION IN AVIATION INDUSTRY THROUGH MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Boeing (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Aviation; Ranking (information retrieval); Context (archaeology); Analytic hierarchy process; Selection (genetic algorithm); Operations research; Aeronautics; Computer science; Aircraft industry; Commercial aviation; Aerospace; Operations management; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Aerospace engineering","score_opus":0.13527967755471781,"score_gpt":0.48362381068035687,"score_spread":0.34834413312563905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907890578","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124609314,0.0020229637,0.8583281,0.00057194993,0.00012289306,0.0016376876,0.00020603278,0.00016239777,0.0123386765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5729887,0.0007525507,0.42435873,0.00007314796,0.00003455476,0.0008685384,0.0001038562,0.000019548348,0.00080032094],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98787326,0.008034948,0.00066349393,0.00052511814,0.0025415625,0.00036155785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99024266,0.007667389,0.0005427631,0.00015933423,0.0011853788,0.0002024264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010821174,0.001418264,0.0013972677,0.0046439148,0.0012188002,0.0026183645,0.0012552202,0.00095881836,0.002841545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013376403,0.00047387916,0.0016381892,0.0043284227,0.0006547955,0.0012988669,0.0015392482,0.0010587636,0.00023122277],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006379793,0.0011414768,0.010325461,0.0029193645,0.00092852797,0.00062622706,0.0020101345,0.49484134,0.0068544573,0.02791502,0.0014053754,0.45039466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104742976,0.00070930016,0.0030514055,0.00038162037,0.00018574487,0.0001370293,0.0012167658,0.9661007,0.0032521097,0.02118382,0.0036061364,0.00007063587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026844635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003266345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010821174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018851543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002900463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057228565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908471060","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.006","title":"A new FlowSort-based method to deal with information imperfections in sorting decision-making problems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Computer science; Sorting; Imperfect; Perfect information; Context (archaeology); Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy logic; Field (mathematics); Data mining; Point (geometry); Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1757442513378903,"score_gpt":0.49563948171100314,"score_spread":0.31989523037311285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908471060","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041450174,0.0001328462,0.99439937,0.0001067659,0.00011431295,0.000080409634,0.00006116403,0.00016257234,0.00079756044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12835553,0.00027163682,0.8653386,0.00024932527,0.0002509024,0.00058040506,0.00038234194,0.00020025272,0.004371032],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974827,0.0011104012,0.00018563446,0.00034034028,0.0007050921,0.0001757602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99337703,0.004063115,0.0003455158,0.00039793472,0.0014652058,0.00035114566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055496437,0.0013936575,0.002380667,0.0037506393,0.0011466525,0.002129153,0.0032435902,0.002462945,0.006051361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010246411,0.0010120417,0.002063427,0.0032449546,0.0010134286,0.0031960085,0.002304373,0.002044959,0.00068803766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035207914,0.00052497094,0.0021785356,0.00033733196,0.00036110796,0.00017785605,0.00022745405,0.612741,0.0031243765,0.069312416,0.005223085,0.30543977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016477095,0.000043348275,0.00011056773,0.000016847662,0.000022413593,0.000027321847,0.000009902218,0.9874001,0.00028359945,0.011010664,0.0010459346,0.0000128461625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004222786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003873225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006051361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013982522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029758771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029349625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908559044","doi":"10.1007/s12559-019-9622-0","title":"Group Decision-Making with Linguistic Cognition from a Reliability Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Computation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Cognition; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Artificial intelligence; Ranking (information retrieval); Perspective (graphical); Machine learning; Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.062484548637651446,"score_gpt":0.41341875544737305,"score_spread":0.3509342068097216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908559044","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051061023,0.00038654968,0.93937683,0.0013931365,0.0000775659,0.0000678728,0.000031713353,0.00009646459,0.0075088916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7899106,0.00020805158,0.20812646,0.00014266593,0.00021547276,0.00018723097,0.000032012755,0.000060098264,0.0011174796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901079,0.0063118944,0.00047677747,0.0007221486,0.0020232792,0.00035809106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9139964,0.07503476,0.0034197676,0.0033224516,0.0033993376,0.0008272614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013557946,0.0010079185,0.0014397947,0.0032688084,0.0010811058,0.0048833266,0.001756197,0.001620319,0.0037494632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06689726,0.0008145483,0.0016063,0.0020420894,0.0049192864,0.00786736,0.00246486,0.002091786,0.00033753444],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002012598,0.00017025888,0.0032648146,0.00041538427,0.00032596875,0.00032688054,0.0020937927,0.14271355,0.001663948,0.7936993,0.00080422993,0.054320592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023092009,0.00008743036,0.0005822621,0.000046200337,0.00006524643,0.000055423166,0.00019549968,0.2415073,0.00053436495,0.7563886,0.00048347222,0.00003100091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011856254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089356827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013557946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013249385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001296775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07170212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908761996","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2019.01.005","title":"Computational method for fuzzy arithmetic operations on triangular fuzzy numbers by extension principle","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fuzzy number; Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Fuzzy set operations; Arithmetic; Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Extension (predicate logic); Defuzzification; Norm (philosophy); Algorithm; Fuzzy mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy set; Algebra over a field; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.06825895460799343,"score_gpt":0.4426220762179773,"score_spread":0.37436312160998386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908761996","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024480072,0.00008164036,0.9947214,0.000064067484,0.000042955893,0.000023515226,0.000018205068,0.000031897733,0.0025682936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16317746,0.00034031543,0.8300466,0.000106704545,0.0001791808,0.00024472177,0.00011969985,0.000090716814,0.0056945416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999102,0.00032362196,0.000055131037,0.00012742683,0.00033795938,0.000053770535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990821,0.00055980677,0.00003015,0.00013258221,0.00017087362,0.000024531279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001438399,0.00045310776,0.0009293827,0.0010606252,0.0007260895,0.0013818535,0.0014143236,0.0005424729,0.0059905173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003488914,0.00028538323,0.0016318742,0.0012975569,0.0013074845,0.002649665,0.0017231142,0.001953286,0.00085134694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007608845,0.000047126858,0.00014611693,0.00015249806,0.000035795372,0.00008173515,0.0001860875,0.0498448,0.0038592368,0.84744996,0.0023745694,0.09574602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021189977,0.000059445425,0.00012223027,0.000033102395,0.000025161777,0.00011497769,0.000040543557,0.5346348,0.0017118626,0.4562284,0.0069882437,0.000020066114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009140744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082479377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059905173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062355265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008256716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020040214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908828475","doi":"10.1109/iemcon.2018.8614996","title":"Fuzzy Techniques to Reduce Subjectivity and Combine Qualitative and Quantitative Criteria in a Multi-objective Design Problem","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Reliability (semiconductor); Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy number; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Fuzzy set; Power (physics); Mathematics","score_opus":0.35513829835168964,"score_gpt":0.5332999204129516,"score_spread":0.17816162206126196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908828475","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018947155,0.000122537,0.997044,0.00004326847,0.000012116872,0.00004422381,0.000006150601,0.000019982223,0.00081293815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1357078,0.00045365613,0.86179304,0.00010205039,0.00005564477,0.0006816826,0.000029921977,0.000046031022,0.001130173],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99447095,0.0030929232,0.00032368192,0.00044450315,0.0015411281,0.0001267999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943916,0.0044043134,0.00045871746,0.00020341104,0.00047523444,0.00006667471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009064884,0.0024135113,0.0014713324,0.0023820954,0.0007286397,0.0015018979,0.0010522958,0.0011324763,0.0019785687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008827373,0.0009288339,0.0019638923,0.0013278193,0.0015086519,0.0015185428,0.0017244493,0.00216239,0.00027402194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091694375,0.00015033124,0.00042155324,0.0007347547,0.00025137,0.000120429904,0.0003641704,0.8156161,0.00743146,0.072147004,0.0003793395,0.10229182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008402309,0.00045050538,0.0002513989,0.00019131768,0.00012494226,0.00008327752,0.0000653727,0.9029111,0.00431861,0.087371476,0.0040924815,0.000055336455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012234306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014459051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009064884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013254838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016917743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047940254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910182561","doi":"10.1007/s40815-018-0581-5","title":"A Note on “Approaches to Interval Intuitionistic Trapezoidal Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Incomplete Weight Information”","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computational intelligence; Weight; Mathematics; Interval (graph theory); Linear programming; Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Combinatorics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.1532914507048815,"score_gpt":0.3624175770019327,"score_spread":0.2091261262970512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910182561","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010355008,0.0065875947,0.95298386,0.013460697,0.0069146054,0.00013431843,0.0002212932,0.00014582589,0.01851637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059035942,0.009660173,0.8990119,0.010286963,0.008715549,0.00042706862,0.00028170057,0.00019760318,0.012383105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99343675,0.0026083027,0.0006403025,0.0008125385,0.0022540775,0.00024802436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911408,0.0055794846,0.00034526375,0.0006887947,0.0021302232,0.00011549434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009570444,0.0015400398,0.0016123948,0.00204456,0.0024659869,0.0053193406,0.006262782,0.0047695716,0.0069021713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020635683,0.0010608011,0.0043891636,0.0040509063,0.0063747843,0.009411585,0.0027849637,0.008411466,0.0017802913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065796776,0.0000323515,0.00015618501,0.0004923373,0.000114392795,0.00031976227,0.00046873628,0.011358325,0.000573297,0.9207609,0.033974517,0.0316834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000149875,0.000030067495,0.00013327268,0.00023937323,0.000048052716,0.000096719494,0.000078695106,0.020277964,0.0005363613,0.9256586,0.0528287,0.000057192752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054616597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008241275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009570444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002806505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026577485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910453715","doi":"10.1007/s10666-018-9647-x","title":"An Integrated Multicriteria Decision Analysis System for Reducing Air Emissions from Mining Process","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Modeling & Assessment","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Analytic hierarchy process; Weighting; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Operations research; Process (computing); Probabilistic logic; Engineering; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07051818611839895,"score_gpt":0.42173444840120317,"score_spread":0.3512162622828042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910453715","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20145456,0.00022029455,0.79073596,0.00017833515,0.00007366813,0.00020526914,0.00019191869,0.003525227,0.0034148127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82282937,0.00007131214,0.17475085,0.00007285213,0.000028002083,0.00017882178,0.00019788255,0.000047216825,0.001823734],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934715,0.0001353804,0.00005931809,0.00020650844,0.00016529736,0.00008630879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995105,0.00017387919,0.00006845865,0.00004111546,0.00016174527,0.000044241053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010453779,0.0007995775,0.001139267,0.00081858155,0.0007500244,0.0014187152,0.00090628763,0.00083317596,0.0023822088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011312034,0.00049407315,0.00073511136,0.0005716714,0.00027663013,0.00091108936,0.0010555434,0.00052293413,0.00031358027],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021931152,0.0009797075,0.005267822,0.00025880584,0.00031285657,0.00040015538,0.00023972683,0.6709986,0.0451834,0.003065812,0.0022202667,0.26887974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035927224,0.00014043105,0.00052947144,0.0000043465493,0.000048680373,0.00002684358,0.000015188204,0.995063,0.0032197435,0.0004874976,0.0004172529,0.000011597367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046482217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052245404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046482217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082553166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015664868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009242296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911534100","doi":"","title":"Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Satisfiability; Computer science; Theoretical computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.11405158357332226,"score_gpt":0.3873354442747253,"score_spread":0.2732838607014031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911534100","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01205186,0.063867934,0.7813469,0.014427023,0.03415942,0.0003155432,0.00056735624,0.0010117899,0.09225216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19881542,0.06201309,0.5285864,0.004256598,0.02887857,0.0007444901,0.0038698025,0.0012650243,0.17157063],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99508625,0.002013691,0.0003848695,0.0006440429,0.0015362543,0.00033494885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989611,0.005471617,0.00026683943,0.0014603639,0.0024718787,0.00071829377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00828847,0.0015780696,0.0029631555,0.002332092,0.0010869411,0.0070967474,0.002498361,0.002393191,0.02991711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013427692,0.00089227373,0.0020497942,0.002107628,0.002911796,0.004446982,0.0022867576,0.0049231877,0.0054038162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086493423,0.0005266036,0.001645849,0.00075795484,0.000384255,0.00048003395,0.00052420003,0.015468695,0.0052940683,0.18047006,0.1844068,0.6091766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018451932,0.0004476861,0.0023191313,0.0007365928,0.00033619764,0.0010393971,0.00033414745,0.13998607,0.0052346773,0.29774326,0.55150616,0.00013211118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004284677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004129018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02991711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023315283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031332984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100082755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912183720","doi":"10.1057/s41270-018-00047-y","title":"Salespeople’s reward preference methodological analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Analytics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Analytic hierarchy process; Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Class (philosophy); Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; TOPSIS; Artificial intelligence; Similarity (geometry); Computer science; Statistics; Operations research","score_opus":0.5020156706393514,"score_gpt":0.48861997054879946,"score_spread":0.01339570009055191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912183720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77153915,0.0013751803,0.19623151,0.0011510527,0.0002161471,0.0013337185,0.0009254455,0.000070987815,0.02715691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9450046,0.00021528444,0.052032717,0.00013292604,0.00003520336,0.00047702444,0.00032345927,0.000021710695,0.0017571306],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97189796,0.021031834,0.0015220419,0.0012790216,0.0037034377,0.00056563306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87657225,0.10428207,0.0030201257,0.00400534,0.010909657,0.0012105413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039978802,0.00057081954,0.00087719364,0.0054687066,0.0009870459,0.0028790666,0.0011444493,0.00082945125,0.009861847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13764212,0.00030247122,0.0025119714,0.003161609,0.00089052325,0.0021123094,0.0018090128,0.0014815575,0.00035544066],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008112453,0.002221956,0.16849804,0.0027918876,0.004653499,0.00039330512,0.005350082,0.021616658,0.0051505906,0.16329882,0.006950967,0.6109617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017008982,0.008434354,0.29158643,0.0017905141,0.006008825,0.001361985,0.023136655,0.30973995,0.016953323,0.3019886,0.03663066,0.0006676617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019420525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030984918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039978802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024518357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022236386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21143067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913578521","doi":"10.1007/s00521-019-04016-z","title":"Multiple-attribute group decision making for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on expert reliability and the evidential reasoning rule","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neural Computing and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Evidential reasoning approach; Reliability (semiconductor); Similarity (geometry); Group decision-making; Interval (graph theory); Selection (genetic algorithm); Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Group (periodic table); Computational Science and Engineering; Machine learning; Decision support system; Business decision mapping","score_opus":0.0707334294407454,"score_gpt":0.4088018779792386,"score_spread":0.3380684485384932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913578521","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017520858,0.00015420414,0.9807592,0.00016844053,0.000026157151,0.000042669057,0.00002044907,0.00002365424,0.0012843226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6088276,0.00028225422,0.38979402,0.000057728503,0.000076655786,0.0001720077,0.00006786807,0.000018233166,0.00070362195],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919661,0.004393837,0.00050975446,0.0008364491,0.0020319598,0.00026190662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98288846,0.013755251,0.0010614707,0.0006141901,0.0014452876,0.0002353807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014339006,0.0010855321,0.0024491467,0.002215931,0.0007790479,0.0024956486,0.001953692,0.0014794652,0.0014970639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030185217,0.00067963597,0.0021354011,0.0012181358,0.0024734854,0.0038594604,0.0016141189,0.002270392,0.00022876455],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002908735,0.00017144393,0.0013883389,0.00044938124,0.000406479,0.00038846635,0.0011062629,0.5547402,0.0020570436,0.37973565,0.0010924996,0.05817342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018183788,0.000069387745,0.00027168114,0.000047312922,0.000051267063,0.000051789277,0.00004509798,0.84118694,0.00046506236,0.15748957,0.000272674,0.000031013544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014524728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011648501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014339006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015776496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012650567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075832784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914729178","doi":"","title":"Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Satisfiability; Computer science; Theoretical computer science","score_opus":0.11442289335141183,"score_gpt":0.39109894401829093,"score_spread":0.2766760506668791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914729178","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011541965,0.057707913,0.7909264,0.013733016,0.031671684,0.00031006942,0.00055990077,0.0009558064,0.092593275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20054099,0.05562366,0.5367871,0.004164632,0.026700424,0.00072421995,0.0037205846,0.001179965,0.17055836],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952277,0.001944962,0.00037476447,0.0006261787,0.0014938624,0.00033241103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901867,0.0051472667,0.00025139304,0.0013814352,0.0023817432,0.0006514242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008147174,0.0015546408,0.0028729516,0.002321268,0.0010718115,0.0070442907,0.0025273028,0.0022965567,0.03141949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01331957,0.0008771,0.0020044004,0.0020297302,0.0027709221,0.0042896294,0.0023140626,0.0049112234,0.0054274965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079874834,0.000521793,0.0015521881,0.00073851156,0.0003721398,0.00047335267,0.0005209231,0.015817882,0.005099199,0.18765664,0.17834343,0.6081051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018782743,0.00042693163,0.0023106164,0.00072975375,0.00032134252,0.0010134797,0.0003220618,0.14943331,0.005226894,0.30975413,0.5301364,0.0001372234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041897455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040224516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03141949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023334723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030974315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10510868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915060661","doi":"10.5267/j.jpm.2019.1.004","title":"A hybrid of Delphi, AHP and TOPSIS Methods for project portfolio management","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Project Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Analytic hierarchy process; Project portfolio management; Delphi; Portfolio; Delphi method; Computer science; Operations research; Business; Operations management; Project management; Engineering; Systems engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1767051285849966,"score_gpt":0.520080189489326,"score_spread":0.3433750609043294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915060661","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0110925045,0.00048360185,0.98109907,0.00027300167,0.00006857625,0.0013906796,0.00012579215,0.0002513904,0.005215392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.087599486,0.00059052295,0.9090273,0.000064470245,0.000023234157,0.0013239946,0.000114396345,0.000030837873,0.0012257281],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873656,0.007711664,0.00086132647,0.0005222229,0.003246625,0.0002925852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994531,0.0037502483,0.00030814283,0.00019560747,0.0010860725,0.000128981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011269,0.0019824537,0.0016450313,0.0077269888,0.0016348688,0.0032472645,0.0012853068,0.0007993497,0.0036362994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010206708,0.00084892317,0.0017719478,0.006292737,0.0009624413,0.0015789173,0.002269068,0.0013583202,0.0004854919],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033573457,0.0005410495,0.002684139,0.004003431,0.0009675658,0.00050158246,0.0060359845,0.13681386,0.012033917,0.061651215,0.004196082,0.7702354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022387973,0.0011711501,0.0045412243,0.0013253175,0.000490805,0.00067628885,0.0055788723,0.81742126,0.008610369,0.126648,0.03293908,0.0003737918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047361352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007889591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018094073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036557156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059596896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916344177","doi":"10.1007/s11590-019-01412-1","title":"The multi-stage dynamic stochastic decision process with unknown distribution of the random utilities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Optimization Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Transport Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal decision; Mathematical optimization; Multinomial logistic regression; Expected utility hypothesis; Decision rule; Expected value; Probability distribution; Mathematics; Stochastic process; Multinomial distribution; Decision theory; Computer science; Econometrics; Statistics; Decision tree; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04098725591223491,"score_gpt":0.35209518520689387,"score_spread":0.31110792929465897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916344177","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07779295,0.0006272352,0.9149951,0.0009781629,0.00005794293,0.0001336161,0.0002016552,0.00007034173,0.0051430073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9079719,0.00091380376,0.079848446,0.00015027968,0.00008679292,0.00039146497,0.00020539819,0.000032021544,0.010399851],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943604,0.0026875315,0.00018027324,0.0012646827,0.0008095332,0.00069763104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499303,0.0035401315,0.00057263725,0.00017546669,0.00038133244,0.00033734392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005311293,0.0013706674,0.0023619528,0.0010586451,0.00094016554,0.0030995172,0.0027072679,0.0024453995,0.003914156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007936713,0.0010756714,0.001991918,0.0016574061,0.0028268585,0.0032529968,0.002045464,0.002499576,0.00041966047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001718956,0.00009391458,0.0015427907,0.00020537923,0.00012318848,0.00074551994,0.00022242568,0.7822441,0.0015651876,0.20407806,0.00047004918,0.008537413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003422219,0.00008125929,0.0003918904,0.000018381306,0.000035279736,0.00008952897,0.00003532748,0.94136584,0.0003539201,0.0570844,0.00047649824,0.000033516168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00529689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029783568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005311293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027078718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017874679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028089166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921655505","doi":"10.1142/s0218488519500156","title":"The Distributivity Equations of Semi-Uninorms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Distributivity; Mathematics; Associative property; Commutative property; Pure mathematics; Property (philosophy); Fuzzy logic; Algebra over a field; Discrete mathematics; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Distributive property; Computer science","score_opus":0.07437707112771202,"score_gpt":0.3944538882638848,"score_spread":0.32007681713617275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921655505","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04743991,0.0006758291,0.9296881,0.00047606486,0.00012970914,0.00009102535,0.00022757675,0.00009438908,0.02117747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67523044,0.001048669,0.30180624,0.00061381614,0.0002996259,0.0005226007,0.00041868887,0.00015326991,0.019906668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99338865,0.0016765702,0.0007110834,0.0015591669,0.0020924935,0.0005720122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99258876,0.003960184,0.00069803203,0.00061525486,0.0018789527,0.00025892738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006824773,0.0006664736,0.0008174073,0.0015927812,0.0012750597,0.0027158468,0.001272347,0.0009881698,0.0045919297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012039019,0.00055182975,0.0018441711,0.0013401257,0.0045180335,0.004473856,0.002298497,0.0028102521,0.0006754491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023528608,0.000018945366,0.00029808958,0.000054421744,0.000024218416,0.00014711062,0.00044558,0.004686735,0.001541096,0.98238236,0.00047457716,0.009903326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002006144,0.000040970324,0.0003551519,0.000038864164,0.000018594044,0.00026989763,0.00009133528,0.058203913,0.0020229856,0.9345828,0.004324455,0.00003080119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019050292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015681402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006824773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018486705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013664054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036093295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923965420","doi":"10.5539/mas.v13n4p51","title":"Assessment and Selection of Contractors in Specific Contracting Projects with Supply Chain Approach, Using GRAY and AHP Methods as Decision Support","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Call for bids; Analytic hierarchy process; Ranking (information retrieval); Gray (unit); Rank (graph theory); Operations research; Procurement; Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Business; Supply chain; Operations management; Engineering; Marketing; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.12143801243072022,"score_gpt":0.4433085411891697,"score_spread":0.32187052875844946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923965420","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2189905,0.00078820786,0.7559321,0.0010372177,0.00010677157,0.00309679,0.00032222978,0.00023783268,0.019488303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59410876,0.00047562065,0.40055564,0.00008494855,0.00002490849,0.00091142015,0.00023458315,0.000034103126,0.0035699676],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907294,0.0050401795,0.00065207004,0.00053829193,0.0024336122,0.0006064474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928455,0.0038224629,0.00064799836,0.0002476527,0.0020003256,0.00043609354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01087112,0.000923346,0.00086698536,0.0060287057,0.0020129315,0.003096195,0.00076440745,0.0007547663,0.004954575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013016349,0.0004473387,0.0009799121,0.003806763,0.001020096,0.001739274,0.0018731866,0.00080801937,0.00039521937],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010219782,0.0007484793,0.023598274,0.0023152104,0.00034672348,0.0007789792,0.008005722,0.15833217,0.011729957,0.05728714,0.007539028,0.7282964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024731972,0.0011300754,0.0142916385,0.00080012926,0.00030446533,0.00038467912,0.014289246,0.8519019,0.017056072,0.076929346,0.022436736,0.00022843556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005040983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072816457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01087112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00230034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005491706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057492673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2926618019","doi":"10.1080/03610918.2019.1586927","title":"DSLRIG: Leveraging predictor structure in logistic regression","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Agricultural Adaptation Council; Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs","keywords":"Logistic regression; Regression; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Logistic model tree; Representation (politics); Artificial intelligence; Graph; Regression analysis; Statistics; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Pattern recognition (psychology); Machine learning; Theoretical computer science","score_opus":0.4123956639035435,"score_gpt":0.5447184207911571,"score_spread":0.13232275688761358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2926618019","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014647896,0.00042262263,0.9826156,0.00044067763,0.000053547512,0.00005816276,0.00020366964,0.0009113922,0.00064646837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4279678,0.00092285377,0.5653279,0.00055876945,0.00020899552,0.0003890337,0.0016296243,0.00035815683,0.0026368275],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99494714,0.0036364468,0.00013165126,0.00055297586,0.0005584237,0.0001734282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99078876,0.0065699,0.00066735357,0.0009936942,0.0007488567,0.00023149546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007252942,0.0014188017,0.0018889569,0.0016702787,0.00055558665,0.0011939883,0.0030733473,0.001356347,0.0021262718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021893324,0.00081054453,0.0013970886,0.0024753439,0.0012374634,0.0020451264,0.0029823382,0.0025752063,0.0011587611],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040143562,0.00016825204,0.00872375,0.00023853531,0.00041017873,0.00032976488,0.0002243933,0.7059543,0.0016701936,0.026256278,0.006121527,0.24950142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025061983,0.000052361785,0.00030341765,0.000015061151,0.000020701125,0.000029234137,0.00001288987,0.98253495,0.00024852212,0.015873399,0.0008717611,0.000012687152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006546729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008506926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007252942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071663177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015196486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038357735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2929708549","doi":"10.1016/j.fss.2019.04.002","title":"Similarity between interval-valued fuzzy sets taking into account the width of the intervals and admissible orders","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fuzzy Sets and Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Regional Development Fund; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV; St. Thomas University","keywords":"Mathematics; Interval (graph theory); Equivalence (formal languages); Similarity (geometry); Fuzzy set; Matching (statistics); Real line; Fuzzy logic; Discrete mathematics; Algorithm; Combinatorics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Image (mathematics); Computer science","score_opus":0.1432102418572271,"score_gpt":0.4016291946683947,"score_spread":0.25841895281116756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2929708549","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22603244,0.0011714519,0.7623965,0.00018445376,0.00013347386,0.00012766737,0.0002162051,0.00011509195,0.009622628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.887569,0.00042834625,0.11005328,0.00004053012,0.00009814424,0.00009732226,0.00024359254,0.000028189652,0.0014414738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940778,0.001632101,0.00055173965,0.00079750444,0.0027275586,0.00021319877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893946,0.0057767336,0.0011556189,0.00088661554,0.002306772,0.00047960455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004656575,0.00043448075,0.001411943,0.0046731383,0.0006575427,0.0043800133,0.0013387856,0.0011782949,0.0013651431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021814562,0.00040731346,0.0013573691,0.002905229,0.0014867774,0.004091272,0.0012700114,0.0011793841,0.00021500763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005611211,0.00021835194,0.007722416,0.0007055703,0.00053208927,0.00081111805,0.0017691087,0.16036268,0.015320854,0.65547276,0.0010753692,0.15544854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031214942,0.00023972629,0.0045518964,0.00011657428,0.00011934456,0.0004684535,0.00036052687,0.5164657,0.0030707358,0.47216666,0.0023275912,0.00008147072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005924572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003964771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046731383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012224743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089958136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024626553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2932101547","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-03643-0_5","title":"Basic Properties for Total Uncertainty Measures in the Theory of Evidence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Information fusion and data science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Generalization; Measure (data warehouse); Axiom; Axiomatic system; Point (geometry); Econometrics; Information theory; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Uncertainty theory; Computer science; Statistics; Data mining","score_opus":0.5485831029195859,"score_gpt":0.4353125234285296,"score_spread":0.11327057949105629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2932101547","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037018347,0.007616458,0.95392865,0.0022406452,0.00053396577,0.00009343775,0.0005449597,0.00015303015,0.031187072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26296824,0.018994506,0.6943184,0.002119495,0.0041602817,0.0014713773,0.0013086133,0.00054974196,0.014109316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916461,0.0032429008,0.0011215585,0.0010154115,0.0026912412,0.00028269793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9673806,0.026529042,0.0010462515,0.00202579,0.0026575525,0.00036071928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0148040755,0.0019042795,0.0024175053,0.006386656,0.001986508,0.009652792,0.002776389,0.0031829735,0.007593445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038021643,0.0012769331,0.0038008653,0.007693517,0.0081906635,0.018129634,0.0042909454,0.007837699,0.002094863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006813265,0.000005457639,0.000045283123,0.000119112665,0.000021697739,0.000023959921,0.000103673876,0.0008528253,0.00015002255,0.9891227,0.0008644679,0.008683998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026301334,0.00000737457,0.000036569683,0.000045946676,0.000011558481,0.000048870443,0.000016250742,0.0030834628,0.000111455796,0.99446553,0.0021615596,0.000008884586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091666647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054955174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0148040755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026423743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014345966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07829237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945531413","doi":"10.1109/tsmc.2019.2906635","title":"Fuzzy Grey Choquet Integral for Evaluation of Multicriteria Decision Making Problems With Interactive and Qualitative Indices","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Choquet integral; Fuzzy logic; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Consistency (knowledge bases); Mathematics; Preference; Ideal solution; Computer science; Fuzzy number; Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Fuzzy set; Statistics","score_opus":0.11699250410195866,"score_gpt":0.4266774768565975,"score_spread":0.30968497275463885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945531413","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008056561,0.00047090137,0.9892805,0.000056521552,0.000025827254,0.00003250716,0.000008370086,0.00006146543,0.0020073403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6249145,0.0009927398,0.37215343,0.000063817446,0.00005321789,0.00021776893,0.00007339426,0.000060237035,0.0014708504],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714017,0.001191624,0.00012822116,0.00025024338,0.0011655563,0.00012423556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885714,0.0006322851,0.000091888694,0.00004726769,0.0003335005,0.00003782833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042116507,0.0013367337,0.0011522527,0.0019641125,0.00074395374,0.0015514067,0.00102589,0.0009746161,0.0010844397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066303005,0.00034732115,0.0011747355,0.0017100981,0.0010296229,0.0015430372,0.001303528,0.0011464091,0.00015202984],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010976282,0.00006146553,0.0010646429,0.00036189603,0.00017981105,0.00014032387,0.00033774428,0.8303678,0.0076419613,0.06024256,0.000824951,0.098667026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058634,0.000022031818,0.00013800307,0.000013368735,0.000016747215,0.000014698837,0.000018322102,0.9920322,0.00067843753,0.0065786843,0.00046941792,0.000012265665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037075859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014846793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018909548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0222736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945903420","doi":"10.1287/ijoc.2020.0978","title":"Lagrangian Duality for Robust Problems with Decomposable Functions: The Case of a Robust Inventory Problem","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFORMS journal on computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Center for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Duality (order theory); Mathematics; Strong duality; Lagrangian; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Applied mathematics; Optimization problem; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.22490339469076664,"score_gpt":0.37738426249737783,"score_spread":0.1524808678066112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945903420","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008148994,0.00023771318,0.98584706,0.0003366327,0.000026764777,0.000024118608,0.000046574147,0.00005045567,0.005281689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65504295,0.0010874445,0.33652246,0.00027378945,0.0002017341,0.00022281767,0.00016892687,0.00014155431,0.0063384483],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989273,0.00055981346,0.00003079652,0.00014702459,0.00022296974,0.00011206033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980343,0.0013684998,0.00025621898,0.00014808238,0.00012503738,0.000067829984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002268809,0.0010365617,0.0010381384,0.00073571305,0.0004682089,0.0017622137,0.0012299516,0.0012076147,0.0033985965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045916704,0.00048564834,0.0012787636,0.000835265,0.0016312762,0.0020022315,0.0016082128,0.0027266378,0.0004470437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041403662,0.00005282832,0.000187488,0.00010448294,0.000035344245,0.00015163068,0.00007165102,0.77050966,0.0011926313,0.2164289,0.0010195082,0.0102044195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072743346,0.000018069844,0.00003986176,0.000011184652,0.0000059734643,0.000029466368,0.000014489553,0.953926,0.00038167278,0.04465415,0.0009071387,0.0000047895664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012655798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008021952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033985965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014206561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011085512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011998713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950124317","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.1412450","title":"A New Weighting Factor In Combining Belief Function","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Weighting; Factor (programming language); Function (biology); Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.21996234106839127,"score_gpt":0.38399965049733764,"score_spread":0.16403730942894637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950124317","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045026713,0.0011532138,0.99163985,0.00014829384,0.00015742694,0.00009138672,0.00007533485,0.00021922178,0.0020126055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20408787,0.001706016,0.78943455,0.00023493764,0.00044951518,0.0004759287,0.0003913263,0.00018107423,0.0030388625],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99359083,0.0019649349,0.0006937773,0.0010768899,0.0023081007,0.00036547886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99060297,0.004380616,0.0005564571,0.0011532247,0.0030409356,0.00026581093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008815204,0.0020446943,0.0016811249,0.004275514,0.00075552403,0.002912875,0.0024309207,0.0026685137,0.0047215098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02985877,0.0006316211,0.0018383521,0.0039928528,0.0012048802,0.0063556246,0.0026467873,0.0021387455,0.001278285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046040706,0.00018428307,0.0024903058,0.00092649343,0.00058747904,0.000260833,0.0003253669,0.0930775,0.012528488,0.10480545,0.0048051937,0.7795481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014516113,0.0005179309,0.0025517484,0.00047175464,0.00086142175,0.0008544565,0.00013285236,0.79580605,0.010489452,0.16176629,0.02614361,0.0002593039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019608776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016058437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008815204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009504265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015852186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046619773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950490442","doi":"10.1515/demo-2015-0006","title":"Measuring association via lack ofco-monotonicity: the LOC index and aproblem of educational assessment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Dependence Modeling","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Variety (cybernetics); Reading (process); Index (typography); Set (abstract data type); Association (psychology); Monotone polygon; Spelling; Mathematics; Resource (disambiguation); Econometrics; Psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Political science; Linguistics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.33038015212009425,"score_gpt":0.45112658120301713,"score_spread":0.12074642908292288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950490442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8091108,0.0012323865,0.18168098,0.0016283038,0.000049187118,0.00010852331,0.00080849323,0.00008949746,0.0052917083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865991,0.00011286101,0.012701097,0.00005026546,0.000048336966,0.000051660845,0.0002296634,0.000009359116,0.00019766887],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97869086,0.0131081,0.0018295294,0.0023981421,0.0033571825,0.000616234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6929065,0.23949067,0.039129246,0.018000068,0.0066763125,0.0037971667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026299834,0.00085391424,0.001538432,0.006791186,0.0010143124,0.0039609117,0.0017015445,0.0016944767,0.002030245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11297736,0.0003888332,0.0013445274,0.006957724,0.0054061767,0.0046689594,0.004865983,0.0030364895,0.00023139766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050858204,0.00045821935,0.81285423,0.00039404357,0.0010715742,0.00049693964,0.0010388796,0.03102283,0.0018524668,0.07897146,0.0010447446,0.07028607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006421469,0.0009663759,0.32364395,0.00028465613,0.00034755078,0.001017757,0.0014804379,0.38649696,0.0035290557,0.27941418,0.002496872,0.00025798878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013641177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015286512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026299834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013163396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011117777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13908845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950829919","doi":"10.3390/geosciences9090402","title":"Geographical Considerations in Site Selection for Small Modular Reactors in Saskatchewan","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geosciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Site selection; Analytic hierarchy process; Modular design; Standardization; Process (computing); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Operations research; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.11018812321781822,"score_gpt":0.3784850296735483,"score_spread":0.26829690645573007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950829919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9686545,0.00023671782,0.009614885,0.0006588275,0.000016841232,0.00070775533,0.00041491323,0.000048168702,0.01964728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973346,0.0003253825,0.021692583,0.000090793576,0.0000036207282,0.00019909024,0.00025550846,0.000016113048,0.004071017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593383,0.0017718113,0.00022093984,0.0003452811,0.0011528527,0.00057530403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928256,0.0030027074,0.0007338044,0.0002872033,0.002571485,0.00057922734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042801183,0.00046112828,0.0003198683,0.001779672,0.0025557508,0.0035090097,0.0010711103,0.00048416716,0.0031235595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006363606,0.00030464525,0.00057006924,0.003689842,0.0016402074,0.0008481434,0.0016532156,0.0005232373,0.00032962215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001309461,0.00043968973,0.44501853,0.001275774,0.00036955177,0.0062175607,0.01481174,0.105182484,0.066397734,0.021410506,0.007237795,0.33032912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001576404,0.0014174896,0.70976835,0.00062682154,0.0003767425,0.00090472226,0.13232748,0.07240496,0.025299424,0.008676985,0.047488764,0.0005506621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54014724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87283766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45985276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018380621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02583624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92512184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952338588","doi":"","title":"Minimax regret based elicitation of generalized additive utilities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Preference elicitation; Preference; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Minimax; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Machine learning; Statistics","score_opus":0.4219303607012453,"score_gpt":0.32364587060569083,"score_spread":0.09828449009555446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952338588","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014140506,0.000098388715,0.98123276,0.00030097246,0.000015354373,0.000098877565,0.00011258204,0.000120555385,0.0038801103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6144934,0.00028788406,0.3814605,0.00024888996,0.000056295798,0.00051495025,0.0003443908,0.00009516224,0.0024986307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98571867,0.009352285,0.0005543786,0.0011526245,0.0026839913,0.00053805753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98714393,0.008845379,0.000819721,0.0018191475,0.0009992339,0.0003726095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009151315,0.0016231061,0.0016493276,0.0010834148,0.0005557402,0.0026977821,0.0023945654,0.0016800177,0.003004463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027372643,0.0005900557,0.0012518371,0.0020559905,0.0017707009,0.004480806,0.0035729392,0.0030044215,0.00047446787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028237398,0.0002201399,0.0010362624,0.00032999343,0.00013855229,0.00019059371,0.00065478403,0.33701885,0.0046749427,0.56306,0.0029919676,0.08940162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030744224,0.00011973606,0.00020839227,0.000044242726,0.000029311424,0.00007249717,0.0001010168,0.6957214,0.0030348846,0.29907995,0.0015298104,0.000028059087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005538366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008189697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009151315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001852227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014180858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048397303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955033234","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2019.4.005","title":"A multi-attribute ranking approach based on net inferiority and superiority indexes, two weight vectors, and generalized Heronian means","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematics; Net (polyhedron); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Statistics; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0737176552505866,"score_gpt":0.37096728218876923,"score_spread":0.29724962693818263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955033234","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009650154,0.00043547206,0.9867068,0.00013074743,0.0000482945,0.00009013433,0.000046652745,0.00008473427,0.0028070468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33976117,0.0005529042,0.65611815,0.00010663343,0.00013133445,0.00026534125,0.00015194494,0.00004906553,0.002863403],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948302,0.0019971558,0.0003306027,0.0007270919,0.0019120091,0.00020294782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978442,0.0009708085,0.0002732303,0.00020563151,0.0005974636,0.00010857267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005277175,0.0010515653,0.0013736214,0.0032000227,0.0006745842,0.0024132093,0.0012291658,0.0006566291,0.002118863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005133994,0.00029041545,0.0014731165,0.0025004512,0.0010844469,0.0034047458,0.0012887911,0.0013472378,0.0002960621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021301648,0.0001954945,0.0019498667,0.0006405541,0.0004258122,0.000120943885,0.0003428301,0.22089453,0.0070681074,0.31218246,0.002474316,0.4534921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046043388,0.00061619474,0.0013539998,0.00008084682,0.00016238664,0.00016899232,0.00014045727,0.8200995,0.0046717026,0.16492158,0.00762042,0.00011788905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011284852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013657562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005277175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001592594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018048949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027908683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2958206500","doi":"10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100877","title":"Determination of the fuzzy measures for multicriteria and optimal design of a building façade using Choquet integrals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Building Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Faculty of Engineering, McGill University; McGill University","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Choquet integral; Process (computing); Fuzzy logic; Building design; Computer science; Task (project management); Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Engineering; Architectural engineering; Artificial intelligence; Systems engineering","score_opus":0.1391067648316367,"score_gpt":0.3975105172953369,"score_spread":0.2584037524637002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2958206500","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027495455,0.0001876032,0.9702683,0.000057868387,0.000015531812,0.00004286185,0.000013080282,0.000042110903,0.0018771659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7507063,0.00019346764,0.24804258,0.00003360091,0.000020075755,0.00017499158,0.000031530115,0.000045568948,0.0007519357],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892056,0.0004693892,0.000051342202,0.00016522381,0.00029465902,0.00009898111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877256,0.00061534136,0.00014126718,0.000056307534,0.00036629444,0.000048352224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025698594,0.0012779782,0.0016089673,0.0018453872,0.00071852264,0.0020688511,0.0010097942,0.0013300311,0.0010607571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050629643,0.000741377,0.0015979238,0.000834852,0.0012864439,0.0011465827,0.0010134494,0.0010311897,0.00016900788],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009621096,0.000064395,0.0004219236,0.00016093308,0.000072364855,0.000052701056,0.00014845742,0.91313213,0.01302385,0.03999559,0.00030192453,0.03252959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000093586605,0.00006401226,0.0001949035,0.000022075026,0.000022674121,0.000015310346,0.000028249338,0.9920184,0.0017636031,0.0055450425,0.00029881202,0.000017537837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034926396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025381213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034926396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014661833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019099169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013590872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2958272519","doi":"10.18280/mmep.010104","title":"DISTANCE BETWEEN UNCERTAIN RANDOM VARIABLES","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Random variable; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.12431573734207307,"score_gpt":0.3275159118269876,"score_spread":0.2032001744849145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2958272519","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010764431,0.0014453685,0.9839967,0.0002310255,0.000098514385,0.00004695963,0.00014478744,0.00006095898,0.0032113232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6847266,0.005208352,0.30191684,0.00036500272,0.00055630296,0.0005406194,0.0011491335,0.00010860403,0.005428617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99110705,0.0027024618,0.0008979079,0.001852443,0.0030831872,0.00035695994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98534703,0.0106424615,0.0011483812,0.0007620988,0.0018412909,0.00025861737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004790091,0.0012233322,0.0014653262,0.0030099011,0.00075111986,0.0029669942,0.0018102292,0.0013783999,0.002062181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025911946,0.00043959793,0.001416831,0.0025005606,0.0020281863,0.005006197,0.0026261527,0.0021624002,0.0005415352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022701478,0.000046299505,0.0035605917,0.0008743769,0.00034398556,0.0006657097,0.0003995959,0.23841527,0.0034172717,0.63630337,0.0016208048,0.11412574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027387088,0.00018522523,0.001975846,0.00016517898,0.00009227624,0.00077550695,0.00017019089,0.43873665,0.002968438,0.54262143,0.01216444,0.00011743344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092347397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039780766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004790091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016112062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009465565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025332749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963057337","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2015.11.007","title":"Inconsistency indicator maps on groups for pairwise comparisons","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Abelian group; Metric (unit); Group (periodic table); Mathematics; Statistics; Combinatorics; Physics; Engineering","score_opus":0.22875851543348866,"score_gpt":0.4443625702068812,"score_spread":0.21560405477339253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963057337","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009771942,0.00035460634,0.9871502,0.00027234052,0.000059406597,0.00014458159,0.00024722837,0.00022301187,0.0017766632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19851372,0.0003614757,0.7975879,0.00016517121,0.0001560276,0.0009436089,0.00093387044,0.00017395997,0.0011643305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843119,0.0075363964,0.0012485747,0.0019816128,0.004431828,0.0004896703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87461734,0.107231595,0.0035203015,0.0072618206,0.006370981,0.0009979834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018837698,0.0012190726,0.0023753673,0.011013176,0.0013579425,0.004110991,0.0032468524,0.0020739103,0.0065517114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11754554,0.0008278934,0.0030690476,0.007249084,0.0033247103,0.009142348,0.0047873114,0.004633631,0.0006514641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011583066,0.00028658044,0.0055345157,0.0014596956,0.00055867556,0.00043195047,0.0019513634,0.12055481,0.0022116252,0.4524992,0.0061791902,0.40717402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066258275,0.00013614842,0.0011500595,0.00021052158,0.00017420575,0.00022221287,0.00028893256,0.2648166,0.0015198286,0.727943,0.0034160696,0.000056082976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016027502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010486636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018837698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018083578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014866756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099624515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966279695","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112850","title":"A new model for evaluating subjective online ratings with uncertain intervals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Grantová Agentura České Republiky","keywords":"Interval (graph theory); Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Heuristic; Quality (philosophy); Decision maker; Fuzzy logic; Data mining; Value (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Operations research","score_opus":0.22822361907365488,"score_gpt":0.48013948567186543,"score_spread":0.2519158665982105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966279695","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073915706,0.00024065922,0.99011946,0.00019436723,0.00005703073,0.000055555913,0.000114188195,0.00013945141,0.0016877097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68718743,0.000750019,0.30022538,0.0002495153,0.00028544877,0.00049620477,0.00050349376,0.0001234134,0.010179106],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945564,0.0021791568,0.00034280182,0.0010618862,0.0014870212,0.00037278383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881748,0.008236022,0.0009352834,0.0005550809,0.001763475,0.0003353062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065537384,0.0015200082,0.0021349327,0.0019538354,0.00047698873,0.0035485532,0.003926729,0.0025438392,0.004531526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01844712,0.0008300371,0.0016511101,0.0022099519,0.0013085464,0.0041992855,0.001248114,0.0022001623,0.0010271716],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020618513,0.00012929997,0.0012173356,0.00020833944,0.0001819515,0.00022136391,0.00020083078,0.8878619,0.0017765282,0.04966068,0.0018792333,0.056456372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007326924,0.000028209433,0.00013207262,0.000008083788,0.00001755527,0.000022747798,0.0000057148845,0.9924213,0.00010939457,0.007039001,0.00019726415,0.0000113692095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055423505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045691184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065537384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002188613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010081548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034659922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972916521","doi":"10.24200/sci.2019.50131.1529","title":"A new decision approach for the sustainable transport investment selection based on the generalized entropy and knowledge measure under an interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientia Iranica","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Tehran; Iran University of Science and Technology; University of Melbourne; Amirkabir University of Technology; Swinburne University of Technology; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Pythagorean theorem; Measure (data warehouse); Entropy (arrow of time); Mathematical optimization; Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Computer science; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09328677455204697,"score_gpt":0.34446977406728335,"score_spread":0.25118299951523637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972916521","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049076923,0.00028244016,0.9926978,0.00015738717,0.00003699555,0.000056993977,0.000030418709,0.000029810679,0.001800495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3847027,0.00096434244,0.6093581,0.00017370038,0.00018412777,0.00058895606,0.0001690475,0.00004309184,0.0038159352],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783593,0.0006355324,0.00015664392,0.00046378674,0.00077083794,0.00013724757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992649,0.00035530815,0.000096395925,0.000028977553,0.00020394838,0.000050546136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025752615,0.0012641997,0.0016325425,0.0024623417,0.00084321504,0.0021591051,0.0016698923,0.0013926207,0.0020343717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024743194,0.00050258933,0.0018109065,0.0018677802,0.0011139383,0.0027733715,0.0017906261,0.0015246375,0.00021843442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009256913,0.000105845385,0.0011641055,0.0006231626,0.00030170605,0.00047123936,0.0005066636,0.6961625,0.0052356105,0.15183794,0.0023687836,0.1411298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002048573,0.0000819187,0.00028042268,0.000040760635,0.00004800876,0.00010239564,0.00006178401,0.9616999,0.0008647406,0.034854185,0.0019114304,0.00003402698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027058457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025312232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027058457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021059297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020147439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01527971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974393878","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2019.9.001","title":"Pugh matrix and aggregated by extent analysis using trapezoidal fuzzy number for assessing conceptual designs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptual design; Pairwise comparison; Fuzzy logic; Feature (linguistics); Industrial engineering; Fuzzy set; Computer science; Decision matrix; Product design; Set (abstract data type); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Engineering design process; Analytic hierarchy process; Product (mathematics); Operations research; Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.15695157429732684,"score_gpt":0.46058893435164855,"score_spread":0.30363736005432174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974393878","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027617041,0.00018883948,0.9688834,0.000050477996,0.00001671224,0.00014271599,0.00006825687,0.00012408689,0.0029084743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45907775,0.00022193427,0.5393179,0.000023847375,0.00002167542,0.00036299587,0.0001441688,0.000029880117,0.00079982757],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958567,0.0016149331,0.000251867,0.0003542436,0.0017501303,0.00017204297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950854,0.0029676128,0.00048474089,0.00034127806,0.0010114065,0.00010962946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040869205,0.0009143475,0.0007744266,0.0050446508,0.00093705434,0.0019980702,0.00088647444,0.0006904688,0.0025092498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011184026,0.00039928732,0.0012171088,0.0028461881,0.0012710552,0.0022645956,0.0011380423,0.00089173956,0.00023624052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003184961,0.0000720977,0.004602749,0.00045404478,0.00013158028,0.00018638937,0.0007091091,0.6867459,0.011109553,0.10605077,0.001051191,0.18856806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001309706,0.00009928505,0.001181027,0.000034522156,0.00002917959,0.000062884355,0.00015298287,0.95660883,0.0021067911,0.0380667,0.0016047,0.00004003842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003926451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031641873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050446508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017350205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013842093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021614015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976540634","doi":"10.1177/0972063419868552","title":"A Decision-making Model for Supplier Selection in Indian Pharmaceutical Organizations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Analytic hierarchy process; Selection (genetic algorithm); Structuring; Supply chain; Process (computing); Business; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Process management; Management science; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Marketing; Economics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Finance","score_opus":0.12458045515175067,"score_gpt":0.49747518079339237,"score_spread":0.3728947256416417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976540634","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1359124,0.0021573224,0.7718799,0.0062696943,0.00027179485,0.00079482753,0.001518196,0.00043743584,0.0807584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91237885,0.0015359947,0.06615854,0.000261399,0.00009092429,0.0007557825,0.00046036465,0.000034329445,0.018323803],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980471,0.0009216953,0.00009440068,0.0002967022,0.0003126066,0.00032753986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980259,0.0012210744,0.00021386596,0.00003465676,0.0003582247,0.00014625145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026851723,0.0011812459,0.0016334669,0.0020605607,0.002300641,0.004551529,0.0031372134,0.003480147,0.011429406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031414723,0.0008208616,0.0015732268,0.0029737232,0.0014792264,0.0021357588,0.0019800672,0.0022324857,0.0011022709],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012517984,0.00012979258,0.0011274946,0.00016806021,0.000077998004,0.0007859322,0.00050729036,0.91667783,0.00060008274,0.0685076,0.0016469817,0.009645693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000355152,0.000060209946,0.00032512672,0.000026951011,0.000033727953,0.00006120479,0.00014432958,0.984233,0.00008441389,0.0137999505,0.0011721541,0.000023408633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035591185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026394788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035591185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063966797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042400607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07076806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978373010","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113003","title":"A hybrid project portfolio selection procedure with historical performance consideration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Waterloo","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Weighting; Portfolio; Computer science; Project portfolio management; Selection (genetic algorithm); Set (abstract data type); Operations research; Fuzzy logic; Process (computing); Mathematical optimization; Risk analysis (engineering); Project management; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Systems engineering; Economics; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.07055262625820863,"score_gpt":0.354612697240098,"score_spread":0.28406007098188935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978373010","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020802528,0.00009618899,0.9775643,0.000038216443,0.000021101603,0.000059802216,0.000042943204,0.0002612564,0.0011137255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37290758,0.000110963156,0.6229459,0.00005616393,0.000069845504,0.00023036492,0.00025139694,0.000093689836,0.0033341425],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981002,0.0006722552,0.00012356973,0.00026764293,0.0007271793,0.000109029206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761665,0.0013989797,0.00015311358,0.00018108485,0.0005666072,0.00008370974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029882852,0.00071880245,0.0013069977,0.0020852298,0.00041574278,0.0011830892,0.001335219,0.0010016408,0.0033756818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042932318,0.00052764965,0.00089264533,0.0021825784,0.00033137086,0.0011405422,0.0010449298,0.00066369737,0.00056245463],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030584953,0.00017425162,0.0021324165,0.00018627678,0.0003178396,0.00019184191,0.00008590557,0.46227923,0.013208266,0.007822262,0.0013808996,0.511915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002362216,0.00011604924,0.00091009866,0.000009042524,0.000044225162,0.00007993103,0.000008797728,0.9943445,0.0018096666,0.001923167,0.0007110394,0.000019935154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015758586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019763026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033756818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039257508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009571421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015803695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979715206","doi":"10.1007/978-981-32-9808-8_22","title":"A Hybrid Delphi Multi-criteria Sorting Approach for Polypharmacy Evaluations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Polypharmacy; Delphi method; ELECTRE; Medicine; Delphi; Likert scale; Sorting; Quality of life (healthcare); Quality (philosophy); Intensive care medicine; Computer science; Operations research; Nursing; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Multiple-criteria decision analysis","score_opus":0.4361055664225111,"score_gpt":0.5117153306501067,"score_spread":0.07560976422759558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979715206","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008807866,0.0002506861,0.9751676,0.0001822061,0.000054171884,0.0008271818,0.00015589625,0.00021753002,0.014336841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056711514,0.0002240265,0.9370978,0.00009596295,0.000014760896,0.0009745365,0.0001759966,0.000062423205,0.0046430063],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900052,0.005985348,0.0004132699,0.0003723486,0.0029132199,0.00031051444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954845,0.0030282394,0.00012308145,0.00021382139,0.0010534457,0.000097011565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008763144,0.0014267089,0.0017552635,0.0045822477,0.001603712,0.0028132054,0.0016544391,0.0011152055,0.011380621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008646213,0.0008614558,0.0019693493,0.0040177223,0.0008277561,0.0018106168,0.0025895047,0.0014728282,0.0011642445],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029969096,0.00038852807,0.000868571,0.0012991343,0.00039539672,0.00021018936,0.00156158,0.1287819,0.0069995,0.08769287,0.007905786,0.7635969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015621386,0.0007596397,0.0030612196,0.00078693783,0.00028130377,0.0005137108,0.0020485641,0.78346235,0.0080374135,0.15958527,0.041030742,0.00027665825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004429053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00833814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011380621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002169604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034196004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04634452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979822934","doi":"10.1108/ijoes-06-2019-0101","title":"Multi-criteria decision-making in the evaluation of environmental quality of OECD countries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Ethics and Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental quality; Quality (philosophy); Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Business; Environmental planning; Air quality index; Environmental impact assessment; Water quality; Natural resource economics; Geography; Environmental science; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.41054629999703823,"score_gpt":0.5639095820717445,"score_spread":0.15336328207470623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979822934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69042,0.0074293735,0.23577668,0.0036786117,0.00035612407,0.0034026708,0.0009749424,0.00014238525,0.057819255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9247756,0.0008005955,0.07269422,0.00011739179,0.000030286454,0.0007733633,0.00017612649,0.000013515816,0.0006188493],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9243843,0.064083256,0.0027695368,0.0009962443,0.006486727,0.0012799512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9500615,0.038000733,0.0039721443,0.0008365018,0.0059052655,0.0012238257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04349346,0.0012848256,0.0013560014,0.008775338,0.0018815248,0.006179364,0.0011076988,0.0010573157,0.0021365006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05226198,0.0003846364,0.001957261,0.005929034,0.0020640916,0.0021308032,0.0035120475,0.0013936987,0.00015423243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018548585,0.0008667991,0.06470093,0.0037475787,0.0017953345,0.0011479451,0.0043300544,0.55946916,0.0015953926,0.0814765,0.0051755533,0.27383986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000354465,0.0017628262,0.037661467,0.0037006815,0.0006557303,0.00035223673,0.015719194,0.75264406,0.0050539137,0.16244376,0.01921026,0.00044145403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054786718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006525296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04349346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006608183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005628835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2300182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980294816","doi":"10.1109/fuzz-ieee.2019.8858797","title":"Consensus Building in Group Decision-Making for the Risk Assessment of Wind Farm Projects","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Group decision-making; Wind power; Context (archaeology); Risk analysis (engineering); Work (physics); Fuzzy set; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Engineering; Operations research; Fuzzy logic; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11755651586385295,"score_gpt":0.46756885428145534,"score_spread":0.3500123384176024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980294816","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016487762,0.0001338091,0.98185295,0.000119070064,0.000018337207,0.00010109384,0.000018301338,0.000039521354,0.0012291538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53699374,0.00035573542,0.4609571,0.00008930315,0.000047748905,0.0006336767,0.00011097423,0.00003642727,0.00077529927],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914982,0.0054209945,0.00044432044,0.00084949296,0.0013937823,0.00039332337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880909,0.00927824,0.00085617264,0.00032003544,0.0011379445,0.0003166362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013426669,0.001289943,0.0021971497,0.002379666,0.0015683015,0.0019753755,0.0017198315,0.0016637121,0.0020049566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017742448,0.0007427308,0.0022962345,0.0020093627,0.0020561921,0.001851002,0.003311719,0.0020777993,0.00019652638],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092810915,0.00005144644,0.00055374415,0.00017393587,0.00012979786,0.00013019593,0.00042655336,0.93413883,0.00091600395,0.032648694,0.00021912633,0.03051881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019588797,0.000054438082,0.000100621466,0.000027208984,0.000025828376,0.000011537138,0.00008188757,0.962785,0.0005360483,0.035972223,0.00037009388,0.000015487429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035283072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030773338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013426669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021122089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024857537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07100791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980521232","doi":"10.3233/jifs-191092","title":"Clustering experts in linguistic environment: A hybrid method","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cluster analysis; Computer science; Tuple; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Document clustering; Machine learning; Hierarchical clustering; Natural language processing; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12222793807448681,"score_gpt":0.4129589976182834,"score_spread":0.29073105954379663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980521232","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057017202,0.00008602856,0.9930757,0.000064503794,0.000016724685,0.00006591366,0.000025460351,0.00016490136,0.00079909444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1603162,0.00017985395,0.83628947,0.00010692672,0.00008130988,0.0003375148,0.00022445647,0.00008824548,0.0023761357],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655366,0.0014119645,0.00019457663,0.00077929173,0.0008348812,0.00022552865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976937,0.0012190347,0.00016588604,0.00015967945,0.0006539812,0.0001076312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003087723,0.0011909668,0.0014504527,0.0041819126,0.0011063932,0.0020588934,0.0023080474,0.0018061822,0.0029856367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051270695,0.0007192036,0.0016588862,0.003361027,0.0008113064,0.0018578847,0.0019963908,0.0009468172,0.0009278184],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032402124,0.00028530273,0.0032924595,0.00038474603,0.00041559883,0.0002831122,0.0012258173,0.4669943,0.009681432,0.030457221,0.0028302565,0.48382577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019730236,0.000048659123,0.0003028819,0.000015774363,0.00003566315,0.00005774844,0.000105385545,0.9918826,0.0009712512,0.005326745,0.0012084321,0.000025152918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038623067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036445996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041819126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009971111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015126078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016329646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984747650","doi":"10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105930","title":"Estimating incomplete information in group decision making: A framework of granular computing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"King Abdulaziz University","keywords":"Granular computing; Granularity; Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Missing data; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Complete information; Group decision-making; Data mining; Flexibility (engineering); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Rough set; Statistics; Mathematical economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.044157385699891846,"score_gpt":0.36687522196275824,"score_spread":0.3227178362628664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984747650","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006882083,0.000665339,0.9903351,0.0006099941,0.000050967523,0.000064878725,0.00006270171,0.000048451246,0.001280431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48080269,0.0018316826,0.51513237,0.0002256626,0.0003420205,0.00041892543,0.00019684847,0.000061562074,0.0009882582],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98442346,0.009209938,0.001228547,0.0014012976,0.0029987018,0.00073797995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9605383,0.031639587,0.0029659602,0.0025168406,0.0016291466,0.0007101993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019158792,0.0020314974,0.005910836,0.0056368713,0.0013480418,0.009174741,0.0037705472,0.0030710062,0.0018798349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054287188,0.0014187349,0.0029504532,0.007533567,0.004860336,0.008684853,0.005157619,0.00397708,0.00019981332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011149505,0.00010075726,0.0012545323,0.0004568956,0.00038145616,0.00021416922,0.00038158314,0.5648318,0.00044809945,0.39220324,0.00066361745,0.03895231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018420593,0.000029315055,0.00021918441,0.00009106015,0.00007066522,0.000026190231,0.00006909373,0.64912766,0.0002023281,0.34956563,0.00055057753,0.000029945117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048411395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026254873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019158792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033127533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002837983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10132259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988284534","doi":"10.1007/s00500-019-04458-6","title":"Proposing a new model to aggregate ratings in multi-source feedback approach based on the evidence theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Aggregate (composite); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Discounting; Process (computing); Data mining; Transformation (genetics); Machine learning; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.26123648408292344,"score_gpt":0.41113981583654846,"score_spread":0.14990333175362502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2988284534","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041325823,0.00033954426,0.99344057,0.0005016428,0.00007691148,0.00008580382,0.00006100287,0.000109428205,0.0012524679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42302907,0.000959187,0.57015723,0.0004535597,0.00038346843,0.0007741498,0.00032333206,0.00008463898,0.0038353833],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882939,0.005322103,0.0009350545,0.0017215104,0.0032312293,0.0004960982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797039,0.013219418,0.0011382969,0.00084283436,0.0046557896,0.00043963967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008984422,0.0012857615,0.0024242545,0.004536493,0.0010135628,0.004672894,0.003838392,0.0031757108,0.0032205489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029314902,0.00076384057,0.002124934,0.004395741,0.0017036078,0.0082192775,0.0029027122,0.0025849275,0.00072844775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000373032,0.00047714723,0.005361952,0.0011527117,0.0010327057,0.0005446372,0.0012263403,0.40252823,0.003735231,0.289516,0.00555062,0.28850132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026014905,0.00009800635,0.00043167314,0.000057577556,0.000101161,0.00006870637,0.00006074238,0.9245746,0.00052416837,0.07278806,0.001219679,0.000049662936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004669628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003955635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008984422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018436366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002336226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047514677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990350446","doi":"10.3233/faia190080","title":"Managing Missing Values in Intuitionistic Reciprocal Preference Relations: From Numeric Procedures to Granular","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocal; Preference; Mathematics; Psychology; Statistics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.17282777994473372,"score_gpt":0.3805041811590137,"score_spread":0.20767640121427997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990350446","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005275224,0.00023828552,0.9915768,0.0003249652,0.000040584695,0.00008119583,0.00007032833,0.00018827121,0.0022042275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15572327,0.00040783672,0.84149,0.00016996436,0.000094169794,0.00028904775,0.00018382631,0.000113372924,0.0015284735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.981988,0.009483409,0.0018003661,0.0015129339,0.004623573,0.0005916578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9394102,0.048984673,0.002837276,0.005607366,0.0025049967,0.0006554937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022927968,0.0016547889,0.002353608,0.0022981633,0.0015282371,0.006292409,0.004539289,0.0020938762,0.0052924403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07898726,0.0012025149,0.0023961118,0.004473964,0.0044266167,0.014450514,0.006350306,0.0057303333,0.0008042978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037368792,0.00028279872,0.00093530875,0.00091174134,0.0002050489,0.0002232674,0.0017327315,0.100032285,0.0013617049,0.57244915,0.0041071037,0.31738517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041749274,0.00007569022,0.00018293563,0.00019724884,0.0000665931,0.00013312924,0.00023557305,0.23161551,0.0011745944,0.7638201,0.0023997684,0.00005719585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019646997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019563232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022927968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020356188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030784192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12125611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992027014","doi":"","title":"An Application of the AHP in Cultural Heritage Conservation Strategy for China 1 APPLICATION DE L'AHP A LA STRATEGIE DE CONSERVATION DE L'HERITAGE CULTUREL DE LA CHINE","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Cultural heritage; China; Christian ministry; Hierarchy; Political science; Humanities; Welfare economics; Geography; Ethnology; Sociology; Operations research; Philosophy; Engineering; Archaeology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0503457021605788,"score_gpt":0.3948810579780636,"score_spread":0.3445353558174848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992027014","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26253825,0.0011014728,0.7030856,0.0032167595,0.00025225134,0.0039865053,0.0005179367,0.00035551182,0.024945658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7179329,0.00067931873,0.27805877,0.00013272285,0.000032647673,0.0011333473,0.0001955661,0.000017987266,0.0018168091],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930736,0.004539572,0.00039403662,0.00027653013,0.0014011787,0.00031509073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99570847,0.0026668806,0.00024129727,0.00011691587,0.0010871387,0.00017930493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007997957,0.0009383547,0.0005819208,0.0034678997,0.0021214152,0.0022087062,0.0011128517,0.0010546186,0.0019493678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007827141,0.00038486434,0.001160418,0.0032650882,0.0011052018,0.0012265163,0.0017933446,0.0009797618,0.00009359164],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004310127,0.0004810431,0.009129244,0.0019636678,0.0003509697,0.0013957954,0.0042740065,0.6587248,0.004784999,0.06300968,0.0046703913,0.25078437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104284285,0.00030485302,0.0019182488,0.00023416172,0.00007521939,0.00006267386,0.0026707333,0.9719347,0.0016576191,0.016192306,0.004788571,0.000056710276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03330611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018913358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03330611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056095654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009649807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066224515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995090400","doi":"10.1016/j.asoc.2019.106005","title":"Distribution linguistic preference relations with incomplete symbolic proportions for group decision making","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Preference; Pairwise comparison; Context (archaeology); Consistency (knowledge bases); Group decision-making; Meaning (existential); Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.09389562549528573,"score_gpt":0.3714625945668729,"score_spread":0.2775669690715872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995090400","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030304043,0.00021889187,0.966065,0.00029326748,0.000033544733,0.00006325827,0.0001568374,0.00006282582,0.002802313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67410684,0.00040614777,0.3214943,0.0001198669,0.00011084143,0.00056222535,0.00034656795,0.00006402639,0.002789128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99037766,0.0056994413,0.0005845412,0.00087438105,0.002086955,0.00037701428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96459687,0.0304394,0.0012204453,0.0017445688,0.0015902851,0.00040841958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010244878,0.00079874136,0.0014780929,0.0029652752,0.0010573937,0.0034446782,0.0018341219,0.0011723092,0.0052677793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047177143,0.00057384383,0.0013912176,0.0041539986,0.0027651214,0.007730003,0.0026956007,0.0024453853,0.0004754338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040039225,0.00012094749,0.0013693159,0.00042027666,0.00014386406,0.00016461269,0.00083117903,0.18090019,0.0014764719,0.7173787,0.0009950962,0.095798954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033741755,0.00006863901,0.00039424477,0.00007575694,0.000038255792,0.000060704646,0.000135464,0.50130683,0.00054190046,0.49632785,0.0009843428,0.000032316395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022678517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018087021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010244878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022813005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013997076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05418074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998229105","doi":"10.1002/int.22213","title":"A normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy linguistic projection‐based multiattributive border approximation area comparison method","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Projection (relational algebra); Representation (politics); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Rule-based machine translation; Term (time); Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence; Score; Fuzzy set; Scale (ratio); Function (biology); Mathematics; Algorithm; Data mining; Machine learning","score_opus":0.25908008157913953,"score_gpt":0.4883926337511811,"score_spread":0.22931255217204155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998229105","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009601794,0.00015976685,0.9875371,0.000081406906,0.000029237226,0.00007553662,0.00003883667,0.0001529333,0.0023234512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4040533,0.0002949094,0.591506,0.000092735,0.000052550404,0.00032707938,0.0002135122,0.00006686494,0.003393134],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961572,0.0011899481,0.00022717565,0.00069578225,0.0015624525,0.00016751922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982072,0.00054300285,0.00015098833,0.00015578656,0.0008608193,0.00008216682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028699997,0.0007802994,0.0010191037,0.0023216764,0.0007572875,0.00221122,0.0018512664,0.0008788653,0.00308259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067622107,0.00032462954,0.0011690385,0.0023654397,0.0010560885,0.0038067573,0.0018517306,0.0012919515,0.00046529688],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031048068,0.00016710152,0.003898308,0.0003687556,0.00024160965,0.00038061064,0.0011811499,0.21623802,0.012437991,0.14218423,0.0033499473,0.6192418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002487124,0.000111731664,0.0010367975,0.00004061449,0.00004820032,0.00022825932,0.0001982013,0.9474627,0.0060345433,0.040836867,0.003910768,0.00006643042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025083213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012859502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00308259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010637429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017072009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015178144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999792360","doi":"10.1109/tcyb.2019.2962095","title":"Optimal Interaction Priority Calculation From Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relations Based on the Monte Carlo Simulation Method for the Acceptable Consistency and Consensus","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Beijing Intelligent Logistics System Collaborative Innovation Center; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Weighting; Monte Carlo method; Fuzzy logic; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.23433878859584825,"score_gpt":0.40380735379312444,"score_spread":0.16946856519727618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999792360","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049093715,0.00006666844,0.9939313,0.000050802228,0.000011154832,0.000038710634,0.000008707165,0.000042551983,0.00094088964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50360847,0.0003533671,0.49307165,0.000090437345,0.00003741101,0.00055922347,0.000098710676,0.000082377126,0.0020984253],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973334,0.0013637436,0.00013183028,0.0003484828,0.00061525626,0.00020730225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719006,0.0019028654,0.00017407678,0.0001269077,0.0005076335,0.00009857254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003993247,0.0011685743,0.0017155886,0.001320979,0.00096592336,0.001724587,0.0015205924,0.001046999,0.0032486802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008214035,0.00071615423,0.0018018287,0.0013487116,0.0010681587,0.002177363,0.0015028758,0.0018176896,0.00026965752],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065975466,0.00004328167,0.00061635487,0.00012531817,0.00006981961,0.00006582482,0.00015722077,0.91709584,0.0010356719,0.05202536,0.0006208168,0.028078528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009469944,0.000016497866,0.00005113904,0.000007015994,0.000009718604,0.0000107873375,0.00001195028,0.9924859,0.00027636884,0.006918872,0.0001934766,0.000008736961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00905523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053872955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00905523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020236464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003385342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021118522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999873224","doi":"10.11606/t.11.2020.tde-20200111-151411","title":"Delineamentos ortogonais e parcialmente ortogonais: teoria e aplicação","year":2020,"lang":"pt","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1723205764169125,"score_gpt":0.4392633944423159,"score_spread":0.26694281802540337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999873224","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12404538,0.0013122433,0.86608523,0.00030455418,0.00006981351,0.00031124888,0.0005871035,0.0022415007,0.005042968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3371827,0.0012077264,0.6568535,0.00009434185,0.000026235686,0.0004221736,0.00051817624,0.0004723861,0.0032226683],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767345,0.00072288373,0.00014850439,0.00065502466,0.0006853381,0.00011478692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944812,0.0033051542,0.0005995092,0.00062512927,0.00085524697,0.00013381119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004030588,0.0012417282,0.0012155233,0.0018827163,0.00052071403,0.0037210651,0.0016694743,0.0011366513,0.005883782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008317123,0.00091428304,0.0011220055,0.0021399832,0.00090658694,0.0019069059,0.0012777263,0.00096400274,0.0013227208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011523252,0.0002966508,0.025099248,0.003107032,0.00024801592,0.00025060534,0.0020625317,0.04470476,0.34648758,0.011376871,0.0012330805,0.5639813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018414423,0.002486412,0.08437747,0.00061070896,0.00062680995,0.00096549804,0.0028471209,0.44545707,0.37921894,0.02630477,0.05652567,0.00039537388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045206957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075965957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005883782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011612523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018718444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021316051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002607199","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0227307","title":"Linguistic Z-number weighted averaging operators and their application to portfolio selection problem","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.12475832322193137,"score_gpt":0.3424043627056298,"score_spread":0.21764603948369843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002607199","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014966099,0.00019355798,0.9833836,0.00009536389,0.000020185887,0.000034075234,0.000029056175,0.0000656028,0.0012124487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5468755,0.0005746083,0.45067924,0.000097393866,0.000060045328,0.00021818261,0.00010509529,0.00003875069,0.00135123],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762934,0.0011043985,0.00021147219,0.00037254105,0.0005567306,0.00012555975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978998,0.0013103745,0.0002676678,0.00009423304,0.0003721278,0.00005585711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031806342,0.0009770073,0.0007843867,0.0015757566,0.0005932658,0.0014479796,0.0010410919,0.0006950301,0.0013144942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062732575,0.00024399912,0.0009879717,0.002103167,0.0010291252,0.0026302913,0.0009397061,0.00084621937,0.00015100552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105493025,0.00005745175,0.0023643484,0.00021915896,0.00012397264,0.00024110566,0.0004092434,0.73467064,0.0048814453,0.08878329,0.0010073066,0.16713664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050201356,0.000042203228,0.00033694023,0.000014631675,0.000018549854,0.000036495996,0.00003991806,0.9698542,0.0006480827,0.028298529,0.0006894516,0.000015953441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056080925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029921262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056080925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010810647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009940705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016821027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003783532","doi":"10.1007/s00500-019-04649-1","title":"Quintuple Implication Principle on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy logic; Discrete mathematics; Algebra over a field; Computer science; Pure mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.2113169866987879,"score_gpt":0.452729424417538,"score_spread":0.2414124377187501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003783532","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021891354,0.0008384044,0.95254666,0.0006581101,0.00020830742,0.00007535212,0.00015505771,0.00007359417,0.02355308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6700355,0.0013204681,0.32254675,0.00040788078,0.00032925673,0.00022627543,0.00021811722,0.000035707624,0.0048800483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979919,0.0005985604,0.00018147528,0.00027619183,0.0008375006,0.00011433676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828184,0.00095975795,0.0000898077,0.00011105582,0.00046577601,0.000091751026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034957295,0.0005261477,0.0008055987,0.0014349615,0.00077686727,0.0027221618,0.0007563665,0.00072218536,0.003058058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004044096,0.0002889693,0.0013756565,0.0011591696,0.0020922597,0.0032711737,0.0013629211,0.0018279785,0.0004287858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009100011,0.000029330056,0.00024516523,0.00021024079,0.000053164902,0.0002892899,0.0003998472,0.009015509,0.0027511986,0.9546341,0.0012913813,0.030989774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017825932,0.000065331544,0.0002275099,0.000051948784,0.000029500834,0.00023045023,0.00009311475,0.040369343,0.0013794356,0.9529638,0.004550634,0.000021046893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039985907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037061388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034957295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009013192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006660837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018487394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004981871","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101793","title":"Participatory analytic hierarchy process for resource allocation in agricultural development projects","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; Canadian Patient Safety Institute","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Citizen journalism; Sustainability; Pairwise comparison; Process management; Process (computing); Resource allocation; Sustainable development; Resource (disambiguation); Management science; Business; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Operations research; Engineering; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.584576250057631,"score_gpt":0.5587150463818018,"score_spread":0.025861203675829225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004981871","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011090253,0.00026976506,0.9825712,0.00040884528,0.000034189536,0.0010002444,0.00010877158,0.00012920875,0.0043875016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21661481,0.00022183219,0.77958935,0.000064895605,0.000024558809,0.0023212691,0.00015428993,0.000043609878,0.00096545723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9228246,0.06415872,0.0017326415,0.0015052762,0.00790859,0.0018701565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9403557,0.050439887,0.0018588622,0.0022642834,0.004218859,0.0008623873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04889952,0.0013472345,0.0026566288,0.005365347,0.0059574023,0.004817617,0.0030480798,0.0021339974,0.005679791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07966058,0.0013017147,0.0025401553,0.0064607314,0.0038609437,0.0043813586,0.0060749967,0.0031447024,0.00054512825],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005431283,0.00048695528,0.0015883324,0.0016922437,0.0005028347,0.0004282853,0.010103071,0.33326018,0.0018786049,0.36772078,0.0040316107,0.27776396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022323235,0.00032899575,0.0007812088,0.00051027245,0.00014173661,0.000070808885,0.0027856228,0.54575753,0.0018281648,0.43839133,0.009081106,0.000099946665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013348603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014705153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04889952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006235583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02017137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25860846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005519960","doi":"10.22111/ijfs.2020.5106","title":"Negations and aggregation operators based on a new hesitant fuzzy partial ordering","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Iranian journal of fuzzy systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Unit interval; Mathematics; Negation; Combinatorics; Commutative property; Binary operation; Discrete mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Norm (philosophy); Bar (unit); Equivalence (formal languages); Fuzzy set; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Physics","score_opus":0.1414882480707365,"score_gpt":0.3585422545071064,"score_spread":0.2170540064363699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005519960","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018050106,0.0006657254,0.9693869,0.0004723634,0.00016670187,0.00008589658,0.000100584206,0.000119598524,0.010952195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49330217,0.0010575503,0.49779782,0.00031633227,0.00024183028,0.00027373276,0.00023493353,0.000040535833,0.0067350264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592376,0.0016432435,0.00044544003,0.00062862365,0.001196414,0.00016249828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823546,0.0006475805,0.00024415413,0.00020853935,0.0005482723,0.00011601662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036941532,0.0010958663,0.0008727263,0.0017435248,0.0008226211,0.002649689,0.00084781944,0.0007989168,0.0021318905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043260003,0.00038937049,0.001344078,0.0019286703,0.0022246598,0.0039549056,0.0016055157,0.0017079448,0.000342599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013168095,0.00005559411,0.0004666154,0.00024143318,0.00012911233,0.00051824155,0.0007653233,0.041658517,0.00783515,0.89246595,0.0016607018,0.054071635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007052297,0.00022815527,0.0006037332,0.00009834961,0.00012729448,0.00071950577,0.00037751463,0.37633345,0.0099289045,0.5866813,0.024709886,0.000121449026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012124325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010183384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036941532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001439838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012664885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019536734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006547441","doi":"10.1007/s12351-020-00551-z","title":"Measuring consistency of interval-valued preference relations: comments and comparison","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Preference relation; Mathematics; Reciprocal; Interval (graph theory); Multiplicative function; Sequential consistency; Causal consistency; Local consistency; Weak consistency; Relation (database); Strong consistency; Statistics; Consistency model; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Algorithm; Data mining; Constraint satisfaction problem; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.8489374756264574,"score_gpt":0.5710113278039322,"score_spread":0.2779261478225252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006547441","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28327638,0.028916853,0.24405614,0.35886717,0.010865335,0.0018275711,0.0029105658,0.0006399075,0.06864018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8455237,0.0051447703,0.11598562,0.022277966,0.0053245523,0.0009874209,0.00094818714,0.00023066936,0.0035771828],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91613275,0.04347969,0.010277998,0.0039007438,0.025222221,0.0009866557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26069662,0.63603574,0.006591559,0.011931459,0.083745696,0.0009988897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10548196,0.0008724042,0.0010843435,0.0033665088,0.002114373,0.0042626327,0.0051454366,0.0036049425,0.005880439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47879985,0.0003198369,0.0021601408,0.00485439,0.004188842,0.007343473,0.0024814515,0.0038198903,0.0009790251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0062674102,0.0007272035,0.07619978,0.00713822,0.0012431812,0.0026180204,0.035910226,0.008578638,0.01129372,0.17947447,0.09946185,0.57108736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011943954,0.004904405,0.15736128,0.01385447,0.002280894,0.0074367616,0.13345192,0.058821335,0.03302243,0.34206516,0.2441832,0.0014237191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005523395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036147542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10548196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038301288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002670136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5578486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008255186","doi":"10.22367/mcdm.2019.14.07","title":"Development and evaluation of an AHP model for software systems selection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multiple Criteria Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Usability; Vendor; Software; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Decision support system; Process management; Software system; Risk analysis (engineering); Knowledge management; Management science; Operations research; Engineering; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.29697467292032753,"score_gpt":0.4721880332666652,"score_spread":0.17521336034633767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008255186","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040802985,0.00013875103,0.9526377,0.00036873043,0.00005351176,0.0013517381,0.00027987667,0.00028409055,0.004082809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22716759,0.00016710421,0.76971346,0.00006723696,0.00001800589,0.0019337088,0.0002566619,0.00003031052,0.0006459412],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99257624,0.0050504636,0.00034496604,0.00023035865,0.001585233,0.00021286882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837652,0.012326347,0.00046357384,0.00027951135,0.0029617655,0.00020359566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011178464,0.0010004444,0.0012468992,0.0027000115,0.0014937773,0.0019755033,0.0016572154,0.0012871707,0.0024107676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018819816,0.00058900303,0.0011382202,0.0026023549,0.00067182374,0.0015162865,0.0013963757,0.0015731255,0.00025360403],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023738961,0.00032550114,0.0019389002,0.0004946626,0.00012188751,0.00011716633,0.00047899602,0.88187116,0.0017640853,0.017821856,0.0011086307,0.09371985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033940123,0.00009229701,0.00016345351,0.000031852367,0.000013173946,0.000010246766,0.000109852685,0.99581355,0.0004084086,0.0028990337,0.00041317515,0.000010974645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013385335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009791039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013385335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029835054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045050574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059118092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009902259","doi":"10.1177/0144598720910264","title":"Petroleum potential assessment using an optimized fuzzy outranking approach: A case study of the Red River petroleum system, Williston Basin","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energy Exploration & Exploitation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Petroleum; Fuzzy logic; Ranking (information retrieval); Flexibility (engineering); Structural basin; Petroleum exploration; Computer science; Process (computing); Key (lock); Petroleum engineering; Geology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1947863583253482,"score_gpt":0.3738350163159935,"score_spread":0.17904865799064526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009902259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97937244,0.00010202553,0.017114995,0.00012830718,0.0000030055626,0.0001199771,0.0002730634,0.000038631864,0.0028475076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801978,0.00006987535,0.018821737,0.0000056965123,9.29072e-7,0.00002927319,0.00013927059,0.000005694758,0.00072976784],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946123,0.00022867945,0.000023684759,0.00006737046,0.00016829168,0.000050738206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992854,0.000427991,0.000046414116,0.000044627635,0.00016313605,0.000032440184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009875834,0.000496398,0.00052038435,0.0020414102,0.00080433534,0.0011098171,0.0006339729,0.0005481001,0.00065052346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022521247,0.00021455219,0.00041750018,0.0022088103,0.00067576783,0.00070228387,0.00060476444,0.0003171905,0.00004488106],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027345007,0.00020868119,0.050923277,0.00023020877,0.00015033409,0.0025487642,0.00072519825,0.85573536,0.0048301066,0.0072178566,0.00076726556,0.07638951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036407197,0.00010092752,0.020775732,0.00002013947,0.000042401174,0.00013802868,0.0013931984,0.96968085,0.003938808,0.0024169937,0.0014126885,0.000043900556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28018728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39576975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28018728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036487752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032252898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5571128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011001830","doi":"10.1109/tcyb.2020.2974924","title":"A Dynamic Adaptive Subgroup-to-Subgroup Compatibility-Based Conflict Detection and Resolution Model for Multicriteria Large-Scale Group Decision Making","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Conflict resolution; Cluster analysis; Conflict analysis; Computer science; Group decision-making; Compatibility (geochemistry); Group conflict; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.11351058917744986,"score_gpt":0.374537989599287,"score_spread":0.26102740042183714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011001830","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021362986,0.00022686452,0.9723298,0.00039279112,0.00006115346,0.00017699815,0.00007775782,0.00015418674,0.005217449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78604776,0.0003764837,0.20740505,0.00020039301,0.00008754163,0.0007965745,0.00021528247,0.000047355235,0.004823497],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740773,0.000969709,0.00014722774,0.00061944005,0.0005932689,0.00026262054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981502,0.00084117334,0.00028984356,0.00007947168,0.00047209766,0.00016717782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003025261,0.001209835,0.0013139829,0.001550362,0.0013610681,0.0021162168,0.0035126682,0.0020790761,0.0038665489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00518248,0.00050143804,0.0013169001,0.0018778238,0.0011130827,0.0028582842,0.001961205,0.0019910377,0.00047158526],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015839394,0.00013731117,0.0023840338,0.00015702737,0.00014263077,0.00025271942,0.00065809465,0.9003835,0.0016781756,0.050221767,0.0017369094,0.042089447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013807069,0.00003509234,0.00019992335,0.000006839664,0.000019156316,0.000027571365,0.000053147425,0.9882401,0.00013563907,0.010669404,0.00058569957,0.000013627394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00781088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005478607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00781088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020307214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018511827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015999317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011576447","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2020.106423","title":"Controlling the worst consistency index for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations in consensus optimization models","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Normalization (sociology); Group decision-making; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Consistency index; Index (typography); Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Linguistics; Statistics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.32253962520638263,"score_gpt":0.33495705269356335,"score_spread":0.012417427487180721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011576447","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07536865,0.00015246499,0.9223848,0.00015099281,0.00002859167,0.000053274944,0.000025532458,0.00007162401,0.0017640631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9229206,0.00007284279,0.07605418,0.00003227919,0.000021462298,0.00009219202,0.000038763737,0.000041018367,0.0007266805],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956381,0.0026865038,0.00020438712,0.00053321733,0.0006368349,0.0003009567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98524123,0.010840526,0.0012741985,0.0009582509,0.0013386575,0.00034702633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010715153,0.0009997045,0.0015564316,0.0012820422,0.00084837904,0.0027511676,0.0019984315,0.0015438785,0.0010841158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028700765,0.0007644766,0.0010054647,0.0011744071,0.0016218402,0.0034537043,0.001850758,0.0021910719,0.00015461557],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036405408,0.00014255272,0.0014031446,0.00014198545,0.0001985525,0.00010576699,0.00025555136,0.905526,0.0040383753,0.05992965,0.0004304912,0.027463894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007629617,0.000040505198,0.00012816313,0.000006619036,0.00001128078,0.000008862082,0.00001528422,0.98871094,0.0009583621,0.0100458525,0.000056601875,0.000009932617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011559756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000935709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010715153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015956258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001131101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056667864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014409699","doi":"10.1080/1331677x.2020.1736117","title":"Pythagorean fuzzy combinative distance-based assessment with pure linguistic information and its application to financial strategies of multi-national companies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Pythagorean theorem; Fuzzy logic; Linguistics; Computer science; Business; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23011591108096885,"score_gpt":0.47308721650455965,"score_spread":0.2429713054235908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014409699","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10461952,0.0012798597,0.8884243,0.0003556132,0.00005714987,0.00010211296,0.00003641672,0.00007366425,0.005051308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79012865,0.0008189294,0.20766854,0.000034384895,0.000025768428,0.00011633781,0.000050130497,0.0000146557995,0.001142535],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671614,0.0013770094,0.00019304399,0.00034180554,0.001245665,0.00012624737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974885,0.0014905499,0.00025861553,0.00008142054,0.0005733775,0.00010749377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003700195,0.0012103589,0.0011693247,0.004203615,0.00087917346,0.0026504728,0.0009612037,0.0011786524,0.00079214084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007912725,0.00031400597,0.0012988441,0.002853644,0.0009042878,0.0023995303,0.0019835928,0.0009594818,0.00013299398],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026345946,0.0001867036,0.004708236,0.0005262701,0.00035059586,0.0005714882,0.0014456474,0.5816312,0.006315653,0.05833658,0.0007539995,0.34491023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009601036,0.0001409091,0.0011721035,0.00004725007,0.00004988746,0.000109139684,0.00036753603,0.9791798,0.0015523554,0.016229952,0.0010966376,0.000044732056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046925093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029629865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046925093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020053764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001522186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019568741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014571275","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110513","title":"Developing successful environmental decision support systems: Challenges and best practices","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Decision support system; Usability; Best practice; Field (mathematics); Risk analysis (engineering); Decision analysis; Computer science; Information system; Management science; Knowledge management; Process management; Engineering; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.32045912406271027,"score_gpt":0.4499605382694952,"score_spread":0.12950141420678496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014571275","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016287819,0.9947017,0.0016521484,0.0018643717,0.00023239531,0.000018532259,0.000026910562,0.0000144684245,0.001326631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021894644,0.99262494,0.0041482216,0.00053387287,0.00021148243,0.000035534496,0.0000387571,0.0000052524465,0.0002125111],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978125,0.0007066395,0.00029925734,0.0001888797,0.00088151736,0.00011116198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98744816,0.00939181,0.0007145382,0.00021248336,0.0019556084,0.00027748305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007858279,0.0012850919,0.0025236655,0.004066384,0.0005222116,0.0037413337,0.0024807279,0.0027840831,0.0030195694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012323435,0.00046293356,0.0008948369,0.005577695,0.0012969478,0.0037375945,0.0015113753,0.002881906,0.0010735457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002932319,0.00006261917,0.00018658685,0.026626635,0.00014080488,0.000058248814,0.00009118589,0.0014504852,0.00031316065,0.014815529,0.009503053,0.9467224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004134981,0.00020907985,0.0012240234,0.062563606,0.00055245875,0.00045877942,0.00059525925,0.0016840236,0.0008181538,0.051280912,0.8804829,0.000089470836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029229454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057114502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007858279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001931619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070741437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04155904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015497865","doi":"10.1093/jcde/qwaa039","title":"An efficient controlled elitism non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective supplier selection under fuzziness","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational Design and Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sorting; Mathematical optimization; TOPSIS; Genetic algorithm; Particle swarm optimization; Taguchi methods; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ideal solution; Multi-objective optimization; Supply chain; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Maximization; Algorithm; Mathematics; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.07019889654136877,"score_gpt":0.3544353585863633,"score_spread":0.28423646204499453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015497865","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042499136,0.00016759471,0.9548943,0.00013220978,0.000024922805,0.00010126711,0.000025449577,0.00019563858,0.0019594089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6789455,0.000152025,0.3176559,0.00014442607,0.000019460535,0.0003949385,0.00009197174,0.00003447908,0.0025612954],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932253,0.00025949907,0.000031032643,0.00008454997,0.00022144415,0.0000809885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905616,0.0006027455,0.00008743906,0.000035265693,0.00018781061,0.00003063878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018294357,0.00086127355,0.0010263695,0.0011234853,0.0005359016,0.0009680815,0.0015102539,0.0013518294,0.0010439652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025189884,0.00044724403,0.00071723067,0.0009257063,0.00077916257,0.0005493409,0.0007338546,0.00075541384,0.0001380337],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003695637,0.00003867237,0.0003526005,0.000028693323,0.000025386305,0.000036227615,0.000052610325,0.9730435,0.0011977126,0.0030263865,0.0002028364,0.021958407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000143396255,0.000023898476,0.00004780892,0.0000043015884,0.0000043600044,0.000005120085,0.0000047187555,0.99883074,0.00026260273,0.0006947499,0.000105050865,0.0000023043458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008876271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059411083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008876271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013156101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001806018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017649174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016633888","doi":"10.3390/sym12040628","title":"Grey Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making Methods Based on Interval Grey Triangular Fuzzy Numbers Partitioned Bonferroni Mean","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symmetry","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; National Key Research and Development Program of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy logic; Bonferroni correction; Fuzzy number; Fuzzy set; Operator (biology); Partition (number theory); Group decision-making; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Combinatorics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1489690294844085,"score_gpt":0.43240145144504966,"score_spread":0.28343242196064117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016633888","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054280916,0.00020091719,0.9929965,0.00006859615,0.000034415818,0.000054038544,0.000017363749,0.000060242117,0.0011397892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36425725,0.0006087925,0.63280547,0.00008669888,0.00008529314,0.00039116762,0.00009620251,0.00004638975,0.0016227742],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665403,0.0014512717,0.000212853,0.0005350274,0.0009928028,0.00015393256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829787,0.0009013683,0.00017760906,0.000095715084,0.00046525878,0.00006213699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038126372,0.0012107891,0.001429384,0.0014528448,0.0008456821,0.0013158902,0.0015385118,0.0008311571,0.0027959424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007248277,0.00038380077,0.0017899342,0.0015674027,0.0010739603,0.0022187056,0.0014210573,0.001405446,0.00028114088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023484619,0.00007270301,0.0014087822,0.0005951175,0.00030634028,0.00025799486,0.0006016229,0.61688673,0.007832724,0.11608123,0.0017231484,0.25399873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000481026,0.00014247614,0.0003803714,0.000046856607,0.00006418712,0.00008446151,0.000074843236,0.9353275,0.0024840676,0.05951396,0.0017898364,0.000043384814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002531606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019695116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038126372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011678765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017161538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020163417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016868175","doi":"10.1177/1063293x20911165","title":"A model for supporting the ideas screening during front end of the innovation process based on combination of methods of EcaTRIZ, AHP, and SWOT","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrent Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"SWOT analysis; Analytic hierarchy process; Process (computing); Product (mathematics); Process management; Front and back ends; Product innovation; New product development; Engineering; Innovation management; Management science; Hierarchy; Computer science; Knowledge management; Engineering management; Operations research; Marketing; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.23002052544576243,"score_gpt":0.46171943277677047,"score_spread":0.23169890733100804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016868175","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008084275,0.00009980071,0.98430437,0.0005251287,0.00004050864,0.0006836359,0.00011021308,0.00027846056,0.005873725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14042856,0.00027238944,0.8560847,0.000086746375,0.000016662625,0.0012705002,0.0001801303,0.000028126913,0.0016321569],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99444145,0.002609686,0.00048739614,0.00048035625,0.0017007377,0.00028032108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950315,0.003236379,0.0004382658,0.00019467429,0.000916709,0.00018246913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068112924,0.0016096483,0.0009859101,0.004904535,0.0024833914,0.003921741,0.0020601137,0.0016372637,0.0040345965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008837351,0.0006453475,0.0015618311,0.004888244,0.0018511175,0.004368527,0.002418079,0.0013803376,0.0005816532],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043750694,0.00060818106,0.006835192,0.001774091,0.0002759411,0.00095006364,0.0059043136,0.33433878,0.0077817845,0.29604977,0.005343232,0.33970115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001398953,0.00029669353,0.0013263029,0.00032306352,0.00018006633,0.00029447395,0.0017045062,0.890259,0.0036021958,0.08763372,0.0141011905,0.00013890212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011207331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012468792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011207331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037555173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008984694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036022007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020325612","doi":"10.1111/exsy.12568","title":"Development of optimal water supply plan using integrated fuzzy Delphi and fuzzy <scp>ELECTRE III</scp> methods—Case study of the Gamasiab basin","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"ELECTRE; Computer science; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Fuzzy logic; Data mining; Operations research; Delphi method; Delphi; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.24288212394532588,"score_gpt":0.42733901948983977,"score_spread":0.1844568955445139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020325612","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31320065,0.00015194809,0.6710134,0.00036000647,0.000031854514,0.0012467962,0.00031756013,0.00017522725,0.013502583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5753235,0.00010155164,0.4228975,0.000020121446,0.0000037091916,0.00056219497,0.000099476296,0.0000156432,0.00097628194],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981415,0.0012355511,0.00007493235,0.000120488185,0.00029376397,0.00013365895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869424,0.00087229465,0.000089255016,0.00006789827,0.00022680119,0.000049468934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035910746,0.0007624878,0.0005998668,0.001835673,0.0010283162,0.0010486256,0.0006573087,0.00075506524,0.0029040482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033135768,0.00045457648,0.0008422285,0.0011312739,0.00049939577,0.0006561374,0.0011148056,0.00058275333,0.00012246502],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028745364,0.00044649385,0.005776423,0.00069394795,0.00014699715,0.0010231867,0.001835157,0.8060682,0.00940326,0.02040975,0.0016032908,0.15230592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056382156,0.0001749276,0.0015985469,0.000060939004,0.000026078791,0.00010131411,0.0015769457,0.98440623,0.004409699,0.0053769713,0.0021646188,0.000047297315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008532672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01041336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008532672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012421091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020781325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01899165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027343686","doi":"10.1007/s00521-020-05003-5","title":"Investigation of multiple heterogeneous relationships using a q-rung orthopair fuzzy multi-criteria decision algorithm","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neural Computing and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Operator (biology); Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy logic; Function (biology); Algorithm; Computer science; Fuzzy set; Membership function; Sensitivity (control systems); Score; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.300391159135658,"score_gpt":0.40921677571153814,"score_spread":0.10882561657588014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027343686","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035959512,0.00010727896,0.9619737,0.00010786278,0.000030689043,0.00017442911,0.000032163807,0.00013840468,0.0014760188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3697658,0.000114573166,0.62822855,0.00010271908,0.000023820565,0.00029513196,0.00009314111,0.00004797032,0.001328351],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979808,0.00084139797,0.0001533039,0.00034405975,0.00049893226,0.000181512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958407,0.0031289184,0.00014686427,0.0000852436,0.0006877246,0.000110552064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007500681,0.0011314895,0.0026254035,0.0026198942,0.0017512543,0.0022661735,0.0020314318,0.0024500636,0.0036805472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069818594,0.00073141727,0.0019727226,0.0019037303,0.0009158803,0.0016665047,0.0014941009,0.0013935381,0.00029828984],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003883207,0.00031924117,0.002887259,0.00028736735,0.00027425334,0.00030515736,0.0003666242,0.82185286,0.0038132067,0.020182028,0.0008980342,0.14842567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012639728,0.00005132269,0.00011825068,0.0000062625813,0.000021937749,0.000014663125,0.000016686032,0.99835336,0.00031084244,0.0009816746,0.00010685484,0.000005515741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012577888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007309868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012577888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015553108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027969396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039667845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029114179","doi":"10.1109/tsmc.2020.2992272","title":"Composite Decision Makers in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Modeling","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Conflict resolution; Preference; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Composite number; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Sociology; Algorithm; Statistics","score_opus":0.29130454373127584,"score_gpt":0.3599170306421542,"score_spread":0.06861248691087835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029114179","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008717683,0.00023921911,0.9844208,0.0003813333,0.000032293963,0.000076715754,0.00008717757,0.000050539937,0.0059942906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6010507,0.0010477236,0.38969734,0.00025159374,0.00009717968,0.0006103344,0.00025185253,0.0000545476,0.006938844],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574184,0.003015322,0.00011906743,0.00038657174,0.0005325525,0.00020469323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673766,0.0022619597,0.0003109105,0.00014867897,0.0003623902,0.00017831408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004346868,0.0016959211,0.001583173,0.0019013019,0.00096927484,0.0035504368,0.002747728,0.0020742815,0.0046683718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006503844,0.00072332117,0.0018231944,0.0030235455,0.002081123,0.004297739,0.0022276319,0.0026901914,0.000620834],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005404158,0.0000455562,0.00033882906,0.0000977274,0.000087781234,0.00020538717,0.00031898374,0.5799929,0.00043567797,0.4085964,0.00067983405,0.0091469055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018054172,0.000026175188,0.00005518547,0.000016566097,0.000014820027,0.000032032916,0.000077920005,0.83563226,0.00011245731,0.16289282,0.0011022032,0.00001952678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045431564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005143577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046683718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027288767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023506763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022988677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3030607447","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2020.2.001","title":"Distribution center location selection using a novel multi criteria decision-making approach under interval neutrosophic complex sets","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Interval (graph theory); Distribution center; Center (category theory); Computer science; Distribution (mathematics); Data mining; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Business","score_opus":0.3152621192288691,"score_gpt":0.459247508967024,"score_spread":0.1439853897381549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3030607447","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062235137,0.00012373817,0.9913085,0.00010298602,0.00002213351,0.00010988511,0.000029631923,0.00004197864,0.0020375582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4194169,0.0004949035,0.5776366,0.0000908488,0.00009104483,0.0005676524,0.00011785829,0.000029268613,0.0015549278],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961792,0.0015016227,0.0002717436,0.000509977,0.0012976632,0.00023982616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850273,0.00074726244,0.00019689462,0.000055534347,0.00040954453,0.00008806394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036767775,0.0013214534,0.0016376302,0.0025915105,0.0010937226,0.0032705036,0.0020992574,0.0013386263,0.0022448963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036620065,0.00074126216,0.0020473376,0.0022854677,0.0008991585,0.0018189523,0.001750991,0.0013223069,0.00018244087],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013438819,0.00013891883,0.0011945309,0.000519052,0.00027542413,0.0004951705,0.00052559533,0.8443954,0.0056499573,0.055730116,0.0015765191,0.089364864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020026984,0.0000690016,0.00018763395,0.000028039014,0.00004456476,0.00005979415,0.00006464783,0.98632807,0.0006638737,0.01150466,0.0010045143,0.000025268746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004455265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003695038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004455265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021335497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021345438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019444883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3031204161","doi":"10.31181/jiedm200101149m","title":"ELICITING CONSUMERS’ PREFERENCES IN SERVICE SECTOR VIA CONJOINT ANALYSIS: A CASE STUDY ON CREDIT CARD","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Industrial Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Conjoint analysis; Analytic hierarchy process; Profitability index; Marketing; Business; Credit card; Product (mathematics); Service (business); Tertiary sector of the economy; New product development; Computer science; Operations research; Economics; Engineering; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Preference","score_opus":0.2734727427119851,"score_gpt":0.39783178261139773,"score_spread":0.12435903989941266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3031204161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949824,0.00006569729,0.003376126,0.00016105505,0.0000050998715,0.0001416598,0.000042714553,0.000004357794,0.0012208148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920328,0.00009341886,0.0070798597,0.000052079195,0.00000431196,0.00006147335,0.000032141535,0.0000024437081,0.000641462],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645233,0.0025115595,0.000110727204,0.00016324437,0.00043329172,0.00032883315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99052,0.007857193,0.00029916043,0.0003090279,0.00071351643,0.00030099222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005459122,0.0004576718,0.0004886532,0.0012471254,0.0024763318,0.0017348696,0.00071767473,0.0019220865,0.002417327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007814088,0.00031793315,0.00081503345,0.0021091318,0.0011857412,0.0011267215,0.0010974596,0.0013001938,0.00021603944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006381304,0.01943999,0.30940822,0.0019478321,0.00049185846,0.027254213,0.16868007,0.051317826,0.028924452,0.01668622,0.006225194,0.3632428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004280828,0.0107105505,0.16871314,0.00046477988,0.00054653035,0.007730365,0.5037014,0.25064376,0.030276781,0.013420229,0.01278847,0.0005758149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005519975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009229384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005519975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018055445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012588324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02887088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3031271474","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2020.5.005","title":"Raw material supplier selection in a glove manufacturing: Application of AHP and fuzzy AHP","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy logic; Selection (genetic algorithm); Raw material; Computer science; Manufacturing engineering; Operations research; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06410561390666217,"score_gpt":0.3712683098198945,"score_spread":0.3071626959132323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3031271474","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088862,0.00073703926,0.9003192,0.0005771661,0.0000828344,0.0006841494,0.00011017796,0.00011251317,0.008514873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6573414,0.0005854231,0.34057137,0.000055255587,0.000030482106,0.00027853047,0.00005378798,0.000014227042,0.0010695105],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99457294,0.0034708157,0.00025002603,0.00023017467,0.0012093312,0.0002667057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949098,0.0040759034,0.00029678756,0.00008115718,0.0005152432,0.00012118278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056419782,0.0007980224,0.0011968982,0.0025312703,0.0012993605,0.0019444348,0.0011892811,0.0011724846,0.0014603948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007165631,0.0004847109,0.0009898357,0.0027778219,0.000801046,0.001101183,0.0014998727,0.0010339953,0.00009754447],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020402319,0.00019196021,0.0016693729,0.00071011705,0.00019036466,0.0008061128,0.0007152468,0.8892941,0.0028918793,0.022266475,0.00051094237,0.08054948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029657795,0.00008793015,0.0003499877,0.00005235034,0.000031252246,0.000050017163,0.00039546235,0.9882361,0.00088932033,0.00903703,0.0008188936,0.000022032971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007797285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007797285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013257433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022477894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029838026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033592975","doi":"10.5539/jms.v10n1p174","title":"Assessing Countries Sustainability: A Group Multicriteria Decision Making Methodology Approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management and Sustainability","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Group decision-making; Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Sustainable development; Cluster analysis; Benchmark (surveying); Fuzzy logic; Management science; Environmental economics; Operations research; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.20546305552728095,"score_gpt":0.46851277415063197,"score_spread":0.263049718623351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033592975","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01277755,0.0002899598,0.98251456,0.0003609596,0.00004319183,0.00044286044,0.000077920624,0.000060604023,0.0034324876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20072217,0.00041143832,0.79692465,0.000112779475,0.00005036706,0.0008803296,0.00010561018,0.000022347347,0.0007702945],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890782,0.008188933,0.000429649,0.0006948558,0.0012867922,0.00032142084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945044,0.003895894,0.0005160515,0.00018237038,0.00073513837,0.00016607989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011924046,0.0013789948,0.0015509364,0.0050083282,0.0011483338,0.0037388748,0.0017884456,0.0015325274,0.0027761199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010222627,0.0005052162,0.001973071,0.0038791553,0.0014408461,0.0020433501,0.0021067455,0.0014916138,0.00031287226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012849338,0.00025932104,0.0036641888,0.0007931864,0.0006210202,0.00026884445,0.0015311437,0.70094097,0.0019594517,0.16382375,0.0017415597,0.12426797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004197225,0.00020520267,0.0006586204,0.00016093046,0.00011097739,0.000067040964,0.00075046346,0.8636445,0.0008580552,0.12936687,0.00408866,0.000046705693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026229725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026209983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011924046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028331843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035203444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06306112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034432439","doi":"10.3390/math8060956","title":"Ranking Multi-Metric Scientific Achievements Using a Concept of Pareto Optimality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Pareto principle; Rank (graph theory); Metric (unit); Dominance (genetics); Computer science; Multi-objective optimization; Ranking SVM; Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Machine learning; Operations research; Mathematics; Econometrics; Economics; Operations management; Biology","score_opus":0.5272747781700724,"score_gpt":0.4808562808714657,"score_spread":0.0464184972986067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034432439","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020053964,0.0008512414,0.9720052,0.00040431824,0.000065390326,0.00022114324,0.00014387594,0.000116915566,0.006137926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.406768,0.0013033423,0.5879392,0.00020437012,0.00016018783,0.00054988347,0.0003432273,0.000085688094,0.0026461207],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98724836,0.0042243935,0.00083637296,0.0009045526,0.006196206,0.0005900351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906786,0.0051492713,0.0010268631,0.00062846177,0.0020583996,0.00045828847],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012154833,0.0021998691,0.0021499014,0.011566695,0.0013902461,0.004486702,0.0013326692,0.0011719788,0.0019801285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017309127,0.0005162843,0.0018988249,0.005751419,0.002403978,0.0046603736,0.003495163,0.001840722,0.00039205502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001984077,0.00023000338,0.0061913603,0.0012884308,0.0006526567,0.00027715616,0.0008712016,0.2625292,0.009188276,0.33368582,0.0041880677,0.38069952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006826316,0.00061537465,0.0046050707,0.00028818537,0.00018592022,0.00029651498,0.00053502806,0.6923534,0.0074523347,0.2803929,0.013044309,0.00016270512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022768702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023212899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9884333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031551789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035374626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06428164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035689345","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2020.106533","title":"An extended GEDM method with heterogeneous reference points of decision makers and a new hesitant fuzzy distance formula","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Computer science; Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Group decision-making; Mathematics; Fuzzy number; Fuzzy set; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.19261970279203822,"score_gpt":0.36931030651465774,"score_spread":0.17669060372261952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035689345","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027920452,0.00011732147,0.9964384,0.000038907892,0.00003134269,0.000013545336,0.00001626819,0.000036267527,0.0005159024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15914927,0.00019522144,0.83667326,0.00009509562,0.000075996584,0.000141113,0.0001437315,0.00006383949,0.0034624892],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985933,0.0005797235,0.00011617736,0.00028925025,0.0003526225,0.000068973364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990728,0.00042916994,0.00005927274,0.00010115417,0.00029934457,0.000038210754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020677831,0.0007410485,0.0015418909,0.0014851424,0.00044115432,0.0010527967,0.0022601923,0.001586632,0.0025244663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034492707,0.00045881362,0.0011869831,0.0016690412,0.0005587659,0.0018017646,0.0020229502,0.0010569773,0.0005766719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020825907,0.00012052018,0.0010515962,0.0005395265,0.00026174381,0.0003255839,0.0003126756,0.38725343,0.010955994,0.10111175,0.0027961822,0.4950627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023068658,0.00006642832,0.00021177018,0.00002409298,0.000035348894,0.00011158792,0.000026570584,0.9801952,0.0013876094,0.014787968,0.0031025894,0.00002779686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012648947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013652699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025244663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000586634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008251935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010935664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036016861","doi":"10.3390/civileng1010003","title":"Comparison of Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Methods for Urban Sewer Network Plan Selection","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CivilEng","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs","keywords":"ELECTRE; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Analytic hierarchy process; TOPSIS; Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Operations