{"meta":{"query_hash":"73ad57275fec","filters":{"topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights"},"cohort_total":229,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":229,"exported":229,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/73ad57275fec","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Ombudsman+and+Human+Rights"},"results":[{"id":"W107739689","doi":"","title":"The Ombudsman in Manitoba","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Public administration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029158831498825928,"score_gpt":0.31348691559171166,"score_spread":0.28432808409288574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W107739689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3681799,0.000031483745,0.000023163364,0.0008242423,0.0002099655,0.00007328704,4.7656336e-8,0.00003595667,0.63062197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649871,0.000029102092,0.000047711637,0.0002021652,0.0002387623,0.0000011132734,1.5529324e-7,0.0000028183533,0.034491066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993275,0.000038730315,0.000101953614,0.000075710224,0.00017561758,0.0002805092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996732,0.00014737053,0.00001583022,0.000092071525,0.00001725547,0.000054305063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012238931,0.000035678724,0.000038453803,0.000034793222,0.0006002646,0.000071228445,0.0001998389,0.000034960653,0.00025996676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023245151,0.000021338195,0.000021618838,0.00011169107,0.00019115949,0.00006647378,0.000014086842,0.00007039212,0.000305561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032728044,0.000012440503,0.004949285,3.3428168e-7,0.0000010948397,0.0000064748206,0.0041115656,6.2527214e-8,0.0000040548,0.97970366,0.0021852478,0.009022512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012562031,0.000009444572,0.105987124,0.0000029837927,0.0000010653105,2.1681288e-7,0.017873464,0.0000019933832,0.00007891289,0.07185257,0.8039899,0.00007668993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047126003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7828222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9078511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062366016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029946252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71240735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496826918","doi":"","title":"New Words for Old Problems: The Dunsmuir Era","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Immigration; Political science; Immigration law; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.010810600682408855,"score_gpt":0.27487413197571353,"score_spread":0.2640635312933047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496826918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7960689,0.003329431,0.019128256,0.07856685,0.0063194702,0.0022420613,0.0000053525864,0.00030809504,0.0940316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.879983,0.0007674687,0.00031057346,0.00029104107,0.004388856,0.000011093364,9.519172e-7,0.00002056088,0.11422644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973507,0.00007144353,0.00018496899,0.00014509787,0.00031279848,0.0019349871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993955,0.00009806573,0.00011894013,0.00015629931,0.00008152984,0.00014967473],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026720522,0.00010650929,0.0001141551,0.000053950327,0.0016277728,0.00023530333,0.00059463986,0.000099359146,0.00040059918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007271138,0.00006591666,0.00014386776,0.00012279456,0.00014191952,0.00021545748,0.000016427075,0.0020459855,0.00006104283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010827123,0.000016756721,0.00012463874,0.0000012835147,0.000033544256,2.8493e-7,0.005559061,0.0000010212351,0.00009426441,0.97213566,0.0025896206,0.019433022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031263742,0.00007930742,0.0001467872,0.0000047438775,0.000017104207,0.00001764249,0.0020853668,0.0000052087526,0.000016688044,0.67224914,0.3249781,0.00008724409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005896437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15162951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3223885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023753919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043047443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524189649","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2184585","title":"Figliola: Competing Jurisdiction, Shared Governance, and Protecting Human Rights in the Canadian Administrative State","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Corporate governance; Human rights; State (computer science); Administrative law; Business; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.022488752737136568,"score_gpt":0.3000926294857492,"score_spread":0.27760387674861264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524189649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95556146,0.00041910136,0.000010208145,0.00097623275,0.00012359401,0.00028970794,0.0000037910804,0.00001628667,0.042599622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810207,0.00006716058,0.00001499266,0.000055946344,0.0005868815,0.000008731945,0.0000014506352,0.000006513947,0.0011562334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686754,0.00047722072,0.00021649674,0.00012477669,0.00031305823,0.0020008932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994514,0.00007238706,0.00016475286,0.00007292179,0.000056073488,0.00018243815],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044929893,0.00010961168,0.000116681316,0.000084328516,0.004903438,0.00025924604,0.00024153585,0.00006047248,0.000089075664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043660104,0.00007786261,0.000037132504,0.00018387326,0.00015220293,0.00047015012,0.000010063548,0.0017447502,0.000011685903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074749837,0.00003268608,0.010414651,0.0000025587103,0.000025310663,0.0000049533423,0.06710423,5.567247e-7,0.000007738514,0.92156273,0.000107454915,0.00072968594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010071645,0.0003590681,0.16230294,0.000109324224,0.000030924442,0.00015880626,0.029601058,0.000012276446,0.00004053474,0.68977463,0.11611957,0.0004837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21159427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99214697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7805527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010984768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001676933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524584862","doi":"","title":"The impact of the Freedom of Information Act on central government in the UK: does freedom of information work?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Cabinet (room); Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Political science; Freedom of the press; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.007174448899705758,"score_gpt":0.203142544789349,"score_spread":0.19596809588964326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524584862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7290642,0.00002706922,0.000015984288,0.00029851633,0.00054515747,0.0015429485,0.0003801978,0.000016219466,0.26810968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842579,0.00016702074,0.000025649651,0.000013828122,0.00007451212,5.087672e-7,0.000028058379,0.000006274292,0.015426292],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975029,0.00024322512,0.00051406695,0.00010797312,0.0013516832,0.00028010938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739015,0.00035754524,0.0014538433,0.00057494827,0.00016392875,0.00005959403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008824057,0.00021357468,0.00039036706,0.0001406653,0.0004181103,0.000043864085,0.0015164174,0.00031070702,0.00026515455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085903084,0.00011256182,0.0004112903,0.00020756916,0.0012279557,0.0006318548,0.00015500077,0.0004998202,0.0000116747315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003283921,0.0011574198,0.08334478,0.00047518953,0.00075687433,0.0000050826634,0.45289975,0.0015429077,0.000059644855,0.3789503,0.060567915,0.016956206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003238719,0.0008211847,0.79999876,0.00059248426,0.0002484852,5.7523215e-7,0.043116666,0.000052586893,0.00010504279,0.0045641144,0.14677866,0.00048274233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013001128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04137333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71665394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005550106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072238036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537271728","doi":"10.58948/2331-3528.1752","title":"The Ombudsman as a Monitor of Human Rights in Canadian Federal Corrections","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace law review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.01829577698368406,"score_gpt":0.3386227510650267,"score_spread":0.32032697408134264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537271728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2699823,0.004895096,1.00551375e-7,0.0047786543,0.0012436376,0.0008321408,0.0000049598884,0.000039988783,0.7182231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98989713,0.0010858153,0.000012204351,0.0002889337,0.00021607643,0.000029751369,0.0000021525564,0.000006078648,0.008461878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886614,0.00018927241,0.00023039542,0.00014250811,0.00019969378,0.0003720007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992565,0.00008637722,0.00008526916,0.00025441605,0.000072748866,0.0002447164],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007737898,0.00009085298,0.00020877675,0.00003604642,0.0022710955,0.000082687824,0.00030225122,0.00006917808,0.00065216183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005109871,0.000060438942,0.00008804067,0.0001909168,0.00044184498,0.00009408767,0.000013167402,0.00026752477,0.00018658489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.4664827e-7,0.000016086646,0.0008014627,0.000044725362,0.0000045705574,0.0000031240174,0.0008370583,1.5850212e-8,0.000011563027,0.9955829,0.0023042934,0.00039379494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005985843,0.000015886342,0.0014537806,0.00031716333,0.000011281563,8.897355e-7,0.000067133595,3.9799937e-7,0.000029827395,0.016764037,0.98118967,0.000090048845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9136164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99935865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019093552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556284564","doi":"","title":"On the Improvement of the Administrative Reconsideration Committee System of China: From the Quasi-judicial Perspective","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Administrative law; Administrative court; China; Credibility; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Administrative services organization; Perspective (graphical); Phenomenon; Principal (computer security); Administration (probate law); Business","score_opus":0.055021399540355204,"score_gpt":0.306808682248128,"score_spread":0.25178728270777284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556284564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65444785,0.000023784456,0.00000442429,0.014519011,0.00072581595,0.0005320088,0.00009685646,0.000009349769,0.3296409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998986,7.6155305e-7,0.00000414208,0.0004761741,0.00033835776,0.000008871436,5.138492e-7,0.0000032037813,0.00018197279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842775,0.0002900715,0.00017136736,0.0001777176,0.0006697185,0.00026338338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885577,0.00021999354,0.00019839367,0.0002019343,0.00036002437,0.00016390267],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015732532,0.00007647185,0.00012283547,0.000032979115,0.0026663952,0.000101299505,0.00078891026,0.00005201236,0.000059886606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051638583,0.00003986992,0.00006437356,0.0004435963,0.0032357962,0.00011384936,0.000032225824,0.00014780507,0.0000075500184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042614406,0.000010762163,0.00032994992,6.218042e-7,0.0000061560345,3.9769216e-7,0.12007173,2.2448091e-7,0.00004135888,0.87647206,0.0028568537,0.00020561622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027923693,0.00021806448,0.024994038,0.00006760464,0.000032447355,2.7246278e-7,0.8126316,0.000034129873,0.0013358342,0.15664725,0.003578716,0.00018079225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34422186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7400415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71982485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011910219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004127416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560490588","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1193","title":"Criminal Lawyers’ Assn. v. Ontario: A Limited Right to Government Information under Section 2(b) of the Charter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislation; Freedom of information; Constitutional right; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; Law; Possession (linguistics); Political science; Right to know; Right to privacy; Public administration","score_opus":0.02245867008261149,"score_gpt":0.27133113335754283,"score_spread":0.24887246327493134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560490588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5181768,0.0006555623,0.00015264642,0.01760095,0.0046074586,0.0030962618,0.000039150516,0.00011092442,0.45556027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895134,0.00033562435,0.00012590968,0.0062562115,0.0002519016,0.000035611392,0.0000067241485,0.000007832472,0.0034668026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857306,0.00010487575,0.00030732268,0.00011670357,0.00069869764,0.0001993368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992718,0.000027676359,0.00015610423,0.000303612,0.00014121488,0.000099553865],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006345058,0.000106679334,0.00019393367,0.00001487469,0.00039174125,0.000060916707,0.00029233616,0.00007662142,0.0030612478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033543543,0.000069598165,0.00012928802,0.00012887578,0.00012560893,0.0004151507,0.000047003265,0.00023226677,0.0001745557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014198623,0.0000972196,0.00043293863,0.00054641924,0.00003998069,5.910093e-7,0.013732448,0.0000014646226,0.00039544454,0.95884216,0.024214284,0.0016828787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010598336,0.0000291365,0.005268685,0.00043793223,0.000078130885,0.0000012828841,0.00014370032,0.0000016104789,0.00018765287,0.0011037056,0.9925358,0.00010632538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015290587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62695694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96832156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022097862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013852194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99785006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561848916","doi":"","title":"A study on Theoretical Construction of the Right of Claim on Social Assistance Benefits: From the Perspective of Comparative Study in the Mainland and Taiwan of China","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; China; Administration (probate law); Social assistance; Mainland China; Law and economics; Perspective (graphical); Social benefits; Property rights; Social Welfare; China mainland; Welfare; State (computer science); Business; Law; Political science; Public administration; Public economics; Economics; Economic growth; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.022287173674419423,"score_gpt":0.30608526797474134,"score_spread":0.28379809430032193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561848916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9275891,0.000009180208,7.886369e-7,0.0012077916,0.00009235169,0.0005801935,0.00006058318,0.0000017244496,0.07045826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99983245,7.7232005e-7,0.0000040105383,0.000052281375,0.00009428131,0.000005567827,2.0979466e-7,0.0000023391494,0.000008071014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775034,0.0008896653,0.00022211201,0.00022092776,0.0007048696,0.00021207707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907756,0.00030991112,0.00022480964,0.00016190218,0.00016748927,0.00005833348],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017735607,0.00008879952,0.000254855,0.000072216055,0.0012177055,0.000033762528,0.00067208847,0.000046585752,0.00002816579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013965656,0.000047114554,0.000048941183,0.0006403614,0.008588671,0.000064398875,0.000028045253,0.00017694107,3.3915492e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018189385,0.0001007552,0.035095923,6.7874475e-7,0.000007532749,2.1919303e-7,0.28506836,3.749574e-7,0.000008185585,0.6795378,0.000020367142,0.00014162426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025835368,0.00016419322,0.6276949,0.000012563835,0.000015114074,4.7372925e-8,0.33211136,0.0000026129555,0.000031745283,0.03963902,0.000028943265,0.000041147607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031544283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4204059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6398988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020178496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046928317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562671362","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1096","title":"Section 7 and Administrative Law Deference: No Room at the Inn?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Due process; Law; Political science; Charter; Persuasion; Procedural justice; Economic Justice; Natural justice; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Law and economics; Administrative law; Sociology; Public law; Sources of law; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04595910244958342,"score_gpt":0.32727778018793663,"score_spread":0.28131867773835323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562671362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019967826,0.04665011,0.0000054018637,0.0071949847,0.00046473116,0.00088983186,0.000017166836,0.000090690046,0.9247193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9424353,0.023188014,0.000048419995,0.0060925484,0.0008017586,0.000052284897,0.000028401046,0.000015617588,0.027337618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875355,0.0002757338,0.00021549412,0.00022439717,0.00030592145,0.00022487683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994257,0.00008939739,0.00009188879,0.00019489384,0.00012946437,0.000068655216],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000627419,0.000120975164,0.00020750337,0.000008061223,0.0012260926,0.0001067752,0.00016728051,0.00005859307,0.0015433624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002159539,0.00007716513,0.000071128256,0.00010034429,0.0005460626,0.0001695206,0.000041474425,0.00013416146,0.00033011296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033480794,0.000020948342,0.00010440742,0.00012748779,0.000007594437,0.0000022571085,0.00036259566,5.5078605e-8,0.000012041673,0.9511653,0.047934428,0.00025954735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007797526,0.00003456169,0.00033944877,0.00036385143,0.00003970892,0.0000027853118,0.000045563484,7.179137e-7,0.000021849257,0.01299413,0.98596424,0.00011518363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038418404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1492108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93817115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075392316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067336034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572741729","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720110703.011","title":"A Thought of Taking CPPCC As Chinese Professional Supervisory Institution of Unconstitutional Behavior in Applying Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Institution; Legislator; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.06753247913920621,"score_gpt":0.32861153011726946,"score_spread":0.2610790509780633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572741729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6223058,0.000018006309,0.0000030115834,0.00003301616,0.00035032193,0.00021801816,0.000012911198,0.000008026981,0.37705085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993555,0.0000023142816,0.00014543711,0.00010633857,0.00012139778,0.000030192374,0.0000021896647,0.0000032247833,0.0002334182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852145,0.00007477199,0.0002405315,0.00021380033,0.00054645503,0.00040299143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993404,0.000022406351,0.00013338971,0.000085632084,0.00017281466,0.00024531264],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087911123,0.000084765314,0.00015643617,0.00028942092,0.0013007848,0.000021845197,0.00046707966,0.00010178881,0.0005065751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112005386,0.000078950536,0.00005416969,0.0009260264,0.005099506,0.00054924644,0.00003621338,0.00013411991,0.000011352461],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046706728,0.000043988974,0.08373054,0.0000061710894,0.0000012218389,0.000009120925,0.018261679,1.9667007e-7,0.00046641415,0.89669645,0.0000071873515,0.0007723814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006147529,0.000054838172,0.92883927,0.0001578609,0.000021643224,0.00000388046,0.020824539,0.000009906887,0.00087195786,0.036774404,0.011347211,0.0004797458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25994354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6764612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85992205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045286946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004509738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572997802","doi":"10.46560/meritum.v7i2.1600","title":"A mediação popular na China: acesso à justiça ou harmonia imposta?","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03888223172613995,"score_gpt":0.28632873377187,"score_spread":0.24744650204573007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572997802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46341172,0.013272985,0.0021753348,0.10979756,0.024790857,0.003965057,0.0006044945,0.00237289,0.37960908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98320615,0.0007978653,0.0006514787,0.0004240873,0.004914387,0.00019172709,0.00026391514,0.00015645007,0.009393956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900526,0.0014344511,0.0015248097,0.0014217881,0.0025502644,0.0030161142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99432266,0.00028175133,0.0010374906,0.001199472,0.0006066976,0.002551911],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024142992,0.0012014357,0.0011873514,0.0008265929,0.003961335,0.0008548113,0.001903536,0.0016070476,0.0007006121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007594245,0.0011512586,0.00073436316,0.0014991217,0.00016861585,0.002147506,0.0006116216,0.0018195959,0.00033099196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002265839,0.0015595153,0.0016725226,0.00018568727,0.00041842312,0.0002037006,0.05555941,0.000007654418,0.0005680023,0.92878467,0.009037685,0.0017761408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001631413,0.00013148079,0.016393257,0.00028790883,0.0003671544,0.0004416833,0.0048410203,0.00016499768,0.0003838215,0.0009823163,0.9729488,0.0014261623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021907452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015794227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9639111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001803609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013940295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577914688","doi":"","title":"Security Council Targeted Sanctions, Due Process and the 1267 Ombudsperson","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Georgetown journal of international law","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Obligation; Charter; Political science; Law; Security council; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.012228735685392423,"score_gpt":0.26728822418363546,"score_spread":0.25505948849824306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577914688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7378767,0.00031212458,0.00002937837,0.021282023,0.0041062105,0.00015554712,0.00001134874,0.000025058445,0.23620157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939831,0.00010812835,0.00010662355,0.0005731988,0.0014607568,0.0000025344402,0.0000015342758,0.0000066269595,0.0037575215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983282,0.00010086544,0.00030243633,0.000107152955,0.0009966888,0.00016462534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811876,0.00015223798,0.0002917604,0.00008064233,0.0012346552,0.00012195593],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020443823,0.000091305745,0.0001637331,0.00005008225,0.0006115371,0.00020553122,0.00043131082,0.000078158686,0.0013297709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003781732,0.000057261568,0.00010226685,0.00007059523,0.00092704175,0.00045837506,0.000024894342,0.0004896904,0.000017530074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013368198,0.000057031648,0.00049663044,0.00000387573,0.00006863748,0.00001466436,0.0128380135,0.000003084639,0.000100113444,0.9822789,0.0037843832,0.00022102603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014616085,0.000034483823,0.001466796,0.000025994175,0.000032252436,0.00011417599,0.0021165146,0.00008223494,0.00022328932,0.19245638,0.80186325,0.00012300906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045325112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006394452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7980789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009958431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039546966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590983153","doi":"","title":"International Journal of Rule of Law, Transitional Justice and Human Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Democracy; Transitional justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Rule of law; Work (physics); Law; Academic freedom; Freedom of expression; Sociology; Public administration; Public relations; Engineering; Higher education","score_opus":0.009322230827673868,"score_gpt":0.29557869736234976,"score_spread":0.2862564665346759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590983153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9698281,0.00015399297,0.0003110948,0.00080269546,0.00095074956,0.000042796437,0.0000036724593,0.000006878542,0.027899992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703807,0.00018137424,0.00019419256,0.000037570382,0.0017432087,2.7139586e-7,0.0000012624737,0.000006167403,0.0007978842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983008,0.00009221279,0.0003403249,0.0000822296,0.0005796558,0.00060475717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907154,0.000052912594,0.00029186448,0.000054655604,0.00041645137,0.000112549125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018416323,0.000079774654,0.00015388733,0.00013919685,0.0006746009,0.00007535065,0.00038472336,0.0000843069,0.00040969066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020396305,0.00006466894,0.00010526071,0.00004604732,0.0004462109,0.00034749953,0.000012911106,0.0012599232,0.0000036014078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030101737,0.00008130896,0.00011379886,0.0000030357376,0.00008744301,0.000006099843,0.002522397,7.989608e-7,0.0019397329,0.9944487,0.00006511341,0.000701422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008887551,0.00014855948,0.00086460053,0.000019689165,0.000105265266,0.0003145343,0.0011408395,0.0000020678572,0.000337845,0.96130806,0.034770306,0.00009948181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003761796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022461213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03470519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013796311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008207971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99537635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591112736","doi":"10.1111/capa.12091","title":"Asymmetric decentralization of the administration of public safety in the <scp>C</scp>anadian federal political system","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Sovereignty; Politics; Public administration; Federalism; Corporate governance; Rule of law; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Separation of powers; Administration (probate law); Political science; State (computer science); Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.02714652751484225,"score_gpt":0.2670178902906499,"score_spread":0.23987136277580762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591112736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6352127,0.000068397065,0.001060983,0.046047,0.0008686442,0.0014672921,0.00012521273,0.000057286095,0.31509247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988573,0.0000039334464,0.000029615252,0.0003473281,0.00022785277,0.000015403837,0.00009050641,0.000010640249,0.0004174301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691504,0.0010124622,0.0005671991,0.0002285096,0.0005931033,0.0006836987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814713,0.00037425192,0.00027416792,0.00034978383,0.00028449,0.0005701672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019311556,0.00013635126,0.00019580308,0.0004236951,0.0008366196,0.0003377925,0.000615818,0.00021394907,0.000040071183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001865689,0.00010343311,0.000094191746,0.0012503822,0.0004212566,0.0004165843,0.000010378308,0.00016923022,0.000008400933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013923518,0.000036267018,0.011633955,0.000026303438,0.0000065379595,0.0000017154608,0.001011762,3.2618058e-7,0.0000018597541,0.9858189,0.00084937876,0.0006115769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088602776,0.00037068911,0.38789368,0.00010015785,0.00004962129,0.000030169082,0.029847924,0.00093982765,0.0002502473,0.0122907655,0.56711125,0.00022965683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018669708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92082965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97352815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069203303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00545681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98786503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599077220","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1223","title":"Contractual and Covenantal Conceptions of Modern Treaty Interpretation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Treaty; Negotiation; Supreme court; Law; Covenant; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05609932130275677,"score_gpt":0.31803833645359314,"score_spread":0.2619390151508364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599077220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.184221,0.12434863,0.0011279379,0.0009994244,0.0005000013,0.0020611049,0.000094409115,0.0001713926,0.6864761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844432,0.01465409,0.00012461022,0.00033527816,0.00003857079,0.000009768333,0.0000060410944,0.0000046029104,0.0003838516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992329,0.00012938985,0.0002219556,0.00012883206,0.00015397568,0.000132932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957,0.000048509453,0.00009864025,0.000114250455,0.000091033144,0.00007753644],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031328213,0.00007566313,0.00024013339,0.0000147890505,0.00016952332,0.000013348715,0.0001081347,0.000042306707,0.0010688966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033033528,0.00005997974,0.000069801245,0.00004211943,0.00051706855,0.00020989256,0.000015154963,0.000057977137,0.000034501976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013678296,0.00007752545,0.00026865595,0.00032255665,0.000028559805,0.0000023423627,0.018800447,4.2073548e-8,0.00004839231,0.96049595,0.00066647906,0.01927535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014330829,0.00041157551,0.0057307743,0.007316839,0.00073906407,0.000013724354,0.0014457424,0.00015197457,0.00038687134,0.16076593,0.82080656,0.0007978431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074239663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038110248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82014006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002170823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050705887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1693358874","doi":"10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020120804.2031","title":"Discussion on Constitution Supervision of Chinese Local People’s Congress: The Way out of the Nominal Constitution Supervision in China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; China; Law; Power (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.02557432744098765,"score_gpt":0.3467035960829722,"score_spread":0.32112926864198454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1693358874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98348373,0.0003583116,0.000036040292,0.0019709326,0.0006119176,0.0005478275,0.000015667289,0.000026664562,0.012948891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992712,0.0002023534,0.0000272596,0.00003996347,0.00009068354,0.000014816978,0.00005448303,0.000004830396,0.00029438268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978694,0.00071623246,0.0004910955,0.00016092802,0.0004905358,0.00027183222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984559,0.00019646238,0.0002883637,0.00072556507,0.00026458723,0.00006912702],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013058651,0.00016911267,0.0002474152,0.00005898485,0.0015156608,0.000109482644,0.00087161537,0.00016374762,0.00010520704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032046228,0.000070921196,0.00014426798,0.00030778127,0.00408705,0.0010663136,0.00022797783,0.00035273738,0.00002510644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002655241,0.00062732014,0.24390826,0.00007056014,0.000019989184,2.424329e-7,0.14877027,0.00033381762,0.0076006744,0.58948916,0.00031127772,0.008602871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010795168,0.0000773234,0.9682163,0.00044751627,0.000027692375,0.0000026640457,0.010527021,0.00036928637,0.0022642012,0.004129957,0.012614894,0.00024361508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026543331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012751289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7243081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000195629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000099651734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1757609320","doi":"10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020120805.966","title":"Comparative Analysis on Constitutional Supervision Modes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Constitution; Operability; Materiality (auditing); Political science; State (computer science); Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.09688097939581644,"score_gpt":0.4258350658870662,"score_spread":0.3289540864912498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1757609320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7962212,0.0003501656,0.000041669547,0.00036105054,0.00006184363,0.00011556113,0.00000987792,0.00007715556,0.2027615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99723,0.00010093963,0.0003276351,0.00011839528,0.00012481658,0.000011850419,0.00019958112,0.0000018894933,0.0018848788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889004,0.00028154155,0.00017427228,0.000119840006,0.0002988774,0.00023541776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898636,0.0001541516,0.00008179729,0.00035604977,0.0003035129,0.000118113465],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004778804,0.00009761649,0.00017113016,0.00007911977,0.0022195547,0.0003230771,0.00039593465,0.000080659,0.0005581098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049048547,0.00007347006,0.000119503464,0.0003384825,0.002383798,0.0011748025,0.000058090605,0.0001570763,0.0003496602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014401781,0.00009719281,0.013859066,0.0000013199733,0.00006898704,5.6059648e-8,0.01785796,0.00015981852,0.000112979724,0.9669957,0.0006018993,0.0002306005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009042931,0.00007110397,0.43198517,0.00005704512,0.0003740409,0.0000013054382,0.019781971,0.001264939,0.0020253249,0.014642535,0.5281092,0.0007830973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040781248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081379595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9523532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015367755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036358688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W178908084","doi":"10.29173/alr128","title":"Proportionality as a Remedial Principle: A Framework for Suspended Declarations of Invalidity in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Proportionality (law); Law; Remedial education; Adjudication; Discretion; Political science; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.13464476143966841,"score_gpt":0.3905629564135247,"score_spread":0.25591819497385626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W178908084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01092214,0.002394568,0.00008448604,0.0044978135,0.0005274485,0.0037777976,0.000074611664,0.000024883242,0.97769624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99443686,0.0007583141,0.0016334445,0.0022799077,0.00012383699,0.00015467855,0.00007197042,0.0000054706397,0.0005355123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862117,0.00018465583,0.00042796583,0.00020782747,0.00024972158,0.0003086444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893326,0.00026973538,0.0001518946,0.00020759812,0.00017825962,0.0002592613],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010418802,0.000096190466,0.00028054006,0.00003218071,0.00042598258,0.00001698108,0.00023067252,0.000117966745,0.003442969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009176759,0.00008599828,0.000108316824,0.000189134,0.001282727,0.00018902804,0.000016270471,0.00012158285,0.00007175015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052720266,0.00006201698,0.0016281354,0.00015238515,0.000011267694,0.0000021297683,0.0010300956,4.02371e-8,3.07723e-7,0.99678195,0.0002941699,0.000032224445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010531174,0.000017869646,0.0005895583,0.0005570517,0.000029265537,0.000001339017,0.000016518474,4.8519894e-7,0.000022265536,0.4035106,0.59505236,0.000097384356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78196955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9835147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016409002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021712251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1820973665","doi":"","title":"Judicial Proposal: The Practical Review and System Evolution of Extended Jurisdiction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Jurisdiction; Ideal (ethics); Law; Judicial review; Reflection (computer programming); Political science; Judicial discretion; Administrative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03540637345866093,"score_gpt":0.3322986344407263,"score_spread":0.2968922609820654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1820973665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026823763,0.0034805222,0.000105596,0.028444413,0.0014393737,0.0014701312,0.000019207802,0.00011399278,0.938103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990348,0.000058300815,0.000049091796,0.00023241364,0.000354301,0.000007787517,3.983802e-7,0.0000033936174,0.00025947962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998596,0.00019613428,0.00015211968,0.00017614028,0.00054911606,0.00033049908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900836,0.000024842297,0.00010117202,0.00009302846,0.00032822884,0.0004443701],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002638172,0.000057538957,0.00012698145,0.000079177626,0.0016001454,0.00007523562,0.00023893111,0.00005685933,0.000018732546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000337049,0.000042663283,0.000025713665,0.0006384977,0.0025406866,0.00033607567,0.000021549904,0.00010277703,0.00001808009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015286091,0.0000050259155,0.000246156,0.000026965245,0.0000019536647,0.0000020271427,0.0054963846,1.1707733e-8,0.000007108882,0.9878181,0.005580661,0.0008140789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078677776,0.00026904093,0.042481203,0.0006647966,0.0004573856,0.000040646173,0.14170107,0.0001161986,0.000052769377,0.068393484,0.7441828,0.0008538262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058963954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1617615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97221106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012437842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060319076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1837478881","doi":"10.29173/alr289","title":"The Scope and Meaning of Reasonableness Review","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Supreme court; Standard of review; Meaning (existential); Political science; Statutory law; Law; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05192000239868214,"score_gpt":0.3357584087911012,"score_spread":0.28383840639241903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1837478881","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008835541,0.5856427,2.5600218e-7,0.003947225,0.00006920811,0.000304539,2.602135e-7,0.0000060337416,0.4099414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008498098,0.9810856,0.0000318188,0.0029661928,0.000069273236,0.000017523607,0.0000014652348,0.0000074901395,0.0073225372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988233,0.0003317787,0.00026153668,0.00013720577,0.00026693943,0.00017927561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990264,0.00030742225,0.00013938294,0.00025913384,0.00013715237,0.0001305076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018794702,0.000081157086,0.00031507027,0.0000050428516,0.0003639803,0.000033875494,0.00026568238,0.00002604461,0.00012962654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005058502,0.00004692273,0.000057137982,0.00013878725,0.00035864796,0.00013863445,0.000047275516,0.000059882754,0.000081102546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.909911e-7,0.0000055643486,0.00001903023,0.0019422271,0.000007972119,5.3020733e-7,0.00034825364,5.155638e-9,1.3561248e-7,0.9710826,0.015507246,0.011085617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051435454,0.000011869408,0.000008593554,0.016150849,0.00006897091,0.0000016572866,0.000024696577,1.520095e-7,0.0000025989236,0.0066348575,0.9769753,0.00006897418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007779129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04227032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9644478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019308154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000116367446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W186748699","doi":"","title":"Emerging Global Actors: The United Nations and National Human Rights Institutions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Governance","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Government (linguistics); Political science; Global governance; Civil society; Public administration; International law; Institution; Corporate governance; International human rights law; Economic growth; Public relations; Law; Politics; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.034912549240785296,"score_gpt":0.3402135667098585,"score_spread":0.3053010174690732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W186748699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29924375,0.00015825048,0.000067005465,0.0014963401,0.00036841095,0.00015052891,0.00013130512,0.00006702553,0.6983174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974738,0.000047870977,0.00012793015,0.00024385338,0.00016836057,0.0000072820494,0.000008494146,0.000001987503,0.0019204385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877334,0.00011574223,0.00013962922,0.00018578373,0.000541418,0.00024406236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995176,0.000038419857,0.00009500916,0.000108045526,0.00014938645,0.00009154676],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002351395,0.00009829733,0.000076351345,0.000035262325,0.003423498,0.00014032738,0.00022844401,0.0000605117,0.00018204183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016217455,0.000074244774,0.000040925865,0.0012807668,0.00052074937,0.0002694428,0.000025175026,0.00007998979,0.000048410693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.471079e-7,0.00002872559,0.0020310152,0.0000012584028,0.000011051097,0.0000015501979,0.0004408401,0.000016994642,0.0000010956287,0.9907709,0.0066576586,0.0000380054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016264086,0.0000055319942,0.036078814,0.000012126749,0.000007657685,0.0000027009548,0.00010884481,0.0000047805875,0.0000029257133,0.16598083,0.797541,0.00009212858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007730906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11481708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82479006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043194726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022030738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891201568","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720100602.002","title":"Analysis on the Functions of Administrative Law Enforcement Interpretation in China","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Administrative law; Political science; Enforcement; Humanities; Law; Law enforcement; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02519119921449278,"score_gpt":0.3217184960479076,"score_spread":0.29652729683341483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1891201568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37073046,6.60604e-7,0.000008117964,0.0007620923,0.00015768074,0.0000954869,0.000009135689,0.0000042664765,0.6282321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987664,4.131916e-7,0.000005825894,0.00028578052,0.000073135736,0.0000075954163,0.0000017432236,0.0000014390805,0.0008576621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991279,0.00005794712,0.000112038804,0.00014313287,0.00031020006,0.00024877716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956715,0.000050306113,0.000056020588,0.000097210825,0.000070294,0.00015904628],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085071573,0.000046836736,0.00007976755,0.00023278332,0.0013885286,0.000085985484,0.00033922188,0.00004090424,0.0010488585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089884445,0.000035860397,0.000053110278,0.0013847963,0.0019981328,0.0001519873,0.0000084575295,0.00014603745,0.000017322733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015354152,0.00000745173,0.0019076819,2.9543025e-7,0.0000059719077,4.991479e-7,0.033374436,0.0000016337736,0.000047752495,0.9640716,0.000062539795,0.00051860244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004948331,0.00028662244,0.54431725,0.000034977606,0.00022895522,3.2112007e-7,0.17085002,0.0011605003,0.0010524687,0.07202999,0.20869128,0.0008527869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20828108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9692735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8920416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023452181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008605705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891827686","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511618246.004","title":"Taking the administrative state seriously","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Computer science; Business; Programming language","score_opus":0.04947971725597465,"score_gpt":0.25610843295630886,"score_spread":0.2066287157003342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1891827686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004897649,0.00006853509,0.000044435692,0.0000699978,0.00027563798,0.0005059905,0.00017030143,0.00015440737,0.9982209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020859415,0.0000537007,0.000014599712,0.00007703907,0.00034247714,5.265626e-7,0.000021330981,0.000029742085,0.97860116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985428,0.00011423336,0.00016056326,0.00038796864,0.00042960438,0.00036482312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988568,0.00010784187,0.00037448417,0.00036334156,0.00015577624,0.00014178197],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019060067,0.00028742538,0.00027814103,0.00008866758,0.0015180606,0.00016804779,0.0007416205,0.00025148803,0.00005458366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000064785218,0.0002569333,0.00020692291,0.000008222997,0.0012282308,0.0001037779,0.00015451503,0.0004913211,0.000042088872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002463683,0.000005075082,0.000001125529,0.000011723851,0.00006108841,0.00023994225,0.0018311777,0.0000010407489,0.000001290508,0.94958735,0.04755397,0.0006815826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019484683,0.00003018989,0.000070467584,0.000067495086,0.00010100497,0.0000019734107,0.0003476125,0.0000026515784,0.000020415002,0.00025755636,0.9985701,0.00033567697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040391386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020861737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9510161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027846405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039914934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1946209890","doi":"10.1164/rccm.200701-024ed","title":"The New IGRA and the Old TST","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.02264579828387906,"score_gpt":0.33736883759121966,"score_spread":0.3147230393073406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1946209890","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041728118,0.03246319,0.000046772973,0.9529836,0.0008327115,0.0001375574,0.0000025688987,0.000010660078,0.009350112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09147801,0.0016315908,0.00003113255,0.87866896,0.026384389,0.0000017570026,8.7427713e-7,0.000024457782,0.0017788031],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971708,0.000803191,0.0004973,0.00017678404,0.00093842566,0.00041348228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951109,0.0036735348,0.00028634508,0.00019367243,0.00038606505,0.0003494266],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021799519,0.00019854361,0.0005872677,0.00011206379,0.0010765959,0.00012498259,0.00041966574,0.00016410202,0.00009821675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011958665,0.00008674584,0.0001195011,0.00016831071,0.017046604,0.000079003985,0.00003680207,0.0018338725,0.0000023889047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016115088,0.000004139189,0.00012771532,0.000040650462,0.000053987413,0.0005359407,0.018313223,1.194278e-8,9.4796394e-7,0.052176826,0.8489327,0.079652734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068650104,0.000879274,0.00017114982,0.00017780965,0.00020407813,0.00004253656,0.024906278,6.675597e-8,9.5197805e-7,0.005033735,0.9677824,0.000115222625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000452111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042361417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118849725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000496321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003119608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9856284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W195164713","doi":"","title":"Opening the Cabinet Door: FOI and government policy making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UCL Discovery (University College London)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Freedom of information; Deliberation; Public administration; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.021615601182175807,"score_gpt":0.23414903342021173,"score_spread":0.21253343223803592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W195164713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6691919,0.00005357744,0.00009754913,0.0014834127,0.00016489952,0.00030322577,0.00011766787,0.00004493156,0.32854283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9091877,0.00005762911,0.0001566721,0.00027798474,0.00015105034,6.385007e-7,0.0000013509092,0.000008896709,0.09015813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987171,0.00016643053,0.00008851093,0.0002641617,0.0004079864,0.00035580323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994761,0.00007773368,0.00008958421,0.00022401493,0.000026394253,0.00010618639],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027354225,0.0001306161,0.0001550029,0.00007261583,0.0019040935,0.00010797612,0.00049694884,0.00007130628,0.00045339487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002409107,0.00011109438,0.00007976099,0.0003057871,0.00048561223,0.0010920179,0.0002933384,0.0001400738,0.000045729365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008652764,0.00004116011,0.0028986374,0.0000065989984,0.000034656754,0.00010307164,0.025072096,8.685331e-7,0.000011519272,0.9685752,0.0028158084,0.00035389978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029487065,0.0002430642,0.15682001,0.00013582915,0.0002204333,0.000029188965,0.21864633,0.00021672591,0.00008564222,0.026179034,0.59337306,0.0011019706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050187428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013837285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9423961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034340058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018568423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968488002","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb00913.x","title":"The privacy commissioner of Canada: Multiple roles, diverse expectations and structural dilemmas","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy policy; Legislation; Political science; Data Protection Act 1998; Information privacy; Privacy law; Privacy by Design; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); The Right to Privacy; Privacy protection; Business; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.02576048862781449,"score_gpt":0.26089804090366997,"score_spread":0.23513755227585548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968488002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9491089,0.00016588048,0.000014600506,0.019401586,0.00033071687,0.0003083397,0.000056728048,0.000016960976,0.030596271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971815,0.0000039130946,0.000052954154,0.000059861737,0.000046798785,0.000005653545,0.000017366227,0.00000393893,0.0026280214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991933,0.000115448325,0.0001391398,0.00010470113,0.00019396307,0.00025345787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913174,0.000102257734,0.00006820629,0.00012303957,0.00010977635,0.00046500642],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015913953,0.000061804116,0.00006301293,0.00004593321,0.0020269617,0.00013704247,0.00013335269,0.000044844935,0.00020141539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004228282,0.00004849001,0.00001581283,0.000107323336,0.0002398502,0.00017871027,0.0000054507113,0.00006369309,0.0000011289368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017039303,0.0000034037582,0.00577629,0.0000017902245,0.00000757879,0.0000034588652,0.00306412,1.1596456e-7,0.0000033351732,0.9822284,0.008158002,0.00075177575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020354825,0.000021714905,0.01896226,0.000003944521,0.0000069557136,0.0000024363949,0.021346748,0.00006154615,0.00006518718,0.0043294886,0.95486856,0.0001276138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4660191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99976766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97789896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022165009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069666826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984140242","doi":"10.7202/043404ar","title":"Nouveau développement du droit administratif en Chine","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010483017210511673,"score_gpt":0.2603413324638297,"score_spread":0.249858315253318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984140242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8167088,0.0015360302,0.0011336537,0.04096111,0.0013004412,0.00037697455,0.000039680628,0.00015210993,0.13779117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7566699,0.0010885835,0.002786154,0.0016113552,0.0031609528,0.000017633296,0.0000232171,0.000038265203,0.23460396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971926,0.00023555766,0.00048533958,0.00050872396,0.0005834291,0.0009942994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986923,0.00017468516,0.00018436325,0.00034769785,0.000065122666,0.00053588004],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083566277,0.00034047436,0.0003853473,0.000115256866,0.0010293991,0.00020245193,0.0006393042,0.0005916089,0.0060862517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007047522,0.00038294992,0.00024989067,0.00029965528,0.0014341585,0.00033782964,0.000051776515,0.0007310077,0.0017492548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027086046,0.0003387563,0.0012080843,0.00005396196,0.00010875003,0.00010676013,0.0742838,0.00003322106,0.00005213259,0.84665287,0.012770638,0.06436395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087775633,0.00022900634,0.012884384,0.00009647572,0.00014103312,0.000034767,0.003873103,0.00044409576,0.0004453883,0.1356981,0.8445581,0.0007177548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068646204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012572777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8317875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003028907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038931312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992252252","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.864364","title":"Is Consent the Foundation of Fair Information Practices? Canada's Experience Under Pipeda","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Library science; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.029387196906130838,"score_gpt":0.3274001810575127,"score_spread":0.29801298415138183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992252252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9366093,0.00033680163,0.001956256,0.032064263,0.00035094304,0.00020415876,0.0000013157579,0.000016669988,0.028460277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99550396,0.0007880369,0.000020651129,0.0008220824,0.00028372701,0.0000022331992,0.0000012307646,0.0000028292097,0.0025752245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836296,0.0001205723,0.0002405225,0.000058645706,0.00050581613,0.0007114575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990085,0.000103831815,0.00058970513,0.00009333104,0.00015267263,0.000051972744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001127976,0.00006192279,0.00006981674,0.000039241822,0.00078422454,0.00011104974,0.00025409562,0.00003401127,0.00031156527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001295973,0.000043051205,0.00003602237,0.00010520545,0.000149622,0.0009396489,0.000011749431,0.0004784591,0.000026133599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021547146,0.00002560816,0.0006139925,0.0000028866486,0.00004297173,2.2126899e-7,0.0353117,0.000046619054,0.00002299245,0.94754046,0.0019579798,0.014413012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048673077,0.00008600578,0.0025719057,0.00001687815,0.000033116063,0.00004367482,0.16695559,0.000089781985,0.00030477624,0.12039752,0.70882744,0.00018661573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23355435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9703123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82714295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013337301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011607412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99399585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993297088","doi":"10.7202/042508ar","title":"L'ombudsman: première avenue de contrôle de l'Administration, ses caractéristiques, son efficacité","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Wonder; Administration (probate law); Political science; Public administration; Law; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009019204008820675,"score_gpt":0.26488700342018856,"score_spread":0.2558677994113679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993297088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95050955,0.00031382308,0.0018607987,0.0015056717,0.00010540891,0.0002605719,0.000019061785,0.00022026738,0.045204844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96964294,0.000095558695,0.0013990655,0.00061570306,0.0010978356,0.000023365272,0.000015825462,0.000025450341,0.027084284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998315,0.00022753097,0.00023589702,0.00027597824,0.00028753988,0.0006580848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907196,0.00017718562,0.0001246557,0.00022240964,0.000072531795,0.0003312321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070685206,0.00016410975,0.00021184806,0.00007014717,0.0008200807,0.00019634377,0.00034489145,0.00038551027,0.0002723937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019932822,0.00018225262,0.00011525575,0.00011560551,0.0005417099,0.0001967845,0.0000135695,0.00041945456,0.00010628041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015137988,0.00037347432,0.012538828,0.000091960166,0.00010917901,0.00018803505,0.15236889,0.00016694289,0.0011498648,0.78140473,0.01920837,0.03224836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014826051,0.00022016822,0.0417472,0.00014328811,0.00016427707,0.00006527582,0.009000666,0.0006903135,0.009455081,0.08972878,0.84629714,0.0010052138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000814813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015598349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8270888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014405384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056754274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8704245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994382601","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2007.tb02002.x","title":"The American distortion of the ombudsman concept and its influence on Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legislature; Humanities; Not for profit; Law; Management; Philosophy; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.01285996568857332,"score_gpt":0.26593429748492214,"score_spread":0.2530743317963488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994382601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97020996,0.000030768057,0.0000035863886,0.02051501,0.00022047188,0.00018065337,0.000016881173,0.0000076590095,0.008815004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99772584,0.000007139095,0.0000014662579,0.0006519935,0.00009909977,0.000002889907,0.000004358673,0.0000038948947,0.0015033241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990742,0.00007731668,0.00016087161,0.00011640606,0.00028875444,0.00028242043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914527,0.000113054586,0.00015798553,0.00014027419,0.00011812063,0.00032532247],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034314522,0.000062909334,0.00006586266,0.000037343652,0.0013073741,0.000092472954,0.00022083473,0.000030273472,0.000020861666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023777965,0.00004269406,0.000018078646,0.00021913645,0.00054022484,0.00011793398,0.0000061067503,0.00009159577,0.0000013849916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066017174,0.00000658194,0.005314677,0.0000019344186,0.000006629822,0.0000039811143,0.0012216261,4.400726e-7,0.000012035592,0.9827891,0.002782521,0.007853844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008385736,0.000082272585,0.37331322,0.0000092181135,0.0000062263607,0.0000014936187,0.0026585355,0.0000068442246,0.0005202187,0.0009821205,0.62221074,0.00012524158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72399586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004554192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004565714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002727790","doi":"10.7202/042499ar","title":"Les conséquences juridiques des informations erronées fournies par les préposés de l'Administration publique","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Redress; Political science; Equity (law); Good faith; Law; Government (linguistics); Damages; Administration (probate law); Public administration; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020315623045872838,"score_gpt":0.2874767287644119,"score_spread":0.267161105718539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002727790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89852905,0.0002580296,0.0020914795,0.0030477191,0.00005680718,0.00021517496,0.000013700976,0.000273371,0.09551464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872787,0.00039805542,0.006123438,0.00038926824,0.00036762774,0.000041412924,0.000021738328,0.000013447159,0.005366289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998517,0.00019791379,0.00032224762,0.00017748786,0.0002877132,0.00049763866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913126,0.00020563745,0.00016296994,0.00014727528,0.00014344124,0.00020941827],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000680771,0.00016457934,0.00017576528,0.00016292736,0.0023907544,0.00047560473,0.0003447276,0.00032239567,0.00031927656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024633206,0.00016110533,0.000103241415,0.0001588451,0.002229821,0.0011208183,0.000016844693,0.0003364083,0.00003699017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015952259,0.000060720085,0.0073238113,0.000040725423,0.00003413318,0.000006560286,0.10709885,0.000040491053,0.000096777345,0.8596886,0.0017383113,0.023855112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051968754,0.00026326938,0.057050128,0.00016390102,0.00010228092,0.00004383272,0.055006932,0.00026008094,0.009310478,0.5486388,0.32770813,0.0009324841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002728374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09772026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3259698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077708944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072336104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018322449","doi":"10.7202/043805ar","title":"Standards of Judicial Review : Is it Time to Change our Analysis ?