{"meta":{"query_hash":"73ad57275fec","filters":{"topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights"},"cohort_total":229,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":229,"exported":229,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/73ad57275fec","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Ombudsman+and+Human+Rights"},"results":[{"id":"W107739689","doi":"","title":"The Ombudsman in Manitoba","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Public administration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029158831498825928,"score_gpt":0.31348691559171166,"score_spread":0.28432808409288574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W107739689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10026196,0.05056734,0.0019078578,0.14102937,0.008431739,0.00037868158,0.0029423176,0.00037472174,0.69410604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.068628415,0.008281767,0.0012291953,0.007863568,0.0001791232,0.00007748216,0.00044227127,0.000082516315,0.91321576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990096,0.00014540451,0.00003650036,0.00015162576,0.00024120079,0.00041571638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988242,0.00011516848,0.00007725553,0.000042441556,0.00037235246,0.000568643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011458063,0.0004913599,0.0002824568,0.0009170858,0.013111618,0.0032445476,0.0011741386,0.0028031068,0.06382401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017013006,0.0006514113,0.00020186613,0.0016410766,0.0022092853,0.0012895642,0.0026642936,0.0028323976,0.005944548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002204105,0.00018934331,0.03487399,0.00046736564,0.000035873985,0.0039991653,0.009381625,0.0002824863,0.0035795388,0.22935295,0.5869064,0.13071093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009133721,0.000013846688,0.017807065,0.0002544597,0.000006118456,0.00013583213,0.0032462494,0.00008974248,0.00034518578,0.001468788,0.976607,0.000016458549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82873434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94156885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17126566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019560115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061038308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34454852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496826918","doi":"","title":"New Words for Old Problems: The Dunsmuir Era","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Immigration; Political science; Immigration law; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.010810600682408855,"score_gpt":0.27487413197571353,"score_spread":0.2640635312933047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496826918","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006025549,0.07683676,0.0060190507,0.78951985,0.010174681,0.00004076544,0.00009850595,0.00013215511,0.11115265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3640481,0.036083534,0.013069304,0.44322717,0.014486813,0.00022011544,0.00010942871,0.00044456142,0.128311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9674143,0.014026501,0.00130788,0.0044627637,0.009364623,0.0034239718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971899,0.019025724,0.0010609137,0.0028527472,0.0033967744,0.0017648437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021800306,0.00064079376,0.0012403759,0.0036146322,0.015806066,0.026010772,0.0028607694,0.016043369,0.0062594144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05132928,0.00071674417,0.0006284728,0.0027808866,0.05079523,0.018996337,0.0077347844,0.020155337,0.0013649057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022217759,0.000009406829,0.00013196777,0.000070133814,0.000005605718,0.00012381109,0.0026809014,0.000058547444,0.0000712611,0.8875578,0.08645287,0.0228155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000234498,0.000016986727,0.00031923785,0.00038848683,0.0000071861264,0.00014538881,0.0020839905,0.00016058855,0.000160383,0.19230093,0.8043543,0.000039038725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10648613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13851851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10648613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04364727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036042824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3166846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524189649","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2184585","title":"Figliola: Competing Jurisdiction, Shared Governance, and Protecting Human Rights in the Canadian Administrative State","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Corporate governance; Human rights; State (computer science); Administrative law; Business; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.022488752737136568,"score_gpt":0.3000926294857492,"score_spread":0.27760387674861264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524189649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13085158,0.0057669007,0.009191344,0.08342564,0.00061129563,0.00017808151,0.0011864625,0.00012996269,0.7686588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9289244,0.0013481904,0.003189811,0.0030403184,0.00011379148,0.00006218281,0.00016382834,0.000035818135,0.06312162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600154,0.00081724656,0.000076342985,0.00041097228,0.0010563612,0.0016374527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963594,0.0013429644,0.0001870525,0.00030314893,0.0011981166,0.00060926843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034774092,0.00030530756,0.00039103476,0.0016444371,0.015310867,0.009321314,0.0021495055,0.003298672,0.01814722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0096524,0.00023265246,0.0005157669,0.0028399725,0.016642675,0.003527856,0.0030030308,0.0031207723,0.00048353046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013526464,0.000006847835,0.0012292693,0.00002039889,0.0000033504655,0.00003597256,0.0046101226,0.000246814,0.00004368041,0.9757715,0.012519829,0.005498747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004778842,0.00003573747,0.025997786,0.0005000469,0.00007778672,0.000121059944,0.027013043,0.0036878795,0.0005525131,0.5797248,0.36209017,0.00015149257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9850211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.934964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13118455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47187144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524584862","doi":"","title":"The impact of the Freedom of Information Act on central government in the UK: does freedom of information work?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Cabinet (room); Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Political science; Freedom of the press; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.007174448899705758,"score_gpt":0.203142544789349,"score_spread":0.19596809588964326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524584862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005558114,0.1347033,0.00061263714,0.0585871,0.005218097,0.0000432648,0.0002552223,0.00010863262,0.79491365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23919092,0.07944357,0.00093460723,0.01306634,0.0018476489,0.00011057174,0.0003296944,0.000155317,0.6649213],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822956,0.00059559866,0.000080330086,0.00012630456,0.0006885484,0.00027972096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974177,0.0016390695,0.00018912753,0.00012570767,0.0004241918,0.00020407441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012593109,0.0004909287,0.00045318052,0.0013241065,0.0038002657,0.011141975,0.00053045136,0.0024308052,0.014994233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040680775,0.0003994737,0.00019308738,0.0037632086,0.0071510347,0.0052497946,0.0020081878,0.00335415,0.003384158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027890454,0.000016245815,0.00031555464,0.00035064414,0.0000033051456,0.00013386575,0.010214282,0.0001658635,0.00011010571,0.27554274,0.6689999,0.044119567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053436056,0.000012908689,0.0025837007,0.000667726,0.0000040627397,0.00013724575,0.0044227573,0.000067019326,0.00011577704,0.0131324455,0.9788311,0.000019957592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.090477765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15813074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090477765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018227115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010602384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17990226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537271728","doi":"10.58948/2331-3528.1752","title":"The Ombudsman as a Monitor of Human Rights in Canadian Federal Corrections","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace law review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.01829577698368406,"score_gpt":0.3386227510650267,"score_spread":0.32032697408134264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537271728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05584082,0.3389537,0.0012717699,0.21167861,0.0040874234,0.00033927948,0.00047352107,0.000108056,0.38724685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6883433,0.15417269,0.0016940493,0.03117267,0.00083632144,0.00012532008,0.00026401464,0.00008458316,0.12330717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98914474,0.0021257326,0.00030518803,0.00063714286,0.004640132,0.003147174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98285365,0.0023548296,0.0008011992,0.0003294202,0.011174192,0.002486778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008083936,0.00034748044,0.0004715161,0.004272754,0.01577851,0.007329697,0.0023731063,0.0042389096,0.00643964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017857559,0.00041341598,0.00035555012,0.0058014127,0.005357952,0.0023887611,0.001704931,0.0025079134,0.00045674978],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074774805,0.000113770744,0.018037705,0.0015520771,0.000053092037,0.00089564634,0.01211168,0.0010572362,0.00047719813,0.29137573,0.40767813,0.266573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016375952,0.000043791228,0.03356145,0.0014942011,0.00006358936,0.00016486793,0.006303205,0.00038403345,0.00027926214,0.0029484935,0.9546787,0.00006210115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99566144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14387956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14387956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28396872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99297833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556284564","doi":"","title":"On the Improvement of the Administrative Reconsideration Committee System of China: From the Quasi-judicial Perspective","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Administrative law; Administrative court; China; Credibility; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Administrative services organization; Perspective (graphical); Phenomenon; Principal (computer security); Administration (probate law); Business","score_opus":0.055021399540355204,"score_gpt":0.306808682248128,"score_spread":0.25178728270777284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556284564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7703114,0.0032584544,0.0075343205,0.07158679,0.0008271681,0.0005390694,0.00026969492,0.00013519524,0.14553793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759911,0.00078516954,0.0017866652,0.001916662,0.00017346795,0.00007356592,0.00007518964,0.000014503351,0.019183632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99377304,0.0017953274,0.00033869848,0.00067057187,0.0013546009,0.0020678283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99538946,0.00072935893,0.00083063217,0.00032510253,0.0017270141,0.0009984644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006524106,0.00022343214,0.0003106437,0.0017406854,0.0076519833,0.0048778937,0.0017133468,0.0018605065,0.0053635477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007627762,0.00026819066,0.00053553976,0.0017774767,0.0042998698,0.0030784896,0.0020468,0.0016979519,0.0002719445],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006212614,0.00013800384,0.07423001,0.00022934415,0.000064573615,0.0011311001,0.016553758,0.0024095227,0.001252802,0.8321012,0.024856014,0.0469715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018251548,0.0003622578,0.5302799,0.00046297832,0.0002245093,0.0005016503,0.01995236,0.016605608,0.0027929342,0.10696792,0.32130155,0.0003657969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21905908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24516165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21905908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018781262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03576093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43556803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560490588","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1193","title":"Criminal Lawyers’ Assn. v. Ontario: A Limited Right to Government Information under Section 2(b) of the Charter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislation; Freedom of information; Constitutional right; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; Law; Possession (linguistics); Political science; Right to know; Right to privacy; Public administration","score_opus":0.02245867008261149,"score_gpt":0.27133113335754283,"score_spread":0.24887246327493134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560490588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0460908,0.0045203166,0.002630702,0.1136604,0.00089716987,0.00030312408,0.0021794317,0.00016002425,0.82955796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49124178,0.004463066,0.004701725,0.08662976,0.00048357842,0.00026020658,0.0007323226,0.00006481076,0.4114226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892046,0.00064314116,0.00038841658,0.00081984815,0.0061958083,0.0027482398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953057,0.0017702125,0.0003696628,0.0002526941,0.0018639505,0.00043764594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030385933,0.00035825986,0.0004967772,0.0010067726,0.011655812,0.006458011,0.0019723817,0.009472935,0.0061473288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00758987,0.0007603017,0.0006234213,0.0015624058,0.008460551,0.0022413991,0.0016058795,0.0060973396,0.0008770875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004282557,0.00002723208,0.0032429725,0.00017200423,0.000018420349,0.0013396324,0.0091232145,0.00027787528,0.0014787157,0.82250327,0.15130216,0.010471574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012652409,0.000054352757,0.021885093,0.0003804574,0.000093980154,0.00048150678,0.002533118,0.0005458831,0.0012951815,0.044391606,0.9279673,0.0002450248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9654034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98737097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053075638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053075638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09087724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38509256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561848916","doi":"","title":"A study on Theoretical Construction of the Right of Claim on Social Assistance Benefits: From the Perspective of Comparative Study in the Mainland and Taiwan of China","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; China; Administration (probate law); Social assistance; Mainland China; Law and economics; Perspective (graphical); Social benefits; Property rights; Social Welfare; China mainland; Welfare; State (computer science); Business; Law; Political science; Public administration; Public economics; Economics; Economic growth; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.022287173674419423,"score_gpt":0.30608526797474134,"score_spread":0.28379809430032193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561848916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.892323,0.001490253,0.002381992,0.0030582,0.000020769012,0.000045026594,0.000040472783,0.000003910611,0.10063654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986847,0.00019770428,0.00022813227,0.000055369197,0.000002807627,0.000015519045,0.000014516721,0.0000011445987,0.00080000586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758637,0.0015118064,0.000057429872,0.00022968969,0.00023078558,0.00038388843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972371,0.0018833615,0.0002729305,0.00017707955,0.00030118282,0.00012826064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038207301,0.00027141767,0.0003570377,0.0029320954,0.0058911582,0.0031768521,0.0016165529,0.0010366741,0.0063484497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057780268,0.00018505381,0.00043637305,0.003490166,0.01608153,0.0065453458,0.0024983468,0.001953705,0.00007910069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040870622,0.000067325804,0.012381016,0.00007083002,0.000022038292,0.00097123324,0.06693415,0.00035974637,0.00030668874,0.9107524,0.00032769385,0.007765962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010976402,0.00029227405,0.10371736,0.00093737006,0.00016491783,0.0011683863,0.47514167,0.008598289,0.0014740383,0.3554761,0.05282777,0.00009203791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06797234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062153094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06797234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012609058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004354573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13515335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562671362","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1096","title":"Section 7 and Administrative Law Deference: No Room at the Inn?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Due process; Law; Political science; Charter; Persuasion; Procedural justice; Economic Justice; Natural justice; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Law and economics; Administrative law; Sociology; Public law; Sources of law; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04595910244958342,"score_gpt":0.32727778018793663,"score_spread":0.28131867773835323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562671362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011492836,0.021982314,0.007301857,0.4102493,0.0035792876,0.000054612497,0.00012891673,0.00011657891,0.5450943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53858805,0.0145254135,0.006406177,0.25011674,0.0050081606,0.00015596571,0.00020239399,0.00021420637,0.1847829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9738946,0.0060798526,0.00067887164,0.0018728023,0.010968142,0.006505751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828892,0.007713516,0.00079499144,0.0011200474,0.0058619496,0.0016203524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015268073,0.00045319585,0.0009238841,0.0018488086,0.012348656,0.015803277,0.0036761782,0.015194906,0.00965364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031070488,0.0006576433,0.0008741757,0.0018926429,0.03897182,0.010601864,0.004016171,0.018603679,0.0015807863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040992386,0.0000053812655,0.00009949775,0.000016580681,0.0000022567615,0.00002660085,0.0010083563,0.000041892774,0.000029245757,0.98000336,0.015426726,0.0033360613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022024782,0.000019908552,0.0016826575,0.00037729528,0.000017168792,0.00008872779,0.0034293425,0.0002499466,0.00019926741,0.5314916,0.46234888,0.00007328213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.691484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7447049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.691484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03507601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08286907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62066585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572741729","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720110703.011","title":"A Thought of Taking CPPCC As Chinese Professional Supervisory Institution of Unconstitutional Behavior in Applying Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Institution; Legislator; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.06753247913920621,"score_gpt":0.32861153011726946,"score_spread":0.2610790509780633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572741729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32625785,0.0013252224,0.092446595,0.025023373,0.0008581293,0.00076170464,0.0002543033,0.0006114314,0.5524613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94931847,0.00032614724,0.007212617,0.0012697596,0.00019562035,0.00017640629,0.00006973661,0.000042798514,0.041388467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954873,0.00096660765,0.00025592337,0.00096429297,0.0013747675,0.00095098134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728286,0.00047717217,0.00029295558,0.00042398198,0.0009873918,0.0005356898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003699647,0.00024141296,0.00016598418,0.0013758459,0.004571479,0.0040978543,0.0008859011,0.001486878,0.0057406663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051354705,0.00023540454,0.00032688671,0.0011511337,0.008798903,0.0025734908,0.0024239284,0.0025451002,0.0004326022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025457113,0.000037678758,0.017860362,0.00009446187,0.000015520565,0.0004249295,0.014060363,0.0006054153,0.0018624681,0.9138184,0.011657251,0.039537657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008081023,0.00020401944,0.096440814,0.00036989473,0.00014630274,0.0009605247,0.0133140925,0.013979198,0.008026713,0.2670453,0.59918755,0.00024486057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03684845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029131223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03684845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006366589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016694603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07326794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572997802","doi":"10.46560/meritum.v7i2.1600","title":"A mediação popular na China: acesso à justiça ou harmonia imposta?","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03888223172613995,"score_gpt":0.28632873377187,"score_spread":0.24744650204573007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572997802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76658326,0.0030218207,0.00071091496,0.023347827,0.0002651142,0.00004744821,0.00019184392,0.000052951396,0.20577878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98092276,0.00075332087,0.00013575851,0.0005131223,0.0000824842,0.000017541026,0.00004093393,0.0000119985125,0.017522175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843866,0.00038811253,0.000044517375,0.00015613953,0.00043931796,0.0005332478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808264,0.00048751003,0.00041751444,0.00017739339,0.00033622264,0.0004987686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019306294,0.00036606798,0.000351722,0.001929001,0.008455643,0.007422089,0.00080637785,0.0012299012,0.015203378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003655471,0.0002587642,0.0002509632,0.004519932,0.010724153,0.0044880393,0.0030919178,0.0018905011,0.0005563616],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023723357,0.000112293885,0.06967211,0.0005308186,0.00005616234,0.0022992338,0.24245638,0.0004087661,0.0022849774,0.5867505,0.01962511,0.07556641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009198719,0.00020674233,0.25644246,0.0007908279,0.00008570559,0.00057606125,0.18297337,0.0017094953,0.0017980579,0.038476285,0.51670367,0.00014522881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07224939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11297744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07224939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009759781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01039078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14365768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577914688","doi":"","title":"Security Council Targeted Sanctions, Due Process and the 1267 Ombudsperson","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Georgetown journal of international law","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Obligation; Charter; Political science; Law; Security council; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.012228735685392423,"score_gpt":0.26728822418363546,"score_spread":0.25505948849824306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577914688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017516628,0.0074635325,0.014985386,0.07504744,0.0036409784,0.00020701607,0.00015452385,0.00011579891,0.88086873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6888203,0.0054047764,0.008477264,0.04914565,0.0027802507,0.00050124276,0.00016108666,0.00016777893,0.24454162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97721964,0.008089055,0.0012696461,0.003270093,0.0059513045,0.0042002182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987678,0.0063058143,0.0012134236,0.0013293998,0.0026889264,0.0007844402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015842834,0.0005802335,0.00056389946,0.0010821208,0.010902692,0.01238267,0.0019880326,0.015758729,0.0087278625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030566929,0.00052740553,0.00062181347,0.0013548544,0.0139518995,0.0063842842,0.0046632164,0.012693381,0.0019098006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006499546,0.000010948969,0.00017351913,0.000017373777,0.0000017520506,0.00007947005,0.0008630709,0.00007837711,0.00003693826,0.98003274,0.014768528,0.0039307657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003864854,0.00007796736,0.0020592178,0.00092939293,0.000021986856,0.00024689897,0.0024704123,0.0010922749,0.00052138447,0.34708372,0.64534914,0.00010904206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07317467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0783409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07317467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010014062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020796623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14549744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590983153","doi":"","title":"International Journal of Rule of Law, Transitional Justice and Human Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Democracy; Transitional justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Rule of law; Work (physics); Law; Academic freedom; Freedom of expression; Sociology; Public administration; Public relations; Engineering; Higher education","score_opus":0.009322230827673868,"score_gpt":0.29557869736234976,"score_spread":0.2862564665346759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590983153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0138015915,0.04410914,0.0035111506,0.05015887,0.0018580584,0.00004462937,0.0001337765,0.000037885125,0.88634485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8575734,0.022831319,0.002119095,0.0045692855,0.0025035564,0.00011309456,0.00011918153,0.000078140736,0.11009296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813867,0.0008190509,0.00010074704,0.00024993654,0.0004098255,0.00028170616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981558,0.0009822149,0.00017631747,0.000291712,0.00018683175,0.00020715171],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021846958,0.00031054948,0.0005199802,0.00087258406,0.004662721,0.015441745,0.00080280425,0.0034433065,0.01770913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005190358,0.00018420667,0.00028572272,0.0015141842,0.018908909,0.004244212,0.0027803576,0.00470353,0.0013585867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000816209,0.000024945124,0.00040372004,0.000049745126,0.000006946976,0.00007884454,0.0015790134,0.00012024144,0.000055919973,0.9643052,0.021193322,0.012173891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011401549,0.00002790849,0.0015028325,0.0004070632,0.000011501433,0.00015878706,0.0050753066,0.00038831652,0.00010645382,0.65501744,0.3372815,0.000011424909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006877554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008644395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98229086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004374965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069565447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059242964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591112736","doi":"10.1111/capa.12091","title":"Asymmetric decentralization of the administration of public safety in the <scp>C</scp>anadian federal political system","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Sovereignty; Politics; Public administration; Federalism; Corporate governance; Rule of law; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Separation of powers; Administration (probate law); Political science; State (computer science); Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.02714652751484225,"score_gpt":0.2670178902906499,"score_spread":0.23987136277580762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591112736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6997023,0.0005656958,0.00539553,0.010900018,0.000041270894,0.00012745107,0.00024164245,0.00006452927,0.28296152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968021,0.00005380015,0.00024950615,0.000086655695,0.000005525504,0.0000070894566,0.000017693068,0.0000024436242,0.0027752179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955615,0.0011959224,0.0001299309,0.00053972134,0.00095656223,0.0016163355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959027,0.00075600646,0.00081777043,0.0006329991,0.0013637393,0.00052682887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031608935,0.00008428601,0.00023102334,0.0022357947,0.006118091,0.0052378452,0.00060180266,0.00074673886,0.003926153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005097564,0.00023830256,0.0001689821,0.0019581376,0.007063685,0.0019010213,0.0026754541,0.0014432075,0.00021251054],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086732216,0.00007451372,0.024126766,0.000051064075,0.000016351125,0.00019181444,0.013867437,0.004132703,0.0011927267,0.9212,0.0047667343,0.030293206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014034571,0.00016597025,0.33931798,0.00052969303,0.00007002234,0.00045004694,0.044373468,0.022488581,0.0033096252,0.22742124,0.36152002,0.00021302041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4047844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58552974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9554115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044588506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032872956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8048566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599077220","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1223","title":"Contractual and Covenantal Conceptions of Modern Treaty Interpretation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Treaty; Negotiation; Supreme court; Law; Covenant; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05609932130275677,"score_gpt":0.31803833645359314,"score_spread":0.2619390151508364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599077220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021112496,0.009791741,0.07209715,0.061532144,0.0009761122,0.00013914886,0.00018227127,0.000091671944,0.8340772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93318033,0.0032372933,0.01722956,0.01053382,0.0012701402,0.00034215985,0.0001287311,0.00011373726,0.03396425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96283495,0.015067772,0.0012889954,0.0028162638,0.013697516,0.004294556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899031,0.004347482,0.0011415437,0.0012494007,0.0028026742,0.0005558593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018637955,0.0005516573,0.00074187695,0.0044181747,0.011197791,0.017428933,0.003713879,0.008271078,0.004462934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021928107,0.0005672589,0.0009251614,0.005035189,0.07656521,0.010295363,0.0044372124,0.01315231,0.00042509713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.374089e-7,0.0000010105978,0.000017171737,0.0000027670965,7.12845e-7,0.0000038860803,0.0005797846,0.000036667254,0.000004705549,0.99867094,0.00036980503,0.00031202345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009235486,0.0000045635634,0.00033069824,0.000075473035,0.0000063315492,0.000035602217,0.0009908887,0.00068864337,0.000054223772,0.94447726,0.053305984,0.000021044749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19541048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.133662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19541048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045594588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030705733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38854617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1693358874","doi":"10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020120804.2031","title":"Discussion on Constitution Supervision of Chinese Local People’s Congress: The Way out of the Nominal Constitution Supervision in China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; China; Law; Power (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.02557432744098765,"score_gpt":0.3467035960829722,"score_spread":0.32112926864198454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1693358874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24187751,0.0044647707,0.0046015335,0.4359929,0.001714704,0.00015553017,0.00011896719,0.000043467095,0.31103057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96934444,0.0011959551,0.0006167332,0.012929109,0.0004842618,0.00007632977,0.00003423498,0.000013211833,0.015305693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993665,0.0026438183,0.00027274064,0.00077298586,0.0013478406,0.0012975618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945339,0.0035770214,0.0004335564,0.00028140386,0.0007175579,0.0004566268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0103011215,0.00022276762,0.00036680733,0.0014662726,0.012001373,0.0059932894,0.0016081793,0.0047758184,0.0066442564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011786776,0.00020565846,0.00056091417,0.0019488723,0.019953292,0.006970374,0.0035810852,0.0060144896,0.00019837533],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013102824,0.000007780316,0.0018120117,0.00007107192,0.0000056042086,0.0005140068,0.03948428,0.00016257419,0.00015803645,0.94706696,0.0064600734,0.004244404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008808491,0.00007092268,0.032544658,0.0010913023,0.000060080896,0.0004768042,0.12715316,0.0025864772,0.0012939628,0.28568766,0.5487882,0.00015872337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10887349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08096173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10887349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021633608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027796824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21647954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1757609320","doi":"10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020120805.966","title":"Comparative Analysis on Constitutional Supervision Modes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Constitution; Operability; Materiality (auditing); Political science; State (computer science); Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.09688097939581644,"score_gpt":0.4258350658870662,"score_spread":0.3289540864912498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1757609320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8210142,0.0014620436,0.0017311308,0.00055070885,0.0000253154,0.00004133652,0.00011582527,0.0000087411945,0.17505057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984158,0.0003137521,0.00015835324,0.000011834602,0.000005751011,0.000008977483,0.000032318618,0.0000019505235,0.0010513499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724764,0.0015908492,0.00011032314,0.00021507393,0.00049431424,0.00034173726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947403,0.0036107658,0.0004557926,0.00035772004,0.0006393799,0.00019599525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003508643,0.00017902763,0.00019289913,0.0042545768,0.0015929003,0.0017318364,0.00039525967,0.00031121788,0.00948351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00974695,0.000085578526,0.00020348284,0.004479549,0.0031375908,0.0037059959,0.0012472775,0.00061952183,0.00015790292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026799692,0.00006567766,0.05294733,0.00035190058,0.000053700584,0.0010341251,0.13460657,0.00070690823,0.0014437579,0.71077174,0.0015855018,0.09616469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057203306,0.00044700186,0.40082735,0.0009107122,0.00020348681,0.0012496442,0.3950803,0.003690355,0.003858915,0.08207003,0.111520536,0.00008439005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035796256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004429509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00948351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027971151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012639757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031725526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W178908084","doi":"10.29173/alr128","title":"Proportionality as a Remedial Principle: A Framework for Suspended Declarations of Invalidity in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Proportionality (law); Law; Remedial education; Adjudication; Discretion; Political science; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.13464476143966841,"score_gpt":0.3905629564135247,"score_spread":0.25591819497385626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W178908084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018304087,0.002868147,0.4543712,0.026835967,0.00047062914,0.00056142744,0.00049193075,0.00023957615,0.495857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7886175,0.0018669438,0.17245448,0.0020857237,0.0002569388,0.000529811,0.0002056932,0.00015716843,0.033825707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793866,0.0071586,0.00077714905,0.0020183942,0.008057639,0.00260165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877406,0.004981768,0.0009552628,0.0011074226,0.0045119803,0.00070301036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019436825,0.0010657345,0.0007361436,0.009871011,0.016379507,0.017332405,0.005114491,0.0032315103,0.005506615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027674178,0.0008104703,0.0013084381,0.007837087,0.06297582,0.010668655,0.005531313,0.007444404,0.0004766519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.4521284e-7,0.0000010004456,0.000063240754,0.0000061871565,0.0000010752537,0.000016716382,0.0011540196,0.00023612163,0.000015925698,0.9963374,0.00042910266,0.0017385215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008966765,0.0000061015794,0.00064946583,0.00014332833,0.000016105672,0.00004158652,0.0025850723,0.0037822232,0.00014673329,0.9237425,0.06883385,0.00004410592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7860546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7914843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9133526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08664742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12307423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.628674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1820973665","doi":"","title":"Judicial Proposal: The Practical Review and System Evolution of Extended Jurisdiction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Jurisdiction; Ideal (ethics); Law; Judicial review; Reflection (computer programming); Political science; Judicial discretion; Administrative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03540637345866093,"score_gpt":0.3322986344407263,"score_spread":0.2968922609820654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1820973665","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07993612,0.0034703407,0.4482667,0.053884033,0.0014531618,0.0007684576,0.0002478397,0.00062093284,0.4113524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86921215,0.0007585021,0.09179807,0.0016874219,0.000517078,0.00041745455,0.0000888374,0.00024516677,0.035275307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9411148,0.03853449,0.0022080748,0.006804794,0.008702613,0.002635084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9453061,0.027630566,0.002946247,0.011006859,0.011357121,0.0017529521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05828115,0.00033749084,0.00072512735,0.0029462045,0.008633316,0.012820604,0.003748117,0.005342878,0.0106005035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09963998,0.0007044983,0.0010584136,0.0023627642,0.029641379,0.012021115,0.007411761,0.0050601684,0.0012409585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063791676,0.0000059059353,0.00027020578,0.000020026986,0.0000047079757,0.000042328687,0.0013283421,0.00046702626,0.00012312789,0.9897193,0.001494491,0.006518229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052198728,0.000079007674,0.0012175398,0.00010340584,0.000028129845,0.0002017018,0.0013142315,0.005205494,0.00060491293,0.89068,0.10043347,0.00007985396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013162143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00911486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05828115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010939624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019903481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3082239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1837478881","doi":"10.29173/alr289","title":"The Scope and Meaning of Reasonableness Review","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Supreme court; Standard of review; Meaning (existential); Political science; Statutory law; Law; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05192000239868214,"score_gpt":0.3357584087911012,"score_spread":0.28383840639241903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1837478881","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013942053,0.09290529,0.19641578,0.40049246,0.004874029,0.0004223559,0.0001893643,0.00024972847,0.29050884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79262304,0.027699089,0.078879,0.0726601,0.010399196,0.0015439449,0.00014442508,0.00026418245,0.015786944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7801822,0.14012013,0.015249908,0.014483239,0.045334686,0.0046298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77027005,0.17671977,0.009716226,0.01539649,0.024715198,0.0031823386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14801319,0.0005154632,0.0023299395,0.008991308,0.0076708673,0.02255405,0.0039928453,0.012640573,0.0015645557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21408209,0.0010865197,0.0012086862,0.004287931,0.06921936,0.019238262,0.008961428,0.014593279,0.0005105233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028989084,0.0000030882302,0.0000880091,0.00004731567,0.0000034526197,0.000020790827,0.00045601148,0.00014212857,0.000026882428,0.9936172,0.0013212153,0.004271012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009606869,0.000017892897,0.0002561489,0.00045030253,0.000007716193,0.000055948294,0.00037234873,0.00041528424,0.00008689217,0.95145416,0.046847425,0.000026200192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01085178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00707848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14801319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015807046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03588213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7827779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W186748699","doi":"","title":"Emerging Global Actors: The United Nations and National Human Rights Institutions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Governance","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Government (linguistics); Political science; Global governance; Civil society; Public administration; International law; Institution; Corporate governance; International human rights law; Economic growth; Public relations; Law; Politics; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.034912549240785296,"score_gpt":0.3402135667098585,"score_spread":0.3053010174690732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W186748699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017684033,0.018182427,0.005432457,0.1265414,0.0015020294,0.000039600625,0.00012787689,0.000055049382,0.8304351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84050804,0.020416364,0.0147347115,0.04258254,0.0016390765,0.00034291623,0.00032339108,0.00013754905,0.07931537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942058,0.0027022886,0.00019610864,0.0007836733,0.0011281151,0.0009840993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954738,0.0020538704,0.0006981029,0.00048747304,0.00052769214,0.00075903255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009282644,0.0004592282,0.00033632264,0.0018620365,0.004467833,0.011149611,0.00087093946,0.0054113227,0.0062170895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068598203,0.00020377466,0.00034319414,0.0025310884,0.0149063775,0.014197764,0.0071333232,0.00642161,0.0005185088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033493577,0.0000035706744,0.000310521,0.00001354795,9.760759e-7,0.000027532957,0.001407028,0.000040093466,0.000020753552,0.9866875,0.004515997,0.006969101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057247394,0.000019397856,0.0017578743,0.0005766526,0.0000059631284,0.00014425252,0.007100575,0.00025097845,0.000137139,0.30073473,0.68924105,0.000025603951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008969223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011834459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011149611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00696044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076366104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050501764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891201568","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720100602.002","title":"Analysis on the Functions of Administrative Law Enforcement Interpretation in China","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Administrative law; Political science; Enforcement; Humanities; Law; Law enforcement; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02519119921449278,"score_gpt":0.3217184960479076,"score_spread":0.29652729683341483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1891201568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.970424,0.00027322676,0.0021628472,0.0006775904,0.000007743141,0.00008169309,0.00026581614,0.000032863765,0.026074305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732226,0.00006746964,0.00038391256,0.000013511144,0.0000045415427,0.000018927643,0.0000981114,0.0000054109482,0.002085977],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99295735,0.001956752,0.0004508333,0.0007547071,0.0026168611,0.0012634163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988815,0.003847641,0.0019945533,0.0007356385,0.0040975795,0.00050949387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061380393,0.0002946859,0.00045692027,0.0067906072,0.0030074783,0.0036558649,0.0011451413,0.0004630421,0.0055169524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01413884,0.00028538538,0.000656619,0.00921856,0.0039126095,0.0018497127,0.0015862512,0.0006571252,0.00025800665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014218096,0.00007255109,0.7453329,0.00020365822,0.00013238423,0.0008240084,0.027131164,0.0038865404,0.0009266908,0.14122713,0.002404858,0.07771597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000145201475,0.00004040366,0.95625484,0.000077440825,0.00010588156,0.000110119465,0.0109460205,0.012814395,0.0008784447,0.009927055,0.008786061,0.00004488488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2630213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18681803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2630213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017420955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021851482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5229807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891827686","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511618246.004","title":"Taking the administrative state seriously","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Computer science; Business; Programming language","score_opus":0.04947971725597465,"score_gpt":0.25610843295630886,"score_spread":0.2066287157003342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1891827686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059823766,0.0072179823,0.0070381477,0.043664984,0.0018427412,0.00003139898,0.000034554363,0.00009793209,0.9340898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5583531,0.007598918,0.006313624,0.020839822,0.002383038,0.00016355426,0.00007304985,0.00018951396,0.40408534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728036,0.0010889078,0.00008738667,0.00041077574,0.00070088904,0.00043157532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811244,0.0008086429,0.00009227174,0.00037387325,0.00048935734,0.00012347348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003379054,0.00026909506,0.00029924038,0.0009425383,0.0068082795,0.013560748,0.0006994505,0.0031029077,0.007125172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052570906,0.00029589448,0.00042965083,0.0009259343,0.013484746,0.008076614,0.0031159385,0.0070119486,0.0016112737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011919228,0.0000024901294,0.000041014613,0.000007358945,6.720865e-7,0.00001107111,0.0011843758,0.000045222474,0.00002410828,0.989647,0.00506703,0.0039684735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046652126,0.000011608176,0.00033154554,0.000120933895,0.000009095864,0.000049792317,0.0020074209,0.00024214221,0.00017939044,0.3608372,0.63619673,0.000009350133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013545375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022166047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013560748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010137142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047369957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1946209890","doi":"10.1164/rccm.200701-024ed","title":"The New IGRA and the Old TST","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.02264579828387906,"score_gpt":0.33736883759121966,"score_spread":0.3147230393073406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1946209890","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052132306,0.0028105588,0.000112288515,0.9797147,0.01165312,0.0000034775821,0.000009242174,0.000009089381,0.005166141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009193124,0.0015734752,0.0002448114,0.9375418,0.046023816,0.000019942992,0.000012111967,0.000018511744,0.0053724265],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906625,0.0040397714,0.00058513583,0.0010757425,0.0022028359,0.0014339951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831849,0.0093760295,0.00074985944,0.0010459769,0.0016971481,0.0039461115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01288001,0.0007060102,0.001670868,0.001053384,0.0052592903,0.00635864,0.0019302829,0.07544927,0.008950618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03615152,0.0005408291,0.0013274912,0.00076161063,0.014711125,0.009908897,0.0034425082,0.06426161,0.0028684938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011323949,0.00008678135,0.0017325289,0.0000715552,0.00002621696,0.0033172318,0.0005369666,0.000088762165,0.00017655276,0.061367877,0.9119275,0.020554833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018904015,0.00009839078,0.0012645663,0.00044181373,0.00002962909,0.0030637505,0.0013541281,0.0003632994,0.00011233452,0.059061393,0.93393916,0.00008248918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004987752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009936917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07544927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057835164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062243734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06811684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W195164713","doi":"","title":"Opening the Cabinet Door: FOI and government policy making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UCL Discovery (University College London)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Freedom of information; Deliberation; Public administration; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.021615601182175807,"score_gpt":0.23414903342021173,"score_spread":0.21253343223803592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W195164713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14140648,0.011360947,0.011387023,0.14184135,0.00052134163,0.00011707863,0.00016510433,0.00012047079,0.6930802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97819555,0.0015908112,0.0012414673,0.0026971658,0.0001226692,0.000046338842,0.000036179117,0.00004542398,0.016024329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9405197,0.037934497,0.0017941436,0.0026621534,0.006842275,0.010247305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9240039,0.059637103,0.0042687682,0.0051178536,0.0033711283,0.003601255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04234171,0.00029113152,0.00088423426,0.0039172154,0.015048041,0.026556818,0.0021180282,0.008656593,0.01452187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07540996,0.00067908684,0.0006905059,0.0067092855,0.050204303,0.020191012,0.010472421,0.008046703,0.0011021243],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053763946,0.000022998314,0.000997634,0.00007264396,0.000007083206,0.00019679409,0.020141797,0.0005478303,0.000097544165,0.9561309,0.0034933393,0.018237542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007088535,0.000064106614,0.005107137,0.0009154976,0.000013891873,0.00019221414,0.07046057,0.00091814995,0.0003882384,0.57224834,0.34951952,0.00010140706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04675233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03994179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04675233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023489589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030023282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22392702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968488002","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb00913.x","title":"The privacy commissioner of Canada: Multiple roles, diverse expectations and structural dilemmas","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy policy; Legislation; Political science; Data Protection Act 1998; Information privacy; Privacy law; Privacy by Design; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); The Right to Privacy; Privacy protection; Business; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.02576048862781449,"score_gpt":0.26089804090366997,"score_spread":0.23513755227585548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968488002","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09349291,0.0036072088,0.003837571,0.71039003,0.0006127516,0.000116754796,0.00015824185,0.00008528923,0.18769921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93880725,0.0016677269,0.0024900928,0.030828172,0.00015132048,0.000055735367,0.000056235218,0.00007019079,0.025873246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9613227,0.010212547,0.00078670995,0.0026539688,0.011915937,0.013108007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603217,0.013440781,0.0016715601,0.00084822025,0.010931838,0.012785899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022524985,0.0005580112,0.0005915609,0.0029784632,0.07750835,0.03266318,0.004452527,0.015039697,0.009006093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040277753,0.0009803692,0.00056189287,0.003996258,0.03745631,0.008803833,0.010214202,0.010468424,0.0006963859],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076985736,0.000044140517,0.00803043,0.00011476989,0.000030723233,0.0027478803,0.10082993,0.001153973,0.00033706156,0.74977374,0.10547349,0.031386867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007765336,0.000045042554,0.01148527,0.0008035127,0.00006854558,0.000999582,0.3481328,0.0038559232,0.0007136204,0.16010392,0.47328702,0.00042703204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9740588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97954047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20806032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20806032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28939885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9185378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984140242","doi":"10.7202/043404ar","title":"Nouveau développement du droit administratif en Chine","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010483017210511673,"score_gpt":0.2603413324638297,"score_spread":0.249858315253318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984140242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15846612,0.026252303,0.007427243,0.02402547,0.0009041273,0.00044519664,0.00075387966,0.00031660433,0.781409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42980295,0.01572602,0.006920883,0.004525585,0.0005970075,0.00042421065,0.00038196295,0.0002013287,0.5414201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523985,0.0008145802,0.00024374759,0.0006800635,0.0021423835,0.0008793373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701905,0.00092516013,0.00044876267,0.00032693887,0.00095913373,0.0003209858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029115665,0.0003182334,0.00034352543,0.003245661,0.004734299,0.005179747,0.0011190199,0.0027079517,0.019941865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005741532,0.00043753663,0.00085696357,0.0039595556,0.0035061697,0.002612117,0.0019326995,0.0021187116,0.0017537895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070636444,0.00011407065,0.011655908,0.00035621712,0.000036991038,0.00060914893,0.018220266,0.00073965493,0.002975816,0.8384296,0.020923339,0.10586836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010123006,0.0001001315,0.04201181,0.0002560727,0.000028730892,0.00016621989,0.0017813442,0.00032266325,0.0016149728,0.0065304837,0.9471107,0.000066697314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25901517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38342887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25901517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022028059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026841704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51501507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992252252","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.864364","title":"Is Consent the Foundation of Fair Information Practices? Canada's Experience Under Pipeda","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Library science; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.029387196906130838,"score_gpt":0.3274001810575127,"score_spread":0.29801298415138183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992252252","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1045837,0.0026314687,0.0025919888,0.7745109,0.00093114615,0.00018305006,0.00028043083,0.00010707316,0.11418011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8560108,0.0021871885,0.0022103814,0.08028909,0.00034748617,0.0001692291,0.00012697456,0.00015601091,0.058502898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8913702,0.031850126,0.0025943513,0.0054278774,0.039715897,0.029041577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7064469,0.14978486,0.0069974298,0.012898454,0.07498278,0.048889603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08906886,0.0004806487,0.0012602048,0.0024609647,0.05800948,0.029266315,0.0059898756,0.018152818,0.012300121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17009087,0.0010833339,0.0011574813,0.0054984163,0.033778306,0.0117271915,0.011654104,0.027064342,0.0006754359],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003273436,0.00032090012,0.018014783,0.00024152285,0.000056163084,0.0012179096,0.0968852,0.0012113781,0.0004390841,0.6502333,0.14913669,0.081915736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040539063,0.00027151973,0.034453426,0.0011934763,0.00010156454,0.0004817373,0.12086492,0.0023440742,0.00084912527,0.10710826,0.7313684,0.0005580164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20164171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20164171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.55932844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9259825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993297088","doi":"10.7202/042508ar","title":"L'ombudsman: première avenue de contrôle de l'Administration, ses caractéristiques, son efficacité","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Wonder; Administration (probate law); Political science; Public administration; Law; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009019204008820675,"score_gpt":0.26488700342018856,"score_spread":0.2558677994113679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993297088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037927847,0.07675604,0.010056859,0.31079552,0.0036908502,0.00021023254,0.00033687367,0.0004029724,0.5598228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37116167,0.014108604,0.00587109,0.01830622,0.0010959146,0.0001515592,0.000079301186,0.00013392308,0.5890917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941175,0.0015789834,0.00021591519,0.00067238306,0.0019751247,0.0014400905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960431,0.0011974621,0.0006544221,0.00029159305,0.0010581653,0.00075535587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005844536,0.0004261181,0.00037532675,0.0012671272,0.007485308,0.009543633,0.00096458197,0.0052058008,0.025440332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011620101,0.00035624346,0.0002599732,0.001264163,0.0055053174,0.0046043284,0.0021829626,0.0032908688,0.0031642774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008689471,0.000044975946,0.0052156127,0.00018641975,0.000012715214,0.00019455668,0.0031148212,0.00010380336,0.00088491134,0.72614205,0.17538784,0.088625364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010749642,0.00004117027,0.005095575,0.00021112083,0.0000078259845,0.00014756864,0.0009066106,0.00010901917,0.00047025373,0.00710275,0.9858715,0.000026002837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2777243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40198573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2777243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020573286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027427953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5522155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994382601","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2007.tb02002.x","title":"The American distortion of the ombudsman concept and its influence on Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legislature; Humanities; Not for profit; Law; Management; Philosophy; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.01285996568857332,"score_gpt":0.26593429748492214,"score_spread":0.2530743317963488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994382601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12260352,0.017263884,0.0025695018,0.42337763,0.004396461,0.00010864453,0.00054513296,0.00013398674,0.42900124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81099373,0.0075963,0.0025825866,0.060821857,0.00046416098,0.00006361939,0.00014398522,0.00016481575,0.11716886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889782,0.0014940893,0.00023401574,0.001048025,0.004299894,0.0039458293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98732436,0.0021628053,0.0006007371,0.00031345154,0.0064479355,0.003150692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007855625,0.000446905,0.0006186444,0.0023673826,0.036407247,0.011253296,0.0031042194,0.0062848167,0.008064829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011368148,0.0004842304,0.0005585417,0.004721353,0.021333791,0.002402508,0.005014025,0.010501932,0.00039633407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060635055,0.00003633691,0.004653636,0.00008651354,0.00001398322,0.00041689942,0.012675525,0.0004390429,0.00025815688,0.8851586,0.07517021,0.021030553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000286902,0.000026466189,0.010631382,0.00032208706,0.000028025483,0.00014517143,0.01567321,0.0007254115,0.00041146087,0.021683335,0.9501792,0.00014549494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27866185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27866185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37550354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002727790","doi":"10.7202/042499ar","title":"Les conséquences juridiques des informations erronées fournies par les préposés de l'Administration publique","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Redress; Political science; Equity (law); Good faith; Law; Government (linguistics); Damages; Administration (probate law); Public administration; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020315623045872838,"score_gpt":0.2874767287644119,"score_spread":0.267161105718539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002727790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35442916,0.0082516065,0.017132819,0.134716,0.0031038483,0.0003436684,0.0009528108,0.00027656226,0.48079357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438472,0.0046866736,0.005276658,0.008844668,0.001481719,0.00020998175,0.00017316763,0.000082372884,0.03539752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95545423,0.02252849,0.002601493,0.002558646,0.013780344,0.0030769077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7835428,0.1670542,0.016109083,0.011036817,0.019662524,0.0025945723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034274373,0.00051067176,0.0007268216,0.002899607,0.008885924,0.009301273,0.0014388046,0.006666253,0.011891875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21570556,0.0007004774,0.00084330415,0.002711088,0.011238195,0.0072096414,0.0042836806,0.009910571,0.001680685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012836392,0.0002700827,0.022236647,0.00032659105,0.000179288,0.0029260372,0.00888895,0.0041181166,0.0007120069,0.8541644,0.035563916,0.06933039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006301135,0.0009365079,0.055192403,0.0013014753,0.0007102619,0.00462924,0.020816173,0.009489692,0.0053162975,0.6694699,0.2311113,0.00039664938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028114924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03596362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034274373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005331859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007505102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18126237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018322449","doi":"10.7202/043805ar","title":"Standards of Judicial Review : Is it Time to Change our Analysis ?