research; Group decision-making; Ideal solution; Pairwise comparison; Selection (genetic algorithm); Analytic network process; Decision matrix; Decision support system; Management science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.32461437520027836,"score_gpt":0.5428293398909022,"score_spread":0.21821496469062385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036016861","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10591588,0.003993752,0.8755429,0.00065406825,0.00028537362,0.0014260737,0.00023656026,0.00039347398,0.011552013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46952954,0.0017892142,0.52541167,0.00013529888,0.000055425444,0.0012991746,0.00020641332,0.0000744617,0.0014988201],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98763925,0.0077854344,0.0006810655,0.00047858182,0.0030865003,0.0003291612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817085,0.013990558,0.00077447,0.00047295916,0.002691364,0.00036218716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017598774,0.0016135351,0.0019267338,0.0066348338,0.00093767507,0.0025725986,0.0019105059,0.0015234054,0.0032735222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02347399,0.00065749325,0.0024710936,0.0041788453,0.00067871157,0.0018914156,0.0017509842,0.0013836181,0.0003509205],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013551044,0.0004866972,0.0037435582,0.0024291475,0.0008076548,0.00020127445,0.0012885637,0.5140158,0.0018214552,0.013492113,0.0018645183,0.45849413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014544987,0.00044256373,0.0019412155,0.00025509897,0.00016039911,0.00005602493,0.00075775234,0.9853955,0.0014220851,0.007124765,0.0022209901,0.00007813592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041598077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005226694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017598774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022452862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023217548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093072355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036704845","doi":"10.1109/tfuzz.2020.3003501","title":"Consistency- and Consensus-Based Group Decision-Making Method With Incomplete Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Probabilistic logic; Group decision-making; Preference; Missing data; Computer science; Complete information; Data mining; Reliability (semiconductor); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.16214479027792605,"score_gpt":0.3734027041551108,"score_spread":0.21125791387718473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036704845","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032107437,0.00008447263,0.99596244,0.00007171813,0.000014530404,0.000031393454,0.000012727154,0.000043974036,0.000568113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40348247,0.00037355887,0.593177,0.0001328844,0.00008073246,0.0005651773,0.00017221282,0.000060001687,0.0019559704],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957071,0.0017611614,0.0003208283,0.0008051723,0.0011506815,0.00025514685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624807,0.0020558387,0.00041260262,0.00020768183,0.0009297593,0.00014608563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005927958,0.0015009342,0.0020309803,0.0014552043,0.0011849937,0.001930046,0.0025025962,0.0013687571,0.0018426365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008338933,0.0008050308,0.0019918925,0.0018525646,0.0010988269,0.0031829723,0.0024928972,0.0021879736,0.00028295358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014554922,0.00006278456,0.0009795369,0.00030527412,0.00021860863,0.00020164503,0.0005706044,0.82160777,0.0023709172,0.06729409,0.0011754953,0.10506766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023408025,0.000043265674,0.00006321583,0.0000132769555,0.00003198909,0.000029603272,0.000033072178,0.97811973,0.00054847676,0.020560918,0.00051662594,0.000016419339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036364947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023940725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005927958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016614649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028595238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031350434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038410581","doi":"10.3390/a13070163","title":"An Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Risk Analysis Model (IT2FRAM) for Determining Construction Project Contingency Reserve","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Algorithms","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fuzzy set; Vagueness; Membership function; Fuzzy logic; Ambiguity; Computer science; Contingency; Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy number; Data mining; Contingency table; Risk management; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Linguistics","score_opus":0.32993763002430737,"score_gpt":0.4803315673796275,"score_spread":0.15039393735532014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038410581","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009849635,0.00018752323,0.9851774,0.00019947927,0.000043361462,0.000053799056,0.000078177494,0.00016314814,0.0042473795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64956236,0.00050312845,0.34376135,0.00017158494,0.00011646514,0.0003982969,0.00025665975,0.0000621934,0.0051679914],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989466,0.00035132878,0.000059516395,0.00022462966,0.00033046835,0.000087498454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988285,0.00061122637,0.00019831589,0.00006011341,0.00026151526,0.000040351308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017304627,0.0009769636,0.000747355,0.001402264,0.00054890127,0.0018910409,0.0017261517,0.0017843329,0.0027064788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033934664,0.0003597387,0.0015357769,0.00082822866,0.0004966337,0.0015706904,0.0007953004,0.0012506542,0.00041308845],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004451727,0.00003129631,0.0010572373,0.000081224076,0.000054514578,0.0001530749,0.00010665601,0.93045676,0.0013831441,0.033312242,0.0010754005,0.032244053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003092497,0.000024626197,0.00014492295,0.000012329662,0.000011150303,0.000055345154,0.000012453425,0.992172,0.00020798012,0.00662626,0.0007194137,0.000010396537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004711444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034947612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004711444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011626967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012590435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009368062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043534803","doi":"10.3390/en13143617","title":"Consumers’ Perceptions of the Supply of Tap Water in Crisis Situations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energies","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Quality (philosophy); Polling; Water supply; Control (management); Work (physics); Service quality; Tap water; Water quality; Service (business); Environmental economics; Water industry; Potable water; Process (computing); Operations management; Marketing; Economics; Engineering; Computer science; Environmental engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.13085066347327215,"score_gpt":0.3828615819308336,"score_spread":0.2520109184575614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043534803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980513,0.000018399234,0.00008691187,0.00011769093,0.000002171178,0.00000564082,0.000016909287,0.0000011715642,0.0016998126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996056,0.000027727032,0.00004310198,0.000027974653,0.0000023629573,0.0000035410505,0.000020604195,9.302368e-7,0.000268154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928755,0.0003190862,0.000046618945,0.00004429378,0.00019203586,0.00011053025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975152,0.0012935181,0.0004942432,0.00007687474,0.0003793457,0.0002408487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001233959,0.000119917866,0.00016796187,0.00048664652,0.00064140576,0.0015822238,0.00014612262,0.00067407644,0.0041672853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040130313,0.00016978351,0.00028489743,0.00045357144,0.0006280644,0.00091467466,0.0006603697,0.00062517537,0.00025853238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016732918,0.00066182273,0.6245779,0.00033911713,0.00012846608,0.0027226608,0.3210933,0.0008262945,0.016205445,0.0015267757,0.0014747157,0.028770197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003114727,0.0008950555,0.5271336,0.00006546082,0.000047037207,0.0005946948,0.4630976,0.001164383,0.0014804592,0.0006384587,0.0047910763,0.000061033195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003923051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003586631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041672853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044445915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020667318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01394099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045507721","doi":"10.1111/coin.12386","title":"Conditional Preference Networks with User's Genuine Decisions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Ceteris paribus; Pareto principle; Net (polyhedron); Outcome (game theory); Preference relation; Relation (database); Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics; Economics; Statistics; Microeconomics; Data mining","score_opus":0.4358606671887069,"score_gpt":0.4281798976902216,"score_spread":0.00768076949848534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045507721","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11312174,0.00015609838,0.87583315,0.0004554401,0.000028810267,0.00010451045,0.0003409089,0.00013207906,0.009827372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90538585,0.00014057379,0.09100897,0.00008498687,0.000022944976,0.0001865048,0.00027727822,0.000024957373,0.0028679187],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962754,0.0022974557,0.00013959128,0.00048344137,0.0004947633,0.0003093172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919857,0.006028497,0.00060709135,0.00043372257,0.00062117755,0.00032376844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042045075,0.00083453144,0.0007719907,0.0013800221,0.0005664615,0.0016508137,0.0010549889,0.0010462138,0.0056318967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113138445,0.0004446537,0.00093600765,0.0014878453,0.0017409596,0.0034491103,0.0015161227,0.0015138476,0.00031573928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028282468,0.00009727682,0.0022344254,0.0001127382,0.00007573737,0.00017641099,0.00017919112,0.716426,0.0010138826,0.25187308,0.0009164013,0.026611978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013778607,0.00004623046,0.00035752624,0.000016658001,0.000014933517,0.00002960194,0.000030763134,0.87503403,0.00033000953,0.12351259,0.00059849396,0.000015399699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041974597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044716857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056318967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001969209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008830517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02223587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047484812","doi":"10.1016/j.inffus.2020.08.010","title":"Multi-granular linguistic distribution evidential reasoning method for renewable energy project risk assessment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Fusion","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Computer science; Representation (politics); Artificial intelligence; Risk analysis (engineering)","score_opus":0.1250313887532216,"score_gpt":0.4498904480058207,"score_spread":0.32485905925259906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047484812","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009428409,0.00019384408,0.98898506,0.00010416296,0.000024758716,0.000031071628,0.000058661277,0.00014773429,0.0010262775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56701654,0.0003050779,0.43058804,0.00012012132,0.00005946567,0.0001464492,0.00020932853,0.000039209463,0.0015157115],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821824,0.0005665077,0.00019837325,0.0002671059,0.000654242,0.0000954871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979614,0.0012362787,0.00017573257,0.00014638349,0.00041467074,0.00006547324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003271645,0.00065957,0.0010696271,0.0025413963,0.0008123422,0.0021239028,0.0013147477,0.00092566706,0.0023657547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060518687,0.00036015394,0.001258938,0.0016500431,0.0006703617,0.0024772568,0.0014301431,0.0012733411,0.0003033578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000391375,0.00032600062,0.002160701,0.0005169004,0.00034176174,0.00051684835,0.0005913772,0.46780238,0.0095883235,0.08211012,0.0026495263,0.43300462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016533177,0.000030285584,0.0003142568,0.00003268141,0.000053732452,0.00005539001,0.000044536842,0.9650311,0.0010046923,0.032691255,0.00070722617,0.0000183088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022294172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023132195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003271645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008292106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012581317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017302275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048736466","doi":"10.1007/s40815-020-00924-8","title":"Citation Analysis of Fuzzy Set Theory Journals: Bibliometric Insights About Authors and Research Areas","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología","keywords":"Computer science; Citation; Field (mathematics); Data science; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy set; Citation analysis; Management science; Computational intelligence; Bibliometrics; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.4355136552884411,"score_gpt":0.5309238991282088,"score_spread":0.0954102438397677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048736466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9111111,0.012848988,0.026235323,0.0033682475,0.00024680453,0.00010071833,0.002728983,0.0001926265,0.043167185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99157166,0.0016444784,0.0046554804,0.000056206754,0.00023243947,0.000024565594,0.00059803465,0.000016945709,0.0012002821],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941802,0.0015662612,0.0006274917,0.00040368008,0.0029404825,0.0002818895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9505844,0.03082484,0.0064341775,0.0014468363,0.009566771,0.00114285],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067209164,0.00044267357,0.0011779867,0.05755227,0.0016303051,0.009112543,0.0010454092,0.0012514264,0.0034843613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06302288,0.00021038699,0.000929916,0.06191868,0.0009357856,0.005074237,0.0014921686,0.0006868541,0.0005224753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005830849,0.00056849455,0.48992583,0.0015755263,0.001491662,0.00040681515,0.0048647574,0.01823677,0.006116793,0.05404671,0.007261157,0.41492248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007598877,0.00040620385,0.67139155,0.0009880129,0.0015080607,0.000946142,0.009661967,0.1496786,0.009801606,0.13374925,0.021460632,0.00033199615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005719276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9424477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029293478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023805108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035544038},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3049128818","doi":"10.1108/gs-09-2019-0032","title":"Study on the reliability assessment and early-warning method of online auditing based on the perspective of IT control","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Grey Systems Theory and Application","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Reliability (semiconductor); Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Warning system; Audit risk; Risk analysis (engineering); Pairwise comparison; Reliability engineering; Operational auditing; Process management; Accounting; Operations research; Engineering; Internal audit; Artificial intelligence; Business; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.12613380954087725,"score_gpt":0.4489537912818131,"score_spread":0.32281998174093585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049128818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4893758,0.0015895963,0.4777089,0.002347972,0.000162115,0.0011520628,0.00009659625,0.00030924156,0.027257651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490972,0.00029528176,0.049405586,0.000068383844,0.00003143589,0.00021992248,0.000027501652,0.00001555636,0.00083904143],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746789,0.01640227,0.0011051942,0.0011504538,0.006174949,0.00048819993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9527444,0.026111169,0.0056569595,0.0021582604,0.012618213,0.0007110163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017168524,0.0005603808,0.00047701056,0.0030033032,0.0007978464,0.0021854255,0.00094156084,0.0005826631,0.0017170993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04852402,0.00027647824,0.0006482546,0.0021827456,0.0016390294,0.0034138984,0.0012891877,0.0011597836,0.00016036957],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059618085,0.00079544587,0.080594316,0.0023671135,0.00022973379,0.00046545707,0.02530471,0.036213536,0.0091831405,0.08849383,0.0034490991,0.75230736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026636184,0.0035254061,0.1324374,0.0020793849,0.00065862597,0.0011796206,0.032462258,0.7080175,0.02124153,0.075867474,0.021876348,0.00038800167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028639378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018222124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017168524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00237229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035998554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09079689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049559018","doi":"10.2991/ijcis.d.200801.002","title":"Bid Evaluation for Major Construction Projects Under Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Environment and Characterized Expertise Levels","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; City University of Hong Kong","keywords":"ELECTRE; Ranking (information retrieval); Group decision-making; Computer science; TOPSIS; Context (archaeology); Quality (philosophy); Operations research; Process (computing); Selection (genetic algorithm); Vagueness; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Data mining; Management science; Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.206727624611418,"score_gpt":0.439669006722594,"score_spread":0.23294138211117602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049559018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8150086,0.0004233443,0.17291752,0.000244965,0.00004428513,0.00066768605,0.00017920107,0.0001235736,0.010390783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98441905,0.000085909065,0.014425847,0.0000092845075,0.0000069648777,0.00011942042,0.00010376376,0.000012154552,0.00081770786],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99220616,0.004241939,0.00035729737,0.0005135246,0.0019082129,0.0007728233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867932,0.0072184275,0.0010616574,0.0006195104,0.003340617,0.0009666031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013706195,0.0011202578,0.0012870174,0.0022232558,0.0010365602,0.003648633,0.0011419071,0.0008981011,0.0024518694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016966848,0.0003774711,0.001091291,0.0019447567,0.00078162487,0.001773102,0.001678817,0.0006555395,0.00028506859],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027899642,0.0007550917,0.02828579,0.0008009467,0.00034129136,0.0010375638,0.0019738786,0.78595084,0.01005241,0.02172694,0.0027080465,0.14357728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006578606,0.0008095262,0.009577513,0.00003297027,0.000104070445,0.0001310901,0.0017107168,0.9761563,0.0043214234,0.006099501,0.0009281583,0.00006303595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054055587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040607103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013706195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024583815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023044222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07248616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080725479","doi":"10.1109/tase.2020.3014907","title":"Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Uncertain Linguistic Cloud Petri Net and Its Application to Risk Assessment for Subway Fire Accident","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Petri net; Cloud computing; Computer science; Interval (graph theory); Mathematical proof; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Algorithm; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07874959326371368,"score_gpt":0.3919999709221096,"score_spread":0.3132503776583959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080725479","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012844292,0.000113949296,0.9849236,0.00010331757,0.000030406003,0.00003759083,0.000035479872,0.00017807567,0.0017333594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68218,0.00044213748,0.3150039,0.000070114074,0.000041105,0.00008530966,0.00010224396,0.00004354179,0.0020317736],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999252,0.00014578862,0.00005500979,0.00017091051,0.00030033372,0.000075884855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935216,0.00029110702,0.00010136954,0.000038958973,0.00016062129,0.000055796256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095993164,0.0007033009,0.00048706675,0.0011306405,0.00066260365,0.0011743288,0.0009979579,0.00044561457,0.001346022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021191472,0.00026499396,0.0013834579,0.00075099146,0.00083061634,0.0017876652,0.00090269174,0.00090159196,0.00012751103],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019547703,0.00007904948,0.003152432,0.0002261606,0.00007613171,0.0006790201,0.00049967365,0.742828,0.008838878,0.14758042,0.0012202137,0.094624564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005058987,0.00001499669,0.00024367892,0.000011689752,0.000016150543,0.000058220838,0.000040135135,0.9812563,0.0014807999,0.016083278,0.0007752902,0.000014377612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010934589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068995077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010934589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018450702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016493307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021741867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080892763","doi":"10.1109/tfuzz.2020.3018110","title":"A Comparative Study Between Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Fuzzy Variants: A Perspective Based on Two Linguistic Models","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy set; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy logic; Rank (graph theory); Hierarchy; Transitive relation; Mathematics; Linguistics; Data mining; Machine learning; Operations research","score_opus":0.25369495835266964,"score_gpt":0.44137293185844034,"score_spread":0.1876779735057707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080892763","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12384249,0.070348226,0.6727504,0.009763603,0.00096362847,0.00042011344,0.00018666525,0.00017850734,0.1215462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7550564,0.017900893,0.22311334,0.0005119679,0.0004299082,0.00030232882,0.00010760998,0.000044410033,0.0025332072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871176,0.008259612,0.00033031908,0.00048861664,0.003412314,0.00039165263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855826,0.0106442245,0.00076817616,0.00050109916,0.0021005163,0.00040338046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01377442,0.00065636623,0.0011168241,0.0059962417,0.0014550477,0.00631288,0.001311438,0.0017176757,0.0019201036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02116419,0.00032954864,0.0010976059,0.006182738,0.0028035268,0.0068052304,0.0021357983,0.0017753773,0.00020910907],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019417575,0.00011239424,0.0017955453,0.00091846124,0.00012230568,0.00030102936,0.0032482038,0.022544645,0.0010352568,0.8433385,0.0020656944,0.124323785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097201446,0.0011605168,0.0067710746,0.0015439712,0.00028884117,0.0006450661,0.014304151,0.36868382,0.0017751411,0.5410923,0.06339011,0.00024772238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041857366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031071675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01377442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003492842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027936846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07284701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082018327","doi":"10.1109/fuzz48607.2020.9177591","title":"The Assessment of Importance of Selected Issues of Software Engineering, IT Project Management, and Programming Paradigms Based on Graphical AHP and Fuzzy C-Means","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Software engineering; Software; Engineering management; Systems engineering; Engineering; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","score_opus":0.08459061407153895,"score_gpt":0.39937380289874885,"score_spread":0.3147831888272099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082018327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78817016,0.00034662982,0.20341632,0.0002967183,0.000048316615,0.0007948749,0.00017588638,0.00017650593,0.006574579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88957304,0.00010643281,0.10943171,0.000032019398,0.000022346194,0.0003302782,0.00012105403,0.000016061076,0.00036696772],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845716,0.009575942,0.00075712096,0.0007459105,0.0039651385,0.00038432342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9460307,0.043085024,0.0037700431,0.0012458976,0.0050754175,0.00079287967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0151077155,0.0007791288,0.0005588335,0.0059957127,0.0008392863,0.0018994577,0.00059952814,0.0007423024,0.0013828804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05227235,0.00017728323,0.00059765315,0.003543958,0.0008368658,0.0013821837,0.0015256745,0.00065305707,0.00019094386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026347798,0.001138398,0.117659315,0.0025315857,0.00041925075,0.0003406954,0.020425288,0.035517767,0.035738718,0.008721776,0.001503382,0.77336913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039633943,0.006444283,0.4213286,0.00088348624,0.0006542701,0.0008599669,0.048468404,0.42654887,0.04924915,0.033235326,0.011339762,0.00059152336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097628526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014085203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0151077155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085456745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001100676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07989824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083654798","doi":"10.35784/bud-arch.2158","title":"Determination of the residential renovation range","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Budownictwo i Architektura","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Geomechanica (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Decision maker; Selection (genetic algorithm); Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Range (aeronautics); Task (project management); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Operations research; Fuzzy logic; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Systems engineering; Artificial intelligence; Business","score_opus":0.10680552347544865,"score_gpt":0.3876536833910012,"score_spread":0.28084815991555256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083654798","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3608937,0.0024636516,0.5700109,0.00027440244,0.00005746321,0.00035289553,0.0004383383,0.00062922615,0.06487945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8868577,0.0005839388,0.10916449,0.000014447305,0.000014648487,0.00014072118,0.00019596393,0.00006186789,0.0029660882],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982658,0.00063506805,0.000100634075,0.00023461782,0.0006143152,0.00014960294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805593,0.0010120925,0.00019157762,0.00013769425,0.0005080794,0.00009466702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021435092,0.0005221024,0.00062626635,0.0038909304,0.0006833903,0.0016340821,0.00070591026,0.0005915214,0.0036539081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004503941,0.00027677364,0.00061751634,0.0015136653,0.00042453114,0.0013341181,0.001211018,0.00045436833,0.0007432703],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039239283,0.00014256132,0.02406054,0.0008904663,0.00012498691,0.0011059501,0.001528657,0.3902304,0.033958,0.05086618,0.00210115,0.49459866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067471985,0.00080334424,0.056566954,0.0007240773,0.00019760117,0.0026840935,0.0066112056,0.7581062,0.06522441,0.057709016,0.050968383,0.00033723545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012199008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002195279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038909304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005322095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005224446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012223542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092625516","doi":"10.1142/s0219622020500340","title":"Eigensolutions of Partially Reliable Decision Preferences Described by Matrices of <i>Z</i>-Numbers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Statement (logic); Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Probabilistic logic; Mathematics; Computer science; Formal concept analysis; Computation; Problem statement; Mathematical optimization; Algebra over a field; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Pure mathematics; Management science","score_opus":0.05903972683355314,"score_gpt":0.3776599688988117,"score_spread":0.3186202420652586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092625516","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047049418,0.00012601286,0.94865596,0.00013924601,0.000018483614,0.000053224154,0.00009285981,0.000056472167,0.0038083307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7121902,0.0005776538,0.28163052,0.00010448329,0.000054399516,0.00052256696,0.00028589283,0.000085257496,0.0045490246],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988417,0.00044624033,0.000055653047,0.00019696746,0.00031628684,0.0001432369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845135,0.0009098938,0.00031878758,0.00007173956,0.00019187553,0.00005634383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016355141,0.0012810163,0.0007185343,0.001304708,0.0004403069,0.0020823425,0.0005890985,0.0007247608,0.0028990763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039325934,0.00042619163,0.0011232836,0.0010632657,0.001398549,0.0014542153,0.0009583092,0.0009555734,0.00042888924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001411802,0.0001026769,0.0021896583,0.0003037731,0.00018299128,0.0005717937,0.00075170083,0.54492676,0.016245268,0.38423777,0.00203325,0.048313178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015061283,0.00008368669,0.000766209,0.00004121091,0.000013952651,0.00016341738,0.0002488659,0.78032863,0.001297284,0.21594149,0.0010572913,0.00004289055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000950423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007364854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028990763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061445875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007844749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009698391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093106141","doi":"10.1155/2020/1796132","title":"Evaluating Railway Operation Safety Situation in China Based on an Improved TOPSIS Method: A Regional Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Computer science; Cosine similarity; Quality (philosophy); Evaluation methods; Operations research; Transport engineering; Measure (data warehouse); Risk analysis (engineering); Reliability engineering; Data mining; Engineering; Cluster analysis; Artificial intelligence; Business","score_opus":0.15727513897102655,"score_gpt":0.48417941057720987,"score_spread":0.3269042716061833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093106141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5064403,0.0017950301,0.47078538,0.00061322906,0.00009865739,0.0008624394,0.00072258874,0.0004000995,0.018282376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90265,0.0010105795,0.094161,0.00002895947,0.00002061701,0.00020115952,0.00031107862,0.0000140377415,0.0016025536],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.995522,0.0017475743,0.0005386818,0.00039730364,0.0015803506,0.00021407737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984999,0.00029950347,0.0002495667,0.00007341637,0.0007931501,0.00008449334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036990002,0.0013321863,0.0009253553,0.0062801605,0.0007176583,0.002699774,0.000949043,0.0004544218,0.0013401455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039333873,0.00039070533,0.0016240266,0.0057080663,0.0005335227,0.0018142875,0.0013752399,0.00043071577,0.00016284554],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042087885,0.00037270878,0.08070465,0.0023570685,0.0013593751,0.001707278,0.004929184,0.31825575,0.034086786,0.022735508,0.0031388742,0.52993196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001063111,0.0009697499,0.08519956,0.00027523792,0.0011157655,0.0006115483,0.0080119055,0.8723466,0.012848669,0.011423239,0.00677332,0.00031817122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01848061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018047381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01848061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023995428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031169844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036746085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093360043","doi":"10.1057/s41270-020-00089-1","title":"Cutoff criteria for overall model fit indexes in generalized structured component analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Analytics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":346,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg","keywords":"Structural equation modeling; Goodness of fit; Cutoff; Component (thermodynamics); Index (typography); Statistics; Mathematics; Residual; Econometrics; Sample (material); Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.2662953277231987,"score_gpt":0.44715636927833025,"score_spread":0.18086104155513155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093360043","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20532268,0.003265811,0.77065945,0.0023622857,0.0004204897,0.0015966065,0.0010494599,0.002489044,0.012834153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7304028,0.00030172087,0.26474658,0.0004506337,0.000083639476,0.0022892707,0.0010591625,0.0003680267,0.00029806807],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9064398,0.061142303,0.009171402,0.0050958185,0.015752438,0.002398324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5471596,0.36186576,0.016386937,0.031964302,0.03782888,0.0047944984],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.104917936,0.002396609,0.0034910815,0.009866766,0.0038447639,0.007270473,0.0042512086,0.0038795515,0.0042824335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4962897,0.00096189085,0.002803532,0.008870797,0.0048096613,0.0063370597,0.006241333,0.005937722,0.0009928605],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002865674,0.0015869478,0.22850055,0.0026080504,0.0017155954,0.0019416666,0.008803006,0.07025369,0.005486116,0.20755297,0.027215155,0.4414706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005839414,0.0018415363,0.063658684,0.0028320614,0.000782382,0.0010536165,0.004573733,0.53493553,0.0075102975,0.3725183,0.0092027085,0.0005072292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035723906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003615479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89508206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028012425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049535953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5548657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093936753","doi":"10.1109/jsyst.2020.3027716","title":"A Biobjective Optimization Model for Expert Opinions Aggregation and Its Application in Group Decision Making","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Systems Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Objectivity (philosophy); Computer science; Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Subjectivity; Group decision-making; Expert opinion; Field (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1908346164987336,"score_gpt":0.4317006410091515,"score_spread":0.24086602451041791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093936753","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004966534,0.00058917777,0.98957133,0.00053612515,0.000074521995,0.000056553487,0.000057070632,0.00006659671,0.0040820553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62773174,0.0022926053,0.3590357,0.0005755129,0.00028125173,0.0008623498,0.00030557375,0.000107410706,0.008807862],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972179,0.0014374272,0.00013332762,0.00044945488,0.00056693715,0.00019492871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972441,0.0017712972,0.00030447348,0.00007145151,0.0005156873,0.000093008864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004232622,0.0016786356,0.0017089953,0.0015174826,0.0008808916,0.0023823257,0.0018616928,0.002634974,0.0025130839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006664261,0.0005313283,0.0013816474,0.0020767823,0.0013581152,0.0021026745,0.001684949,0.0021012793,0.0004918599],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036217552,0.00003982108,0.00042247277,0.00014608918,0.00007335653,0.00009818717,0.00014674224,0.9196323,0.00058417453,0.05867991,0.0015950124,0.018545745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000413579,0.000018846758,0.000060753777,0.000011803271,0.000010982801,0.000010448955,0.000014344805,0.98768055,0.00007913705,0.011530196,0.0005708887,0.000007859616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008017029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004112272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008017029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023407126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018951009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022384465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094298137","doi":"10.5902/1983465955294","title":"Ranking product systems based on uncertain life cycle sustainability assessment: a stochastic multiple criteria decision analysis approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Administração da UFSM","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Vrije Universiteit Brussel; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Decision analysis; Operations research; Decision support system; Product (mathematics); Data mining; Engineering; Machine learning; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.1519371297206755,"score_gpt":0.44209143358182734,"score_spread":0.2901543038611518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094298137","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02814439,0.00039206134,0.9671241,0.00045246084,0.00002902354,0.00020933872,0.00015632907,0.00008672087,0.003405588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59221673,0.0005451254,0.40512902,0.00013247418,0.000062828,0.0005320856,0.00029382174,0.000043831034,0.0010439726],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990445,0.0059121125,0.00046096373,0.0005873146,0.0022787116,0.00031585785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98796767,0.008916958,0.00092842296,0.00033823095,0.001593553,0.00025524048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009534586,0.0014874373,0.0013469139,0.004958924,0.0008488719,0.0037011167,0.0013497382,0.0012297613,0.0025474182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015911676,0.0008125613,0.0024697091,0.0027949733,0.0010981095,0.002000226,0.0019291415,0.0014145196,0.0002194611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008212911,0.00009268257,0.0024339426,0.00041677037,0.0002778583,0.00017970976,0.0002773611,0.90158206,0.0020798245,0.0441345,0.00063215016,0.04781106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000129444725,0.0000781108,0.00060326123,0.00007009959,0.000050185234,0.000039243707,0.000099626086,0.96638876,0.00053484377,0.031136505,0.00095147965,0.000034945944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004379479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004105956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009534586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003007075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026494598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050424278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094584901","doi":"10.1109/tfuzz.2020.3033062","title":"A Majority Rule-Based Measure for Atanassov-Type Intuitionistic Membership Grades in MCDM","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Mathematics; Type (biology); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Measure (data warehouse); Membership function; Notation; Selection (genetic algorithm); Fuzzy set; Computer science; Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence; Arithmetic; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.3224092961436115,"score_gpt":0.40052950920069513,"score_spread":0.07812021305708361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094584901","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012332854,0.00021843072,0.9845568,0.00018808834,0.000055067158,0.00007968994,0.000055868233,0.00008721216,0.0024259484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48020947,0.00024018806,0.5177562,0.0001398963,0.00008278897,0.00029696652,0.00017475736,0.00004187654,0.0010578248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843499,0.005943365,0.0014122021,0.002103667,0.0056288517,0.00056199124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99107295,0.0039126035,0.0011337803,0.0011545209,0.0024454508,0.00028060676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011259781,0.0010969547,0.0015647665,0.0035866348,0.0016320164,0.0038945042,0.0026403076,0.0015953864,0.001719031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03194206,0.00048696832,0.001692057,0.003097978,0.0026807243,0.005415929,0.0030689908,0.0023948322,0.00046261196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034821752,0.00019193042,0.0034743007,0.0005506222,0.00029337525,0.00017904936,0.0013484468,0.17263927,0.010866142,0.5134618,0.002512692,0.29413402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056173332,0.00026362695,0.0017289252,0.00018309872,0.00011181879,0.00017147206,0.00026898336,0.7369741,0.008623428,0.24611181,0.005362825,0.00014359487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015460256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014456882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011259781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022790702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013320943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05954814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096321907","doi":"10.3390/app10217591","title":"An Adaptive Bayesian Melding Method for Reliability Evaluation Via Limited Failure Data: An Application to the Servo Turret","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; People's Government of Jilin Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Changchun Science and Technology Planning Project; National Science and Technology Major Project; McMaster University","keywords":"Computer science; Reliability engineering; Reliability (semiconductor); Robustness (evolution); Bayesian probability; Data mining; Resampling; Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.3464720569236783,"score_gpt":0.5029810246991901,"score_spread":0.15650896777551188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096321907","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077013914,0.00008932279,0.99158585,0.00005543206,0.000009994728,0.000028040693,0.000015456564,0.00008839268,0.0004260984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31580412,0.0002490102,0.68175215,0.00008713822,0.000052101626,0.00018158706,0.00012501475,0.000060419872,0.0016884995],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882954,0.00054406805,0.00006226145,0.00021124215,0.00029859005,0.000054282937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732023,0.0018103397,0.00015822232,0.00011221728,0.00053469796,0.00006434136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037938734,0.0008018814,0.001077882,0.0013808847,0.0005323853,0.0007560433,0.0012037313,0.001167261,0.0016164121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070912023,0.0004690742,0.0007651245,0.0008602631,0.00064091344,0.0011636922,0.00086764613,0.001040487,0.00024098637],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002448552,0.00010015954,0.0015244507,0.00019168585,0.00009664342,0.00020549756,0.00026896264,0.78775465,0.008963917,0.01672334,0.00089192076,0.18303384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047942744,0.000019601452,0.00016208517,0.0000053676686,0.0000065014856,0.000012439411,0.000007925868,0.997451,0.0005585343,0.0014953131,0.00026710687,0.000009327329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004979261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048213084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004979261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069614174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000864588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020064175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096813063","doi":"10.1109/access.2020.3035906","title":"A Method Based on Bivariate Almost Stochastic Dominance for Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making With Probabilistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Information","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Access","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Mathematics; Bivariate analysis; Fuzzy logic; Stochastic dominance; Dual (grammatical number); Group decision-making; Fuzzy set; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.15750197623029932,"score_gpt":0.4429555813350046,"score_spread":0.2854536051047053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096813063","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00119053,0.00007442867,0.99796826,0.00004001639,0.000016660439,0.000029814386,0.000012527611,0.000022967693,0.0006447699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17605782,0.0005265759,0.82024723,0.00013441041,0.00011895185,0.00045970883,0.00013812046,0.000048751728,0.002268323],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626046,0.0017675419,0.00024750808,0.00042777558,0.0011334183,0.00016332723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980386,0.0010738143,0.00012627388,0.000106583844,0.0005744645,0.00008038522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037486067,0.001304014,0.001393854,0.002033785,0.00079625595,0.0014496911,0.0011938284,0.0009630003,0.002354189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065283887,0.00051297667,0.0019798873,0.0016662468,0.00082400773,0.0022179584,0.0019297714,0.001655989,0.0004012744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015756025,0.00013296919,0.0011057494,0.00066700357,0.00036184498,0.00030115142,0.00055102416,0.4145764,0.009976502,0.18906221,0.0027821911,0.3803254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027846892,0.00014516362,0.00026969175,0.000038723352,0.0000464752,0.00014794868,0.0000605416,0.94751936,0.0022234938,0.045744825,0.0037254076,0.000050406128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015083165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014671505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037486067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093564065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018091635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019824803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102178727","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2020.10.004","title":"ARAS-FUCOM approach for VPAF fighter aircraft selection","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Consistency (knowledge bases); Selection (genetic algorithm); Process (computing); Operations research; Computer science; Sensitivity (control systems); Risk analysis (engineering); Rank (graph theory); Management science; Engineering; Mathematics; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Business","score_opus":0.1923422896853643,"score_gpt":0.4168619421793106,"score_spread":0.22451965249394631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102178727","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020243475,0.0005617195,0.96922374,0.00019317915,0.000070918155,0.00018298296,0.00012029855,0.00016346922,0.009240255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34791842,0.0006407564,0.6452025,0.00012887795,0.000078593825,0.0005698582,0.0003178291,0.000053762455,0.0050893994],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732214,0.0011734671,0.00011169774,0.0002778226,0.0009226716,0.00019208562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989957,0.00058448495,0.00008071208,0.000056995246,0.0002515127,0.000030588348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002798492,0.0012832938,0.0014718552,0.004298251,0.0009519418,0.0013722968,0.0015089881,0.0013057366,0.005490087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004657068,0.0004926914,0.0022417894,0.0026338452,0.00048999256,0.0011428708,0.0014037645,0.0008743657,0.00041786177],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019072331,0.00015680245,0.0030976483,0.0005668544,0.0003097861,0.00039167612,0.00023847689,0.52107257,0.0028977874,0.056723725,0.0033532493,0.41100067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023356917,0.00017912067,0.00071395695,0.000060316088,0.000069802794,0.00023649838,0.000094291085,0.97599345,0.0010798543,0.016526418,0.0049926336,0.000030317844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033214048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004149009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005490087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088459195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015294388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018366218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102892898","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2020.10.001","title":"Aggregating the results of benevolent and aggressive models by the CRITIC method for ranking of decision-making units: A case study on seven biomass fuel briquettes generated from agricultural waste","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Data envelopment analysis; Briquette; Computer science; Rank (graph theory); Aggregate (composite); Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Mathematics; Machine learning; Engineering; Coal; Waste management","score_opus":0.139636842681228,"score_gpt":0.41199432590989793,"score_spread":0.2723574832286699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102892898","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44009584,0.00037288916,0.5511122,0.00044749049,0.000064306056,0.00028948474,0.0001137354,0.00014779344,0.007356284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89071095,0.00012639466,0.107895985,0.000025401141,0.00000971004,0.00013542837,0.000080380276,0.000023364593,0.0009924296],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932775,0.0043546357,0.00026772564,0.00032740302,0.0014211258,0.00035163274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923052,0.0053803897,0.00045088344,0.0003466077,0.0013351454,0.00018174476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010855138,0.0015102258,0.0011911216,0.0024986179,0.0010571278,0.0023531443,0.000775483,0.00103305,0.0010992074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011886314,0.0004521971,0.0017473343,0.0020645976,0.00097073504,0.0013507542,0.0012043627,0.0011847154,0.00014144358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035914042,0.00023256634,0.0070294626,0.0002772939,0.00019029128,0.0004084248,0.0005891641,0.903218,0.0032088754,0.010548062,0.00076989585,0.07316888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000193366,0.00015361262,0.0012769557,0.000022902395,0.000048768317,0.00004175085,0.00025745202,0.99281424,0.0019012021,0.0030319053,0.00039026022,0.000041729192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006367666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069309045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010855138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019717445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016411282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057408154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106288544","doi":"10.1109/tsmc.2020.3031086","title":"Integrating Continual Personalized Individual Semantics Learning in Consensus Reaching in Linguistic Group Decision Making","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Sichuan University; Southwest Jiaotong University; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Group decision-making; Semantics (computer science); Computer science; Process (computing); Preference; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Linguistics; Machine learning; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09993417933916073,"score_gpt":0.3545957332167583,"score_spread":0.2546615538775976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106288544","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036592364,0.00017409625,0.9602725,0.00034224807,0.000028380235,0.00006432874,0.000020785375,0.00013292956,0.0023722977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91765755,0.0001366522,0.08077822,0.00011358432,0.00003430847,0.00013947547,0.00004331343,0.000025203759,0.0010716016],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967732,0.0012594577,0.00019927257,0.00074526056,0.00077463733,0.0002482112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99279153,0.0043506273,0.000746854,0.00049630285,0.0013108766,0.00030378226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056458474,0.000751889,0.0012126518,0.001123848,0.0009800359,0.0015155287,0.002003117,0.001275803,0.0015288674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013738108,0.00041859772,0.00081366854,0.0010373624,0.00241636,0.003166581,0.0030119738,0.0018384341,0.00021614757],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012375374,0.00013202695,0.0030883413,0.00019373439,0.00011479674,0.00019003976,0.0008180843,0.83236694,0.001446914,0.07026739,0.00065171823,0.09060627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010238131,0.00006818768,0.0001812106,0.000009902801,0.000010778285,0.000023342434,0.00005625036,0.9652372,0.0003524443,0.03369758,0.0003373646,0.000015471327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004043522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032837149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056458474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015398426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020605333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02985841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107957514","doi":"10.1088/1742-6596/1707/1/012030","title":"Research on women’s career choice based on MADM with IFS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Physics Conference Series","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Computer science; Path (computing); Fuzzy logic; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.4757515708741897,"score_gpt":0.46913672137462625,"score_spread":0.006614849499563424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107957514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8244456,0.0005163713,0.15876709,0.0009952675,0.00006301464,0.0002385878,0.000226618,0.000046793637,0.01470068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765253,0.00009251005,0.022727767,0.00002426939,0.000010582377,0.000075466494,0.000066592846,0.0000026795665,0.00047483953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942731,0.0037636328,0.00024402831,0.00043491222,0.00089056464,0.00039362226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852903,0.0116394535,0.0011784974,0.00032390916,0.0010985234,0.00046922077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008903079,0.00065722695,0.00075351505,0.003517248,0.0008815738,0.0030331453,0.00091236894,0.00058524363,0.00328745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01810705,0.00023882206,0.0013408957,0.0027217953,0.001113776,0.0019944164,0.0010750506,0.0010657462,0.00015624762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011820787,0.0011115207,0.27166003,0.0010257955,0.0007700315,0.00064369466,0.006849955,0.20017299,0.0025771102,0.28377727,0.0024116866,0.22781795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044719567,0.00054844184,0.046416216,0.0002707067,0.00021632324,0.00020663888,0.006421297,0.8183486,0.0012266322,0.12304989,0.0031413177,0.000109263434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003401421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032191975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008903079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035675974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001412836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04708451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108053535","doi":"10.1109/tfuzz.2020.3041164","title":"Analysis of Acceptably Multiplicative Consistency and Consensus for Incomplete Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Multiplicative function; Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Property (philosophy); Interval (graph theory); Mathematics; Group decision-making; Mathematical optimization; Complete information; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2705239673590031,"score_gpt":0.3912109914322972,"score_spread":0.12068702407329412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108053535","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023446232,0.00013767381,0.9745281,0.00017067227,0.0000147423,0.00003778545,0.00003577512,0.000036768597,0.0015922732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76495653,0.00034953686,0.23257026,0.00009249778,0.00007280383,0.00023912948,0.00016330637,0.000044986322,0.001510983],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99178547,0.0037099614,0.0004700447,0.00127162,0.0023464106,0.0004163996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842795,0.010520212,0.0020114458,0.0008684781,0.0019625959,0.0003577373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010634901,0.0011767313,0.0016658106,0.0014761329,0.00081068586,0.0026457466,0.0020341936,0.001319325,0.0013816094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029154574,0.0007557941,0.001925071,0.0017071173,0.002140727,0.0041567273,0.0021595038,0.002468489,0.00016559512],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018163168,0.00007294051,0.0021336474,0.00033112528,0.00032769793,0.00047195677,0.00077344856,0.5251274,0.0032415006,0.43106994,0.00069677323,0.03557195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023393488,0.00007605137,0.00031570357,0.000024535462,0.0000451541,0.000081011094,0.000074391166,0.84839916,0.00092993263,0.14944951,0.0005514291,0.000029697881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002187599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011732717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010634901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001918831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021061723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05624342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108069106","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2020.11.002","title":"Application of the fuzzy clusterwise generalized structured component method to evaluate implementation of national education standard in Indonesia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goodness of fit; Accreditation; Path analysis (statistics); Structural equation modeling; Latent variable; Cluster (spacecraft); Statistics; Econometrics; Fuzzy logic; Component (thermodynamics); Variance components; Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08886408219928368,"score_gpt":0.4611828408792482,"score_spread":0.37231875867996456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108069106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75628453,0.00040517387,0.23481306,0.0002332868,0.00008777337,0.00089880574,0.0004235026,0.00025802566,0.006595791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9043228,0.00014006221,0.094507426,0.000017600447,0.000008642625,0.00027718017,0.00026943607,0.000013677182,0.00044306763],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959521,0.0019434015,0.00031449544,0.00031143526,0.0012875012,0.00019102727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960783,0.0017874544,0.00033037193,0.00014312028,0.0015545425,0.00010623369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048502106,0.00058269646,0.00083004707,0.003880084,0.0007431439,0.0016285077,0.000733655,0.000476169,0.0010595496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009052522,0.00019558554,0.0008601759,0.0039936947,0.0005405709,0.0006180972,0.0006264127,0.00047608704,0.00008509977],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015812728,0.0008630789,0.19916043,0.0009232772,0.0010011457,0.00052981416,0.0048741805,0.2129601,0.009011488,0.013634207,0.0037225091,0.55173856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000553155,0.00044408801,0.10677848,0.00011620381,0.00018550163,0.00009757543,0.0029502218,0.8788355,0.0037030268,0.0050025606,0.0017172237,0.00011429775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020823173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01820282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020823173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001701422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026905164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04140395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112602384","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-18-2020-989","title":"Extension of VIKOR Method for MCDM Under Bipolar Fuzzy Set","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"VIKOR method; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Extension (predicate logic); Ranking (information retrieval); Fuzzy logic; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Fuzzy set; Compromise; Operations research; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.20701681711855058,"score_gpt":0.5037174762330056,"score_spread":0.296700659114455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112602384","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013844065,0.0004309632,0.9939195,0.00010917171,0.000067718225,0.000080557,0.000026351312,0.000045031018,0.003936294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.102628395,0.0015754519,0.8917474,0.00016568182,0.000108631604,0.00036877656,0.000105969535,0.000072392206,0.0032273268],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977423,0.001110256,0.00011215242,0.0002055027,0.00074071443,0.00008904799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992042,0.00038069714,0.000057431193,0.00006219803,0.00026841366,0.00002718169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023392309,0.0010101652,0.0011827529,0.002249103,0.0007394306,0.0011342501,0.0014457088,0.0010314505,0.00394033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035872327,0.00042098478,0.0014367466,0.0018020723,0.0007094017,0.0014197173,0.0011848335,0.0014399375,0.00086717133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013388287,0.00010585867,0.0008650817,0.0012730928,0.00024627047,0.00043317862,0.0006500958,0.23812106,0.010801521,0.31892186,0.0049691843,0.423479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078064186,0.00016022513,0.00044652037,0.00023698513,0.00006242753,0.00050083606,0.00012055653,0.846815,0.0026692182,0.11540452,0.033437524,0.00006808197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026272845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020568215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00394033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068017404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010044733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013181746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112772891","doi":"10.1109/tcyb.2020.3035909","title":"A Differential Evolution-Based Consistency Improvement Method in AHP With an Optimal Allocation of Information Granularity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; University of Alberta","keywords":"Granularity; Consistency (knowledge bases); Analytic hierarchy process; Reciprocal; Pairwise comparison; Matrix (chemical analysis); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Process (computing); Reliability (semiconductor); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Operations research","score_opus":0.0714746244694055,"score_gpt":0.3551026907999575,"score_spread":0.283628066330552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112772891","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048614712,0.00008267799,0.99406624,0.0000547013,0.000017090164,0.000057279092,0.000011828148,0.000079355574,0.0007693853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26896873,0.00016279584,0.7293719,0.000077154946,0.0000344951,0.00035246188,0.00007811789,0.000060294176,0.0008939991],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971921,0.0011114676,0.00014980935,0.0003284546,0.0010778857,0.00014039196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820936,0.0010078272,0.00016260661,0.00011602144,0.00045227338,0.00005192344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004067647,0.0007048045,0.0011549405,0.0012797705,0.0008280863,0.0011825901,0.0016188279,0.0008401001,0.0012858424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00589489,0.00050079275,0.0012023522,0.0018401281,0.0006803961,0.0011593506,0.0018564139,0.0014610627,0.00017803196],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014044036,0.000120416116,0.001059534,0.00029008897,0.00012419092,0.00013517938,0.000485623,0.77526605,0.008644098,0.025239453,0.0010073985,0.1874876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016286975,0.00004641728,0.00009652185,0.000012960784,0.000015677047,0.000022967635,0.000019355894,0.9947332,0.0011587389,0.0032682067,0.00059948815,0.000010112918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00338238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002095861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004067647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086151366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015321749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021512032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115843551","doi":"10.1108/dta-07-2020-0154","title":"Assessment of national innovation capabilities of OECD countries using trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy ELECTRE III method","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Technologies and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"ELECTRE; Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy set; Fuzzy logic; Originality; Value (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Operations research; Computer science; Mathematics; Data mining; Actuarial science; Statistics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Social science; Sociology","score_opus":0.33265751442714514,"score_gpt":0.5056090366198612,"score_spread":0.1729515221927161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115843551","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27194503,0.00085871853,0.6750494,0.00055860454,0.00013947439,0.0006521808,0.0011366433,0.00029771053,0.0493622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8526453,0.00034811528,0.14380644,0.00004409052,0.000012817888,0.00033309008,0.00040612687,0.000013305281,0.002390737],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884593,0.0004004626,0.00012033807,0.00012328065,0.00040863917,0.00010122171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862766,0.00065325754,0.00016293884,0.00005604635,0.00046088954,0.000039131734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019183268,0.0006017181,0.0005011296,0.0041670254,0.00055123284,0.0021298442,0.0006058984,0.00052796403,0.0023365226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036959294,0.00016951369,0.0014736862,0.002271628,0.00042248913,0.0006870381,0.0007230359,0.00046169804,0.00015303907],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005110016,0.00019518941,0.044201378,0.0012020402,0.0005159228,0.0010216441,0.0017029424,0.5650135,0.008696166,0.05760802,0.006238209,0.31309393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044936864,0.00024346446,0.019924294,0.00031623335,0.00018870221,0.0003812471,0.0035750323,0.9363898,0.0076529062,0.02108031,0.010072274,0.00013076008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056917816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042431946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056917816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001339278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010266609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011317253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115966624","doi":"10.17684/i12a167ro","title":"Haosul hazardului sau cosmosul determinismului?","year":2020,"lang":"ro","type":"article","venue":"Diacronia","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association for the Study of Adult Education","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.33476328165107466,"score_gpt":0.42360615952076125,"score_spread":0.08884287786968659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115966624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29058054,0.0331206,0.30434814,0.0550602,0.0013717116,0.00036561085,0.0011388256,0.0002889332,0.31372547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959876,0.006693116,0.01857366,0.0016500849,0.00040286029,0.00012361494,0.00013621357,0.000041804415,0.012502652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665254,0.0012454788,0.00012288718,0.0008133361,0.0007083153,0.00045743113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948708,0.002981848,0.00078751193,0.00044896078,0.00065375416,0.00025724384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004448171,0.0007100259,0.001007547,0.0013748582,0.0012785108,0.0073454925,0.0010235411,0.0016488315,0.008658123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010607337,0.00040708116,0.00065114157,0.0013930391,0.0051178914,0.006338639,0.0019867036,0.0018069707,0.0012224994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019881601,0.00028931504,0.04908592,0.001287309,0.00043666313,0.0007188162,0.0032561682,0.009343396,0.0034709976,0.6840758,0.0055367923,0.24229997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023850136,0.00020798422,0.027619258,0.00095359253,0.00014427752,0.0007696089,0.010430051,0.010721637,0.0030177361,0.8528863,0.09307554,0.00014999683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003944223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005198161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008658123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025337974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029542868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028964281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117342589","doi":"10.1007/s11336-020-09733-2","title":"Global Least Squares Path Modeling: A Full-Information Alternative to Partial Least Squares Path Modeling","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychometrika","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Partial least squares regression; Least-squares function approximation; Path (computing); Component (thermodynamics); Generalized least squares; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Non-linear least squares; Structural equation modeling; Path analysis (statistics); Algorithm; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Estimation theory","score_opus":0.24773196530982647,"score_gpt":0.42662272904878584,"score_spread":0.17889076373895937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117342589","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025406072,0.0001053513,0.996427,0.00009860633,0.000015829037,0.000047036458,0.000064049425,0.00013187788,0.00056965684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11471979,0.0003148282,0.882225,0.00012253594,0.00005563645,0.00039991384,0.0003353231,0.00018098866,0.0016460845],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955603,0.003067249,0.00010654136,0.0005567171,0.0005940859,0.00011507702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949004,0.0034841632,0.0004092951,0.00065368385,0.00045542943,0.00009704104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043821596,0.00158962,0.0013855505,0.0015027468,0.0005450093,0.001307495,0.0018813547,0.0011994055,0.005498761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01593061,0.0005744392,0.0014676551,0.0025980214,0.0011419893,0.002840976,0.002204665,0.0021216301,0.0008975954],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017326644,0.0001716245,0.00311726,0.0005685209,0.0005392083,0.00016736097,0.00073122577,0.29305553,0.002410868,0.25069875,0.0053046513,0.44306177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003954795,0.00013424488,0.00094157225,0.000061566796,0.00007074755,0.00007935805,0.00008126514,0.81876767,0.0008763848,0.17396957,0.004925598,0.000052482286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026937246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042098733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005498761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000566452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022734585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023175359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118310655","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2020.11.007","title":"Nearest solution to references method for multicriteria decision-making problems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Range (aeronautics); Mathematics; Value (mathematics); Decision maker; Computer science; Ordinal Scale; Interval (graph theory); Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.18811936328080392,"score_gpt":0.49329604068432636,"score_spread":0.30517667740352244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118310655","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012752741,0.0002457904,0.9972012,0.00007313079,0.00003470333,0.000049658203,0.000022429653,0.00008137575,0.0010164569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05983736,0.0003962386,0.9376134,0.00011264113,0.0000555704,0.00035715915,0.00014923037,0.00006449243,0.0014139537],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99378103,0.0036435176,0.00028742512,0.0006295394,0.0014843338,0.00017425086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950846,0.003291275,0.00029502023,0.00025031835,0.00096907094,0.00010980117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064899325,0.0012596612,0.0021808385,0.0033580365,0.0012803314,0.0017482452,0.0027193232,0.0025717805,0.005202244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019075925,0.0005848068,0.0016380183,0.0031891828,0.0013776848,0.0023549618,0.0024384789,0.0023379016,0.0010159841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019212916,0.000110320805,0.0008082092,0.00089931674,0.00017618576,0.00023744997,0.000763023,0.4650103,0.0023695568,0.18690708,0.0052393014,0.33728707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034188175,0.00009369173,0.00014097978,0.000093845534,0.000031097978,0.00010212585,0.00008920531,0.9146493,0.00092937396,0.0749206,0.008871829,0.000043772154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004142831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040434105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064899325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010830124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019709235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03432244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119395891","doi":"10.1007/s10726-020-09719-6","title":"Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in a Graphical Approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Pairwise comparison; Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Set (abstract data type); Stability (learning theory); Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Data mining; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Operations research; Statistics","score_opus":0.09060253877963814,"score_gpt":0.4046849358571534,"score_spread":0.3140823970775153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119395891","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00275588,0.00015245627,0.99237,0.00027088632,0.00004536092,0.000057793626,0.00009442909,0.00020488897,0.0040483004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.208204,0.0004794231,0.7873645,0.00015525763,0.00007064211,0.00030099918,0.0001945674,0.000081735,0.0031489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973145,0.0018466309,0.00010000115,0.00016091269,0.00046859295,0.000109424545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974292,0.001848407,0.00015287341,0.00014170661,0.00032867966,0.00009917445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027498312,0.00073442765,0.0010095128,0.0025236486,0.0008562278,0.003261361,0.0011370709,0.0012532598,0.0077484944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007940886,0.00045259728,0.0013529577,0.0022580686,0.0012179787,0.002293349,0.0015847597,0.0012637603,0.00110589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014782754,0.00008507346,0.00033722504,0.00035005546,0.00012361858,0.00027655694,0.00045361885,0.18188727,0.0028936893,0.72344005,0.0033856477,0.08661941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006401509,0.00006370103,0.00016326757,0.00009409061,0.0000788964,0.00007219325,0.00011845175,0.6128027,0.0013106164,0.3767421,0.00845135,0.000038689243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039668363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036116692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077484944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011989293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016968708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025921285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119812748","doi":"","title":"Multiple perspective consequence of failure estimation of subway stations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Estimation; Geography; Computer science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.13540573092285302,"score_gpt":0.4320895407327714,"score_spread":0.2966838098099184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119812748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6635024,0.0003383976,0.33096147,0.0004339276,0.0000768872,0.000077724704,0.00037920315,0.000120162615,0.004109781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917848,0.00005415895,0.0075743054,0.000010757955,0.000012160728,0.000013132328,0.000104215454,0.0000064948385,0.00043990265],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753785,0.00076584774,0.000110143585,0.00041943227,0.00070580555,0.00046103224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99160516,0.005401924,0.00084110204,0.00027479776,0.0015245198,0.00035256476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038199103,0.0010881071,0.0012688937,0.002396286,0.0008109814,0.0021539356,0.0012662659,0.0014298265,0.0022297916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010774845,0.00044205663,0.0018328016,0.0015536597,0.00079295906,0.001457895,0.0011067811,0.0009066201,0.00011914451],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077506015,0.00011778138,0.050158627,0.00023705207,0.00041067813,0.0014967256,0.0004020457,0.9026016,0.003472034,0.010453035,0.0008471178,0.029028194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015487665,0.00015364216,0.017310174,0.000022876538,0.00020888298,0.00013369034,0.0003022638,0.9721637,0.0016247164,0.007792427,0.00022620925,0.00004580296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009488796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071964725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009488796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017348173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013290351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020201862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120785167","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1730","title":"A disaggregation approach for indirect preference elicitation in Electre <scp>TRI‐nC</scp>: Application and validation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"ELECTRE; Sorting; Pairwise comparison; Robustness (evolution); Preference; Preference elicitation; Computer science; Decision maker; Credibility; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Algorithm","score_opus":0.16882289800080064,"score_gpt":0.4272772082113002,"score_spread":0.2584543102104996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120785167","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1164747,0.00009626196,0.87930846,0.00014844422,0.000021165335,0.0004973304,0.00028992706,0.0004762889,0.0026873702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53334326,0.00005805219,0.4650534,0.000060901566,0.00000618878,0.000631006,0.00026441156,0.00003155033,0.00055132597],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895159,0.0075529967,0.00046028406,0.00056933734,0.0017109287,0.00019061522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9613395,0.028483842,0.001524471,0.0028335059,0.0054794424,0.0003393454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013947006,0.0008262919,0.00092310936,0.0020559966,0.0006991422,0.0012248683,0.00082509906,0.000833299,0.0032652977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03384045,0.0003837693,0.0007506862,0.0025311077,0.0007971408,0.0009789924,0.0020923116,0.0015818035,0.00035567387],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009391184,0.00060112943,0.007085985,0.0007065704,0.00033807455,0.00014028994,0.0011212598,0.6474973,0.01048961,0.0127487695,0.0014662513,0.31686562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028480981,0.000103494036,0.0013739797,0.000022485832,0.000010220848,0.00002072063,0.000077561075,0.9936879,0.002331367,0.0018260417,0.00050161034,0.000016136428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008445336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047517144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013947006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015243008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016403955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073759735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122390601","doi":"","title":"Ranking by Rating","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Monotonic function; Separable space; Rank (graph theory); Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Invariant (physics); Function (biology); Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.1866511084406737,"score_gpt":0.4678314338056866,"score_spread":0.2811803253650129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122390601","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019452672,0.001958077,0.92450136,0.0014276765,0.00039445324,0.0012004615,0.0014032891,0.0009761993,0.04868587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24611014,0.0020275845,0.72693336,0.00034686396,0.00054829556,0.0012370051,0.0027860685,0.00039416057,0.019616552],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9654894,0.017813709,0.002031794,0.003780629,0.010029671,0.00085486873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96931064,0.012234737,0.0025328149,0.00897868,0.0059994743,0.0009437377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01451693,0.002143955,0.003011391,0.005150907,0.0012370074,0.0062951464,0.002437404,0.0014209442,0.016950743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053667955,0.00056891417,0.0016632149,0.006269938,0.0020011712,0.00627343,0.0034621204,0.0019687037,0.006083577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034556168,0.0002995825,0.0062361234,0.001408647,0.0005340875,0.00016155746,0.0008412559,0.02510976,0.002712646,0.33638296,0.037406184,0.5885616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019410776,0.0008711817,0.0074201124,0.00052554236,0.00026173715,0.0008976881,0.0012890191,0.19832066,0.004855766,0.64071155,0.14433333,0.00031933276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015144589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018905165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016950743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018614986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021802927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07677382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123133844","doi":"","title":"Relative Uncertainty Aversion and Additively Representable Set Rankings","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Ranking (information retrieval); Class (philosophy); Ambiguity aversion; Mathematics; Context (archaeology); Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Risk aversion (psychology); Econometrics; Economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.16800232811797983,"score_gpt":0.4405953414078725,"score_spread":0.27259301328989266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123133844","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0491327,0.0004981741,0.9297844,0.0013752929,0.000096205644,0.000079037345,0.0001411142,0.00009297062,0.01880012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7732488,0.0004967002,0.22098061,0.00040222777,0.00023985683,0.00026461863,0.0002313532,0.00004464814,0.0040912437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986548,0.0063675484,0.0007354005,0.0013059736,0.004317101,0.0007259409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981931,0.011119308,0.0023440348,0.0019272697,0.0019268838,0.00075157505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008180057,0.0010015424,0.0012578556,0.0021622572,0.0010888552,0.0048653553,0.001576483,0.0015413469,0.0029107856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026603406,0.0005421436,0.0015239278,0.001721272,0.004407947,0.0059314547,0.0029891988,0.004226999,0.00040391582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002324593,0.000027152997,0.00025424978,0.000041038842,0.000039938706,0.000038910377,0.000138176,0.016292227,0.00047818638,0.97333646,0.0003715573,0.008958897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010465494,0.00003219832,0.00016891514,0.00002187652,0.000011469983,0.000044002245,0.000041507334,0.030962352,0.000412396,0.96655387,0.0017216613,0.000019322319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063360896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006267856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008180057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020240105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011935983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043260753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125147143","doi":"","title":"Rationalizability of Choice Functions on General Domains without Full Transitivity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Transitive relation; Rationalizability; Mathematics; Relation (database); Element (criminal law); Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Pure mathematics; Mathematical economics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Evolutionary biology; Nash equilibrium","score_opus":0.15488925699050504,"score_gpt":0.42426043521369444,"score_spread":0.2693711782231894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125147143","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23112899,0.0010168761,0.7250447,0.004146038,0.00008745231,0.00026170435,0.0010746022,0.0004963189,0.0367433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434697,0.00074995146,0.048084132,0.00046057111,0.00020865159,0.0004764802,0.00095660036,0.00014569855,0.0054481435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98400396,0.0066919117,0.001142072,0.0042844,0.002268304,0.0016094111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88876355,0.09038306,0.0057561393,0.008227867,0.00508534,0.0017840958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017139534,0.0014501308,0.0031297763,0.0040429803,0.0012373326,0.006588342,0.0020750358,0.002444011,0.00789331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064765416,0.001311461,0.004432513,0.0029521806,0.00834204,0.01470532,0.0053000622,0.006213355,0.00076054304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016301035,0.000058552745,0.0010143198,0.000127657,0.00009558386,0.00015994773,0.0002746932,0.018082205,0.00058729073,0.9723422,0.00061528204,0.0064793658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035632493,0.000023530223,0.00022493576,0.000015052548,0.00001402482,0.00003880392,0.00004203105,0.031843748,0.0002108595,0.96727455,0.00026666833,0.000010123456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028053683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001485902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017139534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042806407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021637483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090643644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125560278","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2021.107103","title":"Dual hesitant fuzzy decision making in optimization models","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Multiplicative function; Consistency (knowledge bases); Dual (grammatical number); Group decision-making; Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy logic; Basis (linear algebra); Computer science; Mathematics; Preference; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.17461104079852222,"score_gpt":0.35307210548590484,"score_spread":0.17846106468738263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125560278","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024476768,0.0009019424,0.9683793,0.0005341302,0.000102519596,0.00003479021,0.00004910559,0.00002806857,0.005493406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8562358,0.0008593553,0.13454379,0.0001410039,0.00017114925,0.00018348785,0.00008157256,0.000033947443,0.0077498658],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961055,0.0029498516,0.00011673816,0.0002581166,0.0003955428,0.00017420929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99188,0.006656903,0.00042040268,0.0002017119,0.00056840596,0.00027265344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070407228,0.0010709638,0.0023857143,0.0013079952,0.0008051651,0.003997382,0.0018544304,0.0020889174,0.002697501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012188637,0.0010892738,0.0011307482,0.00152549,0.002534658,0.0033220174,0.0018358887,0.0024785898,0.00024457465],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001487177,0.00010318324,0.00024769764,0.00021545429,0.00014784181,0.00013185423,0.00013552154,0.71861035,0.00044565497,0.27068466,0.0006236871,0.008505425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011561715,0.000023465731,0.000033374054,0.000017417824,0.00001548971,0.000010738764,0.000017648454,0.9084998,0.00016699637,0.09090916,0.00028428397,0.000010058278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017789132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015283638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070407228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022041071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013924536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03723538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127542994","doi":"10.1007/s13042-020-01269-2","title":"Novel fusion strategies for continuous interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy information: a case study in quality assessment of SmartWatch appearance design","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China; City University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Operator (biology); Computational intelligence; Generalization; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Mathematics; Interval (graph theory); Computer science; Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Fuzzy number; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.13515901205995826,"score_gpt":0.46135541332035307,"score_spread":0.32619640126039484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127542994","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030578684,0.0003926972,0.9662259,0.000111195775,0.000028735287,0.000069669535,0.000028427417,0.000112348156,0.002452357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8373541,0.00019585733,0.16106616,0.00005409571,0.000021268273,0.000050815604,0.000049986003,0.000022788867,0.0011850025],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863297,0.00033960812,0.00010846116,0.00022899735,0.00053609913,0.00015383745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981811,0.0008920274,0.00015198959,0.00012331203,0.0005879904,0.000063661886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003242841,0.0007887874,0.0011565401,0.0012604635,0.00078232307,0.0020070767,0.0011818762,0.0011859388,0.0019031696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041996725,0.00024547175,0.0011159324,0.001210845,0.0006495991,0.0019174307,0.0013295544,0.0009399851,0.00027280822],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072677765,0.00037124133,0.0022123323,0.00048423363,0.00025735452,0.00084691425,0.0011761296,0.4099705,0.040961564,0.06968923,0.0019066242,0.47139707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018483848,0.00021079577,0.0006547872,0.000031368618,0.00006304021,0.00013742104,0.00013033526,0.97623515,0.005060307,0.016404506,0.0010239303,0.000029820541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003236846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025925632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003242841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000954252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007507152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017149985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127656770","doi":"10.1108/imds-09-2020-0518","title":"Inventory classification system in space mission component replenishment using multi-attribute fuzzy ABC classification","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Management & Data Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Purchasing; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Space (punctuation); Component (thermodynamics); Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Industrial engineering; Operations management; Engineering","score_opus":0.7235294339796781,"score_gpt":0.46976273995318424,"score_spread":0.2537666940264938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127656770","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08719317,0.00047556174,0.89631736,0.00044013807,0.00013759156,0.0005224152,0.0005183666,0.0010663613,0.013329175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6948906,0.00037048088,0.29950354,0.00008163943,0.00003562691,0.0003114555,0.0007908413,0.000035717403,0.0039799805],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980398,0.00035655516,0.00026643794,0.0002124253,0.0009776317,0.00014730387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819595,0.00030626458,0.00017346446,0.0001285572,0.0011302247,0.00006552861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015325674,0.0005995101,0.0007399646,0.003588752,0.0011415672,0.0032077848,0.0011823407,0.00080977095,0.0033976696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038068264,0.0002565699,0.0008158801,0.0029204504,0.0004748927,0.0015333381,0.0007425588,0.000697228,0.0006290193],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040546164,0.0003073475,0.024771214,0.00042746408,0.00012779837,0.00037359612,0.00072064676,0.28682497,0.00808578,0.02380966,0.0074118944,0.6467342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018744147,0.00008259845,0.004536086,0.000056647994,0.000041783198,0.000102728896,0.00019972278,0.9828372,0.0029600146,0.004497701,0.0046333447,0.000033474826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02436751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010396068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02436751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024967396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001729021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048451364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127784503","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-7564-2.ch012","title":"Fuzzy Reliability Theory","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in systems analysis, software engineering, and high performance computing book series","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Regional science; Reliability (semiconductor); Bibliometrics; Fuzzy logic; Field (mathematics); Political science; Library science; Geography; Social science; Operations research; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.020142134626294047,"score_gpt":0.28994827395334694,"score_spread":0.2698061393270529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127784503","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011635684,0.014356602,0.78226286,0.0031881423,0.0008317916,0.00013859704,0.0005348702,0.00027677236,0.18677472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7328082,0.021967858,0.18643829,0.0011224512,0.0020691033,0.00051564624,0.00080953527,0.00014325604,0.0541258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749964,0.00072848034,0.00013513734,0.00036021796,0.0011018602,0.0001747905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959699,0.0022332354,0.00031224915,0.00035280234,0.0010404384,0.00009145051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027589826,0.0009750108,0.001189464,0.0028787723,0.0012486564,0.002963526,0.0012515961,0.0013076189,0.009784485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007912777,0.00039589228,0.0013730021,0.0022270933,0.0020211807,0.0028324919,0.0012813421,0.0015406411,0.0025045625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016025224,0.000019884154,0.0004187436,0.0001840255,0.000045723107,0.000083231884,0.00020227635,0.022526149,0.00038514382,0.92787284,0.005848937,0.042397097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008001128,0.000040565938,0.0004388569,0.00012991775,0.000024724444,0.00020597919,0.00012972226,0.05495434,0.0003034358,0.90856344,0.035171084,0.000029831166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029206073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011635697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009784485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027615146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001156674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032732368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132686745","doi":"10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103578","title":"Expertise-based bid evaluation for construction-contractor selection with generalized comparative linguistic ELECTRE III","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Automation in Construction","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"ELECTRE; Selection (genetic algorithm); Process (computing); Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Computer science; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Engineering","score_opus":0.17190523792390283,"score_gpt":0.4475848583406495,"score_spread":0.27567962041674665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132686745","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1390201,0.00036063226,0.8518057,0.0003019455,0.000055170363,0.00029559774,0.00015384245,0.00034939745,0.007657595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9075651,0.00007091146,0.090254895,0.000049142265,0.00003181344,0.00015435401,0.0001938324,0.000029026027,0.0016509068],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957294,0.0023324802,0.00020365712,0.00044981408,0.00094912125,0.00033543934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992845,0.0049699536,0.00023141356,0.0003012077,0.001421144,0.00023137494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006871398,0.0008374645,0.0018667236,0.0045340518,0.0010128331,0.0019666539,0.0014409464,0.0012572076,0.0041927663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017118597,0.00039023094,0.00095781713,0.0022422352,0.0009123316,0.0019417271,0.0019180183,0.00069142325,0.00031176192],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012754496,0.0005341707,0.008619612,0.0004442462,0.00036942257,0.0004435261,0.0005868033,0.6101077,0.004104276,0.03628388,0.0043750047,0.33285597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021287653,0.00006394228,0.00090064225,0.00001279092,0.000027492735,0.000031682932,0.00006130472,0.992964,0.00039925927,0.0052373395,0.0002655219,0.000014671241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063454662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044540702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006871398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016144671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001701738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03633988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134067454","doi":"10.1142/s0219622021500152","title":"Integrated Ranking Algorithm for Efficient Decision Making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Rank (graph theory); Computer science; TOPSIS; Grey relational analysis; Categorization; Weighted sum model; Selection (genetic algorithm); Data mining; Algorithm; Machine learning; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Influence diagram; Decision tree; Statistics","score_opus":0.04191964726753817,"score_gpt":0.40279348231332274,"score_spread":0.3608738350457846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134067454","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001371454,0.00023807488,0.99619436,0.00006516487,0.000023891836,0.00009253055,0.000049721406,0.00035068893,0.0016140463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07461678,0.00042498624,0.92198485,0.00008310165,0.000041583902,0.0005827425,0.00032033803,0.000103122555,0.0018424129],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535406,0.0020045214,0.00037596014,0.00062027364,0.0013602948,0.00028486774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782264,0.0011787884,0.00018892864,0.00015395044,0.00059522525,0.000060481405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004863061,0.0018577796,0.0029947034,0.0037635039,0.0011123763,0.0031529313,0.0018456532,0.0015151981,0.008108731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064391517,0.00079771073,0.0020818254,0.004403887,0.00074453355,0.0021448326,0.0021008772,0.0019773007,0.002483336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012055394,0.00012616509,0.000682057,0.0004229713,0.0002350237,0.000098991106,0.00013858243,0.5393718,0.0018485641,0.04367201,0.0046861693,0.4085971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003592299,0.00008500712,0.00016705718,0.000040479616,0.000041321364,0.000050504113,0.000030430572,0.97128534,0.0006564781,0.023353918,0.0042340145,0.000019502848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00377762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002897766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008108731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015138643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002950679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027126431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134190073","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1742","title":"<scp>TSMAA‐TRI</scp>: A temporal multi‐criteria sorting approach under uncertainty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Sorting; Context (archaeology); Computer science; sort; Generalization; Index (typography); Mathematical optimization; Monte Carlo method; Operations research; Mathematics; Statistics; Algorithm; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.20082180735145602,"score_gpt":0.45017587130958786,"score_spread":0.24935406395813184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134190073","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009757066,0.00020890383,0.98301893,0.00046264363,0.00005673184,0.00029331262,0.0002425234,0.00026510895,0.00569465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24484229,0.0002568586,0.7491848,0.0002206965,0.000092406575,0.00071330625,0.00046771514,0.0001103222,0.0041115936],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938008,0.0032625783,0.00042963252,0.0004991623,0.0016958574,0.0003118652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909496,0.0046207486,0.0006748842,0.00040625548,0.0029957746,0.00035277545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008623391,0.001060793,0.0014692505,0.0046964036,0.0015718275,0.0030170884,0.001350722,0.00127283,0.0070305453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013251386,0.00049820455,0.0021900588,0.0047144946,0.0013693254,0.002383644,0.0017145077,0.0019446568,0.0007725474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020364374,0.0002992307,0.0029094173,0.0006305244,0.00032914028,0.00030543676,0.0005555994,0.56371176,0.0031531425,0.108653314,0.0068482873,0.31240052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014983314,0.00009980588,0.0007182125,0.00007980024,0.000027322567,0.00005848185,0.0001913361,0.94430727,0.0011598483,0.049025588,0.0042828084,0.000034519995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018528836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0211577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018528836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039028174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005640948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04560542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134743486","doi":"10.1155/2021/6678056","title":"Assessment of Near-Earth Asteroid Deflection Techniques via Spherical Fuzzy Sets","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Astronomy","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; Jet Propulsion Laboratory; Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Università di Pisa; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; University of Toronto; Langley Research Center; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades; European Space Agency; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Fundación Séneca; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"TOPSIS; Deflection (physics); Fuzzy logic; Ideal solution; Asteroid; Fuzzy set; Physics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Operations research; Classical mechanics; Astrobiology","score_opus":0.055503123181268765,"score_gpt":0.44456982583394916,"score_spread":0.3890667026526804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134743486","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24735405,0.0010532305,0.7392513,0.0003217503,0.000048951537,0.00028163835,0.00019001741,0.00012386244,0.011375193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90647703,0.0004862594,0.09227961,0.000021344627,0.000018739489,0.00006356911,0.00011725011,0.000005438638,0.0005307905],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956201,0.0017899056,0.0003830377,0.00031916855,0.0017253315,0.00016246577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946412,0.0024624385,0.00090246374,0.00022945229,0.0016152433,0.00014921566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058285384,0.0006767439,0.0005931219,0.0035670178,0.00040997038,0.0021883661,0.0005793027,0.00048382368,0.0010742934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010891952,0.00014972786,0.001322601,0.0020232447,0.0007123869,0.0015292736,0.0009394989,0.00050306646,0.0002103122],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089687994,0.00025041425,0.029900804,0.0008198346,0.0004622809,0.00039878555,0.0020024106,0.34839785,0.023627043,0.07558453,0.0012221838,0.51643693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003926734,0.0010456841,0.021131061,0.00027249422,0.0001911409,0.00040271232,0.0026229431,0.8997759,0.013724398,0.0557064,0.004957697,0.00013027742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026817967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025630263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058285384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011462785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094850705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030824661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135355984","doi":"10.1007/s10726-021-09728-z","title":"Group Decision-Based Construction of Scenarios for Multicriteria Analysis in Conditions of Uncertainty on the Basis of Quantitative and Qualitative Information","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Vale Canada Limited","keywords":"Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Basis (linear algebra); Group decision-making; Data mining; Qualitative analysis; Complete information; Management science; Qualitative research; Operations research; Mathematics; Engineering; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.10536392321985671,"score_gpt":0.4351156819622394,"score_spread":0.32975175874238266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135355984","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02103678,0.00004515759,0.9760389,0.000112824724,0.000013723973,0.00022260715,0.00008177897,0.00007804252,0.002370207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40871948,0.00008859145,0.58950686,0.000029888655,0.000013932561,0.0008503826,0.0003105195,0.00004516294,0.00043519432],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99443626,0.0042831046,0.00020901255,0.00027831356,0.0006092081,0.00018414833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99031866,0.0077723623,0.0004405407,0.00055764336,0.0006071923,0.0003035607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074161617,0.001098033,0.0012491109,0.0030936925,0.0012391442,0.0022657025,0.0016168507,0.0013530821,0.0049372637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01780594,0.0007838036,0.0021511335,0.0021302486,0.0017918753,0.003149238,0.002866709,0.0015399702,0.00034160932],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018048353,0.00010890464,0.001253306,0.0001958865,0.00011204277,0.00035230044,0.0008637534,0.7329651,0.0018181517,0.2291724,0.0006083071,0.032369442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001902773,0.000040015864,0.00011382741,0.00003709346,0.000019983874,0.000038719736,0.00011206567,0.888283,0.0005430679,0.10999748,0.00077880884,0.000016894941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012388958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013763806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074161617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013747155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017059962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03922087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153162649","doi":"10.5267/j.jpm.2021.4.002","title":"Prioritizing risk events of a large hydroelectric project using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Project Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Hydroelectricity; Vagueness; Euclidean distance; Rank (graph theory); Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.15183965803785865,"score_gpt":0.48126620760107713,"score_spread":0.3294265495632185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153162649","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3397741,0.00036073037,0.65467703,0.000389012,0.000028561955,0.00057986286,0.0001346985,0.00011690817,0.0039390884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83559763,0.00027694934,0.1632545,0.0000167255,0.000019273859,0.0002180565,0.00009474611,0.000009281238,0.00051289995],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963399,0.001553747,0.00024814164,0.00026304985,0.0013497114,0.00024544212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952173,0.0030902126,0.00060006,0.00007419972,0.00081959204,0.00019870781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052977423,0.0008773985,0.00093995593,0.0040309806,0.0011756915,0.0028370977,0.0007699229,0.00076033943,0.0008930651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009799372,0.00039454852,0.0012570363,0.00242456,0.00057646533,0.0017116788,0.001313475,0.0008876874,0.000064274966],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039189163,0.00029234274,0.0121722575,0.0005698456,0.00027135885,0.0006209796,0.002069932,0.8130099,0.009810353,0.023953743,0.00097695,0.1358603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021866268,0.00016291985,0.0029950694,0.000044810142,0.00007309054,0.000044588516,0.0005727682,0.9834237,0.0016890104,0.01044116,0.0004918938,0.000039153307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009440971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009549422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009440971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023866268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033795421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028017461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155493775","doi":"10.1155/2021/5535925","title":"A Multistage Dynamic Emergency Decision-Making Method considering the Satisfaction under Uncertainty Information","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Chongqing Jiaotong University","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Process (computing); Operations research; Computer science; Dynamic programming; Interval (graph theory); Key (lock); Dynamic decision-making; Decision-making; Fuzzy logic; Function (biology); Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Operations management; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04745719755476277,"score_gpt":0.42235629874064023,"score_spread":0.37489910118587744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155493775","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013135169,0.00009733782,0.98440903,0.00011146539,0.000026463287,0.00010924985,0.000022916705,0.00007914112,0.0020092877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.654179,0.00032029493,0.340642,0.00012407197,0.0000703845,0.0006948204,0.00013001217,0.000043638338,0.0037956631],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829286,0.00058119016,0.00012862832,0.0003281452,0.0004939309,0.0001752359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991466,0.00035723698,0.00008889779,0.00004334003,0.00028195564,0.00008202928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021812203,0.0010688346,0.0015296952,0.0011031454,0.0010907863,0.0018724387,0.0019853031,0.001526827,0.003933862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024081809,0.0007453514,0.0020897465,0.0013254742,0.0006710104,0.0019157751,0.0018892841,0.0012823109,0.0002498404],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020501578,0.00011502734,0.0015139675,0.00036916428,0.00015477529,0.00034081526,0.00064613624,0.859498,0.0064752763,0.026402263,0.0011430484,0.10313651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002014197,0.00007805064,0.00014407377,0.000014453912,0.00002882668,0.00003208337,0.000057408244,0.99389344,0.00068936264,0.004491571,0.00053290976,0.000017704962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041511827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002748755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041511827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011626419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017659024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0131601095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156852578","doi":"10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101634","title":"Measuring Toronto's vital signs – Comparing global and local ideal point analysis in an urban equity case study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers Environment and Urban Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"TOPSIS; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Equity (law); Computer science; Ideal solution; Categorical variable; Operations research; Econometrics; Data mining; Geography; Mathematics; Machine learning; Political science","score_opus":0.18303010351648327,"score_gpt":0.3693864694156777,"score_spread":0.18635636589919444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156852578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99362105,0.000050805265,0.0014815459,0.0001387032,0.0000031035597,0.000037185346,0.00016396448,0.000008660694,0.004495072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851424,0.000020255653,0.00096663216,0.0000041361486,0.0000012504527,0.0000057917973,0.000058451194,0.00000178767,0.0004273474],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987406,0.00057517056,0.000038184535,0.00011423978,0.00031326953,0.0002185902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99667954,0.0020777148,0.00024026168,0.00015559577,0.00062269595,0.00022428302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017748019,0.00036405263,0.00021367517,0.0012847842,0.0016485654,0.0017990113,0.000700993,0.00067115953,0.0013522975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004659898,0.00012020111,0.00029058606,0.0021017774,0.0013924517,0.0005904678,0.0008699868,0.0003926473,0.00007619913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018314129,0.00081735937,0.55562955,0.00032356955,0.00019552822,0.006250262,0.0159485,0.26437628,0.0065917973,0.04426108,0.0045170137,0.0992576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012762268,0.001131975,0.61521626,0.0001215379,0.00020918236,0.00076515286,0.03973537,0.32004333,0.007963095,0.005065169,0.00947529,0.0001460498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6196095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7449262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6196095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014515921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041357665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7652614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158347582","doi":"10.1007/s40747-020-00224-6","title":"An intuitionistic fuzzy entropy approach for supplier selection","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Complex & Intelligent Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computational intelligence; Selection (genetic algorithm); Entropy (arrow of time); Supplier evaluation; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Mathematical economics; Business; Thermodynamics; Physics; Supply chain management; Marketing","score_opus":0.2933491506386085,"score_gpt":0.44203331183383054,"score_spread":0.14868416119522204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158347582","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011804836,0.0007449965,0.97605217,0.00051603734,0.00008017896,0.000052670526,0.0000806459,0.000043816657,0.010624663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8057666,0.001376838,0.18717301,0.00019234227,0.00024688593,0.00027547736,0.00012938766,0.000022258992,0.0048172385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840635,0.0006508899,0.00007019823,0.00013614331,0.0006600342,0.000076389726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916995,0.00049094285,0.00009845368,0.000048146958,0.00015628697,0.00003622392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019471649,0.00080151897,0.00071719784,0.0020978574,0.000613676,0.0015976849,0.0010531422,0.0007309877,0.0021846355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030701375,0.00024131124,0.0010925974,0.0013691859,0.0011664173,0.0024291384,0.0010984145,0.00093395205,0.00017953619],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004534401,0.000070460555,0.0009965115,0.00022947177,0.00011485735,0.00030365417,0.000357033,0.33064303,0.0023100516,0.6190421,0.0018635307,0.04402389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010860782,0.00006648735,0.0005563304,0.00005063072,0.000026609414,0.00012517963,0.00007323646,0.710164,0.0006385894,0.28571895,0.002525575,0.00004346745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017039592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001476416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021846355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001669363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011280483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012112141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158920981","doi":"10.1108/ijicc-03-2021-0040","title":"A comparison study of fuzzy-based multiple-criteria decision-making methods to evaluating green concept alternatives in a new product development environment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Pairwise comparison; Ranking (information retrieval); Vagueness; TOPSIS; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Analytic hierarchy process; Ideal solution; Fuzzy number; Fuzzy set; Operations research; Set (abstract data type); Rank (graph theory); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.21881628410468879,"score_gpt":0.5385122237491146,"score_spread":0.3196959396444258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158920981","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3508464,0.0087508,0.5968766,0.0007416678,0.00053660106,0.001930379,0.00015751974,0.00020845656,0.03995153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.680421,0.0018550474,0.31464753,0.00010273029,0.000046847803,0.0008578323,0.00006246108,0.000024685973,0.001981858],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98579097,0.009684495,0.00042007928,0.00037695532,0.003501928,0.00022554045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817214,0.013168674,0.00067131093,0.00045192582,0.0036782473,0.00030843026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017171115,0.0010019586,0.0011653473,0.005438909,0.0009425891,0.0024839386,0.0015872326,0.0012315279,0.0037699277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030755693,0.00030830514,0.0014026853,0.0032988458,0.00083746616,0.0018243273,0.001149986,0.0008996988,0.0002693533],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002269576,0.0010663769,0.006204809,0.0038291593,0.00078605517,0.00038012647,0.0033126604,0.20018746,0.006047137,0.058573943,0.0023099512,0.7150327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035825305,0.0032149204,0.010281614,0.0011324881,0.0005115099,0.00035863984,0.0041524684,0.924076,0.0066748527,0.035013292,0.013970006,0.00025589752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026686494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039449027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017171115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026589355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015890163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0908106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161922167","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2021.2.002","title":"Comparative analysis of airline financial and operational performances: A fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS integrated approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Operations research; Profit (economics); Operational efficiency; Computer science; Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy logic; Ranking (information retrieval); Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Economics; Marketing; Engineering","score_opus":0.12542196179760462,"score_gpt":0.41032714315386243,"score_spread":0.2849051813562578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161922167","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47569346,0.0007320171,0.5127358,0.00039761802,0.000049711354,0.0007149181,0.00043472237,0.00027240525,0.008969382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8552578,0.00029367325,0.14354289,0.0000185111,0.000009639824,0.0001956993,0.00017840201,0.000010918707,0.0004923806],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.996741,0.0016955327,0.00017631623,0.0001657251,0.0010649833,0.00015639326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707377,0.0019201683,0.0002462341,0.00008103252,0.0006088915,0.00006984128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005312707,0.00091360207,0.0008458171,0.0048086867,0.000978447,0.0021234702,0.00078158086,0.000702996,0.0019542044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006420956,0.0003958494,0.0014547214,0.0041676094,0.0006428717,0.0011774426,0.000804025,0.0006420093,0.00012996983],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005262394,0.00034064002,0.008697727,0.0011281874,0.00060244696,0.0005014537,0.0016303038,0.7910567,0.008377264,0.012500366,0.0009693166,0.17366932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025538307,0.00023505832,0.0031829972,0.000060026905,0.000095864285,0.000044351702,0.0009055831,0.99042153,0.00148182,0.0029526239,0.0005574822,0.000037187518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015946673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015851378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015946673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020733026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023858834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031707704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164061109","doi":"10.22111/ijfs.2021.6180","title":"On the symmetric quintuple implicational method of fuzzy reasoning","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Iranian journal of fuzzy systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Generalization; Fuzzy logic; Equivalence (formal languages); Mathematics; Modus ponens; Algorithm; Interpolation (computer graphics); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Applied mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.14777262301902014,"score_gpt":0.4219859506572099,"score_spread":0.27421332763818973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164061109","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024094011,0.00038310213,0.9897613,0.00018464722,0.00006444,0.000047536378,0.000043251257,0.00007880512,0.007027456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18336709,0.0008250749,0.8112743,0.00020783894,0.00013213213,0.00016015687,0.00011436632,0.000057401132,0.0038615386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817276,0.0006664585,0.00014217611,0.00033948984,0.00057394593,0.00010515771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991998,0.00035299148,0.000055351124,0.00011012516,0.00024745124,0.000034360135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029054307,0.0005890454,0.00062836165,0.0016785525,0.00085098774,0.002053212,0.0011544803,0.0006500732,0.0053389873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029493608,0.00027243758,0.0013879198,0.0013997043,0.002500349,0.002713718,0.0012020929,0.001642324,0.00084445806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055021927,0.0000308392,0.00027882654,0.00027626017,0.00004476981,0.00021988945,0.00050185283,0.022070881,0.0037971977,0.8344011,0.0017289445,0.13659437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028707962,0.00007417871,0.00023181012,0.00008987445,0.00003652372,0.00038491827,0.00016679995,0.23049042,0.003554385,0.74242985,0.02246533,0.000047252135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013845842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013419962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053389873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010119578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011642827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01786071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164614150","doi":"10.1007/s42952-021-00126-4","title":"Evaluating the failure risk with and without failure data","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Korean Statistical Society","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Konkuk University","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Multiplication (music); Reduction (mathematics); Risk analysis (engineering); Key (lock); Computer science; Reliability engineering; Mathematics; Data mining; Operations research; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.24512009309111568,"score_gpt":0.48262483042142734,"score_spread":0.23750473733031166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164614150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67155087,0.0018153758,0.32224992,0.0006266915,0.00014819986,0.00032541796,0.0008708536,0.00019523468,0.0022173563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706207,0.00024573226,0.027764717,0.00005090295,0.00006925488,0.00011766572,0.0006344697,0.000026992797,0.00046941265],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98399884,0.008525021,0.0015333078,0.0017157019,0.0030755575,0.0011516167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86864597,0.11608249,0.004499975,0.0036882467,0.005368732,0.0017146249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040451694,0.0017607479,0.0031698775,0.0042250506,0.0006095521,0.0033505382,0.002073415,0.0023738842,0.002091154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09158168,0.00052683626,0.0030080718,0.001839503,0.0014240105,0.0034944538,0.0015196716,0.0017199027,0.00018351806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006574496,0.00068742404,0.08824556,0.0010585365,0.002150495,0.00070612185,0.00024135664,0.7800022,0.0023797115,0.012156418,0.0010691532,0.10472866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011866721,0.001330779,0.01467599,0.00008059244,0.00090688997,0.00023502854,0.00020145433,0.96285516,0.0016891003,0.017324062,0.0004894852,0.0000927448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025997357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016840542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040451694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014581215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028466838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21393156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166019629","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-67529-5_7","title":"Review and Selection of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Technique for Sustainability Assessment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Green energy and technology","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation; Centre for Global Health Research; Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Sustainability; Decision analysis; Management science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Disadvantage; Process (computing); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Operations research; Business; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.06683140963797898,"score_gpt":0.4121474885104985,"score_spread":0.34531607887251947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166019629","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013347217,0.9526405,0.02704627,0.0024208457,0.0014359015,0.00013660575,0.00049510994,0.00009446771,0.014395577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010526591,0.92148256,0.057260785,0.0012158181,0.0007077582,0.0001484756,0.0006325828,0.000049585575,0.00797588],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981975,0.00038337757,0.00025960497,0.0001889697,0.0009149475,0.000055552006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996104,0.0018708241,0.000225904,0.00013283176,0.0016077588,0.00005864941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030745352,0.00071617466,0.0010246016,0.0070352205,0.0004710464,0.0016954932,0.001609561,0.0009726765,0.0055014943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054358942,0.00038539417,0.00079922326,0.013754987,0.0006064976,0.0023180025,0.0006706007,0.0010153943,0.0016534856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047585574,0.00006408587,0.00027682653,0.018341668,0.00007950441,0.00013329272,0.00012521226,0.0014468464,0.0021230301,0.019395761,0.04861761,0.9093486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012640299,0.00008678719,0.0014689484,0.009003636,0.00019994899,0.00057376426,0.00017959294,0.0022298659,0.0031093294,0.011561505,0.97151834,0.000055577286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003476717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00663188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070352205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013332373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033424972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018404365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167111008","doi":"10.3846/ijspm.2021.14796","title":"EXPLORING LOCATION DETERMINANTS OF ASIA’S UNIQUE BEVERAGE SHOPS BASED ON A HYBRID MADM MODEL","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Strategic Property Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; VIKOR method; Analytic network process; Computer science; Profitability index; Order (exchange); Process (computing); Economic shortage; Operations research; Business; Mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.5094842930136857,"score_gpt":0.4213374744901775,"score_spread":0.0881468185235082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167111008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8524068,0.0002788161,0.136332,0.0007329224,0.000032261305,0.00039386854,0.0005071465,0.00008549973,0.009230666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97402716,0.00011921913,0.023886992,0.00003253819,0.00000713659,0.0002532218,0.0001724716,0.0000059254585,0.0014953765],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986002,0.0006878351,0.00006974756,0.00022310705,0.00021412908,0.00020501355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825364,0.0011916505,0.00018482067,0.00004361433,0.00022226058,0.000103985236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020392733,0.0008174961,0.000735392,0.0030755422,0.000589099,0.0025046398,0.0015186903,0.0007620491,0.002837979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028273275,0.00037035215,0.002011278,0.0024963964,0.0007226288,0.0010477689,0.0016333215,0.0007378574,0.00013936072],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044377847,0.00071552984,0.14914499,0.000590552,0.00058474555,0.0010276216,0.0024025238,0.73072606,0.0037984692,0.047783058,0.0012556772,0.061527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025004698,0.00014005373,0.0105852885,0.000035880003,0.00008158384,0.00004835776,0.0013429734,0.9815118,0.00030290085,0.0052914303,0.000603644,0.0000312167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01455261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01347699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01455261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027817213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019203649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02893585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167877924","doi":"10.3390/jrfm14060271","title":"An Innovative Job Evaluation Approach Using the VIKOR Algorithm","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attrition; Dilemma; Computer science; VIKOR method; Compensation (psychology); Key (lock); Position (finance); Job analysis; Job evaluation; Human resource management; Job satisfaction; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations management; Business; Operations research; Knowledge management; Engineering; Economics; Management; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Computer security; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1444569255938547,"score_gpt":0.42310890895120795,"score_spread":0.27865198335735325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167877924","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01354121,0.00013930548,0.98256254,0.00021507501,0.00005332621,0.0002747157,0.00002756538,0.00018460314,0.0030016943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17358194,0.00013834564,0.822471,0.00012360793,0.00005890875,0.00047680357,0.000102256294,0.00006850134,0.0029786644],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960967,0.002024855,0.00024294632,0.00043126472,0.0009359714,0.00026835475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99533087,0.0027124807,0.00039451706,0.00020635594,0.0012245526,0.00013125277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006235864,0.0010613216,0.0016059108,0.002858772,0.0012453782,0.0020998898,0.0022434134,0.0021078787,0.0038609125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01048728,0.00051702897,0.00095197896,0.0017627556,0.00085178186,0.001748483,0.001695403,0.0014185334,0.00067483523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022910595,0.0002367648,0.0034034145,0.00021031935,0.0001174975,0.00014441197,0.00031039567,0.55556446,0.0022175775,0.039676722,0.0028307787,0.3950586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027073324,0.00009448267,0.00038354774,0.000026514383,0.0000150358455,0.0000643962,0.000048851995,0.98819935,0.00055566995,0.009107412,0.0014602018,0.00001743801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026246845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002482592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006235864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011892754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002239116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032978833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170121115","doi":"10.5267/j.jpm.2021.5.001","title":"R-method: A simple ranking method for multi-attribute decision-making in the industrial environment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Project Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Data mining; Feature (linguistics); Decision maker; Process (computing); Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Rank (graph theory); Mathematics; Operations research","score_opus":0.36533015703090754,"score_gpt":0.5256598332919963,"score_spread":0.16032967626108874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170121115","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011772588,0.00027711876,0.99676895,0.000066328736,0.000049049086,0.00020239454,0.000080054815,0.0004515512,0.0009272473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024517084,0.00025034172,0.9736143,0.00005718191,0.00004378202,0.0004570088,0.0001304859,0.00010152003,0.00082836114],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865957,0.008449723,0.00062275503,0.00087454874,0.0032133388,0.00024392056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925016,0.005204985,0.0005914707,0.00040706855,0.0011515727,0.00014332066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0098627005,0.0023324448,0.0030236738,0.004357257,0.00096512726,0.00241834,0.002131737,0.0014587535,0.007842424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0115619255,0.0007158151,0.0027474156,0.0035742533,0.0010586617,0.0022359225,0.0015866403,0.0019877627,0.0022268996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032695848,0.00029019685,0.001538654,0.0029057947,0.0007605479,0.00038885366,0.00044884888,0.14066344,0.007784301,0.054339007,0.011323634,0.77922976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028943142,0.0005158551,0.0012545678,0.00034925976,0.00023550027,0.0006524014,0.00019595529,0.8752998,0.0066165226,0.082307845,0.032010797,0.0002720012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017574799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00250225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0098627005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096865674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025200516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052159607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170466384","doi":"10.1002/int.22473","title":"A novel method based on probabilistic linguistic term sets and its application in ranking products through online ratings","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Probabilistic logic; Term (time); Computer science; Decision maker; Selection (genetic algorithm); Prospect theory; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Data mining; Mathematics; Operations research","score_opus":0.190004953955526,"score_gpt":0.471015128163082,"score_spread":0.28101017420755603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170466384","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053395717,0.00016611435,0.99256814,0.00009537207,0.00005319485,0.000102518155,0.00006142598,0.0001733238,0.0014403487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23041087,0.00044125307,0.76557446,0.00011941126,0.00013585428,0.00055233727,0.00028400094,0.000063743304,0.0024180692],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946397,0.0017576887,0.00045221386,0.0007940177,0.0021666691,0.0001897283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99667466,0.0016667972,0.00030298263,0.00019518666,0.0010435556,0.00011681255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036512685,0.0012332652,0.001364095,0.0045502717,0.0009300378,0.002014489,0.00191816,0.0011212854,0.0029316144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107927,0.00046283292,0.0016568983,0.0036349092,0.0008585713,0.0029537277,0.0014649894,0.0014251411,0.0005579064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027167014,0.0002705105,0.0037624761,0.0007768697,0.00029289201,0.00023718893,0.0006567155,0.15832125,0.010229885,0.07873991,0.004487466,0.7419532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032562046,0.00013407037,0.0009400116,0.00004268147,0.00006546074,0.00013018088,0.00010377895,0.97508246,0.0020892215,0.018739987,0.0025628123,0.000076789285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049211397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040229424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049211397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011553196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018301569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019309938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170918780","doi":"10.52981/fjes.v7i1.93","title":"Application of the Fuzzy AHP in Selection of Most Appropriate Construction Method for Tuti - Bahri Bridge","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FES Journal of Engineering Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Transportation of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Bridge (graph theory); Schedule; Christian ministry; Selection (genetic algorithm); Process (computing); Computer science; Truss; Fuzzy logic; Engineering; Construction engineering; Civil engineering; Operations research; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07051968920281587,"score_gpt":0.39498903258002865,"score_spread":0.3244693433772128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170918780","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19414547,0.00087662437,0.7845118,0.0007645861,0.00011019067,0.0019391774,0.0003106327,0.00021693623,0.017124575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5809809,0.00045189538,0.41649592,0.000073727984,0.000019947955,0.0006338615,0.00020703232,0.000019419149,0.0011173079],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972588,0.0014023923,0.00021079251,0.00018886707,0.00072948163,0.00020972796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845874,0.0008104226,0.00012410598,0.000039760274,0.0004916824,0.00007523532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004305823,0.0007014979,0.00079476554,0.0028103644,0.0012986257,0.0017877895,0.00077511324,0.0005425887,0.0020217174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047374456,0.00036502373,0.00093119004,0.0022977882,0.00041256956,0.00061328686,0.001000198,0.0005476836,0.00012016008],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067263,0.00054774515,0.009890427,0.002395857,0.00044319718,0.0018981765,0.0038529052,0.48324037,0.018413907,0.02780189,0.004541302,0.44630167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013990741,0.00036010935,0.0038049968,0.00025180235,0.00016302078,0.00018762147,0.002600206,0.97003144,0.006162922,0.01081364,0.0054074107,0.000076840945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010182496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010574804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010182496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014952188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003569376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022771657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173599855","doi":"10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104363","title":"Interactive algorithms for normalized probabilistic linguistic preference relations in view of the disjunctive probability based consistency and consensus analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Preference; Ranking (information retrieval); Group decision-making; Measure (data warehouse); Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Theoretical computer science; Natural language processing; Data mining; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.17084227147062067,"score_gpt":0.39546238257050087,"score_spread":0.2246201110998802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173599855","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019796717,0.00003710891,0.99728596,0.00005496023,0.000010751187,0.00003282899,0.000014440891,0.00008532743,0.00049908896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13355465,0.00013538885,0.86274034,0.00012887528,0.00009233563,0.00049192086,0.00027599733,0.00025814868,0.002322221],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925372,0.0033858377,0.00043237596,0.0015315629,0.0016790868,0.00043397155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96757865,0.026057724,0.0011357912,0.0019596922,0.0027486766,0.0005194812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009984262,0.0012496201,0.0027000462,0.0029325192,0.0015118136,0.0036737395,0.005819747,0.0024675662,0.007474837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03921711,0.0014788377,0.0023206086,0.0033378284,0.0025596982,0.008389889,0.0066016475,0.005142162,0.0010462208],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033474364,0.00022393526,0.00079122407,0.0003086731,0.00021079065,0.000102225495,0.00058605196,0.42484534,0.0021179162,0.37878475,0.00269669,0.18899772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002650889,0.000026178122,0.0000717942,0.000012927683,0.000019228713,0.000019178644,0.000025774676,0.88400155,0.0005295883,0.11482375,0.00042882626,0.000014726612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038191753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034038175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009984262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025801174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032730056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052802503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174035125","doi":"10.31181/oresta20402055a","title":"Evaluation of OECD Countries with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in terms of Economic, Social and Environmental Aspects","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operational Research in Engineering Sciences Theory and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Compromise; Homogeneous; Order (exchange); Cluster (spacecraft); Test (biology); Scope (computer science); Geography; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Computer science; Mathematics; Ecology","score_opus":0.22634371585116658,"score_gpt":0.5549275802636447,"score_spread":0.32858386441247817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174035125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7651334,0.0031271707,0.17358278,0.00074398797,0.00016349061,0.0019584878,0.0008300402,0.00022397851,0.054236766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8730893,0.0012568642,0.1231762,0.00006689107,0.00002569444,0.00081979996,0.00044919574,0.0000216709,0.0010943767],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850578,0.010902679,0.0008478149,0.00044701406,0.0022409353,0.0005038007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99147356,0.0047494485,0.0008578732,0.00035381535,0.00228544,0.00027977914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016306767,0.0015807999,0.001070517,0.006954052,0.0010107418,0.0042098192,0.0008736715,0.0007648687,0.0016371531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019690704,0.0002886978,0.0015845606,0.0050869584,0.0007858756,0.0011986415,0.0017429214,0.00050874025,0.00020741505],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015254304,0.0008863964,0.04371135,0.0023882906,0.0012236994,0.0010870945,0.0024332863,0.5873092,0.0039463094,0.027063873,0.004387566,0.32403752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028829416,0.001789642,0.0280888,0.0013773055,0.0006988056,0.00029451738,0.01117092,0.90711486,0.009493964,0.02299665,0.016472992,0.00021330018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049736844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005766233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016306767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027595272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030729235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08623952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176035139","doi":"10.1108/k-02-2021-0161","title":"Cold chain vulnerability assessment through two-stage grey comprehensive measurement of intuitionistic fuzzy entropy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kybernetes","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cold chain; Vulnerability (computing); Vulnerability assessment; Entropy (arrow of time); Computer science; Adaptability; Fuzzy logic; Reliability engineering; Data mining; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer security; Engineering; Business; Physics","score_opus":0.23534954069684613,"score_gpt":0.4432480912243309,"score_spread":0.20789855052748477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176035139","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16410103,0.00026440882,0.828326,0.00021601918,0.000023090945,0.0001834158,0.00009004391,0.000114946175,0.006681055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709563,0.000096377684,0.028285628,0.000013822928,0.000008466306,0.000078363475,0.000034775305,0.000005364766,0.00052094],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978903,0.0007483291,0.000119998076,0.00027752895,0.0007861464,0.00017763986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847025,0.00070521556,0.00028615855,0.000094266215,0.0003659158,0.00007824229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026138234,0.0009810275,0.00066138786,0.0027404688,0.0006613523,0.0019354472,0.0007652011,0.00063807215,0.0011997478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004857157,0.00032553327,0.0012985484,0.0011431614,0.0013046614,0.0025517181,0.0016870381,0.0006511056,0.00006305536],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023366157,0.00012576387,0.017452426,0.000380861,0.00032756396,0.0003802567,0.0012983879,0.79747593,0.012766514,0.09314221,0.00076568115,0.075650744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010777709,0.00012263836,0.004910884,0.00003817882,0.00006423838,0.000067128596,0.00023000415,0.9604731,0.003043964,0.030467689,0.00051431474,0.0000570829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004448042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002942852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004448042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024522287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015318664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017792225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177270918","doi":"10.3390/su13137108","title":"A Novel Approached Based on T-Spherical Fuzzy Schweizer-Sklar Power Heronian Mean Operator for Evaluating Water Reuse Applications under Uncertainty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainability","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation of Korea; Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Operator (biology); Fuzzy set; Set (abstract data type); Geometric mean; Dominance (genetics); Degree (music); Fuzzy number; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.16989053833433018,"score_gpt":0.45409518193066645,"score_spread":0.28420464359633624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177270918","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012113167,0.00017839679,0.9850609,0.00012933457,0.000037683796,0.000047392183,0.000050811814,0.00009524818,0.0022871096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6640101,0.00050623796,0.3323965,0.00015113942,0.00014468264,0.00021438327,0.00021771384,0.000052424268,0.002306845],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706334,0.0007019418,0.00026650648,0.0007006557,0.0011003473,0.00016721537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814487,0.00061801774,0.0002662534,0.00010928403,0.0007759282,0.00008565222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028138317,0.0009389772,0.0008384582,0.0017581191,0.00069768593,0.0020996681,0.0011544867,0.00095576147,0.0016355788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060763066,0.00023710885,0.0012359563,0.0012458094,0.0017122518,0.0032034898,0.0012622133,0.0011133602,0.0002065079],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002907953,0.00009253413,0.006325044,0.00044057626,0.0001851697,0.00044829064,0.00090766477,0.3998089,0.023841675,0.25435948,0.0037620114,0.30953783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012421347,0.0001341984,0.0009360931,0.000035995872,0.000036532292,0.00016518118,0.00017218372,0.9423274,0.004229388,0.049369276,0.0025285967,0.000052753603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044852663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034488284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044852663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015362559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016562751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014881134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179430214","doi":"10.1109/fuzz45933.2021.9494396","title":"A novel Data-driven fuzzy aggregation method for Takagi-Sugeno-Kang fuzzy Neural network system using ensemble learning","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Queen's University","keywords":"Artificial intelligence; Interpretability; Computer science; Machine learning; Fuzzy logic; Neuro-fuzzy; AdaBoost; Data mining; Fuzzy classification; Defuzzification; Fuzzy set operations; Artificial neural network; Fuzzy control system; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy number; Classifier (UML)","score_opus":0.3264630842428242,"score_gpt":0.45961854870988805,"score_spread":0.13315546446706383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179430214","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007032646,0.00012796918,0.99200904,0.000041482952,0.000033693097,0.000022834922,0.000014703148,0.00016635249,0.0005513079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5042785,0.00028939513,0.49321467,0.00006192027,0.000071391965,0.00017280705,0.00013901693,0.000053874115,0.0017184286],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994136,0.00012962609,0.000047283742,0.00012648862,0.0002466058,0.000036342077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995204,0.00013927704,0.00005845895,0.00004101827,0.0002158064,0.00002496578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012838098,0.0006932308,0.0008747548,0.0007333761,0.00066948606,0.00072210515,0.0008075613,0.0006081669,0.00077031663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016148315,0.00030435927,0.0009190325,0.0007775401,0.0002445357,0.0013171517,0.00068185275,0.0008821031,0.00017029178],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009261344,0.00009133897,0.002214999,0.00013596103,0.00020305757,0.0001381216,0.00022322255,0.6148805,0.01066493,0.008993905,0.0017549244,0.3606065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002506211,0.000017929004,0.00020669945,0.0000049807036,0.000012225958,0.000016392156,0.0000075586754,0.9972626,0.0008148602,0.0012339599,0.0004127373,0.000007657642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003972094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044573466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003972094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054603437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006818846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007897913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183338968","doi":"","title":"Safe-screening rules for atomic-norm regularization","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Regularization (linguistics); Computation; Norm (philosophy); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Algorithm; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.340029900067766,"score_gpt":0.3077442827802822,"score_spread":0.0322856172874838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183338968","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005544599,0.00013002059,0.9903529,0.0002958063,0.000048009544,0.0001563229,0.000091851485,0.00020876463,0.0031717727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18591863,0.0003345453,0.8079223,0.00075905264,0.00015037852,0.0009254441,0.0004170126,0.0003575789,0.0032150962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98902065,0.0044020754,0.0007173872,0.0016044694,0.003789555,0.00046586993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96681625,0.024151301,0.0014519437,0.004027459,0.002992637,0.0005603269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011814279,0.0013690288,0.0018614321,0.0013753028,0.001172139,0.0027198715,0.0033035178,0.0024089233,0.0044321786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05239596,0.00081604224,0.0020777232,0.0013085939,0.0036856686,0.0038245854,0.0034273118,0.0064664204,0.0012776258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023450083,0.00023696678,0.0016167222,0.00040072898,0.000112261834,0.00031443007,0.00034457343,0.1770651,0.0041129338,0.6609681,0.008864278,0.14572947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004853451,0.0000760241,0.00016966692,0.00008319497,0.000023006856,0.00009651954,0.000029718844,0.55601287,0.003077714,0.43669653,0.003656856,0.000029398643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014320579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021679602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011814279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000983247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029311976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06248063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184023486","doi":"10.1109/tsmc.2021.3093467","title":"A Granular Computing-Driving Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Method for Supporting Large-Scale Group Decision Making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Group decision-making; Preference; Fuzzy logic; Granular computing; Computer science; Semantics (computer science); Linguistics; Flexibility (engineering); Granularity; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Psychology; Statistics; Social psychology; Rough set","score_opus":0.055755334803164656,"score_gpt":0.38350071784265255,"score_spread":0.3277453830394879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184023486","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00514694,0.000048570313,0.99354833,0.00008080008,0.000019939149,0.000041228086,0.000017192391,0.00014978499,0.00094728166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34652966,0.00011935874,0.65142506,0.000119445736,0.000043451942,0.0002244701,0.00007431096,0.00006598905,0.0013983359],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976047,0.0009290653,0.00017667917,0.00036452647,0.00080311706,0.00012189497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964833,0.002014899,0.00032672612,0.00040054313,0.00059332245,0.00018116813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034803913,0.0008799328,0.0010688626,0.0013681509,0.0010123844,0.0020376125,0.001772995,0.0010339913,0.0027578808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00885846,0.0004657584,0.0012138498,0.0015710598,0.0011821307,0.0027192933,0.0018356896,0.0016033525,0.0004346883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030398322,0.0001601078,0.0013915682,0.0003258687,0.00014300081,0.0003249614,0.00094868644,0.6565413,0.010956226,0.16973646,0.0020634902,0.15710437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014618044,0.000024630679,0.000065488915,0.000011589372,0.000012632561,0.0000257183,0.000033909782,0.9706274,0.0010147693,0.027368149,0.0007859304,0.000015192823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033849638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026305642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034803913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014665199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015166028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018406272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184215512","doi":"10.37394/23203.2021.16.36","title":"Optimizing Material Selection Using a Hybridized Multi-attribute Decision Making Model","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS AND CONTROL","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; TOPSIS; Weighting; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ideal solution; Entropy (arrow of time); Profitability index; Rank (graph theory); Data mining; Operations research; Industrial engineering; Machine learning; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.13027868922880784,"score_gpt":0.3894996309684154,"score_spread":0.2592209417396075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184215512","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053080294,0.00075207494,0.93581414,0.00028244208,0.00004893026,0.00024029714,0.00017277081,0.00017796946,0.009431043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7784018,0.00085817976,0.21354279,0.00013195323,0.000040511626,0.0009953692,0.00025066463,0.00003636256,0.005742388],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834454,0.0007237865,0.000083031286,0.00026153593,0.00042557693,0.00016143075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988501,0.0007400963,0.00011266393,0.000033524862,0.00021524623,0.00004830772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024868574,0.001426853,0.001792771,0.0019727037,0.0008653204,0.0029968838,0.0019056412,0.002147643,0.0038570191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002190114,0.00088127895,0.002073252,0.0022172104,0.00074212445,0.0011206554,0.0014645179,0.0011543604,0.0003809633],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026463515,0.000032488806,0.0003792577,0.00007047622,0.000045471592,0.00009193928,0.00004048151,0.98875403,0.000550959,0.0024285251,0.000114217386,0.007465634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046847667,0.000031296673,0.000080083104,0.000008177182,0.000014291226,0.000008727808,0.000014284304,0.9984182,0.00013887713,0.0011166049,0.00015926945,0.0000054924303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006586832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004954658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006586832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001714303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016713198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013151884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185287204","doi":"10.1002/int.22562","title":"A new method for deriving priority from dual hesitant fuzzy preference relations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Dual (grammatical number); Preference relation; Computer science; Group decision-making; Fuzzy logic; Probabilistic logic; Property (philosophy); Basis (linear algebra); Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.2587212012644264,"score_gpt":0.4737449613594993,"score_spread":0.2150237600950729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185287204","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009332993,0.000056025387,0.998018,0.000035679655,0.000025344083,0.000034956727,0.000020858353,0.00004747242,0.0008283028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0752599,0.0002577652,0.92163575,0.00007665676,0.00008849954,0.00022110279,0.00013838345,0.0000617847,0.002259999],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615085,0.0012856409,0.00042721035,0.0006887836,0.0012612145,0.00018623292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969913,0.0013708948,0.00021480181,0.00024201447,0.0010694031,0.00011161937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040043117,0.0011859784,0.0012640619,0.0034904028,0.0009988268,0.002455984,0.0014750081,0.000923229,0.004329228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009217139,0.00072317745,0.002152019,0.0030106422,0.0011255951,0.004258279,0.0017357004,0.0024143471,0.00091813895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021405602,0.00012256758,0.001354359,0.0007721019,0.00025371733,0.00035504313,0.0012171419,0.09370637,0.013358161,0.39928162,0.0046702577,0.4846947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008076298,0.00020998647,0.0005545808,0.00010789166,0.00012572859,0.00057735684,0.00027090407,0.77416176,0.008808322,0.19657913,0.018371182,0.00015234575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019335146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016059376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004329228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013369534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019557273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021177113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188290581","doi":"10.1016/j.inffus.2021.07.017","title":"A Linguistic Information Granulation Model and Its Penalty Function-Based Co-Evolutionary PSO Solution Approach for Supporting GDM with Distributed Linguistic Preference Relations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Fusion","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National University's Basic Research Foundation of China; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Particle swarm optimization; Preference; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Realization (probability); Penalty method; Evolutionary algorithm; Consistency (knowledge bases); Function (biology); Optimization problem; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.12043772507513291,"score_gpt":0.35724718131112776,"score_spread":0.23680945623599486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188290581","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006081203,0.00009228778,0.9923894,0.00008138297,0.000024570385,0.000027178758,0.000015511487,0.000075319644,0.0012132181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51530546,0.00023140604,0.4812027,0.0001231785,0.0000520823,0.00030552776,0.00011739155,0.000077951016,0.0025842602],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993331,0.00020978972,0.000052913958,0.00010920002,0.00024084508,0.00005409423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991955,0.00037811362,0.0000653289,0.00007550786,0.0002501692,0.000035449946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014567302,0.0006137716,0.0009887132,0.0010379633,0.0005309894,0.0012527723,0.0015048074,0.0011334199,0.0017512635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028113255,0.00035525367,0.00093328534,0.0015122088,0.00064718054,0.0017115265,0.001437895,0.001084311,0.00024640054],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000974307,0.00010847548,0.0005242494,0.00012357562,0.00007332192,0.00008933142,0.00016257953,0.8605442,0.004612165,0.03840133,0.0011369798,0.09412641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032683897,0.000010834743,0.000029552499,0.0000028603392,0.000004716474,0.000007239106,0.0000033030394,0.99828017,0.00020483258,0.0013144544,0.00013582007,0.000003023112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047962116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033038463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047962116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006784827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010513103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009536564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190713262","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2021.7.004","title":"Decision-making in the purchase of equipment in agricultural research laboratories: a multiple-criteria approach under partial information","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Purchasing; Viewpoints; Order (exchange); Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Agriculture; Computer science; Marketing; Decision-making; Operations research; Business; Management science; Knowledge management; Process management; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.18329088325482146,"score_gpt":0.4718940223082004,"score_spread":0.2886031390533789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190713262","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1671949,0.0010373964,0.8145015,0.0018076354,0.000078468074,0.00080256036,0.00019522947,0.00006099007,0.01432128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83875686,0.0004706657,0.15881605,0.000101193444,0.00004204173,0.00055398425,0.00007987452,0.000012714907,0.0011666877],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98614526,0.010708149,0.00046599857,0.0007692882,0.0013028808,0.0006084671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876479,0.010171989,0.0008296258,0.00023324051,0.00073306175,0.0003842542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008778988,0.0015186527,0.0017467744,0.0027016865,0.0016463923,0.0045013507,0.0017022127,0.0023475217,0.0022017865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01301257,0.00082970026,0.002224954,0.0023323682,0.00245492,0.0026877439,0.0024461998,0.00164064,0.00013164936],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031256521,0.00027418215,0.0030011227,0.000890221,0.0003920356,0.0009909638,0.0017576513,0.86196136,0.002397578,0.091920085,0.00057946565,0.035522725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006780359,0.00031708778,0.001157084,0.00018111814,0.00012775254,0.0001235142,0.0010129734,0.9182475,0.00086178596,0.07602433,0.0017946463,0.00008431488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005440599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061773993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008778988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043983585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003409558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046428263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193221273","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2021.7.003","title":"On ranking by using weighted self-normalizing distance metrics in multi-attribute decision-making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normalization (sociology); Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Data mining; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Selection (genetic algorithm); Group decision-making; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10884263843305889,"score_gpt":0.422627217124527,"score_spread":0.31378457869146814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193221273","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023051476,0.0014196701,0.9716088,0.0002717454,0.00007895559,0.0001686971,0.00005989367,0.000089132955,0.0032516287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21573325,0.0011973758,0.781524,0.00010189008,0.00007499417,0.0003272938,0.0001297096,0.0000531175,0.0008583955],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795241,0.01331417,0.0010990063,0.0012233218,0.004523439,0.00031594973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98094946,0.013928473,0.0012499948,0.001270337,0.0023794118,0.00022231191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018454036,0.0012938066,0.0016919457,0.004764045,0.00093207194,0.0027427883,0.0014946522,0.0011368862,0.0010598873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034219865,0.000329057,0.0013434055,0.007085105,0.0029015737,0.004213609,0.0022586165,0.001513731,0.0002610957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015303145,0.00020448206,0.0028032286,0.0009675506,0.00033820228,0.00014536905,0.0006376234,0.37772882,0.003878109,0.2080291,0.0013684396,0.403746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027428283,0.00051921356,0.0015283927,0.00018555358,0.000079609556,0.0001472249,0.00017851508,0.8294839,0.005022979,0.15813379,0.004579991,0.00011332867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002546304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026241902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018454036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020235444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021682603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09759539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194893391","doi":"10.1093/imaman/dpab031","title":"Less is more: simple algorithms for the minimum sum of squares clustering problem","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IMA Journal of Management Mathematics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada; Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Cluster analysis; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.21928588231538756,"score_gpt":0.4395994161972727,"score_spread":0.22031353388188515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194893391","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024371255,0.0004944698,0.96920353,0.00049462495,0.00009650382,0.00019360575,0.00009536878,0.0007373511,0.004313338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10571703,0.00013564137,0.89142805,0.00020629946,0.00007483673,0.00023125563,0.00032042028,0.00024176032,0.0016447197],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777126,0.0010647845,0.000111445785,0.0003478915,0.0005785372,0.00012611265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99454415,0.0033313178,0.00040203045,0.00066181796,0.0008477553,0.00021294189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035031755,0.0013908234,0.0017012408,0.0020598187,0.0009179827,0.0014564374,0.0022941804,0.0020269107,0.006218887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012810759,0.00056830444,0.0012073059,0.002329351,0.0010718094,0.002612543,0.0018919385,0.002327602,0.001347307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048506501,0.00052118505,0.001537751,0.00037572,0.000120483775,0.000087194996,0.0002704107,0.54215795,0.003594716,0.05114467,0.011088475,0.38861635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014013809,0.00015778253,0.00044324232,0.000032323336,0.000024197128,0.000060823564,0.000050989616,0.9497904,0.0016899795,0.044715103,0.0028695846,0.000025394236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020836112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025416974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006218887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010364081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013673897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020804226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196990262","doi":"10.1007/s11356-021-14690-z","title":"The green-agile supplier selection problem for the medical devices: a hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Transport Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Reliability (semiconductor); Agile software development; Flexibility (engineering); Supply chain; Computer science; Operations research; Supply chain management; Field (mathematics); Agile manufacturing; Selection (genetic algorithm); Risk analysis (engineering); Reliability engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Business","score_opus":0.11577440325268852,"score_gpt":0.44122941632046864,"score_spread":0.32545501306778013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196990262","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06878159,0.00096571236,0.92103994,0.0010539776,0.00008277007,0.00028792748,0.00022948094,0.000081667946,0.007476933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7833741,0.0008051493,0.20982,0.00020610102,0.00009862134,0.00042525123,0.00018915688,0.00005731029,0.005024324],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675745,0.0016681745,0.00012875313,0.00038903893,0.000654726,0.00040185006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953799,0.0035016506,0.00034540216,0.00009516004,0.00037607265,0.0003018607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060288454,0.0019219292,0.003008847,0.0038802095,0.0013793986,0.0040798252,0.0025892684,0.0038943307,0.0037984538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005946118,0.0014862417,0.0023823539,0.0031370658,0.0016754462,0.0026099165,0.0022442397,0.0017346407,0.00023266308],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001316913,0.00011073699,0.00066817226,0.00021305251,0.00018676241,0.00030767638,0.000110925335,0.96699345,0.0010829801,0.014691583,0.00065696466,0.014846042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002642738,0.000078590514,0.00022321519,0.000036033245,0.00004410816,0.000050393857,0.00008831073,0.9861946,0.00033158442,0.012563785,0.00033849053,0.000024401552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007698495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005806505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007698495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002784683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028268222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031883955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200986883","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-6878-1.ch013","title":"Fuzzy Logic Theory and Applications in Uncertainty Management of Linguistic Evaluations for Students","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Fuzzy set operations; Linguistics; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy classification; Fuzzy cognitive map; Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Fuzzy number; Mathematics; Natural language processing","score_opus":0.09528023391499378,"score_gpt":0.4466260779755547,"score_spread":0.3513458440605609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200986883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032160734,0.04011077,0.43901652,0.009830249,0.0021367806,0.00014695042,0.0002677201,0.0004452826,0.50482965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15010165,0.06128906,0.42636093,0.0030083007,0.0031198447,0.0004608427,0.0005141601,0.00030426655,0.35484084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993765,0.00020015938,0.000035696918,0.000068118534,0.00029556654,0.000023978395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989225,0.0007353947,0.000036063444,0.00006006841,0.00021389913,0.00003204272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013621456,0.00078037346,0.00049591914,0.0013766466,0.00091971137,0.0029673101,0.00073986687,0.0010460244,0.014705872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033935036,0.00028882612,0.00053751277,0.0017348974,0.0016655474,0.003418593,0.0009766704,0.0023495168,0.0033841662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010822635,0.00002612481,0.000121485,0.00019322867,0.000013477261,0.000103305225,0.00063352106,0.004887369,0.0005428432,0.78214246,0.052512508,0.15881282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005062443,0.00002065838,0.00023260103,0.00034549937,0.000009209432,0.00019923048,0.00024973258,0.016027883,0.00041507758,0.7421917,0.24028255,0.000020887808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002317124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014705872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017276626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009877966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049196005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201468878","doi":"10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107902","title":"Systems failure analysis using Z-number theory-based combined compromise solution and full consistency method","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Failure mode and effects analysis; Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Consistency (knowledge bases); Reliability (semiconductor); Prioritization; Reliability engineering; Process (computing); Compromise; Risk analysis (engineering); Automotive industry; Machine learning; Engineering; Management science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09582894413593868,"score_gpt":0.3980041777284429,"score_spread":0.3021752335925042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201468878","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030238046,0.00005968297,0.9959661,0.000023214532,0.000011036513,0.000028726055,0.000008676558,0.000038388163,0.00084042206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5032706,0.00025686424,0.49276632,0.00007061631,0.000037927206,0.00043121338,0.00011045527,0.00011228632,0.0029437048],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730504,0.001038569,0.0001306432,0.00030057033,0.0010826866,0.00014246414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997045,0.0019505903,0.00018603443,0.00017827448,0.0005854082,0.000054755914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004456934,0.0012772627,0.0024618697,0.0023487504,0.0009917534,0.0018595275,0.0025603655,0.0016316832,0.0026689616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007877326,0.0007742285,0.0022743326,0.001851996,0.0013290055,0.0022062506,0.0025560448,0.001393584,0.00046273018],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011473394,0.000038657123,0.0005888762,0.00018049993,0.00016939058,0.000081440376,0.00009740557,0.9123901,0.0023738334,0.036808938,0.00047232056,0.046683814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086725,0.000023739534,0.00008854053,0.0000098708315,0.000018862316,0.000017340313,0.000008043317,0.990488,0.0004000309,0.008674366,0.0002520837,0.000010450133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029176387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017353906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004456934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010741947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001711375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023570836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201692011","doi":"10.15480/882.2916","title":"Cutoff Criteria for Overall Model Fit Indexes in Generalized Structured Component Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Structural equation modeling; Goodness of fit; Cutoff; Component (thermodynamics); Index (typography); Statistics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Sample (material); Residual; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.1679311603700588,"score_gpt":0.4266380214332936,"score_spread":0.2587068610632348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201692011","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3350746,0.0017623758,0.6390867,0.0010601936,0.00027528574,0.001800237,0.0016558957,0.0033149924,0.015969774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8019263,0.00025550966,0.19266337,0.00020474424,0.000055953147,0.0016213041,0.0020301836,0.00057009,0.00067247945],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9638684,0.019388393,0.0040895073,0.0020308825,0.008638608,0.0019842838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80988014,0.14604735,0.0058945934,0.012806704,0.022350257,0.0030209918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05869576,0.0025329972,0.0033908226,0.010015216,0.0035999408,0.0077529065,0.0026804374,0.002748831,0.00538167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24380153,0.0010472409,0.004578841,0.0066610454,0.0024104833,0.004661495,0.004893454,0.004721877,0.0014090858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0053733974,0.002082078,0.2738833,0.0026614887,0.0039587254,0.0025961362,0.0055202995,0.07523179,0.013204853,0.09860589,0.022675538,0.49420646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008113229,0.003524809,0.15709114,0.0017897642,0.002162087,0.0014154251,0.0048722452,0.64440614,0.013039141,0.16287796,0.007505393,0.0005045501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033961686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038670648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05869576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020306518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005449244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31041658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202375536","doi":"","title":"Development of a fuzzy multi-criteria decision support system for municipal solid waste management.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"oURspace (University of Regina)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Solid waste management; Fuzzy logic; Decision support system; Municipal solid waste; Waste management; Engineering; Computer science; Business; Environmental planning; Operations research; Environmental science; Risk analysis (engineering); Data mining; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08642081273625737,"score_gpt":0.36705036189424217,"score_spread":0.28062954915798477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202375536","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054049034,0.0008054891,0.9296313,0.0009957325,0.00024377169,0.00092669687,0.0005055876,0.006989847,0.0058526215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24355724,0.0005219103,0.7471485,0.00022545643,0.00004186353,0.0005610543,0.0006448612,0.000114617214,0.007184444],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975747,0.00004528817,0.000023581842,0.000040410992,0.000114424394,0.000018870654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970716,0.00007377488,0.000020211637,0.00001884719,0.00014583152,0.000034005272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007747089,0.00034371114,0.00046201766,0.0003724459,0.0004813089,0.0010456349,0.0008290629,0.00079624564,0.0042119264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015038621,0.00032160422,0.00046885782,0.00024933924,0.00013463231,0.0008206227,0.000491735,0.0006733346,0.0011906514],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006119717,0.0004180726,0.0029415318,0.0008069338,0.00025343942,0.0009118052,0.0005708111,0.10489486,0.07060879,0.008883255,0.01290158,0.7961969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020474581,0.00043689937,0.0022086855,0.0001533566,0.00015027371,0.00034960615,0.00020909889,0.9115241,0.043302283,0.00415331,0.037247986,0.000059589598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032158697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037260626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042119264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038664055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009891918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0140903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202822179","doi":"10.5267/j.jpm.2021.8.001","title":"A new hybrid method for selecting the best project manager: TODIM-FSE and Behavioral TOPSIS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Project Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Prospect theory; Context (archaeology); Decision maker; Loss aversion; Computer science; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Process (computing); Odds; Risk-seeking; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Engineering; Business; Psychology; Economics; Machine learning; Logistic regression; Social psychology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.27354828380499374,"score_gpt":0.5208362236672347,"score_spread":0.24728793986224096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202822179","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010141831,0.000118849355,0.984738,0.00018379139,0.000044778717,0.00022361192,0.00013283093,0.0002154322,0.004200759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17527902,0.0002155421,0.82173157,0.00008114905,0.000017340422,0.00071320246,0.00030128442,0.000032083124,0.0016288059],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939122,0.0030124134,0.0005013115,0.00053438736,0.0018297384,0.00020997098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611545,0.0022265394,0.00024506619,0.0001871496,0.0011323406,0.00009338291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058682556,0.0015758135,0.0013133916,0.0074189105,0.0010609071,0.0031399897,0.0015068565,0.0010541631,0.0049497564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010769389,0.0004379913,0.0019175821,0.0042596017,0.00078452914,0.001904052,0.0020230531,0.0010710122,0.0007183494],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019720633,0.0003629782,0.009376627,0.0012768172,0.00058589224,0.00020390071,0.0017112936,0.113343194,0.006204083,0.05576433,0.0028643091,0.8081094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000761001,0.00039030606,0.0046584923,0.00033957366,0.00021309975,0.0003431221,0.0016942023,0.92192394,0.0045881304,0.05234745,0.013271658,0.00015395971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043572555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055165654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074189105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015602829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024244841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031034648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208854516","doi":"10.1007/s40815-021-01094-x","title":"Commentary on “Utilizing Linguistic Picture Fuzzy Aggregation Operators for Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making Problems”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Operator (biology); Linguistics; Computational intelligence; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Fuzzy number; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy set; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09231662330703991,"score_gpt":0.4078079432344455,"score_spread":0.31549131992740564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208854516","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000092973445,0.0014031872,0.00045480832,0.96645397,0.030640425,0.000011055573,0.000084330895,0.000018517285,0.0008406772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017113478,0.00072761,0.00055929524,0.9634388,0.032444958,0.00005529092,0.000021386737,0.000019345589,0.0010219903],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835495,0.0056221355,0.0021664763,0.0024918944,0.0050887563,0.001081124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9254528,0.051582113,0.0027775655,0.00147458,0.016358258,0.0023545572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018159844,0.0013994564,0.0024624974,0.0018916287,0.0054303906,0.005776688,0.0084776515,0.06555772,0.004880174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09358517,0.0012772165,0.0035608064,0.0030990543,0.012599754,0.0059069935,0.0035580145,0.086851984,0.0045809536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005720138,0.000012967191,0.00008756006,0.00016745151,0.000042834665,0.0001587829,0.000319293,0.0000921409,0.00009574479,0.009499853,0.9853953,0.0040708594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021462217,0.00005961804,0.0012174908,0.0016808545,0.00017272237,0.00043340525,0.0007574333,0.0007586909,0.0005620994,0.047302958,0.9466393,0.00020086538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025233842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031600725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06555772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064115105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009149473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09603959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209738737","doi":"10.3233/jifs-210182","title":"A novel approach for solving all-pairs shortest path problem in an interval-valued fuzzy network: Suggested modifications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Shortest path problem; Interval (graph theory); Mathematics; Path (computing); Constrained Shortest Path First; Fuzzy logic; K shortest path routing; Point (geometry); Fuzzy number; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Fuzzy set; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence; Graph","score_opus":0.25962880497492125,"score_gpt":0.41505386335077743,"score_spread":0.15542505837585618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209738737","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029937057,0.00029889558,0.99344724,0.00018335933,0.00008190098,0.000063551146,0.000038721682,0.000057879373,0.0028347971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20176567,0.0010956181,0.79065275,0.00020428833,0.00020041193,0.0003795404,0.00023142323,0.00007364311,0.005396685],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988543,0.00027583164,0.00011004929,0.0003098409,0.00036173355,0.000088321394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943787,0.00021638002,0.000039577317,0.000046821486,0.00022582423,0.000033538705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012002438,0.0009992255,0.0010735614,0.0012994144,0.0009061465,0.0014829844,0.0023010164,0.0015515204,0.0037617432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021848558,0.00041927825,0.0015995282,0.0014788827,0.00059055927,0.0022767705,0.0012413338,0.0019484839,0.0006574287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014189523,0.00016951488,0.000985487,0.000761724,0.00014359222,0.00050564524,0.0005305073,0.5672615,0.008947873,0.14699845,0.006317694,0.26723608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021414264,0.00006816364,0.0001484978,0.000032684507,0.000028202205,0.00015110655,0.00006905928,0.9654768,0.0012320197,0.02735947,0.0053855022,0.000027088503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042557083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031151269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042557083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010596163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015811686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012584269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209809308","doi":"10.1007/s12559-021-09884-z","title":"Commentary on “D-Intuitionistic Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Their Application in Multiple Attribute Decision Making”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Computation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Chen; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy set; Decision maker; Artificial intelligence; Degree (music); Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Operations research","score_opus":0.1199071059984842,"score_gpt":0.40819953203732345,"score_spread":0.28829242603883926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209809308","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009921428,0.002480213,0.0005749932,0.96555847,0.029612191,0.0000079175425,0.00006120254,0.000009529409,0.0015963088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004713623,0.0013826968,0.00064375525,0.93922263,0.05255536,0.00006644035,0.000018026827,0.0000219378,0.0013755079],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97890663,0.008643402,0.0020824021,0.003141429,0.006058868,0.0011672009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8874685,0.087639764,0.003039611,0.0018322645,0.01749016,0.0025296898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019681077,0.0012334143,0.0022862703,0.0019175119,0.006329783,0.0084287,0.009069811,0.070734255,0.005641221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12034535,0.0011494976,0.0028354093,0.0035317892,0.016669987,0.008017984,0.0045954273,0.07022865,0.0034520058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065777385,0.000009212943,0.000059350834,0.00020780199,0.000030146146,0.0002150317,0.00049233757,0.00017889068,0.00006027645,0.040446244,0.95330346,0.0049316273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014313194,0.000036063946,0.00045204375,0.0018226781,0.000079736375,0.00043334244,0.0007987554,0.001088689,0.00037650092,0.13776308,0.8568444,0.00016153709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019659042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019705795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070734255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076001813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008749874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10408473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212061210","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2021.10.002","title":"Optimal selection of an electric power wheelchair using an integrated COPRAS and EDAS approach based on Entropy weighting technique","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"EDAS; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Weighting; Computer science; Entropy (arrow of time); Ranking (information retrieval); Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Mathematics; Estimation of distribution algorithm","score_opus":0.07246308821723078,"score_gpt":0.38400954473717697,"score_spread":0.31154645651994617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212061210","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121959716,0.00053614826,0.86849904,0.00020369327,0.000046944315,0.00024130514,0.0001240106,0.00012777543,0.008261349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8427015,0.00034149265,0.15349782,0.00006963318,0.000021585593,0.00033985975,0.0001706909,0.00003684528,0.0028206294],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895716,0.00045711925,0.000060029946,0.00012969956,0.0002555306,0.00014042722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992155,0.0004649746,0.00008587838,0.000026840271,0.00016098158,0.000045905002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016230968,0.0011995261,0.0015683508,0.0023755503,0.0004696055,0.0018406765,0.00087622047,0.0008470736,0.0030590221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025034489,0.00062389055,0.001499692,0.0011602433,0.00044888305,0.0010419084,0.001017998,0.0005528008,0.00021599224],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010864751,0.000086237575,0.0011105246,0.00016645681,0.00012746558,0.00011564496,0.00007205865,0.9466524,0.0026004375,0.0055105817,0.0003997523,0.043049783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011915413,0.00006078805,0.00031777722,0.000017394706,0.000029619092,0.000012541728,0.000037735877,0.99714714,0.00040481158,0.001690967,0.00025996845,0.000009386774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008198872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005838209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008198872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011638607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001361608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016302288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215362846","doi":"10.3934/mbe.2022039","title":"Analysis of medical diagnosis based on variation co-efficient similarity measures under picture hesitant fuzzy sets and their application","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College","funders":"","keywords":"Singleton; Data mining; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Similarity (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Variation (astronomy); Fuzzy set; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07988576445181808,"score_gpt":0.37314105065787867,"score_spread":0.29325528620606056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215362846","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06428038,0.0008298648,0.931844,0.00029452745,0.000044979104,0.00004936286,0.000064784734,0.00006367441,0.002528337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92423946,0.00044220753,0.07387321,0.000049344028,0.00007146382,0.000055741602,0.00008354648,0.000014838614,0.0011701694],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976706,0.0007306429,0.00018631115,0.0004724665,0.0007904323,0.00014944731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965209,0.0019911104,0.00046937776,0.00017943977,0.0007137393,0.0001254828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031990511,0.0005303194,0.0008148716,0.003489022,0.0005222813,0.0019991915,0.0009465529,0.0008237832,0.001187944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0098553635,0.0002203085,0.000936886,0.001830724,0.0012577334,0.0022722376,0.0009949352,0.0008302899,0.000115945324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025567578,0.00011372659,0.011449074,0.000428343,0.00039759837,0.0007107597,0.0009650631,0.46595836,0.006660965,0.3464554,0.0015767639,0.16502832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004495935,0.00006788605,0.0017440534,0.000026487787,0.000033741875,0.00016772373,0.00011791097,0.9556886,0.0012454985,0.04026327,0.0006119792,0.000028464796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019659316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087074237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003489022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014596032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067775627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01691842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216065188","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3944312","title":"One axiom to rule them all: An axiomatization of quantiles","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Quantile; Axiom of choice; Axiom independence; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory; Urelement; Axiom; Constructive set theory; Econometrics; Calculus (dental); Computer science; Set theory; Medicine","score_opus":0.18005293338412304,"score_gpt":0.4220390666107706,"score_spread":0.24198613322664758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216065188","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011258169,0.0006046598,0.9421241,0.01077737,0.00058723486,0.00006853123,0.00049053656,0.00031805874,0.033771273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39717,0.0009775831,0.5846584,0.004448745,0.0007548797,0.0003158611,0.0005827008,0.00019964871,0.010892129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995027,0.0019118877,0.0005254263,0.001058838,0.0010900343,0.00038676092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98940593,0.0056865364,0.00063285045,0.0020190584,0.0018755194,0.00038014996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008575487,0.0008132294,0.0011962679,0.0013041986,0.0026184954,0.0036870209,0.0033362538,0.0030793517,0.007456372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01887516,0.0008219664,0.0027419457,0.0017320646,0.007412811,0.0104662655,0.0036829067,0.009294813,0.0017370145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062152117,0.000011402496,0.00018429568,0.000018857718,0.000011494667,0.0000263878,0.00008689992,0.0006834726,0.00012371823,0.99271715,0.0015750496,0.0045550386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015089524,0.000009397837,0.00011063905,0.000016959608,0.000013694064,0.00005070002,0.00003417532,0.0034824384,0.00018190169,0.9909123,0.0051564155,0.000016325004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030187732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00322976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008575487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016630936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022934177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04535204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217806805","doi":"10.3934/mbe.2022050","title":"Complex pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators based on confidence levels and their applications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College","funders":"","keywords":"Pythagorean theorem; Closeness; Confidence interval; Computer science; Sensitivity (control systems); Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; CLs upper limits; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Data mining; Statistics; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.15022240821364852,"score_gpt":0.37318635824427143,"score_spread":0.22296395003062291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217806805","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015894672,0.0018909,0.97567874,0.000420629,0.00009343808,0.000035347384,0.00008737381,0.000058742688,0.0058401227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57175875,0.0035735448,0.42103043,0.00019412566,0.00033074463,0.00020899667,0.00014149556,0.00005853125,0.0027033982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610704,0.001420111,0.0003612616,0.00062109815,0.0013093109,0.00018126317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996452,0.002099982,0.00043653377,0.00032501624,0.0005688347,0.00011762679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056216493,0.000995164,0.0008082338,0.0025466103,0.00063985545,0.003163279,0.0011351153,0.00090910756,0.0016613511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011872344,0.00037678442,0.0015250411,0.0035707564,0.0028957853,0.004616846,0.001999376,0.0027413762,0.00022822472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006521857,0.000027627211,0.0010390028,0.00022411265,0.0000982931,0.00016954979,0.00048888556,0.069062866,0.0024494054,0.854194,0.0011516346,0.071029484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014347166,0.000096797165,0.000750208,0.000102120954,0.00005045841,0.00024724787,0.00015627434,0.45838144,0.0019887853,0.5316542,0.0064942557,0.0000640085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012826376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049520214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056216493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015475095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007807513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029730499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200394996","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116378","title":"An advanced decision-making model for evaluating manufacturing plant locations using fuzzy inference system","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Delphi method; Delphi; Fuzzy logic; Selection (genetic algorithm); Operations research; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.20329879232348097,"score_gpt":0.48459461312797536,"score_spread":0.2812958208044944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200394996","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029067008,0.00019375651,0.96728677,0.00014397305,0.000048990347,0.00007291622,0.00013000384,0.00033031215,0.0027262648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85503584,0.000185401,0.14138234,0.000062121515,0.00003755287,0.00023951956,0.00017367468,0.000024450967,0.0028592008],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992932,0.00017856984,0.00005318179,0.00021226595,0.00018025946,0.000082586506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991242,0.00046511707,0.00008757203,0.000036397065,0.000250455,0.00003621294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001576359,0.0008959055,0.0017135596,0.0010374947,0.0009575165,0.0019175502,0.0018359291,0.002098779,0.0030996425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002382574,0.00056427333,0.0009867939,0.0010867615,0.0006099985,0.0015483327,0.00079961633,0.0011273029,0.0004683015],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006334312,0.000039561317,0.00031859108,0.000042381816,0.00003434935,0.00006560056,0.000039868897,0.9810337,0.00085444737,0.0035741387,0.00026838065,0.013665645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045198753,0.000011897548,0.000055526085,0.0000030428234,0.000009330425,0.00000529456,0.0000025864058,0.9988599,0.000121934325,0.0008547143,0.00006703047,0.0000043098357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025043497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01729425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025043497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017810041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001847966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04979545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200485312","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116392","title":"A personalized individual semantics-based multi-attribute group decision making approach with flexible linguistic expression","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Guangdong Province Higher Vocational Colleges and Schools Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Sichuan University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Group decision-making; Expression (computer science); Semantics (computer science); Consistency (knowledge bases); Selection (genetic algorithm); Process (computing); Aggregate (composite); Preference; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Programming language; Psychology","score_opus":0.145654702168185,"score_gpt":0.4108322455413814,"score_spread":0.26517754337319643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200485312","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006181281,0.00007614312,0.99189734,0.00014738434,0.000026888669,0.00006533277,0.00004388653,0.00022147747,0.0013401995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31082863,0.0001538941,0.68535423,0.00023645922,0.0000941795,0.0003710445,0.00026524538,0.0001278848,0.0025683506],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624854,0.0013529576,0.00025792752,0.0007377425,0.0011787979,0.00022397723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829286,0.0008183931,0.00013251805,0.00021152548,0.00042893694,0.000115715215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003348235,0.0009350325,0.0019802237,0.0017341519,0.0013260666,0.0024862979,0.0028402982,0.0015544158,0.0035373464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005364581,0.0006260074,0.0018739955,0.0022422993,0.0009796385,0.0041060415,0.0036822157,0.0019229649,0.00077507814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043687332,0.00070555875,0.0015879365,0.0003563635,0.0004571491,0.0004738113,0.0016959397,0.38537058,0.009800713,0.12926328,0.0059932955,0.4638585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032335996,0.00010270214,0.00019496116,0.000025486614,0.00008947518,0.0000837493,0.00014146537,0.9247511,0.001446818,0.07115991,0.0019351214,0.0000368372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022621406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027562263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035373464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010780159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020432265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017707348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200532495","doi":"10.5267/j.jpm.2021.10.003","title":"Development of a hybrid AHP and Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence for project risk assessment problem","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Project Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dempster–Shafer theory; Analytic hierarchy process; Taguchi methods; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk assessment; Operations research; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Business; Computer security","score_opus":0.5028392919532441,"score_gpt":0.5270742277863069,"score_spread":0.0242349358330628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200532495","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030357921,0.00022510285,0.99525,0.00015180146,0.000022681199,0.0001536348,0.000041415606,0.000041353323,0.0010782749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14981224,0.00048042944,0.8477963,0.00009419306,0.000049717644,0.00080562604,0.00011600693,0.000018710432,0.0008267306],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916916,0.0037132048,0.0006289627,0.0005950469,0.0030769312,0.00029440262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99275196,0.005253633,0.0003694463,0.00016700437,0.0012926807,0.00016522597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007548313,0.0012270275,0.0015768949,0.0052404,0.0009675845,0.0025181752,0.0023503911,0.0018920763,0.0018881345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013634046,0.00087128766,0.0019340558,0.0031885067,0.0009275958,0.0026674187,0.0029270088,0.0018730494,0.00020797648],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012720894,0.00016103321,0.0020805618,0.0010589766,0.0004251392,0.00035063285,0.0005349775,0.7023471,0.002322282,0.06626573,0.0016233645,0.222703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003272082,0.000090197165,0.00025800295,0.00009857002,0.000047653662,0.00008260942,0.00015853954,0.96982634,0.0007101276,0.026748855,0.0019169158,0.000029464876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004990877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038461501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007548313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001958542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043408214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039919794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200540082","doi":"10.3390/en15010058","title":"Fuzzy-Based Investigation of Challenges for the Deployment of Renewable Energy Power Generation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energies","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"King Saud University","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy number; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy set operations; Computer science; Defuzzification; Operations research; Signed distance function; Membership function; Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.25748342406631736,"score_gpt":0.38243774262664504,"score_spread":0.12495431856032768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200540082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59855264,0.0019548142,0.28218588,0.0045729266,0.00019407681,0.00036712256,0.0003557544,0.000056962137,0.11175984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97501266,0.0004498238,0.022880964,0.000055189535,0.000021406318,0.000042533356,0.000037588285,0.000002506054,0.0014973814],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891436,0.00047878516,0.00005320261,0.00010079112,0.00034176692,0.00011114633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786913,0.0013583809,0.0002839061,0.00004697135,0.0003573223,0.000084187006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020660914,0.0003735096,0.00031724706,0.0014929425,0.0008727475,0.0030745587,0.0005643702,0.0010096384,0.0019908112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046393834,0.0001666005,0.0006420561,0.0010215387,0.000984777,0.001713302,0.0006843256,0.0006968636,0.00011671294],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002787877,0.0002607188,0.023790546,0.00069833285,0.00017630808,0.002463527,0.002708588,0.44179377,0.009174228,0.4400705,0.0032442883,0.075340316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012950698,0.00023379395,0.010213673,0.00024392287,0.000057082554,0.0004856952,0.0075890357,0.8051629,0.0023425452,0.16654259,0.007028326,0.00008752053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004894494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00704811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004894494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021448946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013405228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015562296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205801157","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2021.11.003","title":"Similarity measures for Fermatean fuzzy sets and its applications in group decision-making","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Cosine similarity; Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence; Similarity measure; Data mining; Measure (data warehouse); Fuzzy set; Mathematics; Score; Pattern recognition (psychology); Computer science; Machine learning; Image (mathematics)","score_opus":0.12072234647255287,"score_gpt":0.430329274883008,"score_spread":0.3096069284104551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205801157","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018400278,0.0017500971,0.9747106,0.000306896,0.000093657894,0.000110634064,0.00007873987,0.000055670636,0.004493419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40535262,0.0014327269,0.5906413,0.00014247905,0.00021356945,0.00038415854,0.00021349714,0.000028731496,0.0015909543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913702,0.003609583,0.0009672489,0.0010196746,0.002816482,0.00021668943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904785,0.005994555,0.001063682,0.00057873543,0.0016618355,0.00022274033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007180067,0.0008581517,0.0012433992,0.0054303287,0.001262327,0.0023613337,0.0014111317,0.0014934238,0.0017600491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019999666,0.00026867387,0.0017778844,0.0047413055,0.002323461,0.0040406655,0.0017788429,0.0018825908,0.00038128137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017341053,0.00012865115,0.0035579698,0.0005508306,0.00028316106,0.00022214037,0.00074070285,0.1386157,0.0032882395,0.6037706,0.0015346723,0.247134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026714933,0.00032130998,0.002340532,0.00016371266,0.00007055767,0.00031172126,0.00024628008,0.5614999,0.002139794,0.42520022,0.0075709354,0.000108330525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016443846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009322119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007180067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023953426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009795864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03797227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206244976","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2021.11.002","title":"Comparing best-worst method and full consistency method in a fuzzy environment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Pairwise comparison; Consistency (knowledge bases); Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Management science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.17746062219387115,"score_gpt":0.4391031052958378,"score_spread":0.26164248310196664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206244976","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.110768266,0.0013819332,0.8768565,0.00029934436,0.00020179038,0.00021258216,0.00022904866,0.00040526522,0.009645296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47534776,0.0004885446,0.52193993,0.00008302704,0.00005708242,0.0002263168,0.0002584868,0.00012484915,0.0014740563],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864617,0.0062833866,0.0008503157,0.0016320784,0.004304064,0.00046835162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980569,0.012634248,0.0011127637,0.0018448237,0.0035865102,0.00025260408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013701581,0.0010327381,0.0016330166,0.0058638705,0.001614335,0.0025611133,0.0015952915,0.001596904,0.002907129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03457385,0.000431204,0.0017911496,0.004227906,0.0013467625,0.0033269455,0.0014927265,0.0011280569,0.00035470762],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014808638,0.00032861275,0.031503916,0.0014593538,0.0014178746,0.00044552732,0.0014892224,0.21673898,0.007675759,0.05068359,0.0043135174,0.6824628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020428524,0.0010503832,0.019662123,0.00027946458,0.0005575069,0.0010523413,0.0014776064,0.88383555,0.015503979,0.065083936,0.011031313,0.00026149568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004576414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049225665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013701581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010982058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002103308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072461784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206252622","doi":"10.1155/2021/2046097","title":"A New Decision Support Framework with Picture Fuzzy Information: Comparison of Video Conferencing Platforms for Higher Education in India","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment; Natural Resources Conservation Service; European University Association; Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development; National Institute of Environmental Research; Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán; International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement; Instituto Politécnico Nacional; Universidad Veracruzana; NSW Department of Education; Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey; Directorate for Education and Human Resources; Universiteit Maastricht; University of Twente; Educational Testing Service; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; Higher Education Authority; Council for Higher Education; Korean Educational Development Institute; American Educational Research Association; Division of Chemistry; Lumina Foundation; Universidad de Guadalajara; McGill University; Compagnia di San Paolo; European Commission; London School of Economics and Political Science; University of the Arts London; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Computer science; Usability; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Fuzzy logic; Ranking (information retrieval); Robustness (evolution); Videoconferencing; Group decision-making; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Multimedia; Human–computer interaction; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02954812662755102,"score_gpt":0.3964465133940667,"score_spread":0.3668983867665157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206252622","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26885998,0.00057062093,0.7155257,0.00073100766,0.00006375527,0.0004191076,0.0003294184,0.00019180166,0.013308603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.867023,0.00013836328,0.1318585,0.000036546895,0.000011428488,0.000120941935,0.000108204666,0.000009297828,0.0006937542],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973279,0.0014277771,0.00013472408,0.00023283363,0.0006596081,0.0002171304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759334,0.0015774284,0.0001975321,0.00009592259,0.00043568006,0.00009999916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003538463,0.0006114994,0.0006812366,0.0026465205,0.00068223465,0.0023407293,0.0014067877,0.0008103823,0.0019154889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056548496,0.00025625405,0.0010201222,0.0022550495,0.00078137283,0.0012917491,0.0011990299,0.0007559929,0.00010031469],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004042884,0.0002465104,0.0071988567,0.0005210383,0.00017114877,0.00043899825,0.0007451979,0.7475412,0.0028385029,0.09123664,0.0013782079,0.14727935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033733777,0.00026400478,0.003375383,0.00005446914,0.00006217813,0.00010739248,0.0008686452,0.9759445,0.0011321945,0.015544215,0.0025675953,0.000045692406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01807101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014298437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01807101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036723276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029415495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035931647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206599590","doi":"10.1007/s40815-021-01231-6","title":"MAGDM Framework Based on Double Hierarchy Bipolar Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Information and Its Application to Optimal Selection of Talents","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Selection (genetic algorithm); Hierarchy; Computational intelligence; Fuzzy logic; Set (abstract data type); Analytic hierarchy process; Term (time); Fuzzy set; Data mining; Context (archaeology); Rank (graph theory); Rule-based machine translation; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.051845750713911745,"score_gpt":0.3758721122530279,"score_spread":0.3240263615391162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206599590","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01166978,0.0007737954,0.9817706,0.00022537378,0.00008153317,0.000038297447,0.00006493476,0.00008084153,0.0052949083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69682974,0.0010764337,0.29727724,0.00014609065,0.00018623566,0.00018091008,0.00015172405,0.000033193744,0.004118459],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990866,0.000360045,0.000061938445,0.00014593404,0.00025627518,0.00008913354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936944,0.00031751348,0.00005609087,0.000035905898,0.00018294071,0.000038000897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016718609,0.00051806687,0.0010444844,0.0015491785,0.0006036372,0.0017791444,0.0013915627,0.0008707768,0.0023471676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027031694,0.00025645498,0.00082651747,0.0021493635,0.0005035506,0.0016899004,0.0012975198,0.00070617744,0.00024001571],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002695233,0.0001720185,0.0012037727,0.00055248366,0.00023548752,0.00043319495,0.000373114,0.39656886,0.0060998797,0.3939281,0.0040211393,0.19614233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012423561,0.000061033275,0.00024104257,0.000032352797,0.00003571994,0.00007128474,0.00004953583,0.94622487,0.0006785704,0.050615136,0.0019514323,0.000026549715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002294724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017372955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023471676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010097432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010296602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008841753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206951340","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1248532/v1","title":"A Note On “Pythagorean Uncertain Linguistic Hesitant Fuzzy Weighted Averaging Operator and Its Application in Financial Group Decision Making”","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Pythagorean theorem; Operator (biology); Group decision-making; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Point (geometry); Fuzzy set; Work (physics); Group (periodic table); Linguistics; Mathematics; Algebra over a field; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Pure mathematics; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1541548977824219,"score_gpt":0.49457709921394016,"score_spread":0.34042220143151825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206951340","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00968917,0.013914885,0.9226187,0.019349698,0.00659102,0.00011411357,0.00012189673,0.00011567561,0.027484836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35544682,0.024701037,0.5778541,0.0071146498,0.00989676,0.00034459625,0.00023275027,0.0001646338,0.02424466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964342,0.0020677936,0.00023302398,0.000458009,0.00071456324,0.00009232961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953485,0.0029486134,0.00015695358,0.0002651737,0.00118139,0.000099239674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065307547,0.000559536,0.0006533235,0.0011287879,0.00097346905,0.0021096084,0.0012332445,0.0016107216,0.0035228878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009622495,0.00022851714,0.0013859253,0.002475703,0.0025634395,0.003370642,0.0014653249,0.002962612,0.00072961353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015267509,0.0000635702,0.0006191582,0.0006960066,0.0001411198,0.0010743988,0.0013493816,0.023954252,0.0036192175,0.82383424,0.041935995,0.102560036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027190812,0.00017838947,0.0008150385,0.00031252898,0.000098072065,0.0003821149,0.0004080857,0.15410483,0.004582297,0.6931668,0.14577973,0.00014496822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029672242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00184836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065307547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011871967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011311651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03453839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210293606","doi":"10.1007/s41066-021-00311-0","title":"A perceptual computer for hierarchical portfolio selection based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Granular Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Selection (genetic algorithm); Rank (graph theory); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Perception; Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy set; Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Data mining; Mathematics; Psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.12159274920586506,"score_gpt":0.3953482125052738,"score_spread":0.27375546329940875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210293606","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030919079,0.00012806352,0.95805645,0.00016647387,0.00008828848,0.00014228241,0.0001559057,0.005011645,0.005331837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3942511,0.00016402174,0.6018937,0.00016227417,0.00003363215,0.00020824844,0.00018535933,0.0002758858,0.002825716],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996754,0.00008674071,0.000028539034,0.00007371142,0.00010873157,0.000027040787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988771,0.00073313876,0.00004494556,0.00013286801,0.00013782542,0.00007416754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091841095,0.00041945453,0.00074372836,0.0007581161,0.00044991955,0.001737653,0.001027083,0.0006745922,0.013395811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036555196,0.00027780255,0.00053230237,0.0006391774,0.0005007593,0.0013467061,0.0011529202,0.0005378072,0.0009723693],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016664194,0.0002945654,0.0019428609,0.00051888096,0.00013161008,0.00062555517,0.0007956315,0.13567108,0.053113602,0.07576673,0.012683776,0.7167893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007407402,0.00013189806,0.00058621384,0.000039579718,0.00004019473,0.0001143411,0.00007726265,0.9640929,0.006641299,0.022531344,0.005643731,0.00002707525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020375154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018506936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013395811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048372385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004897411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044813454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210295248","doi":"10.1155/2022/4488576","title":"Novel Decision-Making Techniques in Tripolar Fuzzy Environment with Application: A Case Study of ERP Systems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":true,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College","funders":"King Saud University","keywords":"Fuzzy set; Operator (biology); Generalization; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Monotonic function; Mathematics; Choquet integral; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1454825417001225,"score_gpt":0.4096299271664136,"score_spread":0.26414738546629113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210295248","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39669004,0.005624092,0.54350233,0.003211309,0.00015946761,0.00038135584,0.00023648026,0.00023335702,0.049961597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87822247,0.0020031154,0.11455306,0.00012729576,0.000065006156,0.00008057315,0.00008279677,0.00001858653,0.0048471857],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886715,0.00051631185,0.00008455152,0.00016448864,0.00024562387,0.000121854646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989568,0.0005550878,0.00009813256,0.00008104376,0.00023875122,0.0000701481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019552677,0.00049998687,0.0005349592,0.0010627309,0.001450231,0.0026740143,0.0008611759,0.0016769032,0.002029091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002605759,0.00016954826,0.00071756664,0.002170997,0.000736651,0.0024148584,0.001130619,0.0010855058,0.00028154833],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036998486,0.0006182552,0.014356006,0.001019574,0.00024594954,0.014373862,0.0067245243,0.21878983,0.012376308,0.26147872,0.008156483,0.4614905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006022026,0.00034515178,0.0066747633,0.00017100859,0.00016553255,0.002301327,0.008122703,0.81037086,0.0064413636,0.11879576,0.046404734,0.00014660461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038012643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004581689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038012643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010926292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082116516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010340571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210542188","doi":"10.1007/s10462-021-10124-x","title":"Multi-criteria decision-making for coronavirus disease 2019 applications: a theoretical analysis review","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence Review","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Context (archaeology); Multidisciplinary approach; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Management science; Computer science; Pandemic; Decision analysis; Data science; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Medicine; Disease; Sociology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Geography; Engineering; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3122358513913376,"score_gpt":0.5498448854277446,"score_spread":0.23760903403640699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210542188","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022578405,0.9556043,0.031004773,0.0035413173,0.00022867286,0.000041656058,0.000042890984,0.000017082592,0.007261413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09145313,0.8751764,0.030843137,0.00083816884,0.0006446118,0.000112147456,0.00009288435,0.0000136919,0.00082584226],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811906,0.0008381107,0.00014769708,0.00014414202,0.0006471624,0.00010384397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98957294,0.0090300385,0.00035539054,0.000105614075,0.0008688932,0.00006706232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050851223,0.00090681936,0.001432744,0.0042334967,0.0004698226,0.0030436288,0.0017327236,0.0015569786,0.0025167945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009664049,0.00039360224,0.0013238877,0.0045404164,0.0009725647,0.0021101455,0.0009391359,0.001728518,0.00039458557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104980165,0.0002467866,0.0011079152,0.023667283,0.0005379905,0.00023861529,0.0003586591,0.038910296,0.00074174104,0.18226112,0.010106239,0.74171823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076517936,0.0004975726,0.0043589296,0.03519387,0.0009866102,0.0008554652,0.0012325285,0.107909665,0.0017410885,0.5556441,0.29129785,0.00020572841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026245299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028172939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050851223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026641276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026564533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02689302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213180076","doi":"10.1504/ijsom.2007.012136","title":"Fuzzy AHP-based supplier selection in e-procurement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Services and Operations Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Purchasing; Analytic hierarchy process; Procurement; Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Supplier evaluation; Operations research; Supplier relationship management; Quality (philosophy); Fuzzy logic; Process (computing); Process management; Operations management; Supply chain; Business; Supply chain management; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.053316751949573984,"score_gpt":0.4015697694346537,"score_spread":0.34825301748507975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213180076","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044919234,0.0005346354,0.94712454,0.00038306517,0.00005720916,0.0005148485,0.000082845385,0.0001567276,0.0062268795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5620367,0.0004025021,0.43505776,0.0000953938,0.00003227911,0.0005011473,0.000098439945,0.00002330918,0.0017524919],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399406,0.0041515077,0.00022096462,0.00019516172,0.0012578622,0.0001804882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971437,0.0020669766,0.00014477296,0.000059846952,0.0005071708,0.00007750875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065131714,0.00059303996,0.0010264742,0.0017188567,0.0014467604,0.0015447887,0.0012386198,0.00094494084,0.0020464114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007317671,0.0005524665,0.00062911486,0.0023617079,0.0009280214,0.0011760388,0.0013528906,0.0009144659,0.00025400618],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002383311,0.00017859472,0.0010712986,0.00037294824,0.00012286358,0.0002705306,0.0006664639,0.86093056,0.0018538769,0.024637248,0.0013083122,0.108348966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039528597,0.00004921994,0.00017276482,0.000033603068,0.00001580356,0.000023423647,0.00013211844,0.9871973,0.0007313293,0.01069782,0.0008918898,0.000015285319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012308604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0123694865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012308604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002126466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025576341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034445405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214679120","doi":"10.1155/2022/5025768","title":"Application of Fuzzy Linguistic Rating and Entropy-Based GRA to Address Uncertainty in Safety Performance Index Construction","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Weighting; Vagueness; Entropy (arrow of time); Computer science; Composite index; Data mining; Generalized entropy index; Index (typography); Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Engineering; Mathematics; Composite indicator; Business","score_opus":0.031171201159865897,"score_gpt":0.3499923656376316,"score_spread":0.3188211644777657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214679120","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063969344,0.0002105124,0.9318166,0.00010070093,0.00003748527,0.00020996763,0.000104167964,0.0002692582,0.0032819526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68743193,0.00013308013,0.31106862,0.000031151878,0.00004109237,0.00022089898,0.00019255615,0.000040967316,0.00083969615],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962754,0.0016318155,0.000340999,0.0003867813,0.001205795,0.00015923515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99471164,0.0029698312,0.0007040123,0.00035463402,0.0011410995,0.00011880412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004764016,0.00079618423,0.00087987486,0.0042653433,0.00051153696,0.0016225837,0.0008647071,0.00061931723,0.0014008011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014309308,0.00028686284,0.001061757,0.002610628,0.0006468438,0.0014199174,0.0013216233,0.0005895315,0.00025377792],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003553596,0.0002595781,0.020100608,0.0005281299,0.00033824515,0.00047952894,0.0016010737,0.3795086,0.014140295,0.039345726,0.0014367771,0.54190606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013444664,0.00012519029,0.004405719,0.00003882326,0.00006260007,0.000092345006,0.0001829239,0.9805023,0.003365615,0.010181443,0.0009798945,0.000049643484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022688964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019873893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004764016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082661473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010172437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025194824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214871626","doi":"10.3390/buildings12030295","title":"Hybrid AHP-Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach for Selecting Deep Excavation Support System","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Buildings","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Taif University","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; TOPSIS; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Lagging; Ranking (information retrieval); Ideal solution; Fuzzy logic; Engineering; Operations research; Scope (computer science); Pile; Process (computing); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.11796699096347382,"score_gpt":0.37549892604663604,"score_spread":0.2575319350831622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214871626","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01610125,0.00065551413,0.9720472,0.00023860246,0.00006805632,0.00063312927,0.00023479643,0.00043184933,0.0095896125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37164566,0.0009294063,0.62262434,0.00009512491,0.000041837586,0.0008688676,0.00047153997,0.000037323425,0.0032858886],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968605,0.0011615525,0.00024601104,0.00021420742,0.0012987413,0.0002190105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992449,0.00028322314,0.00007383796,0.000030533483,0.00032414825,0.00004335935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002507905,0.0014202901,0.001268217,0.0047141947,0.0019694206,0.0025654095,0.0014320327,0.00083413714,0.0044144345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002298021,0.0006350169,0.0016517674,0.0041348906,0.00050162163,0.0011830532,0.0018004143,0.00089492294,0.0004549107],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024291729,0.00021470276,0.0024391238,0.001997784,0.0005910103,0.0011606489,0.0013259944,0.5906822,0.011657754,0.043607365,0.004692234,0.34138814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007056596,0.00021311047,0.0008882356,0.00015433882,0.000120087694,0.00020553159,0.00073472754,0.96556807,0.003225904,0.02102374,0.007729959,0.00006569898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01367774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013575214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01367774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001560268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036621788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027196288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223957752","doi":"10.1177/01466216221084210","title":"A Comparison of Modern and Popular Approaches to Calculating Reliability for Dichotomously Scored Items","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Psychological Measurement","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cronbach's alpha; Reliability (semiconductor); Monte Carlo method; Statistics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Psychology; Computer science; Psychometrics","score_opus":0.7494451842918853,"score_gpt":0.49012840491475185,"score_spread":0.2593167793771335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223957752","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15044172,0.022689434,0.7707635,0.0061908425,0.0009948574,0.00062508835,0.0006168027,0.00049675105,0.047180954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52492726,0.009622931,0.46008316,0.00080091425,0.00040938932,0.0015314776,0.00052795326,0.00027154025,0.0018254229],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.91981125,0.054617,0.0039258264,0.0036436731,0.017389754,0.00061256473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8078433,0.14245756,0.008833358,0.012349837,0.027620818,0.0008951352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0769159,0.001092385,0.00085285713,0.0062230495,0.0011178278,0.0027085957,0.001833847,0.0010841308,0.00260749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22165397,0.0005023901,0.0011229978,0.008510004,0.0028233822,0.005230124,0.0031770575,0.0033314119,0.00076891034],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082943076,0.00036467868,0.0535571,0.003534798,0.0014052291,0.000117576834,0.017876817,0.0073218555,0.0026429535,0.2913171,0.015699387,0.6053331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006205178,0.0032899352,0.26650307,0.010905367,0.0015322207,0.0025041113,0.02134194,0.100218154,0.010583541,0.45807582,0.123394735,0.0010305825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020598941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046336134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0769159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024431325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002243564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.406775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225300847","doi":"10.1109/dasa54658.2022.9765059","title":"Bumper Beam Composite Material Selection using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Material selection; Analytic hierarchy process; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ranking (information retrieval); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; New product development; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Product design; Product (mathematics); Ideal solution; Automotive industry; Manufacturing engineering; Rank (graph theory); Process (computing); Engineering; Operations research; Materials science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Composite material; Business","score_opus":0.22957055326278789,"score_gpt":0.4705503337909242,"score_spread":0.24097978052813632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225300847","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12931673,0.00072496396,0.8641983,0.00016278992,0.00002586428,0.0004255704,0.00009344281,0.00011537744,0.004936979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6697423,0.00045921723,0.32799602,0.000039222054,0.000015250748,0.00043808136,0.00009235938,0.000017999702,0.0011996283],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717546,0.0011599421,0.0001493196,0.00018942886,0.0011343652,0.00019149297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773115,0.0014431751,0.00016427776,0.000041686522,0.0005520942,0.00006763545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004119232,0.0010469656,0.0013408329,0.0038208193,0.0011394433,0.0022254137,0.0009152047,0.000985967,0.0016604324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040637623,0.0006207858,0.0015994796,0.0016555602,0.0004872091,0.0009542338,0.00082861475,0.0005402752,0.00013879935],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044364997,0.0002657077,0.003674436,0.00087827694,0.00025408927,0.0004458449,0.00054790615,0.8219115,0.0327542,0.009699313,0.000898437,0.12822656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002334594,0.00021197842,0.0008414652,0.000051845196,0.000050177438,0.000050488583,0.00016838165,0.9901037,0.0042789853,0.0034815515,0.00070371514,0.00003435439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043034274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053357678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043034274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015436787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014930939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021784842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225315677","doi":"10.1109/dasa54658.2022.9764965","title":"Selection of Sustainable Energy Alternatives from Indian Context","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Petroleum Technology Research Centre; University of Regina","funders":"Mae Fah Luang University","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Sustainable energy; Energy (signal processing); Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Renewable energy; Biology; Electrical engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.12343620302996886,"score_gpt":0.4160697405662962,"score_spread":0.29263353753632737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225315677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7816816,0.0020269947,0.039562732,0.0009803823,0.00009145617,0.00051045336,0.00097291014,0.00011572792,0.17405787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709877,0.0011041737,0.023510884,0.00007474584,0.0000109257035,0.00015303963,0.00032703514,0.000018172077,0.0038134523],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930775,0.00022489266,0.00003274524,0.000044442182,0.00024730834,0.00014283981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999723,0.00010449614,0.000026451697,0.000010666191,0.00009986155,0.000035534747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050527113,0.0007474112,0.0006029805,0.0049078315,0.0009773262,0.0028865011,0.00045758998,0.0003917799,0.004738478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012139203,0.00018454174,0.0009826504,0.0043317922,0.0003383165,0.0006084446,0.00098125,0.00043981653,0.00030575966],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014309637,0.00093421404,0.031172248,0.0021392533,0.0006033281,0.0056155305,0.00210794,0.3421304,0.029513638,0.13475177,0.010921803,0.43867892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031932152,0.0021060866,0.05457368,0.0011315631,0.0014262733,0.002309677,0.039023288,0.67332786,0.02971508,0.09482648,0.10090327,0.00033750432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064558447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019773802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064558447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013982714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001861839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015851796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226065915","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-93352-4_8","title":"Introducing a Probabilistic-Based Hybrid Model (Fuzzy-BWM-Bayesian Network) to Assess the Quality Index of a Medical Service","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in fuzziness and soft computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Economic shortage; Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Bayesian network; Quality (philosophy); Fuzzy logic; Group decision-making; Service (business); Bayesian probability; Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Machine learning; Management science; Data mining; Engineering; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.29918728041750214,"score_gpt":0.46546321878925534,"score_spread":0.1662759383717532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226065915","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021032519,0.00049734715,0.9928663,0.00035480518,0.000081045095,0.00003365978,0.00008042138,0.00009107446,0.0038921617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22212961,0.0018463843,0.76630574,0.00036352716,0.00024409479,0.00029330706,0.00024616133,0.00007688648,0.00849428],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990095,0.00033231467,0.00005448993,0.00019783007,0.0003535714,0.000052199255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924064,0.0004881697,0.00007559168,0.00003051737,0.0001389767,0.000026063786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017202696,0.0007882047,0.0006698999,0.0018867782,0.00045347612,0.0020245924,0.0021349227,0.0018946707,0.0029913792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041151517,0.0005369587,0.00104874,0.0025153584,0.0009999408,0.0032578986,0.0014298911,0.0017011272,0.0005865551],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049663144,0.000083148225,0.0015660159,0.00020942611,0.0001423054,0.00017926494,0.00016134976,0.47137403,0.0042677233,0.412703,0.0035120153,0.10575206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041334815,0.000025870233,0.00035932922,0.0000301776,0.000021400534,0.0000742249,0.00001498943,0.9065115,0.0004890856,0.08950001,0.0029400168,0.000029230288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009528127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009156514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009528127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018880734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010741497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018945336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229059026","doi":"10.1037/xge0000804","title":"Worse is bad: Divergent inferences from logically equivalent comparisons.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"John E. Fetzer Memorial Trust","keywords":"Framing (construction); Framing effect; PsycINFO; Logical equivalence; Markedness; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Equivalence (formal languages); Philosophy","score_opus":0.38586830505385283,"score_gpt":0.5378986633379681,"score_spread":0.15203035828411526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229059026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8330054,0.0030719254,0.07096297,0.009047975,0.0005372094,0.00033650102,0.000709273,0.00013334943,0.08219535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860697,0.00033795062,0.011134911,0.0013677698,0.00010402968,0.00011198177,0.00032029068,0.000038027607,0.00051529007],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9674829,0.019576702,0.0016171305,0.0036958952,0.0070469826,0.0005805052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7814912,0.18476218,0.014614738,0.012516575,0.0050150882,0.0016002012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03045707,0.00071274105,0.0006394693,0.002403666,0.0012797937,0.0039192643,0.0015798737,0.0020172286,0.0069543417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2811433,0.0006134073,0.00095989095,0.0015938288,0.005446784,0.011420423,0.00594328,0.0037350405,0.00039313798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0049634925,0.0009252019,0.15823182,0.002723232,0.001898525,0.0031221933,0.07472452,0.003890206,0.017231377,0.3481292,0.010970204,0.37318996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033607546,0.00036945287,0.12389056,0.0006590915,0.00068777235,0.0013393481,0.012013966,0.010312719,0.00596606,0.8322007,0.012014998,0.00020927185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011132022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014763471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03045707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011930452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083011866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16107428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229799740","doi":"10.1002/int.20018","title":"Belief, plausibility, and probability measures on interval-valued type 2 fuzzy sets","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Interval (graph theory); Axiom; Type (biology); Measure (data warehouse); Fuzzy set; Fuzzy logic; Discrete mathematics; Probability measure; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy measure theory; Representation (politics); Analogy; Fuzzy number; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.2532592522639635,"score_gpt":0.4500281764192226,"score_spread":0.1967689241552591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229799740","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034970313,0.0040193633,0.9349224,0.0011083154,0.00028127932,0.00009180369,0.00033615835,0.00015987792,0.024110518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6353077,0.0035153914,0.35265422,0.00040563458,0.00066770706,0.00049706973,0.0003856205,0.000040307732,0.006526258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960395,0.0014272736,0.0003540338,0.0005483436,0.0014425816,0.00018819791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941876,0.0031195579,0.0009976499,0.00046144344,0.0009917154,0.00024199372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004107118,0.0009995522,0.000727184,0.0033044384,0.000747698,0.004447052,0.0011833074,0.0015734994,0.0023121652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013886836,0.00042474346,0.001189378,0.0029192027,0.0034539339,0.0064540743,0.0013452036,0.0019453437,0.00052707305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075505486,0.000026393931,0.00048803427,0.00017566605,0.0000708208,0.0003239138,0.000489209,0.020974962,0.0016004082,0.9432276,0.0010127979,0.03153466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018877454,0.00005972931,0.000620341,0.00010039102,0.00003122623,0.00025969438,0.00014358616,0.05824106,0.00090317806,0.93287116,0.006706056,0.00004469493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011052149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009075505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004447052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018945002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007594722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021720767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230643689","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-7456-1.ch004","title":"Type-One Fuzzy Logic for Quantitatively Defining Imprecise Linguistic Terms in Politics and Public Policy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Set (abstract data type); Presidential system; Fuzzy set; Class (philosophy); Politics; Mathematical economics; Ask price; Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Moderation; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Fuzzy number; Political science; Economics; Law; Statistics; Economy","score_opus":0.3114031335719822,"score_gpt":0.4502623175291929,"score_spread":0.1388591839572107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230643689","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033235054,0.029119361,0.82070524,0.007742947,0.0014645678,0.00014611868,0.0006060247,0.00021839306,0.13667393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16833942,0.024523484,0.7634852,0.0037992168,0.0018173452,0.0007159161,0.00081234047,0.00020009691,0.03630703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960516,0.0018257608,0.00030631336,0.0003815212,0.0013170625,0.00011775908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970011,0.00229655,0.00017308195,0.00015720307,0.00032797197,0.00004407089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005167616,0.0012456421,0.00081453857,0.002931666,0.0013586929,0.0055654896,0.0018528177,0.0020154428,0.006691976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071603204,0.00055612304,0.0014061399,0.004586079,0.005306063,0.008572442,0.0016239495,0.0053480226,0.0020901642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018563618,0.000015042282,0.00007935806,0.00030636648,0.000019721107,0.000084428146,0.0005991701,0.0042322483,0.0004221111,0.94536024,0.0073324745,0.041530255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006794375,0.000012039856,0.00008908976,0.00035922712,0.00001646515,0.00008662993,0.00024378595,0.010079762,0.00039228663,0.93736786,0.051319104,0.00002691752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029409803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002794637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006691976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050452584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014427333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036606133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231172375","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14663403.v1","title":"Environmental decision making using multiple participant-multiple criteria decision techniques","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sustainability; Commission; Management science; Decision analysis; Aviation; Operations research; Outcome (game theory); Order (exchange); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental economics; Business; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.30621305780900715,"score_gpt":0.47134869689254516,"score_spread":0.165135639083538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231172375","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027836237,0.00013934475,0.968309,0.00019171508,0.00004619549,0.0009856565,0.00008161508,0.00006774735,0.002342481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19229725,0.0002100415,0.8047404,0.000033420016,0.000025432006,0.0018627287,0.00008099628,0.00002786104,0.0007218635],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96880686,0.026772939,0.0007056333,0.0011816334,0.0020647198,0.00046816695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93648916,0.05900652,0.0013890367,0.0010341003,0.0015923356,0.00048893807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024657367,0.0023286983,0.0021516208,0.0025189908,0.0020139127,0.004263274,0.0026857762,0.0023278277,0.0073273033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041458663,0.00085711305,0.0025834476,0.0028604036,0.0018807289,0.0041473503,0.0030710644,0.0027422442,0.0005682844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013543203,0.0011822013,0.0028772992,0.002192356,0.0007295834,0.0010029481,0.007585545,0.5913996,0.006397408,0.19165796,0.0012319037,0.1923888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020504775,0.0005530722,0.00031557074,0.00013896737,0.00007802071,0.00012604153,0.0015137821,0.857621,0.0030113438,0.13277088,0.0035740305,0.00009226753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011074641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018047298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024657367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018646598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023603647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1304022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232876393","doi":"10.1093/med/9780199685219.003.0007","title":"From items to scales","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Weighting; Judgement; Psychology; Scale (ratio); Computer science; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Information retrieval; Applied psychology; Epistemology; Medicine; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.22396757887825564,"score_gpt":0.45647714585754096,"score_spread":0.23250956697928532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232876393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060246307,0.029530618,0.20725417,0.029472724,0.007811243,0.00094989134,0.0030751997,0.0015674105,0.71431404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16490899,0.052980345,0.45488706,0.014956624,0.0030303118,0.002814612,0.004814058,0.0019060737,0.29970187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989604,0.005550894,0.0007354665,0.0006916617,0.0032405818,0.0001773701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99073094,0.005578835,0.00027493146,0.00094628514,0.002205885,0.0002631734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00668703,0.0010122784,0.0008036964,0.0038558417,0.0011625704,0.0075634667,0.001729239,0.0013994204,0.037882186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03366994,0.00051938306,0.0005110538,0.0065209977,0.0045022806,0.0093075195,0.0031762272,0.0055378503,0.012544914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022689755,0.000032139404,0.00039711836,0.0005980615,0.000019543233,0.0000681134,0.0021765397,0.00060930866,0.00027599424,0.6250211,0.14346196,0.2273175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008389842,0.000028066765,0.00059104443,0.0012761861,0.0000092342325,0.00010974339,0.0014121803,0.0006203326,0.0002494708,0.28825405,0.70742244,0.000018781006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010897518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013560742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037882186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032563722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002209319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12672853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236229155","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_2969","title":"List Comprehension","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Encyclopedia of Database Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13588427165389866,"score_gpt":0.3765323235399375,"score_spread":0.24064805188603883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236229155","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019018668,0.0014067631,0.0030938962,0.0010873775,0.003087272,0.00018081267,0.014063171,0.0027396877,0.9741508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00096441404,0.001152592,0.0013034423,0.00068487413,0.0006068493,0.00011805502,0.00931228,0.0014310721,0.98442644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944144,0.00007116208,0.000039179013,0.00011781598,0.00027158874,0.000058721234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844825,0.0003789698,0.00006784879,0.000171446,0.0007601202,0.00017339666],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045207143,0.0015507679,0.0014888047,0.0033584451,0.0011044656,0.0058513638,0.001924189,0.0013072528,0.8772028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046395683,0.00051915366,0.0006994658,0.00536751,0.00043561496,0.004932358,0.002127455,0.0013455267,0.8298239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001745341,0.000015642448,0.000043279742,0.00022227582,0.0000018979575,0.000023898405,0.00003957519,0.00004105005,0.00029610939,0.0061081448,0.92304695,0.07014379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035567166,0.000006535904,0.000078514335,0.00008853757,0.0000013292457,0.00002971999,0.000026219295,0.000026382635,0.00010108917,0.0015066674,0.99812704,0.0000043507125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027004813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003839827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8772028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011869961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011610825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17515528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236315844","doi":"10.1093/med/9780199685219.003.0005","title":"Selecting the items","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Homogeneity (statistics); Ambiguity; Cronbach's alpha; Jargon; Psychology; Social psychology; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Psychometrics","score_opus":0.30185358535304213,"score_gpt":0.4625184005020122,"score_spread":0.16066481514897007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236315844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13212004,0.0040600486,0.16228342,0.017251762,0.0073349243,0.101335205,0.046757933,0.0038312296,0.5250255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13320985,0.0059898975,0.48716623,0.0062216637,0.00093510875,0.10260629,0.03955522,0.0013902041,0.22292553],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996567,0.0011189639,0.00038370103,0.00022854256,0.0015143236,0.00018733875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98879015,0.003684697,0.0004324058,0.0006527738,0.005843199,0.00059686566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048942086,0.0007970522,0.00087635784,0.0026634054,0.0011809759,0.00223949,0.0012475098,0.0010827184,0.078430384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027765209,0.00043821055,0.00055014476,0.0030082262,0.00062786357,0.0017478241,0.001262841,0.0019650008,0.03895259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017085514,0.0005109665,0.0040363655,0.0017648574,0.000018887742,0.00016868708,0.003344569,0.0004947541,0.0045945193,0.017020242,0.43985415,0.5280212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085426145,0.00035069624,0.014716441,0.002110794,0.000032799744,0.00027235274,0.005360712,0.00094494264,0.0041463715,0.013322397,0.95859265,0.000064427724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075910613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012270093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078430384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014772255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029695274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26237577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236502286","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14657415","title":"Personalised ranking with single source implicit information for recommendation tasks a similarity based Monte Carlo Bayesian Personalised Ranking","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business process reengineering; Ranking (information retrieval); Recommender system; Learning to rank; Similarity (geometry); Posterior probability; Bayesian probability; Information retrieval; Data mining; Monte Carlo method; Machine learning; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.14135676807001446,"score_gpt":0.379622343900828,"score_spread":0.23826557583081354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236502286","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011891778,0.00023523983,0.98654836,0.00013174408,0.000021337511,0.00004410904,0.00006064561,0.0002273706,0.0008393848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5166992,0.00042514043,0.47696394,0.00020503292,0.00014195105,0.00029702223,0.00045479997,0.000081006954,0.004731876],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748564,0.001044733,0.00012831073,0.0004676398,0.000746998,0.00012671552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590296,0.0024733918,0.00030240786,0.00052383955,0.000698185,0.00009923418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026162288,0.0006698045,0.0017558485,0.0011735455,0.0006219127,0.0015476105,0.0018579289,0.0020526825,0.0033483033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010143225,0.00077407726,0.0010897223,0.0016522692,0.0007065901,0.0019957656,0.00084267085,0.0016505545,0.0011001759],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018384146,0.00015728196,0.00157034,0.0001533708,0.00014173148,0.00007167479,0.00009160651,0.8561091,0.0028939692,0.01326765,0.0015856002,0.1237738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000084305575,0.000035043442,0.00023863789,0.000007256722,0.000009833599,0.00002575068,0.000003844992,0.995685,0.000402285,0.0032709297,0.0003020226,0.00001090783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008585737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007295667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008585737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012713005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012560933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017071545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237355819","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14654943","title":"Complexity Analysis in Maintenance Systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Complexity management; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Cognitive complexity; Graph; Artificial intelligence; Industrial engineering; Operations research; Machine learning; Cognition; Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.4365249430465236,"score_gpt":0.4831873217453854,"score_spread":0.046662378698861806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237355819","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060723417,0.0036411695,0.9176242,0.0010332961,0.000107175576,0.00010735624,0.00030182223,0.0001552617,0.016306387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90959793,0.0026110017,0.08130959,0.00014299586,0.00030479726,0.0002079528,0.00053062866,0.000086844266,0.005208244],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977944,0.00060522015,0.0001440969,0.00035725176,0.00091432076,0.00018478463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949838,0.0032133078,0.000701089,0.000239887,0.00070813386,0.0001538196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014076326,0.0008991379,0.0009617823,0.0026940743,0.000772966,0.0026195678,0.0007153487,0.00083748926,0.0031587249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008207604,0.0003536491,0.0014330886,0.0016663658,0.0013606676,0.0028671627,0.0013455477,0.0012665313,0.00029767453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043481887,0.000039586666,0.0039893524,0.00033799827,0.00015116882,0.00026585182,0.00037666305,0.52038586,0.0017468632,0.4238,0.0019750637,0.04688814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005870551,0.000036300542,0.001916283,0.000040935924,0.00002604789,0.00010040034,0.000088905086,0.71508145,0.0004096045,0.27860597,0.0036619375,0.000026289115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004994563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013865901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004994563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002496375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010199983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01811254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239928297","doi":"10.23952/asvao.1.2019.1.07","title":"Set optimization problems on ordered sets","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Set-Valued Analysis and Optimization","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Combinatorics; Mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.07322603679536213,"score_gpt":0.3591107308937117,"score_spread":0.2858846940983496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239928297","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029182982,0.0016111362,0.95621645,0.000511118,0.000117208125,0.00011051629,0.00017685835,0.000043322492,0.012030275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5671016,0.0038289614,0.41501555,0.00026070155,0.0003676849,0.00068989693,0.00060241634,0.00010102313,0.012032116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962314,0.0019718916,0.00021031304,0.0005607436,0.0007731242,0.0002525302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964747,0.0026587571,0.00029581948,0.00014182492,0.0002951944,0.00013373066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030011327,0.0019865714,0.0017551249,0.001598521,0.000869133,0.0026392154,0.001202181,0.0013285499,0.0030409258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069639473,0.0005719578,0.001615892,0.002970503,0.0023728972,0.0041605863,0.0019789452,0.0021495128,0.00039010352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005447161,0.00008268025,0.00039959964,0.0003493583,0.000119736156,0.00026177935,0.00021236872,0.2181451,0.0014156207,0.7572479,0.0010623737,0.02064889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031971158,0.00008860033,0.00020384385,0.000055630793,0.000030030948,0.000074104566,0.00010666,0.40030462,0.0007679868,0.5950071,0.0033068527,0.000022542732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019369879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014013181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030409258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023411158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012257005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016986132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240358517","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14654109","title":"Offshore vs. domestic sourcing in a retail environment : a hybrid decision model utilizing a total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process methodology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Profitability index; Analytic hierarchy process; Business; Total cost of ownership; Strategic sourcing; Competition (biology); Industrial organization; Process (computing); Operations research; Marketing; Computer science; Strategic planning; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.3433999673285633,"score_gpt":0.4515276937715202,"score_spread":0.10812772644295687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240358517","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19485377,0.00058425585,0.7825269,0.0010480531,0.000081652084,0.0004972954,0.0002744802,0.00012241543,0.020011175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8867614,0.0006388549,0.107582815,0.0000743194,0.000031748645,0.00038263574,0.00011333382,0.00002213335,0.0043926905],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983398,0.00095346797,0.000055683944,0.0001658017,0.00033520188,0.00014997875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984983,0.0011160846,0.0001178552,0.000025082127,0.00014745563,0.00009523593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021631194,0.00080908684,0.0009452781,0.0012782491,0.0008883719,0.0034778656,0.001402292,0.0015014104,0.002138014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021540944,0.000531906,0.0012368519,0.0017220671,0.0010658756,0.0015931574,0.0012496492,0.0010906667,0.0001865896],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121902245,0.00011563287,0.0012840513,0.00011440762,0.00005369116,0.00016651275,0.0002504685,0.9564798,0.0009124699,0.023548143,0.00035073125,0.016602123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010261721,0.000055562763,0.00012223847,0.000009685933,0.000014017954,0.000013605104,0.000107651256,0.99557835,0.00010650946,0.0036921827,0.00028163573,0.000008262921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016064413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013535205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016064413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026342485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002776962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03194177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241066629","doi":"10.19080/bboaj.2018.08.555726","title":"An Illustration of Obtaining p-values and Confidence Intervals Through the Use of The Significance Function","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidence interval; Function (biology); Statistics; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.6047185087150978,"score_gpt":0.5465635396379601,"score_spread":0.058154969077137686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241066629","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027298718,0.00033910663,0.99362034,0.0005325419,0.000088027846,0.0000342149,0.00006398344,0.0003405618,0.0022513669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16119099,0.00060584064,0.83605176,0.0004027321,0.00013851446,0.00026303655,0.00015002314,0.00031227697,0.00088485423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811364,0.013894022,0.0007678143,0.0010841681,0.002725793,0.00039188113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91876215,0.0707431,0.0017647212,0.0058574537,0.0025542995,0.00031833927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02524367,0.0014204902,0.0012220581,0.004772871,0.0010270791,0.0030742926,0.0019325855,0.0030192982,0.004864238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11762302,0.0005184705,0.001538426,0.003773943,0.0030046958,0.003144157,0.003212356,0.00580251,0.0010833492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031804576,0.00021221033,0.0032079546,0.00067841966,0.0002576483,0.0012320054,0.00086313585,0.06340806,0.0060145883,0.70086956,0.007024838,0.21591352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013299684,0.0002973982,0.0017365923,0.00028305282,0.0000948478,0.0012952659,0.00025082412,0.24230155,0.012075988,0.72537345,0.016026005,0.00013211447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012305522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069131085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02524367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088430214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017471246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1335029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241223412","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2017.087365","title":"An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach for risk evaluation of new product in a pipe industry","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy logic; Ranking (information retrieval); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; New product development; Product (mathematics); Fuzzy number; Engineering; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Reliability engineering; Data mining; Fuzzy set; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Business","score_opus":0.3365760225838111,"score_gpt":0.5020920421712596,"score_spread":0.1655160195874485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241223412","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04085943,0.00038874376,0.95308846,0.00021760554,0.000036528618,0.0003088006,0.00012116898,0.00007009934,0.0049092253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4689212,0.00040561103,0.52901685,0.000040532508,0.000015060248,0.00037971587,0.00008994485,0.000010660206,0.0011203808],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978702,0.0010267233,0.00009770792,0.000117210606,0.0007888033,0.00009936916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911577,0.00048370502,0.000077154145,0.00003607372,0.0002478565,0.000039464543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029642393,0.0007252628,0.0010310742,0.0032188625,0.0008816583,0.0014574358,0.0010382473,0.001067044,0.0017492541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036477179,0.0005035479,0.0012398219,0.002162743,0.0005169804,0.0008618737,0.0012468315,0.0007477044,0.000113393864],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025041692,0.00029331283,0.0039283317,0.0008076798,0.00031792748,0.00047609687,0.00073754584,0.78715324,0.009147492,0.04458665,0.0012040744,0.15109716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028929706,0.00015217003,0.0007941877,0.00005996553,0.000057194684,0.0000814259,0.00022062326,0.98447025,0.0012756834,0.010860845,0.0019711826,0.000027541886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073222374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011142779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073222374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018387387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020812142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015676618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241279948","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-2451-0.ch019","title":"Application of Fuzzy Soft Set in Patients' Prioritization","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Prioritization; Equity (law); Risk analysis (engineering); Economic shortage; Health care; Quality (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Business; Fuzzy logic; Patient safety; Computer science; Operations management; Medicine; Process management; Engineering; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.06921504964470693,"score_gpt":0.3534670616179296,"score_spread":0.2842520119732227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241279948","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0104713505,0.004157502,0.90665954,0.0028723574,0.00059748563,0.00024717135,0.00019641993,0.00018235826,0.07461588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39157763,0.0049785823,0.574146,0.0009169362,0.00041096678,0.00031528674,0.00024142758,0.000050695646,0.027362576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983912,0.0007516802,0.00009397065,0.00019606693,0.00046214953,0.000104871935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991579,0.0005863556,0.000055703324,0.000032592263,0.00012036544,0.00004704085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002216105,0.0007826012,0.0006274086,0.0018322791,0.0010263309,0.002819025,0.0010000017,0.001211479,0.006700273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023042469,0.00026940953,0.0009390411,0.0022825685,0.0015586792,0.0020589514,0.0015992557,0.0018762989,0.0008427363],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103718485,0.000107604115,0.000948891,0.00063607725,0.000083065126,0.00038834373,0.0010141586,0.0674083,0.0032586262,0.66121054,0.011353175,0.25348744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003031626,0.00014061049,0.0008134353,0.00047551267,0.000077242934,0.00038850502,0.00095127075,0.31226924,0.003266663,0.618177,0.06332894,0.00008131192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031535146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003556706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006700273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026387712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020052649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022414684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241360733","doi":"10.1177/0361198106197400101","title":"Analytic Hierarchy Process as a Tool for Infrastructure Management","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Agency (philosophy); Process (computing); Operations research; Transport engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.15812093854111978,"score_gpt":0.4938474482066554,"score_spread":0.33572650966553563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241360733","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012080314,0.004773587,0.97265494,0.0034907777,0.0003986405,0.0011065314,0.0004892889,0.0015849211,0.014293309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0118913,0.0019999987,0.98295456,0.0002545709,0.00016096846,0.0013000253,0.00032575402,0.00009689072,0.0010159189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9509608,0.032858454,0.003714676,0.001536114,0.010365112,0.00056471635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9673977,0.02517461,0.0013043984,0.0015958126,0.0037786085,0.00074898795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032964364,0.0020944772,0.002324436,0.011764481,0.0026919676,0.009794141,0.003204053,0.0023983377,0.007858149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038077544,0.0012527519,0.0021020833,0.014380923,0.003994154,0.0053428533,0.0039009263,0.0055501326,0.0022907178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012995572,0.0002491646,0.00093503174,0.002982023,0.0003183537,0.0006370109,0.0030600412,0.0389479,0.0015084863,0.52552605,0.035111375,0.39059457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001637021,0.00038706535,0.0010946532,0.0023232338,0.00012404157,0.00043067962,0.001881334,0.1048102,0.001397996,0.6274228,0.2597651,0.00019920804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049007316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004281238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032964364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005007418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010163492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17433429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242447867","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14654109.v1","title":"Offshore vs. domestic sourcing in a retail environment : a hybrid decision model utilizing a total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process methodology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Profitability index; Analytic hierarchy process; Business; Total cost of ownership; Strategic sourcing; Competition (biology); Industrial organization; Process (computing); Operations research; Marketing; Computer science; Strategic planning; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.3433999673285633,"score_gpt":0.4515276937715202,"score_spread":0.10812772644295687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242447867","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19485377,0.00058425585,0.7825269,0.0010480531,0.000081652084,0.0004972954,0.0002744802,0.00012241543,0.020011175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8867614,0.0006388549,0.107582815,0.0000743194,0.000031748645,0.00038263574,0.00011333382,0.00002213335,0.0043926905],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983398,0.00095346797,0.000055683944,0.0001658017,0.00033520188,0.00014997875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984983,0.0011160846,0.0001178552,0.000025082127,0.00014745563,0.00009523593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021631194,0.00080908684,0.0009452781,0.0012782491,0.0008883719,0.0034778656,0.001402292,0.0015014104,0.002138014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021540944,0.000531906,0.0012368519,0.0017220671,0.0010658756,0.0015931574,0.0012496492,0.0010906667,0.0001865896],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121902245,0.00011563287,0.0012840513,0.00011440762,0.00005369116,0.00016651275,0.0002504685,0.9564798,0.0009124699,0.023548143,0.00035073125,0.016602123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010261721,0.000055562763,0.00012223847,0.000009685933,0.000014017954,0.000013605104,0.000107651256,0.99557835,0.00010650946,0.0036921827,0.00028163573,0.000008262921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016064413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013535205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016064413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026342485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002776962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03194177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244232501","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14654943.v1","title":"Complexity Analysis in Maintenance Systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Complexity management; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Graph; Artificial intelligence; Industrial engineering; Machine learning; Operations research; Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.4365249430465236,"score_gpt":0.4831873217453854,"score_spread":0.046662378698861806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244232501","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060723417,0.0036411695,0.9176242,0.0010332961,0.000107175576,0.00010735624,0.00030182223,0.0001552617,0.016306387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90959793,0.0026110017,0.08130959,0.00014299586,0.00030479726,0.0002079528,0.00053062866,0.000086844266,0.005208244],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977944,0.00060522015,0.0001440969,0.00035725176,0.00091432076,0.00018478463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949838,0.0032133078,0.000701089,0.000239887,0.00070813386,0.0001538196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014076326,0.0008991379,0.0009617823,0.0026940743,0.000772966,0.0026195678,0.0007153487,0.00083748926,0.0031587249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008207604,0.0003536491,0.0014330886,0.0016663658,0.0013606676,0.0028671627,0.0013455477,0.0012665313,0.00029767453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043481887,0.000039586666,0.0039893524,0.00033799827,0.00015116882,0.00026585182,0.00037666305,0.52038586,0.0017468632,0.4238,0.0019750637,0.04688814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005870551,0.000036300542,0.001916283,0.000040935924,0.00002604789,0.00010040034,0.000088905086,0.71508145,0.0004096045,0.27860597,0.0036619375,0.000026289115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004994563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013865901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004994563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002496375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010199983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01811254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244651853","doi":"10.1016/j.inffus.2019.08.003","title":"An intelligent quality-based approach to fusing multi-source possibilistic information","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Fusion","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Data mining; Entropy (arrow of time); Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Credibility; Benchmark (surveying)","score_opus":0.17220852028835473,"score_gpt":0.43943801617836326,"score_spread":0.26722949589000855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244651853","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037025334,0.00026519242,0.99473464,0.0001334895,0.000023553492,0.00003661881,0.00002128029,0.00007447361,0.0010082455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39678726,0.00048892415,0.6012251,0.00011712735,0.00009010783,0.00014971504,0.00010743824,0.00004772169,0.0009866146],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625033,0.0010633876,0.0003148552,0.00037769653,0.0018275852,0.00016613553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99622846,0.0016980199,0.0004216108,0.00027173836,0.0012686837,0.00011144923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006061534,0.0013309029,0.0016582294,0.004952876,0.0008102762,0.0033331427,0.0023189103,0.0016219513,0.0016779661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013616806,0.0007489345,0.001956176,0.003461051,0.001443393,0.0044352156,0.0028782564,0.0014282295,0.00029836324],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033101294,0.00025308775,0.0019512489,0.0006389238,0.0006651363,0.00033085913,0.0006626487,0.5426555,0.012271071,0.114856035,0.001982208,0.32340226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016484775,0.000075568765,0.00040399452,0.000043398926,0.000107941196,0.00006490102,0.000044442513,0.95647955,0.0019670408,0.039837636,0.00092441146,0.0000346295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034258591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002988129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006061534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001545952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012872976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032056868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244808931","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14657415.v1","title":"Personalised ranking with single source implicit information for recommendation tasks a similarity based Monte Carlo Bayesian Personalised Ranking","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business process reengineering; Ranking (information retrieval); Recommender system; Learning to rank; Posterior probability; Similarity (geometry); Bayesian probability; Information retrieval; Data mining; Preference; Monte Carlo method; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.14135676807001446,"score_gpt":0.379622343900828,"score_spread":0.23826557583081354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244808931","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011891778,0.00023523983,0.98654836,0.00013174408,0.000021337511,0.00004410904,0.00006064561,0.0002273706,0.0008393848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5166992,0.00042514043,0.47696394,0.00020503292,0.00014195105,0.00029702223,0.00045479997,0.000081006954,0.004731876],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748564,0.001044733,0.00012831073,0.0004676398,0.000746998,0.00012671552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590296,0.0024733918,0.00030240786,0.00052383955,0.000698185,0.00009923418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026162288,0.0006698045,0.0017558485,0.0011735455,0.0006219127,0.0015476105,0.0018579289,0.0020526825,0.0033483033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010143225,0.00077407726,0.0010897223,0.0016522692,0.0007065901,0.0019957656,0.00084267085,0.0016505545,0.0011001759],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018384146,0.00015728196,0.00157034,0.0001533708,0.00014173148,0.00007167479,0.00009160651,0.8561091,0.0028939692,0.01326765,0.0015856002,0.1237738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000084305575,0.000035043442,0.00023863789,0.000007256722,0.000009833599,0.00002575068,0.000003844992,0.995685,0.000402285,0.0032709297,0.0003020226,0.00001090783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008585737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007295667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008585737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012713005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012560933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017071545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245626804","doi":"10.7816/ulakbilge-09-59-05","title":"MEASURING THE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE OF COUNTRIES BY CODAS AND TOPSIS METHODS: G7 GROUP COUNTRIES EXAMPLE","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ulakbilge Dergisi","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ranking (information retrieval); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Context (archaeology); Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Economics; Mathematics; Operations research; Computer science","score_opus":0.1221764526157149,"score_gpt":0.3713277911565858,"score_spread":0.2491513385408709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245626804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7237651,0.0017341609,0.1717451,0.0014413599,0.00024123634,0.001450685,0.0047149155,0.00055471656,0.094352804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78116107,0.0009877399,0.21078382,0.000057822366,0.000016199147,0.00055745547,0.0025090808,0.00004189679,0.0038849679],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646324,0.0018761989,0.00027018457,0.00023469389,0.00092270994,0.00023287725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968706,0.0010500817,0.00030946304,0.00023392309,0.0014584808,0.00007745014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034003267,0.0011720619,0.00053093745,0.0067293607,0.0010347713,0.0025407146,0.00051210896,0.000583346,0.0029816835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059646526,0.00020435428,0.0012555268,0.012597736,0.0005528811,0.0010011952,0.001297185,0.0006354834,0.0005535223],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056831416,0.00061646366,0.17428227,0.0018725533,0.0012793924,0.0020590827,0.008305123,0.060424946,0.0077499347,0.054317623,0.02210592,0.6664184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027878972,0.0017106384,0.3280448,0.0017075725,0.0015893666,0.0016591394,0.07912097,0.36293882,0.026125796,0.06661872,0.12974954,0.00045582408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016629694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017057257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016629694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018845686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020382428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033065796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247288235","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2006.08.019","title":"Glossary of Terms Used in the MyPyramid Food Guidance System","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Glossary; Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09510116312280918,"score_gpt":0.4094943195126215,"score_spread":0.3143931563898123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247288235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006405073,0.12199894,0.08052481,0.011121208,0.009845471,0.0037605737,0.31363484,0.004619285,0.44808987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06590312,0.17399292,0.27494955,0.016266724,0.004152992,0.009350427,0.26891366,0.0040884065,0.18238221],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985505,0.00032562218,0.00053948077,0.00013662264,0.00037970356,0.000068118985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99616516,0.0020419832,0.000473806,0.00017221531,0.0010396218,0.0001072155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014907598,0.0018240216,0.0015872605,0.0071388874,0.0009986417,0.003415625,0.0015101525,0.0016920721,0.096282244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007501296,0.00052035134,0.0011628767,0.008828337,0.0007149261,0.0023203173,0.0012250865,0.0021335597,0.055517223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027066196,0.000092883085,0.0010163201,0.0059434855,0.00004801074,0.0004545238,0.000707937,0.0015599036,0.0014216243,0.044339757,0.7654804,0.17866455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022408987,0.000027443892,0.0010699482,0.0016583578,0.000025626083,0.00042143348,0.00011740854,0.00041249528,0.00027603208,0.004257466,0.99167836,0.000033112872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011706121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011167843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096282244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020742184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026302463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32209617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247995482","doi":"10.24124/2008/bpgub543","title":"Development of fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis approach for contaminated site management.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage; University of Northern British Columbia; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Fuzzy logic; Selection (genetic algorithm); Site selection; Process (computing); Fuzzy set; Task (project management); Management science; Decision analysis; Risk analysis (engineering); Decision support system; Computer science; Government (linguistics); Operations research; Set (abstract data type); Engineering; Data mining; Systems engineering; Business; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.16200298321055645,"score_gpt":0.4425473250152705,"score_spread":0.28054434180471405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247995482","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005357514,0.00081971096,0.9854307,0.00039936302,0.00008862774,0.0004134545,0.00010138995,0.000074743366,0.007314569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060564477,0.0005893674,0.9364932,0.00007179643,0.000020902242,0.00043674,0.000093322014,0.000013318851,0.0017168451],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846315,0.0006554965,0.000091195034,0.0001269611,0.00060719834,0.000056102566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991359,0.0004063345,0.000060995153,0.000024028976,0.00033300807,0.000039743136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002978654,0.000914344,0.0007722861,0.0022159163,0.0010328164,0.0016692574,0.0010215986,0.0010504184,0.0031102307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036671076,0.0003675274,0.0015493267,0.0013375896,0.00056895154,0.0010137632,0.0009929745,0.0014560777,0.00040091152],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008366904,0.00023078817,0.0013275294,0.0009865051,0.00026955135,0.0005008107,0.000946717,0.47910652,0.009362356,0.12303257,0.005655845,0.37849703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043424185,0.00014807888,0.00058491586,0.00025772955,0.000071314986,0.00017140711,0.0002845424,0.9216551,0.0033389493,0.052232828,0.021151738,0.000060046885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052247355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008111996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052247355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020398651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003331062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015752792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251135511","doi":"10.1504/ijmdm.2018.093503","title":"Finding consistent weights assignment with combined pairwise comparisons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Ranking (information retrieval); Consistency (knowledge bases); Computer science; Data mining; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm","score_opus":0.12558393593173395,"score_gpt":0.41686170791094057,"score_spread":0.2912777719792066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251135511","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018987644,0.00005371537,0.9973253,0.000039757546,0.000021025995,0.00006903001,0.000022379965,0.00010044611,0.00046949892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03490395,0.00008211142,0.9639515,0.000036833375,0.000030042405,0.0003668969,0.00011917988,0.00010740709,0.0004020026],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94933254,0.0323611,0.001918113,0.0053328243,0.010178607,0.0008769199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9494143,0.03176187,0.0027864107,0.0074114795,0.008139975,0.00048590323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026262166,0.0025756585,0.0032627364,0.007656833,0.0022188555,0.0040140585,0.003961561,0.0024376323,0.0051128245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.099573866,0.0014989546,0.0026460723,0.008806808,0.002912091,0.006239059,0.0050610933,0.0038732307,0.0016018676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047140077,0.00035373238,0.0028106289,0.0015704208,0.001255646,0.00041567563,0.001613819,0.162842,0.009765328,0.13812701,0.005759008,0.6750153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011070275,0.00042947702,0.0008520331,0.00022391434,0.00026262467,0.00029378253,0.0004154605,0.53125143,0.008460054,0.4504003,0.0071582096,0.00014200599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010455546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016379982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026262166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013243437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032200909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13888925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251301833","doi":"10.5194/hessd-11-371-2014","title":"Comprehensive evaluation of water resources security in the Yellow River basin based on a Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis Approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"National Key Research and Development Program of China; National Science Foundation","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ranking (information retrieval); Water resources; Ideal solution; Structural basin; Water security; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Rank (graph theory); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Drainage basin; China; Inner mongolia; Water resource management; Operations research; Data mining; Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Geography; Mathematics; Environmental science; Geology; Artificial intelligence; Cartography","score_opus":0.23996406441414883,"score_gpt":0.4308453253494173,"score_spread":0.19088126093526844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251301833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5500428,0.00096066523,0.44048285,0.0005990229,0.000047806767,0.0004631263,0.0003506412,0.00011358023,0.006939495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94878834,0.00016925127,0.05020922,0.00002172652,0.00000880644,0.000119649594,0.00009043743,0.0000049422742,0.000587552],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977272,0.0009709757,0.00017508217,0.00020691866,0.00076472526,0.0001550265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989208,0.0004351319,0.00011457509,0.000050680603,0.00037503758,0.000103892904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00397552,0.00087293965,0.00089396926,0.005205334,0.0010474066,0.0023848836,0.0004888803,0.0005997722,0.0010619274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030582047,0.00037957972,0.0014567884,0.0026725903,0.0006817436,0.0016735013,0.0011928736,0.0005638137,0.00005059364],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032513705,0.00029550542,0.04249712,0.00048075814,0.00075356395,0.0006071808,0.00078902626,0.797818,0.010156808,0.022899851,0.0011540127,0.122223064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002540773,0.00013596243,0.008932695,0.000052536496,0.00011609925,0.000050845876,0.0004458149,0.9777014,0.0018503168,0.00987342,0.0007777787,0.000037693237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009583094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012252581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009583094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032692868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028808042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023720443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251728262","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_100560","title":"k-Coreness","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.37475727428673133,"score_gpt":0.45899348243591265,"score_spread":0.08423620814918131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251728262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0125518665,0.0021676433,0.21789257,0.0027051067,0.00084104255,0.00016050883,0.00059598114,0.00040739554,0.7626777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4829106,0.0043740747,0.1635597,0.0037739205,0.0012160032,0.0006927068,0.0015748645,0.0011520775,0.3407461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984665,0.00028189356,0.00010964156,0.0005423051,0.000414669,0.00018503681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997931,0.0007264128,0.00012816521,0.00044700064,0.00065630564,0.00011116745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014583415,0.00092208403,0.0010539512,0.0012726227,0.0018474548,0.0034420597,0.0011052254,0.00108782,0.029332628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054502646,0.0005234069,0.00097503216,0.0016909505,0.0039235093,0.0074301134,0.003173108,0.0035778997,0.012701038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004029516,0.000015215727,0.00010656631,0.00015242473,0.0000131972565,0.000036528178,0.00020865905,0.00066043925,0.0005341452,0.93799037,0.014768554,0.045473594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004897896,0.0000109955645,0.00011654955,0.000050199476,0.0000054822453,0.00008874041,0.00005661416,0.0009735748,0.0004756852,0.9620867,0.03612203,0.000008555468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095654815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077595795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029332628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015339412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013791735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252563725","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v10n2p137","title":"Comparative Performance of Estimation Maximization Among Residual Estimators: A Structural Equation Modelling Perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Residual; Maximization; Mathematics; Structural equation modeling; Regression analysis; Regression; Statistics; Estimation; Econometrics; Perspective (graphical); Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Economics","score_opus":0.15962405268237945,"score_gpt":0.4245427242699918,"score_spread":0.26491867158761234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252563725","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065005414,0.004617055,0.9229409,0.0010047419,0.000055599623,0.00016477003,0.00012081695,0.00035999223,0.005730675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5417543,0.0024943624,0.45372477,0.00018423567,0.000069098,0.0002840349,0.00030525608,0.00017670255,0.0010071843],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9142758,0.07812369,0.0013582031,0.002101601,0.0036105018,0.0005300674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77878433,0.20577142,0.004475381,0.00500756,0.005523761,0.00043750022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0840525,0.001225299,0.0018298903,0.0032132845,0.0005601403,0.0020712477,0.0015906382,0.0013902263,0.0015701954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18374577,0.0006031113,0.0017045472,0.0038002913,0.0014521761,0.0034504102,0.0018681757,0.00174834,0.00034746868],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012771758,0.00038579307,0.032029707,0.0018842523,0.0023130022,0.00018969971,0.0035923026,0.16928643,0.0024199137,0.25147408,0.00304773,0.5320999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016206963,0.001217303,0.018279342,0.00062620913,0.00096671825,0.0002646871,0.00150229,0.8665786,0.0053200573,0.09732819,0.0075824764,0.00017217344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027052064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002437702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0840525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011923237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020961403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44451743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252868867","doi":"10.22215/etd/2006-08539","title":"On the control of confidence processing in sensory-based decision-making tasks","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Psychology; Humanities; Computer science; Art; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07935631155302819,"score_gpt":0.4259624494979025,"score_spread":0.3466061379448743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252868867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6506017,0.002271909,0.30616277,0.0018289177,0.00031501928,0.00041795167,0.00031137353,0.00033094326,0.037759382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798502,0.00035262946,0.01816866,0.000093368384,0.00004938949,0.000082067374,0.00006854351,0.0000430023,0.001292137],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886775,0.0004423928,0.00008896592,0.0001988468,0.00026472492,0.00013737509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880294,0.009645012,0.0007592997,0.00053757423,0.0006368319,0.00039184603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024628465,0.0005533445,0.00051604596,0.00039121724,0.00034499328,0.0030975905,0.0008252913,0.00066954666,0.0041186824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022863707,0.00037808061,0.00044372215,0.0003890588,0.0010016456,0.0015736553,0.00084879785,0.0012989442,0.00031214915],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00666752,0.0016812182,0.0136719225,0.00072072144,0.0006646065,0.00038046637,0.0025992722,0.2704528,0.08712367,0.08074166,0.0045939093,0.5307023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035021082,0.00071922835,0.026099542,0.00011439124,0.00014759909,0.00009632341,0.0002978209,0.85455436,0.011154463,0.10467769,0.0016894914,0.00009892414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004263189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021187337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004263189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000741849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092309393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0137783885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252994177","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14663403","title":"Environmental decision making using multiple participant-multiple criteria decision techniques","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sustainability; Commission; Decision analysis; Management science; Aviation; Decision-making models; Outcome (game theory); Operations research; Computer science; Order (exchange); Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental economics; Business; Economics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.30621305780900715,"score_gpt":0.47134869689254516,"score_spread":0.165135639083538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252994177","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027836237,0.00013934475,0.968309,0.00019171508,0.00004619549,0.0009856565,0.00008161508,0.00006774735,0.002342481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19229725,0.0002100415,0.8047404,0.000033420016,0.000025432006,0.0018627287,0.00008099628,0.00002786104,0.0007218635],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96880686,0.026772939,0.0007056333,0.0011816334,0.0020647198,0.00046816695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93648916,0.05900652,0.0013890367,0.0010341003,0.0015923356,0.00048893807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024657367,0.0023286983,0.0021516208,0.0025189908,0.0020139127,0.004263274,0.0026857762,0.0023278277,0.0073273033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041458663,0.00085711305,0.0025834476,0.0028604036,0.0018807289,0.0041473503,0.0030710644,0.0027422442,0.0005682844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013543203,0.0011822013,0.0028772992,0.002192356,0.0007295834,0.0010029481,0.007585545,0.5913996,0.006397408,0.19165796,0.0012319037,0.1923888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020504775,0.0005530722,0.00031557074,0.00013896737,0.00007802071,0.00012604153,0.0015137821,0.857621,0.0030113438,0.13277088,0.0035740305,0.00009226753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011074641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018047298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024657367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018646598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023603647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1304022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255575919","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-6070-0.ch010","title":"Recent Advancement in Fuzzy System","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in public policy and administration (APPA) book series","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Process (computing); Management science; Action (physics); Computer science; Field (mathematics); Decision process; Decision-making; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Mathematics; Operations management","score_opus":0.09434975117102448,"score_gpt":0.3941612626304994,"score_spread":0.29981151145947493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255575919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022602603,0.35157552,0.08981872,0.008665971,0.006365105,0.000057236877,0.00040971473,0.0004933748,0.54035413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05413419,0.3485035,0.08187152,0.004526494,0.007967572,0.00010876808,0.0009473016,0.00030426882,0.5016364],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951303,0.000065626715,0.000025989095,0.00007143605,0.00029853117,0.00002541666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993649,0.00032203604,0.000020321844,0.000053773914,0.0002040579,0.00003484573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007154332,0.0006320167,0.0005166514,0.0019928871,0.00069867534,0.001884886,0.00079277746,0.0013643911,0.030872177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014196903,0.00028877187,0.0004954573,0.0030173482,0.0008584837,0.0023138742,0.00092568644,0.0020554967,0.00994235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025178186,0.000038393064,0.00014842873,0.00096499035,0.000026012134,0.00013243277,0.00039572522,0.0035307794,0.0009510829,0.27396742,0.17616612,0.5436534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002485465,0.000015232362,0.00014301507,0.0002766899,0.000006129923,0.00018366914,0.000050111747,0.00221585,0.00028176207,0.06330455,0.9335086,0.0000120643945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018003038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022785272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030872177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014405465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089491747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10327768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281482091","doi":"10.1007/978-981-19-0968-9_48","title":"An Integrated AHP-TOPSIS Methodology for Selecting Suitable Project Delivery Method for Construction Projects","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in civil engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Analytic hierarchy process; Ranking (information retrieval); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ideal solution; Computer science; Process (computing); Engineering; Project management; Operations research; Preference; Systems engineering; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.20424352056629885,"score_gpt":0.4214364265534031,"score_spread":0.21719290598710422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281482091","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010214805,0.0003088663,0.98276067,0.00014077072,0.000061681785,0.00050846866,0.00024406904,0.00047034683,0.00529035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.094225354,0.00030766227,0.902586,0.00004216495,0.000014427179,0.00061537354,0.00035923498,0.000048972597,0.001800781],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572796,0.0016597506,0.00034298332,0.000188939,0.0019245117,0.00015594864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985983,0.0006764732,0.00008317302,0.000071419694,0.0005335111,0.00003708747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038738432,0.0011241891,0.0012741473,0.0035446216,0.0012985305,0.002262779,0.0013032989,0.00075783435,0.0038225255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004130868,0.0006938795,0.0017188126,0.004950238,0.00042020174,0.0013324807,0.0015053378,0.0009628265,0.0006911271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021052262,0.0003826246,0.0017580693,0.0015355856,0.00038879685,0.00029048434,0.00067635166,0.12945287,0.014439731,0.016748635,0.005398353,0.8287179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001309897,0.00072165433,0.004424845,0.0004345959,0.00036350687,0.00043968018,0.0012738534,0.93557733,0.012060349,0.029105881,0.015322379,0.0001448829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005840708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009842929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005840708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012266828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003698041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02048707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283067317","doi":"10.1016/j.ins.2022.06.061","title":"A q-rung orthopair fuzzy decision-making model with new score function and best-worst method for manufacturer selection","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Score; Fuzzy logic; Product (mathematics); Function (biology); Task (project management); Quality (philosophy); Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Machine learning; Mathematics; Engineering; Systems engineering","score_opus":0.12177980553644743,"score_gpt":0.4158385807792251,"score_spread":0.2940587752427777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283067317","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014025363,0.0002902984,0.98184276,0.00024120374,0.00006565918,0.00012143461,0.000091844435,0.00020318772,0.0031181623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68553007,0.0005828808,0.304096,0.00017663745,0.00008730738,0.0006927656,0.0003095466,0.00008622326,0.008438574],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963374,0.0018214311,0.00020290706,0.000589564,0.0007313685,0.00031729185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975157,0.0014945875,0.00016091617,0.00008507972,0.0006380146,0.00010584768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062960833,0.0016070695,0.0032722359,0.0025156431,0.0016437186,0.003759501,0.003581633,0.0031542927,0.0052854163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062128194,0.0009807966,0.002254966,0.0026441365,0.001236882,0.0034531595,0.0016429535,0.0020500468,0.00060427614],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009303698,0.00007345631,0.00057454937,0.000105255225,0.00012194272,0.000106020176,0.00010056818,0.9592167,0.00044742876,0.014331424,0.00078197976,0.02404759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008513342,0.000026980648,0.00008336518,0.0000068601767,0.00002145422,0.000013400228,0.000010183056,0.9963987,0.0000631098,0.0031899093,0.00016585425,0.000011512467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020163367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013543727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020163367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002888452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033233454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04009199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283376152","doi":"10.1287/opre.2022.2312","title":"Every Choice Function Is Pro-Con Rationalizable","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research University Higher School of Economics; Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu; University of Bristol; University of Glasgow; York University; Bilkent Üniversitesi; Princeton University","keywords":"Mathematics; Generalization; Function (biology); Invariant (physics); Discrete mathematics; Mathematical economics; Combinatorics; Computer science","score_opus":0.5897146195245632,"score_gpt":0.57844701019602,"score_spread":0.011267609328543204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283376152","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083148494,0.00054262247,0.83188957,0.005828653,0.00013823637,0.00025394445,0.00041902278,0.00031898156,0.07746054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88848305,0.00055226794,0.096602775,0.00083043246,0.0001639035,0.0005862841,0.00025984237,0.000075993,0.012445504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932412,0.0027003132,0.00034469567,0.0014525487,0.0015138842,0.0007474414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922489,0.0046730367,0.00087936246,0.0010979469,0.0008104567,0.00029033853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051211896,0.001037779,0.0012303635,0.0014239977,0.0011311667,0.003553085,0.0009984762,0.0018718551,0.005742583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012848062,0.0005154052,0.0015824437,0.0013518487,0.0071606357,0.0059758644,0.0017545744,0.0024171888,0.000817874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019545569,0.000026632415,0.00027089316,0.000025413823,0.000031120744,0.000041862007,0.000082881554,0.0043719,0.00024234792,0.9889475,0.00046422204,0.005475656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026759491,0.000030392916,0.00020606918,0.000013828465,0.000011786269,0.00004850631,0.00004723851,0.025962405,0.00023038367,0.9704434,0.002963591,0.000015616311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020467483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014497056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005742583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028454144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017211459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027083755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283816293","doi":"10.1037/met0000512","title":"Regression with reduced rank predictor matrices: A model of trade-offs.