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Mantra; Deference; Injustice; Discipline; Judicial deference; Law and economics; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024113953095631697,"score_gpt":0.32638550597224275,"score_spread":0.30227155287661106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018322449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33448094,0.014218347,0.0012959674,0.1407916,0.0002689525,0.0020311892,0.0006570075,0.00026488726,0.5059911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8274357,0.005286416,0.000997592,0.031227257,0.0017377369,0.00004098201,0.000020803402,0.000029133163,0.1332244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866146,0.00009530266,0.00021461386,0.00018499754,0.00054615276,0.00029748955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993816,0.00002243386,0.00009131247,0.00019016788,0.00012918469,0.00018529728],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094434136,0.000090701564,0.0003452868,0.00014248984,0.00025461044,0.000026293203,0.00026549338,0.000113612805,0.005101775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008308392,0.00008968816,0.00022046064,0.00064524997,0.0001296475,0.00010029906,0.00001785876,0.00012280954,0.00041413415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050074825,0.00016175289,0.00067744066,0.000295992,0.0008004089,0.000021667773,0.18203501,0.000011251152,0.00004934137,0.04486531,0.6242555,0.14677629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001186614,0.000042252912,0.00093844417,0.00017819268,0.0005089798,2.925195e-7,0.00097568944,0.000024838122,0.00007372942,0.0019993295,0.99495286,0.0001867235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005028813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005518833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49295473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059257454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011094293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026041722","doi":"10.1111/0033-3352.00093","title":"Less Government, More Secrecy: Reinvention and the Weakening of Freedom of Information Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Secrecy; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Restructuring; Democracy; Business; Government (linguistics); Politics; Public administration; Public relations; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.030109396186381893,"score_gpt":0.2985655148150158,"score_spread":0.26845611862863394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026041722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09887326,0.017697707,0.0007072472,0.04686796,0.00022153414,0.0024433404,0.00005352336,0.00007898752,0.83305645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850563,0.013441117,0.00011793285,0.00039443173,0.000043882093,0.000018295621,0.000022705597,0.000002308812,0.0009030386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988759,0.00017605472,0.00040011414,0.00006380497,0.0003978858,0.00008621227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939376,0.00005620539,0.00029950915,0.00012295722,0.000081762875,0.00004578648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011219764,0.000056128178,0.00017453836,0.000011677038,0.00020476313,0.00006422069,0.0001223402,0.000036064714,0.00071741594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008845149,0.000038859893,0.000060476083,0.00012639869,0.0004809204,0.00066485815,0.000009292478,0.000051104525,0.0000066090884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009257008,0.000013853547,0.000054013915,0.00031094206,0.000007850732,5.7298486e-8,0.0010153841,1.897677e-7,5.5062276e-7,0.9613424,0.0003188316,0.03692665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070061104,0.00005955658,0.0010346893,0.0008242101,0.00007701046,0.0000023250013,0.0021139805,0.0000856297,0.00002805695,0.007943154,0.98701334,0.0001174203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015477925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012681319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9866945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019763555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000905566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78552014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032037301","doi":"10.7202/042693ar","title":"Le contrôle juridictionnel de l'action administrative devant les juridictions anglaises","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Political science; Legislation; Law; Commission; Certiorari; Action (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.027902382751163805,"score_gpt":0.30032537373918466,"score_spread":0.27242299098802086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032037301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79867584,0.00020904964,0.008896431,0.003346371,0.00024244603,0.00023034838,0.00002529645,0.00033028857,0.1880439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97791207,0.00017924266,0.00084578467,0.00029508572,0.0009131931,0.000031457617,0.000010987527,0.000017211632,0.019794954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987521,0.00016168704,0.00019456673,0.00023255197,0.00023090505,0.00042816417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932295,0.00013672038,0.000095685005,0.00013860999,0.00007870913,0.00022731432],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036361467,0.00012739637,0.00015157412,0.00011065947,0.0023216456,0.00013077866,0.00017721383,0.0002475532,0.00032789438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008769125,0.00013951398,0.00011610761,0.00015224887,0.00073799613,0.00032711148,0.000009441401,0.0003382491,0.00009982115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003048264,0.0001537548,0.00057734037,0.0000073511455,0.00004635647,0.000011680046,0.021354899,0.00005964831,0.00041561824,0.96346825,0.0029826588,0.010891934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008545386,0.00012026994,0.015487738,0.000033175766,0.000093613016,0.000023756591,0.026526976,0.0002106269,0.0038988595,0.08436993,0.8679573,0.00042323302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018808927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050046965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87909836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095991004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007000774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038776553","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2003.0029","title":"Transgovernmental Activism: Canada's Role in Promoting National Human Rights Commissions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Commission; Political science; Public administration; Context (archaeology); Economic shortage; Government (linguistics); Law","score_opus":0.01818793404464711,"score_gpt":0.28439548771355955,"score_spread":0.26620755366891247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038776553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7162266,0.0000116583315,0.0000037701445,0.0001533984,0.00016738263,0.0003401509,0.00001594675,0.00007039188,0.2830107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888374,1.04139936e-7,0.00004886077,0.000051774008,0.00024247552,0.000029100054,0.000025217376,0.000020202475,0.010744837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965466,0.00047727028,0.0004796432,0.00047650287,0.0013304501,0.00068952923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911815,0.000089547044,0.00015537182,0.00022594362,0.00008390282,0.00032711012],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005681175,0.0002783529,0.00030674684,0.00016161131,0.004607338,0.00017899045,0.0004218826,0.00014911604,0.0026541273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000048987436,0.00023627644,0.000102090846,0.00019426833,0.0002865362,0.0004246812,0.0000068534164,0.0003743052,0.0000462062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051895004,0.00035216048,0.0004618954,0.000008645963,0.000024028843,0.0000513603,0.03451927,7.92386e-7,0.00069265056,0.9614133,0.0023929505,0.000077757744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017241894,0.00027884243,0.011742148,0.000111646645,0.000023439574,0.0000067499204,0.0031639058,0.000017234637,0.0012775919,0.5500866,0.43079698,0.0007706361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4720215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52091867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010448478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040721436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077028099","doi":"10.7202/042518ar","title":"Réflexion pour une approche critique de la notion de droit à l'information en droit international","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"United Nations","keywords":"Freedom of information; International law; Political science; Right to know; Access to information; Law and economics; Humanities; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Information access; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.006728804330157048,"score_gpt":0.27425898962538703,"score_spread":0.26753018529523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077028099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62367433,0.000017450595,0.10546384,0.003999019,0.00016357306,0.00021689839,0.0000109652065,0.0002190624,0.26623487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766895,0.00009000454,0.0060646064,0.0015103978,0.00089884026,0.000027494138,0.00005589831,0.000016489092,0.014646765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998566,0.00020177595,0.00025629535,0.00017189633,0.0003770116,0.00042704926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928737,0.00018469183,0.000117992255,0.00013081006,0.00009421672,0.00018491573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012312987,0.00012827493,0.00013265273,0.00018028854,0.0004498764,0.00025295652,0.00038791596,0.00042661338,0.00029396714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023313136,0.00015478404,0.00010695595,0.00015252746,0.00034913459,0.00087447127,0.000021428064,0.00045592224,0.00023084678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032527787,0.00006478808,0.00024138347,0.000016856791,0.000024071933,0.0000069619973,0.06148841,0.00020439843,0.00032625496,0.9115067,0.0018318838,0.024255773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079318706,0.000037932772,0.007917283,0.000056931538,0.00003803585,0.000031601372,0.008425465,0.004328901,0.0015164439,0.8260177,0.15046002,0.00037649294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001147751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013782638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35301518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032827097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029864372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85841715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081658595","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.270908","title":"In Search of 'Effective Remedies': Applying the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Australia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Cultural rights; Political science; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Human rights; Law and economics; International human rights law; Law; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.031049839307650418,"score_gpt":0.3467678434883814,"score_spread":0.315718004180731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081658595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924354,0.00005862946,0.0000037952573,0.0018087238,0.0002112726,0.0002365614,9.557957e-7,0.0000030734807,0.0052415766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966266,0.00050335005,0.0000023282746,0.000029775752,0.00054806017,0.000011172626,5.9473297e-7,0.0000030224855,0.002275079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984675,0.00022368509,0.00018793967,0.0001174176,0.00022972914,0.00077372376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999726,0.000096882,0.0000796464,0.000034893004,0.000030691986,0.000031876985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022792409,0.00007266361,0.00012371966,0.00011770231,0.0004066937,0.00005823038,0.00023715994,0.000054843567,0.000096733456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014784551,0.000046721492,0.00004465612,0.0000705381,0.00023005888,0.00020800768,0.000021296713,0.0010343689,0.000013573819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012692025,0.000050159648,0.0066091237,0.0000013935194,0.00004068646,0.000009388311,0.017787468,0.000017257624,0.00008713896,0.9717367,0.00013386746,0.0033998394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021093942,0.00025391817,0.038851615,0.00005613865,0.000010291538,0.000058194684,0.024488274,0.000096637836,0.00021316933,0.89973766,0.033896316,0.0002283775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072780107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23360567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22632766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014186115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036926204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083092465","doi":"10.7202/1026399ar","title":"L’accès des enfants à la justice et leur droit de participation devant les tribunaux : quelques réflexions","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.043641929178812586,"score_gpt":0.3289911729351416,"score_spread":0.285349243756329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083092465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.821444,0.0013823146,0.0061381003,0.0038950203,0.00069841824,0.00034690657,0.00005056189,0.00022749379,0.16581723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96793115,0.0018520203,0.0024054232,0.0008422714,0.0014187349,0.000055929926,0.000032679036,0.000059049857,0.025402749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958538,0.001488581,0.0005608125,0.0005332659,0.0003586913,0.001204861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976475,0.0009195985,0.0002817199,0.00040781894,0.00019315383,0.000550166],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023494633,0.00027386166,0.00047751373,0.00014330108,0.0011283639,0.00036944257,0.0005236437,0.00045463163,0.00078534475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000833717,0.0003856605,0.0002503162,0.0003852845,0.0010205751,0.0007153252,0.00008509536,0.00050999585,0.00063469703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032336655,0.0003009667,0.0058922214,0.0004196597,0.000053150157,0.00004394971,0.023553481,0.00018613727,0.00016215128,0.9316895,0.00081115763,0.036855284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006402542,0.0002163306,0.04020452,0.0007690076,0.0006395727,0.000049033464,0.00165144,0.0054101376,0.0005722757,0.8666391,0.082537346,0.0006709944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045366697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034159753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14648719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007982227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004306853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091461638","doi":"10.7202/043302ar","title":"Salaire des fonctionnaires et vie privée","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.014640191369825787,"score_gpt":0.26653449193165757,"score_spread":0.25189430056183176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091461638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8047337,0.0073920633,0.0017942968,0.011223612,0.0009778155,0.00020586315,0.000012101233,0.00019330044,0.17346725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7819309,0.0013115885,0.0020719967,0.0018711311,0.001440471,0.000010631638,0.000005797657,0.000030446994,0.211327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980804,0.00027623592,0.00025975975,0.00033553885,0.0003430632,0.000705052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991555,0.00012408703,0.00010794702,0.00022963517,0.00006555399,0.0003172512],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005547766,0.0002172596,0.00023252025,0.00009348371,0.0012767741,0.0001750135,0.00033785144,0.00046088683,0.0015853478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074335585,0.00023488338,0.00020692879,0.00026947114,0.0031259346,0.0005551237,0.000030336409,0.0005422603,0.0010826932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010910133,0.00012614153,0.0013681746,0.000049795708,0.000049461793,0.000021960836,0.06492593,0.00004997265,0.00001989076,0.7454567,0.008274957,0.17964609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033920823,0.000071908675,0.016013259,0.00013564329,0.00007048288,0.00001660554,0.0027035926,0.00013659138,0.00015465832,0.26257622,0.7174478,0.00033402137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010780391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03342099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70917284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002111225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028030365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091839077","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss091","title":"A Powerful Weapon in the Right Hands? How Members of Parliament have used Freedom of Information in the UK","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Accountability; Opposition (politics); Creatures; Freedom of information; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Sociology; Public administration; Politics; History","score_opus":0.01777150176184071,"score_gpt":0.2626345562561618,"score_spread":0.24486305449432105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091839077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9476719,0.00014260148,0.00001444416,0.002850316,0.00026388775,0.0007696453,0.000017472314,0.000010021316,0.048259735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994046,0.00005285078,0.000082457795,0.0001975024,0.0001077252,0.000029976405,0.000022282273,0.000004800344,0.00009777426],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785984,0.00050484366,0.00039051345,0.0001047414,0.0007454558,0.0003945837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908805,0.00027718392,0.0002610518,0.00028820915,0.000028220877,0.0000573005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020618474,0.00013991361,0.00022686254,0.00017005007,0.00014267799,0.00006878366,0.000556795,0.00007696028,0.0007403516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031791584,0.00008269464,0.000097355885,0.00026348405,0.0004063962,0.0008418925,0.00003300769,0.00017806211,0.000021463957],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099565594,0.00054789643,0.10255143,0.000054544504,0.000046789493,0.0000040944637,0.8512831,0.00005277184,0.000045556877,0.03057502,0.014149212,0.0005900697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021777,0.00023502161,0.05019829,0.00013559555,0.00005908184,0.0000019124348,0.90209055,0.00008809047,0.0009668845,0.0024645769,0.04128189,0.00030037947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009771359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06150029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05235314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121990655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005506991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99682266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099702670","doi":"","title":"BRIDGING THE DIVIDE? Integrating the Functions of National Equality Bodies and National Human Rights Institutions in the European Union","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Political science; European union; Human rights; Public administration; Economics; International trade; Law; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.05501008516443931,"score_gpt":0.28637028980913587,"score_spread":0.23136020464469656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099702670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033241007,0.0002146809,0.002192166,0.014377026,0.00009163595,0.0003988169,0.00004501413,0.000042003325,0.97931457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8424825,0.00005779518,0.00013572673,0.000106851134,0.00011686694,0.000018819457,0.00011772172,0.000011368123,0.15695234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914086,0.0068590897,0.0004413103,0.00028170503,0.000830316,0.00017902149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99552435,0.0019496402,0.00040479406,0.00046659663,0.0016087434,0.00004589538],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016628627,0.000174559,0.00016117487,0.00013930208,0.0038937954,0.0003931927,0.00088196155,0.00009245478,0.00022219258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005901198,0.000101877165,0.000109314235,0.00010050098,0.0017345827,0.00021867378,0.00021362584,0.00051336497,0.000036249337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.8568513e-7,0.00004195076,0.00007634157,0.0000075014627,0.000019628185,2.3791938e-7,0.031473182,0.000003337171,0.000012530716,0.9638251,0.00228812,0.0022516826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024197857,6.559871e-7,0.010326965,0.0007675202,0.00003706622,0.000003960122,0.0011757258,0.00018967086,0.00003730113,0.4033723,0.5835762,0.0002706699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005539125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15820801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8391584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012495308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023882769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112049446","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2000.tb00203.x","title":"The Practice of One Ombudsman","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Medical Association; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law","score_opus":0.01666754751172351,"score_gpt":0.31042120874887597,"score_spread":0.29375366123715246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112049446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21724153,0.00039243486,0.00016091493,0.019723453,0.0006347723,0.00013773661,8.929117e-7,0.00003149761,0.7616768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836455,0.0011192483,0.00037803798,0.0002872606,0.0009012863,7.29578e-7,3.9392387e-7,0.000004671447,0.013662889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988566,0.0002917342,0.00020794144,0.000052391504,0.0004399444,0.00015138787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992238,0.00024455652,0.00018124757,0.0000824152,0.00018745812,0.00008047226],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001109346,0.000037825448,0.000060398277,0.00002754859,0.0013760731,0.00015820036,0.00018835606,0.000036049158,0.0034732518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021102623,0.000026289457,0.00004815795,0.00009965301,0.0001495866,0.00041415726,0.000004026938,0.00016497356,0.00016743696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013739232,0.00027943033,0.0006613341,0.000004230239,0.000097864184,0.000007886285,0.07539813,0.00008851105,0.000098752804,0.64575434,0.024045853,0.25342625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023061519,0.000043310156,0.0044394424,0.000010611585,0.00002063713,0.00000893548,0.0025021795,0.000014347046,0.000053425476,0.01947417,0.9731519,0.00005038829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007526341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003341744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9491061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004494925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013307137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112602010","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2010.00124.x","title":"The ombudsman and e‐government in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Premise; Institution; State (computer science); Political science; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.010105914968792689,"score_gpt":0.22842804583985657,"score_spread":0.2183221308710639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112602010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.880433,0.0000140636075,6.8169146e-7,0.06443315,0.0004682561,0.00014470868,0.000010741382,0.000006396122,0.054488983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973168,0.000009901731,0.000009696049,0.00039060172,0.00013262413,0.0000090459525,0.0000038054964,0.0000034788031,0.002124047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999196,0.00003902102,0.000106366,0.00011043523,0.0002489275,0.0002992349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993277,0.000058542613,0.00003121156,0.000110503344,0.000026224352,0.0004458063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028941364,0.000050464154,0.00004357266,0.000023906665,0.00084092113,0.00025827155,0.00014867264,0.00004397064,0.00019368023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001152142,0.000041923693,0.000007587789,0.00008300353,0.00014480542,0.00014011067,0.0000052645446,0.00014387259,0.000004185864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.1792737e-7,0.000002540242,0.016983112,7.341067e-7,0.0000015707595,0.000010727825,0.0003198893,7.298233e-9,0.000004292817,0.97388226,0.0030246158,0.005769362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063866224,0.000007901814,0.048029188,0.0000011217766,0.0000010127839,0.0000013904571,0.0020897102,0.000018642015,0.000010954781,0.002317914,0.947389,0.000069296446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9810997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9715643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069280935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012084154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112920785","doi":"10.7202/042327ar","title":"Une contribution positive à la protection des droits individuels : l'institution de l'ombudsman au Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Jurisdiction; Political science; Settlement (finance); Law; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Politics; Strengths and weaknesses; Business","score_opus":0.006557040772635167,"score_gpt":0.23151239626005166,"score_spread":0.2249553554874165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112920785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93723816,0.000037550653,0.009706934,0.0010332766,0.00013034523,0.0003995566,0.00002354768,0.00010726195,0.051323343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99475455,0.000019415605,0.00025541036,0.00025937895,0.0005308984,0.000032623037,0.000023162582,0.000011660368,0.004112887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841887,0.000270262,0.00017527273,0.00022157932,0.0003381734,0.0005758489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937046,0.000078079436,0.00010111765,0.00010617813,0.00011071941,0.00023342845],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069216866,0.0001341838,0.00014945588,0.00008464447,0.001767263,0.00010342807,0.00017795298,0.0002799635,0.000051852287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016586372,0.00014715108,0.00006166684,0.0002640537,0.000856792,0.0003183142,0.0000119995075,0.00036101925,0.000019226174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000358391,0.00005683935,0.0021666999,0.000014123446,0.000041455056,0.000030851268,0.025943538,0.0001944376,0.00037868015,0.94896996,0.00026972298,0.021897838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023685053,0.00022009076,0.44680485,0.00029575,0.0002098237,0.00008272796,0.006650578,0.00068371714,0.014504696,0.3174409,0.20952645,0.0012119346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72362965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9765036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6315291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009207519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016754019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115521965","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2008.00017.x","title":"Human rights commissions and public policy: The role of the Canadian Human Rights Commission in advancing sexual orientation equality rights in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Sexual orientation; Human rights; Political science; Promotion (chess); Politics; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03278025317332882,"score_gpt":0.30329093668754564,"score_spread":0.2705106835142168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115521965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93502146,0.000022202432,5.7937467e-7,0.013275427,0.00014661788,0.00055170245,0.000060217273,0.000014032592,0.05090775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838024,5.0321466e-7,0.000009282942,0.00016496853,0.00016280959,0.000022852153,0.00008298272,0.000009086064,0.0011672816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969514,0.0006941392,0.0005690418,0.00035470809,0.00057894515,0.00085177855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977676,0.00009211357,0.00022486036,0.00044184938,0.00018150042,0.0012920435],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067768083,0.00020651415,0.00023986456,0.00054971175,0.009615087,0.0001939954,0.0005926279,0.00018730818,0.00027259465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000934833,0.00014813773,0.00003654255,0.00090266543,0.00064608885,0.00058469624,0.000028806713,0.0004139942,0.0000021483436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017298132,0.000033320764,0.07504615,0.000004978025,0.000006342029,0.00001942312,0.0038384702,0.0000010103663,0.000018130493,0.9196424,0.0012859772,0.00010205387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047467134,0.00005030483,0.25743,0.00003745232,0.000007993289,0.000010909223,0.002734995,0.0000709111,0.00013044814,0.050025996,0.6886926,0.00033367923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8696164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045224954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02054544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119447935","doi":"10.12927/hcpap..17764","title":"Determining the Utility of Public Reporting - Too Early to Judge","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"A Nudge Too Far? A Nudge at All? On Paying People to Be Healthy","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Data science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.19305162701802955,"score_gpt":0.3812789195046364,"score_spread":0.18822729248660683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119447935","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35883886,0.00005280894,0.000023873175,0.6246921,0.00098864,0.0016598018,0.000086901695,0.00027426975,0.013382754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.070551045,0.0000513177,0.00040746314,0.9152694,0.0010879204,0.00030529467,0.00012732267,0.00017898985,0.012021269],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880586,0.0015235278,0.0032365697,0.0019060888,0.002391469,0.0028837163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99160737,0.0016726694,0.0029498457,0.0020386926,0.0006685552,0.0010628658],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063279895,0.0009793675,0.0017669606,0.00063893147,0.0028968093,0.0006081523,0.0021407565,0.0012310069,0.0011848019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002218616,0.0007918835,0.0007238252,0.0011929814,0.00034251437,0.00044375716,0.0006546274,0.0024571647,0.0007508748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079075915,0.0001423538,0.0041851667,0.000106831714,0.0000738134,0.000059744983,0.06448955,4.4149434e-7,0.0000055127716,0.0005245115,0.9215753,0.00875771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004917285,0.0005611217,0.026563585,0.0000048357024,0.00007909346,0.000009534197,0.00092183676,0.000022071667,0.000011594852,0.00012023403,0.9703342,0.00088020274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009128993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044428505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29057726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013681386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015568433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138389116","doi":"","title":"Preliminary Study on the Damage Compensation Issues of Administrative Guidance Practice in China","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Compensation (psychology); China; Damages; Position (finance); Order (exchange); Power (physics); Political science; Business; Public administration; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.09865793170444127,"score_gpt":0.4018191193925145,"score_spread":0.30316118768807326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138389116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59061164,0.000017973565,5.473502e-7,0.004266477,0.00013251042,0.00036373557,0.00000456332,0.000008970106,0.4045936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986739,0.0000016368286,0.000026940323,0.00028681447,0.0001412026,0.000010632197,5.2694134e-7,0.0000033334193,0.0008549907],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981811,0.00045012296,0.0001569247,0.00021046776,0.00068038574,0.00032099176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909323,0.0001643743,0.00011760296,0.00014308604,0.00022996553,0.00025171522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032186084,0.0000719256,0.00010770538,0.00012507527,0.0010181497,0.000116108095,0.00061290665,0.000039471794,0.000047150337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013507131,0.000057125268,0.000018005248,0.0008149075,0.00158466,0.00045734193,0.000024690416,0.00013618935,0.000026110307],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021427286,0.00012652589,0.017922891,0.0000010435554,0.000002950404,0.000021945363,0.5339104,0.0000014034537,0.000010293164,0.44559595,0.0018287521,0.00055639324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023005735,0.000438065,0.51291555,0.000017901204,0.0000072821585,3.2556284e-7,0.45278573,0.000013536889,0.000038822636,0.0053538387,0.028048635,0.00015027213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11896219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4641484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49499264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054819335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023910217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8869047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203232437","doi":"","title":"Something to Talk About: Is There a Charter Right to Access Government Information?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitutional right; Political science; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Right to know; Constitutional law; Fundamental rights; Freedom of information; Constitutional court; Access to information; Human rights; Law and economics; Information access; Sociology; Constitution; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.00961063109953833,"score_gpt":0.29491041220540953,"score_spread":0.2852997811058712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203232437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79364634,0.00045988074,0.0053485944,0.044205494,0.00058626564,0.00064454775,0.00000980135,0.00009760916,0.15500145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98227787,0.0003472212,0.000071895985,0.007304165,0.0006501479,0.00000481072,6.6498455e-7,0.00000704235,0.0093362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692845,0.000074343276,0.00027690126,0.00013518293,0.00086879294,0.0017163432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935436,0.000019669706,0.00012198436,0.00014154958,0.00008542618,0.00027703735],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014808688,0.0001323152,0.00014901684,0.000109554254,0.0009931051,0.00069465325,0.00066498446,0.000070787595,0.00091704604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003329221,0.0001044323,0.00009493477,0.00025012877,0.000027504659,0.0014197987,0.00003689472,0.00076851406,0.00046669747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044892062,0.00006824418,0.00017461971,0.0000028746358,0.0000639177,0.000004615694,0.0431768,0.000012827242,0.000055780067,0.88829803,0.005604401,0.062492996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041330754,0.00036244217,0.00417806,0.000044227047,0.000019105188,0.000019312398,0.006883139,0.0000069611856,0.00026894966,0.4658402,0.521659,0.00030526594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018955061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061777853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51605463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016375269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085178186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207754643","doi":"","title":"The Nature of Inquisitorial Processes in Administrative Regimes: Global Perspectives Research Workshop Report","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Administrative law; Political science; Commonwealth; Law; Legislature; State (computer science); Common law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Public administration","score_opus":0.07104868652170832,"score_gpt":0.4176713423627071,"score_spread":0.3466226558409988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2207754643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82090825,0.0149185425,0.000033384706,0.0020192135,0.0012644107,0.0004104895,0.0000017174939,0.00002918564,0.1604148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884403,0.0041136458,0.000023999582,0.0000040515083,0.0017946804,0.000006071482,3.7329082e-7,0.000006849343,0.005610033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636006,0.0005587286,0.00031991152,0.00022899923,0.0008431624,0.0016891469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984117,0.000274833,0.00023091196,0.00017923303,0.00081518386,0.00008812571],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007112935,0.00010285049,0.00015952921,0.000088616885,0.0011354898,0.00010828307,0.0006660055,0.00020609934,0.00003933737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016212211,0.00006757484,0.00007002822,0.00073708687,0.0010672032,0.00027070296,0.00003906625,0.0029199962,0.000005021555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024141236,0.00010994779,0.0018421586,0.0000032949808,0.000051125007,0.000043745506,0.060142845,8.812571e-8,0.0000015318244,0.93674916,0.00031844687,0.00049624377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022117095,0.0002146973,0.0013698688,0.00003690251,0.0000067788906,0.00007701406,0.30911556,1.1896852e-7,0.000033646935,0.6828619,0.0059843804,0.000077952005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005817305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10743935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25388724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013578348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014653878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212952951","doi":"","title":"How Canadian Administrative Law Protections Measure Up to International Human Rights Standards","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Human rights; Political science; Judicial independence; International law; Administrative law; Politics","score_opus":0.024344877252424228,"score_gpt":0.3282108884298654,"score_spread":0.30386601117744116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212952951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20535496,0.0003664981,0.0023206726,0.12157982,0.0022190127,0.0012991652,0.00011583096,0.0001916436,0.6665524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94607466,0.000019268562,0.00005159946,0.00018822002,0.002049078,0.000013381297,0.0000032626815,0.0000117620075,0.051588792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969455,0.00015164522,0.00017294435,0.00020601299,0.0008022579,0.0017216289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989243,0.000012028327,0.00008536536,0.000108512344,0.0003752839,0.0004944843],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001659266,0.00013698601,0.00012867525,0.00021019859,0.0038113715,0.00056011294,0.00045343686,0.000100723606,0.0005041906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036853635,0.00011958258,0.00009932511,0.0001525794,0.00017011627,0.00049468037,0.000011835204,0.0011876831,0.00005178361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001245207,0.000018414024,0.000019139472,3.754445e-7,0.000073218274,0.0000036572746,0.0050640097,0.0000021374676,0.000021798034,0.9922703,0.0012307265,0.0012837539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002608569,0.00015090642,0.00004560105,0.000012676589,0.00001157753,0.000029785373,0.0030025733,0.0000010737785,0.000101848666,0.27678877,0.71944636,0.00014796392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072728164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99720424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9244761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065978034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007155049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99847347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241107961","doi":"","title":"Evaluating Ombuds Oversight in the Canadian Access to Information Context: A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Political science; Dispute resolution; Public administration; Statutory law; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Alternative dispute resolution; Law","score_opus":0.05448030005603018,"score_gpt":0.3934642480442726,"score_spread":0.33898394798824244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241107961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9594027,0.000108846914,0.000107183696,0.025654806,0.00013398833,0.0003871578,4.8176247e-7,0.000009066124,0.014195818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953207,0.00008148095,0.000014270501,0.0041904254,0.000261471,0.000011490257,0.0000010277744,0.000003859913,0.00011528521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975356,0.00037315546,0.00020794604,0.00009112097,0.0004343132,0.0013578928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940103,0.00012919161,0.000057460173,0.00008133884,0.000107362255,0.00022360434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003708162,0.00008234726,0.0000988404,0.0001927877,0.0010136984,0.0009004089,0.00042665712,0.00008338996,0.00035891295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025383566,0.000054248925,0.000032629952,0.00021584056,0.0002730911,0.0011051751,0.000028871465,0.0009326942,0.000101526064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007603017,0.000008335939,0.003368659,0.0000010430412,0.000008562633,9.147708e-7,0.054655414,0.0000029387754,7.208441e-7,0.9199419,0.0010605128,0.02094341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048899493,0.00021862595,0.034547795,0.000019035351,0.000012880293,0.00003540778,0.048371114,0.000185031,0.0000014987307,0.89975584,0.016201047,0.00016274556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06541205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8644286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79901654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011175838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037264808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94081146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243465984","doi":"","title":"Discretion and the Culture of Justice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Administrative discretion; Impartiality; Political science; Multiculturalism; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Public relations; Public service; Public administration; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.004784448306542868,"score_gpt":0.2514394177206656,"score_spread":0.2466549694141227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243465984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6824984,0.019209323,0.008848717,0.0071440353,0.00058871915,0.00040989372,0.0000025336972,0.00005098146,0.28124738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818733,0.0028763644,0.000016705773,0.000026655785,0.00048363121,5.652433e-7,4.1904568e-7,0.0000027910855,0.014719611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989952,0.00012956043,0.00010490563,0.000051877054,0.00018103266,0.00053742266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977547,0.000032130392,0.000086334294,0.000040217525,0.000044822867,0.000021002486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013326203,0.00004117022,0.00007177766,0.000019760842,0.0006108456,0.000044639408,0.00011331814,0.0000352602,0.000031960302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018215402,0.000022314267,0.000042298434,0.000056903737,0.00034694845,0.000094145944,0.000005375062,0.00043845977,0.0000035358937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020572052,0.000009147196,0.0000576325,0.0000016377805,0.000009500487,1.9856886e-7,0.0047416766,0.0000018876159,0.000014081133,0.99396104,0.00014569791,0.0010369276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000537574,0.000035157915,0.00039079544,0.0000061362243,0.000059713315,0.000015044129,0.017054362,0.000010484609,0.000011397269,0.97483355,0.0070041274,0.000041673156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007602017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012534071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29937485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010725185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000354926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6994306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246097630","doi":"","title":"Powers and Functions of the Ombudsman in the Personal Information Protection andElectronic Documents Act: An Effectiveness Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Personally identifiable information; Business; Data Protection Act 1998; Information privacy; Private sector; Information privacy law; Privacy policy; Privacy law; Privacy by Design; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.00871426520693131,"score_gpt":0.27640799295483387,"score_spread":0.26769372774790257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246097630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99740785,0.000039023078,0.00010027213,0.0003396373,0.0002642157,0.0007762352,5.9111875e-7,0.000010726843,0.0010614226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999618,0.000054069762,0.0000010254554,0.000021897482,0.000114733346,0.000023465756,8.844196e-7,0.0000048233683,0.00016110606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780136,0.00069923146,0.00019502928,0.000105204825,0.00043887572,0.0007602938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954027,0.000053390922,0.0001604655,0.00012371891,0.000080508784,0.00004162473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049786544,0.0000963578,0.00010424549,0.00012143187,0.0011579852,0.00015465787,0.00030203667,0.00006875659,0.00002836565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006129999,0.000056177967,0.00005432528,0.00027351212,0.00018827844,0.00095467427,0.000017882392,0.0017377053,0.0000034212474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005448294,0.0014560913,0.1756331,0.00002992095,0.0002783498,0.0000014079225,0.2607049,0.00002167584,0.0018330505,0.49835807,0.000025879353,0.061112713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002819928,0.0021844555,0.63857603,0.000023527085,0.0000989792,0.000110697394,0.16119109,0.00008332476,0.00007131986,0.19146174,0.003101576,0.00027732228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015692001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.122206345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46294296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035098323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011626864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8938111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263742207","doi":"","title":"Protecting Third Party Business Interests Under Canadian Freedom of Information Legislation: A Review of British Columbia’s Act","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outsourcing; Negotiation; Legislation; Freedom of information; Statutory law; Leverage (statistics); Business; Business information; Transparency (behavior); Data Protection Act 1998; Goods and services; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Marketing; Economy","score_opus":0.0264725071378312,"score_gpt":0.30135381569132735,"score_spread":0.27488130855349613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263742207","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000033299675,0.98737615,0.000094461735,0.0001736008,0.00025258836,0.0009951489,0.000022975622,0.000017161256,0.011034585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00073652517,0.9967998,0.00002780403,0.00006644176,0.00042011254,0.00001164214,0.00003544442,0.000015415695,0.0018868166],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618465,0.00056366646,0.0011845207,0.00015598083,0.0005459287,0.0013652621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724543,0.00006657309,0.0016809878,0.0001928249,0.000643061,0.00017112472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043346575,0.00018008283,0.0011124414,0.00021629222,0.0005118027,0.00025163082,0.0005887498,0.00027907267,0.00019286516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033277742,0.00021442575,0.00038221315,0.0006638002,0.0001630436,0.0007526119,0.0000205882,0.0019967994,0.000014793616],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012428951,0.00002015816,0.000008615293,0.007514187,0.000134401,0.0000021482936,0.00037557955,5.740076e-7,5.7311644e-9,0.012710604,0.0021108193,0.97712165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013958916,0.000073758,0.000078995115,0.07865946,0.0002742671,0.00017375483,0.00040795986,4.0071365e-7,6.600088e-9,0.019899601,0.90005165,0.00024052412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46046656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9902191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97688115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021200639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029932952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97556645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272064723","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3239","title":"Adjudicating constitutional rights in administrative law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Formalism (music); Human rights; Common law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.053723045879230845,"score_gpt":0.2983441586715995,"score_spread":0.24462111279236867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272064723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03206426,0.00013728693,0.00008701243,0.00025535777,0.00017550566,0.000053250995,0.000004862893,0.000011199644,0.96721125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975427,0.000014108663,0.0010619538,0.000032292977,0.00013077907,1.851806e-8,0.0000011227169,9.059531e-7,0.0012161261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992038,0.00014697031,0.00010580945,0.000084966814,0.00030252273,0.00015594106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994015,0.000038547074,0.00012055876,0.000053456086,0.00016219514,0.00022373072],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043285088,0.00005209677,0.0001153524,0.000015236013,0.0009338994,0.000028014312,0.00022951476,0.00005735206,0.0013438973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000124932985,0.00005336925,0.000049580874,0.000021109096,0.0017600246,0.0006248041,0.000022419277,0.00011955694,0.00001802674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029578025,0.000049412476,0.00022718597,8.894506e-7,0.000011054008,0.000059502443,0.016649088,0.000003762214,0.0000028309732,0.9821548,0.0007598498,0.000052031868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014332694,0.00011572484,0.0008978052,0.00006698256,0.000019307668,0.0000182059,0.03215678,0.000010859176,0.000027727072,0.07611196,0.8889841,0.00015731924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18026817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8739539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96599513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000503412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035820386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277148813","doi":"10.14288/1.0077625","title":"Procedural safeguards in the administrative process","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Business; Procedural justice; Process management; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Perception","score_opus":0.016039400041761628,"score_gpt":0.24797942467599637,"score_spread":0.23194002463423474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277148813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.933939,0.0000079718175,0.000002679944,0.0007324649,0.000105765655,0.00025488777,0.00001930615,0.000028698387,0.064909264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774456,0.000010474166,0.000048861308,0.00008323291,0.000076292024,6.7487304e-7,0.0000032214427,0.0000036812464,0.0020289859],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991309,0.000084881016,0.000071437324,0.00019138104,0.00031059104,0.00021078277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956745,0.000049048158,0.000068373745,0.00012496994,0.00012413297,0.000066025576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042062876,0.000025785925,0.00011688763,0.000025002919,0.0005839871,0.00013463067,0.00053172885,0.00009090248,0.00044685908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046597583,0.000069119924,0.00005418378,0.00025064484,0.000872804,0.0003198703,0.000021370271,0.0002344036,0.000016653406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006075281,0.0015680349,0.11468847,0.00026411744,0.00006886004,0.00096536224,0.3442455,0.0000016035367,0.00026069387,0.008186769,0.02982908,0.49986076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003217634,0.000037907517,0.94268286,0.000029004137,0.000008116461,0.0000092867895,0.047256332,0.000004324035,4.3607466e-7,0.0057059047,0.0038442144,0.00009983687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103637256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97947145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8758342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002280425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000306392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9023317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278258009","doi":"","title":"The Relaxation of Representative Standing in Administrative Law: A Side-Effect of Charters of Rights?