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Mantra; Deference; Injustice; Discipline; Judicial deference; Law and economics; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024113953095631697,"score_gpt":0.32638550597224275,"score_spread":0.30227155287661106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018322449","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020485825,0.032745283,0.023544883,0.91058284,0.009022984,0.00005948011,0.000057232457,0.00009042317,0.0218483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36791623,0.06465305,0.08436138,0.3755882,0.08940578,0.0010741208,0.0003256355,0.0006044696,0.016071172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8315624,0.09093019,0.010195609,0.008699186,0.053240694,0.005371863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7324365,0.14467354,0.016022077,0.027513463,0.0697525,0.009601993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.121351786,0.0008908254,0.0027361286,0.007163596,0.006087854,0.025061447,0.0064009484,0.016145017,0.0031774577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28078476,0.00083654455,0.0016974146,0.0047829784,0.057554014,0.040409405,0.006580585,0.03346526,0.0013677367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008057663,0.000016487778,0.00018967809,0.00012722526,0.00002086866,0.000018075638,0.00061084895,0.00027873297,0.000046699537,0.953767,0.027930921,0.016985407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019531099,0.000022837998,0.0003162976,0.00039669184,0.000009297132,0.000034050725,0.00050507305,0.0003083445,0.00005906409,0.9115247,0.086771905,0.00003224888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007898428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006304484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121351786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016098553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025568303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6417773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026041722","doi":"10.1111/0033-3352.00093","title":"Less Government, More Secrecy: Reinvention and the Weakening of Freedom of Information Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Secrecy; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Restructuring; Democracy; Business; Government (linguistics); Politics; Public administration; Public relations; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.030109396186381893,"score_gpt":0.2985655148150158,"score_spread":0.26845611862863394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026041722","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101244375,0.13034484,0.024073808,0.42147848,0.0011175887,0.00017037413,0.00006391583,0.0001474324,0.3213592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91872776,0.03155438,0.0038629705,0.031389084,0.0009579581,0.00008068066,0.000033960747,0.00004941396,0.0133438315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96996105,0.016200393,0.0012482898,0.0018023893,0.008015681,0.00277215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91182595,0.061698135,0.010608217,0.007629187,0.0065541733,0.0016843854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038793623,0.0003041223,0.00073077145,0.0031993599,0.0028134703,0.008737996,0.0018114625,0.0060119135,0.003290312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043770514,0.00037825675,0.0009174135,0.0031704744,0.046366688,0.012898525,0.0060204933,0.0069592106,0.00041480124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011273357,0.000021266385,0.0008362626,0.00014641503,0.000014875923,0.00010117171,0.002208145,0.00040326905,0.00018223868,0.96901053,0.0028124165,0.024252081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005290087,0.00009756803,0.005150357,0.0012881702,0.00003446901,0.0005210956,0.003451869,0.0006383732,0.0014819566,0.6659181,0.32130393,0.00006121948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008103118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073084007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038793623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007939654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012910996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20516276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032037301","doi":"10.7202/042693ar","title":"Le contrôle juridictionnel de l'action administrative devant les juridictions anglaises","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Political science; Legislation; Law; Commission; Certiorari; Action (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.027902382751163805,"score_gpt":0.30032537373918466,"score_spread":0.27242299098802086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032037301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08916167,0.021517605,0.09525812,0.067908004,0.003129111,0.0007301776,0.00030481003,0.0007671186,0.72122335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65417075,0.007036056,0.030679522,0.0050213644,0.0021237952,0.00061206176,0.00010327711,0.00013648956,0.30011678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864073,0.005352495,0.0006696792,0.0011635864,0.0048797806,0.001527145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98755103,0.0076873912,0.0012258972,0.00083594024,0.0018884784,0.00081129506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012837139,0.00061073375,0.00049001846,0.0012914521,0.0060933908,0.010893621,0.0009951257,0.002981723,0.011707501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020313954,0.0005274676,0.00044035472,0.0007473343,0.005460758,0.003114437,0.0019229375,0.0065937433,0.0026555147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008958226,0.000037567763,0.0021702861,0.000119408665,0.000016035256,0.00027518644,0.005691966,0.00084408856,0.0020878108,0.88810575,0.01761277,0.08294949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000834176,0.00015087843,0.007569864,0.0002028184,0.000014641482,0.00041418077,0.0026087426,0.00094361603,0.0025430212,0.0382943,0.9470637,0.000110906825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039041433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051671196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039041433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068655037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015008897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077628374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038776553","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2003.0029","title":"Transgovernmental Activism: Canada's Role in Promoting National Human Rights Commissions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Commission; Political science; Public administration; Context (archaeology); Economic shortage; Government (linguistics); Law","score_opus":0.01818793404464711,"score_gpt":0.28439548771355955,"score_spread":0.26620755366891247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038776553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1206774,0.007825207,0.0031729771,0.26738927,0.001207816,0.00018129968,0.00019569341,0.00013736475,0.599213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93148404,0.0028628465,0.0020011358,0.012559854,0.000092235154,0.00005017795,0.00008605719,0.000052517684,0.050811093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99082774,0.0021661413,0.000120020326,0.0005027882,0.0022466662,0.004136683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848455,0.0035423187,0.00065381767,0.00043536976,0.0038741461,0.0066487337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006584511,0.00028250826,0.00023896489,0.0016467073,0.027274389,0.0123914555,0.001693126,0.003573554,0.008684577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012918557,0.00024696926,0.00029938077,0.0029668743,0.008023633,0.0025652691,0.0061158123,0.0048911814,0.00031937528],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012545123,0.0001365098,0.022004142,0.00042024243,0.00003572524,0.0012452524,0.061069656,0.0016404431,0.0010101312,0.5750176,0.19737987,0.13991508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003685148,0.000037561793,0.02725259,0.0004754035,0.000035353845,0.00018599075,0.05961112,0.0010809855,0.0006224821,0.015462506,0.8951245,0.000074736105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9797768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119480565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.119480565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27634043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8668962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077028099","doi":"10.7202/042518ar","title":"Réflexion pour une approche critique de la notion de droit à l'information en droit international","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"United Nations","keywords":"Freedom of information; International law; Political science; Right to know; Access to information; Law and economics; Humanities; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Information access; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.006728804330157048,"score_gpt":0.27425898962538703,"score_spread":0.26753018529523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077028099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005882277,0.019243153,0.06550859,0.38391027,0.008537882,0.00008868037,0.00025525663,0.00013335639,0.5164405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6037655,0.016483149,0.04360418,0.12887271,0.018538699,0.00097402284,0.00032492157,0.0005543853,0.18688256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98622537,0.006946635,0.0004346527,0.0018443931,0.0037929076,0.00075598236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889875,0.00707984,0.0005998434,0.0010580542,0.0019306316,0.00034401641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013006752,0.0012073846,0.0013698714,0.0030059514,0.005752398,0.01626515,0.0039493814,0.014748487,0.009627649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017545424,0.00052309164,0.0018117063,0.0029220462,0.038346976,0.016126886,0.005280502,0.026063979,0.0021623722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021050807,0.0000020960258,0.000009150857,0.000010338728,0.0000015930128,0.000012531882,0.0006090568,0.00003834335,0.000017099412,0.9956196,0.0031342227,0.0005438412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013223531,0.000007316432,0.000085543594,0.00024401986,0.0000080275395,0.000058207566,0.0009952292,0.00043948085,0.00012057288,0.78892416,0.20908716,0.000016962678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013787525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010340799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01626515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011076569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008585173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08036649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081658595","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.270908","title":"In Search of 'Effective Remedies': Applying the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Australia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Cultural rights; Political science; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Human rights; Law and economics; International human rights law; Law; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.031049839307650418,"score_gpt":0.3467678434883814,"score_spread":0.315718004180731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081658595","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23481414,0.0052198432,0.007435868,0.47258842,0.0013649461,0.00032997975,0.000017667724,0.000037961516,0.27819118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582648,0.0018359821,0.0028326237,0.019552309,0.0001785224,0.00013273618,0.0000062779563,0.000018974371,0.017177716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877115,0.0073340926,0.00035255132,0.00055654935,0.0014544977,0.002590878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993115,0.0034818698,0.00083179335,0.00040308473,0.00094566506,0.0012225503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010819546,0.0003912415,0.00059602567,0.0012869133,0.012183587,0.008196794,0.0016781602,0.009802533,0.0057062646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03708222,0.00037252938,0.00037540513,0.0009453263,0.021815497,0.00754452,0.011466451,0.009693584,0.00033318822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049928498,0.00024727258,0.004759926,0.0002953761,0.000025686064,0.00093247584,0.14175998,0.00073235657,0.0006183459,0.73061377,0.024548227,0.09541666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009133388,0.0003401848,0.03379686,0.0015148023,0.00012442558,0.00046205558,0.24671678,0.0029710974,0.0012170746,0.42183077,0.29079804,0.00013660446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078241155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19208804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078241155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066615436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03518006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15557152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083092465","doi":"10.7202/1026399ar","title":"L’accès des enfants à la justice et leur droit de participation devant les tribunaux : quelques réflexions","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.043641929178812586,"score_gpt":0.3289911729351416,"score_spread":0.285349243756329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083092465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32510537,0.045711394,0.006332501,0.25552222,0.002727367,0.000088556924,0.00020980973,0.000042444233,0.3642604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9540624,0.008894264,0.0009039278,0.010948527,0.00048143388,0.000058912974,0.000042750125,0.000032702945,0.024575016],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904546,0.00487925,0.00024499116,0.0009405656,0.001376399,0.0021041585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99058354,0.005204387,0.00058469566,0.00045195397,0.00196249,0.0012130035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007945151,0.00053403963,0.0006626684,0.0015690911,0.016613787,0.010524765,0.001845815,0.004290507,0.0075415256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013125663,0.0002478524,0.00039811913,0.001410239,0.025237614,0.006479696,0.0066941283,0.005587471,0.0005088719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045987646,0.000058677237,0.006349056,0.0003299778,0.000025580826,0.0011381027,0.5164332,0.00010566669,0.0003151076,0.42961854,0.011880212,0.03369989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009427614,0.00005627218,0.017297814,0.0023758286,0.000031494208,0.00070445525,0.6624253,0.00014317119,0.00041598847,0.037143778,0.27932018,0.000076281394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25879148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36730695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25879148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013802139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018457763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5145703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091461638","doi":"10.7202/043302ar","title":"Salaire des fonctionnaires et vie privée","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.014640191369825787,"score_gpt":0.26653449193165757,"score_spread":0.25189430056183176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091461638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3980498,0.005960718,0.006786556,0.02167444,0.00045524733,0.00007655384,0.00060392433,0.00014989644,0.5662429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8693271,0.0018847925,0.0013722393,0.0009005393,0.00017334196,0.000046435256,0.00015348593,0.000046504745,0.12609544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725467,0.0008166202,0.00010033828,0.00037761446,0.0008504712,0.00060025137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730825,0.00063890044,0.00073266507,0.00031453735,0.00060164306,0.00040394175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001954568,0.00021227683,0.00023300853,0.0010726352,0.0028375078,0.0042960313,0.0005545888,0.00089449284,0.022269335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004495795,0.00019125505,0.0003094849,0.0011854961,0.004956487,0.0021798592,0.0036244637,0.0016530047,0.0021487018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023867398,0.00016276787,0.049658958,0.0003399784,0.00007131032,0.0005055102,0.059357643,0.001233681,0.0035455087,0.7222796,0.011545539,0.15106092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021265161,0.00024381735,0.2084667,0.00047697028,0.000032663742,0.00043396783,0.026414707,0.00040154313,0.0021224844,0.041001506,0.72026247,0.00012184956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032285605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05046265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96771437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005684214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005496782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074498355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091839077","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss091","title":"A Powerful Weapon in the Right Hands? How Members of Parliament have used Freedom of Information in the UK","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Accountability; Opposition (politics); Creatures; Freedom of information; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Sociology; Public administration; Politics; History","score_opus":0.01777150176184071,"score_gpt":0.2626345562561618,"score_spread":0.24486305449432105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091839077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6030417,0.0068023843,0.0026899257,0.13106439,0.0014262919,0.00006137567,0.00013040799,0.00007360418,0.25471002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97600955,0.00082252995,0.00015292731,0.0058687027,0.00009264726,0.0000123851105,0.000016813014,0.000037511814,0.016986845],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9632616,0.02017565,0.0019034818,0.002088303,0.0058200066,0.0067508235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786751,0.010728462,0.0034960152,0.0014967779,0.002818885,0.0027846787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014853348,0.00018865404,0.00048864365,0.0012349696,0.014323923,0.014129885,0.0009415528,0.004880806,0.008200078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050837573,0.0004877318,0.00045848222,0.0021634344,0.017290022,0.01009925,0.0068035126,0.0058120796,0.0014723144],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017182523,0.000057611524,0.018271198,0.00021969512,0.00003823037,0.0014406337,0.67628324,0.00031890135,0.0010248375,0.22902355,0.025462015,0.04768822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000406742,0.00015148633,0.03258174,0.00063127186,0.000029502658,0.00074791507,0.25150672,0.00027443568,0.0009185153,0.012413055,0.700404,0.00030083986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.170465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1457952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.170465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014630325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007352133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33894557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099702670","doi":"","title":"BRIDGING THE DIVIDE? Integrating the Functions of National Equality Bodies and National Human Rights Institutions in the European Union","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Political science; European union; Human rights; Public administration; Economics; International trade; Law; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.05501008516443931,"score_gpt":0.28637028980913587,"score_spread":0.23136020464469656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099702670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40854353,0.021887401,0.020062903,0.048297837,0.0005946042,0.00012925289,0.00005863436,0.00007713135,0.50034875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98486495,0.0016583891,0.002212893,0.0024141285,0.000053042542,0.00005216768,0.000020041436,0.000024343659,0.008700059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96369606,0.02594909,0.00095216016,0.0018051808,0.0023553001,0.0052422676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907074,0.005071076,0.0010800255,0.0009723113,0.0009391468,0.0012300365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030978855,0.00028493084,0.0005232433,0.0019913446,0.0087829605,0.025278104,0.0016984715,0.0052729915,0.0048049823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017824003,0.00044606804,0.0004822226,0.0035774186,0.024560528,0.028479228,0.014760999,0.004607868,0.0007050497],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027234488,0.000036328496,0.0027559148,0.00009305995,0.000008313483,0.0002309238,0.14864685,0.0001829207,0.00013900646,0.79257387,0.001587986,0.05371753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028799861,0.00009983847,0.013353939,0.0022553052,0.000028418328,0.0004120803,0.5020693,0.0004701578,0.00064454146,0.117665805,0.36289975,0.00007204907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011239738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010770298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030978855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009959271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013924447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1638338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112049446","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2000.tb00203.x","title":"The Practice of One Ombudsman","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Medical Association; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law","score_opus":0.01666754751172351,"score_gpt":0.31042120874887597,"score_spread":0.29375366123715246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112049446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36231834,0.013740934,0.028075943,0.3038661,0.004151936,0.00025580326,0.00005602316,0.0003622134,0.2871727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94463944,0.0010851308,0.0041102367,0.008004689,0.0001082964,0.000046652032,0.0000072838243,0.00010794746,0.041890424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94972634,0.030045355,0.0012660075,0.0044256216,0.0074308356,0.0071058455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95753455,0.013559418,0.0030638776,0.0027616494,0.011169171,0.011911237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03885305,0.00037745002,0.0007404262,0.0024706174,0.03607139,0.011839239,0.002426068,0.005642114,0.006909968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059891675,0.00062952307,0.00033337568,0.0024637382,0.03662276,0.0068356832,0.0083433185,0.008444345,0.00084459205],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009095169,0.00007365036,0.009114171,0.00010307099,0.0000170408,0.00057518575,0.30475238,0.00026418065,0.0012798721,0.5862228,0.03797425,0.05953241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015668818,0.00009277233,0.0028095138,0.0008662321,0.000018957915,0.00029424785,0.2286514,0.00082056824,0.0010230769,0.030262295,0.7350356,0.00010962875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2525389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2862395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2525389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045014568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09375796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5021379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112602010","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2010.00124.x","title":"The ombudsman and e‐government in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Premise; Institution; State (computer science); Political science; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.010105914968792689,"score_gpt":0.22842804583985657,"score_spread":0.2183221308710639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112602010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3494277,0.017350024,0.0008399348,0.046713453,0.0005187634,0.000060843282,0.00067900185,0.00009184284,0.58431846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9154578,0.0041563422,0.0004968646,0.0023876356,0.000040654264,0.000009558109,0.00011346321,0.000032279917,0.07730525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775165,0.00013698282,0.000038412418,0.00013376879,0.0007623774,0.0011768097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985196,0.00022122613,0.00013095906,0.000043224285,0.0006304382,0.00045457637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007453425,0.00017730166,0.00021759089,0.001632691,0.014676385,0.006092256,0.0007453063,0.0012697285,0.014832248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030460951,0.00020240714,0.00017249802,0.006405587,0.0059312377,0.0016557312,0.0023262515,0.0017968676,0.000386895],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096137854,0.00006879888,0.038741052,0.00024846554,0.00002338981,0.0010441255,0.036336638,0.00053648424,0.00065661967,0.7629133,0.066647165,0.09268784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017976363,0.000018568267,0.08699203,0.00040226994,0.000019844087,0.00024093203,0.037729,0.0008077007,0.0005067329,0.01075077,0.86245346,0.000060664275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99606967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8977115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10228849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14872295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7421584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112920785","doi":"10.7202/042327ar","title":"Une contribution positive à la protection des droits individuels : l'institution de l'ombudsman au Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Jurisdiction; Political science; Settlement (finance); Law; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Politics; Strengths and weaknesses; Business","score_opus":0.006557040772635167,"score_gpt":0.23151239626005166,"score_spread":0.2249553554874165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112920785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18840913,0.046105072,0.0036304637,0.3191101,0.002679871,0.00010108915,0.0001670233,0.000086893255,0.43971038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88134634,0.010138701,0.0020658176,0.016485639,0.0005797513,0.000022998436,0.000027748394,0.00003605947,0.089296944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928069,0.0018828298,0.0001248718,0.00035691023,0.0020955321,0.002732967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939598,0.0017476556,0.00047554998,0.00025794533,0.0015132943,0.0020457676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045402762,0.0003290642,0.00038105063,0.0011666385,0.014251141,0.009795695,0.0013953103,0.004127636,0.0071458807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008278239,0.00032325985,0.00037578036,0.0010233837,0.010739371,0.0020283444,0.003981003,0.0049541756,0.00036789084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008718193,0.00008114603,0.013298349,0.00021346226,0.00004214697,0.00082970236,0.0151914535,0.00065547787,0.00066667184,0.8274003,0.0503421,0.091192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038264996,0.00008781335,0.025831727,0.0008499798,0.00007889259,0.0005119825,0.012577897,0.0006559381,0.000983499,0.022258734,0.936004,0.00012128393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94427186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9702458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060987096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060987096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13556501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44249445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115521965","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2008.00017.x","title":"Human rights commissions and public policy: The role of the Canadian Human Rights Commission in advancing sexual orientation equality rights in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Sexual orientation; Human rights; Political science; Promotion (chess); Politics; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03278025317332882,"score_gpt":0.30329093668754564,"score_spread":0.2705106835142168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115521965","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09751503,0.01960501,0.0026023337,0.44125617,0.0018209637,0.00021030112,0.0001938547,0.000092734794,0.43670356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.919075,0.0059227645,0.0018020534,0.027003434,0.00018208184,0.00004499541,0.0000587469,0.00003049022,0.045880374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98127156,0.0041089966,0.00029619312,0.00077962334,0.005470898,0.008072697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97633684,0.0076755835,0.0015409669,0.0004584002,0.00668177,0.0073064463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01195423,0.00029740192,0.00028472635,0.0026576752,0.032306507,0.015381207,0.0018527614,0.005953978,0.009098235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023788597,0.0005273,0.0004102468,0.003553497,0.017720578,0.0040612174,0.0061464985,0.0059778304,0.0003201789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005619463,0.00009004901,0.017870165,0.00038982634,0.00003649349,0.0011516417,0.033438742,0.001386769,0.00034397494,0.7921481,0.09510998,0.057977937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007507409,0.000044117038,0.034090746,0.0011028729,0.000075602686,0.00021119001,0.06091418,0.001475159,0.0006433077,0.031678174,0.8695139,0.00017558699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9912402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20197667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20197667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44451123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.925594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119447935","doi":"10.12927/hcpap..17764","title":"Determining the Utility of Public Reporting - Too Early to Judge","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"A Nudge Too Far? A Nudge at All? On Paying People to Be Healthy","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Data science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.19305162701802955,"score_gpt":0.3812789195046364,"score_spread":0.18822729248660683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119447935","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010896541,0.0033789228,0.0063593583,0.953135,0.005184294,0.00024172115,0.00016889152,0.00010565072,0.020529522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33426282,0.0029242816,0.009267889,0.64023924,0.008539702,0.00094153086,0.00020732256,0.00011865001,0.003498599],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.5648901,0.3007443,0.033555485,0.0104908,0.07653327,0.013786014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.13865022,0.71621376,0.042521555,0.020676594,0.073756225,0.0081816865],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.42639652,0.00058625865,0.0019279096,0.0047860076,0.0037576745,0.015151128,0.0057772766,0.027566243,0.003517679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7688166,0.001042756,0.0018956467,0.0031911721,0.013264329,0.02133728,0.00783556,0.030360665,0.002313128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011534292,0.00041502528,0.078879625,0.0016909938,0.0003062718,0.0014424886,0.010615329,0.0016031687,0.00069285725,0.20597045,0.42990512,0.26732525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008518065,0.0017185104,0.060760837,0.014819234,0.00057087024,0.0028618346,0.015270302,0.018522946,0.0048581683,0.30023107,0.57843304,0.0011014021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008423295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055128676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5736035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013219998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018382773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70735526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138389116","doi":"","title":"Preliminary Study on the Damage Compensation Issues of Administrative Guidance Practice in China","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Compensation (psychology); China; Damages; Position (finance); Order (exchange); Power (physics); Political science; Business; Public administration; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.09865793170444127,"score_gpt":0.4018191193925145,"score_spread":0.30316118768807326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138389116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955558,0.00010710066,0.00008274851,0.00041592796,0.0000053956387,0.000049267317,0.000035286306,0.000001753307,0.00374675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976999,0.00015508392,0.00009874633,0.000076870936,0.000006949603,0.000032255306,0.00004572753,0.0000011036716,0.0018833617],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575883,0.0010157038,0.00034454121,0.00033512633,0.0014133344,0.0011324809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98779607,0.0031609784,0.0031372292,0.0004489206,0.003680947,0.0017758745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004635235,0.00025186499,0.000385729,0.002554261,0.003907059,0.0019980995,0.0010584873,0.0006418488,0.005930237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009832864,0.00025513946,0.0004725915,0.0032347164,0.0018780705,0.001970794,0.0014493052,0.0009880225,0.00028078593],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015034473,0.00069767825,0.85298485,0.00028263853,0.00005255668,0.001271492,0.096866824,0.0005107479,0.00067846087,0.00708017,0.0023910091,0.037033174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000135229675,0.00024075511,0.90193,0.00009129479,0.000028358889,0.000114982395,0.090630956,0.0009351565,0.0002380426,0.0004418967,0.0053060898,0.000028879744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12517788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17558207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12517788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011139716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013588431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2488985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203232437","doi":"","title":"Something to Talk About: Is There a Charter Right to Access Government Information?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitutional right; Political science; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Right to know; Constitutional law; Fundamental rights; Freedom of information; Constitutional court; Access to information; Human rights; Law and economics; Information access; Sociology; Constitution; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.00961063109953833,"score_gpt":0.29491041220540953,"score_spread":0.2852997811058712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203232437","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0101382,0.00413368,0.012884785,0.6048349,0.001501064,0.00007828868,0.00028300306,0.00008155289,0.36606446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7031896,0.0058267275,0.013687582,0.16719095,0.0015435463,0.00018366454,0.00027258258,0.00012232269,0.10798301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98721373,0.0034534694,0.00036824113,0.0016037205,0.003906347,0.003454507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99130404,0.0046808715,0.0006141112,0.0008429173,0.0018134553,0.00074452657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012136863,0.0004649927,0.0010078744,0.001479642,0.017128797,0.023240507,0.0029479042,0.019989869,0.010357585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022502728,0.0004404931,0.00080388866,0.0027547823,0.06703472,0.021492803,0.0044649704,0.016130041,0.0015459139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028424208,0.000003236524,0.000067116554,0.000009947428,0.0000010963444,0.000040235136,0.0015581222,0.000030428622,0.000040886327,0.99055076,0.0061077466,0.001587672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001156955,0.000011718785,0.00055199896,0.0002546396,0.000011712349,0.000105213185,0.0077534816,0.00025495185,0.00024098084,0.78259885,0.20814629,0.000058560523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5116412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48015037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4883588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028294394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057226237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207754643","doi":"","title":"The Nature of Inquisitorial Processes in Administrative Regimes: Global Perspectives Research Workshop Report","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Administrative law; Political science; Commonwealth; Law; Legislature; State (computer science); Common law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Public administration","score_opus":0.07104868652170832,"score_gpt":0.4176713423627071,"score_spread":0.3466226558409988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2207754643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12694919,0.08402253,0.007535071,0.15574777,0.0019146842,0.00010244886,0.00032252353,0.00007638698,0.62332946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92085004,0.04213435,0.0017991861,0.007472965,0.0012438186,0.00014757116,0.00016263215,0.0001403182,0.026049139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914824,0.0056935297,0.00017173628,0.00075729995,0.0006430346,0.0012519407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989393,0.008176308,0.00056067616,0.0006450181,0.0006428816,0.0005820211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010629153,0.00048071195,0.00072846474,0.0036247787,0.007888397,0.024560826,0.0016521433,0.0046435646,0.012311641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055163065,0.00046724384,0.00080163317,0.006858674,0.02466251,0.021218684,0.008080705,0.0085754255,0.0009067156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006172234,0.00010706446,0.0027357016,0.00047674708,0.00002009992,0.0004011777,0.12784909,0.00035378276,0.0003674959,0.8167874,0.014860035,0.035979554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001710939,0.0000730425,0.008945537,0.0016388174,0.000027865486,0.0004240521,0.29869816,0.00044498633,0.0006743909,0.07801542,0.6109931,0.00004747679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00801652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00918223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024560826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010381497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007034778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07532346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212952951","doi":"","title":"How Canadian Administrative Law Protections Measure Up to International Human Rights Standards","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Human rights; Political science; Judicial independence; International law; Administrative law; Politics","score_opus":0.024344877252424228,"score_gpt":0.3282108884298654,"score_spread":0.30386601117744116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212952951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047952686,0.0034841618,0.004596062,0.10369809,0.0007755932,0.00014913503,0.00074193405,0.00016147902,0.83844084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9095813,0.002689318,0.0049419734,0.017275825,0.0002908143,0.00009127597,0.0003751958,0.00013790347,0.064616404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9576087,0.0035590113,0.0009339169,0.0035879754,0.022810409,0.011500078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9663155,0.005382393,0.0018842262,0.003383358,0.019181607,0.003852945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012567961,0.0005610313,0.0007176586,0.0062825507,0.022499958,0.022982847,0.0027643878,0.003993604,0.0093165375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05192799,0.000696927,0.0010120368,0.0074588177,0.025795408,0.0060475077,0.004877977,0.0067124646,0.00088004506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015925565,0.000015972671,0.004217972,0.000048271762,0.000023775234,0.0000824838,0.009626836,0.00033615364,0.00022042278,0.9400115,0.022123337,0.023277357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005012596,0.00004487849,0.070310354,0.0006828778,0.0001473856,0.00015349695,0.019368127,0.00086505024,0.0009657371,0.18565759,0.7215098,0.0002445363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9855326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99010426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15705809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15705809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22568236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97769314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241107961","doi":"","title":"Evaluating Ombuds Oversight in the Canadian Access to Information Context: A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Political science; Dispute resolution; Public administration; Statutory law; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Alternative dispute resolution; Law","score_opus":0.05448030005603018,"score_gpt":0.3934642480442726,"score_spread":0.33898394798824244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241107961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7908314,0.003982276,0.001900625,0.015921256,0.000066992405,0.0005217699,0.00066645973,0.000021869258,0.18608733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99349207,0.0015927646,0.001160604,0.00070190866,0.000015356092,0.00008808417,0.00015192793,0.000010890327,0.002786406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783638,0.0048409007,0.0006862689,0.00152553,0.009506145,0.0050772717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93114996,0.036534246,0.0068409466,0.0015298775,0.020395625,0.0035493444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01747603,0.00053522084,0.0009264678,0.007400653,0.026210245,0.020946532,0.0037919707,0.0027927866,0.0054124035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06314129,0.0006244587,0.0007356843,0.016813489,0.02579642,0.0071661943,0.0067469548,0.004412272,0.0002621998],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015986376,0.00024580644,0.16848686,0.0007067191,0.00008194083,0.0009003479,0.23454496,0.0023504782,0.00044464145,0.5438137,0.009391567,0.038873058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005635355,0.00010064595,0.17787017,0.0012917368,0.00020610263,0.00013618151,0.7296046,0.0040432047,0.00036814515,0.022744572,0.06344833,0.000129995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99445903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27544746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27544746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25435552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8403783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243465984","doi":"","title":"Discretion and the Culture of Justice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Administrative discretion; Impartiality; Political science; Multiculturalism; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Public relations; Public service; Public administration; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.004784448306542868,"score_gpt":0.2514394177206656,"score_spread":0.2466549694141227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243465984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16531284,0.005040521,0.02261936,0.07823515,0.0005584082,0.00006609029,0.000071388975,0.000062850886,0.72803336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99016625,0.0005527513,0.00093754596,0.002595132,0.00007543137,0.00001960268,0.0000089371115,0.000018371442,0.005626027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97588027,0.010615231,0.0007521183,0.0019871003,0.006430884,0.0043344535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98751974,0.0049713366,0.0016382053,0.0017246307,0.0024154242,0.001730628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0135168675,0.00030447103,0.0004888354,0.0020042697,0.018255295,0.014019166,0.0014112077,0.002509246,0.002669693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021174474,0.00030398142,0.0004374222,0.001545097,0.07062586,0.0058003594,0.0091850795,0.005230531,0.00031983477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075456983,0.0000066563125,0.00077656785,0.000011348108,0.0000050674303,0.000041252704,0.014860716,0.00016028393,0.00008286582,0.97862524,0.0009865437,0.004435905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002262963,0.00002918872,0.0037136402,0.00028170698,0.000018604936,0.00012130263,0.022284135,0.0006607805,0.0004948682,0.8302401,0.14205515,0.0000777868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.119145125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084626704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119145125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01671514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022641528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23690325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246097630","doi":"","title":"Powers and Functions of the Ombudsman in the Personal Information Protection andElectronic Documents Act: An Effectiveness Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Personally identifiable information; Business; Data Protection Act 1998; Information privacy; Private sector; Information privacy law; Privacy policy; Privacy law; Privacy by Design; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.00871426520693131,"score_gpt":0.27640799295483387,"score_spread":0.26769372774790257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246097630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8619813,0.0013076446,0.0023948145,0.0077742278,0.00017308258,0.00059040467,0.00005304857,0.000017077135,0.12570842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949674,0.00040573816,0.0007057501,0.0012296762,0.000040589857,0.00017923249,0.000017153785,0.000009560055,0.0024448687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8229512,0.14141108,0.004087696,0.0037356152,0.020296682,0.0075177415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7538413,0.19953437,0.017084157,0.006771238,0.015978273,0.0067907227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.106590495,0.00047238253,0.0007031092,0.003314076,0.008539089,0.008976008,0.0019867632,0.0030119482,0.0041203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13409375,0.0004991512,0.00064989796,0.0033853275,0.015714303,0.012106326,0.0047026686,0.004567707,0.0003641305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015231768,0.007939579,0.12399832,0.0010086386,0.000319237,0.0008655396,0.16277094,0.0020870976,0.0017510636,0.5596953,0.0085873185,0.12945373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010250307,0.008618141,0.21301585,0.0020371939,0.001465094,0.0006730094,0.5808725,0.009981936,0.009901763,0.034159746,0.13789159,0.0003582701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0500868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05393805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9499132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02513679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021560924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56371117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263742207","doi":"","title":"Protecting Third Party Business Interests Under Canadian Freedom of Information Legislation: A Review of British Columbia’s Act","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outsourcing; Negotiation; Legislation; Freedom of information; Statutory law; Leverage (statistics); Business; Business information; Transparency (behavior); Data Protection Act 1998; Goods and services; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Marketing; Economy","score_opus":0.0264725071378312,"score_gpt":0.30135381569132735,"score_spread":0.27488130855349613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263742207","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046350475,0.97876817,0.00008453809,0.00427322,0.00026868968,0.00002199083,0.00006781907,0.000008795883,0.016043315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01370269,0.9796964,0.00030741855,0.0019258137,0.00012423415,0.000029407707,0.00007297536,0.000008623435,0.0041324077],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953367,0.0006291908,0.00025639715,0.00026359045,0.0030248377,0.0004892406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891627,0.0034944282,0.00065257715,0.0002240728,0.0059390347,0.00052722037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055943425,0.0007979289,0.0012167124,0.010686838,0.0040843613,0.0039136563,0.0015986991,0.0026937926,0.0036031816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010717221,0.00055176165,0.00053237745,0.018859863,0.00393278,0.0016695554,0.00095235504,0.0021838767,0.0010412242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065800035,0.00007536712,0.0012514549,0.012266242,0.000056365974,0.0004147462,0.0013531602,0.0007434306,0.00037659242,0.04929252,0.2455509,0.68855345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011220795,0.000026816437,0.0043919673,0.00770139,0.000072866904,0.00019680762,0.00037166267,0.00009820961,0.00020527325,0.001347446,0.9855387,0.000037733727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92393947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9526676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07606053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06191043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13411132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44919378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272064723","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3239","title":"Adjudicating constitutional rights in administrative law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Formalism (music); Human rights; Common law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.053723045879230845,"score_gpt":0.2983441586715995,"score_spread":0.24462111279236867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272064723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08310308,0.007267596,0.30420652,0.04300314,0.0010845776,0.0005285963,0.0001348993,0.00023994643,0.56043166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94611174,0.0018349495,0.031400062,0.0030398152,0.0005932091,0.00034465647,0.000054471937,0.00008658657,0.01653441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9121914,0.048481215,0.005864893,0.005773014,0.017048396,0.010641067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9332989,0.047748998,0.0033661327,0.008801808,0.005533558,0.0012506229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05620176,0.00061900774,0.0012993575,0.0039676256,0.011763011,0.021469055,0.0038109408,0.012001361,0.0041218973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079958215,0.0012484596,0.0015732447,0.003910856,0.080327906,0.020657094,0.011716386,0.009792704,0.0008012265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027709282,0.000004218726,0.000097233016,0.000011265031,0.000002614276,0.000037727394,0.001357248,0.00022948941,0.000049230628,0.9962851,0.00027278494,0.0016502591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022906452,0.000021592996,0.00036970444,0.00014811006,0.000014986529,0.000065175474,0.0014157185,0.0011437504,0.00043493832,0.960682,0.03565008,0.00003100644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03451233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027030634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05620176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017346965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027876388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29722685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277148813","doi":"10.14288/1.0077625","title":"Procedural safeguards in the administrative process","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Business; Procedural justice; Process management; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Perception","score_opus":0.016039400041761628,"score_gpt":0.24797942467599637,"score_spread":0.23194002463423474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277148813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027702976,0.0068155667,0.35118002,0.035356797,0.0015760427,0.0009758407,0.00022933233,0.0007822507,0.57538116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.752514,0.004175652,0.15066937,0.011170846,0.0015825003,0.0015112225,0.00021556563,0.00030685306,0.077854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90947074,0.033705495,0.010116592,0.010004912,0.029186804,0.0075154253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93365175,0.03121909,0.0065076374,0.017865766,0.009628205,0.0011276114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04289373,0.0007128606,0.0009498734,0.0022846763,0.009879136,0.020990305,0.0038631086,0.007781107,0.004079465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06323787,0.0010693413,0.0018894839,0.0027777492,0.047630593,0.01033828,0.00727647,0.01512114,0.0025118995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060166903,0.000010071689,0.000119983386,0.000034560944,0.000005882198,0.000029605953,0.0026222132,0.00034926698,0.00020726486,0.9888626,0.0012460602,0.006506546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033604025,0.00007096308,0.0012970361,0.0005654945,0.000049133123,0.00016636445,0.0018716074,0.0012141254,0.0020082681,0.72849345,0.26413158,0.00009834129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03670854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028990902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04289373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012925892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05030477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2268464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278258009","doi":"","title":"The Relaxation of Representative Standing in Administrative Law: A Side-Effect of Charters of Rights?