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Methods","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Learning Partnership","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Mathematics; Linear regression; Regression analysis; Constant (computer programming); Regression; Rank (graph theory); Regression diagnostic; Variable (mathematics); Variables; Econometrics; Combinatorics; Polynomial regression; Computer science","score_opus":0.41604150202304757,"score_gpt":0.556736739686867,"score_spread":0.14069523766381942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283816293","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059101786,0.0011036432,0.9253974,0.0021232255,0.0001677427,0.00032528286,0.0009200624,0.0011415449,0.009719307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74140453,0.0017298468,0.20008884,0.0006027141,0.0002791368,0.0013544485,0.0015892431,0.00064287015,0.05230849],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838643,0.01228536,0.00029801184,0.0016285791,0.00091712124,0.0010065333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9460876,0.044435795,0.0035266534,0.0029157237,0.0022217263,0.0008123995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025959643,0.0023572429,0.002125572,0.0021282528,0.0009519971,0.004807343,0.0036723223,0.0027148537,0.01896547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077012174,0.0021243829,0.002059653,0.0031307465,0.0024371974,0.004582515,0.0024419054,0.0042988206,0.007808356],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007637267,0.0004298233,0.014514186,0.00028156795,0.0007905864,0.00048310574,0.00073431816,0.6101508,0.0005618686,0.2597773,0.010184528,0.101328164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000657625,0.0001266315,0.0015420446,0.00006309197,0.00007451377,0.00012028109,0.000056072793,0.8948931,0.000104769555,0.10073866,0.002174951,0.00004018026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011733769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0104525555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025959643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022960652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024198983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13728935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285061422","doi":"10.1109/tfuzz.2022.3179594","title":"Expertise-Structure and Risk-Appetite-Integrated Two-Tiered Collective Opinion Generation Framework for Large-Scale Group Decision Making","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Preference; Weighting; Computer science; Group decision-making; Flexibility (engineering); Context (archaeology); Cluster analysis; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Statistics","score_opus":0.07594165579841897,"score_gpt":0.37395357215215047,"score_spread":0.2980119163537315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285061422","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007639554,0.0001354341,0.98987865,0.0002045653,0.00002392118,0.000073964104,0.000023330262,0.000070500486,0.0019500072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5685254,0.00022268134,0.42866328,0.00014162155,0.00009810138,0.0003291445,0.00011465025,0.000028800358,0.001876409],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743515,0.0012658513,0.000117843956,0.0003249602,0.0006821771,0.00017410959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981255,0.00088432035,0.00019101721,0.000111944115,0.00055451534,0.00013276284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004538113,0.0007365394,0.000699049,0.0011412759,0.00071476976,0.0013819878,0.0016177963,0.0010817146,0.0021109993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005573484,0.0002543981,0.0011602853,0.000911802,0.0009449822,0.0017751507,0.0015981491,0.0011958418,0.0002921308],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014672383,0.00016585273,0.001954426,0.00027139924,0.00017925621,0.00042828821,0.0012940847,0.6040936,0.0060431277,0.21956696,0.0029661267,0.16289017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013335017,0.000046815734,0.00023244144,0.000011090048,0.000023709432,0.00003501869,0.0000644847,0.9556963,0.00040633333,0.042554293,0.0009012118,0.000014946593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002856067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028380435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004538113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014847775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012447265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024000168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285191514","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-07430-1_9","title":"Advanced Decision-Making Neutrosophic Fuzzy Evidence-Based Best–Worst Method","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in systems, decision and control","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Economic shortage; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Task (project management); Natural disaster; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy set; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Business; Systems engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.2709978846186924,"score_gpt":0.4851462760445444,"score_spread":0.214148391425852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285191514","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004060281,0.0018842241,0.9719305,0.00029594335,0.00017877044,0.00006368812,0.00007130106,0.000067066925,0.021448253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2166936,0.0022864644,0.7700521,0.00017644424,0.00019071624,0.00015594169,0.00018494549,0.00004617653,0.010213544],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871147,0.00045860218,0.000093340284,0.000108608176,0.0005717987,0.000056164863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913484,0.00048530608,0.000042147676,0.000052443676,0.0002569826,0.000028277676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020190168,0.0008262431,0.0009409789,0.0012117536,0.00054662256,0.0016720202,0.0012737456,0.001062613,0.0047103325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028575177,0.00027393262,0.000895884,0.001440805,0.0007029005,0.0013492267,0.0010067386,0.0014659788,0.0006000349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013760595,0.000089624,0.0003533705,0.0006013948,0.00021707645,0.00017432122,0.00015919685,0.22432296,0.004614949,0.34438002,0.008056522,0.41689298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002428434,0.00007405553,0.00035727327,0.0001995994,0.00009573249,0.00021135426,0.000052716456,0.6555504,0.0034411887,0.3199625,0.019984564,0.000046277404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007960743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010256256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047103325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008033227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008813332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01575768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285200946","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-08965-7_7","title":"Application and Comparison of CC-Integrals in Business Group Decision Making","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in business information processing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Choquet integral; Preference; Ideal solution; Computer science; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Group (periodic table); Certainty; TOPSIS; Similarity (geometry); Modular design; Ideal (ethics); Group decision-making; Management science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Psychology; Statistics; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0673348112312594,"score_gpt":0.3843921618588343,"score_spread":0.3170573506275749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285200946","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14751714,0.0045302846,0.8199751,0.00031420265,0.00035101245,0.00027317772,0.00013662918,0.00039639883,0.026506014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65562576,0.001275312,0.33990034,0.000053838157,0.00010915153,0.00019274485,0.00014134111,0.00015218781,0.0025492061],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.992148,0.004791232,0.00031800062,0.0003617258,0.002119164,0.00026182324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.936589,0.05582685,0.00065806037,0.0019641838,0.0044504306,0.0005114623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01698656,0.00082732126,0.0013831872,0.0036984219,0.0011247596,0.0032021592,0.0015025868,0.0011832505,0.0034311658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059287217,0.00021757907,0.0008073986,0.0054285056,0.0014077774,0.0031842494,0.0016999074,0.0014483022,0.00031403682],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013817734,0.00032071082,0.0047222143,0.00059228553,0.00016226605,0.00015391447,0.00076947844,0.20698854,0.0026983297,0.34729874,0.0019712367,0.43294048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045544744,0.00037211145,0.0021483982,0.000107131,0.00010699184,0.00013492546,0.00025644377,0.9070415,0.0034840768,0.08277521,0.003475737,0.000051968214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005843173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039803544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01698656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024349147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024323808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08983463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285263362","doi":"10.7764/ric.00023.21","title":"AN INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE PRIORITIZATION MODEL: CASE STUDY OF TRIPOLI, LEBANON","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Ingeniería de Construcción","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Computer science; Operations research; Entropy (arrow of time); Sample (material); Prioritization; Analytic hierarchy process; Electricity; Process (computing); Engineering; Management science","score_opus":0.08017934806153548,"score_gpt":0.4080304470722354,"score_spread":0.3278510990106999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285263362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9072212,0.00036334517,0.06556897,0.00083603663,0.000038467166,0.00023070615,0.0010770599,0.00012251356,0.0245417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987092,0.00017610613,0.008598352,0.00002566013,0.000007516732,0.00012279765,0.00025427065,0.000010581847,0.003712763],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996257,0.00017322457,0.000012893763,0.00005887529,0.000043622284,0.00008566525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995029,0.00026308864,0.00005852475,0.000016731903,0.0001054344,0.000053334574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007511252,0.00077794585,0.0004989818,0.0010192358,0.0008766477,0.0018601888,0.0012777597,0.0015227919,0.0034947628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009913831,0.0003083566,0.0006842874,0.0014827726,0.00055591983,0.0008038216,0.0009903263,0.0007227968,0.00020215199],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007629511,0.00014463971,0.004178234,0.00006924142,0.000037360067,0.0010501734,0.0001730396,0.97943956,0.0007612889,0.00740252,0.00058467465,0.0060828114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019245414,0.000063434236,0.0012066351,0.000011712665,0.000019361943,0.000041505406,0.00042183473,0.99591005,0.00022634842,0.0014130799,0.00065563584,0.000011251967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06990775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06526868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06990775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036533945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001942461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13900167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285271081","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-07430-1_7","title":"An Advanced TOPSIS-PFS Method to Improve Human System Reliability","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in systems, decision and control","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Interrupt; Reliability (semiconductor); Human reliability; Ideal solution; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Human error; Embedded system","score_opus":0.14676811047592034,"score_gpt":0.48640546242807503,"score_spread":0.3396373519521547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285271081","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031234988,0.00033457004,0.98584217,0.00010580081,0.00012758424,0.00012873336,0.00022530535,0.0009319631,0.009180312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08934194,0.0005318285,0.89775103,0.000077746336,0.00006446898,0.0003030029,0.00055124133,0.0001876291,0.011191166],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985012,0.00046521195,0.00006414842,0.00015038387,0.0007475443,0.00007159427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909663,0.0003674459,0.000039982402,0.00007708501,0.00040405797,0.000014680648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016863573,0.0011323559,0.00092781533,0.0016565416,0.00072311645,0.001237289,0.001007081,0.00067970523,0.010311934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034718583,0.0003314884,0.001240468,0.0025605042,0.0003405199,0.0011918509,0.00084486173,0.0011181617,0.0022040901],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093850365,0.00009697884,0.0007340603,0.00058643165,0.00014463936,0.000110523506,0.00014841364,0.11137283,0.005057525,0.022688434,0.011616919,0.8473494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004691157,0.00027834228,0.0022723137,0.00015112078,0.00017601211,0.00034586352,0.00018769372,0.90796185,0.011853702,0.039138135,0.03751964,0.00006836641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053973338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067287423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010311934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007924435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018250055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034496844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285743035","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2022.895552","title":"Knowledge Mapping of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Healthcare: A Bibliometric Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Frontiers in Public Health","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Bibliometrics; Analytic hierarchy process; Health care; Decision analysis; Citation; Citation analysis; Computer science; Management science; Operations research; Knowledge management; Library science; Political science; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.437582638276243,"score_gpt":0.5230287735380312,"score_spread":0.08544613526178824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285743035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72471666,0.035044268,0.15316169,0.009107389,0.0003097789,0.002461481,0.015044991,0.000839579,0.059314106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91475767,0.006601821,0.073854655,0.0001284858,0.00016379308,0.00079964014,0.0026791398,0.000055854955,0.0009589127],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9663798,0.016839085,0.0036598328,0.002264409,0.010166124,0.0006908015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9091569,0.072946526,0.007244968,0.0031141248,0.0069378614,0.00059964333],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021900611,0.0010277247,0.0022703034,0.09110954,0.0017744842,0.009805515,0.0012254092,0.0011248143,0.0035559102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11270694,0.00041034145,0.002591927,0.11632078,0.0014823808,0.0058460794,0.0044925646,0.0006739454,0.0004818306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003407726,0.00040231593,0.22569333,0.009538806,0.0033816083,0.0007393311,0.0066222986,0.05336667,0.0013739705,0.039839774,0.00881243,0.6498887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022578616,0.0006155342,0.29387805,0.0060194694,0.0037014205,0.0019212133,0.026979133,0.41368648,0.004921365,0.18359195,0.064027525,0.00043207084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059367907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037052596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9088905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004578695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005370064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11582285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286490894","doi":"10.1080/01605682.2022.2096502","title":"Verifying and managing additive consistency and deriving weights for hesitant fuzzy preference relations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Operational Research Society","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Ambiguity; Preference; Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Weak consistency; Fuzzy logic; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Strong consistency; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Programming language","score_opus":0.3586288390354071,"score_gpt":0.47228778580358177,"score_spread":0.11365894676817467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286490894","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021874264,0.00005790485,0.9769876,0.00005202709,0.00001101602,0.00007437314,0.000018817087,0.000044668785,0.00087926735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42997852,0.0001358113,0.5687526,0.000040270403,0.00003438615,0.00022489448,0.0000931183,0.000039334762,0.000701099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840513,0.0077589033,0.0014508057,0.0017183307,0.0043628025,0.0006579259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788285,0.013249225,0.0020752677,0.0020250396,0.003470941,0.00035105427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016326867,0.001376623,0.0015665598,0.0039813034,0.001272993,0.0038138255,0.002068212,0.0012318088,0.0014875897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04449694,0.0010421542,0.0018463851,0.0035029908,0.0019412033,0.0063675274,0.0034035018,0.0023012978,0.00023507797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041865424,0.00027082756,0.005945413,0.00059624045,0.0005335518,0.00045428757,0.0026203974,0.32587042,0.009746002,0.3918067,0.0009302452,0.2608073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003472359,0.00012715616,0.00058259343,0.000060197814,0.00009879113,0.000115926596,0.0003346242,0.84659374,0.0060012927,0.14499752,0.0009918106,0.000061617604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016165082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012788903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016326867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015015767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002392218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08634573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288357452","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1905.04667","title":"Functional Correlations in the Pursuit of Performance Assessment of\\n Classifiers","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Association (psychology); Correlation; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Computer science; Mathematics; Psychology","score_opus":0.35221357683037785,"score_gpt":0.30900952578405794,"score_spread":0.04320405104631991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288357452","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17273138,0.0033986636,0.81262213,0.0016908761,0.00016250092,0.00019545725,0.00020972201,0.00021438913,0.008774832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9042111,0.0006973956,0.09375047,0.0001614555,0.0002487229,0.00021417443,0.00016311459,0.000049676637,0.0005039115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95915526,0.027045093,0.0019839983,0.002763679,0.00818787,0.0008640203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84905994,0.123714596,0.012102148,0.0049976143,0.0088383695,0.0012873083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041594695,0.0021621236,0.0015172397,0.007884879,0.0013741552,0.0039656437,0.0019547103,0.0025767304,0.0008672374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14962447,0.00049323647,0.0008618951,0.0061705066,0.005214988,0.00506677,0.0039415653,0.0021311804,0.00030632777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006670875,0.00034655008,0.079676904,0.0010162324,0.0012344611,0.0004418204,0.0022654678,0.25686857,0.0045511858,0.33153874,0.003215612,0.3181775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003039548,0.00047654478,0.016513295,0.0002252593,0.00015357482,0.0002460115,0.0005437498,0.68827045,0.004181468,0.28651702,0.002663853,0.00017831581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023204375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002029792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041594695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020589316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019382298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21997643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289690032","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2019-0572","title":"Development of an assessment and prediction framework for bridge expansion joints","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Markov chain; Reliability engineering; Bridge (graph theory); Genetic algorithm; Construct (python library); Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Mathematics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.10574725646295143,"score_gpt":0.3802713029830384,"score_spread":0.274524046520087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289690032","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03251178,0.00019329121,0.96446246,0.00029088347,0.00002220619,0.00009203577,0.00016193748,0.00023170825,0.0020338194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7474108,0.00028301845,0.24971873,0.000057471356,0.00004354596,0.00027618892,0.00036495237,0.000033080854,0.0018121991],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992065,0.00024040382,0.000050935854,0.00021482767,0.00018513546,0.000102281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989961,0.0004722898,0.0001342168,0.00003166709,0.00030467784,0.00006117231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022269685,0.00075624435,0.00081117963,0.0012735915,0.0005680713,0.001683244,0.0014523199,0.0010697631,0.001476921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040459903,0.00047823662,0.0008340405,0.00085971283,0.0005342466,0.0012594429,0.0012751137,0.0011893831,0.00019700441],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016640546,0.000046752473,0.0015755306,0.000023085999,0.000032513162,0.000059692935,0.00005095403,0.9731665,0.00068284303,0.008532604,0.00032060617,0.015492329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012724101,0.000006263273,0.00013136337,0.0000025492861,0.000003922822,0.0000032065968,0.0000070174106,0.99836177,0.000065096225,0.0013117723,0.00010342758,0.0000023016698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0397927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022880299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0397927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016903268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031828845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079122186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293200001","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2022-0150","title":"An automation solution for evaluating school capital projects based on fuzzy expert system","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Alberta; Ministry of Transportation of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Automation; Fuzzy logic; Process (computing); Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Expert system; Engineering management; Prioritization; Systems engineering; Engineering; Process management; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10932706579700172,"score_gpt":0.36673331892303246,"score_spread":0.2574062531260307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293200001","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029051675,0.00004053156,0.96638906,0.00008142662,0.000010167495,0.00019156355,0.000056651144,0.0007064651,0.0034723524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4346481,0.000075051765,0.5624797,0.000030693212,0.00001709407,0.00029752144,0.0001183379,0.000034219145,0.0022992846],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874485,0.0003553375,0.00011440469,0.00022969999,0.00042850056,0.00012718889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987262,0.00055697345,0.000113479146,0.00009500708,0.0004561501,0.000052186937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014462831,0.000801998,0.0009726426,0.0012863427,0.0009493948,0.0017408171,0.0008960262,0.0012474955,0.003213437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003302848,0.00045251337,0.00077238586,0.0007782184,0.00038282364,0.0008739584,0.0010597728,0.00064297405,0.000497395],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020155006,0.00019282766,0.0023177827,0.0002617876,0.00007690136,0.00048177066,0.0007578594,0.6364571,0.018121205,0.016235523,0.0023143922,0.32258132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039562514,0.000075873395,0.0007034757,0.000023500694,0.00003614507,0.000072480834,0.00013378747,0.9874001,0.0036954,0.0060654944,0.0017299744,0.000024149324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007939312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0079132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007939312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001034693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020154573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015786171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293768785","doi":"10.3934/era.2022080","title":"Complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy competition graphs and their applications","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Research Archive","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College","funders":"","keywords":"Neighbourhood (mathematics); Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.19098738867133502,"score_gpt":0.4538723686263116,"score_spread":0.26288497995497656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293768785","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055891737,0.0006206253,0.91672856,0.0007022502,0.00008283025,0.00009378381,0.000128756,0.00010332672,0.025648104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82689023,0.0005146094,0.16725358,0.00013588382,0.00006520859,0.0001224694,0.00009839604,0.000032089614,0.0048874905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866736,0.0006162631,0.00005573277,0.00021385205,0.00034285427,0.00010400313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981838,0.0010791379,0.00021178312,0.00009940569,0.00029954175,0.00012636297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018794306,0.0004883208,0.00044713257,0.0017497953,0.00092673395,0.0013999703,0.00080761366,0.00079926825,0.0044823014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039143697,0.00021509621,0.00075151795,0.0014038747,0.0014625527,0.0017238181,0.0012422404,0.0009793941,0.00023818329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048329694,0.000045948378,0.0009806084,0.0001296002,0.000033672633,0.00021653525,0.00022767419,0.15124904,0.0013871259,0.80743665,0.0011834826,0.037061285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001118906,0.0000566844,0.0005244365,0.000025559431,0.000014313455,0.00012528077,0.0001534612,0.66333383,0.000542844,0.33117083,0.004011916,0.000029694196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039575794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027938571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044823014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018796811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009169508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0149948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295200355","doi":"","title":"Comonotonic measures of multivariates risks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.16740920171910323,"score_gpt":0.3772635362925703,"score_spread":0.20985433457346708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295200355","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042635925,0.00039911413,0.9504878,0.00053392554,0.000046468194,0.00003596912,0.000094153525,0.000069907794,0.005696699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81330514,0.0006923843,0.18171273,0.00018756237,0.00021864926,0.00009871144,0.00015618143,0.000067025554,0.0035617037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982955,0.0005678346,0.00010079305,0.00041776482,0.00045514444,0.00016290265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955844,0.0017796317,0.000935021,0.0006152296,0.00062853534,0.0004571863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036067856,0.00058164273,0.0006811448,0.0021196413,0.0006264909,0.0028644565,0.0011810107,0.0006782306,0.003471781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010358748,0.00038406812,0.000952606,0.0017895432,0.0027569183,0.004611953,0.0027291507,0.001556874,0.00026114972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005999606,0.000009003212,0.00041345853,0.000016934653,0.000011120027,0.000025624537,0.000060194216,0.006877792,0.0003686926,0.9857745,0.00020422504,0.006232291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045483944,0.000022843613,0.00068326615,0.000013581328,0.000009522743,0.00003460155,0.000040112132,0.08487647,0.00047899032,0.91206706,0.001752764,0.000016222093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010688362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001329455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036067856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013590021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000928903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019074738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295539287","doi":"10.3390/jrfm15090405","title":"An Alternative to Coping with COVID-19—Knowledge Management Applied to the Banking Industry in Taiwan","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Banking industry; Coping (psychology); Consistency (knowledge bases); Crisis management; Operations research; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Business; Actuarial science; Computer science; Economics; Psychology; Accounting; Management; Engineering; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07340347800969352,"score_gpt":0.38751660363114887,"score_spread":0.3141131256214553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295539287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.875388,0.0008045227,0.087307684,0.007878431,0.00007399933,0.00044428528,0.00005442892,0.000058181085,0.02799042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874929,0.00016969714,0.011325483,0.00009603254,0.0000067254664,0.000037187863,0.000012391953,0.0000015452398,0.00085803616],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846137,0.0008090463,0.000098517005,0.0001763136,0.00021167398,0.00024312186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871397,0.0005434824,0.00025472522,0.000079262405,0.00023780503,0.00017072371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019010061,0.0003390399,0.00028876387,0.0015745717,0.0015450432,0.0027303514,0.0007189473,0.0015790451,0.0014177327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032839007,0.00013973918,0.00051940535,0.0012877176,0.0008944068,0.002048553,0.0016709493,0.0007685679,0.000083502564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004965238,0.0014331717,0.106562965,0.0017838364,0.00048636284,0.0068773874,0.0133661935,0.1763363,0.015611038,0.1968048,0.003942619,0.47629875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018158398,0.0023864976,0.055782612,0.00088187226,0.0003403661,0.0018929823,0.062160887,0.6763682,0.009997721,0.16213326,0.027610714,0.00026341417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053518335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008608476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053518335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016707457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035721313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012122154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295714445","doi":"10.1142/s0219622022500493","title":"Improvement of VIKOR Method With Application to Multi-Objective Design Problems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"VIKOR method; Computer science; Margin (machine learning); Mathematical optimization; Normalization (sociology); Product design; Design methods; Decision maker; Fuzzy logic; Product (mathematics); Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Machine learning; Engineering","score_opus":0.048867969678188836,"score_gpt":0.410273599407437,"score_spread":0.36140562972924817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295714445","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018176469,0.00036849797,0.99579716,0.00005509108,0.00002948948,0.000053032392,0.000010736899,0.00008386443,0.00178446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10331236,0.0009245811,0.8925786,0.00009471105,0.000061000355,0.00053165137,0.0000642807,0.00018875586,0.0022440576],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971528,0.001366876,0.00018834232,0.0002749034,0.0009199522,0.000097145516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963091,0.002532253,0.00026109058,0.00015192853,0.0007029293,0.00004279358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049840785,0.0023778647,0.0020888795,0.002167826,0.0006905493,0.0014780085,0.0015777218,0.0016571633,0.0031156288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070839245,0.000977471,0.002134315,0.0017115917,0.0008037461,0.0014068733,0.0012193972,0.0022055642,0.00083017955],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006936926,0.00008144859,0.00046998292,0.00073793175,0.00013019657,0.00015092138,0.0001947163,0.8461993,0.0064253192,0.021424862,0.0009138171,0.12320209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000144886235,0.000076159406,0.00012849981,0.00005010547,0.000022321,0.000057457768,0.00001637373,0.9902879,0.0011442447,0.0056785527,0.0025046347,0.000019332125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002607201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020712928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049840785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008073378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015176948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026358664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296011377","doi":"10.1016/j.mex.2022.101854","title":"The number of boundedly rational choices on four elements","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MethodsX","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Biochemical engineering; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Biology; Management science; Operations research; Mathematics; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.36904870905872394,"score_gpt":0.5487227732633759,"score_spread":0.17967406420465198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296011377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75017357,0.00022512062,0.23605233,0.0005089531,0.000022883862,0.00014375163,0.00052962336,0.00017700801,0.01216679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.948307,0.00013401688,0.04919064,0.000048612008,0.000015178074,0.0002996869,0.00044959484,0.00004066243,0.0015146978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426234,0.0023620708,0.00037149762,0.0009895008,0.0014595166,0.0005551285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.939475,0.050245874,0.0031966872,0.0048975195,0.0012939658,0.00089098595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007704169,0.0007233915,0.001456855,0.0032266025,0.0010938408,0.0031241695,0.0021313517,0.0014223651,0.010567113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04295416,0.00041563855,0.0019161188,0.0015469894,0.0038875367,0.004327134,0.00238455,0.0016198934,0.00034359697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000999049,0.00021654817,0.018612063,0.00030735802,0.00030137136,0.00033542677,0.0006739775,0.16829312,0.0043924088,0.7679348,0.00090103206,0.03703288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006212184,0.00013150668,0.003852287,0.00006294026,0.00007509629,0.00012985316,0.00031212202,0.2691914,0.0040455717,0.72060007,0.0014867054,0.000050214145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001222893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008137546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010567113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023795576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012510403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040744007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296201467","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.051","title":"A granular multicriteria group decision making for renewable energy planning problems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renewable Energy","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canada First Research Excellence Fund; University of Alberta","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Analytic hierarchy process; Group decision-making; Interpretability; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Data mining; Relevance (law); Operations research; Management science; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.09472860775902023,"score_gpt":0.36922949193059107,"score_spread":0.2745008841715708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296201467","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030060187,0.000284961,0.964311,0.0005334107,0.00008804298,0.00018578078,0.000116060124,0.00012240472,0.0042980746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66685873,0.00028061686,0.32961157,0.00019083248,0.00011273396,0.00045694565,0.00020038629,0.000050202798,0.0022380368],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626523,0.0018890785,0.00023400634,0.00040779894,0.0008428475,0.0003610794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949976,0.0034908748,0.00037528167,0.00035718273,0.000509435,0.00026958453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00632876,0.0011042504,0.0026527352,0.001778704,0.0011285637,0.0035490843,0.0020051198,0.002387492,0.004658633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01069739,0.0008802816,0.0019908235,0.0024107997,0.001480702,0.0025837524,0.0032988943,0.002598297,0.00035315382],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018641952,0.000114937706,0.00049740507,0.00021055594,0.000113308684,0.0001777235,0.00014057518,0.92516214,0.00078461936,0.040506627,0.0008864905,0.031219222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020976371,0.00005155831,0.00008597474,0.000025752359,0.000016403888,0.0000169237,0.00002252334,0.97992617,0.00013770403,0.019395571,0.00029151747,0.000008947016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003895607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029131088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00632876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015866425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016089535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033470094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296514159","doi":"10.18280/mmep.090422","title":"Picture Fuzzy Choquet Integral Based Geometric Aggregation Operators and Its Application to Multi Attribute Decision-Making","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Choquet integral; Operator (biology); Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy measure theory; Extension (predicate logic); Mathematics; Fuzzy set; Set (abstract data type); Correlative; Computer science; Fuzzy set operations; Mathematical optimization; Algebra over a field; Artificial intelligence; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.07718768300571785,"score_gpt":0.3295801205299457,"score_spread":0.2523924375242278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296514159","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020185957,0.0004339775,0.97540295,0.00020932291,0.00005563563,0.000039666425,0.000029627097,0.000054228592,0.003588534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6556974,0.0007069803,0.3415452,0.00010081249,0.00009938716,0.00015641775,0.000073898984,0.00003185809,0.0015878942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986797,0.00053792447,0.00006151747,0.00017395384,0.00047412308,0.00007281106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990299,0.00049771456,0.0000953982,0.0000702357,0.00026565616,0.000041127685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021390354,0.0006862623,0.00072067423,0.0012475859,0.0006326727,0.0012975502,0.0008275566,0.00073652476,0.0012686296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039647324,0.0002031008,0.001172355,0.0015863834,0.001217945,0.0017431239,0.001276702,0.0011501209,0.00012161296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016183006,0.000064683,0.0014242134,0.00031760422,0.00015207008,0.00045550207,0.00054602546,0.26117837,0.012568042,0.5804842,0.0019335452,0.14071399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012585936,0.00010281873,0.0004200811,0.000022804208,0.000033313445,0.00017040168,0.000101921934,0.8051472,0.0018750952,0.18988547,0.002189531,0.00003883076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015173517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000908998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021390354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000779882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090517005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011312425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296718170","doi":"10.18280/mmep.090403","title":"Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Prince Sultan University","keywords":"Scopus; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Variety (cybernetics); Bibliometrics; Computer science; Product (mathematics); Publishing; Work (physics); Diversity (politics); Operations research; Data science; Management science; Information retrieval; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.12092739512972212,"score_gpt":0.34257266319102625,"score_spread":0.22164526806130413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296718170","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010954327,0.0014006536,0.97250146,0.00022550518,0.00012399703,0.0005267661,0.000777701,0.00062413735,0.012865538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20604508,0.0018274281,0.7834097,0.00011979463,0.00008426162,0.0009423148,0.0012635537,0.00018661037,0.006121208],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902728,0.003897657,0.0005687696,0.0008940419,0.00411561,0.0002511127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913799,0.0041311844,0.00074705173,0.0005846868,0.0029883664,0.00016878836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007353247,0.0017103016,0.0020417648,0.007283649,0.00088348595,0.004641628,0.0016855419,0.0010719805,0.009322216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018787278,0.0004725289,0.0020053182,0.009541939,0.00079830876,0.0022273338,0.0023622438,0.0011294358,0.0017045424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030547183,0.00016785153,0.004998694,0.002147123,0.0006213792,0.00028228416,0.0005943732,0.15703015,0.004938908,0.0563839,0.009154521,0.76337534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006311446,0.00061690196,0.004208646,0.0005816214,0.0003973022,0.0003977731,0.00076303084,0.8300783,0.005552838,0.10858579,0.048587445,0.00016711956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032899554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031489204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009322216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012095494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025117097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038888156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296965579","doi":"10.1007/s00500-022-07462-5","title":"A reliable probabilistic risk-based decision-making method: Bayesian Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (B-TOPSIS)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province; Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Computer science; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Similarity (geometry); Data mining; Operations research; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Chemistry","score_opus":0.09807207969649798,"score_gpt":0.4191479461598187,"score_spread":0.32107586646332076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296965579","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016321325,0.00010519659,0.9970583,0.00006348684,0.000022311944,0.00009812519,0.00003994172,0.000116099814,0.00086445874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06615131,0.0002285053,0.93227327,0.000046651523,0.000032510976,0.00044312945,0.00009844109,0.00006452656,0.0006615716],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814274,0.0076501374,0.001011324,0.0009797584,0.008676946,0.00025449754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99029106,0.0052571385,0.0007430083,0.00047231387,0.0030734797,0.00016297579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010525977,0.0015173242,0.0029594838,0.0055470075,0.0012868617,0.0031824457,0.0022032545,0.0018593621,0.004004344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028783547,0.0010101151,0.0024910162,0.004575758,0.0011371614,0.0028896115,0.0024150203,0.002642251,0.0010815096],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043336986,0.00040427022,0.0017319717,0.0018694993,0.00079840573,0.00021360157,0.00092593237,0.1725374,0.014244786,0.09099699,0.0056500635,0.71019375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069545335,0.00033231647,0.001253653,0.0002060004,0.00019458804,0.00029434895,0.00013961247,0.9310759,0.004760193,0.056708608,0.0047737793,0.000191412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026758434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003054574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010525977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015800128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003911506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05566734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297464354","doi":"10.3390/civileng3040049","title":"Scrutinizing Competitiveness of Construction Companies Based on an Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CivilEng","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Pillar; Competitive advantage; Preference; Process (computing); Index (typography); Fuzzy logic; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Business; Industrial organization; Computer science; Operations research; Marketing; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.18451493692073057,"score_gpt":0.43028770586225007,"score_spread":0.2457727689415195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297464354","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21134157,0.00094490754,0.75172204,0.0014156721,0.0001118953,0.0010951293,0.0004448518,0.00014340728,0.032780614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9313104,0.00057956023,0.06404201,0.00009705266,0.000037702004,0.0008432448,0.00015622369,0.00001193845,0.0029218679],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660206,0.0018293554,0.00014505867,0.00038083576,0.0006194185,0.00042326484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973231,0.0018578009,0.00024312091,0.000038043745,0.00039741103,0.00014054477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045153922,0.0017919042,0.0016260876,0.0027058958,0.0012679235,0.0046626437,0.0024978372,0.0027174356,0.0039220112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047081895,0.00066787534,0.002040273,0.0024954989,0.001262449,0.0016018883,0.0020776677,0.0018814345,0.0002398382],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048015416,0.00008063961,0.0011825085,0.00009560943,0.000063225445,0.000208202,0.00015214716,0.9831955,0.00039309027,0.009830687,0.00019795039,0.00455246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001100021,0.000057309488,0.00028581166,0.000022255499,0.000023510864,0.000014615444,0.00011832534,0.99531966,0.00012429326,0.0037777133,0.00023167508,0.00001385207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012787858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008037338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012787858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048047546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035502228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034861147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297541772","doi":"10.3390/jrfm15100431","title":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Production Fields: A Structured Content Analysis and Implications for Practice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Decision analysis; Computer science; Production (economics); Work (physics); Domain (mathematical analysis); Automotive industry; Sorting; Business decision mapping; Process (computing); Management science; Decision support system; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Business; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.11616547565051184,"score_gpt":0.421308657559483,"score_spread":0.30514318190897116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297541772","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14337397,0.01936302,0.65802526,0.08571165,0.00073440815,0.0064852135,0.00061737356,0.0002829822,0.08540619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.548093,0.0060241777,0.44097045,0.0011850634,0.00013944376,0.0021495873,0.0001499311,0.00005372023,0.0012346017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9423493,0.045497056,0.0025135386,0.0013488169,0.007454638,0.00083663536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84214675,0.1383785,0.004202447,0.0033286854,0.010658703,0.001284966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06364603,0.001162033,0.0012216485,0.00990256,0.0046664467,0.011921693,0.0025993132,0.0032312893,0.0035035433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08668457,0.0006670395,0.0009651286,0.01200066,0.013704313,0.010413639,0.004397611,0.0030127214,0.00052491325],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014212528,0.0007386246,0.010905751,0.007661581,0.00015310796,0.0009800342,0.07980054,0.01408426,0.0016779136,0.53426456,0.009065362,0.34052607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008370079,0.00023218003,0.00560143,0.014212492,0.000080443,0.00048942206,0.12577266,0.037927695,0.0017459539,0.7676116,0.046093084,0.00014941355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035328767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004345426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06364603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012988237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015849615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33659643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297769378","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2022.5.001","title":"Technique of Accurate Ranking Order (TARO): A novel multi criteria analysis approach in performance evaluation of industrial robots for material handling","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Weighting; Selection (genetic algorithm); Confusion; Ambiguity; Computer science; Entropy (arrow of time); Data mining; Rank (graph theory); Mathematics; Operations research; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.36448184895749,"score_gpt":0.47063895151581553,"score_spread":0.10615710255832556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297769378","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004517611,0.00097355316,0.9912446,0.0001876683,0.00005511111,0.00016419312,0.000046975092,0.00006738459,0.0027428176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19691427,0.0013141603,0.7999431,0.00012752038,0.000101691294,0.00034678154,0.00010905577,0.000048470432,0.0010949027],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98657817,0.006586891,0.00061670475,0.00066676404,0.0052843285,0.00026707147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933407,0.004286135,0.0007730859,0.0003615852,0.0011492053,0.00008927169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0089593185,0.0016356295,0.0017420788,0.0059126886,0.0009660908,0.0022212404,0.001246543,0.001108793,0.002023063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013629372,0.0004157701,0.0017352791,0.004569908,0.0014599361,0.0026127605,0.0016670575,0.001890422,0.00031864992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018756054,0.00019428915,0.0032260143,0.0024116312,0.00048020828,0.00029000614,0.0012081413,0.24116465,0.012846957,0.21054052,0.0044121267,0.52303797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076120916,0.0010875514,0.003596442,0.0004968235,0.00023525715,0.00062371994,0.0006084766,0.75715566,0.010581828,0.19901894,0.026270043,0.00024919206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017299808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024041084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0089593185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001375124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00202574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047381997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298258403","doi":"10.1007/3-540-32371-6","title":"Fuzzy Mathematical Programming and Fuzzy Matrix Games","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Studies in fuzziness and soft computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Game theory; Fuzzy logic; Resolution (logic); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Matrix (chemical analysis); Management science; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.17315737728746441,"score_gpt":0.4588837149646848,"score_spread":0.28572633767722033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298258403","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008322872,0.06383032,0.5802221,0.0076415916,0.0014263688,0.000101452235,0.00023797472,0.00021904137,0.3379983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37768012,0.083032355,0.3033662,0.0023832195,0.00253929,0.0006538974,0.0004077603,0.00030027743,0.22963685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959904,0.00013390763,0.00001676885,0.00003580553,0.00019210471,0.000022429316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994216,0.00042307412,0.00003494325,0.000031379106,0.00007105183,0.000017999837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007409705,0.0013258706,0.0012250055,0.0010361627,0.00064859603,0.0021446366,0.00082454813,0.0010772188,0.0064607984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001867406,0.0004658885,0.00053525047,0.0023118728,0.0020263975,0.002585558,0.0006506165,0.0023499841,0.0010579636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007650404,0.000027876189,0.000035658508,0.00013597884,0.000012930615,0.000031317362,0.00008845291,0.015610031,0.00022257873,0.93306667,0.015665732,0.03509499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051613915,0.000011329734,0.00006791633,0.000075536715,0.0000063837724,0.000048330076,0.000043258107,0.024072122,0.00015411634,0.9432812,0.032225303,0.000009280914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002131359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022024328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064607984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017112438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095528894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021613479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298396118","doi":"10.1007/s00500-022-07498-7","title":"A comprehensive study on effect of multi-subgroup background in group decision-making","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Cluster analysis; Data mining; Particle swarm optimization; Computer science; Granularity; Set (abstract data type); Machine learning","score_opus":0.1401565352299772,"score_gpt":0.4496721565176673,"score_spread":0.30951562128769006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298396118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9658138,0.0054531433,0.022970876,0.00055672124,0.00012337262,0.0003727478,0.0001523912,0.000045792767,0.0045110895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98444694,0.0010675455,0.013363555,0.00016639993,0.00004683425,0.0001459085,0.0000940244,0.000017365086,0.0006514955],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99248683,0.005679063,0.0002513551,0.000450369,0.0008786038,0.00025376855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9395304,0.054439843,0.0012547886,0.0017905514,0.00198577,0.0009986998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010907697,0.0005265255,0.0014353716,0.00070709223,0.000735902,0.0012687015,0.0006033565,0.0006457517,0.003460224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032177035,0.00014460443,0.001817708,0.0011554797,0.0005397605,0.0013793363,0.0008773563,0.0010202214,0.00021367354],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026994793,0.011265431,0.10464162,0.006894453,0.007501686,0.00026052978,0.003884654,0.045997445,0.009093569,0.018198458,0.0022176509,0.7630497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003732438,0.07431114,0.43740648,0.0037771428,0.031822663,0.00064274436,0.010927334,0.29396105,0.03163026,0.087352835,0.02391014,0.00052573235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026675467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028310928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010907697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010403363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022003904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05768609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299508139","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.1042030","title":"A New Weighting Factor In Combining Belief Function","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Weighting; Factor (programming language); Function (biology); Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.21996234106839127,"score_gpt":0.38399965049733764,"score_spread":0.16403730942894637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299508139","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039014535,0.00059761934,0.99375147,0.000108439,0.00008096294,0.00006323153,0.000033592005,0.00011865877,0.00134463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1925997,0.0010457681,0.8032983,0.00017027145,0.00025534435,0.0003690966,0.000175889,0.000096973716,0.0019886154],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994325,0.0018883054,0.00060616795,0.000889151,0.0019658504,0.00032554838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99316543,0.0033328568,0.000457109,0.0006591148,0.002174346,0.00021119216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0079207355,0.0016684248,0.0014082306,0.0036894195,0.00068090303,0.0023575267,0.0020381438,0.0024041312,0.002956528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020512257,0.0005584264,0.0015640187,0.0029362708,0.0011522236,0.005721896,0.002357282,0.0017720086,0.00081640895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003659837,0.00017071221,0.0024431674,0.00084730407,0.00046504673,0.00030966225,0.00041168628,0.13523605,0.016981464,0.147587,0.0037217457,0.6914602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102513004,0.00043751003,0.0014832871,0.0003125676,0.0005171885,0.0007578819,0.000115311144,0.8297176,0.009695824,0.13729952,0.019334685,0.00022610978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014088616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011349607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0079207355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008785257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013946533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04188937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300757403","doi":"10.3386/w17561","title":"Testing Conditional Factor Models","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Banff Centre","funders":"National Research Foundation; Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Factor (programming language); Computer science; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.9439100317300765,"score_gpt":0.6816582772583875,"score_spread":0.262251754471689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300757403","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07054643,0.00027093472,0.92139685,0.0004446794,0.00013938,0.00016149839,0.001194195,0.0007426248,0.0051035066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7741461,0.00044389477,0.21758544,0.0003652563,0.00031857507,0.0010472011,0.0038387966,0.00024024145,0.0020145022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9604031,0.022889728,0.0017885908,0.0075455243,0.005610198,0.00176297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6424304,0.3110958,0.011985382,0.02370752,0.008917735,0.0018631694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034140263,0.0023942092,0.0028874688,0.0040694885,0.0014020036,0.0043792194,0.00424799,0.0021235824,0.018587045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24713774,0.0008899355,0.004290858,0.0044357716,0.0035624076,0.0068836114,0.0034990532,0.0041036475,0.0016563389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008943534,0.00059053645,0.07181233,0.00064650556,0.0025887429,0.0008388011,0.0012804511,0.11268057,0.001524895,0.56678456,0.006684145,0.23367403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013315851,0.0004488001,0.01235305,0.00018280881,0.00026024965,0.00040600382,0.00038233833,0.5036801,0.0013761196,0.4766149,0.0040338365,0.00012866239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053315405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027226175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034140263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014879509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035014118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18055308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302984178","doi":"","title":"Multi-criteria Group Decision Making with Private and Shared Criteria An Experiment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte (University of Toulouse)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Computer science; Group decision-making; Psychology; Chemistry; Social psychology","score_opus":0.15354871646365878,"score_gpt":0.4093034495158489,"score_spread":0.2557547330521901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302984178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9257191,0.0001658932,0.065121055,0.00046527077,0.0002306461,0.0012110883,0.00043528297,0.000096499425,0.006555253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9250375,0.00008816756,0.06986379,0.00010245501,0.00006646756,0.0018839877,0.00025469417,0.000023903323,0.00267903],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98612726,0.010918195,0.00046660664,0.00091814954,0.00117901,0.000390845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8963841,0.09367704,0.0016619923,0.004471185,0.0020334055,0.0017723022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021177946,0.001287132,0.0024416777,0.00065662625,0.0014271018,0.0024041187,0.0018340242,0.0030565422,0.0077622985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047620535,0.0006686447,0.0018591435,0.0010544739,0.0019421485,0.002579678,0.0019531548,0.0022079505,0.00042256326],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07235039,0.025243726,0.008522275,0.003331971,0.0023478628,0.0007054122,0.003442424,0.65847385,0.016806254,0.097383246,0.0033063942,0.108086176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0120412065,0.02523548,0.00462923,0.00014164422,0.0006019176,0.000113617825,0.00063285715,0.8495742,0.011584096,0.0914973,0.0036637657,0.0002847659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016488566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001076712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021177946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015586776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024493714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306402950","doi":"10.3390/su142013200","title":"Development of a Multi-Criteria Analysis Decision-Support Tool for the Sustainability of Forest Biomass Heating Projects in Quebec","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainability","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Centre de Géomatique du Québec; École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies","keywords":"Sustainability; Weighting; Process (computing); Decision support system; Decision analysis; Triple bottom line; Greenhouse gas; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Environmental economics; Process management; Management science; Business; Engineering; Environmental science; Economics; Ecology; Data mining","score_opus":0.08926371762050546,"score_gpt":0.4284322651829289,"score_spread":0.33916854756242343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306402950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49358964,0.00037304562,0.4313843,0.0020330844,0.000074278396,0.0046992963,0.003642319,0.0021943296,0.062009785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58046603,0.00020049034,0.41073024,0.000085868414,0.0000069958646,0.0011969081,0.0011167086,0.0000823653,0.0061144177],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858654,0.0007642439,0.00008039292,0.00010610976,0.00032029208,0.0001424331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651355,0.0021616614,0.00012539553,0.00009683339,0.0009143636,0.00018818713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036002984,0.0009290959,0.00039704234,0.0025587818,0.0018285086,0.002848227,0.0011975933,0.00094818306,0.0075637344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068009193,0.00033329465,0.00063831784,0.0016463695,0.00055530126,0.00090842566,0.0008532546,0.0005489269,0.0004112653],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048045855,0.0006491596,0.012717622,0.0007352214,0.00013265424,0.0012243319,0.0017476444,0.67578936,0.009880008,0.023638392,0.012154774,0.26085034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117602656,0.00014040044,0.004293061,0.00016421646,0.00003431603,0.000049801278,0.0011507254,0.9736058,0.0034728008,0.002703389,0.014189493,0.00007843064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46694443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5930683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53305554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015756125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016062476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.928453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306658998","doi":"10.3390/jrfm15100467","title":"BWM—RAPS Approach for Evaluating and Ranking Banking Sector Companies Based on Their Financial Indicators in the Saudi Stock Market","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Weighting; Stock (firearms); Portfolio; Stock market; Business; Actuarial science; Computer science; Operations research; Finance; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09185234027628916,"score_gpt":0.3533167676618602,"score_spread":0.2614644273855711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306658998","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07721748,0.0008513654,0.90703267,0.0005584371,0.000062781226,0.0006851487,0.0004907029,0.0004444307,0.012657019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38214186,0.0003702197,0.6150396,0.00007841554,0.000023531395,0.00041725472,0.0003344189,0.000030099121,0.0015645181],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964239,0.0016605501,0.0003010446,0.00034491505,0.0010839212,0.00018575601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975956,0.0012886159,0.00031300288,0.00012244377,0.000597825,0.00008245706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042588273,0.0014810798,0.0013314937,0.008369785,0.0009209395,0.002423308,0.0012633421,0.0011336235,0.0037833091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007093183,0.00057283835,0.0018735423,0.0041371556,0.0007576286,0.0014888509,0.0018442712,0.0010021118,0.00043737693],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002817656,0.00045795823,0.015382111,0.0015153566,0.000763769,0.000573947,0.0013783788,0.41628224,0.008166469,0.037370138,0.003878843,0.51394904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039814287,0.0004430835,0.0038629498,0.00021522988,0.0001610381,0.00026473225,0.001076708,0.96216303,0.0032233922,0.023593634,0.0048952913,0.000061030667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004970266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075299237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008369785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013142138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021901086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022523105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308261645","doi":"10.1007/s10668-022-02719-3","title":"Digital transformation challenges in sustainable financial service systems using novel interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy double normalization-based multiple aggregation approach","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment Development and Sustainability","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Normalization (sociology); Pythagorean theorem; Financial services; Sustainable development; Weighting; Digital transformation; Computer science; Economics; Business; Finance; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11139462228703832,"score_gpt":0.30630191163545323,"score_spread":0.1949072893484149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308261645","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030680465,0.00046961693,0.96072733,0.0004213294,0.000078531106,0.000053201606,0.000042432926,0.000064737054,0.007462298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85616726,0.0005977092,0.14036226,0.00006839277,0.00005908767,0.00008682311,0.00007052868,0.000023109138,0.0025648773],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987943,0.00042600927,0.00007670709,0.00018848908,0.00039934053,0.00011517943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994167,0.0002214306,0.00009295087,0.000039853647,0.00018734002,0.00004175217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020483218,0.00052194815,0.0009795144,0.0011383735,0.0009847287,0.0033005534,0.0011835672,0.0007362289,0.0015502505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002538299,0.00022318514,0.00097576453,0.0019680106,0.00081988476,0.0028346947,0.001708757,0.000965094,0.00011322553],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012564799,0.0001202809,0.002007249,0.00034901954,0.00015599,0.00047226824,0.0005569596,0.54605067,0.0062260297,0.3065532,0.0019324478,0.13545035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041386124,0.000032736825,0.00041785336,0.000024429728,0.00003177328,0.000060170103,0.00019632095,0.9559749,0.0009751639,0.04095387,0.0013098359,0.000018908713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003666188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031613787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003666188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019435569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015129182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014101565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308742991","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2022.108803","title":"A robust multicriteria clustering methodology for portfolio decision analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cluster analysis; Portfolio; Computer science; Modern portfolio theory; Operations research; Data mining; Engineering; Business; Artificial intelligence; Finance","score_opus":0.47462046408890357,"score_gpt":0.41829271549609787,"score_spread":0.056327748592805704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308742991","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008920085,0.00010047075,0.9985884,0.00003217464,0.00001650669,0.000019965306,0.000022988015,0.00009259436,0.00023487478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07160025,0.0002471303,0.9257477,0.00009244232,0.00010622568,0.00019942233,0.0002698042,0.0001861856,0.0015508344],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701905,0.0015139258,0.00016213677,0.00042618532,0.0007404804,0.00013823871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99549615,0.0022482798,0.00038168483,0.0005206054,0.001235016,0.00011828878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004539345,0.0012658396,0.0023499404,0.0028822895,0.000963093,0.0014084774,0.0025604824,0.0014727722,0.003055727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010269939,0.00091976393,0.0028469407,0.0028115045,0.0008144947,0.0014029919,0.0017120774,0.0018972452,0.0011860342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012577588,0.00011140512,0.0005320825,0.00020314778,0.0004023335,0.00005975821,0.0000809178,0.7092554,0.0041141603,0.045751408,0.003641284,0.23572238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009650234,0.000033085526,0.00018965884,0.000012087113,0.000025059797,0.000023606519,0.0000063095295,0.9884244,0.0006077449,0.009625605,0.0010249224,0.000017892937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060756905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050129592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060756905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001168724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019983526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024006605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308911753","doi":"10.24908/pceea.vi.15882","title":"Analyzing the Employability Skills of Engineering Graduates using AHP Techniques - A Case Study of Kerala State in India.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Employability; Internship; Analytic hierarchy process; Accreditation; Curriculum; Engineering; Engineering education; Engineering management; Medical education; Psychology; Operations research; Pedagogy; Medicine","score_opus":0.03570406927115988,"score_gpt":0.33534318351531783,"score_spread":0.29963911424415796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308911753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99743444,0.000052882522,0.00070604036,0.00013091035,0.0000040102595,0.000044481087,0.000065198336,0.000008462592,0.0015536341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981717,0.00008699127,0.0010265685,0.000016790096,0.0000026141156,0.000018251185,0.000071747374,0.0000031808493,0.000602236],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922955,0.00027710642,0.00004955676,0.00006468217,0.00020289436,0.00017625246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755424,0.0015667595,0.00023441415,0.000100466095,0.0003677048,0.00017641803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001221264,0.0002491344,0.00020324977,0.0018664713,0.0015036968,0.0010844815,0.00067446975,0.00047287808,0.00085086405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019808477,0.00016773734,0.00046907377,0.0018517078,0.0006621605,0.00039302855,0.00076620484,0.0005046798,0.00012169857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004440023,0.002755593,0.6248737,0.0010572141,0.0003048651,0.028407075,0.09624611,0.04716624,0.01075973,0.007016878,0.004507486,0.17646103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000266757,0.000909745,0.7194978,0.00014367294,0.00013030668,0.0017965224,0.21627653,0.04639465,0.0039503616,0.0015187886,0.009258749,0.00009621792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032393623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054190803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032393623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020335712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013704912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06441015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309080453","doi":"10.1007/s10489-022-04279-5","title":"A novel group decision-making approach in multi-scale environments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Group decision-making; Ranking (information retrieval); Decision analysis; Scale (ratio); Decision engineering; R-CAST; Business decision mapping; Evidential reasoning approach; Decision support system; Stability (learning theory); Influence diagram; Machine learning; Weighted sum model; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Decision tree; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15868950052488054,"score_gpt":0.3942217909729093,"score_spread":0.23553229044802879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309080453","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005633365,0.00007246461,0.9920517,0.00013693524,0.000057129877,0.000053411724,0.000015735803,0.000054483407,0.0019247549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24273036,0.00016910481,0.75310105,0.00016848763,0.00016911223,0.0004026742,0.00007277208,0.000057218087,0.0031291826],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741495,0.001144331,0.00010480766,0.00040625557,0.00075253285,0.00017718835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973864,0.0017419393,0.00016969508,0.0001601617,0.00036289383,0.0001789717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033545804,0.0010109512,0.0019076683,0.001213818,0.0012083885,0.002231823,0.0024009768,0.0020305135,0.0040172283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046833334,0.0004648735,0.0015186477,0.0015985371,0.0010529597,0.0026198805,0.0030321719,0.0014580319,0.0005690188],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021669015,0.0004480341,0.001332434,0.00034222248,0.0004211131,0.0004654949,0.0006232878,0.631605,0.0049152113,0.1258395,0.0033168125,0.23047419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025151665,0.000087925255,0.00011236013,0.00001230255,0.000033956676,0.000044943088,0.000049503873,0.96317226,0.00032411068,0.034779303,0.0013429242,0.000015422882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00160367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021318325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040172283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082643086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012578167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017740905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309374654","doi":"10.1109/smc53654.2022.9945605","title":"Managing Inconsistency With an Optimal Distribution of Information Granularity in Fuzzy Preference Relations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Junta de Andalucía","keywords":"Granularity; Consistency (knowledge bases); Pairwise comparison; Preference; Data mining; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Reliability (semiconductor); Matrix (chemical analysis); Process (computing); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.14323777273122654,"score_gpt":0.3576604413775825,"score_spread":0.21442266864635598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309374654","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17391133,0.0005189325,0.82331866,0.00029244513,0.000035002682,0.0001969749,0.000051466854,0.00029872087,0.0013765063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72981465,0.00013082165,0.26949328,0.00006676429,0.00003146716,0.00016398542,0.000057743266,0.00004549552,0.00019571571],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839671,0.008082969,0.001349857,0.002072369,0.0037507007,0.000776945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94638443,0.03517017,0.004629407,0.009013718,0.004113157,0.0006891684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01903167,0.0008219711,0.00152366,0.0020715934,0.0013263456,0.0030652988,0.0018027991,0.0014038933,0.0009556171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06835855,0.00067919755,0.00096449105,0.002926515,0.0014743627,0.0060165254,0.0039515803,0.0024723313,0.00016353486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030866617,0.0013130257,0.016800625,0.00094983063,0.00053413707,0.00063208136,0.005468888,0.28669113,0.027433302,0.12668386,0.0014939129,0.5289126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047518083,0.0009121258,0.005123813,0.00015838449,0.00030518114,0.0004297866,0.0008505795,0.79223716,0.02503216,0.17203122,0.0022905574,0.00015388145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007506308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004938947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01903167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012693523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011758299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10065031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309573958","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2022.11.030","title":"A subgroup dominance-based benefit of the doubt method for addressing rank reversals: A case study of the human development index in Europe","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science; Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of Hunan Province; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation","keywords":"Data envelopment analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Weighting; Pairwise comparison; Comparability; Rank (graph theory); Econometrics; Dominance (genetics); Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.5117664980602848,"score_gpt":0.5401859807640578,"score_spread":0.028419482703772925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309573958","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27535033,0.00076000165,0.6961978,0.0029585538,0.00031765737,0.00079348666,0.0005743078,0.0003306147,0.022717211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8177399,0.00014891729,0.17880876,0.00025547264,0.000109987915,0.00021130161,0.00021066556,0.000080266385,0.0024348304],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98330724,0.012241009,0.00047237464,0.0008876059,0.0024321605,0.0006595482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96440405,0.026716653,0.0013252039,0.0029077975,0.0039550117,0.00069130823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020868558,0.00088688126,0.0020122086,0.003628561,0.002200179,0.0029815445,0.0023266731,0.0019525486,0.005093237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053831063,0.0002589498,0.0019304685,0.0030989486,0.0020346814,0.0036584453,0.002972577,0.0024798668,0.00040401847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019435995,0.001389609,0.03594849,0.00078952534,0.0007866517,0.0011709585,0.0039618076,0.09468037,0.00580162,0.25377965,0.010178666,0.589569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038274785,0.0019465107,0.013612033,0.00021160913,0.0006848438,0.0008846025,0.005576315,0.6434946,0.0046085133,0.31573918,0.01263936,0.0002197235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007205929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007959393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020868558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013643139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038999708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110364795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309848589","doi":"10.3390/en15238838","title":"Solar Energy Implementation in Manufacturing Industry Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Fuzzy TOPSIS and S4 Framework","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energies","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Photovoltaic system; TOPSIS; Solar energy; Context (archaeology); Decision support system; Automation; Manufacturing; Renewable energy; Fuzzy logic; Engineering; Computer science; Environmental economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Business; Mechanical engineering; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Marketing; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.10699902301563889,"score_gpt":0.45103676225951955,"score_spread":0.34403773924388065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309848589","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10746845,0.0008229089,0.8663296,0.0008012027,0.000066262255,0.0010072506,0.00022959767,0.00021117911,0.023063568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6916786,0.0006409129,0.3046452,0.0000688547,0.000016596183,0.0004964957,0.00016573636,0.000014290738,0.002273288],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945623,0.0029388003,0.00036759605,0.0003156031,0.0014835243,0.00033219068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987231,0.00062597496,0.00020578908,0.000045622764,0.0003265396,0.0000729362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047796,0.0011353504,0.0010988928,0.002873622,0.0015582964,0.004000166,0.0016662817,0.0013286866,0.0028280925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031748775,0.00063688494,0.0021007503,0.003367371,0.0010179839,0.0015106436,0.0016173405,0.0009507803,0.0002502638],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018433556,0.00021740099,0.0034509466,0.0009964781,0.0003819498,0.0010574135,0.0011052288,0.84677154,0.0062911017,0.05284149,0.0010782208,0.08562396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052283885,0.0003138191,0.0015722368,0.00023906521,0.00014009236,0.00014573499,0.0014062319,0.946082,0.0029880845,0.042475168,0.0045050536,0.00008022725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01090081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01265962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01090081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034802146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003993444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025277257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311923604","doi":"10.1007/s44196-022-00167-5","title":"Auto-generated Relative Importance for Multi-agent Inducing Variable in Uncertain and Preference Involved Evaluation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province; National Social Science Fund of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Preference; Computer science; Statistic; Variable (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Polar; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.4771536417961815,"score_gpt":0.48708979093637034,"score_spread":0.00993614914018881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311923604","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062466897,0.00017630748,0.93432665,0.00014326496,0.000030791784,0.000087170316,0.000037283153,0.00006633155,0.002665311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80101216,0.000140654,0.19764683,0.000039469458,0.000037000733,0.00017911188,0.00008731048,0.000029632387,0.000827903],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99420977,0.0032242096,0.00026833673,0.00052021065,0.0015373462,0.00024016053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990404,0.006877362,0.00041935255,0.00035309675,0.0017308071,0.00021535683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006968796,0.0006601958,0.00074056705,0.002718408,0.000626874,0.0016144394,0.00095252425,0.00073088217,0.0020606008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019550286,0.00028279712,0.0008025277,0.0015335338,0.0010970905,0.0020510636,0.0012423333,0.0009776489,0.00014635368],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046198044,0.0001823289,0.007543764,0.0005958748,0.0002202629,0.00020250422,0.0006919319,0.5920494,0.006727901,0.19000748,0.0013884681,0.19992803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016565225,0.00009428744,0.00094301964,0.000026295156,0.000027428376,0.000032520726,0.00006417922,0.9717568,0.001407526,0.025116973,0.0004913615,0.00002305968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001716989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013893368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006968796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016623179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011173466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036854982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312180710","doi":"10.1080/15623599.2022.2159628","title":"Decision support system (DSS) for selecting sustainable insulation material using Pareto search and novel fuzzy-modified technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) approach","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Construction Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Preference; Similarity (geometry); Pareto principle; Mathematical optimization; Multi-objective optimization; Ideal (ethics); Order (exchange); Fuzzy logic; Decision support system; Data mining; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Engineering; Operations research; Statistics; Economics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.14123217514030695,"score_gpt":0.40472992722363094,"score_spread":0.263497752083324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312180710","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017123695,0.00016760144,0.978522,0.0001574297,0.00003457533,0.00026931983,0.00023049462,0.000836329,0.0026584703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2860361,0.00039661484,0.7102422,0.00008477929,0.00003046468,0.0007104497,0.0005832742,0.000034591732,0.0018815898],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890757,0.00035438396,0.00013571064,0.00013110069,0.0004170096,0.000054223485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910283,0.00040861798,0.00010026342,0.000050774797,0.0002934426,0.000044104152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018613782,0.0009648468,0.0009995502,0.0021147835,0.0007856423,0.0016506165,0.0010419105,0.0008644851,0.0036173281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025156573,0.00034155365,0.00086978707,0.0017683172,0.00028240052,0.001120262,0.0010918425,0.0008198137,0.00062803057],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003875349,0.000361555,0.0030751624,0.001427621,0.00022940601,0.00047814962,0.0006946333,0.3074624,0.029722955,0.029241115,0.0067103417,0.6202091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108655535,0.00034587545,0.000946519,0.00014447428,0.000105669096,0.00015423799,0.00028212063,0.96302885,0.010787796,0.014649836,0.009384491,0.00006151222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017064234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002146643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036173281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006526066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014755875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012101114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312626945","doi":"10.4018/ijfsa.313428","title":"Mehar Approach for Solving Shortest Path Problems With Interval-Valued Triangular Fuzzy Arc Weights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Shortest path problem; Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy logic; Mathematical optimization; Path (computing); Mathematics; Constrained Shortest Path First; K shortest path routing; Longest path problem; Fuzzy number; Arc (geometry); Computer science; Algorithm; Fuzzy set; Discrete mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Graph","score_opus":0.09614878309249149,"score_gpt":0.3698983832586623,"score_spread":0.27374960016617084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312626945","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017262497,0.00025368517,0.99648774,0.000059514678,0.00003133985,0.000030603933,0.000015428035,0.0000557628,0.0013396722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11924621,0.000886707,0.87510675,0.00012116373,0.000102716636,0.0002619551,0.00013898566,0.000081661834,0.0040538837],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868613,0.00048571004,0.0000804261,0.00022153054,0.00043722492,0.00008891667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986481,0.0008848648,0.00008686248,0.00006681601,0.00028071736,0.00003263322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014468136,0.0012019377,0.0015842739,0.0017492673,0.00082495797,0.0012060789,0.0022883508,0.0017528482,0.006349873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030043628,0.0006713716,0.0015521189,0.0020869651,0.00059126806,0.0024828839,0.0012826754,0.0026969598,0.0010297063],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010027679,0.00013460788,0.00026660395,0.0006890583,0.0001604177,0.00018097826,0.00019340952,0.6935275,0.0056894985,0.09574736,0.002633683,0.20067658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010947944,0.00006490034,0.00004745028,0.000019590181,0.000022136344,0.000049778428,0.00003384405,0.9767686,0.0009842397,0.019439919,0.0025425996,0.000016082846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027388716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034014452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006349873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008318096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011101924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02124238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313136702","doi":"10.1109/tsmc.2022.3214221","title":"Reinforcement Learning-Based Feedback and Weight-Adjustment Mechanisms for Consensus Reaching in Group Decision Making","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Windsor","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reinforcement learning; Markov decision process; Computer science; Scalability; Harmony (color); Artificial intelligence; Group decision-making; Reinforcement; Decision problem; Notation; Machine learning; Markov process; Mathematics; Statistics; Psychology; Algorithm; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06285006846990177,"score_gpt":0.3260461768517512,"score_spread":0.2631961083818494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313136702","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028330278,0.00012053135,0.96934605,0.00022761528,0.000036790323,0.000112084206,0.000016953263,0.00031933747,0.0014903763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87992424,0.00011986338,0.117838524,0.00011026715,0.00003902856,0.0003088556,0.00003583078,0.00004300013,0.0015804179],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704534,0.0012577277,0.0001924819,0.0006303719,0.0005876917,0.00028634517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925249,0.0043070363,0.0011712038,0.0006039343,0.0010188962,0.00037409048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045513995,0.0010328217,0.0011623484,0.0006384134,0.00080257404,0.0010796321,0.0021774552,0.0012106623,0.0021967585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01803005,0.00043994546,0.0007049173,0.0005347331,0.0013859042,0.0020926541,0.0018027861,0.0020278841,0.00040007677],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028877624,0.00031964981,0.0017690726,0.00018623151,0.00013524426,0.00015871269,0.0005408352,0.82555145,0.006052782,0.046044834,0.0012549695,0.11769751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000364706,0.00005844633,0.00016510759,0.000007973714,0.0000138542755,0.000012282966,0.000017254753,0.98663914,0.0010013125,0.0117427595,0.00029285104,0.000012451931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00413439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028501563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045513995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016129307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001969997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024070382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313160636","doi":"10.23977/aetp.2022.061101","title":"Comprehensively Evaluating Higher Education in North America Based on a Weighted Hierarchical Indicator Model: Specific to Different Study Abroad Students","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wuhan University; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Preference; Higher education; Geospatial analysis; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); International education; Knowledge management; Mathematics education; Political science; Psychology; Geography; Information retrieval; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09998577830874004,"score_gpt":0.5155393727745733,"score_spread":0.41555359446583323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313160636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.753484,0.0002706258,0.23436446,0.0006444191,0.00004694873,0.00049901346,0.00035408628,0.00012666974,0.010209708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416978,0.0001380874,0.056737907,0.000029958053,0.00001001386,0.000184219,0.00016980861,0.000007790447,0.0010244413],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799144,0.001197654,0.00011825122,0.00020615966,0.00032836632,0.0001581174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979753,0.0011006922,0.0002557861,0.000078498655,0.00044066543,0.00014902977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002947359,0.0006208485,0.00047495522,0.002566591,0.00057438586,0.0027172007,0.0005866317,0.00044548546,0.0017659554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005411066,0.00019011706,0.0008818733,0.003128921,0.000552137,0.001070385,0.0010733135,0.00055035687,0.000114478564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005983789,0.00094232266,0.2346558,0.00064289354,0.0010344298,0.00048511007,0.0036258267,0.42320958,0.0067914682,0.047660023,0.0037675742,0.27658665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025121271,0.0002678805,0.031485073,0.00006877156,0.00017306456,0.000041751937,0.0023624822,0.9537076,0.00082726567,0.009523169,0.001464236,0.000053538355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023143226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033896994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023143226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00202115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027102062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04601705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313441510","doi":"10.13033/isahp.y2022.014","title":"ANALYZING EIA IN PARANÁ, BRAZIL AND CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES WITH FUZZY-SET QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND THE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISAHP proceedings","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Qualitative comparative analysis; Normative; Stakeholder analysis; Sustainable development; Management science; Process management; Outcome (game theory); Environmental resource management; Political science; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.12504333143993235,"score_gpt":0.46166616661796217,"score_spread":0.3366228351780298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313441510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9086068,0.0014210466,0.019480903,0.0008840847,0.00002285735,0.0006777497,0.00038930046,0.00002795159,0.06848938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98213357,0.0005021629,0.015684819,0.000052548457,0.0000021206677,0.00024827593,0.00011828467,0.0000046278706,0.0012535959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574775,0.0025880616,0.0001662793,0.00025526094,0.00095316075,0.0002895176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921312,0.0047441376,0.00069889694,0.0002567413,0.002033587,0.00013555793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008472731,0.00019047088,0.0002668178,0.004103628,0.0019430657,0.0023060367,0.000498176,0.00038165867,0.0013744615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01010244,0.0001683308,0.0003496912,0.0049884436,0.0023635682,0.00092430547,0.0013218706,0.00034120283,0.00004701314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039828816,0.00054775126,0.11598168,0.0030539562,0.00029106723,0.002708548,0.17116266,0.030771889,0.0073307464,0.37166294,0.0052154586,0.29087502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006204951,0.0005486305,0.22262031,0.002281935,0.00033096023,0.0005137516,0.54907024,0.05869036,0.0067183785,0.058808178,0.100206085,0.00014910306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09011543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17738274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09011543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010038617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007816573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17918181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313640127","doi":"10.18280/ijsdp.170834","title":"Evaluate Ho Chi Minh City Sustainability Using Fuzzy Extent Analysis Method","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ho chi minh; Sustainability; Sustainable city; Ranking (information retrieval); Sustainable development; Business; Context (archaeology); Environmental economics; Environmental planning; Accommodation; Urban planning; Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Geography; Political science; Civil engineering; Engineering; Economics; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.15280299456586954,"score_gpt":0.4666539403635747,"score_spread":0.31385094579770517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313640127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80458117,0.0005999081,0.17756143,0.0003072364,0.0000347984,0.0006041204,0.0009385523,0.00014393221,0.015228859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91987383,0.00025615678,0.07806082,0.000020781124,0.000006053365,0.00024779973,0.00033603457,0.0000072361872,0.0011912902],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991679,0.00022376337,0.000069806585,0.00009017969,0.0003489111,0.00009946271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989164,0.0005169186,0.00009497679,0.000032774526,0.00038774358,0.00005112875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017416476,0.0004623807,0.00052122574,0.0046397005,0.00090136006,0.0018455304,0.00041049896,0.0005063219,0.0026682445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002701008,0.00021908643,0.0010021247,0.002734958,0.00042808827,0.0008545935,0.0007942519,0.00035454772,0.00010461259],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085744914,0.00051711296,0.1317726,0.001565124,0.00053852634,0.0008581307,0.0047430624,0.375235,0.024283981,0.029152965,0.0032054856,0.42727056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065010056,0.00040598484,0.06272193,0.00019622916,0.00026862073,0.0001576726,0.006539622,0.9006151,0.011905278,0.011192569,0.00581494,0.00011704813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018944513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022757942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018944513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020856983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020553693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037668467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313893761","doi":"10.3390/encyclopedia3010006","title":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods and Concepts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":708,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Selection (genetic algorithm); Management science; Computer science; Section (typography); Process (computing); Operations research; Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.19008288407050963,"score_gpt":0.5537171911985436,"score_spread":0.3636343071280339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313893761","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004353485,0.073378585,0.8498625,0.003896841,0.00080913474,0.0009969693,0.0012500533,0.00037475003,0.06507765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08385772,0.06402377,0.84159935,0.0011654428,0.0007880168,0.0011241642,0.0008814158,0.000106355845,0.006453777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906131,0.0036864874,0.0007175066,0.00082312606,0.003990071,0.00016967417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580836,0.002658974,0.000385759,0.00029411132,0.00076433766,0.0000883758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005717126,0.001819563,0.001813368,0.0077751414,0.0011762091,0.0034063368,0.001884635,0.0018895224,0.007888953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073746834,0.0005833666,0.00157719,0.010365294,0.002657694,0.002382601,0.0024460484,0.0024827821,0.0017236975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006439077,0.00013916686,0.0014106181,0.006103752,0.0002698681,0.00024690805,0.000640849,0.035414584,0.0022362312,0.51634556,0.022878084,0.41424996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005509153,0.00014394164,0.0017266254,0.003380849,0.00013136519,0.000819073,0.0006480955,0.053787943,0.0031470181,0.5743822,0.3616187,0.00015910415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020834089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002960749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007888953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027033787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026333716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03023541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317754025","doi":"10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110042","title":"Multi-source fuzzy comprehensive evaluation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Data mining; Data source; Quality (philosophy); Credibility; Object (grammar); Process (computing); Fuse (electrical); Limit (mathematics); Function (biology); Multi-source; Factor (programming language); Fuzzy set; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.31370522102318565,"score_gpt":0.462824857014768,"score_spread":0.14911963599158234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317754025","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06681899,0.0012237036,0.9168645,0.00018939495,0.00006340779,0.00016989755,0.0005228833,0.000395973,0.013751235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8681014,0.00038889758,0.12796502,0.000030055702,0.000033375723,0.00011521462,0.0004659162,0.000042061743,0.0028580336],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823844,0.00055033667,0.00009381454,0.00015965317,0.00087889255,0.00007886065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976707,0.0008311444,0.0001310713,0.00016297563,0.0011269979,0.00007712039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002945324,0.001018992,0.0011454119,0.005858911,0.0006761031,0.002143546,0.00057981256,0.0006868869,0.0029261755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058423397,0.0002456691,0.0010139714,0.0037054163,0.00032560373,0.0013533991,0.0011747271,0.0003690235,0.00028216856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041819984,0.00014833281,0.0039827614,0.0006476038,0.00063498714,0.00022798937,0.00020245717,0.53849393,0.0066402936,0.024753246,0.003910961,0.41993925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011313739,0.000054701453,0.0018930883,0.000049805385,0.00009021127,0.000044372708,0.000039137758,0.9852153,0.0019819594,0.009523223,0.0010718189,0.00002496379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003081059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038679999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005858911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012040902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010607217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015576541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319456377","doi":"10.1016/j.engappai.2023.105931","title":"Revisiting the consistency improvement and consensus reaching processes of intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program; Social Science Planning Project of Shandong Province; Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee; National Social Science Fund of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Pairwise comparison; Computer science; Multiplicative function; Preference; Group decision-making; Preference relation; Viewpoints; Process (computing); Relation (database); Construct (python library); Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.18815584449619888,"score_gpt":0.3907232188182142,"score_spread":0.20256737432201533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319456377","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06929615,0.00072312675,0.9124571,0.0014194767,0.00012438216,0.00012843945,0.00004662072,0.00009644288,0.01570825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7964999,0.0004763941,0.19882998,0.00031464075,0.00014290652,0.00021547744,0.00006260336,0.000073053016,0.0033850821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872376,0.0075254333,0.0005808373,0.0015776972,0.0024548797,0.0006236011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91139853,0.07293746,0.0037667765,0.0053988965,0.005718499,0.0007797406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023630502,0.0010053378,0.0017230946,0.0017358185,0.0014478803,0.0043638693,0.0035920797,0.002596354,0.0044773743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09283951,0.001024917,0.0023922622,0.001898225,0.0055360836,0.010718237,0.0035950355,0.00473947,0.00044302078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017172036,0.00010047453,0.00080955174,0.00034335378,0.00009962762,0.00009133595,0.0011739802,0.068217985,0.0016757353,0.8853666,0.0006005513,0.0413491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038741313,0.000107762346,0.00048561595,0.000048962076,0.000040673563,0.000036638146,0.0001301832,0.28379405,0.0011094235,0.7131861,0.0009836884,0.000038117196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030536463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002139798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023630502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025889713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034332778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12497151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319864599","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4331045","title":"Priority Ranking for the Best-Worst Method","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Econometrics; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.1687062931969355,"score_gpt":0.48245747284858115,"score_spread":0.3137511796516457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319864599","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058715143,0.00093349343,0.98408556,0.0004920838,0.00027071394,0.00013413576,0.00010075241,0.0002065774,0.007905158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19072373,0.00067328836,0.8024358,0.00025739308,0.00025515753,0.00023682849,0.00027145635,0.00018543129,0.0049607926],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830125,0.01048754,0.0006889762,0.0011377924,0.0038586562,0.0008145833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98555607,0.009944512,0.00048042167,0.0010024256,0.0024549584,0.00056170684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013511337,0.0017096424,0.0032323461,0.0063661127,0.0022204872,0.004996855,0.0024389522,0.0020844482,0.011830138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030763865,0.00067620917,0.0023704015,0.0035530746,0.00181203,0.0033399006,0.0019792987,0.0030078813,0.0013399994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009177865,0.00043114502,0.002466919,0.0014634283,0.00063930557,0.00017253071,0.00031390318,0.20205204,0.0019454416,0.29703707,0.018028716,0.47453174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016239918,0.00038827574,0.0007469636,0.00018179142,0.00020871409,0.0002410152,0.00012946887,0.6475931,0.0013865341,0.34018996,0.008674272,0.0000975501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003535656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003912786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013511337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022987886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038658727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07145566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320031228","doi":"10.1109/ssci51031.2022.10022198","title":"An Improvement of Consensus in Group Decision-Making Through an Optimal Distribution of Information Granularity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2022 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Granularity; Computer science; Granular computing; Group decision-making; Preference; Data mining; Process (computing); Group (periodic table); Fuzzy logic; Mathematical optimization; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Rough set","score_opus":0.05513989581785366,"score_gpt":0.3851552041242278,"score_spread":0.33001530830637416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320031228","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052816838,0.0001929907,0.9438613,0.00021681609,0.000023480852,0.0000841566,0.000012920166,0.0000983591,0.0026931588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83241236,0.0001662829,0.16672993,0.000053079842,0.000026239313,0.00012315484,0.000018760262,0.00002234002,0.00044790792],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99381846,0.003118795,0.00039255366,0.0009061785,0.00130478,0.0004592769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99039596,0.00632631,0.0010036784,0.001107574,0.00090740365,0.00025908742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008025653,0.0006790461,0.001303698,0.0013402151,0.0009812887,0.0018624807,0.0011399639,0.0011595202,0.0010334408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020690415,0.000373409,0.0008996787,0.0015537691,0.0018303015,0.0035365333,0.003071625,0.0015219237,0.0001654515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004540714,0.00022823602,0.0025448774,0.0004421651,0.00017822033,0.00029821874,0.0020798892,0.59045607,0.015015802,0.2304573,0.0008695399,0.15697564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008796935,0.0002801553,0.0010472159,0.00007144617,0.00007626309,0.00009723771,0.0003984089,0.829396,0.0060273376,0.16079497,0.0016663754,0.000056650893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007248379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004882514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008025653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001048702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014083231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04244417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320482480","doi":"10.1007/s40747-023-00971-2","title":"Designing pentapartitioned neutrosophic cubic set aggregation operator-based air pollution decision-making model","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Complex & Intelligent Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Ignorance; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Operator (biology); Computer science; Unobservable; Externality; Frame (networking); Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Value (mathematics); Computational intelligence; Management science; Mathematics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Machine learning; Law","score_opus":0.3219828979254318,"score_gpt":0.44204515020521984,"score_spread":0.12006225227978806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320482480","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07283928,0.00018916426,0.9135654,0.00055363943,0.00005702015,0.00014568077,0.00014993953,0.0001280831,0.012371841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92609054,0.0001947253,0.0694589,0.000063399355,0.00001908611,0.00021943533,0.00012583841,0.000011915114,0.0038160689],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992743,0.00024079646,0.000042103016,0.00014141836,0.00018060139,0.00012081282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999385,0.00031463732,0.000058985355,0.000018446886,0.00017724515,0.000045666413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013123858,0.00052054407,0.00078273355,0.0008353999,0.00087271386,0.0020906655,0.0013641996,0.0009855636,0.004038691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016586194,0.00036385015,0.00090068014,0.0007987428,0.00071362394,0.0013143464,0.0011917759,0.0012981428,0.00021918547],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005076505,0.000049622337,0.0011317718,0.00005468967,0.00003852544,0.00016066922,0.00016423222,0.9542681,0.0008485642,0.033160638,0.0006052908,0.0094672125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027135736,0.000009107073,0.000052941727,0.0000027164479,0.00000387956,0.0000074676,0.000014359637,0.9961845,0.00007007849,0.0035251325,0.00012400174,0.0000030278973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02058229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010482249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02058229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018102351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021445274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040924966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320582667","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2011.09053","title":"Matrix compatibility and correlation mixture representation of generalized Gini's gamma","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Concordance; Statistics; Bivariate analysis; Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient; Correlation; Correlation coefficient; Pairwise comparison; Generalized gamma distribution; Random variable; Gini coefficient; Gamma distribution; Inequality; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.3484431590409707,"score_gpt":0.3457040365780059,"score_spread":0.0027391224629647604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320582667","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05310105,0.0005280429,0.93679744,0.00040145896,0.00003278716,0.000055918823,0.00014709414,0.00012428952,0.008811902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81229913,0.0008870164,0.18096936,0.00023134309,0.00016131524,0.000408905,0.0004016461,0.0001663942,0.0044749365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962993,0.001755826,0.00012403743,0.0006118778,0.00093808956,0.0002710162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881919,0.0077600717,0.0012283375,0.0011354547,0.0013190506,0.00036523803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055235885,0.0009172235,0.0014184031,0.003074336,0.00073703687,0.0035042027,0.0013887793,0.0011099988,0.0035896758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025029324,0.00050647394,0.0011133644,0.0033368738,0.002193332,0.00422198,0.001943849,0.0019095469,0.00059525215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063876905,0.000030314994,0.0014487163,0.00007933205,0.000060149927,0.00012409012,0.00029469392,0.05309529,0.0013411794,0.91428113,0.001197696,0.027983516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000797318,0.000033946417,0.0010113578,0.000034274188,0.000018478784,0.00011911525,0.00006305731,0.32567576,0.00051067537,0.6709768,0.0015184515,0.000030148287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013045613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008251219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055235885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013844708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009519826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029211879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321241825","doi":"10.30564/jmser.v6i1.5400","title":"Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting Method (SAW) as a MultiAttribute Decision-Making Technique: A Step-by-Step Guide","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Science & Engineering research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Simple (philosophy); Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Process (computing); Two step; Energy (signal processing); Machine learning; Mathematics; Statistics; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.11776553190458815,"score_gpt":0.5232759339221472,"score_spread":0.40551040201755906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321241825","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023460411,0.0004963725,0.9931022,0.00014997437,0.00005079486,0.0003835406,0.00009517364,0.00019464699,0.0031812862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0116639,0.0005644205,0.98569864,0.000037376798,0.000015487461,0.00038969665,0.00011188179,0.000048398244,0.0014701515],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546164,0.0022371614,0.00032933056,0.0003379682,0.001522028,0.000111890084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963307,0.0022581012,0.00022841907,0.00016431099,0.0009604584,0.00005798999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005923806,0.0013464937,0.000911934,0.003218593,0.00077766494,0.002024181,0.0015580248,0.0008292245,0.008459283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006905388,0.0006613148,0.0014087181,0.0034090267,0.00094550237,0.0022176746,0.0012473875,0.0020831185,0.0020446212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010554052,0.00030222605,0.0022529026,0.0022161964,0.00015080758,0.00052577694,0.0011438712,0.0420217,0.015674124,0.18113808,0.011114649,0.74335414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006963338,0.0008071935,0.0040605394,0.0010999745,0.00014859658,0.0014140186,0.0012051478,0.5319726,0.036025472,0.24511895,0.17776157,0.00031633768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017905887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031043773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008459283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009037748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002383883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03132844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321785381","doi":"10.5772/intechopen.109992","title":"Decoupling of Attributes and Aggregation for Fuzzy Number Ranking","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IntechOpen eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Axiom; Mathematics; Data mining; Ranking (information retrieval); Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2422710110538305,"score_gpt":0.42473804002178583,"score_spread":0.18246702896795533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321785381","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042111054,0.005319139,0.87737274,0.0012497373,0.0005533089,0.0001026782,0.000099895675,0.00018031003,0.110911116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15228932,0.0068907547,0.81393903,0.00048232035,0.00066976197,0.00022506647,0.0002113223,0.00012815195,0.025164235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725777,0.0010146024,0.00015729334,0.00028150372,0.001204916,0.000083957646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987464,0.0007159854,0.0000904156,0.00020704589,0.00019967982,0.000040549316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029572363,0.00095959834,0.0008074863,0.0017312347,0.00078604673,0.00363253,0.0008874759,0.00074857596,0.0044445843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037843608,0.0003599181,0.0010689354,0.0027824568,0.0025952032,0.0052477154,0.0015067955,0.002737304,0.0015334784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000099588715,0.000011554134,0.00007674324,0.00014703113,0.000010803099,0.000039876264,0.00014590974,0.0041693957,0.00060926296,0.9333809,0.002554023,0.058844592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050925523,0.000026650512,0.00018722273,0.000114206225,0.000015195347,0.00013974607,0.00006813285,0.02456141,0.00081046997,0.916355,0.057691224,0.000025641186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005622826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008027075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044445843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017413748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010197806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015639544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322419571","doi":"10.1007/s12559-022-10100-9","title":"Complex Cubic Fuzzy Einstein Averaging Aggregation Operators: Application to Decision-making Problems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Computation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Einstein; Mathematics; Operator (biology); Fuzzy number; Fuzzy set; Algebra over a field; Algorithm; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Applied mathematics; Pure mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.13646687500375343,"score_gpt":0.4348444185292088,"score_spread":0.29837754352545537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322419571","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047448296,0.0003316564,0.94669676,0.00032505865,0.00008690741,0.000046147543,0.000038791703,0.00008131311,0.004945042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6733676,0.0005092182,0.32187235,0.00011167109,0.00012312413,0.000107850385,0.000055273922,0.00005765244,0.0037951786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991922,0.00039982508,0.000045598466,0.000079054575,0.00021766034,0.000065678636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970284,0.0017327282,0.0002790108,0.00017012637,0.0006326292,0.00015719658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029355926,0.00055777456,0.0011396512,0.00096774683,0.0008993419,0.0015193868,0.00079255796,0.00081107294,0.0016824965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006781053,0.0002229327,0.00067965145,0.0019524994,0.0010142555,0.0015280786,0.0014502303,0.0014088034,0.00013634385],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112078174,0.000094768184,0.0007028437,0.0001391665,0.000054380325,0.00014093835,0.00033790883,0.24690495,0.0029090212,0.6735792,0.001789959,0.07323484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009406894,0.00003340266,0.00022141499,0.000008091373,0.000010847907,0.000032360676,0.000034707642,0.8659598,0.00056386326,0.13222864,0.0008786454,0.00001887558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002836634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002871818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029355926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096125953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011732492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015525043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322747415","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-23876-5","title":"Multicriteria Location Analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Management science; Computer science; Operations research; Engineering","score_opus":0.269165860517525,"score_gpt":0.5585799203009432,"score_spread":0.28941405978341816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322747415","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013783815,0.0005995873,0.9771552,0.00015034035,0.000067192384,0.000028570954,0.00026382026,0.0003785885,0.0075728428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47848216,0.0010436735,0.49475735,0.00012768083,0.00021565064,0.0001411108,0.0014295339,0.00030435435,0.02349843],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999363,0.00021453167,0.00003185145,0.000165084,0.00016751012,0.000058131765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988267,0.00054330763,0.000102190555,0.00024452066,0.00026009258,0.00002333053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009128389,0.0007500091,0.00088328734,0.001789476,0.00046653356,0.0011979738,0.0009360848,0.0005007364,0.0074277115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040351925,0.00042406077,0.0014998827,0.002498524,0.0003440706,0.0012544272,0.0012913296,0.0007316432,0.0017610707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013999744,0.000064557134,0.0035974456,0.00015248828,0.00029900536,0.00016558445,0.00012396986,0.40535322,0.003212015,0.090707935,0.012735772,0.483448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059009135,0.000027356053,0.0013544135,0.000015781065,0.000034952373,0.0001265269,0.00005309359,0.9671171,0.0008188823,0.026167007,0.0042647216,0.000014318239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036720936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003952765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074277115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006682545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075102615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024848223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322747680","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-23876-5_3","title":"Multicriteria Decision Making","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Management science; Economics","score_opus":0.2908228738938315,"score_gpt":0.5540723227178553,"score_spread":0.26324944882402385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322747680","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010115339,0.0024050325,0.91421056,0.0009634751,0.0003313001,0.00009597907,0.00007805515,0.00012468729,0.071675465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39101937,0.0029187624,0.5655208,0.0004420457,0.0004919598,0.00029525274,0.0002626458,0.00009535898,0.038953763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977144,0.001082756,0.00014250928,0.0003107528,0.0006274815,0.00012215754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970203,0.0021580555,0.00017130401,0.0003336681,0.00025916134,0.000057419402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028880797,0.0010881402,0.0011435411,0.000911362,0.0005264738,0.0028048598,0.0010368886,0.0009538566,0.010943597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007264799,0.00047766647,0.0012718557,0.0015689506,0.00095944694,0.002041725,0.0018431311,0.0015799362,0.0014073418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117207266,0.000096377786,0.00028227537,0.00028152866,0.00019416946,0.00014092194,0.00019027322,0.1062641,0.0011173575,0.626529,0.008972511,0.25581434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038383576,0.00011021547,0.00026713932,0.00014705356,0.000047613765,0.00023865109,0.00008819222,0.33641708,0.0011760668,0.6351843,0.02625593,0.000029364832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038864344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067053194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010943597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088437373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007192341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036609948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323659754","doi":"10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106026","title":"Information measures based on similarity under neutrosophic fuzzy environment and multi-criteria decision problems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Python (programming language); Entropy (arrow of time); Data mining; Similarity (geometry); Fuzzy set; Set (abstract data type); Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.15210494276633657,"score_gpt":0.3765908369697578,"score_spread":0.22448589420342124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323659754","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13444984,0.0054218015,0.8512967,0.00087259756,0.00019380788,0.00013949742,0.00018479314,0.00006825822,0.007372598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90269154,0.0012259012,0.09486779,0.00007999233,0.00024152781,0.00014342552,0.00014516519,0.000014463419,0.00059019413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99163085,0.004088603,0.00071427174,0.0005724029,0.0027497332,0.00024416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97711015,0.017774405,0.0018495885,0.0008025765,0.0020025384,0.00046076596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007904988,0.0007004845,0.0017183936,0.005966807,0.00070662843,0.0035056667,0.0011751754,0.0015172665,0.00086784625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030443406,0.00026672875,0.0010199322,0.004949249,0.0023548768,0.0060534063,0.001597545,0.0012771478,0.00010243407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053267804,0.00034223337,0.0059029907,0.0008962949,0.0008393487,0.0005299262,0.0007601687,0.20260401,0.0038382234,0.6550438,0.001892022,0.12681828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003842224,0.00037963403,0.0041970694,0.00015606201,0.00016427647,0.00031872102,0.0002662497,0.5968915,0.0012363297,0.3948364,0.0014162874,0.00009897293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007844529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048271051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007904988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019923057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007957815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0418061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327662240","doi":"10.1109/access.2023.3254532","title":"Hybrid Renewable Energy Resources Selection Based on Multi Criteria Decision Methods for Optimal Performance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Access","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Renewable energy; Computer science; VIKOR method; Environmental economics; Wind power; Operations research; Engineering","score_opus":0.25406187598056895,"score_gpt":0.5226077744693292,"score_spread":0.2685458984887602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327662240","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038580745,0.0015642674,0.9489958,0.0002657476,0.000071814946,0.0002620546,0.00008767589,0.00025161364,0.009920272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71724516,0.0007614262,0.2785563,0.00010373015,0.00004598588,0.000567755,0.0001183811,0.00004973909,0.0025516008],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829954,0.0007581436,0.000099043034,0.00016055252,0.0005458569,0.00013689777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988192,0.00074758305,0.00009715272,0.000035647186,0.00026396886,0.00003647371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028205425,0.0015756838,0.0015871502,0.002103518,0.0006948989,0.0020573265,0.00089374447,0.0012078683,0.0027295414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030287995,0.0005345316,0.0017412066,0.001632586,0.0004341744,0.0008441283,0.0009415882,0.00082824327,0.00024228552],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000713721,0.000090390466,0.00056133093,0.00025428794,0.00010113573,0.0000879058,0.000095586336,0.9395099,0.0019725196,0.0072736247,0.0004999418,0.049481887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011822155,0.00005464804,0.0001445804,0.000024407693,0.000015749043,0.000013561045,0.000021946016,0.99673814,0.00057832355,0.0018075326,0.0005802237,0.000009117037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043599783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033899813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043599783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012729306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012325142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014916599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327860890","doi":"10.1108/ci-11-2022-0299","title":"A hybrid AHP-MAUT model for assessing competitiveness of construction companies: a case study of construction companies in Vietnam and Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Construction Innovation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Analytic hierarchy process; Competitive advantage; Context (archaeology); Business; Profitability index; Critical success factor; Pairwise comparison; Industrial organization; Marketing; Process management; Computer science; Operations research; Engineering","score_opus":0.16825162790446174,"score_gpt":0.4118117687170637,"score_spread":0.24356014081260197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327860890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8011509,0.0012500796,0.17299841,0.0017815266,0.00007109604,0.0014739839,0.0011598674,0.0002170248,0.019897101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484897,0.00034652936,0.04833615,0.000054414733,0.0000094412835,0.00035174718,0.00024344445,0.000012095225,0.0021564988],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867743,0.00068621035,0.00006416807,0.00012631268,0.0002308763,0.00021503134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799,0.0013090186,0.00010614887,0.000036496578,0.00045371326,0.000104625644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026654038,0.0007750748,0.000824778,0.0020587416,0.0016301621,0.0027968,0.0018807389,0.001249876,0.0020954101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029600228,0.0003888543,0.0010080674,0.0020197798,0.000706201,0.0006759166,0.0010327136,0.0009140409,0.00010948374],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023775766,0.00033528116,0.017743958,0.00047101302,0.00014455926,0.0010333682,0.0011326553,0.9308595,0.0009351619,0.010677898,0.0012706737,0.03515806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014004469,0.000059882204,0.0014368743,0.000031616615,0.000020875175,0.000029283228,0.0011194691,0.9956418,0.00018774351,0.00084784074,0.00059748185,0.000013029944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3410082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29802865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6589918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008600202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008293771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6780466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4328107717","doi":"10.1002/9781119569503.ch11","title":"Selection of Wastewater Treatment for Small Canadian Communities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Weighting; Vagueness; Grey relational analysis; Selection (genetic algorithm); Fuzzy logic; Process (computing); Computer science; Operations research; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.3648659206786448,"score_gpt":0.42962465253530474,"score_spread":0.06475873185665992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4328107717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9387063,0.0005267299,0.01765308,0.0006815296,0.00002961419,0.0016575201,0.00074555195,0.00009659671,0.03990297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94959646,0.00046399233,0.040149804,0.00008543021,0.0000034845834,0.0002698827,0.0003606988,0.000019746707,0.009050506],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882275,0.00019236823,0.00003349416,0.00009308345,0.0006094594,0.00024876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922407,0.00008599648,0.000053085285,0.000014316899,0.00046486154,0.0001575916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009382889,0.00065677677,0.00043208004,0.0027262296,0.0047059776,0.002273003,0.0009916315,0.00044598492,0.0041912636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022779927,0.00018959066,0.0006567117,0.0027345498,0.00069191336,0.0005006579,0.0013068501,0.00031851596,0.00027143268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018207964,0.0010524248,0.09705499,0.0018946077,0.00022556633,0.004673426,0.0045513096,0.09669517,0.108970895,0.021283573,0.012248323,0.64952886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004941415,0.0022205247,0.28928924,0.00085379457,0.0006684838,0.0011244178,0.07442251,0.3746838,0.109375566,0.017637659,0.12857026,0.00065961195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80043155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95470273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19956845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01854212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034082975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40148747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4328107781","doi":"10.1002/9781119569503.cintro","title":"Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Citation; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.22091374776782474,"score_gpt":0.46811353619737994,"score_spread":0.2471997884295552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4328107781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005704237,0.0007192659,0.0060502854,0.0035772237,0.003019561,0.00013882876,0.0023696828,0.00058417633,0.9829706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003590104,0.00072472554,0.0034361337,0.0016001572,0.000737054,0.00010522578,0.0016679881,0.0002218211,0.9879169],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892056,0.00018563826,0.000041106952,0.00016799432,0.00057299476,0.000111778645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977709,0.0004152926,0.00008652016,0.00031461514,0.0010269827,0.00038573233],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016390075,0.000749269,0.00040687338,0.0019292937,0.0012195499,0.004365811,0.0012952313,0.0017230297,0.51720715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052477904,0.00019902366,0.0005864724,0.0018840196,0.00062761677,0.0022531997,0.0019558894,0.0017325132,0.30233347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045611523,0.000069177564,0.00029033577,0.00015299767,0.0000035542093,0.00007026709,0.00009346095,0.00031351316,0.00028724992,0.07350026,0.72235644,0.2028171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031836605,0.00000744165,0.00023324479,0.00006996442,0.0000013992945,0.000043786797,0.000042203428,0.00011598889,0.00012212736,0.00688293,0.9924739,0.0000037664356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038232738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005910083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48279285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016366129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002486829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68864536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4328134628","doi":"10.1117/12.2671824","title":"Self-normalized double robust estimation for debiasing position bias","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Debiasing; Estimator; Variance (accounting); Robustness (evolution); Position (finance); Computer science; Robust statistics; Normalization (sociology); Algorithm; Bias of an estimator; Statistics; Minimum-variance unbiased estimator; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4567871959014032,"score_gpt":0.4777852131218792,"score_spread":0.020998017220476006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4328134628","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01165114,0.00029098667,0.98683226,0.00007443957,0.00005059745,0.000031246684,0.00003325082,0.00027036038,0.00076575193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4880846,0.0003457863,0.5078164,0.00018424752,0.000086481865,0.0001457007,0.00021953203,0.00017304852,0.0029442864],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996944,0.0007796754,0.0002282545,0.00087655574,0.00099033,0.0001811544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99319273,0.0028676323,0.00065511273,0.001232873,0.0019540864,0.000097622826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035969336,0.000978112,0.0011638253,0.0009472521,0.00045981645,0.001208495,0.0011633503,0.001004061,0.0022273934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015709016,0.000377614,0.0010005783,0.00082997786,0.0006340318,0.0016900388,0.0010453012,0.0011869837,0.0007278843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006965643,0.00025560491,0.00847977,0.00060305384,0.00035526947,0.00022285667,0.00041232695,0.24940926,0.06540807,0.026861377,0.0034650639,0.6438308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024638979,0.00016890148,0.0024012085,0.00003571587,0.00006530109,0.00022384242,0.000043335272,0.9669552,0.022667544,0.0051659043,0.0021858728,0.00006244988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026202616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022099402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035969336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062042614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008976442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019022644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360603965","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119948","title":"Optimizing consistency and consensus in group decision making based on relative projection between multiplicative reciprocal matrices","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Projection (relational algebra); Multiplicative function; Mathematical optimization; Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Group (periodic table); Group decision-making; Reciprocal; Projection pursuit; Mathematics; Local consistency; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Constraint satisfaction","score_opus":0.12458810276891401,"score_gpt":0.4171919492966053,"score_spread":0.2926038465276913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360603965","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021912498,0.000091059635,0.97714555,0.00011106625,0.000017256656,0.000037093134,0.000011422608,0.000034273657,0.00063979556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6635724,0.00021955631,0.33453974,0.00008491152,0.000066930756,0.0002976004,0.0000800047,0.00006810767,0.0010707419],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891256,0.0071792984,0.00037664556,0.0012739489,0.001680528,0.00036404116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9575723,0.036164586,0.0017287182,0.0012281407,0.0028138664,0.00049239554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013610756,0.0012914527,0.0029764883,0.0015444675,0.0009407072,0.0024969722,0.0024058188,0.0021249359,0.0011097398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049864314,0.0010441268,0.0013599674,0.0017670114,0.0033336086,0.0046015736,0.0034923526,0.0024758219,0.00020740773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022727979,0.00010909986,0.00059469184,0.00020353438,0.00016538898,0.00006354156,0.00028411517,0.89130366,0.0017002326,0.06733282,0.00040273703,0.03761292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016970518,0.00008227537,0.000105524145,0.000010295338,0.000016858023,0.000017236678,0.00002267833,0.96528214,0.00054249517,0.033796594,0.000091313086,0.000015553876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020606099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010859532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013610756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011427847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001921772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07198137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361002030","doi":"10.1016/j.ins.2023.03.110","title":"Priority ranking for the best-worst method","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Sichuan University; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Prioritization; Consistency (knowledge bases); Ranking (information retrieval); Logarithm; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Simple (philosophy); Monte Carlo method; Mathematics; Statistics; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Management science","score_opus":0.42360341012623437,"score_gpt":0.5537606757160536,"score_spread":0.13015726558981922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361002030","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005193076,0.0009818783,0.985782,0.00051917264,0.00026181384,0.0001322026,0.00011550947,0.00022703176,0.0067873024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16493325,0.0006574573,0.82924306,0.00026358163,0.00024948883,0.00023231376,0.00032125838,0.00019276614,0.0039068405],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803477,0.012209312,0.0008509398,0.0012799605,0.0044242144,0.000887874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810052,0.012984132,0.00057593687,0.0013669237,0.003368494,0.0006992444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015729638,0.0017397966,0.0033157256,0.007362675,0.0024111427,0.0055679283,0.0025234735,0.0021284919,0.011543684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037420914,0.00068998395,0.0024803728,0.004151356,0.0019053556,0.0038466274,0.0021690396,0.0033424112,0.0013316808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009406234,0.0004382811,0.0028333538,0.0014681908,0.00064335624,0.00016123646,0.00032449496,0.15134299,0.0018952849,0.3174726,0.018853797,0.50362575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001706077,0.0003543696,0.00082124287,0.00020971101,0.00023311094,0.00025304517,0.00014440676,0.59301966,0.0015965785,0.39329392,0.009799354,0.000103991355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00373313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004121251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015729638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025444746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004374257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08318728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361793027","doi":"10.4171/dms/8/11","title":"The Skolem-Mahler-Lech theorem","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Documenta mathematica series","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Mathematical