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalization; Law; Legislature; Political science; Common law; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Judicial review","score_opus":0.01752918431100646,"score_gpt":0.3319992919564557,"score_spread":0.31447010764544925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278258009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863087,0.00028197476,0.00021479426,0.00042764767,0.00008063436,0.0001945183,0.000002828185,0.0000039129677,0.012484976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849474,0.00058648153,0.000005351641,0.000001742398,0.000054460965,0.0000027366261,1.9382631e-7,0.000003836285,0.00085048197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980288,0.0005903564,0.0003518831,0.00009481177,0.0003375463,0.00059661496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985577,0.0006874487,0.0005343611,0.00009053751,0.00009643719,0.000033539414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032431919,0.000069047725,0.00018929446,0.0000738177,0.00026651708,0.000011533489,0.00019701093,0.00004397385,0.000024428724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014158613,0.000034068842,0.00008708405,0.00012814354,0.0005655122,0.00021180228,0.000009931227,0.00028825278,0.0000014634152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020809237,0.000021172018,0.0016348212,0.0000034060179,0.0000574656,9.1729345e-7,0.009805252,4.1635104e-7,0.0013593932,0.9855639,0.000012218326,0.0013329965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012134484,0.0013303842,0.00196542,0.00016042816,0.00002674367,0.0000040017844,0.011647382,0.000002204046,0.024726655,0.958554,0.00028731185,0.00008196748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010029228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047459662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04645674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004205678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007088919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9699217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286842734","doi":"","title":"Pour Une Charte De Bonne Gouvernance Publique (Towards a Charter for Good Public Governance)","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Humanities; Law; Corporate governance; Public administration; Philosophy; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.03217459328694384,"score_gpt":0.28781069164007056,"score_spread":0.25563609835312673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286842734","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3039196,0.06424682,0.022488212,0.527059,0.008578785,0.0013541629,0.00014050027,0.00022310484,0.071989745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7671826,0.013164859,0.00026493703,0.001317442,0.0064092265,0.000039302467,0.000007010874,0.00007729926,0.21153733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908145,0.00046433523,0.00065109227,0.0005373808,0.00082275213,0.006709954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971929,0.00009692783,0.0007657095,0.00033104062,0.00066990283,0.0009435096],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066873515,0.00045575976,0.0005566727,0.00011496949,0.001057672,0.0005910195,0.0011542315,0.00042257863,0.00032360048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032734807,0.0004300743,0.00047215592,0.0005579064,0.0004979648,0.0017601054,0.00007136302,0.0025969616,0.0002984026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007061174,0.0003048554,0.00042906494,0.000021225933,0.00024395293,0.000014133824,0.005251608,0.000002428213,0.000019668312,0.92692596,0.022618173,0.044098336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018335399,0.00051584374,0.00058601174,0.000057418172,0.00006580902,0.00022850967,0.0028709495,0.00015746415,0.00002131095,0.54682183,0.44648808,0.00035324297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029631027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08004449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5257416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009493258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034096844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289829804","doi":"","title":"How Do Canadian Administrative Law Protections Measure Up to International Human Rights Standards? The Case of Independence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Human rights; Political science; Judicial independence; Independence (probability theory); International law; Right to a fair trial; Politics","score_opus":0.02290479935336207,"score_gpt":0.32850167811381614,"score_spread":0.30559687876045405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289829804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77100855,0.00050335703,0.0014382452,0.046004977,0.0011424626,0.0013707208,0.0001331666,0.00006174648,0.17833677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903453,0.000018361212,0.000024007535,0.00007841261,0.00080584246,0.000011328729,8.402025e-7,0.000007693161,0.008708213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768466,0.00021470521,0.00019078617,0.00016582689,0.00065194955,0.0010920748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988695,0.00002735036,0.00013445519,0.00013546979,0.000567843,0.00026540048],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024147525,0.00011231528,0.00011737129,0.0001421966,0.0032448713,0.00034898467,0.0004904096,0.00009031936,0.00027904593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005632728,0.000078396944,0.00008692159,0.00016362764,0.000283131,0.00037816528,0.000015664862,0.0012532835,0.0000098502005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013332699,0.000016888029,0.000017984768,5.829707e-7,0.00007060815,0.000032311218,0.009423042,0.0000043657697,0.00001917095,0.98833996,0.00027899558,0.0017827387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004887113,0.00033417347,0.00005946433,0.000037327518,0.000036616544,0.0011006452,0.030013261,0.0000039963816,0.00036461247,0.5715605,0.39576155,0.00023916605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1449737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8528019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027657007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057346467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312315066","doi":"10.1111/capa.12150","title":"Who speaks for whom? Implementing the Crown's duty to consult in the case of divided Aboriginal political structures","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Crown (dentistry); Supreme court; Law; Politics; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.03758062790090474,"score_gpt":0.36620874558509586,"score_spread":0.32862811768419115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312315066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8767866,0.0000059169633,0.00014009359,0.11399033,0.00012220071,0.00063734024,0.00021175727,0.000008933937,0.008096839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981907,5.6487374e-7,0.000055402415,0.00086003146,0.00033853526,0.00003310698,0.000009990063,0.0000050144113,0.0005066423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998746,0.00016118406,0.00022424897,0.00015514364,0.00015209515,0.00056133844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989509,0.00033174572,0.000065295695,0.00017498604,0.00015018672,0.0003268717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000931854,0.00007724857,0.00009266562,0.0001070446,0.0009280619,0.00030954988,0.00028346936,0.000058844907,0.00025301756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038742775,0.000041685213,0.000038464736,0.00016892083,0.00036458723,0.00018925231,0.0000063763723,0.00006032041,0.0000037586394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005098879,0.000005486086,0.0015393961,0.0000036182958,0.0000044841995,0.00002827906,0.0030875094,8.333364e-9,0.000006855387,0.9899193,0.003597571,0.0018023625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042999076,0.000114051254,0.018714601,0.000015434787,0.000015949841,0.00004020383,0.014452335,0.000005888181,0.00011676456,0.06403338,0.90190256,0.00015886094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04319926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97675216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93355286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019209157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029481212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96317214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321360707","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.2014","title":"Accès à l’information et organisations internationales : le cas de l’Union européenne","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017318477179528762,"score_gpt":0.2780758538571587,"score_spread":0.26075737667762994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321360707","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13272996,0.00059266447,0.026859606,0.5735737,0.0017994493,0.00052085926,0.00006970127,0.00032268662,0.26353136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95925415,0.0011627182,0.0026296075,0.016916472,0.0007961312,0.00003252722,0.00016031605,0.00002848903,0.019019572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812216,0.00051982835,0.00037661684,0.00019942442,0.0003498729,0.00043210597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876934,0.00012745874,0.00021629086,0.00020137413,0.0004533619,0.00023216722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015059343,0.00018704754,0.00015563394,0.0002261489,0.00060858607,0.00053868117,0.00042836703,0.00033358243,0.0007880796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003687116,0.0002031584,0.00009989063,0.00038286988,0.00036372046,0.0040087346,0.00008638022,0.00050910545,0.0006550768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036400388,0.00014149683,0.00016196042,0.00002763372,0.0000233404,0.0000061455135,0.038818844,0.00023105391,0.00005104507,0.95495874,0.0039824015,0.0015936736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038895535,0.00004155803,0.0070823706,0.000069690446,0.000013221064,0.000020438732,0.0018183446,0.00006936401,0.00056634453,0.4116134,0.5780997,0.00021656617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015664782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03622749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8265242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011824582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025216034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99088997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341155549","doi":"","title":"Discussion on Chinese Public Security Organs' Anti-Corruption Campaign","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Language change; Law enforcement; Public security; Mass line; Commercialization; Business; Public relations; Enforcement; Public administration; Political science; Law; Economics; Communism","score_opus":0.017578974391745876,"score_gpt":0.2880569953165785,"score_spread":0.27047802092483264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341155549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7159892,0.000005332151,0.000017956414,0.013852909,0.0008825131,0.00019837913,0.00002785701,0.00008882929,0.26893708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99509525,0.000009908435,0.0000055344176,0.00059514376,0.00086843857,0.0000052497517,0.0000017622418,0.000009039038,0.003409644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976844,0.00013503093,0.00013685758,0.00040871633,0.0007380677,0.000896911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854153,0.000039711646,0.00006624681,0.00017993861,0.00017085485,0.0010017363],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011212818,0.00012792391,0.0001354461,0.00029841225,0.0042830408,0.0003157572,0.000708359,0.00012006895,0.0012456134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035941572,0.00006849843,0.00006150967,0.0011401766,0.00208087,0.0008332144,0.000031688327,0.00011368665,0.00048717897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040110726,0.000052127707,0.05341623,0.0000035167593,0.0000037927543,0.000017985258,0.04094485,2.5263882e-8,0.0012723374,0.87390816,0.0048939446,0.025483012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007195244,0.000099100194,0.2547293,0.00007155065,0.000009642839,0.0000016618638,0.012023446,0.000007079683,0.00022628426,0.07822586,0.6528906,0.0009959354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013899958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34226662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7956823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013759192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001979062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2355211222","doi":"","title":"Judicial Protection Experience of Canadian Constitutional Equality Rights and It's Reference Value for China","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Shangrao Normal University","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Judicial review; Law; Norm (philosophy); China; Constitutional court; Value (mathematics); Human rights; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Constitution","score_opus":0.04182307490236055,"score_gpt":0.27579543536078777,"score_spread":0.23397236045842723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2355211222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9696671,0.000005185005,0.00047953852,0.0004609644,0.00037527984,0.00015019086,0.000032557553,0.0000047012345,0.028824516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873036,0.00001177321,0.00043118073,0.000019690313,0.00020890273,1.6830568e-7,0.0000010711457,0.0000010947126,0.0005957531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993232,0.000064009495,0.00014555306,0.000081976024,0.0002217836,0.00016350027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920154,0.000031721665,0.00021008668,0.00004953853,0.0002748348,0.00023228956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005217637,0.000056578825,0.00012672438,0.00029630325,0.00087332446,0.00002228075,0.00018253292,0.000098476434,0.00017161845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052371077,0.000051813775,0.00005582766,0.00016570046,0.000977691,0.0004993757,0.000015596608,0.00020900054,9.1873403e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014583251,0.000049632403,0.0012433092,0.00001156678,0.000016838098,0.000016464157,0.012646592,0.0000040755176,0.0007534443,0.98429286,0.0004597894,0.00035960702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022406382,0.0006111368,0.1083314,0.00012729793,0.000112479174,0.00006222411,0.008309644,0.00006986509,0.0023188065,0.045153838,0.8322208,0.00044189248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1426631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4677587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.939139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009357415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057693175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.863046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W237141118","doi":"","title":"Analysis on the Functions of Administrative Law Enforcement Interpretation in China 1 ANALYSES FONCTIONNELLES SUR L'APPLIACTION DU DROIT EN CHINE","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Administrative law; Enforcement; Political science; China; Law; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03153667126939179,"score_gpt":0.3281684268430081,"score_spread":0.2966317555736163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W237141118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66092116,0.000022573404,0.00017800917,0.0032132084,0.0012320046,0.00027773812,0.00006111592,0.000011234968,0.33408296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996305,0.000016065887,0.000012937528,0.00024021333,0.00045898536,0.000020627687,0.000013032982,0.0000060059597,0.0029271718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980471,0.00020350443,0.00034228922,0.0003749635,0.00056500774,0.0004670998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989131,0.00019182659,0.00022205389,0.00018917109,0.00018763804,0.00029617758],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013780404,0.00016014384,0.00025331558,0.00053471996,0.002150523,0.00017193519,0.00047952385,0.00014662769,0.0029208362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016657102,0.0001367441,0.00019843581,0.0035606744,0.0032236006,0.00051316957,0.00002226551,0.00039707695,0.000046538447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001111187,0.00007062163,0.0037730397,0.0000042036713,0.00008409542,0.000002044606,0.033197608,0.000121418656,0.00026455938,0.9584333,0.00019307237,0.0038449285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090975093,0.00059768173,0.6908559,0.000117574375,0.0014997735,0.0000028381553,0.121465504,0.018507738,0.0017555713,0.06090765,0.10204779,0.001332212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42006275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9617912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89752567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009881199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012019136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2377985425","doi":"","title":"The Regulation of Proportion Principle on Administration Enforcement Right","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Harm; Connotation; Administration (probate law); Administrative law; Law and economics; Business; Law enforcement; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.08470265963752183,"score_gpt":0.447642574161956,"score_spread":0.3629399145244342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2377985425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5545206,0.000019429459,0.00018171415,0.019480685,0.0005948078,0.0006357327,0.000004193218,0.00003870923,0.4245241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98074186,0.00005600864,0.000035351386,0.000025609063,0.0004134602,0.000013677911,0.00002631883,0.0000031444827,0.018684594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768305,0.0001340612,0.00022841422,0.00014051498,0.001627369,0.0001865863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982265,0.0001258816,0.00009813733,0.00014523887,0.0013634005,0.00004082559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014377062,0.000050863528,0.000054241595,0.00015215554,0.0007302407,0.0001523775,0.00033523195,0.000048032547,0.00063814555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031560866,0.00003454357,0.000027793532,0.00028036456,0.00026406773,0.00020764711,0.00001966813,0.000114266375,0.00006530478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001341693,0.00011991066,0.00027503644,0.0000030091658,0.000007542054,0.0000013549466,0.0006034907,0.000045809953,0.0007968773,0.990769,0.0010355519,0.006208192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032324038,0.00020067008,0.4151723,0.00007013087,0.0000028617474,8.9959985e-7,0.00027132314,0.00027861734,0.0070991446,0.13922724,0.43725345,0.000100102305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016847695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007290508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8515418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020887915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028456224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69872457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404515011","doi":"10.1057/9780230281998_17","title":"How Well Does Freedom of Information Work?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Freedom of information; Work (physics); Mythology; Political science; Operations research; Sociology; Law; Engineering; History; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.013934828086776223,"score_gpt":0.22667762531924254,"score_spread":0.2127427972324663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404515011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003726859,0.0000849523,0.000041525374,0.00016086288,0.0012868473,0.0005574773,0.00007764324,0.00010916277,0.99730885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8731448,0.00007478043,0.0003631547,0.00006800303,0.00088193844,0.000008448013,0.000050919873,0.00003397478,0.125374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810886,0.00003973301,0.00044601632,0.00026389092,0.00074257504,0.00039895016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828935,0.00009889755,0.0005989782,0.00053032703,0.00026637808,0.00021605394],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034785416,0.00037332394,0.0005031772,0.00032951488,0.0004002946,0.00024941386,0.00060941523,0.0007702279,0.0018220749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032770102,0.00028071384,0.0003000993,0.00002037332,0.0010763605,0.0000046468176,0.00010179222,0.00054413936,0.00036192962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017335266,2.377098e-7,0.000050168648,0.00004442183,0.000048574966,0.0000041503026,0.0043534236,5.5451277e-8,0.000016752607,0.9899631,0.000065156106,0.0054365993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020110811,0.0000276086,0.00010542023,0.000101067555,0.000050594917,5.5389916e-7,0.0002504937,3.7996637e-7,0.00014696305,0.77386814,0.22490163,0.0003460408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032899447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074424953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8727721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006294132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017446997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479361638","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-6106-6.ch012","title":"Social Inclusion and OmbudsOffice Websites in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in electronic government, digital divide, and regional development book series","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Inclusion (mineral); Scope (computer science); The Internet; Digital inclusion; Institution; Political science; Public sector; Public relations; Internet privacy; Public administration; Business; Sociology; World Wide Web; Law; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.006817743850930617,"score_gpt":0.21370468226164807,"score_spread":0.20688693841071745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2479361638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0139957415,0.03864436,0.00001247753,0.0018265402,0.00019868278,0.00061395444,0.000043193122,0.000047633268,0.9446174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42915577,0.05689155,0.00002311921,0.00065501506,0.00021587624,0.000026856615,0.00007012351,0.00004923156,0.51291245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711883,0.000030994306,0.00046438567,0.0005582299,0.0011506946,0.000676876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993051,0.00017448861,0.00026693824,0.0000944468,0.000032751857,0.00012625773],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022321992,0.00041177878,0.00047447562,0.00007925342,0.00085302955,0.0001338294,0.00025701564,0.00018153296,0.000077959914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002268717,0.0003953818,0.00004340411,0.00004409653,0.0005755888,0.0012305414,0.00040466367,0.00037046283,0.000006922224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091501555,0.000019713876,0.0028478063,0.00008893924,0.00003835496,0.000024048557,0.0028038672,0.0000016514973,7.7538607e-7,0.96737486,0.0013945443,0.025313942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003229382,0.000040834202,0.0021492776,0.00022132494,0.0000076070332,0.00000418679,0.00030640917,5.999563e-7,0.0000036196832,0.114534914,0.8819336,0.0004746336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009570477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94706136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9374909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028963007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00227531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509187215","doi":"","title":"Petitioning the Australian parliament: Reviving a dying democratic tradition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Parliamentary Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Redress; Political science; Law; Democracy; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.045615308800601204,"score_gpt":0.3120668076720401,"score_spread":0.2664514988714389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509187215","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1622103,0.044877138,0.0009353565,0.62227935,0.00355052,0.010993713,0.0001261687,0.0013493983,0.15367804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93135846,0.045860916,0.00036678006,0.0042082313,0.00087549473,0.0001950068,0.000023183553,0.000038773673,0.017073156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997219,0.0006153375,0.0005762758,0.0004107607,0.0005491681,0.00062941224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988238,0.0001906501,0.00026597542,0.0004276174,0.00004850642,0.00024345407],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012301533,0.00025844027,0.0003650447,0.000057662386,0.0013237068,0.00015335665,0.0005102851,0.0000727747,0.00653075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006561101,0.00014945887,0.00022251629,0.0002791117,0.0004842211,0.00071087154,0.000030643805,0.00020193725,0.0007435824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023624494,0.00035960504,0.010407703,0.0032074524,0.0004167069,0.00016266535,0.011180301,0.0000015795823,0.0007048031,0.14802034,0.51067835,0.3148369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073584064,0.00013740356,0.0064840815,0.029407706,0.0005118816,0.00004602926,0.004308343,0.000001370158,0.0001649586,0.020112727,0.9372435,0.00084611913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038760537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010422632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7691482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031997857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012549471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509688180","doi":"","title":"Openness in the EU and Beyond: The Contribution of the European Ombudsman to Open Meetings and Lessons from the Canadian Experience","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public law","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Political science; European union; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; International trade; Business; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.041286033765241315,"score_gpt":0.3046867189748281,"score_spread":0.26340068520958676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509688180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59262764,0.000051718525,0.0000016310323,0.29131782,0.00010323159,0.00053565355,0.00002091844,0.0000056448757,0.11533573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99295914,0.000015753469,0.000004296219,0.0064828857,0.00009518089,0.000026517064,0.0000012966944,0.0000052341147,0.0004097126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814713,0.0010141594,0.00013529026,0.00018898767,0.00023103076,0.00028338074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902964,0.00039229073,0.00006902356,0.0003232659,0.00007124919,0.00011455414],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027446742,0.00007486689,0.00009461023,0.00001614721,0.0019248462,0.0008039466,0.0016456251,0.000031077612,0.000065571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026258331,0.000025310956,0.000019178638,0.00018422698,0.0010871771,0.00034505033,0.000313269,0.00008847508,0.000007714281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018818191,0.000007278567,0.0033815538,2.5967398e-7,0.000003706295,7.1762196e-7,0.06288303,1.8115214e-8,0.000035287416,0.9301703,0.0014304089,0.0020855838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003017076,0.00001089705,0.20975009,0.000025202378,0.000007212052,8.7290306e-7,0.012232297,0.000001132796,0.000053811968,0.018087234,0.75943786,0.00009167415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5035823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97971785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.912083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056847144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015547036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528823845","doi":"10.3138/9781442685901","title":"Provincial &amp; Territorial Ombudsman Offices in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.017130601661644252,"score_gpt":0.21755607648049657,"score_spread":0.2004254748188523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528823845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012656879,0.00025380318,7.445646e-7,0.000015878895,0.00091883395,0.00044287642,0.00012591427,0.00003813958,0.9969381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014399403,0.0000872549,0.00007325579,0.0000150879505,0.001307582,1.9835552e-7,0.000046362424,0.000013361935,0.99701697],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982645,0.00014447472,0.00020992383,0.00035199372,0.0006662605,0.00036285436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999096,0.000062468534,0.0002822641,0.0002819882,0.0001032768,0.00017405058],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016182942,0.00022550621,0.00044770126,0.000034299566,0.0003214245,0.000031156145,0.0008523169,0.0003305851,0.00039375422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009588943,0.000276489,0.00012032201,0.0000018821457,0.00029499157,0.00015861914,0.00010066519,0.00024983316,0.0000036261713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003562145,0.000092294555,0.000061039325,0.00016318238,0.00012672959,0.00019845169,0.07129855,0.0000052458226,0.00000700632,0.16850293,0.7492065,0.009981887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045502413,0.000030418933,0.00015695971,0.0001169044,0.00004906239,1.5178145e-7,0.00024078286,8.028529e-7,0.0000031186503,0.00062039436,0.9980326,0.00029376097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24882615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004848125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008255256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528848164","doi":"10.3138/9781442685901-014","title":"11. Yukon’s Ombudsman: An Evolutionary Step Forward","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.026411063616855898,"score_gpt":0.23652065224901386,"score_spread":0.21010958863215795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528848164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000082014514,0.00092166744,0.00003166214,0.000040210867,0.00024534695,0.00041541847,0.000077714794,0.00015212913,0.9980338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012881628,0.00043289142,0.00081492064,0.00003593949,0.00038342737,1.6290252e-7,0.00003392038,0.000024064253,0.9969865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982978,0.000087713,0.0001943558,0.0004585331,0.00061892165,0.00034264103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865633,0.000038607697,0.00029244166,0.00048912567,0.00022557269,0.00029794875],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017170575,0.00028690338,0.0004415273,0.00004642782,0.00080365554,0.00003609708,0.0008895266,0.0005290201,0.001989325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003559943,0.00034855862,0.000287374,9.673361e-7,0.0007658832,0.00037606875,0.00013148764,0.00019730069,0.000030062998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062765306,0.000037549566,0.0000034397467,0.000026131509,0.00007452419,0.000043891454,0.017536625,0.0000013740654,0.000001588394,0.9539033,0.016732296,0.011576498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003668055,0.0001366075,0.00015023159,0.00009774632,0.0001509049,8.1154104e-7,0.0004389001,0.000012614392,0.000002137131,0.011167376,0.9870881,0.00038780493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17512856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.461019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97035575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068632216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002721543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529091158","doi":"10.3138/9781442685901-010","title":"7. Nova Scotia’s Ombudsman: Conciliator, Consultant, and Cooperator","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Political science; History; Archaeology; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.030195159176684735,"score_gpt":0.23801878051373399,"score_spread":0.20782362133704924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529091158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035125218,0.0027989345,0.0000043003256,0.00003570333,0.0002356938,0.0004262162,0.00012479897,0.00008492893,0.9959382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051017064,0.0010466609,0.00014626171,0.000068755304,0.00016281901,4.0106446e-8,0.0000106608895,0.000019202065,0.9934439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865186,0.00005838758,0.00019062051,0.00041373202,0.0004055339,0.00027989194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987969,0.00006961071,0.00024856286,0.0003050625,0.00031960986,0.0002603034],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017732359,0.00027931077,0.0005026659,0.000029557275,0.00040464426,0.000052173833,0.00045343584,0.00045338672,0.0020074158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011624631,0.0003245393,0.00012498941,0.0000011403066,0.001373269,0.00016754583,0.000119972385,0.00020427769,0.000032699987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071802315,0.00001655222,0.0000059883273,0.000042422453,0.000113882386,0.000058428668,0.019660586,1.3310081e-7,0.000015041972,0.96064097,0.013457989,0.0059162043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006628238,0.00008937452,0.000040431936,0.00015486333,0.00014769209,0.0000011827724,0.00030443736,0.0000016637379,0.000023593511,0.001242824,0.996965,0.00036610413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19546351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54456204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98350704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002827347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003485586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531021224","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4380","title":"DU MAUVAIS USAGE DE LA TRADITION RECONSTITUÉE : LA MÉDIATION EXTRAJUDICIAIRE EN CHINE","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"China; Mediation; Legislation; Political science; Context (archaeology); Humanities; Economic Justice; People's Republic; Sociology; Law; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03362365252687576,"score_gpt":0.32970309075840404,"score_spread":0.29607943823152827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531021224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64411235,0.0014169499,0.00075701915,0.0028696964,0.001712182,0.00040311637,0.000050600636,0.00006952164,0.34860855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98685974,0.00044661656,0.00084406434,0.0005166492,0.0038986502,0.000019387104,0.000009564074,0.000030595642,0.0073747416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756557,0.0008520742,0.00037803073,0.00026162073,0.0004158328,0.00052689307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982695,0.0008247885,0.00023065742,0.00021208306,0.00007946202,0.00038348945],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018726015,0.00021771759,0.00029969437,0.00019012904,0.00035913236,0.00019539293,0.00052401563,0.00034425152,0.0030737747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030555527,0.00023265838,0.00011941019,0.00034706175,0.0006572075,0.0016001132,0.00007616622,0.0003149521,0.00041154693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010914051,0.0011193078,0.024951058,0.0006749916,0.00013698387,0.000037881113,0.065257095,0.00031171902,0.00069677964,0.8454237,0.027212448,0.034068886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011463941,0.00018988538,0.5902036,0.00081763533,0.0013876404,0.000040946386,0.00307901,0.00047223063,0.0013438954,0.015413767,0.3850129,0.0008921174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013986795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030145873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83000994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024159481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039476584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99783754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556106055","doi":"10.21128/1812-7126-2016-5-83-96","title":"Ombudspersons’ control over municipal authorities: the Canadian experience and its applicability in Russia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Political science; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Public administration; Environmental science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.03020555784405362,"score_gpt":0.30124403745289313,"score_spread":0.27103847960883953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556106055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93269545,0.00045865914,0.000036015124,0.007437163,0.0005856836,0.0009825781,0.00010249902,0.00010934804,0.057592586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963736,0.00008269694,0.00003429898,0.0004856131,0.00036357754,0.00012873126,0.0000023546752,0.000015957658,0.0025131826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974422,0.00036019555,0.00034226212,0.0005235704,0.00046609426,0.00086571893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984854,0.00035899086,0.00008520172,0.0004462815,0.0000854549,0.00053867826],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010389513,0.00024652822,0.00028781372,0.0002154098,0.001899838,0.00019709715,0.00061400875,0.00023814512,0.0011092848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031531078,0.00015203885,0.00008145091,0.00035225967,0.0017562316,0.00044941378,0.00006126982,0.00028619682,0.00016177945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040728733,0.000061743944,0.025348583,0.000011517839,0.00001843354,0.000043035026,0.060668174,0.0000026114508,0.00008257371,0.91074276,0.00047677633,0.0025030368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045703836,0.00011507696,0.23065442,0.00032518283,0.00006607941,0.000021456704,0.019535057,0.00033045324,0.000083119565,0.04301671,0.699821,0.0014610571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.118749104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9042376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8677261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004961392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072925363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562433023","doi":"","title":"Comparative study on local governance system: Japan and Canada (1)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"法学論叢","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Business; Regional science; Geography","score_opus":0.01990033604544739,"score_gpt":0.2838744302728618,"score_spread":0.2639740942274144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562433023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.894365,0.000009871148,0.0000011619477,0.00015108917,0.0004558321,0.00016605352,0.0000047713766,0.000021182846,0.10482504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99570864,6.7265495e-7,0.0000059518666,0.000054777676,0.0001686116,0.00000448371,3.4819504e-7,0.0000027343765,0.0040537925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933255,0.000056499506,0.00007070482,0.00013467266,0.00026607647,0.00013951064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969316,0.00004889144,0.000036913276,0.00010254294,0.000026130609,0.000092359594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012821694,0.00005839352,0.000112416565,0.000007525143,0.00039707418,0.000041660132,0.00011745808,0.000025958972,0.00007237687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006310075,0.00004660077,0.000008747588,0.000032177337,0.00016421996,0.000046067766,0.00001352529,0.00012582005,0.000035610294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022970195,0.00018054464,0.025135282,0.000013869056,0.00003303524,0.000036636495,0.069255985,0.0000024169683,0.00005041272,0.88524497,0.019177392,0.0008464699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084834505,0.00026531206,0.628059,0.000040234023,0.000025622341,0.000002010456,0.15676561,0.00007025757,0.00017070747,0.00051628076,0.21285996,0.00037661596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8283927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99792725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8847287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103725135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019813169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30540136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587951507","doi":"10.29173/cais487","title":"Information and Technology for Human and Children's Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Information and Communications Technology; Human rights; Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Information technology; Internet privacy; Work (physics); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Law; History","score_opus":0.012094940533743827,"score_gpt":0.2482368645004349,"score_spread":0.23614192396669106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587951507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987841,0.000048695034,0.000004194096,0.002406048,0.000039319373,0.0006024593,0.00003044288,0.000039317667,0.008988488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990833,0.000040293504,0.00020107556,0.00006241547,0.0000580705,0.000036987713,0.0000025740833,0.0000053746935,0.0005099192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991341,0.000008960688,0.0002737952,0.00012627842,0.0001998812,0.00025698318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844868,0.0000468674,0.0003674462,0.00007137829,0.014943887,0.00008358439],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030094272,0.00012701991,0.00023496863,0.00018081516,0.0005105485,0.0016408623,0.00055906916,0.00016153288,0.000025945317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018327378,0.00009172404,0.000042246535,0.00017037969,0.0010358428,0.008463752,0.0001730397,0.00011835906,0.0000020413913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001567882,0.000037857502,0.087312326,0.000107449276,0.000042137228,2.9542898e-8,0.072432294,3.484301e-8,0.0014546367,0.8307546,0.0023083978,0.0055345865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011040483,0.00040839455,0.25386694,0.00020306424,0.00008671213,0.00000921067,0.010441154,0.00003390644,0.009357126,0.62288576,0.10119959,0.00040410235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011395179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001934846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20786883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020922631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000781314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590199685","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4555","title":"Rachel Murray, The Role of National Human Rights Institutions at the International and Regional Levels: The Experience of Africa; Brian Burdekin, assisted by Jason Naum, National Human Rights Institutions in the Asia-Pacific Region, The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Decree; Human rights; Constitution; Promotion (chess); Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.13252074511468057,"score_gpt":0.354440683926519,"score_spread":0.22191993881183844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590199685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7345385,0.00035177145,0.000030322992,0.01109273,0.00036081692,0.0012398893,0.0001309707,0.000048461854,0.25220653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925666,0.000016462047,0.000038067894,0.00030683444,0.0006144599,0.00015768112,0.00007536006,0.00001472452,0.0062098214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551576,0.00058473594,0.00087417406,0.00050822744,0.0021228546,0.00039423004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744105,0.0006597197,0.0006340833,0.0005868642,0.00056449085,0.00011378653],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010910961,0.00031969397,0.000331046,0.00029676128,0.008680144,0.0002546132,0.0031923659,0.00018771902,0.0003492969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011052405,0.00015947549,0.0001882031,0.0007896933,0.0058229268,0.0014462479,0.0004043751,0.00052100787,0.000013763057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050987062,0.0003711633,0.0006533633,0.000014966422,0.000105483574,0.0000075879593,0.051572915,0.00014773481,0.0006460941,0.9161069,0.030302089,0.000020727175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009428174,0.000068062494,0.053987365,0.0001712109,0.00012065715,0.00004724159,0.0042748945,0.000051012415,0.0009942274,0.05548387,0.88350165,0.00035701628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005446111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026649082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.860623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021159867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048543158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595183341","doi":"","title":"Ombudsing at Canadian universities through the eyes of a Dutch ombudsman","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Confidentiality; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Value (mathematics); Order (exchange); Spring (device); Work (physics); Public administration; Library science; Public relations; Law; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.026005802083734708,"score_gpt":0.27285112486830815,"score_spread":0.24684532278457344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595183341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9450081,0.0003346139,0.00008364011,0.001786588,0.00022724921,0.00015288118,0.0002794702,0.000054003307,0.05207347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943854,0.00059926644,0.00014103731,0.00024182709,0.00033244555,0.0000013579883,0.000076110184,0.000013995497,0.004208564],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984261,0.0002810712,0.00018595837,0.00034337875,0.0002556189,0.00050787337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998582,0.00043731637,0.000113974114,0.00064813986,0.000031549676,0.0001870382],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005123364,0.00015055593,0.0001907266,0.000064369626,0.0019034694,0.00009361385,0.0013549575,0.00005955158,0.00013268722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000061165015,0.00008824181,0.000038990955,0.00015377915,0.0007818115,0.00056991447,0.00045153341,0.00009387573,0.000018891129],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013841157,0.000064081214,0.054316573,0.0002482884,0.00031136218,0.00006636954,0.69532824,0.000054726737,0.0004697364,0.22058868,0.007832907,0.02058064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086532976,0.00008042855,0.07049273,0.001189658,0.00019079774,0.000013481936,0.117086135,0.0016045737,0.000081222766,0.023360671,0.78426987,0.0007651178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3331587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93619186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7764369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011059974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020547268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598569344","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v1i1.8163","title":"National Responsibilities to Citizens: Past or Present?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Business","score_opus":0.17316086082287874,"score_gpt":0.4036671492675798,"score_spread":0.23050628844470106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598569344","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10686679,0.00006458876,0.000033604243,0.4482806,0.0020198482,0.00035756174,0.00006898694,0.000058987534,0.44224903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819099,0.0000107008145,0.00043049263,0.0019399183,0.004699263,0.0000029420512,0.0000018942193,0.0000146738175,0.010990244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813044,0.00030044277,0.0003212404,0.00013483399,0.0007092886,0.00040373727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697536,0.0008926342,0.00011580039,0.000102254606,0.0005922492,0.0013217273],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015571157,0.000088412715,0.00016650144,0.00063934876,0.00060894975,0.00019388505,0.0002640589,0.00008445077,0.0019511948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042992975,0.0000717441,0.00009428781,0.00055568456,0.00035860616,0.0004520502,0.000015893473,0.00028859556,0.0007826098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012397596,0.000015637035,0.00015629617,0.000006275986,0.000030647363,0.00072140835,0.00622896,0.000013310307,0.0000048174115,0.71064276,0.2818705,0.00018540244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017014708,0.00012891936,0.0014369957,0.00003407097,0.000010104447,0.000028484663,0.001333222,0.0000033474091,0.0000043147893,0.41741857,0.5793334,0.00009838565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011823345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03492303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8750431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003125844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055277017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598886592","doi":"","title":"After Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick: Judicial Review of Executive Discretion","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Standard of review; Political science; Judicial review; Supreme court; Law; Parliament; Deference; Judicial discretion; Principle of legality; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Impartiality; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.008595753170056222,"score_gpt":0.28534974033618593,"score_spread":0.2767539871661297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598886592","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27060455,0.4295866,0.0134298215,0.047123328,0.001849368,0.0018253184,0.0000058659175,0.00023778444,0.23533739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85074604,0.13022177,0.0000481728,0.0008457537,0.0011850126,6.562093e-7,0.0000020341404,0.000008820727,0.016941728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761724,0.00017931142,0.00031714072,0.0001442848,0.00046722515,0.001274816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940157,0.000019293904,0.00021585943,0.00010789421,0.00011137314,0.00014398334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015179262,0.0001139617,0.00023970293,0.000078529556,0.00030339137,0.000034387125,0.00025419926,0.00007294404,0.0004971139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044010896,0.000092135786,0.0001840048,0.00019151071,0.00012777599,0.00026634624,0.0000072511116,0.0007737491,0.000043637276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006340415,0.000059346836,0.00013205693,0.000028991164,0.00003755336,0.000004696566,0.002932629,1.70153e-7,0.000016929309,0.96427876,0.0012144772,0.031230992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048236953,0.0004873434,0.0039154263,0.0015790857,0.000100644174,0.000036580088,0.0016598766,8.120201e-7,0.000034051613,0.94594383,0.045522388,0.00023757966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085598073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021704996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5801415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050233357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007121001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601144099","doi":"","title":"Toronto Ombudsman Says Regular Complaints Continue to Rise","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018667448760352246,"score_gpt":0.30291987818427235,"score_spread":0.2842524294239201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601144099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22504881,0.00006212655,0.00049494015,0.0044820555,0.00048649416,0.00033902813,0.0000067757637,0.00018520093,0.76889455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79082507,0.000018115477,0.00052763923,0.00037822474,0.00040121307,0.0000086381415,4.0668175e-7,0.00001034437,0.20783037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986661,0.00012407734,0.00017105431,0.0002720433,0.00034722002,0.00041949996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991569,0.000086705484,0.00003876576,0.00028091753,0.00008983371,0.0003468569],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044108738,0.00011166714,0.00016602347,0.000030624506,0.0005177582,0.00008400738,0.00037376562,0.00007644828,0.012237219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006320753,0.0000697863,0.00006830247,0.00005583637,0.00022684137,0.00021150077,0.000055777655,0.0000303258,0.0025980214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016977167,0.000048916674,0.00077782955,0.0000021627773,0.000013492849,0.000008066853,0.00900452,5.1231773e-8,0.00091560837,0.8654549,0.106797785,0.016959691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003659535,0.00004804717,0.004802197,0.000029659357,0.000006425288,4.4578937e-7,0.0014393723,6.32985e-7,0.00050965627,0.01528778,0.97730774,0.00020209042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005921726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19736119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000247579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052625255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99817854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610719859","doi":"10.7202/1039192ar","title":"Modern Municipal Statutory Frameworks in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue Gouvernance","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Panacea (medicine); Jurisdiction; Corporate governance; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Business; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.023667527735799727,"score_gpt":0.28179274913119623,"score_spread":0.2581252213953965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610719859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89814544,0.00041796477,0.000017713102,0.0008136202,0.0010112134,0.0001163193,0.0000108930935,0.000017559138,0.09944927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98646617,0.00035479444,0.00009025416,0.00015595903,0.00029785628,0.000009888294,5.684694e-7,0.000008344163,0.012616145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905944,0.000050680577,0.00013418969,0.00018803394,0.00022258952,0.00034506698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991942,0.000044508244,0.00016040899,0.0004761827,0.000027045715,0.00009765419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018400772,0.00007675915,0.0001459285,0.000016716049,0.0007603089,0.0000963058,0.0007067004,0.00010894358,0.00012869512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011342912,0.00008131532,0.00002841112,0.000028781444,0.00016973379,0.00024148767,0.000057002773,0.00037700168,0.00002199986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041954303,0.000113681876,0.43240497,0.00008966823,0.000031863336,0.0005255704,0.09887157,0.0006407052,0.00000980811,0.353579,0.032711364,0.08097985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034439657,0.000009096315,0.35998586,0.00027861467,0.000005397362,5.946874e-7,0.0010857751,0.0011748397,0.000010039233,0.02730777,0.60946685,0.00033076035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9814983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99971884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5767555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009043606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012352981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5847758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617067218","doi":"10.35492/docam/3/2/4","title":"A Duty to Document","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings from the Document Academy","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Duty; Transparency (behavior); Democracy; Legislation; Corporate governance; Business; Openness to experience; Public relations; Public administration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025688282254692302,"score_gpt":0.3131869085696622,"score_spread":0.2874986263149699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617067218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7574906,0.00014834957,0.000034752476,0.18145622,0.00037386164,0.00087674765,0.000008575883,0.00026797524,0.059342943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646829,0.00021574555,0.00026882038,0.0040870165,0.0016334952,0.00010185575,6.300904e-7,0.000019766878,0.028989814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796116,0.00003657319,0.00026242516,0.00041773156,0.0007371953,0.0005848982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925673,0.00017099276,0.00011270509,0.00009384316,0.000063393534,0.0003023123],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093046343,0.0001816001,0.0001737881,0.000057541285,0.00081823237,0.00033051116,0.0009557707,0.00012766993,0.0029443228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014333313,0.00009258707,0.00008781772,0.00021012293,0.00023525601,0.0006815626,0.00019355741,0.0001774051,0.0023930196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004375636,0.000023019327,0.0036623443,0.0000034753657,0.000045806642,6.628029e-7,0.0314386,4.7658734e-8,0.0017035557,0.84118104,0.11200729,0.009890397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028757442,0.000025180709,0.003996082,0.00007158597,0.000021530986,2.1588642e-7,0.0010456793,1.4503037e-7,0.002021876,0.26818943,0.72415954,0.00018116237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048498914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011759447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6121522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026100635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042010182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99838376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761486869","doi":"","title":"The unreasonableness doctrine of administrative law: a comparative study of England, Australia, Canada and New Zealand.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07940477145759284,"score_gpt":0.32395173896039575,"score_spread":0.24454696750280291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761486869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7301693,0.000049848535,7.193631e-7,0.000078024226,0.000106933985,0.00027890093,0.000029360652,0.000007964704,0.26927894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9189331,0.000081950275,0.000016560029,0.000011701169,0.0001152853,0.0000020841128,0.000001436311,0.000007930705,0.08082993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982877,0.00052458147,0.00039719808,0.0001898746,0.00037937486,0.00022127476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987252,0.00047682048,0.0002966709,0.00021643621,0.0001280973,0.0001567888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045325718,0.0001352285,0.00030553818,0.00001882163,0.00024094264,0.000017670869,0.0003211296,0.000021537096,0.000051048766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002850947,0.00007672822,0.000033407192,0.00005150604,0.0007056853,0.00009588308,0.000058612033,0.00006759745,0.000002414124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029097457,0.00029260048,0.014695839,0.000028131037,0.00017915553,0.000048405167,0.07387181,7.1941423e-7,0.000052119583,0.90269595,0.0051032305,0.0027410535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028546744,0.0008962848,0.055904556,0.000120534285,0.0000844327,0.0000017666783,0.0052423994,1.6456669e-7,0.00043146065,0.0053372597,0.9288524,0.00027409737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7636133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98260456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92374915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031541247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031430816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3128886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767707499","doi":"10.1080/10192557.2009.11788192","title":"Some Reflections on the Legislative Context of the Hong Kong Ombudsman","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asia Pacific Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Public administration; Scope (computer science); Interpretation (philosophy); Administration (probate law); Legislation; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.07423472032869614,"score_gpt":0.3512061208741674,"score_spread":0.27697140054547126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767707499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083049096,0.010945929,0.0000014627755,0.036971,0.00034294327,0.00084999827,0.0000051288866,0.000044644345,0.9500084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97685,0.009577691,0.000009129238,0.0035912509,0.00026336743,0.00001440728,0.0000012506514,0.0000070495266,0.009685855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983341,0.00058855995,0.00027816906,0.00019138194,0.00037127465,0.00023652417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990146,0.0001769928,0.00019732365,0.000472447,0.0000811587,0.00005745642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007765831,0.00012564677,0.00026994883,0.000017400327,0.001180421,0.000050146635,0.00043711346,0.000053854048,0.00026803926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083606195,0.000061204504,0.00022781506,0.00031637034,0.00062887336,0.00016652301,0.000017718918,0.00022816913,0.00016118506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013581737,0.00003520514,0.0000067015503,0.000024683277,0.000012052363,6.024092e-7,0.0049923696,7.250186e-8,0.000011675759,0.98526424,0.007530189,0.0021208222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069120346,0.000051236635,0.00038200346,0.0010618962,0.000043966287,8.6895943e-7,0.0013617339,2.917289e-7,0.00009288983,0.050210565,0.9466243,0.00010116147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002964379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022841545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9760195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000631133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008276197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90789634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774233808","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.31158","title":"L’Ombudsman face aux défis de l’évaluation : est-il possible d’évaluer l’intangible?