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalization; Law; Legislature; Political science; Common law; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Judicial review","score_opus":0.01752918431100646,"score_gpt":0.3319992919564557,"score_spread":0.31447010764544925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278258009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32507318,0.0043342663,0.040760804,0.13167633,0.0006622048,0.00018118627,0.00009799467,0.00012395935,0.4970901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98393434,0.0005983423,0.002725944,0.0036637953,0.00031209897,0.00004619468,0.00001619433,0.00003267269,0.008670367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96636313,0.0152343875,0.0010946897,0.0033259399,0.008482206,0.0054995264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9424374,0.03186098,0.010671939,0.0065336996,0.0054812105,0.003014768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023771051,0.00027707886,0.0008769488,0.0016877443,0.0073848614,0.01245584,0.0024382968,0.0042277616,0.0051527354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06759978,0.0004947235,0.0008970773,0.0031248825,0.065874375,0.015748348,0.008387041,0.009268249,0.0004099501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024098163,0.000016642955,0.002107426,0.000034066506,0.00000972478,0.000100309095,0.008179463,0.00024852535,0.00014013803,0.97835964,0.001127105,0.009652889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010549388,0.00019366929,0.034853496,0.00047280762,0.000055702334,0.0002982885,0.016940173,0.0014698994,0.0013117868,0.8460012,0.09815958,0.00013785224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06095425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07359765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06095425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013064857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014851365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12571484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286842734","doi":"","title":"Pour Une Charte De Bonne Gouvernance Publique (Towards a Charter for Good Public Governance)","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Humanities; Law; Corporate governance; Public administration; Philosophy; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.03217459328694384,"score_gpt":0.28781069164007056,"score_spread":0.25563609835312673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286842734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027349485,0.018414944,0.040901583,0.3450889,0.004062379,0.00032487453,0.00087868003,0.00058600906,0.5623931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56899625,0.006942358,0.024534462,0.016892636,0.001417736,0.00042909573,0.0004160497,0.00021252457,0.380159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960439,0.0014675696,0.00014841686,0.00056949403,0.0010722204,0.0006984377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688053,0.0010856541,0.0002777435,0.00028752253,0.0011567472,0.00031184065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005018923,0.0004901988,0.00032443524,0.0013934233,0.006637424,0.010535009,0.00083452783,0.0060097137,0.01819175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007954677,0.00033525264,0.0007227827,0.00166356,0.0076199584,0.005818536,0.0021071516,0.0059755533,0.002067118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016119186,0.000008895579,0.00025883093,0.00006410854,0.0000031504696,0.00013859352,0.0019436193,0.0004219354,0.00017954722,0.9502756,0.03820341,0.008486248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023688443,0.000034833072,0.002334009,0.00027011766,0.00001055976,0.00015605622,0.0018660882,0.00082985434,0.00047595662,0.10930242,0.88463885,0.00005768637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34636825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27996963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34636825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024848279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021153258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6887044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289829804","doi":"","title":"How Do Canadian Administrative Law Protections Measure Up to International Human Rights Standards? The Case of Independence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Human rights; Political science; Judicial independence; Independence (probability theory); International law; Right to a fair trial; Politics","score_opus":0.02290479935336207,"score_gpt":0.32850167811381614,"score_spread":0.30559687876045405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289829804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073078424,0.0075208424,0.004801476,0.23300104,0.0012538622,0.00012341481,0.0010104029,0.00015977537,0.6790506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94610405,0.004108945,0.0038139478,0.019771995,0.000297234,0.00007333185,0.00036927607,0.000088090914,0.0253732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96329355,0.0031776077,0.0008001489,0.0031513788,0.020311635,0.00926563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9617601,0.0069566583,0.003106982,0.0029271676,0.021430133,0.0038188656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013933713,0.0006485426,0.0010416002,0.008382546,0.02279082,0.021258982,0.0033300694,0.004173543,0.006472747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06542148,0.00068088353,0.0011273453,0.012490429,0.033258803,0.009603246,0.0051880316,0.006787842,0.0005584613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002224565,0.000024505129,0.008659463,0.000085284584,0.00003964555,0.00007925923,0.01130097,0.0003646488,0.00014203455,0.92329836,0.025959408,0.0300241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007223868,0.00006461726,0.16712156,0.0012066921,0.0002245678,0.0001798224,0.034827717,0.0014477764,0.0010963229,0.22286423,0.5704293,0.00046510188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9897685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9919517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82376885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17623115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22961542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9554551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312315066","doi":"10.1111/capa.12150","title":"Who speaks for whom? Implementing the Crown's duty to consult in the case of divided Aboriginal political structures","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Crown (dentistry); Supreme court; Law; Politics; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.03758062790090474,"score_gpt":0.36620874558509586,"score_spread":0.32862811768419115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312315066","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13516118,0.004175216,0.0053342097,0.6109383,0.0013815534,0.00016991574,0.000028416358,0.000041204636,0.2427699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9125438,0.0011087633,0.00222808,0.06713546,0.00032056565,0.000074866184,0.000009530992,0.000035296285,0.016543677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9529019,0.018267704,0.0015563186,0.0025329948,0.008816995,0.015924003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94643974,0.035305224,0.0024378754,0.0018033528,0.007056699,0.006957045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04666024,0.0004784229,0.0010364688,0.0015527672,0.06597543,0.018806944,0.005564326,0.0246833,0.004884089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073010705,0.00091965706,0.0006210861,0.0017417769,0.06351445,0.008103452,0.014659515,0.02904625,0.00050444703],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024786996,0.000046600642,0.0020129667,0.00007366598,0.000021712127,0.003958408,0.21013516,0.00032083748,0.00059040287,0.7442901,0.028718283,0.009807033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066822424,0.00006379579,0.005226899,0.0017144014,0.0001285584,0.0014374062,0.41104636,0.001816539,0.0015682231,0.24051459,0.3361193,0.00029709097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7387875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8332464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26121253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06654546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14197889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5255017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321360707","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.2014","title":"Accès à l’information et organisations internationales : le cas de l’Union européenne","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017318477179528762,"score_gpt":0.2780758538571587,"score_spread":0.26075737667762994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321360707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2361171,0.011561765,0.0023583572,0.06892041,0.0006266901,0.000037505426,0.000084299376,0.00003550448,0.6802584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93497837,0.004028767,0.0009235832,0.004270139,0.00030147663,0.000048188624,0.00005410361,0.00003206212,0.055363253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897602,0.0040072175,0.00032656148,0.0008213506,0.0021178236,0.002966843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99046385,0.0051108985,0.001415817,0.0007270032,0.0010523044,0.0012301664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005718579,0.00024474494,0.00043129586,0.003472718,0.012780642,0.021650253,0.0010411761,0.008574926,0.014929669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014620354,0.00033219898,0.00046729174,0.005818086,0.011618162,0.011579278,0.010657643,0.0052321763,0.0009796993],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031094336,0.000033815184,0.0035019584,0.00006368641,0.000007513048,0.0011941154,0.039945632,0.00012353518,0.00009740486,0.9346518,0.007720331,0.012629264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033245822,0.000056398694,0.018112807,0.0011382158,0.000026104382,0.0019491536,0.07905061,0.00046659453,0.0003491445,0.09268511,0.8060625,0.00007018784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05405337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044299934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05405337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008054022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061986004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107477486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341155549","doi":"","title":"Discussion on Chinese Public Security Organs' Anti-Corruption Campaign","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Language change; Law enforcement; Public security; Mass line; Commercialization; Business; Public relations; Enforcement; Public administration; Political science; Law; Economics; Communism","score_opus":0.017578974391745876,"score_gpt":0.2880569953165785,"score_spread":0.27047802092483264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341155549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3784035,0.0049984404,0.00068034616,0.2866782,0.0026944343,0.000169364,0.00020886962,0.00006572497,0.32610118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89239115,0.0019070482,0.00020413322,0.0485501,0.0010578901,0.00011032366,0.00006367882,0.000019675223,0.05569604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977099,0.00062186946,0.00008676398,0.00020216776,0.0005241093,0.0008552125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781597,0.0012044401,0.00019626669,0.00006399714,0.00037219483,0.00034710907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035725236,0.00036360463,0.00029763905,0.0011753298,0.008489464,0.003465417,0.0008619455,0.0036502453,0.012441735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004770063,0.00019227168,0.00045137174,0.0013679041,0.0035142426,0.0020604155,0.002015887,0.0026865578,0.0004853827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029540976,0.00031825306,0.04487755,0.0011038748,0.00007740187,0.0069683576,0.21375574,0.0006983303,0.0036469281,0.5036233,0.1608166,0.06381823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013842472,0.00016967494,0.1086813,0.00059275515,0.00013670728,0.0005957418,0.10009787,0.0009043912,0.0036694643,0.01595794,0.76892805,0.0001276971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07278944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06421993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07278944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011350311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009324286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14473152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2355211222","doi":"","title":"Judicial Protection Experience of Canadian Constitutional Equality Rights and It's Reference Value for China","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Shangrao Normal University","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Judicial review; Law; Norm (philosophy); China; Constitutional court; Value (mathematics); Human rights; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Constitution","score_opus":0.04182307490236055,"score_gpt":0.27579543536078777,"score_spread":0.23397236045842723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2355211222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37567028,0.0053464565,0.002535321,0.067834236,0.0006044211,0.00009566002,0.00024871834,0.000082953135,0.5475819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94793373,0.0009238185,0.00055274763,0.0020833588,0.000063024214,0.000018304014,0.00006520938,0.000012713982,0.048346963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931722,0.0011746128,0.00019679496,0.0006274,0.0028765737,0.0019523808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99489,0.0010248957,0.00020965464,0.00029301285,0.0026540556,0.0009283254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006137109,0.00021811848,0.00034153947,0.0019055043,0.021135261,0.00619449,0.0011992245,0.0020712288,0.007102852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008604046,0.0001885145,0.00033139045,0.0035458747,0.009877603,0.0021610619,0.0025789703,0.0035871407,0.00021475971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005553183,0.000034347348,0.007833538,0.00007827659,0.00001607243,0.0010550051,0.07510732,0.000431656,0.0007338358,0.81685317,0.0400351,0.057766173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040500563,0.00008358231,0.03907751,0.00021382443,0.000062160856,0.00035155402,0.036437426,0.001549876,0.0014553496,0.043969315,0.876577,0.00018195323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9121435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93827486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.932192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06780797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09046048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4919836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W237141118","doi":"","title":"Analysis on the Functions of Administrative Law Enforcement Interpretation in China 1 ANALYSES FONCTIONNELLES SUR L'APPLIACTION DU DROIT EN CHINE","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Administrative law; Enforcement; Political science; China; Law; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03153667126939179,"score_gpt":0.3281684268430081,"score_spread":0.2966317555736163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W237141118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93366027,0.00049979344,0.0065572113,0.0013189635,0.000022712533,0.00015306979,0.00059004466,0.00008507082,0.05711292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993342,0.000104870385,0.0009626697,0.000032407184,0.000010370778,0.000031140487,0.0001820853,0.000014887578,0.0053196307],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99371207,0.0014841671,0.0004614458,0.00078974833,0.0026558526,0.0008967252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893328,0.0035347862,0.0014595371,0.00053898664,0.004794379,0.00033958207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004953661,0.0003865311,0.0004380999,0.006535657,0.0029045797,0.0050594653,0.0009805276,0.0006351664,0.0073378407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011209968,0.00032615705,0.000869275,0.008643606,0.0032164336,0.0024515244,0.0015315885,0.00094872835,0.00039580374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014510928,0.00007006969,0.6712228,0.00032084924,0.00016892892,0.0014345242,0.025027618,0.005272172,0.0017240217,0.20699786,0.004599027,0.08301704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018136363,0.000065065746,0.8947344,0.0001963358,0.00026419465,0.0002137676,0.01972322,0.029127993,0.0027386765,0.022756984,0.030062217,0.00009899763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17900163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10907991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17900163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014395205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013827833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35591942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2377985425","doi":"","title":"The Regulation of Proportion Principle on Administration Enforcement Right","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Harm; Connotation; Administration (probate law); Administrative law; Law and economics; Business; Law enforcement; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.08470265963752183,"score_gpt":0.447642574161956,"score_spread":0.3629399145244342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2377985425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025444455,0.0013632135,0.16089197,0.013000663,0.00090710743,0.0004361424,0.00018774501,0.0002661454,0.7975026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8090144,0.0013315099,0.060778055,0.012373249,0.0014901706,0.0011027637,0.00015523883,0.00019822447,0.11355643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788057,0.004544759,0.0017628307,0.004616767,0.008490146,0.0017797516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901551,0.0037415714,0.00086344115,0.0018976539,0.0030072602,0.00033486317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010026828,0.00037638663,0.0006500222,0.001364653,0.0043835267,0.006340769,0.001370687,0.005070317,0.006697779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016063403,0.000503362,0.0012141782,0.00092286797,0.013782072,0.0054667024,0.0035851863,0.0070041968,0.0018853975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056178437,0.000012274313,0.00028819233,0.000016705391,0.0000043062864,0.000038613067,0.0003989554,0.00012416128,0.00026893805,0.9932156,0.0014905238,0.0041360087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005798482,0.000082620405,0.0021490161,0.00025304494,0.000047463374,0.0003528987,0.0004149285,0.0016577921,0.0026457838,0.8192104,0.17305034,0.000077650526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037575103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024357035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010026828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002858507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006618314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05302757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404515011","doi":"10.1057/9780230281998_17","title":"How Well Does Freedom of Information Work?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Freedom of information; Work (physics); Mythology; Political science; Operations research; Sociology; Law; Engineering; History; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.013934828086776223,"score_gpt":0.22667762531924254,"score_spread":0.2127427972324663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404515011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010686012,0.015631612,0.024244877,0.19222865,0.0011716449,0.000048877657,0.00017588396,0.00013505647,0.75567746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8658996,0.015456414,0.008069038,0.020739622,0.0018032184,0.0001957043,0.0001611958,0.00026296667,0.08741223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98563,0.009217797,0.00038507776,0.0012910698,0.0018828673,0.0015932834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96995497,0.022105353,0.0012191307,0.0042584846,0.0014446765,0.0010173811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020737462,0.00065649825,0.0010601367,0.0019582952,0.005457631,0.017780058,0.0017172899,0.007908717,0.016707728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037385292,0.0003743512,0.000992701,0.0033127235,0.05662318,0.036781915,0.0072720074,0.0045293453,0.004487464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006458444,0.0000069240114,0.00014780503,0.0000372263,0.0000061059736,0.000024790823,0.0013034036,0.00013514301,0.0000104870305,0.98646903,0.004394675,0.007457998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055430987,0.0000078359735,0.00011964105,0.0001605255,0.0000030998183,0.00003933655,0.0012888368,0.00011455108,0.000047511334,0.94946736,0.048737474,0.000008198585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050143176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026775685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020737462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046868846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047379993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10967147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479361638","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-6106-6.ch012","title":"Social Inclusion and OmbudsOffice Websites in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in electronic government, digital divide, and regional development book series","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Inclusion (mineral); Scope (computer science); The Internet; Digital inclusion; Institution; Political science; Public sector; Public relations; Internet privacy; Public administration; Business; Sociology; World Wide Web; Law; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.006817743850930617,"score_gpt":0.21370468226164807,"score_spread":0.20688693841071745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2479361638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20397075,0.01707567,0.00032552404,0.019301645,0.0003921989,0.00006405054,0.0005827401,0.00014212646,0.7581453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7362568,0.015153086,0.000640794,0.0019206017,0.00005530191,0.00003479542,0.00037669291,0.00012085764,0.24544108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825615,0.00008529794,0.000022328037,0.000075782256,0.0007790133,0.0007814405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984478,0.00019758349,0.00009168703,0.000041944488,0.00053313014,0.00068786787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006537336,0.0003044951,0.00047018033,0.0031777206,0.025091046,0.01023231,0.0012654148,0.001459228,0.012745896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019093915,0.00026988902,0.0003203218,0.009366521,0.0062437495,0.0022511573,0.0040172413,0.0017016295,0.0009311048],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007396227,0.00015722582,0.018398529,0.00040203176,0.000017080409,0.0018559274,0.13450263,0.0006428271,0.0004967243,0.44601244,0.20535047,0.19209014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000078137155,0.000016647733,0.039974317,0.0006464147,0.000017746093,0.00030058628,0.0822077,0.0005308285,0.0002936956,0.0077940393,0.8681478,0.0000624176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13754818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13754818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21898107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99798656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509187215","doi":"","title":"Petitioning the Australian parliament: Reviving a dying democratic tradition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Parliamentary Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Redress; Political science; Law; Democracy; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.045615308800601204,"score_gpt":0.3120668076720401,"score_spread":0.2664514988714389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509187215","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03235972,0.50760716,0.004340928,0.23140697,0.0053121075,0.00017259421,0.00004953039,0.000037695827,0.2187134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.582641,0.27967364,0.004198671,0.07094989,0.0026767112,0.00017172325,0.00004165861,0.000045501263,0.05960113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9725028,0.016718732,0.0011961177,0.00097639463,0.007009315,0.0015966969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808631,0.010527907,0.0018332282,0.0015382073,0.0038472621,0.0013903205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03351161,0.00028885063,0.0009524889,0.0019337733,0.005755666,0.0056046606,0.0017320119,0.005675131,0.0026534721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03155523,0.00043699748,0.0005318591,0.0020445648,0.014794266,0.0058130194,0.0048462097,0.0073052016,0.00048228764],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004330996,0.00008876284,0.0007571547,0.003563056,0.000056876248,0.00039794671,0.030521967,0.00036480054,0.00048864423,0.7213748,0.035963528,0.20637907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014582415,0.0001081782,0.004606467,0.0040388945,0.000036277477,0.00033231138,0.0033592233,0.00016102588,0.00028273702,0.03579609,0.9512324,0.00003177932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039770506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060067967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039770506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011318646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034909487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17722845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509688180","doi":"","title":"Openness in the EU and Beyond: The Contribution of the European Ombudsman to Open Meetings and Lessons from the Canadian Experience","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public law","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Political science; European union; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; International trade; Business; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.041286033765241315,"score_gpt":0.3046867189748281,"score_spread":0.26340068520958676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509688180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18812306,0.009236879,0.0027076076,0.273604,0.0019213294,0.00009463755,0.00010873006,0.000089065325,0.5241147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9356698,0.0018762175,0.0006397636,0.015554852,0.00020246288,0.00004185922,0.000028550872,0.00010361838,0.04588281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9723095,0.010601089,0.00043385342,0.0016540983,0.00482714,0.0101743825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9634796,0.017357515,0.0009711597,0.0012143272,0.0037703295,0.013207128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02324885,0.0004780434,0.0007118491,0.00170588,0.04865308,0.02888016,0.0030134604,0.0116803255,0.012962465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037845153,0.0004506806,0.00058239576,0.0029650622,0.033170916,0.010569651,0.017883655,0.01391559,0.00051682274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012188998,0.000120978795,0.002623252,0.00012797126,0.000019633342,0.0011641599,0.3361744,0.0003681598,0.00038015336,0.57831556,0.04597548,0.034608386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028786442,0.000033820168,0.0070214295,0.0004968726,0.000013628274,0.00020013143,0.32301763,0.00025310373,0.00021532258,0.0367928,0.63181394,0.00011247574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86307895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90979445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13692105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07299014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13666677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52958304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528823845","doi":"10.3138/9781442685901","title":"Provincial &amp; Territorial Ombudsman Offices in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.017130601661644252,"score_gpt":0.21755607648049657,"score_spread":0.2004254748188523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528823845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010632449,0.017110348,0.00025901737,0.013011667,0.00063191215,0.000048086476,0.0013571333,0.000108111126,0.95684123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06199258,0.005788735,0.0003304928,0.0009589721,0.000049191858,0.00002099457,0.00022116891,0.00006641911,0.9305715],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902785,0.00004416987,0.000014882594,0.00006794258,0.0002724674,0.0005727173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993092,0.00007971297,0.00003073886,0.000021665597,0.0002646394,0.00029416624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004354315,0.0004763735,0.00036279619,0.0013006409,0.017592855,0.007970704,0.0011721781,0.0021670773,0.053772572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011624587,0.00074567716,0.00026586198,0.005313856,0.0028763383,0.0017968881,0.0013831471,0.0023355624,0.0052405517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002711997,0.000020997099,0.0020321133,0.00011551521,0.0000040582636,0.00031772975,0.006069157,0.00035163958,0.00011977217,0.28305352,0.65636885,0.051519528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004435441,0.0000035142614,0.004195256,0.00009952498,0.00000391978,0.00004341991,0.0036102016,0.00011254214,0.000049987448,0.002016751,0.9898489,0.000011700383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99432075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99871206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9082439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09175613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17187862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66574043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528848164","doi":"10.3138/9781442685901-014","title":"11. Yukon’s Ombudsman: An Evolutionary Step Forward","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.026411063616855898,"score_gpt":0.23652065224901386,"score_spread":0.21010958863215795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528848164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004063134,0.018744124,0.008101256,0.03969924,0.0015055678,0.000042349304,0.00014591817,0.000095730335,0.9276027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20266736,0.012234681,0.009969053,0.0057817763,0.0002649262,0.00010652351,0.00014803915,0.00031664287,0.768511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907815,0.0003910627,0.000033005435,0.00012421921,0.0001761809,0.00019737818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994585,0.00018311515,0.000028404209,0.00007719637,0.00018217838,0.000070618786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016872663,0.000642286,0.000440194,0.0011607335,0.0049810973,0.005110918,0.0009246032,0.0034990185,0.025405567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027000345,0.00033647404,0.00020511246,0.0019871783,0.008566775,0.005985264,0.0023362827,0.003245257,0.0036576735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068428963,0.000003949732,0.00006029343,0.000028317154,0.0000012734694,0.000041225074,0.0034002208,0.000055878834,0.000022418257,0.94065946,0.040028453,0.015691664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069097755,0.000006981538,0.00026385326,0.00020090173,0.000004393097,0.000081817554,0.0020559323,0.00012531063,0.00010304459,0.14906062,0.8480787,0.0000114362165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10551951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30344373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89448047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010821102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010517384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20981061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529091158","doi":"10.3138/9781442685901-010","title":"7. Nova Scotia’s Ombudsman: Conciliator, Consultant, and Cooperator","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Political science; History; Archaeology; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.030195159176684735,"score_gpt":0.23801878051373399,"score_spread":0.20782362133704924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529091158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037639076,0.02240724,0.00045778335,0.05785523,0.008572437,0.00014086453,0.00064004975,0.0002440976,0.9059183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060708583,0.0015537172,0.00016296402,0.003385709,0.00008775384,0.000016895496,0.00005893644,0.000039099315,0.988624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992404,0.00008059869,0.000022870161,0.00007397364,0.00018920122,0.00039305902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987961,0.00011064291,0.000047682046,0.0000388912,0.0004789495,0.00052769476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006676723,0.00064137817,0.0003477968,0.00080061704,0.0070611774,0.0037819257,0.0009182544,0.0067971097,0.12992221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00206829,0.00063645106,0.0003192069,0.00097043824,0.00092230627,0.0014376328,0.0015363641,0.0028526618,0.035571445],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018173445,0.000005890614,0.00026192496,0.000053084943,0.0000010951056,0.00026458365,0.0004665974,0.000023390156,0.00011242188,0.0057775867,0.97394705,0.019068165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046840464,0.000005535443,0.0012647504,0.0001276057,0.0000023204432,0.00013069359,0.00065654883,0.00002483313,0.00004087756,0.00021870741,0.99751663,0.000006778519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6602005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92635095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33979952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009054015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023867512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6836013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531021224","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4380","title":"DU MAUVAIS USAGE DE LA TRADITION RECONSTITUÉE : LA MÉDIATION EXTRAJUDICIAIRE EN CHINE","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"China; Mediation; Legislation; Political science; Context (archaeology); Humanities; Economic Justice; People's Republic; Sociology; Law; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03362365252687576,"score_gpt":0.32970309075840404,"score_spread":0.29607943823152827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531021224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.237127,0.025828175,0.011184059,0.08154418,0.0011859661,0.0000926873,0.00017682069,0.0000977047,0.6427634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94697857,0.0055793193,0.0019021613,0.002529086,0.00029001312,0.00010189772,0.00003454318,0.000053321357,0.042531032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928975,0.0040259697,0.00021034456,0.0005457106,0.0015005383,0.0008199446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534553,0.0021558024,0.0004817844,0.0009407147,0.0006803618,0.00039580156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004995281,0.00030343013,0.0004151549,0.0015522742,0.00921501,0.006860899,0.0012110065,0.0028801318,0.008230203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007638421,0.00025148346,0.00044269842,0.0031832035,0.027851615,0.006749617,0.006174572,0.0044273753,0.00059681805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018631174,0.00001244935,0.0016623475,0.00009997883,0.0000081520575,0.00031129995,0.13962977,0.000045152006,0.0004630136,0.8336229,0.0029468075,0.021179512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025654464,0.000082817576,0.012624295,0.0013400924,0.000061035,0.0009980628,0.10257751,0.00040265566,0.0010647835,0.16709454,0.71363825,0.000090209214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056806028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13457024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056806028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008788853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014201816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11295074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556106055","doi":"10.21128/1812-7126-2016-5-83-96","title":"Ombudspersons’ control over municipal authorities: the Canadian experience and its applicability in Russia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Political science; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Public administration; Environmental science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.03020555784405362,"score_gpt":0.30124403745289313,"score_spread":0.27103847960883953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556106055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87419623,0.0015120745,0.00024071535,0.009831869,0.00009204978,0.00003134319,0.0001240849,0.000011970542,0.113959625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98913443,0.00050203165,0.000060220504,0.0004239441,0.000008621743,0.000010117274,0.000026791022,0.00001111938,0.009822679],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887977,0.0030012853,0.0003052847,0.0007910799,0.0022760471,0.0048285415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98530537,0.006385776,0.001180689,0.0006237561,0.003591977,0.0029125025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076142745,0.0002729987,0.00075820996,0.0025849913,0.039177153,0.010286131,0.002757557,0.0029263827,0.0076750643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020575846,0.00048151272,0.00041709168,0.005360758,0.015174938,0.0036483123,0.006206331,0.0055322074,0.00033691924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009078846,0.00006785652,0.02706429,0.00008108964,0.00002365246,0.00057309796,0.8689269,0.00015371652,0.000282052,0.083397955,0.004808255,0.014530338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018412704,0.00003872492,0.061476137,0.00028250724,0.000040534323,0.00013171956,0.81637084,0.00019760929,0.00035901237,0.0019540386,0.1190442,0.00008622626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99041945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10173277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10173277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13625908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73812634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562433023","doi":"","title":"Comparative study on local governance system: Japan and Canada (1)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"法学論叢","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Business; Regional science; Geography","score_opus":0.01990033604544739,"score_gpt":0.2838744302728618,"score_spread":0.2639740942274144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562433023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98311275,0.0025222476,0.000080950886,0.0006186376,0.000015490496,0.000029894556,0.00083947653,0.000005332135,0.012775165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956938,0.0011218487,0.00015310173,0.00009884106,0.0000059442054,0.000011320772,0.00045996672,0.0000033311553,0.0024517633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882835,0.00015901595,0.00003798463,0.00011002208,0.0002936915,0.00057086576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969037,0.00043075328,0.00036624944,0.00008472285,0.0014760782,0.00073836045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010803101,0.00023843438,0.0004839005,0.004321302,0.0062410464,0.0023996034,0.00081328984,0.0005080461,0.0048434995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030205573,0.00014350063,0.0003310409,0.015394131,0.0024797597,0.0009920927,0.00144995,0.0005539525,0.00012963553],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005103777,0.00026959705,0.8471607,0.0007194532,0.00020135504,0.002225224,0.06571539,0.0008360999,0.0011282221,0.019423574,0.011074264,0.05073568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011840612,0.00005954297,0.89339525,0.0001075279,0.0000918583,0.00012842822,0.09327613,0.0001675881,0.00018780027,0.00022496178,0.012322857,0.000026249965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9918385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99767286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95131606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048683967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04599275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35322857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587951507","doi":"10.29173/cais487","title":"Information and Technology for Human and Children's Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Information and Communications Technology; Human rights; Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Information technology; Internet privacy; Work (physics); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Law; History","score_opus":0.012094940533743827,"score_gpt":0.2482368645004349,"score_spread":0.23614192396669106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587951507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018498642,0.040000476,0.005230486,0.08086283,0.0007102062,0.0000544217,0.00010807979,0.000038981292,0.8544958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8890606,0.025853224,0.0040893327,0.0072273416,0.0009554745,0.0001885621,0.000068370864,0.0000439821,0.07251323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992265,0.0049432097,0.00027427374,0.00045497285,0.0009907797,0.0010718034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950866,0.003153539,0.00054110814,0.00049839757,0.0002620891,0.00045821647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005332254,0.00040719446,0.0004834823,0.0009937652,0.0050609997,0.009880363,0.00044472064,0.0035088498,0.01606712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076067005,0.00014538421,0.00032602617,0.0014098837,0.026188359,0.0069528995,0.005148076,0.0038980762,0.0012387927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047964513,0.000008425102,0.00037306742,0.000037341502,0.0000029233927,0.00006735395,0.005657935,0.000038525523,0.000072109746,0.97964853,0.003342202,0.010746765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011980737,0.000044804303,0.0021480229,0.0005378883,0.000007732572,0.0003665859,0.00758978,0.00008226309,0.00023408352,0.50510985,0.4838446,0.000022446646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049699876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055377455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01606712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032810473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063127102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05374986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590199685","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4555","title":"Rachel Murray, The Role of National Human Rights Institutions at the International and Regional Levels: The Experience of Africa; Brian Burdekin, assisted by Jason Naum, National Human Rights Institutions in the Asia-Pacific Region, The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Decree; Human rights; Constitution; Promotion (chess); Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.13252074511468057,"score_gpt":0.354440683926519,"score_spread":0.22191993881183844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590199685","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023868636,0.30007666,0.0011856989,0.6299624,0.008186192,0.00009023621,0.00038986054,0.00015158877,0.057570428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055738658,0.34931302,0.0040842225,0.1751094,0.0042994358,0.0003630089,0.0004037092,0.0005508581,0.41013774],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871314,0.0006208756,0.000040518313,0.0001411734,0.00032761402,0.00015666893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969086,0.0017165727,0.00019753192,0.00004905016,0.00051939505,0.0006087929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029618796,0.0011031753,0.0005509266,0.0014757111,0.007534113,0.0048942296,0.0021387476,0.0046811425,0.018360125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005063017,0.0007226748,0.00030906414,0.0022529564,0.0028120016,0.009452206,0.002490329,0.0061689042,0.005370665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008493577,0.000017800408,0.00023435679,0.00016829262,0.0000026475486,0.00011116241,0.0060522943,0.000031758875,0.000046093443,0.008042567,0.964328,0.020956539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009397547,0.000006933884,0.0009246731,0.0005530666,0.000005056815,0.00023665084,0.015795873,0.00003982378,0.00009666087,0.0040837866,0.9782306,0.000017535225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08676767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24848874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08676767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034315244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009011866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17252529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595183341","doi":"","title":"Ombudsing at Canadian universities through the eyes of a Dutch ombudsman","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Confidentiality; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Value (mathematics); Order (exchange); Spring (device); Work (physics); Public administration; Library science; Public relations; Law; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.026005802083734708,"score_gpt":0.27285112486830815,"score_spread":0.24684532278457344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595183341","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06645,0.023136592,0.0045596478,0.6124602,0.007521984,0.00021166004,0.00082573766,0.00028475808,0.28454944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5719599,0.016117318,0.008571882,0.08126569,0.0006340967,0.00016307003,0.0004568708,0.0008059433,0.32002518],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812974,0.0049232123,0.0006579315,0.0015331986,0.0060441727,0.005544028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97292036,0.0036816786,0.00093812717,0.0012412175,0.011268848,0.009949671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016667737,0.00063534017,0.0006913557,0.0021617787,0.04732454,0.017670874,0.0022812202,0.0047535705,0.01832865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027221156,0.00066465477,0.0005444569,0.0052166404,0.014201757,0.006478806,0.0085425535,0.0072009503,0.0018962095],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092699185,0.000047224807,0.0045416714,0.00021415112,0.00002550733,0.0014568651,0.16787928,0.00021836987,0.0014205349,0.12956356,0.6161122,0.078427926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045687366,0.000006966133,0.0015719907,0.00021160094,0.000005401585,0.00011647895,0.07109696,0.000089502086,0.00017437803,0.0024165874,0.92425495,0.00005067107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9711811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87644035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.123559676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2255353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89649236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598569344","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v1i1.8163","title":"National Responsibilities to Citizens: Past or Present?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Business","score_opus":0.17316086082287874,"score_gpt":0.4036671492675798,"score_spread":0.23050628844470106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598569344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06190436,0.010672267,0.0068069315,0.14073244,0.0018715742,0.000018136701,0.000049606275,0.000039917282,0.77790487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790754,0.002041469,0.00084536447,0.0042711403,0.00033868555,0.000024158882,0.000018555242,0.000019273582,0.013365937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507207,0.0027806063,0.00014004474,0.00055920053,0.00072890386,0.0007190947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970675,0.0008482495,0.00029069505,0.00052242714,0.0005987198,0.00067240105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004260884,0.0002723654,0.00038009067,0.0007207041,0.009534483,0.009319292,0.001182504,0.0037186053,0.0037722886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005399853,0.00019594484,0.00029864925,0.0008592563,0.040179305,0.014751215,0.004479026,0.0057680323,0.00046528716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005914325,0.000016124155,0.0011817617,0.00002968779,0.0000032036708,0.00011147078,0.024473371,0.000035590474,0.00006694223,0.96125644,0.0041602734,0.008659194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005955803,0.00003149658,0.003479772,0.00058617286,0.0000147627,0.0006417828,0.094504125,0.00028996138,0.00028100776,0.5500431,0.35008484,0.000037125566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007645957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015848016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99235404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008116505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051586023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058889568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598886592","doi":"","title":"After Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick: Judicial Review of Executive Discretion","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Standard of review; Political science; Judicial review; Supreme court; Law; Parliament; Deference; Judicial discretion; Principle of legality; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Impartiality; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.008595753170056222,"score_gpt":0.28534974033618593,"score_spread":0.2767539871661297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598886592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07695304,0.041405138,0.004814592,0.4081529,0.011006815,0.0007534629,0.0018342163,0.0002380319,0.45484185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35059884,0.008201167,0.0039100153,0.32155812,0.0010466801,0.00024904992,0.00048583254,0.00012157146,0.3138288],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98635536,0.0016575227,0.0005956703,0.0017613784,0.0051167677,0.004513366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882608,0.004751552,0.00029256826,0.0004937309,0.0052673314,0.0009340754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008076273,0.0005653514,0.00049827836,0.0015566302,0.014758758,0.010469743,0.003452524,0.014289944,0.004943633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023559881,0.00091736985,0.0009457943,0.002161029,0.006302859,0.0028381676,0.0017648309,0.01678036,0.00075110985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002722003,0.000079191086,0.009874268,0.00041097196,0.00012062032,0.0038367526,0.010762597,0.00090425345,0.0046776314,0.43055597,0.4806464,0.057859212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001809864,0.00007366287,0.021316681,0.0008926304,0.00014902692,0.0004152222,0.0046746903,0.0009151032,0.0048530367,0.01951858,0.94661725,0.00039315142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9699414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9699414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1000628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12707113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72600985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601144099","doi":"","title":"Toronto Ombudsman Says Regular Complaints Continue to Rise","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018667448760352246,"score_gpt":0.30291987818427235,"score_spread":0.2842524294239201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601144099","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041608526,0.00444277,0.00022431674,0.80240077,0.041542582,0.000059256334,0.001195899,0.00050495646,0.14546864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017872958,0.0014877372,0.00025136233,0.19175191,0.005624217,0.00004860062,0.0005998223,0.00023467201,0.7821287],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991651,0.0005257186,0.0003335117,0.0005598808,0.0039090915,0.0030207925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98435485,0.002180549,0.0007695017,0.00066419767,0.0064114328,0.005619467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035339836,0.00077915366,0.00085809117,0.0019524847,0.014291046,0.011265278,0.001843611,0.027046349,0.14274678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016492305,0.00074835704,0.0013748208,0.0015850887,0.00353212,0.0038581148,0.0037968447,0.013644765,0.03276126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011623215,0.000008188441,0.00043667422,0.000019577445,0.0000027582685,0.00010801803,0.00019359743,0.000006371414,0.00005246341,0.0030017705,0.9929362,0.003222723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076591095,0.000008414639,0.0026095726,0.000053718133,0.0000052016735,0.000042796637,0.0008662061,0.000018519982,0.00005403928,0.0004280854,0.9958911,0.000014628928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38840306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5537386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61159694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01654564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036599156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7722846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610719859","doi":"10.7202/1039192ar","title":"Modern Municipal Statutory Frameworks in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue Gouvernance","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Panacea (medicine); Jurisdiction; Corporate governance; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Business; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.023667527735799727,"score_gpt":0.28179274913119623,"score_spread":0.2581252213953965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610719859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088454485,0.014822851,0.019207276,0.073422395,0.0015448078,0.0002182856,0.0011587511,0.00054882275,0.8006223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82103187,0.0051392573,0.012679055,0.008806487,0.0002924751,0.000115348244,0.0005155587,0.00012524374,0.1512948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98942125,0.0011682498,0.0003932713,0.0011606611,0.004706722,0.0031498584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99396956,0.00080044667,0.00033200413,0.00042891732,0.0037955332,0.00067357684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005318788,0.00038362647,0.0003968021,0.0024736489,0.015196796,0.009230875,0.002468063,0.00282321,0.005671301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009479675,0.00052210985,0.0005252781,0.0047678626,0.01769456,0.002033665,0.0035513819,0.004263323,0.00046917703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000518418,0.000005215491,0.0006733914,0.000022202235,0.0000031913291,0.00006912075,0.00236929,0.00061496336,0.00008157374,0.97493017,0.012622754,0.00860298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002184227,0.000014538977,0.007506198,0.00022488803,0.000018616929,0.00010720928,0.0046799183,0.0022043348,0.00029411123,0.088549085,0.89627135,0.00010797451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98918813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21094613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21094613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22974165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91519064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617067218","doi":"10.35492/docam/3/2/4","title":"A Duty to Document","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings from the Document Academy","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Duty; Transparency (behavior); Democracy; Legislation; Corporate governance; Business; Openness to experience; Public relations; Public administration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025688282254692302,"score_gpt":0.3131869085696622,"score_spread":0.2874986263149699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617067218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014105175,0.0027209003,0.049198713,0.10285611,0.0026486402,0.00063598773,0.00047814424,0.00042258014,0.82693374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43420884,0.0040149,0.0413104,0.074114785,0.0024506082,0.0011239819,0.0008570385,0.0005616802,0.4413578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9458721,0.016042389,0.0059041195,0.0055662245,0.022404537,0.0042104917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89157605,0.030821064,0.009159567,0.034158364,0.027664015,0.006620946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02709149,0.0006604336,0.00092072453,0.0020975322,0.013427503,0.015969384,0.002923999,0.012647384,0.014638804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08056637,0.0009014828,0.0008346778,0.0019092687,0.033162113,0.017078713,0.011557686,0.010050851,0.010187073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019581554,0.000049404483,0.0007204359,0.000116762174,0.000010598168,0.00016097221,0.016129408,0.00009464774,0.00071756286,0.9170085,0.04095825,0.024013754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013093773,0.000035603396,0.00061311724,0.00049314473,0.000014120392,0.00056088227,0.0034861264,0.00012629315,0.00057641347,0.08587011,0.90815866,0.00005240192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024055675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018608851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02709149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006895647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032310657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1432752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761486869","doi":"","title":"The unreasonableness doctrine of administrative law: a comparative study of England, Australia, Canada and New Zealand.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07940477145759284,"score_gpt":0.32395173896039575,"score_spread":0.24454696750280291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761486869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4578573,0.041833855,0.0007677936,0.028135028,0.00018429277,0.00008894597,0.000678254,0.000022482736,0.47043204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95452315,0.011748131,0.00033971688,0.00082187896,0.00002396712,0.0000367069,0.00011505874,0.000025422394,0.032365907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968843,0.0005168895,0.00011858314,0.00014433017,0.0014522994,0.00088359683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919166,0.0033995502,0.0008575913,0.0002177089,0.0027134067,0.0008951724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002128095,0.0002397648,0.0004323006,0.0028295158,0.008416471,0.0051996903,0.0015173908,0.0013116628,0.009706762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018661803,0.00037549977,0.00024851094,0.007674185,0.013114864,0.0038756046,0.0020338034,0.0019424674,0.0005328813],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001251271,0.00010886783,0.034579806,0.0007924535,0.000053163607,0.00148481,0.36006743,0.00072121,0.0004352974,0.48956025,0.0548307,0.057240885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035310928,0.000042235417,0.37535143,0.0014206812,0.00009800868,0.00051499857,0.40127096,0.0005321228,0.00020197083,0.022375425,0.19806986,0.000086883476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9864563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9375365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062463492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073622555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45320648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767707499","doi":"10.1080/10192557.2009.11788192","title":"Some Reflections on the Legislative Context of the Hong Kong Ombudsman","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asia Pacific Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Public administration; Scope (computer science); Interpretation (philosophy); Administration (probate law); Legislation; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.07423472032869614,"score_gpt":0.3512061208741674,"score_spread":0.27697140054547126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767707499","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29600373,0.041507762,0.0027556955,0.4268671,0.0037705458,0.00014427234,0.00012919103,0.000034412205,0.22878726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89159566,0.008938546,0.0008540729,0.05973949,0.00077408913,0.000105755054,0.000024009785,0.00002803874,0.037940457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878528,0.006570635,0.0004922865,0.0007582393,0.00097195,0.0033540318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939166,0.0036864204,0.00068678206,0.00022104308,0.0008428432,0.00064634375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014390206,0.00043864772,0.0006070678,0.0010332109,0.017768195,0.012750493,0.0019940918,0.0067684916,0.0038748777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009430684,0.0009095009,0.0006913399,0.0016131351,0.026054332,0.0055910703,0.004698519,0.011134591,0.00038904286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003668811,0.0000361584,0.00375959,0.00012107187,0.00001415678,0.0020266154,0.10880768,0.0003573053,0.00042054485,0.8656415,0.01431313,0.004465573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004191032,0.00014097156,0.018416401,0.0012876029,0.000051040694,0.0005836526,0.19590603,0.0007131596,0.0010962047,0.052378874,0.7291496,0.00023453498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4224558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3960084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4224558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037930787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027132995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83999366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774233808","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.31158","title":"L’Ombudsman face aux défis de l’évaluation : est-il possible d’évaluer l’intangible?