physics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.10589456652922156,"score_gpt":0.3866834483589769,"score_spread":0.2807888818297553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361793027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014045039,0.01783619,0.40932024,0.009010165,0.0016409996,0.000048629376,0.000761492,0.00021188927,0.5471252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.597069,0.025579365,0.1574704,0.003491062,0.0037611946,0.00033679488,0.00061267614,0.00039728006,0.21128222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994547,0.00017646543,0.00002314824,0.000094747,0.00020438651,0.00004671086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988908,0.0007562058,0.00005870596,0.00009477314,0.00016243961,0.0000370763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010427133,0.0008290033,0.000996714,0.0017846853,0.0009973039,0.0025999213,0.0009985518,0.0015160021,0.014342617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045254384,0.00030781643,0.00084091414,0.002177217,0.0029032475,0.00369055,0.0015418446,0.0034665603,0.003395273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007542398,0.000006380355,0.000040779345,0.00007802512,0.000010245119,0.000024476089,0.000038409904,0.0012832242,0.0001641434,0.97440594,0.0072363196,0.016704453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026152736,0.0000042134193,0.00005406035,0.000018938821,0.000005141881,0.000044127064,0.000009168369,0.0029746485,0.00014733661,0.9855988,0.011134923,0.0000059204926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013059884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010897232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014342617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017249049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009818976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047980785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362471920","doi":"10.1038/s41598-022-22399-3","title":"Development of neutrosophic cubic hesitant fuzzy exponential aggregation operators with application in environmental protection problems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"King Khalid University","keywords":"Weighting; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Exponential function; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy set; Mathematical optimization; Decision matrix; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Operations research","score_opus":0.07886325138224022,"score_gpt":0.32189507179282967,"score_spread":0.24303182041058946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362471920","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007841765,0.00037416816,0.9889654,0.00014078863,0.000034672932,0.00003904797,0.000015501933,0.00002577182,0.0025629322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52757734,0.0016303418,0.46640214,0.0001534211,0.00013867264,0.00024243892,0.000089028195,0.00003883983,0.0037277702],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.998379,0.00072084,0.00012796302,0.00024139683,0.00042944693,0.00010143079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976592,0.0014185383,0.0001591487,0.00007867858,0.0005957717,0.00008868743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032562965,0.00089647283,0.0008332395,0.0009928775,0.0007199991,0.0014221903,0.0010212512,0.0010292277,0.0013687961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005199614,0.00041071052,0.0012400215,0.0012940833,0.0012925183,0.0022784001,0.0014627951,0.002116515,0.00017931515],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008924311,0.00008884002,0.00092527084,0.00030056998,0.000096450654,0.00043541993,0.0008650346,0.62374634,0.0054675024,0.29614937,0.0018604005,0.069975585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050214203,0.00004053126,0.000096788244,0.00001528643,0.000010275908,0.000046585887,0.000056208744,0.94994813,0.0007808203,0.04770635,0.0012782776,0.000015701797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025427083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001255671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032562965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000897121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012732435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017221093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4363650062","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2023.109229","title":"Minimum cost consensus model with altruistic preference","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Preference; Revealed preference; Altruism (biology); Social psychology; Psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.41788359774091194,"score_gpt":0.37360398666870065,"score_spread":0.04427961107221129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4363650062","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14817345,0.00036627427,0.8267162,0.0027173727,0.00014963941,0.00011558717,0.00025209866,0.00015764953,0.02135175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9441401,0.00017953057,0.04057222,0.00017243222,0.00006084209,0.00021056575,0.00012676204,0.000034676435,0.014502936],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984939,0.00076748367,0.000049836035,0.0002468003,0.0002440888,0.00019779512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964736,0.0022571268,0.00031588256,0.00018644078,0.00048134406,0.00028556178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020553705,0.0008711569,0.0021655848,0.0008437354,0.0008409339,0.001840786,0.0025966947,0.0030971754,0.005553458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005870913,0.0005351964,0.00092252594,0.0011800826,0.0011347083,0.0021207915,0.0013593568,0.001634306,0.0005818351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019834543,0.000085916705,0.0003684982,0.00013002304,0.000087114866,0.0002759395,0.0001094053,0.86502594,0.0011582463,0.121524885,0.0016308364,0.009404859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038495487,0.000035993227,0.00008838848,0.0000061130013,0.000014160564,0.000024986934,0.00001831638,0.96184105,0.0001269608,0.037563205,0.00023051236,0.0000117276695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034423708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018301707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005553458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016268194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012745915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018578172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366992302","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119936","title":"A multi-criteria group-based decision-making method considering linguistic neutrosophic clouds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Group decision-making; Ambiguity; Computer science; Measure (data warehouse); Set (abstract data type); Terminology; Rule-based machine translation; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Data mining","score_opus":0.15088401660841,"score_gpt":0.46632951404911954,"score_spread":0.31544549744070954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366992302","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01041966,0.00009710862,0.9878473,0.00011196304,0.000052272237,0.000117210664,0.00003429019,0.00008464651,0.0012355234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28848255,0.000120979304,0.7090675,0.000104784274,0.00007040796,0.00050748826,0.00010873295,0.000046489364,0.0014910498],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978598,0.0007991644,0.00014457507,0.00036955593,0.0006802099,0.0001467699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830854,0.0009113549,0.000102017904,0.00007710585,0.00047068234,0.00013031649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032194974,0.0011080365,0.0020317885,0.0024171649,0.001530146,0.00215059,0.002075481,0.0017937945,0.0033518567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035542785,0.0006909098,0.0019791855,0.002271682,0.0007455627,0.0017655225,0.0018069405,0.001087722,0.0003568754],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005686978,0.00041036413,0.0016381537,0.00069899746,0.00046945282,0.00046274817,0.0006845251,0.64659876,0.012346547,0.03364501,0.0034895488,0.2989872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000382716,0.00008217892,0.00015917132,0.000022492684,0.000058035264,0.000042514082,0.0000533502,0.9917636,0.0009488505,0.0061744354,0.00063061237,0.000026442369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034037186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003216169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034037186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011582738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019878566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017026544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367394512","doi":"10.1007/s11071-023-08506-7","title":"Marginalization in random permutation set theory: from the cooperative game perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nonlinear Dynamics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Random permutation; Permutation (music); Mathematics; Cardinality (data modeling); Set (abstract data type); Perspective (graphical); Power set; Game theory; Function (biology); Random function; Probability theory; Permutation graph; Set function; Event (particle physics); Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Theoretical computer science; Computer science; Random variable; Mathematical economics; Symmetric group; Data mining; Statistics","score_opus":0.11408280634449779,"score_gpt":0.43453203580239214,"score_spread":0.32044922945789434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367394512","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03584242,0.00041414905,0.9505448,0.0014523574,0.000058062586,0.0000704757,0.00007289009,0.000047810012,0.011497045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89527005,0.0006017271,0.09509415,0.00033136221,0.00021148045,0.0003682803,0.00010668461,0.00007620741,0.007940003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928006,0.0048110187,0.00018666688,0.00069815305,0.0010897391,0.00041379465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98289996,0.014177796,0.0006860974,0.00087613094,0.0007949736,0.00056490843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008514833,0.0011297007,0.0022034633,0.0014508456,0.0011689061,0.0038627416,0.0025951157,0.0018812643,0.0041265544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021682596,0.00075880054,0.0018021746,0.0011832307,0.0061772647,0.007319656,0.0036280216,0.0032530678,0.00034902777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028656092,0.000031129428,0.00023604938,0.000045931607,0.000043152784,0.000040817253,0.00013107566,0.05911369,0.00021500536,0.93545943,0.0003762916,0.0042788805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007778811,0.00001861436,0.00010194912,0.000011236559,0.000008146162,0.000016383856,0.00002764379,0.20003073,0.0000791033,0.7993019,0.00038401404,0.000012511795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021614023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014997327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008514833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025081115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017600909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04503131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367625087","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-21-2023-41","title":"Neutrosophic Generalized Exponential Robust Ratio Type Estimators","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Mathematics; Mean squared error; Exponential type; Exponential function; Statistics; Type (biology); Simple random sample; Applied mathematics; Econometrics; Population; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.1586862700377372,"score_gpt":0.45225246029527627,"score_spread":0.29356619025753905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367625087","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007136569,0.00050741,0.99092567,0.000045747252,0.000030786476,0.000051220715,0.000030457677,0.00007846502,0.0011935643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43182713,0.0015344801,0.56392884,0.00016369285,0.00016653852,0.00024122129,0.00021985894,0.000042235744,0.0018759962],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996433,0.0016514584,0.00023151281,0.00051607704,0.0010777384,0.00009017779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99570507,0.0023570594,0.0005547609,0.00045367,0.00087475,0.00005466512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053753206,0.00070031796,0.00095624424,0.0016570196,0.00023182364,0.0011672014,0.0013315255,0.000921445,0.0015762436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018665805,0.00021197327,0.001009802,0.0011131364,0.00080881274,0.0016422747,0.0008580102,0.0008478662,0.00034975255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028893718,0.00012941506,0.0044423686,0.00075830374,0.00049236964,0.00019159295,0.00015988722,0.20166774,0.013837486,0.31114474,0.001797339,0.46508992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043196167,0.0002645508,0.002372564,0.00006900306,0.00011832549,0.00040057985,0.000050737784,0.9213259,0.008408254,0.06147596,0.0054047015,0.000066185916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040695426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032582204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053753206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050267053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061598304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02842778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372294683","doi":"10.2166/hydro.2023.169","title":"Development of a genetic algorithm-based graph model for conflict resolution for optimizing resolutions in environmental conflicts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydroinformatics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict resolution; Resolution (logic); Genetic algorithm; Competence (human resources); Operations research; Management science; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Law; Management","score_opus":0.21333996384455875,"score_gpt":0.3993496615784933,"score_spread":0.18600969773393453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372294683","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013768161,0.0002008202,0.9806929,0.00022381199,0.000035068468,0.00009704124,0.00007912574,0.00016637356,0.0047366954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61115,0.00042291734,0.38320217,0.00014927215,0.000030497042,0.0006722563,0.0002810713,0.000092534065,0.003999222],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993248,0.00036055662,0.000025022196,0.00011128408,0.000111703645,0.000066620676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991536,0.00056028453,0.00007501949,0.000032092026,0.00014147491,0.000037507292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011444194,0.0011528746,0.0010612402,0.0013448354,0.00058887445,0.0014610202,0.0016142174,0.0017715844,0.0027608566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021564532,0.00048677548,0.0010870234,0.0011754457,0.00083092664,0.0010162726,0.0010642157,0.0011933867,0.00027166517],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070758647,0.000009922798,0.00012436505,0.000013618655,0.000011778244,0.000021984562,0.000013979517,0.99179804,0.00015403044,0.004259673,0.00014885086,0.0034367824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002626324,0.0000059890326,0.000019383326,0.000002927368,0.000003179071,0.0000030148137,0.000004282847,0.99829704,0.000042171978,0.0014730231,0.00014459703,0.0000017742116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018061914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011176055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018061914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016017633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023520119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035913527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376277637","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2675123/v1","title":"Identification of the Best Sector for Multinatinal Companies Investment Using the Q-rung Double Hierarchy Linguistic Term Set Todim Approach","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Hierarchy; Term (time); Foreign direct investment; Investment (military); Identification (biology); Business; Economics; Operations research; Economy; Finance; Engineering; Political science; Market economy; Macroeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.6471035032677815,"score_gpt":0.5672328815980664,"score_spread":0.07987062166971515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376277637","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20027982,0.0006696949,0.76551735,0.0011960363,0.000098359335,0.00030936167,0.00067107653,0.00015415311,0.031104187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80325216,0.0001850494,0.19381706,0.00006136913,0.000019364705,0.00013877415,0.00025446623,0.000011451815,0.002260337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990785,0.00037025704,0.00008264557,0.000121157624,0.0002461442,0.00010122057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993492,0.00025157677,0.00012311254,0.00002242863,0.00019500489,0.00005878142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013491246,0.00037977484,0.00040952547,0.003610216,0.00071937835,0.0021486334,0.0006405856,0.00062396843,0.0033485356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032809458,0.0001313265,0.00062467536,0.0017689982,0.0005611604,0.0010406912,0.0008674254,0.00038296983,0.0002226003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004035188,0.00022515371,0.019652428,0.0008721909,0.00015097375,0.0006476105,0.0011112596,0.2044376,0.010071387,0.39344785,0.0061034877,0.3628766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026094225,0.00011382705,0.003957428,0.000097628756,0.000044591558,0.00012840415,0.0010850738,0.8863442,0.0030468616,0.09773769,0.0073824427,0.000035835383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005953913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050998884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005953913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002589699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014859968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018789709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376608292","doi":"10.47852/bonviewjdsis3202885","title":"Analytic Network Process (ANP) Method: A Comprehensive Review of Applications, Advantages, and Limitations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Data Science and Intelligent Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic network process; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Interdependence; Process (computing); Risk analysis (engineering); Selection (genetic algorithm); Management science; Supply chain; Operations research; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Business","score_opus":0.71021649790926,"score_gpt":0.6139106854791126,"score_spread":0.09630581243014735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376608292","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019043604,0.99190617,0.0046833055,0.0009819046,0.00022426462,0.000038491136,0.0000481136,0.000024322866,0.0019029126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002562397,0.99011105,0.0064185564,0.00022084176,0.00019692996,0.000053362375,0.000056478766,0.000011058938,0.00036928174],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699914,0.00092739065,0.0003838524,0.00034647813,0.0012548815,0.00008829282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906461,0.0065352833,0.0005271273,0.00020103432,0.00194041,0.00014994098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066371094,0.0014313768,0.0022103302,0.0071163727,0.0006647285,0.0022713318,0.0019458836,0.0018138853,0.0030381933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009670019,0.00067386834,0.001315597,0.010334204,0.0014042846,0.00296577,0.0011019354,0.0020685853,0.0011211145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044443554,0.00006838737,0.00047954972,0.030541152,0.00020714375,0.00012747331,0.00018521275,0.0024196252,0.0004852572,0.020397274,0.018896228,0.92614824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002311478,0.00015040995,0.001715083,0.019135617,0.00048580303,0.000999802,0.00032855436,0.0025369097,0.0009770553,0.02315137,0.95037335,0.0001229968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005267609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006060747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071163727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024763637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048271925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035100818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377042403","doi":"10.30564/mmpp.v5i2.5578","title":"An Effective Compromising Ranking Technique for Decision Making","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Macro Management & Public Policies","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"VIKOR method; TOPSIS; Regret; Decision matrix; Ranking (information retrieval); Ideal solution; Computer science; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Process (computing); Data mining; Matrix (chemical analysis); Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13019753214907331,"score_gpt":0.470276085463908,"score_spread":0.34007855331483466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377042403","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019727463,0.00036533852,0.9911446,0.00015076497,0.00008088165,0.00010125994,0.000033885757,0.00020379772,0.0059466655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051631078,0.000561684,0.9438506,0.000114886025,0.00006221205,0.00022100491,0.00008221222,0.000072420684,0.0034038972],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918425,0.0034316601,0.00033285332,0.00071537966,0.0034423147,0.0002353408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714226,0.001505292,0.00025051826,0.0002847344,0.00075844786,0.000058632708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050914395,0.0016384225,0.0017650081,0.003696395,0.0015482994,0.002282207,0.0015131285,0.0011643087,0.0073023215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009576733,0.00041508581,0.0016777224,0.0036156317,0.0009306357,0.0026457252,0.0020393613,0.0017336295,0.0021892139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010673186,0.00013092409,0.0007044619,0.0010120422,0.00020247968,0.00023634241,0.00068071514,0.06254331,0.012429031,0.19384563,0.0067448155,0.72136354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006742872,0.00069516443,0.0013756076,0.0004472305,0.00024282956,0.0011546972,0.000524176,0.7011573,0.015311649,0.1887121,0.09012387,0.00018788721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001015376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017693958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073023215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008906679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016268294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026926458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377966428","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2022-0076","title":"Decision support system for selecting engineering consultants using qualifications-based selection (QBS) and fuzzy TOPSIS","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Operations research; Consistency (knowledge bases); Selection (genetic algorithm); Subjectivity; Fuzzy logic; Transparency (behavior); Decision support system; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Management science; Engineering; Operations management; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10530723802889957,"score_gpt":0.3567614850458714,"score_spread":0.25145424701697183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377966428","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030294426,0.00011173597,0.9592204,0.00033534016,0.00006528488,0.0011343297,0.0005013077,0.0037818563,0.004555242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33147034,0.00022974126,0.6633488,0.00010562299,0.000037870068,0.0012923814,0.00092794345,0.00008917567,0.0024981082],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959449,0.0015181702,0.00062902557,0.00046467304,0.0011955572,0.00024762424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554175,0.0022514865,0.00048247256,0.00018904063,0.0013306867,0.00020456467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058798087,0.001657658,0.001509918,0.005579994,0.0018699017,0.0031915968,0.0012725428,0.0010293728,0.009669504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0083436025,0.0007583798,0.0013341537,0.0031493832,0.00048162148,0.0016164399,0.0018097,0.00092993013,0.0019442617],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013194038,0.00063509104,0.0067541515,0.0016709218,0.0003414566,0.0012819853,0.0023774048,0.19672568,0.022439683,0.015777279,0.014321753,0.7363551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032941147,0.00042034278,0.0025550043,0.00021248533,0.00019632668,0.00026473397,0.00096527755,0.962576,0.011138136,0.011227854,0.009961829,0.00015268794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052401214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051395698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009669504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013857293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030046527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03234774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379259660","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2023.4.009","title":"A novel multi-criteria group decision-making approach using aggregation operators and weight determination method for supplier selection problem in hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy environment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pythagorean theorem; Operator (biology); Mathematics; Group decision-making; Flexibility (engineering); Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy logic; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ranking (information retrieval); Score; Function (biology); Trigonometry; Preference; Computational intelligence; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.0999104012901123,"score_gpt":0.4142851751112227,"score_spread":0.3143747738211104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379259660","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073015564,0.00019887589,0.9911082,0.00011672249,0.000026526952,0.000065709835,0.000016791768,0.00003627451,0.0011294343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3322198,0.00042751842,0.66423154,0.00014395492,0.000091702146,0.00052988087,0.00010941449,0.00003460022,0.0022115565],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970505,0.0011739221,0.0002038441,0.00050973304,0.0008916639,0.00017028613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998757,0.0005946366,0.00015860901,0.00004675707,0.0003609974,0.00008199268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003998971,0.0015183851,0.0020168598,0.0018780429,0.0011187263,0.0023293323,0.0019763252,0.0016829106,0.0015658984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035624888,0.0005802109,0.0016539635,0.0023187404,0.0010157828,0.0021783474,0.0018891654,0.0016083026,0.00022325794],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017389635,0.0001782451,0.0012648249,0.0005626287,0.00042061173,0.00059756584,0.0008145552,0.73576206,0.0056745885,0.07058418,0.0023767985,0.18159002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016904638,0.00009595918,0.00014790025,0.00002612415,0.000041016832,0.000069406175,0.000059951235,0.98224777,0.0006562174,0.01565331,0.00096036034,0.000025013736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025095362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021372195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003998971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015079668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017818004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0211488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379506296","doi":"10.30564/jmser.v6i2.5637","title":"A Comprehensive Overview of the ELECTRE Method in Multi Criteria Decision-Making","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Science & Engineering research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"ELECTRE; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Management science; Computer science; Adaptability; Set (abstract data type); Variety (cybernetics); Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.4630533687587306,"score_gpt":0.5968949086258867,"score_spread":0.13384153986715608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379506296","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005903172,0.048667613,0.9250196,0.0012748394,0.00047947545,0.00022211214,0.00017384985,0.00019147391,0.023380734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035598394,0.0797551,0.87226105,0.0009651637,0.0010768473,0.0008487757,0.00047126238,0.00019263497,0.008830796],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940275,0.0031022632,0.0004921376,0.00048134144,0.0017445948,0.00015209524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965879,0.0025210613,0.00018343098,0.00018303012,0.00046079987,0.00006380813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00576585,0.0018501555,0.0017004723,0.0039787632,0.00093088305,0.0032788897,0.0019069931,0.0023790584,0.008161099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071040126,0.0008730586,0.0023197115,0.007330849,0.0017133851,0.0030605332,0.002229763,0.0032523554,0.0033760846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050395032,0.00013970493,0.0008174818,0.004676973,0.00025319683,0.00046399568,0.0003646994,0.07292576,0.0016027757,0.32739368,0.018584149,0.5727272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036542613,0.00013272796,0.00095884013,0.0032754513,0.00009352446,0.0011216812,0.00022268531,0.14068393,0.0021285126,0.42793646,0.42317787,0.00023182422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018556896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019882596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008161099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018856999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022093703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03049314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379507421","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-30403-3_8","title":"Hybrid Multi-attribute Decision-Making Methods Based on Preferential Voting","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in systems, decision and control","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Process (computing); Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Machine learning; Political science","score_opus":0.3180020934915572,"score_gpt":0.5070131577339035,"score_spread":0.18901106424234632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379507421","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038599134,0.00025031794,0.99481344,0.00004400544,0.000049856757,0.000055321136,0.000016452415,0.000081936065,0.00082882214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15288544,0.00029781353,0.84381723,0.00009538384,0.000103590726,0.00034135458,0.00009512123,0.00008503225,0.0022790157],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937278,0.003768543,0.00039710742,0.0006319376,0.0012408056,0.00023389432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863961,0.010580545,0.00035220556,0.00085184624,0.0016047098,0.00021464065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010638288,0.001373087,0.003105056,0.0019179245,0.0009295957,0.0023710197,0.0034125766,0.0015508323,0.005204786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012244837,0.0009591605,0.0019461892,0.0026605583,0.0011454893,0.003872419,0.002089338,0.002603376,0.0008143539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005589529,0.00028385202,0.0008549313,0.00039018877,0.0004982273,0.00007054819,0.00029291448,0.45830297,0.0029918593,0.08779998,0.0022040724,0.4457515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040188064,0.000083438295,0.00013073678,0.000021349662,0.00004568668,0.000027625883,0.000015926513,0.96969193,0.000764578,0.028412404,0.0007451598,0.000020954443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012756475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016390254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010638288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009944509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012240614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0562613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379507457","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-30403-3_6","title":"Group Preferential Voting","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in systems, decision and control","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Value (mathematics); Group decision-making; Group (periodic table); Computer science; Power (physics); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Machine learning; Physics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.3479738682841503,"score_gpt":0.45576485566576996,"score_spread":0.10779098738161969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379507457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060686516,0.001763864,0.18381731,0.002261956,0.00077477534,0.00011339262,0.0001386446,0.00015683276,0.80490446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30250934,0.0021100868,0.07375993,0.001205567,0.00044458144,0.00027815043,0.0003103516,0.00019984866,0.6191821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988808,0.00052042893,0.000026984711,0.00015487852,0.00031114396,0.00010570697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988701,0.0005341084,0.000050182185,0.0003120785,0.00018088077,0.000052762087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014278833,0.00045572798,0.0005342835,0.0007604253,0.0010733749,0.0020316048,0.0008983916,0.0011504464,0.034756012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004321472,0.00023076664,0.0003539594,0.0013947458,0.0015526621,0.0020469928,0.0009248882,0.001757535,0.006068755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015651052,0.000010606426,0.00006117451,0.000033195265,0.0000075138837,0.000010908705,0.000076531556,0.001677898,0.00019738112,0.91907007,0.019988071,0.058850843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010640738,0.000020109917,0.00014020877,0.000027945109,0.000006619295,0.00006339497,0.00005561074,0.006195038,0.0004410432,0.86398417,0.12904873,0.0000064750366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083408423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017305722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034756012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010705502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007433306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11627042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379507493","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-30403-3_3","title":"Introduction to Fuzzy Logic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in systems, decision and control","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy number; Proposition; T-norm fuzzy logics; Fuzzy Control Language; Fuzzy electronics; Fuzzy set operations; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Fuzzy control system; Fuzzy set; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.27517222461636653,"score_gpt":0.45205292374855616,"score_spread":0.17688069913218962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379507493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00090956717,0.05795067,0.14411029,0.0040872837,0.0045559253,0.00009947174,0.0008874546,0.0005271058,0.7868722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024748623,0.04238484,0.08287674,0.002333361,0.003009072,0.00020089207,0.0007064896,0.00030018334,0.84343976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963784,0.00005461246,0.000023407936,0.00005892094,0.00020186014,0.000023438852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996675,0.00018309074,0.000009637918,0.000027644835,0.000099307195,0.000012779423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047814043,0.0011263485,0.0008730033,0.002354281,0.0009065013,0.0019333776,0.0008038094,0.0010301087,0.060435683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001212335,0.00041067763,0.000585452,0.002619376,0.0011348639,0.0023708064,0.0007169078,0.0018961113,0.01740618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015162832,0.000036942743,0.000074436044,0.0004161687,0.000014567457,0.00011414795,0.000297598,0.002174103,0.00075725326,0.4455866,0.22711092,0.32340208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035427277,0.000015435986,0.00012808097,0.00022102227,0.0000060667303,0.00016924045,0.000056933994,0.0016357813,0.00025870153,0.18913092,0.80836236,0.00001198239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002538253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037460611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060435683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001355922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084331667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20217752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379507534","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-30403-3_9","title":"Preferential Voting Based on the Logic of Uncertainty","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in systems, decision and control","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Political science","score_opus":0.37838358878795686,"score_gpt":0.44543813341069416,"score_spread":0.0670545446227373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379507534","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009990374,0.0015446574,0.874575,0.0027205616,0.00036138162,0.000063293875,0.000098040815,0.00008873669,0.1105579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7379205,0.0025310426,0.22366561,0.0008073978,0.0005974064,0.00027334463,0.00015763709,0.0001159836,0.03393105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542797,0.0026718092,0.00016523332,0.00043115817,0.0010181608,0.00028576644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99088377,0.007084552,0.00034342345,0.00084204704,0.0006591162,0.00018707615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058156103,0.0006708519,0.001040216,0.0010617109,0.0010970733,0.0040097754,0.0017799177,0.0014272947,0.0075688264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015263378,0.00044851034,0.00079571776,0.0016735053,0.00494539,0.0052819476,0.0015233206,0.003466216,0.00075401535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130792705,0.0000031185705,0.0000358076,0.000021141863,0.000008374198,0.0000107838405,0.000048934035,0.0054015657,0.00011088684,0.9846318,0.0011101138,0.008604334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061030005,0.0000056824188,0.00002210429,0.0000097349575,0.0000038739277,0.000013028652,0.000011303168,0.014764221,0.00009552291,0.982689,0.0023751787,0.000004252239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095065526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011740403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075688264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022547622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012050718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030756235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379507624","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-30403-3_10","title":"Applications of Preferential Voting in Industry and Society","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in systems, decision and control","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Management science; Computer science; Operations research; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.23434232030262808,"score_gpt":0.447926992148112,"score_spread":0.2135846718454839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379507624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0088442005,0.02407214,0.32529113,0.009354898,0.0016065489,0.000052338673,0.00009733316,0.000072501,0.630609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.732612,0.023801114,0.107510224,0.0018420503,0.0021546946,0.00021494314,0.00009948224,0.000112489,0.13165303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779946,0.0014084959,0.00007139074,0.00021643587,0.0003813642,0.00012289561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99570066,0.0033881203,0.00015065631,0.00034136858,0.00033821719,0.00008103947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028675962,0.00068218197,0.00078939233,0.0012473185,0.0013699998,0.0034373624,0.0013339282,0.0021402938,0.009677453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00878786,0.00038849475,0.00058612874,0.002751733,0.005651981,0.0047979737,0.0014732785,0.0022723014,0.000822406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018779039,0.000002275356,0.000025020076,0.000014586762,0.000001940779,0.000008343458,0.000044311117,0.0013734074,0.000015339732,0.99057275,0.0012305176,0.0067095654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013533745,0.0000020228533,0.00002482311,0.000014265946,0.0000013545703,0.000017162356,0.000028893597,0.0023719268,0.000025667661,0.9888282,0.008682091,0.0000022794602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025617308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026076525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009677453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00254928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001264434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032374263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379507640","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-30403-3_7","title":"Preferential Voting Based on Undesirable Voters","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in systems, decision and control","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Process (computing); Computer science; Management science; Operations research; Mathematics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.3761633810815831,"score_gpt":0.4495771729754204,"score_spread":0.07341379189383729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379507640","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04830276,0.0009283138,0.79044145,0.0022696112,0.00045726582,0.00011635688,0.00009081297,0.00010605697,0.1572873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8771009,0.00080979196,0.085135356,0.00040513603,0.00024347183,0.00016578022,0.00006372031,0.00008754519,0.035988368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951965,0.002921993,0.000116358664,0.00040157873,0.0009456894,0.00041790007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862049,0.010075615,0.00067257136,0.0017938777,0.0009318984,0.00032104598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006733588,0.00063808425,0.001026083,0.0009153713,0.0010448183,0.0023821986,0.0015832493,0.0012838134,0.006925967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020085402,0.00037653215,0.00067632063,0.0011346855,0.002662861,0.0028594069,0.0013591019,0.002862854,0.0006953076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119074,0.000022393153,0.00056949415,0.00008111937,0.00003630575,0.000049098544,0.00016038568,0.015363811,0.00082833343,0.9381018,0.0033419025,0.041326225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003443694,0.00005578659,0.00034634865,0.000035332043,0.000027215034,0.00010131178,0.00008447375,0.068339735,0.0008377239,0.9237617,0.006362076,0.000013830962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038817804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010914812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006925967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011420208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079735427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035611033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379518489","doi":"10.21428/594757db.15b61c8c","title":"Counterfactual Explanations for Rankings","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.602429265984331,"score_gpt":0.5681456405066458,"score_spread":0.03428362547768515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379518489","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017733846,0.0005215519,0.9709641,0.0037110283,0.00020813082,0.00017449303,0.00043576752,0.00036765993,0.0058834064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5172806,0.0004759384,0.476978,0.00090354757,0.0002806769,0.0010015582,0.0008305141,0.00015050957,0.0020986425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97514355,0.017403957,0.0012125166,0.002297639,0.0032964523,0.0006457363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8473612,0.12545104,0.010664026,0.010913962,0.0048809624,0.00072888605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022634199,0.0018469265,0.0009789991,0.0044812355,0.0019687065,0.0046208426,0.0034182535,0.0036316742,0.010097252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13297863,0.0008401749,0.0025422366,0.0029577243,0.0056708893,0.008173031,0.003621336,0.0044476558,0.00059669523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010629775,0.000084769614,0.0035084852,0.00026520246,0.00014594142,0.00049526733,0.0010688357,0.06484539,0.00034459625,0.90081865,0.0025659949,0.02575061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056569468,0.000036052345,0.0007351978,0.000117298994,0.000039879484,0.00012986863,0.000189948,0.24194479,0.00053601136,0.750471,0.0056913123,0.000052008287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006094199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060153333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022634199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003241819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023541297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11970246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379660443","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4472480","title":"Modified Methods to Solve Interval-Valued Fermatean Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Problems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.2672416056168468,"score_gpt":0.5126066016652848,"score_spread":0.24536499604843803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379660443","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064236145,0.00018786898,0.9915109,0.000054967484,0.000068864036,0.00005100016,0.000017669985,0.000042393065,0.0016426481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19525906,0.00030689585,0.7989582,0.000089326095,0.00010353128,0.0005339017,0.00008150751,0.00009648935,0.0045711105],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894327,0.000524273,0.000054661297,0.00009727336,0.0003192599,0.000061321174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99692553,0.002304277,0.0001420735,0.000119225806,0.00045120862,0.000057741978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034413745,0.0010763084,0.001402202,0.0011377931,0.00048203327,0.0010681017,0.002037493,0.0017083422,0.0040447703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007512668,0.0005496523,0.0013700905,0.0011329461,0.0007553095,0.0010426849,0.0012242654,0.0019713899,0.00052740425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017441442,0.00018505333,0.00041946958,0.00038735446,0.00016660066,0.00014578515,0.00017428308,0.7747556,0.0043007834,0.06568091,0.0012570708,0.1523528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015600908,0.000054848097,0.00006904265,0.000013742043,0.000011674081,0.00001504873,0.000007436019,0.987621,0.00034667048,0.011169608,0.00066603464,0.000009163154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018742952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002178418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040447703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081273785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010945299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01819998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380324286","doi":"10.1007/s40815-023-01529-7","title":"Cubic q-Fractional Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy number; Measure (data warehouse); Discrete mathematics; Algorithm; Computer science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.14477068800297335,"score_gpt":0.4384908692893288,"score_spread":0.29372018128635546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380324286","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060297634,0.006931499,0.8854298,0.0014888499,0.00065554364,0.000055951987,0.0001601127,0.00018791207,0.044792704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78617543,0.0030425312,0.19866402,0.00024754446,0.00035804693,0.0000650864,0.00007396711,0.00004689509,0.011326519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995474,0.00014640683,0.000026302221,0.000056565026,0.00018094319,0.000042278552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798536,0.0012195178,0.00017881943,0.00011906015,0.000410097,0.000087106266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015233053,0.00040011702,0.0007909642,0.0019127341,0.0012398721,0.0015493783,0.0008404027,0.00094622833,0.003178964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065160417,0.0002591837,0.00070195424,0.0030432919,0.001718401,0.0012073715,0.0010773384,0.0013162488,0.00029682688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010212997,0.000035718338,0.00037425983,0.00021811447,0.0000201494,0.00013640823,0.00024138142,0.09187391,0.0017622679,0.8258585,0.0019763466,0.07740079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000136039935,0.000030447638,0.00019753199,0.000036848884,0.000012406179,0.0001180502,0.00007261961,0.41701517,0.0006966939,0.5740752,0.00770044,0.00003093048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064152116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029859757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064152116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017011605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087674125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012755752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380519737","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-30337-1_6","title":"Some Open Research Problems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in fuzziness and soft computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Open research; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.7573392206506715,"score_gpt":0.5782762555952511,"score_spread":0.1790629650554204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380519737","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049408725,0.07396966,0.029304905,0.65304893,0.017266454,0.000084797546,0.0005015938,0.00016824521,0.22071454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23423433,0.1609986,0.090242475,0.18788843,0.09566413,0.0012210975,0.0020448358,0.0005608864,0.2271453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920974,0.004143612,0.0003892446,0.0011946629,0.0015562228,0.0006188774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9585674,0.028029427,0.0011160248,0.0033830318,0.007180768,0.0017233662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013965747,0.000862263,0.0014373269,0.0034616764,0.0053526564,0.010643905,0.0035899268,0.008148091,0.060602263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046045754,0.00037514395,0.0011527581,0.005000256,0.009790308,0.02027102,0.0045625996,0.008829635,0.008817487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059666014,0.00011608165,0.00020227722,0.00029396015,0.000014275732,0.0000958436,0.00051882624,0.00048342356,0.000070331436,0.82878053,0.09817361,0.071191154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001435863,0.0000077219875,0.00006731331,0.0002221425,0.0000035185458,0.000055197746,0.0007448279,0.00037411784,0.000027971577,0.92465127,0.073824234,0.000007396845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002491873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021770648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060602263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032412615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051251124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20273477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380987881","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i2.7249","title":"The Basic Components of Agreement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Agreement; Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Management science; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.32836837640902933,"score_gpt":0.4382867172272609,"score_spread":0.1099183408182316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380987881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041683823,0.0036115313,0.42363262,0.024299618,0.0006450548,0.0012520849,0.00053928024,0.00039345014,0.5039425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87400943,0.0017971421,0.10822567,0.0018521358,0.00046963632,0.0016326533,0.0003979477,0.00013967308,0.011475649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93916893,0.029713333,0.0057400796,0.0060945028,0.01572484,0.0035584297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9263501,0.050332367,0.0051839137,0.008358916,0.007988234,0.0017864184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03078155,0.0010803018,0.0014416161,0.0071444465,0.006770598,0.016416177,0.003425703,0.0064453143,0.012285738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07691436,0.0009982274,0.0015428836,0.006568044,0.048738547,0.02661111,0.011116886,0.0057618637,0.0020063377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012374167,0.0000072989696,0.00031568378,0.00008483057,0.000007982013,0.00003085494,0.0019141138,0.00018968999,0.00006634057,0.99157906,0.00043582416,0.0053559663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000092948285,0.0000132040905,0.0002223546,0.00013537983,0.000007709697,0.00006503163,0.0013300028,0.0005337241,0.000109738525,0.98564976,0.011910857,0.000012924396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019526297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009865228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03078155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058493176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053461865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16279036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381053317","doi":"10.1007/s11042-023-15619-z","title":"Signed distance-based approach for multiple criteria group decision-making with incomplete information using interval type-2 neutrosophic numbers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multimedia Tools and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Closeness; Ranking (information retrieval); Interval (graph theory); Group decision-making; Aggregate (composite); Data mining; Fuzzy logic; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15311514538676713,"score_gpt":0.3999580454829426,"score_spread":0.2468429000961755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381053317","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027331943,0.0001568315,0.9962775,0.000047895497,0.000033148284,0.000031809668,0.000021202239,0.000023028491,0.0006752992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23367448,0.000500684,0.7633389,0.000089420544,0.00009282504,0.00041527665,0.00016641842,0.000041859515,0.0016800006],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945327,0.0026950033,0.00040616063,0.0005097705,0.0016807035,0.00017563626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947856,0.0035537241,0.00030936344,0.00016991436,0.0010403149,0.00014096637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005117493,0.0012626167,0.002205943,0.0027119957,0.00073691044,0.0026220595,0.0023975838,0.0015013074,0.0023554482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010071785,0.00050730904,0.0018194763,0.0030277125,0.00096177304,0.002883929,0.0017592106,0.0018339133,0.00037302653],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027347752,0.00026088642,0.0007954048,0.0007540105,0.00032661893,0.00029334245,0.0003950689,0.58621943,0.004071581,0.17767784,0.0017614024,0.22717093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015834907,0.00012136592,0.00013698424,0.000038804606,0.000036610825,0.000054189448,0.000039151495,0.95141476,0.0007211326,0.046196923,0.0011952741,0.000029014873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020522645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017033946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005117493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016878785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001959551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027064204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384701493","doi":"10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101936","title":"Conflict analysis based on a novel three-way decisions graph model for conflict resolution method under hesitant fuzzy environment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Fusion","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Conflict resolution; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Operations research; Fuzzy logic; Graph; Mathematical optimization; Preference; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.2803987748799241,"score_gpt":0.42198693771191215,"score_spread":0.14158816283198805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384701493","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007149909,0.000103297105,0.9909944,0.00010765535,0.000021796091,0.000041814725,0.00004796085,0.00008841413,0.0014447711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62812406,0.00039512198,0.36773393,0.00013031586,0.000053522035,0.00031714508,0.000295817,0.00007510794,0.0028749479],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980673,0.00080961525,0.0001210611,0.0003681338,0.0005045771,0.00012924055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984775,0.0009449117,0.00013927973,0.000070792514,0.0003103076,0.000057201076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017621306,0.001087317,0.0013594824,0.0020235558,0.00090236624,0.0021038454,0.0021904213,0.0011746627,0.0025819552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033283876,0.00045309393,0.0017537435,0.0022449284,0.00082246354,0.0031949177,0.0013356495,0.0012748592,0.00028220835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013439529,0.00009726334,0.00088645343,0.00015257577,0.00020665364,0.00019604123,0.00034074805,0.84454083,0.0021816394,0.08724338,0.0013824212,0.06263755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004860366,0.0000138838695,0.000067460816,0.0000048047814,0.000019844754,0.000020299809,0.000020469055,0.9851842,0.00023904303,0.014081766,0.0003324059,0.000010989343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009461421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062215016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009461421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016017884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017000531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018812716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385225844","doi":"10.3390/su151411373","title":"The Innovation-Based Human Development Index Using PROMETHEE II: The Context of G8 Countries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainability","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Index (typography); Context (archaeology); Benchmarking; Order (exchange); Human Development Index; Developing country; Business; Computer science; Operations research; Environmental economics; Economics; Human development (humanity); Mathematics; Marketing; Economic growth; Geography; Artificial intelligence; Finance","score_opus":0.176812413110891,"score_gpt":0.4652713929970874,"score_spread":0.2884589798861964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385225844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85504013,0.002925835,0.05547557,0.0014386302,0.00008967375,0.00028429177,0.0022389637,0.000051498104,0.082455434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800638,0.0009984501,0.017480597,0.000039373863,0.000012492117,0.0001248356,0.00037318713,0.0000055161945,0.00090173975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889827,0.0006976416,0.000054748358,0.00010151975,0.00012753216,0.00012018586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992434,0.00037123062,0.00016167937,0.000045071814,0.00013852202,0.000040155428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001362418,0.00039481436,0.00031175953,0.004277065,0.000521837,0.0024624085,0.00037712077,0.0004170062,0.00080212485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002981393,0.00010753398,0.00040575108,0.007775804,0.00064188946,0.0012676326,0.0015408554,0.0005819619,0.00008436876],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024134568,0.0002071322,0.16552062,0.00093601923,0.00023933085,0.0043478925,0.0033714597,0.2949432,0.0022206535,0.33554366,0.006466058,0.18596251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007281058,0.0009861164,0.22810955,0.0012738617,0.0002900366,0.0022720976,0.029395124,0.50912267,0.005904258,0.12636358,0.09589481,0.00031514297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011084875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009228983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011084875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020046637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011908574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022040725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385548388","doi":"10.1007/s00500-023-09011-0","title":"A review on TOPSIS method and its extensions for different applications with recent development","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":206,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Management science; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Quarter (Canadian coin); Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Geography","score_opus":0.5713732761471263,"score_gpt":0.5695728295020038,"score_spread":0.0018004466451224665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385548388","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042951017,0.99114144,0.0046952404,0.00040648784,0.00028155852,0.000031975993,0.00011295259,0.000028419401,0.0028723266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040535717,0.9852948,0.0090934,0.00024035829,0.00024237634,0.000037157915,0.00011586237,0.000008232833,0.00091430487],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877757,0.00025519027,0.0001909414,0.0001751268,0.00055048446,0.000050691706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778014,0.0013959521,0.00018818387,0.000067291665,0.00051956804,0.00004886006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021841552,0.0013866455,0.002096198,0.0069941683,0.0004998268,0.0022213915,0.0012554098,0.0013465381,0.0042907703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034748176,0.0004976689,0.0014231984,0.013226637,0.00073710294,0.0020938853,0.0007872037,0.0014857373,0.0011841429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050609346,0.00009043144,0.00033315414,0.03446272,0.00022101606,0.00011443909,0.00009961177,0.0012524679,0.0011980323,0.009022724,0.01107148,0.94208336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045754994,0.00040494485,0.004185857,0.020703766,0.0013600584,0.0015511735,0.00040338864,0.002846802,0.0027774828,0.021898223,0.94362324,0.00019930486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033688515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005435843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069941683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012560353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034663673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01435405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385552782","doi":"10.1007/s11042-023-16298-6","title":"Correction: Signed distance-based approach for multiple criteria group decision-making with incomplete information using interval type-2 neutrosophic numbers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multimedia Tools and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Interval (graph theory); Type (biology); Group (periodic table); Group decision-making; Information retrieval; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13371786211802336,"score_gpt":0.3909472390221548,"score_spread":0.2572293769041314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385552782","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006788521,0.0015590565,0.012946918,0.033528578,0.94457245,0.00007696034,0.002866677,0.0012187053,0.0025518269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.116032764,0.0096261315,0.106457986,0.07135287,0.4562029,0.001140015,0.0058618365,0.005340507,0.227985],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916101,0.002151478,0.001875123,0.0011153017,0.0027638844,0.00048414277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9173729,0.01971406,0.0025043439,0.006128044,0.05259825,0.0016824228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074782837,0.0031437355,0.002936571,0.005411687,0.0028694458,0.0044000065,0.005608281,0.006528676,0.063297294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14876695,0.0012354607,0.0022958324,0.005593316,0.0033204406,0.0029693125,0.002116802,0.010770283,0.021987483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016331697,0.0000156485,0.00020452582,0.0007542128,0.00007901501,0.0005401104,0.00011184497,0.00041524353,0.00018355969,0.0060082222,0.9730857,0.018438721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018451139,0.000067322544,0.0021332218,0.0006531659,0.00018361122,0.0020992272,0.0002337437,0.0055824015,0.0011636211,0.013637583,0.9739179,0.0001438111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018814925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013844307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063297294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041551287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055422927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21175057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385652294","doi":"10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101964","title":"Two improved N-two-stage K-means clustering aggregation algorithmic paradigms for HFLTS possibility distributions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Fusion","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Cluster analysis; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy clustering; Tuple; Data mining; Group (periodic table); Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11088759220032167,"score_gpt":0.4212142413536048,"score_spread":0.3103266491532831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385652294","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00362996,0.000088226116,0.9948226,0.00007066076,0.0000274926,0.00008008624,0.000031642066,0.0001537435,0.0010956064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09500446,0.00017086265,0.9017064,0.00008363217,0.00006466896,0.00031636946,0.00022147418,0.00007831926,0.0023538752],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712914,0.00062140974,0.0002848716,0.0005364576,0.0012610909,0.00016705281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978309,0.00059866277,0.0002023713,0.0002874055,0.0009749266,0.00010578021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002229867,0.0010327715,0.0011194774,0.0028238385,0.0011821227,0.0023556915,0.0029540074,0.00125797,0.002925953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005715866,0.00061811693,0.0021674484,0.0026295783,0.000852286,0.0030858328,0.0025302265,0.0017648829,0.0007852857],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002957123,0.00023513412,0.0023330841,0.00045248313,0.00021966064,0.00020246008,0.0012248391,0.26450884,0.012658633,0.12998238,0.0049390476,0.5829478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024643268,0.000061500774,0.0007119633,0.00002462032,0.000027029764,0.00012039533,0.00010897516,0.9616026,0.0035953422,0.02897171,0.004695912,0.00005516081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005762961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008914661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005762961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018930247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025243363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013734937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385812665","doi":"10.3390/jrfm16080372","title":"State-of-the-Art Review on the Analytic Hierarchy Process with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Analytic hierarchy process; Acronym; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Management science; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Risk analysis (engineering); Hierarchy; Operations research; Engineering; Business; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.17444371976442002,"score_gpt":0.3774876594887631,"score_spread":0.2030439397243431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385812665","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043176027,0.9952749,0.0012391491,0.0009994135,0.0002002882,0.000027907114,0.000045655906,0.000009144366,0.0017717581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00520383,0.99163014,0.002233617,0.00044017288,0.00023133417,0.000042857086,0.00006363583,0.00000566009,0.00014880422],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99234676,0.002903399,0.001585952,0.000623187,0.0023260408,0.00021460949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94681054,0.04324538,0.003579598,0.00077216333,0.0052127265,0.00037949727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011093278,0.0011792532,0.0023279206,0.0112062,0.0007924553,0.0043421304,0.0023046953,0.0022274898,0.005710844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0339336,0.000659963,0.0022316745,0.016787032,0.0014655092,0.0037063514,0.0012836808,0.0014824169,0.00093611376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015310525,0.00010416047,0.0009217547,0.2339892,0.0008667636,0.00023859015,0.0008559354,0.0010501897,0.000612546,0.017460179,0.021514997,0.7222325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053162235,0.00031176556,0.0048630913,0.37214607,0.0050921543,0.0010545984,0.0018078099,0.0012319242,0.0011887136,0.017904963,0.59421754,0.00012822519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004579647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008031535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0112062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029089374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009724691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05866754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385843526","doi":"10.33552/ijebm.2023.01.000502","title":"Using PROMETHEE Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Applications and Procedures","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Iris Journal of Economics & Business Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hog Administrative Marketing Services (Canada); Research & Development Corporation; University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Investment (military); Operations research; Preference; Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Business; Statistics","score_opus":0.34616566954825373,"score_gpt":0.5090231889710958,"score_spread":0.16285751942284205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385843526","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050052686,0.00031486698,0.995207,0.00017811783,0.000040240408,0.00046376383,0.00014925098,0.0003150331,0.0028312101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007939982,0.00038409562,0.9891487,0.000063585576,0.000016316382,0.001508903,0.00015021604,0.00008780368,0.0007003539],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9767397,0.015628489,0.0017043081,0.0011520186,0.0044472045,0.00032830838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796326,0.015425944,0.0010439677,0.0011264988,0.0025994899,0.0001714192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020250825,0.0023082471,0.0019278905,0.0043631215,0.0016510865,0.0040541277,0.0026814458,0.0018964236,0.010955573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029044248,0.0011098752,0.0032398307,0.005957021,0.0017567849,0.0027821444,0.0036534257,0.004555318,0.0033058755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001972157,0.00030635862,0.001152098,0.0032629534,0.00043349553,0.00041598265,0.0013509386,0.11828276,0.0033637723,0.32166052,0.01703327,0.5325407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002556569,0.00025761573,0.0009056807,0.0011815882,0.00016058207,0.00073880254,0.00044857652,0.4396204,0.007901907,0.40655798,0.14166057,0.00031066802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017815654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022459454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020250825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016120785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045552533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107097864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385859630","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4543000","title":"Smooth and Enhanced Smooth Quadrature-Inspired Generalized Choquet Integral","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Choquet integral; Quadrature (astronomy); Generalization; Mathematics; Smoothing; Key (lock); Applied mathematics; Operator (biology); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10024876344810521,"score_gpt":0.3999731354902724,"score_spread":0.2997243720421672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385859630","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056964774,0.0006567697,0.93495274,0.00025907106,0.0001405676,0.000023162387,0.000035947414,0.00005162028,0.006915358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8675732,0.0005651134,0.12522008,0.00015567393,0.00016555749,0.000046891764,0.00006294176,0.000052105217,0.0061582746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993703,0.00026593936,0.000020916394,0.00008065338,0.00019314574,0.000069094276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987282,0.0006836304,0.00010493785,0.00007864828,0.00029982865,0.000104812534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020082167,0.0005196267,0.001084543,0.0006996505,0.00031623396,0.0015631351,0.00096591737,0.0011095685,0.0017798388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00443494,0.00026050938,0.00088868564,0.00064549514,0.0011781203,0.0013189819,0.0013767829,0.0011039249,0.00018349392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019249452,0.00007512516,0.00075546675,0.00018063538,0.00009063655,0.00013117224,0.00012497054,0.3026125,0.008478904,0.6525544,0.0012031528,0.03360051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000101720025,0.000037065693,0.00015387643,0.000007609518,0.000012164556,0.000029067709,0.000009461929,0.92545336,0.00028259566,0.07358239,0.0004111274,0.000011110135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008052153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058590225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020082167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061862235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007144698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010620594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386002365","doi":"10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101972","title":"A two-stage consensus model for large-scale group decision-making considering dynamic social networks","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Fusion","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Computer science; Cluster analysis; Group decision-making; Social network (sociolinguistics); Scale (ratio); Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Machine learning; Mathematical optimization; Social media; Engineering","score_opus":0.08751093906767125,"score_gpt":0.40981870173099594,"score_spread":0.32230776266332467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386002365","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02136954,0.00031783505,0.9735493,0.00056158577,0.00007406681,0.000093732335,0.00012765249,0.00010753559,0.0037987162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8941521,0.0005069272,0.094785094,0.00019068601,0.0001159635,0.00052830164,0.0002629352,0.000056792836,0.009401116],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633175,0.0015513416,0.00018090801,0.0009309643,0.00057546096,0.0004296559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99313146,0.0048043127,0.0005710053,0.00020173079,0.0009769545,0.00031451794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006528769,0.0017252631,0.0042103007,0.0015880255,0.0014788862,0.0032074905,0.005188881,0.0051313597,0.0047834963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009881618,0.0014608587,0.001978754,0.0023116956,0.0025236679,0.0044356138,0.0028502212,0.0027069126,0.0006875136],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008101593,0.000037842812,0.00022872076,0.000077901714,0.00007361672,0.00011652695,0.00012017754,0.967145,0.00044448988,0.026421908,0.0003836673,0.00486905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000100598145,0.000018043644,0.000039307153,0.000004135471,0.000011246339,0.0000069051134,0.000009346726,0.99318177,0.00004821164,0.0065753097,0.00008728011,0.000008392025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012246604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069128578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012246604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028261475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023115857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03452784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386283173","doi":"10.32920/24058713","title":"Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Assessment for Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Supply chain; Selection (genetic algorithm); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Fuzzy set; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Similarity (geometry); Cosine similarity; Interval (graph theory); Operations research; Management science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Business; Marketing; Statistics","score_opus":0.2623034250957873,"score_gpt":0.5020117647112315,"score_spread":0.23970833961544424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386283173","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006596803,0.00027532197,0.9895235,0.00013285581,0.000030054505,0.00014674262,0.000031875603,0.00004248036,0.0032204413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30431432,0.0004871775,0.69304293,0.000090292546,0.000050297516,0.00059657544,0.000096991884,0.000017663904,0.0013038596],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426633,0.0031806838,0.0003093928,0.00035937544,0.0016874765,0.00019683728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757785,0.0014061386,0.000237561,0.00008388493,0.00057552004,0.00011896353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006503758,0.0015930209,0.0014351911,0.0027982993,0.0012236848,0.0027136663,0.0016899438,0.0011788332,0.0027588161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065117152,0.0006296887,0.0022249878,0.0026798295,0.0011730761,0.0017130384,0.0016619824,0.001823289,0.00031609106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020598067,0.000259964,0.0016128406,0.0009055762,0.00042836115,0.00068875036,0.0010701336,0.7495191,0.005902225,0.12740426,0.0020631093,0.10993973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028096229,0.00013379581,0.0003447148,0.00010057607,0.0000743612,0.00007937737,0.0001501171,0.9543609,0.00093077874,0.041942734,0.0018091077,0.000045343822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00364998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044974727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006503758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027956977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029187612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034395576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386304139","doi":"10.32920/24058713.v1","title":"Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Assessment for Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Supply chain; Selection (genetic algorithm); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Fuzzy set; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Similarity (geometry); Cosine similarity; Interval (graph theory); Operations research; Management science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Business; Marketing; Statistics","score_opus":0.2623034250957873,"score_gpt":0.5020117647112315,"score_spread":0.23970833961544424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386304139","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006596803,0.00027532197,0.9895235,0.00013285581,0.000030054505,0.00014674262,0.000031875603,0.00004248036,0.0032204413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30431432,0.0004871775,0.69304293,0.000090292546,0.000050297516,0.00059657544,0.000096991884,0.000017663904,0.0013038596],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426633,0.0031806838,0.0003093928,0.00035937544,0.0016874765,0.00019683728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757785,0.0014061386,0.000237561,0.00008388493,0.00057552004,0.00011896353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006503758,0.0015930209,0.0014351911,0.0027982993,0.0012236848,0.0027136663,0.0016899438,0.0011788332,0.0027588161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065117152,0.0006296887,0.0022249878,0.0026798295,0.0011730761,0.0017130384,0.0016619824,0.001823289,0.00031609106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020598067,0.000259964,0.0016128406,0.0009055762,0.00042836115,0.00068875036,0.0010701336,0.7495191,0.005902225,0.12740426,0.0020631093,0.10993973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028096229,0.00013379581,0.0003447148,0.00010057607,0.0000743612,0.00007937737,0.0001501171,0.9543609,0.00093077874,0.041942734,0.0018091077,0.000045343822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00364998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044974727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006503758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027956977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029187612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034395576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386397637","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121420","title":"Architecture selection for 5G-radio access network using type-2 neutrosophic numbers based decision making model","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Computer science; Weighting; Selection (genetic algorithm); Fuzzy logic; Context (archaeology); Artificial intelligence; Architecture; Data mining; Machine learning; Management science; Operations research; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.2162033217602287,"score_gpt":0.47031863143397956,"score_spread":0.25411530967375084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386397637","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085585944,0.00037476994,0.9014626,0.00041750039,0.00009519098,0.00016011349,0.00014900324,0.00012398526,0.011630842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9120816,0.00023827636,0.08343741,0.00008574988,0.000033474782,0.00022152156,0.0001238139,0.000012058026,0.0037661502],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991749,0.0002701505,0.000037281385,0.0001477651,0.00025504187,0.00011482194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945945,0.00032126985,0.000047029425,0.000012245613,0.00013212844,0.000027884616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009523401,0.00084247807,0.0008745564,0.0011961705,0.00072026055,0.0016030326,0.00096082967,0.0008750274,0.0027798014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001621499,0.0003029422,0.00088664464,0.00077338016,0.00042958526,0.0010083686,0.0005720466,0.0005744455,0.00014132225],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045901,0.000043068874,0.0006676712,0.000058892878,0.00003953281,0.00008770679,0.000045950314,0.971376,0.0008103577,0.009554153,0.00063418935,0.016636565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044068875,0.00002374013,0.00010415467,0.0000057172147,0.000010217174,0.000013093538,0.000012341484,0.9962224,0.00014977761,0.0033051898,0.00014421015,0.00000474774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006711593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052109943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006711593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001499522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012182193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013345063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386742044","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2023.6.002","title":"Exploring managerial insights through multi criteria decision making techniques in pharmacy inventory classification problem","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Context (archaeology); Pharmacy; Inventory management; Supply chain management; Knowledge management; Supply chain; Management science; Business; Marketing; Process management; Computer science; Operations management; Medicine; Operations research; Economics; Nursing; Engineering","score_opus":0.5182005756656943,"score_gpt":0.5007403021530226,"score_spread":0.017460273512671765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386742044","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08411314,0.0011926182,0.90340173,0.0022465945,0.00007903028,0.0005579263,0.00021296501,0.00007983964,0.008116105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5169511,0.000686423,0.48076215,0.0001777093,0.00006900273,0.0004607437,0.000118318174,0.000017298391,0.0007571897],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912307,0.006758909,0.00033579493,0.00042616096,0.0009073144,0.00034119774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696343,0.027618296,0.0009866771,0.0004221294,0.0009974446,0.00034114785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013375685,0.0014018368,0.0014595739,0.0042315233,0.0013303536,0.004440375,0.0014421159,0.0018634188,0.0032475789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024624804,0.0007516411,0.0016630169,0.0033235825,0.0016310619,0.0024456496,0.0022571557,0.0027369526,0.00016441637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022591047,0.0004850353,0.0050621694,0.001138214,0.00034109427,0.0005028582,0.0014293976,0.7860661,0.001368625,0.09523805,0.0013234405,0.10681909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029070125,0.00010949909,0.00058694737,0.00015966794,0.000046322533,0.00005669243,0.0005672287,0.9193933,0.00035983475,0.07747196,0.0011896827,0.00002966749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004096424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058584525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013375685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024730782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033435312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070738256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386742317","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2023.7.006","title":"Ranking fuzzy numbers by volume of solid of revolution of membership function about axis of support","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Centroid; Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Fuzzy number; Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Membership function; Value (mathematics); Volume (thermodynamics); Function (biology); Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy set; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.08991399003843657,"score_gpt":0.3996230322306712,"score_spread":0.3097090421922346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386742317","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2273138,0.0012060608,0.7582269,0.0003484754,0.00023941275,0.0001635179,0.00031607004,0.00037804252,0.011807691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7963731,0.00056807057,0.20124842,0.000044399374,0.00010760323,0.000114326744,0.00027805613,0.000054866916,0.0012111623],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968267,0.00083072955,0.00028168326,0.000290406,0.0015555145,0.00021501779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944508,0.0028320537,0.0007265298,0.00040376704,0.0013778576,0.00020889704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027804927,0.00081004336,0.0010599055,0.004145913,0.00058280834,0.0027858366,0.00059348356,0.0005471376,0.0025564753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014386777,0.00016126093,0.00074219797,0.0021322323,0.001592691,0.0017362126,0.00096162094,0.00059301336,0.00041140488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008718031,0.00007255834,0.015062692,0.0007344399,0.00020416455,0.00044139475,0.000969727,0.17973348,0.027457464,0.15138012,0.0032012516,0.6198709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010212349,0.0013848309,0.021653317,0.0003789679,0.00016115891,0.0011588673,0.0017352955,0.6940038,0.030181812,0.22417136,0.024746628,0.00032185877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014019695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010200518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004145913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088159315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007766041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0147048235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386753727","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121554","title":"Generalized TODIM method based on symmetric intuitionistic fuzzy Jensen–Shannon divergence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Divergence (linguistics); Vagueness; Axiom; Computer science; Measure (data warehouse); Similarity (geometry); Mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Applied mathematics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Data mining","score_opus":0.16139386579907652,"score_gpt":0.441755891558242,"score_spread":0.28036202575916547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386753727","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027786824,0.00017474801,0.995581,0.000044868262,0.00005165463,0.000020822088,0.000019760468,0.000058329475,0.0012703106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2376502,0.0005444684,0.75562525,0.00013611463,0.00018922948,0.00024139266,0.00020821419,0.00018284707,0.0052223676],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986733,0.0005250083,0.00008485196,0.0001806271,0.00046191434,0.000074271586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985196,0.00062763103,0.00008527262,0.00012048808,0.0005786893,0.00006827961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020855782,0.00072912034,0.0018542901,0.0016915584,0.00061490195,0.0013884619,0.0015824129,0.001065128,0.0031673487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041779964,0.00029579602,0.001310727,0.0012783112,0.0006775209,0.00154002,0.0016022262,0.0011973572,0.00048175693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022054145,0.00018703942,0.0010753649,0.0008494927,0.00028595873,0.00023015634,0.00024338535,0.33700162,0.012443144,0.25151116,0.004842494,0.3911097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008044494,0.000037037327,0.00015164884,0.000018057852,0.000018897019,0.00006376522,0.000016293636,0.9753517,0.0011558271,0.021581996,0.0015757318,0.00002103207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015031677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001510545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031673487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000649014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015626758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01102972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386760194","doi":"10.1016/j.spl.2023.109932","title":"A relative-rank measure for the rank transformation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics & Probability Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Actua; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematics; Measure (data warehouse); Rank (graph theory); Quantile; Transformation (genetics); Parametric statistics; Set (abstract data type); Range (aeronautics); Extension (predicate logic); Sample (material); Key (lock); Scheme (mathematics); Dual (grammatical number); Rank correlation; Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.21437468481831262,"score_gpt":0.4134736412833763,"score_spread":0.1990989564650637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386760194","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027449154,0.0005820012,0.9918637,0.0005477076,0.0001667269,0.0000535158,0.00018965619,0.00013261214,0.003719125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24986868,0.0021386296,0.7333915,0.00088330056,0.001610055,0.00087765825,0.00097176037,0.00038729678,0.009871035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9790908,0.011744876,0.001006868,0.0020167544,0.0054401346,0.00070045196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9654087,0.02072614,0.002847055,0.0045937262,0.005468851,0.0009554509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016551804,0.001636349,0.002281128,0.0063038296,0.0015629184,0.0067552933,0.002296902,0.0024560099,0.007844799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06497981,0.00054026797,0.0016707025,0.0061648297,0.00587678,0.00822832,0.004216783,0.0056250324,0.002996052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010555906,0.000063587046,0.00051988894,0.00022753834,0.000066087094,0.000073267445,0.00015321329,0.01852295,0.0018303677,0.8680503,0.007440201,0.1029471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034118388,0.00033011817,0.00067785673,0.00011228288,0.00005580634,0.0003523422,0.000120907374,0.17284542,0.0022619069,0.80692375,0.016179757,0.00010577929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009960894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066961715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016551804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021230713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00311762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08753538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386882126","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3350522/v1","title":"Multi-Level State Evaluation in Complex Systems: Information Granules and Evidence Theory Approach","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"State (computer science); Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.8494291378891943,"score_gpt":0.6089298411874452,"score_spread":0.24049929670174908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386882126","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016670473,0.0014054173,0.97857213,0.0005876339,0.000043255273,0.000115608505,0.00014688256,0.00012535955,0.002333209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64566493,0.0012365002,0.35133445,0.00018492583,0.00017523742,0.0003281288,0.00023495138,0.000049750186,0.00079110346],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955472,0.0018822162,0.0004683339,0.0005473243,0.0013580815,0.0001969753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711619,0.022938875,0.0024048842,0.001033158,0.002091141,0.00036994455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007986314,0.0011511984,0.0019609793,0.0063627833,0.0008142719,0.005957137,0.002164877,0.0019078982,0.0018637141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03502268,0.0006279111,0.0016878977,0.004256339,0.003487086,0.00598905,0.0032378554,0.002419569,0.00018929008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027542625,0.00013770793,0.009609692,0.0010926322,0.0004948089,0.00071409275,0.0012243683,0.44086197,0.0029877184,0.38902777,0.0024803923,0.15109335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013609906,0.000053938908,0.0017929308,0.00020740136,0.0000857079,0.000089279914,0.00023079025,0.81636566,0.0013326369,0.17843035,0.0013427822,0.000054877433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031181523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020521288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007986314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025320179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013198516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04223615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387098955","doi":"10.1007/s00500-023-09235-0","title":"An induced OWA aggregation operator with dual preference setting for DEA cross-efficiency ranking","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Aggregation problem; Minimax; Operator (biology); Ranking (information retrieval); Robustness (evolution); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.23044973541976577,"score_gpt":0.4598779317560974,"score_spread":0.22942819633633166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387098955","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012303697,0.00018684217,0.98249197,0.00014846648,0.00011029651,0.00007436762,0.00013347228,0.00009834095,0.004452563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34529462,0.000357157,0.6476441,0.00018858275,0.00018700743,0.00042299365,0.0005656978,0.000106684995,0.0052332496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605894,0.0015965691,0.00026564198,0.0004955456,0.0012387483,0.0003446764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997661,0.000743533,0.00017632823,0.00033235067,0.0008986195,0.00018808265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039040183,0.00096747203,0.0013543203,0.0023769678,0.00083557423,0.002484729,0.001227508,0.0009421787,0.003485247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066141086,0.0003268048,0.0015403675,0.0026874063,0.00078541704,0.0023637523,0.0024458624,0.0017188468,0.00052799605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035282184,0.0004529907,0.0015230039,0.00050502486,0.00027536723,0.00018762669,0.000344626,0.1275292,0.01593915,0.4787592,0.010404026,0.36372688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003521996,0.0002494564,0.00072766776,0.0000805555,0.00007780354,0.00016263135,0.00012023999,0.7946334,0.0035233588,0.19297692,0.0073508667,0.00006183442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010799129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011944302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039040183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008945215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001657179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020646632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387108253","doi":"10.18280/jesa.560417","title":"Integrated Supplier Selection and Inventory Management Problems Considering Discounts and Uncertainty: A Fuzzy-Probabilistic Approach","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universitas Diponegoro","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Selection (genetic algorithm); Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Inventory management; Computer science; Economic order quantity; Mathematical optimization; Operations management; Business; Mathematics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Supply chain; Marketing","score_opus":0.10288192247010328,"score_gpt":0.34215043936120815,"score_spread":0.23926851689110487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387108253","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02701597,0.00064496754,0.9679337,0.0003603314,0.000036164685,0.00009066431,0.00007657656,0.000052647367,0.003788968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8287699,0.0012146459,0.16638145,0.00008509996,0.000097843294,0.00022270462,0.00011672245,0.000031873886,0.0030798302],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981761,0.00072618877,0.00009838146,0.0002434528,0.0005521719,0.00020375822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757344,0.0018023202,0.00024597152,0.00005646974,0.00022405213,0.0000977882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035572504,0.0011270891,0.0017334941,0.0019946662,0.0008979697,0.002662895,0.0018859548,0.0018248908,0.0019387142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047150357,0.0011109466,0.0017916834,0.0024799649,0.0010021586,0.0022683416,0.0015085492,0.0016189212,0.00013626457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023307723,0.000023040991,0.00026270398,0.000057906156,0.000033865126,0.000080356105,0.000039311217,0.9768634,0.00022719335,0.015619478,0.000117325806,0.006652099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045715456,0.000018622428,0.000080447695,0.000009737872,0.00001551061,0.000018148949,0.000019174486,0.9910821,0.00010583266,0.008408388,0.00022981914,0.000007664869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008463623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006445091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008463623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023926026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027408611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018812776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387260730","doi":"10.23952/jnva.7.2023.5.08","title":"Newton’s method for uncertain multiobjective optimization problems under finite uncertainty sets","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nonlinear and Variational Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Science and Engineering Research Board","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Multi-objective optimization; Mathematics; Newton's method; Robust optimization; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Nonlinear system; Physics","score_opus":0.16185256834947526,"score_gpt":0.46083178039910544,"score_spread":0.2989792120496302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387260730","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008136519,0.000272809,0.9974732,0.0000740789,0.000029629115,0.000015373173,0.000010865206,0.000027438175,0.0012829738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15468715,0.0017934233,0.8355786,0.00016852094,0.00018126065,0.00033857842,0.00013708929,0.00013963191,0.0069757826],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993782,0.00021901361,0.00003209034,0.00008488894,0.00025729783,0.000028504932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995345,0.00026574294,0.000045451812,0.000026033735,0.0001123379,0.00001604663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012357815,0.0010155907,0.001064887,0.0006088707,0.0005088596,0.0007207635,0.0009516376,0.001064314,0.0018289152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017950279,0.00039527175,0.0010835216,0.00065174606,0.0008629168,0.0012106737,0.00097181916,0.0018769384,0.00042364906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003567118,0.000024463658,0.00033337477,0.0003969918,0.000080692094,0.00012973316,0.00014686135,0.7808196,0.0035382311,0.13305096,0.001903943,0.079539426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056982462,0.000017390068,0.000054085016,0.000015805672,0.0000063809057,0.000021136108,0.0000076121855,0.98063743,0.0004786652,0.01599347,0.002754343,0.00000797757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004105921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002926739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004105921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007461321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012712169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008164048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387310908","doi":"10.1007/s40747-023-01217-x","title":"Innovative discussion of decision-making model based on complex cubic picture fuzzy information and geometric aggregation operators with applications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Complex & Intelligent Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"King Khalid University","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Mathematics; Operator (biology); Fuzzy number; Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems; Fuzzy set operations; Fuzzy classification; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Defuzzification; Computer science; Algorithm; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.12953103292389073,"score_gpt":0.3940022074505573,"score_spread":0.2644711745266666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387310908","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024052797,0.0007116027,0.961177,0.0012201291,0.000109400185,0.000059407113,0.00008082157,0.00004652187,0.012542262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83874506,0.0011030453,0.15344602,0.0001984288,0.00017396428,0.00020782887,0.000108974156,0.000016701755,0.0059999246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872416,0.00046335591,0.000073132556,0.00023472914,0.00040502942,0.000099607765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993292,0.0003151711,0.00008684673,0.000046587244,0.00018216124,0.00004010285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020050881,0.00071359606,0.00067284866,0.0011041848,0.0008681261,0.0021678754,0.0014050953,0.0011411948,0.0028590641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027103352,0.0002524451,0.0012636629,0.0015867121,0.0013660386,0.0029073737,0.0013845474,0.0013180149,0.00017239657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004144992,0.000024118568,0.0009151539,0.00015069678,0.000055086566,0.00041936376,0.00030626685,0.2232879,0.001358771,0.74932104,0.0017639246,0.02235615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009409819,0.00002959151,0.00023088293,0.000021412674,0.0000208632,0.00008705046,0.0000980391,0.7877401,0.00033101797,0.20905815,0.0023540403,0.000019410474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004968314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002684069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004968314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018810781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013490424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013648212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387352975","doi":"10.5267/j.ac.2023.9.002","title":"Application of TOPSIS, VIKOR and COPRAS for ideal investment decisions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Investment (military); Ranking (information retrieval); Business; VIKOR method; Industrial organization; Finance; Operations research; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.1885090671571325,"score_gpt":0.45659192280116634,"score_spread":0.26808285564403384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387352975","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06078976,0.0013524197,0.8965626,0.0012238176,0.00027521444,0.0035669815,0.0010271657,0.00088377215,0.034318343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19628456,0.0008636178,0.79865897,0.0000552931,0.000025536336,0.0020643314,0.00051567575,0.00007854186,0.0014535679],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818974,0.011409364,0.0012629165,0.00076477707,0.004227159,0.0004383362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849439,0.011181021,0.0010399374,0.000386553,0.0022369442,0.00021154727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015925884,0.002417726,0.0018072856,0.00786794,0.0017609097,0.0059881103,0.0014415187,0.000604837,0.0073478958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02977534,0.0008848854,0.0026048238,0.010088121,0.0014073584,0.0018409053,0.001987289,0.0023421615,0.0010650727],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006177035,0.00049555505,0.01057657,0.005949196,0.001651702,0.0013223549,0.006545467,0.1916385,0.004371388,0.19352736,0.015316673,0.56798744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026888616,0.001279897,0.012220821,0.002008152,0.0005816818,0.00076773064,0.009717079,0.7247887,0.0040502427,0.19775546,0.04622029,0.00034113636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007133326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010465258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015925884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003512508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009170281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08422512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387430003","doi":"10.54517/ssd.v1i1.2220","title":"A comprehensive guide to the TOPSIS method for multi-criteria decision making","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainable Social Development","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Closeness; Decision matrix; Ranking (information retrieval); Ideal (ethics); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Similarity (geometry); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Data mining; Operations research; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.22004947185859686,"score_gpt":0.5303405396287614,"score_spread":0.3102910677701645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387430003","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015144522,0.02246849,0.8408543,0.006295863,0.002026987,0.0027707755,0.0031483953,0.0023293763,0.11859144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0100767715,0.01736821,0.9425153,0.0010715722,0.00023824892,0.0021398216,0.0015411145,0.00032281774,0.024726236],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99164295,0.0035127248,0.0009482082,0.00036998323,0.0033537776,0.0001722958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99517584,0.0025290232,0.00026055667,0.00031286755,0.0015997255,0.00012195518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007139533,0.0021964577,0.0014737626,0.005948999,0.0018275279,0.0041958196,0.0022658394,0.0023974709,0.030873414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0090661,0.0010092119,0.0016246677,0.010483262,0.0018084818,0.0030293467,0.0020923773,0.0043727932,0.016299397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005309775,0.00022180767,0.0005755887,0.0044725286,0.00013873447,0.0005552354,0.0023990574,0.010020693,0.0041853394,0.1846301,0.18826348,0.6044843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043229003,0.00012468411,0.0011620703,0.0028067387,0.00004257394,0.0006719219,0.0008352869,0.0093361745,0.0014051084,0.079741076,0.90367293,0.00015819255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00703601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015296087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030873414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034321048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008263231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103281856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387570777","doi":"10.1080/03155986.2023.2264915","title":"Cloud model-based best-worst method for group decision making under uncertainty","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFOR Information Systems and Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Group decision-making; TOPSIS; Pairwise comparison; Cloud computing; Robustness (evolution); Bayesian probability; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Operations research; Management science; Engineering","score_opus":0.37014037207068373,"score_gpt":0.5475197828076245,"score_spread":0.17737941073694075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387570777","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043998053,0.000104388586,0.9940911,0.00011184605,0.000030374491,0.00005879097,0.000026813374,0.00009667661,0.0010801875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2955069,0.00022652918,0.7018398,0.00021928946,0.0000856981,0.00037382237,0.00018348041,0.000097553384,0.0014668993],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961797,0.0017347909,0.00019120473,0.000506652,0.0010746926,0.000312944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99609816,0.00240115,0.00039594824,0.00031386464,0.0006129905,0.00017794051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004497558,0.001747226,0.0022845557,0.0025447565,0.0014110558,0.00262232,0.0024498506,0.0014854416,0.0045877425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009449849,0.0007462053,0.002208741,0.0026942564,0.0009232817,0.0026247394,0.0025045718,0.0024241921,0.000598442],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020433082,0.00015759915,0.001234791,0.00018596159,0.00022704364,0.00012048966,0.00019767889,0.8307824,0.0015846309,0.030037956,0.001458788,0.13380833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014473047,0.000034185105,0.00009898931,0.000012536683,0.000018175198,0.000019672701,0.000027321907,0.98714995,0.00035141475,0.011804229,0.0004599277,0.000009165685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00882888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009105915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00882888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022034287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032021163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02378565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387614233","doi":"10.3233/jifs-233563","title":"Switching perspectives: Investigating the relationships and applications of q-fractional fuzzy sets with other fuzzy set classes in decision making","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy set; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm","score_opus":0.17280209790148873,"score_gpt":0.4179570026386075,"score_spread":0.2451549047371188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387614233","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04046162,0.0013814829,0.9314559,0.0010339333,0.00010197088,0.00006276381,0.000033064047,0.000044651606,0.025424624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7454804,0.002017735,0.24892347,0.00035816853,0.00020303813,0.00010968818,0.000042161715,0.000019730329,0.0028455195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985196,0.00062594033,0.00008128115,0.0002488883,0.0004177301,0.00010664965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99595284,0.0029796443,0.00039065292,0.0002369579,0.00031967676,0.00012020187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004260229,0.0007667793,0.00060428097,0.0019961863,0.0011946207,0.0024662274,0.0011341965,0.0011397185,0.0037252675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007078999,0.00026590863,0.0014298182,0.0020477956,0.003171579,0.0043021096,0.0013487571,0.002027359,0.00030700458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040473613,0.000043914675,0.0007297089,0.000111535104,0.00003163743,0.00017457835,0.0007073053,0.04153766,0.0018674207,0.9081553,0.00034571096,0.04625468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000138817295,0.00010381256,0.00046233507,0.00009195072,0.000027871762,0.00012654396,0.00038626135,0.28238186,0.0013568762,0.70910454,0.0059172814,0.000026738653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002383306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010724473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004260229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017657157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008182411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022530496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387762844","doi":"10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107242","title":"Accelerating the integration of the metaverse into urban transportation using fuzzy trigonometric based decision making","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Metaverse; Fuzzy logic; Consistency (knowledge bases); Possible world; Rank (graph theory); Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Mathematics; Virtual reality","score_opus":0.21435894911123649,"score_gpt":0.4184994486389296,"score_spread":0.20414049952769314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387762844","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075456455,0.00015733484,0.9187455,0.00023978644,0.000047780162,0.000114284965,0.000030321113,0.00016552831,0.0050429734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7372423,0.00015827696,0.26117745,0.000059197166,0.000022174181,0.00010691737,0.000055963643,0.000025066995,0.0011528145],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979006,0.00092703494,0.00013340742,0.00028934306,0.00056313904,0.00018645474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978556,0.0011338698,0.00026662264,0.00014615734,0.00045775837,0.00013998398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003710583,0.00092562515,0.001159482,0.0020371296,0.001214,0.0030536389,0.0012918937,0.0013722961,0.0020318949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00578268,0.0004130662,0.0015950493,0.0017889888,0.0008911454,0.0032364,0.0024819828,0.0012716085,0.00024028546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023913106,0.00021871901,0.0042495914,0.00017935094,0.00012802094,0.0002809316,0.00056611304,0.7930353,0.0048363623,0.053988937,0.00070582895,0.14157169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062393287,0.000086345186,0.00032665522,0.000019804052,0.000022206006,0.000022480217,0.00011687619,0.98791367,0.0010656215,0.009831174,0.00057269825,0.000016287744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005857325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006012084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005857325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020577055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024923673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019623697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387824501","doi":"10.1016/j.ins.2023.119799","title":"Z-relation-based multistage decision making","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Relation (database); State (computer science); Class (philosophy); Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Data mining; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.22499797294568444,"score_gpt":0.48561020064794724,"score_spread":0.2606122277022628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387824501","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020093704,0.00014296568,0.9765206,0.00010095758,0.000021642943,0.00026316664,0.00007224759,0.00016527879,0.0026194123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5478656,0.00026709453,0.44815642,0.000089030356,0.00002776005,0.00052020076,0.00021155,0.000052488405,0.0028098172],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994493,0.003227214,0.0003347651,0.0006432141,0.00094601547,0.00035569252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929288,0.0056149336,0.0003022936,0.00026719837,0.00072469254,0.00016218306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007417478,0.0009604768,0.0022352375,0.002007372,0.0011533129,0.0024875696,0.002093411,0.0015340799,0.0067639314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010086701,0.0007640458,0.0022447545,0.0019590177,0.0013858093,0.0026329006,0.0023361738,0.0012757435,0.0007324269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009143246,0.00025249633,0.0019743724,0.00057077943,0.00031523328,0.00020386498,0.00058658974,0.72250485,0.0047625573,0.0895522,0.0012667679,0.17709595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047209385,0.00023836156,0.00031887786,0.000037999238,0.00007864536,0.00003606538,0.00005912451,0.9619426,0.0018118873,0.03455901,0.0008459476,0.00002421294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006235518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057114502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007417478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001723065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002466732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039227903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387826864","doi":"10.1016/j.inffus.2023.102083","title":"Conjunctive and disjunctive combination rules in random permutation set theory: A layer-2 belief structure perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Fusion","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Random permutation; Permutation (music); Mathematics; Dempster–Shafer theory; Set (abstract data type); Theoretical computer science; Computer science; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics; Symmetric group","score_opus":0.0654500502634029,"score_gpt":0.38485580788253165,"score_spread":0.31940575761912876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387826864","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014288944,0.00033754934,0.9818284,0.00044115115,0.000026911765,0.000051088948,0.000054462584,0.00006103005,0.0029105053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61990803,0.00075076893,0.37549755,0.00026106217,0.00017642348,0.00024798515,0.00017040699,0.00004717095,0.0029406392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955363,0.002141937,0.00035756017,0.00045133507,0.00120556,0.00030728724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841576,0.012907607,0.0007608871,0.0009655558,0.0010106318,0.00019766754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008628668,0.00086301274,0.0016376028,0.0017236491,0.0006981991,0.0048483997,0.00261799,0.0016824076,0.0028118212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018509096,0.0009926755,0.00201483,0.0019791948,0.0031329081,0.007960211,0.002374458,0.002564364,0.00035594337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018115314,0.000127203,0.0010644688,0.00022181486,0.00029371015,0.00017104323,0.0003798047,0.315773,0.001277326,0.6153865,0.00085015415,0.064273834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001711457,0.000032541364,0.00021551494,0.000025042156,0.00005065017,0.00003588047,0.00002494374,0.565819,0.0005278873,0.4328511,0.0003733682,0.00002695192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025245838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023253462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008628668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012703078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010748078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045633316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388442618","doi":"10.1002/sta4.630","title":"Mediation analysis with latent factors using simultaneous group‐wise and parameter‐wise penalization","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stat","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Latent variable; Mediation; Latent variable model; Structural equation modeling; Set (abstract data type); Multivariate statistics; Dimension (graph theory); Outcome (game theory); Variable (mathematics); Feature selection; Latent class model; Computer science; Econometrics; Statistics; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.176136432841983,"score_gpt":0.41493649848351755,"score_spread":0.23880006564153455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388442618","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016207032,0.00013026274,0.9823527,0.00018907334,0.000029058396,0.00024087811,0.00011387014,0.00022002173,0.00051720126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3451484,0.00019302317,0.65035367,0.00016025883,0.00006896027,0.0021134357,0.0006690787,0.00015095511,0.001142281],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753347,0.020036222,0.0006506622,0.0019431483,0.0013914232,0.00064390467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9497789,0.04137715,0.0018729026,0.0046551125,0.0019603737,0.00035558818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027062586,0.0019635016,0.0024174317,0.002229588,0.0015354721,0.0021428107,0.0028272308,0.0016088807,0.0065640314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060691666,0.00068908534,0.0041433643,0.002762154,0.002400349,0.0022493524,0.0037662385,0.0033624761,0.0006306977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013885886,0.0012420672,0.03910437,0.0012945031,0.003793396,0.0009694923,0.0026316612,0.25434163,0.006780351,0.24147193,0.0061922567,0.44078976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014754588,0.00034500298,0.0040510683,0.00007875727,0.00030946048,0.000114725866,0.0003140201,0.8799889,0.0018234197,0.109755024,0.0030039512,0.00006805073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033917266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036817503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027062586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007639149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002946548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14312232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388573595","doi":"10.1016/j.fss.2023.108771","title":"Using I-subgroup-based weighted generalized interval t-norms for aggregating basic uncertain information","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fuzzy Sets and Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Science and Technology Program of Hunan Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Interval (graph theory); Semigroup; Operator (biology); Function (biology); Construct (python library); Fuzzy set; Fuzzy logic; Discrete mathematics; Algebra over a field; Pure mathematics; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.28029061960466856,"score_gpt":0.43340199602400337,"score_spread":0.1531113764193348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388573595","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076474873,0.000087410284,0.9913249,0.000031986852,0.000033150925,0.000034824534,0.00003692945,0.00006411189,0.0007392574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29164687,0.00031728466,0.70617235,0.00008097323,0.00014654921,0.00026810906,0.00038086035,0.00010450831,0.00088253146],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968497,0.0012829247,0.0003977155,0.00050240656,0.00083198556,0.00013521787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534374,0.0017622884,0.00051828695,0.0005331108,0.001689911,0.00015264677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041219066,0.0009944845,0.0014435339,0.0016153144,0.00045374894,0.0019596638,0.001239623,0.000623681,0.0011783588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010319811,0.00019861171,0.0015424158,0.0021878371,0.0008074074,0.002905609,0.0013573302,0.0010768931,0.00033903745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008076522,0.0002618055,0.0016117444,0.0006539344,0.00049420085,0.00027943327,0.00073327613,0.34218076,0.032271143,0.17036691,0.0027385962,0.44760054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001663377,0.00030157334,0.00029267676,0.00004016761,0.0000830582,0.000096178446,0.00010653823,0.91541964,0.0057094595,0.0760437,0.0018385745,0.000051722138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017705668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011707714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041219066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005503831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080545974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021798968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388662555","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2023.109757","title":"A robust-fuzzy multi-objective optimization approach for a supplier selection and order allocation problem: Improving sustainability under uncertainty","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy logic; Credibility; Operations research; Computer science; Robust optimization; Sustainability; Goal programming; Selection (genetic algorithm); Sensitivity (control systems); Credibility theory; Total cost; Engineering; Mathematics; Economics; Microeconomics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.12697726138159632,"score_gpt":0.3329300269842453,"score_spread":0.20595276560264897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388662555","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007872257,0.00023855755,0.99014926,0.00014533458,0.00003603594,0.00004037551,0.000037502476,0.00009411548,0.0013864458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49438986,0.00041209787,0.50186384,0.00016903425,0.000104369596,0.00026916122,0.00013957727,0.00011488936,0.0025371925],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987029,0.00052342756,0.00006818476,0.00018727017,0.00042402805,0.0000941306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986528,0.00079390436,0.00014450669,0.00006083231,0.00030318962,0.000044643555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034692662,0.001261995,0.0020293063,0.0016430622,0.00054119213,0.0015977519,0.0018603889,0.0023885553,0.0022988478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047868476,0.0008722761,0.0018258266,0.0015192565,0.00069841574,0.001585651,0.0013422921,0.0011329046,0.00026894655],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037712678,0.00003895819,0.0000962444,0.00008404895,0.000057558853,0.000045849276,0.000020514219,0.976664,0.0013031769,0.0052991477,0.00028943253,0.016063368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004776998,0.0000229045,0.000026339572,0.000004656683,0.000009182403,0.0000061630108,0.0000027094718,0.9984213,0.00020495278,0.0011698273,0.00012318935,0.0000039898164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004598986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036175444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004598986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011958805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016174144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018347502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388861964","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-21-2023-121","title":"A Novel Method for Finding the Shortest Path With Two Objectives Under Trapezoidal Intuitionistic Fuzzy Arc Costs","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shortest path problem; Vagueness; Mathematical optimization; Constrained Shortest Path First; Computer science; Longest path problem; Node (physics); K shortest path routing; Fuzzy number; Path (computing); Fuzzy logic; Scheduling (production processes); Mathematics; Fuzzy set; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Graph","score_opus":0.12378985224016364,"score_gpt":0.479491927614491,"score_spread":0.35570207537432735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388861964","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015986694,0.00014102296,0.99712867,0.000059010617,0.000039318355,0.000033423454,0.000014998213,0.000044970253,0.000939993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10370832,0.0005063548,0.8931518,0.0000665927,0.0000641368,0.00021899804,0.00006837681,0.000057921727,0.002157443],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992423,0.00018047373,0.000052330957,0.00015218354,0.00032086784,0.0000518313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991454,0.00046372623,0.00007562729,0.000046207297,0.00023755385,0.0000314997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014522666,0.0010709137,0.001249535,0.0014424167,0.0007016437,0.0011894262,0.0014016872,0.0012354231,0.002252757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026169927,0.00044801357,0.0015187323,0.00133483,0.00070534815,0.0016458271,0.0009318002,0.0015056697,0.00034651102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011734582,0.000091095084,0.0005540131,0.0006592522,0.000106469975,0.00021568818,0.00036388915,0.6447984,0.01220967,0.105380714,0.004314589,0.23118895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019441084,0.000070766015,0.00011032259,0.000029915762,0.000025097717,0.00013001806,0.000032552725,0.9834321,0.0015019734,0.011363199,0.003260001,0.000024603036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032471255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002876932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032471255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012183238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022595902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008839548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388936579","doi":"10.1109/tetci.2023.3332557","title":"Aggregation of Basic Uncertain Information With Two-Step Aggregation Frame","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Frame (networking); Certainty; Set (abstract data type); Operator (biology); Process (computing); Computer science; Complete information; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.12108039238674234,"score_gpt":0.4105180624922562,"score_spread":0.28943767010551386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388936579","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008374679,0.00036767058,0.9862614,0.00014080704,0.0000679986,0.00007191665,0.00008708274,0.00009552109,0.0045328937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39978695,0.0012258902,0.5938178,0.00013928715,0.0002772638,0.00034253416,0.0003977663,0.000041502146,0.0039710565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997612,0.00059973623,0.00022813576,0.00046295204,0.0009262835,0.00017090913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987515,0.00041917717,0.00017126565,0.00018092121,0.00042472765,0.00005244751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029174057,0.000980591,0.00095138326,0.0018819296,0.0007245164,0.002280302,0.00094366237,0.000748049,0.0016705681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035533279,0.00030376329,0.001464654,0.002032678,0.0010131423,0.0028448163,0.0020171315,0.0011109096,0.0002622461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023276174,0.00008460181,0.0011416879,0.00037857876,0.00014915453,0.00067456753,0.001147513,0.13665259,0.017079255,0.68019104,0.0031110912,0.1591573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003480053,0.00020517467,0.00092604494,0.00011285011,0.00013595767,0.00023247008,0.00027051193,0.685342,0.011469707,0.2846561,0.016510101,0.000104302824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017328522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001157805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029174057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011872149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009800382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015428901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388962023","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-44742-6_7","title":"Elimination Choice Translating Reality (ELECTRE) in Uncertainty Environment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in computational intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"ELECTRE; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Multiple-criteria decision analysis","score_opus":0.5569784676796589,"score_gpt":0.5197965661826222,"score_spread":0.03718190149703671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388962023","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023603577,0.0061449935,0.61806524,0.004567767,0.00075778685,0.000077038596,0.00022790002,0.00010006941,0.3464556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67936265,0.0050091236,0.22195454,0.00070420984,0.0004031738,0.00022229686,0.00025964933,0.000119288125,0.09196497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990626,0.0004406059,0.000039157367,0.00013485149,0.0002674127,0.00005542185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899894,0.0007334768,0.000056234905,0.000094729905,0.00007936945,0.00003728858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012669638,0.00049773126,0.000460822,0.0008678719,0.00084740994,0.0025462345,0.000681933,0.0007753271,0.0066831796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026223264,0.00021587347,0.0006142035,0.0012788306,0.0041564275,0.003570575,0.0021063688,0.0022823699,0.0007303047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006455944,0.000005487277,0.0000405745,0.000031945452,0.0000032721002,0.000033726286,0.00007785777,0.00173308,0.000095871685,0.9819786,0.0011331416,0.014859963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030348028,0.000013965671,0.00007360729,0.00003058516,0.0000031024276,0.0000950744,0.000074114665,0.0060666604,0.00023590481,0.9754286,0.017967924,0.0000073562765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063273817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061432616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066831796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086429773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006666121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022357404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388962034","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-44742-6_12","title":"The Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) in Uncertainty Environment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in computational intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Econometrics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6167841651678955,"score_gpt":0.5490635622553337,"score_spread":0.06772060291256177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388962034","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053020325,0.01260867,0.8962947,0.001941208,0.0008171719,0.00006927058,0.0000876669,0.0001382498,0.08274104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41010052,0.015685184,0.52892643,0.000921909,0.0015436722,0.0003079995,0.00012373066,0.00020435058,0.04218618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969361,0.0015658126,0.00011810984,0.0003950141,0.0009153342,0.000069657835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929137,0.00560428,0.00031302,0.00047621728,0.00059196324,0.00010075209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043491246,0.0011434038,0.0009088966,0.00134435,0.0006895248,0.0037707966,0.0012637194,0.0012245073,0.004285688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018222652,0.00043765677,0.00063900807,0.0025263568,0.00448896,0.005172445,0.0022309981,0.0033145798,0.00077742455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011925896,0.00001219098,0.00011771818,0.000115984454,0.000015984599,0.0000398905,0.0001148112,0.012499663,0.0002125734,0.91645986,0.003897828,0.06650155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023635225,0.000024595234,0.00014521719,0.000055478464,0.000009259064,0.00011281732,0.0000433027,0.044009876,0.0002092787,0.9411591,0.014210412,0.00001828875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012112994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009835421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043491246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012828875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008934091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023000658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388962077","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-44742-6_3","title":"Weight Determination Methods in Fuzzy Environment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in computational intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.5343345987091491,"score_gpt":0.5657177875027328,"score_spread":0.031383188793583705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388962077","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019872624,0.0023531937,0.9852776,0.000106746746,0.00014015893,0.000016097745,0.000018478047,0.00010093334,0.009999628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09091855,0.0045371475,0.8738695,0.00009903398,0.00025172438,0.00010159485,0.00008272563,0.0001867657,0.029952914],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952364,0.00012548266,0.000021663946,0.000061417915,0.0002490343,0.000018803014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994267,0.0003425859,0.000020878193,0.000045970264,0.00015318074,0.000010707683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088312034,0.0006196653,0.0005651176,0.0010273757,0.00034660602,0.00097343203,0.00090039865,0.0004951809,0.0036145616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027241886,0.00028313007,0.00039797,0.002202017,0.00062372827,0.001590811,0.00053721416,0.0011209111,0.0010291247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024448715,0.000036227328,0.0001940231,0.0002315302,0.00003430013,0.000040494753,0.00017784096,0.052521735,0.003919072,0.29476207,0.008025374,0.6400328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009024135,0.000042038962,0.0004859699,0.00012606427,0.000030822106,0.00014446932,0.00008189644,0.546868,0.0045006955,0.4041291,0.043547124,0.000034677272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012276383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001215668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036145616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047112582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002661077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012091935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388962081","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-44742-6_5","title":"Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method in Fuzzy Environment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in computational intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Simple (philosophy); Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Pattern recognition (psychology); Mathematical optimization; Physics","score_opus":0.442726951712455,"score_gpt":0.5200099438864115,"score_spread":0.07728299217395651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388962081","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035641505,0.00083354017,0.99158406,0.00006359083,0.00009402768,0.000014656525,0.000021855158,0.00008514223,0.0037389325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11839777,0.0016545696,0.8662814,0.00006752946,0.00011928772,0.00006536066,0.00006723892,0.000066812,0.013279989],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947745,0.00017167591,0.00003243732,0.00008079776,0.00021155442,0.000026097501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997211,0.00012292906,0.000014397401,0.000031210846,0.00009960437,0.000010651269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072363036,0.0003889096,0.0005481043,0.00065008254,0.00030726375,0.00071533705,0.0006475923,0.00041440065,0.002733893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097391667,0.00016582661,0.00054815,0.0016274521,0.0004158665,0.0011899201,0.0005721822,0.0007431683,0.0005833505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094055446,0.000056072357,0.00035253057,0.00048545582,0.00007077315,0.0001418515,0.00020438425,0.042060178,0.025205405,0.237181,0.005763845,0.6883844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023496073,0.00025487444,0.0011262923,0.00008783246,0.000113230875,0.00063366693,0.00015950731,0.65446454,0.024875244,0.26386327,0.054317385,0.00008060635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085497345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011505794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002733893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002726647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035235478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009145737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388962109","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-44742-6_10","title":"The Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique (MACBETH) in Uncertainty Environment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in computational intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Attractiveness; Categorical variable; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Statistics; Machine learning; Mathematics; Psychology","score_opus":0.5506227244416032,"score_gpt":0.5249108816572251,"score_spread":0.025711842784378103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388962109","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024929577,0.0044821547,0.9128932,0.0016741817,0.00072665553,0.0002600243,0.00021437617,0.00016253107,0.0546573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33779818,0.0026989963,0.6433337,0.00031592374,0.0002820347,0.0003895215,0.00012863756,0.00007286671,0.014980209],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961902,0.0018885562,0.0001285078,0.00025382914,0.0014417683,0.00009714803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950931,0.0035295815,0.00020972463,0.0002562371,0.0008239094,0.00008736131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003119282,0.00045748465,0.0005008426,0.0026845133,0.0006343821,0.0018335974,0.0009495491,0.0006044435,0.003003859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010009415,0.00020533321,0.0006390321,0.0032122445,0.0019037313,0.0023473608,0.0013430811,0.001426317,0.00040128088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007396472,0.000054582393,0.0023934306,0.00035284506,0.000041731084,0.000065297914,0.00062209857,0.009928677,0.004405242,0.38445252,0.008892899,0.5887166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026113185,0.0005459277,0.014914166,0.0003352227,0.00010674545,0.000980781,0.0013475763,0.27844185,0.011539553,0.64120835,0.050331283,0.0002223712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021943937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030594568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003119282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013681094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009868753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01649648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388962115","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-44742-6_9","title":"VIKOR Method in Uncertainty Environment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in computational intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; VIKOR method; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5864847372517583,"score_gpt":0.5540412137893942,"score_spread":0.03244352346236412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388962115","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004650575,0.0028614854,0.96265686,0.00026334455,0.00030329364,0.00002741756,0.00007449155,0.00040211118,0.028760431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1427587,0.0049945884,0.76890516,0.00023168289,0.00028921556,0.00017167204,0.00028450167,0.0008013733,0.08156312],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976736,0.000076668846,0.000012282467,0.000038017006,0.00008912302,0.000016563716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997718,0.0001345943,0.000013253697,0.00002735839,0.00004570483,0.000007411226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004268503,0.00041171344,0.00061933696,0.0006798118,0.0003670312,0.0007163385,0.0008287841,0.00052327465,0.0055850632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010443879,0.00020560376,0.0003978405,0.00072524685,0.0005418706,0.001113908,0.0007138389,0.0009998493,0.0019622068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075118034,0.00003504,0.00034928852,0.00067805115,0.00005394541,0.00021392781,0.00020639316,0.07095793,0.006720758,0.38171127,0.017157512,0.52184075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020828278,0.00006277844,0.00082436664,0.00016866185,0.000046700025,0.000823734,0.00010005024,0.5889464,0.008919889,0.28264618,0.117382735,0.000057687248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045702243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005624185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055850632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002029078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034416298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01868391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388962131","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-44742-6_4","title":"Non-Compensatory Methods in Uncertainty Environment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in computational intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.5192079060981933,"score_gpt":0.5592917222070716,"score_spread":0.040083816108878234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388962131","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005798645,0.0145041775,0.9035714,0.0008954685,0.0005928385,0.000029809718,0.000028359285,0.00013294865,0.07444633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3833048,0.015510188,0.46722615,0.00060359814,0.0009939928,0.00022934089,0.000087206114,0.00030670656,0.13173804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943763,0.00024878452,0.000022025526,0.000055055705,0.00021906801,0.000017406519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981635,0.0015301157,0.000042035124,0.0000951617,0.00014926102,0.000020005193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013499433,0.000630494,0.000514478,0.00048547573,0.00023854397,0.00094534253,0.00085812266,0.0005927924,0.0041448735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033782672,0.00018173216,0.00031463828,0.0009484988,0.0011768349,0.0015762766,0.0006914361,0.0011290675,0.00063238427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017378345,0.000027899101,0.00012622275,0.00029327945,0.000024575407,0.00006942387,0.000112256486,0.039427888,0.0010829278,0.7821842,0.007929828,0.16870409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006652659,0.000036884903,0.0002455845,0.000106342,0.00001564536,0.00013921756,0.000042174648,0.19297524,0.001158872,0.77311033,0.03214735,0.00001573205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039335262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005545164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041448735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042006694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003304689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013866007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388962138","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-44742-6_13","title":"The Criteria Importance Through Inter-Criteria Correlation (CRITIC) in Uncertainty Environment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in computational intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Correlation; Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4214454357394952,"score_gpt":0.5039529091403345,"score_spread":0.0825074734008393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388962138","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0133183915,0.003921016,0.9464388,0.0010822407,0.0002879284,0.000045303,0.000037041016,0.00006680132,0.034802493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69135725,0.003478725,0.2926203,0.00030777734,0.0003707458,0.00015413623,0.000052974432,0.000113559974,0.011544568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712855,0.0017099063,0.00008114083,0.00026571838,0.00072446215,0.0000902132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99054307,0.007969159,0.0002858833,0.00031313807,0.00076422177,0.00012453255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047461456,0.0009109444,0.00085455814,0.0010512873,0.00051760365,0.0021001857,0.0011255784,0.001057215,0.001649363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013427326,0.00048188688,0.00063392875,0.0017697302,0.00256757,0.0025901156,0.001526024,0.0029306642,0.00017842809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005151227,0.000040917945,0.0009072526,0.00028544106,0.00009839258,0.00013600751,0.00031012384,0.20420408,0.0009261917,0.6938415,0.003860844,0.09533773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010952679,0.0000679617,0.00058768323,0.00011427722,0.000051230174,0.000106639854,0.000054498105,0.5867859,0.0007921389,0.40716973,0.004224576,0.000034433335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014345612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015200943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047461456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014996679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010908435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02510029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388962140","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-44742-6_8","title":"Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Fuzzy Environment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in computational intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Hierarchy; Fuzzy logic; Process (computing); Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.5359850413556837,"score_gpt":0.5323480776012793,"score_spread":0.0036369637544043654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388962140","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004243805,0.008457852,0.93714315,0.00085607084,0.00044355672,0.00011361101,0.00010962812,0.00020881243,0.04842367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15064889,0.010549348,0.8169066,0.00024805052,0.00040372097,0.00024383204,0.00017325637,0.00007629342,0.020750059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987614,0.00047973558,0.00004842215,0.00007345787,0.00059445156,0.0000424992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942005,0.0004068809,0.000023717439,0.000035329984,0.0000984142,0.000015619114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001629823,0.0005000381,0.0006884653,0.0010437086,0.0007143742,0.001666449,0.0008372759,0.00076901074,0.0032271252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021108906,0.0002662724,0.00044302313,0.0029202185,0.0011640582,0.0014584248,0.0008954766,0.0014667573,0.0008583634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004371413,0.00007473049,0.00016170644,0.0006151006,0.000032952597,0.0001436091,0.00043651913,0.072669476,0.001999864,0.5333541,0.013445602,0.3770226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015295229,0.00008350845,0.00030943408,0.00027833576,0.000027329048,0.00014100272,0.0002489862,0.23635802,0.0025120506,0.7050598,0.054933418,0.00003274451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024180608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024641426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032271252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010350217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012863642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010795772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388962158","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-44742-6_11","title":"Multi Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) in Uncertainty Environment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in computational intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Attributive; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5785871355673455,"score_gpt":0.5281964793732211,"score_spread":0.05039065619412442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388962158","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022841316,0.0033923483,0.96263087,0.0001678603,0.0002166857,0.000057859914,0.00007180539,0.00030956554,0.01031166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43424132,0.0012965465,0.5586441,0.00009266358,0.0001266439,0.00008342653,0.00015311861,0.000110479,0.005251742],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837506,0.00061177125,0.00006661833,0.0003491866,0.00048893876,0.00010844555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980533,0.0011371003,0.00010757454,0.0002014858,0.00044686574,0.000053637978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024847314,0.0004588827,0.00106387,0.0012460793,0.0008417789,0.0022122546,0.001729756,0.0009004939,0.0031826121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004283021,0.00025884242,0.00079109304,0.0027747473,0.0011752476,0.0027705426,0.0012865921,0.0009760007,0.00029359947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033353045,0.000083509025,0.0015958145,0.0002810418,0.000091444665,0.00014110917,0.00035137765,0.15628657,0.0043354067,0.2110001,0.005160897,0.6203392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012628225,0.00015912342,0.0013020802,0.000062918356,0.000050772782,0.00031509984,0.0001549931,0.8689503,0.0046023806,0.115303025,0.0090424055,0.000044323933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029549159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019282785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031826121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010076675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008709793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013140619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388962178","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-44742-6_6","title":"Technique for Order Preferences by Similarity to Ideal Solutions (TOPSIS) in Uncertainty Environment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in computational intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Similarity (geometry); Ideal (ethics); Order (exchange); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Economics; Chemistry; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.517560907252382,"score_gpt":0.5014067748008166,"score_spread":0.016154132451565384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388962178","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017754664,0.0004203158,0.99157566,0.00012931693,0.000103891645,0.00008999299,0.000055485918,0.00018619845,0.005663837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033345673,0.00066036265,0.96304864,0.000047573074,0.000051795887,0.00014278723,0.00008267627,0.0000349807,0.0025855426],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797326,0.0005678955,0.00012674047,0.00019001737,0.0010782899,0.00006382278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925035,0.0004179535,0.000036824113,0.00007897395,0.00019882966,0.000017047096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021640419,0.0008611029,0.0010376727,0.0020575565,0.000733883,0.001532501,0.0012577628,0.0006748089,0.005354723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003293297,0.00032048248,0.0013515255,0.003565478,0.00083806965,0.0019726362,0.0010880791,0.0021957702,0.0012032675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007114468,0.00013212953,0.0003381832,0.0010384955,0.000205904,0.00025967314,0.0009346018,0.02552517,0.012735598,0.326508,0.011074918,0.62117624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069771646,0.00041580768,0.0009836935,0.00032050267,0.0002374854,0.0014244885,0.0007794067,0.43612427,0.016534954,0.48544168,0.0575196,0.00014836503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012740344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017327566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005354723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006772872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00124654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017913342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389077567","doi":"10.1109/icmlc58545.2023.10327962","title":"A Novel Preference Scale Function Based on Poincaré Metric for Decision-Making","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Metric (unit); Scale (ratio); Function (biology); Construct (python library); Computer science; Poincaré conjecture; Membership function; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy logic; Algorithm; Fuzzy set; Statistics; Pure