{"meta":{"query_hash":"4d71120b810e","filters":{"topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods"},"cohort_total":442,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":442,"exported":442,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4d71120b810e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Optimal+Experimental+Design+Methods"},"results":[{"id":"W1031741470","doi":"10.1016/b978-075067618-2/50014-7","title":"Introduction to Analysis of Variance","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Variance (accounting); Analysis of variance; Factorial; One-way analysis of variance; Replication (statistics); Main effect; Statistics; Variable (mathematics); Factorial analysis; Variance-based sensitivity analysis; Computer science; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Variables; Mathematics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.07176784849284745,"score_gpt":0.3845153044998531,"score_spread":0.31274745600700565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1031741470","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024297436,0.015928648,0.95226854,0.0009782122,0.0024086002,0.00016374481,0.0008555414,0.0024668537,0.02468687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011878751,0.024809266,0.8810425,0.0013760282,0.0027018695,0.0019397801,0.0015798674,0.003121412,0.07155061],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399143,0.0031447269,0.0004468418,0.0007652494,0.0014918438,0.00015988068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800918,0.015471258,0.00036733516,0.0016004029,0.0023281993,0.00014102219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074362173,0.0038424034,0.0036149998,0.003137139,0.00066506787,0.0030085237,0.0021657331,0.0021661394,0.04987596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020512942,0.0017152114,0.0022221094,0.0030420506,0.0025370668,0.0025091923,0.0012735503,0.0043129185,0.032996237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010030597,0.00012233686,0.00031820103,0.0018978894,0.00023276222,0.00013523569,0.00042893732,0.0058328677,0.0015885695,0.13624513,0.17137305,0.6817247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086782784,0.00015876022,0.0013794361,0.0011769992,0.0001598707,0.0005251268,0.0001663969,0.014151953,0.0022390157,0.39095122,0.5888539,0.00015046891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001355503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016072867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04987596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011361267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022333602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1668517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W109547034","doi":"10.1007/s00184-013-0461-9","title":"Some results on constructing general minimum lower order confounding $$2^{n-m}$$ 2 n - m designs for $$n\\le 2^{n-m-2}$$ n ≤ 2 n - m - 2","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Combinatorics; Order (exchange); Zhàng; Statistics","score_opus":0.21584645927730445,"score_gpt":0.4501946779864947,"score_spread":0.23434821870919026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W109547034","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002623458,0.00021061729,0.9960412,0.00012154525,0.000024933935,0.000100536774,0.00008533641,0.0001124795,0.00067988125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033355094,0.00031250875,0.96244943,0.0003257023,0.000110659916,0.0010898601,0.00033620678,0.0001401991,0.0018803326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98214436,0.012947921,0.00076042814,0.0019422314,0.0017339041,0.000471191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9210578,0.06835026,0.0025523435,0.0054910295,0.0019389839,0.00060953165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026953744,0.0035070647,0.004312712,0.002256452,0.0010723603,0.0016884892,0.00353164,0.0025936041,0.009078755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07080456,0.0029866432,0.004193091,0.0022126662,0.003105465,0.0035638157,0.0041131373,0.003988793,0.0012976249],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00219841,0.0007500199,0.002968636,0.002059099,0.0007158068,0.00021207177,0.00060655107,0.19481543,0.014933548,0.43847942,0.0061245994,0.33613634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007486202,0.001082637,0.0014861436,0.00023659563,0.00022313796,0.0001554532,0.00006886994,0.43440327,0.0049090097,0.54870117,0.007884555,0.000100505975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010417665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020543349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026953744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020867963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040652524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14254671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W110861836","doi":"","title":"Recursive Constructions of Balanced Incomplete Block Designs with Block Size of 7.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Block (permutation group theory); Mathematics; Block size; Arithmetic; Combinatorics; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.0795173013893631,"score_gpt":0.3721314229376046,"score_spread":0.2926141215482415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W110861836","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00824111,0.0001961565,0.9865073,0.00007888099,0.000039627215,0.0003815145,0.0003084701,0.0002931561,0.003953694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09567549,0.0002504344,0.89822716,0.00012933568,0.00004157677,0.0022056613,0.00045557387,0.00012330296,0.002891456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98666024,0.008931639,0.0006127314,0.0012361165,0.0018221098,0.00073718355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97488344,0.017248467,0.0017966597,0.0038737855,0.0017017133,0.0004958232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014049643,0.0011717041,0.001663766,0.0014016958,0.00063967623,0.0015790572,0.0021004246,0.0011516156,0.011272482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031208474,0.0011425387,0.0014364319,0.0010887054,0.0016824492,0.0018698543,0.0019460393,0.0016916436,0.0027163532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019713673,0.00036276062,0.0013615431,0.000955781,0.00023714424,0.00017140091,0.00034856546,0.058494624,0.025450964,0.66029423,0.0041620526,0.24618943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016871439,0.0024864,0.0017008687,0.0004941676,0.00039204065,0.00028343473,0.00015158419,0.27203968,0.040178616,0.64259887,0.03784425,0.00014287872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061600824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016526515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014049643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013701284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030812307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074302554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W122717491","doi":"","title":"Nested Partially Balanced Incomplete Block Design.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Block (permutation group theory); Combinatorics","score_opus":0.12638211415481782,"score_gpt":0.4114496631792185,"score_spread":0.2850675490244007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W122717491","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010639943,0.00045597786,0.981087,0.00014279658,0.00015128149,0.002956398,0.00064931595,0.0002675813,0.0036496741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15533288,0.00039337773,0.82437044,0.00025661787,0.0000913916,0.014085127,0.0006380585,0.000102310114,0.0047298134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94213307,0.04722311,0.0014215088,0.0038991023,0.004262325,0.0010608825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93108475,0.053820625,0.0039927615,0.0074589835,0.0026225091,0.0010204351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040256336,0.0021452368,0.0040991623,0.0009052132,0.00076825154,0.0017031619,0.0023796866,0.0019295013,0.021394106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09518063,0.0015524337,0.0016767635,0.0010796917,0.0024048965,0.0025342011,0.0020037766,0.0021177863,0.0024137648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01833033,0.0017395557,0.0031160496,0.0035656027,0.0016848008,0.00019589347,0.0006137753,0.13580923,0.009073848,0.5532517,0.0058803195,0.2667389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00664088,0.00940158,0.0025209961,0.00075870956,0.001307575,0.00017247313,0.00013748226,0.46232367,0.009974372,0.4736065,0.033003043,0.00015268297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010874884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020521728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040256336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017944571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004774939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21289837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W135223351","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4613-0049-6_7","title":"Additional Selected Topics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Maximization; Computer science; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Variety (cybernetics); Block (permutation group theory); Mathematical optimization; Optimal design; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.11270832870251576,"score_gpt":0.3942728854141296,"score_spread":0.28156455671161384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W135223351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053660374,0.0033530348,0.0025518984,0.0020513665,0.0072909202,0.00033445127,0.009184955,0.0011048143,0.973592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00070437806,0.0012925476,0.0005987579,0.00037411752,0.0009107101,0.000067572844,0.002807675,0.0002744256,0.9929697],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960846,0.000037156296,0.000013623178,0.000067756635,0.00022315753,0.000049866267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999283,0.00013275718,0.000028019927,0.00007050391,0.00028275218,0.0002029389],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048627998,0.0012609235,0.0013041184,0.0033914833,0.0012186541,0.0026839068,0.0011582893,0.0010007909,0.7993418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017206323,0.00035700636,0.0008037052,0.0036308595,0.00026079392,0.0018472255,0.001716417,0.0010402536,0.6767257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014957848,0.000045034976,0.00004911829,0.00013323853,0.0000022495017,0.000022179225,0.000019763726,0.00006402269,0.00024072902,0.0016876768,0.9184579,0.07926297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007369913,0.000018299008,0.00049480365,0.00009558743,0.000004264496,0.000029978062,0.00003461498,0.000058569953,0.00017505547,0.0019446396,0.9971318,0.000004927427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026734334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00925518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7993418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011727532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014408126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28621447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481493156","doi":"","title":"Optimization in 2 m 3 n Factorial Experiments","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Algorithmic operations research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Integer programming; Factorial experiment; Post hoc; Factorial; Design of experiments; Mathematical optimization; Orthogonal array; Theoretical computer science; Industrial engineering; Algorithm; Mathematics; Machine learning; Taguchi methods; Engineering; Statistics","score_opus":0.5038899504498755,"score_gpt":0.6029256541613165,"score_spread":0.09903570371144099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481493156","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0092253,0.00041123034,0.9877751,0.00019162017,0.000031981035,0.0003150551,0.00006624944,0.00011290559,0.0018705423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14709887,0.00048357164,0.84777874,0.00022236288,0.00006403502,0.0025571904,0.000116219555,0.00006402567,0.0016149059],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9595641,0.03424145,0.0010953585,0.0027563637,0.001735892,0.00060690305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9535488,0.04115858,0.0024634195,0.0017102439,0.00082546327,0.00029357304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027076438,0.0018609653,0.0030251918,0.0012061957,0.00080546475,0.0018653921,0.0018269522,0.0015388796,0.0030382813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040364884,0.001479337,0.002226301,0.001866889,0.0030946499,0.0018865096,0.0019618939,0.0016961157,0.0004400799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012104879,0.0003713207,0.0015798424,0.001616716,0.00041964045,0.0002024697,0.00029993968,0.65069246,0.0045711817,0.21581066,0.001611354,0.12161399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004475489,0.0015598073,0.0012453557,0.00010770849,0.00010798649,0.00006571824,0.00007946775,0.7689641,0.002990894,0.21933585,0.005022605,0.00007289151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018500692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024841605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027076438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028044933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036452177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14319563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491175567","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11194","title":"Techniques for the construction of robust regression designs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Robust regression; Regression; Computer science; Regression analysis; Mathematics; Outlier; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.233197658014244,"score_gpt":0.4119830676601403,"score_spread":0.17878540964589631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491175567","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014801692,0.0001339473,0.9992022,0.000045618453,0.000028738017,0.00005746017,0.00001933037,0.00009689032,0.00026791033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008251183,0.00032676116,0.98961675,0.000102233986,0.00009864816,0.00096732983,0.00007434192,0.00016798437,0.00039478551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9284835,0.05595342,0.0026619206,0.00355153,0.008653339,0.0006962161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83787405,0.13322023,0.008746685,0.010858219,0.00869183,0.0006089854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06697272,0.003074392,0.003825245,0.007693448,0.0011303503,0.0021880285,0.003931383,0.0030241306,0.010621935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19353658,0.0025388072,0.005542219,0.00446596,0.0045698863,0.0030097768,0.0052019255,0.00675522,0.003860887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026583544,0.00014844649,0.0007434765,0.001641271,0.0006434148,0.00018383686,0.0005397606,0.069048874,0.0036211866,0.6530728,0.006063719,0.26402745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030009527,0.0005550514,0.0006385002,0.00063453696,0.0002637579,0.00022525752,0.00009252965,0.22702907,0.004503226,0.7281552,0.03745158,0.00015119642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010417963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085075817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06697272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002162571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033124795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3541898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516925883","doi":"10.1080/00224065.2002.11980155","title":"Analyzing Unreplicated Blocked or Split-Plot Fractional Factorial Designs","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality Technology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Split plot; Factorial experiment; Factorial; Replication (statistics); Plackett–Burman design; Mathematics; Plot (graphics); Randomization; Statistics; Computer science; Main effect; Design of experiments; Algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Arithmetic; Response surface methodology","score_opus":0.49810525736246597,"score_gpt":0.5329440955844972,"score_spread":0.03483883822203121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516925883","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031162675,0.0002315321,0.96631896,0.00004710198,0.000051700925,0.00065443385,0.00023439943,0.00036539682,0.00093379006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23272517,0.00028801739,0.7601449,0.00013981068,0.000046531593,0.0037138541,0.00067261234,0.000118215954,0.002150923],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97750676,0.013979926,0.0007455278,0.0030622117,0.004108184,0.0005973655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9332397,0.050680876,0.0059871697,0.006240851,0.0034889013,0.00036247965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022305327,0.0017058102,0.0021286963,0.0014209002,0.0006278528,0.0012765755,0.0020243793,0.0012570388,0.0068418044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05908218,0.0006940647,0.0018326244,0.0014398544,0.0013707007,0.0012553534,0.00084058294,0.00097393664,0.0008781587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057066563,0.0020889852,0.013902487,0.0035135366,0.0012335938,0.0005447749,0.0010731583,0.21352664,0.048620157,0.12378685,0.003604663,0.58239853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010438241,0.005387403,0.014051751,0.0002792999,0.00039687357,0.0002437663,0.00023315978,0.71558386,0.0401494,0.20654164,0.01586126,0.00022771391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010051515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011511194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022305327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014487823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002448696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117963254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527212461","doi":"10.1002/bimj.201200200","title":"Modified Gaussian estimation for correlated binary data","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrical Journal","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Estimator; Statistics; Generalized estimating equation; Gaussian; Consistency (knowledge bases); Correlation; Binary data; Regression analysis; Binary number; Regression; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.4222998253043632,"score_gpt":0.5111461501127252,"score_spread":0.08884632480836202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527212461","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049721054,0.00010087192,0.9946114,0.000044465392,0.000012037223,0.00003602614,0.00003199934,0.00009018994,0.00010101141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17865439,0.0004287408,0.8183678,0.0002008795,0.000056842036,0.00046102155,0.0004223263,0.00009513876,0.0013128604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842769,0.01111376,0.00053430494,0.002246024,0.0014384332,0.00039058478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9617805,0.02950089,0.0023152062,0.004292529,0.001874592,0.00023631031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02626292,0.0010735083,0.0024471101,0.0019175009,0.00051172153,0.00118179,0.0030462965,0.0016470404,0.0020127534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.083175436,0.00077715894,0.0018071247,0.002055035,0.002137259,0.0027542138,0.0020489537,0.0020169683,0.00056851574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055283355,0.00018412915,0.010668159,0.00045107774,0.0008419457,0.00031200532,0.00070229697,0.31528687,0.0032659683,0.3445791,0.0022572197,0.3208983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069786984,0.00016721958,0.0029432082,0.000068689646,0.000097277654,0.00012584572,0.000052433534,0.8523696,0.0015183141,0.13992827,0.002584203,0.000075228796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038202945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034349423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02626292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010337476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018058126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1388933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538737853","doi":"10.1002/mren.201400060","title":"D‐Optimality in Model‐Based Experimental Designs: Applications in NMRP of Styrene","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Macromolecular Reaction Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología","keywords":"Polystyrene; Optimal design; Work (physics); Computer science; Applied mathematics; Experimental data; Statistical physics; Biological system; Mathematics; Materials science; Mathematical optimization; Thermodynamics; Physics; Statistics; Polymer","score_opus":0.182083592544223,"score_gpt":0.42628530482558014,"score_spread":0.24420171228135715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538737853","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008909314,0.00033623667,0.98974645,0.00013314807,0.000017174558,0.00013689912,0.000023531504,0.000049148322,0.00064821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39907816,0.0011613909,0.5970191,0.00030045904,0.000036364752,0.0014025467,0.00014571629,0.00005879093,0.0007975701],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902756,0.007745549,0.00032907972,0.0006460388,0.0008190212,0.0001846882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97452605,0.022681404,0.0013896624,0.0006494591,0.0005676469,0.00018588114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017297793,0.0018621491,0.0021141053,0.0010970962,0.00048039408,0.001283822,0.0010284495,0.0014830247,0.0010540396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023072943,0.001359478,0.002148671,0.00087336765,0.0018398409,0.0010667116,0.0016936847,0.0017909127,0.00020119552],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038836666,0.00015896244,0.00042815105,0.00030912572,0.000111910405,0.000040962324,0.00006029082,0.9329873,0.0029709314,0.0345358,0.00013587989,0.027872398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094016774,0.0006966776,0.00019485188,0.000037612215,0.000046151443,0.000016669592,0.0000116587335,0.9637842,0.0028525505,0.031444676,0.0007935749,0.000027269736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001326453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010526814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017297793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021118624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031927682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09148055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557325407","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9574.2009.00444.x","title":"Multi-sample simple step-stress experiment under time constraints","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistica Neerlandica","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Accelerated life testing; Stress (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Sample (material); Statistical inference; Maximum likelihood; Mathematics; Simple (philosophy); Statistics; Stress testing (software); Sample size determination; Computer science; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10592661547284808,"score_gpt":0.44287912075045915,"score_spread":0.33695250527761106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557325407","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11225357,0.00017199626,0.88500655,0.00022621035,0.00006936313,0.0008457903,0.00058048824,0.00021856959,0.0006275117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52335656,0.0001516174,0.4692304,0.00031424637,0.000078364785,0.0037246086,0.0009197823,0.000048239515,0.0021761635],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.982982,0.010208788,0.0006821499,0.0038128884,0.0019019208,0.00041230733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89225286,0.08791125,0.006239535,0.010298935,0.002496115,0.0008013043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028042592,0.0010221092,0.0025183668,0.00055240205,0.0005384134,0.00092864403,0.0025391914,0.0022453074,0.004343644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06319542,0.0010560664,0.0021225682,0.00078600814,0.0019959877,0.0018836233,0.0014526111,0.0023122411,0.00037196832],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012987811,0.002165873,0.029230298,0.0020035475,0.0021471865,0.0012626633,0.00083774555,0.52684736,0.04199846,0.21302424,0.0026428762,0.16485187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081398187,0.0041508777,0.015829422,0.00006458705,0.0003538881,0.00022363568,0.000081690225,0.84757495,0.016639763,0.11139012,0.0027118798,0.00016521374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011378499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015731682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028042592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010370708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015091039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14830524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561674584","doi":"10.1002/9781118445112.stat00522","title":"Box‐Cox Transformations: Selecting for Symmetry","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Encyclopedia; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.16126139943251264,"score_gpt":0.46637625494535256,"score_spread":0.3051148555128399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561674584","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037728846,0.00029773606,0.98364866,0.00041307358,0.00039433388,0.0016084779,0.002480896,0.0035748044,0.003809201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05600488,0.00030632163,0.92072916,0.0003786494,0.00022437808,0.009353284,0.0021979609,0.0032716587,0.0075337114],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.87233764,0.10199969,0.00464524,0.010039035,0.008981361,0.0019970585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7677536,0.18075095,0.0060443487,0.037325528,0.0071882876,0.000937298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08769506,0.0031558387,0.005027059,0.0047045574,0.0018761454,0.003999659,0.004838478,0.0033036796,0.09153425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30244124,0.0025979474,0.0047059376,0.0071065524,0.0040428573,0.0053446526,0.0038808528,0.006342497,0.015729135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0049253064,0.00085566536,0.0049191895,0.0026582403,0.0017457422,0.0005070883,0.0011240486,0.016526882,0.003260779,0.2272226,0.10540583,0.6308485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036244702,0.0025332842,0.009385443,0.0009436645,0.001428897,0.0005788532,0.0006792499,0.22878926,0.01627339,0.6316308,0.10372472,0.0004080353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018027785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016817598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09153425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016032555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066117025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46378136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1563682158","doi":"","title":"RANCANGAN FAKTORIAL 25 DENGAN SEPEREMPAT ULANGAN","year":2006,"lang":"id","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Factorial experiment; Mathematics; Fraction (chemistry); Fractional factorial design; Block (permutation group theory); Statistics; Factorial; Main effect; Confounding; Quarter (Canadian coin); Randomized block design; Combinatorics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.07190565509468562,"score_gpt":0.4254744187676641,"score_spread":0.3535687636729785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1563682158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30059427,0.0148822395,0.05503954,0.010474784,0.0079156505,0.0033341711,0.0123982495,0.0029227124,0.5924384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32969877,0.006372961,0.04999116,0.00083657703,0.0003707252,0.0019911155,0.006180598,0.0008575662,0.6037005],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988794,0.00033033016,0.00006390266,0.00024899293,0.0003862769,0.000091126356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900997,0.0002385368,0.00007270085,0.00014961656,0.0003797792,0.00014945884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013075088,0.00054704375,0.00061274174,0.00043747012,0.0009351612,0.0016583273,0.00058268115,0.0003442987,0.09542353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016430011,0.00019149319,0.0002535199,0.0005274706,0.00064246415,0.00053545024,0.0006835933,0.00076123874,0.022579558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004969971,0.0010239169,0.0035769735,0.0016518239,0.00007697083,0.00037412497,0.0015934118,0.0013202089,0.029973695,0.025974208,0.17293718,0.7565275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002095522,0.0015081696,0.013702444,0.00034906075,0.000092612456,0.00025281453,0.0008108119,0.0015643518,0.020321086,0.0031591721,0.9579821,0.000047755126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091111276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025646712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09542353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011831778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015129023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31922346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564432298","doi":"10.1002/9780470061572.eqr012","title":"<scp>L</scp>atin Hypercube Designs","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Encyclopedia of Statistics in Quality and Reliability","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Latin hypercube sampling; Orthogonality; Hypercube; Computer science; Stratification (seeds); Class (philosophy); Computer experiment; Strengths and weaknesses; Univariate; Space (punctuation); Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Parallel computing; Simulation; Geometry; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Multivariate statistics; Monte Carlo method","score_opus":0.1368736867543813,"score_gpt":0.455217255129216,"score_spread":0.3183435683748347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564432298","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038108819,0.0023423815,0.72729915,0.003193036,0.0021723402,0.004297615,0.004201876,0.0015992372,0.25108346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.080951214,0.005477071,0.74834,0.0037107817,0.0014131231,0.02416633,0.0038296515,0.001523028,0.13058883],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98662436,0.007878798,0.00074805546,0.00082442566,0.0036749996,0.00024940094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9737906,0.014718002,0.0015952609,0.003180635,0.006350126,0.00036548512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010254853,0.0014511283,0.0014023139,0.0023979512,0.0010462896,0.003125245,0.0019717014,0.0016314635,0.12038416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03482396,0.0006409972,0.00080119603,0.004249429,0.0024350272,0.0015739317,0.0017056057,0.0020046933,0.02448918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062977057,0.00021746768,0.00083015475,0.0020540054,0.00009649094,0.00029301675,0.0004067076,0.018577216,0.0022136879,0.33532357,0.19811648,0.4412415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043190937,0.00048986153,0.0014304626,0.0015679687,0.00007306287,0.0004115943,0.00021898081,0.05528195,0.006872287,0.22261623,0.7104903,0.00011546436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022546174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003257234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12038416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020166298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041661295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4027251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587669494","doi":"10.1002/cjs.5550360305","title":"Marginally restricted sequential D‐optimal designs","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Variable (mathematics); Optimal design; Value (mathematics); Sequential analysis; Computer science; Algorithm; Statistics","score_opus":0.2719362671563821,"score_gpt":0.4007528114557431,"score_spread":0.128816544299361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587669494","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013900342,0.0002399797,0.98296446,0.0001969679,0.00006958225,0.00067442725,0.00007976375,0.00015447394,0.0017198705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25636005,0.00027214282,0.73698056,0.00038912304,0.00007575937,0.004061079,0.00017659593,0.00006955771,0.0016151784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94158614,0.050977368,0.001700579,0.0029644088,0.0020990486,0.00067253975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9197173,0.06401388,0.004292602,0.007373036,0.003470225,0.001133033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029289907,0.0017239092,0.0030904806,0.0013743201,0.0007160048,0.0013366363,0.0021911447,0.0021824248,0.008720176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07153775,0.0016638578,0.0016650391,0.0011136958,0.0035383804,0.001926818,0.0032264735,0.0025081795,0.0010737691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012164412,0.0014216553,0.0037979435,0.002333376,0.0007716285,0.00022768717,0.00084098574,0.21735522,0.009756903,0.49484953,0.0025044864,0.25397617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029932056,0.00511539,0.0016793052,0.00032971674,0.00022483965,0.00013997474,0.00012720547,0.4644787,0.0069324183,0.5077035,0.010120176,0.00015564714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007300402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005212093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029289907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016485811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024546783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15490168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589049529","doi":"10.1002/mats.201200085","title":"Design