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Strengths and weaknesses; Valuation (finance); Task (project management); Political science; Face (sociological concept); Business; Sociology; Management; Psychology; Accounting; Economics; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.15142852316943903,"score_gpt":0.4234776728772624,"score_spread":0.27204914970782335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774233808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92522204,0.00043497884,0.00025796014,0.0076810676,0.0014610311,0.0013321277,0.000009118455,0.000039339036,0.06356232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99485207,0.00005392033,0.0019631176,0.00010266115,0.00094264856,0.00003642189,0.000009803931,0.000021840739,0.0020174903],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969752,0.00064651814,0.00045248316,0.00020172633,0.0010856678,0.0006384411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657005,0.00006263915,0.0006996601,0.00037665214,0.0013764935,0.0009144825],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008662244,0.00015826935,0.00023129751,0.0003803527,0.0030520512,0.0012963902,0.0007618806,0.00019052008,0.0013384345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016768909,0.0001511037,0.00017272109,0.0001589012,0.00050284766,0.0010492301,0.000014946986,0.00029657548,0.00009136457],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025561518,0.00010985161,0.023389569,0.000019877249,0.00011053342,0.0000621478,0.051685825,0.00031586172,0.000074441705,0.044452503,0.006952306,0.87280154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003439384,0.0010533897,0.33814594,0.0003878729,0.000862071,0.00007409084,0.011919588,0.010985208,0.00052052055,0.22572961,0.40592375,0.0009585402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029839853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4095241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.871843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012500365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011955564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787098944","doi":"10.7202/1042926ar","title":"The History, Law and Practice of Cabinet Immunity in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Parliament; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Statutory law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.017855781757439033,"score_gpt":0.2517230255402843,"score_spread":0.23386724378284526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787098944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52510166,0.0003779325,9.898739e-7,0.0011368231,0.0002764335,0.00009065179,0.0000022509855,0.0000065004615,0.47300678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99587065,0.00013548296,0.000057238296,0.0003258882,0.00014882167,0.0000025747024,6.249392e-7,0.0000040098894,0.0034547274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993017,0.00020183812,0.000120638324,0.00007787115,0.000114441966,0.00018352875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992742,0.00037154686,0.00007949947,0.00015415174,0.00006311945,0.0000574862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068022526,0.00003324654,0.000086453954,0.000014440063,0.00026445466,0.000014093535,0.00017695807,0.000030063427,0.00007802651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002049284,0.000036431557,0.000013083855,0.0000531849,0.00049568363,0.00009954148,0.000022625161,0.000097542186,0.000005219293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034133715,0.000026792846,0.0021660104,0.000019681713,0.000010671331,0.000017605831,0.021576142,6.016128e-7,0.00006351275,0.9688444,0.006302374,0.0009380862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019229231,0.00004011198,0.012821446,0.00003251776,0.000013306207,0.000008027172,0.0059388126,0.00003072153,0.00005190467,0.031945314,0.94881505,0.00011047917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97375584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9425127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094080664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006973608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24601766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788223979","doi":"10.3968/10075","title":"Improving Public Security Administrative Mediation System in China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Party-directed mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Transformative mediation; Public relations; Business; Law and economics; Order (exchange); China; Political science; Power (physics); Public security; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.025319590519920065,"score_gpt":0.29897721855065845,"score_spread":0.2736576280307384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788223979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4279237,0.000007473281,0.000008135864,0.0007455182,0.00050394377,0.0001787947,0.000010000555,0.00004073335,0.5705817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985049,7.979842e-7,0.00002025024,0.00012687566,0.0010679536,0.000008013217,0.0000016555618,0.000004268817,0.00026531107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820966,0.000118689924,0.00014882625,0.00029675977,0.00049393624,0.0007321356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990116,0.000020377038,0.000079229736,0.00009398514,0.00019112517,0.0006037093],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001625309,0.00007882004,0.0001052172,0.0002932474,0.0030619607,0.0003686732,0.00053435616,0.00009656599,0.00021303771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002500349,0.000081524195,0.000026688213,0.0012066476,0.0025111155,0.0007182103,0.000023007062,0.00012756353,0.00008640827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010019764,0.00000683736,0.006350594,0.0000044733933,9.0207317e-7,0.000008210121,0.070606224,4.076602e-9,0.000027855423,0.9193512,0.00026676216,0.0033758932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011347029,0.00028148718,0.35115784,0.00009150435,0.000017993652,0.000004564728,0.35376215,0.0009672036,0.00049947127,0.032714862,0.25763786,0.0017303749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14669678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89281535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8866364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022310049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047434717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99823594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896220206","doi":"10.29173/alr2499","title":"Rethinking the Ramifications of Reasonableness Review: Stare Decisis and Reasonableness Review on Questions of Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Standard of review; Administrative law; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Judicial deference; Political science; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Common law; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04687796393010721,"score_gpt":0.3460340334172457,"score_spread":0.29915606948713847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896220206","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035633327,0.86184365,0.000007004279,0.016372949,0.00013140758,0.0016525444,0.00001911951,0.000023404373,0.119593576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030594172,0.9547016,0.00018644438,0.012358037,0.00011237639,0.000109244625,0.000020920354,0.000020083966,0.0018970933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969028,0.001011682,0.0008399771,0.00038912488,0.0005686961,0.0002877068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962687,0.0012172846,0.0005934574,0.0010679174,0.00072714296,0.00012549396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028295352,0.00021241044,0.0008591689,0.000024394605,0.0009628122,0.000032817596,0.0006771777,0.000085750675,0.00082388264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012012145,0.00013712923,0.000202617,0.00053792243,0.0014717319,0.00023486896,0.00007826562,0.00017521293,0.00007606882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002529962,0.00004912796,0.000017307415,0.0140446,0.000029338515,4.29176e-7,0.0007180915,2.4915439e-8,0.0000012283062,0.96921414,0.009364204,0.0065589882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058121033,0.000040783467,0.00007519757,0.15999952,0.0004085595,0.000002674144,0.000021620139,6.610182e-7,0.000014575407,0.014232488,0.82499814,0.00014768179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015028471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0471365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9549816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048991198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017965114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99153054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896385746","doi":"10.3968/10485","title":"On the Scope Limit and the Time Limit of the Temporary Administrative License Granted by Local Government Rules","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"License; Scope (computer science); Administrative law; Business; Safeguarding; Law; Haven; Government (linguistics); Local government; Time limit; Public administration; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.019007583006512993,"score_gpt":0.2578320101440051,"score_spread":0.23882442713749208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896385746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4808532,0.00008458578,0.0000027706344,0.018334074,0.00021861978,0.0004931839,0.000098707256,0.000011955563,0.4999029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99394166,0.000014088214,0.000004024104,0.0024402465,0.00019109866,0.0000072838925,4.4720758e-7,0.000004815624,0.0033963607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981412,0.00028884033,0.00013948252,0.00022830235,0.00080337626,0.00039878607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990772,0.00028340242,0.00011398649,0.00019215446,0.00009733372,0.00023590747],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013677512,0.00010113061,0.00012682418,0.000020979138,0.004589041,0.00018522063,0.0009240348,0.00006241429,0.00030396692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023915847,0.00004937764,0.000055458135,0.0004296732,0.019679554,0.00013279256,0.000060503302,0.00014564987,0.00006217473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033842276,0.00001985926,0.00026656038,0.0000016295943,0.000010534798,0.0000016775309,0.030079924,2.1643103e-8,0.00010834959,0.9312399,0.036236938,0.002000764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023968527,0.0008044403,0.03977073,0.00028594726,0.00013175623,0.000004444149,0.122657664,0.00025723668,0.006964311,0.105239555,0.7202058,0.0012812495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025095487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18542443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82600033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003275596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013135811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99670684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899696301","doi":"","title":"Canadian Administrative Law and Good Governance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CentAUR (University of Reading)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Administrative law; Constitutionality; Corporate governance; Good governance; Law; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Relation (database); Public administration; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Constitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.02584130930107432,"score_gpt":0.262154510708977,"score_spread":0.23631320140790268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899696301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36100167,0.000016966085,0.0000023113325,0.0016592809,0.00009272011,0.000058634596,0.000022518992,0.000009345145,0.6371365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97543406,0.00007797217,0.00010510916,0.000051298397,0.000034934954,2.1621881e-8,0.0000015911329,0.0000022580555,0.024292724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995421,0.000022200571,0.000029656296,0.0001240099,0.000107904874,0.0001741342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947876,0.000014686649,0.00009430747,0.00015128893,0.00003517677,0.00022576633],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000095939926,0.00004724283,0.00009087985,0.000018495533,0.002292485,0.00006368012,0.00030078125,0.000053215837,0.00033888573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011381803,0.000058173635,0.000028357998,0.000018050054,0.00078608544,0.00032752828,0.000035071746,0.00005565636,0.000028674709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005140691,0.000008141617,0.0049000424,0.000004306311,0.000010259,0.00002483113,0.012346036,1.8722053e-8,0.0000066403095,0.9808832,0.0011680588,0.00064332114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059576647,0.000063432286,0.16952893,0.000070022965,0.000035308894,0.000001393439,0.023293236,0.00000885486,0.00007932338,0.012507616,0.7935739,0.00024220395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6382453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9701592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96837556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014132122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019668225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900083978","doi":"10.1177/1478929918807972","title":"What Is an Ombudsperson? Global Diffusion, International Standardization, and Institutional Diversification","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Standardization; Democracy; Diversification (marketing strategy); Institution; Corporation; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Institutional theory; Public administration; Political science; Public institution; Civil society; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Marketing; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.08904207041328743,"score_gpt":0.419098828666169,"score_spread":0.33005675825288155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900083978","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086938046,0.3441018,0.0020809977,0.25968948,0.008950783,0.0022532917,0.00035223522,0.0004444951,0.29518887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69237953,0.29226696,0.00030453957,0.012365057,0.0015862233,0.000017084467,0.00002911717,0.0000058251244,0.001045621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875677,0.000113362854,0.0001957701,0.00024472756,0.00043482968,0.00025451384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990604,0.000036551726,0.000047190868,0.00010738186,0.0005446487,0.00020380494],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033481035,0.00009468995,0.00018393912,0.000019156276,0.001074706,0.00013766081,0.00016619799,0.000038650945,0.0009819313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024805404,0.00007488018,0.000041672207,0.00012151608,0.0014902484,0.00062767323,0.0000914377,0.000042235013,0.00011487065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033751721,0.00003722873,0.0015818147,0.000078903606,0.000038613674,9.656429e-7,0.0030847099,6.4962165e-9,2.3585456e-7,0.9770133,0.0046735676,0.013487312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020026311,0.000050781167,0.011208416,0.0005950727,0.000069264075,0.0000024819917,0.004714362,0.000010323671,0.0000025516922,0.04938157,0.9336084,0.00015650854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001368212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005189091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9289348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003204539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008180667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900682386","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0084","title":"<i>Dunsmuir</i>’s Disconnect","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Transparency (behavior); Political science; Law; Rule of law; Action (physics); Administrative law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Judicial opinion; Sociology","score_opus":0.013911962211216943,"score_gpt":0.24684771979243017,"score_spread":0.23293575758121324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900682386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098698445,0.00013619264,0.00019834081,0.000410751,0.0004383721,0.000039963565,0.0000023992548,0.00002131071,0.9000542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884448,0.00015639125,0.0005261371,0.000056393532,0.00062034995,4.181958e-9,3.0949948e-7,0.0000028707987,0.010192727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993595,0.0000970382,0.00006671693,0.00007809382,0.00022093023,0.00017772432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951684,0.000023071072,0.00008889534,0.00008208245,0.00014097837,0.00014813988],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028221085,0.000047833862,0.000095752715,0.00001123798,0.0017937302,0.000036397993,0.0003168073,0.000045020854,0.010719128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008020331,0.000047178564,0.00008244488,0.000016032598,0.0008598529,0.0005585521,0.000030310688,0.00006730264,0.00006427472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041610085,0.000048044847,0.00025589232,0.000002094888,0.00003367897,0.000022692257,0.051297806,2.149574e-7,0.000056241748,0.93675464,0.009486038,0.002001026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040583228,0.00012629824,0.0014991517,0.00002123013,0.000024825742,0.000005158453,0.024451062,0.000003683081,0.000054457654,0.0057605677,0.9675475,0.00010027763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07680144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74869347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9580614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018984394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075459466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900859774","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0085","title":"A house divided: The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent jurisprudence on the standard of review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Standard of review; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Voting; Political science; Statute; Roberts Court; Jurisdiction; Concurring opinion; Deference; Legislature; Economic Justice; Law of the case; Unanimity; Statutory law; Majority opinion; Original jurisdiction; Court of record","score_opus":0.022875086450049906,"score_gpt":0.2539409517552513,"score_spread":0.23106586530520137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900859774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15149847,0.012235799,0.00009433758,0.0700837,0.0011887543,0.0008714945,0.00010562712,0.000028637693,0.7638932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829687,0.015226904,0.00006194173,0.00033539662,0.000120131575,2.5456925e-8,1.2394109e-7,0.000003818113,0.0012829861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872035,0.00025689948,0.00014417755,0.0000666891,0.0006647636,0.00014710148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988832,0.00011545097,0.0002954819,0.0001800954,0.0004464189,0.00007934677],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010656263,0.00005577584,0.00017675907,0.0000063332905,0.0010621878,0.000010175552,0.0006340861,0.000025364421,0.003694695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057639536,0.000034013203,0.00007435145,0.000028600227,0.0008550547,0.00013287806,0.000042988868,0.00010166582,0.0000015777389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023846774,0.00007822188,0.0002356405,0.00007283635,0.00013006068,0.000013484186,0.030166497,0.0000017480472,0.000027543176,0.58022356,0.3865562,0.0022556935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017943792,0.00020299315,0.0011726144,0.0005463213,0.000056963716,0.0000015320217,0.0063708755,8.837421e-7,0.00014148036,0.0010113275,0.9902589,0.000056693178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.703495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8314702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000408718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008108999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99721605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901759511","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1363","title":"Diagnosing Administrative Law: A Comment on Clyde River and Chippewas of the Thames First Nation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Skepticism; Political science; Public law; State (computer science); Rule of law; Argument (complex analysis); Common law; Duty; Politics","score_opus":0.07116693918474473,"score_gpt":0.3280372216470354,"score_spread":0.2568702824622907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901759511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18036495,0.041497838,0.0000036568526,0.11539853,0.0011739437,0.004829116,0.000056803347,0.00008629245,0.65658885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98140985,0.0112372115,0.000021688706,0.0065985317,0.00006675699,0.000014765903,0.0000029698238,0.0000064708283,0.0006417498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896455,0.00021515643,0.00019189225,0.00015902716,0.00032807174,0.00014132386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934125,0.00020466857,0.000139196,0.00020354404,0.00006266421,0.00004865915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046381183,0.0000959559,0.00023346583,0.000009958719,0.00041802193,0.00003599038,0.00019275947,0.000039841998,0.00035357304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036486734,0.000060601295,0.00008380754,0.00006967253,0.00044410862,0.0001225564,0.00003994181,0.00009598196,0.000049795224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027511655,0.00004846746,0.0006645777,0.00036300614,0.000013537856,4.271753e-7,0.003003617,1.7852372e-7,0.0000015779528,0.99189025,0.0035761795,0.00043545512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015725366,0.000073679505,0.0014195726,0.003409373,0.00004079345,3.7896234e-7,0.00013537603,0.0000020918376,0.00012317144,0.008831322,0.98570794,0.00009904955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001378873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011260247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9830589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004990849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047001737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62834823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913640895","doi":"","title":"Shenpi (Licensing) Reform from the Perspective of One Municipal Jurisdiction: Ideologies, Institutions, and Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Legislature; Public administration; Regulatory reform; Law reform; Jurisdiction; Political science; Rule of law; Agency (philosophy); Administrative law; Bureaucracy; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03129384742439987,"score_gpt":0.28743274430277305,"score_spread":0.25613889687837316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913640895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4826575,0.0017990961,0.000011382943,0.0031776922,0.000289812,0.0002120531,0.00003356757,0.00011056012,0.5117083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99598485,0.00014740262,0.00040838603,0.0005399787,0.0008429272,0.0000065149857,0.0000128562015,0.0000081165645,0.0020489874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987439,0.00015561991,0.00024062961,0.00026337605,0.00033047347,0.00026598223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920666,0.000118954675,0.0001127829,0.0003264442,0.00014556803,0.00008960327],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035932704,0.00012287818,0.0002021297,0.000027540687,0.0015474863,0.00012109775,0.00028249426,0.00013177138,0.0003173166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042194373,0.0000904995,0.000068548856,0.00015060385,0.0021045217,0.00037888988,0.00008609512,0.00026148203,0.00006412802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017071445,0.000058244234,0.0005186486,0.000002181587,0.000025407582,0.0000029277728,0.004752783,0.0000038980234,0.00003906286,0.993873,0.0006550261,0.000051748284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072028977,0.00007795628,0.026886158,0.00007802392,0.00008775028,0.0000020168077,0.016300365,0.00000980494,0.0003263753,0.47479716,0.48043528,0.00027883047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49696988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62580025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5190759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030423532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014027095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916346634","doi":"","title":"The Constitution outside the Courts: The Case for Parliamentary Involvement in Constitutional Review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Political science; Parliament; Scrutiny; Parliamentary sovereignty; Constitution; Law; Statutory law; Separation of powers; Politics; Constitutional law; Legislation; Accountability; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0198201382128783,"score_gpt":0.3015644593193679,"score_spread":0.28174432110648956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916346634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31014568,0.3045036,0.0033692736,0.30858508,0.006184733,0.011609979,0.000046385507,0.00009826377,0.055457033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94683737,0.048781164,0.0000071841,0.002244467,0.00039794948,0.000050084895,0.0000031713803,0.000003762845,0.0016748648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977681,0.0003511093,0.0003086304,0.00013042334,0.0003132706,0.0011284584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990982,0.00041696013,0.00017135238,0.00017262618,0.00009543512,0.00004547174],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00736861,0.00010074291,0.00012595813,0.000024656829,0.0026392639,0.00014041307,0.00040749434,0.000036946534,0.000100349396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008438997,0.000044791825,0.00012172622,0.000092250644,0.0012114813,0.00016685022,0.000024929528,0.0008410799,0.000046772686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000145336135,0.000020264277,0.00032142946,0.000009710301,0.00004664193,0.000008255906,0.0006507199,0.000008543391,0.0000013707516,0.99297214,0.003043528,0.0029028833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054993236,0.00007670076,0.00004664246,0.00017792005,0.000055958957,0.00044177778,0.021858152,0.00002305636,0.000002419466,0.4612429,0.5154197,0.000104787614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010273625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11361456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6366917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011135688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004166216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942323866","doi":"","title":"Who guards the guardians? Recent developments concerning the jurisdiction and accountability of ombudsmen","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Jurisdiction; Arbitration; Private sector; State (computer science); Law; Accountability; Political science; Public sector; Public administration","score_opus":0.019352232161797767,"score_gpt":0.24844834448217332,"score_spread":0.22909611232037555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942323866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9535701,0.00009532894,0.00009035721,0.0022924733,0.000087094086,0.00024158045,0.0000047075227,0.000047251477,0.043571107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777573,0.00076726073,0.0003091243,0.000021319438,0.000009363357,4.02044e-7,6.636151e-7,0.0000032987439,0.0011128259],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913657,0.00014788496,0.00013260994,0.00019416535,0.00020606676,0.00018268311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993281,0.000067724235,0.0001546104,0.00026743612,0.00015032975,0.000031807464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076516025,0.00008348936,0.00017140576,0.00009230487,0.0007708208,0.000012452561,0.00038076902,0.00015811958,0.0002479709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008394649,0.000059594156,0.000041478386,0.0002605403,0.0015309011,0.00009190818,0.000100252204,0.00019835861,0.000009486442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007385994,0.0001173648,0.5792687,0.000034200926,0.00021306938,0.0000062254553,0.042258166,0.000004983731,0.00017438896,0.32383218,0.0016398284,0.05237705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058357127,0.000035000256,0.34148028,0.0000395131,0.000051129973,0.0000018104782,0.025540508,0.0000040792142,0.00084734824,0.017691445,0.61359006,0.00013524176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008778139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022854658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6119502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008923681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015627165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5928609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942526628","doi":"10.7202/1058171ar","title":"Les rapports difficiles entre la liberté d’expression et ses limites raisonnables","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.017412316913374627,"score_gpt":0.2559491134920333,"score_spread":0.23853679657865867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942526628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7480167,0.0041492456,0.000026006011,0.002855092,0.00087974407,0.00037656093,0.00003786338,0.00015546058,0.2435033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7305107,0.002187295,0.00034677007,0.00022142379,0.0007007773,0.000013832131,0.000031199572,0.000048642156,0.26593935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970509,0.0006656339,0.0004323091,0.0006115398,0.00039000355,0.00084961427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821115,0.0006479514,0.0002801229,0.00045411987,0.00008227138,0.00032439656],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000684437,0.00029796953,0.0005274273,0.00013809667,0.00045171543,0.00030353386,0.0005055937,0.0005114975,0.006204075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076480814,0.00036980884,0.00032813114,0.00026399747,0.0005002024,0.0005349408,0.00013067399,0.0004519706,0.0013308993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006477915,0.0009258427,0.0480871,0.0011645311,0.00011796424,0.00031171547,0.07879719,0.0001827998,0.0026809757,0.81738335,0.025361765,0.024921954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011491086,0.00022682447,0.023432367,0.0036145987,0.0001830833,0.00008025162,0.008798484,0.0004490441,0.0030936145,0.13170037,0.8259256,0.0013466653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000762349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009709309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8005638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023668357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023663715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945515784","doi":"10.4000/etudescaribeennes.15155","title":"Explorer dans la Caraïbe la contribution des institutions nationales des droits de l’homme et des ombudsmans à l’appropriation des valeurs visant une meilleure gouvernance dans les relations UE-CELAC","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études caribéennes","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0339915948230478,"score_gpt":0.29175541607803335,"score_spread":0.25776382125498554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945515784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90744,0.0034877534,0.008370506,0.00091548933,0.0006038051,0.0007564738,0.00041995148,0.00030014978,0.07770588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98536307,0.0031482782,0.0028515356,0.000064734704,0.00033060598,0.00014791882,0.00030452438,0.00007808837,0.0077112354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951477,0.0014148561,0.00074467435,0.00079723925,0.00081283564,0.0010827134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678403,0.0010366804,0.0004365461,0.0004333112,0.0009400416,0.00036936247],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015023174,0.00061265205,0.0005707504,0.00025248792,0.0036748187,0.00047888685,0.00065360416,0.0006532301,0.00018991415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062443,0.00061030936,0.0003914668,0.0011052605,0.0069292234,0.0024376628,0.00015394535,0.0006349486,0.00019318452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001965001,0.0004297946,0.13833351,0.00015351456,0.00018410612,0.000023761777,0.1357385,0.0028699888,0.0016642229,0.7193422,0.00013561733,0.0011051578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013756014,0.00021424891,0.66522413,0.0012269899,0.00052917004,0.000104884035,0.049352966,0.0012864769,0.0008123385,0.24421173,0.03454493,0.0011165448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008281367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18745753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5268906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027131422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014571284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945867602","doi":"","title":"Effectiveness Framework for Home-State Non-Judicial Grievance Mechanisms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Legitimacy; Human rights; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Judicial review; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Public administration; Law; Business; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.006840780019596003,"score_gpt":0.2826990895050662,"score_spread":0.27585830948547024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945867602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7044946,0.00046649043,0.28863004,0.00046098934,0.0024236287,0.0008764148,0.000005073023,0.00006978019,0.0025729723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99390554,0.000685947,0.0006577941,0.000086620516,0.0008198527,0.00001698918,0.0000016021168,0.000031342475,0.0037942796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649066,0.00019511575,0.00020923647,0.00027057843,0.00041481832,0.0024195688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990807,0.00032602053,0.00017013849,0.00015097378,0.00013950448,0.00013265018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003300504,0.00016181522,0.00027263546,0.00009754846,0.0009171089,0.00013992994,0.00044010417,0.00014472613,0.00012875196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007739791,0.00014195158,0.00019099363,0.00017475129,0.00010130455,0.00028963797,0.000023026709,0.0012628537,0.00022361126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015984198,0.00003734114,0.00020364037,0.000013852927,0.00006827345,0.0000013636276,0.0015569959,0.000015021953,0.00023856132,0.9940554,0.000021702828,0.0036280213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074944424,0.00046071003,0.00071932113,0.0000698179,0.000021926244,0.0000075705902,0.0013925787,0.000019205447,0.00032561398,0.99306166,0.0029508849,0.0002212623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000116215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027819313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28941095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096993084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021766562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7053753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950719070","doi":"","title":"Le secret ministériel au Canada (Cabinet Secrecy in Canada)","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Secrecy; Cabinet (room); Law; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.006825773134857658,"score_gpt":0.21902132155917775,"score_spread":0.2121955484243201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950719070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84341145,0.0051090913,0.00008122243,0.021361643,0.0051517854,0.00017712601,0.000027807733,0.000009641631,0.124670245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93554604,0.0012138587,0.000012336142,0.0007251738,0.004135215,0.0000022340055,0.0000056783015,0.000029595658,0.058329858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927804,0.00042017005,0.00052256545,0.00033950838,0.00088816084,0.0050492035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988275,0.0000951313,0.00025368162,0.00021120741,0.00016460991,0.00044784046],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016481781,0.00027948708,0.00036574772,0.00009107884,0.0013381891,0.000085323285,0.0007039202,0.00014949773,0.0009499563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057803325,0.00028993713,0.00008474196,0.0004330664,0.00051672955,0.000281395,0.000046288074,0.0022279264,0.00003747011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033397147,0.000050759172,0.005665729,0.000010379549,0.00009530765,0.00007960577,0.002597335,0.0000082007155,0.000005528166,0.9758073,0.009949392,0.0056970464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011428691,0.00035515602,0.006405674,0.000107812455,0.000045104218,0.00023366364,0.038913693,0.00012460261,0.0000417909,0.2918749,0.6601193,0.0006354614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6839324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026924659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4881513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952826690","doi":"10.36939/cjur/vol28no1/art208","title":"Accountability and Responsiveness at the Municipal Level: Views from Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of urban research","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Lawrence College; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.19690122809021632,"score_gpt":0.3899493726337436,"score_spread":0.19304814454352726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952826690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840728,0.0022803026,1.2009865e-7,0.0031523504,0.00043468483,0.00021541487,0.000063659056,0.0000012661192,0.009779426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98680127,0.000047052403,0.0000062902013,0.00016968463,0.00028650768,0.0000013357736,0.0000016119855,0.000008211574,0.012678053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968149,0.0014481508,0.0002321747,0.000151504,0.00081197545,0.00054131134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970485,0.0012271499,0.00007760802,0.0003006936,0.000530091,0.0008159609],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050379448,0.00007482964,0.00019160614,0.00015308888,0.00123964,0.00019015184,0.0006963736,0.000071440656,0.0034643563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041597898,0.000050966883,0.00004584149,0.00023008391,0.0008042415,0.00015187098,0.00004850433,0.0005496926,0.00004995756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035240443,0.000021648453,0.5400066,0.00003807967,0.00011330754,0.0003785275,0.10535028,0.000009290469,0.00026703443,0.015680304,0.3350587,0.0027238668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019528302,0.000035279943,0.23964906,0.000039848554,0.000004600345,0.0000040503255,0.009067347,0.0000019962586,0.000037519872,0.0017386025,0.7491559,0.000070506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99325687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41409722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014627487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013204219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W295307247","doi":"","title":"Rights, Review and Reasonableness: The Implications of Canada's New Approach to Administrative Decision-Making and Human Rights for Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Political science; Law; Human rights; Legislation; Discretion; Proportionality (law); Supreme court; International human rights law; Common law; Administrative law","score_opus":0.03660092761202962,"score_gpt":0.35024680147946685,"score_spread":0.31364587386743725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W295307247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8200408,0.03455187,0.017114712,0.044497244,0.00040023675,0.009767679,0.000061445186,0.00007054529,0.073495425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900559,0.00057863526,0.0006651554,0.00014348156,0.0001819455,0.00003352786,0.0000014036611,0.0000061898786,0.008333768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839973,0.000091224494,0.00026131302,0.00018878301,0.00020652598,0.0008523892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991549,0.00018202503,0.00016467768,0.00014449359,0.00016739567,0.00018651133],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009965732,0.00010908951,0.0002079634,0.00003735099,0.00193844,0.000103313876,0.00030378083,0.000043649783,0.00010303364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045457164,0.00006608145,0.000042096275,0.00012421128,0.00013577951,0.00015469242,0.000020382724,0.00032361076,0.0000017703593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036964427,0.00001547085,0.0000610789,0.000016520435,0.000038665567,8.6956234e-8,0.0006048346,3.156665e-7,0.0000033061285,0.9848963,0.012408291,0.0019514445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013838275,0.000072807634,0.0031072574,0.00014243682,0.00007367047,0.000026671269,0.00067837123,0.000001025712,0.000003886564,0.9346442,0.061001826,0.000109459754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.158632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90558225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74695027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032360991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002276328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953734689","doi":"","title":"The International Ombudsman Yearbook, Linda C. Reif (Ed.) : recent publications","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yearbook; Parliament; Political science; Law; Library science; Politics","score_opus":0.02551074843048468,"score_gpt":0.2969614081440274,"score_spread":0.2714506597135427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953734689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03700643,0.000157001,0.00003378768,0.01139787,0.0013072337,0.00021427694,0.000007022992,0.00014507108,0.9497313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92478293,0.00007581071,0.00014142581,0.00014401483,0.0045317276,0.000014199643,0.000014872184,0.000021303047,0.070273735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973265,0.00025443203,0.00054072036,0.00027522704,0.0010112148,0.00059192476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998374,0.00015784033,0.0003550009,0.000352452,0.00048757516,0.0002731471],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012097623,0.0001794067,0.00016859813,0.00014671484,0.012472094,0.0016997055,0.0013393065,0.00010379142,0.0036989409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025150779,0.00011561178,0.00016592527,0.00020407327,0.0010665411,0.000493141,0.00007128529,0.0005449658,0.0003422331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006255031,0.00008869013,0.00013365281,4.571454e-7,0.00003444324,0.000011637223,0.001116637,0.0000019259883,0.000014431164,0.92022145,0.07794857,0.00042183165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021618482,0.000022255592,0.0013054339,0.000008169159,0.000014510672,0.000012388548,0.00029727857,0.0000028401757,0.000033278233,0.31571302,0.68224245,0.0001321983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00459609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.270146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8877765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041363126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016101482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969081664","doi":"10.3968/11097","title":"The New Development of “Substantial Rule of Law” in China: Substantive Settlement of Administrative Disputes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); China; Administrative law; Law; Substantive law; Political science; Rule of law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02904913828834046,"score_gpt":0.31177573601475195,"score_spread":0.2827265977264115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969081664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84218454,0.000039691397,0.0000041565404,0.00031410813,0.00018978043,0.00024848248,0.00003009202,0.0000030236183,0.15698612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992957,0.0000060870366,0.00013494452,0.00001862766,0.0000410507,0.000001914782,0.0000014978997,0.0000031190482,0.00049704267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848235,0.00006385218,0.00030819082,0.00017290814,0.0005663302,0.0004063674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993101,0.0000640388,0.00018994251,0.00010002045,0.00013388456,0.00020201164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009795428,0.00007447144,0.00017799014,0.00010108713,0.0006794507,0.000031499683,0.0005798806,0.000046998794,0.00015876228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041528554,0.000059219536,0.000041221585,0.00060084334,0.001908485,0.00016495762,0.000027823613,0.00007357735,0.000006140431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008363788,0.000017629025,0.00592251,0.00000624563,0.000006236312,8.8521654e-7,0.13256454,2.3329524e-7,0.00078506506,0.858646,0.00006669608,0.0019756122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001419001,0.00023156843,0.62927836,0.0002238983,0.000023942042,2.829904e-7,0.15419412,0.000013956498,0.06607436,0.041076686,0.10674972,0.0007141232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044166528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7916626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8175693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003557875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060065393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972940952","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review of Administrative Action in the High Court of Australia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Political science; Judicial review; Law; Administrative law","score_opus":0.1619903611601266,"score_gpt":0.4113545483295878,"score_spread":0.24936418716946118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972940952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89541817,0.00091115833,0.000021374943,0.01037007,0.0007902817,0.00046427347,0.000013879251,0.000012408871,0.09199838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99385,0.005004399,0.00007124148,0.00017631601,0.0004020662,0.0000014594802,9.945777e-7,0.000002688557,0.0004908433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858993,0.0003871139,0.00033847507,0.00006426424,0.0004759015,0.0001443061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993686,0.00006902644,0.0002984699,0.000078120946,0.00013501557,0.00005073623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091858476,0.00006070303,0.00019747473,0.000033962162,0.0004039723,0.000012875027,0.00022021878,0.000051055376,0.000899706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004098485,0.000039751078,0.00008781002,0.00013129774,0.0005048474,0.00016716395,0.000005480738,0.0002517391,0.000009946161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000347455,0.00018148909,0.00083830353,0.00016106834,0.0000244304,0.000074987205,0.012059858,7.827927e-7,0.000024395813,0.9702581,0.016072564,0.0002692762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026758693,0.0017609413,0.21763563,0.0094808005,0.0002908998,0.00035212372,0.020756464,0.0000013956262,0.0035252082,0.19231005,0.5504251,0.00078547513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00515409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073420648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.777948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004717893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017049983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.985115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979050458","doi":"","title":"The Political Legitimacy of Cabinet Secrecy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Cabinet (room); Politics; Openness to experience; Political science; Legitimacy; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.01747944023703239,"score_gpt":0.32895209057059616,"score_spread":0.31147265033356375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979050458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5414275,0.0013690215,0.00032773975,0.027498575,0.0009401662,0.00021015907,0.0000028053084,0.00003302905,0.428191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98175156,0.0010810171,0.000008216061,0.000050679704,0.00096651725,0.0000011184994,2.4857422e-7,0.0000071962013,0.016133416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972278,0.00012433357,0.00017660107,0.000086971435,0.00033601135,0.002048298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992476,0.000086575645,0.00018216594,0.00024837957,0.000103866216,0.00013138949],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018082333,0.00006947798,0.000110753055,0.000028045746,0.0038638092,0.00029117218,0.0008245689,0.000050175142,0.0000805512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022260199,0.00004419294,0.000102910046,0.000022841059,0.00077653315,0.00021934444,0.00003677237,0.0008169016,0.000033284454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010316589,0.000015497419,0.0009198108,7.171054e-7,0.000028533063,0.0000013425347,0.0004941434,8.63586e-8,0.000009776688,0.99386525,0.0001613296,0.004493208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024437267,0.0000713373,0.0019281283,0.00000720924,0.000013347433,0.000019015322,0.005213672,0.0000033559038,0.000034425284,0.95867944,0.033720974,0.00006469975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002046852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046815895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4403241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039485158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028296215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984162081","doi":"10.1177/0020852319870241","title":"Media coverage of reports published by the Québec Ombudsman: an automated content analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Administrative Sciences","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Tone (literature); Media coverage; Mandate; Political science; Content analysis; News media; Print media; Visibility; Law; Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.08613295065847268,"score_gpt":0.4122552439056207,"score_spread":0.32612229324714803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984162081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80161583,0.0047923466,0.00002074656,0.009900192,0.00083137624,0.0006478037,0.00009066379,0.000062607156,0.18203846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957194,0.0015689936,0.0000745691,0.0003834307,0.000046068464,0.000009360831,0.000038021197,0.0000028379673,0.0021573526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709624,0.00030318808,0.0007172391,0.00033253757,0.0013873467,0.00016342114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760765,0.00047047352,0.0009286785,0.00025699902,0.00064327207,0.00009291679],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002802459,0.0001135816,0.00040516688,0.00013099649,0.00019972792,0.00012320788,0.00092187186,0.0000372665,0.003865206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009243252,0.000067556706,0.0002237371,0.00074269855,0.0013890476,0.00068542367,0.00004295446,0.00008136738,0.000012958341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060641323,0.0011576031,0.19873099,0.00065930944,0.0017738843,0.0000324317,0.025590586,0.00003206811,0.0011192921,0.73473364,0.029659443,0.0064500817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001284,0.0023511327,0.41190153,0.0058133127,0.0015926203,0.000039420196,0.03074314,0.0017823529,0.006419569,0.020878587,0.51549685,0.0016974404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006775551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021008857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7138551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006853221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010317646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988018695","doi":"10.31078/consrev523","title":"Constitutional Change: Towards Better Human Rights Protection in Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Constitution; Charter; Law; Political science; Rights of Nature; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Ex post facto law; State (computer science); Bill of rights; Right to property; Linguistic rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.14478667659264227,"score_gpt":0.38808269231669107,"score_spread":0.2432960157240488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2988018695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13459936,0.014168214,0.0003751214,0.012306319,0.003800856,0.008729498,0.00008834804,0.00029842948,0.8256339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99308753,0.000670226,0.00009321264,0.0010768339,0.0005665404,0.00019054713,0.000045726523,0.00000259218,0.004266815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983192,0.0001860807,0.00034552783,0.00031598163,0.0005188237,0.00031434814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994566,0.000022995953,0.000103180326,0.00016641984,0.00013261258,0.00011823648],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007059833,0.00015312203,0.000293873,0.000086239364,0.0005899591,0.00004830897,0.00021627695,0.000115288785,0.008494918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003903778,0.00013067768,0.00012099642,0.00026051278,0.0026875525,0.00043730132,0.000029271556,0.00024416385,0.0030327805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002351295,0.00004514255,0.0009952299,0.00022011068,0.000008370141,0.000010603755,0.00010328699,3.9426257e-7,0.000015270278,0.9960828,0.0013191289,0.0011973071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030380217,0.000018278486,0.0050270795,0.0020792969,0.000018922106,0.000009765472,0.0000062389545,0.0000010882026,0.0000134417105,0.027863873,0.9644472,0.00021102946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013863748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018928896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9682189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028200398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029603243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022970702","doi":"10.1017/s0008423920000438","title":"A Human Rights Approach to Emergency Response? The Advocacy of Canada's Human Rights Commissions during the COVID-19 Crisis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Human rights; Legislation; Political science; Public administration; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.04834605542909221,"score_gpt":0.33362495880731236,"score_spread":0.28527890337822015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022970702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87046653,0.000025957994,0.000035771664,0.10464583,0.00026821287,0.00024390334,0.00002506646,0.000008777062,0.024279967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957559,1.8552664e-7,0.000051004263,0.0026268077,0.00044059512,0.000002717031,2.4386492e-7,0.000006582698,0.0011159757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961365,0.00057243364,0.0005803674,0.00026583893,0.0011534175,0.0012914283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915059,0.00017961608,0.00019669782,0.00032908368,0.0003694407,0.0074192355],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002409597,0.00015444132,0.00025754495,0.0002171882,0.011572907,0.00016044112,0.002464905,0.000057545327,0.00085389655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010189712,0.00008576498,0.00012840593,0.0010213437,0.0022117267,0.00019796164,0.00006663055,0.0004029819,0.0000057195693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001169872,0.000017128476,0.00036512833,0.000008364518,0.00000975587,0.000046332592,0.018939149,0.000024080005,0.00019367933,0.94565344,0.03472981,0.0000014184404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000568285,0.0002948516,0.20294937,0.00004242009,0.00007578551,0.00006317159,0.016151581,0.00001946768,0.00065312645,0.092451654,0.6861782,0.0005521063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9479443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98781276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8532018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001301329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010550919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99505836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024006262","doi":"10.3968/11595","title":"On the Establishment of a National Human Rights Institution in China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Institution; China; Legitimacy; Political science; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.03136715062327861,"score_gpt":0.2921910507712139,"score_spread":0.2608239001479353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024006262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45861483,0.0000019774109,0.00000130161,0.0047278944,0.00007764112,0.00012254201,0.000007064647,0.0000073471006,0.5364394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987549,3.2251933e-7,0.000004153366,0.00089365774,0.0001859596,0.0000044055555,9.972987e-7,0.0000014861923,0.00015409583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998741,0.00006414922,0.00011124503,0.0001642495,0.0006413622,0.00027799877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956304,0.000025188794,0.000045464167,0.00004445101,0.000083053856,0.00023881269],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074033183,0.000049780516,0.00006901399,0.00012726377,0.0024013186,0.00008677953,0.00046992686,0.00003803177,0.00032233002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012848563,0.000038138103,0.00002619761,0.0008807272,0.0015875158,0.00022065993,0.0000145681215,0.000107206644,0.000024999163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.026512e-7,0.000007512014,0.00043871172,8.2336464e-7,6.0921883e-7,0.0000017076633,0.022212693,0.0000014642576,0.000038946768,0.9757074,0.0015133346,0.00007588413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006539067,0.00014241083,0.15109164,0.00005869213,0.0000064042565,2.6308797e-7,0.008373239,0.00010870925,0.0005450645,0.49918455,0.33931106,0.00052406866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09772073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5657218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5401401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069438573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012944434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034896080","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1422","title":"Vavilov and the Culture of Justification in Contemporary Administrative Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Supreme court; Administrative law; Judicial review; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Citizenship; Confusion; Agency (philosophy); Standard of review; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.11703072414492736,"score_gpt":0.37751435522991417,"score_spread":0.2604836310849868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034896080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001631784,0.2454179,0.0000049330893,0.011044824,0.00012994811,0.0008447826,0.000016371312,0.000020316063,0.74088913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96201396,0.034309305,0.00004991043,0.0016301243,0.000057411857,0.000018476634,0.000014827722,0.000003901626,0.0019021041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987812,0.0005037041,0.00026562635,0.00015363391,0.00019736035,0.00009848553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994199,0.00009990641,0.000107955406,0.000177005,0.00015128893,0.00004391709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085227547,0.0000718371,0.0002775031,0.0000060871484,0.00019866365,0.000034826568,0.00013420606,0.0000475502,0.00021111754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074568445,0.000044930337,0.00006192236,0.00012915865,0.00083798135,0.00013100095,0.000021768403,0.000108251574,0.000012755192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005731391,0.000025303307,0.000026324095,0.0003508221,0.0000076402985,0.0000042847923,0.0066688247,1.3522209e-8,0.00001129078,0.9903256,0.0023965854,0.00017757886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039979792,0.00001485966,0.00013576192,0.0015291481,0.00004361959,0.0000016715437,0.002010273,9.200041e-7,0.00012691147,0.031630922,0.96401644,0.00008969633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008292811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012034027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96161985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017576076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017174368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67152697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W306134649","doi":"","title":"The Discretionary Nature of Judicial Review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Law; Certiorari; Political science; Judicial discretion; Writ; Judicial review; Discretion; Supreme court; Original jurisdiction; Politics","score_opus":0.0058765152476186544,"score_gpt":0.2997923885590466,"score_spread":0.29391587331142793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W306134649","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04609002,0.6136298,0.00017466734,0.120654896,0.0011287627,0.00057588564,0.000002724709,0.00006678672,0.21767642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77686054,0.21735309,0.0000064757733,0.00058261683,0.0007336037,5.5990137e-7,8.0768814e-7,0.0000032059816,0.004459102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822885,0.00016796606,0.00019245953,0.00007423282,0.00038598687,0.00095051224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995753,0.000048691756,0.00014211755,0.000092524955,0.00009012745,0.000051195766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023336955,0.000061023948,0.00011590948,0.000025258398,0.0010565496,0.000030126275,0.00035861012,0.00006952067,0.000073401294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000893891,0.00003620202,0.00011765096,0.00012878564,0.00016551765,0.00010951892,0.0000072654166,0.0014031227,0.000014273409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008612522,0.000015904192,0.00002204775,0.000002584175,0.000014337832,7.2252817e-7,0.00023677302,8.0999186e-8,0.0000053185377,0.97642994,0.0022782022,0.020985488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008419469,0.00010388893,0.00077656785,0.0001070509,0.000020518142,0.000016446998,0.00066399993,3.5236835e-7,0.0000032789007,0.8580866,0.14008442,0.000052670446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028540737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002923722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7307705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024441892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016556429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81262326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093995633","doi":"10.1111/capa.12392","title":"The duty to assist in Canadian Freedom of Information law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Freedom of information; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Law; Administrative law; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02666741190849772,"score_gpt":0.26639584059124005,"score_spread":0.23972842868274233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093995633","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092757426,0.000018800689,0.000047733654,0.48666567,0.00041589662,0.00066340907,0.0001342735,0.000031764346,0.41926503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646693,0.0000017150837,0.000036654328,0.0030657738,0.00013384111,0.000011127203,0.000045345136,0.0000032725804,0.00023535974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990429,0.000067224246,0.00022596674,0.00008626621,0.00018923906,0.0003884044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824893,0.00003288141,0.00005607065,0.00010728222,0.000121413315,0.0014334155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004131607,0.00005882962,0.00007237856,0.00014071046,0.0007165799,0.0003406073,0.0002718907,0.00007887968,0.00021205733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032713343,0.000053798147,0.000022985707,0.0003868146,0.00016654415,0.00057890284,0.0000051161114,0.00008746491,0.00009501432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023606249,0.0000018026396,0.0017445036,0.0000024543197,0.0000020753287,0.0000021336923,0.0032120894,7.2697367e-7,5.1058265e-7,0.9881162,0.0060024974,0.00091266626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000715617,0.000038806877,0.008698661,0.00000340711,0.0000015176652,2.0952484e-7,0.0019019176,0.00006189773,0.000007565225,0.001314129,0.98782754,0.00007280878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91861147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98680204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005045961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077526807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W310390019","doi":"","title":"International Human Rights on the Internet. Internet Resources.