mathematics; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.2813588343886084,"score_gpt":0.4435377304232548,"score_spread":0.16217889603464636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389077567","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010995064,0.0004344891,0.98185986,0.00028389084,0.0001133918,0.00008678005,0.000083002415,0.00011349435,0.006030003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5124054,0.0008379542,0.48355916,0.00021300314,0.00022988471,0.0005044292,0.00026711076,0.000062655,0.0019204317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99454284,0.002404552,0.00048113562,0.0005367558,0.0018211508,0.00021355375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961528,0.0016878693,0.00040239206,0.00028230177,0.0012654676,0.00020898553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042778854,0.0010790228,0.0009656772,0.0024128258,0.00072682754,0.0026392154,0.0009199191,0.0010142477,0.0026222328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010923038,0.00020013862,0.0012625441,0.0027803364,0.0015145203,0.004640639,0.0013136443,0.0013757887,0.00051376206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019864611,0.00013311715,0.002745386,0.0005697261,0.0001886857,0.00024979352,0.0006786868,0.05579124,0.008309748,0.6543693,0.00458002,0.27218574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007491034,0.00072375004,0.0034199338,0.00014722325,0.00011593084,0.00048830704,0.00037584986,0.47173032,0.0055179936,0.4935018,0.023675684,0.0002283187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009885983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000588762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042778854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015999014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010952537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022623897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389089084","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-21-2023-128","title":"Cubic Pythagorean Hesitant Fuzzy Linear Spaces and Its Relevance in Multi Criteria Decision Making","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pythagorean theorem; Mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Intersection (aeronautics); Algebra over a field; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.1257454572206507,"score_gpt":0.47920131015686257,"score_spread":0.35345585293621185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389089084","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023003114,0.0019409448,0.9635969,0.0007589409,0.00009874623,0.0000668515,0.00006512042,0.0000579833,0.010411406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7854438,0.002016813,0.20647468,0.00021940903,0.00019870253,0.00018288079,0.00007803948,0.000026793397,0.0053589507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554944,0.0026019118,0.00020268589,0.00044765015,0.0009961918,0.00020211338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966678,0.002045429,0.00029516374,0.00019789636,0.0006691256,0.00012455553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043410114,0.0008522828,0.0008717801,0.0015839775,0.0010726015,0.0026317127,0.0007759272,0.00091160036,0.0019117038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007675573,0.0003307406,0.0011712277,0.002139515,0.0028559405,0.0027787334,0.0017920869,0.002053292,0.00027501653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010398176,0.000035386583,0.00070532557,0.00031690835,0.00014001539,0.0003975029,0.0007340573,0.16375561,0.0018083372,0.785727,0.0013417483,0.044934027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012479875,0.00009961925,0.00036584685,0.000052572606,0.000030014278,0.00015489942,0.0002445174,0.4574452,0.0011058956,0.53586316,0.0045808577,0.00004495157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027755164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016620781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043410114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001839137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014787714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022957683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389849986","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2023.12.002","title":"A q-rung orthopair fuzzy decision-making framework considering experts trust relationships and psychological behavior: An application to green supplier selection","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entropy (arrow of time); Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Data mining; Selection (genetic algorithm); Context (archaeology); Machine learning; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.17552836347375084,"score_gpt":0.4595775001409101,"score_spread":0.28404913666715925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389849986","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018769698,0.00021397842,0.97799385,0.00036513145,0.000033949746,0.00009428542,0.000029404713,0.00004990427,0.0024497982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5916612,0.00045702522,0.4049094,0.00013832559,0.00007663333,0.0002729863,0.00006237868,0.000025729854,0.0023962953],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974841,0.0013556824,0.00011938558,0.00038162127,0.0004998252,0.0001594148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968232,0.0020941417,0.00026967688,0.00006960353,0.00057359703,0.00016982974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006538305,0.0008602877,0.0014202239,0.0015050138,0.0013229777,0.0025830446,0.0019968438,0.0023011884,0.0022064163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073507656,0.0006281685,0.0016246267,0.001264101,0.0014904665,0.0020598294,0.0019219054,0.0018023985,0.0002473187],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015241234,0.0001234911,0.0014561011,0.00015480748,0.00016010804,0.00053063093,0.0006300356,0.85706216,0.0018930588,0.08459389,0.0007982242,0.052445192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008701734,0.00003097308,0.00011705573,0.000012274234,0.000016766442,0.000022443597,0.00004572825,0.98555225,0.00016708509,0.013720773,0.00029009313,0.000015777421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011943073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010724442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011943073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029701584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029562567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034578264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389942765","doi":"10.1080/10705511.2023.2272294","title":"GSCA Pro—Free Stand-Alone Software for Structural Equation Modeling","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Structural equation modeling; Component (thermodynamics); Software; Computer science; Software engineering; Programming language; Machine learning; Physics","score_opus":0.34141222945545857,"score_gpt":0.45342396747973723,"score_spread":0.11201173802427866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389942765","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"software","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026259187,0.0009489999,0.6409646,0.0010727504,0.0005743638,0.0014410147,0.0790445,0.25080302,0.022524808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014148091,0.0015064793,0.82969457,0.001130358,0.00020669938,0.008051899,0.05946213,0.06462894,0.021170795],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980566,0.0008302021,0.00027605382,0.0002731827,0.00046263108,0.00010139495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792564,0.01573096,0.0008749125,0.001510713,0.0023517439,0.00027521732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005217796,0.00282246,0.0015742802,0.0030429373,0.0005617726,0.002495067,0.0030552084,0.0014576092,0.25450963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028042994,0.0022087733,0.0024026646,0.0035384644,0.0005553132,0.0032212653,0.0022865366,0.0035773488,0.095058575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018012225,0.00016920792,0.0011537586,0.0024864306,0.00028224176,0.0001524296,0.00044029762,0.006210714,0.0016459532,0.025296578,0.7486592,0.21332312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053699256,0.000171801,0.0053101517,0.0013744296,0.00024781114,0.00063853,0.00029324324,0.06182178,0.005544948,0.10391541,0.81986743,0.00027746838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037917027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056896824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25450963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008645716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031282164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8514195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390029646","doi":"10.18280/mmep.100625","title":"An Innovative Method for Attribute Reduction: Weighted Attribute Concepts for Probabilistic Analysis of Decision Attributes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Reduction (mathematics); Computer science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.19806129972929934,"score_gpt":0.43237079220635777,"score_spread":0.23430949247705843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390029646","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011717487,0.00017000362,0.9973016,0.00012338633,0.00004687189,0.00007239341,0.000055157845,0.00004555001,0.0010132438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05949731,0.00050737703,0.9375273,0.00015093773,0.00021711166,0.00063954503,0.00020586934,0.000086286134,0.001168206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98894966,0.004375699,0.00078962074,0.0016115054,0.003938612,0.0003349097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99050504,0.0058704168,0.0007392369,0.0012217049,0.0014465767,0.00021696187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010737158,0.0017353665,0.0016847237,0.0062778727,0.0011926946,0.0043606013,0.0029994051,0.0012373227,0.0031605451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022404594,0.00078901893,0.0038011272,0.0063878754,0.0033061015,0.007658939,0.004178117,0.0051074186,0.0008664561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000642701,0.00009944272,0.0007731659,0.0003536535,0.0001639752,0.00011688275,0.00065372576,0.03559456,0.0028396433,0.829727,0.0021680344,0.1274456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025025874,0.00009389345,0.00034922065,0.00015576032,0.000081862294,0.00019970196,0.00015435582,0.22587106,0.0025791954,0.7574095,0.012993801,0.000086591135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001051426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008224961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010737158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018967857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002412795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056784213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390122136","doi":"10.5267/j.ijiec.2023.12.004","title":"BHARAT: A simple and effective multi-criteria decision-making method that does not need fuzzy logic, Part-2: Role in multi- and many-objective optimization problems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multi-objective optimization; Mathematical optimization; Compromise; Fuzzy logic; Pareto principle; Simple (philosophy); Mathematics; Optimization problem; Process (computing); Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.12620302419145477,"score_gpt":0.42098832931910657,"score_spread":0.2947853051276518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390122136","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023387938,0.00038086588,0.9929751,0.00022241191,0.00009637276,0.0003719507,0.00007070868,0.00030416777,0.0032396624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050825268,0.00036998425,0.9446457,0.0002079375,0.000059380756,0.0008542275,0.0001406718,0.00010161307,0.0027951845],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911078,0.0044042445,0.0004851785,0.0006148041,0.0031764344,0.00021158211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954999,0.0026653663,0.00038301613,0.00024367694,0.0010870856,0.000120979974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074695824,0.0016578813,0.0021158936,0.003195073,0.0018730994,0.0029702827,0.0026773952,0.0019527226,0.0073355976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009156297,0.001039318,0.0023793334,0.0026204027,0.001523288,0.0030693498,0.0026872926,0.002549115,0.0012240845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003949846,0.00029828513,0.001538911,0.0020212096,0.00058830675,0.00034634495,0.0006326046,0.24622826,0.0126425605,0.09627068,0.010375777,0.6286621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024013392,0.00036561998,0.0010684279,0.00030760816,0.0001637963,0.0003731138,0.00024583226,0.86146104,0.010079455,0.09642737,0.029045919,0.00022168254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024112093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002969739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074695824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019693905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028872394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039503396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390122195","doi":"10.5267/j.ijiec.2023.12.003","title":"BHARAT: A simple and effective multi-criteria decision-making method that does not need fuzzy logic, Part-1: Multi-attribute decision-making applications in the industrial environment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Normalization (sociology); Fuzzy logic; Group decision-making; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Data mining; Weighted sum model; Decision maker; Operations research; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Optimal decision; Decision tree","score_opus":0.1575127770520264,"score_gpt":0.4300152273096848,"score_spread":0.2725024502576584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390122195","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023610773,0.00040308226,0.99305975,0.00017990115,0.00008663775,0.00051631767,0.00008561549,0.00028096372,0.0030267565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04494319,0.00034044377,0.95128685,0.00015605646,0.000040691437,0.00092480937,0.00015508247,0.000073784075,0.0020790577],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98951066,0.0049637747,0.00050101633,0.0006327545,0.0041585756,0.00023330076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967548,0.001851179,0.0003097616,0.00020055847,0.0007902816,0.00009333046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006872931,0.0016691198,0.0026219734,0.0041007195,0.0017774013,0.003175874,0.0024936562,0.0018228958,0.006836855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009112263,0.0011592535,0.0026125333,0.0035242643,0.0014355856,0.0031127054,0.0032930046,0.0023223702,0.0010617747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037358212,0.00028554088,0.0014251961,0.002290303,0.0007447643,0.0004261625,0.00071833393,0.18582799,0.015720781,0.106751814,0.008812642,0.67662287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025718723,0.0005077246,0.0012505113,0.00033758106,0.00022040514,0.0004513566,0.00028473258,0.82884806,0.010666273,0.12002827,0.036869034,0.00027886676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023904468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003437367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006872931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001812042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031869581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036347985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390454298","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-50959-9_14","title":"Aggregation Operators on Shadowed Sets Deriving from Conditional Events and Consensus Operators","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Operator (biology); Fuzzy set; Fuzzy logic; Theoretical computer science; Algorithm; Data mining; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09816449090264046,"score_gpt":0.36883687494591155,"score_spread":0.2706723840432711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390454298","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010422033,0.00014413422,0.9804929,0.00010113313,0.00008923682,0.000035651712,0.000051087423,0.0000814931,0.008582243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46025363,0.00082095974,0.5158861,0.0003135673,0.00043441856,0.00031275733,0.0004422501,0.00034540365,0.021190854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835473,0.0004762515,0.00012398894,0.0002651783,0.00062111916,0.00015867474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661356,0.0020018164,0.00023973906,0.0004077947,0.0005572782,0.00017971764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029968554,0.000813226,0.0009817699,0.0017279554,0.0009443748,0.0024334835,0.0012135815,0.00086989405,0.0035012683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063718697,0.00049999857,0.0018274968,0.0021129055,0.002189098,0.0039977785,0.0027153122,0.0028731658,0.0005419036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026664657,0.000018917342,0.00009081173,0.000042414416,0.000014680345,0.00008206136,0.00021923803,0.014956062,0.0018449848,0.9633242,0.001014065,0.01836581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005474037,0.0000201792,0.00009088979,0.000012814185,0.00000958859,0.000057416324,0.00003958854,0.11903641,0.0007959765,0.8779921,0.0019266178,0.000012889513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080143847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005779791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035012683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011006555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000748749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015849113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390643712","doi":"10.1016/j.procs.2023.12.052","title":"Ordering of Solar Photovoltaic Panels using the MEREC-SPOTIS Hybrid Analytical Model","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Procedia Computer Science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Photovoltaic system; Renewable energy; Computer science; Solar energy; Warranty; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Environmental economics; Concentrated solar power; Process engineering; Operations research; Electrical engineering; Mathematics; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.29314310612585204,"score_gpt":0.43548769536269694,"score_spread":0.1423445892368449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390643712","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07446799,0.00033152621,0.899119,0.00040728808,0.000083248924,0.0002569268,0.00033030505,0.00022022461,0.024783349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83231723,0.00045247716,0.15387511,0.00010471503,0.000045188553,0.00047837922,0.00032790328,0.000045643894,0.012353346],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991768,0.00034553235,0.000034997345,0.00009240714,0.00024746018,0.00010275527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991721,0.00047288573,0.00009595445,0.000023632832,0.00019636386,0.000039019586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012359099,0.0008749757,0.0010657812,0.0015457997,0.00075781054,0.0020863425,0.0012695428,0.0010640271,0.004826688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020142558,0.00060186605,0.001454788,0.0015596197,0.0005176569,0.00090359396,0.00087161566,0.00087476266,0.00042038024],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041265153,0.000046214383,0.0004922816,0.000069815316,0.000037021993,0.00006113612,0.000053545547,0.9777002,0.0005816581,0.011561135,0.00043223656,0.008923471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030712315,0.000016725864,0.000057322293,0.0000039712518,0.0000053142294,0.0000063994335,0.0000108393515,0.99821824,0.00008078683,0.0013816603,0.00021189022,0.0000038134747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013529469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014319757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013529469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017769684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017657174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026901484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390908529","doi":"10.3233/jifs-224124","title":"Influencing factor analysis and enterprise evaluation of lithium-ion battery recycling based on improved DEMATEL method","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":true,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Reuse; Scale (ratio); Process (computing); Battery (electricity); Fuzzy logic; Set (abstract data type); Factor (programming language); Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.17552388779401987,"score_gpt":0.4645782273642775,"score_spread":0.2890543395702576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390908529","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39393643,0.00052270375,0.5958911,0.0002689441,0.000035612356,0.000535427,0.00040727196,0.00035654576,0.00804596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87195283,0.0003245282,0.12538134,0.00002551497,0.000015479049,0.0004151125,0.00028151702,0.000019648285,0.00158409],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596417,0.0016833955,0.00029996794,0.00036406136,0.0014495973,0.00023871846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707425,0.0015269584,0.00020529852,0.00009916441,0.0010249099,0.00006940004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042487024,0.0010777515,0.00091883953,0.0071135643,0.00070823,0.0016273204,0.00046190407,0.00051055325,0.0017430998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077034365,0.00028865653,0.001782898,0.0036961476,0.00042529288,0.001159317,0.0008378297,0.00042416446,0.00016051444],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008158175,0.0004689287,0.06370562,0.0010644869,0.00070407626,0.0007065401,0.0024116004,0.30925593,0.018214747,0.024193391,0.0025991031,0.5758598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004912956,0.000240557,0.028403452,0.00005742721,0.00016590464,0.00011747931,0.00071494846,0.95810807,0.0052351966,0.0048256954,0.0019883246,0.0000938371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009570458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005303356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009570458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001605524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016139724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02246958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390951826","doi":"10.1007/s13132-023-01680-4","title":"Identifying Digital Transformation Barriers in Small and Medium-Sized Construction Enterprises: A Multi-criteria Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Computer science; Relevance (law); Process (computing); Categorization; Risk analysis (engineering); Knowledge management; Process management; Management science; Business; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09407732000887291,"score_gpt":0.39877172614099937,"score_spread":0.30469440613212645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390951826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94623685,0.00039518983,0.041423656,0.0007569265,0.000020659816,0.00052484847,0.000115777104,0.000021307946,0.010504715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909733,0.000081428814,0.008447191,0.000023684892,0.0000036673366,0.0000797032,0.000046633446,0.0000050035515,0.00033937625],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921595,0.004214591,0.00034408114,0.00039422637,0.001597166,0.0012905215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96031916,0.033317614,0.0020391885,0.00031835667,0.0024777702,0.001527844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012437295,0.0007782328,0.001482179,0.0054742154,0.0023678085,0.0106850285,0.0015362697,0.0021284614,0.0031136496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029320631,0.00055019115,0.0013131803,0.0038839802,0.0024758065,0.0040754722,0.0032738722,0.0016038173,0.0001017657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037897655,0.003526928,0.15265822,0.0026453095,0.0012778207,0.0028822715,0.011714094,0.5194258,0.014020678,0.1386033,0.0018775718,0.14757824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016322413,0.0015128964,0.07627857,0.00090591045,0.00053755817,0.00027551813,0.05672856,0.7476262,0.007944455,0.10322141,0.0045348406,0.00027092683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013659579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016953612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013659579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056908857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006659086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06577551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391166932","doi":"10.1007/s41066-023-00428-4","title":"Pythagorean fuzzy aczel-alsina power bonferroni mean operators for multi-attribute decision-making","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Granular Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pythagorean theorem; Bonferroni correction; Mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.13787061863298264,"score_gpt":0.43617993167964686,"score_spread":0.2983093130466642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391166932","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009022223,0.0010340384,0.98617435,0.000353989,0.00010458518,0.000043782,0.00005169162,0.000051944044,0.0031634062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38976413,0.0017135753,0.602691,0.000252966,0.0002748021,0.00038999526,0.000116151765,0.0000631222,0.0047341995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655724,0.0015948212,0.00023745175,0.0004960302,0.000915057,0.00019933432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946295,0.0037642529,0.00028009323,0.000350592,0.0008397914,0.00013578516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006684034,0.00093066227,0.0017779557,0.001603228,0.001335205,0.0023325523,0.0013886357,0.0012865467,0.0027050765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016060509,0.00039031685,0.0017194591,0.0025050128,0.0023966932,0.0029203533,0.002539177,0.003313838,0.00039059494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020674976,0.00006446405,0.0005069151,0.00041299645,0.000126143,0.00014334582,0.00040137168,0.088265516,0.0024689583,0.76272845,0.0019604957,0.14271453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003018102,0.00011740403,0.000428468,0.00007987018,0.00006744608,0.00012458906,0.00007324947,0.4029132,0.0019691132,0.59007335,0.0040787067,0.00004440204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018987645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015088437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006684034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019380446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019893963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03534895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391262729","doi":"10.31181/dmame722024978","title":"Analysis on the Hesitation and its Application to Decision Making","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Score; Function (biology); Monotonic function; Membership function; Flexibility (engineering); Metric (unit); Preference; Mathematics; Property (philosophy); Degree (music); Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Mathematical optimization; Data mining; Fuzzy set; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Statistics; Engineering; Operations management","score_opus":0.047947744777737236,"score_gpt":0.3814970146995491,"score_spread":0.3335492699218119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391262729","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06078264,0.000562192,0.9305903,0.0005358502,0.000079575424,0.00012243008,0.00009478708,0.00012641355,0.007105862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87564176,0.00049879786,0.121723935,0.00012784936,0.00009156635,0.00018378765,0.00018298665,0.000033728094,0.0015155377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99173975,0.0033172767,0.000761164,0.00085572375,0.0029070934,0.00041892476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848471,0.009835109,0.0013458495,0.00070126454,0.0029101057,0.00036051834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074417447,0.0010426333,0.00095544104,0.0028534064,0.00075611577,0.002740637,0.0011244991,0.0009190435,0.0026291772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02702427,0.00024044586,0.0013098919,0.0026318517,0.0022236588,0.003949766,0.0017479981,0.0013757095,0.0002394251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035831422,0.0001566851,0.017324643,0.0006772599,0.00029168895,0.00074159406,0.0018162542,0.23549826,0.006073815,0.4946895,0.0023108872,0.24006121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014899843,0.00025977005,0.0043220776,0.000081696555,0.00006921934,0.0002687127,0.0004286421,0.79485136,0.003609926,0.19266695,0.0033267853,0.00009999242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013939941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005484667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074417447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00232407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013968918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039356172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391290358","doi":"10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102268","title":"Integrating incomplete preference estimation and consistency control in consensus reaching","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Fusion","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Estimation; Computer science; Control (management); Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.13833564375755056,"score_gpt":0.385711299883309,"score_spread":0.24737565612575843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391290358","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068257926,0.00011025277,0.992394,0.000108160406,0.000018902092,0.000033491102,0.000011336449,0.000035726924,0.00046237715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6809803,0.00027228636,0.3170876,0.00016636518,0.000114222305,0.00030693435,0.00011181998,0.00006045072,0.0008999124],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848491,0.0070783584,0.0012589751,0.001889092,0.0042418703,0.00068245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9521052,0.03378628,0.0035701455,0.0031268068,0.006716071,0.00069539715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028326513,0.0015405582,0.0039224154,0.0028916923,0.0014487526,0.0040423083,0.0034775566,0.0023002229,0.0014108395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07695656,0.0013082405,0.0021159097,0.002782511,0.0030535723,0.008358035,0.0050300984,0.0034548645,0.00022748845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004399921,0.00025688534,0.0013972615,0.0005567673,0.00051630934,0.00012096713,0.000625816,0.7348079,0.0037105344,0.112307794,0.00071510486,0.14454463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027106918,0.000105312625,0.00025195573,0.00003517014,0.00005586112,0.000020909738,0.000033225046,0.9386051,0.0015521249,0.059084766,0.00019217459,0.00003617033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036355583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025940458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028326513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022897741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003854351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14980668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391464996","doi":"10.5874/jfsr.23.30.3_1","title":"Demand Forecasting Method of Moving Average considering Variable Selection by Multiple Comparison Procedure","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Food System Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sciencetech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.4531831912997341,"score_gpt":0.5114749878609808,"score_spread":0.05829179656124667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391464996","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011717591,0.0001930948,0.9864042,0.000089451096,0.000086152926,0.00014290659,0.00007219866,0.00066493783,0.0006294493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3096087,0.00035302664,0.68593454,0.00012448036,0.00019245433,0.0009697023,0.0005465542,0.00019150703,0.0020789986],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953307,0.002374765,0.00029420975,0.0009878175,0.00074179843,0.00027066932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936155,0.0045042024,0.00030545876,0.00024711716,0.0012283099,0.000099428544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007053398,0.001450961,0.002512018,0.0026009378,0.0010396607,0.0010958925,0.002530678,0.0013290828,0.0043417593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012573317,0.00062921114,0.0020933722,0.0022924216,0.0004726199,0.0013917219,0.00084600894,0.0021087786,0.00071404845],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006506476,0.00036879422,0.0078214025,0.00046727716,0.0008437252,0.00028898663,0.00024743727,0.44905397,0.0042833076,0.01095222,0.0031858396,0.52183634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028648734,0.0001307196,0.00084442797,0.000010139095,0.000044522807,0.000031424057,0.000023522853,0.99570566,0.0009738298,0.0014537191,0.00073311216,0.000020387737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076338574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042662346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076338574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008297516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022101284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037302434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391576353","doi":"10.1007/s10462-023-10647-5","title":"Three-way decisions in generalized intuitionistic fuzzy environments: survey and challenges","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence Review","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Division of Graduate Education; Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment; Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Computer science; Management science; Flexibility (engineering); Fuzzy set; Strengths and weaknesses; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy logic; Boosting (machine learning); Context (archaeology); Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5391893118409208,"score_gpt":0.4773155601423373,"score_spread":0.0618737516985835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391576353","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015743077,0.7101784,0.21489714,0.010644571,0.00077261607,0.00009443399,0.00015697081,0.0001401351,0.04737268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2075412,0.70615613,0.07756151,0.0012729131,0.0018814967,0.000094368566,0.00022606604,0.00003511443,0.005231284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979049,0.0007516363,0.00017144358,0.00029928592,0.00073185784,0.00014089578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702567,0.0020173043,0.0001916626,0.000110730485,0.0005484328,0.00010616834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044953316,0.00081445865,0.0011265965,0.002938937,0.0010481082,0.0043569803,0.0016378664,0.001852905,0.0022882463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003925299,0.00057370577,0.001241804,0.004650095,0.0024023491,0.005902417,0.0014090046,0.0024510766,0.0006011185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005777631,0.0001352435,0.0026308948,0.00450558,0.00010294487,0.00036707017,0.0015977437,0.023280367,0.00050892925,0.51437825,0.008562079,0.4438731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019538471,0.0001691679,0.0030661055,0.0035801444,0.000108283166,0.0011298509,0.0041774637,0.06864175,0.00088931376,0.62816215,0.2898346,0.00022169157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004807744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003489244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004807744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022361118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027761527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023773909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391631704","doi":"10.1103/physrevlett.133.020802","title":"Single-System-Based Generation of Certified Randomness Using Leggett-Garg Inequality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Physical Review Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Bose Institute; Ministry of Electronics and Information technology; Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India; ITEA","keywords":"Randomness; Inequality; Certification; Statistical physics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Applied mathematics; Econometrics; Computer science; Calculus (dental); Physics; Statistics; Economics; Mathematical analysis; Medicine","score_opus":0.5062087368143008,"score_gpt":0.49231873530649484,"score_spread":0.013890001507805949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391631704","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21027191,0.00036601446,0.7687128,0.0010961381,0.00011813097,0.00018713051,0.00012209071,0.00025938932,0.01886637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95574474,0.0000777295,0.04288496,0.00008354186,0.000012272184,0.00007292964,0.000022242537,0.000021238473,0.0010802818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804664,0.0007467844,0.00006389726,0.00020626723,0.0006794302,0.00025698738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719834,0.0017274141,0.00037366073,0.00045069918,0.0001553013,0.00009465372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018431444,0.0004563211,0.00069496455,0.0004114396,0.0005561991,0.0014361844,0.00095118117,0.0010796994,0.0021910593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004693574,0.00022369645,0.00043465328,0.00040385037,0.0025480203,0.0013851791,0.0019196073,0.0011234445,0.00038059521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026097652,0.00009237861,0.00074483507,0.00012070269,0.00005889248,0.0003509831,0.00013612214,0.18251929,0.024727887,0.77085185,0.0010391682,0.019097023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005654471,0.00011559976,0.00016082394,0.000017378212,0.000014755098,0.00008766841,0.000016649277,0.80883104,0.014096054,0.1755998,0.00096525747,0.000038484166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028470164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003229281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021910593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095025543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079839735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009747565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391759521","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4722923","title":"A General Framework for Robust Individualized Decision Learning with Sensitive Variables","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Psychology","score_opus":0.06513379295182002,"score_gpt":0.3888471682020371,"score_spread":0.32371337525021704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391759521","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044681953,0.000054022825,0.99870896,0.00008970006,0.000011309208,0.000020656193,0.000021622458,0.00003997234,0.00060689036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18545236,0.00059520465,0.80713695,0.00036643032,0.00024172768,0.00063492643,0.00029043586,0.00014973243,0.0051322356],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933708,0.003062693,0.00034304115,0.0011692594,0.0016532021,0.00040092185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98996466,0.0070667,0.00060795026,0.0009792278,0.0011765916,0.00020484878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01254238,0.0016879307,0.0027581956,0.0016927053,0.0008567574,0.003084249,0.004703767,0.0025266358,0.006899459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027800493,0.0010665287,0.0024306134,0.0022849436,0.0024583486,0.003890862,0.0041664755,0.003830207,0.0013258993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051151197,0.00007119706,0.00027875334,0.00017343383,0.00015354194,0.00011879815,0.0001409468,0.4942874,0.00085669936,0.45128298,0.0017928323,0.050792336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016107897,0.000050073584,0.00008702202,0.000029750092,0.000026448397,0.000032922373,0.000013417873,0.7529033,0.00034273232,0.24491104,0.0015676934,0.000019392919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034140944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024498655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01254238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018887997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028953545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06633127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391911722","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v38i8.28641","title":"Composing Biases by Using CP to Decompose Minimal Functional Dependencies for Acquiring Complex Formulae","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Université Laval","keywords":"Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6027175003288999,"score_gpt":0.48437410910599876,"score_spread":0.11834339122290116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391911722","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024041258,0.000067137946,0.9728001,0.00015485371,0.000016721075,0.00008947923,0.00011364064,0.0011996819,0.0015171528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16731168,0.00007561275,0.8303852,0.00012960508,0.000030342388,0.00021764441,0.00045864534,0.00035272352,0.0010385774],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981546,0.0003954586,0.00015921434,0.0005779192,0.0005607189,0.00015212476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906661,0.0058822413,0.00050626113,0.0017479873,0.0009660459,0.00023136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028595931,0.0011521813,0.00092167815,0.0013115804,0.0005051182,0.0013815068,0.0022949686,0.0009508877,0.005122028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018475575,0.00092514814,0.001607025,0.0009290198,0.0015177224,0.0050169113,0.0030427102,0.0034729226,0.0009557451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030938513,0.00027300406,0.006468795,0.000631114,0.00016230693,0.00027535183,0.00059892767,0.1224856,0.04056118,0.10335623,0.00404881,0.7208292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050564275,0.00012609962,0.00094476965,0.000047113113,0.000052839012,0.00015931473,0.0000619028,0.8304821,0.018660754,0.14527597,0.004101656,0.000036979225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025641457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045218156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005122028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015932104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002556237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017134905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391938804","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101438","title":"Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process based environmental, social and governance risks assessment for the future phosphorite mining in Estonia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Extractive Industries and Society","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Corporate governance; Fuzzy logic; Process (computing); Analytic hierarchy process; Business; Phosphorite; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Political science; Engineering; Environmental science; Computer science; Operations research; Ecology; Artificial intelligence; Law; Finance; Biology","score_opus":0.1527567671225558,"score_gpt":0.4507398496350236,"score_spread":0.29798308251246786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391938804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8848358,0.00059230364,0.10334007,0.00063478464,0.000045367608,0.00018318262,0.00045245484,0.00006292221,0.009853185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825883,0.0002067024,0.015060985,0.00001411274,0.000005244987,0.000049274277,0.00016305459,0.000006214988,0.0019060215],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900216,0.00041255253,0.00007726965,0.000087301516,0.0002700489,0.00015062759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918455,0.00043328622,0.00008172443,0.000022073522,0.00022556019,0.000052814245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022778562,0.00052169,0.00052636315,0.0023028497,0.0010490747,0.0028277538,0.00067757705,0.0007636539,0.0013059027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021115097,0.00026353414,0.0013178644,0.0011543477,0.0003996268,0.00094171334,0.0010217694,0.0005661031,0.00008238521],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004910464,0.00024670732,0.029249664,0.00042344633,0.0002422625,0.00113767,0.0011906333,0.8704808,0.0036681122,0.021506097,0.0017705847,0.06959299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013721539,0.00010312632,0.00885501,0.00006820284,0.00007584098,0.00006257379,0.001536322,0.9817203,0.0011992636,0.0050273486,0.0013055268,0.000032707074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0400912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04701148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0400912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004029223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035929147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07971573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392130603","doi":"10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111439","title":"A two-objective-optimization-driven group decision making model under the bipolarity of decision information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Guangxi University; Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Group decision-making; Mathematical optimization; Granularity; Computer science; Multi-objective optimization; Particle swarm optimization; Multiplicative function; Pareto principle; Flexibility (engineering); Set (abstract data type); Preference; Data mining; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.05471724215184107,"score_gpt":0.37544540726366454,"score_spread":0.32072816511182345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392130603","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07512761,0.00042000873,0.9122141,0.0009595853,0.00009399203,0.00016279086,0.00021838052,0.00009202106,0.010711485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9142626,0.00034915615,0.07984572,0.00016323221,0.000050141898,0.00035253048,0.00016251787,0.000025961253,0.004788175],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984647,0.00079087366,0.000055229175,0.00021803875,0.0002833758,0.00018783697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985416,0.00087501184,0.00017718156,0.000034403514,0.0002214235,0.00015042884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027206244,0.001066926,0.0018285373,0.001028445,0.00071742584,0.0023659326,0.0016577424,0.0019633146,0.0026558165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029669348,0.0006572439,0.000985844,0.0014889005,0.0009954387,0.0014226402,0.001433943,0.00124295,0.00029611317],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012780238,0.0000788285,0.0005585265,0.00009045684,0.00009284496,0.00015984809,0.00010741113,0.9584976,0.00095500506,0.03030384,0.0005029668,0.008524902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021191818,0.000045567787,0.00011837218,0.0000071340187,0.000014292982,0.0000134006095,0.000014508152,0.99244773,0.000059761587,0.007127434,0.000121125806,0.0000094759125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004772409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032525067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004772409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013280748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014127507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014388204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392172273","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4739141","title":"Stochastic Gamma Discounting and Heterogeneous Agents in Climate Policy Evaluation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Economics; Climate policy; Climate change; Econometrics; Natural resource economics; Actuarial science; Finance; Ecology","score_opus":0.14747944230269963,"score_gpt":0.47347988236314775,"score_spread":0.32600044006044815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392172273","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22016935,0.003562077,0.75095814,0.0061410232,0.0004543435,0.00027719454,0.0001966676,0.00007601123,0.018165259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9374225,0.0014814307,0.05705129,0.00030140378,0.00020087241,0.0001446336,0.000069421236,0.000043786098,0.0032845605],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865573,0.010825998,0.00037244742,0.0006722809,0.0010546212,0.0005173406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9246187,0.07024444,0.0021484764,0.00075768365,0.0011001315,0.0011305487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023993019,0.0017256037,0.003187963,0.002181456,0.0010692552,0.0047930763,0.0017586563,0.0037878517,0.0029175333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07294982,0.0015228167,0.0016060652,0.0023478086,0.0044904435,0.007282435,0.0028744107,0.0043697115,0.00016406308],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022162688,0.00007718232,0.0009583403,0.00014192576,0.00016961168,0.00017730505,0.00019135336,0.788418,0.0001323762,0.1985432,0.00057979557,0.010389286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049327587,0.000049684088,0.00024196604,0.000048028793,0.000048549635,0.00001773537,0.00010004315,0.6023415,0.0001094107,0.3965098,0.00044913517,0.00003488911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008983476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070299767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023993019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005003813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026967532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12688869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392181106","doi":"10.1007/s40815-023-01646-3","title":"Cross-Platform Distributed Product Online Ratings Aggregation Approach for Decision Making with Basic Uncertain Linguistic Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Computer science; Product (mathematics); Computational intelligence; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09477624637432658,"score_gpt":0.4259912504212587,"score_spread":0.3312150040469321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392181106","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030959811,0.00042794368,0.96513647,0.0001425752,0.00008930036,0.000105228464,0.00009483391,0.00021774253,0.0028261098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7776689,0.00033415473,0.21835174,0.000059911272,0.0001344305,0.00014818908,0.00023167333,0.000038210994,0.003032897],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975942,0.0008804164,0.00015956227,0.00042298593,0.0007977263,0.00014506935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971762,0.0013823652,0.00021090696,0.0002761406,0.0008356883,0.00011879559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031636788,0.0009925914,0.0015314012,0.0015791797,0.0007271899,0.0023228552,0.0014586298,0.0008238457,0.0026398518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045344913,0.0004451223,0.0010869809,0.0024717918,0.0004057453,0.0026077055,0.0015169827,0.0009690639,0.0004782191],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073994655,0.0005853165,0.0029620423,0.0004770283,0.00068362436,0.00063348946,0.0005505091,0.530163,0.007918328,0.033626635,0.0037079433,0.41795212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009822875,0.00008484074,0.00043042502,0.000009776939,0.00005304208,0.000045238772,0.00006245844,0.989209,0.0007679019,0.008714985,0.00059776864,0.000014809666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019702485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023209057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031636788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071133603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007417267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016731322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392374365","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-22-2024-43","title":"On Null Vertex in Fuzzy Graphs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Null (SQL); Vertex (graph theory); Fuzzy logic; Combinatorics; Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Graph; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Data mining","score_opus":0.06511446457253449,"score_gpt":0.44902285785875096,"score_spread":0.38390839328621645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392374365","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16608661,0.0012369223,0.80710655,0.0006084071,0.00013816518,0.00008046915,0.00028437225,0.00015765407,0.024300806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88090444,0.0015305193,0.11171263,0.00022276709,0.00019397322,0.00010928031,0.00036970602,0.00010181761,0.0048549133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987546,0.0004627116,0.00005774738,0.00026821153,0.00031667814,0.00013998456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995109,0.002932043,0.00046688053,0.00040881368,0.00063520245,0.00044792882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013950187,0.0006530013,0.000823012,0.0028278735,0.0016316809,0.002077565,0.0009886477,0.0014783604,0.0023638604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068567055,0.00037943883,0.0010247232,0.0020249526,0.0028163614,0.0041973083,0.0014715153,0.0015842143,0.00034996032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008412659,0.000020415095,0.001103286,0.00013619289,0.00002485326,0.000454665,0.0004189471,0.015312923,0.0030461443,0.96363914,0.00079343544,0.014965854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013321562,0.000042335232,0.00041364928,0.000048279195,0.000023010527,0.0002587702,0.00016589399,0.05428723,0.0013178685,0.9401651,0.0032383502,0.000026094292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015604196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096041604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028278735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011515811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005078035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0083553195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392381657","doi":"10.1016/j.fss.2024.108926","title":"Analysis of smooth and enhanced smooth quadrature-inspired generalized Choquet integral","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fuzzy Sets and Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Choquet integral; Mathematics; Mathematical proof; Generalization; Quadrature (astronomy); Operator (biology); Class (philosophy); Smoothing; Mathematical optimization; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy measure theory; Applied mathematics; Algebra over a field; Algorithm; Fuzzy set; Computer science; Pure mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy number; Mathematical analysis; Statistics","score_opus":0.09463708075317545,"score_gpt":0.3965969203522646,"score_spread":0.3019598395990892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392381657","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08807878,0.0009155,0.9047833,0.00017456325,0.00009522181,0.000021808142,0.000021835238,0.00005409285,0.0058549293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9450393,0.00053574686,0.051259864,0.00006253825,0.00007497065,0.000021473837,0.000041023366,0.000034943747,0.0029302023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965,0.00010589586,0.0000114959985,0.00004885504,0.00013362142,0.00005019341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919134,0.00037188415,0.00007718279,0.00004375884,0.00025882912,0.000056940884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013071266,0.00043724626,0.0007981502,0.00073673984,0.0003509344,0.0011881958,0.00081714673,0.0007383346,0.0011276766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002932317,0.00020632331,0.0008224647,0.0005773024,0.0009310769,0.001155565,0.00076465117,0.0006844074,0.000101696525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021202904,0.00008401893,0.0016107408,0.00022319297,0.00013610127,0.0003157442,0.00021136987,0.35240778,0.01728545,0.5929076,0.0010363973,0.03356965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056992744,0.000025186027,0.00027466455,0.0000058265664,0.000013558547,0.0000612704,0.00001526145,0.9682695,0.00045156878,0.03052512,0.00034308853,0.0000092315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010022952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006049146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0013071266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005694016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006930973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0069128275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393142710","doi":"10.3390/su16072684","title":"Development of a Generic Decision Tree for the Integration of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) and Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO) Methods under Uncertainty to Facilitate Sustainability Assessment: A Methodical Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Sustainability","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Management science; Computer science; TOPSIS; Ranking (information retrieval); Decision tree; Sustainability; A priori and a posteriori; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Engineering; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Business","score_opus":0.3606065260425197,"score_gpt":0.5849824995761069,"score_spread":0.22437597353358724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393142710","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035620602,0.37944236,0.59069234,0.0047515132,0.00096028665,0.0035948728,0.0014208462,0.00034723862,0.015228514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032506123,0.26260707,0.6978415,0.00092298014,0.00020658677,0.003218905,0.0009273856,0.00007434769,0.0016950538],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98907465,0.0062448774,0.0013538314,0.0006118606,0.0025374417,0.00017737686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847733,0.010771601,0.0013371567,0.00039347034,0.0025953369,0.0001291722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016766245,0.0019718318,0.002122153,0.009868951,0.000914557,0.004294622,0.002702403,0.0020720016,0.0052560535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027264548,0.0009046036,0.0046754116,0.00996794,0.0011131475,0.0038459038,0.0020155283,0.0023443478,0.0010754777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087629596,0.00012012241,0.001155028,0.070775844,0.0010372748,0.00034758207,0.0013657103,0.025354428,0.0013165937,0.15081926,0.014128272,0.7334923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016425198,0.0005080526,0.002950585,0.11750599,0.0038702204,0.0011776172,0.0019543192,0.07744285,0.0035129439,0.19504467,0.59546256,0.00040586203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004818038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011589723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016766245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036341818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010004216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08866948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393590703","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.3842255","title":"A SAT-based Resolution of Lam's Problem (SAT instances and certificates)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Resolution (logic); Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.20631492001667875,"score_gpt":0.3604770025184032,"score_spread":0.15416208250172445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393590703","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010971549,0.00018052828,0.001569535,0.00022158668,0.00005735659,0.000065919696,0.98845065,0.0053289756,0.0030283644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015268263,0.0000680793,0.002654864,0.000073286115,0.0000057190387,0.0001538064,0.9945417,0.00018251433,0.00079320656],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819905,0.00037892108,0.00017196628,0.0005418412,0.0004994666,0.00020886492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712163,0.0009831311,0.00021592467,0.0010152758,0.0004958314,0.00016812126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017502718,0.0025548087,0.0010773173,0.0028955527,0.00094550423,0.0022304272,0.0043807183,0.0026297085,0.050830707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008219522,0.00093687215,0.0017097237,0.005409842,0.00058151025,0.0017188935,0.0020290068,0.003200239,0.06747417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015991481,0.00008444142,0.0010948525,0.0009479524,0.00004034763,0.000054019216,0.000037253445,0.003178065,0.00029306576,0.002808713,0.9813929,0.009908545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009159256,0.00009281033,0.004795205,0.0003752332,0.000056513334,0.00019480343,0.00014639471,0.017829528,0.002708938,0.012395936,0.96042174,0.0000669197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013638766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027069917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050830707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023843027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027244254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17004567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393710868","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4310317","title":"A SAT-based Resolution of Lam's Problem (SAT instances and certificates)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Resolution (logic); Computer science; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Programming language","score_opus":0.3593517043645712,"score_gpt":0.4224739414125167,"score_spread":0.0631222370479455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393710868","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00095798745,0.00017500971,0.0015345723,0.00022379792,0.00005324297,0.00007187393,0.9900337,0.0037806677,0.003169133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002054358,0.00008320165,0.0033898444,0.00008625742,0.000007309498,0.00022086049,0.99305576,0.00017266588,0.0009297054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810165,0.00046905852,0.00019182004,0.00057460135,0.00047431703,0.0001887034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960508,0.0016387578,0.00025999555,0.00122363,0.0006513833,0.00017546756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020671634,0.0021498501,0.0009866073,0.003060916,0.00088345737,0.002171182,0.0039662975,0.00245162,0.066977635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01160185,0.0008476591,0.0018842374,0.005665528,0.0005490907,0.0016766263,0.0018335277,0.0027733622,0.06642575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001553247,0.00008301588,0.0015255306,0.0011733546,0.000051437164,0.000046056422,0.000039396815,0.0039184266,0.00019615717,0.0029367062,0.9775938,0.012280952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000914772,0.00010729527,0.0059771463,0.00047980776,0.00007172863,0.00015919823,0.00018237413,0.018655904,0.0020298897,0.01562447,0.9557231,0.00007419195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015246545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031219188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066977635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021784191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002725496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2240625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393873063","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.3842256","title":"A SAT-based Resolution of Lam's Problem (SAT instances and certificates)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Resolution (logic); Computer science; Mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.3593517043645712,"score_gpt":0.4224739414125167,"score_spread":0.0631222370479455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393873063","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000862647,0.00017099731,0.0013454593,0.00021842729,0.0000521489,0.000072657574,0.99071723,0.0038777096,0.0026826756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017344247,0.00008261562,0.0031943605,0.00008673571,0.0000068559857,0.00021182882,0.9937389,0.0001722465,0.00077198766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801147,0.00045995376,0.00022266699,0.00062725303,0.00048533612,0.0001933161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545515,0.0019341755,0.0003189353,0.001375316,0.00071948057,0.00019686882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021115125,0.002293375,0.0010282967,0.0034754782,0.00095730124,0.0022190297,0.0042559304,0.0025685055,0.06428409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012601028,0.0009064082,0.0020971838,0.0061314804,0.00056216365,0.0017224712,0.0019524279,0.0028750654,0.06324489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016300856,0.000082062135,0.0015170512,0.0014415471,0.000057591587,0.00005036491,0.000041048625,0.003590266,0.00023887127,0.0027389012,0.9776949,0.012384451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010424862,0.00011273419,0.0060814377,0.00057047093,0.00008410242,0.00016597993,0.00017139003,0.016586585,0.0022613832,0.014101293,0.9587431,0.00007900858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014866492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032413702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06428409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022581771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030275688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21505171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394807700","doi":"10.3390/su16083287","title":"Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) to Select the Most Sustainable Power-Generating Technology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainability","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sustainability; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Social sustainability; Environmental economics; Harm; Management science; Sustainable development; Decision analysis; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Engineering; Operations research; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03187131561495048,"score_gpt":0.4246345541351696,"score_spread":0.3927632385202191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394807700","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07926766,0.00042676434,0.9082908,0.00057419366,0.00007849408,0.0011180036,0.00019669566,0.00011258629,0.009934683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5628198,0.00028670218,0.4355017,0.000101709185,0.000014053741,0.00056847493,0.00007947171,0.000014141722,0.00061388],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99251246,0.0055117416,0.0002693755,0.00031520321,0.001156901,0.00023424407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959359,0.003107111,0.00028218378,0.0001409857,0.00039913104,0.00013456054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008247374,0.0011659003,0.0012971788,0.0029138706,0.0013417349,0.0018357699,0.0014032339,0.0011704788,0.0020194445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009924876,0.000672757,0.0013261013,0.0028881966,0.0012521752,0.0010186906,0.0020299628,0.00117151,0.00013004968],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012932657,0.00018280232,0.0015575925,0.0005317474,0.00023571882,0.00021823702,0.00039742157,0.9344113,0.0022233168,0.018916909,0.0005863349,0.040609285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005684678,0.00016463616,0.0003675206,0.00008294927,0.000043365533,0.000036492474,0.00022533763,0.97954637,0.001014322,0.017005226,0.0014287315,0.000028189683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007271123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012812249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008247374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030533965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031121431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04361683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394958701","doi":"10.47852/bonviewaaes42022765","title":"Using SMART Method for Multi-criteria Decision Making: Applications, Advantages, and Limitations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archives of Advanced Engineering Science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business","score_opus":0.16807156742400034,"score_gpt":0.48596069073795467,"score_spread":0.31788912331395436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394958701","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063200393,0.0021929152,0.9788558,0.0016949737,0.00027654966,0.000600953,0.0002758506,0.00044879495,0.0093341125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07389925,0.0016386494,0.920944,0.0004303062,0.00010387186,0.0010217881,0.00022761256,0.0001194122,0.0016151487],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9579064,0.028917156,0.0023870382,0.0021310234,0.008178254,0.00048007257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94062644,0.045568723,0.002571951,0.0036130985,0.007005918,0.000613868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03190523,0.0017508409,0.0023472456,0.0044915113,0.0018072288,0.005382326,0.0025912826,0.0018835219,0.00991126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04602737,0.0009113529,0.0032284246,0.0070346114,0.0027439084,0.004014836,0.0034759822,0.003793302,0.0017381163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055076944,0.0002411999,0.008035095,0.0055784,0.00082835415,0.0005521621,0.0033267054,0.07717061,0.003376386,0.18903579,0.013446144,0.69785833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025081733,0.00059849216,0.004259877,0.003073773,0.00035896947,0.0008615892,0.0024327273,0.52547514,0.005266003,0.3363488,0.120704114,0.00036961935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032398691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062487754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03190523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022956906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060687577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.168733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394987813","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2024.04.017","title":"Constructing order-2 information granules of linguistic expressions with the aid of the principle of justifiable granularity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Granularity; Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Theoretical computer science","score_opus":0.23223501163687857,"score_gpt":0.4724556413174244,"score_spread":0.24022062968054583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394987813","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029439392,0.00022663106,0.9673587,0.00023794486,0.000052503816,0.00016670075,0.00033446084,0.00037656983,0.0018070543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30579904,0.0002369329,0.6915831,0.00008417732,0.0000762379,0.00045052663,0.00089214696,0.00015800566,0.00071992126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958865,0.0013855135,0.0007001882,0.00065354,0.0010316727,0.00034251835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910329,0.0060713296,0.00067264726,0.000866443,0.0011434616,0.00021311568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004431097,0.00087911024,0.0017554099,0.0053673475,0.001468405,0.0070400927,0.0011208779,0.0011220718,0.0024525416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019279905,0.0009784367,0.0027164358,0.0040865713,0.0023080187,0.0062091933,0.0033944661,0.0019585283,0.00037482206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006142452,0.00013515611,0.0023139778,0.0007531729,0.00022478944,0.0006115001,0.0042559896,0.046143617,0.015436656,0.7341769,0.002844263,0.19248971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056288132,0.0000779951,0.0007928336,0.00012014091,0.0000952547,0.00009471327,0.0006131842,0.2018023,0.005644475,0.7862844,0.004358265,0.0000601761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017854773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00099219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070400927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011273588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018354903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023434162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031761","doi":"10.1016/j.fss.2024.108987","title":"A relation algebraic approach to universal integrals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fuzzy Sets and Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Unit interval; Algebra over a field; Fuzzy set; Algebraic number; Choquet integral; Context (archaeology); Algebraic structure; Measure (data warehouse); Fuzzy measure theory; Fuzzy logic; Interval (graph theory); Relation (database); Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics; Fuzzy number; Mathematical analysis; Combinatorics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1718642122514406,"score_gpt":0.39682380592225125,"score_spread":0.22495959367081064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031761","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007506983,0.0020861165,0.967188,0.000872415,0.00019035769,0.000020958894,0.00006768964,0.00007469351,0.02199276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.574751,0.0044193584,0.40568754,0.00048052723,0.0013908634,0.00015568243,0.00015272922,0.00012646684,0.012835785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983115,0.00071308174,0.00012798258,0.00020487534,0.0005330302,0.00010951179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745303,0.0015753666,0.00015796279,0.00028285684,0.0004391154,0.00009175935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028459611,0.00068276835,0.0014548107,0.003523581,0.0014481299,0.0038182575,0.0016897949,0.0009835328,0.004359138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007866288,0.00053001725,0.001479194,0.0037309227,0.0040132483,0.0074798474,0.0021063115,0.0030000955,0.0005440911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017235939,0.0000028674954,0.00001741346,0.000010240321,0.000003434392,0.000011257426,0.000047523943,0.0008768054,0.000055223296,0.9964341,0.00017708603,0.0023623474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023376874,0.000005112201,0.000029431201,0.000010461363,0.000005610126,0.000020898407,0.000023266992,0.009988365,0.00006336426,0.9874879,0.002357869,0.000005427278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021480813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013806755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004359138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002035706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089753605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015051067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395700982","doi":"","title":"Peregrination Through Blackbox Optimization: Multimodality, Stochasticity and Risk Aversion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Institut de Valorisation des Données","keywords":"Multimodality; Risk aversion (psychology); Computer science; Economics; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05719002966062887,"score_gpt":0.3413218285799664,"score_spread":0.28413179891933754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395700982","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055605095,0.0009011845,0.93627757,0.00048188536,0.000093640236,0.000055647823,0.000051564573,0.00054197066,0.0059913923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77356374,0.00082206883,0.21109779,0.00029336434,0.00008835696,0.0001702607,0.0001293168,0.00046612052,0.013368945],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993418,0.00027090876,0.000021861364,0.00012973972,0.00013114267,0.00010450402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984363,0.0009911722,0.00015226583,0.00013532539,0.00016864628,0.00011638974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018823283,0.0012446204,0.0016931897,0.0005746865,0.00051929493,0.001945779,0.0011786468,0.0017188338,0.006334592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046048528,0.00070713507,0.0011543223,0.00045365142,0.00094904477,0.0018185637,0.0021672854,0.0016396358,0.0006088913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017576524,0.000082755665,0.0008551532,0.00012029411,0.00009437457,0.00008238949,0.00008262019,0.938686,0.0032045578,0.017990887,0.0011168884,0.03750838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001000331,0.00002870514,0.00009644751,0.000011148565,0.000009730918,0.000011573563,0.0000070139185,0.99522865,0.0005450176,0.0036160403,0.0004311695,0.0000045704296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029076375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024121031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006334592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009085365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011358524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021191359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396521267","doi":"10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102451","title":"Optimal resources allocation to support the consensus reaching in group decision making","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Fusion","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Unit (ring theory); Moderation; Operations research; Resource allocation; Management science; Environmental economics; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08442983497493019,"score_gpt":0.4029864856137309,"score_spread":0.31855665063880073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396521267","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021692537,0.00021593926,0.9748447,0.00029169893,0.000045568897,0.00006661424,0.00002320198,0.00006323786,0.0027563926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89481014,0.00016128975,0.10381238,0.00010098492,0.000052710177,0.0002132532,0.000042471478,0.00002610829,0.000780638],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689263,0.0015609041,0.00015340102,0.00037880338,0.00062678853,0.00038748718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935074,0.005072933,0.0003140003,0.00020629025,0.0007510591,0.0001483009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053917943,0.0011000187,0.0019891039,0.0014729439,0.0008804128,0.0019871076,0.0013854231,0.0016906125,0.0019447189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016514061,0.0005425748,0.00079632306,0.0012833055,0.0014698537,0.002852499,0.00225809,0.0015741265,0.00023352116],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020763745,0.00010686416,0.00035159645,0.00014381528,0.00008704913,0.00006390858,0.00019317963,0.90400505,0.0019415409,0.04624094,0.00075537735,0.04590306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001541214,0.00004207183,0.000088783745,0.000014071563,0.000017534068,0.000007933512,0.000024502047,0.9788603,0.00066914805,0.020082025,0.00016917929,0.000009038306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002390142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012740247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053917943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012364073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021697145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028514862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396640822","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2024.110190","title":"Minimum cost with consensus constraint to support multi-attribute product design","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Budget constraint; Product (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Measure (data warehouse); Constraint satisfaction problem; Product design; Computer science; New product development; Mathematics; Data mining; Economics; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Business; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.335394420602357,"score_gpt":0.387608335323872,"score_spread":0.05221391472151499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396640822","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012568585,0.00011297283,0.9852879,0.00009213085,0.000033924673,0.000065264736,0.000055603545,0.00013676808,0.0016469478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62273324,0.00015935021,0.37363937,0.0001066219,0.00005506339,0.00041187558,0.00027259917,0.00012289673,0.0024989974],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762565,0.0007400609,0.00012004156,0.00039600438,0.000869652,0.0002486401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948468,0.003230831,0.00032770896,0.00028441616,0.0011260781,0.00018415849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029137903,0.0013534023,0.002503962,0.0012927048,0.0007352088,0.0015498948,0.0024784978,0.0018093479,0.0033830903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008057341,0.00078890915,0.0013754645,0.0019070349,0.00055934937,0.0017005791,0.0017016821,0.0017602812,0.00041058878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010809873,0.00010663097,0.00024233422,0.00012857538,0.000047816655,0.00009059765,0.000054863907,0.94649464,0.0023588506,0.014733625,0.0011694146,0.034464553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007189593,0.000024866731,0.00003220352,0.000004519163,0.0000058687306,0.000007379812,0.0000033973834,0.9967063,0.0003505424,0.0027009116,0.00015319386,0.000003639119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048835236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031175506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048835236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011220799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021050621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015409768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396701114","doi":"10.11159/icsect24.144","title":"Relationship between Management Challenges and Construction Project Sizes Using Fuzzy AHP","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Operations research; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08091541548631442,"score_gpt":0.32020670722648764,"score_spread":0.23929129174017322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396701114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835692,0.000113859474,0.012749207,0.0002551926,0.000009926497,0.00020462774,0.0001251647,0.000025709956,0.0029470525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993877,0.00005261688,0.005714124,0.0000063148,0.0000034497336,0.00007887492,0.00008460639,0.000003288132,0.00017977366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538827,0.0020190729,0.0003866037,0.0002545932,0.0015189259,0.00043249398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.954349,0.036540076,0.003352678,0.000592881,0.003979604,0.001185824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007396409,0.0004668781,0.00040581747,0.0037046752,0.001066451,0.0023533918,0.0007406472,0.00062053086,0.0015642822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027282272,0.0003222383,0.00066603516,0.0034338066,0.0005608412,0.0016882987,0.0013455393,0.0008333919,0.0000945558],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010600665,0.0009350649,0.5679139,0.0006061856,0.00047646437,0.0013435635,0.004819061,0.30107227,0.0033566982,0.0052030254,0.0012711673,0.11194255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005135525,0.0009635646,0.21394444,0.00014579162,0.00014298772,0.00042150737,0.017476369,0.75401795,0.003312151,0.0070599806,0.0023040324,0.00015989738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005890178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00811634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007396409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024008432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016959356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039116442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396744001","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2024.05.003","title":"Consensus adjustment for multi-attribute group decision making based on cross-allocation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China; Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology; Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Group decision-making; Group (periodic table); Computer science; Operations research; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.5106377270280633,"score_gpt":0.5767042496599998,"score_spread":0.06606652263193646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396744001","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013464133,0.00009770231,0.9853625,0.000084992236,0.000055353838,0.000094347204,0.00001504367,0.00013126474,0.00069459045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59647053,0.00014877378,0.40012276,0.00013303045,0.00008740923,0.0005920474,0.00017807046,0.00015259058,0.0021147318],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99160004,0.0040181745,0.00052259996,0.001469179,0.0017907952,0.0005991256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822879,0.01159209,0.0009146306,0.00094070524,0.003727384,0.0005372597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01555218,0.0013964835,0.0036001906,0.0023979899,0.001684011,0.0022282943,0.003704767,0.0023664066,0.004111536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030314608,0.0010850049,0.0023888303,0.0023509727,0.0015507938,0.0038567777,0.0038767292,0.0029670885,0.0005519157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067861064,0.00036074696,0.0012387133,0.0003285193,0.0004536025,0.00013424866,0.0004375454,0.7783253,0.003791059,0.02980156,0.0017922455,0.18265787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021148402,0.00007492778,0.00019235861,0.000011137274,0.000032126976,0.000012892767,0.000022045053,0.99102014,0.0005515228,0.007852438,0.00019037991,0.000018816614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004320844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024200964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01555218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020250992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027430581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08224875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396768995","doi":"10.1007/s41066-024-00477-3","title":"Multi-level state evaluation in complex systems: information granules and evidence theory approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Granular Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ambiguity; Vagueness; Computer science; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Complex system; Task (project management); Domain (mathematical analysis); Component (thermodynamics); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Systems engineering; Engineering; Algorithm","score_opus":0.43403508438861904,"score_gpt":0.45029309413445323,"score_spread":0.01625800974583419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396768995","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022032082,0.00414396,0.96887666,0.0013419823,0.00011568517,0.00013194814,0.00015779118,0.00010453358,0.0030954075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73082584,0.0033213063,0.2639376,0.00023021213,0.0002994607,0.00035670408,0.00018095563,0.000031473515,0.00081647735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465805,0.0025112375,0.0006843633,0.0005704994,0.0013205764,0.000255304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9704132,0.024886115,0.0017761027,0.001047476,0.001481031,0.0003960046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010583168,0.0011898244,0.0034628606,0.006567254,0.0008129033,0.007820472,0.0017704833,0.0021321187,0.0015806117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034997214,0.000803025,0.001934436,0.0046572955,0.003391838,0.0069259643,0.0032301687,0.0022946016,0.00012970564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003026654,0.00020324964,0.0039313203,0.0012995149,0.00074701203,0.00040735287,0.0006359204,0.34319496,0.0016400086,0.52845025,0.0014009248,0.11778681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003563292,0.00007319521,0.001070178,0.00026188925,0.00018856043,0.000068923095,0.00016032497,0.5356752,0.00062289427,0.4608247,0.00096027344,0.000058204794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025236644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014138462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010583168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021174436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015835877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055969775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396791663","doi":"10.1016/j.fss.2024.109009","title":"Generalized extended Bonferroni means for isomorphic membership grades","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fuzzy Sets and Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Bonferroni correction; Combinatorics; Statistics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.27532228466951386,"score_gpt":0.433865728471085,"score_spread":0.15854344380157115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396791663","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011923473,0.00019344913,0.98403394,0.000093851144,0.00009097839,0.00003961088,0.00007582834,0.00011231097,0.0034366532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24106821,0.00036011508,0.7472227,0.000180135,0.00026580787,0.00030471187,0.00023825263,0.00017649899,0.010183502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99482864,0.0020953529,0.0003513166,0.0010941627,0.0012695317,0.0003609833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99228036,0.003969168,0.00051161594,0.0016169528,0.0014052321,0.00021671201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004416749,0.00091299467,0.001446188,0.0017628773,0.0012195895,0.0021306206,0.0023480307,0.0014142778,0.009307915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020979777,0.00050156616,0.0018120566,0.00226254,0.002276982,0.004513163,0.002944306,0.0030326722,0.0012373279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017348143,0.000060001792,0.00039413478,0.00016233798,0.0000854265,0.00010866164,0.00041264063,0.03266712,0.0021063036,0.8134643,0.0017371934,0.1486284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027314809,0.00010596153,0.00036563998,0.000050268187,0.00004914069,0.00011027454,0.000070599395,0.102786444,0.0016765038,0.8899733,0.004741619,0.000042943222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013191208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020476757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009307915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015335309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015156541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031138122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396823300","doi":"10.11836/jeom21428","title":"Application of three statistical models in association between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons exposure and cognitive level in workers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; Cognition; Environmental chemistry; Environmental science; Chemistry; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.48117134387844795,"score_gpt":0.5819117153765053,"score_spread":0.10074037149805737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396823300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6044948,0.0018677289,0.38614598,0.0027593758,0.00029861016,0.00056876126,0.0010919247,0.00079458987,0.0019781915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95140517,0.0006246888,0.044139504,0.00017958946,0.00016612731,0.0006697383,0.0006345925,0.00006414094,0.0021164143],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98711115,0.008886817,0.0005352969,0.0016138997,0.0009747244,0.00087815983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94361204,0.048268817,0.003738785,0.0014584572,0.0022118383,0.00071015366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026668737,0.0022406625,0.0017361516,0.003091634,0.0010285175,0.002907111,0.0031468375,0.00178036,0.0026367803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047246072,0.00081820757,0.005700442,0.0016802275,0.0013772924,0.0017236777,0.002383721,0.0023272687,0.00038099743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002466515,0.0010743699,0.3858532,0.0004630742,0.004871429,0.001001699,0.00095508795,0.45208392,0.0008199721,0.025661878,0.0032452324,0.12150366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007298783,0.00039082867,0.022577258,0.000046392954,0.0005134206,0.00012002792,0.00019199916,0.9653148,0.00023382535,0.009982426,0.0005061631,0.000049831364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017414901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007563947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026668737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020402311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003077328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14103949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396934089","doi":"10.1007/s10726-024-09882-0","title":"A Novel Consensus and Dissent Framework Under Grey Preference Based on the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution for Two Decision Makers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Dissent; Preference; Conflict resolution; Graph; Resolution (logic); Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Theoretical computer science; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.29011607344459783,"score_gpt":0.426973462304629,"score_spread":0.13685738886003118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396934089","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067854286,0.00016271257,0.9884071,0.00038133145,0.000057216606,0.000053815675,0.00004542201,0.000059024856,0.004047962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6118509,0.0006552483,0.37912506,0.0003621349,0.00016596068,0.00041349884,0.00022323965,0.00012017927,0.007083863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623007,0.0021010737,0.00013966775,0.00053859246,0.0007313169,0.0002592945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967097,0.0022592684,0.00021436771,0.00015238642,0.00046422452,0.00020008441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041004084,0.0012246018,0.0019868691,0.002137904,0.0012103239,0.0027170377,0.0035393003,0.002812368,0.004573467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008128114,0.00052649464,0.0018766125,0.0026710401,0.0024982782,0.005728997,0.0026043183,0.0024071168,0.00051680696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074807096,0.000056080527,0.00027249914,0.00016627382,0.00011241115,0.00018662961,0.0003741985,0.28665924,0.0009839357,0.68885577,0.0018232034,0.020434976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016027183,0.000024758723,0.00005694965,0.000012517482,0.000020473135,0.000025667141,0.000053376636,0.7296084,0.00012411101,0.2691859,0.00084863836,0.000023128809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059137708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044236043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059137708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023626012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026262538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021685302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397033978","doi":"10.1007/s40815-024-01702-6","title":"Some Aggregation Operators Based on Dombi t-norm (TN) and t-co-norm (TCN) Operations: Applications in Economic Corridor Prospective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Education Department of Jiangxi Province; King Saud University","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Computational intelligence; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05142112620377472,"score_gpt":0.40160971185371086,"score_spread":0.35018858564993616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397033978","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014903482,0.0007497254,0.9816063,0.00021280012,0.00018177544,0.00004071064,0.00009776617,0.00008498544,0.0021224713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2539046,0.0013495983,0.74058926,0.0001223503,0.00029802366,0.00022573117,0.00032617353,0.000095016825,0.0030891802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975343,0.00092034275,0.00029993607,0.00044565645,0.00068839174,0.00011135653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960978,0.0015751433,0.00036515572,0.00019443885,0.001562945,0.00020457394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003916196,0.000902604,0.0011304348,0.0017833045,0.0010746701,0.0022385644,0.0009653612,0.0009836887,0.0015122715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006730132,0.00020966488,0.0013737724,0.0035369413,0.0013152456,0.0034182826,0.0011348672,0.0019202625,0.00024372942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005742615,0.00033908454,0.0021916602,0.0006013912,0.00014970002,0.00029120897,0.0007254093,0.13226852,0.014874968,0.42128968,0.0067808987,0.41991323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025920986,0.00026593538,0.001044817,0.00007000883,0.000075177166,0.0002827012,0.00023865476,0.86786413,0.006204498,0.1177557,0.006075435,0.00009705721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003344302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025150487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003916196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001186701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016720584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020711064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398241180","doi":"10.30564/jmser.v7i2.6280","title":"A Comprehensive Guide to the COPRAS method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Science & Engineering research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Operations research; Engineering","score_opus":0.35885059824149107,"score_gpt":0.6079737648719774,"score_spread":0.24912316663048634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398241180","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004837466,0.010870566,0.9504504,0.0031050753,0.00079101336,0.00092784315,0.0016805572,0.0014512932,0.030239528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004228447,0.008453994,0.97729856,0.0008080571,0.00023817312,0.0012083265,0.00088150246,0.00036398234,0.0065190084],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917659,0.004062216,0.00087933516,0.00048642108,0.002616885,0.00018922937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989101,0.00686911,0.0005361877,0.0007239715,0.0025881445,0.00018164955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008397144,0.002902563,0.0017518621,0.0054546036,0.0014800514,0.0032674926,0.002655943,0.0030058885,0.025191145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017773287,0.0013794315,0.0020012942,0.00829079,0.0022176218,0.0028725255,0.002511902,0.006697795,0.018113608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056476703,0.00031901003,0.00056356046,0.0036156194,0.00012698947,0.00057942024,0.0010416231,0.024124108,0.0026484795,0.2782121,0.22191489,0.46679777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041444215,0.000094415285,0.00059073546,0.0021427276,0.00003496469,0.00083767815,0.00026193477,0.025002955,0.0012600956,0.14388683,0.8256817,0.00016452835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005538696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008903335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025191145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023861148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076225842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0842728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398250614","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0299655","title":"Risk assessment of organ transplant operation: A fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy FMEA","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Risk analysis (engineering); Intensive care medicine; Fuzzy logic; Risk assessment; Transplantation; Computer science; Medicine; Operations research; Surgery; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.18136674665446023,"score_gpt":0.37718509265162065,"score_spread":0.19581834599716041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398250614","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0384572,0.00072859495,0.9545265,0.00038138946,0.000051827996,0.00027509488,0.00015477127,0.000108294626,0.0053163683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6562301,0.0007601001,0.34057957,0.000111779314,0.000050516253,0.00044063773,0.00018001074,0.000024804944,0.0016224532],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856806,0.0006187056,0.000097754724,0.00019185901,0.00036840423,0.00015519134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991246,0.00051703426,0.00009477561,0.00001978237,0.00019199082,0.000051788233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026195715,0.0014074544,0.0012961414,0.0046135336,0.0011183386,0.001989702,0.0016045765,0.0014122395,0.0021250704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027572971,0.00070768717,0.002095785,0.0020819036,0.0006892196,0.0010076411,0.0015181755,0.0008467416,0.000095053925],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059271628,0.000079504134,0.0019024394,0.00027183894,0.00016584742,0.00024228473,0.00026071738,0.95370966,0.001422967,0.008692514,0.00056510564,0.032627862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016273392,0.000044946937,0.00043583408,0.000045117387,0.00004532837,0.000039001294,0.000112437294,0.9926514,0.00025445138,0.0057341815,0.0006018268,0.00001931299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020240441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016215881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020240441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024861512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019545867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040245235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399618194","doi":"10.1109/tfuzz.2024.3409720","title":"Biobjective Optimization Method for Large-Scale Group Decision Making Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations With Granularity Levels","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Granularity; Preference; Group decision-making; Group (periodic table); Fuzzy logic; Scale (ratio); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy set; Linguistics; Mathematics; Natural language processing; Data mining; Statistics; Psychology; Social psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.11135215529020857,"score_gpt":0.38983145071971215,"score_spread":0.27847929542950356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399618194","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006527767,0.00016948256,0.9912219,0.000120944474,0.000019536375,0.000034717657,0.000011406275,0.000045853627,0.0018483023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64040995,0.00052940386,0.35353026,0.00019067283,0.000057086752,0.00043190227,0.00008660902,0.00006486172,0.0046992553],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983896,0.00059300795,0.00011343959,0.00031259665,0.00047453804,0.00011684383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998874,0.0006260448,0.0001225107,0.00005881413,0.0002609554,0.000057601366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022957877,0.0011524975,0.0012161834,0.0009324547,0.00075571955,0.0020078649,0.0012063059,0.0011258889,0.002018935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034326597,0.00048334987,0.0011833824,0.001007225,0.00089006434,0.0017970881,0.001544644,0.0014478981,0.00021003284],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000726032,0.000056780646,0.00070803723,0.00019575364,0.00012725512,0.00017451633,0.0002860276,0.8823251,0.0034009928,0.06516636,0.0010114193,0.04647513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009698403,0.00002441091,0.00007592661,0.000008759755,0.000015311547,0.000021226739,0.000026124577,0.98736924,0.0004194158,0.011593519,0.0004267778,0.000009620966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032862863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00206923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032862863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015271949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015894565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012141466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399669139","doi":"10.3390/math12121865","title":"The Quest for an ESG Country Rank: A Performance Contribution Analysis/MCDM Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Accountability; Multitude; Rank (graph theory); Management science; Prioritization; Transparency (behavior); Political science; Environmental economics; Computer science; Operations research; Engineering; Economics; Geography; Mathematics; Management","score_opus":0.16651383712929674,"score_gpt":0.44925549243751844,"score_spread":0.2827416553082217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399669139","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045364533,0.0017923175,0.906101,0.006518447,0.0001702275,0.0006121494,0.00032319932,0.00017398172,0.03894421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42347944,0.0017535132,0.571142,0.00030350452,0.000119657525,0.00038865028,0.00021213556,0.000051434134,0.002549665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840666,0.010320509,0.0005006436,0.0006967945,0.0038239036,0.0005914165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915741,0.004728009,0.0008423565,0.00037021644,0.0021174517,0.00036787512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013896307,0.0013033411,0.0015485553,0.0127361845,0.0017282959,0.008731795,0.0017266021,0.0016821895,0.0023200137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018646836,0.0005006056,0.0009006737,0.010346402,0.0025667066,0.0038659037,0.0033234342,0.0021572332,0.0003287936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088990375,0.00029339545,0.007160002,0.0010625356,0.00033049277,0.00034208168,0.0014791543,0.22449356,0.0011654639,0.5230782,0.006554172,0.23395203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040756076,0.00020591838,0.00347425,0.0006674947,0.00013690408,0.00017642215,0.0045032185,0.6375321,0.0015322153,0.32783237,0.023770794,0.0001276381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005625395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008905489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013896307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042467965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071918163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07349157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399686210","doi":"10.5267/j.jpm.2024.5.002","title":"Project portfolio selection criteria in the oil &amp; gas industry and a decision support tool based on fuzzy Multimoora","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Project Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Selection (genetic algorithm); Fuzzy logic; Biochemical engineering; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1393539174347893,"score_gpt":0.4531186464391016,"score_spread":0.3137647290043123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399686210","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20971482,0.00043916158,0.7753258,0.0007805263,0.000052690997,0.0010928672,0.00044745763,0.00044660585,0.011700048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4457793,0.00012445633,0.55229545,0.000056446166,0.000015398182,0.0005014418,0.00023233438,0.00002422839,0.0009709669],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868889,0.008115843,0.0012302321,0.00067451893,0.0026858784,0.0004046625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797203,0.01485726,0.0016214226,0.0004906998,0.0025964112,0.0007139102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0146512035,0.00089205784,0.00091347063,0.0070680273,0.0015767058,0.003583708,0.0011430156,0.0009595708,0.002931209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024315717,0.00047959838,0.00097457436,0.0039093513,0.0009232492,0.0024932756,0.0020727108,0.00093346636,0.00037307758],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012482773,0.00092647295,0.021154558,0.0015982017,0.00041689537,0.0009981039,0.0040729647,0.2231195,0.011718996,0.05388657,0.0043691862,0.6764903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001275992,0.0007743353,0.0083742235,0.0004707745,0.00015274668,0.0004711282,0.0031183136,0.9264185,0.008136163,0.0435728,0.008236832,0.00014655614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025500816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003620851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0146512035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020994083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002383637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07748395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399915238","doi":"10.1007/s10479-024-06099-x","title":"Estimating and predicting the human development index with uncertain data: a common weight fuzzy benefit-of-the-doubt machine learning approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Operations Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human Development Index; Fuzzy logic; Rank (graph theory); Mathematics; Measure (data warehouse); Econometrics; Artificial neural network; Fuzzy set; Index (typography); Population; Statistics; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Computer science; Human development (humanity); Economics","score_opus":0.5296110238330884,"score_gpt":0.541465042957517,"score_spread":0.011854019124428516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399915238","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07512826,0.0004823587,0.92221826,0.0004965731,0.0000432507,0.000072459625,0.000102264006,0.00009867854,0.0013579244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8774042,0.00027863905,0.12109761,0.000088284476,0.00011316885,0.0000911907,0.00017684404,0.000020113179,0.0007299445],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973647,0.0009797775,0.00021718229,0.00042186026,0.00082303374,0.00019340722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99095297,0.006609755,0.00062847417,0.00044511576,0.00119251,0.00017117019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074548544,0.0010870617,0.0017377953,0.0041612913,0.00066922925,0.0021571377,0.0025110191,0.0020522869,0.0009062418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018102823,0.0005275174,0.0011698517,0.002256986,0.0014586181,0.0030554496,0.0018272966,0.0017579333,0.00013021621],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026782003,0.00023080927,0.0071535925,0.00020459043,0.00025698464,0.0001821248,0.00015127144,0.8278777,0.0012932227,0.024261296,0.000986037,0.13713458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053975364,0.000028476794,0.00044597356,0.000013099793,0.00001810418,0.000015804428,0.00001332765,0.9894778,0.00020918674,0.009665602,0.00009718202,0.000010053601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004440156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028461532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074548544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013323595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011544576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039425552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399919470","doi":"10.18280/mmep.110618","title":"Unveiling Water Quality Insights by Exploring Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS in Multi-criteria Decision Analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Quality (philosophy); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Computer science; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Operations research; Engineering; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.27620656189276577,"score_gpt":0.39501846242145766,"score_spread":0.1188119005286919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399919470","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029022409,0.0008211522,0.95890856,0.0009834684,0.000058386362,0.00010827767,0.00006484741,0.00006460938,0.009968374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56705004,0.0009721539,0.43050468,0.00014630763,0.00004948398,0.000114170645,0.0000518202,0.000019293158,0.0010921161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919248,0.005131541,0.00028787652,0.0003720677,0.0020376889,0.00024593863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951042,0.0034891618,0.0005105927,0.00019917848,0.0005677058,0.00012910852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009809118,0.0013608543,0.0009342457,0.0042275507,0.0009801264,0.005011271,0.0013135318,0.0009852729,0.0017514236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011159578,0.00052367436,0.0014911501,0.0029057208,0.0039277324,0.0038210407,0.0022630966,0.0020796421,0.00018498042],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018087632,0.0002131687,0.0026973546,0.001317823,0.00035131822,0.0008365472,0.005474422,0.20797734,0.0062852674,0.64984286,0.0014431786,0.123379745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029375704,0.00019249825,0.0013338232,0.00036589644,0.00009532799,0.00017551216,0.0020746267,0.42320853,0.0022137095,0.56456065,0.0056576007,0.000092438066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003404003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059440015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009809118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033056634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031945275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051876187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399963442","doi":"10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae232","title":"Valuations of target items are drawn towards unavailable decoy items due to prior expectations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PNAS Nexus","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Decoy; Computer science; Psychology; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.18746072068548222,"score_gpt":0.4552383851139726,"score_spread":0.2677776644284904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399963442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9782054,0.0002729139,0.0126589155,0.0001853986,0.000028093562,0.000047894202,0.00004499591,0.000033271474,0.008523274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952231,0.00012781571,0.0037138932,0.00011061571,0.00001427292,0.000040766503,0.00006304731,0.000023708286,0.00068290776],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722314,0.0009252489,0.00019306743,0.0007047695,0.00075872644,0.00019509377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862131,0.008456061,0.0017479558,0.002046893,0.0008990217,0.00063694036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033028382,0.00047827672,0.00054290635,0.0004733212,0.00051783014,0.0022729014,0.00044712468,0.00081898057,0.005256866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023255039,0.000773794,0.0007622387,0.00029100804,0.0009910577,0.002546992,0.0014560886,0.0019223127,0.0005454942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0065836976,0.0008325435,0.45146725,0.0016493733,0.0009864203,0.0016694939,0.011243524,0.011260305,0.31034717,0.039761778,0.0017229747,0.16247559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024872742,0.0017272715,0.8814005,0.0002720692,0.00045739335,0.0012619213,0.0033151403,0.027437871,0.027437277,0.05142639,0.004809516,0.00020588395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011266302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001172077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005256866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005544831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028399733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017585933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400089263","doi":"10.1680/jenes.24.00009","title":"Multi-criteria site selection for wastewater treatment plant in Bent Saidane, Tunisia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Analytic hierarchy process; Site selection; Fuzzy logic; Bent molecular geometry; Environmental science; Geographic information system; Geography; Water resource management; Computer science; Engineering; Remote sensing; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Physics","score_opus":0.059081903052464434,"score_gpt":0.3403442534735577,"score_spread":0.28126235042109327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400089263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823668,0.0002955404,0.014798817,0.00014451549,0.000007398378,0.00016202976,0.00016456818,0.000045333658,0.0020150242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98170805,0.00014789513,0.017100573,0.000014140657,0.0000026398923,0.000073373674,0.00012404945,0.0000076058955,0.00082160014],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987299,0.0006214601,0.00008988623,0.0001158127,0.00026752433,0.00017543988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905175,0.00036119283,0.00015729223,0.000033362194,0.00028080057,0.00011549139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016110988,0.0005199525,0.0004967497,0.002216782,0.0009909256,0.0016964879,0.0005320112,0.00066055165,0.001296026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001774191,0.00024511787,0.00068136817,0.0016799475,0.0003624399,0.0005240536,0.00069981255,0.0002149728,0.0001199913],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001582721,0.0010506589,0.16795172,0.0015988742,0.00056384405,0.0047285426,0.0016634687,0.47120807,0.06900163,0.003450551,0.002426869,0.2747731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021674004,0.0023918303,0.18807347,0.0003004753,0.0003770426,0.0011185684,0.011774764,0.73487824,0.047060844,0.004574731,0.009020511,0.00021283269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01909058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035909615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01909058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018417622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019156804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03795892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400144854","doi":"10.30798/makuiibf.1396650","title":"Analysis of G20 Countries in terms of Scientific Publication Performances","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Rank (graph theory); Normalization (sociology); Index (typography); Quality (philosophy); Information retrieval; Statistics; Library science; Mathematics; Sociology; Social science; World Wide Web; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08783860858281102,"score_gpt":0.3860640040981034,"score_spread":0.29822539551529237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400144854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941269,0.00032268706,0.00039396467,0.00003899782,0.000005823792,0.000027086418,0.0007439401,0.00001433982,0.004326185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974446,0.00024902305,0.00062411546,0.0000122067395,0.000006206011,0.000021863398,0.0012207392,0.000006001704,0.0004153655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780065,0.0005900217,0.00031831075,0.00023060718,0.0006747545,0.00038558713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926657,0.0026304538,0.001907407,0.0004865421,0.0017996548,0.00051017577],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030342282,0.00044360585,0.0005173023,0.011411758,0.00044633367,0.002081426,0.00022979114,0.0003444607,0.0013457118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008493978,0.00010379322,0.00086444925,0.016127514,0.0004215944,0.0010117625,0.0013516505,0.00023332686,0.00039292107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007199121,0.000103584076,0.9282607,0.00022023081,0.0005735027,0.00076320913,0.0015017414,0.0068555227,0.0022548202,0.0024570692,0.0008762102,0.055413615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001928543,0.0003090537,0.98324054,0.00006401998,0.00015289713,0.00025782982,0.005466955,0.004729288,0.001427885,0.00060655194,0.0036981124,0.000027548544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00420417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035837828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9885882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075044984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060899754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016046762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400167095","doi":"10.1587/transinf.2023edp7102","title":"Conflict Management Method Based on a New Belief Divergence in Evidence Theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Divergence (linguistics); Credibility; Dempster–Shafer theory; Computer science; Information fusion; Artificial intelligence; Kullback–Leibler divergence; Sensor fusion; Data mining; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1708050005189233,"score_gpt":0.4327161722974736,"score_spread":0.2619111717785503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400167095","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023730996,0.00028092222,0.99614257,0.0001913448,0.000044265224,0.000066896966,0.000025241898,0.00007721722,0.0007984075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.279485,0.00066849723,0.7169697,0.00033487895,0.00023668267,0.00047162402,0.00022151083,0.00007573459,0.0015363483],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871947,0.0041823094,0.0014718059,0.0016737353,0.0050250385,0.00045237874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845866,0.00900563,0.001118096,0.0008290974,0.0039458177,0.0005148223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010778785,0.0013465451,0.002344652,0.005765497,0.0014144037,0.0045048376,0.0036331788,0.002439935,0.0027608725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030147886,0.00071286166,0.0021636267,0.003779878,0.0020180966,0.0068558548,0.005452072,0.0039463476,0.0004383639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044253815,0.00021869277,0.0041293297,0.0009941814,0.0006371258,0.00061462587,0.001639175,0.19338775,0.008125652,0.21124633,0.004453968,0.57411075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080535414,0.00014416261,0.0006703797,0.0000993274,0.00013041108,0.00044000463,0.00018834186,0.8784577,0.00382254,0.11174149,0.0041369116,0.000088234665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015437036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009592999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010778785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021513114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028164352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057004333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400201529","doi":"10.1080/03155986.2024.2367193","title":"Supplier selection for global service providers: a decision support system","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFOR Information Systems and Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Service provider; Selection (genetic algorithm); Business; Process management; Decision support system; Computer science; Service (business); Knowledge management; Data mining; Marketing; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.20456980599707517,"score_gpt":0.48998356826470696,"score_spread":0.2854137622676318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400201529","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049658753,0.0002085782,0.934531,0.00060523447,0.00005340047,0.00027722522,0.00066741335,0.008906612,0.005091739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5800344,0.0003246288,0.41445598,0.00023720642,0.00007328,0.00035868614,0.001408162,0.00022296372,0.0028847472],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991486,0.0002702178,0.00008435558,0.0002111537,0.00022987438,0.000055808356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984975,0.000854372,0.0001265782,0.00015058796,0.00025595777,0.000115095354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022222425,0.0008051252,0.000966711,0.0012673747,0.00072031916,0.002389692,0.0012537702,0.0009131843,0.00706515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032337555,0.00034348317,0.00054453727,0.0011872398,0.00039199038,0.0017124001,0.0012543441,0.000689673,0.0015607636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064382533,0.0003920545,0.005304194,0.00028586786,0.00015978556,0.0006119657,0.00046992686,0.5955295,0.00935696,0.018677913,0.010290326,0.3582777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008381348,0.00007962956,0.00029935062,0.00002498911,0.000042009513,0.000056652494,0.00009239639,0.9851318,0.0028032868,0.0060174824,0.0053505898,0.000017961704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030667838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021553002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00706515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008790319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001382097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023635268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400365763","doi":"10.1007/s00500-023-09607-6","title":"Multi-criteria decision-making using a complete ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers: modified results","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.2347358149974256,"score_gpt":0.4620532923938475,"score_spread":0.2273174773964219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400365763","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014189386,0.00083263364,0.9800178,0.00018287987,0.00011280159,0.00007909284,0.0000591968,0.00003138448,0.0044948095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3620635,0.0011361007,0.63222384,0.00013161151,0.00016213073,0.0002706837,0.00014812333,0.000062150146,0.003801924],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944237,0.0029287455,0.00038214345,0.00047440248,0.0015213004,0.00026971492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99284077,0.0044138283,0.00029045713,0.000573919,0.0017109415,0.00017013004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009317765,0.0014355527,0.002876478,0.0025134592,0.001073202,0.0032979427,0.0015315709,0.0012408061,0.0036157744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015188278,0.0005451433,0.0043420047,0.0024402773,0.001680285,0.0032591235,0.0014426378,0.0018509809,0.000545147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030916696,0.00016347782,0.000811946,0.0010765423,0.00061416853,0.00027313386,0.00034650756,0.6030244,0.004816958,0.27857423,0.002297431,0.107692055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021644148,0.00012745829,0.00026681533,0.00007568734,0.00010650515,0.00006451848,0.000063380125,0.8812881,0.0012977897,0.115539156,0.0011054333,0.00004343549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002376475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022206793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009317765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013962394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016142649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049277663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400383844","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124643","title":"CARD: Comprehensive approach based on relative difference for decision-making problems with dual evaluation forms − Application to sustainable renewable energy selection","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Iran University of Science and Technology; Iran National Science Foundation; Iran's National Elites Foundation","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Renewable energy; Sustainable energy; Artificial intelligence; Environmental economics; Machine learning; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Mathematics; Business","score_opus":0.0673593248607758,"score_gpt":0.38357851599157544,"score_spread":0.31621919113079966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400383844","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001708324,0.00014283494,0.99679035,0.0000809291,0.00006079117,0.000087532106,0.000037758768,0.00008835241,0.0010030874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12659937,0.00032022904,0.8683044,0.00016692623,0.00009999669,0.0006246945,0.00020877444,0.00011296301,0.0035626572],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951757,0.0024894888,0.00026161288,0.00043970573,0.0014205243,0.00021294893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925465,0.0050048353,0.00024633086,0.00045577777,0.0015286027,0.00021789847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010287932,0.0014797435,0.0029092596,0.0024671908,0.0009632353,0.0023193748,0.0024792699,0.0018376267,0.007866607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01690102,0.0007380971,0.0017524692,0.0024218329,0.0011686928,0.0032910502,0.0028212578,0.0029182103,0.0006265231],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039650625,0.00038631522,0.00093140604,0.00075277255,0.000256605,0.00014480302,0.00021795755,0.40429685,0.0019017713,0.2314422,0.0069674617,0.35230538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033616583,0.0001153526,0.00017154508,0.000039973063,0.00003121629,0.000040652958,0.000017984155,0.96000123,0.0005313689,0.036256358,0.0027352541,0.000025368765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023965598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023949358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010287932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012677116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025253429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05440837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400486206","doi":"10.61091/jcmcc121-08","title":"Graphs whose \\(l_p\\)-optimal rankings are \\(l_{\\infty}\\) Optimal","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.057671884514077766,"score_gpt":0.3598149763912203,"score_spread":0.3021430918771425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400486206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5562687,0.0010228101,0.36941522,0.0036800893,0.00020659863,0.00030923416,0.0046393625,0.0007638976,0.06369406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.827037,0.00066879584,0.16119725,0.00083762914,0.00013502646,0.000351584,0.0029931504,0.00031531267,0.0064641503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712414,0.00091136125,0.00016265955,0.00071796274,0.000511699,0.000572173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924286,0.003748455,0.0012169929,0.0010742127,0.00093945954,0.00059217133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022456236,0.0008324161,0.0013697526,0.0018679269,0.0014522708,0.0033617143,0.00081272196,0.0012770474,0.005192318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011027078,0.00071948295,0.0010040886,0.0016982438,0.0031745066,0.0032738894,0.0014966071,0.0017850134,0.0006505564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061376445,0.00038065953,0.008665741,0.0006695379,0.0003248206,0.00031045318,0.00059901853,0.10196318,0.007519089,0.7580676,0.012424067,0.10846222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005536486,0.00018493521,0.0037795163,0.00009084188,0.000061996594,0.00038834516,0.00033438514,0.07810564,0.0032160666,0.90455735,0.009166174,0.000059430688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015023113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024901503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005192318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020006085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022594065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017369986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400595039","doi":"10.1007/s10479-024-06131-0","title":"Requirement-driven supplier selection: a multi-criteria QFD-based approach under epistemic and stochastic uncertainties","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Operations Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Quality function deployment; Uncertainty quantification; Computer science; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Operations management; Machine learning","score_opus":0.6530890408517598,"score_gpt":0.5876089016102118,"score_spread":0.06548013924154794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400595039","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008848925,0.00020745661,0.988224,0.00021493425,0.000024295561,0.00016616215,0.00008382021,0.000061464634,0.0021688377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5200424,0.00046675614,0.47685823,0.0001449606,0.00005068458,0.000563104,0.00022343002,0.00006726889,0.0015831176],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936726,0.0033879073,0.00028610465,0.0005156365,0.0018358073,0.00030192113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917418,0.0061324793,0.00053297944,0.0002089344,0.001211754,0.00017211917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00872934,0.0016976958,0.0029450199,0.0030761096,0.00089774554,0.0029076142,0.0030096995,0.0020364588,0.002282749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012512904,0.0015652612,0.0026402448,0.0035596818,0.0011303357,0.0021848413,0.0021813326,0.0015073008,0.00022184134],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007270583,0.000118981225,0.00047314266,0.0003469499,0.00015180823,0.00023306083,0.0002379821,0.94231313,0.001607784,0.016060999,0.0006592397,0.03772422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014506586,0.000036364458,0.00014431267,0.000033599277,0.000028799512,0.00003516979,0.000043692944,0.99025214,0.0003078209,0.008759001,0.0003278371,0.000016859014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010273688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008358695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010273688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025620868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042817323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046165705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400722748","doi":"10.1016/j.ins.2024.121195","title":"On homology groups for pairwise comparisons method","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Laurentian University","funders":"Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Mathematics; Homology (biology); Algebraic number; Mayer–Vietoris sequence; Persistent homology; Combinatorics; Pure mathematics; Algorithm; Genetics; Biology; Statistics; Gene","score_opus":0.34824259162578103,"score_gpt":0.547241422165759,"score_spread":0.19899883053997797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400722748","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027976106,0.0002731656,0.9950245,0.00012802516,0.000064558546,0.00004993886,0.000053777963,0.00012789298,0.0014805966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14775708,0.00059431145,0.8457902,0.00026953954,0.00045185033,0.0007640333,0.000517635,0.0003188981,0.00353652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98585886,0.009463765,0.00040141045,0.0017092816,0.0021734703,0.00039316097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9671715,0.027099399,0.00065621483,0.0029465964,0.001640727,0.00048552515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009614237,0.0009345881,0.0019777298,0.004046067,0.0016491832,0.0017193878,0.0037223133,0.0018973831,0.010946631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03247954,0.0005572886,0.0019717491,0.0037513182,0.0036171507,0.005190695,0.005694211,0.004170696,0.002047515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002690315,0.00021147057,0.001025679,0.000476554,0.00019235747,0.00013992489,0.0005927695,0.04463177,0.0031563295,0.61518514,0.00548913,0.32862982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037936596,0.00013881647,0.00044728446,0.00005799582,0.000048108748,0.00010027241,0.000092382856,0.21522546,0.0015576478,0.7758687,0.006388198,0.000037170354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015802687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009404737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010946631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011744484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001471521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050845563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400811090","doi":"10.1109/csci62032.2023.00112","title":"Data Imputation Under Similarity Rule Constraints Using Fuzzy Multi-Objective Programming","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data mining; Imputation (statistics); Fuzzy rule; Artificial intelligence; Similarity (geometry); Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Machine learning; Missing data","score_opus":0.5181512835896187,"score_gpt":0.5187840654768898,"score_spread":0.0006327818872711166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400811090","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009481342,0.00020487922,0.98924154,0.00015025208,0.00001709744,0.000072633324,0.00009333011,0.000082599996,0.0006563717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33877873,0.0003723444,0.65701395,0.00023978813,0.000080986974,0.00053011224,0.00068668585,0.000105213825,0.0021922393],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956454,0.0023557416,0.00024247826,0.00073345937,0.00075789855,0.00026497824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99043196,0.0072692614,0.00077651365,0.00040111798,0.0008845699,0.00023661608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009104685,0.0013977056,0.0032029718,0.0019427115,0.000829358,0.0025293315,0.0032106296,0.0022743486,0.0020356246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01271314,0.0009391207,0.0021669473,0.003015206,0.0009998655,0.0023661284,0.002154114,0.0027479986,0.00034791452],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005064297,0.00007607003,0.00055263616,0.0000900614,0.00006644424,0.00007679463,0.00005398052,0.96379584,0.00023253285,0.008446186,0.00052753906,0.026031302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065279887,0.000016052978,0.00005230563,0.000008551397,0.000005046469,0.000007728261,0.000007746753,0.99472445,0.00012624009,0.00491514,0.00012538843,0.0000047907315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064161173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004221627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009104685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015759713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028215218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04815072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400962088","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-65668-2_11","title":"Three-Way Bibliometrics Analytics for Supporting Literature Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Bibliometrics; Analytics; Data science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.17167197655905858,"score_gpt":0.44044411854205945,"score_spread":0.26877214198300087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400962088","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09607655,0.004734564,0.6483639,0.0030160372,0.00077727373,0.0013336836,0.12604555,0.07812322,0.041529234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25857463,0.0018797717,0.69077706,0.00019383927,0.00036606382,0.001133617,0.040605653,0.0011829619,0.005286465],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915418,0.0019468237,0.0015078058,0.0008031483,0.003909825,0.00029057995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9614244,0.022824867,0.0045279367,0.0036790979,0.006233146,0.0013105293],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062352614,0.0015774235,0.0019272491,0.044459764,0.0013430921,0.011217703,0.0013652329,0.00092099915,0.013728187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04138002,0.0006702691,0.0019457011,0.05255503,0.00046059888,0.00627651,0.0057617025,0.001100808,0.007540779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005147469,0.0003978373,0.040943224,0.0026197433,0.0008919908,0.0003368319,0.0017837528,0.0062431004,0.008055887,0.034262307,0.06268135,0.84126925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002812836,0.00052652176,0.07279406,0.0017816165,0.0012260388,0.0015763788,0.004825695,0.3463524,0.03224329,0.29127324,0.24644232,0.0006771543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023478712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056086797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95554024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009617025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035183246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04592544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401136363","doi":"10.18280/mmep.110710","title":"Balancing Sustainability and Decision Maker Preferences in Regional Development Location Selection: A Multi-criteria Approach Using AHP and Fuzzy Goal Programming","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goal programming; Analytic hierarchy process; Sustainability; Decision maker; Selection (genetic algorithm); Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Operations research; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Management science; Process management; Business; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Ecology","score_opus":0.13549872517525485,"score_gpt":0.3580151182304036,"score_spread":0.22251639305514875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401136363","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06288292,0.00042050143,0.93110347,0.0005274345,0.00003246371,0.0004105688,0.000060711533,0.000075863514,0.004486054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52347773,0.00032200044,0.47487962,0.000096827855,0.000026264735,0.00042944876,0.000059409387,0.000022887001,0.0006858908],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884361,0.008698353,0.0003623674,0.00041269933,0.001705848,0.00038471806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99236894,0.005404729,0.0006759975,0.00020756583,0.0010229183,0.00031983777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014089431,0.001172508,0.0013121339,0.00432712,0.0014037952,0.0036825007,0.0016328853,0.0011458047,0.0015392049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011981882,0.0006446329,0.0013606605,0.0039079385,0.0013063711,0.0022298957,0.0025847293,0.0013655683,0.00016520181],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041570846,0.0004883029,0.007924492,0.0015510317,0.00061978877,0.00063999934,0.002812654,0.71175534,0.007294475,0.06382969,0.0012713602,0.20139718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079745754,0.00040496473,0.0019147268,0.0002763286,0.00020249918,0.0001739052,0.0025277107,0.9297768,0.0028668924,0.05832811,0.0033280978,0.000120232784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027173131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004567893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014089431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024319051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040613427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07451296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401334383","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-22-2024-130","title":"Jonckheere Trend Test under Indeterminacy with Applications","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Context (archaeology); Parametric statistics; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Computer science; Statistical hypothesis testing; Mathematics; Machine learning; Statistics; Geography","score_opus":0.06900908026851905,"score_gpt":0.4444981851190176,"score_spread":0.3754891048504986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401334383","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19596867,0.00092948024,0.79186416,0.0009686981,0.00029612592,0.00042139893,0.00058774464,0.00038097985,0.008582808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8875945,0.00030801352,0.10889631,0.00021385892,0.00017327745,0.00058202585,0.00045149156,0.000054822623,0.0017256875],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9701282,0.01644229,0.0018714684,0.004283174,0.0061466754,0.0011282734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82428944,0.15168417,0.0070340186,0.0064207776,0.009287203,0.0012843283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029769886,0.0010882667,0.002464527,0.0039550033,0.0016632044,0.0033520465,0.00289156,0.0029541631,0.004847813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17512617,0.00042166674,0.0019175292,0.004768592,0.0045688543,0.004701638,0.0026314624,0.00295149,0.00049337966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036377448,0.00065909664,0.13756454,0.0011410618,0.0012912413,0.0046960795,0.0018496885,0.1881944,0.006704993,0.32137024,0.0058267144,0.32706428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019726563,0.0014277546,0.025260635,0.00018718316,0.0002553104,0.0012017478,0.0009625243,0.7879336,0.0037428283,0.17321032,0.0054583736,0.00016251732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018199455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007927941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029769886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012440942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025197386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15744007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401334472","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-22-2024-131","title":"Real-Life Applications of New Type Spherical Fuzzy Sets and Its Extension Using Aggregation Operators","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Extension (predicate logic); Idempotence; Commutative property; Euclidean geometry; Fuzzy logic; Monotonic function; Hamming distance; Sphericity; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Applied mathematics; Algebra over a field; Pure mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Geometry; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.12636022789104262,"score_gpt":0.46218481981657755,"score_spread":0.33582459192553493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401334472","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013363256,0.0005264416,0.9827927,0.00024087157,0.00004329447,0.00002155286,0.000016363949,0.000043859112,0.002951655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65930396,0.0012663451,0.3368741,0.00011701422,0.00014398844,0.000074043586,0.000060392973,0.000032305627,0.0021278684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978048,0.0010906428,0.00016504903,0.00028127883,0.00055554655,0.00010258228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782073,0.0011349024,0.00023770567,0.0002465013,0.00048174596,0.00007847519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041561294,0.0007542752,0.00066244387,0.0011953207,0.0005534273,0.0014988775,0.0009764554,0.0007207601,0.0012225477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005629774,0.00026129244,0.0016384653,0.0015766682,0.0015831919,0.002428101,0.0017124099,0.0012103677,0.00018349427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006158376,0.000047670324,0.0012543412,0.00022569101,0.000102498016,0.00030804012,0.0004063273,0.34486017,0.0042197434,0.5561005,0.00089756853,0.09151586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068824074,0.00007015424,0.0003339166,0.000024507926,0.000022817641,0.0001417579,0.000080282865,0.83464277,0.0013301729,0.16053037,0.002793264,0.000023187093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023807928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017880464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041561294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011665395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007559028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021979988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401416213","doi":"10.4018/ijssmet.347947","title":"A Comprehensive Survey and Literature Review on TOPSIS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Service Science Management Engineering and Technology","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Process (computing); Computer science; Management science; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.05422489591092754,"score_gpt":0.38863267501838195,"score_spread":0.3344077791074544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401416213","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006728824,0.9251756,0.017421372,0.005227254,0.0010029753,0.00019545101,0.0007972419,0.00019423373,0.043256998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030086529,0.95439196,0.011621424,0.000681888,0.00038914624,0.000108345375,0.00058688544,0.000020291163,0.002113546],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967404,0.0008854498,0.00045796254,0.000245656,0.0015103939,0.00016008223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994003,0.0037856638,0.00042497,0.00016747497,0.001483185,0.00013568757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034399934,0.0014719331,0.0013564812,0.014230778,0.0011225764,0.0026984352,0.0012696408,0.0013387314,0.011384554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00840385,0.00046432743,0.0012307831,0.022603028,0.0009252359,0.003316641,0.0012501975,0.0011832475,0.002113904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061002644,0.00009402809,0.0015904161,0.032564707,0.00023305134,0.00035975003,0.001109,0.0022949425,0.0009713632,0.024332495,0.03255904,0.9038301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002421911,0.0002804868,0.010028884,0.04537243,0.0006489562,0.001824615,0.005180687,0.0031293968,0.0014508792,0.030053614,0.90182525,0.00018048141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043787137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006145881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014230778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025292365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00548636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038085103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401490254","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-68279-7_14","title":"L-Fuzzy Weak Preference, Preference, and Choice Relations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.16235713176861188,"score_gpt":0.36834039253437545,"score_spread":0.20598326076576357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401490254","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049017552,0.013866066,0.6393952,0.0073965257,0.00089387165,0.00009429212,0.0006319685,0.00018661242,0.28851795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7169368,0.007956181,0.19368736,0.0013943923,0.0011889132,0.00030901228,0.00055300305,0.000095613206,0.07787879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990061,0.00050520105,0.000065862274,0.000104921004,0.00026212985,0.000055875003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849916,0.0010430906,0.00009074476,0.00011492871,0.00018211185,0.00007005153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016144663,0.0005748656,0.00047269627,0.0011114808,0.0008236588,0.0027078823,0.00049972004,0.0008848306,0.007591267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040278346,0.0002979011,0.00058942114,0.001924135,0.0025155402,0.004221056,0.0010336436,0.0023634331,0.001374025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002506268,0.000013133364,0.000100111996,0.000087922126,0.000007844757,0.000039315953,0.00021395754,0.0009967847,0.00090366136,0.9654434,0.0036176338,0.028551102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049904625,0.0000148793015,0.000102019105,0.000023034287,0.000004178174,0.000064891334,0.00005114124,0.004167275,0.00019432668,0.9865427,0.008823521,0.0000070419032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096368464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009121569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007591267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013105284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060082524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025395334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401647028","doi":"10.3390/axioms13080559","title":"Neutrosophic Analysis of Experimental Data Using Neutrosophic Graeco-Latin Square Design","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Axioms","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Latin square; Square (algebra); Mathematics; Natural language processing; Computer science; Chemistry; Geometry","score_opus":0.6321107700523465,"score_gpt":0.5266994831264806,"score_spread":0.10541128692586588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401647028","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0130011495,0.0004224683,0.9810481,0.00015582732,0.00007258796,0.0025603226,0.0002207501,0.00015315635,0.0023655628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07954325,0.0006200258,0.9114234,0.00015601605,0.000036412188,0.0074504353,0.00016996996,0.000028933095,0.00057151384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9559205,0.032835197,0.0023682837,0.0036974004,0.0047568902,0.00042161922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9480274,0.041818123,0.003710751,0.0025163162,0.003598127,0.00032920798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036264624,0.0020169136,0.0026444974,0.0023136793,0.0010589376,0.0027775338,0.0018835416,0.0013976817,0.004705444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041662116,0.0005384607,0.0021230853,0.0028586523,0.003437114,0.0015180424,0.0014711343,0.0025618307,0.0005238356],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037623367,0.0011903889,0.0077230646,0.007476815,0.002067231,0.00052347995,0.0040687504,0.13860603,0.025868164,0.409777,0.003212578,0.39572415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012758812,0.008743576,0.0098413,0.001112183,0.0008212705,0.00047000183,0.0015273816,0.5530827,0.032171026,0.3496917,0.040671743,0.0005911673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010772183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012486974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036264624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024156095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003243647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19178796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401965045","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36781","title":"Navigating ambiguity: A novel neutrosophic cubic shapley normalized weighted Bonferroni Mean aggregation operator with application in the investment environment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heliyon","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"King Saud University","keywords":"Shapley value; Operator (biology); Cooperative game theory; Bonferroni correction; Fuzzy logic; Vagueness; Ambiguity; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Game theory; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.08353920772364223,"score_gpt":0.3725529845515386,"score_spread":0.2890137768278964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401965045","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0078359125,0.0001963304,0.9872529,0.00018957032,0.00008551313,0.00006846702,0.000054140495,0.000120927274,0.0041963058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32015914,0.000556681,0.6734053,0.00027385086,0.00019415913,0.00030957116,0.00019224809,0.00010753064,0.004801426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715936,0.0009641245,0.00016628332,0.00043213821,0.0010883771,0.00018969372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982315,0.00079089217,0.00022766563,0.000162725,0.00046681397,0.000120485485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031783506,0.0010147378,0.001092524,0.0012663702,0.0010326235,0.001974416,0.0018851946,0.0011354078,0.0037655747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071034543,0.00032643016,0.0012311407,0.0019904142,0.001348856,0.0027632534,0.0026013055,0.0018792562,0.00039904378],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019122023,0.000137518,0.001632482,0.00033320693,0.00016482995,0.0003988832,0.0006411049,0.30400226,0.0067923516,0.3613316,0.00690225,0.3174724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023286417,0.00014449637,0.0003452922,0.00004813058,0.00004258135,0.00019535502,0.000115561925,0.7935438,0.0022652938,0.19507885,0.008139052,0.00005824856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024857302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027619333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037655747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015969488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002651343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016808867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401977419","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-22-2024-142","title":"On Null Vertex in Bipolar Fuzzy Graphs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Null (SQL); Vertex (graph theory); Fuzzy logic; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics; Graph; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.059226258353785165,"score_gpt":0.43500998058797974,"score_spread":0.3757837222341946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401977419","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22749843,0.000802141,0.7113157,0.00070878054,0.00014878329,0.00009474584,0.00039119966,0.0001725408,0.0588677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91781634,0.0007301617,0.07377748,0.00015717543,0.000091490954,0.000082552935,0.00029782738,0.00006230507,0.006984722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949443,0.00015749673,0.000020729414,0.00010887342,0.00013976546,0.00007868377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999008,0.0004259818,0.00011437679,0.00007174862,0.00022640688,0.00015361502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005227398,0.0004641973,0.00052798673,0.001856771,0.0015261895,0.0017153273,0.0006034752,0.00077579415,0.003900386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023968655,0.00022644084,0.00057317805,0.0013064768,0.0015470895,0.0023183664,0.0009417353,0.0009260949,0.0003725118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008746899,0.000018925191,0.0009983258,0.00010961259,0.00001590424,0.00031736484,0.00033520907,0.00965212,0.0035753024,0.9632094,0.001468865,0.020211404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000185464,0.00004450561,0.000547924,0.000043765584,0.000021294052,0.00024614183,0.00024321691,0.057058457,0.0015082383,0.936266,0.003978041,0.00002394237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018829476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012367782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003900386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091040996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044241536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013048053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401977744","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-22-2024-143","title":"Exploring Profit Opportunities in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Metric Spaces via Edelstein Type Mappings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Metric space; Type (biology); Pure mathematics; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.4120894207710082,"score_gpt":0.44967979544627096,"score_spread":0.03759037467526277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401977744","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18863758,0.0005950656,0.79102814,0.00040377432,0.000027903025,0.00006934986,0.000059569327,0.00003185331,0.019146668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367434,0.00043209072,0.060924366,0.000022859384,0.000016549091,0.000075419535,0.000029865707,0.00001046065,0.001744996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844414,0.00069576537,0.000065362125,0.00021185614,0.0004184521,0.00016438088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981018,0.0011289772,0.00028645727,0.00013211303,0.00016512444,0.00018551282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029083027,0.000899719,0.0006861577,0.0016508184,0.00082400185,0.002933543,0.00087583857,0.00084323634,0.0022059462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060589574,0.00046189153,0.001144197,0.0012997016,0.00289627,0.0062548844,0.0027451825,0.0017442162,0.00014112241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007566251,0.0000538963,0.0009298597,0.00009545884,0.0000430311,0.00023598097,0.00038034125,0.07113381,0.0016668453,0.91080356,0.00019792702,0.014383721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013003359,0.00012275219,0.0004735196,0.00003881353,0.000016709133,0.00012636886,0.00033753732,0.22039607,0.00096155016,0.775725,0.0017617604,0.00002688594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063136284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003515584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002933543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016894259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074905483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01538074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401991877","doi":"10.1037/cep0000344","title":"Determining the optimal environmental information for training computational models of lexical semantics and lexical organization.