of Experiments for Reactivity Ratio Estimation in Multicomponent Polymerizations Using the Error‐<scp>I</scp>n‐<scp>V</scp>ariables Approach","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Macromolecular Theory and Simulations","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Design of experiments; Reactivity (psychology); Computer science; Nonlinear system; Nonlinear regression; Mathematics; Regression analysis; Statistics; Physics","score_opus":0.12193078032005286,"score_gpt":0.399763141765593,"score_spread":0.27783236144554013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589049529","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012153703,0.00022764818,0.9868395,0.000052600815,0.000021507394,0.00029450987,0.000023506622,0.00008371842,0.0003033389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17371047,0.0005362465,0.82334805,0.00006428539,0.00002152519,0.0017545351,0.000060109902,0.000036872367,0.0004680454],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874534,0.009299915,0.00041660032,0.00095512846,0.0016247066,0.0002502839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98543525,0.012379436,0.0010924267,0.00051129085,0.00046943838,0.000112204354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019538818,0.0010975912,0.0016990926,0.0008958516,0.00045409662,0.0010080136,0.0011623346,0.0011939757,0.001094712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02251077,0.00095118844,0.0014344977,0.0006462649,0.0011358168,0.0008997168,0.0009807321,0.001827897,0.0001932327],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015453439,0.0011656544,0.0016835193,0.0015055457,0.00038432676,0.00007286786,0.0002318593,0.69118,0.07440794,0.056198854,0.00038973437,0.17123438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001860069,0.002787254,0.0007154323,0.000047860907,0.000101887126,0.000028303693,0.000025616411,0.9286154,0.04976746,0.015537356,0.0021335317,0.00005396322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049698295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009149079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019538818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010590369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022799985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1033324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597786057","doi":"10.1002/9780470057339.van010","title":"Nested Experimental Designs","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Encyclopedia of Environmetrics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nested set model; Differential (mechanical device); Subclass; Environmental science; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Data mining; Biology","score_opus":0.1035037793585716,"score_gpt":0.3919361837683146,"score_spread":0.28843240440974305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597786057","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033866446,0.0015855444,0.8954151,0.0009366715,0.0034971798,0.042548977,0.0035957447,0.001079028,0.017475275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13439314,0.00083273096,0.70466495,0.001334025,0.00053443195,0.15015417,0.0012527116,0.0001632549,0.0066705025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8828242,0.08906147,0.0054688645,0.010178967,0.010505863,0.0019606648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8227037,0.13358691,0.013953068,0.018165614,0.009205262,0.0023854955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0753229,0.0032421274,0.0048943292,0.0015762533,0.001855662,0.002964569,0.0046384367,0.00367629,0.032741413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16574992,0.0015777481,0.0029052305,0.0015246419,0.0037652224,0.0026649754,0.0035792291,0.004871327,0.0035902355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.039751448,0.010053256,0.011650277,0.01304521,0.004796967,0.00066823553,0.0047282614,0.035062097,0.009353906,0.50954705,0.027259372,0.33408403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02540496,0.04593279,0.007561331,0.0036090761,0.0029090568,0.00057490665,0.00087883323,0.110988,0.01366695,0.64662427,0.14116491,0.0006849209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083364133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013565083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0753229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022165363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004063739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39835036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1690361420","doi":"10.1002/mats.201400049","title":"Bayesian Design of Experiments Applied to a Complex Polymerization System: Nitrile Butadiene Rubber Production in a Train of CSTRs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Macromolecular Theory and Simulations","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bayesian probability; Flexibility (engineering); Computer science; Bayesian optimization; Natural rubber; Bayesian inference; Process engineering; Materials science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.07603592521570766,"score_gpt":0.3803337126649136,"score_spread":0.30429778744920594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1690361420","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078151554,0.00020869235,0.9198395,0.00012008161,0.00003921344,0.00039599524,0.00005601515,0.00017373374,0.0010152154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6083918,0.00028262922,0.3889573,0.000110998415,0.000018737666,0.0011460969,0.0001001816,0.000036074143,0.000956234],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476767,0.0033990366,0.00021251578,0.0005317616,0.0009085751,0.0001805021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901348,0.0072319075,0.0011449569,0.00052448193,0.0007811606,0.00018281453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010201878,0.00092104427,0.0011937188,0.00057994464,0.00046396043,0.00074887817,0.00082867115,0.0009595672,0.0012854114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014168155,0.0006527571,0.0008059097,0.00045560094,0.0010400633,0.0006177359,0.0007494236,0.0014500708,0.00017235991],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021394715,0.00057503465,0.0020049321,0.00043474993,0.00023650362,0.000069739326,0.00015533646,0.87457556,0.035862736,0.021022404,0.0002520578,0.06267138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002527917,0.0019113631,0.0010994525,0.00002837754,0.000093671035,0.00002487737,0.000017364056,0.9563887,0.029741772,0.009067754,0.0013156226,0.00005829872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016615529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016607842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010201878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011781803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021066633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05395329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1709872326","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-30379-6_53","title":"Optimal Robust Designs of Step-Stress Accelerated Life Testing Experiments for Proportional Hazards Models","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Extrapolation; Reliability (semiconductor); Hazard; Proportional hazards model; Accelerated life testing; Delta method; Mathematics; Statistics; Reliability engineering; Function (biology); Weibull distribution; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.650024958779505,"score_gpt":0.4754724647418152,"score_spread":0.17455249403768974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1709872326","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012396217,0.0003675379,0.99747,0.000043165677,0.000030513333,0.000059103822,0.000043555123,0.00010568186,0.00064087985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12591836,0.0013465505,0.86773396,0.0001702999,0.00013825347,0.0013167419,0.00032850684,0.00025691694,0.0027903384],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920664,0.0056163203,0.00023852575,0.00075677794,0.0011211508,0.00020083757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848632,0.012951695,0.0007276937,0.00067786867,0.0006548316,0.00012468774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011312325,0.0021235896,0.0020320388,0.00087549316,0.00026105213,0.0010869782,0.0023411158,0.0013846635,0.006806229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022375831,0.0016426429,0.0019189917,0.0006607858,0.0014793503,0.0011692725,0.0014156355,0.0026010443,0.0008978846],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011338922,0.00023070782,0.00043300726,0.0012338969,0.00042438516,0.000064576896,0.00011371122,0.6172087,0.010330052,0.14241469,0.003121271,0.22329108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019973969,0.00060447224,0.0003899403,0.00011432833,0.00014804036,0.00003104915,0.000016139149,0.8679232,0.0067019975,0.119865224,0.003956851,0.00004894687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007187695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077715935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011312325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012097158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019875425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059825957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1779186027","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11270","title":"Robust model‐based stratification sampling designs","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Mean squared error; Robustness (evolution); Stratified sampling; Mathematics; Minimax; Sampling design; Sampling (signal processing); Econometrics; Regression analysis; Variance (accounting); Computer science; Population; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.6658353299386891,"score_gpt":0.46093345414289444,"score_spread":0.20490187579579466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1779186027","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008192756,0.00008465871,0.990761,0.00008238886,0.000021479162,0.00025568766,0.00005813494,0.00010517185,0.00043872034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30826336,0.00014921406,0.68826765,0.00020513864,0.000055549426,0.0018321273,0.0003336278,0.000073787814,0.00081957295],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9618839,0.03313804,0.0006668835,0.0019866922,0.0018925193,0.0004318987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9443553,0.039915316,0.003413707,0.0089293355,0.0029205,0.00046584726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040941097,0.0011319709,0.0023754577,0.0013086118,0.0006166591,0.0011990971,0.0028663164,0.001604753,0.0021704733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092846535,0.0009850134,0.0017009063,0.0009139651,0.002232489,0.0016238558,0.0025587901,0.0019723424,0.0004727352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012358053,0.00030707708,0.0066162534,0.00043086114,0.0006862172,0.00012238506,0.00046641388,0.5069507,0.004122348,0.36678144,0.0018468695,0.11043364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027219713,0.0006272914,0.0011476994,0.000073455485,0.00010372714,0.000044026892,0.000029982071,0.84656334,0.0017164435,0.14745599,0.0019236705,0.00004214386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013001572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011262086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040941097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013285719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002113329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21651983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1805695232","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2015.8.001","title":"Optimal laptop VDU parameter setting using Taguchi method","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taguchi methods; Laptop; Computer science; Statistics; Engineering drawing; Industrial engineering; Mathematics; Machine learning; Engineering; Operating system","score_opus":0.2086883616781507,"score_gpt":0.4746946301537337,"score_spread":0.266006268475583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1805695232","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07105436,0.001954117,0.9226382,0.00008923048,0.00009552814,0.00051001087,0.00010736278,0.00040516473,0.0031459914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25749707,0.0013149449,0.73888576,0.000068291054,0.000024184732,0.0009778049,0.00011582584,0.00007063552,0.0010454328],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969862,0.0011276993,0.00026396711,0.0003946638,0.0010364824,0.00019092057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833965,0.0009910801,0.00022725947,0.00013207647,0.00027617818,0.000033600147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003032126,0.0012741721,0.0018580129,0.0014178474,0.00047503083,0.0017739859,0.001168537,0.0010734387,0.0019860798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040736534,0.0006697269,0.0010682666,0.0015633992,0.0005479966,0.00083643536,0.00061568106,0.001210129,0.00080235535],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000897342,0.00058342115,0.0020186345,0.003006139,0.000121209116,0.00021004544,0.0004937031,0.121346995,0.54224783,0.003635648,0.0009956679,0.32444337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016574572,0.0030985896,0.0035226424,0.00025746322,0.00031947103,0.00027955684,0.00043169947,0.2911697,0.68378866,0.0038638916,0.012871177,0.00023141933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007064443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013383566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003032126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006407532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009269464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016035616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W183476718","doi":"","title":"Correction to \"All c-Bhaskar Rao designs with block size 3 and c >= -1 exist\".","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Block (permutation group theory); Block size; Arithmetic; Combinatorics; Computer science","score_opus":0.12105832927030821,"score_gpt":0.37764119276679703,"score_spread":0.25658286349648884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W183476718","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005345207,0.0021674272,0.008001319,0.11093197,0.8711723,0.00007515003,0.0021116214,0.0016643936,0.0033411928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060359545,0.012745181,0.041258935,0.27860948,0.40188608,0.0012903404,0.0040052063,0.0030713244,0.19677389],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99282634,0.0017493466,0.0012553018,0.001076871,0.0024170838,0.00067521574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9342376,0.024089148,0.003928677,0.005442301,0.030200835,0.0021014942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067197992,0.002777942,0.0032884753,0.0036133153,0.0040378054,0.0029353327,0.004732484,0.0085522635,0.06668543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12686837,0.0019519355,0.001965533,0.003539574,0.0041527245,0.0032636204,0.0026876123,0.016482098,0.038458716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012833122,0.000011354177,0.00006774464,0.00032173423,0.000032252112,0.00017494922,0.00006546646,0.0001030957,0.00011328507,0.0033574894,0.98673034,0.008893976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000188452,0.00006528304,0.0008023154,0.0004438108,0.000083337116,0.0005748939,0.00010030321,0.0008323334,0.001026759,0.009357431,0.9864275,0.000097546144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007034295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008183264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06668543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036108713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048265853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22308499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1858569781","doi":"10.3968/j.sms.1923845220120501.1995","title":"Evaluation of Optimal Split-Plot Designs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in mathematical sciences","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical variable; Plot (graphics); Set (abstract data type); Split plot; Mathematics; Algorithm; Optimal design; Mathematical optimization; Sample size determination; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.8332496111643519,"score_gpt":0.6522853637196269,"score_spread":0.18096424744472506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1858569781","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009113514,0.00020977328,0.9887637,0.000059733342,0.000033487533,0.000608535,0.00008742349,0.00021695255,0.00090681267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.121278875,0.00019883687,0.87545127,0.00009827738,0.000022245378,0.0020693222,0.00019221143,0.00012036593,0.00056850084],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9454342,0.04507465,0.001603925,0.0027262757,0.0044324617,0.0007285286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.891182,0.08984816,0.005135898,0.0054370663,0.0075366064,0.0008603119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05187724,0.0019919237,0.0029061462,0.0020018942,0.0006329414,0.0018387808,0.0020301098,0.0018539177,0.007232154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13075036,0.0012360893,0.0016982098,0.0012847063,0.0020843004,0.0023687459,0.0020682495,0.0017692349,0.00080729043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007184329,0.00090110005,0.006882928,0.0032508757,0.0007795352,0.00022248874,0.0010342816,0.27462572,0.013180825,0.23208222,0.003865519,0.4559902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012415744,0.005380301,0.0027260394,0.00057427475,0.00031495825,0.00017444977,0.00023874789,0.7670644,0.020449068,0.19152313,0.010173344,0.00013976508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042220388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035063544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05187724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017316162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023483804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27435637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1877248584","doi":"10.1080/00224065.2015.11918139","title":"Response Surface Methodology Using Split-Plot Definitive Screening Designs","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality Technology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"National Science Council","keywords":"Plot (graphics); Split plot; Computer science; Restricted randomization; Column (typography); Projection (relational algebra); Surface (topology); Design of experiments; Statistics; Mathematics; Algorithm; Geometry","score_opus":0.8766149783657292,"score_gpt":0.6257243463458664,"score_spread":0.25089063201986284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1877248584","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012452269,0.00013548337,0.98429316,0.00006522422,0.000046662262,0.0015858453,0.00026206466,0.0005124864,0.0006468551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1178575,0.0001906922,0.87301606,0.00018246667,0.000026112539,0.0069912146,0.0006317081,0.00013909784,0.0009650825],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.93468094,0.052452862,0.0022340366,0.0039901016,0.0059418525,0.0007002655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.935773,0.04481126,0.0041882135,0.007886072,0.006846822,0.0004946281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045975894,0.0024233137,0.0027817357,0.0019333793,0.0007756308,0.0020546496,0.0022336047,0.0023166686,0.007884962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095253095,0.0012539469,0.0029096138,0.0021200962,0.002095175,0.0022356727,0.0022684939,0.0031408689,0.0015122175],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0105564445,0.0029658165,0.00799625,0.0060640015,0.0017887203,0.0003359433,0.0015818833,0.20597616,0.050638784,0.21458831,0.007589767,0.4899178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021366912,0.026143374,0.0075313244,0.00048935175,0.00046855392,0.00027169124,0.00036247392,0.72294307,0.048674814,0.17345841,0.017091436,0.00042877562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045844616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003814066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045975894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097647076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002037147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24314666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1902241019","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.033","title":"A new Bayesian approach to multi-response surface optimization integrating loss function with posterior probability","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"China Postdoctoral Science Foundation; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Bayesian optimization; Bayesian probability; Reliability (semiconductor); Mathematical optimization; Multivariate statistics; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3873727016503927,"score_gpt":0.486740999509749,"score_spread":0.09936829785935625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1902241019","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044924478,0.00008213568,0.99908197,0.00006396538,0.000013902919,0.000014913493,0.000012283449,0.000044936172,0.00023673548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07152506,0.0005640572,0.9216724,0.00033864303,0.00019522708,0.0006600209,0.00021085981,0.00034557484,0.0044881618],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455243,0.0026629323,0.00025777883,0.00059950526,0.001748937,0.00017840821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99376714,0.004504037,0.00040477212,0.0003420085,0.0008181832,0.00016384447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010043798,0.0019603232,0.0034013225,0.0017712312,0.0006332766,0.002385147,0.0036715635,0.0033176802,0.0038035004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014311353,0.0021265259,0.0023021563,0.0015856072,0.0017765295,0.0034477552,0.0038474693,0.003687252,0.0009933596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001609121,0.00018167961,0.00035488902,0.00034100327,0.00023996695,0.000063123065,0.00009225743,0.78309757,0.0051953443,0.120626375,0.0017518565,0.08789502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014721193,0.000030444284,0.000056516765,0.000013484959,0.000018984801,0.000013499988,0.000002806983,0.9791054,0.00040172433,0.01952518,0.00080146355,0.00001575244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026927767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028389506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010043798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016587386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024544613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053117335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W191350240","doi":"10.22237/jmasm/1241136180","title":"Aligned Rank Tests for Interactions in Split-Plot Designs: Distributional Assumptions and Stochastic Heterogeneity","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Univariate; Rank (graph theory); Statistics; Mathematics; Multivariate statistics; Ranking (information retrieval); Plot (graphics); Context (archaeology); Code (set theory); R package; Split plot; Restricted randomization; Syntax; Econometrics; Data mining; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","score_opus":0.2996917279586515,"score_gpt":0.5578593513974754,"score_spread":0.25816762343882393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W191350240","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012437848,0.00040371023,0.9817718,0.00015826845,0.00016992539,0.0016797439,0.0008237137,0.00051145646,0.0020435501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.116128094,0.00048081143,0.86604565,0.00024948115,0.00013866663,0.014069344,0.0011800192,0.00035428253,0.0013537022],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8265553,0.12901446,0.008223326,0.009591098,0.025286589,0.0013292219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5701113,0.3651418,0.024726996,0.025684962,0.0131396055,0.001195288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08208374,0.0017295913,0.0040600356,0.0036021394,0.001255472,0.0025091602,0.00478532,0.0026121903,0.018020732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33652475,0.0009256128,0.002991025,0.0049422276,0.0035822492,0.00355538,0.0020656835,0.0035007878,0.0026195652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007704461,0.0017565533,0.030545002,0.011105041,0.0044620414,0.0015072114,0.0030464309,0.029986415,0.013615867,0.20799214,0.02247522,0.6658036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031171427,0.020061264,0.07168235,0.002544412,0.0026548335,0.0027003651,0.0021141788,0.24332206,0.03335388,0.5577067,0.059909973,0.0008328472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058163743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009329973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08208374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001318779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003600851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43410552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1931398059","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11256","title":"Efficient semiparametric mixture inferences on cure rate models for competing risks","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Nonparametric statistics; Statistics; Semiparametric regression; Multinomial distribution; Econometrics; Soft tissue sarcoma; Cancer; Multinomial logistic regression; Mixture model; Medicine; Proportional hazards model; Mathematics; Internal medicine; Sarcoma; Pathology","score_opus":0.40898035703447816,"score_gpt":0.4564198491778415,"score_spread":0.04743949214336335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1931398059","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020921124,0.0003355536,0.9767144,0.0003831315,0.000032018488,0.00026714423,0.00032525393,0.0002411588,0.00078031945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55892676,0.00095517177,0.42949843,0.0005324567,0.0002455015,0.0022720392,0.0017582745,0.00028714104,0.005524189],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9523345,0.04093319,0.0008918297,0.0030456728,0.001974492,0.0008203136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76002276,0.22145925,0.007975891,0.0069945958,0.002399209,0.0011482941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.074261524,0.002216241,0.0053492147,0.0038545432,0.00093191734,0.0033211128,0.004438668,0.0028368954,0.007786215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17392348,0.0027837444,0.0049326955,0.002353141,0.0035782668,0.00457193,0.0051182895,0.0053827725,0.0011049632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011955376,0.00033428663,0.007350092,0.00046791593,0.0010100167,0.00035735927,0.000541513,0.64793676,0.0007772923,0.2791517,0.0022283797,0.058649104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098783654,0.00012382107,0.0010530615,0.00005678378,0.00010972868,0.000054309487,0.00003866336,0.8538544,0.00025499184,0.14357184,0.00073336903,0.00005031129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057955272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004164213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074261524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032784005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025984219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39273715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940783033","doi":"10.1002/sim.6110","title":"Shift-invariant target in allocation problems","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Invariant (physics); Scale invariance; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Optimal allocation; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.10073763129737792,"score_gpt":0.4457221730689747,"score_spread":0.34498454177159676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1940783033","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011091317,0.000120248405,0.9974004,0.00029370096,0.00004150386,0.00015526151,0.00004767303,0.00007209673,0.00076000456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0898921,0.0004061281,0.9026642,0.0006023157,0.00025831157,0.0030222312,0.00018675097,0.00014779983,0.002820146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.961642,0.03143743,0.0010154865,0.0029084787,0.0023295793,0.0006670873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9531956,0.039547313,0.002036444,0.0030924233,0.0017218717,0.00040643825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042802267,0.002103382,0.00395098,0.0022391065,0.0008440615,0.0022888745,0.0034025852,0.003765183,0.008736488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.089203194,0.0016091167,0.0026267886,0.002553645,0.004157081,0.0036603857,0.0036486606,0.005468263,0.0022020799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061190926,0.00024633945,0.0010134309,0.0007813387,0.0003406187,0.00017660756,0.00039282054,0.18200694,0.0016867262,0.6879432,0.004052243,0.120747715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030184613,0.00037118717,0.00026590165,0.00008452855,0.00006450364,0.00008773674,0.000035167854,0.34512195,0.0012442602,0.6470432,0.0053334194,0.00004637227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006944378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048822415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042802267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024437471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024309938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2263627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941690598","doi":"10.3968/j.sms.1923845220120401.1522","title":"Sensitivity of Design Optimality Criteria to Second-order Response SurfaceModel Restrictions and Center Point Replications","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in mathematical sciences","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Center (category theory); Mathematics; Point (geometry); Variance (accounting); Sensitivity (control systems); Order (exchange); Statistics; Linear model; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Geometry","score_opus":0.4462560441076815,"score_gpt":0.5532982038796652,"score_spread":0.10704215977198372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941690598","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25709993,0.0007677247,0.7390404,0.00036240544,0.000053461994,0.00045880437,0.00010338863,0.00018981454,0.0019240024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88948995,0.00015267868,0.108941056,0.000088062305,0.000019354484,0.0007697856,0.00010885563,0.000054102893,0.00037608488],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.87541837,0.10788988,0.0034860407,0.0043264492,0.007620475,0.001258802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34598604,0.6031016,0.019599298,0.02223261,0.00836527,0.0007152325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10801654,0.001141805,0.0023137543,0.0009768979,0.00056278124,0.0019723705,0.001816192,0.0020717238,0.0017453282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3484661,0.0009214253,0.0015863949,0.0008106557,0.0019989442,0.0021704084,0.0020318474,0.002255246,0.00024618802],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004484722,0.000753414,0.017401647,0.0010044376,0.00082602375,0.00039148887,0.0006187759,0.83373517,0.017878039,0.04851488,0.0004900845,0.0739014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000421572,0.0033852253,0.012643313,0.00015755113,0.00020039904,0.0001881148,0.00025732603,0.9273189,0.01980768,0.034158006,0.0013443588,0.000117608135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010718268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004878906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10801654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016625759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020544317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57125294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W194305686","doi":"10.1023/a:1019288220413","title":"Maximization of Manufacturing Yield of Systems with Arbitrary Distributions of Component Values","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Operations Research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Theory of computation; Bounded function; Hypercube; Monte Carlo method; Mathematical optimization; Probability density function; Nonlinear system; Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Function (biology); Random variable; Yield (engineering); Computer science; Algorithm; Discrete mathematics; Statistics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.4890581218960466,"score_gpt":0.5390253233917611,"score_spread":0.04996720149571454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W194305686","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10684263,0.00041946457,0.88811845,0.00027176185,0.000016663298,0.00013478653,0.00011354137,0.00012555245,0.0039571915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8829078,0.00047869343,0.114746176,0.000055958448,0.000038001857,0.00030865945,0.00009649748,0.00007245575,0.0012957794],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965581,0.0022045074,0.000107843145,0.00044406927,0.0004541877,0.00023126205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986943,0.011090117,0.00095638126,0.00046772804,0.0003980455,0.00014474658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077563105,0.0014652244,0.0016633003,0.00090310426,0.00039982266,0.0014535285,0.0012414135,0.0012585099,0.0010887713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022204217,0.001079846,0.0008810364,0.0009836827,0.002140787,0.002018601,0.0015454767,0.0007912193,0.00023670903],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006499558,0.0001497017,0.00096281024,0.00040150067,0.00011537026,0.00006080165,0.00009005598,0.8924549,0.012908798,0.059535526,0.00028221635,0.03238828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006875913,0.00033844655,0.00088615296,0.00003102289,0.000078045705,0.00003949269,0.000025919064,0.9332622,0.014950583,0.049818963,0.00047647094,0.000023957275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040191988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033002655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077563105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013643691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016055157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041019738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1943160398","doi":"10.3968/j.pam.1925252820120402.1517","title":"Comparison