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Strengths and weaknesses; Valuation (finance); Task (project management); Political science; Face (sociological concept); Business; Sociology; Management; Psychology; Accounting; Economics; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.15142852316943903,"score_gpt":0.4234776728772624,"score_spread":0.27204914970782335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774233808","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23782723,0.02147858,0.08542871,0.4230579,0.0026061044,0.00044348976,0.00015363102,0.00024632787,0.22875808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96380377,0.0022880032,0.020289743,0.0061656875,0.00021545446,0.00026039133,0.000029126491,0.000082617385,0.00686527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.84080255,0.11778518,0.004725605,0.0040345816,0.027506687,0.005145401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8794845,0.07230514,0.009805927,0.005804619,0.02664583,0.0059540276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11492639,0.00053027645,0.0010428602,0.0037623686,0.009758902,0.020183805,0.002258437,0.00477358,0.004720367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19543013,0.00048464298,0.00045027674,0.004039969,0.029103452,0.015761333,0.007829653,0.0068009584,0.000595392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012847285,0.00013979606,0.0104391035,0.00052444724,0.00005322551,0.00016159135,0.03864777,0.0006447865,0.0006124651,0.76783025,0.018117111,0.16270106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008850368,0.00041550465,0.023709696,0.008973788,0.00012931037,0.00056108134,0.17764628,0.007372543,0.006948009,0.32846972,0.44539052,0.00029501365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03042467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03241283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11492639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029041732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04527026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6077961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787098944","doi":"10.7202/1042926ar","title":"The History, Law and Practice of Cabinet Immunity in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Parliament; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Statutory law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.017855781757439033,"score_gpt":0.2517230255402843,"score_spread":0.23386724378284526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787098944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13691749,0.048170973,0.008732639,0.11633045,0.0020081573,0.0001693608,0.00072324625,0.00040047252,0.6865472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86143196,0.014589487,0.0028458608,0.011795461,0.00022292502,0.00004021306,0.000117423384,0.00014594676,0.10881074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98999435,0.0011401029,0.00033246606,0.0011358823,0.004567585,0.002829648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876637,0.005062328,0.0007896859,0.0004935342,0.0043043513,0.0016864105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049536023,0.00035235312,0.0004508095,0.0026176188,0.027182525,0.012987112,0.0025516234,0.004287064,0.007020636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016337024,0.0009683426,0.00037513828,0.0053325747,0.026813122,0.0028208324,0.0032066598,0.007854863,0.0005108441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005314167,0.00003909996,0.004271096,0.00029898022,0.000021200316,0.0009318661,0.03623685,0.0009235784,0.0007724569,0.8414697,0.04773,0.06725192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001668829,0.000030512052,0.014747667,0.00048301445,0.000025875592,0.0002208042,0.011605337,0.0008116278,0.00094414357,0.013090429,0.95785886,0.00016506147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24342097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24342097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26908943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87752444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788223979","doi":"10.3968/10075","title":"Improving Public Security Administrative Mediation System in China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Party-directed mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Transformative mediation; Public relations; Business; Law and economics; Order (exchange); China; Political science; Power (physics); Public security; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.025319590519920065,"score_gpt":0.29897721855065845,"score_spread":0.2736576280307384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788223979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8685291,0.00417508,0.019062784,0.012896678,0.00039916128,0.0023336469,0.00036100583,0.00096600543,0.09127667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775059,0.0011657886,0.006119788,0.00043045933,0.00007630696,0.00037355197,0.00024386228,0.000026460059,0.014057845],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99416935,0.001505863,0.00037367627,0.0004637115,0.0018457681,0.0016416758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959216,0.0005571407,0.00045009019,0.00036066875,0.0017515067,0.000959004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008213997,0.0005142878,0.00045814842,0.0027643617,0.006472652,0.003645223,0.0032916698,0.0013567408,0.014572153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008347612,0.00036615,0.00085362623,0.0025656829,0.0015668581,0.003140257,0.0046483497,0.00091511843,0.00077355845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007559049,0.0019387297,0.12798044,0.0025795265,0.00038832764,0.0045597116,0.017793322,0.031152783,0.01612059,0.23445845,0.048128877,0.51414335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016454797,0.002682854,0.26473787,0.001240913,0.0016989916,0.0013300052,0.033014115,0.14494768,0.016145712,0.06360368,0.4683374,0.0006152723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09332143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06478137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09332143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011415229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051283136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18555653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896220206","doi":"10.29173/alr2499","title":"Rethinking the Ramifications of Reasonableness Review: Stare Decisis and Reasonableness Review on Questions of Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Standard of review; Administrative law; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Judicial deference; Political science; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Common law; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04687796393010721,"score_gpt":0.3460340334172457,"score_spread":0.29915606948713847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896220206","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02093019,0.024042647,0.041747477,0.581798,0.0037329642,0.00019331329,0.0001154594,0.00012100688,0.32731894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8348461,0.012994314,0.023437604,0.092459895,0.0044665295,0.00019713829,0.00005273071,0.00018223829,0.031363465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9651976,0.01375645,0.0014773465,0.00342968,0.012178239,0.003960672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93318385,0.045693778,0.002322118,0.004018767,0.012382003,0.002399459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046849962,0.00062883913,0.0015436015,0.004603564,0.017732536,0.026659524,0.0044892966,0.015259473,0.003513446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09320846,0.000862434,0.001291853,0.0035901435,0.115486935,0.020431804,0.008146422,0.023176998,0.00053154083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032939506,0.0000023638622,0.00006637741,0.000008686237,0.0000020923273,0.000043225577,0.0009615137,0.00012097297,0.000018661965,0.9951821,0.0018566798,0.001734067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018492454,0.000009503607,0.00038883896,0.00017942389,0.000012705011,0.000045200886,0.0012011296,0.0008989874,0.00011342367,0.94052804,0.056558788,0.00004550282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45187873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5118756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45187873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06554774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08859325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.898497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896385746","doi":"10.3968/10485","title":"On the Scope Limit and the Time Limit of the Temporary Administrative License Granted by Local Government Rules","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"License; Scope (computer science); Administrative law; Business; Safeguarding; Law; Haven; Government (linguistics); Local government; Time limit; Public administration; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.019007583006512993,"score_gpt":0.2578320101440051,"score_spread":0.23882442713749208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896385746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24130438,0.015349801,0.29834205,0.008544716,0.0010820472,0.00048125302,0.0006448355,0.00041600747,0.43383494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95896155,0.00355242,0.020983499,0.0006754981,0.00053808687,0.00036013612,0.0002658604,0.00010471827,0.01455827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98691213,0.0032729474,0.0012945147,0.002022738,0.005214949,0.001282804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98388404,0.007992179,0.0013139837,0.0015312192,0.0043310774,0.0009474862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007686935,0.00047138167,0.0007286067,0.003417422,0.002875127,0.008639107,0.001551867,0.002008186,0.0049070865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03043851,0.0005925518,0.0012711757,0.0020973873,0.008250088,0.012875803,0.003213665,0.0032868737,0.0007741215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026839494,0.00001904505,0.0018946087,0.00007696889,0.000009807516,0.00026831034,0.0016184396,0.0018292929,0.00047385367,0.9810611,0.001405906,0.011315864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006061572,0.00008867929,0.007968967,0.00085260207,0.00009314707,0.0007877305,0.003928569,0.026313363,0.0015749857,0.87443036,0.08371529,0.00018565504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014971565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00512932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014971565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004032497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056021283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04065287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899696301","doi":"","title":"Canadian Administrative Law and Good Governance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CentAUR (University of Reading)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Administrative law; Constitutionality; Corporate governance; Good governance; Law; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Relation (database); Public administration; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Constitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.02584130930107432,"score_gpt":0.262154510708977,"score_spread":0.23631320140790268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899696301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054011787,0.02920298,0.0019657365,0.098304994,0.0010917394,0.00006640165,0.00040059836,0.00008687134,0.86347944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65064645,0.046031445,0.007932912,0.03969489,0.0009828205,0.000156293,0.000778434,0.00017826715,0.25359848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98549575,0.0022495047,0.00038521134,0.0012097452,0.0069809468,0.0036788739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98819613,0.0025351406,0.00067726744,0.00062423217,0.0061856885,0.0017816518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052039,0.0005650675,0.0005475409,0.0056196903,0.021130541,0.01460129,0.0023365782,0.004320606,0.016980343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017330976,0.00046986222,0.0005961748,0.0103912065,0.026301093,0.0042473893,0.0043437243,0.004819717,0.0011302636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002602096,0.0000034578454,0.00045575405,0.000071407194,0.0000034330048,0.000059188314,0.0016606313,0.0001488766,0.00001988174,0.93571997,0.051085915,0.010768801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070651076,0.0000051470433,0.0066639883,0.0005615814,0.0000147532855,0.00007440854,0.0030765517,0.00025564688,0.00006353371,0.09687665,0.8923596,0.00004104444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98836493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20956123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20956123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2724642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9167969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900083978","doi":"10.1177/1478929918807972","title":"What Is an Ombudsperson? Global Diffusion, International Standardization, and Institutional Diversification","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Standardization; Democracy; Diversification (marketing strategy); Institution; Corporation; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Institutional theory; Public administration; Political science; Public institution; Civil society; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Marketing; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.08904207041328743,"score_gpt":0.419098828666169,"score_spread":0.33005675825288155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900083978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39989465,0.12342462,0.009513664,0.10924873,0.00079571665,0.00007738515,0.00005602382,0.000031188523,0.35695797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775794,0.016500445,0.00085514924,0.0015789281,0.00022253706,0.000017508853,0.000017179962,0.000010228301,0.0032186424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99462044,0.0032219752,0.00021768344,0.0005679956,0.00092291593,0.00044898415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952064,0.0026481617,0.001013956,0.00032494543,0.00041337853,0.00039307526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007642011,0.00019893506,0.0004129837,0.0027308383,0.0031801078,0.0073502674,0.0005800044,0.0019349377,0.0025856122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009693423,0.00014620331,0.0001867099,0.0052569234,0.015364237,0.012167087,0.0035784252,0.0019000209,0.00016871211],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017155835,0.000028604743,0.005555772,0.00029175004,0.000011566977,0.00013333642,0.033777416,0.00017131923,0.00025094816,0.8644109,0.0026496006,0.092701554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001472935,0.0000980302,0.031038538,0.0025915552,0.000033427226,0.000705941,0.11187778,0.0005760972,0.00065950013,0.39665124,0.45570725,0.000045845158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00326646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030041116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007642011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004662663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031598916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040415347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900682386","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0084","title":"<i>Dunsmuir</i>’s Disconnect","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Transparency (behavior); Political science; Law; Rule of law; Action (physics); Administrative law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Judicial opinion; Sociology","score_opus":0.013911962211216943,"score_gpt":0.24684771979243017,"score_spread":0.23293575758121324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900682386","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008124356,0.009335781,0.0022074876,0.77402705,0.0036464802,0.000022784057,0.000106883665,0.00008037929,0.20244874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40026873,0.0057686227,0.004253587,0.5118422,0.0019281685,0.00009411981,0.00008479056,0.00011314937,0.07564667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892603,0.0028752538,0.0004863132,0.0015322757,0.0037073914,0.0021384503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930387,0.0037815745,0.00044593733,0.00043099603,0.0018027425,0.00050003757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006512283,0.00030662667,0.0004586326,0.001538413,0.013109427,0.015834672,0.0028080214,0.011273204,0.0036677662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017412763,0.0004272627,0.00054646784,0.0019306935,0.024036407,0.0044428166,0.0026690948,0.010132717,0.0007420265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009547003,0.0000062255313,0.0003850737,0.000034082226,0.0000038301387,0.000114035,0.003431164,0.0000618218,0.00009941975,0.88064486,0.10885691,0.006353059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011769267,0.000011765059,0.0019743564,0.0002741725,0.000012459283,0.00022130086,0.004531472,0.00022378821,0.00049324986,0.11626698,0.8759104,0.00006825656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6211209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74492323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37887907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041605435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04467784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76222074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900859774","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0085","title":"A house divided: The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent jurisprudence on the standard of review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Standard of review; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Voting; Political science; Statute; Roberts Court; Jurisdiction; Concurring opinion; Deference; Legislature; Economic Justice; Law of the case; Unanimity; Statutory law; Majority opinion; Original jurisdiction; Court of record","score_opus":0.022875086450049906,"score_gpt":0.2539409517552513,"score_spread":0.23106586530520137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900859774","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03241665,0.030730722,0.0053152996,0.7442232,0.0075067873,0.0001333702,0.0005542706,0.00013406097,0.17898567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54102325,0.008792759,0.004872246,0.3638457,0.0033342883,0.00009204658,0.00024254862,0.00019570497,0.0776015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95171505,0.0052107493,0.001671753,0.0064494405,0.027522821,0.007430116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.945698,0.020525327,0.001421882,0.0019160291,0.024626018,0.005812734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028599115,0.0005052451,0.0009688898,0.0035250494,0.03284977,0.030126352,0.0046296213,0.01899979,0.0035671312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05930044,0.0009899669,0.0012115851,0.0048957393,0.027414868,0.0063712485,0.0037992315,0.021848394,0.00040401114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003616673,0.000018833201,0.0018891917,0.00007105238,0.000034304663,0.000391436,0.0055140057,0.000394829,0.00054715044,0.8457999,0.12839673,0.01690644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059764734,0.000038807073,0.010245366,0.0005618604,0.00008357128,0.00013796339,0.0035647033,0.0009637935,0.0008170858,0.057594266,0.92566067,0.00027212643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97783947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81418234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18581767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25408524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9443361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901759511","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1363","title":"Diagnosing Administrative Law: A Comment on Clyde River and Chippewas of the Thames First Nation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Skepticism; Political science; Public law; State (computer science); Rule of law; Argument (complex analysis); Common law; Duty; Politics","score_opus":0.07116693918474473,"score_gpt":0.3280372216470354,"score_spread":0.2568702824622907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901759511","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014916725,0.0060099866,0.00020283145,0.97981834,0.003993287,0.000024606597,0.00011539432,0.000023590657,0.008320183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013254596,0.0019558053,0.00033807647,0.973854,0.0019483531,0.000051381954,0.00003213224,0.000030018715,0.008535579],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986285,0.0032507784,0.0006599818,0.0022106715,0.00486897,0.0027246522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755034,0.017967599,0.00072391756,0.00036909073,0.0038647212,0.0015712745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015730493,0.0012862667,0.0014196085,0.0016033814,0.035590533,0.011995167,0.008989761,0.06764575,0.005368493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03815739,0.0015632295,0.0018304756,0.0027068765,0.020833569,0.008792168,0.0041556736,0.054743458,0.0010752687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038305545,0.000018321414,0.00043617497,0.000140052,0.000018537312,0.0004984599,0.008909691,0.0001434969,0.00020457843,0.07111183,0.9142922,0.004188336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080974394,0.0000337698,0.0028919738,0.0007089656,0.00006601706,0.00021217954,0.016007617,0.00029965144,0.00048942096,0.013355128,0.9656127,0.00024147671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8874571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17834997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036676727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08191115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3588006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913640895","doi":"","title":"Shenpi (Licensing) Reform from the Perspective of One Municipal Jurisdiction: Ideologies, Institutions, and Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Legislature; Public administration; Regulatory reform; Law reform; Jurisdiction; Political science; Rule of law; Agency (philosophy); Administrative law; Bureaucracy; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03129384742439987,"score_gpt":0.28743274430277305,"score_spread":0.25613889687837316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913640895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77489,0.001966573,0.0070353723,0.034803174,0.00014167977,0.00016136143,0.00009250103,0.00008148984,0.18082777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885604,0.00029057532,0.0006035564,0.00077706535,0.00002399385,0.000036587684,0.000015137523,0.0000052336736,0.009687373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971699,0.0008106766,0.00012299353,0.0003449541,0.0005137993,0.0010376903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920076,0.00023210362,0.00013277499,0.00009209887,0.00017265131,0.00016959102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031706446,0.00019359452,0.00025301788,0.0013761262,0.005707146,0.0073193545,0.0009886863,0.0018029338,0.0021545917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002609461,0.00024156031,0.00042649359,0.0016887593,0.010341794,0.0029682512,0.0035628695,0.0028608006,0.00011736347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016329308,0.000019955807,0.0034841474,0.00002748575,0.000005969126,0.00021189643,0.0076384027,0.0013419454,0.0004915111,0.9776363,0.0011494891,0.007976666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118337484,0.00033684733,0.057194825,0.00022289401,0.00013454226,0.00027178056,0.05267852,0.022759667,0.0073397825,0.5503541,0.30835918,0.00022950079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10013507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10943053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10013507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027243773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027407385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19910449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916346634","doi":"","title":"The Constitution outside the Courts: The Case for Parliamentary Involvement in Constitutional Review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Political science; Parliament; Scrutiny; Parliamentary sovereignty; Constitution; Law; Statutory law; Separation of powers; Politics; Constitutional law; Legislation; Accountability; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0198201382128783,"score_gpt":0.3015644593193679,"score_spread":0.28174432110648956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916346634","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05446478,0.010807966,0.018193807,0.5567332,0.0020479385,0.00018257047,0.00006882706,0.00013042174,0.35737047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8814244,0.0020126621,0.0046851304,0.081151105,0.0026552032,0.00035732068,0.00004916656,0.00017081788,0.027494095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8407602,0.098036006,0.005024261,0.014030874,0.020827692,0.02132107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.669093,0.26770386,0.011181745,0.018080816,0.020109024,0.013831479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10537829,0.00035518015,0.0010525269,0.0022920107,0.019007176,0.03071331,0.0040858476,0.030897733,0.0085528465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20283283,0.001309544,0.0015508515,0.002112799,0.037404582,0.020054463,0.013635495,0.029012017,0.001961839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005887073,0.000070625734,0.0021712,0.00011591003,0.000026695685,0.00081245444,0.00894194,0.00020778619,0.000326421,0.9492828,0.01770655,0.020278769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021477295,0.00010258403,0.0061334283,0.0011381607,0.000106681706,0.0012345342,0.0054702586,0.0017202274,0.0010989193,0.58059126,0.40204462,0.00014448081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017189577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016241377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013141384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030803876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5573003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942323866","doi":"","title":"Who guards the guardians? Recent developments concerning the jurisdiction and accountability of ombudsmen","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Jurisdiction; Arbitration; Private sector; State (computer science); Law; Accountability; Political science; Public sector; Public administration","score_opus":0.019352232161797767,"score_gpt":0.24844834448217332,"score_spread":0.22909611232037555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942323866","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039286323,0.090958394,0.013137004,0.69614506,0.004881954,0.000035705998,0.00003900783,0.00010108555,0.15541537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8427501,0.026788058,0.0044013388,0.0988048,0.004231955,0.00006954659,0.000035014476,0.000085378655,0.0228338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9568778,0.023290917,0.002009094,0.005811344,0.005139017,0.0068718116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8919497,0.0788453,0.010316474,0.0052107773,0.0076508927,0.0060268873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053965244,0.00038776323,0.0009281836,0.0020176077,0.011762506,0.020508679,0.0042721434,0.0178891,0.006861951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0930888,0.0008967893,0.000627557,0.0032676356,0.049464084,0.024229635,0.008555175,0.019801853,0.00071620574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024153342,0.000013724648,0.0009582126,0.00011002942,0.000006911883,0.00019895386,0.012427492,0.00012463603,0.0001233035,0.9404247,0.016004492,0.029583398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001943011,0.00006398055,0.0031138356,0.0017742394,0.000027842438,0.00045347662,0.019054063,0.0007835358,0.00054786436,0.29715776,0.6768802,0.00012373595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057357218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04694502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057357218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02078647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02447058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2853989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942526628","doi":"10.7202/1058171ar","title":"Les rapports difficiles entre la liberté d’expression et ses limites raisonnables","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.017412316913374627,"score_gpt":0.2559491134920333,"score_spread":0.23853679657865867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942526628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043685004,0.021119703,0.070441924,0.16441652,0.0022951327,0.00010376696,0.00015084747,0.00014188254,0.6976452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8426564,0.008398634,0.013938665,0.018947303,0.0014710117,0.0002693277,0.000072162526,0.00023752812,0.114009045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98885053,0.005807242,0.00043006413,0.0013592888,0.002307153,0.0012457378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98638433,0.010361399,0.0007413465,0.0011164205,0.0010479022,0.00034857844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009639154,0.00072065706,0.0007450141,0.0021087073,0.006352313,0.011567954,0.0016790463,0.007737259,0.009863901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016000422,0.00038934618,0.0010677767,0.0014358275,0.034355666,0.011301568,0.006293661,0.010844166,0.0013173649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054997786,0.0000043922264,0.00009773883,0.000021988815,0.0000021942637,0.000037404738,0.003898994,0.000045191417,0.00006464007,0.9913223,0.0018817999,0.002617863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017744893,0.00004489336,0.0013789872,0.00046676918,0.000014691909,0.00026382224,0.00733784,0.00046391482,0.0011246403,0.6114372,0.37740156,0.00004791505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011632073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016531479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011632073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008984847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005548738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06518996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945515784","doi":"10.4000/etudescaribeennes.15155","title":"Explorer dans la Caraïbe la contribution des institutions nationales des droits de l’homme et des ombudsmans à l’appropriation des valeurs visant une meilleure gouvernance dans les relations UE-CELAC","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études caribéennes","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0339915948230478,"score_gpt":0.29175541607803335,"score_spread":0.25776382125498554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945515784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5816919,0.014239412,0.0020554299,0.038116064,0.0003444427,0.000031512922,0.00010056399,0.000021511496,0.36339918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96064436,0.0027415706,0.0007057154,0.0013570355,0.000066622066,0.000025200483,0.000026371548,0.000013345181,0.034419697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976452,0.00097559,0.000033010285,0.00019548464,0.0002172614,0.00093336933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983444,0.00065774197,0.00031259772,0.00012645892,0.0002286894,0.0003300324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033258514,0.000244394,0.00027328203,0.001091241,0.005436524,0.0070912163,0.0005526914,0.0015047266,0.011897116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026390397,0.000210141,0.00027471228,0.0013733394,0.007993138,0.0033970918,0.003145957,0.002125764,0.0007153446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008491203,0.000058003134,0.023291245,0.00015665418,0.000028666189,0.00033311226,0.08968931,0.00016355893,0.0007868684,0.8363389,0.004924658,0.04414414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003681202,0.00013246066,0.107017025,0.0013469945,0.00005591919,0.00030114243,0.19909422,0.00024179113,0.001340753,0.06010756,0.63027674,0.00004865256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033995666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08445285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033995666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007187936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007765851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06759554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945867602","doi":"","title":"Effectiveness Framework for Home-State Non-Judicial Grievance Mechanisms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Legitimacy; Human rights; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Judicial review; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Public administration; Law; Business; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.006840780019596003,"score_gpt":0.2826990895050662,"score_spread":0.27585830948547024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945867602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010557368,0.0018061786,0.18790914,0.016449671,0.00037153272,0.0007728077,0.0002699725,0.00019389151,0.7816695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85232013,0.0024656262,0.058350176,0.0056731477,0.0009638581,0.002341563,0.00021580739,0.00019692146,0.07747289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9729997,0.0094274515,0.001253798,0.0035076053,0.008575938,0.0042355657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9723256,0.0146029545,0.0024921708,0.0029799913,0.006222699,0.0013765976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033401854,0.001132199,0.0015559093,0.0061964598,0.008554322,0.014511808,0.007033129,0.013387476,0.020420073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03480757,0.001113716,0.0021621315,0.0023026722,0.027497012,0.014675012,0.006779935,0.009509245,0.0032189433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.910749e-7,0.000004804174,0.00002888382,0.0000071362906,0.0000015980768,0.000012735506,0.000078653604,0.00020435893,0.000009772123,0.99886924,0.00033338118,0.0004484585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052551182,0.00003322023,0.0003137261,0.00019975525,0.00003420494,0.000078144454,0.00040503225,0.0031779208,0.00024820972,0.9479806,0.04744498,0.000031762116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026817445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019316928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033401854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019372722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022090282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17664802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950719070","doi":"","title":"Le secret ministériel au Canada (Cabinet Secrecy in Canada)","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Secrecy; Cabinet (room); Law; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.006825773134857658,"score_gpt":0.21902132155917775,"score_spread":0.2121955484243201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950719070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18901685,0.033207007,0.0025905166,0.09934299,0.0017045605,0.00015483041,0.003577208,0.00019495144,0.67021096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7969153,0.005631153,0.0008170713,0.005301891,0.00017196826,0.00003520629,0.00043183638,0.00007054092,0.19062513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941683,0.00045880213,0.00013257678,0.0005865947,0.0025660724,0.0020876501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99450606,0.0013525499,0.00050560833,0.00026712916,0.0022782763,0.0010903804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029713053,0.00032696401,0.00032169253,0.0016989697,0.016355755,0.008447532,0.0012126178,0.00257095,0.017104803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008351836,0.0005466033,0.00030532767,0.0036238006,0.0061188443,0.0017012213,0.002536222,0.0034996949,0.0009815454],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011672899,0.00002662769,0.011518898,0.00042495452,0.00003398634,0.0007107631,0.027101858,0.0008514224,0.0010074541,0.7121307,0.18379496,0.06228164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014831197,0.000015232684,0.030483844,0.0003554377,0.000024283978,0.00012414313,0.007792996,0.00032126863,0.00079382653,0.0041208714,0.95588493,0.00006829153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99484986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8568704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14312957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20586523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99384826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952826690","doi":"10.36939/cjur/vol28no1/art208","title":"Accountability and Responsiveness at the Municipal Level: Views from Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of urban research","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Lawrence College; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.19690122809021632,"score_gpt":0.3899493726337436,"score_spread":0.19304814454352726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952826690","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070729817,0.6365236,0.00014070107,0.33313018,0.0038194906,0.0000096677395,0.00028897807,0.000018763954,0.025361462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040605254,0.85916054,0.0004206986,0.04913098,0.002945293,0.000035439658,0.00032193313,0.00006956651,0.047310226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994181,0.00072992966,0.00016775721,0.00029100545,0.0033348892,0.0012955036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98239636,0.0035450005,0.0006451501,0.00020819117,0.01098662,0.0022185845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005302999,0.0006957408,0.0010445133,0.003319647,0.006880212,0.008902456,0.0017189059,0.0048310217,0.005594287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012764636,0.0004886192,0.0005143226,0.012036904,0.006300396,0.0035947417,0.002121291,0.0067537995,0.0010255328],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022494574,0.000007728264,0.0005347745,0.000579116,0.000016850487,0.000050971437,0.0013525563,0.00018508483,0.000048650138,0.03145824,0.92041755,0.04532598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068262248,0.0000040332225,0.0030465422,0.0016171872,0.000023010358,0.000033773173,0.0018037705,0.000052679225,0.00006366234,0.0029155307,0.9904013,0.000031643744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9781115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.905221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09477901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23498428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68767303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W295307247","doi":"","title":"Rights, Review and Reasonableness: The Implications of Canada's New Approach to Administrative Decision-Making and Human Rights for Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Political science; Law; Human rights; Legislation; Discretion; Proportionality (law); Supreme court; International human rights law; Common law; Administrative law","score_opus":0.03660092761202962,"score_gpt":0.35024680147946685,"score_spread":0.31364587386743725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W295307247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009700826,0.060586207,0.002817331,0.7997564,0.0039326227,0.00012726165,0.00014945831,0.000036526504,0.12289335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5720824,0.07520216,0.013956153,0.2375778,0.007738919,0.0002894706,0.00017039315,0.0001238495,0.092858866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96218896,0.010451052,0.0020548268,0.0027166468,0.017899208,0.004689168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87756693,0.06805611,0.003415613,0.0032883,0.03721847,0.010454572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037406936,0.0004020178,0.0010129658,0.0056209904,0.01264945,0.019607145,0.0031814643,0.010432166,0.004660871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10373271,0.00061158097,0.00075321284,0.005376004,0.024519391,0.009525374,0.0042113806,0.00965235,0.00040317202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044374574,0.000023490595,0.0010507769,0.00032941005,0.00002976104,0.00042366184,0.0042810044,0.00080300454,0.00012346177,0.89547354,0.07409755,0.023320038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009864187,0.00005143438,0.007113915,0.001664961,0.0001006277,0.0002645948,0.0034017395,0.0024666819,0.00022928383,0.2865244,0.6979045,0.00017915147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94594765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97482514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16123384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16123384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32042208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97284985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953734689","doi":"","title":"The International Ombudsman Yearbook, Linda C. Reif (Ed.) : recent publications","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yearbook; Parliament; Political science; Law; Library science; Politics","score_opus":0.02551074843048468,"score_gpt":0.2969614081440274,"score_spread":0.2714506597135427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953734689","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034317095,0.87846875,0.0006329903,0.013780335,0.023184955,0.000065408494,0.0047438256,0.00028315533,0.078497365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027909726,0.8372524,0.0018742278,0.0021397353,0.0060015745,0.00014131307,0.0061888173,0.00025917785,0.14335187],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820805,0.00020143346,0.00026579076,0.00018533821,0.000998036,0.00014132864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952644,0.0011461906,0.0005924987,0.00021115002,0.0023325405,0.0004531757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028741427,0.0019138221,0.0016168755,0.011400085,0.0015744953,0.008416534,0.0015383741,0.0016415439,0.08765242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008386217,0.000927872,0.0004522264,0.028048517,0.00090384757,0.008301681,0.0017508409,0.0021300775,0.081825286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001171911,0.000007493718,0.000105249135,0.00050793187,0.0000029399152,0.000012941168,0.00007407306,0.000036918165,0.000028203585,0.0020865898,0.9006044,0.09652159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001056658,0.0000020872762,0.0002921391,0.00088434474,0.000002122669,0.000024676487,0.000068957415,0.0000065937543,0.000014895718,0.00044396182,0.9982558,0.0000034352413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01528267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020977667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08765242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034206049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009700246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29322654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969081664","doi":"10.3968/11097","title":"The New Development of “Substantial Rule of Law” in China: Substantive Settlement of Administrative Disputes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); China; Administrative law; Law; Substantive law; Political science; Rule of law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02904913828834046,"score_gpt":0.31177573601475195,"score_spread":0.2827265977264115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969081664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6554714,0.006289992,0.04685543,0.04704873,0.00070003496,0.0007025209,0.00019239042,0.00022566823,0.24251385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760696,0.0011961956,0.008261045,0.0011947978,0.00017495564,0.00008869026,0.000049881088,0.000012916344,0.012951906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962075,0.00088650535,0.00037388067,0.0006898575,0.0011154157,0.00072698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997382,0.0006184076,0.0003939235,0.00038958836,0.0007788984,0.0004371544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006127036,0.0002784554,0.00040541106,0.0017182227,0.005152452,0.0055846553,0.0014016024,0.0016927352,0.0024704013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004898209,0.00039760917,0.00055432064,0.0019506429,0.010196713,0.003362788,0.002699389,0.0020928662,0.0001521534],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025313691,0.000042826687,0.011027718,0.00018607391,0.00002293924,0.0004757785,0.0062848334,0.0015341302,0.0016750967,0.9133634,0.0050333166,0.060328536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017287253,0.0002983408,0.1295421,0.00035108678,0.00012562779,0.0005385418,0.0044855014,0.019286914,0.003326284,0.5584257,0.28321078,0.00023617025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06457002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077459455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06457002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012497235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037671853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12838835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972940952","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review of Administrative Action in the High Court of Australia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Political science; Judicial review; Law; Administrative law","score_opus":0.1619903611601266,"score_gpt":0.4113545483295878,"score_spread":0.24936418716946118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972940952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46893087,0.015472689,0.0034270366,0.13676722,0.0032646607,0.0010021359,0.00024712613,0.00010941382,0.37077886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89048016,0.0032781602,0.0018799782,0.031197231,0.0013890403,0.00020452063,0.00007052471,0.00005351934,0.0714469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9472817,0.017569073,0.0040496783,0.0035030306,0.016277693,0.011318818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.893481,0.062810704,0.005349662,0.003502861,0.029461231,0.0053945724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043017678,0.0003757143,0.0014162698,0.0038927956,0.017949047,0.015793785,0.0036328458,0.017718522,0.003968538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12034285,0.0013142345,0.00079632306,0.0029368948,0.0071847313,0.0030783273,0.0056718844,0.01624778,0.00069151947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006654859,0.00046336412,0.020711862,0.001113967,0.0005447313,0.007951485,0.06687627,0.0037838465,0.0051368815,0.54606265,0.24152616,0.105163306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002920908,0.00051042443,0.1319392,0.0022641947,0.0007277936,0.0010052286,0.02063218,0.008758008,0.0053000962,0.092434615,0.7355495,0.00058660086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26153237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47081137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26153237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027432268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06803434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5200201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979050458","doi":"","title":"The Political Legitimacy of Cabinet Secrecy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Cabinet (room); Politics; Openness to experience; Political science; Legitimacy; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.01747944023703239,"score_gpt":0.32895209057059616,"score_spread":0.31147265033356375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979050458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05995733,0.005418894,0.03374103,0.07865492,0.001264608,0.00005107337,0.00011667476,0.0001997137,0.82059574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764525,0.0012090376,0.0020696619,0.0025171572,0.00069029524,0.000048620102,0.00004469936,0.00008776417,0.01688029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.968362,0.016015379,0.0015998746,0.003960557,0.0073255207,0.0027366413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9002566,0.06668545,0.011204385,0.011136006,0.008662083,0.0020554836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029686067,0.00037351972,0.0007135348,0.0024735066,0.012471839,0.019475088,0.0014375376,0.0066407914,0.007765899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08187397,0.00096802483,0.00062735245,0.0031998113,0.044125788,0.013020098,0.0088104475,0.011195659,0.0016791319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010751967,0.0000029225528,0.00022981904,0.000019260742,0.0000033545984,0.000050336283,0.0029643218,0.000103814134,0.00006209521,0.9927654,0.0012945144,0.002493348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004394279,0.000022742628,0.00087307213,0.00034375553,0.000030166291,0.00018533063,0.002155162,0.0012229845,0.00090251566,0.81186265,0.18230739,0.000050325092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064394623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048161703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029686067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008319232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009157353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15699679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984162081","doi":"10.1177/0020852319870241","title":"Media coverage of reports published by the Québec Ombudsman: an automated content analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Administrative Sciences","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Tone (literature); Media coverage; Mandate; Political science; Content analysis; News media; Print media; Visibility; Law; Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.08613295065847268,"score_gpt":0.4122552439056207,"score_spread":0.32612229324714803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984162081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9245245,0.0011224548,0.00537686,0.00070896925,0.00009975635,0.0009172767,0.0408927,0.000809788,0.025547648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93816185,0.0009934704,0.016611435,0.00013394274,0.00017897182,0.0010655485,0.033238757,0.00013833049,0.00947776],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961671,0.0007356137,0.00030102613,0.00038500415,0.0021569629,0.00025417935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9460554,0.01894905,0.007138905,0.0015043399,0.02548569,0.0008665614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037341586,0.0005673765,0.00051986275,0.03127504,0.0014780978,0.0033459903,0.0006770042,0.00036578087,0.0042656553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027434345,0.0002113021,0.00038300798,0.021694632,0.0007023089,0.0009384463,0.0011451903,0.0004827029,0.0010864282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000513095,0.00029830885,0.6960822,0.0015253338,0.0003490602,0.0012980654,0.027200058,0.0017881077,0.006778706,0.0018900326,0.026780354,0.23549668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017913659,0.00007016124,0.9328245,0.00038431626,0.00015648961,0.00019172337,0.0133245215,0.01139027,0.003162353,0.00026360957,0.03812521,0.00008908298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49105144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3917229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50894856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068215574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005728739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97638637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988018695","doi":"10.31078/consrev523","title":"Constitutional Change: Towards Better Human Rights Protection in Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Constitution; Charter; Law; Political science; Rights of Nature; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Ex post facto law; State (computer science); Bill of rights; Right to property; Linguistic rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.14478667659264227,"score_gpt":0.38808269231669107,"score_spread":0.2432960157240488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2988018695","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023530265,0.52921677,0.009351939,0.22715633,0.0052377735,0.00023173062,0.00009770473,0.00006594006,0.20511149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45788896,0.38667747,0.014460347,0.07943775,0.0038514028,0.00020995762,0.00016310447,0.000038767317,0.057272263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925143,0.0039543356,0.0004115917,0.000631732,0.0019263071,0.00056164525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955218,0.0022861888,0.00038921175,0.00033910264,0.0011955382,0.0002681912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014273525,0.0002894513,0.0005752561,0.002412842,0.0023948597,0.0045493213,0.0014043126,0.0051187924,0.0028498813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015558933,0.0002870669,0.00051997823,0.0021214243,0.00867617,0.005444927,0.0023628026,0.0062500816,0.0002541295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060590633,0.00002943492,0.00018449288,0.00079580885,0.000011381772,0.00014008534,0.002581628,0.0006540919,0.0004326944,0.9394425,0.010284061,0.045437705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014970917,0.00006547196,0.003209202,0.0028047487,0.000028993085,0.00014776118,0.001274188,0.0005964896,0.00048093268,0.15303734,0.83831424,0.000025770854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08591927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075528584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08591927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01372663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030137418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1708383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022970702","doi":"10.1017/s0008423920000438","title":"A Human Rights Approach to Emergency Response? The Advocacy of Canada's Human Rights Commissions during the COVID-19 Crisis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Human rights; Legislation; Political science; Public administration; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.04834605542909221,"score_gpt":0.33362495880731236,"score_spread":0.28527890337822015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022970702","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002470484,0.0043399297,0.001533426,0.8694952,0.0012854796,0.000022024673,0.00006468518,0.000025277652,0.120763436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5560988,0.016304411,0.004163093,0.34286228,0.0036791319,0.00007852929,0.0001344546,0.00012693137,0.0765523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98870146,0.0031853225,0.00017192781,0.00074199395,0.00233546,0.004863814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859891,0.0038446165,0.00058481924,0.0005061184,0.0036257203,0.005449608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010285612,0.00061645696,0.00052219647,0.002154396,0.01922816,0.019355057,0.0028231025,0.010597693,0.018014329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018947758,0.00037506368,0.0005284122,0.0018642623,0.04858041,0.011561321,0.0054949545,0.015572511,0.001298194],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020877076,0.00004605069,0.0012674519,0.00008001178,0.000012236349,0.00014943749,0.0047054985,0.00037204905,0.00011469785,0.85755026,0.11345833,0.022223078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051224004,0.000028509992,0.0047006714,0.0011728161,0.00003184301,0.00013711576,0.027736278,0.0009310712,0.00023682512,0.3178851,0.64697117,0.00011734789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92005116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95400053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090641625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.090641625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2668617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6576541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024006262","doi":"10.3968/11595","title":"On the Establishment of a National Human Rights Institution in China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Institution; China; Legitimacy; Political science; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.03136715062327861,"score_gpt":0.2921910507712139,"score_spread":0.2608239001479353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024006262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7832399,0.0014015342,0.004355974,0.012158899,0.00013211495,0.00031101512,0.00009468728,0.000043436823,0.19826251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787596,0.0005811783,0.0021055087,0.0005512034,0.000035257017,0.00005805454,0.00004092488,0.000006311681,0.017862039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753344,0.0005367616,0.00017732197,0.00030891164,0.0006014552,0.0008421252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979715,0.00029977752,0.0003680314,0.00014897264,0.00053984346,0.00067180506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005070002,0.00016169605,0.00028888616,0.0011988459,0.007045484,0.0030198295,0.0007370959,0.0010636176,0.003295439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002549297,0.0002269159,0.00029081915,0.001256116,0.004539399,0.0019761717,0.0024831505,0.0011439931,0.00015610972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005640724,0.000109461485,0.040535767,0.0001547205,0.000030040052,0.0010960026,0.0103947325,0.0021988517,0.0015726321,0.8953589,0.0066960733,0.041796293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012757198,0.00038107837,0.38235343,0.0008730994,0.0001784813,0.00078074617,0.018487683,0.025100235,0.0057671783,0.20428397,0.3613187,0.0003477128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15712698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1790842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15712698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014174159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04923144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31242478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034896080","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1422","title":"Vavilov and the Culture of Justification in Contemporary Administrative Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Supreme court; Administrative law; Judicial review; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Citizenship; Confusion; Agency (philosophy); Standard of review; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.11703072414492736,"score_gpt":0.37751435522991417,"score_spread":0.2604836310849868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034896080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046210755,0.06248895,0.013573816,0.36473808,0.0013375138,0.0000612016,0.000084601044,0.000092852744,0.51141226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9417717,0.009516963,0.00344698,0.026837634,0.0005867711,0.00009111437,0.00003010272,0.000082179984,0.017636498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9609446,0.019686194,0.0011151494,0.0029901403,0.010880706,0.0043831957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641164,0.025544949,0.0020755418,0.0017396604,0.0051675183,0.0013559347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028365362,0.00031273774,0.00082064926,0.0050589493,0.019819822,0.024881564,0.0026454006,0.009613823,0.0023721738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038562126,0.00053541374,0.00036297433,0.005177794,0.1365163,0.009776487,0.00592329,0.011934298,0.00030672696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002397501,0.000002431981,0.00010893986,0.00001521623,0.0000016533318,0.000022481567,0.0064416463,0.000045382585,0.000023733766,0.9881832,0.0021478923,0.0030049183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002076231,0.00001842058,0.001219947,0.00038406817,0.00000781546,0.00008915638,0.0107323155,0.00033737507,0.00015788333,0.69982725,0.28715125,0.0000537171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4228874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42875698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4228874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06452235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07368995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8408519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W306134649","doi":"","title":"The Discretionary Nature of Judicial Review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Law; Certiorari; Political science; Judicial discretion; Writ; Judicial review; Discretion; Supreme court; Original jurisdiction; Politics","score_opus":0.0058765152476186544,"score_gpt":0.2997923885590466,"score_spread":0.29391587331142793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W306134649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015952332,0.031353503,0.12075492,0.047633715,0.0019574277,0.00036006124,0.0003167074,0.0006122226,0.781059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82801086,0.01976167,0.033011682,0.013428346,0.0059369425,0.00040890856,0.00022097581,0.0002203405,0.09900034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9438124,0.013013794,0.0031170258,0.0069132247,0.030032344,0.0031112465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93167233,0.032644413,0.004105804,0.013024122,0.016366925,0.0021864064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022504637,0.00038119595,0.0006682338,0.0033665502,0.003194124,0.011151152,0.0021023403,0.0029711341,0.0041752513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06790365,0.0006400836,0.00037992944,0.0024486505,0.01542495,0.005583128,0.0025800979,0.0042006676,0.0014165153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012158143,0.000010222953,0.0002950622,0.00007534142,0.000012514213,0.000047832043,0.0005918034,0.00064953323,0.00027117517,0.9491046,0.010662401,0.03826738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003330882,0.000028962591,0.0021774368,0.00028074923,0.00001671627,0.00017744294,0.00017572522,0.002320123,0.0005356157,0.6719437,0.32222933,0.00008085068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029795669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034680285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029795669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011621705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019358741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11901736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093995633","doi":"10.1111/capa.12392","title":"The duty to assist in Canadian Freedom of Information law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Freedom of information; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Law; Administrative law; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02666741190849772,"score_gpt":0.26639584059124005,"score_spread":0.23972842868274233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093995633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051910453,0.002522431,0.009386598,0.09945939,0.00059628097,0.0001954976,0.0003995388,0.00006821452,0.83546156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9441047,0.0011496601,0.003312804,0.0128211295,0.00015271018,0.00006434501,0.000093656985,0.000030200177,0.03827078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97466236,0.004000475,0.00094680936,0.0022241103,0.011012974,0.0071532577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772132,0.008000764,0.0013902416,0.0018318787,0.008964184,0.0025998382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0132252555,0.00036671275,0.00063983357,0.0028241219,0.024347039,0.016995536,0.0025682894,0.0064655477,0.008465973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035847783,0.0005247051,0.00068537245,0.003678467,0.047756378,0.005819717,0.008474294,0.0083651,0.0003839647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042808942,0.0000062827507,0.00086360646,0.00001553232,0.0000024443846,0.000055416614,0.004587719,0.00015298552,0.000053736785,0.9840276,0.006011509,0.004218973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004692168,0.000029316836,0.016141057,0.00075282,0.000060271963,0.0002604854,0.016095532,0.0021656642,0.0005098994,0.48941457,0.47426137,0.00026204577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97286093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9735677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88399273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11600727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22378701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84169555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W310390019","doi":"","title":"International Human Rights on the Internet. Internet Resources.