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Social Studies","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Social studies; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Pedagogy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.055768601806438625,"score_gpt":0.31809622481679034,"score_spread":0.26232762301035173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W310390019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39721113,0.00006782619,8.431338e-8,0.007921621,0.00043208853,0.000111894406,0.000009172318,0.000039586444,0.5942066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85426867,0.000022448181,0.0000018906239,0.0014044117,0.0022157815,0.000017068614,0.0000041282096,0.00000898851,0.14205663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871373,0.00016153166,0.00017018964,0.00022397569,0.00032625056,0.00040433885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950564,0.000085090825,0.00004625649,0.00010134731,0.00008793191,0.00017374089],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003167907,0.0001353404,0.0001596076,0.00009207088,0.0026109074,0.00017925056,0.000598089,0.00008553522,0.010090424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029916964,0.00009690651,0.00010053486,0.00011390227,0.0010021657,0.00008058871,0.000027374708,0.00020588745,0.0009026156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055430637,0.000012926929,0.0002370461,0.0000010183472,0.00013066755,0.00001808791,0.12969396,9.09326e-8,3.3436763e-7,0.52342117,0.34405148,0.0024277107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010230231,0.000018261066,0.0026270715,0.000019034846,0.000010249228,2.180048e-7,0.005420581,7.30165e-7,0.0000052000996,0.019411223,0.9722531,0.00013204299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27981988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9218919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.642072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069722533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005733393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3103913731","doi":"","title":"A nova Lei do Tribunal dos Conflitos: a peça que faltava (parte I)","year":2019,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova (rocket); Political science; Tribunal; Nova scotia; Law; History; Engineering; Ethnology","score_opus":0.09851857456721318,"score_gpt":0.4039366541984645,"score_spread":0.3054180796312513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3103913731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76414365,0.0008163764,0.0000090747235,0.0005532415,0.015411908,0.002592046,0.00019159509,0.00005107843,0.21623106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76091737,0.00002602988,0.000051735293,0.000041128416,0.0004073709,0.000019438274,0.0000466739,0.000043180247,0.23844709],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99043554,0.00067370763,0.0025810592,0.0020732083,0.0030129245,0.0012235771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99151444,0.00025308988,0.003799363,0.0021897277,0.0015260259,0.00071735535],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004638489,0.0006664321,0.0017196602,0.00073272217,0.0016099912,0.0071305097,0.009426406,0.00047073144,0.007254072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017634127,0.0006096262,0.0007052944,0.0016918201,0.0034552752,0.0056198835,0.0022835021,0.0005977142,0.000556328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026389414,0.007324941,0.19014122,0.003742832,0.0020078244,0.0006633033,0.112545036,0.00017325765,0.16066554,0.13426426,0.37924305,0.0065898052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010267467,0.0020064106,0.14398986,0.0046988963,0.00120631,0.0001139409,0.02919861,0.00046701322,0.20032361,0.009253302,0.5936228,0.004851782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007433607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027505131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21437976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022363673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030346296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108702718","doi":"","title":"Rebuilt on Sand: Canadian Administrative Law after Vavilov","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Standard of review; Autonomy; Citizenship; Judicial review; State (computer science); Compromise; Immigration law; Immigration","score_opus":0.02845912712821984,"score_gpt":0.29537771249160105,"score_spread":0.2669185853633812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108702718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30732903,0.0009903427,0.00006160682,0.047766108,0.00047867378,0.00031057867,0.00001626698,0.00008262747,0.6429648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900551,0.00032638686,0.0000127127205,0.003940966,0.0012045342,0.0000031533916,0.0000015442569,0.000013683539,0.0044419356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721617,0.00015984532,0.00016147661,0.00018917053,0.0003273778,0.0019459858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991526,0.000029439463,0.0000649427,0.00008521321,0.000057645433,0.0006101574],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006240129,0.000121580226,0.00013555224,0.000055714354,0.0008879406,0.00015879124,0.00030046294,0.00008888407,0.00096631673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034895816,0.00010373738,0.0000961731,0.00012115659,0.00017658272,0.00017623685,0.000008495324,0.0013433446,0.0004114221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057456138,0.000014889533,0.00016727857,9.84703e-7,0.000035107412,0.0000382151,0.008025673,6.4987086e-7,0.00000439404,0.9899851,0.0009205523,0.00074970815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005462508,0.0009741054,0.00056552,0.000021925272,0.00003223254,0.000024629751,0.008875694,0.000003712123,0.000068285364,0.5733948,0.4151591,0.0003337715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034333263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9239276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8895943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011220028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006755127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110687891","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Cabinet Secrecy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Cabinet (room); Discretion; Statutory law; Political science; Qualified immunity; Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Premise; Law; Doctrine; Business; Public relations; Computer science; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.028105980608057718,"score_gpt":0.2762705864611994,"score_spread":0.24816460585314168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110687891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72994286,0.0037937823,0.0048212316,0.06512002,0.000925697,0.00031218055,0.0000019707534,0.00034953587,0.19473271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98955405,0.0016054161,0.00007015606,0.0009525299,0.0020791735,7.602206e-7,0.0000010499904,0.000013281956,0.005723601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974001,0.00017156468,0.00016820914,0.00014743484,0.00037726958,0.0017354073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995432,0.00003237281,0.00009029682,0.00006509417,0.000059326852,0.00020974813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014417268,0.00008847873,0.00012337643,0.000039393904,0.0009341428,0.00013415262,0.0003625906,0.000075000804,0.00045935047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009380158,0.00007676214,0.00009092028,0.00015670659,0.000101004705,0.00022185834,0.000021724632,0.0016174765,0.00019663204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011230688,0.0000089752275,0.00025039405,0.0000014798575,0.00002832637,0.000005852032,0.023051707,0.0000024271874,0.000033524037,0.9722243,0.000514566,0.00386721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025077417,0.0001158693,0.000079495716,0.000006675042,0.0000138322885,0.000016226086,0.0058520418,0.00001817482,0.0000145105605,0.9324155,0.061098624,0.000118302494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024545548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012059765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25961116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005057981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032809167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71847653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112919139","doi":"10.1089/env.2020.0017","title":"Fiduciary Responsibility and the Green Energy Act, 2009 (Ontario, Canada)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Justice","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Ambiguity; Obligation; Scope (computer science); Indigenous; Legislature; Duty; Political science; Divergence (linguistics); Law and economics; Energy (signal processing); Law; Business; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.010790851766379965,"score_gpt":0.20498736503420764,"score_spread":0.19419651326782766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112919139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9098289,0.00059091055,0.000022143433,0.01989201,0.0002604848,0.0002327029,0.000032742482,0.000034395984,0.0691057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97713125,0.00006415913,0.000030990555,0.007358523,0.00029938683,0.0000037643151,0.0000046998457,0.000006278303,0.015100927],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988253,0.00026017026,0.000119463264,0.00022910602,0.00035947608,0.00020646512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941933,0.00021065206,0.000043509313,0.000133627,0.000002207103,0.00019065019],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026476852,0.000091942056,0.0001135042,0.0000071781396,0.0007193837,0.000032298336,0.00019838235,0.00004269947,0.002371292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038548846,0.00006782617,0.000029091118,0.00003403686,0.0006051413,0.000094772004,0.000086110806,0.00013420278,0.000023904171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00259338,0.0002970203,0.018971724,0.00008958718,0.00021469043,0.00034786915,0.4527668,0.000050645132,0.00068394106,0.36130902,0.14464492,0.018030368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087582425,0.000039485152,0.072400995,0.0000044297253,0.00015701291,0.0000020010743,0.00984313,0.00008544238,0.000080646336,0.0025518937,0.91372865,0.00023050429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9285121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76908374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025597212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025778537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113356208","doi":"10.7202/1078534ar","title":"Liberté d’expression des juges de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme versus secret des délibérations","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Freedom of expression; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.027707510668237147,"score_gpt":0.3018707808441605,"score_spread":0.2741632701759234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113356208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7326881,0.0029252442,0.0023976217,0.0020734663,0.0012573712,0.000126146,0.00012506467,0.00012822577,0.25827873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90041137,0.004006437,0.00805785,0.000359219,0.0019982094,0.000033993067,0.00010951415,0.000070965405,0.08495242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703807,0.0007641543,0.00044480196,0.00050178036,0.0004515442,0.00079967786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975482,0.00095858605,0.00020679954,0.00028213975,0.00050714076,0.00049710006],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008089009,0.0002989917,0.0002964437,0.00015602163,0.0010749334,0.00053512177,0.0006643988,0.0003443523,0.0026789878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087389397,0.00036750137,0.0002814904,0.00036183247,0.0016649954,0.0007316063,0.0001239765,0.00047111846,0.00026408382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011448364,0.0005325148,0.0033722997,0.00014840846,0.00018888699,0.00056713796,0.029414484,0.00034445323,0.0031902674,0.95115477,0.0021300272,0.008842271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012743613,0.00012370905,0.015424064,0.0012872372,0.00018013286,0.00040563862,0.0021675753,0.0028887945,0.0034506486,0.6646135,0.30758736,0.00059699395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028533032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027622461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30545732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019258005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013613304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121761895","doi":"","title":"The History, Law and Practice of Cabinet Immunity in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Parliament; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Statutory law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.015513828541856588,"score_gpt":0.27524920758214244,"score_spread":0.2597353790402859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121761895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6975895,0.009366428,0.0000048664515,0.008700105,0.000863449,0.000121369354,0.0000010714367,0.0000039045885,0.2833493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99184847,0.0044202614,0.000004701796,0.000092590126,0.00009414914,5.380278e-7,1.0072946e-7,0.0000032099413,0.0035359561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862814,0.0002592569,0.00012711497,0.000053176293,0.00021430524,0.0007180137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999285,0.00021190583,0.0002354188,0.00015789547,0.00006277522,0.00004702346],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030117277,0.000044405228,0.000079674435,0.000013380606,0.0015586199,0.00005987707,0.00039531014,0.000022559345,0.000017783186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003235665,0.000031230236,0.000017009124,0.00001216212,0.00038119298,0.00025416916,0.00002589326,0.00074608007,8.321631e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025074778,0.0000101500345,0.0009766908,8.865057e-7,0.000017569724,0.000003194539,0.0018723822,2.9419502e-7,0.000007243717,0.9947458,0.00036935174,0.0019713973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047539937,0.00007287199,0.008323983,0.000013629717,0.000019262787,0.000048205497,0.031111263,0.0000046577175,0.0000062512618,0.2664725,0.6933426,0.000109329645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.987396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99984664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7282733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031919696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011540857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123267429","doi":"","title":"Negotiations with Métis: What Courts Can Do to Help","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Metis; Dispute resolution; Political science; Representation (politics); Law; Identification (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.015839953240968607,"score_gpt":0.2800543257681065,"score_spread":0.2642143725271379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123267429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6722252,0.00008292544,0.0012272283,0.045822185,0.00049920304,0.00051506003,0.0000032584603,0.00026714095,0.2793578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778117,0.000026416677,0.0008512546,0.0015993032,0.00019846007,0.0000078630255,0.0000014603557,0.0000061327332,0.019497402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992776,0.000020724867,0.00006783211,0.00013958338,0.00025042772,0.0002438302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996101,0.0000149092275,0.000018108387,0.0001141079,0.000059717084,0.00018303185],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001040461,0.000059520367,0.000068210946,0.00004907915,0.00058269064,0.0003632618,0.00013113147,0.000032386364,0.0010206043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000072870625,0.000042887732,0.000019570027,0.00012853649,0.00009918567,0.00033101038,0.0000131960005,0.00004248914,0.0002559206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027724368,0.000037653943,0.0002536038,0.0000011396862,0.0000072236244,0.0000061807855,0.066734694,0.000101268764,0.0000045391403,0.9297906,0.0022210188,0.0008392724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00128093,0.000346983,0.012760245,0.00018661762,0.00004201049,0.000003979451,0.12186519,0.0000027528542,0.0005671476,0.1752721,0.6869464,0.0007256678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033950433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19852133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7545185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016289791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035107115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123581503","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Ramifications of Reasonableness Review: Stare Decisis and Reasonableness Review on Questions of Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Standard of review; Administrative law; Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Law; Judicial review; Judicial deference; Political science; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.028256218865027247,"score_gpt":0.3277561341449648,"score_spread":0.2994999152799375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123581503","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04727564,0.8904674,0.0006462387,0.026493283,0.00037534302,0.0012348546,0.00002161279,0.000055586937,0.03343006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4674443,0.5306918,0.0000711217,0.0005482156,0.00018189999,0.00000786039,0.0000020391572,0.000009419013,0.0010433575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974678,0.000600291,0.00046145378,0.00018416859,0.00052530156,0.0007609523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982176,0.00026799925,0.00045461228,0.00034724618,0.00063611433,0.000076473334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058469474,0.00011806456,0.00032418623,0.000052461623,0.0012619331,0.00003527344,0.00048442744,0.00006545787,0.00012911893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043923818,0.00007759078,0.0001115522,0.00032168583,0.0007612623,0.00018740019,0.000029907149,0.0006611025,0.000009122464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009512469,0.000037781,0.000046325393,0.00021563392,0.000041844924,3.091233e-7,0.001342076,2.3967073e-7,0.000008037739,0.98808354,0.00066869747,0.009546008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019744717,0.00023755038,0.00041191446,0.012360549,0.00025700004,0.000034625566,0.0013103554,0.0000037574468,0.000050552626,0.83804536,0.14692184,0.00016906176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085938466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015558795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42016864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027230135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016582772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9705897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123669297","doi":"","title":"Tribunals and Guidelines: Exploring the Relationships between Fairness and Legitimacy in Administrative Decision-Making","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Normative; Tribunal; Political science; Administrative law; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Function (biology); Process (computing); Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.12632738791135176,"score_gpt":0.3817816199171554,"score_spread":0.25545423200580364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123669297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903551,0.0023183771,0.0022122841,0.0021917515,0.00007129022,0.00015156732,0.0000014553249,0.000016090156,0.0026821126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714845,0.0015248298,0.00015924092,0.000018306071,0.000694197,0.0000067550345,7.750931e-7,0.000008271116,0.00043914968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979715,0.00029809968,0.0003723174,0.00016217386,0.0002880977,0.0009078208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883705,0.0008066576,0.00013117027,0.00007276272,0.00009630397,0.000056055003],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043077995,0.00010230252,0.00015232681,0.000119620396,0.0014433119,0.00024378429,0.00017279906,0.00005380618,0.000013393284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039037166,0.00007158345,0.00003675007,0.0001971852,0.00020094965,0.00049584074,0.000025396306,0.0010909322,0.000003288758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019090929,0.000013862738,0.04392326,0.000001496597,0.000018298477,0.0000053894514,0.0053951414,0.00001270381,0.0000016447577,0.91446817,0.000072304465,0.036068656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029779717,0.00004080311,0.065956004,0.00009153797,0.000016267068,0.000024503124,0.021144658,0.000014121297,0.0000024961216,0.9099884,0.0023179906,0.00010541809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003596188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04969987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04934025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030808317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093724846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124726179","doi":"","title":"Courts: An Effective Venue to Promote Government Transparency? The Case of the Court of Justice of the European Union","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); European Union law; Political science; Jurisprudence; European union; Law; Legislature; Economic Justice; International law; Data Protection Directive; Scots law; Business; Sources of law; International trade","score_opus":0.014795295357207293,"score_gpt":0.2762261322795088,"score_spread":0.2614308369223015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124726179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99284124,0.00027945507,0.00021598085,0.001376482,0.00031359209,0.00039734016,0.0000132035075,0.000003823624,0.0045588887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992915,0.00007800341,0.0000063987804,0.000027009493,0.0002187153,0.0000017540098,1.2596631e-7,0.0000093138615,0.00036722285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968957,0.0017493161,0.00022226939,0.00009341034,0.00053720956,0.0005021095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991895,0.00005675443,0.00029679944,0.0002383511,0.00014470852,0.000073906784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006377403,0.00007957307,0.00012596253,0.000013895194,0.0004492946,0.00001680259,0.0006046016,0.000028548407,0.0000059311487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011127509,0.000038528393,0.00009371391,0.00014709376,0.00029157262,0.00007965338,0.000034220677,0.00054364465,0.0000016250762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022010999,0.0007550631,0.0015829457,0.00006942426,0.00037612006,0.000038322818,0.30847338,0.0007492132,0.0027904976,0.5995667,0.0007553445,0.08462286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005062086,0.0061049387,0.0622551,0.0009043785,0.0022091977,0.0012504648,0.2766676,0.00020044876,0.01234206,0.5932713,0.038898543,0.00083384925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006844713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023761727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08378901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004898182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086848275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99405205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124743992","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190685515.003.0007","title":"Systematic Government Access to Private-Sector Data in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Personally identifiable information; Statute; Government (linguistics); Private sector; Enforcement; State (computer science); Business; Information privacy; FTC Fair Information Practice; Public administration; Information privacy law; Political science; Law; Privacy by Design; Computer science","score_opus":0.09574048041989948,"score_gpt":0.31387579537374344,"score_spread":0.21813531495384397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124743992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003287453,0.0000681929,0.0000055052055,0.000474957,0.00071847066,0.0011328914,0.00015770186,0.000019495346,0.99709404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039515804,0.00004690141,0.000027680158,0.00048572294,0.00029060442,0.000012950968,0.000019958492,0.000024739658,0.95957565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768865,0.000033178643,0.00034997237,0.00042754758,0.001218615,0.0002820432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796927,0.00008991792,0.00024934873,0.0014607289,0.000025399353,0.00020536102],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004276717,0.00019808195,0.00047407448,0.000037926442,0.0003039775,0.0003857129,0.003299029,0.00011306884,0.0038607828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006883502,0.00015553315,0.000031059215,0.000008280878,0.000058679907,0.00026410012,0.00068170193,0.00015343733,0.00023205545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050907474,0.000008930028,0.0002282509,0.0021860206,0.00007648865,0.00010182994,0.00084869686,5.043227e-7,1.9387596e-7,0.9522629,0.04416489,0.00011623667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015246544,0.000012072027,0.0008239142,0.00574712,0.0000687964,4.2336072e-7,0.00021466835,0.000008822608,0.0000022844563,0.009930834,0.98241985,0.00061874604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9272946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.942332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022288507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016888953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128298117","doi":"","title":"Cabinet Secrecy in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Cabinet (room); Statutory law; Law; Political science; Statute; Parliament; Confidentiality; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.007851338147979458,"score_gpt":0.2490628725279168,"score_spread":0.24121153437993736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128298117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94786364,0.0003843517,0.000061044426,0.0014038583,0.00050029455,0.00006319728,8.010439e-7,0.000009844917,0.04971299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886492,0.0005278286,0.000008358499,0.00018070526,0.0011011777,8.1801187e-7,5.78003e-7,0.000006894611,0.009524441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744636,0.000117792144,0.00015090611,0.00010449041,0.00029830015,0.001882153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996809,0.000023408178,0.0000566718,0.00007165777,0.00006107855,0.00010628848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001120191,0.00006772384,0.00009624544,0.00006546809,0.00047053487,0.000042830347,0.00026766845,0.000035071498,0.00056178815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030409534,0.000058840506,0.000027120448,0.00015222262,0.00010483806,0.00012557313,0.000011269708,0.0007712441,0.000055982164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014820337,0.000017766517,0.012879189,8.4378394e-7,0.000020459967,0.000011969599,0.0031977599,0.000001296957,0.00001053284,0.97351354,0.0014885444,0.008843302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005445812,0.00013663061,0.0075546987,0.000014855916,0.000007742514,0.000037611753,0.021114033,0.000017449132,0.00002602302,0.86323047,0.107102506,0.00021342062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9606083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11028307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00467077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027901825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130246329","doi":"","title":"Repenser le secret ministériel (Rethinking Cabinet Secrecy)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Secrecy; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.011811490311373686,"score_gpt":0.24980933952791376,"score_spread":0.23799784921654007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130246329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7673319,0.023299137,0.00041678388,0.019769488,0.004792343,0.0003997024,0.0000071597997,0.000087438435,0.18389605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6342558,0.004241701,0.000089787616,0.00041748938,0.001781957,0.0000017798684,0.000005721201,0.00004357335,0.35916218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99268657,0.0006527583,0.0006070447,0.0005113209,0.00082712166,0.004715199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850684,0.00014213489,0.0004471905,0.00038336436,0.00019175567,0.0003287232],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004697849,0.00036386505,0.00048503757,0.00015280265,0.0013159309,0.0003191741,0.0008042414,0.0004388225,0.0032685583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053838517,0.0003524383,0.00037492978,0.00036885063,0.00046327757,0.0007540903,0.00008252868,0.0043252683,0.002070169],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043935073,0.00010540696,0.00073091686,0.000023102668,0.00019939391,0.000026611031,0.011796672,0.000015118707,0.0000728282,0.9796725,0.0013666124,0.005946923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009030204,0.0004353283,0.00020262944,0.00014221342,0.00006397695,0.00034811188,0.0117373625,0.00008674251,0.0000377652,0.8126928,0.17291166,0.00043839662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029530074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036166117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17526613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018760995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014177317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133618439","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3459225","title":"Delegated Legislation and the Duty to Consult on and Accommodate Aboriginal and Treaty Rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Treaty; Duty; Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.005382830428682681,"score_gpt":0.27316535745062326,"score_spread":0.26778252702194055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133618439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98590285,0.0005309172,0.000029198489,0.0032941473,0.00010236912,0.00026208788,0.0000015304757,0.000017533459,0.009859372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924536,0.0018088984,0.000013593097,0.00015400857,0.0001858805,0.0000020419307,9.267066e-7,0.00000591541,0.005375175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985138,0.00020491309,0.00013356659,0.0001712166,0.00020958993,0.0007669028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953985,0.00012758703,0.00007596368,0.000085350905,0.00005542699,0.000115810755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013621495,0.000105744184,0.00015278457,0.00007112637,0.0009146824,0.00022509381,0.0001096295,0.000056858313,0.00003919241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000150055985,0.000056373887,0.000023733004,0.000088635,0.00025836137,0.00022688473,0.000012862499,0.00058030814,0.000025949543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022314646,0.000013118157,0.0022324324,0.000001184038,0.0000376501,0.0000011476168,0.004769654,0.0000013996745,0.000016970951,0.98766804,0.00006380821,0.0049714716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046140207,0.00048030572,0.016402375,0.000037362013,0.00006633783,0.00010057364,0.0025472466,0.00011533674,0.00003512752,0.88212216,0.09320651,0.00027267344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012522929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027238686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105545886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016075495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042103077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99051166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136102735","doi":"","title":"The Constitutionalisation of English Judicial Review in Ireland: Continuity and Change","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Irish; Public law; Prerogative; Jurisdiction; Constitutionalism; Legislature; Common law; Judicial independence; Constitutional law; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.015733107153439542,"score_gpt":0.28128752782279814,"score_spread":0.2655544206693586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136102735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9035018,0.06300159,0.000009462973,0.0019695181,0.00079447875,0.0005689047,0.00000199428,0.000012585394,0.030139655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9090629,0.08987395,0.0000012495038,0.00009464734,0.0004373385,0.0000026081414,7.257909e-7,0.0000019364347,0.00052461744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884933,0.00017444439,0.0001716204,0.000068062895,0.00021065336,0.0005259016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995791,0.00008375968,0.00012394729,0.00004922731,0.0001353305,0.000028668675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032407967,0.000044141765,0.0001180933,0.00003150439,0.00026265022,0.000025173735,0.00011236585,0.000035432193,0.000044053977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019533193,0.000029976405,0.000034090703,0.00007941752,0.00022282828,0.00015755558,0.000010214248,0.0004297599,0.000006523645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008864216,0.000009266976,0.007877813,0.000010714217,0.000009297706,1.927965e-7,0.0038625184,5.923432e-8,0.0000012753311,0.98363477,0.00006098243,0.004524227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012135643,0.00016819476,0.02942516,0.00067261036,0.000041994197,0.000011212686,0.006522016,0.0000035621445,0.0000057173256,0.7526736,0.20908144,0.00018089193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057190674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048170555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23096114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021647822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009079391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96919787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136743244","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review in Administrative Law: A Comparative Study of Rights Consciousness with Special Reference to Sri Lanka","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UCL Discovery (University College London)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Political science; Human rights; Judicial review; Law; Jurisprudence; Fundamental rights; Administrative law; Rule of law; Legitimacy; Politics","score_opus":0.037251507118399904,"score_gpt":0.31182237833005505,"score_spread":0.27457087121165513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136743244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65649223,0.000107503656,3.0883425e-7,0.000060281352,0.00016981112,0.0019081142,0.00067836256,0.000022505765,0.34056088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95914644,0.0002327456,0.000019207719,0.000071231356,0.00020535881,0.0000094345805,0.0003183299,0.000011847154,0.039985422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970328,0.0006344033,0.00037850742,0.0006870576,0.0008588446,0.00040835203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986673,0.00015400705,0.00039041077,0.00032434703,0.0002674805,0.00019645125],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023121729,0.00038942497,0.0011727386,0.00039538974,0.00090121746,0.000059018585,0.0007275645,0.00022644829,0.0011689175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000089882515,0.00037588892,0.000117107855,0.0010664916,0.00040005706,0.0007441231,0.00004248173,0.00044588593,0.00009360107],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008231727,0.0024818527,0.00022427824,0.00039924652,0.00030130942,0.0012288125,0.37961262,0.000008420712,0.0000029293187,0.59741056,0.010031011,0.00006726165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006547485,0.0035322476,0.014201762,0.0070998766,0.00092870666,0.0000038617836,0.7811839,0.000001721023,0.00004787263,0.0042396453,0.18019368,0.002019253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016534742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9127905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89625573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003951723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012180384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166515364","doi":"10.26180/14585700.v1","title":"Human rights and institutional dialogue : lessons for Australia from Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; Human rights; Political science; Public administration; Media studies; Genealogy; Law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.12521639897878478,"score_gpt":0.35598680525582893,"score_spread":0.23077040627704415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166515364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59756917,0.0003017624,1.1660199e-7,0.0005438858,0.00074987795,0.00094573654,0.39211452,0.000042018393,0.0077329255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5382041,0.0000011239744,0.0000066059843,0.00005575089,0.00046002422,0.00010507015,0.44813916,0.0000072561597,0.0130209625],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908453,0.00009465253,0.0001417575,0.0002542515,0.0002421656,0.0001826411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928445,0.000244666,0.00011291796,0.000103426144,0.00015936926,0.000095193194],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000058035617,0.00014522034,0.0001984864,0.000046164572,0.0021622954,0.00022342341,0.00017508956,0.00019450673,0.023262568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015908651,0.000106121784,0.000046890647,0.00007961653,0.0000713964,0.00006442972,0.00001915726,0.0001849752,0.000009233704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039152317,0.000022157308,0.000020377855,0.00022262991,0.00014972583,0.000040185714,0.014852934,0.000002087877,0.0000044297494,0.39835382,0.58616054,0.00013197897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078533613,0.000006545954,0.024417164,0.0010691037,0.0000681524,3.9145783e-7,0.0006333159,0.0000060254633,0.00002629899,0.017958956,0.95475,0.00027871146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93077964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99893296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38039485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008109388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005976251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167819846","doi":"","title":"Canada and the United Nations Human Rights Council: Dissent and Division","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; General assembly; Fundamental rights; Law; Public administration; Politics; Linguistic rights; Right to property; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.027029424025363753,"score_gpt":0.27499275946811574,"score_spread":0.24796333544275198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167819846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7544608,0.000032895812,0.000004581951,0.006732421,0.00004285942,0.00013087399,0.0000016226624,0.000023890641,0.23857005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767662,0.000020014882,0.0000104580095,0.00042241983,0.00004650476,9.981193e-7,0.0000020869315,0.0000012239262,0.02273009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993089,0.00006396252,0.000074542506,0.00009187141,0.00034904038,0.00011168186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996242,0.00012962123,0.000021050537,0.00006843597,0.00008094981,0.000075748074],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002820741,0.000048583093,0.000060904324,0.000060747418,0.0023250524,0.00009897735,0.00007316648,0.000021262294,0.00013891817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027074626,0.00002569497,0.000009237387,0.00020399131,0.00029267478,0.00006189073,0.000010158386,0.000045889832,0.0000013251187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014804655,0.000007356356,0.00008096412,4.800547e-7,0.0000023645296,0.0000011158141,0.0034109761,2.731279e-7,0.0000024636902,0.98811096,0.008320711,0.000060873434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053630315,0.000021738886,0.047554616,0.000012137471,0.000012729947,5.0701163e-7,0.0008475496,0.000055887198,0.000011689948,0.14125116,0.8095764,0.00011928106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9543158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84685975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008225365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015279677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173979244","doi":"10.17803/2311-5998.2021.80.4.164-176","title":"Institute for the defense of human rights (ombudsman) in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Commission; Political science; International human rights law; Law; Public administration; Institution; Autonomy; State (computer science); Fundamental rights; Variety (cybernetics); Consolidation (business); Business","score_opus":0.017290988635121397,"score_gpt":0.23896451373249405,"score_spread":0.22167352509737265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173979244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96455514,0.00009826141,0.00012224793,0.0006928055,0.00037628284,0.00034526395,0.000224793,0.000017153989,0.033568062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99212265,0.00004247522,0.00021275568,0.00007820813,0.00003799238,7.388796e-7,0.000021373087,0.000008113801,0.0074757156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863577,0.00014851359,0.0002423349,0.00024598849,0.00038738764,0.00034003265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988874,0.00022957237,0.00017238963,0.0003118512,0.00028199717,0.00011678054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029615924,0.00012929972,0.00029824395,0.00005911039,0.00092995906,0.000021085201,0.0004882906,0.00006181994,0.00013500334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018677789,0.000117278905,0.00009973257,0.00028003566,0.0008376874,0.00024282106,0.00008649681,0.00014127072,0.000001611597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005914525,0.00007918764,0.0011695347,0.000044378805,0.00006813757,0.00014722919,0.00833372,0.0001363354,0.000062525214,0.98757553,0.0021933175,0.0001309413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018971318,0.00007351212,0.003219949,0.000096394564,0.00011097862,0.0000011886351,0.008895932,0.000075581745,0.0025851342,0.048428133,0.93427414,0.00034190604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.947052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99938667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9391474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042652249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017390776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7152587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174334786","doi":"10.1177/03128962211022568","title":"Ethics in financial planning: Analysis of ombudsman decisions using codes of ethics and fiduciary duty standards","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Management","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Due diligence; Duty; Accounting; Business; Conflict of interest; Misconduct; Accounting management; Complaint; Finance; Public relations; Actuarial science; Law; Political science; Accounting information system","score_opus":0.18898214666448035,"score_gpt":0.45049666701883306,"score_spread":0.26151452035435274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174334786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958043,0.00023393435,0.00074073207,0.0014719012,0.00019870557,0.00007797771,0.00003083803,0.0000030275653,0.0014385768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954485,0.0005405178,0.003334303,0.00007791233,0.000059094677,2.835764e-7,0.0000021761757,0.0000053707968,0.0005317902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971738,0.000629011,0.0007176244,0.00015109502,0.0011134195,0.00021503432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981531,0.00051320746,0.00050056993,0.00015267156,0.00056939916,0.00011104745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005773671,0.00010240955,0.00047535935,0.0006014836,0.00027282225,0.000048809732,0.0002379106,0.00018095212,0.00017030037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082819164,0.00009540665,0.00018243483,0.00086630293,0.00034573398,0.00015982863,0.000074026226,0.00073426496,2.1119514e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054464256,0.0012666362,0.18567416,0.00084202515,0.004945373,0.0033008873,0.3540468,0.0284521,0.00048377246,0.40409195,0.005959314,0.010392334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002469766,0.00034356106,0.8376222,0.0028641196,0.00410503,0.000014857739,0.07482648,0.00021026388,0.0014313296,0.043123145,0.032397706,0.00059150613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025897293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047514634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6519481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119584154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006171682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.389057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185224195","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3727613","title":"The Constitutional Status of the Administrative State","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Administrative law; Political science; Constitutional law; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Computer science; Economics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.015165258259826037,"score_gpt":0.2986405043234348,"score_spread":0.28347524606360874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185224195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8890185,0.0013029622,0.000114565446,0.0019018626,0.00078926457,0.00024955132,0.0000070820147,0.000010831851,0.10660543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743117,0.001974412,0.0000039085644,0.000036199017,0.00011842054,9.314165e-7,2.7741953e-7,0.0000026685193,0.023551477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978289,0.00020628244,0.0001622064,0.00007355908,0.00039797998,0.0013310645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943244,0.00012743798,0.00016569723,0.000104435356,0.00010791695,0.00006209172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012909598,0.000058636448,0.0000757637,0.000017193686,0.0011540758,0.00006620862,0.00034005436,0.000027164282,0.00013855766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005680845,0.000029173192,0.00008794508,0.000091404436,0.0011605851,0.00010626769,0.00001903496,0.00074548495,0.000048529182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018611652,0.000013115749,0.0033851895,5.584708e-7,0.000039667157,2.0581497e-7,0.0019643593,0.0000042726024,0.000018773548,0.9933584,0.0000899535,0.001106943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029737822,0.000109569126,0.004015333,0.000010127209,0.000009874498,0.000012548085,0.01053436,0.000002838346,0.000070707574,0.86000204,0.12487001,0.000065227185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001864454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020900788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13335632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005047269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0112630455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192797517","doi":"","title":"Ethics in financial planning: Analysis of ombudsman decisions using codes of ethics and fiduciary duty standards","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Due diligence; Duty; Accounting; Business; Misconduct; Complaint; Accounting management; Conflict of interest; Ethical code; Public relations; Finance; Actuarial science; Political science; Law; Accounting information system","score_opus":0.2701194800982885,"score_gpt":0.4584642894339271,"score_spread":0.18834480933563857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192797517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.870245,0.0014046645,0.000027033593,0.00034436336,0.000092806804,0.0001627721,0.12254806,0.000026216001,0.005149092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996578,0.00004573676,0.00030537957,0.000107467604,0.000054967666,0.0000028969519,0.0027948157,0.000006852981,0.000103890314],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980993,0.00046524336,0.000311347,0.00021663329,0.0007169293,0.00019049601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996879,0.0020322425,0.00016173688,0.00017537655,0.00067560433,0.0000760744],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011152803,0.00008879752,0.0003588098,0.00025346866,0.00041259476,0.000040206985,0.0001636336,0.00035863998,0.012940942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015106301,0.00008855456,0.000110365254,0.0009523368,0.00010190144,0.00010800291,0.00010040534,0.00064458116,0.0000021901064],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016998756,0.00069114583,0.05220326,0.0012332924,0.00087498367,0.0005084915,0.82819104,0.0051498762,0.0005601428,0.06398228,0.042970147,0.003465374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018068929,0.00017744083,0.74167484,0.015406859,0.0011159783,0.000004379074,0.029325522,0.003595539,0.0043499884,0.028022973,0.17314778,0.0013717848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004237599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033494443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7988655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007101128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002090144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196990703","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-32103-5_7","title":"The Role and Purpose of Ombudsmen in a Global Media World","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CBC (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Journalism; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Accountability; Political science; Function (biology); Variety (cybernetics); Position (finance); Social media; Dual function; News media; Business; Engineering; Law; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.016092312263875603,"score_gpt":0.26400516863909895,"score_spread":0.24791285637522334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196990703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064500584,0.0028701471,3.451777e-7,0.00043399545,0.0001791329,0.00016417475,0.00001113064,0.000016239861,0.99567986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031056592,0.0010471913,0.000041582705,0.00006898875,0.00022100587,0.0000029173964,0.0000046916753,0.000008587847,0.96754843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901533,0.00004061326,0.00021802407,0.00019559271,0.0003404527,0.0001900054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994455,0.00016421854,0.000087502616,0.00016498718,0.000053690248,0.00008409894],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003146628,0.000122012905,0.00023519249,0.000049370097,0.000189645,0.00008043578,0.00022747634,0.0001366008,0.0015993043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020206566,0.000081879174,0.000065193795,0.000046996356,0.00055421086,0.000046190256,0.000085542306,0.00014840305,0.000026794929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044608955,0.0000059192926,0.00019820132,0.0000036580393,0.000012691123,0.000009276412,0.0017676719,1.7806137e-8,2.4403263e-7,0.9841492,0.00064444274,0.013204224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086026455,0.0000053360836,0.00044646836,0.000043340584,0.000009385888,2.505608e-7,0.00061011297,5.8078825e-7,0.0000017956611,0.41761762,0.5810971,0.00008197009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010731303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5130242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5804527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008085114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021559792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199428718","doi":"10.31178/aubd.2020.01","title":"Evoluția ideologiei în dreptul persoanelor din Quebec","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analele Universitării din București Drept","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Ideology; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Human rights; Root (linguistics); Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03925576624538638,"score_gpt":0.25488929468088156,"score_spread":0.2156335284354952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199428718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6862802,0.0004956669,0.00050294946,0.02537487,0.0006339374,0.00068601663,0.000041386684,0.0009939909,0.284991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9228075,0.00014181758,0.00027233546,0.0012900109,0.00072520843,0.0000024536173,0.000031141564,0.000027638658,0.07470189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972766,0.00027983397,0.00027676855,0.0007233684,0.0006692524,0.000774154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847573,0.00015305307,0.0001804284,0.00037189334,0.00018332955,0.000635555],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029201803,0.000302407,0.00040109927,0.00018391924,0.0012929753,0.00016270278,0.0009913662,0.00025655213,0.0061719483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000167675,0.00031082513,0.00031159772,0.00069946167,0.00081252557,0.00071040675,0.00019550881,0.0003870391,0.0012581561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015366866,0.00020917079,0.013520747,0.000049634473,0.0002888772,0.00068395643,0.1417643,0.00006838137,0.0003940422,0.5132507,0.3256047,0.004011806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001199442,0.00021359173,0.006274827,0.000037339,0.00017651024,0.0000030496105,0.07123357,0.00026793053,0.00025954004,0.0026784572,0.9167456,0.0009101441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018405935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059111547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59114087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043491292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004563158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199800736","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192896919.003.0007","title":"Scope of Judicial Review of Administrative Action","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Scope (computer science); Administrative law; Statutory law; Political science; Legitimacy; Jurisprudence; Law; Autonomy; Action (physics); Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.208192619605145,"score_gpt":0.42057387411500746,"score_spread":0.21238125450986245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199800736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000138267515,0.0125243375,0.0000038546814,0.00022368375,0.00024760666,0.00022683335,0.000014643483,0.000012199896,0.986733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012789639,0.091279745,0.00007693685,0.00015825918,0.00034267546,0.0000014382057,0.000019879591,0.000009035591,0.90683305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998987,0.000043444565,0.00033373118,0.00015528327,0.00039613352,0.000084366155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991301,0.000048728758,0.00035012123,0.00014068371,0.00028118826,0.000049193604],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024123852,0.00010473565,0.0004306823,0.000044511395,0.00008507746,0.000007636758,0.00013102917,0.00016224307,0.030034529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032990738,0.00008939573,0.00018065386,0.000026076681,0.00036453645,0.000052640666,0.000020476373,0.00012222373,0.000054294527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003241878,0.000011613255,2.8169913e-7,0.0010161691,0.00003087643,0.0000028752117,0.00038098934,1.7043478e-9,0.000005230807,0.9870359,0.008658086,0.0028547868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006493064,0.000084801235,0.000011011187,0.011318474,0.00011071148,3.8969955e-7,0.00020532175,1.9117623e-8,0.0004955847,0.032536253,0.9550186,0.0001539004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002232617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066390713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9544996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039907743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006989851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97085214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200251861","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192896919.003.0001","title":"A Values-based Approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realisation; Legitimacy; Autonomy; Subject (documents); Value (mathematics); Political science; Administrative law; Judicial review; Comparative law; Law and economics; Action (physics); Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.057952509891348966,"score_gpt":0.289821604916783,"score_spread":0.231869095025434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200251861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000048582488,0.0002885,0.00027049094,0.00022626441,0.00026672237,0.0001848503,0.000005155061,0.00015057603,0.99860257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007881879,0.00005006345,0.0011714052,0.0005000009,0.00079097756,0.000003893675,0.00005021631,0.000028554809,0.9966167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875563,0.000037246093,0.00015281625,0.0003390863,0.00049395656,0.00022126612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938494,0.000049060094,0.00006863461,0.00027013608,0.00009323302,0.0001340107],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023744439,0.00017567999,0.0002561754,0.00008348598,0.00040006245,0.00012716332,0.00025649104,0.00033840316,0.026031978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008998858,0.00014978052,0.00021841236,0.000018960014,0.00032688642,0.000039754865,0.000027510614,0.00022976373,0.00072493183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013419431,0.000014947574,6.777287e-7,0.000014778827,0.000018739896,0.000013843734,0.000695819,7.5705896e-7,1.4993924e-7,0.98250973,0.016087124,0.0006421146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009302489,0.00001021163,0.0000019050699,0.00003806015,0.00002906822,2.3957637e-7,0.00013148773,0.000012081743,0.000002484794,0.099277526,0.9001747,0.00022923212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016459022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014462507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88408756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009654292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005209082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97485834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201932254","doi":"","title":"The Standard of Review and The Duty to Consult and Accommodate Indigenous Peoples: What is the Impact of Vavilov?