of Optimality Criteria of Reduced Models for Response Surface Designs with Restricted Randomization","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Progress in applied mathematics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restricted randomization; Mathematics; Statistics; Variance (accounting); Central composite design; Set (abstract data type); Split plot; Response surface methodology; Design of experiments; Computer science; Randomization","score_opus":0.3305761640566564,"score_gpt":0.5173610822794575,"score_spread":0.18678491822280113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1943160398","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018165972,0.00036136238,0.9797202,0.00012994141,0.000018560062,0.00025393785,0.00009525131,0.00027054985,0.0009842108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31759062,0.00055727566,0.67614573,0.00020667021,0.000052350577,0.002641053,0.0007081362,0.00041097967,0.0016871978],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93895555,0.053070504,0.0012152672,0.0018916496,0.004169857,0.00069724093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8613068,0.12615032,0.0034828852,0.0046743653,0.003917344,0.00046822848],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056461703,0.0018900306,0.0031689284,0.0020771478,0.0004622525,0.0017795406,0.002107255,0.0015506734,0.0032764052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09545782,0.0013419535,0.00320852,0.000968629,0.0019120751,0.002124963,0.002059995,0.0022978943,0.00073515653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016410833,0.00032394423,0.0015631386,0.0008065263,0.0004582361,0.00006807396,0.00029428035,0.7851498,0.0033918142,0.112153195,0.0011844778,0.092965364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012477771,0.0006107689,0.0008163064,0.000065758504,0.000091595415,0.000029888388,0.000033442044,0.9540473,0.0017483769,0.041221075,0.0011664057,0.000044272463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016686098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014850554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9435383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024901824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043510143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29860163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1955080364","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11260","title":"Covariate‐adjusted response adaptive designs incorporating covariates with and without treatment interactions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covariate; Statistical inference; Inference; Computer science; Conditional independence; Independence (probability theory); R package; Econometrics; Machine learning; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3704392104197118,"score_gpt":0.4250319695548762,"score_spread":0.054592759135164426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1955080364","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040679265,0.0004636268,0.95441204,0.00037598854,0.0002745134,0.0021259508,0.00031224766,0.00030452618,0.0010519121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4395727,0.00030985512,0.54588526,0.0005895121,0.00021825953,0.011118866,0.00037952067,0.00008597338,0.001840064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.877459,0.1079899,0.0028559412,0.006796409,0.0037162239,0.0011824543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89521635,0.07092036,0.0085501345,0.017631149,0.0064336765,0.0012482895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07906813,0.0015537174,0.002972499,0.0015070876,0.000836954,0.0013210186,0.0038934278,0.0033081938,0.009716374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.120012105,0.0010105295,0.002511914,0.001940881,0.0031747299,0.0022202916,0.0022317264,0.0033213338,0.0009977643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.031358987,0.0036052107,0.012830272,0.0027548433,0.0027450207,0.0003033818,0.0011833431,0.11407347,0.010162276,0.4292672,0.0055190995,0.38619697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010591623,0.017582329,0.010108805,0.00054569513,0.0014717022,0.00026370847,0.00021468748,0.5662866,0.0063964296,0.3699108,0.016254267,0.00037335366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007842914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005408252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07906813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012134509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002507831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41815722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963676859","doi":"10.1002/cjs.5550340404","title":"Some robust design strategies for percentile estimation in binary response models","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Percentile; Minimax; Binary number; Mathematical optimization; Estimation; Computer science; Estimation theory; Mathematics; Algorithm; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.2014466815106305,"score_gpt":0.3944487031194451,"score_spread":0.19300202160881458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963676859","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015861049,0.00007823672,0.9978405,0.0000443389,0.0000056343174,0.00005105206,0.000012473057,0.00005863008,0.00032292248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15561903,0.00033024824,0.84086794,0.00013992595,0.000044102017,0.001203744,0.000093765324,0.00012265313,0.0015786282],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98115885,0.015580948,0.00045105544,0.00084288826,0.0016553786,0.00031090947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97170895,0.024043942,0.001570159,0.0011128628,0.0013252242,0.00023891807],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024810283,0.0017127197,0.002032387,0.0018368486,0.00040581395,0.0014761104,0.0020066432,0.0020007428,0.0039075115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050420064,0.0014195221,0.0014841026,0.00084900984,0.0016531833,0.0016294903,0.0023025114,0.0019521427,0.00075825804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077883125,0.00022856907,0.00059775426,0.00047555132,0.00025258222,0.00011026515,0.00027708668,0.53688395,0.0072552077,0.28850433,0.0013328242,0.16330318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013778715,0.00056016765,0.00041084876,0.00013439382,0.000073978,0.00004482587,0.00003705592,0.8775343,0.004075835,0.11447034,0.0024646614,0.000055854995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057805015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035938562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97518975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001422579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011180813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13121086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965247940","doi":"10.2307/3315869","title":"Bounds on the maximum number of clear two‐factor interactions for 2<sup><i>m‐p</i></sup> designs of resolution III and IV","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Factor (programming language); Fractional factorial design; Resolution (logic); Mathematics; Upper and lower bounds; Combinatorics; Factorial experiment; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.21832012318510416,"score_gpt":0.40652571316754493,"score_spread":0.18820558998244077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965247940","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01579828,0.0014146193,0.97842306,0.00044223404,0.000047351805,0.0002542705,0.00016088232,0.00030242922,0.003156852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14876616,0.0009401943,0.8454958,0.0004194016,0.00013555987,0.002271354,0.00032446216,0.00024055144,0.0014065278],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93375653,0.042053092,0.004260325,0.005846498,0.011803016,0.0022805019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4485626,0.5036103,0.017839478,0.021529684,0.005723335,0.0027345323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06876121,0.0039555784,0.00466946,0.0026671295,0.00147791,0.0030767825,0.0033580225,0.0034946566,0.006584642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18993768,0.0031836152,0.004336891,0.0018109961,0.005501841,0.005906859,0.005490303,0.007851293,0.0014915208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007220171,0.0012547963,0.0060577784,0.0037398792,0.0008962635,0.0006287707,0.001532815,0.19528165,0.047046885,0.34390423,0.0045097833,0.38792697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078330253,0.003539015,0.006857522,0.0010812493,0.0005777347,0.0009020832,0.0002604755,0.32554427,0.060424972,0.58869463,0.010978022,0.00035667262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037419263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005939068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06876121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028586944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027691163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36364836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967636732","doi":"10.1016/j.cherd.2009.01.001","title":"A new definition of mixing and segregation: Three dimensions of a key process variable","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mixing (physics); Variance (accounting); Mathematics; Dimension (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Robustness (evolution); Scale (ratio); Field (mathematics); Statistical physics; Computer science; Physics; Combinatorics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.06359765893898006,"score_gpt":0.32389812291503584,"score_spread":0.2603004639760558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967636732","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034632452,0.0005145698,0.99372995,0.0003481963,0.00020364785,0.00006363037,0.000045240125,0.000042989064,0.0015885974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17818488,0.0010674978,0.81520414,0.0009984194,0.0006565233,0.0016347704,0.00012393162,0.00011747594,0.0020123224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787844,0.011502042,0.0016337264,0.0040293285,0.0034910843,0.0005593632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97752076,0.015496386,0.0024670353,0.0022828274,0.0016422154,0.00059078156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01989612,0.003168621,0.003314062,0.0022616198,0.0010364307,0.006800082,0.0037633323,0.0034279209,0.0042177583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025315717,0.0010480672,0.0024418589,0.0015947244,0.011230722,0.010850797,0.0047345217,0.005710465,0.00043739175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044411715,0.00029178013,0.00079651986,0.00058842695,0.00014180184,0.000042534506,0.00030224267,0.029047344,0.009024337,0.91442823,0.0010217003,0.043870892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027204238,0.0011083215,0.0010814593,0.00024283193,0.00031210063,0.00011122905,0.00021000626,0.23138092,0.010120685,0.7364368,0.018526273,0.00019729654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040636133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037873155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01989612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002072904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002952481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10522199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967860508","doi":"10.1016/s0378-3758(02)00248-3","title":"Max–min multiple comparison procedure for isotonic dose–response curves","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Studentized range; Pairwise comparison; Isotonic; Statistics; Confidence interval; Range (aeronautics); Multiple comparisons problem; Simple (philosophy); Combinatorics; Standard deviation","score_opus":0.2953533969958073,"score_gpt":0.5057111480488095,"score_spread":0.21035775105300214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967860508","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011620573,0.00023944439,0.9749117,0.00023200332,0.0005960549,0.005034905,0.0015294808,0.0036938663,0.0021420263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050026257,0.000115942305,0.91200435,0.00036201486,0.000110217465,0.032291472,0.0006205243,0.0013174614,0.0031517106],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89621496,0.07310872,0.0052532954,0.014414565,0.008203814,0.0028046619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8467496,0.11611031,0.0053603784,0.025094809,0.005626502,0.00105839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0753514,0.004187311,0.011102343,0.0034084336,0.002780954,0.0027758426,0.0056981677,0.0042859423,0.038843196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16919483,0.0025242884,0.0062882,0.003355792,0.0036562905,0.0029380177,0.002875909,0.010311735,0.003159444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.056356758,0.004559488,0.0033380217,0.006875246,0.01018315,0.00071606797,0.0024759453,0.024147982,0.029018246,0.10477421,0.03690808,0.7206468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018288516,0.040935833,0.03908461,0.0016792539,0.0067910105,0.0016662137,0.0009817699,0.31770933,0.10008983,0.3318053,0.13934405,0.0016242814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013784531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018341036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0753514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028525873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007551821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39850104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969203999","doi":"10.5539/jmr.v3n2p200","title":"An Algorithm for Constructing a D-Optimal 2^K Factorial Design for Linear Model Containing Main Effects and One-Two Factor Interaction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematics Research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Factorial experiment; Matrix (chemical analysis); Factorial; Algorithm; Design matrix; Construct (python library); Java Programming Language; Order (exchange); Fractional factorial design; Java; Mathematical optimization; Linear programming; Factor (programming language); Optimal design; Combinatorics; Linear model; Computer science; Statistics; Programming language","score_opus":0.6601359548389913,"score_gpt":0.5883080652928527,"score_spread":0.07182788954613861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969203999","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00073856453,0.000034360855,0.9984291,0.000021038748,0.0000097020675,0.000140912,0.000035398,0.000433059,0.00015781364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043999925,0.00002040401,0.99468213,0.000023405943,0.000005006793,0.0005945201,0.00006125744,0.0000621059,0.00015116704],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962275,0.002081998,0.00026177347,0.0006236589,0.0006393043,0.00016578891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886783,0.009654766,0.00038645143,0.00042531986,0.0007296652,0.00012551992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065500108,0.0023387123,0.0022619544,0.0019218515,0.00096633256,0.0009793582,0.001677356,0.001382661,0.014707026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014242877,0.0014336174,0.0017596822,0.0016575727,0.0010765725,0.001110067,0.0016596967,0.0019958806,0.0036212003],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013396324,0.0004674682,0.0014559361,0.0010866951,0.00032877762,0.00020366373,0.00031544207,0.10868998,0.014338377,0.022774946,0.0062218304,0.84277725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016310102,0.0016186879,0.0020178582,0.00019225117,0.00033161917,0.00057965866,0.00020453362,0.8602041,0.019348001,0.090059854,0.0235724,0.00024009291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002579066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033666412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014707026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013071614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032879175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04919994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970823692","doi":"10.1002/masy.201000046","title":"Diagnostic Checks and Measures of Information in the Bayesian Design of Experiments with Complex Polymerizations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Macromolecular Symposia","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bayesian probability; Factorial experiment; Fractional factorial design; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Quality (philosophy); Polymerization; Nitroxide mediated radical polymerization; Design of experiments; Mathematics; Radical polymerization; Statistics; Chemistry; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Engineering; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.15654033627861919,"score_gpt":0.36001906494376495,"score_spread":0.20347872866514577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970823692","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0747859,0.0005034876,0.9219096,0.0004138873,0.000052329957,0.0008570997,0.00013567264,0.00022895074,0.0011130996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55273175,0.0002156029,0.44462848,0.00015315416,0.000052870437,0.001770103,0.00015045235,0.000042963817,0.00025463995],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7316663,0.24219394,0.0067569944,0.0062722,0.011614201,0.0014962952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20714895,0.7515629,0.021531155,0.011205324,0.0074289464,0.0011226514],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.20066042,0.0028248483,0.0037651756,0.0042459113,0.0011085195,0.0035498906,0.0032092654,0.004227334,0.0020803418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.52528775,0.0014965578,0.00234277,0.0019359132,0.00761091,0.0046527022,0.0038813397,0.003267873,0.00021979635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014752068,0.0015974353,0.012383827,0.0026218058,0.0024230494,0.000349782,0.0016435719,0.47371206,0.0073724575,0.2581981,0.00085008214,0.22409579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013805848,0.0048230425,0.004827207,0.0003616054,0.00057922094,0.00014884151,0.00009124733,0.82063234,0.011586209,0.15414964,0.001194363,0.00022579625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007221768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043494033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20066042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031254843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003774983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.985728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973353515","doi":"10.2307/3316054","title":"An adaptive randomized design with application to estimation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptive design; Estimation; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Population; Completely randomized design; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.10743609521977451,"score_gpt":0.4002492733428469,"score_spread":0.2928131781230724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973353515","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020160822,0.00007628093,0.9968522,0.00014639102,0.000070186485,0.0002903965,0.000015496345,0.000096691125,0.00043637856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.086092785,0.00015465722,0.90940595,0.00025313167,0.00013953273,0.0027657866,0.000045964593,0.000032122687,0.0011101066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9351826,0.056341708,0.0013077826,0.0031354188,0.0034439482,0.0005886621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93211305,0.05526186,0.0029979171,0.0047295983,0.0042762095,0.00062141864],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036227528,0.0016514851,0.0023835679,0.0017232177,0.0008119719,0.0013620341,0.0025197698,0.0029075714,0.0056603993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07957442,0.0009701516,0.0015613894,0.0016610649,0.003571225,0.0015943667,0.0024362714,0.0024521449,0.00061774533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002315895,0.0006674718,0.0016297533,0.00067094486,0.000477849,0.0002060371,0.00034158,0.19644105,0.004804871,0.53181684,0.0027839907,0.25784373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014921642,0.002253148,0.0006538005,0.00012849655,0.00013291284,0.00012475901,0.000030289735,0.76085615,0.002354471,0.22363757,0.008233908,0.00010229624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009504175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000780758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9637725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013713118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021256113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19159174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973360772","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2009.02.010","title":"De-aliasing effects using semifoldover techniques","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Factor (programming language); Aliasing; Factorial experiment; Fractional factorial design; Factorial; Plackett–Burman design; Design of experiments; Statistics; Arithmetic; Computer science; Programming language; Artificial intelligence; Response surface methodology","score_opus":0.14964504147306526,"score_gpt":0.5156544275279231,"score_spread":0.3660093860548579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973360772","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029416338,0.00006603478,0.99616325,0.000019348076,0.000029532326,0.00007801946,0.00003755841,0.00046594278,0.00019863585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06281801,0.00009912008,0.9343388,0.00010322045,0.00002998094,0.0008095599,0.00016470719,0.0004927713,0.0011437439],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837414,0.009820137,0.0011379787,0.0022184537,0.0023828142,0.00069917174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9314351,0.04479902,0.0036802255,0.016294492,0.0032986936,0.00049242185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030936329,0.0019155756,0.0026869501,0.0016932276,0.0013322579,0.0020059424,0.0023425329,0.0020106942,0.012389168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06701707,0.0014201644,0.002934935,0.0022951302,0.0016586597,0.0030321016,0.0029266442,0.0026220581,0.0011830283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037839767,0.00066394644,0.0030744285,0.0010632827,0.0014630767,0.00028351962,0.0010015698,0.027454218,0.041936573,0.0914474,0.0029216432,0.82490635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005337367,0.0025063423,0.011239131,0.00021423114,0.0014941085,0.00065492064,0.00028672765,0.60069305,0.15087934,0.2043911,0.026799526,0.0003077849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010981137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019700327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030936329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008085002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023515285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16360891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975354213","doi":"10.1007/s13595-011-0179-7","title":"Bayesian inference for multi-environment spatial individual-tree models with additive and full-sib family genetic effects for large forest genetic trials","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Forest Science","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; University of British Columbia; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Bayesian probability; Gibbs sampling; Bayesian inference; Sampling (signal processing); Spatial analysis; Mathematics; Tree (set theory); Computer science","score_opus":0.30021762239114985,"score_gpt":0.4666888968853303,"score_spread":0.16647127449418042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975354213","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08213347,0.0008345274,0.9142712,0.00064310344,0.000048765072,0.00030650903,0.0006397363,0.00031137507,0.0008113031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59906495,0.0011017759,0.39196825,0.00037760194,0.00015669901,0.0017668857,0.0019359998,0.00028597083,0.0033419004],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.94640034,0.045985874,0.0016414004,0.0036472334,0.0014009877,0.0009240885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.55846983,0.42372102,0.0062792297,0.007916235,0.0020716588,0.0015420807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11397468,0.0023400534,0.006449529,0.0029428154,0.0014730892,0.004196254,0.0064517353,0.0043529356,0.005443208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21071011,0.004243517,0.004570394,0.0030661486,0.0052477303,0.006053424,0.0036878022,0.0051373052,0.0005413804],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027056055,0.00055452687,0.009770182,0.00059537706,0.002190907,0.00026975526,0.00050973747,0.8341788,0.0008440339,0.09898862,0.001331187,0.048061315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000551623,0.0001533738,0.0020806883,0.00007670807,0.0004287339,0.00006383269,0.00004560033,0.84372544,0.00039539253,0.15184742,0.0005697721,0.000061411534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00825156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011340037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11397468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034743866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042253737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60276294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977348009","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2005.09.008","title":"Existence and symmetry of minimax regression designs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Minimax; Mathematics; Symmetry (geometry); Optimal design; Minimax approximation algorithm; Regression; Regression analysis; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Combinatorics; Statistics","score_opus":0.26716237170947266,"score_gpt":0.5117761184801407,"score_spread":0.24461374677066805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977348009","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071404176,0.0002152245,0.99044037,0.00037685607,0.00003351231,0.00016613981,0.00008501078,0.000110885645,0.0014315327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28227085,0.0009802278,0.7072181,0.0006808988,0.0002836748,0.0033919427,0.00049965974,0.0003258854,0.004348787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9219772,0.06077722,0.0031549812,0.0070785824,0.005579204,0.0014327392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.52430457,0.4180918,0.0199937,0.024183147,0.011146871,0.0022799368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10634214,0.0022097246,0.006900263,0.002893564,0.0015218164,0.004000179,0.005401674,0.0045720735,0.008097739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32353425,0.0046473485,0.004565706,0.0017367565,0.009525059,0.009892957,0.0065790485,0.006729966,0.0014813275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006249478,0.00015989838,0.00149266,0.0004000406,0.00029452814,0.00011981981,0.00043708307,0.036930423,0.0012425401,0.9150688,0.0012759024,0.041953452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040817092,0.00044348807,0.00075088115,0.00010032532,0.00010196286,0.00014515455,0.0000493823,0.13251759,0.001078259,0.8629603,0.0013934857,0.00005108278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007325222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043543067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10634214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001775543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057598995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5623977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977717747","doi":"10.1063/1.2748617","title":"Weighted complex projective 2-designs from bases: Optimal state determination by orthogonal measurements","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Physics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; Queensland Government","keywords":"Orthonormal basis; Mutually unbiased bases; Abelian group; Dimension (graph theory); Prime (order theory); Projective test; State (computer science); Linear subspace; Constant (computer programming)","score_opus":0.31893650638736837,"score_gpt":0.46898697359942826,"score_spread":0.1500504672120599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977717747","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05808187,0.00027257102,0.9379752,0.00015516936,0.000035455818,0.00011714641,0.0001361762,0.00010698045,0.0031193893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4727905,0.00044970482,0.5226167,0.00021402545,0.000075127995,0.0009156208,0.00030887988,0.00008498346,0.0025443414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943885,0.0033200725,0.0002743602,0.0009076348,0.00075710675,0.00035233656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99447906,0.0030898806,0.00082607404,0.0009752323,0.00043621243,0.0001935046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005907579,0.0010198622,0.001343007,0.0010932826,0.0008187165,0.0015988986,0.0010732142,0.0011626291,0.0028807633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013262944,0.0009291065,0.00085100386,0.0010510499,0.0026626596,0.0027466489,0.0030327647,0.0010674767,0.00058127305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006222022,0.00011935303,0.0014727146,0.00027248444,0.00011326724,0.00014848428,0.0002922087,0.10051929,0.010514433,0.7922713,0.001049012,0.092605196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019318404,0.0006770784,0.0006781511,0.00011613344,0.000066082226,0.00023062236,0.00011891343,0.3189633,0.015287747,0.65709585,0.0064575206,0.00011541807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000273682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025835965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005907579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079633336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000951867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031242669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979736402","doi":"10.1016/j.csda.2015.04.001","title":"Robust and efficient estimation of effective dose","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Statistics & Data Analysis","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Alberta","funders":"Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Estimator; Nonparametric statistics; Parametric statistics; Robustness (evolution); Asymptotic distribution; Mathematics; Monte Carlo method; Semiparametric model; Parametric model; Context (archaeology); Semiparametric regression; Robust statistics; Sample size determination; Statistics; Econometrics; Computer science","score_opus":0.266889376336155,"score_gpt":0.4777968272809065,"score_spread":0.2109074509447515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979736402","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016131446,0.00011506101,0.9977723,0.000052452637,0.000009882523,0.0000276518,0.000048040423,0.00020265064,0.0001586917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11689372,0.0002444263,0.88067704,0.00011385985,0.00005710662,0.00043360254,0.00037728297,0.00027533452,0.0009276966],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421036,0.0031226384,0.00027978458,0.0009187683,0.0012653382,0.00020308403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797951,0.015031956,0.0016167581,0.0022462439,0.0011485493,0.00016138166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009036956,0.001570689,0.0023100444,0.0017949193,0.00036405603,0.0023294473,0.0022401188,0.0018181889,0.0023044236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03631684,0.0015432965,0.0016781682,0.0010757943,0.00147716,0.0020116598,0.0022745999,0.002310159,0.0008261821],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079984555,0.00020659671,0.0011322742,0.00070465996,0.00042467972,0.00007412118,0.000108366105,0.6918217,0.021164527,0.060182743,0.0024933845,0.22088705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059773545,0.00010913964,0.00058827514,0.00003691194,0.00005778342,0.000059006496,0.000010473993,0.95171344,0.011123478,0.03451806,0.001683984,0.00003971037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013742173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015400647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009036956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014246134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030158982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047792554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979760414","doi":"10.1108/17542731111139509","title":"Statistical, technical and sociological dimensions of design of experiments","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The TQM Journal","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"JDA Software (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Computer science; Relation (database); Value (mathematics); Management science; Interpretation (philosophy); Design of experiments; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Sociology; Business; Economics; Engineering; Social science; Data mining; Statistics; Mathematics; Machine