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Lexical semantics; Computer science; Lexical functional grammar; Lexical item; Lexical choice; Semantics (computer science); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Training (meteorology); Computational semantics; Programming language; Operational semantics; Generative grammar; Geography","score_opus":0.18161950251286632,"score_gpt":0.39900587704713086,"score_spread":0.21738637453426454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401991877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73045486,0.00049717736,0.25000086,0.00077795406,0.000051364797,0.0013040454,0.00031671626,0.000546673,0.016050324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80286247,0.00029983252,0.19363156,0.00008999678,0.000010933331,0.0010486743,0.0003856879,0.00006344383,0.0016074169],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981186,0.0012353783,0.00011226621,0.00021949988,0.00024258846,0.00007159503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838663,0.013878719,0.0008496016,0.00066551875,0.0004374738,0.00030244407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040415367,0.00076030206,0.0005245896,0.00080912764,0.00035155704,0.0016979454,0.0011510882,0.0010804748,0.005155014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03304276,0.00049655634,0.00040807502,0.0006239218,0.00083889696,0.0032881673,0.0018419789,0.0011161333,0.00085059286],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029061495,0.004934088,0.013622291,0.0015271658,0.00019285061,0.00026511296,0.0021693276,0.28959262,0.042138904,0.038120512,0.0034443222,0.60108674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056477985,0.0025263538,0.014982288,0.00034528348,0.00020154541,0.00013029574,0.0017056012,0.7904806,0.06561151,0.113369465,0.009909563,0.00017273948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007027887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013822305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005155014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011417358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011317903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021373928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402910088","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125454","title":"Multi-view neutrosophic <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" altimg=\"si2.svg\" display=\"inline\" id=\"d1e2958\"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math>-means clustering algorithms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Algorithm; Computer science; Cluster analysis; Database; Data mining; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06396399516179124,"score_gpt":0.3418368717969467,"score_spread":0.2778728766351555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402910088","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044424287,0.00008202856,0.99312145,0.00010366533,0.000018885989,0.00004251991,0.0000750331,0.00011583445,0.0019981274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18389553,0.00025571056,0.81314707,0.00012705663,0.00003703205,0.0001297023,0.00033664185,0.00006814505,0.0020031142],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990447,0.00023533578,0.000058993057,0.00021971426,0.00038905133,0.000052227384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921083,0.0002578634,0.000102864564,0.00009979174,0.00028474364,0.000043883854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012596804,0.00085768243,0.0007480433,0.0013665089,0.0008376841,0.0017688291,0.0013079267,0.0010805612,0.002418453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028983846,0.00034406985,0.0008485262,0.001175747,0.0007340131,0.0013926034,0.0013969077,0.0012673036,0.0006688646],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014730565,0.0000959362,0.0013518668,0.0003333571,0.00011078938,0.00020021487,0.00026844663,0.5768953,0.0167405,0.12149902,0.0086898655,0.27366737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052424634,0.000019785548,0.00021501962,0.000016816375,0.000008666967,0.00005480462,0.000035328918,0.9766516,0.0029807203,0.01744001,0.002552916,0.000019064177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051105353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060070483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051105353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013365587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001333974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010161579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403165669","doi":"10.61091/ars-160-13","title":"Properties of Cubic Fuzzy Competition Graphs with Applications","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Competition (biology); Fuzzy logic; Cubic graph; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Graph; Line graph; Biology","score_opus":0.07967434188132747,"score_gpt":0.34778938230432416,"score_spread":0.2681150404229967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403165669","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22958818,0.0005027515,0.711937,0.00065945485,0.00007283933,0.0001248121,0.00049252127,0.00025611682,0.056366358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367557,0.00027292056,0.05592016,0.000112223526,0.00003997292,0.00009073131,0.00026249368,0.000044749024,0.006501117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992907,0.00017423432,0.000033827153,0.00013400326,0.00026328678,0.00010392493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976452,0.0011275179,0.00029244527,0.00018636453,0.0005533351,0.00019504238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007267943,0.00031920997,0.00042309897,0.0014546424,0.0012377901,0.0011183593,0.0007885642,0.000656655,0.0064236913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037547392,0.00021592698,0.0008333002,0.0015743101,0.0014725885,0.0015975062,0.00091740786,0.0008625634,0.00036963826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058401318,0.0000247125,0.0011809091,0.00009482625,0.00002340192,0.00023287677,0.00028954248,0.058906373,0.0027528065,0.90984786,0.0013470075,0.02524124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001698027,0.000043645658,0.0009985871,0.00001903678,0.000013140996,0.00035381367,0.00017433058,0.25922707,0.0008881693,0.7328021,0.0054340386,0.000029085146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007840718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044058817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007840718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013959436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083402114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021489382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403548830","doi":"10.3390/engproc2024076014","title":"Selection of Wind Turbine Blade Material Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Method","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Selection (genetic algorithm); Blade (archaeology); Turbine blade; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Turbine; Marine engineering; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Engineering; Structural engineering; Aerospace engineering; Artificial intelligence; Operations research","score_opus":0.1877033147315465,"score_gpt":0.478786042904539,"score_spread":0.2910827281729925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403548830","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07657404,0.0006617253,0.90681714,0.00028639508,0.000110312416,0.0014443425,0.00036841957,0.00027230763,0.013465322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2903436,0.000979941,0.70560575,0.00004444074,0.00001614364,0.0005907073,0.00023328027,0.000018369243,0.0021678365],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675024,0.00084022904,0.00029823655,0.00017138277,0.0018081676,0.00013177544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987192,0.0004947902,0.00019080575,0.00004920067,0.0005101831,0.000035857833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031375696,0.0014640515,0.0012481451,0.00395217,0.0011102521,0.0021059297,0.0011217453,0.0006224749,0.0036601473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035050586,0.0005284519,0.001984636,0.0027505804,0.000590119,0.0010197656,0.0007819385,0.0006551766,0.0005324703],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007623503,0.00047392948,0.0066172485,0.0061081178,0.0006780975,0.0017228262,0.0032361422,0.21181393,0.13555269,0.036229633,0.005243538,0.5915615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018041609,0.0014544845,0.008008408,0.00067242206,0.00058607425,0.0009915988,0.0034821648,0.8525376,0.080705196,0.034830455,0.016191654,0.000359667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002610767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057173376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00395217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011097942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025825312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016593277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403560116","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4993076","title":"Inference for Time-Varying Factor Models Under Local Stationarity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Factor (programming language); Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1772774269884217,"score_gpt":0.4441881159512706,"score_spread":0.2669106889628489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403560116","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03667381,0.00019355425,0.9621125,0.000268002,0.00003257776,0.000027242148,0.00014740456,0.00014036991,0.00040454592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86068434,0.00079094304,0.13236605,0.00024734065,0.00025265905,0.00019483767,0.0013516361,0.00020378504,0.003908427],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878252,0.0064786547,0.00060117233,0.0034998534,0.00081018364,0.0007848692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77478397,0.21111813,0.0053921603,0.0055967667,0.0022296566,0.0008792112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023489702,0.0016397334,0.0044536493,0.0024181183,0.0009497839,0.0038803625,0.00397071,0.0033988955,0.0050127306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13281712,0.0022349227,0.004330147,0.0030836714,0.003979496,0.0077339024,0.0027346667,0.004472336,0.0006733589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059322326,0.0001768559,0.0056159175,0.00029046644,0.0010645909,0.00031352087,0.00035780514,0.8338108,0.00082363957,0.1214272,0.0009701172,0.034555804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036526708,0.000062136634,0.00091588375,0.000025057652,0.00008033803,0.00004435939,0.000046045287,0.88736016,0.00033464577,0.110891715,0.00017288215,0.000030278443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00768159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005020054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023489702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019443801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019973693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12422687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403583470","doi":"10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112362","title":"Synthesizing complexity: Trends, challenges, and future directions in fuzzy-based multicriteria decision-making (FMCDM) methods","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Management science; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.17134531298456088,"score_gpt":0.4552920282500601,"score_spread":0.2839467152654992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403583470","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010487652,0.012980018,0.9689209,0.0037996115,0.00018010558,0.00009090231,0.00006418531,0.00011012279,0.0033665241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21067823,0.009862999,0.77666485,0.0005942159,0.0006689074,0.00026683035,0.00017123563,0.00011618593,0.0009765935],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98911196,0.0063219774,0.0006579844,0.0007924044,0.0028801174,0.00023566809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94595426,0.044910286,0.002241791,0.0020446642,0.0041422625,0.000706699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018698506,0.0014892614,0.0033138257,0.004254468,0.0011681964,0.0075212414,0.00276852,0.0019004433,0.0029155281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0461588,0.0006928569,0.0023919211,0.0050666234,0.0029406156,0.008200109,0.0040590926,0.003922999,0.00040389792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015287024,0.00021907804,0.0032387367,0.0026154278,0.0005452371,0.00007267145,0.001122564,0.14843065,0.0010416035,0.30914345,0.0027743161,0.53064346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029421422,0.00008881239,0.0004788429,0.0005543463,0.00007375399,0.000049231963,0.0004466664,0.44568416,0.00062447286,0.5451188,0.0067854878,0.00006590152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023089822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003771692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018698506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025144804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003150118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09888828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403640278","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-22-2024-193","title":"On Intuitionistic Fuzzy Soft Pretopology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University","keywords":"Mathematics; Soft set; Fuzzy logic; Pure mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.06798415846853204,"score_gpt":0.4588992609797342,"score_spread":0.3909151025112022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403640278","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16133134,0.001621861,0.68894565,0.0015580484,0.00024148275,0.00011618535,0.00027250845,0.00019012147,0.14572279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91553825,0.00077785604,0.07500928,0.00026118636,0.0001997209,0.000112942216,0.00017465095,0.00003646214,0.007889674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839824,0.0003266626,0.00010792889,0.00024284857,0.00074091693,0.00018334266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831533,0.0005980861,0.0002238235,0.00018575114,0.00050927204,0.00016773138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013150445,0.00049972837,0.0004826728,0.0019837788,0.0011029826,0.0026053118,0.0005779432,0.0006182253,0.0035809933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028505358,0.0002851844,0.00094394205,0.0012114212,0.0049425163,0.004348565,0.001820657,0.0018172711,0.00051073404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025028747,0.000020253807,0.0002968242,0.00006633384,0.0000131238785,0.00013348645,0.0003536164,0.0045793606,0.0011004766,0.9842376,0.00036203393,0.0088117365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012938029,0.000058967984,0.0005197333,0.0000562309,0.000011563459,0.00016012721,0.00021142497,0.01605152,0.0006917528,0.97612643,0.006079796,0.00001945439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013863326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009606851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035809933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018272662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010643313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013257861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403775493","doi":"10.1007/s10462-024-10911-2","title":"$$p,q,r-$$Fractional fuzzy sets and their aggregation operators and applications","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence Review","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Applied mathematics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.25773871148196315,"score_gpt":0.4798106051713636,"score_spread":0.22207189368940045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403775493","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02721952,0.008225578,0.9346585,0.0013774002,0.00028395082,0.00008723521,0.00026969076,0.00019845356,0.027679678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58323634,0.00746321,0.39975762,0.00031765772,0.00034158834,0.00020345085,0.00024541208,0.00005141944,0.008383341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859995,0.00041571516,0.00013923306,0.00030331642,0.00043164467,0.00011012393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989064,0.0005559461,0.00015909373,0.00008042964,0.00026296874,0.000035226254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024817868,0.0007556356,0.0007329957,0.0020680262,0.0008866341,0.0024711476,0.0008472892,0.0010928015,0.0025612484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043661282,0.00028111436,0.0014239047,0.0026247804,0.0015595425,0.002399494,0.0009199664,0.0016159482,0.00040471173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010949441,0.00006328498,0.0020318525,0.00032683535,0.00011512962,0.00044901436,0.00081276,0.09771867,0.0051898533,0.70508677,0.004857571,0.18323879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015398875,0.000082217965,0.0015465154,0.00019717225,0.000062619634,0.0004191183,0.00039729394,0.5115811,0.0023501003,0.4604656,0.022795778,0.00008707732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009091122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003936753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009091122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020055214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010401402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01807636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404136173","doi":"10.1007/s13762-024-06092-8","title":"Assessment of groundwater sustainability in arid and semi-arid regions using a fuzzy Delphi method","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Arid; Sustainability; Groundwater; Fuzzy logic; Environmental science; Water resource management; Delphi method; Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental resource management; Environmental engineering; Geology; Computer science; Geotechnical engineering; Ecology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06251746438387802,"score_gpt":0.45243435182503966,"score_spread":0.38991688744116165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404136173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7076777,0.00034557885,0.28086612,0.0003460247,0.000019792822,0.00048838434,0.00015781276,0.00003783737,0.010060746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413188,0.00015460984,0.057687003,0.000024142828,0.0000038950725,0.00017690808,0.000040149367,0.000003083499,0.0005913962],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730504,0.0018010313,0.00011778364,0.00010920499,0.00044851957,0.0002182935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978136,0.0017272299,0.000090901776,0.00003816474,0.0002546791,0.000075405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00442368,0.00051668606,0.0007005218,0.0017832419,0.0008918024,0.0011610239,0.0006602483,0.00065777934,0.0011949815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040558884,0.0003733535,0.0010567025,0.0010005664,0.00052901433,0.000743236,0.001191293,0.00037736798,0.000048507365],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090121984,0.00059385994,0.021557292,0.0009853265,0.0007064203,0.00077214837,0.0024652772,0.7823012,0.014523864,0.026514137,0.000875303,0.14780386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008928691,0.0006617763,0.008178785,0.00012740298,0.0002059189,0.00026393196,0.0032224546,0.9639563,0.0046473523,0.016825534,0.0017314275,0.00008973634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004437029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004437029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012483312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014063182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023394942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404782689","doi":"10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.626","title":"ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kootenay Association for Science & Technology","funders":"Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion; Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea; Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology","keywords":"Preference; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.5224362640997373,"score_gpt":0.47926384642419,"score_spread":0.0431724176755473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404782689","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026831595,0.00027823215,0.9551708,0.00028825036,0.000107221,0.0001863656,0.00039165205,0.008775313,0.007970543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38832158,0.0001469836,0.5999838,0.00073796086,0.00008891377,0.0004553151,0.0013122145,0.002057211,0.0068959743],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983058,0.00054168265,0.00009188195,0.00041115066,0.00044444797,0.00020504149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977691,0.001047317,0.0001301207,0.0005577483,0.00039020763,0.000105450345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002211317,0.0011515087,0.0010595224,0.00060032954,0.00051743863,0.0016534132,0.002295779,0.0009752728,0.0119539825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009720072,0.00045195964,0.0010741702,0.00078345294,0.0005431724,0.002367243,0.0021385215,0.0020044118,0.00330144],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068625424,0.00037937862,0.0031918779,0.00034815504,0.00015890006,0.00014657433,0.00016367492,0.2621579,0.0098649375,0.030123672,0.017489364,0.67528933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006602239,0.00011960926,0.00030303036,0.000018121373,0.000023839544,0.00004542541,0.00004347149,0.9751209,0.0034740996,0.016870733,0.0038958418,0.00001895622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039257687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072491243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0119539825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008172153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019134999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039990067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405384638","doi":"10.54550/eca2025v5s1r8","title":"Schur-positivity for generalized nets","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Enumerative Combinatorics and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Geology","score_opus":0.15420011682830603,"score_gpt":0.4667683906619219,"score_spread":0.31256827383361585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405384638","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10371366,0.000977981,0.8429257,0.0016306189,0.0001684187,0.00013245028,0.00042554605,0.00016777842,0.04985779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81108767,0.001733678,0.15908204,0.00075900933,0.0005637698,0.00046353787,0.00051854894,0.00013573421,0.025655977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970843,0.0014342349,0.0001331805,0.0003975353,0.00068031455,0.00027047627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837188,0.012247645,0.00091955106,0.0008042775,0.0015173395,0.00079239835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00551441,0.0015152299,0.0021201447,0.0031935072,0.0019033137,0.0044119474,0.001993328,0.0014859275,0.008013995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016306708,0.0010474983,0.002170459,0.0031324255,0.0062545375,0.0076926076,0.0030788775,0.0040586996,0.00068311294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026313848,0.000016688258,0.00013632378,0.000063034495,0.000015596092,0.000059684862,0.00010067764,0.007817979,0.00033987308,0.98581064,0.0005572445,0.0050559635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050498134,0.0000075825333,0.000048741404,0.00001214045,0.00000560759,0.000019898178,0.000015449068,0.021519572,0.00010064812,0.97784,0.0004178537,0.0000073805904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020395091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00267691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008013995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026844966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017181272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02916336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405463779","doi":"10.5206/mase/20391","title":"Study on multidimensional fuzzy graphs through modified partial ordering","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics in Applied Sciences and Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.19118388158935423,"score_gpt":0.40174332797085377,"score_spread":0.21055944638149954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405463779","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0568264,0.0010294834,0.9262923,0.00069182424,0.000070610455,0.000043916978,0.00012892514,0.000051154708,0.014865319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7294697,0.0022073844,0.2612065,0.00021079597,0.00016381961,0.000111091205,0.00021144286,0.000048013193,0.0063711563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999003,0.00036716068,0.000052268453,0.00020906405,0.00029540903,0.00007310268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984189,0.0007921784,0.00022067621,0.00016784466,0.00029157556,0.00010875336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012217718,0.00051602384,0.0005142547,0.0017259035,0.0008535156,0.0015477312,0.0006510746,0.0005592294,0.0025763249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033581278,0.00020381332,0.0009066542,0.002738257,0.0013109628,0.0035177777,0.0008276425,0.0009839502,0.00018803842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001581292,0.000012914058,0.00047840748,0.000070157395,0.000021816606,0.00015165751,0.0002556268,0.032940015,0.0013490946,0.9474752,0.00053072046,0.016698677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009601386,0.000046166188,0.00046557546,0.00003617731,0.00002505953,0.00018310802,0.00020973085,0.2178021,0.0009823885,0.77262306,0.0075910133,0.000026060523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023607565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019124936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025763249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014227635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007106321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010322928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405558017","doi":"10.23952/jnva.9.2025.1.06","title":"A Newton method for uncertain multiobjective optimization problems with finite uncertainty sets","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nonlinear and Variational Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Science and Engineering Research Board","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Multi-objective optimization; Robust optimization; Computer science; Mathematics; Newton's method; Nonlinear system; Physics","score_opus":0.09714205533300085,"score_gpt":0.43725433795700436,"score_spread":0.3401122826240035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405558017","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020738323,0.00019513548,0.9962603,0.00007977251,0.000021255786,0.000025332933,0.000010918463,0.000023412873,0.0013101107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25732076,0.0009554853,0.734631,0.00016425607,0.000093735085,0.00049297104,0.00012733415,0.00009093645,0.0061235153],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994923,0.000238177,0.000019248753,0.00006173321,0.00016268552,0.000025799447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999348,0.0004314151,0.0000713191,0.000021310483,0.000105272484,0.000022635275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001488826,0.00107981,0.0010101093,0.00065546203,0.0005189088,0.000736524,0.0009652546,0.0012354401,0.0014916735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020021973,0.0004996048,0.00095515116,0.0005782957,0.00085528474,0.0009911498,0.0010079008,0.0015314419,0.00030924068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028231014,0.000020336518,0.000247932,0.00016222666,0.000041937434,0.000087992245,0.000086529624,0.93441546,0.0022099677,0.039454114,0.0005444056,0.022700883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026434543,0.000013782312,0.000028089808,0.000008867853,0.000003280408,0.000009355785,0.0000047421495,0.99496573,0.00020769676,0.004090861,0.0006610921,0.0000038424523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042039403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003514817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042039403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088153104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001398171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008358955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405801416","doi":"10.1016/j.cor.2024.106961","title":"Minimum cost consensus model considering dual behavior preference","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Operations Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China; Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province; Department of Education of Hebei Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Preference; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.704949151322681,"score_gpt":0.569455537508496,"score_spread":0.135493613814185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405801416","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12298005,0.00026987877,0.86012506,0.0016047778,0.0001259016,0.00009251549,0.00017380253,0.0001109444,0.014517163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93850064,0.00017743694,0.047079224,0.000116248855,0.000060605937,0.0002110241,0.00015307695,0.00003850059,0.013663158],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848086,0.0006896314,0.000053796586,0.0002926029,0.0002660932,0.00021695888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967924,0.0019366648,0.00025439638,0.00016950736,0.00060085085,0.0002461289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020187832,0.00092247507,0.0024722703,0.0010257795,0.0007694554,0.0019881309,0.0025204145,0.0027110607,0.005887972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050774203,0.0006085241,0.0010594068,0.0013571235,0.0009920894,0.0023071,0.0013485786,0.0019355355,0.0005520365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002812394,0.00014531032,0.0005900787,0.00014566524,0.00011426604,0.00027022755,0.00012670747,0.8655282,0.0014859299,0.11482312,0.0014128374,0.015076381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025945716,0.00003098016,0.00009188911,0.000004861972,0.0000152543425,0.000018420511,0.00001736135,0.97416556,0.0001057625,0.025362326,0.00015161473,0.000010036724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040380238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022608095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005887972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015627539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013748916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019697249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405864188","doi":"10.1007/s12559-024-10368-z","title":"Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Yager Power Operators and Possibility Degree-Based Group Decision-Making Model","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Computation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"King Saud University","keywords":"Degree (music); Group (periodic table); Group decision-making; Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy logic; Power (physics); Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Combinatorics; Social psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.14342358326501864,"score_gpt":0.4407393233889107,"score_spread":0.29731574012389206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405864188","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044003405,0.0002158698,0.95075494,0.00027015578,0.000032928223,0.00007020642,0.000052981854,0.000047727957,0.004551835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90080726,0.00020356978,0.096958525,0.000045214932,0.000030730396,0.00016234751,0.00005094703,0.0000088076895,0.001732536],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973062,0.0012509462,0.00013833157,0.0003654488,0.00072613807,0.00021278356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979377,0.001194929,0.00029040905,0.000098718345,0.00033290067,0.00014545115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036388345,0.00093261333,0.001054896,0.0015153865,0.00075361674,0.0023600862,0.0018334569,0.0010866149,0.0025128783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005825433,0.000336724,0.0013071016,0.0015364491,0.0020814638,0.0031516638,0.001278925,0.0015851831,0.00017151365],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007426082,0.000061169456,0.001066796,0.0001137353,0.00011167181,0.00023806989,0.00034916104,0.6898463,0.0010410934,0.28959936,0.00047837527,0.017019996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011303661,0.0000337767,0.00014505797,0.0000126384875,0.000012760421,0.000027421584,0.000037337944,0.9321709,0.00016089424,0.0671066,0.0002686515,0.000012738097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031267772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019940624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036388345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002160111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013114917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019244194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405941339","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5069325","title":"Unbiased Criteria Identification for Two-Sided Matching: An Environment-Based Design Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Matching (statistics); Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.1950715806197599,"score_gpt":0.4366935395453535,"score_spread":0.2416219589255936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405941339","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002614867,0.000023994862,0.9965563,0.000033734617,0.0000073435303,0.00016440306,0.000011447401,0.000029803225,0.00055818947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20573433,0.00010834443,0.7906823,0.00013066702,0.000022019149,0.0020301556,0.00006549149,0.000054467364,0.001172185],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9427062,0.048069336,0.0011149995,0.0027425508,0.0044655437,0.00090135436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9546917,0.03762824,0.0015900467,0.002447769,0.003148455,0.00049369794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038098894,0.0019742842,0.0037218109,0.0026216628,0.00090212765,0.0024188233,0.0029478425,0.002989736,0.0053107487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06755291,0.0013111064,0.0021369003,0.0017980728,0.0022017069,0.0025346268,0.0036294798,0.0021466692,0.0006523417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018673615,0.0009416586,0.002248062,0.00070965645,0.00080432714,0.00022644753,0.0004921078,0.5488068,0.00449817,0.2947107,0.00094605074,0.14374861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029987918,0.0010632232,0.00047331944,0.000070474634,0.00012936372,0.000060404793,0.00005792172,0.8586327,0.0023623838,0.13578351,0.0010193621,0.000047431666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007673055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007346036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038098894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013989286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036616812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20148855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406042004","doi":"10.1017/psy.2024.13","title":"Mediation Analysis in Bayesian Extended Redundancy Analysis with Mixed Outcome Variables","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychometrika","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea; National Research Foundation of Korea; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Bayesian probability; Outcome (game theory); Mediation; Psychology; Statistics; Econometrics; Bayesian statistics; Psychometrics; Computer science; Clinical psychology; Mathematics; Bayesian inference; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.09010771718045163,"score_gpt":0.44349688096931894,"score_spread":0.3533891637888673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406042004","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047000617,0.0008315444,0.9496379,0.0005367662,0.000045928442,0.00024821176,0.0001120665,0.00016783351,0.0014191534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6371928,0.0004826745,0.36021397,0.00015258513,0.00009105993,0.00078198645,0.00014819045,0.000064052896,0.00087269215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9486757,0.04572651,0.00073862146,0.0016989443,0.0024899237,0.0006702814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93153834,0.059156276,0.0031073017,0.0025823489,0.0030913188,0.0005243204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044118688,0.0013012685,0.0022774693,0.0031529253,0.0013260879,0.0017567413,0.002750867,0.0011307967,0.0042609307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08719823,0.00080604025,0.0019642238,0.0027383221,0.0015851612,0.0025695332,0.003692325,0.0014729692,0.0003711395],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012088418,0.0006791825,0.022867009,0.0011342315,0.0023380746,0.0012162775,0.0023378609,0.2457504,0.0019480333,0.4350078,0.0032406452,0.2822716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013891837,0.0003403244,0.0038353594,0.00014128268,0.00034725966,0.00020603358,0.00021892141,0.75346464,0.0006823965,0.23863378,0.0019014764,0.00008966909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003512381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025734408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044118688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012423339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025889273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2333247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406183016","doi":"10.15626/mp.2021.2757","title":"The Devil is Mainly in the Nuisance Parameters: Performance of Structural Fit Indices Under Misspecified Structural Models in SEM","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meta-Psychology","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Structural equation modeling; Econometrics; Nuisance parameter; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5075904091821208,"score_gpt":0.5103925816882979,"score_spread":0.002802172506177092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406183016","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2797802,0.0032063068,0.7004101,0.0023166682,0.0006644072,0.0005316611,0.000761283,0.0014773401,0.010852012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86639446,0.0006515077,0.12970304,0.00049181434,0.00013367503,0.00055913336,0.0006618886,0.00044076322,0.00096368033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.86834747,0.089114115,0.01061768,0.015027175,0.016015837,0.00087779085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39256546,0.5434437,0.012693148,0.04046114,0.009818693,0.001017854],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14937305,0.0022446432,0.0036852448,0.005248744,0.0013974758,0.005211217,0.0032250246,0.0033562896,0.0020941633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.49594125,0.0013981103,0.0028476908,0.0047106207,0.007449504,0.007509721,0.0049092593,0.005543773,0.00079293305],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016850879,0.00047202414,0.37966663,0.001977812,0.006781644,0.0016209922,0.007012066,0.14045559,0.0036769498,0.17214999,0.0062893378,0.27821198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003718493,0.0026036634,0.14433445,0.0014900976,0.0014555114,0.0030020727,0.0023218119,0.45432872,0.01267621,0.36357793,0.013094315,0.0007433614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017278526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002406391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85062695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015875379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002442894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7899697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406297432","doi":"10.37256/cm.6120256152","title":"Supplier Selection Utilizing AHP and TOPSIS in a Fuzzy Environment Based on KPIs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Mathematics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; Alzahra University","keywords":"TOPSIS; Mathematics; Analytic hierarchy process; Selection (genetic algorithm); Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1592854200370295,"score_gpt":0.38954711469262077,"score_spread":0.23026169465559126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406297432","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02902853,0.0005551608,0.9610977,0.00041291097,0.00006553852,0.0012576625,0.00021175938,0.00028682893,0.0070839524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2184689,0.000792173,0.7783547,0.0000631436,0.0000330085,0.0008345502,0.00026875813,0.00003551868,0.0011492555],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895744,0.005569565,0.0008085698,0.00051339826,0.003176172,0.00035803686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939985,0.0037400315,0.00048705228,0.00017146864,0.0014621248,0.00014087955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011925833,0.0016680309,0.0016617404,0.009551393,0.002581447,0.005122176,0.0015529225,0.0007705894,0.002855654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011854221,0.0009325306,0.0021582185,0.008233271,0.0012470596,0.0021513186,0.0025541708,0.0015949163,0.0004102292],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043708272,0.00032428335,0.0061395923,0.003078743,0.00087048794,0.0011779623,0.0044424445,0.4925099,0.009183254,0.06811242,0.0036620297,0.4100618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010753005,0.0003149078,0.0021331182,0.00045932946,0.00022181078,0.00017327191,0.002814272,0.92893004,0.0028279163,0.05587987,0.0059856027,0.00015226801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013812618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018740417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013812618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037012694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069573424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063070595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406332648","doi":"10.56554/jtom.1471209","title":"Evaluation of Logistics Performances of G20 Countries Using SD-Based COPRAS and SAW Methods","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Turkish Operations Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.4218965397387919,"score_gpt":0.5830836088956087,"score_spread":0.16118706915681685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406332648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9566132,0.0005023693,0.023105482,0.00009862885,0.000055675846,0.00028588535,0.0072191274,0.00019971153,0.011920004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646207,0.00031796814,0.024053298,0.000021569003,0.00002836117,0.00033153585,0.008787658,0.000035187688,0.0018036288],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975001,0.0009185694,0.00028625916,0.00035828925,0.000707211,0.00022958683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943539,0.002166159,0.0015296725,0.00038406465,0.0014101213,0.00015606364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003758546,0.0011221274,0.0008159851,0.010775979,0.00032900117,0.0015864425,0.000544928,0.00046128256,0.0022412883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072754957,0.00020277302,0.0015986207,0.013247471,0.000521313,0.0009288122,0.0013114418,0.000568172,0.00053920824],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008940735,0.0004304692,0.73759675,0.0011309955,0.001487918,0.0009408232,0.0021192934,0.068334684,0.002557642,0.0055912915,0.005993148,0.17292304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049843748,0.0013927966,0.832665,0.00024066376,0.00037149794,0.00045208447,0.0107094515,0.12883012,0.0045910245,0.0034120232,0.017127309,0.00015808408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067388588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005408305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010775979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009487668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071165647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019877374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406568119","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-443-22282-5.00003-6","title":"Scoring methods","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.19310573492401478,"score_gpt":0.4761188835021572,"score_spread":0.2830131485781424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406568119","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017939588,0.001320676,0.82145303,0.00035583464,0.0005150116,0.00042481834,0.0010722959,0.003695907,0.16936839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0348061,0.0016889133,0.629054,0.00039252875,0.00024559977,0.0011046354,0.004227761,0.0016516647,0.32682884],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546295,0.0012900226,0.00025748045,0.00053881295,0.0022797487,0.00017093371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971872,0.0008996574,0.00009915286,0.0006757425,0.0010648465,0.00007333313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003326305,0.0016406423,0.001354461,0.0047058347,0.00135822,0.0034869947,0.0022773554,0.0013378494,0.10925394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009547113,0.00077823957,0.0010921869,0.00516492,0.0008381723,0.0024015927,0.0026769917,0.0014128657,0.05914376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024605892,0.00005243548,0.0003638489,0.00022271682,0.000026192087,0.0000307804,0.00007029576,0.0030591427,0.0014985112,0.047404435,0.050679725,0.8965673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004047906,0.00011640076,0.0030908152,0.0005519406,0.00007676874,0.00079801783,0.00031539184,0.120648526,0.011027898,0.26268408,0.60053116,0.000118453674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017740814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003305759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10925394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007687503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015684239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36549085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406568129","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-443-22282-5.00005-x","title":"Pairwise comparison techniques","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1320718141645285,"score_gpt":0.41596160353781436,"score_spread":0.28388978937328585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406568129","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006221093,0.0009948689,0.9631758,0.00012358012,0.00025940005,0.00016768518,0.00041627107,0.0012471041,0.03299328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010805779,0.0010487908,0.944772,0.00011941737,0.00013969214,0.00052857207,0.001291233,0.0007010407,0.040593427],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573886,0.0018899359,0.00025508928,0.0006384806,0.0013447447,0.00013288566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951624,0.0028627345,0.00012587375,0.00087695924,0.0009025174,0.000069467686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039045971,0.0018907684,0.0019095298,0.003673989,0.0012760377,0.0020731615,0.0022501124,0.0012527836,0.08304684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013710688,0.00095006125,0.0021672854,0.006341106,0.0008203263,0.0028970977,0.0023480565,0.0023839534,0.029363388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004766975,0.00007118104,0.00012683864,0.0004888426,0.00008140449,0.000051857067,0.00011429796,0.005373129,0.0018205679,0.04938853,0.030631991,0.9118037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066400695,0.00024603208,0.0014241561,0.000616209,0.00022081312,0.0011253632,0.00033578635,0.12518556,0.0105443755,0.39937907,0.46075034,0.00010586684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009845739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002009334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08304684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054642773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00136611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27781934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406568154","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-443-22282-5.00007-3","title":"Multicriteria decision-making under uncertainty","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Management science; Economics","score_opus":0.0807987682616358,"score_gpt":0.39692829437958377,"score_spread":0.316129526117948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406568154","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007271041,0.015690472,0.77042234,0.0017993281,0.0006909782,0.00008861706,0.00015454263,0.00021761772,0.20366506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3240107,0.022128576,0.5101432,0.000755573,0.0013916352,0.00046994817,0.0003938084,0.00023428725,0.1404723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990446,0.0004319102,0.000051438514,0.00009430219,0.00033675527,0.00004097486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860966,0.0011190377,0.0000662145,0.000077545155,0.00010101572,0.000026469754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015336097,0.001095795,0.001140469,0.0007707469,0.0003142899,0.0024472426,0.00082881964,0.0009662468,0.01343125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031782386,0.000448384,0.00069069356,0.0016606838,0.0008313658,0.001511081,0.001352418,0.0015332053,0.0020822682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006736773,0.00008238589,0.00021915395,0.0008244694,0.00015839709,0.00019556585,0.00024081038,0.13671497,0.0019563935,0.44241813,0.022437485,0.39468488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000215231,0.00007322548,0.00033780953,0.0005395708,0.000040481627,0.00028677794,0.00012724723,0.17589754,0.0009184826,0.7454594,0.07626541,0.00003268425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065686094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010739885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01343125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082351366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059876323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044932008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406568206","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-443-22282-5.00010-3","title":"Artificial intelligence algorithms and multicriteria decision-making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Algorithm","score_opus":0.10977968999328912,"score_gpt":0.4055165959507725,"score_spread":0.29573690595748336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406568206","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033511587,0.056870125,0.51893175,0.003821643,0.00189035,0.00008184927,0.00021333186,0.00052324735,0.41431656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12527278,0.060092077,0.43477312,0.0013543618,0.0021406107,0.00033959618,0.0006676897,0.0003904546,0.37496936],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994618,0.00021304164,0.000026318585,0.000057663303,0.00021966035,0.000021490807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987153,0.0010479274,0.000034438555,0.0000813098,0.00010297222,0.00001805836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000816314,0.0010320782,0.0008154604,0.00083388004,0.0003069633,0.0024597535,0.0007740946,0.0010742034,0.024296654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026577283,0.0003817094,0.00042289292,0.0020702917,0.00097353774,0.0020705657,0.0008866134,0.0018475323,0.0057142805],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031058174,0.00006641414,0.00015108215,0.0007272489,0.00005418316,0.00009915516,0.00017467843,0.033707198,0.0006722659,0.39337432,0.053631466,0.5173109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014325745,0.000030697793,0.0002504498,0.00050362624,0.000022521788,0.00018689346,0.00009516797,0.06253268,0.0006073259,0.70874625,0.22699037,0.000019750945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008274813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012479519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024296654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072465895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005835034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08128035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406568207","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-443-22282-5.00002-4","title":"Introduction to multicriteria decision-making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Management science; Engineering","score_opus":0.05516151838708886,"score_gpt":0.38327333663016055,"score_spread":0.3281118182430717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406568207","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014636657,0.030796861,0.63667184,0.0031236378,0.002124512,0.00011787484,0.00050871185,0.0005037581,0.32468912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05957125,0.04035532,0.6227194,0.0017805547,0.0022106853,0.0005170543,0.00076258386,0.00045772427,0.27162552],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992951,0.00022224094,0.000054089855,0.00009284441,0.0003028926,0.000032794454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864227,0.001027512,0.000039792318,0.00008161389,0.0001807009,0.000028126733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011985536,0.0012264088,0.0010367117,0.0011268379,0.00039214172,0.0019874424,0.00090567773,0.000914067,0.039216947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025877997,0.00054886285,0.00083366036,0.002155019,0.00080579065,0.0016158298,0.001113654,0.0020782214,0.008101758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027153812,0.00006305935,0.0001310195,0.0009082655,0.00006001622,0.0001382405,0.00020978528,0.023153273,0.00090395776,0.39576748,0.08513416,0.49350357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000097295015,0.000039144135,0.00024291694,0.0006401731,0.00002089653,0.00026216285,0.00007677232,0.023133082,0.0005539988,0.56135815,0.41363323,0.000029708941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009471682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017689269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039216947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010233519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010271834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1311937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406568213","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-443-22282-5.00001-2","title":"Overview of decision-making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.14206440651526908,"score_gpt":0.4262239365937579,"score_spread":0.2841595300784888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406568213","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00092975027,0.13206145,0.17837662,0.004953384,0.0016343944,0.00017952496,0.0005914662,0.0005975796,0.6806758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037581075,0.21211146,0.21895696,0.0027195064,0.0019034181,0.0006148506,0.0015467184,0.00038942054,0.52417666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999064,0.0002583291,0.00005929574,0.0001118429,0.00044948634,0.000057076497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941206,0.00038028456,0.000021506057,0.00004596144,0.000109629385,0.00003056347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001066856,0.0016457348,0.001154153,0.0021601603,0.00070615555,0.004237135,0.001390254,0.0018296351,0.043863162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015343123,0.0006602175,0.00082530355,0.003897241,0.0012969658,0.003513209,0.0013945849,0.002019014,0.018610494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019491277,0.00007259956,0.00007910094,0.0012360626,0.000023462519,0.00007673222,0.00021905972,0.0067358036,0.00053190585,0.5003797,0.08612184,0.40450433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049996506,0.00002090833,0.00013086811,0.0006224398,0.000007612202,0.000102850805,0.00008975651,0.0030532642,0.00020186165,0.32661664,0.66913295,0.000015812895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002209076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003154035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043863162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022172926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024985773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14673686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406568265","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-443-22282-5.00004-8","title":"Compromising methods","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.18514368460838065,"score_gpt":0.47345840494913155,"score_spread":0.2883147203407509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406568265","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003087802,0.0017524172,0.6608391,0.0009162499,0.0005943134,0.00024871633,0.00028925214,0.000716331,0.33155578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10903059,0.00251466,0.5005642,0.001149962,0.00042638084,0.0007250666,0.0010844513,0.001035701,0.38346896],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583924,0.0014095716,0.00019420475,0.0006400423,0.0017262843,0.00019058857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965192,0.0017491054,0.00012942079,0.0010162176,0.00049209734,0.000093999246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030898578,0.0014183342,0.00094735046,0.0018253748,0.00136185,0.0031117557,0.0017529266,0.0020325438,0.09132605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012219765,0.00060252065,0.00096122245,0.0016052283,0.001257301,0.0029253103,0.00454908,0.0023558785,0.020032603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008427923,0.000076359116,0.0003915047,0.00028405534,0.000040566705,0.00008186608,0.00021540471,0.0083630355,0.0024577116,0.44412762,0.03136937,0.5125082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029836747,0.0001369913,0.0005348649,0.00032531054,0.000042843556,0.00073531514,0.00019146549,0.06396599,0.004920569,0.56552863,0.3635475,0.000040680614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004553582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006745154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09132605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008278579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095768936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30551612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406612933","doi":"10.1109/smc54092.2024.10831146","title":"Building Consensus in Group Decision-Making with Intuitionistic Reciprocal Preference Relations: An Analysis of Various Protocols of Information Granularity Distribution","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocal; Granularity; Computer science; Preference; Group decision-making; Group (periodic table); Preference relation; Distribution (mathematics); Data mining; Information retrieval; Statistics; Mathematics; Programming language; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09730102928278524,"score_gpt":0.4286681920084713,"score_spread":0.33136716272568606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406612933","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058124874,0.00028341217,0.9370468,0.00031689723,0.00003108771,0.00019669316,0.000037385136,0.00008612003,0.003876607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8116558,0.00047274856,0.18597864,0.00008213391,0.000030064819,0.0004907512,0.000060546674,0.000035135123,0.0011941846],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99045753,0.005956191,0.00042381336,0.00087654934,0.0016420974,0.00064376363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95179325,0.038926642,0.00328892,0.0026478742,0.0024869647,0.0008562895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01746085,0.0012238066,0.001314324,0.0014105211,0.0013073351,0.002347527,0.0021252797,0.0019345861,0.002119132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046295077,0.000494242,0.0015304295,0.0018022716,0.003077881,0.005075128,0.0026751745,0.0025246956,0.00028078488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033951172,0.00015109088,0.0011374486,0.00034862716,0.00016425161,0.00022308732,0.00091754284,0.6555499,0.0034350858,0.3038221,0.00064134726,0.033270046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051317093,0.00013023696,0.00021621503,0.000033970744,0.00004042082,0.00004471464,0.00017055153,0.8945365,0.0019754006,0.102171876,0.0005923538,0.000036370773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001974805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009242438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01746085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027491394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025365527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09234291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406927510","doi":"10.1007/s10479-024-06327-4","title":"A generalized approach for multi-criteria decision aid methods","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Operations Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Qatar National Library; Qatar University","keywords":"Theory of computation; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.8288587454749092,"score_gpt":0.7196189920463937,"score_spread":0.10923975342851555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406927510","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004052552,0.0001031735,0.9982141,0.00006346075,0.000020366155,0.000044335833,0.000014814192,0.000048878235,0.0010855797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058023073,0.0002940823,0.938891,0.0001237798,0.000073060524,0.0004978847,0.00005755043,0.000068564535,0.0019710385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99216604,0.005438627,0.00028922854,0.00037867136,0.0015627109,0.00016487871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608624,0.0022373102,0.0001873007,0.00040277827,0.0009903121,0.0000961309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074202344,0.0017094698,0.0015556033,0.0024387052,0.0008286163,0.0024426756,0.0022297385,0.0011702769,0.0061068567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009512247,0.00062418374,0.0019147587,0.0024600646,0.0012800625,0.0016102117,0.002937751,0.0024337913,0.001137352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050279785,0.00008585421,0.00036492143,0.00048246613,0.00021854295,0.00015491074,0.00024486575,0.36947668,0.0016329156,0.47642648,0.0026341695,0.14822793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021768863,0.000056283017,0.000085636406,0.00008812498,0.000032008444,0.000039895713,0.000034923094,0.75715494,0.00057921564,0.23132266,0.010562581,0.000021885726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020901165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025903042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074202344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012023515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024392665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039242387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407104516","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-28","title":"Neutrosophic Run Test for Randomness in Imprecise Data with Application","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Taif University","keywords":"Randomness; Mathematics; Test (biology); Statistics; Data mining; Computer science","score_opus":0.07594357380009294,"score_gpt":0.46192357801912665,"score_spread":0.3859800042190337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407104516","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092402086,0.0006369805,0.89886385,0.0006328878,0.00013564076,0.00036491154,0.0004589478,0.0002224155,0.0062822984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78531337,0.00028458372,0.21218778,0.00024252456,0.00010563605,0.0006666771,0.00042566253,0.000036053145,0.0007378025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97595835,0.011657003,0.0015796415,0.0025593,0.007464286,0.000781554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9299478,0.058009278,0.003596586,0.0031424146,0.00461254,0.00069140835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018084092,0.00067942904,0.0015445153,0.0029862414,0.0009651714,0.0029430883,0.0017036727,0.0014713184,0.002790258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0658758,0.00023211956,0.0016286116,0.0027653556,0.0031779576,0.002403126,0.0020814647,0.0022569634,0.0002388797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020687277,0.00045601118,0.047288314,0.0020133727,0.0015273463,0.002318218,0.0018974645,0.17937583,0.012401723,0.4932762,0.0038859807,0.25349087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001756093,0.0016355488,0.020362107,0.00037283145,0.00024679134,0.0012564524,0.00096464896,0.63922495,0.010431387,0.31737837,0.00766756,0.00028372667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081799127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054474233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018084092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013278952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002359341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09563899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407236111","doi":"10.3390/jtaer20010023","title":"A Decision Framework for Supplier Selection in Digital Supply Chains of E-Commerce Platforms Using Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy VIKOR Methodology","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Fuzzy logic; Interval (graph theory); VIKOR method; Supplier evaluation; Operations research; E-commerce; Supply chain management; Business; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Marketing","score_opus":0.18481446386015357,"score_gpt":0.5080819719219684,"score_spread":0.3232675080618148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407236111","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00861847,0.00031719674,0.986839,0.00016113519,0.000023429955,0.00019439172,0.000045396984,0.000037981965,0.003762988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36770064,0.00090859126,0.6282505,0.00009063446,0.000060775496,0.00088139344,0.00017543927,0.000025512989,0.0019065326],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952968,0.002772112,0.00025201554,0.00051684084,0.00086446403,0.00029778035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743795,0.00171744,0.00026213605,0.00005383011,0.00041694843,0.00011156081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00767326,0.0016226681,0.0017380989,0.0038826154,0.0011926129,0.0038793895,0.0027609356,0.0019123007,0.0033108143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055707917,0.0008250567,0.0025902365,0.002849487,0.0015977822,0.0027345354,0.0015227833,0.0018149371,0.0003844762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010153856,0.00020470121,0.0012094078,0.0006337412,0.00018526099,0.00050104357,0.0008319276,0.72963285,0.0021592528,0.21739219,0.0009160656,0.046231978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030948628,0.00012562244,0.00020259504,0.000093629635,0.000049588754,0.000062209685,0.00019767105,0.9605244,0.00039516288,0.03689056,0.0013966844,0.000031003186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005169663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004140701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00767326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037086974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038653845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04058057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407505237","doi":"10.1037/met0000718","title":"Fit indices are insensitive to multiple minor violations of perfect simple structure in confirmatory factor analysis.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Methods","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Confirmatory factor analysis; Minor (academic); Statistics; Simple (philosophy); Statistical analysis; Factor (programming language); Psychology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Structural equation modeling; Computer science; Humanities","score_opus":0.3580454211727005,"score_gpt":0.6116049977086426,"score_spread":0.25355957653594213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407505237","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041317474,0.0019718143,0.8942832,0.003299602,0.0013013993,0.002500304,0.0028224955,0.003548738,0.04895498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4029063,0.0011665344,0.58054197,0.0025093236,0.00039201378,0.0059769605,0.0028017727,0.00134082,0.0023642324],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.691937,0.19123061,0.02145258,0.024664963,0.068712145,0.002002625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.29934058,0.5077388,0.049188446,0.10724636,0.03414997,0.0023358166],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.25428706,0.0042247917,0.004283784,0.010543811,0.0038210372,0.0089519,0.0057941917,0.0050139343,0.011355802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7229806,0.004565492,0.004422227,0.016855111,0.010759619,0.015062029,0.008406305,0.011416644,0.00826574],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00112994,0.0005897333,0.16270171,0.0050659864,0.006655146,0.0012346655,0.005916362,0.025186837,0.0035198217,0.24353515,0.056029886,0.48843476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052204827,0.001992758,0.1100715,0.0036311934,0.0015420801,0.00282081,0.0036053914,0.19712116,0.008524164,0.6084038,0.060539663,0.0012254904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002426495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048240987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74571294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004239493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00920603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9195968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407552098","doi":"10.3934/jimo.2025030","title":"Site selection of medical waste disposal plants: A social network group decision-making framework with incomplete Pythagorean fuzzy preference relations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Pythagorean theorem; Group decision-making; Preference; Selection (genetic algorithm); Operations research; Site selection; Computer science; Group (periodic table); Fuzzy logic; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Engineering; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Chemistry; Political science","score_opus":0.08513686768604142,"score_gpt":0.3625822918919075,"score_spread":0.27744542420586604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407552098","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055981785,0.00035637675,0.9397417,0.0005355578,0.000042155323,0.00015075083,0.000103056285,0.00004348925,0.0030451096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81535417,0.00048397007,0.18151818,0.00010951506,0.000059508813,0.00036642238,0.0001616288,0.000016138783,0.001930541],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965412,0.0018019755,0.00016812934,0.00061018066,0.00056899554,0.0003094664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997079,0.0017531476,0.00042315412,0.000090190304,0.00045386035,0.00020072743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048370683,0.0012883365,0.0014445969,0.0016516297,0.0012127322,0.002252517,0.0019603297,0.0019049747,0.002022957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005897305,0.0006364905,0.0017086536,0.0017677029,0.0011113638,0.0025335709,0.0016698932,0.0014242539,0.00015790173],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008989382,0.000053720152,0.0015987214,0.00013956382,0.00011276771,0.00028960354,0.00028040016,0.948337,0.00072324293,0.030147556,0.00042718055,0.017800353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011023631,0.000029717234,0.00018064225,0.000010088771,0.000022503094,0.000019006608,0.0000690189,0.9880019,0.0001536979,0.011216697,0.00027252638,0.000013252551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010002505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007839156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010002505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002956733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024327834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025581181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407573142","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2024-0502","title":"Enhancing efficiency in railway freight logistics using a two-stage decision support technique with Q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Stage (stratigraphy); Computer science; Transport engineering; Operations research; Decision support system; Operations management; Business; Engineering; Data mining; Geology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04283933670499765,"score_gpt":0.33356451165909395,"score_spread":0.29072517495409633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407573142","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023947492,0.00008693601,0.9742159,0.000092359776,0.000019183683,0.00014935574,0.000024552432,0.0001777994,0.0012863966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62098557,0.00016714417,0.3773628,0.00009474425,0.000021439675,0.00035300295,0.00006620456,0.000025130792,0.0009240403],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977077,0.0009092278,0.0001845303,0.0003941737,0.00062842434,0.00017579718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671704,0.002159853,0.00033970413,0.00008406671,0.00061705156,0.000082344224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006141971,0.0012330977,0.00152756,0.0014974417,0.0008257858,0.002113703,0.0019014394,0.0014332469,0.0017814925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007004336,0.0008368639,0.002174007,0.0010513263,0.00073455006,0.001554763,0.0013748967,0.0015339113,0.00025655425],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027903056,0.00020738856,0.0017775303,0.00029724976,0.00013026179,0.0002237225,0.00045319519,0.86493254,0.00637531,0.012637942,0.00052559504,0.11216028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012680309,0.00008147336,0.00010624913,0.000010085183,0.000016439473,0.000010655237,0.000017861512,0.99715364,0.000991811,0.001413082,0.00017639561,0.000009548997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009238043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056617414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009238043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016819478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022124788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032482266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407657181","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-25","title":"New Type of Fuzzy Algebra Structure Setting Complex Bipolar Neutrosophic Sets of Bisemirings","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Phayao","keywords":"Mathematics; Type (biology); Algebra over a field; Fuzzy logic; Pure mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Geology","score_opus":0.07276268612374602,"score_gpt":0.4420036799889449,"score_spread":0.3692409938651989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407657181","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35877272,0.001954466,0.53740114,0.00093368534,0.00031174385,0.00017565634,0.00061359315,0.00027332618,0.099563695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9150754,0.000494089,0.074406095,0.0002028043,0.0001716239,0.00011140474,0.0003226082,0.00003625468,0.009179733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919814,0.00015287823,0.00006263122,0.00017477134,0.00031540942,0.000096170035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943024,0.00009796825,0.000094469855,0.0000693514,0.00019993834,0.000108051274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006590456,0.00037887925,0.00036573346,0.0017280846,0.0010555313,0.0026837,0.00048421376,0.0005650491,0.0034047961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012838898,0.00024359908,0.0005321357,0.0013001473,0.0014591125,0.0030876305,0.0010986002,0.00094461406,0.00038901396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000342821,0.000015423297,0.00044673332,0.00004067336,0.000012773833,0.00014395418,0.00031223393,0.0011339159,0.003928926,0.98436177,0.00061815954,0.008951089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030020388,0.000087617416,0.0017354613,0.000051658797,0.000035481244,0.00073235267,0.0006445493,0.038710658,0.004520258,0.92840797,0.02499448,0.00004946571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001053043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008132294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034047961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012117669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048046757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01139015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407755337","doi":"10.7717/peerj-cs.2555","title":"The technique of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) based on the triangular q-rung fuzzy numbers (TR-q-ROFNS) with applications in best African coffee brand selection","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PeerJ Computer Science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"King Saud University","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Fuzzy logic; Hierarchy; Fuzzy number; Mathematics; Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Operations research; Fuzzy set; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04486780936093245,"score_gpt":0.377613295597296,"score_spread":0.3327454862363636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407755337","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042502186,0.0009895418,0.9892352,0.00034907437,0.00010147474,0.00013424079,0.00004428886,0.00010395587,0.0047919927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17273314,0.0018115337,0.8234779,0.00011458037,0.000091704605,0.000264375,0.0000781234,0.00002784032,0.0014007761],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966599,0.0014676384,0.00021299516,0.00034932132,0.0011967471,0.00011342118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978523,0.001217193,0.00023236584,0.00011045058,0.00054559833,0.000042110198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003926328,0.00070080825,0.0008761123,0.0024968714,0.0012509944,0.001485208,0.00092744647,0.0010198215,0.0018461681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071597784,0.00028932633,0.0013236066,0.0032478108,0.0013724864,0.001689675,0.001100722,0.001552297,0.00030886763],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013632163,0.0001098506,0.002430568,0.0012510953,0.00021548191,0.0006102157,0.001369025,0.2307843,0.008648317,0.24753821,0.0047955774,0.50211096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047279224,0.00026961137,0.0015784478,0.00027584762,0.00008851355,0.00039925473,0.00044022728,0.8018513,0.0052454174,0.16492738,0.024749372,0.00012732016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006596184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004835753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006596184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014737507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024547018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020764649},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4407879206","doi":"10.3390/jrfm18030116","title":"Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution in Performance Evaluation in the Albanian Banking Sector","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal solution; Ideal (ethics); Analytic hierarchy process; Preference; Order (exchange); Similarity (geometry); Fuzzy logic; Process (computing); Hierarchy; TOPSIS; Computer science; Mathematics; Business; Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Economics; Statistics; Epistemology; Finance; Image (mathematics)","score_opus":0.11985625949086685,"score_gpt":0.406282919227958,"score_spread":0.28642665973709114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407879206","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059016638,0.001669696,0.9182594,0.00093106803,0.00016730248,0.00092629954,0.00014370121,0.00016369521,0.018722262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41957355,0.0010827928,0.5773062,0.000082334394,0.000049401748,0.0007006955,0.000103787635,0.000014911272,0.0010863597],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98879725,0.0068098,0.0006288339,0.00042093,0.0030303032,0.00031280564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965804,0.0020363834,0.0003732202,0.00013610392,0.0007880182,0.00008577911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009055465,0.00069979485,0.000977498,0.003776662,0.0015086441,0.003265077,0.00077930815,0.0007207765,0.0021085197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012291757,0.0002844919,0.0011730526,0.005051244,0.001272293,0.0022002878,0.0014936144,0.0011478142,0.0002054562],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040455128,0.00047223415,0.0067419363,0.003160589,0.00061695173,0.000768592,0.0072541633,0.15507342,0.01038832,0.3010892,0.005650548,0.5083794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020914193,0.0010658972,0.0059323115,0.00093612634,0.00028325466,0.0003410476,0.0045336327,0.76158494,0.0059273043,0.20260218,0.016363015,0.0002211249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005597073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008546039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009055465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025501347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042170417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047890425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407914181","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-84353-2_14","title":"Smooth Quadrature-Inspired Generalized Choquet Integral in an Application to Drone Engine Failures Detection","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Quadrature (astronomy); Computer science; Choquet integral; Drone; Applied mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.04687277275633937,"score_gpt":0.3622807494948453,"score_spread":0.3154079767385059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407914181","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017139832,0.0011509783,0.97837836,0.000094013645,0.00015634319,0.000012568754,0.00001266349,0.00013335503,0.0029217906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6274192,0.0013797982,0.3643458,0.00012408629,0.00017258724,0.000028372706,0.000044487617,0.00007880998,0.006406953],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987733,0.00003317165,0.0000054096113,0.000023027042,0.000050369268,0.000010695504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983263,0.000081368475,0.000009755834,0.000010167631,0.00005639612,0.000009710575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000464435,0.00035463748,0.0006732739,0.0003944859,0.00019189219,0.00064991246,0.0005349192,0.0007502528,0.0008199891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082872953,0.00016871982,0.0005623568,0.0005803082,0.00036550497,0.00037052963,0.0005762741,0.0006704406,0.00016976263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032942597,0.00016800722,0.0010230968,0.0004796434,0.00013257856,0.00040381364,0.00022993908,0.4519164,0.089867204,0.13030516,0.0030319458,0.3221128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037933717,0.000034541634,0.00013659161,0.0000060532875,0.000011596786,0.000053013788,0.0000066479824,0.9918933,0.0014047952,0.005496179,0.0009460455,0.000007407609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075953954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008092418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0008199891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022518155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023145878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002743125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408170600","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-63","title":"A Study on Multi-Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Their Application in Ordered Semigroups","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Algebra over a field; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.07984929259899431,"score_gpt":0.45218326041304835,"score_spread":0.37233396781405403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408170600","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070472784,0.017783253,0.84675896,0.0017319117,0.0008296259,0.000075078,0.000088218934,0.000076039316,0.06218423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77685964,0.010129154,0.20412211,0.000381209,0.0011701207,0.00009867099,0.00008083702,0.000031185067,0.007127096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860173,0.00048894325,0.00008472822,0.00025434655,0.00048291354,0.00008726402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980324,0.0011706203,0.00019013703,0.00012997542,0.0003451927,0.00013179603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021385907,0.00063940865,0.00058833894,0.0013384452,0.0011712372,0.0017859822,0.0008062038,0.0008479018,0.0022288098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036604204,0.0002841203,0.0013319985,0.0014907697,0.0023892259,0.003930838,0.0011665846,0.0019641062,0.00026300954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023184397,0.000046421294,0.00044802393,0.00033122106,0.00002898904,0.00042968374,0.0009678203,0.0065528387,0.0022386825,0.97164917,0.00055450154,0.016729318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017207289,0.0001595404,0.0008069869,0.00026974396,0.000050992076,0.0007370283,0.0006293088,0.07623845,0.0020559411,0.8962697,0.022713967,0.000051250365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067645696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004914372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022288098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095767435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005920296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011310041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408256235","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2024.12.008","title":"Integrating the AHP and TOPSIS methods to select accounting staff","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; TOPSIS; Operations management; Business; Computer science; Operations research; Accounting; Management science; Engineering","score_opus":0.09456424304860293,"score_gpt":0.5069718169860667,"score_spread":0.4124075739374638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408256235","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052431952,0.0013655544,0.9191586,0.0007531052,0.00019670352,0.004694065,0.000604852,0.0005085521,0.020286588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16224195,0.0011112099,0.8325036,0.00009529455,0.000038208316,0.0017004228,0.0005018238,0.000039009425,0.0017684017],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875245,0.0068042423,0.0011536507,0.00040805934,0.0037240621,0.00038550142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945992,0.002853799,0.0003609288,0.00017083003,0.0018547873,0.00016043741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011130816,0.0013305494,0.0013697214,0.011812675,0.0019456844,0.0034379715,0.001061713,0.00054676534,0.004862228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013960699,0.000535343,0.0012635918,0.009817875,0.00056669686,0.0013261933,0.00198986,0.0008668206,0.00066055515],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029164783,0.0004791211,0.008620764,0.003466283,0.0005904193,0.0005754226,0.0038953742,0.04009912,0.0052425014,0.02696807,0.00477576,0.9049955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007574898,0.0022237475,0.028272709,0.0046172095,0.0013797132,0.0009814021,0.028281556,0.6799236,0.015129656,0.14237066,0.09553973,0.00052253663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068854825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013457718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011812675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019162656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006831674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058866024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408288129","doi":"10.1287/deca.2024.0207","title":"A Bayesian Analysis Framework for Decision Making with Interval Pairwise Comparison Judgments","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Bayesian probability; Decision analysis; Decision theory; Interval (graph theory); Bayesian statistics; Computer science; Credible interval; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Bayesian inference; Statistics; Machine learning; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.09914625328407649,"score_gpt":0.4823816967058079,"score_spread":0.3832354434217314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408288129","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055318495,0.00020367399,0.99720985,0.00021999885,0.000021404465,0.000049943264,0.000060948958,0.000035708945,0.0016453097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.082369745,0.0010366752,0.91336817,0.00023954615,0.00021850796,0.00071152946,0.0002989756,0.00007010165,0.0016867251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844744,0.00990255,0.00062134914,0.0015431081,0.0030557648,0.00040289754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830678,0.0128974905,0.0010055789,0.0006379121,0.0020548122,0.00033633513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020861285,0.001962374,0.0019865609,0.0035139872,0.0013418205,0.0043155053,0.0036562455,0.001777223,0.008204158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035404492,0.0011180962,0.00232818,0.0039546993,0.002761072,0.005898378,0.00226607,0.004724953,0.0016136696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004213202,0.000069704845,0.00042070044,0.00028716653,0.00012198188,0.00011207102,0.0003399598,0.0947358,0.0005521556,0.8444832,0.0026558815,0.05617928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023350394,0.000039628303,0.00025428052,0.000094062794,0.000039419974,0.000058978185,0.000044711727,0.31193808,0.00022186733,0.6826991,0.0045370557,0.000049440376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063870894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066926866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020861285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003774246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047246274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11032635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408312899","doi":"10.1007/s44196-025-00784-w","title":"Book Review: Multicriteria Decision-Making Under Conditions Of Uncertainty: A Fuzzy Set Perspective. John Wiley &amp; Sons. ISBN: 978–1-119–53,492-1.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Set (abstract data type); Artificial intelligence; Management science; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.09203633979064135,"score_gpt":0.4772753400079664,"score_spread":0.38523900021732504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408312899","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006067929,0.8756426,0.015851505,0.0103024235,0.013211433,0.00009324863,0.00048325968,0.0002636026,0.083545126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008184071,0.78482914,0.016441535,0.004412569,0.007850296,0.00016391001,0.0008641056,0.00025743613,0.17699693],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902856,0.00013326878,0.00007043214,0.00012292032,0.00060668465,0.000038217004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839824,0.00091101363,0.00010338422,0.000051928662,0.0004530616,0.000082318875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007947732,0.0012351471,0.0019348474,0.0027072642,0.0005001127,0.0029222283,0.0011186166,0.0016955999,0.029077603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002874032,0.00066254113,0.000914067,0.0048921397,0.0009785034,0.0030200174,0.0007303864,0.003155162,0.018333541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030031799,0.000047318663,0.00009197621,0.0026080327,0.000051991497,0.00012900138,0.000116435935,0.0017827003,0.00049875793,0.022201948,0.69628346,0.27615836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072520743,0.00004147056,0.00031171544,0.0016996549,0.000017922355,0.000623222,0.00005175985,0.000724663,0.00017400015,0.012194887,0.984133,0.000020458372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015456399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002554386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029077603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00133412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014778178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097274244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408398527","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2025.111032","title":"Consensus reaching model with self-confidence-based dynamic weights and personalized adjustment constraints for multi-attribute group decision making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Group decision-making; Group (periodic table); Computer science; Data mining; Self-confidence; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1162322378801627,"score_gpt":0.36258651479667797,"score_spread":0.2463542769165153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408398527","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015546412,0.00017565736,0.98130506,0.00021902107,0.00003792269,0.00007018904,0.000038243605,0.00014251306,0.002464961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8651762,0.00033997366,0.12669688,0.00017083484,0.000060397753,0.00060323236,0.0001725518,0.000091848575,0.006687999],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629325,0.0012031428,0.00021350566,0.0010303601,0.000819058,0.00044060688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99371946,0.0041517285,0.00050312275,0.00027493678,0.001073268,0.00027751573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054687923,0.0018680984,0.0034358434,0.00166291,0.00133553,0.0027713769,0.005156523,0.0034035407,0.0044393125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012222504,0.001130962,0.0017091223,0.002333438,0.0017424288,0.004519614,0.0031883006,0.0036016176,0.0006095051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007896129,0.000068328656,0.00028064326,0.00008567824,0.00007474543,0.00007084102,0.00014547573,0.95759654,0.0005655686,0.025451113,0.0005584851,0.015023556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008957616,0.000019005367,0.000037981798,0.000004698065,0.000010921516,0.000006516953,0.000007481613,0.9932219,0.00006224439,0.0065269335,0.00008456465,0.00000876446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01050211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005124794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01050211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023215427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024030404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028922021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408744676","doi":"10.5267/j.uscm.2025.2.003","title":"A decision-making framework for green substations: Insights from AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uncertain Supply Chain Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Business; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.059361830073515934,"score_gpt":0.3916513330502991,"score_spread":0.33228950297678317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408744676","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048462097,0.00029457267,0.99122214,0.0004992062,0.000027392576,0.00017562216,0.00006301238,0.000056284123,0.002815581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18429235,0.0005555073,0.8139101,0.00007571108,0.00003757487,0.0003953387,0.00009064067,0.000022600989,0.00062015187],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99428844,0.0034672131,0.00029954207,0.0002797276,0.0014990106,0.00016601325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972422,0.0017922894,0.0002665609,0.000105548956,0.0004701099,0.00012339265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009550983,0.0013067169,0.0013408574,0.004761821,0.0020655154,0.0034583535,0.0019627812,0.0010943178,0.0023900636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071713934,0.0005246636,0.0015149775,0.0038214074,0.002013721,0.0023005414,0.0024691147,0.0019141055,0.0002767309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060109596,0.00013265447,0.0011959894,0.00075009244,0.0002151568,0.0003877793,0.0015679899,0.54701203,0.0023321332,0.33541143,0.0017584778,0.109176144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027272728,0.00007541668,0.00032113434,0.00021170406,0.000045135086,0.00008866152,0.00072300213,0.7640443,0.0006462717,0.22913973,0.0046256054,0.000051770035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006388841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0099482285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009550983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032922486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005089201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050511062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408744693","doi":"10.5267/j.uscm.2025.2.002","title":"Enhanced decision-making in uncertain environments: A Fermatean fuzzy approach for heterogeneous group dynamics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uncertain Supply Chain Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Group decision-making; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Dynamics (music); Group dynamic; Operations research; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Social psychology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03906293936908308,"score_gpt":0.35028065779986395,"score_spread":0.3112177184307809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408744693","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011872545,0.000091803304,0.985666,0.0001477932,0.000016724696,0.000047704925,0.000021905698,0.000021642873,0.0021139742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42198423,0.00026878843,0.5759878,0.00010131039,0.00006555303,0.00021655898,0.00005274432,0.000020574447,0.0013024246],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964025,0.0018407163,0.0001934321,0.00042421004,0.0009946321,0.00014449394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943486,0.004074564,0.0005720628,0.00025759503,0.000587136,0.00016008966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067429487,0.00087626884,0.0009885728,0.0026512432,0.0012429116,0.0020814568,0.0015282154,0.0011451588,0.0021024162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011823334,0.00045240513,0.0016611004,0.0015836223,0.0017819911,0.0030328482,0.0021756524,0.0016903839,0.00027954282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014985481,0.00010838011,0.002170728,0.0002977645,0.00018466628,0.00030096632,0.0009568681,0.65907997,0.0042691333,0.22895178,0.00065349543,0.10287636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008767177,0.00005947075,0.00032421673,0.000037648108,0.000025439122,0.000047167476,0.0000791155,0.9164861,0.0007375994,0.08120041,0.00096140016,0.0000326185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019121169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023673095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067429487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020485686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013998442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035660565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408859000","doi":"10.18280/ijsse.150211","title":"Enhancing Service Quality Through Effective Language and Fuzzy SERVQUAL in Occupational Safety Companies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SERVQUAL; Service quality; Fuzzy logic; Business; Quality (philosophy); Occupational safety and health; Service (business); Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Marketing; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03742366459130998,"score_gpt":0.40614794998678116,"score_spread":0.3687242853954712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408859000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90804785,0.0007599996,0.06419928,0.0033409176,0.000043320673,0.00058510416,0.000083073945,0.00010961171,0.02283087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663126,0.00022557993,0.03241402,0.00013833932,0.0000064850306,0.00010586098,0.000028011338,0.000004792051,0.00076431176],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930274,0.00465292,0.0003092806,0.00014044145,0.001417739,0.00045221488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491817,0.0029101798,0.0006096762,0.00016138982,0.0010735608,0.00032706084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008115043,0.0002643742,0.00028137336,0.0018290352,0.0009863277,0.0025967096,0.00044649217,0.00047531733,0.0018971566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00953315,0.00017531945,0.0003412181,0.001467233,0.00095923274,0.002006478,0.0017378614,0.0006489791,0.00022362692],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076958217,0.0018267791,0.08624958,0.0015411685,0.000072309864,0.00049885147,0.033952564,0.011590704,0.010622458,0.033717167,0.0033679623,0.81579083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005465294,0.0067719705,0.27622676,0.0050314693,0.0002945426,0.0018304515,0.20333205,0.3381889,0.041791584,0.06648308,0.059024423,0.00047825536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050077843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007041442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008115043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030078213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039574252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042916954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408923560","doi":"10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112418","title":"Artificial intelligence-driven energy optimization in smart homes using interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy Aczel-Alsina aggregation operators","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Building Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy logic; Energy (signal processing); Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.08753746916069569,"score_gpt":0.38254680168778793,"score_spread":0.29500933252709227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408923560","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053097706,0.0002117502,0.9429071,0.00014572918,0.00003460725,0.000029474526,0.000021496266,0.000041369396,0.0035107424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91716707,0.00013381352,0.08089419,0.000028534998,0.00001781142,0.000062085135,0.0000277833,0.000014898783,0.001653829],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962866,0.00016301275,0.00001713766,0.000058666796,0.00009300746,0.000039528815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996189,0.00023485765,0.00003573835,0.000014679779,0.00007658424,0.000019197638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014608519,0.00045389368,0.0009154634,0.00038230667,0.0005096416,0.0009909166,0.0006018101,0.00057322066,0.0010292575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012683433,0.0002061312,0.00074261223,0.0005516922,0.00049837935,0.0009462977,0.000651357,0.00071775884,0.00007049096],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000605152,0.000057048528,0.00045091566,0.000048395126,0.00004286826,0.00007154424,0.00008102093,0.94298023,0.0020787253,0.03500162,0.00039155592,0.018735563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002220662,0.000013766128,0.000048941118,0.0000022635109,0.0000031367529,0.0000049937844,0.000007604154,0.9954318,0.00015923737,0.0042404486,0.000083223,0.00000233029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031086362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002603397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031086362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076685235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007287369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007725835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409102251","doi":"10.1109/tsmc.2025.3552113","title":"Utility-Driven Minimum Cost Consensus Model With Preference Learning and Fairness Concerns","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Research Centre","keywords":"Preference; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.14600138306724805,"score_gpt":0.3665691552985451,"score_spread":0.22056777223129706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409102251","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04883625,0.00022112245,0.9438033,0.0005736147,0.000048759386,0.0001060421,0.000100036894,0.000100838326,0.006210079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94035566,0.00022675464,0.051816173,0.00010212915,0.000039481456,0.00025924115,0.0001063469,0.000024439663,0.0070699225],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779725,0.0008266015,0.00009434392,0.00048469566,0.00048288453,0.0003142489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779093,0.0011291957,0.00033840124,0.000117295225,0.00048090945,0.00014331017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025765416,0.0010842273,0.0015093603,0.00067575363,0.00081319374,0.0016250637,0.0024484,0.0017133802,0.003108203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052587516,0.0004439811,0.0009821375,0.0008985119,0.00090862083,0.0019998262,0.0011575232,0.0015540792,0.0003426874],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013282993,0.000064477295,0.00087019155,0.00008882443,0.000058948932,0.00020552,0.00018112773,0.90348434,0.0014440955,0.078560986,0.000810636,0.0140980985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014787264,0.000024356816,0.00008915753,0.0000030837489,0.00000771062,0.000016419008,0.000012312513,0.98516047,0.00015302966,0.01432782,0.00018343552,0.0000074177474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064267446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030327835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064267446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019675153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014858808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014275432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409257704","doi":"10.3390/pr13041120","title":"Optimizing Solar PV Deployment in Manufacturing: A Morphological Matrix and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Processes","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Software deployment; Fuzzy logic; TOPSIS; Photovoltaic system; Matrix (chemical analysis); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Process engineering; Mathematics; Materials science; Engineering; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Electrical engineering; Composite material","score_opus":0.11643180374148027,"score_gpt":0.4079726774332473,"score_spread":0.291540873691767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409257704","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057615254,0.0003508242,0.9341242,0.00029558764,0.00003499105,0.00041686327,0.00014299015,0.00013009646,0.0068891784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5206533,0.00064784783,0.47699454,0.000037232407,0.00001402525,0.00031713472,0.00011972139,0.000018232462,0.0011979953],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799746,0.0009661881,0.00014285783,0.00017452637,0.00060250075,0.000116478695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849045,0.00086605386,0.0002293589,0.000048654638,0.0003189728,0.000046444336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028214897,0.0011973007,0.0008828625,0.0032189481,0.00093819597,0.0028098484,0.0010708725,0.0007740994,0.0025849384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040991018,0.00068975386,0.0017410849,0.0026921968,0.000744766,0.0013851739,0.0012678608,0.0007946922,0.00023676525],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018224446,0.00019792901,0.0043463735,0.0007931248,0.0003237742,0.0004924736,0.00074245513,0.780107,0.013863026,0.025916498,0.00080491655,0.17223014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021058873,0.00024259553,0.0013346891,0.00008281028,0.00008296529,0.00008776187,0.0005941101,0.97919846,0.0031189525,0.013639711,0.0015531135,0.000043688084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060954182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009558031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060954182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001761369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022617264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014921665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409326974","doi":"10.3390/infrastructures10040089","title":"Novel Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Maritime Infrastructure Maintenance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Infrastructures","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cambrian College; Canadore College","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Operations research; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06690273765687844,"score_gpt":0.4294388458497775,"score_spread":0.36253610819289905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409326974","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014429917,0.0005836446,0.9791148,0.0005045258,0.00005934712,0.00028651726,0.00015717212,0.000060221373,0.0048037535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47500116,0.0006802236,0.5205704,0.00015384192,0.000096958065,0.00086505845,0.0003303893,0.000025937885,0.0022760348],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937442,0.0034956727,0.0003802751,0.00069015723,0.001251355,0.00043836425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962967,0.0023138192,0.00031890307,0.000069660375,0.00076966867,0.00023129069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009846281,0.0016888364,0.0017803658,0.0034524044,0.0014976799,0.004022797,0.0027305202,0.0020917442,0.002808168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007506047,0.0006849425,0.0021228925,0.0024196175,0.0014071346,0.0025695907,0.0018262776,0.002049292,0.00026726385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009997492,0.00016922066,0.0015522691,0.00034063333,0.00020764614,0.0003495671,0.0003977824,0.87229055,0.0012119171,0.08678908,0.0012866039,0.035304785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000266721,0.00009764645,0.00033312477,0.00006598356,0.00004216561,0.000048297672,0.00012586598,0.96880484,0.0002418735,0.028970536,0.0012089887,0.000033988494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011889226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012134366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011889226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005484687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043039382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052072763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409376666","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-44-333997-4.00007-1","title":"Strategic resource allocation for smart healthcare management using Disc q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy hybrid aggregation information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Resource allocation; Health care; Business; Computer science; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Economics; Computer network","score_opus":0.1156342788890435,"score_gpt":0.3715745586838965,"score_spread":0.255940279794853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409376666","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006986991,0.0003124755,0.9816196,0.00028431986,0.00006251024,0.00007277529,0.000070247566,0.00019105196,0.010400008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5630575,0.0006742743,0.4225585,0.00022833441,0.000085763524,0.00020783483,0.00017238331,0.000060264596,0.01295524],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995028,0.00018447576,0.00003389996,0.00006352668,0.00016535337,0.000049852057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996364,0.00022161259,0.0000256476,0.000024945115,0.00007424663,0.000017140423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013911347,0.00048866787,0.0007660712,0.00066550664,0.00050317944,0.0016211524,0.0007095534,0.0007005228,0.006139637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001437257,0.00027197096,0.0007061074,0.0010595911,0.0004850028,0.0012896894,0.0010207604,0.00083296874,0.0005140817],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014777752,0.00008580057,0.00055552245,0.00023090171,0.000081286584,0.00016953023,0.00024085719,0.56099766,0.0043980847,0.13404623,0.0064246347,0.29262176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008841002,0.000059412803,0.00016572386,0.000024119405,0.000015413087,0.000026283184,0.000046615412,0.95382106,0.0007176866,0.042048525,0.0030546524,0.000011736857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054319105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052308585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006139637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012918309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001195187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020539105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409376808","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-44-333997-4.00009-5","title":"Decision aid technique for optimal design in wearable health monitoring devices through Disc q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Dombi aggregation information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Wearable computer; Computer science; Optimal design; Wearable technology; Operations research; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Embedded system; Machine learning","score_opus":0.09272394415146339,"score_gpt":0.390579305701133,"score_spread":0.2978553615496696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409376808","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036825852,0.00010575524,0.9940228,0.000048520713,0.000024742187,0.000023909382,0.000019867412,0.0001510791,0.0019206728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33661473,0.00029932315,0.6570883,0.0001057881,0.000056094595,0.00013846945,0.00008053032,0.00004723454,0.005569473],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964094,0.00011070313,0.0000306107,0.00005592549,0.00013112965,0.000030754345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959964,0.00022285548,0.00002980008,0.000022434293,0.00011558724,0.000009659587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001089224,0.0005807575,0.0006776148,0.0005982866,0.00046816742,0.00093018136,0.00057258614,0.00057679997,0.004717957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015021833,0.00027541877,0.00056068215,0.00054336037,0.00026837178,0.0006835089,0.0006107995,0.00072934135,0.0005229087],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030602282,0.00016456044,0.0006190049,0.00036960375,0.00006116882,0.00020146873,0.0003265128,0.29698348,0.02460078,0.0371425,0.0054464145,0.6337786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010626547,0.00010653453,0.00025960614,0.000031700634,0.000021701115,0.000049303857,0.000034116398,0.9864992,0.0037396727,0.0066540916,0.0025835272,0.000009957539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001917386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002427699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004717957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044053362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050569896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015783131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409377117","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-44-333997-4.00017-4","title":"MEREC-MARCOS method for Disc q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets and its application in multi-criteria group decision-making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Group decision-making; Fuzzy logic; Group (periodic table); Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology; Physics; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08701492289821341,"score_gpt":0.43165797140769324,"score_spread":0.3446430485094798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409377117","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018071994,0.0007873626,0.9922495,0.00009569635,0.00018256977,0.000045711182,0.000052077157,0.00018807275,0.004591848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05648266,0.00081981387,0.9315718,0.0000749083,0.0001348029,0.00022554172,0.00008951151,0.0001620541,0.010438959],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894077,0.0004682849,0.00008297952,0.00017706265,0.00028805574,0.00004280913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883133,0.0007237003,0.0000563885,0.00008350387,0.0002817369,0.000023349201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022221738,0.0006665654,0.0011255383,0.0017458119,0.0008000435,0.001242302,0.0013610253,0.0011779481,0.008772758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038948448,0.0003816583,0.0011886463,0.0015183281,0.0009624794,0.0010019954,0.0009668833,0.0016317088,0.002135709],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021736084,0.000094750205,0.00048176444,0.000980894,0.00008057828,0.00026564157,0.00034883345,0.055918016,0.012083158,0.34626135,0.008694603,0.57457304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031118005,0.00015877836,0.00072681135,0.00015043747,0.00007187446,0.00048211197,0.0000996961,0.83000755,0.011317981,0.09653935,0.06032541,0.000088929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022686094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024526664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008772758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070251146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011716438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029347837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409377183","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-44-333997-4.00010-1","title":"A minimally invasive robot empowered by Aczel–Alsina aggregation operators within a Disc-q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy environment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.047046423144105294,"score_gpt":0.3208917642634346,"score_spread":0.2738453411193293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409377183","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019477746,0.00015518042,0.9725811,0.00010050044,0.00009138869,0.000041553492,0.000043805558,0.0008581396,0.0066506104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27989078,0.00017145358,0.7062123,0.0000894848,0.000051019397,0.00009574716,0.00009389175,0.000091312584,0.013304075],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980825,0.000029817216,0.000010600342,0.00005458803,0.000077147255,0.00001970249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99990785,0.000027580218,0.0000103136435,0.000017525803,0.000021391019,0.000015356383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024256516,0.0005226785,0.0005791854,0.00032421446,0.0006510051,0.0007269692,0.00077865785,0.00082643837,0.004239016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026364095,0.00025292282,0.00050166994,0.00030344372,0.00044398426,0.0006318423,0.0011131682,0.0007438804,0.00088459876],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052830926,0.0001868613,0.0008498334,0.0003151852,0.00006659441,0.0009837208,0.00049446715,0.14171809,0.3016551,0.066346064,0.0054511963,0.48140448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003526543,0.0005575188,0.0009813117,0.00004977427,0.000045548553,0.00092041626,0.00011012164,0.8977657,0.042760424,0.022079777,0.03461438,0.00007967852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011336635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012327835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004239016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023075368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004559057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014180958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409377402","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-44-333997-4.00012-5","title":"Disc q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Schweizer–Sklar aggregation operators and their application in adaptive healthcare technologies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Health care; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.05866296971735429,"score_gpt":0.3441784898543577,"score_spread":0.28551552013700343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409377402","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00768982,0.0010955433,0.97184485,0.00038257876,0.00022234546,0.00004956261,0.00006384329,0.00020423347,0.018447265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35173678,0.0020932849,0.58797085,0.00038570966,0.00030621054,0.00019157835,0.0002805375,0.00025739177,0.05677763],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939847,0.00020427992,0.00005472382,0.000093487724,0.00020108254,0.000048023183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938726,0.00028761453,0.0000425339,0.00005159773,0.00020379215,0.000027125214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017988287,0.00055668096,0.00064103876,0.0007445318,0.0007348172,0.0016655965,0.0007467609,0.0007829059,0.008257899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024539162,0.00025776692,0.0006555595,0.0013233369,0.00081149896,0.0013525293,0.0012198449,0.0012301321,0.00118053],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023058723,0.000084930056,0.00042830748,0.00031175045,0.000053175954,0.00016982877,0.00034567443,0.10246925,0.007340161,0.41005394,0.012866859,0.46564564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018817094,0.00012313588,0.00040756536,0.00006285053,0.000023578705,0.00012943787,0.000097902106,0.76145536,0.003534636,0.21478319,0.01933547,0.000028093435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027674919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019361038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008257899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090198073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091122265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027625442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409377405","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-44-333997-4.00015-0","title":"Enhancing health data security in blockchain: ELECTRE method with Disc q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"ELECTRE; Blockchain; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Mathematics; Computer security; Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Multiple-criteria decision analysis","score_opus":0.09290529572162806,"score_gpt":0.4161901135669968,"score_spread":0.3232848178453688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409377405","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076382174,0.00017022171,0.9811156,0.00018338427,0.000043024793,0.000081863844,0.00005481454,0.00013381819,0.010579113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4934905,0.00041114044,0.48904607,0.00012372991,0.0000522186,0.0002328363,0.00013257327,0.00007945955,0.016431535],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999337,0.0003144605,0.00003662218,0.00007551524,0.00018897318,0.000047472142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990257,0.00065026927,0.000037735757,0.00006946654,0.00018731943,0.000029479419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016844952,0.00042490932,0.00065798906,0.0009280735,0.0006210583,0.0011101167,0.0007910406,0.00073807186,0.008376638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024345198,0.00022834288,0.00064035726,0.0008473829,0.00057798874,0.0012297162,0.0011027409,0.000695959,0.00058676564],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001594595,0.00012847313,0.0006310849,0.00028965398,0.00005707478,0.00014118438,0.00018257118,0.49288332,0.0044300286,0.11391037,0.003391804,0.38379502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012618576,0.00005056377,0.0001171304,0.000028146786,0.000013008656,0.000042276068,0.000042130127,0.9581731,0.001573773,0.036659367,0.0032786704,0.000009250895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029057153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028369843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008376638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085229054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010753701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028022587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409691644","doi":"10.3934/math.2025421","title":"Modified methods to solve interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making problems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIMS Mathematics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Interval (graph theory); Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.2213366840316755,"score_gpt":0.5237722354745232,"score_spread":0.3024355514428477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409691644","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017623862,0.00025107103,0.99681157,0.00004679818,0.000039880764,0.00004685105,0.000009704288,0.000034741854,0.0009970424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07563389,0.00050157524,0.9209845,0.00008191295,0.000087075634,0.00039142877,0.00005629569,0.000048669284,0.0022146152],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780256,0.0011173957,0.00013858425,0.00019538034,0.00066462863,0.00008138204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975782,0.0016263364,0.00015245247,0.000120951,0.00047590828,0.00004615013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004298806,0.0013161397,0.0013087479,0.0015593197,0.0005507575,0.0010547006,0.0021708205,0.0015169609,0.00315327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006476682,0.00051600713,0.0018273628,0.0012825168,0.0008570665,0.0012201646,0.0012133566,0.0018959516,0.0006711851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013559539,0.00013679409,0.00051211467,0.0009403057,0.00026095164,0.00028379232,0.00042356568,0.5833043,0.006765195,0.1423382,0.0022002263,0.262699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003224713,0.000082990286,0.00012707392,0.000048768627,0.000027495134,0.00007289945,0.000026855496,0.9634749,0.0011629751,0.030649401,0.0042675454,0.00002683394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013540501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014504844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004298806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073264196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011053387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022734523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409841120","doi":"10.34248/bsengineering.1605982","title":"Performance Evaluation of G7 Countries in Terms of Patent Applications","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.12531387516220358,"score_gpt":0.39754900959803857,"score_spread":0.272235134435835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409841120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97047585,0.0006591881,0.009412248,0.00021609421,0.000035647743,0.00023957161,0.0006996927,0.00007263067,0.018189076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989669,0.00028356744,0.0085514,0.000023524635,0.000006972928,0.00007776093,0.0005831423,0.000012184371,0.0007924134],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99195963,0.0039308895,0.0006006858,0.000488618,0.002040053,0.0009800756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889498,0.004627274,0.0014002324,0.00062489527,0.003533493,0.0008643661],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012537928,0.00089366327,0.00086832966,0.008771486,0.0008412184,0.0038579886,0.00055398175,0.0010883097,0.0019316853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018174669,0.00016147342,0.0014501917,0.007834232,0.00066737965,0.0014262858,0.0017665034,0.00042015786,0.00039090915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003199,0.0007179048,0.28287053,0.0015028478,0.0012828519,0.0020013321,0.0016331477,0.40544575,0.01327962,0.021203568,0.0054294225,0.26143396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002121443,0.0057734894,0.31430548,0.0004966261,0.0012016683,0.0010243045,0.014398605,0.5964907,0.031157807,0.013518494,0.021125503,0.00029530155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039111325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038424854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9912285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018029056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019051515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066307664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410046240","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-443-26639-3.00016-8","title":"Fuzzy logic decision support system for in situ remediation of contaminated aquifer","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental remediation; Aquifer; Contamination; In situ; Fuzzy logic; Environmental science; Computer science; Geology; Artificial intelligence; Geotechnical engineering; Chemistry; Biology; Groundwater; Ecology","score_opus":0.08397451853195219,"score_gpt":0.36892288556404834,"score_spread":0.28494836703209614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410046240","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053285446,0.00163048,0.9100101,0.0005213862,0.0002760945,0.00018273601,0.00070507644,0.0034470633,0.02994171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.577941,0.0014070892,0.3837202,0.00028877816,0.00014122689,0.00025861428,0.0007622046,0.000075221295,0.035405587],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999014,0.000018243552,0.000008122045,0.000014826515,0.000046653146,0.000010768595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998759,0.000057553993,0.000007869913,0.000006345594,0.000044887045,0.000007324122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029759336,0.00036663515,0.00038041547,0.00046663225,0.00030957285,0.00077014015,0.00059866364,0.00062934455,0.00813164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004338275,0.00012829242,0.0003149276,0.0003392858,0.000112522896,0.00039370183,0.00023484389,0.0004364731,0.0010150408],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065983785,0.0002616293,0.000987141,0.00048979203,0.000054764594,0.00047909486,0.00016625588,0.10762753,0.06994981,0.013106047,0.018215856,0.78800213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007236172,0.00032777488,0.0013585781,0.000102120364,0.00008009788,0.00024378911,0.0000960469,0.9299284,0.03026158,0.010795307,0.026693186,0.000040755476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025859785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026551585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00813164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034030425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003640016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027203083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410095936","doi":"10.63689/2993-7159.1274","title":"Development of Aczel-Alsina Aggregation Operators in Neutrosophic Cubic Sets for Multi-Expert and Multi-Criteria Weighting: Optimizing Alternative Fuel Technology Selection","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neutrosophic Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","score_opus":0.12632350319488161,"score_gpt":0.4256346927691251,"score_spread":0.29931118957424346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410095936","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006496124,0.00011332617,0.9919086,0.00007424489,0.00002222579,0.00004887345,0.000025174386,0.000028662362,0.0012827243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21315013,0.00035234555,0.7848641,0.00009483994,0.000058746715,0.00035139892,0.000119859076,0.000049322673,0.0009592951],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961217,0.0017582438,0.00025552732,0.00040835893,0.001310332,0.00014579433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954182,0.002580319,0.00038161493,0.0002772832,0.0012068353,0.00013574024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069227964,0.0012743074,0.0011060438,0.0022109225,0.0008750961,0.0021287692,0.0015455523,0.0009808125,0.0012326479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011639355,0.00039958337,0.0014294521,0.002324583,0.0012717564,0.0027358385,0.0024891777,0.002106125,0.00020466668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009053047,0.00008645046,0.0012000048,0.0002649901,0.00009704012,0.00012831889,0.00056931097,0.5854689,0.004524338,0.2303178,0.0015487082,0.17570356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056908457,0.000044651457,0.00015897307,0.000026266967,0.000011183002,0.000023086446,0.000049387952,0.9463395,0.0013039807,0.050353702,0.0016640141,0.000019563337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003449697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003201132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069227964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016687124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018761032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036611676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410184846","doi":"10.3934/math.2025472","title":"Decision analysis with known and unknown weights in the complex N-cubic fuzzy environment: An application of accident prediction models","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIMS Mathematics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Accident (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08680106339763816,"score_gpt":0.37331530295616794,"score_spread":0.2865142395585298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410184846","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32669282,0.0001541913,0.66992444,0.00029812616,0.00003147343,0.00009474389,0.0000799336,0.00007552913,0.002648752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9548515,0.00011023336,0.044468485,0.000014748864,0.000013981132,0.000037694557,0.000036906797,0.000004510525,0.0004618903],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986659,0.0006483569,0.0000746847,0.00018022707,0.00031053287,0.00012037251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568933,0.003262733,0.00034136,0.000117858006,0.0005023185,0.000086324835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029048892,0.000505039,0.0006191735,0.0008907146,0.0008055469,0.0012773917,0.0006720123,0.0005428236,0.00086434255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076022744,0.000229575,0.0007678629,0.0010501101,0.0006080313,0.0010236542,0.0007416197,0.00094677246,0.00005682039],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017310597,0.00007187716,0.0037329714,0.00008119552,0.00005562299,0.0001482106,0.00030302454,0.94545937,0.0007555328,0.01126305,0.00025133262,0.037704777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026635612,0.000017519887,0.00040107168,0.0000031773998,0.000005773733,0.00000965352,0.00004402265,0.9963307,0.00019263543,0.002921991,0.000064257416,0.0000066763982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019262461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009118417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019262461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016320499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014357939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038300693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410279919","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-92741-6_4","title":"A Decision-Theoretic Formulation of Three-Way Conflict Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Operations research; Management science; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.07849270183665025,"score_gpt":0.3763030176843653,"score_spread":0.29781031584771506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410279919","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027674423,0.00031585715,0.9743939,0.0008197021,0.00009349283,0.00007640536,0.00009359542,0.000036704823,0.021402866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3853258,0.0010144734,0.59796405,0.00057865115,0.00029168333,0.0006892773,0.00029888403,0.00008509616,0.013752076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99550843,0.0025965807,0.00019642366,0.00037576325,0.0010338846,0.0002888791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964051,0.0025275173,0.00030999773,0.00017939856,0.0004090862,0.0001688482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049532545,0.0014768239,0.0013340248,0.001780353,0.0012790858,0.00575628,0.0038988057,0.0022462648,0.010688069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007104436,0.00083795545,0.0021493186,0.0034883718,0.003938635,0.0051008877,0.0027314902,0.0038988707,0.0010859708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001086684,0.000023448392,0.00006335831,0.00004388836,0.000022120921,0.000043211272,0.0000940318,0.037933663,0.0001633773,0.95435035,0.00086112146,0.0063904985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081099415,0.0000138807,0.00003387279,0.000019331745,0.00001126753,0.00003964238,0.000052498443,0.12036684,0.00011222987,0.8767488,0.0025815873,0.00001188242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019579746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016914472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010688069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028385455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022327886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035755157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410306278","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-92744-7_19","title":"Finding Consistent Pairwise Comparisons with Genetic Algorithms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Pairwise comparison; Algorithm; Genetic algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.12181166867934096,"score_gpt":0.3720249093119226,"score_spread":0.25021324063258166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410306278","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052771447,0.00029593022,0.9923821,0.00009686771,0.00004234643,0.00014076546,0.000058957045,0.0004140066,0.0012918474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043346714,0.00012046967,0.9548468,0.00008758247,0.00003693869,0.0002721737,0.00022590024,0.00017688246,0.0008864994],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.991915,0.0042010034,0.0004146524,0.0013777881,0.0018209905,0.00027057523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800283,0.017090958,0.0006147783,0.0011025163,0.0010026944,0.00016076343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077818027,0.0026624973,0.004131207,0.005111352,0.0014587353,0.00209813,0.005637416,0.0036016619,0.0068052527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03418208,0.0020042954,0.0032169216,0.0067082467,0.0025468124,0.0043770075,0.0030988366,0.003940171,0.0013582006],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003639417,0.00033560707,0.0012045752,0.0005208419,0.0005056877,0.00021900017,0.00023875941,0.40603352,0.0026838337,0.031926446,0.005186276,0.55078155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010866035,0.00015096257,0.0002353418,0.00007637777,0.00011106437,0.00011260089,0.00007576432,0.89648104,0.0018593505,0.099365935,0.0013913221,0.00003159164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026379093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003000823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077818027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013084904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021437928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041154623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410327631","doi":"10.23952/jnva.9.2025.4.08","title":"Sequential splitting algorithms with Bregman distance for solving equilibrium problems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nonlinear and Variational Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Medical University, Taiwan; China Medical University","keywords":"Algorithm; Bregman divergence; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.07835111323484283,"score_gpt":0.40097569236686853,"score_spread":0.3226245791320257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410327631","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063577034,0.00012873227,0.9925476,0.000049384955,0.000014702196,0.000041058516,0.0000052952896,0.00006660356,0.0007889797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2539684,0.0002474447,0.74217564,0.00010424284,0.000034630753,0.0003335663,0.000076197866,0.0000744681,0.0029854206],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906176,0.00030886458,0.00006232714,0.00017471382,0.00030872732,0.00008372299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918,0.00042528345,0.00006325067,0.00005935253,0.0002139406,0.000058146456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022313846,0.000979186,0.0013775673,0.0009806056,0.0008771214,0.00074077275,0.0016966922,0.0015903845,0.003267516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027330013,0.00054864783,0.0008723409,0.0007560534,0.0010008175,0.0020373818,0.0018787778,0.001955265,0.0005536592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016455667,0.0001527656,0.00048375997,0.00022005316,0.000081533275,0.000081454775,0.00024585886,0.7383924,0.0078104534,0.09746825,0.00082262495,0.15407631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017506305,0.000056812358,0.000034921522,0.0000072591556,0.000004687556,0.000014788763,0.000013347811,0.98500943,0.00084789784,0.013432226,0.00055453187,0.0000066377916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028200021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022305325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003267516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00154689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011800885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410542096","doi":"10.4314/swj.v20i1.35","title":"Optimal site selection for nuclear power plants in Nigeria using geospatial multi-criteria-evaluation techniques","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science World Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geospatial analysis; Selection (genetic algorithm); Site selection; Nuclear power; Computer science; Environmental science; Geography; Biology; Remote sensing; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.14935729512003443,"score_gpt":0.48313015142518106,"score_spread":0.33377285630514664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410542096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85776615,0.0010733845,0.12841976,0.0004134434,0.000029026525,0.0010332601,0.000667197,0.00015278402,0.010445027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91110504,0.000277407,0.08742464,0.00002153946,0.0000043046307,0.0002453409,0.0003024322,0.000015871663,0.0006034899],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998094,0.0010069308,0.00013391823,0.00015571779,0.00042084785,0.00018845755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976705,0.0013741096,0.00029945598,0.000056053643,0.00047416866,0.0001257316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030578081,0.000896337,0.0008730328,0.0046796342,0.000844438,0.00289341,0.00064703374,0.0008316807,0.0015032879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053103413,0.00047604597,0.00091185403,0.0025479211,0.0005566714,0.0010270606,0.0008627928,0.00039597476,0.00011488625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040025142,0.00047063446,0.042254243,0.00088009896,0.00020929857,0.00104738,0.00067175727,0.8287672,0.0055033606,0.005883248,0.0013737528,0.112538844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055564422,0.00041924353,0.015992058,0.00018041802,0.00010659984,0.00017862792,0.0026455733,0.97050834,0.0032840183,0.0050844518,0.0014851904,0.0000600317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009613311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016396195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009613311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020047314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027073955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019114673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410788988","doi":"10.3390/computers14060208","title":"Applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Information Systems for Strategic and Operational Decisions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Process management; Computer science; Management science; Information system; Business; Operations research; Knowledge management; Engineering","score_opus":0.1432181038653194,"score_gpt":0.4421951222441396,"score_spread":0.2989770183788202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410788988","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012736356,0.13798143,0.75350434,0.014523062,0.0013284807,0.002364042,0.00045845067,0.0002447272,0.076859064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19550589,0.059253905,0.7388252,0.0015770578,0.0005770695,0.0018137572,0.00024941316,0.000058166122,0.0021396265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9269173,0.055596672,0.004025379,0.002024715,0.01088498,0.0005509481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9322699,0.058614407,0.002622939,0.001685898,0.004330461,0.00047646998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04309151,0.001976025,0.0026997456,0.01424802,0.0032104952,0.01030905,0.0021906497,0.0034590468,0.0054342784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051887862,0.0008719417,0.0023284766,0.015986988,0.0066630146,0.0066697807,0.005011813,0.0043780697,0.0008088913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010252305,0.00023119456,0.0030224063,0.017419877,0.001125931,0.0006699672,0.0050239298,0.0543004,0.0019537574,0.5427654,0.0059207003,0.36746386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067354085,0.00040627923,0.002801349,0.017028501,0.0004074685,0.00048362894,0.0057437094,0.061658252,0.0018407567,0.8077683,0.10146371,0.00033083893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003353968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069047376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04309151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073468867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00948544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2278924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410899294","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2025.3.007","title":"A route selection process using a multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) approach based on the simple additive weighting (SAW) method: Evidence from Thai fresh fruit exported to China by road transportation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Naresuan University","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Weighting; Selection (genetic algorithm); Simple (philosophy); Process (computing); Decision-making; Operations research; China; Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Management science; Engineering; Operations management; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Geography","score_opus":0.08790009997520574,"score_gpt":0.44092331279799435,"score_spread":0.3530232128227886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410899294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5255303,0.0025237633,0.44357806,0.0014552218,0.000102802594,0.0024006378,0.0004531088,0.00010187814,0.023854261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67304623,0.0012373565,0.3239079,0.000071408685,0.000011335881,0.00044535723,0.00020567435,0.000020403048,0.0010543816],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880844,0.008628615,0.00058106834,0.0005980165,0.0018147447,0.00029312592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905007,0.0056385584,0.0011012859,0.0003857263,0.002210466,0.00016321981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012596265,0.0008731825,0.0007124178,0.0056873253,0.0014448192,0.0022705088,0.0014902835,0.0008167883,0.0025154133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0162904,0.00056407036,0.0013133641,0.0070036165,0.0013559129,0.0030583413,0.0014535506,0.0008858421,0.00021486788],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043112587,0.00058076653,0.07677544,0.005985564,0.00076678075,0.0014228788,0.014957562,0.14991266,0.004453911,0.055547696,0.002814478,0.6863512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048062197,0.002289434,0.08600303,0.0040345695,0.0014269586,0.0012452435,0.070459016,0.6789285,0.008799747,0.094556026,0.051262967,0.0005139384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019613197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041900393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019613197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045281006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005573238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06661624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410963786","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128441","title":"Enhanced TARA model for heavy-duty vehicles using ISO/SAE 21434 and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"FedDev Ontario; Mitacs; University of Windsor","keywords":"Heavy duty; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Process (computing); Analytic hierarchy process; Operations research; Hierarchy; Industrial engineering; Artificial intelligence; Automotive engineering; Mathematics; Engineering; Economics; Operating system","score_opus":0.12642417738572131,"score_gpt":0.44389679054542824,"score_spread":0.31747261315970693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410963786","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038143214,0.0002655435,0.9435049,0.00030505305,0.000059787784,0.00029158435,0.00038333726,0.00022449743,0.016822005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76762956,0.00041032227,0.22234447,0.00008262886,0.00003883151,0.0007636449,0.0004562831,0.00004311624,0.008231174],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991937,0.00027055058,0.00004428063,0.00014397912,0.0002520724,0.00009543632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992217,0.00038241604,0.00009132299,0.000027634906,0.00024368992,0.00003317327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015123455,0.000821524,0.0006977035,0.0012692617,0.0007740798,0.0020908893,0.001767877,0.0015197876,0.0049763066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017466182,0.0004171163,0.001624888,0.0008271939,0.00044872516,0.0011323559,0.0009817923,0.0011353663,0.0005446012],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023822658,0.000033032313,0.00031602287,0.00005034439,0.000014747232,0.00009258515,0.00006569391,0.98100567,0.00080503296,0.009730344,0.00029777034,0.007564843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029271282,0.000013234071,0.00006684425,0.000005538981,0.000004598673,0.000008526073,0.000015433174,0.99745864,0.000104407605,0.0019350616,0.00038085275,0.0000039837046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022664806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017846957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022664806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017392798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002700692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04506576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410991290","doi":"10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113340","title":"The hierarchical and stochastic VIKOR to deal with imprecise and missing information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Soft Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Missing data; VIKOR method; Computer science; Complete information; Data mining; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Machine learning; Fuzzy logic","score_opus":0.03131012607856585,"score_gpt":0.35236690434484874,"score_spread":0.32105677826628287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410991290","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030312443,0.0004417569,0.9950236,0.00013963356,0.00005596697,0.000028027887,0.00003596622,0.000060278166,0.0011835886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25117293,0.0014974679,0.7406122,0.0002509515,0.00019047147,0.00024765334,0.00021317191,0.00018160223,0.005633407],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971922,0.0012952962,0.0001853913,0.00028219694,0.00089256495,0.00015242472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934009,0.004354103,0.0005139439,0.000723305,0.00086160447,0.00014603701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056959363,0.0008532904,0.0016083531,0.0018886486,0.0009053244,0.0015204137,0.0025195708,0.0013760233,0.0025481647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016294038,0.00078782585,0.001760287,0.0020702288,0.0014474653,0.0034719475,0.0026429156,0.0023680574,0.00047422643],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007271471,0.0000640943,0.00039461584,0.00043876845,0.00014567643,0.00013291443,0.0001993667,0.63720405,0.0016990703,0.2620862,0.0025284297,0.09503405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005600965,0.000027106758,0.00013307558,0.00003244477,0.000014382334,0.000046027686,0.0000122152705,0.9246227,0.00035460698,0.0736233,0.0011086903,0.000019936251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036393239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003157953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056959363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009808294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019919323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030123353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411134263","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-132","title":"Interval-Valued Complex Neutrosophic Sets and Complex Neutrosophic Soft Topological Spaces","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Topological space; Soft set; Interval (graph theory); Pure mathematics; Topology (electrical circuits); Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Computer science","score_opus":0.15862157619739067,"score_gpt":0.47126721998575977,"score_spread":0.3126456437883691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411134263","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08783366,0.007885087,0.8258109,0.0026851243,0.00052789197,0.00020409582,0.00079292915,0.00020199618,0.07405821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79079354,0.00552991,0.19403735,0.00052650046,0.00054014847,0.0004332145,0.0005617454,0.000029264016,0.0075483876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984091,0.00047351522,0.00013491452,0.00034088592,0.00051540916,0.00012620613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830985,0.0007184594,0.00035251552,0.000121770754,0.00037333168,0.00012410014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001060552,0.00071042386,0.0005111132,0.0025133083,0.0010266615,0.0039615985,0.0007289286,0.0010418037,0.002268796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032303848,0.0002276223,0.00065138214,0.0025226707,0.0033576281,0.0039684908,0.0013099742,0.0016396333,0.00030582293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003192509,0.000023711911,0.00066428207,0.00020307548,0.000032646472,0.00033839376,0.00055599,0.009501183,0.00200133,0.9614681,0.0014241613,0.02375522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001012149,0.00005704847,0.0013188065,0.00013866725,0.000022735248,0.0004415128,0.0005836746,0.046804592,0.0008995636,0.9240687,0.02560733,0.00004717331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016424905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008210928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039615985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017020741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009227721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012349427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411212385","doi":"10.1103/n7r5-s63q","title":"Performance