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Social Studies","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Social studies; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Pedagogy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.055768601806438625,"score_gpt":0.31809622481679034,"score_spread":0.26232762301035173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W310390019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016553858,0.025121816,0.00021633449,0.023127548,0.0008715371,0.000019687594,0.0014018803,0.000057159166,0.9475287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14124894,0.070397876,0.00079191173,0.008166489,0.0017878585,0.00009294768,0.002003576,0.00013770512,0.77537274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842,0.00024344426,0.00006071474,0.00011778203,0.00077862345,0.00037942373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739265,0.00068506645,0.00035709003,0.0002485434,0.0007372657,0.0005794035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012724131,0.0004898882,0.0002998155,0.005431055,0.0040618405,0.005674722,0.00074417284,0.0034721075,0.14233121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005785639,0.00021717553,0.00017006592,0.011223454,0.0038398854,0.006117099,0.0020210778,0.0018078053,0.016211478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001403454,0.00003225964,0.0017512387,0.00018137295,0.000002621481,0.00007627867,0.002526468,0.000046304867,0.00006862748,0.38541037,0.48045054,0.1294399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026661216,0.000004729783,0.005291253,0.00049739267,0.0000035358962,0.00006342712,0.0018022335,0.00003323234,0.000051046158,0.01609515,0.97614586,0.00000938635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42225975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57820374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42225975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075177294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011839345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83960384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3103913731","doi":"","title":"A nova Lei do Tribunal dos Conflitos: a peça que faltava (parte I)","year":2019,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova (rocket); Political science; Tribunal; Nova scotia; Law; History; Engineering; Ethnology","score_opus":0.09851857456721318,"score_gpt":0.4039366541984645,"score_spread":0.3054180796312513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3103913731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2976672,0.0026081947,0.0040537044,0.024006573,0.00057151454,0.00011434085,0.00020913877,0.00005147149,0.6707179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8567598,0.00088951166,0.0014944369,0.0025784187,0.00011975127,0.00007116211,0.00013321955,0.000055986337,0.13789767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956981,0.0010677543,0.000122366,0.0005407734,0.0013860404,0.0011850401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976533,0.00053355395,0.00025774623,0.00028855,0.00069707254,0.0005698207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024054754,0.00019201812,0.00019342975,0.00088539947,0.008882015,0.007951223,0.000989281,0.0016442938,0.010299659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006984081,0.00019116407,0.00022672127,0.0015778443,0.01086892,0.0040827715,0.0048224917,0.003923528,0.0012730047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053622323,0.00003069051,0.009564151,0.00010583324,0.000006660267,0.000754818,0.19509347,0.00011315398,0.0008794392,0.71593845,0.024447607,0.053012036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076184283,0.000059612194,0.026369622,0.00031763667,0.000007299831,0.0005628438,0.16873436,0.00023019544,0.00070184254,0.03312182,0.7698445,0.00004273647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036152724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06763265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036152724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008630672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008960958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07188457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108702718","doi":"","title":"Rebuilt on Sand: Canadian Administrative Law after Vavilov","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Standard of review; Autonomy; Citizenship; Judicial review; State (computer science); Compromise; Immigration law; Immigration","score_opus":0.02845912712821984,"score_gpt":0.29537771249160105,"score_spread":0.2669185853633812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108702718","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017590715,0.016667465,0.0029327492,0.59248114,0.0064085172,0.00009243375,0.0003859996,0.00021384952,0.36322713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39286464,0.0069678593,0.003270726,0.33075964,0.0018272322,0.000098793644,0.0001823299,0.00027929962,0.26374948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98579234,0.0015668978,0.0002864249,0.0016613998,0.0066085514,0.0040842923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917108,0.0031046171,0.00022152219,0.00036594414,0.003747375,0.00084977114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008011816,0.0005446593,0.00067362277,0.0017949312,0.03509915,0.017928323,0.0042472845,0.015908511,0.006665713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01834247,0.000557326,0.0009208613,0.0025855126,0.017877256,0.003790885,0.0037732385,0.012611119,0.0008574512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022418897,0.000008893823,0.00051226595,0.00004212147,0.000009478863,0.00038315408,0.0071093417,0.0002648108,0.000168285,0.78930646,0.19373135,0.008441288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016623022,0.000009134223,0.0013775558,0.00017160323,0.000023715585,0.00007270602,0.003931565,0.00034353507,0.00023551694,0.033362214,0.9603624,0.000093272276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9900122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85347474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14652528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20382966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9899097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110687891","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Cabinet Secrecy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Cabinet (room); Discretion; Statutory law; Political science; Qualified immunity; Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Premise; Law; Doctrine; Business; Public relations; Computer science; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.028105980608057718,"score_gpt":0.2762705864611994,"score_spread":0.24816460585314168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110687891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082510956,0.012780409,0.07926741,0.23479857,0.0046206727,0.00043418235,0.00061629276,0.00078343344,0.5841881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87804526,0.0036772268,0.014484415,0.032507014,0.0012637671,0.000150832,0.0002077951,0.00024411293,0.069419555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9514914,0.006891834,0.002074259,0.004799493,0.026404615,0.0083384635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9204965,0.032638006,0.0034843236,0.009982417,0.029691724,0.0037069884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037507646,0.00063232635,0.0009892154,0.0041568577,0.019309942,0.02073844,0.0050004288,0.010334037,0.0052851005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07205307,0.0011291143,0.0009967715,0.0040726513,0.03382279,0.0096093295,0.008656299,0.014568169,0.0011867072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015271298,0.000008795247,0.0008535873,0.00005547577,0.0000081091475,0.0002501652,0.0069049774,0.0006017295,0.00037991322,0.96300054,0.01419117,0.013730281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006133099,0.000052282372,0.004009967,0.0012519119,0.00008642403,0.00039866785,0.009494752,0.0037209701,0.0027865074,0.25511587,0.72273856,0.0002828761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7349483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74799126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7349483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06279912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15987019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5332253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112919139","doi":"10.1089/env.2020.0017","title":"Fiduciary Responsibility and the Green Energy Act, 2009 (Ontario, Canada)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Justice","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Ambiguity; Obligation; Scope (computer science); Indigenous; Legislature; Duty; Political science; Divergence (linguistics); Law and economics; Energy (signal processing); Law; Business; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.010790851766379965,"score_gpt":0.20498736503420764,"score_spread":0.19419651326782766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112919139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058876056,0.031909306,0.0012178917,0.18369807,0.0012847182,0.00017769558,0.0033248696,0.00007641564,0.719435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49320063,0.014862358,0.0030481475,0.027773697,0.00018256856,0.00012728479,0.0007828246,0.000074068674,0.45994845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961583,0.0002729188,0.00011901753,0.00027444778,0.001884623,0.0012907336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787986,0.0002721123,0.00013813975,0.00007635278,0.0011006882,0.00053294125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015980516,0.00034499788,0.00022581151,0.0009127764,0.016876714,0.0062977364,0.0012125422,0.003858925,0.005924455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004354488,0.00037029604,0.00031356412,0.00211774,0.0075731655,0.001456253,0.0020469052,0.0034697787,0.0004986635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045938366,0.00003760736,0.008974863,0.00015832853,0.000017213324,0.00059858646,0.014538596,0.0006901117,0.00045138106,0.6255387,0.32529193,0.023656756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018975628,0.000012867439,0.05040427,0.00032328616,0.000017697017,0.000118589654,0.0057927812,0.00033118096,0.00024473516,0.012465267,0.93018746,0.00008296011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17651446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17651446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27998564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9551265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113356208","doi":"10.7202/1078534ar","title":"Liberté d’expression des juges de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme versus secret des délibérations","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Freedom of expression; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.027707510668237147,"score_gpt":0.3018707808441605,"score_spread":0.2741632701759234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113356208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10523736,0.0035382118,0.01000252,0.013772969,0.00040355098,0.000044670105,0.00009450224,0.000052860767,0.8668534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8953212,0.0010742802,0.0019431666,0.001743817,0.00014471517,0.000068852256,0.000058950223,0.00006378489,0.09958109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945904,0.0024950246,0.00019515742,0.0005827541,0.0012401701,0.0008964536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964032,0.0013780812,0.00052702427,0.00051318685,0.00066651474,0.0005120639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043880683,0.00037655927,0.0003182385,0.00084086973,0.0055840123,0.010262682,0.00069777167,0.0025713218,0.014637689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008000916,0.00024107941,0.00035419958,0.0008293604,0.015016123,0.005385939,0.0051705535,0.0037553138,0.0017727552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044524724,0.000012954481,0.0009872606,0.00004356949,0.000011233751,0.00011169106,0.033947468,0.00007286948,0.00028778994,0.9528768,0.002491076,0.009112821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059422193,0.00011997868,0.014223181,0.00086586474,0.000052597825,0.00066312414,0.07098453,0.0003973707,0.0018653035,0.2669826,0.6437032,0.000082735765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006986039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009217806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014637689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004210133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004447993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048967898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121761895","doi":"","title":"The History, Law and Practice of Cabinet Immunity in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Parliament; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Statutory law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.015513828541856588,"score_gpt":0.27524920758214244,"score_spread":0.2597353790402859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121761895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13691749,0.048170973,0.008732639,0.11633045,0.0020081573,0.0001693608,0.00072324625,0.00040047252,0.6865472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86143196,0.014589487,0.0028458608,0.011795461,0.00022292502,0.00004021306,0.000117423384,0.00014594676,0.10881074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98999435,0.0011401029,0.00033246606,0.0011358823,0.004567585,0.002829648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876637,0.005062328,0.0007896859,0.0004935342,0.0043043513,0.0016864105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049536023,0.00035235312,0.0004508095,0.0026176188,0.027182525,0.012987112,0.0025516234,0.004287064,0.007020636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016337024,0.0009683426,0.00037513828,0.0053325747,0.026813122,0.0028208324,0.0032066598,0.007854863,0.0005108441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005314167,0.00003909996,0.004271096,0.00029898022,0.000021200316,0.0009318661,0.03623685,0.0009235784,0.0007724569,0.8414697,0.04773,0.06725192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001668829,0.000030512052,0.014747667,0.00048301445,0.000025875592,0.0002208042,0.011605337,0.0008116278,0.00094414357,0.013090429,0.95785886,0.00016506147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24342097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24342097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26908943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87752444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123267429","doi":"","title":"Negotiations with Métis: What Courts Can Do to Help","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Metis; Dispute resolution; Political science; Representation (politics); Law; Identification (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.015839953240968607,"score_gpt":0.2800543257681065,"score_spread":0.2642143725271379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123267429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013515717,0.011115113,0.026518064,0.6358368,0.002805907,0.00023170347,0.000052420943,0.00043249447,0.30949178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7466077,0.010450098,0.040430877,0.11723704,0.0033787836,0.0008404568,0.00020082666,0.00046665198,0.0803875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94523925,0.03261823,0.0024436612,0.002498391,0.009787923,0.0074125123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9163874,0.046542577,0.0051051057,0.00831702,0.0118731735,0.011774761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051744547,0.0008323086,0.0012482931,0.003940955,0.0244544,0.03133616,0.0057642404,0.02650615,0.01979057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15048812,0.000762844,0.0010831357,0.002795218,0.017805457,0.04212012,0.019426959,0.01593469,0.004724901],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052182055,0.00023412642,0.002195911,0.0002470527,0.000031153297,0.0009613905,0.017414702,0.000604233,0.0003154989,0.7517465,0.1140496,0.11214769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008751704,0.000070212496,0.0007130794,0.0011048336,0.000025745303,0.0004445449,0.024716506,0.0010756976,0.00046472796,0.58769065,0.3835138,0.00009274025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061560953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010485058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007355847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019193966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27365458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123581503","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Ramifications of Reasonableness Review: Stare Decisis and Reasonableness Review on Questions of Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Standard of review; Administrative law; Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Law; Judicial review; Judicial deference; Political science; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.028256218865027247,"score_gpt":0.3277561341449648,"score_spread":0.2994999152799375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123581503","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02093019,0.024042647,0.041747477,0.581798,0.0037329642,0.00019331329,0.0001154594,0.00012100688,0.32731894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8348461,0.012994314,0.023437604,0.092459895,0.0044665295,0.00019713829,0.00005273071,0.00018223829,0.031363465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9651976,0.01375645,0.0014773465,0.00342968,0.012178239,0.003960672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93318385,0.045693778,0.002322118,0.004018767,0.012382003,0.002399459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046849962,0.00062883913,0.0015436015,0.004603564,0.017732536,0.026659524,0.0044892966,0.015259473,0.003513446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09320846,0.000862434,0.001291853,0.0035901435,0.115486935,0.020431804,0.008146422,0.023176998,0.00053154083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032939506,0.0000023638622,0.00006637741,0.000008686237,0.0000020923273,0.000043225577,0.0009615137,0.00012097297,0.000018661965,0.9951821,0.0018566798,0.001734067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018492454,0.000009503607,0.00038883896,0.00017942389,0.000012705011,0.000045200886,0.0012011296,0.0008989874,0.00011342367,0.94052804,0.056558788,0.00004550282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45187873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5118756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45187873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06554774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08859325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.898497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123669297","doi":"","title":"Tribunals and Guidelines: Exploring the Relationships between Fairness and Legitimacy in Administrative Decision-Making","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Normative; Tribunal; Political science; Administrative law; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Function (biology); Process (computing); Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.12632738791135176,"score_gpt":0.3817816199171554,"score_spread":0.25545423200580364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123669297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37359568,0.0062874956,0.11225931,0.10970556,0.0006718787,0.00032944873,0.000067234425,0.000082547136,0.39700076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99253017,0.0003227346,0.004567672,0.000936099,0.00008342165,0.000086703025,0.000008236005,0.000014830904,0.0014502186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.869667,0.09786086,0.005196206,0.005514065,0.015376195,0.006385767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64308155,0.29534268,0.0265279,0.011657023,0.018500175,0.0048906775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08704198,0.0003830788,0.0010884664,0.0059130196,0.011560426,0.017652376,0.0025792746,0.0077544586,0.0049445005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2728718,0.0005762604,0.0006853166,0.005731681,0.07418783,0.023680732,0.012712045,0.006425292,0.00032442692],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022758833,0.00002983097,0.002756092,0.000051836843,0.000010712533,0.00006422373,0.012130327,0.000449033,0.000038070935,0.9767702,0.00040736186,0.0072695287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039197726,0.000050337883,0.003598008,0.00027102692,0.000017042497,0.000063701176,0.012168747,0.0019795396,0.00013533246,0.9687405,0.012902147,0.00003432153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01615057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014633886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08704198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012615531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019546762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4603275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124726179","doi":"","title":"Courts: An Effective Venue to Promote Government Transparency? The Case of the Court of Justice of the European Union","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); European Union law; Political science; Jurisprudence; European union; Law; Legislature; Economic Justice; International law; Data Protection Directive; Scots law; Business; Sources of law; International trade","score_opus":0.014795295357207293,"score_gpt":0.2762261322795088,"score_spread":0.2614308369223015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124726179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13913299,0.018662902,0.02019778,0.33669353,0.0016565967,0.00009313829,0.000061014165,0.000101384525,0.48340076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9632334,0.001808302,0.0021981706,0.022442924,0.0005349711,0.000040266277,0.000011796756,0.00003955975,0.009690642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94857025,0.032635137,0.0016448353,0.003478344,0.008035292,0.005636146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94432956,0.044645183,0.0035273721,0.0032498774,0.002788721,0.0014592072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030900935,0.00029159905,0.00070988317,0.0025714245,0.0152770085,0.027391551,0.0018908198,0.021311617,0.0029209699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07046731,0.0005957777,0.0008676048,0.0031184219,0.03169668,0.023737973,0.009254805,0.015365485,0.0003534888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072354005,0.0000065651593,0.00023434596,0.000016333895,0.0000046605123,0.000216741,0.0033914621,0.00014881609,0.000071469505,0.9905013,0.002385948,0.0030150067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006470877,0.0000645798,0.0016654284,0.00071198423,0.000044754408,0.00058715435,0.010661426,0.0013259163,0.00092552666,0.7198424,0.26397118,0.00013491727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017847601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014086775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030900935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009348155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011533302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16342175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124743992","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190685515.003.0007","title":"Systematic Government Access to Private-Sector Data in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Personally identifiable information; Statute; Government (linguistics); Private sector; Enforcement; State (computer science); Business; Information privacy; FTC Fair Information Practice; Public administration; Information privacy law; Political science; Law; Privacy by Design; Computer science","score_opus":0.09574048041989948,"score_gpt":0.31387579537374344,"score_spread":0.21813531495384397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124743992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07146594,0.011130073,0.0033932617,0.027897572,0.00033504987,0.00022198114,0.0036477905,0.00027771285,0.88163054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6696751,0.016954748,0.0052487147,0.0057727443,0.00011784071,0.00013713843,0.002858899,0.00022197994,0.2990128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99301445,0.00044734526,0.0001510468,0.0004825812,0.004226729,0.0016778482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992297,0.0018898039,0.0003016786,0.00072129845,0.0039229225,0.0008673281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030115342,0.00027734842,0.0003968543,0.0046009333,0.011983089,0.010658317,0.0019357742,0.0013546932,0.012271015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010159851,0.00053370604,0.00043647,0.015092313,0.006646236,0.002376035,0.0040060123,0.0020158112,0.0011078322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003355708,0.000050699884,0.00814652,0.00025773738,0.000019566149,0.0006096195,0.02962098,0.0009994665,0.00067955675,0.6523407,0.16394182,0.14329979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009068374,0.0000074204095,0.010453829,0.00043686957,0.000012413452,0.00010753234,0.006211777,0.00073610747,0.000505071,0.014671068,0.96680003,0.00004871093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99356055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86343956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13656043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31711227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128298117","doi":"","title":"Cabinet Secrecy in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Cabinet (room); Statutory law; Law; Political science; Statute; Parliament; Confidentiality; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.007851338147979458,"score_gpt":0.2490628725279168,"score_spread":0.24121153437993736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128298117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15910523,0.017413368,0.0029659665,0.114255175,0.0014112265,0.00013153077,0.0009275105,0.00019598907,0.703594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8552752,0.006814076,0.0011535818,0.0065464242,0.0001496996,0.000027612765,0.00022152603,0.00006008155,0.12975183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99454284,0.00047416036,0.000120985336,0.00042335413,0.0021268986,0.002311811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931978,0.0016168697,0.00046357544,0.00026007698,0.0023576745,0.0021040565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025132631,0.0002722208,0.0003354814,0.0011565121,0.028704856,0.0072948695,0.0011501192,0.0027457909,0.014856508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008751582,0.00045939436,0.0003075615,0.002714473,0.0095206015,0.0018756507,0.0032695741,0.0047370074,0.0009774254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005191782,0.00004413425,0.0062281955,0.00019148241,0.000010854726,0.0011897704,0.03888597,0.0011797941,0.000642711,0.7735616,0.11590283,0.062110703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016574388,0.00002653955,0.016531128,0.0003515864,0.000014475752,0.00024884698,0.01619578,0.00071445765,0.0006822645,0.017532142,0.9475979,0.00008820175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99428916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8595848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14041522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31035414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130246329","doi":"","title":"Repenser le secret ministériel (Rethinking Cabinet Secrecy)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Secrecy; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.011811490311373686,"score_gpt":0.24980933952791376,"score_spread":0.23799784921654007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130246329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12751673,0.017819611,0.00964382,0.21231025,0.0023714895,0.00024461036,0.00081450597,0.0002600851,0.629019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8221264,0.003609428,0.0023752116,0.018660523,0.00040527183,0.00006633121,0.0001613615,0.000091683934,0.15250373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99021417,0.0020807553,0.0002497423,0.0008907338,0.0034858342,0.0030787825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902666,0.0033466034,0.0008130576,0.00088313944,0.0035482713,0.0011423077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007530879,0.000396243,0.0003345116,0.0010020975,0.008559528,0.0077464897,0.0014940405,0.004016051,0.012625146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016461495,0.00041728732,0.00042796155,0.0013745393,0.0070936573,0.0028573,0.0036785945,0.0057338746,0.0014952188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014023134,0.000026791251,0.0054627024,0.0003208195,0.000032190426,0.000617674,0.017775988,0.00085186557,0.001614286,0.8462322,0.08023697,0.046688303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041624487,0.000053204014,0.009582818,0.0006145376,0.0000457941,0.00025304922,0.0070756534,0.0008553021,0.0024161811,0.0220666,0.9569102,0.0000850544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7432731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7633031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7432731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044108022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07100698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51647764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133618439","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3459225","title":"Delegated Legislation and the Duty to Consult on and Accommodate Aboriginal and Treaty Rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Treaty; Duty; Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.005382830428682681,"score_gpt":0.27316535745062326,"score_spread":0.26778252702194055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133618439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043743707,0.001505256,0.005211481,0.08501094,0.0011482585,0.00011512875,0.00008617065,0.00009900622,0.86308014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66398454,0.0007128124,0.003581408,0.031358454,0.0007644239,0.0003428834,0.000078526515,0.00015896473,0.29901794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9729116,0.010388252,0.001202211,0.0023202612,0.0055549876,0.0076227323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974999,0.012422211,0.0016902207,0.004101508,0.0041222028,0.0026648175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02119126,0.0003599044,0.00084401126,0.0014597067,0.018470021,0.010914953,0.0028967327,0.017942248,0.02117975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05008335,0.0009578391,0.00074146065,0.0013839661,0.019740002,0.005686096,0.009130528,0.015178738,0.0028059792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023192342,0.00005265217,0.0007571991,0.000029745497,0.000010681462,0.00032535728,0.021537412,0.000099930934,0.0004278269,0.9442595,0.024728958,0.007747616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092403934,0.00008096222,0.009062886,0.00077216205,0.000057758873,0.0006275885,0.018236909,0.0008253808,0.0007708844,0.29964784,0.66969156,0.00013373056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11272802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1346316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.887272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011658224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02907034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22414374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136102735","doi":"","title":"The Constitutionalisation of English Judicial Review in Ireland: Continuity and Change","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Irish; Public law; Prerogative; Jurisdiction; Constitutionalism; Legislature; Common law; Judicial independence; Constitutional law; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.015733107153439542,"score_gpt":0.28128752782279814,"score_spread":0.2655544206693586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136102735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11944729,0.02091809,0.009741072,0.09837407,0.002498849,0.00036878363,0.00039923802,0.00032803896,0.7479246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8638271,0.0051554884,0.0053642807,0.026870511,0.0016037136,0.00035358788,0.00019758813,0.00022479464,0.096402906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9526433,0.013348084,0.004325381,0.007822241,0.011369515,0.010491439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9555512,0.019609055,0.0037260153,0.004349227,0.013376602,0.0033879247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037854698,0.00029065204,0.0007547368,0.003853419,0.0069289,0.023993526,0.003734157,0.0045199874,0.0030994564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053461596,0.0012588347,0.00061679457,0.0031224862,0.028280225,0.0063335835,0.0052760034,0.009567738,0.0006590874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008119412,0.00006412341,0.0024650441,0.00027925218,0.000027639193,0.0003901712,0.014093945,0.0012091488,0.00078233855,0.906289,0.022998838,0.051319312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013955394,0.00017265412,0.020406626,0.0007345604,0.000049703813,0.00031558448,0.007195103,0.0012102921,0.0018797016,0.06584768,0.9016488,0.00039959262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24634248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27448767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24634248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0736797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05004988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53458613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136743244","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review in Administrative Law: A Comparative Study of Rights Consciousness with Special Reference to Sri Lanka","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UCL Discovery (University College London)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Political science; Human rights; Judicial review; Law; Jurisprudence; Fundamental rights; Administrative law; Rule of law; Legitimacy; Politics","score_opus":0.037251507118399904,"score_gpt":0.31182237833005505,"score_spread":0.27457087121165513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136743244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85601205,0.013062635,0.0005683416,0.0075085047,0.00009348612,0.0001310887,0.000033999764,0.000015485739,0.12257439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99220794,0.004887569,0.00016773994,0.00063197466,0.00004459722,0.00004897154,0.000014343158,0.000007757991,0.001989158],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98688394,0.007736022,0.00067027914,0.0005350316,0.0022306095,0.0019442125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740778,0.018612754,0.0031526138,0.00063582684,0.0025824746,0.0009384437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008443763,0.00020552086,0.0006844798,0.0049570375,0.01130072,0.013638926,0.0015749952,0.0018798099,0.003333523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024920443,0.0005101531,0.00038126958,0.007905294,0.015823543,0.005355066,0.0060145073,0.0035257447,0.0002770482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043522396,0.00010675436,0.010023965,0.00048657664,0.000028409315,0.0017047576,0.83990175,0.000111271416,0.0007670161,0.12048316,0.0019859134,0.024356911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001651279,0.0001705316,0.06418472,0.00079870207,0.000049933355,0.0007862901,0.8529522,0.00015727915,0.00043547354,0.003278437,0.07708611,0.00008394375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038455054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067906454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038455054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014428027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014020855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10468316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166515364","doi":"10.26180/14585700.v1","title":"Human rights and institutional dialogue : lessons for Australia from Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; Human rights; Political science; Public administration; Media studies; Genealogy; Law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.12521639897878478,"score_gpt":0.35598680525582893,"score_spread":0.23077040627704415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166515364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32126904,0.04739156,0.0015612053,0.27960977,0.0017064222,0.0001953895,0.0002844746,0.00006578532,0.3479163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9346093,0.013688116,0.00086522865,0.009178986,0.00008447275,0.00006508533,0.000085240565,0.00006880336,0.041354783],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99038893,0.0036242066,0.00021293577,0.00039913887,0.0015819946,0.0037927174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98618746,0.0047162087,0.00042727307,0.00037391682,0.003602055,0.004693192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009216983,0.00046821605,0.0010388008,0.0022959197,0.036623146,0.016507735,0.0021703225,0.004382164,0.010774525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020195337,0.00043334367,0.00038367233,0.004518812,0.019479536,0.00919504,0.009252334,0.0077127363,0.00063430134],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010111611,0.00008311106,0.00560221,0.00030019804,0.000020587739,0.0011214024,0.7242533,0.00024655918,0.00009260971,0.14975052,0.047493972,0.07093446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001968786,0.000024481453,0.01198816,0.0014242267,0.000019714766,0.00015330603,0.75094014,0.00018615674,0.00011186605,0.013105503,0.22196768,0.00005907629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9813089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99157715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8675535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13244656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20099711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96097153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167819846","doi":"","title":"Canada and the United Nations Human Rights Council: Dissent and Division","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; General assembly; Fundamental rights; Law; Public administration; Politics; Linguistic rights; Right to property; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.027029424025363753,"score_gpt":0.27499275946811574,"score_spread":0.24796333544275198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167819846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004102188,0.06909956,0.00093854585,0.8093705,0.036039956,0.00014684092,0.0005020142,0.000068523135,0.07973192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04229608,0.026457677,0.0027743813,0.7966548,0.0054685255,0.00024244875,0.00041890386,0.00021946429,0.12546764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96652603,0.0036300484,0.0012953314,0.0028550432,0.019822307,0.0058712866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97846496,0.0062317196,0.0005989735,0.00056821946,0.010009388,0.0041267197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024804363,0.0010230893,0.0011450142,0.0046872185,0.025057431,0.020188084,0.006427296,0.028554771,0.0053724637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037268337,0.0007930324,0.0015817569,0.0076392237,0.019193273,0.008049288,0.006440232,0.021494381,0.001257909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037648897,0.000030044013,0.00050799217,0.00020627955,0.000021004365,0.00028882644,0.0052570775,0.00018315067,0.00016028646,0.190904,0.7708885,0.031515274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011720719,0.0000044897447,0.0007516707,0.00032477314,0.000013530949,0.000034569824,0.00332408,0.00005268595,0.00010164154,0.0037480718,0.99159205,0.000040785955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94810677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96457225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121138886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.121138886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3266296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87892824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173979244","doi":"10.17803/2311-5998.2021.80.4.164-176","title":"Institute for the defense of human rights (ombudsman) in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Commission; Political science; International human rights law; Law; Public administration; Institution; Autonomy; State (computer science); Fundamental rights; Variety (cybernetics); Consolidation (business); Business","score_opus":0.017290988635121397,"score_gpt":0.23896451373249405,"score_spread":0.22167352509737265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173979244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009721637,0.04233839,0.0030311283,0.09334654,0.005304939,0.00041346357,0.0034162512,0.00042730517,0.8420003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.090985134,0.01868344,0.006392736,0.011815633,0.00029180743,0.0001771266,0.0012142269,0.00016091748,0.870279],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957001,0.00031210505,0.00012456546,0.00040320196,0.0021193437,0.0013407249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558026,0.00049083255,0.00016706747,0.00016156008,0.0022521976,0.0013479469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021636423,0.0007471214,0.00056444685,0.0018385787,0.01282722,0.008020248,0.0017713938,0.003711087,0.029829811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053469827,0.0004825012,0.0004488257,0.0022152322,0.004496704,0.0016441521,0.0027525548,0.0041639083,0.003119771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056941644,0.000046540677,0.0041076196,0.00028036267,0.000015247932,0.0005758407,0.0016667319,0.00043666022,0.0004500803,0.41281393,0.49249014,0.087059945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075188063,0.000009294852,0.005636761,0.00024371612,0.000007308831,0.00006221054,0.0007359168,0.00023777751,0.0001622289,0.0037225196,0.9891495,0.000025176405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9894326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09972199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09972199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3043918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7235371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174334786","doi":"10.1177/03128962211022568","title":"Ethics in financial planning: Analysis of ombudsman decisions using codes of ethics and fiduciary duty standards","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Management","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Due diligence; Duty; Accounting; Business; Conflict of interest; Misconduct; Accounting management; Complaint; Finance; Public relations; Actuarial science; Law; Political science; Accounting information system","score_opus":0.18898214666448035,"score_gpt":0.45049666701883306,"score_spread":0.26151452035435274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174334786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9384152,0.00079197466,0.013648235,0.0043033073,0.00010651285,0.001059178,0.001521049,0.00004530925,0.040109295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97831637,0.00044609467,0.015302562,0.0003096639,0.000033899134,0.0011936019,0.00094596396,0.00004982717,0.0034019272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90354973,0.05597082,0.008864242,0.0029610628,0.024443494,0.004210713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6617853,0.24230872,0.05230475,0.007778098,0.032679737,0.0031433476],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050575636,0.00031413295,0.00056866586,0.012883083,0.0039734584,0.006459281,0.0011752544,0.0012419092,0.005287184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24955282,0.00037773064,0.00042496482,0.025666248,0.006319336,0.00498174,0.005642251,0.0019665183,0.0005747903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002941661,0.0002139367,0.42102465,0.0011151553,0.00006930772,0.0009909953,0.21482775,0.0026146153,0.00057901593,0.17357232,0.018581579,0.16611649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028918479,0.00017419977,0.48627102,0.0021635778,0.000032570868,0.0006648668,0.33340335,0.014034063,0.0012721977,0.074783,0.08698808,0.00018424095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024374051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022651576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016214978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01535218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26747268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185224195","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3727613","title":"The Constitutional Status of the Administrative State","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Administrative law; Political science; Constitutional law; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Computer science; Economics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.015165258259826037,"score_gpt":0.2986405043234348,"score_spread":0.28347524606360874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185224195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11529375,0.002417039,0.011035758,0.0443051,0.0005641754,0.00005337177,0.00029091781,0.000050824307,0.825989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986813,0.00030658895,0.0009809855,0.0012139146,0.00039097675,0.00007048479,0.00004388479,0.000019379824,0.010160857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886127,0.0052452167,0.0004946071,0.0019396497,0.0015854393,0.0021223638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888109,0.0067022797,0.00092539017,0.0015623533,0.0012447427,0.0007542218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0134141315,0.00028426386,0.0007438439,0.0019123007,0.010082122,0.01560084,0.0016692239,0.005595406,0.007530127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020779341,0.00055396085,0.0005556303,0.0021754412,0.031414334,0.0090114055,0.0036203351,0.0074110627,0.00078516523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004967586,0.0000036898437,0.00007450538,0.0000023747612,0.0000013358479,0.000004199799,0.00022686251,0.000027742002,0.000022698488,0.9987833,0.0003395064,0.00050886517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027004797,0.000014126088,0.00083451025,0.000042608386,0.000016861917,0.000016906779,0.00060965866,0.00030678418,0.00018793177,0.9792069,0.01872288,0.000013716619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078109796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008597983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01560084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005827052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007933688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07094157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192797517","doi":"","title":"Ethics in financial planning: Analysis of ombudsman decisions using codes of ethics and fiduciary duty standards","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Due diligence; Duty; Accounting; Business; Misconduct; Complaint; Accounting management; Conflict of interest; Ethical code; Public relations; Finance; Actuarial science; Political science; Law; Accounting information system","score_opus":0.2701194800982885,"score_gpt":0.4584642894339271,"score_spread":0.18834480933563857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192797517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8701945,0.0014275678,0.019193534,0.008040456,0.00021206803,0.0013999174,0.0042339372,0.00008099825,0.09521706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746295,0.0006148502,0.014823678,0.00046370892,0.00005148205,0.0013615496,0.0017778695,0.00007241131,0.006204928],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91231847,0.049788535,0.0073448964,0.0030065733,0.023321528,0.0042200116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6584355,0.25112465,0.04774696,0.008432946,0.03133291,0.0029270188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05126627,0.00031569746,0.000526579,0.013376818,0.003896081,0.006982782,0.0012479513,0.0013115047,0.0100569725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2568201,0.00037202664,0.00040270688,0.028812874,0.005858911,0.005178912,0.0054119206,0.0020450652,0.0009936568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002730598,0.00017330669,0.37113813,0.0010976263,0.000068260524,0.0008592351,0.12571059,0.0024027773,0.00039952731,0.28069562,0.03898276,0.1781991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003421869,0.0001630505,0.48945677,0.0027627524,0.000038401187,0.000672601,0.23554842,0.013110238,0.0010896215,0.112530656,0.1443999,0.00019337056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02312342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022168081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05126627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015178152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012654399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2711252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196990703","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-32103-5_7","title":"The Role and Purpose of Ombudsmen in a Global Media World","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CBC (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Journalism; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Accountability; Political science; Function (biology); Variety (cybernetics); Position (finance); Social media; Dual function; News media; Business; Engineering; Law; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.016092312263875603,"score_gpt":0.26400516863909895,"score_spread":0.24791285637522334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196990703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070920535,0.007848627,0.0012598821,0.022495942,0.00071220146,0.000017742177,0.000013611652,0.000015231523,0.9605447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5705103,0.009320339,0.0018158751,0.010633825,0.0010782579,0.00018256831,0.000028812025,0.00014101881,0.40628895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955189,0.002850652,0.00006776189,0.0002911779,0.00053782086,0.00073364814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975715,0.0016535788,0.00013258064,0.00016281215,0.00018593627,0.00029350832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049440973,0.00055579905,0.0004079076,0.0015520459,0.010715532,0.01695099,0.00086276233,0.005780718,0.009667979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005057524,0.0003219739,0.00022040137,0.0020550399,0.03198562,0.015845452,0.0058104075,0.005457895,0.001370642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002738768,0.000004186913,0.00006287679,0.000009077303,4.8636787e-7,0.000024038298,0.0062784813,0.000007821662,0.000020148385,0.98445153,0.0049430467,0.0041954494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000493697,0.000016496651,0.0005777834,0.00044015094,0.0000051260968,0.00016056282,0.023975909,0.00011177846,0.00020059907,0.41496813,0.55952626,0.000012291181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057704146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011812431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01695099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044636647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054269535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032386243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199428718","doi":"10.31178/aubd.2020.01","title":"Evoluția ideologiei în dreptul persoanelor din Quebec","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analele Universitării din București Drept","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Ideology; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Human rights; Root (linguistics); Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03925576624538638,"score_gpt":0.25488929468088156,"score_spread":0.2156335284354952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199428718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32087633,0.023885975,0.0012454112,0.02527952,0.00038914816,0.00007861463,0.00070098595,0.000086252636,0.62745774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8799687,0.0034252305,0.000532063,0.0011723585,0.000028671839,0.00003486826,0.00009813136,0.000035237917,0.114704765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984523,0.0003504818,0.000022640106,0.00017293265,0.0002801291,0.0007214724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993932,0.00014776552,0.000051003954,0.000024215267,0.00022766228,0.00015608012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009968645,0.00034358894,0.0002616292,0.0016763549,0.01216661,0.0058140447,0.0007387249,0.0011511501,0.010671182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012891828,0.0001846185,0.00020666176,0.0023341042,0.007253387,0.0011876023,0.001546145,0.0023180863,0.00038493573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008089926,0.00005546451,0.0073801028,0.00011744379,0.00002213184,0.001318574,0.07964069,0.0005312696,0.0010008479,0.8220987,0.027690427,0.060063384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020356701,0.00003099808,0.042838305,0.0003392991,0.000018284805,0.0002388449,0.04856082,0.0007200455,0.00046915174,0.009529678,0.8971698,0.00006440954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9873745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13161641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13161641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05013215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95494837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199800736","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192896919.003.0007","title":"Scope of Judicial Review of Administrative Action","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Scope (computer science); Administrative law; Statutory law; Political science; Legitimacy; Jurisprudence; Law; Autonomy; Action (physics); Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.208192619605145,"score_gpt":0.42057387411500746,"score_spread":0.21238125450986245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199800736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017593492,0.014220521,0.061879676,0.013825055,0.000901582,0.0003870365,0.0001321504,0.00020457005,0.89085585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8338723,0.007270063,0.031351212,0.0083411,0.0023204207,0.0008304208,0.00017059468,0.00023049739,0.11561338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93687373,0.03073089,0.0041362685,0.0045783757,0.020968655,0.0027121555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8963387,0.07013339,0.004886793,0.008592016,0.017950011,0.0020990602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034165516,0.00032249183,0.00093656336,0.0050440766,0.0032556308,0.014819886,0.00253781,0.0045592007,0.0054010716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060398225,0.00068068603,0.00060380343,0.0022451067,0.01185769,0.005556263,0.004228083,0.0052051074,0.0016428063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017683475,0.000028126637,0.00079290505,0.0001253692,0.00001348661,0.00014874493,0.0025932598,0.00085884955,0.00085818063,0.93987256,0.010762411,0.043928415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029372948,0.00009826474,0.0039498173,0.0020434721,0.000038756396,0.00052241416,0.0022398783,0.0034912026,0.0025913096,0.600791,0.3841067,0.00009788547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003349478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057612597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034165516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006125036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010844049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18068665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200251861","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192896919.003.0001","title":"A Values-based Approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realisation; Legitimacy; Autonomy; Subject (documents); Value (mathematics); Political science; Administrative law; Judicial review; Comparative law; Law and economics; Action (physics); Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.057952509891348966,"score_gpt":0.289821604916783,"score_spread":0.231869095025434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200251861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025932952,0.0043928865,0.022757001,0.01719227,0.00050253863,0.000050848877,0.00006883049,0.000034350243,0.952408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6666447,0.012189894,0.03298361,0.0075287498,0.0011221382,0.00052363396,0.00028316522,0.00021235905,0.2785118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995773,0.0025911736,0.00008678454,0.0003603837,0.0008694596,0.0003190998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810565,0.0010042386,0.00011411665,0.00020117032,0.00038384675,0.00019102234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033207657,0.0006503196,0.00041951134,0.0022383162,0.004647763,0.010850541,0.0015769198,0.0024592574,0.010588188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003731224,0.00027815875,0.00039241902,0.0020621251,0.025059287,0.008256064,0.0038909046,0.0051687215,0.0017168811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.7427543e-7,0.000003845055,0.000026272926,0.000010078393,7.4264204e-7,0.000009474376,0.0009363127,0.000060885264,0.0000107002115,0.99369216,0.0026827687,0.0025659543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002037695,0.0000052996425,0.00008846631,0.000157437,0.0000016154274,0.000043914573,0.0024157465,0.00025490945,0.00006723779,0.79229873,0.20466064,0.0000039482693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039426642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005048788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010850541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010593879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005831833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0768643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201932254","doi":"","title":"The Standard of Review and The Duty to Consult and Accommodate Indigenous Peoples: What is the Impact of Vavilov?