learning; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.5071897920712852,"score_gpt":0.4986354264586207,"score_spread":0.008554365612664538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979760414","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020929271,0.013621888,0.8529143,0.053507123,0.004735243,0.0064037265,0.00069450855,0.0005084696,0.04668548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26348713,0.0038887847,0.705993,0.00707696,0.0017334163,0.015965633,0.00014813799,0.00015037399,0.0015565816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.44350094,0.47788692,0.023213184,0.0066194185,0.047057495,0.0017220243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.22166933,0.6998185,0.029336065,0.026363548,0.020796007,0.0020165893],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2974599,0.0017024381,0.0027575972,0.0051281108,0.0035029843,0.014668286,0.0023622427,0.0042828666,0.0049417797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46072894,0.0011673777,0.0014001456,0.006873152,0.026871376,0.0071820887,0.0051447414,0.007825994,0.00054158637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010698277,0.00046988658,0.0100302715,0.010624122,0.0004670946,0.00039749395,0.009158421,0.007285301,0.0033396282,0.78378177,0.0071932077,0.16618294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051145215,0.0024165327,0.014095438,0.004295091,0.00046505182,0.0012427113,0.0077371425,0.0148256775,0.004355041,0.82543105,0.12433759,0.00028739127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017885418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027309759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99649704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007385012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024265325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.866357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979949183","doi":"10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000215)19:3<323::aid-sim372>3.0.co;2-d","title":"Saddlepoint approximations for small sample logistic regression problems","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Inference; Mathematics; Logistic regression; Sequence (biology); Applied mathematics; Binomial distribution; Statistics; Binomial regression; Econometrics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.33454370973748493,"score_gpt":0.5060935000628242,"score_spread":0.17154979032533924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979949183","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026576843,0.00039220587,0.9956927,0.00022552277,0.000029934967,0.00002691113,0.00003515595,0.00007705262,0.00086298375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39467004,0.003706057,0.58699924,0.0006972333,0.00031116817,0.0014001667,0.00071360846,0.00047763556,0.011024881],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625254,0.0026101961,0.00017627202,0.00030557506,0.00052769016,0.00012769765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968071,0.028746977,0.000980233,0.0007678488,0.0011637702,0.00027024542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012613322,0.0014137742,0.0021271585,0.0018174378,0.0005765997,0.0019220245,0.0019679,0.0017836603,0.0038934797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056738444,0.0012093253,0.0014985051,0.0013937863,0.002194904,0.0026867113,0.002103265,0.0035855153,0.00088261225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009712183,0.000034054658,0.0012172548,0.0002597621,0.00010500023,0.00024012911,0.00020110894,0.60806584,0.0006291842,0.3654297,0.0023459003,0.021374857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020499901,0.000022719383,0.000100395795,0.000031613814,0.000009102902,0.00003605927,0.000017083545,0.8867956,0.00014634036,0.1117927,0.001017585,0.000010339346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002634206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001753019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012613322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013062155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001210578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06670642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982700054","doi":"10.1016/s0378-3758(00)00213-5","title":"On the orthogonal designs of order 40","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer","keywords":"Mathematics; Orthogonal array; Order (exchange); Construct (python library); Combinatorics; Statistics; Taguchi methods; Computer science","score_opus":0.29387407187914283,"score_gpt":0.4945985188595861,"score_spread":0.20072444698044328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982700054","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035901095,0.0005431219,0.9923645,0.00035586566,0.00013129301,0.0004838229,0.0001536784,0.00012344675,0.0022541285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057236508,0.001225993,0.93334985,0.0005226536,0.0002379025,0.0048488714,0.00030500357,0.0001523103,0.0021209011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.71434116,0.25105706,0.007052253,0.010249888,0.014625247,0.0026744013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49468163,0.44970724,0.010113687,0.035403196,0.008646892,0.0014473475],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.20020302,0.004066789,0.008134856,0.003898937,0.0026296072,0.0045258664,0.0040342174,0.0034914166,0.013184401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34526062,0.004876424,0.005363281,0.0048083556,0.0134351235,0.009732629,0.0073500383,0.0072736014,0.0015930595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010289917,0.00012567648,0.00063037704,0.00040544267,0.00029429625,0.000062265535,0.00055156957,0.0212932,0.0004114212,0.907605,0.0017685449,0.065823294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052012294,0.00035917226,0.00043694692,0.00017206703,0.00012901476,0.00005131603,0.00004624739,0.0489127,0.0004232681,0.9439041,0.0049762544,0.00006867231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042494186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037045663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20020302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043966323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012934115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98629206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982712605","doi":"10.1016/j.laa.2008.04.039","title":"Robustness of optimal designs for correlated random variables","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linear Algebra and its Applications","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Robustness (evolution); Random variable; Statistics; Combinatorics; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.15584439858390192,"score_gpt":0.40223299507339727,"score_spread":0.24638859648949535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982712605","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016461581,0.0005442782,0.9810158,0.0002716455,0.000065744855,0.00022031966,0.0001215051,0.00018476641,0.001114393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6566716,0.00087294314,0.33690068,0.0005158404,0.00026692258,0.0028161716,0.0005002809,0.0002495832,0.0012060271],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7459992,0.2156089,0.0063470327,0.017063478,0.012210762,0.0027706246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2846004,0.6575123,0.026178285,0.024159716,0.006208535,0.0013406886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17551327,0.00342891,0.0069714994,0.0040640496,0.001270343,0.005584322,0.0047840434,0.004594952,0.004373001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43972015,0.003216894,0.0041742167,0.0023320909,0.011217677,0.0054123597,0.0048451545,0.0035195814,0.0006092686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0074237785,0.0006521761,0.005025103,0.0015979594,0.003466361,0.00020340725,0.00045195167,0.5047833,0.0049572843,0.39272735,0.0009926006,0.077718675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097205624,0.0014473565,0.0028288031,0.00020173135,0.00064567605,0.000094761665,0.00009579277,0.5843078,0.0062384335,0.40151644,0.0014943099,0.00015684841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010927505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043015237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17551327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004432153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005602596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92821395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983981102","doi":"10.1093/biomet/asn057","title":"Orthogonal and nearly orthogonal designs for computer experiments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Washington State University","keywords":"Latin hypercube sampling; Generalization; Orthogonal array; Mathematics; Fractional factorial design; Computer experiment; Orthographic projection; Orthogonal basis; Orthogonal transformation; Base (topology); Design of experiments; Projection (relational algebra); Factorial experiment; Algorithm; Statistics; Geometry; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.35594747965270723,"score_gpt":0.5003541112410744,"score_spread":0.1444066315883672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983981102","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00066636514,0.00013177951,0.99736494,0.00006952516,0.00008270652,0.00037432846,0.000112478934,0.0001540732,0.0010439173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010853775,0.00025002123,0.9811024,0.00014444075,0.000097729215,0.0067507676,0.00013701105,0.00007537006,0.00058862683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9298815,0.05920195,0.0017702134,0.0028031892,0.005804096,0.0005389953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90066653,0.0792495,0.004044697,0.011631138,0.0038346169,0.0005735837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040896427,0.002148115,0.002285135,0.0020264843,0.00083123986,0.0017781969,0.0017856251,0.0014761244,0.014540067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10751592,0.001178246,0.0018284153,0.0027886105,0.0030547131,0.0025315667,0.002840621,0.0044195764,0.0028446366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072514743,0.00033955713,0.0006796841,0.0011044758,0.0002348269,0.00008759473,0.00037918933,0.028297665,0.0035516254,0.7479226,0.005629964,0.21104766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077237474,0.0015217747,0.0010145967,0.00034932786,0.00011801486,0.00014408524,0.00009143011,0.10518759,0.004027449,0.826953,0.05969306,0.0001272778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048097485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047394488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040896427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012035709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003050128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21628356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986907660","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2011.08.003","title":"Creating catalogues of two-level nonregular fractional factorial designs based on the criteria of generalized aberration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Mathematics; Rank (graph theory); Factorial experiment; Plackett–Burman design; Mathematical optimization; Factorial; Optimal design; Algorithm; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Combinatorics; Response surface methodology; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.4635216322827111,"score_gpt":0.4912496423066186,"score_spread":0.027728010023907512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986907660","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010991277,0.0002662681,0.9811398,0.00011016173,0.00005073274,0.00065288186,0.0014130479,0.0037859704,0.0015898979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024793023,0.00012088494,0.9716585,0.00005929384,0.000014941988,0.0009943866,0.0014215425,0.00039953194,0.0005377288],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.96408933,0.016729018,0.0066316384,0.002633535,0.009091377,0.00082505745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8397758,0.096724786,0.008365648,0.037818696,0.015982801,0.0013323064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03824213,0.0017516778,0.0040716804,0.01053252,0.0018288307,0.0054197907,0.0051353145,0.0025777796,0.007933171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13719368,0.0024174408,0.0044785626,0.006708545,0.0020447616,0.004266476,0.00399854,0.0022635863,0.0026871597],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018317234,0.0005426593,0.0073254295,0.0029345932,0.00039310203,0.0004688856,0.0011443016,0.04703943,0.010173607,0.12020317,0.011555173,0.796388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014905513,0.0016521888,0.006495629,0.0012334787,0.0006421701,0.0017423303,0.0005229626,0.43052253,0.029286226,0.4559411,0.069894485,0.0005763437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015270604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029342948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03824213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021175505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067476323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20224613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986927305","doi":"10.1002/sim.2782","title":"Methods for the statistical analysis of binary data in split‐mouth designs with baseline measurements","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Robarts Clinical Trials; Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Baseline (sea); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Binary number; Binary data; Outcome (game theory); Statistics; Statistical model; Statistical analysis; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.46426087040142916,"score_gpt":0.5858141738594048,"score_spread":0.12155330345797566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986927305","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055562187,0.0002934586,0.9974758,0.000079022786,0.000086802625,0.0009797007,0.000110712564,0.00017743386,0.00024136298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011703495,0.00055539823,0.9715271,0.00015527473,0.00012363994,0.01519481,0.00021880903,0.00009849646,0.00042301172],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8187933,0.15624082,0.005437464,0.0062375506,0.012579979,0.00071093184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70261186,0.25261396,0.01433033,0.024958186,0.004871484,0.00061421463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14429681,0.0029753947,0.0041334694,0.0054664537,0.0010781813,0.0021054377,0.004203016,0.003695073,0.016655775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2739505,0.0018585117,0.0043791067,0.004782813,0.004711526,0.002989196,0.0030791147,0.006900936,0.002845796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00298055,0.0009172449,0.0026329793,0.005385634,0.0025125595,0.00029397596,0.0012805684,0.035438474,0.0040953695,0.38147342,0.01109588,0.5518933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002991092,0.0044897087,0.005653761,0.0022167151,0.0011291917,0.0007000815,0.00023716914,0.22965212,0.007632072,0.7000626,0.044835217,0.00040033954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061262696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067783054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14429681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015776099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029020028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7631236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987072912","doi":"10.1016/j.jkss.2010.04.004","title":"Multi-treatment optimal response-adaptive designs for phase III clinical trials","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Korean Statistical Society","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal design; Clinical trial; Mathematical optimization; Adaptive design; Viewpoints; Constraint (computer-aided design); Mathematics; Computer science; Machine learning; Medicine","score_opus":0.5882728797378395,"score_gpt":0.6229738739250534,"score_spread":0.03470099418721395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987072912","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025213758,0.0028211714,0.95774186,0.0007250836,0.00073826284,0.010942214,0.0003302511,0.0006854842,0.0008018843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2406678,0.0007694565,0.7082891,0.00079458155,0.0002917606,0.047424663,0.0004536364,0.00017912901,0.0011299417],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5769214,0.4005509,0.0065488066,0.00952683,0.0049081566,0.0015438603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70112216,0.26090693,0.011263272,0.020275835,0.0047852173,0.0016465264],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23721229,0.0040491675,0.011052082,0.0034568598,0.0012237191,0.0027911696,0.0041445782,0.0049213544,0.009949477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24719445,0.003841217,0.007818755,0.0020663047,0.004692391,0.0035391792,0.0038014306,0.008402824,0.00082474615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.17202884,0.005916795,0.0059481673,0.009827008,0.02015282,0.00034840067,0.0013866863,0.18800364,0.0036859734,0.1362288,0.00596414,0.4505088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.066799834,0.02406192,0.004300029,0.0010614747,0.0066066454,0.00022862678,0.0001559163,0.67297685,0.0037240933,0.21202192,0.0077385795,0.0003241138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000512658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004483451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7627877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025985877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060578263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9406531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991868481","doi":"10.2307/3316012","title":"Robustness properties of minimally‐supported Bayesian D‐optimal designs for heteroscedastic models","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Optimal design; Heteroscedasticity; Mathematics; Bayesian probability; Variance (accounting); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.27805095404610747,"score_gpt":0.3822553040869715,"score_spread":0.10420435004086404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991868481","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05924924,0.00054706907,0.93740517,0.00031413644,0.00003758092,0.0003958464,0.00029292412,0.00016284926,0.0015953257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6377913,0.0005149417,0.35767597,0.00026273984,0.000064416556,0.0022714064,0.0006372965,0.000096212796,0.0006857411],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91894776,0.06587524,0.0030331893,0.005906851,0.0050845803,0.0011524542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5017674,0.4467885,0.02094783,0.019001137,0.009131537,0.0023636103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09830246,0.002061986,0.0032874078,0.0030173857,0.00084736955,0.002156764,0.0029819228,0.0030240603,0.0033060622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31343678,0.0017858571,0.0022159668,0.0014715344,0.0038689133,0.0022951574,0.0044495477,0.0022107216,0.00046239857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009316514,0.00080344325,0.01093294,0.0013035402,0.001905113,0.00023533948,0.00068361097,0.50322795,0.0076125055,0.32436657,0.0013104299,0.13830206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012533144,0.0023544973,0.004191269,0.00039643672,0.00037016123,0.000110142886,0.00012613802,0.6311099,0.004925707,0.35329303,0.001694522,0.00017489931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011388112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045825765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09830246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021311347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025691213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51987934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992113455","doi":"10.1063/1.3663521","title":"Robust Designs for Three Commonly Used Nonlinear Models","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIP conference proceedings","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Homoscedasticity; Heteroscedasticity; Extrapolation; Nonlinear system; Minimax; Exponential function; Computer science; Mathematics; Non-linear least squares; Least-squares function approximation; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Estimation theory; Econometrics; Statistics","score_opus":0.6086791475359449,"score_gpt":0.4204054572866362,"score_spread":0.18827369024930868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992113455","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005590507,0.00030340423,0.9928894,0.000088580906,0.000021257654,0.00007605706,0.00008701469,0.00009314193,0.00085062935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.280823,0.0011398754,0.7132227,0.00015324325,0.00007862766,0.0014737352,0.0004947291,0.00011019334,0.0025038652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99033654,0.006308955,0.00040631404,0.001424405,0.0012564601,0.0002673026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98135847,0.0126814265,0.0028404184,0.0017086553,0.0012571446,0.00015383598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01771019,0.0016270261,0.0010736464,0.001101779,0.00043725688,0.0013722733,0.0019003113,0.0017216213,0.0039351643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03652097,0.0006406307,0.0018976108,0.00082472456,0.001352262,0.0012723154,0.0018335363,0.0017903944,0.0007725342],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000652384,0.00020176829,0.0015905503,0.0008822858,0.00040012557,0.00013528454,0.00037893103,0.3975163,0.009636896,0.40022108,0.0016445601,0.18673977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002151856,0.0012416815,0.0017203952,0.00020417964,0.0002462496,0.00014372877,0.00008697005,0.8126472,0.015012315,0.1579129,0.010420851,0.00014831964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083149574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005788791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01771019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010337703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015185557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09366161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993387761","doi":"10.1002/asmb.861","title":"Robust designs for Haar wavelet approximation models","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal design; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Heteroscedasticity; Haar; Wavelet; Computer science; Applied mathematics; Algorithm; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2836707091881809,"score_gpt":0.3801837382328027,"score_spread":0.09651302904462183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993387761","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020189462,0.000096743395,0.997549,0.00003156981,0.000011433741,0.000027623317,0.000020756319,0.000036164536,0.00020775916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12651128,0.00051591586,0.8708602,0.00012317668,0.00008846357,0.0008475725,0.00024364179,0.00008258516,0.00072714104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98187125,0.012705133,0.0006223461,0.001992218,0.0024025785,0.00040650333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97498024,0.017906845,0.002594427,0.0024549349,0.0018021934,0.00026140784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022822216,0.0013354422,0.0016377269,0.0015329403,0.00044992383,0.0014624483,0.002081147,0.0021491905,0.0031395047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058065318,0.0012450786,0.0016545312,0.001099696,0.002030877,0.0025011566,0.0026388967,0.0022164013,0.00089905574],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005812579,0.00019691842,0.0012630109,0.00062105263,0.00030522599,0.00007753165,0.00020210959,0.29068354,0.0075082188,0.5334923,0.0011408557,0.16392793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016998796,0.00056011276,0.00057620154,0.00010158484,0.000083803294,0.00005528647,0.000034192555,0.74022067,0.005193032,0.24892215,0.004017992,0.00006489801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004113945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031328862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022822216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010407442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014771543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12069684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993481816","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11190","title":"The factor aliased effect number pattern and its application in experimental planning","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McMaster University","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Rank (graph theory); Ranking (information retrieval); Factorial experiment; Factor (programming language); Design of experiments; Computer science; Statistics; Paired comparison; Mathematics; Machine learning; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.08315733229787388,"score_gpt":0.40718472789242044,"score_spread":0.3240273955945466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993481816","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049305717,0.00013149562,0.99358046,0.00015050218,0.000035339326,0.00021116035,0.000072954266,0.00018023218,0.00070730003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10351415,0.00013788108,0.8939827,0.00014046745,0.000039211573,0.00093046046,0.00009655458,0.00011601785,0.0010426204],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93542874,0.046876658,0.0023280284,0.0070704734,0.0076592565,0.00063674414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7393838,0.20275131,0.012546389,0.031909693,0.0120251095,0.0013836335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.072382435,0.0013994516,0.0029633597,0.003688508,0.0012961284,0.0020202037,0.0028011615,0.002775358,0.00877996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2470281,0.0012160942,0.002166868,0.0040335697,0.006222091,0.003996516,0.0021625145,0.0032683983,0.0009384061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018636159,0.00033133064,0.009361341,0.0012225703,0.00040112121,0.00042950505,0.0008271126,0.122935645,0.0071415408,0.3987657,0.004152331,0.45256817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036701647,0.0014755902,0.0056881146,0.0002774873,0.00016883748,0.00026358778,0.00011144734,0.5421275,0.0055987723,0.43495098,0.008807522,0.00016316572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002070477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001802757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072382435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028004143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031391273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3827995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995381013","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11203","title":"Selection of partial replication on two‐level orthogonal arrays","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Council","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Variance (accounting); Orthogonal array; Variance components; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Accounting","score_opus":0.18985514452340868,"score_gpt":0.41972196113959115,"score_spread":0.22986681661618247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995381013","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03284489,0.00015063379,0.96460176,0.00007638905,0.00007567087,0.0010795789,0.00019500767,0.0004026812,0.0005733097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19373314,0.00009277511,0.8006844,0.00009851421,0.000044836852,0.0042872643,0.00036455182,0.00011724439,0.0005773025],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90665686,0.072931446,0.0045542154,0.009324764,0.005306594,0.0012260556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8658767,0.094153404,0.0071617113,0.02323734,0.008557709,0.0010131549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05459027,0.0018052274,0.003746741,0.0016049867,0.0011357312,0.0016927641,0.0018597948,0.0014402288,0.005803027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17967586,0.0010242191,0.0028918118,0.002080412,0.002281384,0.001986007,0.0022127905,0.001922911,0.0009503383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010932875,0.0009563961,0.025555206,0.002749759,0.002285131,0.000573778,0.001280127,0.0806147,0.095742494,0.1280176,0.0038926883,0.6473992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002901695,0.013881367,0.036281116,0.0006053043,0.0019551339,0.0006227818,0.00043216516,0.5942029,0.115735024,0.21114816,0.021611944,0.0006224083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066593266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065534393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05459027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009632766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003001789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2887044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998682508","doi":"10.1080/01621459.2000.10474272","title":"Integer-Valued, Minimax Robust Designs for Estimation and Extrapolation in Heteroscedastic, Approximately Linear Models","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Statistical Association","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Mathematics; Minimax; Extrapolation; Polynomial regression; Integer (computer science); Mathematical optimization; Variance (accounting); Regression; Linear regression; Simulated annealing; Minification; Regression analysis; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.16231053548561797,"score_gpt":0.43708298046806854,"score_spread":0.27477244498245057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998682508","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002675582,0.00008129968,0.9969163,0.00003235195,0.0000074357977,0.000057755045,0.000014605563,0.00003308957,0.00018151893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0892787,0.00019901842,0.9090187,0.0000746497,0.00002445298,0.0009401533,0.000067313995,0.000039593862,0.00035746905],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9631375,0.031649783,0.0007631992,0.0017684373,0.0023626084,0.00031845353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.943679,0.04625941,0.0040164758,0.003505831,0.0022195254,0.0003197243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040264744,0.0013346628,0.0025735118,0.00121308,0.00038540628,0.001305493,0.0020543917,0.0015111163,0.0020927219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06730449,0.001082026,0.0013861365,0.0010635641,0.0026580011,0.0018099146,0.0019552007,0.0023425082,0.00035508486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010177591,0.00032783885,0.0010934889,0.00068342505,0.00028630564,0.00009716333,0.00033317835,0.57086,0.008316382,0.32687804,0.0005253867,0.08958105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002256614,0.00090044196,0.00049904897,0.00010996694,0.00005780152,0.000038044353,0.000031119733,0.8131369,0.0049995175,0.17798917,0.001956476,0.000055927812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029083746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002592319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040264744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010557581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001584357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21294284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998973039","doi":"10.2307/3316099","title":"Robust sequential designs for nonlinear regression","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Nonlinear regression; Parametric statistics; Computer science; Inference; Nonlinear system; Regression; Algorithm; Regression analysis; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.43052303994889,"score_gpt":0.4281379789056735,"score_spread":0.0023850610432165076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998973039","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024264157,0.00008825849,0.9965269,0.000062423765,0.000053176987,0.00016994125,0.00003864195,0.00011611045,0.00051820383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15448186,0.00025243982,0.8409916,0.0001673143,0.00012148565,0.0023517986,0.00017150596,0.00006780072,0.001394081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9655645,0.026916938,0.0008973861,0.0021195428,0.004030314,0.00047140877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662754,0.023717698,0.0032371662,0.0033311197,0.003018614,0.00042000887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02560784,0.00129319,0.0019440518,0.0010368613,0.00036875837,0.00084087456,0.0017868563,0.0015705716,0.007856394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0541221,0.00077115063,0.0011102685,0.0010873445,0.001656485,0.0011588753,0.0017604094,0.0017508933,0.0012638813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019147756,0.00042083222,0.0014052311,0.0009353299,0.00041781462,0.00013913671,0.00027271477,0.2585136,0.0067233955,0.456276,0.0025533081,0.27042785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012441499,0.0025792245,0.0008451731,0.0001173673,0.00012912188,0.0000994005,0.00004094394,0.6742628,0.0050371257,0.30657464,0.008998069,0.00007202132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064112665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044348367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02560784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010323314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018221932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13542885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000581731","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2007.06.020","title":"Robust designs for one-point extrapolation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Extrapolation; Statistics; Applied