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Standard of review; Duty; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Scope (computer science); Indigenous; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Judicial review; Constitution; Correctness; Treaty; Administrative law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.018010284166518366,"score_gpt":0.3365829973017675,"score_spread":0.31857271313524915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201932254","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021435535,0.93100154,3.989619e-7,0.038005367,0.000052501,0.0014626562,0.00002232713,0.00000390013,0.008015741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10542856,0.8881319,0.0000064985143,0.005574932,0.000022102317,0.000023044982,0.0000022411423,0.0000070925166,0.0008036142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814564,0.00076613284,0.00041434437,0.00018183464,0.0002685828,0.00022347966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969933,0.0019000939,0.00023939947,0.00054474594,0.00023233809,0.00009014574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018579707,0.00013561241,0.00065490446,0.0000066689295,0.0007835905,0.00016206635,0.00039384986,0.00003411347,0.00036596018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004404884,0.00005249007,0.00018646974,0.0002568629,0.0011095423,0.0001706822,0.00012974336,0.00011214337,0.000012880976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050162882,0.000049219623,0.00036547182,0.00607924,0.00038025313,0.0000023535447,0.07297616,8.478381e-8,0.0000027067595,0.8672534,0.014010895,0.03883002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042010134,0.00009398175,0.00063439016,0.013103154,0.0006736086,0.00001290652,0.0018957934,2.3703849e-7,0.000026066245,0.005819525,0.97713935,0.00018089023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010910181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08583087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96312845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002280097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028884393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208620871","doi":"10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-2-228-242","title":"Nullity of Administrative Acts: Grounds, Legal Regime, Discretion","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Siberian Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Discretion; Doctrine; Administrative discretion; Political science; Law; Legal doctrine; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07261212426322339,"score_gpt":0.3809842967830292,"score_spread":0.3083721725198058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208620871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030537057,0.036951397,0.00006465404,0.006551032,0.00052308297,0.0005425675,0.00003388543,0.00006396206,0.95221573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9270249,0.037337735,0.0007566584,0.0021538674,0.0005518521,0.000027699847,0.00007856322,0.000020080972,0.03204866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846435,0.00046982756,0.00032717836,0.00023362816,0.00030240635,0.0002026074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991939,0.000054333712,0.00017925556,0.0002891941,0.00016390151,0.0001193973],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005777319,0.000105288695,0.0003481222,0.0000095927335,0.00028757908,0.00006915659,0.00018027064,0.00006288405,0.0034287034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009055954,0.00008922041,0.00015402917,0.0002091585,0.00046601892,0.00031026974,0.000021559139,0.00010411706,0.00009696548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044900453,0.000050999563,0.000005086426,0.0005184662,0.000014233056,0.000015029154,0.0005959688,7.704645e-9,0.000021675747,0.99628973,0.0012090274,0.0012753137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009093026,0.000030272096,0.00017805542,0.0013506401,0.000049654755,0.0000028848192,0.00024271438,1.0181079e-7,0.0002873997,0.013107592,0.98454106,0.0001186669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054684764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010976689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98333204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000557989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034364898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W411693019","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2759","title":"An Evaluation Model for Non-Governmental Organizations Engaged in Advocacy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Legitimacy; Civil liberties; Human rights; Compliance (psychology); Political science; Independence (probability theory); Civil society; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.03610327948513119,"score_gpt":0.3281239897375741,"score_spread":0.2920207102524429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W411693019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26605415,0.000025613053,0.06478004,0.00089703815,0.0006367209,0.0008407689,0.0000120229915,0.000061245824,0.66669244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960124,0.000011080646,0.0027059948,0.00018844983,0.00053129793,0.000011061364,0.00001242852,0.000017022776,0.00051027397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982537,0.00057338097,0.00021876661,0.0001499324,0.0005476635,0.0002565394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928874,0.00010906103,0.000112138645,0.000114624934,0.00021368901,0.00016173389],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003644471,0.00008466389,0.00011412506,0.00005010008,0.0024253596,0.00020069405,0.00023770228,0.0000754221,0.00036314002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002230245,0.000079323545,0.00004310265,0.00009955042,0.000085660766,0.0005264472,0.00001086155,0.00030707015,0.000020722548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000165208,0.0001884754,0.0005217084,0.0000035799778,0.000008530698,7.47319e-7,0.025487205,0.0030005104,0.00050174433,0.96845055,0.0003345263,0.0014859296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022201627,0.00012911225,0.001446372,0.000034606346,0.000051209645,0.0000044752474,0.007835309,0.5221839,0.00024578618,0.464064,0.0015273954,0.00025766355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003062533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3014417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72995824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041413025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002588803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205466114","doi":"10.1007/s40803-021-00165-3","title":"The Bidirectional Relationship Between Academic Freedom and Rule of Law: Hungary, Poland and Russia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hague Journal on the Rule of Law","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Rule of law; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Academic freedom; International law; Power (physics); Public international law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Higher education; Mathematics","score_opus":0.058189950998683154,"score_gpt":0.31219585378110115,"score_spread":0.25400590278241797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205466114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9409671,0.0010156224,0.0000024283509,0.007455342,0.00027582436,0.000101193305,0.000021841075,0.000008790636,0.050151866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972434,0.00014214228,0.000029048166,0.00011384553,0.00040764906,0.000002352065,0.0000010869766,0.000006699536,0.0020537945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986192,0.0004260697,0.00025499103,0.000084729436,0.00046594438,0.00014905716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984404,0.0010918613,0.00026108575,0.0000903139,0.000035176123,0.000081169994],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017772286,0.0000673424,0.00013492072,0.00004437532,0.003330114,0.00006037523,0.00023400101,0.000054360433,0.000128391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059103273,0.000039548304,0.00005737085,0.00007089169,0.0007641275,0.00011623396,0.000060197384,0.00061764434,0.000003293437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025651494,0.000013922472,0.021770822,0.0000031968937,0.000025637652,0.0000011753611,0.0034866857,0.0000045425145,0.00003777577,0.9736645,0.00083608,0.00012995917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047226652,0.0001448226,0.32052872,0.000045038483,0.000059483864,0.000027182574,0.0009859682,0.000012568364,0.00011687922,0.5060203,0.17146981,0.00011692084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005299344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003497519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4676442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041741714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000664512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229971886","doi":"10.1163/9789047415404_009","title":"A First Nations Ombudsman: Some Considerations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0444094956900903,"score_gpt":0.2860372515891291,"score_spread":0.24162775589903884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229971886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003816874,0.00039333824,0.000013331273,0.008813057,0.00046289398,0.000405472,0.000033221044,0.00028649502,0.9895884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062035173,0.0009760285,0.00059624424,0.00093944184,0.0025164424,0.000014684448,0.000026216123,0.000035708574,0.9886917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985828,0.00002069259,0.00030876487,0.0003330318,0.00046979383,0.00028491527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998845,0.00039980566,0.00012558443,0.0002783019,0.00016341741,0.00018788777],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016653795,0.00023110378,0.000258938,0.0003190195,0.002942078,0.000245026,0.00019390295,0.00038306223,0.06995109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007287156,0.00022000154,0.0001871921,0.00002583194,0.0005279082,0.00030152887,0.00003945484,0.00026969385,0.005437691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.7238228e-7,0.000015220778,6.7968176e-7,0.0000062692843,0.0000306599,0.0000079179545,0.0021615876,0.0000028387308,5.2515443e-8,0.9502753,0.047398318,0.000100704514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070908995,0.0000072761927,0.0000044456983,0.00003178977,0.000025735222,9.75969e-7,0.00005195479,0.0000024490912,4.3915637e-7,0.39394253,0.6056717,0.00018979232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031408976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38691434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5582734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021226521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048032924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235109339","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198841159.003.0015","title":"Implementation of the Principles of Good Governance on the National Level outside the EU","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Good governance; Principle of legality; Political science; Accountability; Rule of law; Corporate governance; Charter; Transparency (behavior); Public administration; Legislation; Law; Human rights; Constitution; Soft law; Ultra vires; International law; Politics; Doctrine; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.1446818144970595,"score_gpt":0.3395601030143803,"score_spread":0.19487828851732078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235109339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013583396,0.000023075809,0.0000022212807,0.006371058,0.0002295691,0.0005153817,0.0001544965,0.000006816792,0.991339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37027526,0.00004124535,0.000009051483,0.0004903534,0.00014920477,0.0000029994305,0.0000024753188,0.000007434278,0.629022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983973,0.0000604503,0.00026703565,0.00013686693,0.0010306532,0.00010769175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873686,0.00033704413,0.000525919,0.00022017285,0.00016669757,0.000013307109],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060690247,0.000111228175,0.00013433554,0.000015737167,0.00031454477,0.000024779689,0.0006173219,0.000081739556,0.0038063065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028582552,0.0000456839,0.00015157208,0.000021724234,0.00039801246,0.000046866542,0.000072621115,0.0001514588,0.00007463994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023643206,0.0000060101847,0.00007322998,0.000005771032,0.000031309126,2.612278e-8,0.002360781,0.0000023149037,0.000005087591,0.9930051,0.004252227,0.0002557894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014389769,0.00002902824,0.025483003,0.000076015735,0.000027728438,1.2566262e-7,0.0011394585,0.0000025076488,0.0003843027,0.10749039,0.86511004,0.00011349962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096531457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032144923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8855147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000946411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004487725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99710435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242155877","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198841159.001.0001","title":"Good Governance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Good governance; Cornerstone; Corporate governance; Rule of law; Accountability; Multi-level governance; Political science; Project governance; Democracy; Public administration; Transparency (behavior); Context (archaeology); Principal (computer security); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Management; Geography","score_opus":0.0173596176300947,"score_gpt":0.2680484014684234,"score_spread":0.2506887838383287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242155877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007261686,0.00024264585,0.0000026267635,0.00030104877,0.00093099446,0.00018598701,0.00001040759,0.00009769634,0.99822134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00031009028,0.00024806714,0.000034033474,0.0003172894,0.0012355702,0.0000015154544,0.000008961184,0.000016906879,0.9978276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990354,0.000023861883,0.00010470003,0.00021125119,0.00041279863,0.00021196074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953353,0.000049932638,0.00009502307,0.00021502297,0.00003721679,0.0000692987],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013589917,0.00011419148,0.00017997537,0.000017867855,0.0001924575,0.00007122046,0.00035540634,0.00026441042,0.018413449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007440432,0.00009498081,0.00009933514,0.000017778937,0.00016124075,0.000078898025,0.000031291896,0.00018442664,0.014402666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.7261722e-7,0.0000029371865,0.0000024547621,0.000005344299,0.0000049964247,0.0000015364361,0.0004961625,1.6186004e-8,2.9764958e-8,0.59573686,0.40336004,0.0003892686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054474174,0.000009491215,0.000042313717,0.000033318964,0.0000081752405,8.159866e-8,0.000027045868,1.9951102e-7,5.308251e-7,0.07717222,0.92250144,0.00015068751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026165872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008538809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51914144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002504181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008421893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9863647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254250651","doi":"10.7202/1078558ar","title":"La Cour européenne des droits de l’homme et le Tribunal des droits de la personne : la réception de la jurisprudence de la Cour par le Tribunal","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015156474435626658,"score_gpt":0.29776717445194545,"score_spread":0.28261070001631877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254250651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83944637,0.0016247501,0.006166724,0.0034182153,0.00035536668,0.00019464137,0.00024206015,0.00015452568,0.14839737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719426,0.0028806988,0.0038250461,0.00059965486,0.0014006358,0.00005948017,0.00010421831,0.00010206626,0.019085603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991784,0.0047291946,0.00068252644,0.00078310195,0.000784208,0.0012369658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950651,0.0030126984,0.00040358878,0.00031898578,0.00049390894,0.0007057275],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060828878,0.00050025934,0.0005615765,0.00025445962,0.0010056713,0.0010228915,0.001059998,0.0008161569,0.00084803236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014878821,0.0006379104,0.0005092974,0.00048208924,0.0026215843,0.00080524385,0.00015703011,0.0013575138,0.00013381105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016200794,0.0014615749,0.012156186,0.0001787516,0.0002641315,0.0021899391,0.02829549,0.00062155025,0.0052084858,0.94434226,0.0017669699,0.0033526318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032251235,0.0001790793,0.11779614,0.0015218827,0.00030679832,0.0056238584,0.005307439,0.006625345,0.002821708,0.5917518,0.26372176,0.001119032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010527985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013766071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35259044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025170364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056719906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256734129","doi":"10.22145/flr.37.3.1","title":"A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia: The UK or Canada as a Model?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Project commissioning; Political science; Publishing; Law","score_opus":0.0750247104430044,"score_gpt":0.36557921807687466,"score_spread":0.29055450763387025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256734129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12445675,0.03732121,0.00007000533,0.14431106,0.0014143302,0.011824222,0.00039599548,0.00018386112,0.6800226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95786726,0.00071040954,0.00015876343,0.008776465,0.00020844798,0.00005234914,0.000007437663,0.000004942056,0.032213897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989609,0.00007537199,0.00026531125,0.00015389181,0.00027746064,0.00026704455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994775,0.000054344877,0.00010871778,0.0001777023,0.00008798138,0.000093768766],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002781242,0.00010923906,0.00028957886,0.000006502033,0.00076918944,0.000054350952,0.00028273222,0.00003986097,0.0013529111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020050189,0.000055919325,0.00011852773,0.00006215662,0.00013265229,0.00007229389,0.000007716899,0.000065469394,0.000017724724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000149377565,0.000016670925,0.0000016090552,0.00013854788,0.000009266869,0.0000035835365,0.0003537428,3.3234343e-7,0.0000013245041,0.8853303,0.113947056,0.00018261334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001380453,0.00008927486,0.00003282384,0.0005613354,0.000041996947,0.0000018563073,0.000017378421,0.000012374293,0.000023811768,0.040140826,0.9588206,0.0001196685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47618905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9679613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8451895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063338004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035338657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293703967","doi":"10.12818/p.0304-2340.2021v79p287","title":"DA EXPANSÃO AO BACKLASH? A CORTE EUROPEIA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS E A TRANSFORMAÇÃO DA EUROPA - DOI: 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2021v79p287","year":2021,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFMG","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health","funders":"Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Humanities; European union; Political science; Philosophy; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.06717760405087064,"score_gpt":0.33362352154969394,"score_spread":0.2664459174988233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293703967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7167706,0.01896742,0.0012533504,0.0053962343,0.0036347227,0.004569816,0.0030181082,0.0016543122,0.24473545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7386304,0.004131081,0.00040319466,0.002345651,0.0032566292,0.00018437525,0.001202759,0.0005360605,0.24930982],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98372495,0.0035743073,0.0027556163,0.0030900135,0.0027097284,0.0041453685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925464,0.0006510797,0.0010321306,0.0025672612,0.0008926367,0.0023105151],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002214303,0.0020762389,0.002627627,0.00050091423,0.0033887266,0.0062557925,0.003193803,0.0010615834,0.019521179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006585845,0.0021205791,0.0017767875,0.0023904862,0.0015927937,0.0015178409,0.00066412607,0.0023593702,0.006720242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015255747,0.006908628,0.009095221,0.008631973,0.00414992,0.025385361,0.18267445,0.00019821072,0.054689392,0.2829133,0.3735549,0.05027308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002837658,0.00038861987,0.0060782647,0.0015682842,0.0011344816,0.00018162648,0.0058306623,0.00044732398,0.0018314772,0.0006187042,0.9761882,0.0028946858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077857694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094764633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60263336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011870846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027104898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300089644","doi":"10.1080/02697459.2022.2126164","title":"Human rights and the city: A case of Ontario, Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Practice and Research","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Virtue; Face (sociological concept); Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Rights of Nature; Law; Environmental ethics; Public administration; Right to property; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.11299406335429767,"score_gpt":0.434670105453925,"score_spread":0.3216760420996273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300089644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8894752,0.00034454645,1.9069574e-7,0.0032063548,0.000058729893,0.00016951964,0.0000031228635,0.0000048898683,0.106737405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750035,0.0000042526017,0.000018461515,0.00009285497,0.000060709925,0.000013406836,0.0000011006957,0.0000026241803,0.024803089],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978923,0.0010223438,0.00010110381,0.00013666603,0.0006179337,0.00022960466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981876,0.0014697637,0.000056832734,0.00010393365,0.000098082266,0.00008380456],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042963536,0.00004206301,0.00009438811,0.0000645124,0.006480448,0.00009756458,0.00013358331,0.000020033782,0.0005025766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017038158,0.000027884853,0.00001101136,0.00013153622,0.0006081011,0.000132657,0.00016321916,0.0006060212,4.3979907e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033497464,0.00010457614,0.0031795464,0.000029243958,0.000100017016,0.004915199,0.5464584,0.0000075355515,0.0000089511195,0.40760916,0.03686954,0.00038280376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005073671,0.000067722765,0.00084159017,0.00000908435,0.000018492015,0.00023566518,0.0393017,0.000007962736,0.000004707809,0.008740228,0.95020545,0.000060045608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9133359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018164849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009649381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99481297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309495784","doi":"10.32920/21596715","title":"Equity in education: signed language and the courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Equity (law); Political science; Sign language; Special education; Right to education; Linguistics; Law; Sociology; Pedagogy; Human rights","score_opus":0.03551462326332959,"score_gpt":0.3943018442702429,"score_spread":0.3587872210069133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309495784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21813145,0.0011099852,0.000004177573,0.005319545,0.00082388375,0.0004830243,0.0000032213168,0.000042782158,0.77408195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9226209,0.00016079945,0.00006618566,0.0006163659,0.000345802,0.00007473936,0.000010129503,0.000004912422,0.076100156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989703,0.0003278146,0.00011511927,0.00018973585,0.0002573975,0.00013958644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956274,0.0001220705,0.000056362613,0.00019539316,0.000017877683,0.00004555098],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011626808,0.00007243988,0.00013473007,0.000049156955,0.00039241163,0.00015632692,0.00034421575,0.00007225583,0.0076152706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040455623,0.00004782036,0.00003891048,0.000045680372,0.00033655358,0.00003420583,0.00065001694,0.00029825643,0.000013760478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007787502,0.000037113765,0.00011568685,0.000014038469,0.000004596901,0.0000019671372,0.10512203,0.0000014913702,2.7171228e-7,0.8871407,0.0040075057,0.0035468456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051389425,0.000008592994,0.0034887996,0.000030503132,0.000020487529,3.872791e-7,0.09036902,0.000015227078,0.0000028360225,0.78505844,0.12025265,0.00023915044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016212158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03745635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70448947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013568337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070406095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309505006","doi":"10.32920/21596715.v1","title":"Equity in education: signed language and the courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Equity (law); Political science; Special education; Linguistics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03551462326332959,"score_gpt":0.3943018442702429,"score_spread":0.3587872210069133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309505006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21813145,0.0011099852,0.000004177573,0.005319545,0.00082388375,0.0004830243,0.0000032213168,0.000042782158,0.77408195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9226209,0.00016079945,0.00006618566,0.0006163659,0.000345802,0.00007473936,0.000010129503,0.000004912422,0.076100156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989703,0.0003278146,0.00011511927,0.00018973585,0.0002573975,0.00013958644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956274,0.0001220705,0.000056362613,0.00019539316,0.000017877683,0.00004555098],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011626808,0.00007243988,0.00013473007,0.000049156955,0.00039241163,0.00015632692,0.00034421575,0.00007225583,0.0076152706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040455623,0.00004782036,0.00003891048,0.000045680372,0.00033655358,0.00003420583,0.00065001694,0.00029825643,0.000013760478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007787502,0.000037113765,0.00011568685,0.000014038469,0.000004596901,0.0000019671372,0.10512203,0.0000014913702,2.7171228e-7,0.8871407,0.0040075057,0.0035468456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051389425,0.000008592994,0.0034887996,0.000030503132,0.000020487529,3.872791e-7,0.09036902,0.000015227078,0.0000028360225,0.78505844,0.12025265,0.00023915044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016212158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03745635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70448947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013568337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070406095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318486529","doi":"10.32920/21977006","title":"The Impact of Ombudsman Investigations on Public Administration: A Case Study and an Evaluation Guide","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Administration (probate law); Public administration; Service (business); Public service; Political science; Public relations; Business; Law; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.30364615167799286,"score_gpt":0.5011781117921159,"score_spread":0.19753196011412305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318486529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97688943,0.00001811316,0.0000060977486,0.0018251482,0.00025147383,0.0016795245,0.000017202205,0.000106906235,0.019206112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955051,0.000019786086,0.00005409156,0.000015510812,0.00029433402,0.00012887278,0.000038009493,0.000013604445,0.0039307065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972837,0.0009998011,0.00041299753,0.00037589678,0.0007194293,0.00020815856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982174,0.0003112139,0.0002572735,0.00053799833,0.00045423696,0.00022188116],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037097714,0.00016566957,0.00018732862,0.00015368886,0.0014721528,0.0006664412,0.000301788,0.00014083603,0.00019565117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048282585,0.000105896936,0.00008948722,0.00018830613,0.00046663597,0.00018469391,0.00012117581,0.00024319634,0.000015096436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000493724,0.0022445924,0.043126795,0.00005640834,0.00082766154,0.00033931236,0.250889,0.00042739447,0.000008711662,0.66090876,0.021273151,0.019848851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017874244,0.0044797,0.13988045,0.0001306995,0.0005494567,0.000056169254,0.29090604,0.012781875,0.000026608459,0.54526687,0.0029326521,0.0012020702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020213023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38867193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3684589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020115207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022996422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318486549","doi":"10.32920/21977006.v1","title":"The Impact of Ombudsman Investigations on Public Administration: A Case Study and an Evaluation Guide","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Administration (probate law); Public administration; Service (business); Political science; Public service; Public relations; Business; Law; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.30364615167799286,"score_gpt":0.5011781117921159,"score_spread":0.19753196011412305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318486549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97688943,0.00001811316,0.0000060977486,0.0018251482,0.00025147383,0.0016795245,0.000017202205,0.000106906235,0.019206112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955051,0.000019786086,0.00005409156,0.000015510812,0.00029433402,0.00012887278,0.000038009493,0.000013604445,0.0039307065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972837,0.0009998011,0.00041299753,0.00037589678,0.0007194293,0.00020815856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982174,0.0003112139,0.0002572735,0.00053799833,0.00045423696,0.00022188116],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037097714,0.00016566957,0.00018732862,0.00015368886,0.0014721528,0.0006664412,0.000301788,0.00014083603,0.00019565117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048282585,0.000105896936,0.00008948722,0.00018830613,0.00046663597,0.00018469391,0.00012117581,0.00024319634,0.000015096436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000493724,0.0022445924,0.043126795,0.00005640834,0.00082766154,0.00033931236,0.250889,0.00042739447,0.000008711662,0.66090876,0.021273151,0.019848851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017874244,0.0044797,0.13988045,0.0001306995,0.0005494567,0.000056169254,0.29090604,0.012781875,0.000026608459,0.54526687,0.0029326521,0.0012020702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020213023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38867193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3684589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020115207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022996422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321346788","doi":"10.1163/9789004480094_002","title":"Foreword","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Political science; Institution; Voting; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Library science; Law; Management; Computer science; Politics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05939167318402796,"score_gpt":0.27661487087973563,"score_spread":0.21722319769570766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321346788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000042758975,0.00011773279,0.000008757124,0.00037356038,0.0003237346,0.00012385423,0.00000574449,0.00013837342,0.998904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00089704554,0.00026134867,0.00007743987,0.0002785104,0.0009792352,0.0000010870734,0.0000035431447,0.000019412775,0.99748236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924445,0.000006955647,0.00011089779,0.00017008155,0.00028893288,0.00017870737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996334,0.00002629539,0.0000503607,0.00015304712,0.000036539583,0.00010037529],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008357331,0.00011796137,0.00014699328,0.00006293405,0.000312301,0.000039444203,0.00020181197,0.00026971404,0.13769087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003491261,0.00009750714,0.00011345483,0.0000067283927,0.00024223205,0.00005041735,0.000019823812,0.0001563348,0.008317903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.4676623e-7,0.0000022594427,6.1901653e-7,0.0000019378863,0.000007710628,0.000005962731,0.00086472376,5.533521e-9,1.0788037e-8,0.8775236,0.11863406,0.0029587534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025108651,0.000006357134,0.0000023632595,0.0000122415495,0.000007842863,1.2266017e-7,0.000015765821,5.1942004e-7,1.717985e-7,0.31732324,0.6824995,0.00010675877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000114316776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047995066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5638654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005782569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003956529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99245423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377252107","doi":"10.1515/9780773553743-008","title":"What Happened to Incumbent Councillors in Greater Sudbury and London, Ontario, in 2014? The Role of the Ontario Ombudsman’s Reports on Alleged Secret Meetings","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0140318882635739,"score_gpt":0.20037041294779948,"score_spread":0.18633852468422557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377252107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14653116,0.0000056517865,1.14469714e-7,0.00035495718,0.00045421207,0.0013835772,0.00002702256,0.00003554558,0.85120773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13888815,0.0000652457,0.000012033961,0.00029538726,0.00005897669,0.0000040319223,0.000008255497,0.000034593377,0.8606333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970666,0.00023451075,0.00047139742,0.000778846,0.00095075974,0.00049786794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998202,0.0001053261,0.00048510154,0.00078580395,0.00023189283,0.00018987834],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093993935,0.00044799267,0.0005940202,0.00026482766,0.0007629092,0.00012260141,0.00075673766,0.00049172214,0.0003917489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016878093,0.0003364872,0.00019538813,0.000026234971,0.0007561004,0.0002598258,0.00062628125,0.0007674912,0.00001001022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009156456,0.00010032019,0.007590947,0.000060774513,0.00027338005,0.0007281629,0.22056676,0.000031163214,0.000012540493,0.76153827,0.007843339,0.00033871178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047762835,0.00009989673,0.0036031003,0.00062303233,0.00008196113,0.0000023197529,0.0018595149,5.752942e-7,0.00015980734,0.005957489,0.98672026,0.0004144148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7387533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8645152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97887695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023500666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047178657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380270405","doi":"10.1515/9780773591837-014","title":"Overview of Canada’s Human Rights System","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028473966836083026,"score_gpt":0.23188434059144059,"score_spread":0.20341037375535756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380270405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000028395452,0.000004022467,0.000004787619,0.000046973764,0.00038313717,0.00047564704,0.00029543054,0.00015616046,0.99860543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034122307,0.000017980125,0.000021851272,0.00003451356,0.00021990904,5.2969267e-7,0.000021611348,0.000037911956,0.96552336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749,0.00020691259,0.00036333245,0.00053933676,0.00091374555,0.00048670266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998069,0.0000890511,0.00056367565,0.00062382506,0.00030048317,0.00035396847],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026449244,0.00041731747,0.0007818996,0.00020546492,0.0023481841,0.000032954158,0.00093213405,0.00049867324,0.00021534448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000032825903,0.00043490392,0.0002831496,0.000011636226,0.0005053065,0.00007265428,0.00023015843,0.00039044843,0.000012010849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014121129,0.0000061298047,5.308752e-7,0.0003090501,0.00013119128,0.00012685628,0.00035740592,8.430474e-7,5.807287e-7,0.98967457,0.009325277,0.000053416927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003545626,0.00003612635,0.000006782961,0.00064519374,0.00021571948,5.7521345e-7,0.00010129216,8.125466e-7,0.000050604805,0.0034883306,0.99461174,0.0004882578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7624358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19703485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98618627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001180913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004274982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382449412","doi":"10.1515/9780228013099-015","title":"Closing the Accountability Gap? Early Lessons from the Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Closing (real estate); Accountability; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.05803046590614616,"score_gpt":0.2828663370079621,"score_spread":0.22483587110181594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382449412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033663478,0.0000064632563,0.000007083646,0.004149312,0.00062147324,0.0014710411,0.0025057045,0.00010341307,0.9907989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07786729,0.00006899369,0.000054434597,0.00032395797,0.0005132999,0.0000046644964,0.00004087,0.000053553824,0.92107296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744374,0.0003178288,0.0002229949,0.0007202684,0.00059598417,0.00069920404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968198,0.0007558405,0.00039316813,0.0013459966,0.00031451555,0.00037067302],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007989355,0.00042415012,0.0004347952,0.00013964539,0.012345121,0.0005982308,0.0022247636,0.0006480894,0.00016305508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007562333,0.0003248755,0.00044765748,0.000009421827,0.001668007,0.00027039045,0.0002910232,0.0007895577,0.000035495847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001584295,0.000007942753,0.0000269356,0.000010577377,0.0001466092,0.000030500489,0.008749775,4.676492e-7,0.0000010541193,0.98398435,0.006054038,0.0008293458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039342145,0.000027319338,0.00026980406,0.00015254415,0.00029009156,2.1741245e-7,0.0008338792,0.0000023235998,0.000021423735,0.023931976,0.97366786,0.0004091595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7999356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44946885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9676138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012483263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011147539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385722488","doi":"10.59962/9780774824798","title":"Unjust by Design","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.02381004698990676,"score_gpt":0.19806947037105027,"score_spread":0.1742594233811435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385722488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015146873,0.00045909683,0.000090695416,0.000006575485,0.00019093884,0.0009995048,0.00031301408,0.000132648,0.99765605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00034946692,0.00041678097,0.00022956694,0.00003441784,0.00011671692,9.5029475e-7,0.00003378187,0.000027163014,0.99879116],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831074,0.00023825328,0.00017731804,0.0003957684,0.00052275206,0.00035516903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988359,0.00012064175,0.00028279366,0.0002727393,0.0002637034,0.00022420024],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023198633,0.00012451869,0.00048159252,0.00003805076,0.00072052295,0.00034280014,0.0008781603,0.00052142877,0.0021283303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012673465,0.00030233356,0.00018630181,0.00001050402,0.0013704175,0.00013983742,0.00013877169,0.00030777452,0.00005883876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000395008,0.000024930761,0.000001172022,0.00028932904,0.00007333783,0.00006741537,0.0018332705,1.4821997e-7,0.0000011474889,0.0029163272,0.99246436,0.002324584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036139012,0.000047257177,0.000015268422,0.0010273632,0.00016140753,0.0000019548245,0.00034536587,0.000002089654,0.0000011118724,0.006459244,0.9912194,0.00035812418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49837646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5123865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014010035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023763602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005925855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385867045","doi":"10.59962/9780774855877-003","title":"An Overview of Public Administration of Human Rights Enforcement in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Enforcement; Human rights; Political science; Public administration; Law enforcement; Criminology; Business; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06157597071860375,"score_gpt":0.2492481010245249,"score_spread":0.18767213030592117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385867045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09643161,0.00021149647,8.02258e-7,0.0000029499924,0.00006891641,0.00039782,0.0003083868,0.000012336258,0.90256566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6594772,0.0002223198,0.000017337268,0.0000035799485,0.000021063555,1.8255173e-7,0.000037252088,0.0000069866296,0.3402141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851024,0.00008731953,0.00034493764,0.00025380723,0.00060738134,0.00019631376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988402,0.000025314348,0.00049410237,0.00024780826,0.00025484918,0.00013773324],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015800704,0.000095677395,0.00045381414,0.000069225454,0.00031356383,0.00003260147,0.00049869926,0.00018803189,0.0012152548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000020256764,0.00020727541,0.00010421499,0.00001119195,0.0006387325,0.00012973636,0.00005530283,0.0001466619,3.5409485e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004568919,0.00027287743,0.00064375374,0.000795726,0.00027764088,0.00096650526,0.009747973,0.000002608503,0.00001532513,0.9434405,0.030369248,0.01342215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001068917,0.00031862673,0.004105883,0.0011543179,0.00010046611,0.000006141937,0.0006723165,0.000005475446,0.000025079818,0.009138589,0.9828888,0.00051538786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99850696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95251954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003759353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016553222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385868168","doi":"10.59962/9780774856010-020","title":"The Subversion of Human Rights by Governments in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subversion; Human rights; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.011592849563828075,"score_gpt":0.1775600725031969,"score_spread":0.1659672229393688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385868168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058568057,0.00022356307,1.6074603e-7,0.0000067315773,0.00012106952,0.00030995466,0.00041944173,0.000011018263,0.94034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19484805,0.00032890055,0.000003463715,0.0000053688136,0.000020456231,1.1497824e-7,0.000011632902,0.000008999724,0.80477303],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844766,0.00006465977,0.00021365115,0.00024896784,0.00078512577,0.00023993631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991755,0.00007153133,0.00032992908,0.00021415528,0.00010589037,0.00010301542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001119101,0.000094661336,0.00031398935,0.000018890245,0.0011183101,0.000040510073,0.00065855676,0.00018300193,0.0003214817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002271625,0.0001711989,0.000101519654,0.0000068695235,0.0009419408,0.000058140868,0.00012735139,0.00022293814,0.0000012867342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032128715,0.000044520326,0.00041202822,0.000062531886,0.00014118155,0.0005383154,0.0033316507,4.1498032e-7,0.0000073585466,0.026704133,0.964508,0.004217753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004972462,0.000029263942,0.0007982008,0.00025802315,0.000032299635,0.000001411868,0.00034453164,6.761989e-7,0.0000058341934,0.002362329,0.99546593,0.00020424175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9995016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13627999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082718575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055628514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.860125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386833785","doi":"10.3917/pinc.013.0018","title":"Nouveau cadre juridique québécois en matière de protection des renseignements personnels dans le secteur privé","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Pin Code","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.033529205089255526,"score_gpt":0.2770687466528555,"score_spread":0.2435395415636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386833785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9335488,0.0003322372,0.0017523995,0.006667401,0.0010815767,0.00086161576,0.0000746542,0.00041999063,0.055261306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7773092,0.00040321314,0.0003683817,0.00012585636,0.0012152612,0.00009544657,0.00001784969,0.0000460893,0.22041875],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973957,0.00071138656,0.00028957077,0.000437981,0.00039029648,0.00077504246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992606,0.00008163531,0.000120247074,0.00024332436,0.00008803426,0.00020616455],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086299627,0.00024242632,0.00024271559,0.00013234823,0.0016794605,0.00014434404,0.00036935465,0.0002838053,0.0008450728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009854606,0.00025445578,0.00014264634,0.00060456403,0.00056538935,0.0003430061,0.00008526048,0.00033175005,0.0012891181],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003058446,0.00026492952,0.0018866753,0.0005172366,0.000121907025,0.00009235015,0.7888272,0.00008945994,0.00395185,0.17958672,0.00889027,0.015740832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013979243,0.00048861944,0.07694301,0.00094897713,0.00017570719,0.000054003005,0.10028195,0.0022995393,0.007871482,0.14217298,0.6659994,0.0013663964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11273631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51668435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6885452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093151955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011478469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389089163","doi":"10.1163/9789047406013_009","title":"Contributors and Titles to The Ombudsman Journal and The International Ombudsman Yearbook 1981-2002","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Yearbook; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01598833418457321,"score_gpt":0.2522845125300291,"score_spread":0.23629617834545588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389089163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000301641,0.0007638685,0.00002193119,0.018409088,0.0008740602,0.00045424455,0.000018395931,0.000037923095,0.9791188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01689167,0.0019324247,0.000054959604,0.0019427919,0.002405388,0.0000055307155,0.000003760201,0.000027275868,0.9767362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985178,0.000058387363,0.00027434915,0.00025510072,0.00063161406,0.00026273477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911475,0.00018898938,0.00015973451,0.0001906306,0.00014301887,0.00020288826],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009960256,0.00022351902,0.00026968133,0.00011632056,0.0011140598,0.0007308494,0.00058655004,0.00018603279,0.0062303115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057437406,0.00011412909,0.00011816991,0.000019961162,0.0010729671,0.00010534621,0.00016460534,0.00047892207,0.0004793682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002075349,0.000004641741,0.000006713157,0.000002516884,0.00008125132,0.000009504825,0.00488181,4.953898e-7,5.699843e-7,0.9496781,0.04387911,0.0014344944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057584135,0.000022725224,0.00007107793,0.00006541221,0.000047657726,0.00001361917,0.00038941394,0.000002459953,0.000001341209,0.18723103,0.8114207,0.00015874492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005674429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011204724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7675416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014921706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020801507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99467814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389095336","doi":"10.1163/9789004482470_002","title":"Foreword","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.034546632557750805,"score_gpt":0.2784966675426018,"score_spread":0.24395003498485096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389095336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000125475235,0.00010180232,0.0000030389006,0.00027948956,0.00020981125,0.00012536481,0.00000775123,0.00013776314,0.99912244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011157021,0.00035711075,0.000054555876,0.00034660255,0.0009335659,0.0000010947365,0.000007122144,0.000019034804,0.9971652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926966,0.000007287571,0.00011039921,0.00017073502,0.00026586573,0.00017605876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967235,0.000022515924,0.00003613535,0.00014863667,0.000022400192,0.00009793577],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000823295,0.000116542054,0.00014495899,0.00006093195,0.00031162534,0.0000391138,0.00020292336,0.00026574873,0.18208043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000014665164,0.000096413234,0.00011149932,0.000006366862,0.00024936677,0.0000500401,0.000011850097,0.00014928951,0.008333773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013920054,0.0000020063608,3.3524853e-7,0.0000012876305,0.000007769299,0.0000058225573,0.0008153899,1.3522979e-8,1.1328631e-8,0.941356,0.0469142,0.010895752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020759142,0.00000512194,0.0000022013458,0.00001048859,0.0000063148536,9.935963e-8,0.000011878374,1.1794822e-7,1.6332814e-7,0.43582273,0.5640328,0.000087333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002416575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012021291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51711863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048134974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010490435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389095385","doi":"10.1163/9789004482470_017","title":"Contributors and Titles to the Ombudsman Journal and the International Ombudsman Yearbook 1981–1999","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Yearbook; Political science; History; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.0138922790213361,"score_gpt":0.24967484906036255,"score_spread":0.23578257003902645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389095385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005030352,0.0009037336,0.000008714877,0.014456463,0.0006569465,0.00042273747,0.000021425853,0.00003725241,0.98298967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013469689,0.004173188,0.00003354089,0.0021706668,0.0024950076,0.0000057378857,0.0000058830265,0.000027278686,0.977619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851304,0.00007620209,0.00027854223,0.00025862904,0.00061167637,0.00026189064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991361,0.0002299772,0.00013459755,0.00019751632,0.000101431324,0.0002003675],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097652536,0.00022279246,0.00027444385,0.000117238975,0.0011371096,0.00075710425,0.00060296,0.00018392393,0.0070917113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036510337,0.000113523165,0.000118812306,0.000019338788,0.0010226374,0.000104724946,0.00012739882,0.00047156675,0.00049168034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035752393,0.0000043391965,0.00000921258,0.0000017010057,0.00008490384,0.000008858462,0.0042574,2.4933792e-7,4.3117006e-7,0.91820645,0.07212435,0.00526635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043277518,0.000020815321,0.00007349643,0.00004621574,0.000047769707,0.000015049345,0.00028010187,0.000004394311,9.075236e-7,0.14855418,0.8503666,0.00015770861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062434794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011427443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77824223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008307081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013874493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99381596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391725426","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.8356","title":"Un ombudsman, cinq mandats : quel est le fil conducteur ?","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02803718919909496,"score_gpt":0.2831969710263049,"score_spread":0.25515978182720994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391725426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3768938,0.0036449048,0.00011331623,0.26784638,0.007955196,0.0011594626,0.000181533,0.0015554852,0.34064993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.637267,0.0025706978,0.00030308354,0.011369233,0.0025743623,0.00011841965,0.0001974689,0.00012480795,0.3454749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99468887,0.0013829854,0.00068904407,0.0009538534,0.00073573325,0.001549507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733996,0.00044659682,0.00029325436,0.0007327828,0.00047370337,0.00071367685],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027915696,0.0005225047,0.0005974309,0.00042021193,0.0013871996,0.0005957804,0.0011126137,0.001002846,0.0049362225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039158427,0.0005436952,0.00033013077,0.0017139615,0.0014045415,0.0016083805,0.0003161582,0.0012242735,0.0071012457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012377636,0.00019823966,0.00033740076,0.00011921481,0.000075342556,0.00018443217,0.007539889,0.000010167487,0.00009860821,0.8641373,0.12322075,0.004066306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055807095,0.000084084466,0.0031562136,0.00011437531,0.000035120782,0.000016864724,0.002165292,0.00012224649,0.000610773,0.28253952,0.71001416,0.00058326713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010432933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024043864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5867934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031951407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001743784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396893716","doi":"10.35467/cal/174924","title":"Międzynarodowe regulacje prawnedotyczące cyberprzestrzeni","year":2023,"lang":"pl","type":"article","venue":"Cybersecurity and Law","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office of Defense Programs; Public Safety Canada","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.024434432663933237,"score_gpt":0.2878004946871743,"score_spread":0.26336606202324103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396893716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6590188,0.0013787268,0.0000024175035,0.0074881166,0.002070261,0.00059061963,0.00007579523,0.00061460945,0.32876065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94208735,0.0014897749,0.000045699064,0.0009301857,0.0010582041,0.000013931628,0.000047933576,0.000041512107,0.054285407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649423,0.00041946536,0.00045560204,0.00084544916,0.0007067306,0.0010785279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983018,0.00029605537,0.00018276283,0.0005244733,0.000108364584,0.0005865467],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011659901,0.00040394004,0.00051568396,0.00016435089,0.0024956865,0.0005313497,0.00050207495,0.0005036177,0.0015246513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007015061,0.0003970471,0.00022452044,0.0008107072,0.002663134,0.000576845,0.0002538505,0.00053290103,0.003173598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002179328,0.00010359774,0.00024484668,0.00008432939,0.000064902546,0.00011928776,0.06392957,8.9305365e-7,0.000020864403,0.90334123,0.030582283,0.0014864082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069212535,0.00012767415,0.003487496,0.00016580065,0.00011997999,0.000008634738,0.010683495,0.000116481766,0.000082343875,0.10319692,0.88062876,0.0006902558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066028787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025922779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8500465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008819623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017376759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399040687","doi":"10.29173/mlj800","title":"The Law Society of Manitoba's Equity Ombudsperson Program","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09733439841300072,"score_gpt":0.3283018801005976,"score_spread":0.23096748168759684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399040687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28386718,0.00040762284,0.000028264638,0.00076168275,0.0016363766,0.00051605125,0.0000044249523,0.00014979634,0.7126286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964216,0.00030538466,0.0013185284,0.0003045584,0.0013139059,0.000009120323,7.40739e-7,0.000019364163,0.00030681962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783474,0.0002443785,0.00037452957,0.0001734772,0.0007503684,0.0006225006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891704,0.00007748407,0.00028751694,0.00024270148,0.00024351157,0.00023172914],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016286132,0.00015819406,0.0002024391,0.000015596588,0.0046535693,0.00041336968,0.00086224155,0.00013060303,0.00029259417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012835103,0.00010418078,0.00034086537,0.00011509934,0.0017717262,0.00036195273,0.00012775772,0.0004744746,0.00008064303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028613014,0.00022895167,0.0006704297,0.000013019612,0.000083923966,0.000014060648,0.0128877815,1.17641996e-7,0.000021014604,0.946739,0.004324646,0.034988448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065911165,0.00038349364,0.0045331754,0.00006841266,0.00009012638,0.000039474064,0.16802932,0.000012958427,0.0007517095,0.21169719,0.61337984,0.00035520535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047355264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76506746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7350418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018686579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009952878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99664223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400134261","doi":"10.30892/rrgp.261104-376","title":"RESULTS