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Standard of review; Duty; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Scope (computer science); Indigenous; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Judicial review; Constitution; Correctness; Treaty; Administrative law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.018010284166518366,"score_gpt":0.3365829973017675,"score_spread":0.31857271313524915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201932254","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02106917,0.16548176,0.0075834407,0.56710076,0.0035659885,0.00018946834,0.0001976632,0.00010504969,0.23470674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70058435,0.055195376,0.010752218,0.1935753,0.0032020193,0.00020430797,0.00016500393,0.00013633724,0.03618506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8938332,0.03280767,0.004801221,0.0058793235,0.05462594,0.008052645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8558672,0.09247,0.008383339,0.0044535813,0.03527949,0.0035463255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.074452996,0.0003009421,0.0010087731,0.006688351,0.006707544,0.019075317,0.0038744854,0.012737816,0.002214485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12800524,0.00082198915,0.0012797407,0.0043611997,0.026984688,0.010728592,0.0038737403,0.009656344,0.00043591013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015375703,0.000017580081,0.0017291573,0.00048726186,0.000041054227,0.00017129828,0.0028723255,0.0003276803,0.00030655894,0.9474293,0.021457361,0.025144946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060406677,0.00015397386,0.021838067,0.0047530187,0.00022720493,0.00045767584,0.006558231,0.00092157023,0.001325475,0.20161982,0.76176316,0.0003214396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5345355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60569733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46546447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05047983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11105248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9364114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208620871","doi":"10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-2-228-242","title":"Nullity of Administrative Acts: Grounds, Legal Regime, Discretion","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Siberian Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Discretion; Doctrine; Administrative discretion; Political science; Law; Legal doctrine; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07261212426322339,"score_gpt":0.3809842967830292,"score_spread":0.3083721725198058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208620871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28374,0.019075302,0.12968045,0.013933804,0.0008269979,0.00024100911,0.00018964855,0.00021019504,0.55210257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98064137,0.0011421004,0.012512342,0.0002950866,0.00025204374,0.00013918249,0.000057271413,0.000058654958,0.0049019884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745101,0.014506778,0.002247008,0.0018946948,0.005464561,0.0013768865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9282262,0.05177049,0.009361023,0.0046722833,0.004238303,0.0017316714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015297553,0.00053858873,0.0009932341,0.007175849,0.0035728253,0.011529872,0.0013592319,0.0021310619,0.0042719506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050588623,0.00047756833,0.0010018011,0.004202196,0.036945526,0.011560961,0.0055643073,0.004268206,0.0006810387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013241059,0.000011554643,0.0015655446,0.000028606853,0.000006587487,0.000047452166,0.0009291804,0.0001785056,0.00006634536,0.9910711,0.00031355728,0.0057683312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019359148,0.00009093935,0.0074419966,0.00044956928,0.00003458251,0.0004887874,0.0031454752,0.0027749431,0.000383281,0.962321,0.022795046,0.000054871296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024189695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015017277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015297553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046135294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032784783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0809021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W411693019","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2759","title":"An Evaluation Model for Non-Governmental Organizations Engaged in Advocacy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Legitimacy; Civil liberties; Human rights; Compliance (psychology); Political science; Independence (probability theory); Civil society; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.03610327948513119,"score_gpt":0.3281239897375741,"score_spread":0.2920207102524429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W411693019","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014371128,0.0007724581,0.7098562,0.019068535,0.00026663774,0.0029550004,0.00025529155,0.00025253688,0.25220218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6138615,0.00058426685,0.3557421,0.0016264413,0.0001767807,0.0076247766,0.00018294524,0.00008915954,0.020112116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9420607,0.04267115,0.0016000487,0.002959526,0.008862619,0.0018459106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9382219,0.044078387,0.0033623532,0.0037022408,0.008577636,0.0020574646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052502554,0.0019779745,0.0012719284,0.00523001,0.0032126142,0.011248438,0.004154533,0.0063383062,0.013446373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06307784,0.00058742124,0.0016071827,0.0029943034,0.01224432,0.016343309,0.004044774,0.0040956773,0.0019378203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042047377,0.00012297218,0.0009393741,0.00008294324,0.000023099949,0.00009021685,0.0009056753,0.0056459922,0.00012124581,0.9800469,0.0010966545,0.010882718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013153456,0.00038167994,0.0009902847,0.00034917248,0.00004658666,0.0001688383,0.0017338387,0.062046062,0.00041602066,0.91090316,0.022773216,0.000059661954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041948096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025666566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052502554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014508345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012427624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2776634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205466114","doi":"10.1007/s40803-021-00165-3","title":"The Bidirectional Relationship Between Academic Freedom and Rule of Law: Hungary, Poland and Russia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hague Journal on the Rule of Law","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Rule of law; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Academic freedom; International law; Power (physics); Public international law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Higher education; Mathematics","score_opus":0.058189950998683154,"score_gpt":0.31219585378110115,"score_spread":0.25400590278241797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205466114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883923,0.0006218439,0.00012299916,0.0009477422,0.000012998495,0.0000051598286,0.00007975714,0.0000032861676,0.009813919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995721,0.00013472715,0.000014111482,0.000019501353,0.000005970865,0.0000016314629,0.000020179808,0.0000011961665,0.00023056407],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986014,0.00033595355,0.00009902461,0.00015483286,0.0002521203,0.0005566872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949905,0.0026994215,0.0012035797,0.00012892892,0.0002883043,0.0006892212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001223482,0.000116515555,0.00068963127,0.0029406492,0.0021294288,0.0060432525,0.00062906276,0.0006911369,0.005402955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005165273,0.00020032839,0.0002899327,0.0046098195,0.0052839774,0.0023601972,0.00400632,0.0013477202,0.00028459716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009575747,0.0005906295,0.66912967,0.0002737339,0.0003665627,0.0018111758,0.04257548,0.0013475493,0.00070926454,0.2277341,0.0030483813,0.051455814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000707967,0.000098670724,0.94102824,0.00010152471,0.00014296376,0.00019322126,0.034021206,0.0005777093,0.00024353906,0.016765835,0.006726584,0.000029691297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028559783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031192621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028559783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022759691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035047154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056787074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229971886","doi":"10.1163/9789047415404_009","title":"A First Nations Ombudsman: Some Considerations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0444094956900903,"score_gpt":0.2860372515891291,"score_spread":0.24162775589903884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229971886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023141075,0.035866953,0.0035076397,0.21483642,0.008884376,0.00005783401,0.00010236938,0.00006809977,0.73436224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10373623,0.026074518,0.008998971,0.1414533,0.0064976495,0.00052822597,0.00012330337,0.000362543,0.7122254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997003,0.0016180037,0.00009377441,0.00029438103,0.00054162956,0.0004492012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981489,0.001116161,0.00006161556,0.00009049674,0.0003715178,0.00021132138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005315958,0.0011169944,0.0010404389,0.0020503805,0.009613864,0.0099078445,0.002314634,0.015765157,0.024295148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007844094,0.00063834584,0.000570646,0.0021232844,0.008253741,0.015466449,0.0030256435,0.01425638,0.002902549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032121825,0.0000070108013,0.00002298179,0.000023352963,8.3287364e-7,0.00004456364,0.00046436288,0.00002924579,0.000014387822,0.92812747,0.06606166,0.005201002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006435431,0.00001175824,0.00015243869,0.00056785496,0.0000043013115,0.00016112256,0.001507624,0.00015006361,0.00006931136,0.24236475,0.7549849,0.000019430743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031734623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08186364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96826535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009192647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007406936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0812754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235109339","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198841159.003.0015","title":"Implementation of the Principles of Good Governance on the National Level outside the EU","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Good governance; Principle of legality; Political science; Accountability; Rule of law; Corporate governance; Charter; Transparency (behavior); Public administration; Legislation; Law; Human rights; Constitution; Soft law; Ultra vires; International law; Politics; Doctrine; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.1446818144970595,"score_gpt":0.3395601030143803,"score_spread":0.19487828851732078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235109339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07022302,0.0038651414,0.04449722,0.059011254,0.00083358755,0.0003333112,0.00016856147,0.0001662252,0.82090175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89957666,0.0021819596,0.03127675,0.009086254,0.00013115324,0.00025064466,0.00015181693,0.00010782704,0.057236947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98337054,0.006890747,0.0009529757,0.0014978508,0.0044914423,0.002796502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900725,0.002229653,0.0007781122,0.0020116267,0.003864515,0.0010435354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015724905,0.00023851512,0.0004734107,0.0007638696,0.003405047,0.01017675,0.0009770069,0.0027175043,0.0028798676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017794652,0.00029029808,0.00043143323,0.0009953228,0.009496332,0.0040911287,0.0038174195,0.004488504,0.0005392912],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058454884,0.000026444284,0.0013625146,0.0000663352,0.000011721126,0.00012243535,0.0036277247,0.0010779677,0.0002928259,0.9647888,0.0055228537,0.023094418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018943661,0.00006573033,0.012747344,0.0018182204,0.000024655716,0.00026332255,0.008784914,0.0013744294,0.0016605171,0.31188822,0.6612796,0.00007416623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05139383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051757675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05139383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0089859255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033052556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10218936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242155877","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198841159.001.0001","title":"Good Governance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Good governance; Cornerstone; Corporate governance; Rule of law; Accountability; Multi-level governance; Political science; Project governance; Democracy; Public administration; Transparency (behavior); Context (archaeology); Principal (computer security); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Management; Geography","score_opus":0.0173596176300947,"score_gpt":0.2680484014684234,"score_spread":0.2506887838383287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242155877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008438814,0.0026788334,0.005934682,0.009032527,0.00057406345,0.000043819946,0.00006222365,0.000048281163,0.9807817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15374604,0.0071153804,0.006780659,0.008817932,0.0011440072,0.00024981098,0.0003495544,0.00016958083,0.821627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747664,0.0009292171,0.00009868036,0.00046044702,0.000733225,0.00030180239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890876,0.00033684674,0.00008445284,0.00027363555,0.00029657542,0.00009969965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018685643,0.0004415605,0.0004238676,0.0007396685,0.002694291,0.006898426,0.0006684191,0.0023789972,0.026325356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032130447,0.000213288,0.00033995404,0.0008834961,0.008149825,0.004856652,0.0027782882,0.002893732,0.0073923627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010292647,0.0000027128788,0.000026252044,0.000015055941,8.770615e-7,0.0000094337165,0.00028514006,0.00010383251,0.000017073884,0.9741363,0.019725384,0.0056769457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002661354,0.000006891042,0.00011444857,0.00016133956,0.0000017509118,0.000039898026,0.00028198803,0.00013008037,0.000071592636,0.31092283,0.6882621,0.0000044337776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032930418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032290507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026325356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036945164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037683018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088067055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254250651","doi":"10.7202/1078558ar","title":"La Cour européenne des droits de l’homme et le Tribunal des droits de la personne : la réception de la jurisprudence de la Cour par le Tribunal","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015156474435626658,"score_gpt":0.29776717445194545,"score_spread":0.28261070001631877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254250651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12362379,0.01668784,0.004512183,0.08275416,0.0018075283,0.000063085936,0.00012253928,0.000046132824,0.7703827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8112409,0.0026587513,0.0005820304,0.0064175534,0.00026193366,0.000037604284,0.000029537709,0.0000431081,0.17872848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705577,0.001127964,0.0000485618,0.00028204214,0.0006957992,0.00078982324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983353,0.0005738768,0.00008486103,0.000080811405,0.00058496895,0.0003402466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026401856,0.00045593723,0.00044259802,0.00088073587,0.017709412,0.011665566,0.0014158855,0.0039127693,0.008529507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036399155,0.00023084499,0.0003095994,0.0011035716,0.025110101,0.0022534933,0.0031723194,0.0062614614,0.0005836992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002956457,0.000013145247,0.0007897604,0.00005423747,0.000007992903,0.00048782965,0.08914838,0.00019838901,0.00030324887,0.8746297,0.02558762,0.008750158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022734203,0.000032287884,0.00789016,0.0006618183,0.000015990736,0.0002119462,0.117943555,0.0005640532,0.000470882,0.04797159,0.82414484,0.00007012485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8049814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88164175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19501859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044574168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030865533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39233416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256734129","doi":"10.22145/flr.37.3.1","title":"A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia: The UK or Canada as a Model?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Project commissioning; Political science; Publishing; Law","score_opus":0.0750247104430044,"score_gpt":0.36557921807687466,"score_spread":0.29055450763387025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256734129","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010836656,0.012935608,0.0039720954,0.6009753,0.0035084304,0.00016043989,0.00050056435,0.000100138415,0.36701074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4713397,0.0139967585,0.0121832425,0.27726394,0.0011341891,0.00058227405,0.00034288774,0.00019255953,0.22296448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932053,0.0014356987,0.00022092999,0.0007227881,0.0024526997,0.0019626315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941168,0.0013033916,0.00021163633,0.00038398738,0.003105495,0.0008787208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048302696,0.0005220113,0.0007513715,0.0017736617,0.009055332,0.010296369,0.0035658996,0.010558511,0.009075448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015213819,0.0004090924,0.000821598,0.002239666,0.0101978285,0.009039204,0.002857573,0.011325515,0.0008384379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019701138,0.000013138841,0.00017960182,0.00007523349,0.000004979765,0.00007703949,0.0011773655,0.0002968847,0.00006079732,0.91635823,0.07338595,0.008351126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008040356,0.000037705024,0.002773886,0.0006919339,0.000028725699,0.00007904914,0.003219076,0.0020047154,0.00016967351,0.18048252,0.8103048,0.00012751785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95737314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9580024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06327785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06327785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10819935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4591151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293703967","doi":"10.12818/p.0304-2340.2021v79p287","title":"DA EXPANSÃO AO BACKLASH? A CORTE EUROPEIA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS E A TRANSFORMAÇÃO DA EUROPA - DOI: 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2021v79p287","year":2021,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFMG","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health","funders":"Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Humanities; European union; Political science; Philosophy; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.06717760405087064,"score_gpt":0.33362352154969394,"score_spread":0.2664459174988233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293703967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08768686,0.036477882,0.009402997,0.22154503,0.0019717715,0.000052123123,0.0002152119,0.00017120285,0.6424769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8878837,0.012280085,0.004730193,0.012474556,0.0006074623,0.000051922867,0.00007073095,0.0001286765,0.0817727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967068,0.001458493,0.00011767123,0.0005676781,0.0005967814,0.0005526715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776447,0.00089971686,0.0002892368,0.00043835488,0.00034493586,0.0002632085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049185506,0.00029057998,0.0003866004,0.0011577554,0.003478715,0.012344021,0.0007457738,0.0033238856,0.020337813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055833715,0.0002186357,0.00037349394,0.0017103057,0.014702488,0.011578896,0.006796588,0.003041043,0.0019388378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003496789,0.00002767206,0.0019448628,0.00012176275,0.000009834442,0.00022801667,0.011320217,0.000099013094,0.00059142796,0.9204909,0.010903337,0.054228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016779706,0.00007485789,0.0072137415,0.0009417824,0.00001833286,0.0004981466,0.023474555,0.00024027684,0.0007843705,0.26508462,0.7016159,0.000036575737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0092742415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010669304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020337813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031023663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005205551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068036795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300089644","doi":"10.1080/02697459.2022.2126164","title":"Human rights and the city: A case of Ontario, Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Practice and Research","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Virtue; Face (sociological concept); Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Rights of Nature; Law; Environmental ethics; Public administration; Right to property; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.11299406335429767,"score_gpt":0.434670105453925,"score_spread":0.3216760420996273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300089644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7045525,0.0033588184,0.00090548344,0.045666534,0.00016969618,0.00024901226,0.0006118423,0.0000270517,0.24445917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96871924,0.0017106084,0.00036019215,0.0029698617,0.000027117312,0.00004889507,0.00009052026,0.000011544448,0.026061958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965391,0.00048220207,0.00006443116,0.00017598958,0.00066620845,0.0020721469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739397,0.0005856354,0.00024050224,0.00011628066,0.000761982,0.0009014922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012990185,0.0003392245,0.00037020518,0.0011813674,0.038337845,0.005076936,0.0017742781,0.0035968837,0.004834904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034162856,0.0003692093,0.0004638764,0.0046739895,0.010888196,0.001349372,0.003686478,0.003261981,0.00023236847],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023886641,0.00020124631,0.11181207,0.00049469614,0.00011343329,0.03522635,0.32350922,0.0037767782,0.0015089244,0.4113379,0.07569011,0.036090393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009326357,0.00007105207,0.100082375,0.0006056602,0.00016898653,0.0021507728,0.48668197,0.0023759063,0.00051063177,0.015050043,0.39201638,0.00019297044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99794227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17989507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17989507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18785623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9512055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309495784","doi":"10.32920/21596715","title":"Equity in education: signed language and the courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Equity (law); Political science; Sign language; Special education; Right to education; Linguistics; Law; Sociology; Pedagogy; Human rights","score_opus":0.03551462326332959,"score_gpt":0.3943018442702429,"score_spread":0.3587872210069133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309495784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07035215,0.008086678,0.011777077,0.16208912,0.000651964,0.000052557243,0.00007315663,0.000032813943,0.74688447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95714146,0.0015605439,0.0009898229,0.013573972,0.00036182624,0.000042438587,0.000023134251,0.000022461889,0.026284313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880824,0.0053513367,0.0002675185,0.0008180135,0.0032275845,0.00225307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897714,0.0068602716,0.000698891,0.00048398762,0.0013109968,0.0008744039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008770022,0.00024752322,0.00038089248,0.0013346386,0.008114655,0.0152342,0.0011716858,0.0074895076,0.009420733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028911002,0.00023987136,0.00030515104,0.0014074034,0.033005513,0.010914484,0.00716991,0.007314738,0.00047848377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002171577,0.0000046493706,0.00025442726,0.0000061407177,7.1179136e-7,0.000042616048,0.0008846159,0.00003638187,0.000012489035,0.99340856,0.001762468,0.0035848035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016090822,0.000019557436,0.0017595023,0.0003286221,0.000008393856,0.000118793985,0.0061684377,0.00052777014,0.00025536757,0.90982693,0.080949016,0.000021615391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055546038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0544114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055546038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0126004955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01670703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11044544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309505006","doi":"10.32920/21596715.v1","title":"Equity in education: signed language and the courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Equity (law); Political science; Special education; Linguistics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03551462326332959,"score_gpt":0.3943018442702429,"score_spread":0.3587872210069133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309505006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07035215,0.008086678,0.011777077,0.16208912,0.000651964,0.000052557243,0.00007315663,0.000032813943,0.74688447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95714146,0.0015605439,0.0009898229,0.013573972,0.00036182624,0.000042438587,0.000023134251,0.000022461889,0.026284313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880824,0.0053513367,0.0002675185,0.0008180135,0.0032275845,0.00225307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897714,0.0068602716,0.000698891,0.00048398762,0.0013109968,0.0008744039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008770022,0.00024752322,0.00038089248,0.0013346386,0.008114655,0.0152342,0.0011716858,0.0074895076,0.009420733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028911002,0.00023987136,0.00030515104,0.0014074034,0.033005513,0.010914484,0.00716991,0.007314738,0.00047848377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002171577,0.0000046493706,0.00025442726,0.0000061407177,7.1179136e-7,0.000042616048,0.0008846159,0.00003638187,0.000012489035,0.99340856,0.001762468,0.0035848035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016090822,0.000019557436,0.0017595023,0.0003286221,0.000008393856,0.000118793985,0.0061684377,0.00052777014,0.00025536757,0.90982693,0.080949016,0.000021615391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055546038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0544114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055546038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0126004955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01670703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11044544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318486529","doi":"10.32920/21977006","title":"The Impact of Ombudsman Investigations on Public Administration: A Case Study and an Evaluation Guide","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Administration (probate law); Public administration; Service (business); Public service; Political science; Public relations; Business; Law; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.30364615167799286,"score_gpt":0.5011781117921159,"score_spread":0.19753196011412305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318486529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4506019,0.03704329,0.033231508,0.06196073,0.0019656222,0.10882523,0.0039950986,0.00072993775,0.3016467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6838517,0.036192954,0.08426728,0.013298355,0.00029954602,0.06759932,0.001529488,0.00028158,0.112679824],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.954586,0.032147843,0.0034976674,0.0008479294,0.006456852,0.002463706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9618149,0.023276946,0.0021518064,0.0013120209,0.00968366,0.0017607257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05245212,0.0011760198,0.000842377,0.0069343387,0.012236824,0.0075646085,0.0036094685,0.0040263254,0.009142827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04201492,0.0011172822,0.0011188063,0.008598926,0.005202039,0.006267309,0.0058910158,0.0026416203,0.0014452781],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055772025,0.0035651813,0.021912808,0.009785058,0.000077711615,0.011444834,0.30815968,0.0034329577,0.0032286379,0.083025806,0.15836623,0.39644346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025610658,0.0023569334,0.025421543,0.010015092,0.0001201794,0.0015206401,0.40632722,0.001416314,0.004270373,0.0060664173,0.5420053,0.00022391493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05826032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13345301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05826032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03565418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036481258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27739662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318486549","doi":"10.32920/21977006.v1","title":"The Impact of Ombudsman Investigations on Public Administration: A Case Study and an Evaluation Guide","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Administration (probate law); Public administration; Service (business); Political science; Public service; Public relations; Business; Law; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.30364615167799286,"score_gpt":0.5011781117921159,"score_spread":0.19753196011412305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318486549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4506019,0.03704329,0.033231508,0.06196073,0.0019656222,0.10882523,0.0039950986,0.00072993775,0.3016467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6838517,0.036192954,0.08426728,0.013298355,0.00029954602,0.06759932,0.001529488,0.00028158,0.112679824],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.954586,0.032147843,0.0034976674,0.0008479294,0.006456852,0.002463706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9618149,0.023276946,0.0021518064,0.0013120209,0.00968366,0.0017607257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05245212,0.0011760198,0.000842377,0.0069343387,0.012236824,0.0075646085,0.0036094685,0.0040263254,0.009142827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04201492,0.0011172822,0.0011188063,0.008598926,0.005202039,0.006267309,0.0058910158,0.0026416203,0.0014452781],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055772025,0.0035651813,0.021912808,0.009785058,0.000077711615,0.011444834,0.30815968,0.0034329577,0.0032286379,0.083025806,0.15836623,0.39644346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025610658,0.0023569334,0.025421543,0.010015092,0.0001201794,0.0015206401,0.40632722,0.001416314,0.004270373,0.0060664173,0.5420053,0.00022391493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05826032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13345301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05826032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03565418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036481258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27739662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321346788","doi":"10.1163/9789004480094_002","title":"Foreword","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Political science; Institution; Voting; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Library science; Law; Management; Computer science; Politics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05939167318402796,"score_gpt":0.27661487087973563,"score_spread":0.21722319769570766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321346788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022495398,0.0064103175,0.0009381937,0.019770982,0.02169468,0.000109859364,0.0010445217,0.00037016912,0.9494363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00090465887,0.0019634254,0.00027279503,0.003979194,0.002233175,0.00003773915,0.00042066732,0.00018118697,0.9900073],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948126,0.000049876515,0.0000224813,0.000070006034,0.0003221869,0.00005414334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868613,0.0002523601,0.000051655832,0.00008941463,0.0007629117,0.00015757693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047855673,0.0006872107,0.0005089675,0.0017952824,0.0024344362,0.004253874,0.0010985197,0.0025038694,0.3904914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026221715,0.0003247481,0.0003413899,0.00160378,0.00084918214,0.0038677373,0.0013764945,0.0037543736,0.32957864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025150887,0.0000066481502,0.000012128428,0.000029974954,2.7414404e-7,0.000012592761,0.00005734161,0.000011185802,0.00003422682,0.012451294,0.9701278,0.017254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.719026e-7,0.0000012722502,0.000025755968,0.000044088425,2.0113015e-7,0.000018165987,0.000031363565,0.0000041731632,0.000015113107,0.00095175253,0.9989066,0.0000010383922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008114655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013125855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3904914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022997863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023077421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377252107","doi":"10.1515/9780773553743-008","title":"What Happened to Incumbent Councillors in Greater Sudbury and London, Ontario, in 2014? The Role of the Ontario Ombudsman’s Reports on Alleged Secret Meetings","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0140318882635739,"score_gpt":0.20037041294779948,"score_spread":0.18633852468422557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377252107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17998931,0.017396916,0.0006825043,0.298485,0.004782569,0.00014878264,0.0023586145,0.00016758914,0.49598876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48473412,0.007417483,0.0002679296,0.016267005,0.0005887041,0.00007738454,0.0008069024,0.00015411284,0.48968634],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99175686,0.0009585128,0.00014604497,0.00041188166,0.0024193204,0.004307401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929021,0.0008835808,0.00086142856,0.00016261249,0.0014512222,0.0037389358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037867993,0.00034660418,0.00033178687,0.0010592812,0.021083502,0.0077551072,0.0022615693,0.003603841,0.019819433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008302671,0.0005836675,0.00041716284,0.0034263772,0.007901305,0.0033095179,0.004734486,0.0049768216,0.0021014472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014502418,0.00003596827,0.019425277,0.0003496048,0.000024548799,0.0018725572,0.23499198,0.00021002519,0.00059050386,0.05055811,0.6495156,0.04228069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016679209,0.000020306834,0.049877044,0.00024025036,0.000012494712,0.0001004113,0.13677219,0.00005862795,0.00018132819,0.00068596355,0.81198,0.00005465769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98135924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10941085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10941085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11632743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79383504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380270405","doi":"10.1515/9780773591837-014","title":"Overview of Canada’s Human Rights System","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028473966836083026,"score_gpt":0.23188434059144059,"score_spread":0.20341037375535756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380270405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024247703,0.053867664,0.0010978953,0.039233357,0.0009668111,0.00012201973,0.0016666902,0.0001858518,0.90043485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1398544,0.089419454,0.0066077653,0.029763674,0.00080577977,0.0003174352,0.0015312748,0.00029339106,0.73140675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611264,0.0003293665,0.000069495036,0.00022536544,0.0020999059,0.0011632537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812,0.00026955557,0.000042814198,0.00005939992,0.0011327402,0.00037542195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015890797,0.00092789804,0.00065132225,0.008251029,0.012999489,0.014633268,0.0021903317,0.0044994517,0.035462167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027589207,0.0007179077,0.0006098636,0.011502905,0.0062880693,0.0027892205,0.0019443054,0.0040198793,0.0026564684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009072178,0.000016953052,0.00029461508,0.00016404917,0.0000073951173,0.0001150838,0.0010142704,0.00058857753,0.000079855075,0.6511948,0.3126383,0.03387701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003999822,0.0000030399199,0.0010499643,0.00021462374,0.0000055877877,0.000035834913,0.0005020061,0.00013607647,0.000032391967,0.01477492,0.9832192,0.000022417325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99337053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19306925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19306925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32130533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9359253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382449412","doi":"10.1515/9780228013099-015","title":"Closing the Accountability Gap? Early Lessons from the Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Closing (real estate); Accountability; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.05803046590614616,"score_gpt":0.2828663370079621,"score_spread":0.22483587110181594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382449412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044704266,0.0629578,0.0019350136,0.36476,0.005332815,0.00005036239,0.0001690555,0.00008560211,0.5602388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31704083,0.06802214,0.004972876,0.08056034,0.001631261,0.00012225004,0.00019488935,0.00034652115,0.5271089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99178326,0.0013938627,0.00012476742,0.0004965711,0.0037259248,0.0024756254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937802,0.0019151546,0.00012952932,0.00018282054,0.0026844218,0.0013078473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008026556,0.00085375557,0.0006629087,0.0020670935,0.025086295,0.014532335,0.0020960732,0.007480167,0.010641576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010513346,0.00048423064,0.00042171177,0.0039639324,0.022525238,0.007163128,0.003919514,0.011784205,0.0014029646],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012948034,0.000014206943,0.0001637618,0.000069533075,0.0000030800356,0.00012729855,0.01072197,0.000102323655,0.00006347654,0.6804464,0.27847353,0.029801456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006659542,0.000005126419,0.00059644657,0.00032403905,0.0000058845853,0.00004601342,0.0059483135,0.00011878957,0.000084442494,0.04867113,0.9441613,0.000031824577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9844039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1559691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1559691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25592008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9789562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385722488","doi":"10.59962/9780774824798","title":"Unjust by Design","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.02381004698990676,"score_gpt":0.19806947037105027,"score_spread":0.1742594233811435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385722488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00061011704,0.0036718366,0.017486675,0.014983071,0.0012946848,0.00010265186,0.00017541634,0.00031622857,0.9613592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.088666305,0.005424957,0.020767119,0.0181273,0.000994704,0.00052019843,0.0004595895,0.000736836,0.86430293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99398744,0.0017403883,0.00022395597,0.0009266239,0.0023968918,0.00072475354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996671,0.0007783343,0.00015873455,0.00090955466,0.0012887581,0.00019359977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004370467,0.001130508,0.00065525534,0.0011138889,0.006421884,0.01205316,0.001563793,0.0033810523,0.026591117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007894718,0.0005253211,0.00052170345,0.0010747762,0.019503891,0.0062407088,0.0032711972,0.004814475,0.008844257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039189704,0.000003913069,0.00004422393,0.000044477703,0.000002430848,0.000013525741,0.0006193944,0.00009321625,0.000049796992,0.9316783,0.05568079,0.011765958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004414214,0.000005158318,0.00007278617,0.00009621721,0.000004318873,0.000036842783,0.00025055194,0.00013187328,0.000086203734,0.13184798,0.8674574,0.000006272128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06761502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10768379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06761502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017652532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019300124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13444293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385867045","doi":"10.59962/9780774855877-003","title":"An Overview of Public Administration of Human Rights Enforcement in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Enforcement; Human rights; Political science; Public administration; Law enforcement; Criminology; Business; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06157597071860375,"score_gpt":0.2492481010245249,"score_spread":0.18767213030592117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385867045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005046495,0.23110984,0.0015458768,0.042616792,0.0013838701,0.00020459892,0.0008730428,0.00018528748,0.71703416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15340059,0.35584658,0.005479222,0.015793009,0.00074223144,0.00024109415,0.0008028123,0.00021217804,0.4674823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995568,0.00037242737,0.000107992746,0.00022882482,0.0019430263,0.0017797407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997747,0.00038276662,0.00007222861,0.000051259976,0.0012877978,0.00045897556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00159048,0.0011460372,0.000968488,0.010188365,0.016679166,0.0153175695,0.0021698847,0.004727557,0.021376234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003172915,0.0010364333,0.00073040696,0.021941407,0.0062573478,0.0035736437,0.0020260767,0.004376897,0.0019117857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025271556,0.00008627048,0.0014837636,0.00065746676,0.000021373979,0.00032199698,0.0038429638,0.0019838104,0.00016121397,0.50623757,0.35206634,0.1331119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081374465,0.000009647399,0.004543039,0.0007223925,0.000016178758,0.00007003605,0.0022492632,0.0004483737,0.00007497365,0.011668947,0.980149,0.00004003754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3041038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3041038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4338466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80714095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385868168","doi":"10.59962/9780774856010-020","title":"The Subversion of Human Rights by Governments in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subversion; Human rights; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.011592849563828075,"score_gpt":0.1775600725031969,"score_spread":0.1659672229393688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385868168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024227459,0.028233968,0.00049471133,0.04273509,0.0005982466,0.000035862202,0.00023401047,0.00004698576,0.9033936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4986763,0.024102487,0.0008494745,0.010281338,0.00013828925,0.00005621614,0.00010076159,0.000109057466,0.46568605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704915,0.00029573013,0.00004251796,0.0001822288,0.0008925636,0.0015377896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987054,0.00032513242,0.000051208754,0.00006563857,0.0004899386,0.00036270448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010755402,0.0004720854,0.00065787684,0.0023855632,0.019158548,0.010695866,0.0012706486,0.0037442963,0.013125273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030701929,0.0006622286,0.0003821498,0.006297062,0.01102518,0.0030384012,0.002713523,0.006135454,0.0007124922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022533699,0.00001706449,0.0007201455,0.00006514953,0.000008194247,0.00017878888,0.008786326,0.0003797916,0.00008361951,0.88457817,0.07777627,0.027383951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022296957,0.0000078372605,0.004946579,0.0003169898,0.000021082973,0.0000844101,0.0086235,0.0004869084,0.00018303243,0.07060368,0.91464716,0.0000563668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99675435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99843305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17303535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17303535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23122495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95916176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386833785","doi":"10.3917/pinc.013.0018","title":"Nouveau cadre juridique québécois en matière de protection des renseignements personnels dans le secteur privé","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Pin Code","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.033529205089255526,"score_gpt":0.2770687466528555,"score_spread":0.2435395415636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386833785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7367587,0.0033545732,0.0026283644,0.028922386,0.0006825867,0.0002347641,0.0049292413,0.00023969686,0.22224964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72979283,0.001634977,0.0013438191,0.0036506047,0.0001006104,0.000117421376,0.0014235771,0.00006432566,0.2618719],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766076,0.00025351532,0.00006708358,0.0002035864,0.0011374333,0.00067760894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99308044,0.00081677607,0.0008857257,0.0002656014,0.0034640296,0.001487435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016103275,0.00019916204,0.00029504037,0.0012471777,0.008268125,0.0023519057,0.00069079787,0.0008349053,0.02830682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069984286,0.0002577109,0.00023877993,0.0017965253,0.0016805361,0.0012414067,0.0012270117,0.0018880392,0.0016646533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033266924,0.00013063381,0.3976955,0.00058112346,0.0001562312,0.0016255968,0.09611544,0.00093706546,0.00604197,0.07065004,0.18837984,0.23735392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012887495,0.00006215583,0.62199605,0.0002627015,0.000021816168,0.00021178376,0.023135165,0.00023558248,0.00071034743,0.00054942875,0.35273373,0.000068409245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9625309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9873145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97239935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027600616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06121616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20025742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389089163","doi":"10.1163/9789047406013_009","title":"Contributors and Titles to The Ombudsman Journal and The International Ombudsman Yearbook 1981-2002","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Yearbook; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01598833418457321,"score_gpt":0.2522845125300291,"score_spread":0.23629617834545588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389089163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001085204,0.06358587,0.0010668461,0.0075735357,0.028123833,0.000088938905,0.0012693335,0.00021216433,0.8969942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017886714,0.017155,0.0005167221,0.0006370148,0.0010902929,0.000043720283,0.00047576262,0.00014294047,0.97814983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993926,0.0000743428,0.00004467565,0.00008391565,0.0003223501,0.00008204197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858594,0.00037814578,0.000108549175,0.00007544934,0.0006481709,0.00020378921],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010252065,0.0008110073,0.00064282544,0.005943973,0.0022871036,0.005203011,0.0007869262,0.001242118,0.13153382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034648557,0.0005424196,0.00029631736,0.007966942,0.0009301711,0.004349893,0.0011362204,0.0023434714,0.04466675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009206617,0.000015845846,0.000099090015,0.000109265246,0.000001256941,0.0000224293,0.00020835639,0.000040269646,0.00006780385,0.022772942,0.9186959,0.05795751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.3468343e-7,0.0000014629348,0.00016796387,0.00009231975,8.588201e-7,0.000012715467,0.00006131515,0.000006647567,0.00001858867,0.0008038404,0.9988318,0.0000017645403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015183251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0373474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99405605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044152224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006138738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44002444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389095336","doi":"10.1163/9789004482470_002","title":"Foreword","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.034546632557750805,"score_gpt":0.2784966675426018,"score_spread":0.24395003498485096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389095336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014017167,0.0021126887,0.00029163432,0.008485415,0.01910877,0.00011791657,0.0017121037,0.00040230682,0.967629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00031700626,0.0003941833,0.000054848282,0.0011054659,0.000976097,0.000025583218,0.00042440477,0.00009161649,0.9966108],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988702,0.0001019568,0.000054442233,0.00018366406,0.00069251657,0.000097174365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997629,0.00027087345,0.000092070186,0.00021495375,0.0014133054,0.00037979838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080719014,0.0010556289,0.0006533524,0.002964101,0.0025190578,0.006955313,0.0015630828,0.0028677164,0.75244915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042575942,0.000386647,0.00040087948,0.002495347,0.0006551957,0.0053828596,0.0022848188,0.0027164577,0.71373326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004147428,0.00000765226,0.000018917863,0.000032228618,3.5008395e-7,0.000009741294,0.000021877317,0.0000048241764,0.000030515715,0.0030583949,0.9773722,0.019439025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.519794e-7,0.0000022001361,0.000044158307,0.000037847512,2.628668e-7,0.000011766494,0.000021018517,0.0000037494522,0.000010978127,0.00029173377,0.99957436,0.0000011545046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036741653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063927807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75244915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021533587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024175604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389095385","doi":"10.1163/9789004482470_017","title":"Contributors and Titles to the Ombudsman Journal and the International Ombudsman Yearbook 1981–1999","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Yearbook; Political science; History; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.0138922790213361,"score_gpt":0.24967484906036255,"score_spread":0.23578257003902645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389095385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012634255,0.070019215,0.0012358612,0.0074082837,0.027901312,0.000089740126,0.0012701679,0.00019545923,0.8906166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024719639,0.02290979,0.0006017792,0.00069823925,0.0014371468,0.000051881085,0.0006066847,0.00017020793,0.97105217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942327,0.00006620364,0.00004476018,0.00008286378,0.00030712757,0.00007570311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856347,0.00040920556,0.00013119522,0.00008463389,0.0006039465,0.00020755832],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011334535,0.00083956233,0.00058965234,0.006280512,0.0019128533,0.0046656453,0.0007980045,0.0011948352,0.12026518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037027085,0.0005146664,0.00023889152,0.00799619,0.0010152013,0.004595447,0.0013116859,0.0022884586,0.042838663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011785436,0.000016390568,0.000108110005,0.00011280484,0.0000013298986,0.000023710756,0.00022029571,0.000045668996,0.000083938074,0.027492883,0.90050715,0.07137595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.775122e-7,0.0000014785461,0.00020613744,0.0000963233,7.6160944e-7,0.000013994796,0.00005943595,0.000008043628,0.000020803658,0.0010022164,0.99858826,0.0000018445835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012290884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027636185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99371946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004319174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051065753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40232712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391725426","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.8356","title":"Un ombudsman, cinq mandats : quel est le fil conducteur ?","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02803718919909496,"score_gpt":0.2831969710263049,"score_spread":0.25515978182720994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391725426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04169706,0.014318241,0.0017188059,0.7564947,0.004257152,0.000055765835,0.00016543416,0.00004796947,0.18124482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.613269,0.008603603,0.002371073,0.094254464,0.0010200479,0.00013011559,0.00012806938,0.000121094185,0.28010246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951782,0.0013470455,0.00013435552,0.0004577009,0.0012070232,0.0016756243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952028,0.0009205423,0.00035079106,0.00027251846,0.0017910727,0.0014622568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006207437,0.00038147645,0.0004641031,0.0009515769,0.01407869,0.006760133,0.00096832734,0.0042122486,0.009971445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010966402,0.00028336336,0.0002467668,0.0009715354,0.013874813,0.004996056,0.0030145596,0.0066630426,0.00096162094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058316993,0.000043213153,0.009545971,0.0001873201,0.000019563013,0.0004371135,0.033258647,0.000083399675,0.0006481813,0.68947643,0.20214112,0.064100705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015291034,0.00003799133,0.020749101,0.0010447911,0.000023963072,0.00022592983,0.039628785,0.00014891595,0.0004718082,0.03285633,0.9047176,0.00007945683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6496045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76861775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6496045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028494861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0608957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7049181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396893716","doi":"10.35467/cal/174924","title":"Międzynarodowe regulacje prawnedotyczące cyberprzestrzeni","year":2023,"lang":"pl","type":"article","venue":"Cybersecurity and Law","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office of Defense Programs; Public Safety Canada","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.024434432663933237,"score_gpt":0.2878004946871743,"score_spread":0.26336606202324103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396893716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29283512,0.005753581,0.09657926,0.015779177,0.0008617183,0.000396233,0.0008792667,0.00050596055,0.5864096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89532137,0.004056028,0.02031776,0.0010381417,0.0001762544,0.00036405868,0.00030962357,0.00020083154,0.07821593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977744,0.00045544517,0.00017521137,0.00054298894,0.000678757,0.00037310258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841917,0.00029566494,0.00030188513,0.00033546198,0.0004345409,0.00021332047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002152454,0.0004291647,0.0006067797,0.0018195282,0.001742656,0.010391555,0.00061819557,0.00078279956,0.015699428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024295466,0.00039688018,0.0004243817,0.0015493275,0.0065072468,0.0053929454,0.0033296915,0.0035684335,0.001655598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006578424,0.0000845364,0.0027860552,0.0002507013,0.000029881041,0.00025143157,0.008009206,0.00039392323,0.0048059677,0.937227,0.002510098,0.043585397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042737942,0.00019084656,0.030768957,0.00048477022,0.000087163025,0.00085276726,0.01314199,0.0010547024,0.0077947197,0.43163118,0.51381934,0.00013085555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029978373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031706188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015699428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002661229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043436317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0525198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399040687","doi":"10.29173/mlj800","title":"The Law Society of Manitoba's Equity Ombudsperson Program","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09733439841300072,"score_gpt":0.3283018801005976,"score_spread":0.23096748168759684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399040687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.110541254,0.008275369,0.0010736395,0.27945164,0.005515908,0.0010250042,0.0029607818,0.00038047894,0.5907759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061187778,0.0017403967,0.0010113855,0.025850656,0.00030919645,0.00034270703,0.00027306055,0.000063640786,0.90922123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970836,0.00030640216,0.00006991681,0.0002807862,0.00090505823,0.0013543009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927239,0.0013449336,0.00025465668,0.0003329347,0.0023550005,0.0029886386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034459876,0.00073400646,0.0005602919,0.0014663321,0.022958538,0.00720259,0.0024500312,0.008299153,0.06549772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063433563,0.0013926227,0.0004425527,0.0012277219,0.003332661,0.0017481087,0.0037932643,0.0062514,0.004900355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013750468,0.0004110224,0.026042257,0.0001983456,0.00004099101,0.0015314039,0.0037512742,0.00024494212,0.0014213282,0.12677908,0.7962383,0.043203462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006699438,0.00006596856,0.041829113,0.00033923122,0.00003905311,0.00015938707,0.006129099,0.0005024607,0.00073660695,0.0038892494,0.9461826,0.000060184266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7728729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9411904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22712708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028758302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17597702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45692933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400134261","doi":"10.30892/rrgp.261104-376","title":"RESULTS OF LOCAL ELECTIONS IN HARGHITA COUNTY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2020","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Română de Geografie Politică","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Alliance; Legislature; Political science; Politics; Public administration; Power (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013443220202043232,"score_gpt":0.31475864898536693,"score_spread":0.3013154287833237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400134261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9195069,0.00065234106,0.00015661276,0.00051911816,0.00020916811,0.00019628454,0.047473695,0.00009114813,0.031194817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8768803,0.00059789844,0.0004951206,0.00023175977,0.00018915827,0.0004867142,0.07919407,0.000090494905,0.04183446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832326,0.00035703825,0.00011187386,0.00021001651,0.0005016235,0.00049612136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646795,0.00048380232,0.00065684074,0.00014537427,0.0014951943,0.00075084314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021057774,0.00033667812,0.00045806763,0.0026584715,0.0011550137,0.0011427047,0.0003939598,0.00027565073,0.0071949936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037718443,0.00020086353,0.00034852748,0.0026876251,0.00027742062,0.00040363177,0.0012177553,0.000611107,0.0035458563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013946149,0.00043141065,0.80741656,0.0005976615,0.00013712549,0.0005978159,0.0069365418,0.00088183786,0.0010199125,0.0009076373,0.14052173,0.039157234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012199227,0.000118875694,0.9700734,0.000043681364,0.000017153847,0.000057811365,0.0058301864,0.00011480925,0.00018598184,0.000036776593,0.023492398,0.00001669058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048985407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1534712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048985407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014616171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011666735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097400606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403213404","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12925","title":"Administrative Law as a Source of Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.061545574966751164,"score_gpt":0.38017783196986965,"score_spread":0.3186322570031185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403213404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006888375,0.023291964,0.101768374,0.120091625,0.0019116501,0.00011751843,0.00013003168,0.00013365922,0.74566674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83745277,0.023127673,0.024436118,0.023457672,0.008184705,0.00046541094,0.00013681049,0.00022234909,0.08251643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96700066,0.014128587,0.0015624528,0.0032799346,0.01233055,0.0016978243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9311457,0.049368553,0.0036899785,0.008654167,0.0062413123,0.00090033776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02598719,0.00039927286,0.0011817896,0.0038029472,0.004258754,0.016502548,0.0025959183,0.008068259,0.008799955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048668426,0.0007067894,0.0006713828,0.002627736,0.031026337,0.017345339,0.0063748537,0.009999433,0.0015132229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.939881e-7,0.0000014483995,0.000021237867,0.000014043345,0.0000011358312,0.000007143415,0.00013615984,0.0000422531,0.000014954026,0.9969072,0.0007149672,0.0021385995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001066203,0.000011231414,0.00016031797,0.00019767196,0.000008131763,0.000065832835,0.00017370995,0.0002706864,0.00016998868,0.8701239,0.1287992,0.0000086455575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024197842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021858143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02598719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061465134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014094451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13743508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405001036","doi":"10.1515/9780776636429-013","title":"CHAPTER B-2 Good Governance: Institutions, Processes, and People","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.03418287138089269,"score_gpt":0.22922190863868194,"score_spread":0.19503903725778926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405001036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018463456,0.02202639,0.0029331853,0.020095149,0.0013290753,0.00006284195,0.00013314965,0.000048666672,0.9515252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07049196,0.023899054,0.003475563,0.007186632,0.001032196,0.000119240554,0.00021234558,0.000103377904,0.8934796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995309,0.0001411691,0.000010305114,0.000060105103,0.00017032566,0.00008732548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974054,0.00009981741,0.00001655659,0.00002090089,0.000068129826,0.00005401255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006247986,0.00042796298,0.00017923584,0.0005473535,0.0028979147,0.0052204104,0.0004955416,0.0015381493,0.024359258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069000956,0.00017172474,0.00020438389,0.0010591556,0.0048804865,0.0034018331,0.0011720792,0.002505107,0.0045318315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031642282,0.000014430037,0.00016912844,0.00009140421,0.0000011686964,0.000036061072,0.0032626365,0.00013547912,0.00011914265,0.83759093,0.13609457,0.022481846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012708475,0.000005826146,0.00038749425,0.00024684283,0.0000010624883,0.000057237743,0.0013032898,0.000059074264,0.00009993107,0.065573424,0.93226004,0.000004598416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02235938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03754583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024359258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004867826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053968853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0814898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408089349","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2025.01.73","title":"Foreign experience of environmental ombudsman institution implementation: comparative analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05870567504509924,"score_gpt":0.4021989952234177,"score_spread":0.34349332017831846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408089349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8962617,0.0014298935,0.0005116569,0.0018326949,0.000097761294,0.000039093124,0.00004418794,0.000010322702,0.09977267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933242,0.0007270908,0.00011122516,0.000103392245,0.000013297184,0.000010371196,0.000025766032,0.000008309824,0.005676382],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934204,0.0034247627,0.00020623444,0.00035270595,0.0009746523,0.0016213327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993371,0.0025459034,0.0010954752,0.00043791847,0.001361962,0.0011877057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008388481,0.00017273256,0.00032638846,0.001941183,0.0059424182,0.0039266767,0.0009589426,0.00084373297,0.00655304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013032635,0.00019499304,0.0002048408,0.0047088373,0.0046346276,0.0039772084,0.0047089355,0.0015910964,0.00035942916],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030816763,0.00041368906,0.072847866,0.00035818145,0.000036336012,0.0028564357,0.6813017,0.0007169794,0.0006196356,0.12908208,0.005232576,0.10622628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000175819,0.00026424072,0.09916823,0.00034658166,0.00001936268,0.0006522618,0.73486614,0.00039362707,0.00083773804,0.0019004912,0.16147996,0.000053796975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05888631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08093804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05888631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012829388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008817591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117087126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408943322","doi":"10.24144/2307-3322.2025.87.3.23","title":"Administrative and legal foundations of the activities of the military ombudsman: international experience and prospects of Ukraine","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.016487969620569896,"score_gpt":0.2812165097411509,"score_spread":0.264728540120581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408943322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.976986,0.003710484,0.00044504408,0.001033037,0.000042585518,0.000013356634,0.00001671196,0.0000072430075,0.017745465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960078,0.0015114825,0.00013437674,0.00010419611,0.0000070724736,0.000006702019,0.000013204668,0.0000043684545,0.0022107312],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830484,0.0008068131,0.00008091429,0.0001253287,0.00014771147,0.0005343394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929655,0.00022792419,0.00018959714,0.00004586803,0.00007738255,0.00016253487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020517928,0.0002716584,0.0004401103,0.00079873716,0.006475563,0.00294978,0.0007662672,0.00071527297,0.0019206839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014190469,0.00030708834,0.00017604679,0.0015408488,0.005527474,0.0024116028,0.0038539593,0.0012954269,0.00025533803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070254304,0.0001300776,0.033161677,0.000329013,0.000013297606,0.0031399315,0.82089806,0.0005095917,0.001552165,0.08022982,0.001307539,0.058658537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004776467,0.00016321392,0.052511927,0.00049519597,0.000012196042,0.0016724131,0.8041004,0.00028113805,0.0009125058,0.0030769801,0.13673122,0.000037963702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032490917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036925163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032490917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060556103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008099107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06460357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409036266","doi":"10.52783/jier.v5i2.2448","title":"The Institution of Ombudsman for Indian Prisons: A Comparative Study of Existing Global Models for Enhancing Accountability, Transparency, and Inmate Rights","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informatics Education and Research","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Institution; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.1908508659425356,"score_gpt":0.5163583508881624,"score_spread":0.32550748494562676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409036266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7071539,0.0032131693,0.0029073555,0.009761678,0.00025803805,0.00027697385,0.00009258681,0.000093069626,0.2762431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99236894,0.0012248558,0.00092343066,0.00049286237,0.000023735378,0.000085974294,0.000019197478,0.000019949772,0.0048410175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98556584,0.009219306,0.00040512678,0.000466658,0.0013546476,0.0029885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990428,0.003114992,0.0019898624,0.0010909735,0.0014870614,0.0018892444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008181287,0.0003922805,0.0003897012,0.0032362156,0.007996016,0.010079028,0.0016795893,0.0012781754,0.0052557443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012319193,0.0002950221,0.00070221524,0.005111723,0.010894772,0.006245407,0.007976497,0.0024954705,0.0004200161],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040831996,0.0005868657,0.04529073,0.00089362887,0.000066186774,0.00086592836,0.20194077,0.0007576878,0.0008777597,0.6194744,0.007951796,0.12088597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064468724,0.0012293011,0.20000716,0.0021774087,0.00029048978,0.000865055,0.6019282,0.0017050416,0.0011946461,0.01616936,0.17409259,0.00027632885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035607245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08052045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035607245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020140147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015523019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1461277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409722457","doi":"10.7202/1117565ar","title":"La codification de la procédure administrative non contentieuse en perspective comparée","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.016821712419058762,"score_gpt":0.32634905876441794,"score_spread":0.30952734634535917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409722457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4090755,0.00426114,0.21143438,0.029204873,0.00077657454,0.0018633481,0.0020852322,0.0012996424,0.33999926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74676514,0.0021895028,0.15485448,0.002754647,0.00013812428,0.00067576545,0.0014903343,0.00043663787,0.09069534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96099764,0.012597234,0.0031303407,0.0032808522,0.015760275,0.0042336565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9006642,0.041160177,0.006116562,0.016393077,0.033695284,0.0019707473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030318448,0.0008163425,0.00074182963,0.007481693,0.0074279686,0.015095021,0.002611157,0.0032437614,0.011289326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060876857,0.0006760429,0.0018741739,0.007985728,0.009668372,0.006377518,0.00340269,0.0043790317,0.0015900899],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026352206,0.00032492506,0.04788813,0.0009976276,0.00016068068,0.0007916527,0.059277147,0.005244482,0.009178486,0.5581477,0.011254191,0.30647147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009205521,0.0005837421,0.17175728,0.0031732956,0.00026687354,0.0011149746,0.06877604,0.010693747,0.023065979,0.039882194,0.68000054,0.0005932452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7413413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74213046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7413413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05282087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11047715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.520364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410232913","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2024-014","title":"Human Rights Institutions: Systemic Underfunding and Policy Reform in Alberta","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.03893102480479039,"score_gpt":0.34081243130662886,"score_spread":0.3018814065018385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410232913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58306426,0.0067290612,0.0038133839,0.21573362,0.00054319756,0.0004716237,0.0005807566,0.00025103262,0.18881306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9291049,0.00273929,0.0035085003,0.011888691,0.00014335876,0.000093101175,0.0003296536,0.000047524496,0.052144967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851413,0.0023178733,0.000323289,0.0006507949,0.0038356772,0.0077311634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734475,0.0056433612,0.0018075443,0.00108706,0.008152385,0.00986214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01328998,0.00027746058,0.00046953227,0.0033625176,0.011782151,0.013378706,0.0037525191,0.004055638,0.004786766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0221773,0.0005054604,0.0003561482,0.004987267,0.009950704,0.002630833,0.0070446837,0.0034028084,0.00024072068],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002905151,0.00035118722,0.09593813,0.0005876309,0.00011354856,0.0020163602,0.022646835,0.012114861,0.0029238877,0.5989179,0.06640515,0.19769394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028729995,0.00029849005,0.31710777,0.0014523922,0.00020455413,0.00054615206,0.08344832,0.0108014885,0.0028888842,0.051689573,0.53097534,0.00029968118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9741746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20330952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20330952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43657306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.924048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410962897","doi":"10.24144/2307-3322.2025.88.3.6","title":"Formation of the institute of military ombudsman in Ukraine: the role and significance of the principle of independence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.008804650483064443,"score_gpt":0.23206400365621158,"score_spread":0.22325935317314713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410962897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7981113,0.0047179763,0.013414909,0.0054933317,0.00032730217,0.00010671528,0.000084360225,0.000081213126,0.17766288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914725,0.0005255097,0.0012831613,0.00013777628,0.000029187117,0.000026212489,0.00003194387,0.000009474685,0.0064841458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976839,0.0010099155,0.00014597422,0.0002295584,0.0003335621,0.0005971181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982071,0.00038742146,0.0005789809,0.00015359861,0.00023445797,0.00043839792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031192165,0.00019926557,0.00031648335,0.0013550861,0.0047007566,0.0049643363,0.0006892416,0.0006214772,0.0021438622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027942224,0.00025006538,0.00032310485,0.0013115047,0.0059616505,0.0022462853,0.004432456,0.0015752449,0.00036282156],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101156984,0.00008236295,0.05650626,0.0002468492,0.0000398383,0.00093535107,0.06571776,0.0014938274,0.0010450982,0.7935649,0.0035893337,0.07667734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030348201,0.00040527026,0.23284326,0.0008985905,0.000115154464,0.0017520278,0.1060344,0.0046035154,0.0036661683,0.09089388,0.55862725,0.00013011815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01177982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010835766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01177982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0088095805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01390168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06391829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413230209","doi":"10.52663/kcsr.2025.30.2.133","title":"A Comparative Study of Local Government Ombudsman Systems : Focusing on Seoul, New York, and Toronto","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Korea Association for Corruption Studies","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Political science; Local government; Grievance; Decentralization; Enforcement; Law","score_opus":0.10220671785885625,"score_gpt":0.3790028785086398,"score_spread":0.2767961606497835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413230209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946031,0.00019183508,0.000058410496,0.000112834154,0.000004926297,0.000020054229,0.00006822773,0.000002586053,0.004937876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830604,0.00018207298,0.00006180335,0.00003633897,0.0000019256104,0.000014479008,0.0001100277,0.0000026808489,0.0012846967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987451,0.00037786606,0.000064406624,0.00011616422,0.00017555988,0.00052080513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997776,0.00036214408,0.000470366,0.00014291359,0.0005286924,0.00071979547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009731292,0.00018666683,0.000277983,0.0019960315,0.0047654337,0.0023201052,0.00047304918,0.00023571,0.0045240615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021918654,0.00020503838,0.00016851515,0.004903651,0.0025860956,0.0013062708,0.0019148708,0.00038769466,0.00019167768],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022245452,0.00015654585,0.6626914,0.000266381,0.00007153084,0.0015717063,0.2906444,0.0003628585,0.001974659,0.013022685,0.0034261358,0.025589336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009098431,0.00009586146,0.58982843,0.00008035224,0.000029950681,0.0001131591,0.39573443,0.00016238783,0.0002350429,0.00010922976,0.013580374,0.000021678714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7046942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9114763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2953058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026692431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013687734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59408975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413526594","doi":"10.64628/aam.mrc7msxw4","title":"How to encourage China to become a law-abiding member of the rules-based international order","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"China; Order (exchange); Political science; Member states; International law; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; International trade; Business; European union","score_opus":0.035384063559625915,"score_gpt":0.321131155088107,"score_spread":0.2857470915284811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413526594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29418766,0.0012887309,0.009169746,0.1867344,0.0033778807,0.0009334828,0.0001220371,0.00039581786,0.50379026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8269603,0.0004218619,0.0048215375,0.035584774,0.00035673592,0.00044239452,0.00009455284,0.00006365959,0.13125421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948643,0.0011853562,0.00019440487,0.0005083631,0.0009495785,0.0022980084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943394,0.0005803648,0.00047296038,0.00046002868,0.0014368441,0.0027104276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061395904,0.00043303563,0.0003798268,0.0009330084,0.010546314,0.0077871424,0.0012675178,0.0052848496,0.008511395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009776538,0.00034264784,0.00047255974,0.0008162172,0.0051026377,0.00427999,0.00416948,0.006049715,0.0012041046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102886,0.00039258663,0.028184945,0.0002056838,0.00008434712,0.0015675604,0.022007212,0.0020710928,0.003419008,0.7100533,0.1734805,0.058430925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014062099,0.0003070247,0.04624406,0.00040031693,0.00008417075,0.00022264765,0.021843715,0.003552978,0.0030730404,0.13247697,0.791437,0.00021749584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06889557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13243538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06889557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006164395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049596775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13698912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414833970","doi":"10.29173/alr2840","title":"Selecting a Standard of Review: What Does This Entail Post-Vavilov?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Transparency (behavior); Duty; Citizenship; Selection (genetic algorithm); Process (computing)","score_opus":0.012272117818400536,"score_gpt":0.32722507867863165,"score_spread":0.3149529608602311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414833970","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002527085,0.02778793,0.010306136,0.9236944,0.01540963,0.00023848108,0.000073054616,0.00011911296,0.019844173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.268272,0.025524694,0.050500516,0.6216777,0.018942384,0.0012785842,0.00019777665,0.00031451575,0.013291812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6073035,0.16253263,0.048415728,0.028383477,0.13732007,0.01604464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48365995,0.26379827,0.0342463,0.035948325,0.16312277,0.01922436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.35812443,0.00082969794,0.0033256887,0.0072771283,0.016520444,0.038767785,0.009238986,0.030493043,0.0014648722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5313656,0.0014853531,0.0021028465,0.0067137266,0.05454808,0.021951059,0.0089282915,0.028270585,0.0010623842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003616827,0.000033825763,0.0017915362,0.00088563684,0.00006995439,0.00014353804,0.004794335,0.00018563178,0.00021196582,0.8212842,0.12192033,0.048643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120962315,0.00014514149,0.0052062245,0.006140777,0.00018707871,0.00039659065,0.005560211,0.0010573507,0.0006706738,0.35609278,0.6240721,0.0003500299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.112287894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12904069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8877121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048574902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16151433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957218","doi":"10.21991/cf29496","title":"The Regime Politics of Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Judicial independence; Charter; Judicial activism; Supreme court; Politics; Skepticism; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.018028879206513602,"score_gpt":0.31882299909524886,"score_spread":0.3007941198887353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01601453,0.06683135,0.028174942,0.29962337,0.0043026214,0.00016264169,0.00011641027,0.00018723944,0.5845868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8088196,0.027969478,0.0056798304,0.11051513,0.008608163,0.0003591431,0.000077455035,0.00014977908,0.037821446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9095676,0.041654352,0.0021633087,0.007568966,0.030808926,0.008236998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94057983,0.039639186,0.0036694105,0.0034619255,0.011038425,0.0016111844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0394606,0.00031795105,0.00085927756,0.003125869,0.006242312,0.014801148,0.0027396858,0.009020795,0.0024856913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072460465,0.00062427216,0.000781981,0.0025787225,0.020760056,0.005871063,0.0028892749,0.011667293,0.0009661277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005832229,0.000006265823,0.00018133639,0.00006401216,0.000015682503,0.000029999836,0.0005986181,0.00026354662,0.00015587691,0.98045576,0.009528634,0.008694357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038655686,0.000036653517,0.0018052723,0.00074657844,0.000047957074,0.00011147238,0.0009626842,0.0011582007,0.00074254954,0.61574,0.37853345,0.00007653016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029015472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027956221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0394606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030133994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025073742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21863842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415692972","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5667090","title":"Ouster Clauses and the Common Law: a Historical Reappraisal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Fredericton","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Tribunal; Administration (probate law); Compensation (psychology); Commission","score_opus":0.018488675668098108,"score_gpt":0.3111052182731197,"score_spread":0.2926165426050216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415692972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021717653,0.2637467,0.015355128,0.11385713,0.0025056363,0.000031354222,0.00017508508,0.000036661415,0.58257467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79113597,0.12592979,0.0043207197,0.02123716,0.009492354,0.00007177987,0.0001420568,0.00014131013,0.04752882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750036,0.0013455892,0.00009780519,0.00038455334,0.00041307692,0.00025856338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99081683,0.007866412,0.00039557426,0.00040666427,0.000387955,0.00012649132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005596144,0.0005989864,0.0006860695,0.0050996924,0.0036901345,0.009445636,0.0017658535,0.009110524,0.008666435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010179233,0.00054721633,0.00042549986,0.00628891,0.04514872,0.024103606,0.003522744,0.008914223,0.00076448504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030627266,0.0000034727616,0.000027751525,0.000013042389,6.8770555e-7,0.00001481694,0.00067587796,0.000024659283,0.000006343993,0.9964056,0.0012045847,0.0016201553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001141963,0.000013309621,0.00038568224,0.0004075623,0.0000053229264,0.00012549075,0.0020670847,0.00033392964,0.0001032959,0.7956098,0.20092371,0.000013430086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008250935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006749991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009445636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00583123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024190294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04230869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47237260","doi":"","title":"Encouraging a culture of justification: a comparison of Teoh and Baker.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Research Online (Deakin University)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Convention; Citizenship; Political science; Human rights; Immigration; Administrative law; Sociology","score_opus":0.1491793758634995,"score_gpt":0.4298648389480665,"score_spread":0.280685463084567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W47237260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11561305,0.007080226,0.005156435,0.05427871,0.00065335206,0.00015290825,0.00004398913,0.000030898933,0.81699055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9472412,0.0030194244,0.00234525,0.013930209,0.00007779125,0.00030444222,0.000031307194,0.00010290974,0.032947473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766783,0.015298171,0.00050223304,0.00091086474,0.0046583,0.0019520965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816149,0.012189964,0.0011289053,0.001082168,0.0029137658,0.0010703178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013181927,0.00035837226,0.00051674317,0.0034893253,0.013575719,0.01074563,0.0015550768,0.0044415155,0.006334442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034054555,0.00026613486,0.00031856302,0.003663717,0.023252053,0.009002387,0.0076725986,0.005979128,0.0005941995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023852337,0.000056312136,0.0012644888,0.00013353911,0.000007770366,0.00016016154,0.2136994,0.000038670332,0.00007122174,0.7503716,0.010657222,0.023515733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003831502,0.00006003886,0.0031544648,0.0009750066,0.000024803354,0.00029234163,0.55619735,0.00019045005,0.0004307485,0.0934575,0.34514365,0.000035429483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02840357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07180134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02840357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012165499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019569369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08826733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W583661070","doi":"10.22215/etd/2011-08918","title":"Newspaper ombudsmanship in Canada : the rise and fall of an accountability system","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Accountability; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.032368044823224106,"score_gpt":0.24713667896939195,"score_spread":0.21476863414616784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W583661070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14796476,0.025344605,0.00082293485,0.17421132,0.0022930526,0.00010443572,0.0017504501,0.00032674824,0.6471817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60166943,0.010922018,0.0007258701,0.0074639902,0.00032785916,0.000033511773,0.0006087207,0.00018646606,0.37806216],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955503,0.00035189997,0.000076768316,0.00027163082,0.002263339,0.0014861483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99149406,0.0010167628,0.00048593627,0.00020216561,0.0041638664,0.0026371581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019859616,0.0002614569,0.00032660575,0.002314024,0.013578254,0.010098134,0.001695946,0.0018009731,0.015772276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009569915,0.000353966,0.00018731886,0.0070085293,0.004577974,0.002546254,0.0018492258,0.0025239608,0.0010615739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009036129,0.000058936756,0.014633477,0.00024507358,0.000014749892,0.0007505884,0.036909617,0.00035878835,0.00033840322,0.2189727,0.5500483,0.17757909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017884806,0.000016738606,0.04748057,0.00031095056,0.000018384728,0.00010694941,0.02119222,0.0004992688,0.0002964407,0.0036605243,0.92635,0.000049976636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13229658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13229658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2680841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95988333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6893799314","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.3946160","title":"E-RIHS PP D4.2 Statutes of the E-RIHS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Prairie Improvement Network","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Statute; Work (physics); Commission; Deliverable; Subject (documents); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.059570754139118165,"score_gpt":0.2682679241148465,"score_spread":0.20869716997572835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6893799314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015906974,0.0006441385,0.017361667,0.007881277,0.0033277946,0.0015941043,0.06582665,0.005152597,0.8966211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0119712185,0.0010899091,0.021365581,0.008257364,0.0008876343,0.0025498637,0.07247924,0.003776828,0.8776224],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766998,0.0044165063,0.0011810726,0.0012362694,0.014666068,0.0018002371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97554195,0.0058841933,0.0008739039,0.002623718,0.014195064,0.00088121044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019211195,0.00089079014,0.00071634125,0.0030891104,0.0024560287,0.008510157,0.00325208,0.004083923,0.27413255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048539918,0.0012752764,0.00085756317,0.0036145153,0.0013678547,0.0044277534,0.0040676817,0.00439873,0.23235877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003601066,0.000033404107,0.00027251276,0.00016537233,0.0000031127245,0.00004513812,0.0003187781,0.0002410464,0.00033800217,0.06020599,0.9179086,0.020432178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063210764,0.000010594092,0.0005046347,0.00011376738,0.0000019870374,0.000021754215,0.00012635741,0.000068669135,0.00023258977,0.0019208285,0.9969791,0.000013430327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03971022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023413075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27413255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008166477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02412349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9170647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6908553512","doi":"10.26106/vrm0-b725","title":"Proceduralne gwarancje związane z wydaleniem cudzoziemca ze względów bezpieczeństwa państwa - uwagi na kanwie sprawy Chakiba Marakchiego","year":2020,"lang":"pl","type":"article","venue":"Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Convention; Human rights; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Order (exchange); European Union law","score_opus":0.06928896651073785,"score_gpt":0.26671157569927106,"score_spread":0.19742260918853322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6908553512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3446635,0.02464198,0.04808633,0.027901966,0.0018093676,0.0007820913,0.00087592605,0.0003495626,0.5508893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8728532,0.007498159,0.0092050135,0.0021276032,0.00034520822,0.00024525006,0.0003044735,0.00021356704,0.10720761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775475,0.0004531171,0.00013037644,0.0003563736,0.00062483427,0.0006806227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917406,0.00022420732,0.0002028332,0.00013464421,0.0001624629,0.00010173893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014903112,0.0005729099,0.0005648009,0.0024725301,0.0049610613,0.010262198,0.00075148465,0.0017513968,0.012532533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027158442,0.0004316817,0.00039954568,0.002073486,0.007564948,0.005678552,0.0048672766,0.002808908,0.0024592176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011691129,0.000099194636,0.010262915,0.00054290745,0.000043444,0.005616378,0.029301293,0.00093517127,0.0028904008,0.84767073,0.021038283,0.08148236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022977236,0.00006612179,0.021514487,0.001087118,0.000081099846,0.004481703,0.024376716,0.0011874232,0.0038658576,0.08913007,0.85409564,0.000090871436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020088082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036757033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020088082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061760065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006713065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044810295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6923589516","doi":"10.14288/1.0314255","title":"PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA SECOND ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BUSINESS DONE IN PURSUANCE OF THE MUNICIPAL SUPERANNUATION ACT FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31ST 1941","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Annual report; Government (linguistics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.011983683066609095,"score_gpt":0.20738551725374732,"score_spread":0.19540183418713822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6923589516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06965104,0.011698648,0.00043968542,0.039730925,0.007259128,0.0009114891,0.35129252,0.00046623798,0.5185504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044224232,0.0034489345,0.00043210285,0.0026108976,0.00014343696,0.000316438,0.02642784,0.000103053986,0.92229307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982248,0.00007428993,0.00007399493,0.00009610852,0.00080341013,0.0007274896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957463,0.00017639613,0.00012469948,0.0000994964,0.0031306394,0.0007223928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010330175,0.0005400023,0.0005854401,0.0029523422,0.0056688515,0.0035102405,0.0013575391,0.0023210538,0.024899457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035928513,0.0007311734,0.00033547948,0.004690868,0.0005949218,0.000549142,0.0010228046,0.0026432867,0.004115904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006923417,0.000029397343,0.007066325,0.00015742956,0.000018982522,0.00013304876,0.00033863253,0.000130714,0.00014358465,0.0018624399,0.98064363,0.009406442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033000964,0.000015547028,0.14690319,0.0002458192,0.000033814085,0.000045638593,0.002026985,0.00018379658,0.00039925595,0.00018730067,0.8498682,0.000057479774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9895583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030817447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030817447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13114308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22359729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6924850377","doi":"10.15468/dl.x7wzg9","title":"Occurrence Download","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Global Biodiversity Information Facility","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Matching (statistics); Range (aeronautics); Data set; R package","score_opus":0.022783737619774647,"score_gpt":0.25353228018712876,"score_spread":0.2307485425673541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6924850377","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000037617167,0.000025576242,0.000042011747,0.00003685983,0.000010063127,0.00000570094,0.99881554,0.00035429574,0.0006723073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001748801,0.000037221023,0.00020775966,0.000048084923,0.0000035243063,0.000042791766,0.99884605,0.00014067041,0.0004990315],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990495,0.00013713591,0.00012533633,0.0003211056,0.00021655104,0.00015046989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773884,0.0006481561,0.00020059457,0.0005530381,0.0006080792,0.00025127607],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090850744,0.0017645034,0.0013934418,0.004689381,0.0009138471,0.0024780827,0.0026403365,0.0018890018,0.15661995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006121746,0.00083740783,0.0011493136,0.0094802035,0.0004123307,0.0021615864,0.00225858,0.0018992905,0.20737854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028017044,0.000010609344,0.00035169895,0.0004927822,0.0000139909325,0.000013818283,0.000018892486,0.00012944873,0.00008480311,0.00038257163,0.99705184,0.0014214694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083408275,0.000007989417,0.0017387468,0.00019356587,0.000013851131,0.00003481135,0.000070639595,0.00018361944,0.00017159912,0.0008484386,0.9966371,0.000016074613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025624719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043535326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84338003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016813915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023323083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5239459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W69577062","doi":"","title":"Authority Migration and Accountability in Canadian Type II Multilevel Governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Corporate governance; Multi-level governance; Political science; Public administration; Business; Law","score_opus":0.08846417711070394,"score_gpt":0.33411347938111685,"score_spread":0.24564930227041293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W69577062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97728753,0.00023413943,0.00035641002,0.0014123552,0.00001731056,0.00004806788,0.0002958919,0.000017449924,0.020330817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978125,0.000093911614,0.00018777548,0.000052272324,0.0000023448,0.0000093018525,0.000117326395,0.0000037389727,0.0017207117],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583817,0.00050241896,0.00012718342,0.00040509857,0.0010811179,0.0020460929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99146444,0.0011656446,0.0022972997,0.00071521715,0.0029142327,0.0014432208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029588325,0.00016816748,0.00026557493,0.002505761,0.009796057,0.0032026235,0.0013091979,0.00048487264,0.003428442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015579917,0.00022493092,0.00034325843,0.0055799014,0.0042828666,0.0012316399,0.0033983286,0.0010984553,0.00011245725],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012268157,0.000075792246,0.8442958,0.00009717282,0.00003962262,0.0006487298,0.05592406,0.002029336,0.00052232377,0.03431793,0.0065997103,0.0553269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010348356,0.000024240204,0.9338008,0.00012609165,0.00001609721,0.00009779131,0.04175763,0.0018841735,0.00022073663,0.0020763676,0.019949907,0.00003573097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9904082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99511933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8944559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10554409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08416096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76577955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6963789470","doi":"10.22080/lps.2022.24352.1406","title":"A Comparative Study of Proper Administration of the Non-governmental Organization in the Laws of Iran, Armenia, and Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Administration (probate law); Face (sociological concept); Legal research; Civil society; Descriptive research","score_opus":0.257798761907814,"score_gpt":0.5361925917122305,"score_spread":0.27839382980441657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6963789470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913202,0.00019059709,0.000030538195,0.00029489867,0.000007861766,0.000028640168,0.00003337176,0.00000217732,0.008091637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755764,0.00030202616,0.00006361454,0.00007838846,0.000002012001,0.00000979334,0.00003774537,0.0000017667993,0.0019470599],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736893,0.00039644053,0.00008750626,0.00020469129,0.00082727603,0.0011151474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946878,0.00088489475,0.0010175162,0.0001318354,0.002020187,0.0012577369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015473908,0.00017938424,0.00025046887,0.0023549306,0.008655566,0.0033157729,0.00074056425,0.00054747873,0.0021298057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005662184,0.00023937535,0.0002012932,0.0042429892,0.0038302632,0.0010608657,0.0012830548,0.0009204223,0.00010302321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019405223,0.0004071524,0.48018137,0.00021729968,0.000044310513,0.0022413435,0.44220772,0.00018289483,0.0011501793,0.012494125,0.004281332,0.05639828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046501605,0.00005873386,0.6140196,0.000071204886,0.0000131347515,0.00012788064,0.37098053,0.00010868025,0.00011524751,0.00009456452,0.014384382,0.00002142083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90490824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9626508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09509176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03647597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04776731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2646529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6969343396","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7420668","title":"Nation's Choice Wisconsin Dells Grand National 2022 live streaming online Cheer &amp; Dance free","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dance; Studio; Event (particle physics); Doors; Upload; Dance education","score_opus":0.06332289154234372,"score_gpt":0.29603685367301585,"score_spread":0.23271396213067214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6969343396","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038981446,0.00008141273,0.00018426373,0.00035599776,0.00022240398,0.000036527126,0.9907217,0.0013240362,0.006683787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00085465424,0.000119682314,0.00052346074,0.00025441588,0.000055083194,0.00011863684,0.99037313,0.00038589444,0.0073150713],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914885,0.00012711674,0.00007534917,0.0002743913,0.00021509612,0.00015913874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826175,0.00022337394,0.000092517126,0.00046949091,0.0006140532,0.00033887912],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009999969,0.0015523591,0.001084545,0.0024809712,0.0013879985,0.0034872217,0.0018558785,0.0012267388,0.16547002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006178741,0.0006105851,0.0010447422,0.0044284873,0.00026193546,0.0031911402,0.0024944677,0.0014772676,0.2553623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025334515,0.0000068932286,0.00034789744,0.00006774497,0.0000046704413,0.0000048075062,0.000010665349,0.000025354866,0.000037877526,0.00016822394,0.9967692,0.0025313494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004993217,0.000012076361,0.004481443,0.0001651598,0.000010181747,0.00002474647,0.00015949336,0.00025281683,0.00015321997,0.0005118247,0.9941532,0.000025923175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047993798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08918131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011590442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017452419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5535524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999153038","doi":"","title":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Law and Practice Special Issue - A Decade of Dunsmuir / Les 10 ans de Dunsmuir","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"CentAUR (University of Reading)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Legislation; Work (physics); Legislature; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.03451123966842477,"score_gpt":0.2891114101686986,"score_spread":0.25460017050027384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999153038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011155866,0.12801215,0.0006230339,0.18760604,0.045667514,0.000067187946,0.00046512863,0.00028231365,0.636161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01246517,0.028163083,0.00065190997,0.013857356,0.0043494604,0.000031904972,0.00022141497,0.00019037281,0.9400693],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948567,0.00037599992,0.00012971193,0.00027403323,0.0035404603,0.000823098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942432,0.00067297043,0.000101746846,0.0002630988,0.0036257063,0.0010932466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032401755,0.0008232861,0.0011230396,0.004084247,0.01174449,0.012726542,0.0022892982,0.0059280503,0.066065006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072789504,0.00088049634,0.0006216256,0.0046580276,0.0070019546,0.0035436212,0.0028110032,0.0064871963,0.011938207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022609925,0.000009082199,0.000044240423,0.000034157016,0.000001125163,0.000022234895,0.00029673427,0.000023236973,0.000018954508,0.038037978,0.94876915,0.012740773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.3007967e-7,8.7513996e-7,0.00017611342,0.00007173158,9.559088e-7,0.000013283441,0.00018703476,0.000012227222,0.000007939897,0.0016386975,0.99788624,0.000004156205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7787703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9072229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9439156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056084406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10464286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44506502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001557907","doi":"","title":"Kat Ward Ep 43 Ghostly Tales with Steve Stockton 'Sittin' In'","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paranormal; Afterlife; Girl; Subject (documents); Ridiculous; Visitor pattern","score_opus":0.007163414466920474,"score_gpt":0.20423702447660944,"score_spread":0.19707361000968895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001557907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013452292,0.0054360135,0.00066775555,0.082832076,0.0079385,0.000059153517,0.0002500244,0.00046220803,0.888902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021725498,0.0010921062,0.00014005261,0.009494834,0.0002978986,0.000024117902,0.000037363123,0.00016352365,0.9670246],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996045,0.00012051666,0.00000966614,0.000044931046,0.00010763205,0.000112792586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993393,0.00012788386,0.00003097373,0.000053580672,0.0001251647,0.00032308535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053927087,0.00036157918,0.00024202067,0.00039116226,0.008898414,0.0032999953,0.00046759722,0.0020943764,0.15806259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002288442,0.00023817878,0.00018041447,0.00028826023,0.0021481928,0.0037645302,0.0052927616,0.0037531774,0.034853946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007682091,0.000014571918,0.00019379111,0.000026255955,0.0000010122607,0.00047572723,0.010521371,0.000007078998,0.00009783818,0.0072253277,0.96684706,0.014582332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001199375,0.000006862095,0.00039003513,0.00007862259,7.93516e-7,0.0005098304,0.015954088,0.000008655445,0.00006302765,0.00059368985,0.98238903,0.000004094485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019613625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06926043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15806259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012526828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016079647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52877206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001838269","doi":"","title":"L'individu face à l'État : statut et rôle du lanceur d'alerte","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Council on Foreign Relations","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Vetting; Hypocrisy","score_opus":0.009480483158449111,"score_gpt":0.1975380135001612,"score_spread":0.1880575303417121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001838269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49097446,0.004495648,0.002547591,0.10088063,0.0005875614,0.000044677126,0.00022949024,0.00005382403,0.40018612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9354998,0.0014860657,0.00030401087,0.0044862935,0.00015039385,0.00003262405,0.000047611073,0.00002630833,0.05796688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726856,0.0011706093,0.000063089705,0.00030955116,0.0004737878,0.00071439263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952486,0.0018539251,0.00055597816,0.0001643117,0.0005827367,0.0015944125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028202715,0.00014669864,0.00022355316,0.0009998883,0.0098324455,0.008260957,0.0007051875,0.0024897675,0.015861394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007196111,0.00021491233,0.00017222963,0.001115206,0.007743829,0.0033335246,0.0052306573,0.0033317618,0.0015277257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012795765,0.00016555698,0.090044975,0.00006638736,0.000022785816,0.0015238413,0.22124648,0.0001285016,0.00038758296,0.5512794,0.037368987,0.097637475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030054849,0.00012482471,0.12263146,0.00056017475,0.000057571713,0.0010399773,0.24137717,0.00053343555,0.0004025308,0.09615138,0.5369925,0.0000988286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050296582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05982812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050296582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004094983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005520648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10000765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008542003","doi":"","title":"Challenges for Australian Tribunals; Towards Aretaic Practice Principles","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Normative; Agency (philosophy); Entitlement (fair division); Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis)","score_opus":0.05756544244098988,"score_gpt":0.31616903886350983,"score_spread":0.25860359642251995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008542003","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04383394,0.014908602,0.02620062,0.58547866,0.0033740725,0.00044424646,0.00004721721,0.00010894247,0.32560378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77048403,0.0099255005,0.03369978,0.07033187,0.0011730021,0.0007751821,0.00006301606,0.00010240423,0.11344521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9569531,0.023759766,0.00214747,0.0022658398,0.010557015,0.004316757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733994,0.009702226,0.0019350521,0.0019249253,0.008376586,0.0046618637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03471466,0.00050868234,0.00068009726,0.002155247,0.024359126,0.029581072,0.0047309324,0.016102655,0.0052339607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03188617,0.00076664885,0.000862891,0.0023641526,0.035454847,0.009260731,0.01572312,0.01702403,0.0014678234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008791263,0.00008495715,0.0010773583,0.00041424859,0.000008366854,0.00060727407,0.11507779,0.0003233914,0.00037345412,0.83033955,0.022726059,0.028958777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010618123,0.00008212075,0.0029515864,0.0016099593,0.000014547439,0.00061953603,0.09938741,0.0009913016,0.00021345505,0.23661005,0.6574557,0.00005363453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05433468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05743251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05433468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022467671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0746777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18359083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010469709","doi":"","title":"Inside and Outside Canadian Administrative Law: Essays in Honour of David Mullan","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04605780861181407,"score_gpt":0.2783848445988079,"score_spread":0.23232703598699384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010469709","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00237865,0.06663416,0.00041130537,0.8214424,0.027348045,0.000046326273,0.0003147745,0.000031731244,0.08139262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13591924,0.0839513,0.0017145023,0.4602128,0.030110637,0.00025199895,0.00034315122,0.00061335077,0.28688303],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99253815,0.0018768422,0.00018196816,0.00075257657,0.002670179,0.001980377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98110974,0.00791738,0.00029972947,0.00032849063,0.007752276,0.0025923867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068411985,0.0017229427,0.0014950908,0.0060465247,0.060055323,0.02023325,0.003945999,0.014477355,0.010312923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022987746,0.0011036053,0.00076965225,0.009871757,0.024256993,0.011739765,0.0052418965,0.018937029,0.0013418479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000096960275,0.000008625758,0.0000929969,0.000052837007,0.00000599111,0.00007556371,0.012462943,0.000039360508,0.00003822136,0.030077016,0.95411783,0.0030189115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006728489,0.0000020620785,0.0006619857,0.00037904372,0.0000083707455,0.000034370758,0.031463567,0.000035190875,0.000048784263,0.003803419,0.9635154,0.000041123978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9623312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9837298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114098765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.114098765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10842478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8278484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016196048","doi":"","title":"Адміністративно-правові основи діяльності військового омбудсмена: міжнародний досвід і перспективи України","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ukrainian; Context (archaeology); Institution; Work (physics); Democracy; Accountability; Military threat; Control (management)","score_opus":0.07443977003509342,"score_gpt":0.3885488224548356,"score_spread":0.3141090524197422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016196048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14451702,0.020372894,0.10663501,0.010451184,0.00085457874,0.0002778388,0.0003576265,0.00020680945,0.7163269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9020386,0.008628812,0.027135853,0.00033560238,0.0002381889,0.00018741701,0.00014766697,0.00008726238,0.06120061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986078,0.0004268227,0.00006973639,0.00023033572,0.0004820225,0.00018327574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872833,0.00040918865,0.0002688221,0.0001757479,0.00029800198,0.00011984703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015012088,0.0003690133,0.00025460243,0.0017803971,0.0025450226,0.006186986,0.0005281475,0.0010016136,0.008885529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002806377,0.0003337191,0.0003322842,0.0019638464,0.0065061525,0.0033123407,0.002249758,0.0015096342,0.0023893532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031650598,0.000031291107,0.0025798688,0.0001666857,0.000011714429,0.0004977992,0.009229469,0.0007050783,0.0011345973,0.91884303,0.002719395,0.06404928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016943424,0.00009904558,0.015350557,0.00058087154,0.000044997,0.0016242003,0.016142648,0.0020422067,0.0030712136,0.4131061,0.54784733,0.00007389321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005174099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053014574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008885529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032511142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038558636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029725075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024018071","doi":"","title":"Právní základ a aktuální činnost Mezinárodního trestního soudu","year":2010,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labrador Retriever; Public rights; Email authentication","score_opus":0.009258532474184107,"score_gpt":0.26736907960913253,"score_spread":0.2581105471349484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024018071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081426345,0.014377073,0.012476178,0.037539564,0.002036414,0.00022308806,0.0008135016,0.0004986277,0.85060924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5817501,0.012840495,0.008585057,0.007079708,0.0010323789,0.00025113043,0.0007890306,0.00041065,0.3872615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967264,0.0008051304,0.00014937254,0.0005963806,0.0011211608,0.00060154294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957039,0.0008413329,0.00059354125,0.0005614318,0.0011716224,0.0011281709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029861664,0.00051588024,0.0005748221,0.0015396659,0.0040698824,0.012973201,0.0011396181,0.002053677,0.05399169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005981889,0.00042347502,0.0006325346,0.0015439101,0.004163974,0.0053080744,0.0065981243,0.004173491,0.009888213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003157113,0.0004916666,0.019091003,0.0014503654,0.0001231559,0.00078205654,0.024175294,0.0005841938,0.006678607,0.6145696,0.07145232,0.260286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024750369,0.00014709453,0.01608127,0.0006201215,0.00005688327,0.00035853,0.009727641,0.00018226287,0.0019285461,0.04677307,0.9240344,0.000065323744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00716169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014070089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05399169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004771514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009647929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1806202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029901828","doi":"","title":"Luustoisen perhe - projekti : Osa 2: tutkimustulosten esittely koulutustilaisuudessa : luento projektin pilottivaiheen osallistujille","year":2008,"lang":"fi","type":"article","venue":"Doria (University of Helsinki)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04559320749048771,"score_gpt":0.23605413978744783,"score_spread":0.19046093229696012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029901828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27172977,0.006709452,0.017799895,0.05011037,0.010209605,0.0078071603,0.008981591,0.001695823,0.6249563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.262682,0.0052302666,0.024819812,0.0073602377,0.0010485137,0.0049360725,0.0061865887,0.0006545934,0.68708193],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958467,0.0011519935,0.00020396685,0.00040539404,0.0015783673,0.00081362267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98947865,0.0012895684,0.00030714078,0.0004090228,0.003751724,0.004763936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008092287,0.0006967544,0.00044432998,0.00090334605,0.002379604,0.005739932,0.001019146,0.001976616,0.06861732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00700835,0.00027464158,0.0006964954,0.00078950473,0.0010359401,0.002138882,0.0052124728,0.0038841185,0.01890705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002859666,0.004637287,0.020605605,0.0035516664,0.00010025064,0.0016422204,0.032212064,0.0015037275,0.025058605,0.031212507,0.3868277,0.48978868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001790004,0.0019211388,0.022819286,0.0008817993,0.00005118607,0.00043699547,0.015086397,0.00033390403,0.007533034,0.0026194921,0.9480621,0.00007562373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066775954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017996302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06861732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031564042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017002173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2295478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7037604870","doi":"","title":"ERIC ED537026: Bricklayer: Apprenticeship Course Outline. Apprenticeship and Industry Training. 