mathematics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.48900906829941165,"score_gpt":0.519636374492855,"score_spread":0.030627306193443393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000581731","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011104135,0.00017458556,0.9976992,0.000057065532,0.000043797663,0.0003253576,0.000060090417,0.0002488079,0.00028077338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053515196,0.00024824453,0.94004637,0.00016170548,0.00007501494,0.0047180043,0.00022695346,0.00021598134,0.0007925962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8640542,0.11720237,0.0030958832,0.007796421,0.0066563664,0.0011947171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7255973,0.22483525,0.010333007,0.031432047,0.0067377775,0.0010645965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10819639,0.0034574694,0.006479536,0.0026620026,0.001192664,0.0028161353,0.006126714,0.0048804125,0.009948533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2610771,0.0037476684,0.004579549,0.0021466203,0.005068215,0.004189708,0.0048752073,0.0064567355,0.00223441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008858111,0.00079813285,0.001702043,0.002358671,0.0024084903,0.0002354884,0.00072790025,0.17514773,0.0042168736,0.49208516,0.004166984,0.3072944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002171549,0.0022342522,0.0012808017,0.00040735383,0.00080494955,0.00012412695,0.00006318821,0.3998795,0.004660622,0.58046407,0.0077401213,0.00016943779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009898442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007181026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10819639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017956021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004007378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57220405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000683594","doi":"10.1007/s10463-014-0470-0","title":"Minimax design criterion for fractional factorial designs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Mathematics; Optimal design; Fractional factorial design; Estimator; Factorial experiment; Optimality criterion; Minimax estimator; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Mean squared error; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Matrix (chemical analysis); Statistics; Minimum-variance unbiased estimator","score_opus":0.5060403338934417,"score_gpt":0.5212604005461885,"score_spread":0.015220066652746778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000683594","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036678447,0.00025181996,0.99463236,0.00017942299,0.000033458455,0.00012473103,0.000054764874,0.000061570165,0.0009940523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15848774,0.0007319843,0.83337075,0.00048294963,0.0002028358,0.002827938,0.0002827931,0.00018586154,0.0034271416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96942836,0.023820985,0.0009723156,0.0018086266,0.0034421647,0.0005274151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91267264,0.07901713,0.002014804,0.002430496,0.0033061714,0.0005586607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045531195,0.0021806331,0.005706208,0.0028369993,0.0010337023,0.0027926988,0.0027483422,0.0034018976,0.0063050366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09093445,0.0015526939,0.0018044086,0.0018344949,0.0035955494,0.0032254292,0.0029371,0.0038205904,0.00070482667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017288604,0.00035148606,0.0010695438,0.0013462171,0.00054496864,0.000111213405,0.00038776593,0.26364458,0.0053314543,0.572481,0.0036325282,0.14937031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045607617,0.00092157105,0.00074855285,0.00025358328,0.00015859281,0.00010513411,0.00004643991,0.5574948,0.002622689,0.43270686,0.004414306,0.00007138059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005959154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045750602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045531195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022483936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044009127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2407949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001211064","doi":"10.3758/bf03207805","title":"Statistical power for the two-factor repeated measures ANOVA","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Sample size determination; Mathematics; Univariate; Monte Carlo method; Type I and type II errors; Correlation; Analysis of variance; Unavailability; Variance (accounting); Power (physics); Statistical power; Mean squared error; Multivariate statistics; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.5420606524719409,"score_gpt":0.6332398172327909,"score_spread":0.09117916476084997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001211064","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16032045,0.0016295492,0.74465936,0.0021632516,0.0029025115,0.017950542,0.0065949694,0.0027604732,0.061018817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62361354,0.00049586897,0.2785958,0.001716115,0.0005907652,0.079750575,0.0021273624,0.002491578,0.010618371],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9230653,0.03347963,0.0050343103,0.010544168,0.02424407,0.003632387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6341918,0.31102026,0.0069717863,0.029347872,0.016307661,0.0021606763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06587568,0.0018863964,0.004109867,0.0032620712,0.0026769014,0.003473159,0.0023018222,0.0045779217,0.039348274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3607685,0.0011743053,0.0029371574,0.003095312,0.0040554972,0.0058105146,0.0030206104,0.0054863677,0.004968241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.038802736,0.006931679,0.032267295,0.0055329683,0.0021211826,0.001341458,0.0098121045,0.012616371,0.03477211,0.15050402,0.056766845,0.64853126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014760924,0.033433612,0.20468241,0.0032154755,0.0028681378,0.0026032808,0.00392712,0.09337783,0.06765138,0.38499585,0.18748091,0.0010031327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009334601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068261864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06587568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012732514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040799263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34838808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001620004","doi":"10.1002/qre.1298","title":"Ensemble of Surrogates for Dual Response Surface Modeling in Robust Parameter Design","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality and Reliability Engineering International","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Kriging; Parametric statistics; Nonparametric statistics; Computer science; Basis (linear algebra); Basis function; Variance (accounting); Radial basis function; Ensemble forecasting; Function (biology); Regression; Machine learning; Mathematical optimization; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial neural network","score_opus":0.3270333269392578,"score_gpt":0.45037196772559607,"score_spread":0.12333864078633827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001620004","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032800802,0.00014555191,0.99619967,0.0000305689,0.000013176704,0.00001546747,0.000014376861,0.000055060078,0.00024607006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36611575,0.0007172947,0.6311764,0.00010628559,0.000054305663,0.0005365367,0.00025043686,0.00010432511,0.00093866367],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957904,0.002857525,0.00018250314,0.00036718926,0.00068797916,0.000114373004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956501,0.0028276918,0.00043167392,0.000490206,0.0005196377,0.00008064125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007896851,0.0013390216,0.0018266652,0.001192848,0.00031059392,0.0011576468,0.0011870391,0.001630881,0.0012671871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01082368,0.0006464192,0.0017839082,0.0010892847,0.001002288,0.0013841644,0.0017236114,0.0018486812,0.00041235975],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010974969,0.00006233231,0.0005809481,0.00016100268,0.00008803418,0.00003642433,0.000051937644,0.93003047,0.003964078,0.027661053,0.00030073497,0.036953148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041710096,0.000041445364,0.00004749274,0.0000072269136,0.0000065766912,0.000006483726,0.0000028673956,0.9954514,0.0005387358,0.0034753922,0.00041158398,0.0000066020166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074349524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046697736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007896851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052614976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008484154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041763067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004668118","doi":"10.1007/pl00012581","title":"On PBIBD Designs Based on Triangular Schemes","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Combinatorics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Greo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Combinatorics; Block (permutation group theory); Discrete mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.5328576690974302,"score_gpt":0.4930455767340003,"score_spread":0.03981209236342986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004668118","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046892744,0.00019021315,0.99075186,0.0001416544,0.000034931225,0.00018130959,0.00009142678,0.000099966084,0.003819453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15712352,0.00062482094,0.8360068,0.00040012607,0.00010199648,0.0014228543,0.00028347614,0.000100453195,0.0039358926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9691377,0.023859058,0.0009272642,0.0023930806,0.002934615,0.0007483542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9121131,0.072314665,0.0029854581,0.009510282,0.0024093562,0.0006671067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028453123,0.0016314284,0.0024377052,0.0020536713,0.00093820546,0.0025143714,0.0022630126,0.0018978185,0.0109873675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06899877,0.001330128,0.0014791377,0.0024019114,0.004905159,0.0036138971,0.0037968536,0.0027948802,0.0013748208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006985486,0.00011175902,0.0005803567,0.00037269198,0.00008151224,0.00004863328,0.00016919732,0.09123621,0.0014676087,0.77160275,0.0014629345,0.1321678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021874341,0.0003376121,0.0001732044,0.000113738075,0.000052650335,0.000039995863,0.000028331197,0.19539928,0.0013225316,0.7980708,0.0042146086,0.000028580811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009049898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008981062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028453123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019694206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029139551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15047634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006192744","doi":"10.1007/s13253-010-0043-5","title":"Statistical Modelling of Neighbor Treatment Effects in Aquaculture Clinical Trials","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Block (permutation group theory); Mixed model; Covariance; Variance (accounting); Computer science; Design of experiments; Statistics; Data mining; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2926904964694667,"score_gpt":0.46131361704564366,"score_spread":0.16862312057617695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006192744","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1500397,0.0023800435,0.8428442,0.0005281186,0.0003745977,0.0019914436,0.0003767369,0.00037786007,0.001087283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.745797,0.00056102616,0.24641572,0.00025838675,0.00014324399,0.0045230594,0.00038345435,0.00010620997,0.0018118725],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.732649,0.24497423,0.00615981,0.0086702965,0.0061152033,0.0014314567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5033351,0.46366188,0.013474162,0.014418096,0.003851523,0.0012592247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17546098,0.0016764682,0.0057867225,0.0016146194,0.00092971703,0.0023481727,0.005149715,0.0032930921,0.0027199944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2252695,0.0022033667,0.0045492956,0.0015262498,0.0043153786,0.0024559924,0.0021936442,0.0033617762,0.00031283853],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.036997538,0.0018656205,0.022101622,0.0029468995,0.0067781215,0.00032300066,0.0014412673,0.649405,0.002183125,0.053545207,0.0015549003,0.22085774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017693245,0.007876943,0.0058895876,0.00019760513,0.0015023776,0.00014561375,0.00012087736,0.92611176,0.0022814497,0.051523082,0.002457619,0.00012378191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002110248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027357072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17546098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025520774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004267629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92793745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007573942","doi":"10.1007/s00184-005-0404-1","title":"A recursive method for orthogonal designs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Class (philosophy); Orthogonal array; Algorithm; Algebra over a field; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Pure mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.35246597602917273,"score_gpt":0.5510554251208561,"score_spread":0.1985894490916834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007573942","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026875432,0.000051173156,0.99937016,0.000018088478,0.000014779177,0.00004286316,0.000012355851,0.00006946916,0.00015240171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011521973,0.00012893946,0.9863381,0.000060039147,0.000044824155,0.00076814275,0.00005376729,0.0000921371,0.0009920561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9774984,0.017970793,0.0006129218,0.0014291354,0.0020073026,0.00048140125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97208357,0.02283929,0.00095616194,0.0023986886,0.0015172075,0.00020509354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019196965,0.0018021882,0.0029481817,0.0018125906,0.0009376889,0.0013709598,0.002612737,0.0019778693,0.010120662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044473037,0.0017576154,0.0031182026,0.0017582555,0.00221338,0.0021935145,0.0024739348,0.0035929454,0.0025718575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006432425,0.00030213923,0.000574616,0.0009551672,0.00049107586,0.000092853195,0.0003563562,0.0679583,0.008049289,0.46668428,0.0039091352,0.4499837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051775173,0.0009502658,0.0010931314,0.0002656327,0.0003722682,0.00026369173,0.000061628685,0.6668012,0.0071412236,0.29397964,0.028378004,0.00017556245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020431576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031905246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019196965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012359022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036887869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10152453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009242172","doi":"10.1111/j.0006-341x.2003.00124.x","title":"A Bayesian<i>A</i>‐Optimal and Model Robust Design Criterion","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Bayesian probability; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Optimal design; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Limit (mathematics); Function (biology); Optimality criterion; Basis (linear algebra); Bayesian experimental design; Bayesian inference; Computer science; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Bayesian statistics","score_opus":0.3170732228480225,"score_gpt":0.4331611706651947,"score_spread":0.11608794781717224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009242172","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025280155,0.00010614215,0.9948519,0.00029405588,0.0000151864315,0.000069715556,0.00006967401,0.00006803393,0.0019974024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16641548,0.00031879527,0.82904506,0.0008076608,0.00010468781,0.0011979525,0.00029183755,0.00012265045,0.0016959086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98679775,0.007809052,0.0006262315,0.0017904409,0.0025236576,0.00045297784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98540664,0.010107711,0.001076404,0.0012598883,0.0018431557,0.00030624107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018407492,0.001954222,0.0024602683,0.0018662909,0.0008488371,0.0019095169,0.0021714175,0.003585534,0.002696329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037277717,0.0010080434,0.0016451802,0.0010550427,0.003472677,0.002393996,0.0024475115,0.002357383,0.00093002134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031284525,0.00020272355,0.0012820278,0.00039250648,0.00026182874,0.000104421175,0.00016397532,0.30537552,0.007736282,0.6016287,0.0038763871,0.07866276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012279008,0.00037500003,0.0006388353,0.00011109008,0.0000772878,0.00010766142,0.000037071954,0.5898151,0.0039218757,0.39964128,0.0050937734,0.00005827305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012578082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072137854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018407492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002111381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003965169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097349286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010002412","doi":"10.1081/qen-120020772","title":"Minimizing Cost of Multiple Response Systems by Probabilistic Robust Design","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SNC-Lavalin (Canada); University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Rework; Reliability engineering; Mathematical optimization; Probabilistic logic; Reliability (semiconductor); Product (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Total cost; Probabilistic design; Manufacturing cost; Function (biology); Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics; Engineering design process; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.3095892073698175,"score_gpt":0.4293579533605675,"score_spread":0.11976874599074999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010002412","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009016502,0.00018413861,0.9895705,0.00011591955,0.000008931735,0.00006291003,0.000015062224,0.00008092011,0.0009450126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67214054,0.0005807406,0.3236266,0.000098887314,0.00004506658,0.0010119235,0.00009941741,0.000094986426,0.0023017428],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949138,0.0029016885,0.00015228066,0.0005042542,0.0013018077,0.00022613323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993153,0.005151672,0.00084646285,0.00028720486,0.00049450126,0.00006711451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069690337,0.0018361142,0.0014200817,0.0010157726,0.00040376763,0.0013434241,0.0012574741,0.0013232726,0.0017235129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012304454,0.0008762877,0.0009947352,0.00081057305,0.0013573768,0.001658745,0.0012014718,0.0011805035,0.00027411184],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006316779,0.000025901914,0.00015595475,0.000074792944,0.000029599118,0.000014812245,0.000023208144,0.9661471,0.000734996,0.02053987,0.000089415866,0.012101112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025948639,0.000118809396,0.00009971206,0.000011174514,0.000018557765,0.0000108018985,0.000008002631,0.9859205,0.000893477,0.012407155,0.00047309644,0.000012637989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017301671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011341976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069690337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017557106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019025565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036856234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010246637","doi":"10.1007/s00184-012-0389-5","title":"D-optimal two-level orthogonal arrays for estimating main effects and some specified two-factor interactions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Victoria","keywords":"Mathematics; Orthogonal array; Orthogonal matrix; Factor (programming language); Matrix (chemical analysis); Combinatorics; Construct (python library); Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Orthogonal basis; Statistics; Taguchi methods; Computer science","score_opus":0.24529758869099522,"score_gpt":0.4749035942362205,"score_spread":0.2296060055452253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010246637","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013907583,0.00007624481,0.99805695,0.000045091434,0.0000143273965,0.00006286158,0.00007583054,0.00013864339,0.00013935324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028196352,0.00008398751,0.96989286,0.00010126412,0.000023739154,0.0009873338,0.00022206634,0.00008923395,0.00040320383],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9674605,0.025889436,0.001069571,0.0031626304,0.001574675,0.00084311276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9304754,0.06124373,0.0016834105,0.004487263,0.0016363891,0.00047370605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02313112,0.0024579908,0.0034799697,0.0015724623,0.0007847983,0.0016322674,0.0026823706,0.0029671083,0.0059994794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076892376,0.0022079728,0.0035154552,0.0020959426,0.0026910575,0.00222587,0.003365675,0.0031074025,0.0014782399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056236377,0.0008985399,0.0034667132,0.0019263697,0.0014186689,0.000253034,0.00064643344,0.22298484,0.027982736,0.22795866,0.0049179373,0.50192255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007945188,0.0009889841,0.002324411,0.00016698804,0.0002849108,0.0001995983,0.00010872462,0.78498656,0.013068772,0.19106391,0.0058401283,0.00017247029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014276686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016005596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02313112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011310424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030252652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12233049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011491153","doi":"10.1016/s0378-3758(02)00387-7","title":"Robust regression designs for approximate polynomial models","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Bounding overwatch; Polynomial regression; Robustness (evolution); Applied mathematics; Polynomial; Inference; Regression analysis; Regression; Statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.45190605868259315,"score_gpt":0.48887331860783384,"score_spread":0.03696725992524069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011491153","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018987998,0.00012700638,0.9973525,0.000058337493,0.000019477468,0.00014147292,0.000048925922,0.00012298615,0.00023052032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10008606,0.00032995254,0.8955115,0.00013769655,0.000083410196,0.0025813892,0.00028681077,0.00016580663,0.0008172809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9254769,0.06486914,0.0013449301,0.003806594,0.0035864427,0.00091588567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83761317,0.13615924,0.009000942,0.012627128,0.0037739275,0.0008256713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055156384,0.0021166187,0.0037278149,0.0018227537,0.0007766704,0.0020730835,0.004657298,0.0029932829,0.007381007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17593479,0.0024464186,0.0027326324,0.0016876985,0.0029839522,0.00370742,0.0029748585,0.0039838837,0.0013258473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004298749,0.0005781345,0.0013992531,0.0012303086,0.0011840747,0.0001285359,0.00036620614,0.3219062,0.0046800706,0.44869635,0.0023556808,0.21317635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010545432,0.0011342285,0.0006617013,0.00014247803,0.00034199897,0.000054970318,0.000040740564,0.6849916,0.0034106842,0.30400825,0.004087586,0.000071239796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012050162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012001061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055156384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018867168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003661109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29169828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012031618","doi":"10.1080/15598608.2010.10412013","title":"Some Constructions of Balanced Ternary Residual Treatment Effects Designs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Residual; Mathematics; Ternary operation; Statistics; Sequence (biology); Algorithm; Chemistry; Computer science","score_opus":0.10312828801991125,"score_gpt":0.4876842862283958,"score_spread":0.3845559982084846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012031618","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020355813,0.00022301928,0.9950118,0.00018270058,0.00007604227,0.00031716842,0.00018033043,0.00014773381,0.0018257232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02965118,0.00026336656,0.9651145,0.00032039615,0.000064781234,0.003084564,0.00021739418,0.000097286735,0.0011865235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94726163,0.040752213,0.0030848954,0.0037618778,0.00408962,0.00104973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.920189,0.06239677,0.0038401436,0.008067723,0.0045071826,0.0009991981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06755486,0.002364435,0.002959899,0.002491572,0.0011364591,0.0028175174,0.0047874046,0.002970887,0.017984517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09923541,0.0021681045,0.003101442,0.0024325808,0.0034930096,0.003751664,0.0048569036,0.0034975123,0.0026095826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008905664,0.00016340922,0.0003144426,0.00071817305,0.00013516888,0.000059620743,0.00038952276,0.008602627,0.0027977012,0.88292176,0.0019019778,0.101105034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007016042,0.000762394,0.0002991185,0.00028897022,0.00018266325,0.00011076023,0.000071384486,0.046424016,0.0039926386,0.9370644,0.010025457,0.000076527496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046597776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000679631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06755486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002579142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00417234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3572685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012573364","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9868.2009.00711.x","title":"Robust Discrimination Designs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis","keywords":"Divergence (linguistics); Neighbourhood (mathematics); Computer science; Kullback–Leibler divergence; Regression; Linear regression; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Algorithm; Statistics","score_opus":0.37932534623046377,"score_gpt":0.4644865830517543,"score_spread":0.08516123682129051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012573364","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008191608,0.00026561302,0.9883167,0.00027367336,0.00008285808,0.00048370095,0.0001365182,0.00015383358,0.0020954493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1742318,0.00022593033,0.8197927,0.00041610136,0.00014148057,0.0032540562,0.0003149814,0.000080226506,0.0015427497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9126234,0.065618336,0.0024598483,0.00966531,0.008588683,0.0010444971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8291985,0.12653428,0.013803126,0.020757433,0.008210755,0.0014958865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06277956,0.0014326744,0.0029255883,0.0018672157,0.00095031207,0.002344178,0.0034406257,0.0027905274,0.008160277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16090558,0.0009736397,0.0018121877,0.0014886722,0.0041270773,0.0028826678,0.003069904,0.003006003,0.0017214804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002082434,0.0005747235,0.003414633,0.0012958545,0.00039997604,0.00012308145,0.00042716117,0.06430825,0.0074288053,0.61743754,0.0030819084,0.29942563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010542902,0.0033198418,0.0017871482,0.00030468986,0.00016939722,0.00017874771,0.00008971275,0.15707156,0.006574472,0.81530225,0.014007094,0.00014083287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029693812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002758724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06277956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001824407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024457835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33201402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012612209","doi":"10.1016/s0378-3758(01)00133-1","title":"Orthogonal arrays of strength three from regular 3-wise balanced designs","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Army Research Office","keywords":"Mathematics; Orthogonal array; Combinatorics; Statistics; Taguchi methods","score_opus":0.2229557193678256,"score_gpt":0.4284878804339385,"score_spread":0.20553216106611288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012612209","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008593616,0.00014967241,0.98841536,0.00008961852,0.00009204734,0.0008277556,0.00040376923,0.00062429206,0.0008038246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.063115105,0.00018004549,0.9289656,0.00017115907,0.00006127277,0.0057067713,0.00082059327,0.00019856161,0.0007808713],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9538617,0.031917542,0.0020827048,0.0057196473,0.0051980508,0.0012203048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9255436,0.05056022,0.003725118,0.015996547,0.0035364733,0.00063807156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03589495,0.0019413208,0.0034434078,0.0017551958,0.00073081144,0.0022100622,0.0026339001,0.0024363918,0.012754779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11577119,0.0015616571,0.0030956415,0.0021813638,0.0032173404,0.002400871,0.0022967523,0.0028050481,0.0021482152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01794866,0.0009321773,0.0032920525,0.002059499,0.0010911771,0.00030458925,0.0008563122,0.0551508,0.03117275,0.21579666,0.007590689,0.6638047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00602928,0.005553702,0.00793793,0.00061443425,0.0013431297,0.0006804635,0.00017519125,0.2607213,0.033809002,0.65248233,0.030122621,0.00053059356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033946973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006464192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03589495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009158545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029293573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18983287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012785947","doi":"10.1139/f01-004","title":"Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1416,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permutation (music); Univariate; Resampling; Mathematics; Multivariate statistics; Statistics; Independent and identically distributed random variables; Null distribution; Variance (accounting); Omnibus test; Regression analysis; Random permutation; Linear regression; Statistical hypothesis testing; Econometrics; Test statistic; Random variable; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.17714782906897386,"score_gpt":0.4305256572153112,"score_spread":0.25337782814633736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012785947","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003003296,0.0012241119,0.9879615,0.00052259065,0.0006010858,0.0012215287,0.0008698015,0.0013687429,0.0032275082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05463222,0.0014720457,0.9300423,0.0005096823,0.00077367225,0.009125016,0.0012369115,0.0006632319,0.0015450155],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.87972397,0.089614876,0.0064366455,0.008384798,0.014484551,0.001355133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75814366,0.20390946,0.010106377,0.02147843,0.005308694,0.0010533568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.077029355,0.0026846156,0.0047818143,0.005405705,0.0020208498,0.003464997,0.004114708,0.0032851165,0.016279103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26832166,0.0015335697,0.0041216286,0.00848165,0.0077181356,0.0055304132,0.0035433304,0.0083028,0.0035016777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001410839,0.0004046312,0.0072160596,0.0051066466,0.0026595686,0.0009701166,0.0013465151,0.025701843,0.004076623,0.41605604,0.03464778,0.5004033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055759354,0.0018145979,0.008536191,0.0011851022,0.0006305661,0.0009812575,0.00043423005,0.11797031,0.005182903,0.7869081,0.07537594,0.0004232789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011994084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010160451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077029355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019289312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004711388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40737504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013774051","doi":"10.1080/10543406.2014.920854","title":"A Step-Up Test Procedure to Find the Minimum Effective Dose","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Estimator; Mathematics; Statistics; Null hypothesis; Monotone polygon; Test (biology); Sequence (biology); Null (SQL); False discovery