of quantum annealing for 2-satisfiability problems with multiple satisfying assignments","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical review. A/Physical review, A","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Adidas (Canada)","funders":"Gauss Centre for Supercomputing","keywords":"Quantum annealing; Satisfiability; Boolean satisfiability problem; Simulated annealing; Quantum; Annealing (glass); Computer science; Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Materials science; Algorithm; Quantum mechanics; Physics; Quantum algorithm; Composite material","score_opus":0.1088143171204155,"score_gpt":0.48263745223239357,"score_spread":0.37382313511197807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411212385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9388254,0.00066241116,0.05528181,0.00047315928,0.000039385046,0.00009345089,0.00012951538,0.00016066745,0.0043341857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710613,0.00015362125,0.02813257,0.000046827663,0.000009168582,0.00007284949,0.00013348869,0.000020786392,0.00036951242],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986864,0.00074335875,0.00007590615,0.00014797764,0.00019480493,0.00015162067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98244876,0.015673522,0.00047179795,0.0005746642,0.0005709513,0.00026042562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045839422,0.0005680759,0.0011440575,0.0006606732,0.00061514403,0.0009228386,0.0010079142,0.001232722,0.001280956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011942217,0.0004164274,0.00080365426,0.00067040254,0.0010780278,0.001151166,0.0007589802,0.0010104246,0.000083601844],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021315957,0.00013505759,0.0013076575,0.00007890343,0.00006196085,0.000020571966,0.000048965627,0.98290056,0.0010940937,0.006536959,0.00017969722,0.0074224775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002190769,0.000065030916,0.00018547151,0.000003576158,0.0000061321425,0.0000037386355,0.000010378653,0.9965938,0.00067299843,0.0023752095,0.000057928733,0.0000037788907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059457063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041261762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059457063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019720693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012896752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02424246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411344883","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-144","title":"Neutrosophic Method for Identifying Extreme Values in Imprecise Data Using Median Absolute Deviation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Absolute (philosophy); Absolute deviation; Statistics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4317860600451961,"score_gpt":0.5765630402223814,"score_spread":0.14477698017718527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411344883","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007140127,0.00017226496,0.99136156,0.00006167442,0.000032062737,0.00008168921,0.0001153568,0.0002582127,0.0007770506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23365594,0.00045823085,0.76379323,0.00010114138,0.000075874734,0.00042879532,0.00058613677,0.00007664578,0.0008240226],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966708,0.00090045854,0.00035429758,0.00056300644,0.0013803641,0.00013110624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951983,0.0024599195,0.00060736143,0.00034499646,0.0012669538,0.000122582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039699106,0.0011710235,0.0012689638,0.005256243,0.00066007086,0.0019707324,0.001539199,0.00090398453,0.002276985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013922403,0.00025921754,0.0011150807,0.0034924985,0.0010277036,0.0015561879,0.0014700566,0.0015354422,0.0006968533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000528325,0.00019476347,0.0100818025,0.0009765981,0.00042350485,0.00043334006,0.00051209895,0.20956638,0.023428626,0.060977593,0.0049631726,0.6879138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005534994,0.00031975654,0.006307288,0.00014000217,0.00009322687,0.00042335133,0.00026603896,0.9201747,0.016778229,0.046730053,0.008556105,0.0001558519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015315586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011495299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005256243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007556198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014642028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02099514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411494759","doi":"10.1007/s12190-025-02520-1","title":"Novel neutrosophic fuzzy max-min-based similarities and their application in clustering for educational decision-making support","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Cluster analysis; Fuzzy logic; Theory of computation; Fuzzy clustering; Group decision-making; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Computer science; Algorithm; Statistics","score_opus":0.05916729549728555,"score_gpt":0.3808636969093272,"score_spread":0.32169640141204164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411494759","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058944408,0.00060107006,0.9367977,0.00016017846,0.000106977874,0.0001400849,0.00015860746,0.00013933105,0.0029517137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5771688,0.00037546895,0.42013276,0.000058369267,0.000105208266,0.00017446066,0.00022485049,0.00004610621,0.0017140293],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982862,0.00043041335,0.00016284306,0.00028849664,0.0007421529,0.0000899183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973609,0.0011437999,0.00024254745,0.00019482637,0.0009274949,0.00013041697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002075569,0.00047778193,0.0010062002,0.0027229632,0.0013466867,0.0017097506,0.0017332168,0.0010935086,0.0017784119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073395497,0.00027628167,0.0011429029,0.0031033533,0.00070740335,0.002504828,0.0013498919,0.00081902434,0.00029892614],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009671793,0.0006326141,0.004434127,0.00082972244,0.00037270095,0.00042911075,0.0010155372,0.24335039,0.028452076,0.20440824,0.00368883,0.51141936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022546674,0.00023722177,0.0018220082,0.000045842688,0.00007797636,0.00029223165,0.00022065347,0.93997735,0.0064772815,0.04801005,0.0027542638,0.000062587795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016153097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027229632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008416449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010897876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010976791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411523406","doi":"10.5206/mase/22681","title":"Distance, similarity and entropy measures of n-dimensional fuzzy sets","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics in Applied Sciences and Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Measure (data warehouse); Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy measure theory; Distance measures; Fuzzy set; Entropy (arrow of time); Fuzzy number; Similarity measure; Defuzzification; Data mining; Similarity (geometry); Fuzzy classification; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.10219074256969747,"score_gpt":0.36092309277858226,"score_spread":0.2587323502088848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411523406","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06459475,0.0049567437,0.9052174,0.0008126167,0.00028476524,0.00013430028,0.0002478951,0.00008614329,0.023665462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.612564,0.002637961,0.3804398,0.00020058111,0.00043600952,0.0003927195,0.0001991698,0.000021405276,0.0031083205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756753,0.0008706278,0.0002707666,0.0002840423,0.00092979113,0.000077221564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967384,0.0019324356,0.00050701736,0.0003121523,0.0003912531,0.00011878127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002436851,0.0005086348,0.0004910221,0.00283612,0.00057734095,0.0019090481,0.0006847914,0.00068405137,0.000762996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01179496,0.00019298818,0.00053758733,0.0018174761,0.002781569,0.0038483012,0.0014196377,0.00094295054,0.00014905691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052851767,0.00003218128,0.0010918755,0.00016786024,0.000050072893,0.00014391597,0.00055108534,0.029356206,0.003574648,0.89700073,0.0008624429,0.06711614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011435782,0.000114033115,0.002444044,0.000099799894,0.00002818961,0.0003839541,0.00026405542,0.12694186,0.002854238,0.856127,0.0106561445,0.0000752667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071809854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006000938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00283612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011677648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062732917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012887418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411668153","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-153","title":"Evaluating Employee Performance: An Approach on Łukasiewicz Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets in BM-Algebras","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Phayao","keywords":"Mathematics; Fuzzy logic; Algebra over a field; Pure mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.17153472418346807,"score_gpt":0.5124389953196431,"score_spread":0.34090427113617505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411668153","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018641984,0.00053789123,0.95221484,0.0011898909,0.00006537757,0.00011228051,0.000094809715,0.00006821904,0.027074743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59449047,0.0004850033,0.40178365,0.00023323543,0.00011836244,0.00024487628,0.00007260005,0.00002204459,0.002549856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949142,0.0026352543,0.00033191865,0.00047946436,0.0013616504,0.00027749772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995691,0.0023576722,0.00056545855,0.00036415472,0.000788545,0.00023316104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008350395,0.0007905467,0.00080561324,0.0030971325,0.0015283987,0.0042473227,0.0020607638,0.0010751089,0.0023095894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010603445,0.00042892154,0.0016957265,0.002181621,0.004997329,0.00570575,0.0027033621,0.0021360058,0.00032644108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018530345,0.000026926653,0.00041065644,0.00005437015,0.000024147668,0.0000773088,0.00058542815,0.01353528,0.000506456,0.9738699,0.00029223325,0.010598703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007849433,0.00002911985,0.000201267,0.000051589624,0.000016621923,0.00004991533,0.00021414344,0.07340333,0.00048462258,0.9230139,0.0024983026,0.000029301036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046076737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035948134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008350395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004351339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025512753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044161618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411717934","doi":"10.17798/bitlisfen.1621902","title":"An Integrated HFLTS and HF-TOPSIS Approach for Wind Turbine Site Selection Problem","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Site selection; TOPSIS; Turbine; Selection (genetic algorithm); Environmental science; Wind power; Computer science; Marine engineering; Engineering; Operations research; Aerospace engineering; Artificial intelligence; Electrical engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.06931653681459232,"score_gpt":0.36136989874397707,"score_spread":0.29205336192938475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411717934","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011779932,0.0004836436,0.9820432,0.00021560292,0.000044630036,0.00015461996,0.000083882434,0.00010786929,0.0050866185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42156723,0.0011850493,0.57164997,0.00012350746,0.00007114758,0.0004564295,0.0002690852,0.000026727152,0.004650877],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697506,0.0012493548,0.00020342476,0.00022007336,0.0012053754,0.00014666757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944824,0.00025500025,0.00005569486,0.000022985703,0.00019159201,0.00002658446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001972074,0.00090440107,0.0011095094,0.0025827326,0.0007139453,0.0017603457,0.0010606525,0.00097625924,0.0027126598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019978476,0.00043653412,0.0016711855,0.0027821774,0.00050663255,0.0012689608,0.0012267266,0.00082806457,0.00029242758],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015154133,0.00018906426,0.0015252632,0.0008716673,0.00039278308,0.0007268561,0.00048783404,0.65654933,0.009112289,0.039069176,0.0025718035,0.28835246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003519983,0.000270846,0.0010115731,0.000102341706,0.00010492726,0.00026060626,0.00027117532,0.9681696,0.0017214437,0.024169596,0.003837878,0.000044659664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005127639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005790367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005127639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010523755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019995482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0104295015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411868961","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103152","title":"Revealed preference axioms for endogenous consideration set formation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Mathematical economics; Revealed preference; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.4683025243735864,"score_gpt":0.43634930970207964,"score_spread":0.03195321467150675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411868961","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070118904,0.00028001147,0.8884524,0.0032404969,0.000105111416,0.0002267451,0.00056338735,0.00012673574,0.03688611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7738424,0.00039461156,0.21655749,0.00068608526,0.0001436699,0.0007884621,0.00047262703,0.000039265666,0.007075366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917216,0.003518562,0.00063157093,0.0012938346,0.002040791,0.00079375476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97406954,0.014609328,0.004145244,0.0031455609,0.0029987844,0.0010315038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008256669,0.00053333,0.00080192543,0.0010467258,0.0012863097,0.0033072394,0.0019817557,0.0017710346,0.0058797975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027076125,0.00053909025,0.0020086707,0.0013408943,0.0044182083,0.0067702006,0.0024981461,0.0035888383,0.000680761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006746907,0.000009895752,0.00015694219,0.000018852408,0.000009744674,0.00003349714,0.0001256026,0.0019495396,0.00018512354,0.9954709,0.0002434761,0.0017897432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022110473,0.000020785372,0.00019908234,0.000015260162,0.000007009937,0.0000541942,0.00007444572,0.016929254,0.00030345202,0.9803492,0.0020094728,0.000015629541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021697218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021837729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008256669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021973136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027466463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043666005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411957072","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126227","title":"Multi-criteria decision-analysis on the circularity and life cycle assessment direction in grains, cereals, crops, and pulses industry: A Canadian Case Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; European Commission","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Agricultural engineering; Decision analysis; Engineering; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Environmental science; Operations research; Mathematics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.06482937438007623,"score_gpt":0.4008717576541387,"score_spread":0.33604238327406244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411957072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8624846,0.0013372677,0.070917845,0.0018686211,0.00004534133,0.0013105223,0.0013779878,0.00006388027,0.060593955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597922,0.00067754195,0.035446577,0.00005335026,0.000005623403,0.00013079075,0.0002678454,0.000011535724,0.0036144687],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975834,0.00083541434,0.000072813025,0.0001798066,0.0007038437,0.0006246656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976991,0.0011354275,0.00015616305,0.000085488726,0.00070175296,0.000222128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035664977,0.00081835187,0.00049044465,0.002177302,0.0036277717,0.0028784985,0.0012705578,0.0011835,0.0020052828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004427979,0.00031180796,0.0010969656,0.0040958426,0.0018775146,0.00086985005,0.0013075125,0.00081889634,0.00008489714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004714388,0.00037832034,0.025869919,0.00049865135,0.00017501657,0.0034239322,0.002159962,0.81466305,0.0038015998,0.06822085,0.004441237,0.07589606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011262212,0.00032388882,0.0193816,0.00024304302,0.00016669252,0.0003348193,0.010130373,0.92681897,0.0030124,0.01775291,0.021581437,0.00014122193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7964312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84688854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20356882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033546515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027452111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4095353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412045797","doi":"10.1007/s10489-025-06540-z","title":"Application of multi-attribute large-scale group decision-making based on adaptive multi-threshold constraints in selecting the optimal site of a wastewater treatment plant","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Computer science; Scale (ratio); Mathematical optimization; Wastewater; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Machine learning; Mathematics; Environmental science; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.07923605621070515,"score_gpt":0.38041390156544985,"score_spread":0.3011778453547447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412045797","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17671795,0.0002759719,0.8203432,0.00030013424,0.000072529496,0.00027548487,0.000048138267,0.00011380063,0.0018527672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9081204,0.00008462778,0.09125978,0.00003793407,0.000018550269,0.00016294599,0.000034847562,0.000011619283,0.00026925554],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971003,0.0015770367,0.00021783322,0.00034662333,0.00056990475,0.00018816329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928992,0.005499641,0.00044895665,0.00017041122,0.0007337299,0.00024812974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00566339,0.001074188,0.0019364469,0.0012798492,0.0010794973,0.0017682894,0.0016255497,0.0015415722,0.0012247459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009801955,0.00070714083,0.0012802905,0.0015093596,0.00084819266,0.0016072363,0.0016745587,0.00123622,0.00006567091],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015000047,0.000162993,0.0009758632,0.00012673985,0.0001245981,0.00012082408,0.00011859113,0.9742528,0.0015830725,0.0022060408,0.00015042737,0.02002808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010825865,0.000054565262,0.00016299036,0.000004105592,0.000019645815,0.0000074933882,0.000019167403,0.9984005,0.00037296218,0.00089511176,0.00004545553,0.000007212626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005606601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045126085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00566339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013145212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018142055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029951274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412508560","doi":"10.1609/socs.v18i1.36000","title":"Position Paper: On the Impact of Direction-Selection in BAE*","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Israel Science Foundation; Israel National Road Safety Authority; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Position (finance); Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Business","score_opus":0.05215064538142036,"score_gpt":0.4000950922151399,"score_spread":0.3479444468337195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412508560","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20558651,0.0059035188,0.7049186,0.005000485,0.0007256004,0.00029719385,0.00028450062,0.0006021638,0.076681346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7765851,0.0023036327,0.2085263,0.0011318199,0.00021835246,0.00017381088,0.0003136288,0.00035844257,0.010388793],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710685,0.0015848465,0.00009911981,0.00027251698,0.0006789448,0.00025772958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693299,0.025637042,0.0008996099,0.001385216,0.0021268711,0.00062135415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004317977,0.00062416174,0.0007799006,0.00063149346,0.00047253992,0.0017519398,0.0013194877,0.0009907547,0.0076120696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032402705,0.00032022866,0.00054427574,0.0009628004,0.00081743643,0.0033229298,0.0014893301,0.0017786404,0.0010871838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001005774,0.0005855656,0.0050338656,0.00044723664,0.00011334452,0.0001435665,0.0001919492,0.40387502,0.0054282933,0.1941843,0.0115894945,0.37740162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008469595,0.00050996593,0.00082958874,0.0001455902,0.000046758472,0.000115205716,0.00012945838,0.9255664,0.0039270855,0.060505502,0.008110448,0.000029320901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039003822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004684792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076120696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092426053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018041305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025464952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412641714","doi":"10.18280/ijsse.150619","title":"Using Fuzzy DEMATEL Technique in Analyzing and Evaluating the Risks of Construction Projects","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Engineering; Construction engineering; Transport engineering; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.19550619675550465,"score_gpt":0.4816930172058774,"score_spread":0.2861868204503728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412641714","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21508189,0.0004736167,0.7753297,0.00025484923,0.000035275687,0.00018638537,0.00041022248,0.0003950914,0.00783296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7947149,0.0002692293,0.20353583,0.000040609575,0.0000117646005,0.00013139132,0.00020279823,0.000019095958,0.0010743317],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987256,0.00050259236,0.000079507634,0.00009099744,0.00051275105,0.000088432986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973756,0.0017556369,0.00020734304,0.00007292683,0.0005305097,0.000058010075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024043864,0.00056118955,0.00071048277,0.004967234,0.0007417593,0.0013475406,0.0006033752,0.00062288524,0.0015262775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004944285,0.00028902607,0.0009619376,0.0022391756,0.00038369597,0.0010664145,0.000529897,0.00047944827,0.00015690902],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008330921,0.0003067807,0.023148457,0.0009081285,0.00037780908,0.00064517424,0.00094155356,0.46828404,0.031123536,0.029818967,0.0023208857,0.4412916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028866883,0.0002263735,0.006414203,0.000058640177,0.000083832034,0.00017031941,0.00029958284,0.9729586,0.0082967365,0.009775219,0.0016295798,0.000057922076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060122292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067145596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060122292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001619406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008735359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0127158165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412767593","doi":"10.23952/jano.7.2025.2.02","title":"Solving an uncertain quadratic multiobjective optimization problem using Newton’s descent method via a robust optimization approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied and Numerical Optimization","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Descent (aeronautics); Mathematical optimization; Multi-objective optimization; Robust optimization; Quadratic equation; Descent direction; Optimization problem; Newton's method; Quadratic programming; Computer science; Mathematics; Newton's method in optimization; Gradient descent; Iterative method; Engineering; Nonlinear system; Artificial intelligence; Local convergence; Artificial neural network","score_opus":0.09640393866883326,"score_gpt":0.395242406603361,"score_spread":0.29883846793452773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412767593","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015304431,0.00012202204,0.9970745,0.00005644844,0.000014705513,0.000018480465,0.000009582841,0.00004420458,0.0011295256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15415235,0.0005523586,0.8406314,0.0001255127,0.00009100545,0.00031373432,0.00010800901,0.00008641635,0.003939133],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994448,0.00018686423,0.000033809883,0.00009133172,0.00021029958,0.000032881264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999421,0.00033995166,0.000073579955,0.000028724467,0.00011739153,0.000019324701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012557738,0.0009856161,0.0010183322,0.0005931208,0.00040089514,0.00077364105,0.0008598882,0.0011670524,0.0016289955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016078226,0.000439205,0.001028279,0.0004790789,0.00054357795,0.00065669446,0.00084412785,0.0011867451,0.00044951163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016972577,0.000021440255,0.00017316209,0.00014504028,0.00004021766,0.000066701694,0.000037843667,0.9559227,0.0029719395,0.010564603,0.00057093374,0.029468458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024457704,0.000014599355,0.000028257227,0.000005002044,0.0000032862133,0.000011036369,0.0000027712622,0.9980106,0.00029972065,0.0010306892,0.00058819336,0.0000034524196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036223168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025411001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036223168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050823524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012677901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007202506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412815654","doi":"10.1142/s0219622025500889","title":"A Decision–Making System for Managing Renewable Energy Alternatives and Strategy Using Triangular Neutrosophic Bipolar Fuzzy TOPSIS","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Renewable energy; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.04530172381779102,"score_gpt":0.3962818716126556,"score_spread":0.3509801477948646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412815654","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075648064,0.00013180738,0.9852514,0.0002507364,0.000048991642,0.00040569337,0.000121033896,0.00032379324,0.0059016584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2934855,0.0004169602,0.7018345,0.00011946121,0.00005238221,0.0011653003,0.00029399368,0.000030434805,0.0026015206],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986191,0.00049532554,0.00014460424,0.00021610605,0.0004192787,0.00010559776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992574,0.00031791965,0.0000996676,0.000035661975,0.00021822161,0.000071084345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028794184,0.001235705,0.0013481034,0.0019167463,0.0017195106,0.0030978422,0.0017614588,0.0013179291,0.0050259405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003094822,0.00051161135,0.0014175592,0.0018950044,0.00074541353,0.0017057672,0.0018196929,0.0015379348,0.0006814867],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014611005,0.0002187798,0.0012467499,0.00054024626,0.0002923259,0.00090806547,0.00087340205,0.70577043,0.008657973,0.10508614,0.0033863038,0.17287356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031994066,0.000109405046,0.00016040205,0.000060279635,0.000064130814,0.00007253922,0.0001856315,0.9641502,0.0010540632,0.030940188,0.0031386141,0.00003257858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006876502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078567285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006876502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020341866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003683736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016813517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413031646","doi":"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2025.103138","title":"Distributionally robust tail bounds based on Wasserstein distance and f-divergence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insurance Mathematics and Economics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Divergence (linguistics); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science","score_opus":0.07651634865397774,"score_gpt":0.33112566024824364,"score_spread":0.2546093115942659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413031646","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018916745,0.001189968,0.97745025,0.00026472268,0.000052996467,0.000033714696,0.00008269571,0.00018801317,0.0018209347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72264624,0.002036805,0.27124035,0.0004276107,0.0003811251,0.00023562649,0.0006754106,0.0005499744,0.0018069203],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98930126,0.0043294304,0.00063924503,0.0013702966,0.0036313918,0.0007283537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90309757,0.07757834,0.005603878,0.00706461,0.0049004843,0.0017550673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024303116,0.0029501459,0.0032252378,0.0045968997,0.0010898235,0.0040692794,0.004070223,0.0036599596,0.0026179985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.117159724,0.00087573886,0.002914554,0.0021902118,0.0053935694,0.009435407,0.006277233,0.00653802,0.0005173021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023876187,0.000100663296,0.0027706337,0.0003321233,0.00024370613,0.00025486533,0.00024295844,0.7534611,0.0028476596,0.21287467,0.00076319906,0.025869688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079916035,0.000096187454,0.00065879803,0.00008411586,0.00003594489,0.00009754903,0.00002980692,0.8635595,0.0012726785,0.13366194,0.0004311055,0.000064475294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016767604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009185594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024303116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033341455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017557298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12852871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413268176","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-97985-9_67","title":"Double Hierarchy Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets Using Einstein Operations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in networks and systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Hierarchy; Einstein; Linguistics; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Mathematics; Physics; Philosophy; Astronomy; Political science; Law; Mathematical physics","score_opus":0.1175774535688509,"score_gpt":0.37943943300911076,"score_spread":0.26186197944025985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413268176","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014669564,0.0004234549,0.9692639,0.00018112548,0.00013343948,0.000040072293,0.0000570377,0.00010268265,0.01512863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4811844,0.00069308927,0.5012322,0.000116656265,0.00019894958,0.00018569225,0.00017331877,0.000111270245,0.016104393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901295,0.00029296466,0.000107449836,0.00014057268,0.0003775495,0.000068580055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900395,0.00048168213,0.000094093084,0.00011343776,0.00025088762,0.00005591934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014164661,0.0005489669,0.00081924524,0.0017167373,0.0008560471,0.0026904077,0.0008028127,0.0006074327,0.0037349605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036738717,0.0003187769,0.0008245465,0.0017445069,0.0013560331,0.0039784266,0.0020207085,0.0016535508,0.00076576613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000549469,0.000017018088,0.000066445435,0.00009519586,0.000021440535,0.00006693957,0.00030949738,0.011040438,0.0033476905,0.94250345,0.0007543266,0.041722633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018504199,0.00006388178,0.00015163657,0.000053251424,0.00003866911,0.000105656356,0.00017872948,0.14248538,0.0046574133,0.8399106,0.012291779,0.000044463366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006389761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053579255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037349605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000874062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005243751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012494624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413286806","doi":"10.3934/math.2025836","title":"A simplified approach to solve hesitant fuzzy linear programming problem with hesitant decision variables and right-hand-side values","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIMS Mathematics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Linear programming; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06404426369828173,"score_gpt":0.3614685098418009,"score_spread":0.29742424614351914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413286806","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010060556,0.00009525857,0.99761045,0.000059691498,0.000021694854,0.000026172982,0.000014367635,0.000026527556,0.0011397821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14321524,0.0010042471,0.8488514,0.00015224268,0.00016673899,0.00039479596,0.00014917963,0.000058204703,0.0060080905],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988029,0.0005207265,0.000073532414,0.00018907727,0.00034982033,0.00006392148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994178,0.00028550043,0.000044549048,0.000059758022,0.0001657422,0.000026705644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013765778,0.0010058964,0.0011448534,0.0009646749,0.0005723188,0.0010949825,0.0014288655,0.0009816389,0.0054299426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020130428,0.00047726094,0.001218769,0.0010721688,0.00072160264,0.0015469571,0.0013386651,0.0019149885,0.00085066626],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008179461,0.000112005735,0.0003253069,0.00054724613,0.00012890996,0.00027251252,0.00025607154,0.6724125,0.005520295,0.17570962,0.003600232,0.14103341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015354011,0.00005224261,0.000086106396,0.000017609775,0.000020443444,0.0000859043,0.000027945323,0.95804864,0.0011656419,0.035938445,0.0045223166,0.000019338082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002255289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054299426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006844867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001607867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018164992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413421230","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5402335","title":"A New Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method for Complex Multi-Source Heterogeneous Systems: Oilfield Waste Treatment Technology Evaluation from Life-Cycle Perspective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Computer science; Management science; Process engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Petroleum engineering; Operations research; Waste management; Environmental science; Systems engineering; Engineering; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1501229042318984,"score_gpt":0.4843788432872204,"score_spread":0.334255939055322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413421230","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024349375,0.00008021083,0.99617743,0.00006175656,0.000050360704,0.00008838124,0.00004987248,0.00011085861,0.0009462573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.078429155,0.00016495746,0.9179332,0.0000994366,0.000088984394,0.0006597946,0.00015289849,0.00011851711,0.0023530861],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964946,0.0016494961,0.00019377384,0.00044369916,0.0010698877,0.00014865177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951692,0.0031898585,0.0002703739,0.00020479062,0.00097377365,0.00019201603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060803024,0.0022096543,0.0027150912,0.0028652672,0.001025953,0.002669001,0.0023042043,0.0027859213,0.0063829804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008070767,0.0010333537,0.0023783827,0.0024053643,0.0009163347,0.0021737588,0.0022547997,0.0024951217,0.00079340505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002411066,0.0003342226,0.0010034819,0.0006384076,0.00046138142,0.00025106771,0.00020722066,0.72778434,0.007113212,0.020213693,0.0023201671,0.2394317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027238715,0.00008026001,0.00013847466,0.000022580589,0.00003790152,0.000034494915,0.000016325355,0.99186957,0.0007067669,0.005918982,0.0011216876,0.000025620735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032572297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042151576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063829804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012865425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023176055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03215611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413431872","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-443-33740-6.00017-7","title":"Consolidating perspectives of experts and decision-makers by fuzzy ZE-TOPSIS for sustainable urban transportation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Business; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Computer science; Environmental planning; Engineering; Geography; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.033594273648034356,"score_gpt":0.34585374582647604,"score_spread":0.3122594721784417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413431872","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011036152,0.0010249848,0.96978307,0.00025843544,0.000103258055,0.000061367704,0.000067077075,0.00014445273,0.017521245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19278866,0.0019252476,0.79400694,0.00008735091,0.0000572752,0.00014757803,0.0002558333,0.000052701722,0.010678371],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884856,0.000459543,0.00006789607,0.0000650873,0.0004897477,0.00006918504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941194,0.00035368936,0.000022525088,0.00003505482,0.0001605142,0.000016323384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021699911,0.0006575646,0.00062820327,0.0014669389,0.0005118384,0.0019009464,0.0007025948,0.00064793805,0.0047032246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019137339,0.00034464433,0.0011051412,0.0014135292,0.0005985122,0.0018665583,0.0014291527,0.0010330417,0.0006424779],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013208145,0.000088697794,0.00058264786,0.00088851585,0.00019355632,0.00041766278,0.0016912022,0.10015263,0.025036557,0.14315444,0.004881555,0.72278047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033005304,0.00022455702,0.0016233104,0.00055502175,0.00027133335,0.00040257652,0.0026761745,0.6481772,0.01529108,0.28293788,0.047676235,0.00013155381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019690944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004173701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047032246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006463973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011437479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015733838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413600864","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-203","title":"On Neutrosophic e-Compactness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compact space; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.06655063684519917,"score_gpt":0.4759213637381064,"score_spread":0.4093707268929072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413600864","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10176397,0.010081213,0.72760266,0.0041524176,0.000256869,0.00011983103,0.00022882051,0.00008014535,0.15571405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8768243,0.0037666524,0.11010195,0.00076084654,0.00044272075,0.0002127857,0.00013872533,0.000030224997,0.0077217505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973794,0.0013054434,0.00014143478,0.00041683135,0.00058502087,0.00017188555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928827,0.0054450557,0.00040946898,0.0004907594,0.00047051135,0.0003015149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036786853,0.0005877034,0.0006303846,0.0020430477,0.0014696633,0.0021772245,0.00059190043,0.0010235079,0.0028550404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008822552,0.00028717122,0.0008165676,0.0018082466,0.00837812,0.0054118,0.0036075928,0.0019050137,0.0003014156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012538234,0.000010591835,0.00021808308,0.0000527166,0.000009391778,0.00007908991,0.00028317215,0.0023133517,0.00046415813,0.9895438,0.00023737102,0.006775812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050094077,0.00004108241,0.00035635862,0.00004854801,0.0000052651317,0.00012980987,0.00015335814,0.005886883,0.00030549587,0.9861459,0.006912944,0.0000092981245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008410933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005701209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036786853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012019182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005595608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019454956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413606890","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-208","title":"Neutrosophic Statistics with Outliers Data: Utilizing Neutrosophic Median Absolute Deviation to Estimate the Mean Parameter Using Neutrosophic Modified One Step M-Estimator","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia","keywords":"Mathematics; Outlier; Statistics; Estimator; Least absolute deviations; Absolute deviation; Mean absolute error; Absolute (philosophy); Mean squared error; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16991186904772093,"score_gpt":0.4781484117921388,"score_spread":0.30823654274441786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413606890","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020482976,0.0003408939,0.9779023,0.00013169141,0.00004358896,0.00004445465,0.00007152036,0.00009469704,0.000887773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5686881,0.0007100622,0.42869765,0.00024005143,0.00013539295,0.00022055139,0.00042077497,0.00005279243,0.0008345762],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977047,0.00091597607,0.00019419241,0.0004014368,0.0007002848,0.00008346378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99370074,0.004178448,0.0007026013,0.00040027653,0.0009189562,0.00009899803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004056104,0.000902009,0.001111691,0.0020420747,0.00045045125,0.0015953273,0.0012047378,0.0010286091,0.0008670697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016077187,0.00030154263,0.0010853792,0.001669181,0.00079128373,0.0019215991,0.0012896027,0.0012849872,0.00021373833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042477399,0.00019952377,0.018687204,0.00075203646,0.00064213073,0.0004317614,0.00044732395,0.5345526,0.011493181,0.0661495,0.0028527253,0.36336735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019360787,0.00018073081,0.00291707,0.00007510142,0.00006404204,0.0001614645,0.00008977464,0.95514154,0.004202149,0.034833398,0.002260911,0.00005440332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015399584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011503504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004056104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061745953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010701439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021450996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413929974","doi":"10.1016/j.mfglet.2025.06.187","title":"A Fuzzy Data-Driven framework for Enhanced risk management Decision-Making in Manufacturing: A Case study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manufacturing Letters","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Risk management; Artificial intelligence; Business","score_opus":0.09339305322206183,"score_gpt":0.42771416200380863,"score_spread":0.3343211087817468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413929974","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15671007,0.0009082597,0.8305529,0.0013322814,0.00006932674,0.00054645387,0.00040735758,0.00021042011,0.009262976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52998847,0.00038898407,0.4676882,0.00007043726,0.000026035157,0.00022758859,0.00014456426,0.000017743583,0.0014479731],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981687,0.0010053638,0.0001159759,0.00014977169,0.0004311383,0.0001290555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969722,0.0022020638,0.00013376823,0.00013303148,0.0004319986,0.00012682725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041478015,0.0007138457,0.00062643865,0.0016433288,0.0012535469,0.002706837,0.0011867948,0.0018506505,0.0018111778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004325649,0.0003078757,0.0010863004,0.0014979744,0.0010496681,0.0013266747,0.0013432014,0.0011617679,0.00016530266],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037654716,0.0005634765,0.0055848113,0.000521656,0.00012620476,0.002799915,0.0018149134,0.767781,0.0069403127,0.08518576,0.002138668,0.1261667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003183685,0.00012654474,0.0007982584,0.000092669296,0.00003597964,0.00027311908,0.0006022762,0.97334415,0.0030425212,0.016867759,0.004737621,0.000047289606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009143751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01168076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009143751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022957702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022838993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02193594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413958659","doi":"10.5267/j.jpm.2025.8.001","title":"Evaluation and ranking of multi-type projects with mixed multi-criteria cost/benefit and optimization of project portfolio selection","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Project Management","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Selection (genetic algorithm); Portfolio; Computer science; Portfolio optimization; Operations research; Business; Engineering; Machine learning","score_opus":0.18210984973430155,"score_gpt":0.45462135760972733,"score_spread":0.2725115078754258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413958659","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08738528,0.0006199006,0.9061805,0.00015751868,0.000028169452,0.0003638221,0.00011531898,0.00015695156,0.004992455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7122445,0.00044497068,0.2831192,0.00005802258,0.000020278878,0.00084988953,0.00023950206,0.000048534406,0.0029751137],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962358,0.0017864945,0.00019701119,0.00028376703,0.0011819471,0.00031505426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731606,0.0014728287,0.00031023854,0.0001272993,0.00060970016,0.00016392073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046929014,0.0017004586,0.0018450718,0.0031281135,0.00054227543,0.0023944962,0.0011363584,0.0012616772,0.0020683312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005591404,0.00075404195,0.0017639189,0.0024926565,0.00061198475,0.0011296953,0.0015211492,0.0007625587,0.00024276554],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007600202,0.00008279782,0.0012833307,0.00017136682,0.00009277472,0.00011293304,0.00005054562,0.9519409,0.0020994048,0.0026347546,0.0003433495,0.04111184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070433393,0.00009985056,0.00042554803,0.000016134654,0.00002338669,0.000026014754,0.000026720923,0.9969434,0.00065215706,0.0014795532,0.00029094674,0.0000091933625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032136801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026904177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046929014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013113699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002103432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024818718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414018627","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2025-0229","title":"Optimal placement of hydrogen vehicle fueling stations using geographic information systems and multiple criteria decision-making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Geographic information system; Computer science; Transport engineering; Environmental science; Operations research; Civil engineering; Engineering; Geology; Remote sensing","score_opus":0.03627733969308659,"score_gpt":0.3235973466019245,"score_spread":0.2873200069088379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414018627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5442037,0.0005028644,0.44340733,0.0009198881,0.00005078363,0.00087412115,0.00059657544,0.00025341485,0.009191384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8782182,0.00014982093,0.12018749,0.0000490555,0.000010945156,0.00023103277,0.00028633434,0.000017497234,0.0008495996],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977344,0.00134312,0.000102895225,0.0002583662,0.0002524406,0.0003087662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997021,0.0020319826,0.00027598525,0.000056268484,0.0004135142,0.00020119775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038303088,0.0014020168,0.0013643171,0.003293759,0.0010512362,0.0028956297,0.0013214948,0.001075221,0.0019210451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059789466,0.0009964145,0.0013426181,0.0024598236,0.0010454606,0.0011995861,0.0014712443,0.00093479286,0.000116264404],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086836684,0.00007416132,0.0028840248,0.000060194085,0.000060953014,0.00006191844,0.000076141085,0.9810821,0.0002639324,0.0021221503,0.00020716032,0.013020424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002367085,0.00006234078,0.00066959055,0.000012731455,0.000020115647,0.000004922838,0.00013323473,0.99665916,0.00016586155,0.00206315,0.00017345494,0.000011716647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.100835815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1106466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100835815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006182844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008687833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20049775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414063020","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-213","title":"A New Approach of Possibility Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set and Its Application in Decision-Making Environment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complement (music); Set (abstract data type); Measure (data warehouse); Similarity measure; Intersection (aeronautics); Similarity (geometry); Fuzzy logic; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.06939213444550976,"score_gpt":0.4193935944969844,"score_spread":0.3500014600514746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414063020","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008870891,0.0031714106,0.9604056,0.0010219519,0.00027619043,0.00007697302,0.00008105616,0.00008681175,0.026009101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43443736,0.0050873305,0.5539615,0.00037865544,0.0005176376,0.00023901905,0.00012457537,0.000033128206,0.0052207704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789196,0.0007031603,0.00013982524,0.0003615624,0.000787102,0.00011639842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993155,0.00030744346,0.00006617365,0.0000621995,0.00018898802,0.000059848062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016054782,0.00076067244,0.0007235618,0.0029704762,0.0012920118,0.0030819543,0.0013162933,0.0011605163,0.0022705572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027701592,0.00031418624,0.001394826,0.0028260495,0.0022962466,0.0038735946,0.001958781,0.0019564591,0.00033118643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029447916,0.000022893784,0.00046354634,0.00024728823,0.000051333,0.00041443805,0.00044379322,0.024218136,0.0026395153,0.9134898,0.0014414537,0.05653834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015955593,0.00009548391,0.0005043445,0.00018667922,0.00005389755,0.0008985868,0.00031973544,0.18913656,0.0025659816,0.7609173,0.045225687,0.00007979988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013617618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008490814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030819543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014726613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013690711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010684967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414105009","doi":"10.1016/j.geomat.2025.100071","title":"Multi-agent systems of large language models as weight assigners: An approach to collaborative weighting in spatial multi-criteria decision-making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Shahid Beheshti University","keywords":"Weighting; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Robustness (evolution); Group decision-making; Process (computing); Outlier; Parsing; Obstacle","score_opus":0.07395771069311624,"score_gpt":0.4278588283182398,"score_spread":0.35390111762512355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414105009","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027831243,0.00014634988,0.9953431,0.00025454763,0.000025857922,0.00004682211,0.000009568281,0.00005363075,0.0013370207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2256334,0.00033341275,0.76989704,0.00019685032,0.00014441156,0.00041568268,0.000054080952,0.000076202385,0.003248918],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929703,0.0048985216,0.00028977287,0.00074153696,0.00083862315,0.00026117728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936597,0.0043773795,0.00058826327,0.00039546404,0.0007418102,0.00023744671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007752672,0.0012923545,0.0014866756,0.0017277062,0.0014568141,0.0040598814,0.0030607062,0.0021712882,0.0020802745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014856242,0.0009912371,0.0019777224,0.0021628868,0.0026880687,0.0048233178,0.0043573687,0.0027433909,0.0004003341],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000818134,0.00009142922,0.0008029211,0.00017935611,0.00021209616,0.00026728926,0.0015389541,0.5986066,0.0018776204,0.3277629,0.0011540978,0.067424916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012705943,0.00002566774,0.00006554531,0.000017154814,0.000025382687,0.000019759482,0.00009507372,0.92544764,0.00027457235,0.072369196,0.0016256404,0.000021678834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063747265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007404622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007752672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022298906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024172454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041000545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414230345","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2025.09.014","title":"Graph model for multiple composite decision makers with large-scale groups: Probability-hesitant fuzzy preference modeling and application","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"China Postdoctoral Science Foundation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Graph; Preference; Decision model; Decision theory; Decision-making models","score_opus":0.2626252537878989,"score_gpt":0.44407243618941006,"score_spread":0.18144718240151114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414230345","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015483256,0.00032087282,0.9780724,0.0004094032,0.000033255434,0.00005730515,0.00011675242,0.00008400537,0.0054227933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78061694,0.0012443678,0.20861034,0.00019429615,0.00011025345,0.00034060807,0.0003262228,0.00005360855,0.008503387],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979983,0.0008484529,0.00010310595,0.000428048,0.00046258222,0.00015950124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751043,0.0014617774,0.00035025706,0.00012363907,0.00041348548,0.00014035632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023741222,0.0012666682,0.0011051886,0.0018909259,0.0010077001,0.0024258844,0.0022425565,0.0019094442,0.003649609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005656716,0.0005176293,0.0018132075,0.0025269745,0.001401405,0.004321716,0.0015202812,0.002013865,0.00046790863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062616586,0.000038284274,0.0010206505,0.00011936067,0.000096807715,0.0003863076,0.00042263712,0.5980738,0.0008377631,0.37963998,0.0011965934,0.018105198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008316915,0.000015242177,0.00010854542,0.000008418445,0.000016741436,0.00004206277,0.00006464616,0.9028889,0.00011088756,0.09589557,0.000826379,0.000014327826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010509968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007451232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010509968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027586743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013834949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020897567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414453564","doi":"10.1007/s40815-025-02065-2","title":"Multi-attribute Decision-Making Methods to Low-Carbon Green Supply Chain Management in N-Cubic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Fuzzy logic; Process (computing); Supply chain management; Ecological footprint; Ambiguity; Computational intelligence; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.06767104061369232,"score_gpt":0.4520419226116101,"score_spread":0.38437088199791775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414453564","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021019736,0.00020377865,0.97714895,0.00015536985,0.00005231587,0.000061397506,0.000025332054,0.000032233766,0.001300871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6222064,0.00028197834,0.3752604,0.00007322207,0.000066798006,0.00019732608,0.000056750832,0.000025289744,0.0018316851],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833715,0.0009481202,0.000100031546,0.00020350036,0.00030855462,0.00010252372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969144,0.0020828175,0.00019169132,0.00009597384,0.00059010036,0.0001250959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048517943,0.00065799564,0.0013068427,0.00089875766,0.0011019569,0.0015118517,0.0013308928,0.0007674474,0.0017371161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005839294,0.0003614055,0.0014286375,0.0017042211,0.00088528846,0.0015431731,0.0012525008,0.0017362582,0.00012605451],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017074135,0.00016562256,0.0008979663,0.00022398155,0.00011989212,0.00015010974,0.0003684292,0.8793365,0.0015477515,0.052226257,0.0008887985,0.063903905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053109893,0.00002371264,0.000062788786,0.000006991671,0.000008907816,0.000007260376,0.00002378235,0.99184287,0.00015860637,0.007665872,0.0001884306,0.0000054608863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008726246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066873156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008726246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016717233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019960373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025659025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414573217","doi":"10.1007/s00010-025-01231-z","title":"A tribute to János Aczél","year":2025,"lang":"hu","type":"article","venue":"Aequationes Mathematicae","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; History of mathematics; Calculus (dental); Functional equation","score_opus":0.1530637288271592,"score_gpt":0.5164967655968694,"score_spread":0.36343303676971017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414573217","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016546874,0.0071592196,0.001397438,0.8642169,0.11350763,0.000011075971,0.00007449204,0.000079593505,0.013388149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017524965,0.009660567,0.004220031,0.7168907,0.11720986,0.00009670646,0.00012743662,0.000488831,0.13378094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99097365,0.0024040581,0.00069207035,0.0010618025,0.0043733935,0.000495013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9445114,0.022966657,0.0019403053,0.0030586396,0.023507327,0.004015547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009559314,0.0009409488,0.0025551273,0.0019313213,0.0049807923,0.009394729,0.002974614,0.007449328,0.022951838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08453828,0.00052120414,0.00078419317,0.0020876732,0.0070407623,0.008770292,0.003564429,0.027523518,0.01578891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022212605,0.0000132070545,0.00006221558,0.000042779433,0.000010510418,0.000050203267,0.0001259675,0.00008827501,0.000030820596,0.032033227,0.95767546,0.009845094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018273455,0.000008720701,0.0001260169,0.00020299814,0.000006343404,0.00010309366,0.00023701695,0.00028978175,0.000063346895,0.038921934,0.9599999,0.000022484626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074425866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073349136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022951838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032697422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046314453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07678157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414613087","doi":"10.1111/itor.70099","title":"A robust composite indicator framework for evaluating Sustainable Development Goal 3 using benefit‐of‐the‐doubt models and principal component analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Transactions in Operational Research","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Principal component analysis; Principal (computer security); Composite indicator; Sustainable development; Composite index; Component (thermodynamics)","score_opus":0.4523675920104262,"score_gpt":0.558162821763583,"score_spread":0.1057952297531568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414613087","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02072115,0.00020849775,0.97567946,0.00039528974,0.00004185577,0.00013107093,0.00032384266,0.00019595855,0.0023029216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7414992,0.00026687182,0.25574005,0.0001379465,0.00006936597,0.0005067656,0.0007383579,0.000073245224,0.00096814166],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98881733,0.007480117,0.00039636248,0.00091664866,0.001980319,0.00040912302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901994,0.0056536947,0.0013916194,0.0007151866,0.0017576827,0.000282471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01704428,0.0016237383,0.0015099641,0.005537698,0.0006118801,0.003950543,0.0023376434,0.0010286297,0.0019077647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02828493,0.00046138678,0.0017666364,0.004314231,0.0019536493,0.0023824875,0.002986436,0.0019185443,0.00029174253],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009709078,0.000114630566,0.0085290065,0.0001514212,0.00039334895,0.00009390289,0.0001558705,0.82850456,0.00058223814,0.11946392,0.0017426412,0.040171314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007551271,0.000055531284,0.0014330971,0.000025919882,0.00002447564,0.000013267182,0.000060834143,0.9464434,0.00020147683,0.051066928,0.0006406713,0.00002690965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00891654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049313614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01704428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00245485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002915014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090139806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415140567","doi":"10.1016/j.ins.2025.122763","title":"Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set based preference representation for composite decision makers in the graph model for conflict resolution","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Sciences","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation; University of Waterloo","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Preference; Fuzzy logic; Term (time); Semantics (computer science); Group decision-making; Conflict resolution; Fuzzy set; Representation (politics); Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.37290882480777676,"score_gpt":0.48740631251294936,"score_spread":0.1144974877051726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415140567","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03374728,0.00015649642,0.9608202,0.00032290304,0.000047816913,0.0000522968,0.00010235057,0.00007265443,0.0046780077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85655457,0.00018624273,0.13872318,0.00009025387,0.000030156652,0.00015741351,0.00014735092,0.00002976495,0.0040811487],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814415,0.0012220555,0.00006470749,0.00016900923,0.0002789815,0.00012102655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847597,0.0009550338,0.00013531349,0.00008370143,0.0002617957,0.00008819941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024146573,0.00067623396,0.0008689997,0.0012992109,0.0005764178,0.0024385506,0.0014580993,0.001066608,0.004069378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004871089,0.0002908039,0.0009869528,0.0015509785,0.0008662513,0.0033143864,0.0010218117,0.0014615497,0.00037437014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028192598,0.00015646842,0.00055984245,0.0002172562,0.00013715551,0.00023518637,0.00055952696,0.6576711,0.0022803654,0.2949949,0.0017233059,0.041182972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001043717,0.00003765802,0.00007204284,0.000012479464,0.000021770838,0.000018833887,0.00006356946,0.9397039,0.00027968938,0.05935583,0.00040774338,0.000015926793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031627691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003435383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004069378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001419804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011509473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013613462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415353132","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-21297-8","title":"A hybrid machine learning-enhanced MCDM model for transport safety engineering","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Harvard University","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Reliability (semiconductor); Sensitivity (control systems); Government (linguistics); Decision support system","score_opus":0.06240204431547637,"score_gpt":0.362478587406061,"score_spread":0.3000765430905846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415353132","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01247069,0.00025093777,0.9808851,0.0005981423,0.000046568948,0.0001206318,0.00033934007,0.00015471154,0.0051339217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6190163,0.00033805147,0.3750808,0.00023619474,0.000052287498,0.0005612477,0.00040906158,0.00004331472,0.004262725],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846077,0.00075207616,0.00007057643,0.00028347308,0.00031364264,0.00011950213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982343,0.0011288159,0.00016849641,0.00006381159,0.00034667717,0.00005791071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023746477,0.00089928746,0.0011999198,0.0015268581,0.0007657066,0.0015965916,0.0022661865,0.0019447773,0.0036192257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004630676,0.0006050642,0.0010592797,0.0020652167,0.0007745037,0.0012541385,0.001434909,0.00161982,0.00039629437],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014662624,0.000017389679,0.00030882968,0.000041534135,0.000015806476,0.000033796234,0.000028069413,0.98314464,0.0001481429,0.009123378,0.00032650193,0.006797332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052541623,0.000008037231,0.00005579647,0.000006839009,0.0000040544337,0.0000060407715,0.000008154851,0.9936748,0.00005309837,0.005710222,0.00046352504,0.0000040061705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021594347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02485798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021594347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022934745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026379381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04293728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415649967","doi":"10.1007/s40747-025-02078-2","title":"Dombi aggregation operator in terms of complex bipolar fuzzy sets with application in decision making problems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Complex & Intelligent Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptability; Fuzzy logic; Flexibility (engineering); Computational intelligence; Operator (biology); Generalization; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy set operations","score_opus":0.13282756316145775,"score_gpt":0.41530429907299976,"score_spread":0.282476735911542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415649967","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006287312,0.0006162589,0.9877329,0.0001784086,0.00008155143,0.00004994018,0.000032016873,0.000046201127,0.004975445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37252122,0.0020094148,0.62081677,0.00021620678,0.00022055709,0.0003550249,0.00010945046,0.000042852593,0.003708482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820876,0.0008362235,0.00013344812,0.00022526705,0.00050065434,0.00009569714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999012,0.0005077646,0.000120550256,0.000072591814,0.00024349478,0.000043562835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025086447,0.001069241,0.0008352148,0.0014904282,0.0008133178,0.0022716832,0.0009061901,0.0008325783,0.0020938064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004427876,0.0003048091,0.00093337556,0.0023780186,0.0012279049,0.002351513,0.0014565125,0.001578247,0.00038647692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012798519,0.00006934221,0.001021543,0.00033724058,0.00009748074,0.00035142648,0.00057375827,0.2068088,0.0078114034,0.6350039,0.0032473987,0.14454977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000151407085,0.000095279356,0.00043636197,0.00006912286,0.00003684159,0.00014902714,0.00012855888,0.7867677,0.0017066014,0.20294613,0.0076089157,0.000040252813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020722433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016245804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025086447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010790778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009622189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0132671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415757702","doi":"10.1007/s40747-025-02057-7","title":"Smart supplier selection using N-cubic fuzzy aggregation: a case study in agricultural manufacturing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Complex & Intelligent Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"King Khalid University","keywords":"Computational intelligence; Fuzzy logic; Robustness (evolution); Selection (genetic algorithm); Ranking (information retrieval); Fuzzy set; Cloud computing; Production (economics); Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.26114450162341923,"score_gpt":0.4418403957712875,"score_spread":0.18069589414786824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415757702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8759215,0.00046243088,0.11138173,0.0007493306,0.000035477435,0.00027219593,0.00020166805,0.00007386147,0.01090188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9514282,0.00020482265,0.04666094,0.00004146757,0.000011686519,0.00006265412,0.00006712435,0.000008430449,0.001514669],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985813,0.0008153249,0.00006437788,0.0001205921,0.000289062,0.0001294053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997364,0.0019110889,0.00016157531,0.00012877608,0.0002724233,0.00016219068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028032186,0.0006565661,0.00069219887,0.0011421307,0.0021536928,0.0012478473,0.0012042159,0.0018644256,0.0018674807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032409239,0.00025539353,0.0008834313,0.0024211856,0.0009160959,0.0010620625,0.0013537221,0.00081626856,0.0001559953],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008694525,0.0008970579,0.027883988,0.0005318999,0.00020187719,0.021307923,0.0034178921,0.81194186,0.00804882,0.02958048,0.0035613144,0.09175748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011619893,0.00037684877,0.006514201,0.00004369219,0.00007928652,0.0010105242,0.004205654,0.968501,0.0041373093,0.010676287,0.004262808,0.00007609481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017091429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026167834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017091429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017301233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012131042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033983886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416922251","doi":"10.1109/tsmc.2025.3627076","title":"Hesitant Fuzzy Ordered Linguistic Term Sets for Group Decision-Making","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China; Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province; Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Interpretability; Term (time); Ambiguity; Fuzzy logic; Group decision-making; Flexibility (engineering); Group (periodic table); Fuzzy set","score_opus":0.05316134752253814,"score_gpt":0.36666345547199175,"score_spread":0.3135021079494536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416922251","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005113937,0.00034278593,0.99213916,0.00016039722,0.000045045366,0.00005043384,0.000028491668,0.000046895817,0.0020728654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40406558,0.00074429356,0.5921011,0.00018736206,0.0001792836,0.00052330794,0.00014354756,0.000054058808,0.0020015156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927003,0.0037940715,0.00050177745,0.0007831025,0.0019709794,0.0002499249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937976,0.0041236607,0.00066703325,0.00034512664,0.0008493435,0.00021732629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074294065,0.0014511822,0.0013819924,0.0023790516,0.0010401995,0.0031746062,0.0019024805,0.0014921821,0.0019841394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015445632,0.0004515417,0.0016773104,0.0024437483,0.002498757,0.003712745,0.002402341,0.002554143,0.00039966073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088964705,0.00006805339,0.0005818609,0.00028504725,0.00017364009,0.00024458143,0.000797528,0.4095953,0.002072633,0.5285417,0.0010251157,0.056525577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013139597,0.000050599796,0.00009740789,0.00004642151,0.00003430892,0.000028298773,0.00008192911,0.76286715,0.0006362517,0.23426405,0.0018498251,0.000030630617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027088635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021733472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074294065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023222587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021474967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039290905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416935608","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-30869-7","title":"Multi-criteria decision making approach for solar energy implementation using N-cubic fuzzy interaction aggregation operators","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"King Abdulaziz University","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Automation; Nuclear decommissioning; Process (computing); Production (economics); Fuzzy set; Population; Solar energy","score_opus":0.14895112932269744,"score_gpt":0.47799052632005296,"score_spread":0.3290393969973555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416935608","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017577412,0.00023642596,0.9778986,0.00013808633,0.00003146816,0.00013959392,0.0000477853,0.00008325317,0.0038473525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.698596,0.0003495629,0.29817,0.00009590398,0.000054015545,0.00052260846,0.00013712977,0.000026252517,0.0020484554],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752086,0.0010593563,0.00016798852,0.0003341494,0.00069267215,0.0002249114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987135,0.0007030637,0.00014790068,0.000035238172,0.0003184698,0.00008187769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036008253,0.0012091099,0.0015061257,0.0012697285,0.0011202135,0.002447104,0.0018262949,0.0011308441,0.002724292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030567788,0.00048310825,0.0017723612,0.001934344,0.0007525234,0.0013554835,0.0016591152,0.0013961729,0.00017568326],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090345115,0.00006726312,0.0006196106,0.0002211853,0.00012652011,0.00025397836,0.0002600234,0.93873507,0.0016853366,0.018934207,0.0007509016,0.03825559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001082447,0.00005201204,0.00011243025,0.000011610392,0.000021278667,0.00001629951,0.000047053538,0.9918087,0.00023852134,0.0072023473,0.000467095,0.000011957214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011840243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010430808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011840243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020076183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031133594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023542643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417188199","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2025.130568","title":"A multidimensional ensemble generalized three-way decision approach under mixed-normal hesitant fuzzy sets for evaluating IoT–blockchain integration in supply chain performance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Probabilistic logic; Supply chain; Ranking (information retrieval); Fuzzy logic; Bayesian probability; Ensemble forecasting; Dimension (graph theory)","score_opus":0.10393811200998508,"score_gpt":0.4016220762133183,"score_spread":0.2976839642033332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417188199","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07977375,0.00034276213,0.91775566,0.00012677761,0.000059185055,0.000062099156,0.00005969068,0.00008279085,0.0017372386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89890975,0.00017059673,0.09979225,0.000041248946,0.000036996447,0.00010715103,0.00010234159,0.000015840646,0.00082385],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732214,0.001249499,0.00019540214,0.00037397665,0.0006398917,0.00021902334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968917,0.0017878173,0.0002281137,0.00012638814,0.0008311871,0.00013482025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046548224,0.0011684719,0.001986925,0.0021041878,0.0007610654,0.0023130819,0.0013214571,0.0014368102,0.0013771448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055327425,0.00050239824,0.0018291518,0.0015690842,0.0007405625,0.0021468827,0.001356478,0.00093368243,0.00012947938],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019883041,0.00008499246,0.0022365192,0.000108182045,0.00030761672,0.00012278979,0.00015454167,0.9469947,0.0015070977,0.009916041,0.00036186117,0.038006794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002484759,0.000025863183,0.00016683046,0.0000056494396,0.000020136948,0.0000071442855,0.000017747421,0.9974814,0.00018575501,0.0020194731,0.000059709226,0.000007829398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052237525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004263183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052237525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013062111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001066917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024617374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417302552","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2025.130834","title":"Trust risk-aware multiple decision-makers consensus seeking under dynamic social network: towards sustainable post-disaster emergency recovery plan selection","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; Social Science Planning Project of Shandong Province; Youth Innovation Technology Project of Higher School in Shandong Province; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Credibility; Ranking (information retrieval); Obedience; Perception; Selection (genetic algorithm); Trust management (information system); Plan (archaeology); Risk perception","score_opus":0.03630038065654139,"score_gpt":0.3626192529710231,"score_spread":0.3263188723144817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417302552","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10048896,0.00035357964,0.8957206,0.00065802754,0.000088017834,0.00010731847,0.000082167244,0.000118312804,0.0023829371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96617436,0.00011168115,0.032401916,0.00007085892,0.000048279806,0.000070244496,0.0000720359,0.000015151965,0.0010355453],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974891,0.0010785689,0.00012276018,0.0005228883,0.0004620072,0.00032481106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919342,0.0056812516,0.0007889634,0.00026527056,0.00096179184,0.0003685257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043367594,0.00089381984,0.0020629321,0.001017738,0.00090674026,0.0021145048,0.0021070985,0.0018299043,0.0014628544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012494106,0.0006267178,0.0010357255,0.0010029433,0.0009354001,0.0025763775,0.002301854,0.0013684299,0.00016644997],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031654767,0.00016133001,0.002141739,0.00015319382,0.00020545708,0.00025695487,0.00025403828,0.94879407,0.0013413114,0.015250258,0.0010024783,0.030122608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068802283,0.000036780897,0.00012395134,0.000004650621,0.000016823502,0.0000137099805,0.000028875273,0.99593544,0.00013669267,0.003609537,0.00008100233,0.000005696908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044794213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034498412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044794213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013993317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019084939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022935271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W46282991","doi":"","title":"Comparison of Multicriteria Methods for Land-use Suitability Assessment.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Suitability analysis; Land use; Simple (philosophy); Evaluation methods; Data mining; Operations research; Reliability engineering; Mathematics; Engineering; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.504412870673479,"score_gpt":0.660225174055708,"score_spread":0.15581230338222907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W46282991","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009948182,0.0019182893,0.98397696,0.00021423495,0.00006946162,0.00025108905,0.00007579763,0.00018389086,0.0033621432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17743815,0.0010659788,0.8190689,0.00013777283,0.00007602156,0.0006835224,0.00020249328,0.00016568034,0.0011614008],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97472274,0.018617785,0.0011351184,0.0013167165,0.00392742,0.00028018074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90495217,0.080230854,0.003837147,0.0045630173,0.0060089286,0.0004078954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03910756,0.0012037038,0.0015122154,0.004172013,0.00065113226,0.0022282253,0.0014320443,0.0010176862,0.0033826723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09981891,0.00043191097,0.0017024259,0.002665382,0.0009876239,0.0024654614,0.0025159724,0.00143003,0.00070170884],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060599315,0.00021418203,0.0055862577,0.0013380296,0.0011890716,0.000081127204,0.0008043359,0.26721364,0.0022114145,0.15161231,0.0029841673,0.5661594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007842694,0.0002662304,0.0026312135,0.0002574217,0.00017158434,0.00021635981,0.00024786312,0.91403866,0.0026382843,0.07279241,0.006568581,0.00009295523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018011951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027353496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03910756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001521079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017206494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20682305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W54250652","doi":"","title":"Optimal recommendation sets: covering uncertainty over user preferences","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Preference; Valuation (finance); Mathematical optimization; Set (abstract data type); Recommender system; Operator (biology); Preference elicitation; Expected utility hypothesis; Maximization; Data mining; Machine learning; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.1923471477013556,"score_gpt":0.44722309885472855,"score_spread":0.2548759511533729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W54250652","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008354409,0.0003344534,0.9890047,0.00033704343,0.000014039138,0.000077951896,0.00006527059,0.00009679386,0.0017152779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35930946,0.0006789514,0.63706785,0.0002627109,0.00010979665,0.00047533927,0.00025923408,0.00008461003,0.0017520433],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887089,0.006248617,0.00051098876,0.0013881737,0.0027032013,0.00044008662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98969007,0.0076459227,0.0007452664,0.0008680385,0.0008446803,0.00020595733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008574607,0.0016545469,0.0035402956,0.0024780298,0.0011599057,0.0032821374,0.003466262,0.0026703468,0.0034760134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019902315,0.0014637691,0.0022838428,0.0032658656,0.0019099914,0.0057920283,0.0025386661,0.002645296,0.0005665454],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015110325,0.00016237347,0.0009349564,0.00027273785,0.00030455278,0.00010087287,0.00032314172,0.78243023,0.00094110396,0.09781783,0.002091762,0.1144693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031397693,0.00009195482,0.0002095561,0.00004964367,0.000039348153,0.000054349664,0.000051121537,0.88467026,0.00055885065,0.11281179,0.0013989786,0.00003271694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024769008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025023285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008574607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023404541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015760784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045347393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W55691372","doi":"10.1023/a:1011257109771","title":"A Distance-Based Collective Weak Ordering","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Axiom; Binary relation; Axiomatic system; Mathematical economics; Group decision-making; Mathematics; Process (computing); Group (periodic table); Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.09888483062954825,"score_gpt":0.37756462514866596,"score_spread":0.27867979451911773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W55691372","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032063328,0.00020222898,0.95206636,0.00053045904,0.00013986688,0.00013948802,0.00014277535,0.00016494308,0.014550521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5260913,0.0003014208,0.46016616,0.00017372014,0.00016402928,0.00029514768,0.00035574086,0.00013057714,0.012322014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950754,0.0020829802,0.00028282247,0.00049466203,0.001735989,0.0003281255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98873514,0.0055204486,0.0005428431,0.0016377363,0.0027424227,0.0008214191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056947805,0.0007040596,0.0014982241,0.002961774,0.0023823911,0.0032590276,0.0022460802,0.0013922409,0.0068585305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018291954,0.00048009882,0.0009536785,0.0034151298,0.002677832,0.0059315814,0.0039679254,0.0021774005,0.0009448351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037917093,0.00020145395,0.0014725544,0.0002528795,0.00007572325,0.00009075895,0.0007903626,0.1059541,0.0031621347,0.71866333,0.0041939206,0.1647637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057682242,0.00024162413,0.0005026116,0.00004862189,0.000043404565,0.00006886865,0.00021872767,0.48215115,0.0013391692,0.5094909,0.0057831486,0.00005407326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028813358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032891363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068585305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021957564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027263267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030117214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W60464842","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-74757-4_2","title":"Introduction to GIS-MCDA","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in geographic information science","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Decision analysis; Weighting; Evidential reasoning approach; Decision maker; Management science; Set (abstract data type); Decision problem; Computer science; Decision rule; Business decision mapping; Operations research; Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Statistics","score_opus":0.07315424640462181,"score_gpt":0.3994691382206688,"score_spread":0.326314891816047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W60464842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00090330135,0.035569217,0.45895758,0.0045624455,0.003567958,0.00013649925,0.0027929235,0.0023642618,0.4911458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019857638,0.05214675,0.47407928,0.0027212529,0.002077852,0.00037570155,0.004291334,0.0022996543,0.44215053],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996406,0.000064274565,0.000021919617,0.00007228196,0.00018208996,0.000018888613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995704,0.00023846449,0.000010324214,0.000044278735,0.00012246009,0.000013979135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004676705,0.000945943,0.0007323442,0.002056113,0.0004967023,0.0021100733,0.0010816385,0.00079422764,0.080944195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014764336,0.00054481917,0.0006480733,0.0047294484,0.00069064484,0.0025767072,0.0011739888,0.0019334124,0.024114218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008276138,0.00003170623,0.0001269934,0.00055329327,0.000013394863,0.000080707745,0.00013973084,0.0052435733,0.00050752715,0.2503944,0.24069226,0.5022081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002316605,0.0000049746386,0.00010009396,0.00020448417,0.0000032767628,0.00012725354,0.000038083013,0.0031150568,0.00023360598,0.13292988,0.8632311,0.000009946235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002312733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004144049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080944195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011137377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010363286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27078533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W619824529","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2569559","title":"Measuring Association via Lack of Co-Monotonicity: The LOC Index","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Variety (cybernetics); Reading (process); Index (typography); Association (psychology); Set (abstract data type); Monotone polygon; Mathematics; Spelling; Econometrics; Statistics; Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematical analysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23020466672970374,"score_gpt":0.4188315777494773,"score_spread":0.18862691101977358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W619824529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5805058,0.0024333417,0.39812633,0.0018416113,0.0002436387,0.00047069392,0.0027454405,0.00036123476,0.013271896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436946,0.00031594778,0.0536911,0.00020640428,0.00022740183,0.00031778114,0.0009932381,0.000054185297,0.000499331],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94642365,0.031986393,0.005183891,0.0059469184,0.0091833705,0.0012758112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.61479187,0.30438623,0.03683275,0.027584674,0.013266759,0.0031377412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042812385,0.0014836758,0.0036408303,0.009140395,0.0015355642,0.005847124,0.0027356565,0.0025524439,0.0029591925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22253259,0.00068748905,0.002800381,0.011096182,0.005212732,0.00725199,0.006509334,0.0033235808,0.0005548825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002079612,0.0008490459,0.6600328,0.0015665882,0.0057135643,0.0009790042,0.0011817561,0.04599897,0.0036141984,0.072666846,0.003862595,0.20145503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029149718,0.003509516,0.19402519,0.00059007335,0.0023446751,0.0035612287,0.0019909525,0.46152407,0.0044476297,0.32084227,0.00631263,0.0005603085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019020069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016172341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042812385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013464995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026162872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22641629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6901857667","doi":"10.60692/h17sy-bek44","title":"Evaluation of OECD Countries with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in terms of Economic, Social and Environmental Aspects","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Compromise; Homogeneous; Order (exchange); Cluster (spacecraft); Test (biology); Natural resource","score_opus":0.17812279075342344,"score_gpt":0.4230193823249236,"score_spread":0.24489659157150015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6901857667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7651334,0.0031271707,0.17358278,0.00074398797,0.00016349061,0.0019584878,0.0008300402,0.00022397851,0.054236766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8730893,0.0012568642,0.1231762,0.00006689107,0.00002569444,0.00081979996,0.00044919574,0.0000216709,0.0010943767],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850578,0.010902679,0.0008478149,0.00044701406,0.0022409353,0.0005038007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99147356,0.0047494485,0.0008578732,0.00035381535,0.00228544,0.00027977914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016306767,0.0015807999,0.001070517,0.006954052,0.0010107418,0.0042098192,0.0008736715,0.0007648687,0.0016371531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019690704,0.0002886978,0.0015845606,0.0050869584,0.0007858756,0.0011986415,0.0017429214,0.00050874025,0.00020741505],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015254304,0.0008863964,0.04371135,0.0023882906,0.0012236994,0.0010870945,0.0024332863,0.5873092,0.0039463094,0.027063873,0.004387566,0.32403752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028829416,0.001789642,0.0280888,0.0013773055,0.0006988056,0.00029451738,0.01117092,0.90711486,0.009493964,0.02299665,0.016472992,0.00021330018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049736844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005766233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016306767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027595272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030729235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08623952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6926378957","doi":"10.25316/ir-14294","title":"Nanaimo Free Press [Wednesday, November 3, 1880]","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"VIURRSpace (Vancouver Island University)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.053787414829713845,"score_gpt":0.2937696541627167,"score_spread":0.2399822393330029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6926378957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044522565,0.0043175304,0.00021631602,0.0009706319,0.0012236318,0.000024881929,0.0019496571,0.0001932019,0.990659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00077316846,0.00082991994,0.00008976368,0.00005892828,0.000037132657,0.000009857582,0.00023571111,0.000069206275,0.9978963],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970406,0.00002675465,0.000011894142,0.000054323886,0.00014801447,0.000054850607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996897,0.00005204713,0.000014910827,0.000025250016,0.0001482839,0.000069897746],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039332372,0.0010587702,0.0005629073,0.001443092,0.0025251156,0.0047943727,0.000814284,0.0018703884,0.49219468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014046511,0.00048148216,0.0003840804,0.0025280085,0.0006138328,0.0019068577,0.0011271401,0.0020876543,0.20616725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041378156,0.000017007444,0.00015234278,0.00012038153,0.0000040186574,0.00006428252,0.00007806729,0.00019177073,0.00014987456,0.0120236175,0.91173714,0.0754201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031816385,0.0000052459254,0.00040292283,0.00007808818,0.0000010535144,0.000016546162,0.00003538891,0.000059056016,0.000065742606,0.0007608793,0.99856794,0.000003921066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08218955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35267365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50780535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033668927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025172732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7243227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6939376029","doi":"10.60692/sqr5y-01x40","title":"Complex pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators based on confidence levels and their applications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College","funders":"","keywords":"Pythagorean theorem; Closeness; Confidence interval; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Sensitivity (control systems)","score_opus":0.21313939252906186,"score_gpt":0.34121098114337184,"score_spread":0.12807158861430998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6939376029","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016988873,0.00157998,0.974444,0.00042755238,0.00009156348,0.000038296188,0.00008750482,0.000059435075,0.006282953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5691868,0.0028471472,0.42451409,0.00016693978,0.000276942,0.00020322391,0.00012869755,0.000051783685,0.0026242961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593276,0.0015183111,0.0003840711,0.00062371884,0.0013612199,0.0001800124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963768,0.0021892241,0.0004218411,0.0003252277,0.0005758054,0.00011100659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057642376,0.0009439443,0.00074911764,0.0024966707,0.0006453078,0.0031786617,0.0011072978,0.0008589378,0.001707861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012284847,0.000365586,0.0014354201,0.0035754626,0.0029055248,0.004688013,0.0019303657,0.0026746478,0.00021765644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006679225,0.000028181974,0.0011325219,0.00021995597,0.00009433836,0.00016495257,0.0005475886,0.07220699,0.0022987535,0.8458179,0.0011891404,0.07623288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014350987,0.00009920263,0.0008127113,0.00010424482,0.000048531725,0.00024082446,0.0001812473,0.47052997,0.0019814488,0.5192781,0.0066459696,0.0000634089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013974527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056321616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057642376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016117364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007973277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030484557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958005145","doi":"10.60692/jb1d3-tyv27","title":"Complex pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators based on confidence levels and their applications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College","funders":"","keywords":"Pythagorean theorem; Closeness; Confidence interval; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Sensitivity (control systems)","score_opus":0.21313939252906186,"score_gpt":0.34121098114337184,"score_spread":0.12807158861430998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958005145","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016988873,0.00157998,0.974444,0.00042755238,0.00009156348,0.000038296188,0.00008750482,0.000059435075,0.006282953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5691868,0.0028471472,0.42451409,0.00016693978,0.000276942,0.00020322391,0.00012869755,0.000051783685,0.0026242961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593276,0.0015183111,0.0003840711,0.00062371884,0.0013612199,0.0001800124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963768,0.0021892241,0.0004218411,0.0003252277,0.0005758054,0.00011100659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057642376,0.0009439443,0.00074911764,0.0024966707,0.0006453078,0.0031786617,0.0011072978,0.0008589378,0.001707861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012284847,0.000365586,0.0014354201,0.0035754626,0.0029055248,0.004688013,0.0019303657,0.0026746478,0.00021765644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006679225,0.000028181974,0.0011325219,0.00021995597,0.00009433836,0.00016495257,0.0005475886,0.07220699,0.0022987535,0.8458179,0.0011891404,0.07623288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014350987,0.00009920263,0.0008127113,0.00010424482,0.000048531725,0.00024082446,0.0001812473,0.47052997,0.0019814488,0.5192781,0.0066459696,0.0000634089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013974527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056321616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057642376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016117364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007973277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030484557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958056963","doi":"10.60692/vh285-07v49","title":"Complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy competition graphs and their applications","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College","funders":"","keywords":"Neighbourhood (mathematics); Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Graph; Graph theory; Compatibility (geochemistry)","score_opus":0.1454111071719827,"score_gpt":0.31262471075344117,"score_spread":0.16721360358145848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958056963","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04772066,0.00062222703,0.9272674,0.00059834257,0.00007860043,0.0000739432,0.0001267076,0.00009824989,0.023413891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8069259,0.0006086962,0.18711251,0.00014241652,0.00007888319,0.00011141874,0.00010225041,0.00003571258,0.0048821783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882036,0.0004907586,0.00005277612,0.00021456185,0.00032566357,0.00009586854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984276,0.0008847281,0.00020817907,0.00010021516,0.00026799002,0.00011120855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016615277,0.0005066726,0.00041221632,0.0018684621,0.0009561035,0.0014172427,0.0007997764,0.0008030893,0.004201651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003689323,0.00022102891,0.00075398554,0.0014763331,0.0015279046,0.001919961,0.0011923977,0.0009917491,0.000244525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003787201,0.0000320935,0.00091256667,0.000113373,0.00002836745,0.00018938987,0.00021808995,0.11333881,0.0013979989,0.84894,0.0009856345,0.033805817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009878005,0.000055813045,0.0006017109,0.0000282318,0.000013855348,0.0001635906,0.00016919256,0.57423306,0.0006370188,0.4188319,0.005223467,0.000032298973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038586634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027235341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004201651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017897026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008568811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014055908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6976782314","doi":"10.60692/568rz-jy692","title":"Complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy competition graphs and their applications","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College","funders":"","keywords":"Neighbourhood (mathematics); Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Graph; Graph theory; Compatibility (geochemistry)","score_opus":0.1454111071719827,"score_gpt":0.31262471075344117,"score_spread":0.16721360358145848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6976782314","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04772066,0.00062222703,0.9272674,0.00059834257,0.00007860043,0.0000739432,0.0001267076,0.00009824989,0.023413891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8069259,0.0006086962,0.18711251,0.00014241652,0.00007888319,0.00011141874,0.00010225041,0.00003571258,0.0048821783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882036,0.0004907586,0.00005277612,0.00021456185,0.00032566357,0.00009586854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984276,0.0008847281,0.00020817907,0.00010021516,0.00026799002,0.00011120855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016615277,0.0005066726,0.00041221632,0.0018684621,0.0009561035,0.0014172427,0.0007997764,0.0008030893,0.004201651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003689323,0.00022102891,0.00075398554,0.0014763331,0.0015279046,0.001919961,0.0011923977,0.0009917491,0.000244525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003787201,0.0000320935,0.00091256667,0.000113373,0.00002836745,0.00018938987,0.00021808995,0.11333881,0.0013979989,0.84894,0.0009856345,0.033805817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009878005,0.000055813045,0.0006017109,0.0000282318,0.000013855348,0.0001635906,0.00016919256,0.57423306,0.0006370188,0.4188319,0.005223467,0.000032298973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038586634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027235341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004201651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017897026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008568811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014055908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6976929411","doi":"10.60692/9k1sh-g6573","title":"Evaluation of OECD Countries with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in terms of Economic, Social and Environmental Aspects","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Compromise; Homogeneous; Order (exchange); Cluster (spacecraft); Test (biology); Natural resource","score_opus":0.17812279075342344,"score_gpt":0.4230193823249236,"score_spread":0.24489659157150015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6976929411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7651334,0.0031271707,0.17358278,0.00074398797,0.00016349061,0.0019584878,0.0008300402,0.00022397851,0.054236766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8730893,0.0012568642,0.1231762,0.00006689107,0.00002569444,0.00081979996,0.00044919574,0.0000216709,0.0010943767],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850578,0.010902679,0.0008478149,0.00044701406,0.0022409353,0.0005038007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99147356,0.0047494485,0.0008578732,0.00035381535,0.00228544,0.00027977914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016306767,0.0015807999,0.001070517,0.006954052,0.0010107418,0.0042098192,0.0008736715,0.0007648687,0.0016371531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019690704,0.0002886978,0.0015845606,0.0050869584,0.0007858756,0.0011986415,0.0017429214,0.00050874025,0.00020741505],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015254304,0.0008863964,0.04371135,0.0023882906,0.0012236994,0.0010870945,0.0024332863,0.5873092,0.0039463094,0.027063873,0.004387566,0.32403752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028829416,0.001789642,0.0280888,0.0013773055,0.0006988056,0.00029451738,0.01117092,0.90711486,0.009493964,0.02299665,0.016472992,0.00021330018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049736844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005766233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016306767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027595272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030729235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08623952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997114346","doi":"","title":"Trust me, I’m a validated test!?: Unseen mild (cognitive) impairment and the use of the MoCA in an old age psychiatry setting.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Pure Amsterdam UMC","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Test (biology); Referral; Montreal Cognitive Assessment; Neuropsychology; Gold standard (test); Cognitive impairment; Presentation (obstetrics); Neuropsychological assessment","score_opus":0.09688469002294194,"score_gpt":0.39082622336813455,"score_spread":0.29394153334519263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997114346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7819135,0.047079306,0.008307973,0.10909795,0.0047499198,0.00038711564,0.0014946666,0.0003403776,0.046629142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814269,0.0037418744,0.0047330987,0.0067168456,0.0008565762,0.00008176777,0.0003455238,0.00004662921,0.002050822],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99452376,0.002393346,0.0007070721,0.0004625522,0.0015801621,0.0003331912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98351306,0.006081959,0.0038830289,0.0007224561,0.0039202636,0.0018793044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008207989,0.00038409064,0.0006440385,0.00170711,0.0011664595,0.0022092136,0.0008927559,0.0019080119,0.0022894898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047398597,0.00026412375,0.0005248194,0.000956216,0.0013823254,0.0028853184,0.0012330877,0.0027024688,0.0013231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045030197,0.00028849803,0.79999846,0.0005267576,0.000203632,0.006998402,0.0037517308,0.00016523522,0.00064595975,0.001845429,0.047025274,0.13810027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057870173,0.00076769973,0.8951962,0.0028443371,0.00035837272,0.04009508,0.010338976,0.0021559137,0.0010269455,0.009241038,0.037595987,0.00032163944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0105766095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013449694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0105766095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012091565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002183964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043408513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999606310","doi":"","title":"Construction/déconstruction par l’école du mythe d’une société canadienne multiculturelle. Etude comparative des programmes d’études du second cycle du secondaire dans les écoles publiques de Colombie-Britannique, d’Ontario et de Nouvelle-Ecosse","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); European union; Christian ministry","score_opus":0.029241402922234646,"score_gpt":0.28436352462552816,"score_spread":0.2551221217032935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999606310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3638478,0.006162997,0.010288151,0.03581346,0.0006573525,0.0005645711,0.0003968755,0.0000985528,0.58217025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85005826,0.0019999794,0.004707033,0.0014446536,0.00007976012,0.00044169987,0.00018337088,0.00005358269,0.14103161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959984,0.0014715997,0.000087257446,0.00033462167,0.0010837208,0.0010244339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99561596,0.0007103483,0.0003754141,0.00045559686,0.0009664054,0.0018763116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043779053,0.0005418192,0.000277935,0.002710616,0.007791632,0.007151346,0.0010540964,0.0011511188,0.010289626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039530615,0.0003403299,0.00032632906,0.0029409637,0.020429965,0.0025615552,0.008012487,0.0016278668,0.00057568453],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007608229,0.00010135452,0.02317458,0.0005396007,0.000024730212,0.00029667286,0.26438385,0.0009859648,0.0019327106,0.59519595,0.014971757,0.098316796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021265985,0.00008777027,0.08936367,0.0005509048,0.000017502567,0.00013130457,0.12039416,0.00046585442,0.00061992044,0.014768117,0.7735403,0.00003914246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5644436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7682306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4355564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054390095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10601163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.876243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030998156","doi":"","title":"The Story Girl","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Girl; Cousin; Bit (key); Download","score_opus":0.02429486037092193,"score_gpt":0.2683385794980606,"score_spread":0.24404371912713868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030998156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014174501,0.0051958407,0.0008677902,0.021149406,0.002149793,0.000056434506,0.0019282239,0.0006004086,0.96663475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00581624,0.0020776726,0.0007294173,0.0033639192,0.00023763921,0.00003900629,0.00071516924,0.00024686966,0.9867742],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933785,0.00020193393,0.000022705568,0.00009581417,0.00026782075,0.0000738768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991049,0.00025129397,0.000049589147,0.00009391764,0.00027402883,0.0002262881],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006514505,0.00049717224,0.00031632802,0.00076962035,0.0032432557,0.0048318193,0.00063332124,0.0014802832,0.34260374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036333639,0.00031260657,0.0002469742,0.0009811004,0.00080529397,0.0032744764,0.0025444056,0.0019384761,0.13488586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008867874,0.0000047576073,0.000043434815,0.000026662283,6.613449e-7,0.00006385606,0.0003507227,0.0000064475607,0.000048218648,0.00285521,0.9785752,0.018016087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.0646973e-7,0.0000023095824,0.000089760055,0.000023160661,3.1357715e-7,0.00005264773,0.00032346192,0.0000040355694,0.000033163997,0.00014683456,0.99932253,0.0000012137285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008715078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02733383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65739626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017060636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001512015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.937696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039668300","doi":"","title":"Models of cognition, the classical/connectionist debate","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Focus (optics); Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.026693886998450468,"score_gpt":0.23005338526478555,"score_spread":0.2033594982663351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039668300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04672304,0.07962303,0.13202105,0.13022445,0.000979933,0.000040369938,0.0008626157,0.00037832602,0.60914725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92071766,0.02440493,0.017954059,0.002261807,0.0009853033,0.00008263615,0.00025784853,0.000090474605,0.03324533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991085,0.00047082396,0.000018026576,0.000102835,0.00022787304,0.00007195003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99601716,0.002982549,0.0001518688,0.00022391882,0.0003816212,0.00024292344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019010992,0.0010339638,0.0009563413,0.0019211847,0.0020012923,0.008369009,0.0020989638,0.0030514854,0.009568785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006371363,0.00039784805,0.00045138295,0.003917783,0.013088728,0.007053398,0.0009995017,0.0030194002,0.0008470745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018876357,0.000015068228,0.000096610784,0.0000617226,0.000010795111,0.000021128284,0.00022317182,0.0037105472,0.000024502458,0.9825815,0.0045720628,0.008663967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004686909,0.0000012983216,0.00008833189,0.000021530666,0.0000031361085,0.000007394211,0.00005084461,0.0023133291,0.000011044083,0.9934522,0.0040427833,0.0000034597222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15072353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14593796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15072353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017307466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064118537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2996924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083872058","doi":"","title":"Babylonian Empire, c. 1750–c. 1595 BCE with Assyrian Border Style 7","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Internet Archive (Internet Archive)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Assyria; Period (music); Empire","score_opus":0.059540901522621995,"score_gpt":0.36118445041082764,"score_spread":0.30164354888820566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7083872058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052309465,0.0030215655,0.0018593308,0.0026010787,0.0010033016,0.00014890377,0.023503924,0.0005514211,0.9620795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023750294,0.0018723538,0.0038819998,0.00029501237,0.0000710338,0.000088141365,0.008871168,0.00036290573,0.9608071],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978036,0.000024667808,0.000008281321,0.000026734448,0.00010991018,0.00005008609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997038,0.000017777938,0.000015386597,0.00001271172,0.00018554743,0.00006475207],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004179181,0.00048831775,0.00018557825,0.00065880636,0.0010974999,0.0015171358,0.0004917444,0.00044043807,0.18020292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008621484,0.00017262866,0.00020136632,0.001071325,0.00050996547,0.00048135093,0.0007389854,0.00075480767,0.0427583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014937531,0.000017723662,0.0010436962,0.00023649361,0.000006224214,0.00013151133,0.00014319926,0.0006344422,0.0005116746,0.018956207,0.8798004,0.098369144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000109176735,0.000008432117,0.0036090193,0.000075843614,0.0000014554053,0.000034418506,0.00007418929,0.00013920803,0.00020778328,0.000842821,0.99499196,0.0000040312157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3147855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4893165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8197971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064407256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009510696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62590647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7084025736","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.c.8044893","title":"Supplementary material from \"The influence of flow on the amount, retention, and loss of plastic pollution in an urban river\"","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microplastics; Plastic pollution; Riparian zone; Hydrology (agriculture); Baseflow; Pollution; Surface water; Flow (mathematics); Water column; STREAMS","score_opus":0.08579019510770806,"score_gpt":0.3500046263415543,"score_spread":0.26421443123384625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7084025736","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018129149,0.0001549844,0.0011185086,0.00062470185,0.0004044317,0.00011759172,0.9813658,0.0005151208,0.0138858715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014663361,0.00088377716,0.005212553,0.00073122437,0.00015833332,0.00041823706,0.9347827,0.00065088936,0.042498868],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990865,0.00007054216,0.00007832762,0.00019280145,0.00042053437,0.00015130057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996289,0.00076444744,0.00018697703,0.0003003999,0.0021577328,0.00030143332],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011055693,0.0008610471,0.0009682693,0.0018896968,0.0022379593,0.002422174,0.0021582146,0.0010330225,0.5234178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007369163,0.00059635437,0.00079913606,0.004512343,0.00037492515,0.0010109055,0.0017282976,0.0006336219,0.108985364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018554111,0.000049726757,0.0064728945,0.0010348505,0.000047181526,0.00013835481,0.00024376407,0.00051365886,0.00085803895,0.00089661434,0.966781,0.022778401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022911688,0.00006366904,0.04699499,0.000870747,0.00007533269,0.00016977893,0.00041459763,0.001583726,0.0010120603,0.0017986986,0.94671035,0.00007695136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4820674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62284595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5234178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00450258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009073266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9585229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099350362","doi":"","title":"Magneto-Mechanical Response in Ni-Mn-Ga Magnetic Shape Memory","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Data collection; Documentation; Suite; Subject (documents); Control (management); Magnetic tape","score_opus":0.12990677793439345,"score_gpt":0.40369436412390775,"score_spread":0.27378758618951426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099350362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9580519,0.0017486064,0.00961421,0.0008083878,0.000391328,0.00007209979,0.00020342627,0.00062120456,0.028488941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989005,0.00014131864,0.0013614966,0.00008716109,0.000009198177,0.000013797753,0.000056155874,0.000019514966,0.009306467],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998996,0.000013924957,0.0000040545888,0.000018954564,0.000038949325,0.000024403727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983704,0.000047809826,0.00002934834,0.000020944291,0.000039914314,0.000024967236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001688011,0.000108660206,0.0001890967,0.00013332335,0.00024858015,0.00062285975,0.0006814334,0.0002967338,0.0054057925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006572207,0.000084092215,0.0000580576,0.0001624451,0.00031655008,0.00034681094,0.00032991517,0.00015154094,0.0009067476],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025478692,0.00032966078,0.002763014,0.00053733663,0.00003397011,0.0009030323,0.00039153744,0.013260589,0.8558938,0.016018324,0.011831619,0.095489256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025319558,0.002113763,0.008374717,0.00009276949,0.000061937164,0.0008288263,0.0012238749,0.20330265,0.7337245,0.008671532,0.041266706,0.00008549334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058529916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016155059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054057925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032008736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024850835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018084168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099843153","doi":"","title":"Background Papers on the Canadian Health Measures Survey Special Issue,","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; MEDLINE; Government (linguistics); Data collection","score_opus":0.609153450489969,"score_gpt":0.4812777535092617,"score_spread":0.12787569698070733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099843153","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021206522,0.22479428,0.002897728,0.26903832,0.2207206,0.001203772,0.14573507,0.0005939535,0.13289562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033675157,0.2958351,0.008590983,0.06908364,0.14748195,0.0021705953,0.17563531,0.0011255854,0.26640168],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98471826,0.0015965545,0.0012803627,0.0011125384,0.009656559,0.0016358285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.910042,0.012220233,0.0031437506,0.0023584517,0.066972815,0.00526261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019804996,0.001971616,0.0019475428,0.025137192,0.0035775988,0.0073922616,0.0044321152,0.003460793,0.047089603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07478443,0.00088137604,0.0015928866,0.03742435,0.0019593737,0.0027847902,0.002265488,0.0034224829,0.009282793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016898613,0.000011317246,0.00041633353,0.00046693246,0.000010249283,0.000007858225,0.00004018708,0.000061959516,0.000021202666,0.0010176634,0.98006594,0.017863456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018149041,0.000010232649,0.011248162,0.0016159983,0.000023735758,0.000023028995,0.00015075349,0.00007305656,0.00006836403,0.00073082285,0.98600763,0.000030009189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8791118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9037296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95343447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046565562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12114303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33785838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100028805","doi":"","title":"A Risk Score to Predict Death Early After Hospitalization for an Acute","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framingham Risk Score; Stroke (engine); Mortality rate; Heart failure; Retrospective cohort study; Risk assessment; Medical record; Statistic; Disease; Risk of mortality","score_opus":0.12899713954344472,"score_gpt":0.4193756540366199,"score_spread":0.2903785144931752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100028805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96651256,0.0012020913,0.019799752,0.001828165,0.0001935433,0.00034296964,0.0037333139,0.00047141977,0.005916201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98995775,0.0002710383,0.0061663496,0.00009966453,0.00008206926,0.00009385199,0.0025229636,0.000019246958,0.0007869777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999474,0.00015282362,0.000049878152,0.00007968226,0.00016927782,0.0000743256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754214,0.0006753451,0.00058318296,0.000137456,0.0008049813,0.00025697873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016766151,0.001264231,0.0005168489,0.001629734,0.00037568563,0.0010270595,0.0007005626,0.00044010108,0.0016498915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006931955,0.00020281092,0.0008600746,0.0006981136,0.00030879493,0.00045447962,0.0005213771,0.000774723,0.00050210144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032249858,0.0000956443,0.97462666,0.000032030777,0.0003500889,0.00011426062,0.000048733156,0.004129804,0.00016585438,0.00025903876,0.0030630308,0.016792446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028014492,0.000635514,0.79882437,0.00011810281,0.0008852336,0.0010421926,0.00019920304,0.19045481,0.00044891055,0.0029362617,0.00410873,0.00006645566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03529511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038420282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03529511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001662883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002398954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07017934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104584205","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2025.130311","title":"A novel neural network-based fuzzy ranking for decision problems in sustainable energy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; University of Alberta","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Fuzzy logic; Energy (signal processing); Decision problem; Artificial neural network; Sustainable energy","score_opus":0.0625539880705815,"score_gpt":0.3745762262368942,"score_spread":0.3120222381663127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104584205","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01747536,0.0007839519,0.9759787,0.00040701078,0.00012988021,0.000085856955,0.00009957823,0.00025976796,0.004779881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6648414,0.0007966763,0.32517835,0.000335384,0.00022763823,0.00034679766,0.00030870247,0.00004915907,0.00791587],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991493,0.0002764731,0.000049348106,0.00017718204,0.00026597388,0.000081748134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995074,0.00022360045,0.000057126224,0.000018801436,0.00016945793,0.00002361321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013544107,0.00085677,0.0011067395,0.0009185191,0.0005531518,0.0012651435,0.001265616,0.0014958071,0.002108325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022791983,0.00030314387,0.0006423934,0.0011716182,0.00048301546,0.0013922786,0.0009333361,0.0010041054,0.00038253414],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011979361,0.00013235307,0.000794323,0.00017666299,0.00008898927,0.00011734692,0.00005546228,0.8283125,0.0030239865,0.01234475,0.0021619457,0.15267195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005088615,0.000031873897,0.00009765222,0.000006932267,0.0000067224514,0.000012499853,0.0000037493803,0.99739456,0.00030006145,0.0017802552,0.00035475052,0.0000058986816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056373626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006005602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056373626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011705279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010574894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011209071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132525583","doi":"","title":"Merkezi sınav yapan kurumlar için kuruluş yeri derecelendirilmesi: Ankara ili için bir uygulama","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"AYBU AVESIS","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regent; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.16558497258193103,"score_gpt":0.46553536780588184,"score_spread":0.29995039522395084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132525583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59950185,0.017464891,0.13404503,0.0067608645,0.0015465135,0.00053960126,0.0025713171,0.0026135675,0.23495637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91853195,0.005986193,0.021626137,0.0004611122,0.00015292001,0.00017989897,0.0010404632,0.00033487653,0.05168638],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883336,0.0001766931,0.00007051058,0.00021070975,0.00050139753,0.00020740426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834657,0.00034994472,0.00024327781,0.00009842022,0.0008109539,0.00015081567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010581923,0.0011676518,0.00086247583,0.0014164405,0.0017021585,0.0048301066,0.00091874046,0.001499216,0.021726001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032619627,0.00055372465,0.0008934605,0.0012198008,0.0013769448,0.0026507215,0.0020719592,0.0015928601,0.0047159377],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018769229,0.00054965826,0.089655146,0.0039053794,0.00043202584,0.0066912198,0.011604981,0.02229472,0.07524029,0.068739325,0.037947334,0.681063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001647919,0.0016334638,0.29364157,0.0029235634,0.0006819415,0.0068130023,0.04481643,0.055891797,0.07057009,0.070007145,0.45194992,0.0009063321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016904972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015859727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021726001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019002995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002930444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07268077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133372927","doi":"","title":"On the Mathematical Foundations of Macbeth (Working Paper LSEOR 03.61, London School of Economics, Londres)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ORBi UMONS","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Attractiveness; Categorical variable; Value (mathematics); Decision theory; Mode (computer interface); Qualitative research","score_opus":0.18414109402485554,"score_gpt":0.3981100610474273,"score_spread":0.21396896702257176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133372927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012620506,0.20435597,0.25778216,0.11817851,0.0056492956,0.00017642185,0.0022025702,0.0004466715,0.3985878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31221446,0.24936269,0.2388123,0.015731635,0.016955106,0.0009650713,0.0029633648,0.0009921278,0.16200326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758935,0.00096457335,0.00017717911,0.00032924948,0.00079149636,0.00014813035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934969,0.0045539523,0.0004230408,0.00046460834,0.0008219475,0.0002395365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050704707,0.0012785206,0.0015954518,0.004385721,0.0019959488,0.006471757,0.0010982895,0.0025508406,0.020500539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009650974,0.000895774,0.0015211675,0.006722923,0.005267057,0.0102564795,0.0030698355,0.0059826635,0.0059082704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117742875,0.000018022967,0.00015689772,0.00016706086,0.000018946126,0.00006124044,0.00012797926,0.0010117522,0.00010537794,0.9440688,0.0342093,0.02004301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062622626,0.0000080412565,0.00033658242,0.00012092275,0.0000073237848,0.00010024236,0.000026630547,0.0012434913,0.00007735639,0.9361572,0.061898533,0.000017422235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027798712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002296207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020500539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054674097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020785094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068581164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133416183","doi":"","title":"Progressive exploration of preferential information in multicriteria decision aid (CEG-IST Research Paper 17/2001, Lisboa)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ORBi UMONS","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Complete information; Information system; Decision support system; Decision analysis; Decision theory","score_opus":0.3631001935917957,"score_gpt":0.5007283708522888,"score_spread":0.13762817726049315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133416183","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040212154,0.0015507484,0.9484899,0.00070776726,0.00006516569,0.00017846076,0.00010333413,0.00010911409,0.008583388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5119416,0.001791151,0.4792691,0.00021216249,0.00013305056,0.0004289603,0.0001737938,0.00007024114,0.00597986],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942444,0.003842246,0.0002547594,0.0005133737,0.0008721737,0.00027304754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98271126,0.014274417,0.00061257347,0.00090209214,0.0011616052,0.00033808185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009291357,0.0009011178,0.0013503593,0.0015934941,0.0006927787,0.0022588617,0.0011264666,0.0010813706,0.0052417424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025879877,0.0007289491,0.0011727805,0.0017218818,0.0022995642,0.0039748005,0.003028559,0.0020663321,0.00047145315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007855584,0.00026830376,0.0019889073,0.0009988736,0.00025117653,0.00021602628,0.00064407673,0.3321902,0.002786012,0.32161525,0.0034981312,0.33475745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010883237,0.00035737685,0.00053152145,0.00017304969,0.000081987804,0.00014520764,0.00006171112,0.6708475,0.0025222467,0.32156408,0.0035738933,0.000032664007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017937585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022685209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009291357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013531103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017566853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04913795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133468081","doi":"","title":"MACBETH (Working Paper LSEOR 03.56, London School of Economics, Londres)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ORBi UMONS","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Attractiveness; Elaboration; Categorical variable; Weighting; Structuring; Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.15657280939802296,"score_gpt":0.3846237365747337,"score_spread":0.22805092717671074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133468081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070602256,0.25618532,0.011577513,0.080958016,0.007439337,0.0001642777,0.020722393,0.0011560112,0.6147369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05494747,0.1617125,0.009964538,0.0034965777,0.0028048458,0.0003339719,0.010527183,0.0010585614,0.7551543],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984578,0.0003781212,0.00019287482,0.00037166747,0.00045659696,0.00014297622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965162,0.0019286573,0.0003483921,0.000314567,0.0005924917,0.00029957088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002473656,0.0015224701,0.0019981167,0.0043594856,0.001449328,0.009592979,0.0008500658,0.0037386424,0.21064566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064551625,0.0008345764,0.00075572525,0.010558217,0.0014471435,0.0068087312,0.0018603764,0.0021674917,0.06955501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009366719,0.00003194485,0.00068768393,0.00069519685,0.00003132752,0.0002871483,0.00026089817,0.0007756154,0.0002343978,0.10135821,0.74517095,0.15037294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025383313,0.000020894784,0.0023752023,0.0006570079,0.000013158672,0.00014801446,0.0002449848,0.00039261786,0.00031717753,0.031007305,0.96476847,0.00002985585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011695771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016494548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21064566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005810553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032648135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70467997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7141568780","doi":"10.56093/jisas.v77i01.171521","title":"Neutrosophic Analysis of the Experimental Data using Neutrosophic Latin Square Design","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminate; Fuzzy logic; Extension (predicate logic); Degree (music); Square (algebra); Row","score_opus":0.2216583141404766,"score_gpt":0.4169355109134371,"score_spread":0.19527719677296052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7141568780","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04910281,0.0005034755,0.9233062,0.00025241458,0.00029597938,0.017709453,0.00067834207,0.00040777895,0.007743516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09769432,0.0004723356,0.86596197,0.00023017822,0.000057762893,0.033857927,0.0003426445,0.000057116726,0.0013257955],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9635615,0.023642592,0.0025273468,0.0035883964,0.0060833963,0.00059680146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9588963,0.028794497,0.0037262545,0.0026516996,0.005550967,0.00038031884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027847148,0.0016956717,0.0022050804,0.0026773494,0.0013168451,0.0024776892,0.0019507218,0.0011983122,0.008135006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045409676,0.0004571684,0.001688142,0.002890977,0.0030051228,0.0012466979,0.0015182428,0.0019965265,0.0007447223],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00893081,0.003380723,0.015751103,0.008652786,0.0015716366,0.0007782495,0.009084925,0.06979723,0.048866704,0.25511265,0.006025274,0.57204795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040129065,0.033695344,0.043645475,0.0022146143,0.001865262,0.000883694,0.006999351,0.41504347,0.08102889,0.2794145,0.13009168,0.0011048635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011226021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010400718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027847148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018672211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033514728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14727157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W826953894","doi":"","title":"A Spatial Fuzzy Compromise Approach for Flood Disaster Management","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Flood myth; Fuzzy logic; Emergency management; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Geography; Business; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.3535799983322447,"score_gpt":0.39946974031801785,"score_spread":0.04588974198577317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W826953894","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004454304,0.0005368685,0.9844357,0.00024664708,0.000042246065,0.00007108151,0.000039865587,0.0000427165,0.010130561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42620903,0.0014986861,0.55817044,0.00023017316,0.000120649565,0.0005769564,0.000155954,0.000058507183,0.012979566],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988393,0.00048340496,0.0000612498,0.00017341512,0.0003590963,0.00008354022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996145,0.00020225624,0.00003174619,0.000016768503,0.00010830778,0.000026495933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022512057,0.0010663911,0.0011522844,0.0013284853,0.0010749456,0.0019368026,0.00198428,0.0020469655,0.0058430624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017438518,0.00051920884,0.0017034895,0.0017250188,0.0008575067,0.0015087194,0.0018915586,0.001319406,0.0005585739],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006442001,0.00005475922,0.0002539337,0.00016322847,0.00012499643,0.00022774756,0.00025277075,0.8258508,0.0023175871,0.1128732,0.0015072265,0.056309327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010947855,0.00006497424,0.000071486815,0.000024990059,0.000027405513,0.00006310349,0.000056170178,0.95591366,0.00036046185,0.039383624,0.0040071337,0.000016089634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035190764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033625304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058430624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020875311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012600475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019547045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W829931006","doi":"","title":"How to Support Government Procurement by a Pairwise Comparisons Model","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RepoS (Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczo-Humanistycznego w Siedlcach)","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Procurement; Pairwise comparison; Agency (philosophy); Government procurement; Government (linguistics); Business; Process (computing); Process management; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Computer science; Engineering; Marketing; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.15977642414922275,"score_gpt":0.36946852720636203,"score_spread":0.20969210305713928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W829931006","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017086912,0.00009397361,0.9689326,0.0010693072,0.00005216978,0.0002907406,0.0001870964,0.0002605312,0.012026643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37694576,0.00029829037,0.61241156,0.00019708119,0.000074283984,0.0014419262,0.00041726304,0.00016173316,0.008052008],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872082,0.00990719,0.00035853052,0.00084398955,0.001140702,0.00054139463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766565,0.019016357,0.0011183568,0.0010003402,0.0016868213,0.0005216437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016852798,0.0013777752,0.0015624006,0.0015898265,0.0010930966,0.0030648021,0.0033966238,0.002436786,0.015799288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035887588,0.00084832,0.0016636819,0.00316807,0.0013137363,0.006948321,0.0026452446,0.0030059773,0.00181826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015190156,0.00019068357,0.0007645958,0.00019613816,0.000082650804,0.00019107915,0.00036102073,0.73466164,0.00038832988,0.21602415,0.0020339699,0.044953868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043382894,0.000096248514,0.00011884267,0.000029754676,0.000021729722,0.000032847314,0.000102572354,0.8752705,0.0002979673,0.121030256,0.0029317604,0.00002417472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005942624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051022265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016852798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002329054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004619588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08912718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W83958266","doi":"10.1023/a:1008697632471","title":"Minimal Fine Limits for a Class of Potentials","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potential Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Hausdorff measure; Combinatorics; Potential theory; Measure (data warehouse); Limit (mathematics); Hausdorff space; Mathematical analysis; Boundary (topology); Hausdorff dimension","score_opus":0.12091007584582487,"score_gpt":0.4126605103298651,"score_spread":0.29175043448404026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W83958266","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06827287,0.0018919613,0.875858,0.0015000146,0.00008746984,0.0001038423,0.0002774597,0.00018810999,0.051820286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8065239,0.0021186455,0.17369264,0.00051267917,0.00030758994,0.00055385457,0.000441116,0.0001970897,0.015652383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973207,0.0010201065,0.000143441,0.00035374542,0.0008713177,0.00029055876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98020256,0.016681932,0.0008311479,0.0006567514,0.0009351618,0.00069248554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051811384,0.0010936763,0.0017875377,0.0037796826,0.0013875186,0.004618295,0.001922232,0.0019464188,0.0054685636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030215006,0.00089229376,0.001295673,0.0021679075,0.0031973256,0.0057988004,0.0034665635,0.00403149,0.00038557829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027225598,0.000024846846,0.00013086795,0.00010075726,0.000019905343,0.00005991674,0.000098668126,0.016885225,0.00044481803,0.9710834,0.00083502225,0.010289165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009100466,0.00001660776,0.00006794883,0.00003400909,0.0000073220813,0.00006278005,0.000020331783,0.05179332,0.00013141721,0.9468302,0.0010179625,0.000008966283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008654927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063019176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054685636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013194348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096770533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027400792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W844899550","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-3442-9_1","title":"A New Fuzzy Disjointing Difference Operator to Calculate Union and Intersection of Type-2 Fuzzy Sets","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Intersection (aeronautics); Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Operator (biology); Type (biology); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Geology; Transport engineering; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.1148286041193512,"score_gpt":0.37726478426891025,"score_spread":0.26243618014955905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W844899550","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030708062,0.00014708127,0.9955825,0.000024478479,0.000086935994,0.000022908725,0.00002236102,0.000118516866,0.00092450884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052262492,0.00015139104,0.94593924,0.00004747715,0.000058433212,0.00008268302,0.00009480216,0.00007343146,0.0012900782],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983936,0.00026172865,0.00014467104,0.00030957954,0.0008176833,0.00007273691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851066,0.000683227,0.00006979001,0.00014159695,0.0005371079,0.000057648434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002018771,0.00070309045,0.0012466034,0.001771926,0.0006187697,0.0011743546,0.00202376,0.0008109555,0.002752437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037638613,0.00040426545,0.0013533547,0.0018649279,0.0009556404,0.002981835,0.0015077047,0.0019268767,0.00053684256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003044531,0.0002048517,0.00063848647,0.00048271523,0.000105814295,0.00017064335,0.00041090135,0.038601488,0.05922315,0.1610859,0.0035712621,0.7352002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044060136,0.00024598523,0.00061746186,0.000044273773,0.00006786033,0.000478608,0.000081731705,0.87764317,0.032715734,0.07383164,0.014140794,0.000088835935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010439164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085867394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002752437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006337264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007965174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010676384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W86716942","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-37372-8_11","title":"Posbist Reliability Theory for Coherent Systems","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in computational intelligence","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Reliability (semiconductor); Binary number; Fuzzy logic; State (computer science); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy set; Reliability theory; Variable (mathematics); Reliability engineering; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Failure rate; Engineering; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.6308766899601868,"score_gpt":0.5655189166827437,"score_spread":0.06535777327744308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W86716942","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002718472,0.005739664,0.9404547,0.0017543524,0.00053767074,0.000037925754,0.00017550995,0.00016749049,0.048414126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52428013,0.016513504,0.36654118,0.0023976315,0.0034813846,0.00077560195,0.00084926805,0.0007614656,0.08439984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986619,0.00045276413,0.00007438202,0.00017851303,0.00056189834,0.0000704849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676895,0.0018597511,0.00017148867,0.00041654127,0.00071922195,0.000064068416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023755333,0.0012728894,0.0013265174,0.0024117301,0.0009992565,0.002524429,0.001751617,0.0018433997,0.010833185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074826595,0.00073353446,0.0010407537,0.0027685552,0.0025907045,0.004301799,0.001582904,0.0048907683,0.0029156918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054109605,0.0000060748584,0.00005722369,0.00006885546,0.000012987401,0.00003101848,0.00005999165,0.0087951515,0.00025622826,0.97112334,0.004617212,0.01496656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023327652,0.0000071123377,0.000060487975,0.000025065103,0.0000070058386,0.00003569073,0.000009304243,0.02574418,0.00011424596,0.9663114,0.0076760896,0.000007117712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014793102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095403654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010833185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017710278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010182584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036240578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W979059312","doi":"10.1007/s40815-015-0049-9","title":"Hesitant Fuzzy Maclaurin Symmetric Mean Operators and Its Application to Multiple-Attribute Decision Making","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Operator (biology); Fuzzy logic; Computational intelligence; Mathematics; Dimension (graph theory); Monotonic function; Aggregate (composite); Idempotence; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.1227620983182432,"score_gpt":0.4106795688893753,"score_spread":0.2879174705711321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W979059312","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013814264,0.0006673146,0.98318464,0.0001486515,0.0000667831,0.000021586658,0.000018448276,0.000038860544,0.0020394137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.563179,0.0015244307,0.42976576,0.00012764455,0.00023278601,0.00017722166,0.000046819416,0.000055702923,0.004890641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980732,0.0010568755,0.00013463332,0.00021111078,0.0004545825,0.00006946044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889203,0.009170012,0.0004238747,0.00031987455,0.0010299168,0.00013602036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057296813,0.0007078585,0.0013773673,0.0010363484,0.00067331054,0.0018406126,0.0014094791,0.0012738099,0.001507343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011929188,0.00042559195,0.0013025693,0.0017938279,0.0018995851,0.0022264419,0.0011972836,0.0019264964,0.00021847044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027556333,0.0001442127,0.00049649266,0.0004416112,0.00022581153,0.0004811617,0.0007776617,0.3315502,0.0059271166,0.5629411,0.0012801711,0.09545888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010165283,0.00007833641,0.00013369093,0.000018399509,0.000029485222,0.00007520603,0.000036434332,0.8455208,0.0017114414,0.15131424,0.001040341,0.000031448188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010564674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006175861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057296813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084800564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011036842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03030181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}