0110.1","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Work (physics); Quality (philosophy); Product (mathematics); Vocational education; Course (navigation)","score_opus":0.017130650825690964,"score_gpt":0.23126674245532367,"score_spread":0.2141360916296327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7037604870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014506994,0.0003193079,0.0016953263,0.001243117,0.000841485,0.000561571,0.0019420197,0.0021593384,0.9897871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011645866,0.00022152787,0.00060359476,0.0003111962,0.00007951218,0.00014594225,0.0008202193,0.00018281462,0.9964707],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955314,0.000042507134,0.000014709756,0.00005965826,0.00017695218,0.00015307465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876803,0.00009071553,0.00003624148,0.000058197526,0.00031521713,0.00073165586],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000697114,0.001172402,0.00056463893,0.0008763474,0.001468463,0.002623116,0.0012912344,0.0018266323,0.7889459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013100366,0.0005340152,0.00030287838,0.0008024467,0.00029245936,0.001701712,0.0030192193,0.0017713744,0.7343091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053345164,0.00028971292,0.00021407488,0.00007563958,5.749068e-7,0.000050820192,0.00007055086,0.0000675843,0.00056814315,0.0011325225,0.9061253,0.09135175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017952707,0.00007301761,0.0014366447,0.00009011099,7.2879305e-7,0.00005442549,0.000115650306,0.00011804101,0.00017966179,0.00046117604,0.99744654,0.000006066836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038885174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012452339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7889459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080546323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025364754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30104303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038693100","doi":"","title":"Indirect Judicial Review in Administrative Law: Legality vs Legal Certainty In Europe","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research Publications (Maastricht University)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Council on Foreign Relations","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Emperipolesis; Liquation; Diafiltration; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.17801607188075758,"score_gpt":0.40411973184123967,"score_spread":0.2261036599604821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038693100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014645758,0.09437301,0.014259904,0.010770974,0.0010988531,0.000055078,0.00019471245,0.00008068279,0.8645211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56215864,0.036022484,0.008428744,0.0059872125,0.0035018083,0.00021812995,0.0004197065,0.00024271228,0.38302055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927597,0.002830328,0.00045655048,0.001015327,0.0023306045,0.0006075233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98876035,0.007975574,0.000698578,0.0009002639,0.0013915211,0.0002736853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070248055,0.00055027875,0.00092512707,0.0032750694,0.0018422288,0.012324021,0.0015000548,0.0047429954,0.020160144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019656437,0.0005437072,0.0005500137,0.0039817365,0.0068650525,0.0052694133,0.0021264409,0.0032323953,0.0023059084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018268169,0.000028338203,0.00030461967,0.000101118414,0.000015594762,0.000039967766,0.00034604385,0.00054104865,0.00007186463,0.9373713,0.021624513,0.03953733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046657304,0.000082776336,0.0038604722,0.0010246328,0.00006418097,0.00035111315,0.00030318534,0.0014955028,0.00050854846,0.6465075,0.34571818,0.00003727572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038369044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006165228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020160144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036162455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054009953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06744236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071441573","doi":"","title":"Some Initial Thoughts on Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd and Edmonton (City) v. Edmonton East (Capilano) Shopping Centres Ltd","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Legislature; Limiting; Judicial review; Administrative law; Standard of review; Common law","score_opus":0.020230310734507775,"score_gpt":0.2638333077511673,"score_spread":0.24360299701665955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071441573","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010163301,0.017116826,0.0017777059,0.6066193,0.004824424,0.00028026014,0.0009995423,0.0000975904,0.35812104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19262841,0.013139674,0.004328614,0.5559599,0.0028086286,0.00033182633,0.0005233753,0.00015169576,0.23012796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910964,0.0016637444,0.00026202458,0.00091335457,0.003508526,0.002556012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99166614,0.0037110576,0.00032959363,0.00016316131,0.0032684929,0.0008615361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049707447,0.0010296117,0.00044089704,0.0032638547,0.028248934,0.014268422,0.0036157435,0.016287183,0.0121848425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015644832,0.00090877624,0.0010250102,0.0035980532,0.01885113,0.007628884,0.0026275658,0.017202036,0.0016425522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031117335,0.000041618237,0.0009895829,0.00011807965,0.00000687188,0.00063602615,0.014782164,0.00011602095,0.0003288591,0.6411847,0.334368,0.007397052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024714467,0.0000293729,0.004741059,0.0005868418,0.000012974183,0.00016233893,0.014135802,0.0001379267,0.00029370002,0.034472514,0.94526184,0.00014098332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9218317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9596933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07816827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074544095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05843756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5408578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096159731","doi":"","title":"Specialty Ombudsman Offices: The New Breed of Structural Heretics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Government (linguistics); Public sector; Private sector; Specialty; Public service; Depiction; Service (business)","score_opus":0.06607557065098654,"score_gpt":0.32646915096013135,"score_spread":0.26039358030914483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096159731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026755234,0.015797572,0.03035127,0.12758292,0.004981985,0.00007963532,0.00012413494,0.00027093894,0.79405624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80724746,0.009624513,0.014983755,0.02360601,0.0047799572,0.00020791829,0.00016442892,0.00059300096,0.13879302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919077,0.0035754403,0.00023193425,0.0012130566,0.0018417748,0.0012301253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932114,0.0026863173,0.00069494377,0.0012417177,0.0010370339,0.0011285861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065507093,0.0005247586,0.0004516054,0.0022352599,0.0108079985,0.014630978,0.0019219824,0.004777294,0.016103132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011844417,0.00058418006,0.0003670676,0.0031606262,0.038849972,0.021812141,0.008732203,0.008669434,0.0026794907],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005162923,0.000004012614,0.00017215712,0.000011039285,6.4296245e-7,0.000031768694,0.0028335943,0.00001903298,0.000019307628,0.98228675,0.0082038995,0.006412742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009675267,0.000019001116,0.00050525635,0.00017595456,0.0000027820427,0.00015770765,0.0055170725,0.00020788785,0.0000835022,0.21670943,0.7765958,0.000015889282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014331835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026483689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016103132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010999275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008528357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07980573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097157888","doi":"","title":"86Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture Discussion on Constitution Supervision of Chinese Local People’s Congress: The Way out of the Nominal Constitution Supervision in China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; China; Subject (documents); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.012015790003606405,"score_gpt":0.28514714728761725,"score_spread":0.27313135728401083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097157888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07413376,0.0064338357,0.0002789243,0.36652175,0.0031618609,0.000064799075,0.000388098,0.00003419276,0.54898274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64189947,0.005335591,0.0004936192,0.085118055,0.0015461735,0.00009575799,0.00016117691,0.000059806265,0.26529035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759007,0.0004528052,0.000103182574,0.00027041585,0.00063088775,0.0009525767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969574,0.0013217159,0.00019262817,0.00017900055,0.0008300251,0.00051925797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003737387,0.00025993923,0.00044116462,0.0010933721,0.020409869,0.009530553,0.0011831524,0.006000043,0.02598518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004783142,0.0003812212,0.00048604523,0.0029027024,0.009788668,0.0030161908,0.0023624406,0.005228115,0.0008750487],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004868165,0.0000363948,0.008333598,0.00019741435,0.000025113091,0.0007983916,0.042747993,0.00019088689,0.000490048,0.63504124,0.29631248,0.015777742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034503824,0.00001676519,0.03344138,0.00026057535,0.000030837255,0.00008602169,0.031461474,0.00017815374,0.00033774626,0.0077198013,0.9263428,0.00009008113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8515105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9073465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8515105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03520882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05471368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29872787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099426683","doi":"","title":"Ministry of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Denial; Psychopathy Checklist; Psychopathy; Checklist; Christian ministry; Risk assessment; Sex offender","score_opus":0.025178291871745598,"score_gpt":0.2942564195329373,"score_spread":0.2690781276611917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099426683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008274249,0.0028908595,0.0010190966,0.048286516,0.0047686063,0.0009559878,0.06092878,0.0008282447,0.8720476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032621846,0.0017312069,0.0012486837,0.0037966298,0.00015825387,0.00015245244,0.008909778,0.00021226144,0.95116884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979944,0.00013387893,0.00007091343,0.000149699,0.00091796595,0.0007331237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897125,0.00048459982,0.00020313446,0.00030360816,0.00671001,0.0025861484],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00102743,0.000622194,0.00047911634,0.0014695262,0.004596322,0.0034094367,0.0018264881,0.0016688735,0.36229008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060914676,0.00045708797,0.0004958634,0.0016970631,0.0006050778,0.000934082,0.0018109591,0.002379167,0.053259704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011729866,0.00008068617,0.0049444386,0.00022394261,0.000014787318,0.00014954059,0.00024313355,0.00013706894,0.00022956153,0.00559217,0.9133244,0.07494294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003376835,0.00003151623,0.016770301,0.00023738152,0.000007751159,0.00007885264,0.00054839154,0.00027385526,0.00013526791,0.00039863284,0.98146063,0.000023676306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92192614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94160664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6377099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027442984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14363456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9096158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102689192","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0043","title":"A pragmatist approach to the administrative state: A new interpretation of John Willis’s ‘three approaches to administrative law’","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Opposition (politics); Interpretation (philosophy); Administrative law; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Constitutional interpretation","score_opus":0.07232671953910134,"score_gpt":0.28953992751324215,"score_spread":0.2172132079741408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102689192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029097067,0.007326329,0.101062275,0.25914925,0.0025945038,0.00009266189,0.00020470606,0.0001832413,0.60029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9110894,0.0026180742,0.022963557,0.017891167,0.0017324658,0.00017000573,0.00008527084,0.000123412,0.043326642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914255,0.0030102357,0.00027537651,0.0009656286,0.0032250502,0.0010981967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99572515,0.0014157499,0.0003339744,0.0005190375,0.0015177897,0.00048821385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062205936,0.00067087234,0.0004649373,0.0042209676,0.008897779,0.012706577,0.0025715197,0.005249667,0.0030126397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009920688,0.00042310986,0.0007628847,0.0029768308,0.06267683,0.009133134,0.004754855,0.007617212,0.00043412863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.152293e-7,0.0000013427607,0.000021743932,0.0000031470177,4.722429e-7,0.000007319401,0.0017030897,0.000024391536,0.000013549174,0.9965629,0.0011168267,0.00054430123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011040909,0.000009395092,0.00039727907,0.00006627629,0.0000059451995,0.00006313173,0.0027301155,0.0007326601,0.00012647647,0.8335147,0.1623161,0.000026861708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12736921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12935653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12736921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024713153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027623385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25325572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113235981","doi":"","title":"Доброчесність як принцип державної служби: концептуальний та правовий аналіз","year":2025,"lang":"uk","type":"article","venue":"Scientific periodicals of Ukraine","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Legislation; Ethical code; Government (linguistics); Compliance (psychology); Code of conduct; Foundation (evidence); Sanctions","score_opus":0.014972594951878073,"score_gpt":0.34115826394483534,"score_spread":0.32618566899295726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113235981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12980765,0.017278263,0.12141229,0.016211748,0.0014048036,0.00034963587,0.0008082328,0.0005267317,0.7122007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8664271,0.010303019,0.048658032,0.000576836,0.00032989707,0.00025412766,0.00026376554,0.00023388395,0.07295334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983455,0.00040406792,0.00010895776,0.00020336238,0.00075653533,0.00018148348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987645,0.00037355867,0.00019157912,0.00017033843,0.00037285042,0.00012716763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016598973,0.00032680196,0.0002681554,0.0017097017,0.0023797557,0.005800796,0.00040325872,0.0010916309,0.01654038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033206518,0.0004910179,0.00033532263,0.0021850003,0.0027571279,0.0017670281,0.0017761649,0.0015483061,0.0055190274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007893928,0.00009183353,0.003971992,0.000407119,0.000027120555,0.0011367967,0.010047506,0.0016781439,0.005717058,0.70636266,0.014367271,0.25611362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023240907,0.000057792935,0.0066759298,0.00034479014,0.000046465128,0.0008526227,0.004208088,0.0013187738,0.0055595622,0.11280585,0.86803836,0.00006856486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009245535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010490452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01654038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025669192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00569295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055333078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116639937","doi":"","title":"Book review - The European Ombudsman Investigated: From Old Battles to New Challenges, D. Curtin, T. Ehnert, A. Morandini and S. Tas (eds), 2025, Hart. ISBN: 978 1 5099 7560 0","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Publications (Maastricht University)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Council on Foreign Relations","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Feature (linguistics); Work (physics); Legislation","score_opus":0.0932206060570369,"score_gpt":0.3436435945943777,"score_spread":0.2504229885373408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116639937","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000122007965,0.9510143,0.00019473201,0.010506512,0.014582947,0.000029462279,0.00038807126,0.0000523061,0.023109676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001510768,0.89934933,0.00050331804,0.0064030825,0.008167707,0.00006725575,0.0008672459,0.00008221861,0.08304917],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988757,0.00019520137,0.00012192462,0.0001150372,0.00062256766,0.0000696587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701333,0.0013858204,0.0002995894,0.00007379513,0.0010172968,0.00021014299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001310398,0.0012038609,0.0020079557,0.0034168665,0.00062174146,0.004225036,0.0013893143,0.002231906,0.06316516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006203961,0.00047147513,0.00068120164,0.00656876,0.0007700029,0.0033065514,0.0010666542,0.0020052982,0.03653765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011603876,0.000006704111,0.000040223054,0.0013509145,0.000010790854,0.000024230221,0.000026914007,0.000028881592,0.000046396697,0.0008861643,0.9188117,0.07875548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004318496,0.000009117181,0.00026324525,0.0025755768,0.000012826802,0.0002032005,0.00004001904,0.0000110362835,0.000029112636,0.00044283122,0.9964042,0.000004604746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069165444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015579778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06316516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020954153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044220653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21130848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125500598","doi":"10.33693/2541-8025-2025-21-6-187-192","title":"The dualistic model of independent control over information and confidentiality: Canada's experience and prospects for implementation in Russia","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Economic problems and legal practice","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Transparency (behavior); Control (management); State (computer science); Balance (ability); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.010662330751292345,"score_gpt":0.29708690371322377,"score_spread":0.2864245729619314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125500598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72118133,0.0034645048,0.003791854,0.09457289,0.00027480008,0.00022782802,0.00013701507,0.00006259812,0.17628716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98607975,0.0013156934,0.0010836542,0.0016607356,0.000016501908,0.00003147362,0.00002914223,0.000019554609,0.00976346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97918636,0.0064427494,0.00045935393,0.00094185065,0.0062030265,0.0067666476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98757184,0.004167298,0.000700923,0.00046841966,0.0033624605,0.0037290563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011665781,0.00026716272,0.0006400433,0.0013860659,0.03378233,0.013699842,0.002970794,0.003563843,0.0033050128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014849167,0.0003930143,0.000507064,0.0036226716,0.017875398,0.0025802243,0.006905885,0.005814367,0.00018137279],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001346946,0.00019373318,0.021948552,0.00025988664,0.000043170126,0.0021288227,0.27938077,0.0015258961,0.0007888127,0.6026743,0.013161958,0.077759415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013225306,0.00020253105,0.053803947,0.00076666323,0.0001125223,0.00091985683,0.51139754,0.0048024277,0.0015150928,0.031232925,0.3948628,0.00025138826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9885294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98815244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8499292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15007079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35346922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9857974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126136542","doi":"","title":"Administrative Law: Cases, Text, and Materials, 8th Edition","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Casebook; Statutory interpretation; Statutory law; Tribunal; Judicial review; Doctrine; Supreme court; Legislature","score_opus":0.03155307214084373,"score_gpt":0.2974684636043396,"score_spread":0.26591539146349585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126136542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012277825,0.029088657,0.009451745,0.025561286,0.016853103,0.00093004585,0.011466722,0.0033016095,0.9021191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007850714,0.025906337,0.0074282866,0.013190731,0.0047294665,0.0007612141,0.008095695,0.0011715844,0.930866],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935695,0.00045993336,0.00035954252,0.00026246806,0.0047979434,0.0005505267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98997366,0.0027050073,0.00048489388,0.0007660745,0.0055874647,0.00048282667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028573992,0.0013163139,0.00096845004,0.006110754,0.0047238497,0.009683939,0.0029128818,0.0033100103,0.13045892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016636573,0.0012459655,0.0006125035,0.007271939,0.0035918923,0.003934265,0.0026689996,0.004203948,0.08438047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027951248,0.000013309664,0.000034495257,0.000057090598,6.7629895e-7,0.000020927102,0.00007587897,0.00007471198,0.00007617915,0.0075247064,0.9719733,0.020145908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018474965,0.0000027532944,0.00025924694,0.00011116882,6.814778e-7,0.00003516861,0.000066765286,0.000044953587,0.00003641092,0.0017636006,0.9976712,0.0000062455847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3121394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36404866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3121394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018597018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039831515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62064505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128688157","doi":"10.26180/4559041.v1","title":"Bills of rights: the newest despotism? a comparison of the development of the principles of judicial review of administrative action in Australia and Canada","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Administrative law; Jurisdiction; Scrutiny; Statutory law; Action (physics); Human rights; Standard of review; Common law","score_opus":0.14231471892724518,"score_gpt":0.3712414000381734,"score_spread":0.22892668111092823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128688157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25165275,0.04101033,0.003421401,0.16822806,0.00081201136,0.00030345772,0.00030522674,0.00007765966,0.5341891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94047827,0.0148361875,0.002340543,0.011476227,0.00022748622,0.00006775042,0.00008643573,0.00006337309,0.030423876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9694445,0.004363149,0.0008865923,0.001624264,0.017512409,0.00616909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9663824,0.0059000845,0.002441557,0.0011616655,0.018505605,0.005608663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010845798,0.00017611949,0.0005388781,0.0050212406,0.0105357645,0.011188529,0.002262455,0.002376251,0.002649717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031903185,0.000497631,0.00047598087,0.004788018,0.014948736,0.0033040552,0.0033422606,0.005183355,0.0002075939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007347172,0.00007229974,0.013913833,0.00036127577,0.00005357588,0.00040179555,0.06572899,0.0008981565,0.0009150202,0.7954036,0.03182384,0.090354204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045372642,0.00009577947,0.29808256,0.0012991114,0.00008121058,0.00038859242,0.035320677,0.0017461586,0.0007812534,0.029782709,0.63212925,0.00024728352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96503365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9842488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16179423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16179423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18562113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97219986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128704530","doi":"10.26180/4559041","title":"Bills of rights: the newest despotism? a comparison of the development of the principles of judicial review of administrative action in Australia and Canada","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Administrative law; Jurisdiction; Scrutiny; Statutory law; Action (physics); Human rights; Standard of review; Common law","score_opus":0.14231471892724518,"score_gpt":0.3712414000381734,"score_spread":0.22892668111092823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128704530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25165275,0.04101033,0.003421401,0.16822806,0.00081201136,0.00030345772,0.00030522674,0.00007765966,0.5341891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94047827,0.0148361875,0.002340543,0.011476227,0.00022748622,0.00006775042,0.00008643573,0.00006337309,0.030423876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9694445,0.004363149,0.0008865923,0.001624264,0.017512409,0.00616909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9663824,0.0059000845,0.002441557,0.0011616655,0.018505605,0.005608663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010845798,0.00017611949,0.0005388781,0.0050212406,0.0105357645,0.011188529,0.002262455,0.002376251,0.002649717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031903185,0.000497631,0.00047598087,0.004788018,0.014948736,0.0033040552,0.0033422606,0.005183355,0.0002075939],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007347172,0.00007229974,0.013913833,0.00036127577,0.00005357588,0.00040179555,0.06572899,0.0008981565,0.0009150202,0.7954036,0.03182384,0.090354204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045372642,0.00009577947,0.29808256,0.0012991114,0.00008121058,0.00038859242,0.035320677,0.0017461586,0.0007812534,0.029782709,0.63212925,0.00024728352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96503365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9842488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16179423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16179423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18562113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97219986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128743467","doi":"10.26180/4559041.v2","title":"Bills of rights: the newest despotism? a comparison of the development of the principles of judicial review of administrative action in Australia and Canada","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Administrative law; Jurisdiction; Scrutiny; Statutory law; Action (physics); Human rights; Standard of review; Common law","score_opus":0.14231471892724518,"score_gpt":0.3712414000381734,"score_spread":0.22892668111092823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128743467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25165275,0.04101033,0.003421401,0.16822806,0.00081201136,0.00030345772,0.00030522674,0.00007765966,0.5341891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94047827,0.0148361875,0.002340543,0.011476227,0.00022748622,0.00006775042,0.00008643573,0.00006337309,0.030423876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9694445,0.004363149,0.0008865923,0.001624264,0.017512409,0.00616909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9663824,0.0059000845,0.002441557,0.0011616655,0.018505605,0.005608663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010845798,0.00017611949,0.0005388781,0.0050212406,0.0105357645,0.011188529,0.002262455,0.002376251,0.002649717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031903185,0.000497631,0.00047598087,0.004788018,0.014948736,0.0033040552,0.0033422606,0.005183355,0.0002075939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007347172,0.00007229974,0.013913833,0.00036127577,0.00005357588,0.00040179555,0.06572899,0.0008981565,0.0009150202,0.7954036,0.03182384,0.090354204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045372642,0.00009577947,0.29808256,0.0012991114,0.00008121058,0.00038859242,0.035320677,0.0017461586,0.0007812534,0.029782709,0.63212925,0.00024728352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96503365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9842488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16179423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16179423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18562113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97219986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7131999950","doi":"","title":"Objection as a legal remedy according to the General administrative procedure act","year":2024,"lang":"hr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Repository Faculty of Law University of Zagreb","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Meaning (existential); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.03148922245876111,"score_gpt":0.31977464152400387,"score_spread":0.28828541906524274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7131999950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05010543,0.0032456536,0.014480148,0.059724864,0.0027634597,0.0005714562,0.0003992704,0.00056318933,0.8681465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7738799,0.001627313,0.010107922,0.041198473,0.0022678555,0.00073947536,0.0003573994,0.00025669628,0.16956496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9544336,0.018501377,0.003639301,0.0044368543,0.012978593,0.0060102297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96080965,0.017421937,0.005329352,0.0084186625,0.005902177,0.0021182145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028625587,0.000712866,0.0008921514,0.002429834,0.007509603,0.01574186,0.0031692132,0.01944331,0.014750267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06609066,0.00068037113,0.0019041355,0.0022525275,0.020686107,0.00830602,0.009704154,0.012217497,0.005125997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032299875,0.00004504861,0.0012644586,0.000052693238,0.000013663722,0.00022210169,0.0020512312,0.00014580476,0.00025266162,0.97503257,0.014959624,0.0059277522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018142356,0.00021021179,0.008235,0.0008347426,0.00013770422,0.0008573901,0.0032449437,0.0018350043,0.0013854497,0.41794968,0.56490487,0.00022366697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013296853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013225996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028625587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066042906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029057538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1513884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132906494","doi":"","title":"Improving juidicial review of administrative discretion in China: lessons from Canadian experience","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promulgation; China; Judicial discretion; Judicial review; Administrative discretion; Administrative law; Discretion","score_opus":0.05485619271003188,"score_gpt":0.4540567213321183,"score_spread":0.3992005286220864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132906494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7477968,0.007961583,0.0017019724,0.08486503,0.0005912727,0.00033897976,0.00035145285,0.00009870295,0.15629414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678312,0.0054570218,0.0021383194,0.0054843575,0.00007812295,0.000055302815,0.00013985124,0.0000596855,0.018756188],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98941106,0.002512047,0.00056762685,0.00068425393,0.0034697093,0.0033552053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97047126,0.006205662,0.0011401188,0.001181657,0.014363213,0.00663812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014433824,0.00039281,0.0005733857,0.0020999028,0.018394185,0.005372823,0.0024107494,0.0017461759,0.005293904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02592603,0.00040318855,0.0003775755,0.0075338874,0.005617527,0.0025752026,0.0028609014,0.0027609342,0.00036310568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030097752,0.00061640865,0.076303706,0.00090580725,0.00007913497,0.005081581,0.4682395,0.0016651393,0.0019232583,0.076045156,0.11806609,0.25077334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016036192,0.00040836402,0.13780227,0.0008148907,0.00012298423,0.0011108597,0.24248597,0.0020513143,0.0016257074,0.0055385497,0.60750663,0.00037202594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97232145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99198496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101710215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.101710215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2129736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7379627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133025843","doi":"","title":"Reconceiving discretion: from discretion as power to discretion as dialogue","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Judicial discretion; Normative; Administrative discretion; Legitimacy; Rule of law; Power (physics); Realisation","score_opus":0.018462506047905374,"score_gpt":0.36556496713437486,"score_spread":0.34710246108646947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133025843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1045928,0.010125259,0.121503964,0.056158483,0.00063247094,0.00009711603,0.00007747899,0.00010969356,0.70670277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815283,0.0014220284,0.0044454476,0.0013286136,0.0002017704,0.00005424205,0.000021031274,0.000051789335,0.010946888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98865694,0.0060115024,0.00029022983,0.0009414546,0.0024874522,0.0016123232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99317706,0.004198922,0.00065734785,0.00078464585,0.00054720097,0.0006347647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008163778,0.00042682525,0.00054629677,0.0025334866,0.0070517757,0.015510936,0.0016289365,0.0027972853,0.0035144144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010214905,0.0003123587,0.0006660282,0.002006182,0.061447505,0.016450962,0.011641912,0.0044543934,0.00039252252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054077605,0.0000034440425,0.00010322752,0.000011016459,0.000001632791,0.000024873514,0.008528154,0.00014177186,0.000042260624,0.98875743,0.00020718947,0.002173548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013081583,0.000009975643,0.00036763775,0.00013002708,0.00000700844,0.000040996354,0.0054913205,0.000596169,0.00019063357,0.94972324,0.043414913,0.000015000842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028159413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019773958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028159413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016237706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013960074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11781335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134358639","doi":"","title":"No English title available","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); General interest; Administrative law","score_opus":0.026473174889237137,"score_gpt":0.2549512135719727,"score_spread":0.22847803868273556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134358639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037286335,0.006743305,0.0014447903,0.014519799,0.037606277,0.0007232268,0.029917698,0.0016491504,0.90702295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023768805,0.0050095962,0.0006675847,0.0052107507,0.0030532938,0.00047691521,0.01407165,0.0013149347,0.9678183],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785525,0.0004196814,0.000264868,0.00035873725,0.00087789854,0.00022353271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926466,0.0017215777,0.00040869458,0.00080562517,0.0035093,0.0009082418],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020149758,0.0011665467,0.0013476554,0.0033234924,0.002423971,0.007167049,0.003755537,0.0030666133,0.8745155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01815063,0.00069512613,0.0011453306,0.002916353,0.0009778995,0.0052137906,0.0039819106,0.003123108,0.77550155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002403575,0.000010527815,0.00004122172,0.00072882505,0.0000034020475,0.0000796441,0.000063217514,0.00002551645,0.00006645889,0.0022658394,0.971168,0.02552337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074705595,0.000005327336,0.00007753155,0.00042789598,0.0000016292455,0.000041903422,0.000056799126,0.000009724509,0.000030843887,0.0005500553,0.99878675,0.0000041330977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049918406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071138227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12548453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024174638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005312102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17898846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134628916","doi":"","title":"Contribution to the integration of environmental considerations in the work of the European Court of Auditors : where does environmental audit fit ?","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Nature Conservation; Environmental audit; Capital (architecture); Institution","score_opus":0.018341531487554758,"score_gpt":0.24176315370713347,"score_spread":0.2234216222195787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134628916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26281372,0.03157845,0.036040507,0.17469749,0.0020913845,0.00010576912,0.00021276878,0.00010542893,0.49235463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687261,0.00426884,0.0045335344,0.0048607006,0.00031045263,0.00002466368,0.000045635512,0.000047431527,0.017182684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9737562,0.014260069,0.0013103543,0.0019712076,0.006264992,0.0024371706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.961825,0.020047365,0.0037020664,0.0032803214,0.008916603,0.0022285525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017524082,0.00029535277,0.00053474534,0.0031506992,0.006322574,0.022044968,0.0013682917,0.0050108405,0.007390722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04449105,0.0004794245,0.00056239974,0.0052588093,0.009836602,0.0108398255,0.008391623,0.003733295,0.00040382674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012374645,0.00009587679,0.023839705,0.0004192613,0.00006888197,0.001433201,0.030992383,0.0035531197,0.0004447887,0.7774017,0.016665056,0.14496233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027269056,0.00012577833,0.060177818,0.004242239,0.0001197743,0.0010766793,0.081209995,0.0040545175,0.0016940321,0.28841004,0.55862164,0.00024029451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040974185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048435792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040974185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010982467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019170713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092677295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135926513","doi":"","title":"Abuse of Public Law in Judicial Decisions","year":2010,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Supreme court; Doctrine; Public law; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Relevance (law)","score_opus":0.019134093079789305,"score_gpt":0.28573892500563786,"score_spread":0.26660483192584855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135926513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2648692,0.013006639,0.046526313,0.017814843,0.00047467818,0.00023146214,0.00007968145,0.00005286968,0.6569444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939733,0.0009541514,0.0009766252,0.00044796048,0.00010356464,0.000042484164,0.000009427506,0.0000111299905,0.0034812633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.946798,0.032082085,0.0031918872,0.003232592,0.008898882,0.0057965307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595195,0.028215516,0.0043517724,0.0040908656,0.0029518614,0.00087051146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022419931,0.00028672995,0.0008889075,0.0033763044,0.008355932,0.014853138,0.001412787,0.004114925,0.0038938608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04440849,0.0008352431,0.00084037794,0.0038917493,0.048172086,0.013218206,0.009401601,0.0061910385,0.00037709234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054686398,0.000010511986,0.00056687207,0.00002524187,0.0000052424143,0.000115025236,0.0061795693,0.00025952602,0.00003988358,0.98866385,0.0004541033,0.0036748345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022580634,0.000034312827,0.0036499961,0.0005584307,0.000036159985,0.00039971655,0.008536041,0.0015483212,0.00034985735,0.9351992,0.049615934,0.00004941768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009128121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006966289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022419931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012805796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0104495175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118569314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7146998226","doi":"10.70675/2a370b28z93f4z4dedzb7bazcbe9388d012a","title":"L'adaptation de l'intensité du contrôle juridictionnel aux caractéristiques de l'action administrative contrôlée","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Context (archaeology); Lawmaking","score_opus":0.06283175833308564,"score_gpt":0.37474348976255145,"score_spread":0.3119117314294658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7146998226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35882038,0.0046121855,0.076919384,0.034355514,0.00096890755,0.0012648078,0.0020775432,0.0023405629,0.5186407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9056607,0.0014414967,0.014889315,0.0020762344,0.00025373197,0.00048543065,0.00056071405,0.00032485666,0.07430749],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865118,0.0033872183,0.00052568386,0.0019132264,0.0051762327,0.0024858809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975391,0.0075904387,0.002825197,0.002877015,0.008401632,0.002914845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009419003,0.0006169995,0.0006180268,0.0021517652,0.004685432,0.010515563,0.0024742868,0.0020642555,0.037225496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026149582,0.0005723177,0.0008707461,0.0023291404,0.0031028131,0.004080957,0.004414552,0.003433619,0.0042555444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009732519,0.0006856906,0.08804803,0.0018662775,0.00042335564,0.00047865632,0.039105672,0.027431875,0.017752757,0.346276,0.050240204,0.42671824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002635683,0.00061623426,0.26923847,0.0010910484,0.00027444505,0.0002741513,0.027669467,0.013198064,0.010291426,0.042648755,0.63399595,0.00043838262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22874326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20869537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22874326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019681202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03763884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4548236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148360771","doi":"10.70675/d751f3a4z885bz40a6z8c54z8e1ceacf8367","title":"La sûreté réelle pour autrui","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Poison control; Legal action","score_opus":0.029732653480807846,"score_gpt":0.3696411107177174,"score_spread":0.33990845723690954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148360771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031008197,0.011261895,0.015757788,0.06544578,0.006297029,0.00044736953,0.00056362915,0.00034329548,0.86887497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19446518,0.0027489318,0.005407841,0.025150895,0.0009129902,0.00036887467,0.0002896623,0.00018145007,0.77047414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907155,0.002235572,0.0006189323,0.0018579953,0.0029485344,0.0016234688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995214,0.0018165114,0.0003964541,0.0005629292,0.0016876855,0.00032239023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004474062,0.00074193283,0.00050958985,0.0010677812,0.0074977,0.0077077528,0.0015625465,0.007332535,0.020688681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013034008,0.0006570084,0.0011108081,0.0007448259,0.0047854013,0.0034895241,0.0042361147,0.012233091,0.006052179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098582095,0.000028757646,0.0012067708,0.0002781483,0.000024433706,0.00047005172,0.020419043,0.0002574535,0.002132742,0.8407251,0.10586034,0.028498566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000145953145,0.00007317799,0.0032504527,0.00032896883,0.000022386344,0.00016837736,0.0020735008,0.0001698286,0.0014576634,0.012107786,0.98027635,0.000057013087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06285471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10904814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06285471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0083831325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010964111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12497771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7149224414","doi":"","title":"a summer school for ombudspersons","year":2018,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Nike; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.029059099723477613,"score_gpt":0.24345838969936293,"score_spread":0.2143992899758853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7149224414","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036172647,0.010818147,0.003908911,0.43205523,0.12246973,0.0015836705,0.001843342,0.0018856364,0.38926268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042797726,0.0025521074,0.003153365,0.02249177,0.0053938124,0.00080267456,0.00062333676,0.00053348375,0.9216518],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505925,0.0015446207,0.00021430195,0.00046996787,0.00072829623,0.0019835564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98513097,0.0005259217,0.00030761756,0.0004139893,0.0011774331,0.01244415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057713687,0.0012642948,0.0012175234,0.0012385395,0.014879661,0.0055928836,0.0013505702,0.005285376,0.26973748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007966851,0.0009166656,0.0007120323,0.0011505571,0.0020346302,0.004853754,0.009654205,0.007987723,0.09497714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006779944,0.00022938965,0.00067529676,0.00006743896,0.0000026917965,0.00040891083,0.002944325,0.000024607889,0.00045837328,0.0054277848,0.96350324,0.026190337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007732329,0.000051459487,0.0010785025,0.00007821166,0.0000010024787,0.000075406104,0.005323818,0.000016406411,0.00006971591,0.00096909184,0.9923194,0.000009279388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004543786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018034386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26973748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033228355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0136526935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90236175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164877947","doi":"10.1080/17153379.2003.12553709","title":"Implementing Human Rights Through Administrative Law Reforms: The Potential in China and Vietnam.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; China; Human rights; International human rights law; Public law","score_opus":0.02234134657699433,"score_gpt":0.30893589412121175,"score_spread":0.2865945475442174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164877947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43109924,0.006350977,0.0052217254,0.24383914,0.0007462064,0.00105085,0.00019428587,0.00012413802,0.31137344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547564,0.0017097238,0.0015013398,0.015173505,0.00011342336,0.00028754555,0.00006509487,0.000011151224,0.026381658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947542,0.0023273374,0.000088600726,0.00021099107,0.0005358801,0.002082992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99562764,0.0014773131,0.00040637425,0.00025016206,0.00070761016,0.0015308466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006223179,0.00021031058,0.00017314103,0.00043214677,0.0042054034,0.0050044283,0.0012060726,0.0036394538,0.006731057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107749365,0.0001494882,0.00021086034,0.00076314464,0.0054914826,0.0032403278,0.0035126663,0.0030094134,0.00024163954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014307305,0.0005707089,0.037120875,0.0004061152,0.000056128272,0.0012063037,0.022117954,0.0035378027,0.0015288088,0.7329597,0.051754586,0.14859787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004720642,0.0009329038,0.13299565,0.0015263958,0.00012607222,0.0002454576,0.06257917,0.008986283,0.0035508506,0.18158391,0.6068791,0.00012207015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1569134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21301195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1569134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007841972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0822999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3120001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W80233134","doi":"10.82308/15812","title":"The impact of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms on Canadian administrative law /","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Administrative law; Political science; Law; Statutory law; Mandate; Public law; Statutory interpretation; Common law; Government (linguistics); Public administration","score_opus":0.02164229028773362,"score_gpt":0.2972256076350571,"score_spread":0.2755833173473235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W80233134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03504951,0.013736489,0.0029758113,0.1592823,0.0025907792,0.00021279597,0.0014215144,0.0001813321,0.7845496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68025655,0.014272405,0.011140288,0.030475598,0.0010647182,0.00013030633,0.0007843271,0.00023570556,0.2616401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850439,0.0015487671,0.00032116656,0.0009591381,0.008687026,0.003440118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98440796,0.0028623594,0.00047981992,0.0005705359,0.009252084,0.0024272893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065191877,0.00052187726,0.00047148328,0.0041737845,0.019795908,0.013854923,0.0022462297,0.003843756,0.021589331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015982939,0.0005048489,0.0009161858,0.0038999764,0.013126577,0.0032095355,0.0036112044,0.00431704,0.0009273739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040994553,0.000019768317,0.0024391345,0.00012509472,0.000012413098,0.00021249296,0.0026604831,0.0005936188,0.00036735384,0.8622401,0.104597785,0.026690762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037184098,0.000028942826,0.021900883,0.00035467834,0.000051893778,0.00010845101,0.0036958647,0.0022581578,0.0005996266,0.038949013,0.93185496,0.00016034473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99677116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23572622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23572622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3400527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8864493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W868840","doi":"","title":"A Primer on Federal Specialty OmbudsOffices","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Statute; Parliament; Context (archaeology); Task (project management); Position (finance); Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Political science; Law; Administrative law; Legislature; Public administration; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Management; Economics; Politics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.08061102184667701,"score_gpt":0.30141492941323306,"score_spread":0.22080390756655605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W868840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023483739,0.26526543,0.015081064,0.23700677,0.03680207,0.00047565202,0.001104516,0.0005732449,0.4413428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053448632,0.26467568,0.02138578,0.2359792,0.016559487,0.0012198499,0.0018650127,0.0007499504,0.40411645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98769,0.0034403342,0.0012967791,0.0010880961,0.0044867746,0.0019980406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879732,0.006444025,0.00080368225,0.0005685601,0.0035211847,0.0006893964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018060468,0.00083088945,0.0009884533,0.0063021155,0.007438706,0.0075786,0.0029619134,0.009107447,0.02039402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021417445,0.0010219407,0.0009260181,0.008674965,0.0071257693,0.008819279,0.0031214443,0.010037063,0.009067197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017044713,0.000033966644,0.00026173814,0.00043675367,0.0000033754407,0.00014025126,0.0017100977,0.00012268916,0.00029636722,0.53815186,0.39499262,0.06383331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010660706,0.00000571181,0.00027906382,0.00040897581,9.064853e-7,0.00003696993,0.0001445831,0.000016801685,0.000037290283,0.0062557664,0.9928054,0.000007429505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15621309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20149834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8437869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023905458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026979102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31060767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W9687415","doi":"10.1128/aac.42.8.2106","title":"The potential of soft governance in the EU information society: lessons from the EU electronic communications regulatory framework","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Soft law; Directive; Enforcement; Legislation; Commission; European union; Business; Multi-level governance; Hard law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law; International trade; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.022124881963689162,"score_gpt":0.27468628509121307,"score_spread":0.2525614031275239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W9687415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22126955,0.00797235,0.017034398,0.25586718,0.00046977153,0.000052410072,0.00008205944,0.000091522284,0.4971608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895419,0.00087964296,0.0013310871,0.0032293173,0.00015917167,0.000024768262,0.000014298357,0.000013211013,0.0048065824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929061,0.0039728475,0.0002303627,0.0004560577,0.0011373429,0.0012973427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98218334,0.011316023,0.0011704757,0.0016713515,0.0019592475,0.0016995764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015445733,0.00024788882,0.0003567551,0.0014590793,0.0031111652,0.0151530495,0.0010895225,0.0068004914,0.005065703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018549906,0.0002355132,0.0004145182,0.0012580551,0.025169574,0.0100595085,0.005155481,0.002935528,0.0003486111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024884364,0.000021889326,0.000931041,0.000022230724,0.0000062276804,0.00013510887,0.0013088752,0.0020559689,0.00008983966,0.9778285,0.002231165,0.015344263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030920484,0.00008534432,0.0042452,0.00029509724,0.000008044481,0.000101259815,0.0048392415,0.0036372833,0.00033565055,0.89617866,0.090205535,0.00003772554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014408254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01084253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015445733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007991906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074004247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08168584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}