rate; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.10704938510907043,"score_gpt":0.4854068352479506,"score_spread":0.37835745013888017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013774051","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037662273,0.00008371653,0.9939083,0.000059409387,0.000038568684,0.00092132366,0.00016570641,0.0004820559,0.0005745528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0303562,0.000066680834,0.9661104,0.00009805927,0.000027035592,0.0020489257,0.0002420818,0.000113896735,0.0009367666],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99265057,0.004373318,0.0003457755,0.0009204979,0.0015263483,0.0001834422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97436255,0.020808866,0.00078435964,0.0016944512,0.0020345857,0.00031520214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012031217,0.0011020735,0.0019386376,0.0025368845,0.0007677309,0.00083099795,0.0027303072,0.0015638488,0.021144783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055204358,0.00057962444,0.0016766286,0.0016176245,0.0012917541,0.001100624,0.0017235941,0.0029950992,0.0028578492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019567092,0.0007964669,0.0043630344,0.0011044837,0.00057956943,0.00040756687,0.0002923374,0.03421451,0.026543165,0.08428179,0.009412567,0.8360478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014082396,0.007957552,0.009846935,0.00035755575,0.00067604583,0.0014932764,0.00027174104,0.71327263,0.08093467,0.15012893,0.03327174,0.00038066367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006700576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084659347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021144783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006606734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024073357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07073635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014468891","doi":"10.1007/s10463-009-0222-8","title":"Forms of four-word indicator functions with implications to two-level factorial designs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; DePaul University","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Mathematics; Factorial; Factorial experiment; Statistics; Plackett–Burman design; Factorial analysis; Econometrics; Arithmetic; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.4405702350079293,"score_gpt":0.49258100385881126,"score_spread":0.05201076885088196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014468891","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006468404,0.00016470504,0.9880896,0.0007355385,0.00020745194,0.00016813546,0.00014651,0.00032075768,0.0036988677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.108631715,0.00019655426,0.88315666,0.0008947825,0.00020288465,0.0026370746,0.00026906704,0.0003083583,0.0037028699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9360796,0.046297707,0.0054842136,0.004581065,0.006209493,0.0013479564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7638479,0.19539179,0.00875881,0.018401416,0.011509255,0.0020908162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052725933,0.0023106656,0.0038475539,0.0034234915,0.001725313,0.00786807,0.0041747675,0.0059488607,0.016582903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18645884,0.0014631287,0.0023976772,0.005114705,0.008636788,0.012072578,0.0046357187,0.0066403705,0.0035572264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033456847,0.00012634305,0.0003479871,0.00023606535,0.000030406223,0.000077240875,0.0005342434,0.0018921978,0.0006019787,0.9318007,0.0019401315,0.06207812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009052602,0.000074120624,0.00012622275,0.000051422023,0.00001815914,0.00006933806,0.000057069825,0.011894646,0.00035248033,0.9847514,0.0024783183,0.000036355897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033524336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043129342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052725933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024225644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029029646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27884465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014721111","doi":"10.3758/brm.42.2.366","title":"Applying the permutation test to factorial designs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavior Research Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Permutation (music); Factorial; Fractional factorial design; Parametric statistics; Factorial experiment; Resampling; Mathematics; Computation; Limit (mathematics); Computer science; Test (biology); Algorithm; Statistics","score_opus":0.773946312954811,"score_gpt":0.7301019632369032,"score_spread":0.04384434971790774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014721111","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007655429,0.00013176196,0.98767275,0.00025086527,0.00030389254,0.0009139445,0.00014551697,0.00046172348,0.0024640616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.121462576,0.0002711004,0.8679969,0.000375934,0.00022720108,0.007422553,0.00029229673,0.0002804665,0.0016709485],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8062073,0.17022762,0.003616712,0.008649093,0.010005838,0.0012933688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6358897,0.3278871,0.0053013847,0.024400573,0.005680777,0.0008405522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.079630755,0.0023111624,0.0050255186,0.0037640922,0.00216029,0.0030527245,0.003475614,0.002509831,0.018560458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31866115,0.0015753582,0.004391444,0.0037390117,0.005231129,0.0046518035,0.0027766214,0.0055424166,0.0016985615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036036724,0.0013215948,0.005159355,0.0017783298,0.0021959548,0.00036309144,0.0010851638,0.030224813,0.0027903088,0.2251975,0.006561843,0.7197184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017218661,0.0048376545,0.0067844805,0.00035027514,0.00065870036,0.00034280284,0.00032279154,0.22306338,0.0044997414,0.7447136,0.01249284,0.00021190464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020697895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017638567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079630755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023842438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006677301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42113274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016255587","doi":"10.1139/x06-112","title":"Post hoc blocking to improve heritability and precision of best linear unbiased genetic predictions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blocking (statistics); Statistics; Heritability; Block design; Post hoc; Block (permutation group theory); Mathematics; Post-hoc analysis; Randomized block design; Selection (genetic algorithm); Block size; Computer science; Biology; Combinatorics; Ecology; Genetics; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.1413515098880563,"score_gpt":0.45646299505219756,"score_spread":0.3151114851641412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016255587","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42041397,0.00018325432,0.5753358,0.000045717694,0.000080523125,0.0011619856,0.00033126646,0.000819677,0.0016276999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60283285,0.00009556323,0.39025453,0.00006341621,0.00002031407,0.0040063257,0.000550734,0.0005238553,0.0016523462],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915302,0.005812485,0.00044484483,0.0011631234,0.000586419,0.0004629878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9681542,0.02456073,0.0016601108,0.003945806,0.0014189318,0.0002602365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012978441,0.00118899,0.0018170038,0.00048588702,0.0005489261,0.00063977495,0.0012409886,0.00061312324,0.0025357627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024835432,0.00059961353,0.0010976263,0.00058635225,0.00079068606,0.00052171684,0.0006638533,0.0014028897,0.0003657183],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010368036,0.0032740536,0.025702741,0.00075777475,0.0009184811,0.00015789413,0.0013471936,0.48389828,0.2221905,0.015721228,0.001528534,0.2341353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077399286,0.006119647,0.02488026,0.00005638503,0.0004906005,0.00007447233,0.00012300564,0.8213173,0.13255897,0.008453614,0.005027554,0.00012427471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027377857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033818204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012978441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089518394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019202104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06863737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016263267","doi":"10.1016/j.jco.2013.04.002","title":"On blocked resolution IV designs containing clear two-factor interactions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Complexity","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematics; Resolution (logic); Block (permutation group theory); Homogeneous; Blocking (statistics); Factor (programming language); Algorithm; Combinatorics; Statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.45002715596824155,"score_gpt":0.49923935731208213,"score_spread":0.04921220134384058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016263267","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01172289,0.0002504018,0.98534226,0.00006378298,0.00005552077,0.0008339557,0.0001352839,0.00018313687,0.0014126279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.117293805,0.00053416245,0.8721045,0.00026014808,0.00008445457,0.0066377055,0.00040600405,0.00022414897,0.002455038],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88046014,0.10668192,0.0019503378,0.004861889,0.004576256,0.0014694695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6718651,0.29999578,0.008929324,0.014644501,0.0036790455,0.000886229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07819735,0.004654087,0.0047890386,0.0020014313,0.00070658675,0.0021690147,0.0033419477,0.0024992279,0.009152391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17741238,0.0026256596,0.0029637644,0.0017551432,0.0035735166,0.0032317918,0.0033131076,0.0036365965,0.0015072462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022938017,0.001819021,0.0025069057,0.005598255,0.0028085762,0.00024865867,0.0013117313,0.31320462,0.024775334,0.31180313,0.0032885156,0.30969724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004986808,0.007976315,0.00304235,0.0008716295,0.0013484778,0.00010919529,0.00016807775,0.5497004,0.0147653995,0.40542847,0.011345712,0.00025718322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011361771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011645178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07819735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019886256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033832542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41355205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018021189","doi":"10.1007/s00184-013-0463-7","title":"Optimal and robust designs for trigonometric regression models","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Trigonometry; Mathematics; Minimax; Optimal design; Trigonometric functions; Regression analysis; Applied mathematics; Regression; Differentiation of trigonometric functions; Function (biology); Inverse trigonometric functions; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Statistics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.3965849092122878,"score_gpt":0.44954812061816074,"score_spread":0.052963211405872956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018021189","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025753682,0.0001832656,0.99651116,0.00008255018,0.00002832139,0.00009463225,0.00003577576,0.000087627006,0.00040130585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19046362,0.00051317445,0.8050384,0.00017605985,0.00011679885,0.0020169716,0.00019556134,0.00012934447,0.0013500485],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.94356704,0.046755966,0.0012251879,0.0041183666,0.003400967,0.0009324717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9273336,0.05963439,0.005682104,0.0042720665,0.0026161992,0.00046164016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043591097,0.0025180217,0.0035958332,0.0017411653,0.00063947076,0.002116381,0.0029810767,0.0032098864,0.005289828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10768103,0.0023750744,0.0026798372,0.001211786,0.0032792888,0.002695011,0.0026257357,0.0031816564,0.0010316176],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024872916,0.00052665325,0.0010252673,0.0016573074,0.00076629827,0.00010883475,0.0003004482,0.4230445,0.00830821,0.39068964,0.0014364811,0.1696491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056977634,0.001310243,0.0010171494,0.00019273345,0.00023453435,0.000056578323,0.000051763647,0.74908096,0.0055133426,0.2385993,0.0032645636,0.000109107925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008471145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073222205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043591097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018433013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034965002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2305345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020172162","doi":"10.1007/s00362-006-0328-5","title":"2 m 41 designs with minimum aberration or weak minimum aberration","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistical Papers","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Nankai University; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Zhàng; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.13212961033756035,"score_gpt":0.4336010623331525,"score_spread":0.3014714519955921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020172162","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041001838,0.0005866558,0.94619906,0.00043224913,0.00038386454,0.003663995,0.00062742416,0.000569422,0.006535606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26224074,0.0003421021,0.71124285,0.0006779057,0.00028014206,0.016289672,0.0004679896,0.0001954149,0.00826319],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9344827,0.05098556,0.002602615,0.0049627647,0.0055375653,0.001428898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9540702,0.031026235,0.0038797082,0.0084478855,0.0019284942,0.00064752327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038483392,0.002007932,0.0031088297,0.0012606088,0.0012923958,0.0020522908,0.0015896132,0.0031250862,0.019350618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.083787546,0.0014294329,0.0034451312,0.0012652188,0.0022010638,0.0015766368,0.0021566644,0.0016427392,0.001921249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04025898,0.0019283193,0.013651085,0.0042086365,0.003440495,0.00049474265,0.0012090671,0.060480464,0.03207116,0.25774553,0.011984094,0.57252747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018623486,0.048650075,0.035276692,0.0010394779,0.004024131,0.0008914218,0.00035620827,0.20713522,0.047902472,0.51101214,0.12453496,0.00055367115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039385463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071905897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038483392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014201569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004477772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20352209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020209089","doi":"10.1002/cjs.5550360204","title":"Likelihood and bayesian approaches to inference for the stationary point of a quadratic response surface","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Bayesian probability; Stationary point; Bayesian inference; Parametrization (atmospheric modeling); Applied mathematics; Point (geometry); Inference; Quadratic equation; Polynomial; Quadratic function; Point estimation; Algorithm; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Geometry","score_opus":0.32222074703924236,"score_gpt":0.38998170668840615,"score_spread":0.06776095964916379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020209089","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050994707,0.00025018226,0.99348384,0.0003868083,0.000015097709,0.00003564463,0.000043076732,0.000056363668,0.0006294721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37464544,0.0010462973,0.61913055,0.0004380253,0.0001976192,0.00080341444,0.00037935705,0.00021712258,0.003142188],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823314,0.0133487005,0.00054565136,0.00156093,0.0018072722,0.0004060726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8398894,0.15150212,0.003256047,0.002373158,0.0024115173,0.00056766294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031976327,0.001357086,0.0026902899,0.0038779099,0.0011759356,0.0027439257,0.0033567604,0.0029266526,0.0051430156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13354507,0.0017152227,0.0026341747,0.002651358,0.005428344,0.004261034,0.0031770184,0.004233356,0.00066783174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029963168,0.000105123356,0.001631203,0.00033398354,0.00023838927,0.00014423576,0.00029603613,0.53907156,0.00096953457,0.4075451,0.0011095761,0.048255682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053256663,0.000043479424,0.00052633014,0.00006487714,0.00003447676,0.000040653704,0.00002887724,0.67323256,0.0003693584,0.3248295,0.0007337577,0.000042894997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058275796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003948952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031976327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002928721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022866684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16910899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020343818","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.05.001","title":"Experimental design for regression analysis when the responses are subject to censoring","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western Forest Products","funders":"","keywords":"Censoring (clinical trials); Computer science; Regression analysis; Bayesian probability; Regression; Statistics; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.38358074031227707,"score_gpt":0.5497928935120152,"score_spread":0.16621215319973814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020343818","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018688684,0.00051620184,0.9951841,0.00019187959,0.00019149277,0.0011080422,0.00015416445,0.0002364203,0.0005488721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052038796,0.0007159717,0.9266897,0.0007179675,0.00023909817,0.018171748,0.00030387586,0.00015502606,0.0009677345],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.85452473,0.13087319,0.0027643526,0.00589634,0.0051129116,0.00082838966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86173767,0.11867082,0.005506453,0.011099987,0.0023299886,0.0006551091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.083038956,0.0020855991,0.00408649,0.0014335689,0.0009966139,0.0015621464,0.0029666077,0.0037755498,0.010526578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15566877,0.0014736273,0.0026886924,0.0015838094,0.0031965387,0.0020411187,0.0019073243,0.0042655016,0.001765831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01363939,0.002181762,0.0034769026,0.007476594,0.002203352,0.0002715916,0.00051138335,0.05399284,0.010054128,0.33322653,0.010638647,0.56232685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009211837,0.011730702,0.0049542733,0.0014968244,0.0018719399,0.00053247303,0.000117402975,0.27168274,0.016184185,0.62867135,0.05321263,0.00033362265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003167768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034764793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083038956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013431829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031213479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43915725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021002368","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2003.12.003","title":"Constructing optimal designs with constraints","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Multiplicative function; Mathematical optimization; Convergence (economics); Class (philosophy); Construct (python library); Optimal design; Function (biology); Computer science","score_opus":0.19406125824831688,"score_gpt":0.46787717471823737,"score_spread":0.2738159164699205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021002368","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027851649,0.00036515543,0.99507266,0.00026200069,0.000034261968,0.0001959411,0.000115470386,0.000103396786,0.0010660146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061242968,0.0004014726,0.9354771,0.00027065206,0.00006603341,0.0018078029,0.00023923987,0.000088473265,0.00040636465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93711036,0.05208436,0.0021539323,0.003972548,0.003929874,0.0007488853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8041899,0.1784571,0.0055346084,0.008071664,0.0029389358,0.0008078695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05146123,0.0022516428,0.004649058,0.0043147127,0.0010642785,0.0030932894,0.0026036324,0.002704081,0.006255512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16858128,0.003921905,0.0033673518,0.0033223063,0.0037196002,0.0040480583,0.0033376666,0.00509359,0.00070945197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011729972,0.0003039158,0.0016833332,0.0015962699,0.00067072647,0.00020005276,0.00036046244,0.19511512,0.0015290907,0.56233686,0.003713655,0.23131756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045666707,0.0002994522,0.0004351049,0.00035191406,0.00017794213,0.00007027368,0.000051320254,0.21677998,0.0017492981,0.7739505,0.0056291833,0.000048327838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011574797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014563514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05146123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002006077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077550854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2721563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021706749","doi":"10.1081/sta-100001556","title":"INTEGER-VALUED, MINIMAX ROBUST DESIGNS FOR APPROXIMATELY LINEAR MODELS WITH CORRELATED ERRORS","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Minimax; Mathematics; Integer (computer science); Linear regression; Polynomial regression; Polynomial; Minification; Mathematical optimization; Linear model; Regression; Applied mathematics; Algorithm; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.3435779794204035,"score_gpt":0.520969719714822,"score_spread":0.17739174029441845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021706749","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002935826,0.0000928405,0.9965693,0.000031057898,0.0000070159763,0.000028895192,0.0000100979,0.000028926816,0.00029601913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24067047,0.000297485,0.75700384,0.00012948627,0.000032054777,0.0006979201,0.000087247914,0.000045947927,0.0010356071],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925639,0.0052460623,0.00027213356,0.00082392787,0.0009425816,0.0001513782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859116,0.010483138,0.0018637686,0.000921984,0.0006888895,0.00013061814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009671536,0.0011515822,0.0015003291,0.0007248341,0.00035646954,0.0013188677,0.0013649039,0.0012912147,0.0017943914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02357994,0.0007409465,0.00074296724,0.000707436,0.0016995335,0.0015704264,0.0011893343,0.0014365365,0.0003898764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033572078,0.00015636151,0.0007824707,0.00038131047,0.00012828724,0.000072003604,0.00015943238,0.71298647,0.006811832,0.18805742,0.00044253148,0.089686185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008016893,0.00062269636,0.00034297034,0.000059592516,0.000035672183,0.00003950939,0.000021815162,0.90315175,0.0042166407,0.089737676,0.0016582701,0.00003318196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021798897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020009663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009671536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007782747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009843535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051148593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023060931","doi":"10.1007/s00184-008-0173-8","title":"Minimax robust designs for field experiments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Mathematics; Estimator; Covariance matrix; Covariance; Mathematical optimization; Field (mathematics); Optimal design; Least-squares function approximation; Robust statistics; Spatial correlation; Algorithm; Statistics","score_opus":0.6510149411035311,"score_gpt":0.5186700726877603,"score_spread":0.13234486841577076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023060931","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00080925255,0.00023741992,0.99828786,0.000073456664,0.000023610097,0.00009005318,0.000034810164,0.000080830076,0.00036263064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11299853,0.0007144328,0.8782745,0.00025307582,0.00016766452,0.0040688543,0.00025853704,0.00019052968,0.0030739375],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9719644,0.022733385,0.0006596721,0.002445285,0.0017074152,0.0004898683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94199353,0.050425325,0.0029290193,0.0025991157,0.0016656525,0.00038732617],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03657962,0.0036826124,0.005258637,0.002041924,0.0008153769,0.0022291404,0.0035095352,0.0035540743,0.0062943804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06897468,0.0028052682,0.0026207564,0.0013517843,0.0040048026,0.0025573703,0.0033053854,0.004763102,0.0012094013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001912465,0.00031138986,0.000604681,0.001759743,0.0008129232,0.00009765154,0.00025493503,0.46276832,0.0052144984,0.38692075,0.0026460947,0.1366966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047258916,0.00076121534,0.00050305104,0.00015679926,0.00012594921,0.00004916754,0.0000242381,0.74836546,0.0026762206,0.24276572,0.00403498,0.00006461484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008783143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068526564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9634204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020028127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031409706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19345385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023389257","doi":"10.1093/biomet/asr022","title":"Robust designs through partially clear two-factor interactions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Factor (programming language); Upper and lower bounds; Class (philosophy); Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.7229823990637422,"score_gpt":0.5014948630397166,"score_spread":0.2214875360240256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023389257","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034398872,0.0001749114,0.995561,0.00006104517,0.000019338113,0.00007560721,0.000110551795,0.00013547634,0.00042205985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09391166,0.00038520503,0.9024694,0.00022479717,0.00010963286,0.0014011984,0.00044800562,0.00010446775,0.0009456268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9560432,0.03008835,0.0018280643,0.006011063,0.0050404677,0.0009887884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8896468,0.08068568,0.009863715,0.014350476,0.004432795,0.0010206335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027598344,0.0035986411,0.0034213103,0.0015478721,0.00078771927,0.0022770185,0.002537874,0.0027467678,0.0043804813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084085785,0.0022950242,0.002974925,0.0014489548,0.004921109,0.003907029,0.004255799,0.004017089,0.0017395134],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003928263,0.0003878562,0.002206241,0.0017782253,0.0009556305,0.00028773453,0.00047588072,0.22354402,0.042552084,0.4889349,0.0024774584,0.23247178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085297454,0.0032090645,0.002515993,0.00027213752,0.0003688431,0.00026215098,0.00005948121,0.3858285,0.031119345,0.5652241,0.009964165,0.00032331215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002518842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003552572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027598344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096145144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021342237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14595568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025162236","doi":"10.1016/j.csda.2006.03.010","title":"New criteria for robust integer-valued designs in linear models","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Statistics & Data Analysis","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Integer (computer science); Generalized linear model; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Algorithm; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.4267899798828539,"score_gpt":0.5165879401463285,"score_spread":0.08979796026347459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025162236","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004896117,0.00015980992,0.9988261,0.000052044586,0.000029490679,0.00006488249,0.000036794336,0.00005591024,0.000285305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043597292,0.0004353731,0.9530947,0.00023473584,0.00021017379,0.0011344132,0.00027698476,0.00021080069,0.0008054822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94927037,0.03717929,0.0029875385,0.002694956,0.006963898,0.0009039312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8636201,0.11667729,0.0058327494,0.0044647306,0.008144094,0.0012611083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06483701,0.0043004886,0.0049224216,0.003447388,0.0007866447,0.0042122523,0.0044662594,0.003166563,0.006017763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1386132,0.0020568615,0.0024159325,0.0023986618,0.003461359,0.005203179,0.004154168,0.0052533816,0.0010453281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008332853,0.0002457586,0.0006714909,0.0016738116,0.00041859978,0.00018247071,0.00029697,0.2958219,0.005484918,0.53967065,0.0036652056,0.15103498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002916293,0.00055181916,0.00029601055,0.00027255315,0.00010938676,0.000094399045,0.000041537463,0.6511706,0.003222919,0.33820435,0.005652921,0.000091815484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051468005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048221592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06483701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022877653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035179215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34289497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025530900","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2007.12.003","title":"Folded over non-orthogonal designs","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Isomorphism (crystallography); Mathematics; Orthogonal array; Orthogonal matrix; Orthogonal basis; Statistics","score_opus":0.21802542119450613,"score_gpt":0.5196836354778618,"score_spread":0.30165821428335565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025530900","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008547911,0.00025376162,0.9896225,0.00012356802,0.00008089673,0.00011882004,0.00011660711,0.00032292475,0.000813091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16500583,0.00043055686,0.82963806,0.0003346213,0.00016395513,0.0014204489,0.00047498874,0.00027056367,0.0022609644],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95305663,0.034495912,0.0024036516,0.0061667752,0.002905777,0.0009712896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83928835,0.11093248,0.0060830284,0.036672305,0.0059551806,0.0010687885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07851147,0.0023347004,0.0035829383,0.0018593621,0.0010746364,0.002938448,0.0023449466,0.0018962945,0.011325878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1613332,0.002276258,0.003275326,0.0022540714,0.0032184722,0.0063310754,0.004347809,0.0030840717,0.0013490964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004272326,0.000504992,0.007035275,0.0012105593,0.0016088162,0.0002256057,0.00067212834,0.06503057,0.009319772,0.37246603,0.0025358603,0.5351181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037803318,0.0011571612,0.0034580436,0.000282316,0.00086279237,0.00014512909,0.000082717546,0.24311106,0.010053826,0.73359776,0.006785393,0.00008573329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005917106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008745414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07851147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014928444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035601147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4152133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026680199","doi":"10.1111/j.0006-341x.2004.00236.x","title":"Letter to the Editor of <i>Biometrics</i>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Biometrics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Population; Mathematics; Biometrics; Statistics; Library