OF LOCAL ELECTIONS IN HARGHITA COUNTY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2020","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Română de Geografie Politică","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Alliance; Legislature; Political science; Politics; Public administration; Power (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013443220202043232,"score_gpt":0.31475864898536693,"score_spread":0.3013154287833237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400134261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.467224,0.004016742,0.00032096083,0.0052227983,0.00067088456,0.0007716346,0.0003618958,0.00038357422,0.5210275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97412103,0.0002256356,0.0001014233,0.00015154232,0.00032590926,0.000010073685,0.000029123577,0.000018486093,0.02501677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981459,0.00015494681,0.000434937,0.0003213209,0.00035161857,0.00059128646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919695,0.0001798007,0.000053858843,0.00024847718,0.000095509145,0.00022540432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007245785,0.00014077484,0.0002728848,0.00019606813,0.00017987382,0.00021492234,0.00020026413,0.00014713562,0.00049956446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080227896,0.0001337973,0.00017608945,0.00056434673,0.0004512139,0.00015385874,0.000037540787,0.00028005335,0.00021785662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036307956,0.00018141295,0.0026381188,0.00034426272,0.00006361899,0.00015638802,0.004477824,0.0000134440725,0.000053352323,0.9101751,0.0806285,0.0012317132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037060367,0.000072026356,0.011512993,0.00038175876,0.000063493295,0.000018510333,0.0009108458,0.00016757386,0.00009402411,0.01629776,0.9698796,0.0002308033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005766206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071936664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8938773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032493658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006023941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87168175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403213404","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12925","title":"Administrative Law as a Source of Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.061545574966751164,"score_gpt":0.38017783196986965,"score_spread":0.3186322570031185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403213404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021650456,0.115282424,0.00013166509,0.0016191719,0.00018219945,0.00044851893,0.00000521946,0.00014023387,0.8800255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783042,0.0048421863,0.000070343194,0.0012341106,0.00017123511,0.000017710383,0.0000036540607,0.000011343539,0.015345198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988732,0.00016566983,0.00023847452,0.00021923555,0.00031469375,0.00018874672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953413,0.00007793058,0.000051722378,0.00018423713,0.000051698098,0.000100270445],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039131372,0.000104878185,0.00028029032,0.000015157958,0.00030359876,0.00007241875,0.00021505177,0.00005406007,0.0013253369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009502229,0.00007523951,0.00015563371,0.0001113629,0.0004948757,0.00016558067,0.000021924523,0.00010873574,0.0006276799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012214913,0.000022142525,2.9329644e-7,0.00068793824,0.000019263252,0.000013634784,0.00444048,7.3158766e-8,0.000004204796,0.99152637,0.0013940032,0.0018903726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024727302,0.000024853363,6.223515e-7,0.001988646,0.000041270814,0.0000015663355,0.000014765368,0.000010728485,0.000057762943,0.2878086,0.70995075,0.000075679156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050197816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0153804375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003449988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011747142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405001036","doi":"10.1515/9780776636429-013","title":"CHAPTER B-2 Good Governance: Institutions, Processes, and People","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.03418287138089269,"score_gpt":0.22922190863868194,"score_spread":0.19503903725778926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405001036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010015901,0.0005486747,0.0000331707,0.00020107355,0.00010135797,0.0002952739,0.00012838599,0.00007675046,0.9985151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1080745,0.00088135316,0.00014562541,0.000051969182,0.00015261574,2.0334289e-7,0.0000118593225,0.00001770108,0.89066416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989972,0.00001726601,0.00013224776,0.0003325992,0.00035696078,0.00016369527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923116,0.000034577202,0.00025253414,0.0001717616,0.00014185187,0.00016810432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007582328,0.00018690423,0.00031411988,0.000047847334,0.0005791092,0.0000356537,0.0003819315,0.00024751367,0.00034888147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012788041,0.00021699887,0.00008384868,0.000007548346,0.00082460674,0.00013048043,0.00014937982,0.00023570823,0.000025937083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011872364,0.000007160866,0.0000140292,0.00013921519,0.000046717763,0.000026313362,0.008159012,2.1858993e-7,8.7753807e-7,0.98935205,0.0014220595,0.0008204604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029462815,0.00003688615,0.00005588428,0.00014862942,0.00009820668,0.0000010624148,0.00020934729,0.0000011093574,0.000009770532,0.008149033,0.99075305,0.00024239444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00291581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03751537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.989331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006116911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034794176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98004746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408089349","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2025.01.73","title":"Foreign experience of environmental ombudsman institution implementation: comparative analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05870567504509924,"score_gpt":0.4021989952234177,"score_spread":0.34349332017831846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408089349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.909562,0.00021975447,0.0019771974,0.00013936992,0.000038936636,0.00021779245,0.000016203738,0.000018848807,0.08780993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981742,0.00008601654,0.00014083854,0.000087355664,0.000028622844,0.000016369935,0.000009314729,9.752447e-7,0.0014562958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985251,0.00025246985,0.0003436723,0.00031780708,0.00033292183,0.00022804095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999369,0.00020120147,0.00011184707,0.00014876433,0.00005649779,0.000112673915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026975552,0.00013684195,0.00041145543,0.00021641009,0.0007664048,0.00006269424,0.00021592116,0.00005217685,0.00073385105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008880691,0.00011873692,0.00011498964,0.0007081724,0.0015459452,0.00030215943,0.00006478925,0.00014054176,0.000016335734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028990187,0.000112278576,0.06196708,0.000005662408,0.00025732408,0.0000017069219,0.030075828,0.000018554678,0.00008183749,0.90685874,0.0002214318,0.0003705842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008290287,0.00019535694,0.78896236,0.000047550864,0.00087844767,5.753292e-7,0.16187274,0.0030791303,0.003685756,0.021594187,0.018400537,0.00045433626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050299295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025360864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8852645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007202328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008515059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80351543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408943322","doi":"10.24144/2307-3322.2025.87.3.23","title":"Administrative and legal foundations of the activities of the military ombudsman: international experience and prospects of Ukraine","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.016487969620569896,"score_gpt":0.2812165097411509,"score_spread":0.264728540120581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408943322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9171411,0.000051793428,0.000006518841,0.004595699,0.00014595104,0.0001733832,0.00005706444,0.000006104074,0.077822395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99103135,0.00005749929,0.00012402858,0.000069662085,0.00001801372,6.119646e-7,0.00000227015,0.0000012620974,0.008695307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937403,0.00008001722,0.00010231372,0.000102501064,0.00028156463,0.000059587805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995128,0.00010081535,0.000083844614,0.0000741761,0.00021149893,0.000016884005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000103898696,0.000052511976,0.00009038812,0.000044134376,0.0004912312,0.000011043255,0.00022695247,0.000034291585,0.000053539694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005519809,0.00003987405,0.000040567946,0.00016479434,0.0019896731,0.0004379141,0.000110849505,0.000057733105,5.4065975e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042089017,0.000037939717,0.001736961,0.000014013558,0.0000307938,2.698453e-7,0.009500328,0.0000032597345,0.0003016295,0.98822147,0.00008077184,0.00003046243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019567516,0.00023565981,0.34550613,0.00032146188,0.000104022714,0.0000066470066,0.0875327,0.00012288496,0.023057094,0.12816882,0.41259852,0.0003892989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001380911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018782001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86005265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006252651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002749386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409036266","doi":"10.52783/jier.v5i2.2448","title":"The Institution of Ombudsman for Indian Prisons: A Comparative Study of Existing Global Models for Enhancing Accountability, Transparency, and Inmate Rights","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informatics Education and Research","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Institution; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.1908508659425356,"score_gpt":0.5163583508881624,"score_spread":0.32550748494562676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409036266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99061507,0.00021807528,0.0019192343,0.00018688013,0.0001822109,0.0009843104,0.0000065224594,0.0000018725749,0.0058858297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889,0.0000957753,0.0008334379,0.000006418218,0.000044043158,0.000020934116,8.67982e-7,9.884778e-7,0.00010752859],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986428,0.00012950072,0.00068387686,0.000045287212,0.00035207765,0.00014645934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976291,0.0005683357,0.00035880212,0.000072221286,0.001311446,0.000060101327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003591174,0.000052434407,0.0001912308,0.00018519234,0.0010696363,0.000114531336,0.00018076265,0.000045728408,0.0000011401127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018778085,0.000033146123,0.000033886776,0.000233087,0.0003958074,0.00043041885,0.000021706532,0.00012519426,6.1993916e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018585991,0.0005501602,0.001309658,0.00059422106,0.00007568737,3.8379394e-8,0.63609445,0.000068659094,0.000010685654,0.35287973,0.00036718394,0.007863682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013168236,0.000684223,0.003965271,0.0005330391,0.000046167144,0.0000017984711,0.75099045,0.0013753396,0.00035552436,0.23742048,0.003231047,0.00007983918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003762161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010167056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115459256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104992905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001143075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8226885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409722457","doi":"10.7202/1117565ar","title":"La codification de la procédure administrative non contentieuse en perspective comparée","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.016821712419058762,"score_gpt":0.32634905876441794,"score_spread":0.30952734634535917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409722457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.630496,0.0012007015,0.0035853046,0.0046225786,0.00035341454,0.00045806135,0.00003741594,0.000078179655,0.3591683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83540565,0.0002507176,0.00040454278,0.0003102648,0.00019005939,0.000035642057,0.000009707895,0.000013578743,0.16337982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976161,0.0011129596,0.0002291896,0.00037340523,0.00022237697,0.00044593186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985644,0.00075446296,0.00013727717,0.0001996487,0.00016929007,0.0001748928],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009058947,0.00020617574,0.00028235358,0.00011545122,0.00070739904,0.00022353101,0.000381691,0.0006875972,0.00016563146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022329246,0.00022817886,0.00015365996,0.00033741386,0.003303631,0.00018555751,0.000024295663,0.00087780954,0.00007998025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005032414,0.00020768978,0.000882939,0.00006205108,0.000113185386,0.000041012026,0.1839584,0.000005222539,0.000132938,0.8097235,0.0031227397,0.0016999858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012983672,0.0001719267,0.06640491,0.00040596118,0.0003409852,0.000018907196,0.25457585,0.0005558582,0.0012039397,0.5075428,0.16695872,0.00052179734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016003338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028067473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30218074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030272298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008357944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410232913","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2024-014","title":"Human Rights Institutions: Systemic Underfunding and Policy Reform in Alberta","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.03893102480479039,"score_gpt":0.34081243130662886,"score_spread":0.3018814065018385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410232913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21683638,0.0000857422,0.0000018353835,0.03545292,0.00015044348,0.00025705338,0.000011016568,0.000041749743,0.7471629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95253515,0.000016722623,0.0000052226337,0.0015534288,0.0005050645,0.000021226595,0.000009359605,0.0000071817803,0.04534664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983816,0.00010849086,0.00025753118,0.00027541435,0.00013833425,0.000838615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998866,0.00003650877,0.000048801805,0.0002560435,0.000052580355,0.00074002513],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030956,0.00014024296,0.0001933626,0.0029770737,0.00235877,0.0003836176,0.00039119588,0.00018576015,0.00007241584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001806869,0.00013605092,0.00003942134,0.0014967294,0.00052856986,0.00047997443,0.000041082465,0.00018496897,0.000050896782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.337258e-7,0.000007745631,0.0014648747,0.000015678017,0.00001016926,0.000006271983,0.0022869345,2.100891e-7,0.0000015073521,0.9946558,0.0010710331,0.0004794794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039772704,0.0000090519225,0.011044129,0.00014104617,0.0000060215693,0.000006237554,0.0009301113,0.000006327965,0.0000019911213,0.2507773,0.7364536,0.00022646907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99227154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7438785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070918933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011671442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410962897","doi":"10.24144/2307-3322.2025.88.3.6","title":"Formation of the institute of military ombudsman in Ukraine: the role and significance of the principle of independence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.008804650483064443,"score_gpt":0.23206400365621158,"score_spread":0.22325935317314713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410962897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9734186,0.00011570025,0.000009928572,0.0016554372,0.00007712097,0.0002618235,0.000027504322,0.0000034145157,0.02443048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878246,0.00006409052,0.000051892537,0.00005699694,0.0000069709804,4.0223637e-7,0.0000013864907,9.726419e-7,0.0010348342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992341,0.0001337822,0.00015273597,0.00007291625,0.0003439277,0.00006258072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994418,0.000075346776,0.00012842749,0.00011853744,0.00022568123,0.000010210915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003419727,0.000044266435,0.00009685812,0.000046977497,0.0002785453,0.0000022963857,0.00037235988,0.00004731032,0.0000122746615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005360058,0.000028913924,0.000044878423,0.0003350789,0.0011399239,0.00038851798,0.000104957326,0.00008111447,9.7950306e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037131213,0.000029719467,0.0025567138,0.00003551392,0.00000950977,1.06000876e-7,0.005514539,0.00021606228,0.0005492498,0.9909702,0.000026628724,0.000054617452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00144874,0.00009473624,0.3630617,0.00036827664,0.000064088825,0.0000011866649,0.014499805,0.0005212081,0.0375655,0.3006307,0.28151444,0.00022966234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034830202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0675126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6903395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070347356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027263784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9495029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413230209","doi":"10.52663/kcsr.2025.30.2.133","title":"A Comparative Study of Local Government Ombudsman Systems : Focusing on Seoul, New York, and Toronto","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Korea Association for Corruption Studies","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Political science; Local government; Grievance; Decentralization; Enforcement; Law","score_opus":0.10220671785885625,"score_gpt":0.3790028785086398,"score_spread":0.2767961606497835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413230209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9650955,0.0027970383,0.000546245,0.0011961648,0.0012810709,0.002291759,0.000024011822,0.000075312375,0.02669286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975068,0.0000913626,0.0000083752275,0.000046663623,0.00016533562,0.000059007834,0.0000014000997,0.0000043392224,0.024555532],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998546,0.000266376,0.00028635192,0.0001785425,0.0005479863,0.00017474739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856126,0.0007499003,0.0003380105,0.00011088557,0.00020724215,0.00003268618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009361982,0.00011421727,0.00035120212,0.000023897293,0.00096768944,0.00007070477,0.00010919755,0.00005486843,0.0000054680913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008600823,0.000080744176,0.00005309384,0.00010010649,0.00011239887,0.0001033607,0.00004172348,0.000059335278,0.0000030873355],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032055596,0.00064798584,0.009485944,0.0000716472,0.0015837163,2.8609858e-7,0.60927427,0.00024444272,0.000038802336,0.33232296,0.04158822,0.004421154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017854254,0.0006142319,0.016713733,0.0001326767,0.00032664236,6.250997e-8,0.95329314,0.00025240192,0.000054976877,0.0037058736,0.022948453,0.00017239721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035616888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040714122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34401885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014202049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053833464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97679037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413526594","doi":"10.64628/aam.mrc7msxw4","title":"How to encourage China to become a law-abiding member of the rules-based international order","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"China; Order (exchange); Political science; Member states; International law; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; International trade; Business; European union","score_opus":0.035384063559625915,"score_gpt":0.321131155088107,"score_spread":0.2857470915284811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413526594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70720935,0.000001012274,0.00016477867,0.034566596,0.0006375938,0.0002140446,0.000009203705,0.000085820975,0.25711158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92570996,6.984381e-7,0.00037638642,0.00086011057,0.00017202322,0.000008644431,0.0000018354816,0.0000061420465,0.07286423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991283,0.00005109638,0.00009350505,0.00013403966,0.000412372,0.00018067623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996179,0.00005788834,0.000030139749,0.00013625718,0.0000739855,0.00008387918],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034982673,0.000059530146,0.00008189499,0.000081850965,0.00028459897,0.000110924586,0.00042312432,0.00003107351,0.0015453422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098085766,0.000037924234,0.00006144576,0.0003439572,0.00007220032,0.000091016664,0.00008317773,0.000051752697,0.00025616618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009852057,0.000042669184,0.00151201,0.000006864655,0.000021600637,0.0000033024637,0.0200742,0.00016632081,0.0005086976,0.95307183,0.02373352,0.00084913487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005436848,0.00006448715,0.070944525,0.00007827715,0.000016028076,3.0763036e-7,0.0054370095,0.0005654811,0.0036070473,0.030773582,0.8875769,0.00039267202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015736035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026631854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92229825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005202209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006117279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414833970","doi":"10.29173/alr2840","title":"Selecting a Standard of Review: What Does This Entail Post-Vavilov?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Transparency (behavior); Duty; Citizenship; Selection (genetic algorithm); Process (computing)","score_opus":0.012272117818400536,"score_gpt":0.32722507867863165,"score_spread":0.3149529608602311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414833970","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007653951,0.6641933,0.0000014020035,0.021896293,0.00044703446,0.0009879698,0.0000039025554,0.00003338558,0.31167132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013596467,0.9297353,0.00007157072,0.021701282,0.00008348702,0.000034671735,0.000009889455,0.000012043552,0.034755256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809235,0.0003935286,0.0005454622,0.00028999988,0.0003696813,0.000308993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985961,0.00041424754,0.00022893534,0.0003690547,0.0003037702,0.000087891094],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011706806,0.00016159678,0.000699071,0.000034796234,0.00043473978,0.00009469789,0.00041109667,0.00006484219,0.0043460005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048791274,0.00010726292,0.00024764848,0.00042926637,0.0002565391,0.00048055744,0.00006469903,0.00015237393,0.00015955635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007358135,0.000039300066,0.00009972506,0.012874916,0.00006211833,0.0000018554932,0.0019047784,7.440213e-9,0.000008172045,0.9259911,0.03195876,0.02705192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008900698,0.00003332506,0.00000893989,0.052088834,0.00020051264,5.231333e-7,0.00014223943,9.02187e-8,0.00008650102,0.0023098977,0.94490916,0.00013096814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011620489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13092817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9236812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008744416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002462861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99656415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957218","doi":"10.21991/cf29496","title":"The Regime Politics of Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Judicial independence; Charter; Judicial activism; Supreme court; Politics; Skepticism; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.018028879206513602,"score_gpt":0.31882299909524886,"score_spread":0.3007941198887353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009345062,0.035976004,0.0072039147,0.08695462,0.0040799226,0.0014106263,0.00017638595,0.0001761266,0.8630879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97155344,0.0063952627,0.00022366851,0.005336933,0.00027303607,0.00006935015,0.00003481155,0.0000062876566,0.01610718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738973,0.00026391674,0.00069350004,0.00032717365,0.0006147473,0.0007108996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759483,0.0007505629,0.00025331706,0.00043311916,0.00080378127,0.0001643754],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010265576,0.00021344403,0.00037230345,0.00019414692,0.005768189,0.00008382138,0.00063370296,0.00016772446,0.00020538883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019303984,0.0001670093,0.00027903492,0.0005960676,0.018719306,0.00029765294,0.00014346887,0.00026649365,0.0001280927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003231659,0.000045268487,0.00052801956,0.000059837712,0.00006630592,0.0000061272262,0.00009462597,0.0000056839913,0.000011317665,0.923037,0.07547833,0.0006351973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034177987,0.000017037462,0.00013857035,0.0010457214,0.00007392256,0.000008151602,0.0011147133,0.0000068224344,0.00006611495,0.29715785,0.6998811,0.0001482385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002896333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013793046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97061896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029782724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006265032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415692972","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5667090","title":"Ouster Clauses and the Common Law: a Historical Reappraisal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Fredericton","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Tribunal; Administration (probate law); Compensation (psychology); Commission","score_opus":0.018488675668098108,"score_gpt":0.3111052182731197,"score_spread":0.2926165426050216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415692972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10952692,0.06134444,0.0011032656,0.07682589,0.008528251,0.0016871134,0.000017720165,0.00033646383,0.7406299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9051021,0.014685246,0.000028655173,0.0006457337,0.0020245994,0.000016845072,0.0000028956574,0.000017039252,0.07747691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643195,0.0008119472,0.00035856068,0.0002945588,0.0004742884,0.0016286885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998946,0.00032417724,0.00025567765,0.00027073824,0.00009342935,0.00010999427],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036713055,0.00022259828,0.00043730641,0.00009853518,0.0015387344,0.0003545185,0.0007461465,0.00032791673,0.000045456087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006273494,0.00014370827,0.00021565627,0.000070914226,0.0006832606,0.000098067685,0.00028033656,0.0052994234,0.000011309027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089422705,0.000030626616,0.00009868213,0.000010876053,0.00013235971,0.0000035459304,0.0054924204,0.0000019290371,1.891477e-7,0.9896055,0.0022187675,0.0023156933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061182963,0.000036736517,0.000038885486,0.000049188347,0.000111949295,0.000024932611,0.0013946922,0.000007071114,4.259876e-7,0.7600626,0.23750858,0.00015313279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0094259605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17838839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79557514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001866396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040373597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47237260","doi":"","title":"Encouraging a culture of justification: a comparison of Teoh and Baker.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Research Online (Deakin University)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Convention; Citizenship; Political science; Human rights; Immigration; Administrative law; Sociology","score_opus":0.1491793758634995,"score_gpt":0.4298648389480665,"score_spread":0.280685463084567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W47237260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9301287,0.00014506013,0.0001624135,0.00041414564,0.000060059014,0.00030205358,0.000028274571,0.000030704043,0.0687286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993281,0.00009413633,0.0014941591,0.0000060380726,0.00005316021,3.810518e-7,0.00000947222,0.0000067565707,0.0050548906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978216,0.00067452784,0.00020420199,0.00026482815,0.0006884365,0.00034639268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986288,0.0002458011,0.0001341242,0.00022794619,0.00059716153,0.00016617401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000985981,0.0000938968,0.0002449819,0.000495634,0.0005834382,0.00003106009,0.00039953453,0.00012659942,0.00021136993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029182725,0.00009228893,0.000059617218,0.0010863037,0.0011116076,0.00018163289,0.000078779056,0.000352767,0.0000064298283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003569353,0.0003195739,0.007244024,0.00006737448,0.000027665543,0.000017446398,0.013624351,0.000007990018,0.0007512396,0.9759328,0.0011188115,0.00085303874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069550605,0.00015799054,0.0056000543,0.000121447374,0.00003468327,0.0000014682114,0.045791365,0.00015280597,0.0013876534,0.0037443612,0.9421251,0.00018756112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017209561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004542836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9721884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010536127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035809242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4487394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W583661070","doi":"10.22215/etd/2011-08918","title":"Newspaper ombudsmanship in Canada : the rise and fall of an accountability system","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Accountability; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.032368044823224106,"score_gpt":0.24713667896939195,"score_spread":0.21476863414616784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W583661070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12758763,0.00029393306,2.6209415e-7,0.000059190574,0.00025026593,0.00045349472,0.000020326072,0.000022906495,0.87131196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59665084,0.000036618654,0.000012226242,0.000052608757,0.0001802019,0.000008185902,0.0000032800115,0.0000147983665,0.40304124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983107,0.00029437878,0.00035004417,0.0003132087,0.00045181243,0.00027988825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901956,0.00016825355,0.00016284295,0.00042607894,0.000083058854,0.00014022664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000896596,0.00018692414,0.0003740961,0.000053343225,0.00024076698,0.00004525341,0.0005601469,0.00020583672,0.00056708086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013584596,0.00011802931,0.000047190206,0.00004801989,0.00049621216,0.00013466713,0.00005564898,0.00028504845,0.000009401847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033223507,0.000048616064,0.011691101,0.0003968507,0.00004209534,0.00002077613,0.04093722,6.3394197e-7,3.9840359e-7,0.93011564,0.013941985,0.0027714716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050582946,0.000066814035,0.06630539,0.00031573762,0.00010588972,0.0000024531485,0.03965763,0.000020061425,0.0000050392255,0.043391746,0.8488594,0.00076396205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8867239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010647646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051592872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91523546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6893799314","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.3946160","title":"E-RIHS PP D4.2 Statutes of the E-RIHS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Prairie Improvement Network","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Statute; Work (physics); Commission; Deliverable; Subject (documents); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.059570754139118165,"score_gpt":0.2682679241148465,"score_spread":0.20869716997572835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6893799314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058489982,0.00010726433,0.00019948484,0.007464267,0.00016504474,0.0005074945,0.00013409078,0.0005436845,0.93238866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947644,0.00009842342,0.0000491409,0.0005180008,0.00030309177,1.6926437e-8,0.00007268228,0.00036242764,0.0038318518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983917,0.00047068103,0.00018463482,0.00021440581,0.00045606086,0.00028255233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991167,0.000029914705,0.000101581245,0.00022920677,0.00035706814,0.00016550036],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043973976,0.00007677437,0.00010745375,0.000039464416,0.0034735044,0.00025965853,0.0010915354,0.000045076966,0.022045989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000546751,0.00006246332,0.00005994376,0.00042572312,0.00039649836,0.00017812847,0.0005699185,0.00020155219,0.003965265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040996692,0.00008254022,0.000030035431,0.00006780465,0.0000381436,0.0000054618554,0.049651604,0.0000101159485,0.0017121348,0.5038996,0.42850143,0.015960168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002059714,0.00006900645,0.00063635514,0.000015111769,0.000007734656,0.000001093345,0.0022065134,0.000023465436,0.00033989717,0.0012574117,0.9951573,0.00008012433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006613189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000629717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9362744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006443354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013221161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99782383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6908553512","doi":"10.26106/vrm0-b725","title":"Proceduralne gwarancje związane z wydaleniem cudzoziemca ze względów bezpieczeństwa państwa - uwagi na kanwie sprawy Chakiba Marakchiego","year":2020,"lang":"pl","type":"article","venue":"Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Convention; Human rights; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Order (exchange); European Union law","score_opus":0.06928896651073785,"score_gpt":0.26671157569927106,"score_spread":0.19742260918853322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6908553512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9013869,0.007619806,0.0000027778121,0.009893686,0.00080782856,0.0012036727,0.00063357345,0.00014636626,0.078305356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736977,0.007539819,0.00011397104,0.0059204292,0.002865926,0.000047870355,0.000041914245,0.00013394441,0.009638415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370295,0.0002806401,0.0020782994,0.0014073778,0.0004353155,0.0020954153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750483,0.0004149834,0.0009153144,0.00034828053,0.00009141056,0.0007252055],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081002363,0.0009977948,0.0018180643,0.00045824161,0.0011855947,0.0005562601,0.0012349318,0.0008718353,0.0022230234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009992134,0.001088369,0.00045230053,0.0002574291,0.0032567817,0.001248,0.00044932004,0.0014405857,0.00035381637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014677772,0.00023980987,0.0019665516,0.0011992325,0.00021040045,0.000022392866,0.05422052,0.000030832154,0.000021316788,0.9376481,0.0034460928,0.00084793736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008836908,0.0019988532,0.033645507,0.0015941216,0.0007370659,0.00008205643,0.07780008,0.0012965277,0.0017207749,0.26759246,0.59924674,0.0054488876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021093225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022386727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6700557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043610955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041385632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6923589516","doi":"10.14288/1.0314255","title":"PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA SECOND ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BUSINESS DONE IN PURSUANCE OF THE MUNICIPAL SUPERANNUATION ACT FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31ST 1941","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Annual report; Government (linguistics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.011983683066609095,"score_gpt":0.20738551725374732,"score_spread":0.19540183418713822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6923589516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958185,0.000064423424,0.00001617382,0.0004481299,0.00022067934,0.00091053016,0.0009368874,0.000010193537,0.0015744946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834944,0.00007024694,0.000042141193,0.000012559044,0.000040323393,0.0000021946046,0.0000038088324,0.000008527999,0.01632577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853355,0.00019283408,0.00027205978,0.00026345733,0.00050035823,0.00023777128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829245,0.00020876393,0.0004105516,0.00042650758,0.000622094,0.000039643895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007973441,0.00003874683,0.0002788683,0.00002203199,0.000441246,0.00005648048,0.0009293849,0.00011433597,0.00020732258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017858153,0.00007160069,0.00016037698,0.0004016863,0.0018527424,0.00037804805,0.00017595693,0.00010318773,7.080241e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025767906,0.0017227352,0.52712506,0.0011658379,0.0003602776,0.00017125561,0.032904305,0.000024334111,0.0044017993,0.0005081103,0.06616594,0.36519268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010434081,0.0000370167,0.98925525,0.00037170356,0.000032656375,0.000011643116,0.005659277,0.000007038297,0.000008831012,0.0008654804,0.002611917,0.00009577927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56982094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99371815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4621302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009228091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005145809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6826507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6924850377","doi":"10.15468/dl.x7wzg9","title":"Occurrence Download","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Global Biodiversity Information Facility","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Matching (statistics); Range (aeronautics); Data set; R package","score_opus":0.022783737619774647,"score_gpt":0.25353228018712876,"score_spread":0.2307485425673541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6924850377","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003356921,0.00003053437,7.9660015e-7,0.0002661541,0.0010159155,0.0002302779,0.99548036,0.0000920198,0.002548248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000011965583,0.00018175937,8.5593274e-7,0.0004997199,0.0000064267524,0.0000016653414,0.9992957,7.249308e-9,0.0000019011084],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822867,0.0001728849,0.00029644396,0.00021087022,0.00073797774,0.00035313575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875194,0.000023036737,0.00022664711,0.00039016295,0.0003733167,0.00023492651],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039867754,0.00020257443,0.00024942827,0.00006868011,0.001136257,0.00038393552,0.0005895765,0.00041544472,0.010567311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017088663,0.00021243989,0.0001691389,0.0002949595,0.00047324368,0.0010384355,0.00020966324,0.00027254006,0.21851647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009721071,0.000030739826,0.00019687536,0.000058880465,0.000018587007,0.000004282061,0.0006043843,4.90071e-7,2.7063825e-9,0.0000052092623,0.9985014,0.0005693953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016663293,0.000009988765,0.000043640597,0.0000030595002,0.000035535588,6.720859e-7,0.0012203731,7.1827957e-9,3.9106502e-7,0.0000065857585,0.99827,0.00024315297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00339512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014704168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20794916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004915806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059891585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9903372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W69577062","doi":"","title":"Authority Migration and Accountability in Canadian Type II Multilevel Governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Corporate governance; Multi-level governance; Political science; Public administration; Business; Law","score_opus":0.08846417711070394,"score_gpt":0.33411347938111685,"score_spread":0.24564930227041293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W69577062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99574596,0.000030230782,0.000012457512,0.0006139445,0.00028187913,0.00022015489,0.000015512,0.000058845144,0.003020995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99223924,0.00004933355,0.000019711622,0.000166853,0.000108740365,4.3705325e-7,0.000007104465,0.000011120468,0.007397461],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824804,0.00038009553,0.00015523213,0.00042003972,0.0002856088,0.0005109647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990053,0.00007931254,0.00009026891,0.00026168313,0.00012626429,0.00043715705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092574646,0.00016175695,0.00019679274,0.0002094792,0.0008827175,0.00020105438,0.00041264205,0.0002224353,0.00007899753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013664976,0.00018578123,0.00003917346,0.00030402868,0.00025484446,0.0014429542,0.00010198229,0.0003543265,0.00007190138],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025898988,0.000033914745,0.9862938,0.0000108899385,0.000004714206,0.000012840425,0.0054494683,0.0000015454921,0.000021330745,0.0072486266,0.0000010182785,0.0008959703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037951037,0.000045047967,0.9614064,0.000046812187,0.000011487596,8.4756095e-7,0.0003872052,0.0000021352926,0.00003955464,0.0008619174,0.036597487,0.00022157855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09454667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8997587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006934545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003611352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9114828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6963789470","doi":"10.22080/lps.2022.24352.1406","title":"A Comparative Study of Proper Administration of the Non-governmental Organization in the Laws of Iran, Armenia, and Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Administration (probate law); Face (sociological concept); Legal research; Civil society; Descriptive research","score_opus":0.257798761907814,"score_gpt":0.5361925917122305,"score_spread":0.27839382980441657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6963789470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949138,0.000099346005,9.1415944e-7,0.00013204273,0.00011566429,0.0007783247,0.000022367592,0.0000025108457,0.0039350213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955744,0.00014491557,0.0000028439676,0.000025788118,0.000027676459,0.000007687121,0.0000022376591,0.000006215994,0.00022521113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980271,0.00041954193,0.00046124664,0.00012895501,0.0008479976,0.00011520156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988475,0.00016162924,0.00059986673,0.0001563957,0.00019648873,0.000038144695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092523743,0.000089846464,0.0003229928,0.00010173594,0.00025160183,0.00012520998,0.0009716351,0.000029155597,0.0005057958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008187376,0.00005451816,0.000024708917,0.000937765,0.0002193187,0.00044495554,0.00016624367,0.0001102786,4.2798337e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089492525,0.00053935475,0.92850035,0.00004708876,0.00007423234,0.000005655927,0.05453344,0.000037825626,0.009802841,0.00062511436,0.0056091174,0.00013551123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035656636,0.000027766087,0.9507535,0.00008181269,0.00002906675,4.853706e-7,0.03908183,0.0000110907795,0.00890212,0.00046930855,0.00021709909,0.000069328846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2838093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78692544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50311613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000951517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004647794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72095984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6969343396","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7420668","title":"Nation's Choice Wisconsin Dells Grand National 2022 live streaming online Cheer &amp; Dance free","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dance; Studio; Event (particle physics); Doors; Upload; Dance education","score_opus":0.06332289154234372,"score_gpt":0.29603685367301585,"score_spread":0.23271396213067214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6969343396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048293534,0.00036788156,0.00009866089,0.0010006281,0.00032908848,0.0006105476,0.0021088282,0.0009558017,0.9940456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002338254,0.000505762,0.00053373195,0.0003497886,0.002018713,1.9889137e-7,0.010249403,0.0043045813,0.97969955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967044,0.00067210244,0.00025664645,0.00057960156,0.001364757,0.00042249155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984781,0.00007754811,0.00027077342,0.00046031483,0.00051973417,0.0001935338],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008696388,0.0002225644,0.00022316657,0.0005163949,0.0041605323,0.0007017551,0.0016941517,0.00015820352,0.39360398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012493758,0.00025014163,0.00008313356,0.0005548346,0.00046665504,0.00020884053,0.0010245082,0.000546613,0.007117314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009636179,0.00015619872,0.000003010345,0.000032297252,0.000062614454,0.0000058784744,0.0035710172,0.00000830366,0.000024669023,0.020649998,0.970711,0.004765396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000463163,0.00003937543,0.0001042557,0.00004534242,0.000019501247,0.000005931211,0.0005893724,0.000012138375,0.0000016360942,0.0015746029,0.99686074,0.00028391098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072772015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013982886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38648668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005361122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044221455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999153038","doi":"","title":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Law and Practice Special Issue - A Decade of Dunsmuir / Les 10 ans de Dunsmuir","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"CentAUR (University of Reading)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Legislation; Work (physics); Legislature; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.03451123966842477,"score_gpt":0.2891114101686986,"score_spread":0.25460017050027384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999153038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012880175,0.00014663694,0.000017016067,0.0006544019,0.00033365848,0.0001745349,0.00011683815,0.0000074693103,0.98566926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06093589,0.0006037011,0.0012500971,0.00009405425,0.003133911,5.552984e-8,0.000026272384,0.000024674164,0.93393135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986693,0.00023805242,0.0002104793,0.00020538506,0.0003644574,0.00031232703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770766,0.00029187003,0.00081590074,0.00014115442,0.0005661207,0.00047729452],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006696975,0.00016900996,0.00045598132,0.00028200858,0.0007992297,0.000045427205,0.00048870203,0.00039750442,0.004341536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013822918,0.0001982627,0.000150592,0.00009181914,0.002678532,0.00042632082,0.000041231204,0.00030753898,0.00002410281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028954956,0.000083105275,0.00022130976,0.00013090715,0.0003314745,0.00036480214,0.26669046,2.030886e-7,0.000018885688,0.39768362,0.33317608,0.001009606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036068857,0.00025597378,0.00021685926,0.0002745692,0.00025610955,0.000024177183,0.060225975,4.2675552e-7,0.000035639165,0.004543103,0.9336262,0.00018028526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07375831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71522695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64146864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060348585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004313108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001557907","doi":"","title":"Kat Ward Ep 43 Ghostly Tales with Steve Stockton 'Sittin' In'","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paranormal; Afterlife; Girl; Subject (documents); Ridiculous; Visitor pattern","score_opus":0.007163414466920474,"score_gpt":0.20423702447660944,"score_spread":0.19707361000968895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001557907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007038326,0.00025407513,1.9310161e-7,0.00020511432,0.0003862169,0.00087896275,0.000060694154,0.00017538294,0.99733555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031689943,0.00024099769,0.00031354153,0.00017806242,0.00027385534,0.000014083318,0.00007338835,0.00010941374,0.99562764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778587,0.00018869442,0.00053576403,0.00026755044,0.0007479044,0.00047422672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986353,0.00012474442,0.00059135293,0.0003633477,0.00013727613,0.00014798471],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000446421,0.0003505983,0.00053327304,0.00016127777,0.00014014312,0.00009600045,0.00048256732,0.00051686255,0.2293278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051427174,0.00030190492,0.00012838183,0.000014789535,0.00042554224,6.200801e-7,0.000063178966,0.00034425763,0.022369428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060983748,0.000046173926,0.000023554858,0.00028395985,0.000042715514,0.00002265535,0.004099141,0.000044206707,3.4949156e-8,0.0009243792,0.99373204,0.00072013354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006577689,0.00017696916,0.000054142412,0.0004642048,0.000036307654,0.000008587059,0.0013798014,0.000002573738,0.0000015319193,0.00003696299,0.99677545,0.00040572905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025472067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09148779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20695837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012645884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014011373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001838269","doi":"","title":"L'individu face à l'État : statut et rôle du lanceur d'alerte","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Council on Foreign Relations","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Vetting; Hypocrisy","score_opus":0.009480483158449111,"score_gpt":0.1975380135001612,"score_spread":0.1880575303417121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001838269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.938025,0.00022127856,0.0008662199,0.0063735996,0.001548119,0.00041302538,0.00013971695,0.0001708223,0.052242193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8434522,0.0004477979,0.00069376745,0.00010798903,0.00013437585,2.1633715e-12,0.00003746454,0.000016696109,0.15510972],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968932,0.00071894354,0.00020383752,0.0007027842,0.0006346571,0.00084654544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981394,0.00032516912,0.00043121888,0.00042633052,0.00028061174,0.0003972642],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045056408,0.00036004177,0.0005799847,0.0002618649,0.0010803193,0.000046529847,0.0011939243,0.00031841386,0.0030296897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015383752,0.00049255986,0.00037257938,0.0005913509,0.0010207272,0.00071954564,0.00064415036,0.00049766304,0.0014342339],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014828956,0.00049399503,0.01411044,0.00021380497,0.0003157182,0.0003997957,0.71954167,0.0016614319,0.00004726082,0.24481072,0.015457892,0.002798985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00260665,0.00016360387,0.017265333,0.00041514702,0.00024867125,0.0000059737963,0.6740043,0.0031565586,0.00002103604,0.0002897257,0.30109385,0.0007291735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049035144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004483684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28563595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005967222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000529481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008542003","doi":"","title":"Challenges for Australian Tribunals; Towards Aretaic Practice Principles","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Normative; Agency (philosophy); Entitlement (fair division); Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis)","score_opus":0.05756544244098988,"score_gpt":0.31616903886350983,"score_spread":0.25860359642251995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008542003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043970544,0.0010916776,0.00022456692,0.0018283706,0.0018492662,0.0012783941,0.0003587294,0.00016598265,0.94923246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72037625,0.0008837533,0.00035906117,0.00004811322,0.0011583038,0.000004740593,0.0013378798,0.000036771326,0.27579516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972396,0.00016320324,0.00046658466,0.0005667876,0.0010628339,0.00050099636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712163,0.00054835767,0.0006963403,0.00037481048,0.0010224815,0.00023637123],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000675681,0.0003708419,0.0005110235,0.00025325964,0.0022200602,0.0001901042,0.00079644076,0.0005985057,0.00006548915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004077391,0.0003294246,0.0004896724,0.00016997919,0.001072052,0.00088226073,0.000048315807,0.00044927935,0.000054798784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003947006,0.0007643361,0.0007582809,0.00091962615,0.0014189287,0.0005504511,0.05958293,0.00013316784,0.000032694308,0.89151096,0.017958269,0.022423346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007395718,0.0001550333,0.011783218,0.0003461246,0.00029266992,0.00002575033,0.02269917,0.000007593969,0.00011555379,0.002911139,0.9604685,0.00045569058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014857528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008293826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9425102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040151383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017066183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010469709","doi":"","title":"Inside and Outside Canadian Administrative Law: Essays in Honour of David Mullan","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04605780861181407,"score_gpt":0.2783848445988079,"score_spread":0.23232703598699384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010469709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36994883,7.4208975e-7,9.149796e-7,0.00028133823,0.000061843166,0.00023803768,0.000032084175,0.000056435656,0.62937975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99268293,0.006793308,0.00005611548,0.00006568794,0.000045156296,9.874751e-7,0.000011333086,0.000009975699,0.00033452522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987995,0.0002241688,0.00012781058,0.00026965563,0.0001786926,0.0004001659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941266,0.000112788,0.00006801621,0.0001431356,0.00006525742,0.00019811753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003027048,0.00012247822,0.00019936854,0.0061299535,0.0004210241,0.000042411713,0.00025776686,0.000116414725,0.00004385991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047626556,0.00013453343,0.000047400288,0.0038010853,0.00036843575,0.00027928306,0.000063173204,0.00017601936,0.000025807483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006451224,0.00009016853,0.008128544,0.000049970415,0.000053260344,0.0013178114,0.28638792,0.000007125807,0.0000069232633,0.69958407,0.00035191013,0.0039577754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005630825,0.000069937836,0.0041986275,0.00005133111,0.000017738972,0.0000013853187,0.020924406,0.000021410426,0.00008024379,0.00015254192,0.9737139,0.00020540974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95368373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99772596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97336197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002513379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013680805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54861146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016196048","doi":"","title":"Адміністративно-правові основи діяльності військового омбудсмена: міжнародний досвід і перспективи України","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ukrainian; Context (archaeology); Institution; Work (physics); Democracy; Accountability; Military threat; Control (management)","score_opus":0.07443977003509342,"score_gpt":0.3885488224548356,"score_spread":0.3141090524197422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016196048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5604935,0.000852977,0.00024903618,0.03782947,0.0033734518,0.0010502887,0.00026666865,0.00043713013,0.39544746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56025213,0.00012856883,0.00024725293,0.00020027939,0.0002960301,0.0000028658867,0.000054578635,0.000012504592,0.4388058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99470454,0.0007298483,0.0006139572,0.00092958147,0.0021826664,0.00083937944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647826,0.0005997732,0.0003792411,0.00068780343,0.0016086629,0.00024628473],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023782873,0.0003974517,0.0005811162,0.0007893484,0.003840237,0.00043020234,0.0025420713,0.00034126083,0.003463188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006261912,0.0003311847,0.00038984406,0.0014695397,0.0056108385,0.0010547925,0.0006613087,0.0004973649,0.00035171234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002132896,0.00030823713,0.0012133394,0.000053285967,0.000115776944,0.000022993547,0.017983828,0.00005510729,0.00036679572,0.9503561,0.028066782,0.001244414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007446104,0.00011309965,0.005595752,0.00007160008,0.000087444445,0.0000034745042,0.024959592,0.00007094629,0.00057943346,0.067007594,0.90035486,0.0004115608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001988964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009427471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8833485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000499305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014858836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024018071","doi":"","title":"Právní základ a aktuální činnost Mezinárodního trestního soudu","year":2010,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labrador Retriever; Public rights; Email authentication","score_opus":0.009258532474184107,"score_gpt":0.26736907960913253,"score_spread":0.2581105471349484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024018071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46653903,0.0028116049,0.000006301833,0.00014283862,0.012496308,0.001306295,0.0006826585,0.00026608713,0.51574886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71342516,0.0000744432,0.000096798045,0.00008834113,0.0049416106,0.00008507782,0.0025487354,0.00015848243,0.27858135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876809,0.0005176019,0.0029777372,0.002215249,0.005383148,0.0012253495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98760533,0.0008650783,0.0031573465,0.0011809715,0.0062887277,0.00090253673],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007027332,0.0015937154,0.0016521794,0.0011122606,0.003052877,0.0049772067,0.0019824195,0.0027634096,0.00010979889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092321075,0.0015655736,0.0015910524,0.001213173,0.0016477266,0.0037052413,0.00017652495,0.0026118546,0.00017010164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056018466,0.012022334,0.027831445,0.007261694,0.005961969,0.0045681247,0.31051967,0.0001106025,0.15452592,0.40864593,0.054858554,0.008091921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005545727,0.0023153934,0.10535658,0.011419443,0.001698788,0.0014515696,0.011254781,0.00026083388,0.087488696,0.041535195,0.72177976,0.009893252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024750273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039282654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6669212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006866449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032708636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029901828","doi":"","title":"Luustoisen perhe - projekti : Osa 2: tutkimustulosten esittely koulutustilaisuudessa : luento projektin pilottivaiheen osallistujille","year":2008,"lang":"fi","type":"article","venue":"Doria (University of Helsinki)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04559320749048771,"score_gpt":0.23605413978744783,"score_spread":0.19046093229696012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029901828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8230006,0.00071779854,0.00007348611,0.0038682176,0.0014391633,0.001675077,0.00017606138,0.00031099457,0.16873859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8520185,0.0011117769,0.00089224527,0.00010596611,0.00077789795,0.0000015456117,0.00006181691,0.00006015096,0.14497012],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99448705,0.00069800153,0.000586953,0.0012202751,0.0016952121,0.0013124937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691,0.00019838609,0.00075200805,0.000877192,0.00062134804,0.00064107793],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089243543,0.00067216286,0.001142625,0.0005490824,0.0039605675,0.00011674697,0.0018743618,0.0006733362,0.004196987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000684923,0.0007661044,0.0005306295,0.0011187936,0.0029749463,0.0013392243,0.00058241945,0.00075689156,0.0012198496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021510548,0.0044490728,0.03472831,0.0013707522,0.0015567185,0.0028912986,0.6699159,0.00003204732,0.0021508872,0.123459324,0.14633109,0.010963529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004766987,0.0011668069,0.08905614,0.0006126495,0.0008076082,0.000057688736,0.07544388,0.0001518514,0.0002666876,0.0023485587,0.82322687,0.0020942863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011308809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068868566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67689574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006346152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013419504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7037604870","doi":"","title":"ERIC ED537026: Bricklayer: Apprenticeship Course Outline. Apprenticeship and Industry Training. 