science; Demography; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Sociology","score_opus":0.16610295402904326,"score_gpt":0.4268696127936606,"score_spread":0.26076665876461735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026680199","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026215086,0.0011975159,0.0006085131,0.88924056,0.10357708,0.000042480187,0.00019523042,0.00007706824,0.004799518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022099635,0.0007900926,0.0006887795,0.90462035,0.07584862,0.00009954552,0.00005459271,0.0000525565,0.015635535],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937348,0.0021200387,0.00076114526,0.0008053266,0.0020251817,0.0005534995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757652,0.015954614,0.0011585746,0.00075654103,0.0049972325,0.0013677798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0107193235,0.0011998621,0.003098863,0.0012349096,0.0031318823,0.005550604,0.002903764,0.037253603,0.007193199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051760767,0.0009714567,0.0016646516,0.0010853616,0.002619057,0.0021802564,0.0008275865,0.029307622,0.0075735706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054710676,0.000014321843,0.00012582476,0.000029805053,0.000010224511,0.0001638003,0.000021457336,0.000033582062,0.000055834134,0.0010259034,0.99501246,0.0034520335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001405769,0.00008113597,0.0012628512,0.0002596975,0.00006452778,0.00055271573,0.00018466348,0.0008038121,0.0004061355,0.0061849444,0.99000615,0.000052738316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047739893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009389166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037253603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044141244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042540072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056689918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027005019","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v4n2p55","title":"Quantile Plots of the Prediction Variance for Partially Replicated Central Composite Design","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quantile; Variance (accounting); Star (game theory); Cube (algebra); Replicate; Replication (statistics); Statistics; Mathematics; Algorithm; Computer science; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.20201414718977026,"score_gpt":0.4313331808864174,"score_spread":0.22931903369664716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027005019","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030067138,0.0003861041,0.9624895,0.00016420358,0.00011403179,0.00034452847,0.0014776146,0.002956137,0.002000766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38966084,0.00031756036,0.60113686,0.0002598785,0.00009114723,0.0022355025,0.003176193,0.001105695,0.0020163038],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777754,0.014569115,0.0009228631,0.0027103575,0.0036161335,0.00040599896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8738075,0.10188965,0.0069693048,0.009094368,0.007869769,0.00036939973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028706865,0.0014541411,0.001598327,0.0024527877,0.0006402331,0.0017218565,0.0017682086,0.0019139535,0.012963197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.105060786,0.00062729744,0.00126462,0.0023102886,0.0015885403,0.0021626533,0.0012909676,0.002880544,0.001485136],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052478095,0.00076769537,0.033077247,0.0031160116,0.0011492841,0.001068728,0.0027073307,0.20149589,0.039099373,0.10713393,0.030888457,0.57424825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033195803,0.002227844,0.06539109,0.0005482288,0.00034348862,0.0007170721,0.0008161764,0.79717445,0.026476784,0.078020155,0.027454676,0.00049808476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021565424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014588367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028706865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009227321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009829107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15181822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027590663","doi":"10.1016/s0166-218x(99)00232-2","title":"On the orthogonal designs of order 24","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discrete Applied Mathematics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Orthogonal array; Order (exchange); Construct (python library); Combinatorics; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Computer science; Taguchi methods","score_opus":0.16773208217413743,"score_gpt":0.4070227853266725,"score_spread":0.2392907031525351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027590663","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055332873,0.00046566877,0.99070626,0.00022835023,0.00011860614,0.00030763858,0.00012061578,0.00007465066,0.0024450077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11339986,0.001707134,0.8753227,0.0005332123,0.00037418984,0.0042006047,0.0003529394,0.00012304042,0.00398627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8166641,0.15855405,0.004288002,0.007613706,0.010524714,0.0023554063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70308816,0.25671127,0.009565453,0.021440178,0.008005406,0.0011896121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12301749,0.0033457885,0.0059247217,0.0030223816,0.0014661386,0.0030771613,0.002901498,0.0023817602,0.010598018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19197989,0.0025009841,0.0031085517,0.0031175264,0.009003271,0.0053159003,0.0046343324,0.003764466,0.0011404124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012963841,0.00014356262,0.0006286785,0.0004987281,0.00029723416,0.000058711514,0.00035584244,0.02910582,0.0008897406,0.8803706,0.0013129365,0.085041724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006241591,0.0009032958,0.0006053924,0.00019076568,0.00014331509,0.00006124909,0.000059739366,0.077326134,0.0011839794,0.9123235,0.0064972322,0.00008129739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013939834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012322178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12301749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002740999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00714472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6505865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027757720","doi":"10.1080/03610920903511769","title":"Applications and Implementations of Continuous Robust Designs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Implementation; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.18421064189139083,"score_gpt":0.5518130027677605,"score_spread":0.36760236087636966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027757720","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008785252,0.00006929699,0.9982205,0.000055315126,0.000016576632,0.000036079706,0.000010329501,0.00012013044,0.00059321465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06527497,0.00018296672,0.9330405,0.00011449185,0.000049211958,0.00051531213,0.000038012753,0.00007848435,0.00070605736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9743027,0.018405553,0.0012688005,0.0018416325,0.0037736364,0.00040773797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655155,0.02569231,0.0019754989,0.0045180437,0.002026932,0.0002716934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019826103,0.0013761504,0.0012320981,0.001303479,0.00050251797,0.001955828,0.002515575,0.002502481,0.007047152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07457694,0.0011290234,0.0013678188,0.0013311603,0.0027532685,0.0019552817,0.0025195696,0.002628857,0.001497016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041827362,0.00019958934,0.0006906328,0.0006920843,0.0001523468,0.00014171751,0.00027296552,0.21376824,0.00504762,0.51333493,0.0014455942,0.26383603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002740763,0.00077753107,0.00031471424,0.00019624521,0.00006242166,0.00019403808,0.00006541953,0.6809157,0.008484963,0.29812613,0.0105232,0.000065429136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049536926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034129585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019826103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011025465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017518363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10485166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028387228","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2011.12.019","title":"Generalized minimum aberration two-level split-plot designs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Plot (graphics); Split plot; Restricted randomization; Rank (graph theory); Algorithm; Combinatorics; Statistics","score_opus":0.41414051249315026,"score_gpt":0.5156379488757189,"score_spread":0.10149743638256864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028387228","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031264596,0.00017280247,0.96357274,0.000116391086,0.00015188644,0.002469636,0.00044217097,0.0010200903,0.0007897313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19644992,0.00009532831,0.788359,0.00020231203,0.000050622977,0.012576168,0.0005009876,0.00034959582,0.0014160462],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9176079,0.06185869,0.0031893987,0.009495723,0.0061259028,0.0017223993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89755535,0.06530658,0.0071788467,0.022618376,0.006061006,0.0012798031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041260857,0.0026515333,0.0066734566,0.0019833455,0.0011534304,0.0023535476,0.0050118724,0.004221086,0.021038555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1290919,0.002097479,0.0029873392,0.00191307,0.0036489812,0.0035427627,0.0035582678,0.0036200958,0.001781834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.118787095,0.0054489444,0.012279984,0.005394252,0.0054542166,0.0004380152,0.0024609824,0.09770257,0.04332149,0.1746201,0.005785538,0.5283067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.029425286,0.039017588,0.019024318,0.00061386975,0.0031448496,0.00043613574,0.00037736775,0.55343,0.03402397,0.3031264,0.016724808,0.0006553742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005768808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008700863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041260857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016704504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028445052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21821088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034173718","doi":"10.1007/s10463-005-0020-x","title":"Connections Between the Resolutions of General Two-level Factorial Designs","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island; McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Mathematics; Factorial experiment; Factorial; Connection (principal bundle); Plackett–Burman design; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Geometry","score_opus":0.4751025642495491,"score_gpt":0.5019135975057859,"score_spread":0.026811033256236794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034173718","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018436499,0.00087579683,0.97429454,0.00067561615,0.00008138601,0.00007590686,0.000089665424,0.0000903436,0.0053802645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29916033,0.0016301303,0.6932437,0.00083981565,0.00045543592,0.0006040676,0.00029009915,0.00014227771,0.0036341122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9700495,0.022450633,0.0013173503,0.0030315025,0.0024580017,0.0006930141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8408005,0.13847344,0.006718851,0.009585206,0.0027305956,0.0016913312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029371524,0.0011305683,0.0020390227,0.002162394,0.0011087523,0.0044900193,0.003175836,0.0025958898,0.007418532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12038575,0.0015042782,0.00279559,0.002099719,0.005611811,0.007701322,0.0043694233,0.006194569,0.0007018028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072926436,0.0000447679,0.0003194224,0.00012356995,0.000040253453,0.00003658466,0.00023948238,0.00445908,0.00036138683,0.97327346,0.0004238202,0.020605307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029787021,0.00003499191,0.00020491942,0.000026457323,0.000015821275,0.000045476605,0.000030125413,0.014300205,0.00017161775,0.9840858,0.0010393962,0.000015502235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002475185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027218758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029371524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013414033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015506506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15533334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035714589","doi":"10.1080/03610920903147812","title":"A Note on Bartlett's<i>M</i>Test for Homogeneity of Variances","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Homogeneity (statistics); Mathematics; F-test of equality of variances; Levene's test; Statistics; Chi-square test; Econometrics; Statistical hypothesis testing","score_opus":0.12547914715936326,"score_gpt":0.539330779527931,"score_spread":0.4138516323685677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035714589","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004242309,0.0070696115,0.90189147,0.058119692,0.012239109,0.0004519639,0.0008388748,0.0010145856,0.014132355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09646963,0.0044551557,0.8178177,0.057581645,0.011767456,0.0022532328,0.0007173695,0.0011240666,0.007813712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.85849494,0.10017755,0.008249142,0.00824646,0.023704085,0.0011278176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45550784,0.48964044,0.0082623,0.028534614,0.016641406,0.001413401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13052152,0.0015048139,0.0032485302,0.0029188944,0.002641815,0.0038174123,0.005119244,0.007462547,0.0069365716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3821376,0.0010348852,0.0021896313,0.005092652,0.010128026,0.006228732,0.002999431,0.016745731,0.0033798683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009868451,0.00021576714,0.005971939,0.0013390525,0.00050836906,0.0012456422,0.001719533,0.0036535442,0.0049090907,0.4442623,0.2410333,0.29415458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038278487,0.0010309154,0.010622632,0.0010371746,0.00031449544,0.0019308351,0.00042541453,0.019137092,0.009370302,0.7537332,0.20146409,0.0005510497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026036855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022607816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13052152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002227105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044148117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69027203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037898831","doi":"10.1080/03610918.2011.594533","title":"Inferences on the Among-Group Variance Component in Unbalanced Heteroscedastic One-Fold Nested Design","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministère de l’Éducation, Gouvernement de l’Ontario; Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Variance components; Confidence interval; Variance (accounting); Component (thermodynamics); Statistics; Computer science; Group (periodic table); Econometrics; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.6107567722578584,"score_gpt":0.5249015163457682,"score_spread":0.0858552559120902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037898831","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040860344,0.00012968181,0.95801574,0.00007101933,0.000036774094,0.00019948544,0.00006261268,0.00008296352,0.0005413627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49044603,0.00022649913,0.507159,0.00019425078,0.000058396567,0.0012099578,0.00027405706,0.000042468648,0.00038932473],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94439685,0.040633835,0.0015038588,0.0064115766,0.0063787373,0.000675199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73913157,0.22934307,0.011863165,0.013617513,0.005155262,0.0008894909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059310757,0.0011184264,0.0026471221,0.0011176729,0.0008360616,0.0015878712,0.0017335378,0.001502702,0.0026258058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2362772,0.0006304456,0.0017347835,0.00076450326,0.0033488157,0.002970815,0.0019208586,0.0018989777,0.00031995124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005032397,0.0012695004,0.04477198,0.0017825188,0.0015857725,0.0006597126,0.003425883,0.17064294,0.017897634,0.29175088,0.0015041108,0.45967674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004921421,0.0045847776,0.02828665,0.0003647361,0.0005842496,0.00042590455,0.00062399346,0.55599713,0.018384712,0.38672048,0.0032985935,0.00023666577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005913952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004871301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059310757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092117727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001702447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31366897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038336950","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2008.05.022","title":"Robust designs for misspecified logistic models","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Statistics; Logistic regression; Econometrics; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.7552309551786061,"score_gpt":0.5199634607146267,"score_spread":0.23526749446397932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038336950","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006107128,0.00026370815,0.99198616,0.00015429637,0.00006661632,0.000593206,0.00012982455,0.00024316396,0.0004559814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13285217,0.00032924552,0.858845,0.00027055503,0.00010810303,0.00614358,0.00037039502,0.00018726882,0.00089361065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8045768,0.17298394,0.004075705,0.009753388,0.006865747,0.0017444046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57207197,0.35789213,0.019045655,0.042856716,0.006480906,0.0016527318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13578486,0.0026483915,0.0045261257,0.0020612825,0.0011742382,0.0034188237,0.006997945,0.004294029,0.010236333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3334894,0.0031177592,0.0040238807,0.0018406152,0.0042744623,0.0046332553,0.004628793,0.006004936,0.001335156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018657744,0.0012853981,0.0041609164,0.0027805236,0.0040602866,0.00035267908,0.0010884658,0.16027074,0.0051839626,0.5454343,0.0035048507,0.25322017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051989164,0.004811812,0.002589682,0.00042644667,0.0017169566,0.00019169139,0.000117394804,0.37807965,0.006260412,0.59229565,0.008094748,0.00021660353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008102186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009342373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13578486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022805627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005221141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7181076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038338945","doi":"10.1111/1467-9469.00247","title":"Heteroscedastic Regression Models and Applications to Off‐line Quality Control","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Estimator; Likelihood function; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Minification; Variance function; Variance (accounting); Econometrics; Estimation theory; Statistics","score_opus":0.21101361298810462,"score_gpt":0.5027999072681889,"score_spread":0.2917862942800843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038338945","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004831816,0.0009324189,0.9920094,0.00025473806,0.00003581079,0.000043128675,0.000066689136,0.000100649006,0.0017252713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5017518,0.006853419,0.47422665,0.0005552055,0.00029924224,0.00080805115,0.00061312405,0.000269908,0.014622619],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876468,0.0076215737,0.0003595582,0.0013038447,0.0026715829,0.00039658707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97397715,0.017942106,0.0039031354,0.001876603,0.0021003783,0.00020055543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012210755,0.001314262,0.0017933206,0.0011217106,0.00040984672,0.0019678627,0.002105009,0.0016577322,0.005601483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028101344,0.00067509804,0.0013745237,0.0023661656,0.0018000836,0.0017292062,0.0019570664,0.0021992873,0.0009008634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023328945,0.00024341566,0.0022557797,0.0006095042,0.00021784125,0.00016098477,0.0002102654,0.54304427,0.0030814304,0.26523563,0.0018419945,0.18286553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030954394,0.00026347017,0.0014045185,0.00006213654,0.00005323733,0.00005108182,0.00004892125,0.84460354,0.00235078,0.14506109,0.006019449,0.00005081982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003038075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012210755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013598884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002014672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0645774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042833209","doi":"10.2307/3316025","title":"Partially replicated two‐level fractional factorial designs","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Covariance; Factorial experiment; Constant (computer programming); Series (stratigraphy); Term (time); Mathematics; Factorial; Plackett–Burman design; Construct (python library); Simple (philosophy); Algorithm; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.3625785804372562,"score_gpt":0.44976741361792516,"score_spread":0.08718883318066895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042833209","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032897793,0.00011211763,0.963565,0.000087378445,0.000079195546,0.0006761243,0.00012397445,0.0005802223,0.001878243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19856314,0.000053933843,0.797258,0.00011973075,0.000047350433,0.00207518,0.00015923813,0.00006601562,0.0016573718],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98262537,0.0125656305,0.00045098495,0.0019284764,0.0018960485,0.0005335172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97848904,0.013362488,0.0012284131,0.004229435,0.002319551,0.0003710604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010413015,0.0010403111,0.0018249829,0.0009289782,0.0008296118,0.0009816226,0.0019909514,0.001413587,0.00917872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031125844,0.0007844567,0.0012894277,0.0009090711,0.0018066448,0.0011666657,0.0011042551,0.0012727688,0.0011121024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008273832,0.001484789,0.0037229345,0.0010933311,0.00048328648,0.00028059605,0.0006292481,0.19551656,0.04628845,0.16572168,0.0034144628,0.57309085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022578056,0.0076935785,0.0053418633,0.00018082789,0.00027155114,0.00019820704,0.00015734305,0.71969277,0.04218599,0.20307751,0.018725932,0.00021659135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008754448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001000026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010413015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011458631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017231021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055069983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043174953","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11128","title":"Sequential design for nonparametric inference","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Nonparametric statistics; Quantile; Statistics; Inference; Econometrics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.3601301529286638,"score_gpt":0.4679454129079356,"score_spread":0.10781525997927183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043174953","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017150426,0.000053241256,0.99762946,0.000054440978,0.000032236818,0.00013932478,0.00001951538,0.00007132843,0.00028539318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12287687,0.0001523406,0.873663,0.00017902513,0.00010535793,0.0020415308,0.0001221366,0.000064121356,0.00079568353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9581362,0.033158526,0.0010985236,0.0030251765,0.00411442,0.00046714954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94140905,0.04382411,0.0035045447,0.006237049,0.0044597606,0.00056545594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048851885,0.0018784103,0.0028049934,0.0015648477,0.0008620511,0.001329574,0.0025560595,0.002364787,0.007969049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090169676,0.0012681694,0.0016729111,0.0016443438,0.0033149219,0.002020044,0.0026492733,0.0033475778,0.0010418216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019163613,0.00045140545,0.0025829596,0.0009239887,0.000541155,0.00016392043,0.00036332794,0.2515056,0.0052856524,0.4866644,0.002622901,0.24697839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085008424,0.001421288,0.000936567,0.00011405772,0.00012760295,0.00010001888,0.000029964514,0.667497,0.004188763,0.31890205,0.0057685534,0.000064113374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015262121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011409329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048851885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017023026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032936304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25835657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044198898","doi":"10.1002/bimj.200410146","title":"Methods of Selecting Informative Variables","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrical Journal","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Dimensionality reduction; Principal component analysis; Dimension (graph theory); Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Feature selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Design matrix; Population; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Algorithm; Computer science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Regression analysis","score_opus":0.1827256570618646,"score_gpt":0.5352720553893084,"score_spread":0.35254639832744383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044198898","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009148517,0.0003672831,0.99787986,0.0001034829,0.000045792385,0.0001249041,0.00006685744,0.00012523666,0.00037181316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027365007,0.00075265754,0.9685893,0.00020556859,0.00024867608,0.0013766105,0.00043982084,0.00013091243,0.00089147297],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797887,0.012007621,0.0011379927,0.0029610016,0.003670845,0.0004338443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9613113,0.030990101,0.0019450573,0.0029707528,0.0024344865,0.000348246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0216775,0.0025703828,0.003954609,0.0068301363,0.0013241167,0.002818198,0.0033457663,0.001934249,0.0060184933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06306128,0.00135076,0.0023470782,0.0044911234,0.0023266675,0.002545087,0.0034298222,0.0031200722,0.0017807363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055497116,0.00027270472,0.0030460749,0.0012534074,0.00059669034,0.00021575084,0.00038866128,0.060940515,0.0043817465,0.12422686,0.0053074406,0.7988153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054929446,0.0005504007,0.0029892235,0.000531867,0.0005967368,0.00043058797,0.00020516937,0.44940442,0.009585625,0.5033717,0.03157658,0.00020835262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009398575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008291407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0216775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009694462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031326788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11464292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044499983","doi":"10.2307/3316089","title":"The analysis of unreplicated factorial experiments from a geometric perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Factorial; Partition (number theory); Context (archaeology); Point (geometry); Mathematics; Factorial experiment; Unit vector; Unit sphere; Unit (ring theory); Space (punctuation); Computer science; Combinatorics; Statistics; Geometry; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.15826180918038166,"score_gpt":0.42955833407703603,"score_spread":0.27129652489665435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044499983","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0403002,0.00050969695,0.95730436,0.00022940936,0.000059005586,0.00020554574,0.000092089824,0.00025655903,0.0010431119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26745933,0.00031966093,0.7299051,0.00023145463,0.000111810645,0.0008427134,0.00029303358,0.00015176096,0.00068502343],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9445532,0.04356385,0.0012232106,0.004788995,0.0053370963,0.00053366506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79441434,0.18268053,0.008657126,0.00938915,0.004316742,0.0005420173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03736038,0.001599979,0.003961832,0.0018258422,0.00057928945,0.0018670887,0.0023822745,0.0010764566,0.0035697732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09805878,0.0010024413,0.0027595938,0.0015659067,0.00616898,0.0023933083,0.0018075102,0.0021803624,0.00034146477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023217944,0.0006997321,0.005028157,0.0015297129,0.0015684491,0.00051124307,0.0008564283,0.3480454,0.03673351,0.32231528,0.0017879194,0.27860236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035639506,0.0026760723,0.01195385,0.0001323269,0.0002691571,0.000265892,0.00016137319,0.61658156,0.023161396,0.3380702,0.0061331755,0.00023859559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007016684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006503828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03736038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018191317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016199063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19758296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044892297","doi":"10.2307/3316055","title":"Restricted minimax robust designs for misspecified regression models","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Robustness (evolution); Parametric statistics; Mathematics; Polynomial regression; Class (philosophy); Mathematical optimization; Regression; Polynomial; Regression analysis; Computer science; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.4242684117404009,"score_gpt":0.4286993554738206,"score_spread":0.004430943733419679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044892297","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009366494,0.00022089151,0.9893439,0.000093630326,0.000024577768,0.00008916707,0.00003273757,0.000114458846,0.000714228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.358432,0.00049581495,0.63564503,0.00026962286,0.00009599673,0.0018009424,0.00019112544,0.00012672474,0.002942698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98225754,0.013857942,0.00051295786,0.0013924013,0.0016783014,0.00030088017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96045387,0.028770626,0.0039892877,0.004210125,0.00212424,0.0004518931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020573897,0.0010906294,0.0021387516,0.00093746546,0.00032499805,0.0011619311,0.0024734265,0.0017666456,0.0050358768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047630224,0.00091899093,0.0010784304,0.00065402215,0.001750061,0.0017470855,0.0025850823,0.0024320902,0.0009135899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032816096,0.00062384625,0.0019022608,0.0009520402,0.0005643681,0.00017898194,0.00037554724,0.34694797,0.018090023,0.3974192,0.0018708322,0.22779332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007013033,0.0030766034,0.001528848,0.00015720948,0.0001569322,0.00012002612,0.000042273234,0.72392035,0.008856175,0.25489435,0.006442706,0.00010329389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016835118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013627886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020573897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064629415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008011681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10880649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045335212","doi":"10.1002/sim.776","title":"Power comparison of robust approximate and non‐parametric tests for the analysis of cross‐over trials","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Parametric statistics; Sample size determination; Mathematics; Ordinary least squares; Statistics; Robustness (evolution); Covariance; Applied mathematics; Statistical hypothesis testing","score_opus":0.3388194152568817,"score_gpt":0.5831102429260211,"score_spread":0.2442908276691394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045335212","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01831309,0.0024538864,0.9753671,0.00036093243,0.00021062,0.0010462005,0.00016975372,0.0002743327,0.0018040108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39197066,0.0013517579,0.5915368,0.00062952755,0.00027003168,0.012180153,0.00055554847,0.00038619858,0.0011192731],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.7767181,0.1937647,0.004942778,0.008409897,0.015299743,0.00086481514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.361268,0.5911325,0.012660278,0.024935702,0.009252546,0.0007509287],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15711863,0.0014599945,0.0036853256,0.002910733,0.0005837078,0.0021668999,0.0031940085,0.003455564,0.004573278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5137746,0.0009728767,0.0030314948,0.00243654,0.0035173981,0.0037912955,0.002639754,0.0026125011,0.0006769087],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02066952,0.00072501873,0.012889894,0.0043253354,0.007857386,0.0004540986,0.0013514404,0.09671805,0.0049774284,0.2106388,0.0053660395,0.63402694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008055664,0.018397752,0.03418986,0.0015382724,0.002911027,0.0013819565,0.0005328316,0.55918354,0.014210734,0.33454847,0.024499742,0.0005501779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036387425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024925082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8428814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013334475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019078456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8309327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046447653","doi":"10.1037/a0014164","title":"Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Factorial; Factorial experiment; Arithmetic; Psychology; Statistics; Confidence interval; Variety (cybernetics); Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.3054079905872321,"score_gpt":0.4825623642055711,"score_spread":0.17715437361833897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046447653","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019155268,0.0013976374,0.9912224,0.0005169267,0.0006441784,0.0012898203,0.00019823186,0.00038491777,0.0024302623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05408736,0.0010621385,0.9300379,0.0006354933,0.00052911387,0.012500117,0.00024927533,0.00029043827,0.0006082317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5240267,0.3806805,0.016277995,0.022854744,0.054459367,0.0017006877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24420212,0.6611785,0.01967176,0.055039488,0.018286685,0.0016213617],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.36098072,0.0041084033,0.0068058004,0.007076579,0.002468422,0.009154152,0.008536139,0.0079738675,0.006728908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.72231734,0.0034613144,0.006945298,0.007471127,0.015774593,0.012961397,0.009868285,0.016045535,0.0017449437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025110508,0.00056106085,0.0035216126,0.0044780974,0.0029554386,0.0002519904,0.005759919,0.013719761,0.0023793022,0.62789005,0.007888621,0.328083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016566876,0.0030998734,0.0061977757,0.0029210958,0.0013532172,0.0004938598,0.00081382063,0.063597426,0.0074151885,0.86539984,0.04641272,0.000638474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015794142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011520134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63901925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00437872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064461264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78802454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048147694","doi":"10.5539/mas.v3n4p19","title":"Markov Chain Monte Carlo-Based Bayesian Analysis of Binary Response Regression, with Illustration in Dose-Response Assessment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Markov chain Monte Carlo; Computer science; Bayesian probability; Monte Carlo method; Markov chain; Bayesian inference; Metropolis–Hastings algorithm; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.06289780851169717,"score_gpt":0.4142650047121909,"score_spread":0.3513671962004937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048147694","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024922497,0.0008304246,0.99475175,0.00029203322,0.000027615719,0.000052957163,0.00006876335,0.0001494366,0.001334859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14956358,0.0027100767,0.84322065,0.00039531372,0.00014714275,0.00059087767,0.0002837985,0.00016785314,0.0029207084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99093074,0.00694786,0.00016976582,0.0006532907,0.0011461374,0.00015226884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795461,0.017967869,0.00087119255,0.00074136053,0.0007342294,0.00013915436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01570267,0.0010097725,0.0015946652,0.001663442,0.00060602225,0.0016497846,0.0016223011,0.0016329995,0.003723838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04021478,0.00069112086,0.0012107735,0.002040768,0.001969266,0.0017058393,0.0013781794,0.0027192663,0.0006589724],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025968486,0.00016615845,0.0024732936,0.0006124552,0.0002279911,0.00015181486,0.00018975501,0.41316432,0.0031433501,0.4463054,0.0032439767,0.13006184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039801092,0.000087343185,0.0008089291,0.00008621265,0.000057899484,0.000081236205,0.00001572262,0.78036916,0.0011992921,0.21261969,0.0045892773,0.00004545059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004178419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003862907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01570267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014040198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023142837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08304465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048699385","doi":"10.1037/1082-989x.5.3.370","title":"How important is transient error in estimating reliability? Going beyond simulation studies.