0110.1","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Work (physics); Quality (philosophy); Product (mathematics); Vocational education; Course (navigation)","score_opus":0.017130650825690964,"score_gpt":0.23126674245532367,"score_spread":0.2141360916296327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7037604870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011814662,0.00045641334,1.729913e-7,0.00029157975,0.00093486795,0.00059668935,0.00009163261,0.0003014591,0.9961457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010481046,0.00024672586,0.00045047695,0.0002136001,0.0010014026,0.000016173151,0.00009727073,0.00012897702,0.98736435],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744713,0.00018561754,0.0006644955,0.00035248674,0.0007741553,0.00057612656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798334,0.00016889066,0.00090015284,0.00041772975,0.00015599844,0.00037391973],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067286944,0.0004341265,0.0005753314,0.0001301831,0.00033270396,0.00026654382,0.0006271218,0.0015999684,0.43801928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016119165,0.00043028643,0.00016713123,0.000018273005,0.0009052633,0.0000010600202,0.0001045163,0.0011839285,0.0046564643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025887131,0.000074725074,0.000017898114,0.0003117645,0.000071005685,0.000011378774,0.0044186832,0.0000031656436,8.6476774e-8,0.0008772721,0.99083686,0.0033512795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053782994,0.000063132546,0.0000520152,0.00025821014,0.0001530619,0.000015578204,0.002134982,0.000006880795,9.1797693e-7,0.00011755029,0.99617016,0.0004896858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067021814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02376943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4333628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035338056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015563882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038693100","doi":"","title":"Indirect Judicial Review in Administrative Law: Legality vs Legal Certainty In Europe","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research Publications (Maastricht University)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Council on Foreign Relations","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Emperipolesis; Liquation; Diafiltration; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.17801607188075758,"score_gpt":0.40411973184123967,"score_spread":0.2261036599604821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038693100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013149926,0.0009472394,0.000002016024,0.00865633,0.00009950992,0.0016794298,0.00018898842,0.00011137825,0.9881836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049826694,0.0070222556,0.00002270406,0.00017201282,0.00023502288,0.000030297642,0.00048475325,0.000030023213,0.98702025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918993,0.0040106084,0.00047877204,0.00086686114,0.0017946346,0.0009497943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99667853,0.0008331472,0.00025341168,0.00067809824,0.0011638103,0.00039298355],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004863424,0.00026462978,0.00059415883,0.0035991296,0.0017543336,0.00028853992,0.0020828852,0.00029688588,0.0045900666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011727966,0.00031775082,0.00014834177,0.00818207,0.0013882793,0.00094313576,0.00058515515,0.0028348782,0.00020297893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029461422,0.00021432711,0.00013164406,0.00009447189,0.000024160874,0.00017937174,0.00087440363,6.9179276e-7,1.311738e-7,0.8321458,0.16589046,0.00041509958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033268792,0.00009801341,0.0011101753,0.00031859672,0.000023185821,0.0000012023131,0.0006711462,0.0000014533064,3.5246322e-7,0.0038642925,0.9932944,0.00028449754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077812853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09707683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82828146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004658833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014987166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071441573","doi":"","title":"Some Initial Thoughts on Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd and Edmonton (City) v. Edmonton East (Capilano) Shopping Centres Ltd","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Legislature; Limiting; Judicial review; Administrative law; Standard of review; Common law","score_opus":0.020230310734507775,"score_gpt":0.2638333077511673,"score_spread":0.24360299701665955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071441573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9021641,0.0006586889,0.000003947214,0.0014161667,0.0012724729,0.0002067994,0.00004388335,0.00006677805,0.09416717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984648,0.00023811868,0.000032139404,0.0004753307,0.0030844612,0.0000083935,0.000009545244,0.000026523952,0.011477483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756396,0.00020731798,0.00035651185,0.00048843795,0.0006952785,0.0006885073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983695,0.00009487641,0.000338347,0.0005992578,0.00010675778,0.0004912208],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033755004,0.000277911,0.0004215779,0.00008405238,0.0023004306,0.00038664936,0.000703402,0.00018999694,0.00021718293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012021884,0.0002553314,0.00009660153,0.000060853177,0.0006175087,0.00073364744,0.00013170214,0.00025765752,0.0000133887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013516619,0.00010781478,0.0046355207,0.00003984123,0.00006563432,0.00008103629,0.0019304854,0.0000037950401,0.00057202746,0.9844566,0.0064895125,0.0014825817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035788137,0.00033966932,0.074211255,0.000881105,0.00012983054,0.000006952607,0.0021797188,0.00009238803,0.014968858,0.087447345,0.8143912,0.0017728781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7323787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9882131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89700925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031461238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006856076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096159731","doi":"","title":"Specialty Ombudsman Offices: The New Breed of Structural Heretics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Government (linguistics); Public sector; Private sector; Specialty; Public service; Depiction; Service (business)","score_opus":0.06607557065098654,"score_gpt":0.32646915096013135,"score_spread":0.26039358030914483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096159731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41100347,0.00009244886,0.00004462083,0.0025240455,0.00068856264,0.00018065998,0.0000020329708,0.00006171898,0.5854024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431002,0.000006449873,0.0003365627,0.00017885411,0.0011258062,3.825525e-7,0.0000014222209,0.0000059280087,0.05524436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894595,0.00009953065,0.0001741188,0.00011552601,0.00045148912,0.00021335935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993437,0.00006079655,0.00008322572,0.00020259281,0.00010992042,0.00019974429],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034874177,0.00007727456,0.00012814126,0.000026243622,0.00024737397,0.00007110707,0.00042843772,0.00006015993,0.0018020781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056262335,0.00004441984,0.00005779406,0.00013911858,0.00045245737,0.00011818811,0.000039780996,0.00008444326,0.00011317553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001291811,0.0000106141715,0.0011648259,0.000002673043,0.000011631779,0.0000010272164,0.035814367,0.0000046257574,0.0000071766285,0.9110697,0.05038053,0.0015199352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000895889,0.00013477275,0.014372528,0.000014582207,0.00003816001,0.0000013494441,0.029213915,0.00007506825,0.00044709397,0.29049295,0.6640246,0.00028910243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005647522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07558099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62057674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000450522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039638052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097157888","doi":"","title":"86Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture Discussion on Constitution Supervision of Chinese Local People’s Congress: The Way out of the Nominal Constitution Supervision in China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; China; Subject (documents); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.012015790003606405,"score_gpt":0.28514714728761725,"score_spread":0.27313135728401083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097157888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821012,0.0001475356,0.000018666027,0.0011852961,0.0006450047,0.0005054519,0.000044632736,0.0000080329955,0.015344163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993805,0.00006181877,0.000012638996,0.00006741874,0.0001114957,0.0000035258454,0.000012013235,0.0000038044711,0.00034675267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983588,0.00026675442,0.00038800796,0.00018895695,0.0004897833,0.00030770866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994235,0.00006116593,0.0001460323,0.00014233257,0.00004693164,0.00018006099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006525683,0.00016428976,0.00026932784,0.00012315398,0.00057441375,0.000021508682,0.00029697362,0.0002074027,0.00035139243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062034516,0.00006617741,0.00009740711,0.0002487729,0.0021146655,0.00045235667,0.00007805163,0.00025991033,0.000007177854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012913688,0.00024730054,0.40355715,0.000049118185,0.000016630214,9.397444e-7,0.08733184,0.000017674272,0.0023917092,0.50459284,0.0006567655,0.0010088918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013425362,0.00013345235,0.9611913,0.0003894626,0.000043670185,0.000008454512,0.021614565,0.00020927598,0.0049497224,0.0025533251,0.0072987727,0.00026547752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07465158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47662404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5576341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016919158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021461675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9315104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099426683","doi":"","title":"Ministry of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Denial; Psychopathy Checklist; Psychopathy; Checklist; Christian ministry; Risk assessment; Sex offender","score_opus":0.025178291871745598,"score_gpt":0.2942564195329373,"score_spread":0.2690781276611917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099426683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59378827,0.000044220134,0.00004617069,0.00028423898,0.00022921339,0.000041574185,0.0000026963364,0.000011561834,0.40555203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96313757,0.000035410096,0.00003907242,0.00002495317,0.000071379094,2.4159354e-7,0.0000012733306,0.0000020845655,0.036687993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934626,0.000025014602,0.00015503075,0.000089323796,0.00020315545,0.00018119764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966663,0.000029546465,0.00004084301,0.000075208525,0.000059267346,0.00012850176],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004254956,0.00003844983,0.00007023388,0.000020014559,0.00024195919,0.000008797061,0.000100148485,0.00003284367,0.0024730319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028661503,0.00003216278,0.000013356198,0.00008199096,0.0001171878,0.00006690844,0.000016485856,0.000026001553,0.000001527563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013646854,0.000046053574,0.0414487,0.000022706474,0.000018943521,0.000008220075,0.019595195,8.01056e-8,0.000030803814,0.91555494,0.016839897,0.0064208005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019449921,0.00002010275,0.111381054,0.000005122222,0.000007847574,7.623168e-7,0.028799845,0.0000028807003,0.00016762275,0.0042212196,0.8550192,0.00017983097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64418894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91133374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057727433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046023185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102689192","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0043","title":"A pragmatist approach to the administrative state: A new interpretation of John Willis’s ‘three approaches to administrative law’","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Opposition (politics); Interpretation (philosophy); Administrative law; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Constitutional interpretation","score_opus":0.07232671953910134,"score_gpt":0.28953992751324215,"score_spread":0.2172132079741408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102689192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01671521,0.0001671482,0.0486996,0.0028289184,0.00020381129,0.0006872866,0.000042508633,0.000020052741,0.93063545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98567754,0.000016237595,0.007690638,0.00013078145,0.00007276181,4.800181e-7,0.0000026295224,0.0000041964263,0.006404733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876344,0.0002474509,0.00022485234,0.00018821385,0.00036729858,0.00020872094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908096,0.00010339526,0.00023104556,0.00016489728,0.00017895007,0.00024077845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004919049,0.0001203217,0.00024796708,0.00004188201,0.0009793757,0.00009478497,0.00062269735,0.00006420006,0.000277896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003683064,0.00010114958,0.00011866836,0.00010625241,0.00047483505,0.00048218697,0.00007838154,0.00015714909,0.0000057117086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003088887,0.00012561874,0.00004233184,0.000015723399,0.000115444134,0.0000039784845,0.15930328,0.00009303437,0.000006454547,0.83221567,0.004773037,0.0029965611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025632924,0.0019463808,0.010636248,0.0006356522,0.00041065252,0.000018646995,0.48170614,0.0007739862,0.00043171798,0.06321022,0.43687013,0.00079694117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04276478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7395637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9689623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003026185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005941202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9636095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113235981","doi":"","title":"Доброчесність як принцип державної служби: концептуальний та правовий аналіз","year":2025,"lang":"uk","type":"article","venue":"Scientific periodicals of Ukraine","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Legislation; Ethical code; Government (linguistics); Compliance (psychology); Code of conduct; Foundation (evidence); Sanctions","score_opus":0.014972594951878073,"score_gpt":0.34115826394483534,"score_spread":0.32618566899295726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113235981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5985326,0.010070992,0.00015320168,0.015880326,0.01543622,0.0016132677,0.000516011,0.00037924567,0.35741815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74354905,0.00045216407,0.0003388887,0.00054234784,0.00061751023,0.00002929849,0.0000775766,0.000038594808,0.2543546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907694,0.0007721586,0.0018740857,0.002045662,0.0025908442,0.00194789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99517184,0.00044921436,0.00070370897,0.0019021534,0.0008949081,0.00087818457],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005179253,0.0007654158,0.0014450209,0.0012003395,0.004599515,0.0019734716,0.0028713574,0.00072234904,0.013694523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094258465,0.00070031383,0.0008877619,0.0034167299,0.013200281,0.0006307154,0.00073244656,0.00082383346,0.0019352441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024414557,0.002708019,0.0012568155,0.0010837029,0.0005689591,0.000114948874,0.0816432,0.000019215191,0.013056718,0.5185479,0.3298855,0.050870858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014950741,0.00018537705,0.002975299,0.00074724964,0.00024048863,0.0000029751252,0.0041155694,0.000262241,0.0025027483,0.020905007,0.9657134,0.0008545902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012566586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003944505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63582784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031918075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035359864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116639937","doi":"","title":"Book review - The European Ombudsman Investigated: From Old Battles to New Challenges, D. Curtin, T. Ehnert, A. Morandini and S. Tas (eds), 2025, Hart. ISBN: 978 1 5099 7560 0","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Publications (Maastricht University)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Council on Foreign Relations","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Feature (linguistics); Work (physics); Legislation","score_opus":0.0932206060570369,"score_gpt":0.3436435945943777,"score_spread":0.2504229885373408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116639937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006791667,0.1592733,0.00014264412,0.37358293,0.00012788386,0.0014795919,0.00006916658,0.0002704937,0.46437484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002170355,0.2557152,0.00025019379,0.0051768115,0.00041925997,0.000013176176,0.00010337856,0.000026246864,0.7361254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561375,0.002024259,0.00027307804,0.00066710106,0.0007473684,0.000674464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700075,0.00070200715,0.00009907173,0.00085678697,0.0005890192,0.000752384],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021829058,0.00019541991,0.00026440137,0.0011939551,0.0023501853,0.00044173034,0.0016763178,0.00010540364,0.0013196548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009593144,0.00016858842,0.00008883637,0.003706593,0.00090610085,0.000734571,0.0006302257,0.00061424286,0.00054604944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056647873,0.000050949307,0.00014139897,0.000038596827,0.00004371949,0.0000066528683,0.0013277186,5.465931e-7,0.000006632818,0.19759452,0.7917958,0.008987821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032277015,0.000033294877,0.0038911747,0.0003372052,0.000058685848,3.294043e-7,0.0011937092,0.000003921915,0.000007670015,0.0022885855,0.9916925,0.00017016426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036852257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029725167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36840612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025118023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001023477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125500598","doi":"10.33693/2541-8025-2025-21-6-187-192","title":"The dualistic model of independent control over information and confidentiality: Canada's experience and prospects for implementation in Russia","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Economic problems and legal practice","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Transparency (behavior); Control (management); State (computer science); Balance (ability); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.010662330751292345,"score_gpt":0.29708690371322377,"score_spread":0.2864245729619314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125500598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98204356,0.0011758221,0.0007940143,0.0061977953,0.00054947473,0.0026617353,0.00014287926,0.0000067415135,0.0064279493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981952,0.0008458165,0.000032862587,0.00042661786,0.000033099313,0.00009405261,0.0000038259823,0.0000036755062,0.00036489085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861497,0.00011491479,0.00066525856,0.00022599325,0.00012959001,0.00024929162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871236,0.00049950345,0.0005450331,0.00010216764,0.00006835193,0.000072611256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013065459,0.00013377117,0.00022989183,0.00006178645,0.000676254,0.0006701059,0.00010183979,0.00007107365,0.000020983638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103459526,0.00011536119,0.000018827026,0.000041327054,0.00029720357,0.002265241,0.00005577348,0.00013930461,2.807576e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023348539,0.00002139999,0.0011954404,0.00018921283,0.000075772106,4.2370138e-7,0.030370401,0.00025844984,0.000022922195,0.9637624,0.00028517947,0.0035848953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017980691,0.00044776857,0.05783096,0.00033092417,0.0005208181,0.00001355503,0.14092848,0.24233428,0.000182819,0.11439079,0.4239183,0.001120598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6491578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87064344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8493716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002241087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011551006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6461847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126136542","doi":"","title":"Administrative Law: Cases, Text, and Materials, 8th Edition","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Casebook; Statutory interpretation; Statutory law; Tribunal; Judicial review; Doctrine; Supreme court; Legislature","score_opus":0.03155307214084373,"score_gpt":0.2974684636043396,"score_spread":0.26591539146349585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126136542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7142255,0.003453645,0.00001577137,0.002708075,0.0062730946,0.0007239636,0.00074860663,0.000174441,0.27167693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680336,0.00075719523,0.00024814767,0.0016593632,0.004539965,0.000027967226,0.00012847917,0.000038928243,0.024566341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628615,0.0006302735,0.0006407541,0.0009427629,0.00070234487,0.00079770776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979351,0.00024701265,0.00028192007,0.00047453225,0.0003008179,0.00076057186],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006243159,0.00043765263,0.0005966973,0.000046560857,0.0024962726,0.0013751764,0.00030538804,0.0004108342,0.020935962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012943639,0.00044098916,0.00014070136,0.00025723682,0.0016829829,0.0010430688,0.00016813591,0.0004346788,0.001272562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057504618,0.0002286469,0.000035040528,0.00008781447,0.00007075522,0.0007642132,0.0033884502,1.659454e-7,0.0011478434,0.98527664,0.008756349,0.00018655356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015231479,0.0005576127,0.0016070978,0.0004282994,0.00024881432,0.00016287164,0.007818685,0.000003200456,0.03045991,0.15821171,0.7977826,0.0011960667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007674452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1005181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.827065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020117102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007310039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128688157","doi":"10.26180/4559041.v1","title":"Bills of rights: the newest despotism? a comparison of the development of the principles of judicial review of administrative action in Australia and Canada","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Administrative law; Jurisdiction; Scrutiny; Statutory law; Action (physics); Human rights; Standard of review; Common law","score_opus":0.14231471892724518,"score_gpt":0.3712414000381734,"score_spread":0.22892668111092823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128688157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99521184,0.0002966343,6.7296725e-7,0.000105631305,0.00029862984,0.00079936936,0.00008817493,9.428028e-7,0.0031980826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969716,0.00044750803,0.000024530455,0.00000292707,0.000011533144,5.452689e-7,0.000010869317,0.0000033174358,0.0025271429],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765563,0.00049814355,0.00075525057,0.00021657874,0.00071730267,0.00015709171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959003,0.00017178355,0.0031102335,0.00035723462,0.00041452504,0.00004594389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054197054,0.00019120806,0.00071866944,0.00006819453,0.00073268876,0.000005827946,0.0009891933,0.00015983895,0.0000825712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073967545,0.00011323468,0.00015572848,0.00026308565,0.001401304,0.00010293924,0.000101888196,0.0002503099,1.1727166e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012857117,0.0018928745,0.3681948,0.01963472,0.0011747534,0.000007077817,0.50011784,0.00005856125,0.0025055767,0.10010847,0.001117016,0.0039026188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034901153,0.000069560854,0.9324324,0.0076367506,0.00028809684,1.585488e-7,0.029021364,0.0000047192234,0.024045588,0.00026538502,0.0057326746,0.00015429495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64246535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5642376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002404873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034006648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6032633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128704530","doi":"10.26180/4559041","title":"Bills of rights: the newest despotism? a comparison of the development of the principles of judicial review of administrative action in Australia and Canada","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Administrative law; Jurisdiction; Scrutiny; Statutory law; Action (physics); Human rights; Standard of review; Common law","score_opus":0.14231471892724518,"score_gpt":0.3712414000381734,"score_spread":0.22892668111092823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128704530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99521184,0.0002966343,6.7296725e-7,0.000105631305,0.00029862984,0.00079936936,0.00008817493,9.428028e-7,0.0031980826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969716,0.00044750803,0.000024530455,0.00000292707,0.000011533144,5.452689e-7,0.000010869317,0.0000033174358,0.0025271429],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765563,0.00049814355,0.00075525057,0.00021657874,0.00071730267,0.00015709171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959003,0.00017178355,0.0031102335,0.00035723462,0.00041452504,0.00004594389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054197054,0.00019120806,0.00071866944,0.00006819453,0.00073268876,0.000005827946,0.0009891933,0.00015983895,0.0000825712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073967545,0.00011323468,0.00015572848,0.00026308565,0.001401304,0.00010293924,0.000101888196,0.0002503099,1.1727166e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012857117,0.0018928745,0.3681948,0.01963472,0.0011747534,0.000007077817,0.50011784,0.00005856125,0.0025055767,0.10010847,0.001117016,0.0039026188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034901153,0.000069560854,0.9324324,0.0076367506,0.00028809684,1.585488e-7,0.029021364,0.0000047192234,0.024045588,0.00026538502,0.0057326746,0.00015429495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64246535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5642376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002404873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034006648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6032633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128743467","doi":"10.26180/4559041.v2","title":"Bills of rights: the newest despotism? a comparison of the development of the principles of judicial review of administrative action in Australia and Canada","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Administrative law; Jurisdiction; Scrutiny; Statutory law; Action (physics); Human rights; Standard of review; Common law","score_opus":0.14231471892724518,"score_gpt":0.3712414000381734,"score_spread":0.22892668111092823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128743467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99521184,0.0002966343,6.7296725e-7,0.000105631305,0.00029862984,0.00079936936,0.00008817493,9.428028e-7,0.0031980826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969716,0.00044750803,0.000024530455,0.00000292707,0.000011533144,5.452689e-7,0.000010869317,0.0000033174358,0.0025271429],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765563,0.00049814355,0.00075525057,0.00021657874,0.00071730267,0.00015709171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959003,0.00017178355,0.0031102335,0.00035723462,0.00041452504,0.00004594389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054197054,0.00019120806,0.00071866944,0.00006819453,0.00073268876,0.000005827946,0.0009891933,0.00015983895,0.0000825712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073967545,0.00011323468,0.00015572848,0.00026308565,0.001401304,0.00010293924,0.000101888196,0.0002503099,1.1727166e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012857117,0.0018928745,0.3681948,0.01963472,0.0011747534,0.000007077817,0.50011784,0.00005856125,0.0025055767,0.10010847,0.001117016,0.0039026188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034901153,0.000069560854,0.9324324,0.0076367506,0.00028809684,1.585488e-7,0.029021364,0.0000047192234,0.024045588,0.00026538502,0.0057326746,0.00015429495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64246535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5642376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002404873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034006648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6032633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7131999950","doi":"","title":"Objection as a legal remedy according to the General administrative procedure act","year":2024,"lang":"hr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Repository Faculty of Law University of Zagreb","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Meaning (existential); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.03148922245876111,"score_gpt":0.31977464152400387,"score_spread":0.28828541906524274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7131999950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8528705,0.00008430099,0.000005174021,0.0004768573,0.0013136333,0.0006935165,0.000067741734,0.00005620274,0.14443204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83310145,0.000025346499,0.00009371587,0.000025290112,0.00043341354,1.2128974e-7,0.00013173644,0.000018370081,0.16617057],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973601,0.00025453055,0.00041122662,0.00065406325,0.0009743225,0.00034572542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981894,0.00007177918,0.000646709,0.00030235611,0.0005830992,0.00020667595],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031965508,0.00036374276,0.00056755554,0.00015952943,0.0018783032,0.0001601183,0.0007898151,0.00045320386,0.00010680323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030925024,0.000321494,0.00051787833,0.00038562313,0.0005776559,0.00043203216,0.00009258096,0.0005135956,0.00010478643],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014074731,0.0003675938,0.0001981867,0.0010231152,0.001027309,0.0002980243,0.8033941,0.000077356955,0.0130599,0.17338185,0.0053044534,0.00046068043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066110585,0.0016855489,0.0061137374,0.0018430073,0.0013826115,0.00005103506,0.8456356,0.000088766305,0.02361397,0.0007318375,0.11722742,0.0009653754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028919473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05212701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17265001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035426568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012826567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132906494","doi":"","title":"Improving juidicial review of administrative discretion in China: lessons from Canadian experience","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promulgation; China; Judicial discretion; Judicial review; Administrative discretion; Administrative law; Discretion","score_opus":0.05485619271003188,"score_gpt":0.4540567213321183,"score_spread":0.3992005286220864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132906494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87352407,0.020441137,0.000079638594,0.0015894227,0.0018566496,0.0016428918,0.000104364095,0.000027967453,0.10073388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97483844,0.01390827,0.000115594885,0.00016142591,0.00040073716,0.00003975933,0.00044499422,0.000032138225,0.01005864],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640656,0.00035859193,0.00090755697,0.00075351854,0.0008122082,0.0007615608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978706,0.00012650559,0.0009307897,0.0003540244,0.00021404811,0.00050399645],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086996437,0.00044483613,0.00087065593,0.00035937093,0.00068704435,0.00008246164,0.000616736,0.0005380785,0.004839848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026621085,0.00045383946,0.00022316664,0.0007365622,0.0005387494,0.0002782665,0.000018200135,0.0006358943,0.000047591107],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010243396,0.00014676292,0.00028920072,0.0020574965,0.00003656862,0.00007401428,0.96368814,7.8858284e-7,0.00034720666,0.018023115,0.00020468405,0.015029624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010801041,0.00053055736,0.09401167,0.06463599,0.00044688577,0.0000016288767,0.80985636,0.00013980355,0.0046710046,0.0025266167,0.019456528,0.0026428765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90371686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98613596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15383177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006345548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038612252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133025843","doi":"","title":"Reconceiving discretion: from discretion as power to discretion as dialogue","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Judicial discretion; Normative; Administrative discretion; Legitimacy; Rule of law; Power (physics); Realisation","score_opus":0.018462506047905374,"score_gpt":0.36556496713437486,"score_spread":0.34710246108646947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133025843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8193644,0.00072478125,0.008208337,0.0048268875,0.009303738,0.002705228,0.000130326,0.0004476501,0.15428863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7785261,0.00053098466,0.00034748513,0.00041034605,0.0016314249,0.00014833939,0.0022513662,0.00015339926,0.21600054],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.992007,0.0007794129,0.0012477532,0.0022839492,0.0021942079,0.0014876508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958902,0.00031649764,0.0010985645,0.0010400555,0.00046233388,0.0011923381],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009166943,0.0012950427,0.0012801696,0.00048148082,0.0029678277,0.0013121595,0.0012446195,0.0015030749,0.054124903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000308524,0.0012845006,0.0007682674,0.0009993251,0.00065410807,0.0011098918,0.00007422037,0.0012499454,0.011521532],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011066372,0.0005140277,0.00011955376,0.00014514303,0.00033003432,0.00010242687,0.93001056,0.00028677526,0.0013067955,0.055787664,0.0007824912,0.00950792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039821933,0.0031837176,0.025743024,0.009340841,0.0015560809,0.000015272455,0.64094216,0.00017817572,0.0061742943,0.19033176,0.11001835,0.0085341185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06674038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074392565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28906837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013757154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013397877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134358639","doi":"","title":"No English title available","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); General interest; Administrative law","score_opus":0.026473174889237137,"score_gpt":0.2549512135719727,"score_spread":0.22847803868273556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134358639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00412057,0.00090762763,0.000010285252,0.00026679193,0.004584624,0.00009650655,0.000008150243,0.00011171832,0.98989373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34524614,0.0002523927,0.00012884825,0.000282794,0.003663193,0.0000030209278,0.0000029567534,0.000021059099,0.6503996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987931,0.00016691294,0.00014420554,0.00022429175,0.00027030063,0.00040114467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926674,0.00013190809,0.00005736009,0.00028358283,0.00011115018,0.00014924543],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047529492,0.00013271558,0.00017988568,0.000036378933,0.00027480096,0.0000999753,0.00031952848,0.00015113766,0.15447503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013140078,0.00011928238,0.00008688398,0.000121155244,0.00040113923,0.00017143613,0.000049462516,0.00017458123,0.27077463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001903867,0.000057022848,0.00005668143,0.00002210372,0.000013734751,0.0000021161,0.0075290264,4.475251e-7,0.000008971845,0.7924045,0.19659129,0.0033122078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121480414,0.00003652548,0.00003067911,0.000046862137,0.000022896997,3.6348638e-7,0.0004939438,0.00006170281,0.00007835132,0.014014009,0.9849212,0.00017196106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015914862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088191923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78832996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006575904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006481557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84629786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134628916","doi":"","title":"Contribution to the integration of environmental considerations in the work of the European Court of Auditors : where does environmental audit fit ?","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Nature Conservation; Environmental audit; Capital (architecture); Institution","score_opus":0.018341531487554758,"score_gpt":0.24176315370713347,"score_spread":0.2234216222195787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134628916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97651196,0.00082865235,0.000016456033,0.012505005,0.0013180879,0.0010020672,0.0006699042,0.0000074876716,0.0071404087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981972,0.00016982276,0.000016777447,0.00019713318,0.00035892677,0.000031853062,0.000014556513,0.000014705779,0.0009990386],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995331,0.0028291906,0.00054787315,0.00022335014,0.00080375926,0.00026481296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984308,0.0006059816,0.00044654464,0.00045510993,0.000016536214,0.000045011537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020318702,0.0001748542,0.0002523897,0.000053083553,0.00090782385,0.000032564345,0.0006659083,0.00005517943,0.004481793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000095265765,0.0000922474,0.00017974466,0.0002616847,0.0013863398,0.00013350739,0.0002475597,0.00037013658,0.000056057383],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010419597,0.0022860032,0.018466583,0.00003782132,0.00020635161,0.000012296579,0.50701785,0.0027152174,0.011242547,0.439677,0.01067049,0.0075636595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011023894,0.0004213476,0.3799552,0.00030004836,0.0003057724,0.000009302378,0.2790497,0.00008906503,0.005050736,0.018287424,0.31497365,0.00045535775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011347267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005311275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42138958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002920655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006234759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99642825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135926513","doi":"","title":"Abuse of Public Law in Judicial Decisions","year":2010,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Supreme court; Doctrine; Public law; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Relevance (law)","score_opus":0.019134093079789305,"score_gpt":0.28573892500563786,"score_spread":0.26660483192584855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135926513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5660899,0.0010518762,0.00000308508,0.000028843355,0.004750506,0.00051428296,0.00019122608,0.000042696298,0.42732757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618088,0.00008243584,0.00010417513,0.000042611246,0.001734627,0.000039725564,0.0010600977,0.00007660131,0.035050925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99126405,0.00042159957,0.0027278548,0.0011517536,0.003730063,0.0007046713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904649,0.0011779679,0.0022526733,0.00069242966,0.0049402015,0.00047180345],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075251696,0.00076092914,0.0012112246,0.0011512556,0.00112604,0.0017251957,0.0013391336,0.0017475684,0.000028403381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009925874,0.0007618993,0.0008569884,0.001200229,0.0016283918,0.003009975,0.000082586084,0.0015524302,0.000021195545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061360915,0.0038586273,0.010943685,0.00054901245,0.00047757168,0.00032186843,0.07804742,0.000021621754,0.015257242,0.88737357,0.0011211133,0.0014146898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009157402,0.0023630522,0.30902383,0.023323752,0.00097592786,0.00068565906,0.01759233,0.00031160118,0.08132204,0.20862511,0.33773974,0.00887955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045662682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025336926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6787484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042096543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021243508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7146998226","doi":"10.70675/2a370b28z93f4z4dedzb7bazcbe9388d012a","title":"L'adaptation de l'intensité du contrôle juridictionnel aux caractéristiques de l'action administrative contrôlée","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Context (archaeology); Lawmaking","score_opus":0.06283175833308564,"score_gpt":0.37474348976255145,"score_spread":0.3119117314294658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7146998226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7658793,0.00034775777,0.017928626,0.002506675,0.0051656845,0.00206656,0.00005508452,0.0006771052,0.20537326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93259054,0.0012956079,0.00035184482,0.0007144658,0.0033647679,0.00014805891,0.000605572,0.00008720144,0.060841948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941244,0.0013324117,0.0012572543,0.001091004,0.0009958331,0.0011990838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99464524,0.000783341,0.0013620314,0.00040111772,0.0020685708,0.00073969003],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001753329,0.00087363203,0.0010846949,0.00036368263,0.003340978,0.00081223226,0.00051109906,0.0013867498,0.0026424702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082006335,0.00087195425,0.0005767021,0.00031134664,0.00067324366,0.0007093716,0.000024363519,0.0009903117,0.000432234],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001773402,0.00072162127,0.0017318224,0.00034330765,0.0007511262,0.00008885109,0.3609778,0.00010280379,0.0021087362,0.60160685,0.013958193,0.0158355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005413693,0.0024666481,0.10093705,0.0010832871,0.0023725678,0.00007825994,0.5278528,0.054780982,0.014105686,0.086815506,0.19979118,0.0043023485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028901372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22260782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5147913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001219917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004584586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148360771","doi":"10.70675/d751f3a4z885bz40a6z8c54z8e1ceacf8367","title":"La sûreté réelle pour autrui","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Poison control; Legal action","score_opus":0.029732653480807846,"score_gpt":0.3696411107177174,"score_spread":0.33990845723690954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148360771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13736771,0.00017977133,0.000008388918,0.00045010925,0.0030742986,0.0003895369,0.0000071998907,0.00010593622,0.85841703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.461739,0.0003219068,0.00004423097,0.000046675577,0.00081124017,0.000010484181,0.00007052534,0.000028323475,0.5369276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996788,0.0003802352,0.00049875095,0.0007755524,0.0008544627,0.00070298335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978085,0.00021282076,0.000647156,0.00070909667,0.00025112793,0.00037126863],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008603895,0.0005046475,0.00060616655,0.00018329866,0.0045860983,0.0011301119,0.0015129448,0.001165604,0.06078269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010937939,0.0004388461,0.0004495049,0.000089026864,0.00067305815,0.00043262003,0.00004444457,0.00069258513,0.008664147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004989578,0.00026422463,0.00021538636,0.00015896471,0.0001422513,0.00006346477,0.1250871,4.3698483e-7,0.00005480498,0.8109192,0.036193527,0.026850693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007553757,0.000084580446,0.010559387,0.00034590517,0.00022317382,0.0000022187667,0.058419216,0.000067715875,0.00038439204,0.11519369,0.81270957,0.0012547872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004034369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041596685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.776516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011065636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012675076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7149224414","doi":"","title":"a summer school for ombudspersons","year":2018,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Nike; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.029059099723477613,"score_gpt":0.24345838969936293,"score_spread":0.2143992899758853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7149224414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117378466,0.00016375896,0.0009134282,0.0014692284,0.004516261,0.001464756,0.00020039105,0.0006020411,0.8732917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31733605,0.0002417756,0.00069336477,0.00014040417,0.0018392686,3.6026924e-7,0.000024342455,0.00004819129,0.67967623],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994972,0.00083616504,0.00038126705,0.0015619844,0.0007765704,0.0014720196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579847,0.000474953,0.00052159943,0.0009973092,0.0009140337,0.001293645],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005658311,0.00070025394,0.00079020637,0.0012132355,0.0064758784,0.0002576105,0.0020739739,0.0010073842,0.00299221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000936888,0.0008802825,0.00084537547,0.0018775974,0.0030388508,0.0013404931,0.00044322823,0.00070743694,0.0016312123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003631935,0.0022780658,0.010511146,0.00037590874,0.002772666,0.0030457608,0.042056583,0.000009167876,0.0018038556,0.3928045,0.5352385,0.0054718885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030134493,0.0006676872,0.0007276976,0.00022151897,0.0009971674,0.000017271142,0.038060423,0.00010073513,0.0012407174,0.00046641476,0.9533787,0.001108232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040755067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067451214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41814017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025221908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018714984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164877947","doi":"10.1080/17153379.2003.12553709","title":"Implementing Human Rights Through Administrative Law Reforms: The Potential in China and Vietnam.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; China; Human rights; International human rights law; Public law","score_opus":0.02234134657699433,"score_gpt":0.30893589412121175,"score_spread":0.2865945475442174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164877947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07974881,0.00008294116,0.000020108497,0.00027315345,0.00015476548,0.0003000851,0.000004431406,0.000042076925,0.91937363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996394,0.000015199926,0.00012792964,0.000010586589,0.00013174786,0.000015511232,0.000004346234,0.0000088381075,0.003291872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839026,0.00026637965,0.00024777596,0.00027829045,0.0002804186,0.00053690263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995867,0.000032961467,0.00009830238,0.00018364882,0.000023938976,0.00007442432],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080554583,0.0001422896,0.00016093037,0.00003217384,0.0030372438,0.00017694017,0.00018187672,0.00007562757,0.00057603494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009709605,0.000089868845,0.000057755224,0.00014384091,0.0007269508,0.00032308066,0.000034212313,0.00019631455,0.000027624319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035292067,0.000032970947,0.00016213553,0.0000039481706,0.000009851527,0.0000114798,0.055147376,2.0483796e-7,0.00002181632,0.94438714,0.00016534183,0.00005420565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005359729,0.00007684371,0.0012248112,0.000026087646,0.000017970386,0.000004233428,0.37827983,0.0000035716998,0.00022538821,0.44706705,0.1722654,0.00027284716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022209387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08298134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91664517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007018913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044443903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W80233134","doi":"10.82308/15812","title":"The impact of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms on Canadian administrative law /","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Administrative law; Political science; Law; Statutory law; Mandate; Public law; Statutory interpretation; Common law; Government (linguistics); Public administration","score_opus":0.02164229028773362,"score_gpt":0.2972256076350571,"score_spread":0.2755833173473235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W80233134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59054416,0.00007372882,3.8572368e-10,0.000034616663,0.0003733599,0.00041445938,0.0005990903,0.000013777646,0.4079468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98235065,0.00006168329,0.0000064503342,0.00006353308,0.00010025705,0.000021165848,0.000052368454,0.000036253845,0.01730764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997253,0.0005052411,0.0005312262,0.00042906287,0.0007098841,0.0005715882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978517,0.00032428416,0.0005681221,0.0005444826,0.00032424828,0.00038716302],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000747406,0.00039234108,0.00045771446,0.00014600765,0.0039861873,0.0000994365,0.0008379059,0.0004900234,0.00035342557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013340027,0.00022493083,0.0003892538,0.00024591282,0.0008239075,0.00028435077,0.00002717345,0.00079414435,0.000037300193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007474933,0.00006360204,0.000022025612,0.00001808955,0.00014561233,0.0000043294867,0.0005719686,0.0000012202147,0.00025210253,0.9959168,0.000029671573,0.0028998675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017093383,0.0012145628,0.046864595,0.001194149,0.00041075828,0.0000074122327,0.0061579705,0.0000054322422,0.028686063,0.5934059,0.31856263,0.0017812094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29385552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9747263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68087083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005870446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038060112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99731046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W868840","doi":"","title":"A Primer on Federal Specialty OmbudsOffices","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Statute; Parliament; Context (archaeology); Task (project management); Position (finance); Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Political science; Law; Administrative law; Legislature; Public administration; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Management; Economics; Politics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.08061102184667701,"score_gpt":0.30141492941323306,"score_spread":0.22080390756655605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W868840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019962901,0.022553222,6.9526476e-7,0.003955729,0.00088149385,0.0010051898,0.000031928725,0.0000738915,0.9515349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71053976,0.087866984,0.0007216433,0.14550276,0.0035028525,0.00016335786,0.00012473814,0.000109548615,0.051468324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985219,0.00017851718,0.00023387774,0.00028103235,0.00025410808,0.00053056027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988134,0.000017619543,0.0000749713,0.0002693258,0.000036709134,0.00078800693],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003826057,0.00015620272,0.0002635531,0.0000903908,0.00069372106,0.00005367963,0.00036500578,0.00005796315,0.027726056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021068907,0.00013853,0.00011930163,0.0001582083,0.00020214039,0.00017050096,0.000011176221,0.00014116098,0.0027548398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001346245,0.0001271481,0.008235569,0.00036713004,0.00009235016,0.00019413838,0.010776933,3.9542872e-8,6.5960296e-7,0.15269472,0.7629739,0.064523935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009007186,0.000047705373,0.0042626807,0.0006848531,0.000030442594,0.0000011508362,0.0003792945,8.861745e-8,0.0000059357476,0.0012450021,0.99304515,0.0002076142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42550164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94402164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9000666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041879577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007137686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W9687415","doi":"10.1128/aac.42.8.2106","title":"The potential of soft governance in the EU information society: lessons from the EU electronic communications regulatory framework","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Soft law; Directive; Enforcement; Legislation; Commission; European union; Business; Multi-level governance; Hard law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law; International trade; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.022124881963689162,"score_gpt":0.27468628509121307,"score_spread":0.2525614031275239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W9687415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90299886,0.00038655216,0.00015137166,0.091373526,0.00018722747,0.00046687227,0.000033513985,0.000025038435,0.004377051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98073673,0.008784061,0.00015098436,0.010083695,0.000094411065,0.0000050935682,0.000007606196,0.0000058106675,0.00013162433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918056,0.00014018685,0.00019325074,0.000086536464,0.00017529944,0.00022417154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992376,0.00012739324,0.00017145985,0.00040877116,0.00003683135,0.000017958606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047537545,0.00008409236,0.00009345671,0.0000065686695,0.001138863,0.00010905417,0.00083385897,0.000088682194,0.00009851249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009741086,0.000045271438,0.00008609086,0.00011060949,0.00070516573,0.00020027481,0.000046661833,0.00023315502,0.0000075143134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056236324,0.0001714663,0.0016836518,0.0000059622785,0.000108179374,2.2398316e-7,0.19741488,0.0000013831932,0.0001351402,0.7222058,0.059965953,0.01825111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050287356,0.000025677135,0.18307367,0.000051269853,0.000025740266,5.7962166e-7,0.006528175,0.00007297013,0.00018745696,0.03204788,0.7773364,0.00014731541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023595947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003000103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71737045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002866517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009074196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87593293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}