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Transient (computer programming); Observational error; Statistics; Standard error; Range (aeronautics); Error analysis; Reliability engineering; Mathematics; Computer science; Algorithm; Applied mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.3949998641647077,"score_gpt":0.6121051813343663,"score_spread":0.21710531716965858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048699385","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06582218,0.0033889867,0.9178565,0.004499236,0.00052051205,0.00025502016,0.00014108662,0.00038232034,0.0071342257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87778616,0.0011729848,0.11845635,0.0009140138,0.00020819153,0.0003782096,0.00013868613,0.00012556998,0.000819833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.90675175,0.08201126,0.0019412042,0.0031888024,0.00547489,0.00063204794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4223566,0.5238027,0.016960884,0.025609937,0.010412793,0.0008571279],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07941175,0.0008020794,0.0011617993,0.00088998454,0.0005814828,0.002696261,0.0014469802,0.001967724,0.0018555605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.51974,0.0004913379,0.001211138,0.001398986,0.0033421174,0.007668643,0.0019761268,0.0030578237,0.0003884001],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009537895,0.00040221403,0.0992327,0.0019485493,0.002853945,0.0005229456,0.004543021,0.2175223,0.001781677,0.41919625,0.008294142,0.24274853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016199869,0.0009097041,0.018498145,0.0010613471,0.0005019572,0.00050866394,0.0015269375,0.39085117,0.003900064,0.5695575,0.012332745,0.00018982911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033102226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022545026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92058825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013305258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020984577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4199745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048882670","doi":"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.08.015","title":"A powerful estimation scheme with the error-in-variables-model for nonlinear cases: Reactivity ratio estimation examples","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nonlinear system; Fraction (chemistry); Focus (optics); Computer science; Estimation; Scheme (mathematics); Algorithm; Estimation theory; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Iterative method; Applied mathematics; Engineering; Chemistry","score_opus":0.0938544274180493,"score_gpt":0.3726196765032083,"score_spread":0.27876524908515904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048882670","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030652187,0.00009102883,0.99570954,0.000061613166,0.0000113279475,0.000017420889,0.000018208459,0.00010832448,0.0009174348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33689034,0.00041304415,0.65623045,0.00008282786,0.000069651396,0.00013580793,0.00010672372,0.00016881837,0.0059023486],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891675,0.00062923384,0.000044208697,0.00013030478,0.00022423019,0.000055271255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972361,0.002017748,0.00017413561,0.00031895723,0.00021306444,0.000040045725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00448211,0.0011114163,0.0012743536,0.0006010085,0.0004779074,0.00087030686,0.0017619326,0.0015505716,0.0025718305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010626661,0.00060088997,0.0012878892,0.0006281141,0.0008216297,0.0018058118,0.0016124332,0.0018284625,0.0005635088],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021021644,0.00015312617,0.00077478745,0.00023162413,0.00009097274,0.00022440168,0.00013348032,0.7219497,0.008832896,0.17314674,0.0017055584,0.09254648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009403777,0.000015848525,0.00005630554,0.0000037227312,0.000010238376,0.000022393762,0.0000034564555,0.9810801,0.0017425002,0.016584415,0.00046242765,0.0000091904785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015498468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014114785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00448211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004393332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004711986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023703933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049010725","doi":"10.1111/j.0006-341x.2004.00159.x","title":"A Note on One‐Sided Tests with Multiple Endpoints","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Econometrics","score_opus":0.23374589013598263,"score_gpt":0.45472142168100044,"score_spread":0.2209755315450178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049010725","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002865831,0.016714888,0.844991,0.10182559,0.016153555,0.000568697,0.0004390357,0.0005580483,0.015883368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054602545,0.010306704,0.8441336,0.063355766,0.018771425,0.0018075127,0.00021991838,0.00050798955,0.0062945574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.75028694,0.19049218,0.011771686,0.011892463,0.03434355,0.0012131468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2579198,0.6911269,0.0078079603,0.027879585,0.014140415,0.0011253374],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2561111,0.0027637384,0.004864603,0.0028575652,0.0027920578,0.0046341834,0.008951227,0.011384039,0.007660305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47982404,0.0013654375,0.0051274565,0.00537163,0.024291314,0.016794896,0.006546251,0.040632203,0.0028284208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074835354,0.00022871996,0.003450257,0.0017956133,0.00055731175,0.0011957783,0.0012004058,0.0059563546,0.0012693802,0.6520394,0.09261649,0.2389419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038310018,0.00096926524,0.002306216,0.0016380993,0.00027290863,0.0011521786,0.0002600602,0.015620123,0.0023893055,0.8089218,0.16573997,0.0003470261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024356248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026518423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2561111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029451307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051557943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9173475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049125983","doi":"10.5267/j.ijiec.2013.09.004","title":"Optimization of multi-response dynamic systems using principal component analysis (PCA)-based utility theory approach","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principal component analysis; Component (thermodynamics); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Control theory (sociology); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Control (management)","score_opus":0.1604123791344658,"score_gpt":0.4085364242494176,"score_spread":0.2481240451149518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049125983","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006437953,0.00019935946,0.9920117,0.0000460184,0.0000086771815,0.00006801597,0.0000141917135,0.000087954926,0.0011260384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5848753,0.0009061545,0.41166815,0.00004480452,0.000029004825,0.0005539959,0.00011848993,0.00007353503,0.001730596],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779487,0.0011089197,0.00010033807,0.00021092354,0.0006899691,0.00009486093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988073,0.0008124865,0.00009814464,0.000038769584,0.0002228658,0.000020436995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023415757,0.0013896425,0.001395477,0.001582617,0.00046794966,0.0013522885,0.0006735133,0.00061011297,0.0015436905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031507364,0.0004955584,0.0012857413,0.0016860443,0.0006007342,0.0010409084,0.00079003605,0.00083845144,0.00020523964],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005520065,0.00007717082,0.00047841412,0.0002973534,0.00011043273,0.00007332032,0.0000762722,0.91580087,0.0035906187,0.011370634,0.00034274225,0.067726895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056747185,0.000051902185,0.00023062104,0.000009697228,0.000016307793,0.000012484245,0.00001795872,0.9955878,0.0008919327,0.0028060584,0.00035968516,0.000009815139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029532462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022358203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029532462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010019572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013912851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012383521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049410843","doi":"10.1002/app.40443","title":"A statistical approach to engineer a biocomposite formulation from biofuel coproduct with balanced properties","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Polymer Science","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Biocomposite; Materials science; Factorial experiment; Design of experiments; Ultimate tensile strength; Response surface methodology; Composite material; Mathematics; Statistics; Composite number","score_opus":0.0539006769759734,"score_gpt":0.3382922479835923,"score_spread":0.2843915710076189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049410843","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06810159,0.00016805051,0.9304294,0.000064146036,0.000018022612,0.0002114258,0.00013836226,0.00024904753,0.00061997893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4136699,0.00022382889,0.58442473,0.000048070615,0.000012141874,0.00081219606,0.00019467133,0.00006532742,0.0005492212],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836546,0.0006400494,0.000114585135,0.00024558345,0.0005474982,0.00008684923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983342,0.0010281113,0.00029836656,0.000083886036,0.00022748331,0.000027984968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044419835,0.0008320651,0.00085261423,0.0009043985,0.0002125148,0.0007993885,0.00055617874,0.00038500602,0.0011844627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004653935,0.00045923083,0.0006999263,0.00069318124,0.00051400816,0.0005096525,0.00051692594,0.0007862643,0.00018389833],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009150925,0.0009827715,0.0024645298,0.0009728752,0.00024311816,0.00010740914,0.0001247071,0.3835655,0.3757008,0.025305592,0.0004571234,0.20916046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005774861,0.002055251,0.0019640906,0.000016074458,0.000084421,0.000040581115,0.000027707321,0.85604364,0.13010132,0.0069895494,0.002576359,0.000043334287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060526724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009645646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044419835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006903612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016997099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02349168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050334918","doi":"10.1016/j.csda.2010.01.033","title":"A comparative study of robust designs for M-estimated regression models","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Statistics & Data Analysis","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Statistics; Robust regression; Mean squared error; Regression; Regression analysis; Least-squares function approximation; Applied mathematics; Estimator","score_opus":0.6235838049097152,"score_gpt":0.568700766208028,"score_spread":0.0548830387016872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050334918","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035080854,0.0012974086,0.96137726,0.00018231677,0.00006878664,0.00033598073,0.00011617652,0.0003335938,0.0012075817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31060976,0.0007254018,0.68557066,0.00018611655,0.0001112794,0.0012093079,0.00030717652,0.0002606793,0.0010196541],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.8800106,0.11000588,0.0020099417,0.003732241,0.0035933182,0.000647931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44240725,0.5270323,0.010218029,0.014418576,0.0051417616,0.0007821135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1022639,0.0014791968,0.002466657,0.0019082569,0.0006002205,0.0017268693,0.0034438563,0.0027735152,0.0065686665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29856196,0.0011277877,0.0035178913,0.0012751962,0.0016257301,0.00318188,0.0021773984,0.0016767085,0.0005968067],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024714097,0.0014831942,0.006835471,0.0035852622,0.004451569,0.00028246958,0.0010606088,0.25237492,0.0081598405,0.23058718,0.0021837812,0.46428153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030721757,0.01376406,0.006445544,0.00056973664,0.0020209795,0.0003139326,0.00025706188,0.8567493,0.008697108,0.102923825,0.004933553,0.00025275836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089806423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086434255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1022639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015861237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002606224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54082966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050485463","doi":"10.1080/10543401003618876","title":"Residuals and Outliers in Replicate Design Crossover Studies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Outlier; Replicate; Crossover; Bioequivalence; Statistics; Computer science; Residual; Identification (biology); Econometrics; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Bioinformatics","score_opus":0.409312864440003,"score_gpt":0.590393232651865,"score_spread":0.18108036821186207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050485463","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.110987395,0.00095458934,0.8843285,0.0002599334,0.00014031184,0.00033643193,0.00027597716,0.0011335585,0.0015833451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63111657,0.00033558722,0.36534956,0.00024623747,0.00010020117,0.0006611657,0.00066420675,0.00037103368,0.0011554545],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95132655,0.033235516,0.0028227959,0.003449375,0.008674785,0.00049091916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8537006,0.11328539,0.014829212,0.013623203,0.0040719477,0.00048964063],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04744896,0.00069829065,0.0014540636,0.00234697,0.00044250843,0.0012156774,0.0015381126,0.0019447644,0.0011739341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17140234,0.00052929355,0.0017980266,0.0017987527,0.0021223833,0.001118638,0.0010150718,0.0016914619,0.000358991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013045536,0.0010242679,0.1058178,0.0019450076,0.0013325659,0.0014450058,0.002667007,0.1199672,0.044561878,0.07950045,0.0046897596,0.62400365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011604457,0.013105249,0.21462522,0.00044197202,0.0010813088,0.0028301764,0.0008980504,0.45264542,0.07069178,0.21869557,0.022996606,0.0008281634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007251785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006558079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95255107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007653612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060341106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2509371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051453094","doi":"10.2307/3315856","title":"Extrapolation designs with constraints","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extrapolation; Bounding overwatch; Mathematics; Norm (philosophy); Applied mathematics; Minimax; Variance (accounting); Mathematical optimization; Mean squared error; Space (punctuation); Statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.21705520395397465,"score_gpt":0.3988301582811531,"score_spread":0.18177495432717844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051453094","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01149619,0.00043143798,0.9851874,0.00016222308,0.000045677076,0.00026128287,0.000075676515,0.00017494857,0.002165156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40229544,0.0005758106,0.5895087,0.0005066539,0.0001532605,0.0028831833,0.00034796516,0.00013426362,0.003594757],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9657814,0.028498502,0.0008414544,0.002157495,0.0023098295,0.00041132772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9532014,0.0375799,0.0027247395,0.003185145,0.0028509581,0.00045783995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027803639,0.001892778,0.003286674,0.0012443875,0.000553262,0.001130962,0.0017045147,0.0018760016,0.0063846563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06339729,0.0010271443,0.0017555426,0.0008973637,0.0019189497,0.0022922733,0.002499029,0.0024429276,0.0010553603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00478677,0.00052016735,0.0022631444,0.0015588043,0.000578601,0.00027169453,0.00040539468,0.4253108,0.008554226,0.29946825,0.0021106729,0.2541715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010539736,0.006803518,0.0018698178,0.0006630866,0.00027119828,0.00021412711,0.000111869296,0.70696676,0.008320701,0.26334345,0.010258951,0.00012265518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004077665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025359218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027803639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009329159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013592488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1470415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051834255","doi":"10.1002/asmb.917","title":"A robust treatment of a dose–response study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Robustification; Flexibility (engineering); Link (geometry); Function (biology); Range (aeronautics); Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Statistics; Engineering; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.3887363654133567,"score_gpt":0.39580036784350786,"score_spread":0.007064002430151151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051834255","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004148205,0.000710419,0.98791355,0.0010199863,0.0005402779,0.002273883,0.0003908693,0.0002254186,0.0027774903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12535065,0.0011331881,0.82978475,0.0029103411,0.0009876342,0.03471745,0.00043338572,0.00021996928,0.004462623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8714801,0.100576356,0.005048845,0.009574918,0.011843206,0.0014765275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81320584,0.13701914,0.010038351,0.032470033,0.00657464,0.0006919408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12902229,0.0027722416,0.004724941,0.0020798985,0.0008990887,0.0031915894,0.005030745,0.0070973993,0.01652272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22681648,0.0011066056,0.005737219,0.0017794786,0.0051081087,0.0025049057,0.0036991267,0.0070379125,0.0015596027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006436498,0.0013106039,0.0016727786,0.0053388383,0.002782116,0.0007209006,0.0007522599,0.06568055,0.022620898,0.7280492,0.006382082,0.15825325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003048404,0.010140596,0.0029202977,0.0012343287,0.001985702,0.000485708,0.00017898566,0.16660598,0.023002658,0.73202914,0.05809103,0.0002771634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038013977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018197822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12902229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002627327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002520387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68234324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051846647","doi":"10.1016/j.laa.2008.02.017","title":"Robustness of A-optimal designs","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linear Algebra and its Applications","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Robustness (evolution); Covariance; Covariance matrix; Combinatorics; Set (abstract data type); Optimal design; Factorial experiment; Algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.19426680317455847,"score_gpt":0.4173525277194035,"score_spread":0.22308572454484504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051846647","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01504613,0.0005442989,0.9808157,0.00040296468,0.000068502784,0.00011496327,0.00019592201,0.0002133067,0.0025981786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7562473,0.0008705218,0.23729187,0.000723252,0.0003163554,0.001417545,0.0005622723,0.00020202453,0.0023687906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9190388,0.062804595,0.003132411,0.008213048,0.005574102,0.0012371344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.54573846,0.40850183,0.020329908,0.016199742,0.007771985,0.0014580883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.068965286,0.0026507857,0.00397015,0.0035390144,0.0010297083,0.0041632266,0.0026881734,0.00335204,0.00501095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22953027,0.0018238281,0.0028777446,0.0017191538,0.0060760905,0.00435238,0.0041732914,0.0024056127,0.0007713921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040818322,0.00039529,0.003427813,0.0012212223,0.0015688606,0.00017599283,0.00026903607,0.42290363,0.006340375,0.46698934,0.001442872,0.09118363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042293867,0.0010349348,0.001713714,0.00015608521,0.00021405015,0.00009106619,0.00006183203,0.5632277,0.0048038326,0.42660075,0.0015821988,0.00009081831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096940744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032214983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068965286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002550648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037188474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36472768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052873271","doi":"10.1080/03610910701790376","title":"A Method for Analyzing Supersaturated Designs with a Block Orthogonal Structure","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supersaturation; Computer science; Block (permutation group theory); Algorithm; Set (abstract data type); Statistical analysis; Factorial experiment; Class (philosophy); Type I and type II errors; Statistics; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.4028390374033875,"score_gpt":0.5540593349346938,"score_spread":0.15122029753130634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052873271","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00058810913,0.000041635172,0.99830186,0.000018422661,0.000037880236,0.00032867023,0.000113727285,0.00028389003,0.0002857228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0059953975,0.00007297675,0.99092907,0.000047448986,0.000024064373,0.002256811,0.00021277432,0.00009462979,0.00036687264],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9725804,0.018578932,0.001314305,0.0027689417,0.00433536,0.00042210953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9531821,0.035973594,0.0021125386,0.003752083,0.0045766453,0.00040305604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024166485,0.0018737343,0.0026235401,0.00520857,0.00168332,0.001316364,0.0022054047,0.0015316935,0.0130375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050263375,0.0013490039,0.0043251645,0.0038428921,0.0018912364,0.001972116,0.0019432108,0.0034792125,0.0021595384],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013128301,0.00068072625,0.0038365223,0.0022794418,0.0013041954,0.0002395874,0.0010850042,0.06290547,0.021882027,0.21383908,0.0113319,0.6793032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011021907,0.0026735207,0.0042303437,0.0005307563,0.0009898,0.00062362535,0.00030624613,0.5858265,0.03898921,0.26088193,0.10339983,0.0004460151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025468548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032309685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024166485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016463475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004827469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12780607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053479559","doi":"10.1080/08982110108918693","title":"PROBABILISTIC ROBUST DESIGN WITH MULTIPLE QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Reliability engineering; Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.3321672477924726,"score_gpt":0.4397579413038509,"score_spread":0.10759069351137829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053479559","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035579654,0.000052121766,0.9957776,0.00005096771,0.000006762522,0.00004556819,0.000021262513,0.000069908776,0.00041781322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6840838,0.00034544984,0.3097736,0.00016355349,0.000077950215,0.0009961496,0.00022963669,0.00012747986,0.0042024045],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872542,0.0050451322,0.0003966938,0.0023242605,0.004457391,0.00052236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806594,0.011841537,0.0036591792,0.0022941094,0.0013193777,0.0002263665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01170205,0.002325103,0.0021212022,0.0014003436,0.0005062982,0.0019109114,0.0031799509,0.0022466646,0.0046810983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028382853,0.0015906881,0.0018287183,0.001398376,0.002712629,0.003941964,0.0033469158,0.0019007201,0.00074464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003760181,0.0001233581,0.0007522744,0.00028189007,0.00014498172,0.00005235704,0.00005956846,0.8688985,0.006387348,0.07256988,0.00032001038,0.05003374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008289941,0.00027173245,0.00061838445,0.000029010956,0.000062307365,0.000044966957,0.000010764429,0.94962305,0.0043929094,0.043934572,0.00089310197,0.00003630314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007567306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067041087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01170205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020546839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012771544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061887085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054451345","doi":"10.1007/s10985-008-9108-y","title":"Review and implementation of cure models based on first hitting times for Wiener processes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Lifetime Data Analysis","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inverse Gaussian distribution; Computer science; Wiener process; Variety (cybernetics); Gaussian process; Inverse; Mixture model; Gaussian; Expectation–maximization algorithm; Applied mathematics; Process (computing); Class (philosophy); Maximization; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Maximum likelihood; Physics","score_opus":0.3148332102313453,"score_gpt":0.5538587081506247,"score_spread":0.23902549791927935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054451345","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067017094,0.89875084,0.0971095,0.0007267706,0.00051516667,0.000059553597,0.00017139147,0.00017409715,0.0018224652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012207018,0.91190684,0.07304152,0.00045297496,0.00052230706,0.0001866292,0.00023358285,0.00006486756,0.001384215],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774265,0.0008016378,0.00026652456,0.0003758828,0.00074643234,0.0000667837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99207413,0.005807731,0.00065207307,0.0004031464,0.0010026655,0.000060158094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006208578,0.0018932321,0.0036448005,0.0029455256,0.00028562848,0.0014226699,0.0044418443,0.002150464,0.0027363838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0117854765,0.0009708683,0.0016895102,0.0027659656,0.0010709137,0.0018292399,0.00083048415,0.0018512732,0.0015452867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011008713,0.000080923666,0.00028464355,0.016979717,0.00029270913,0.00006996883,0.00004144623,0.015175757,0.0016529671,0.041815322,0.01101249,0.91248405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016805156,0.0007419168,0.0026892046,0.011746692,0.0016359417,0.0013697767,0.00010295108,0.049317677,0.011847128,0.12696174,0.7930561,0.00036277802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024911822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023400635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006208578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013735063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030081375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03283453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054487197","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00523_1.x","title":"Corrigendum: Designing Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Experiments with Few Whole-Plot Factors","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Plot (graphics); Table (database); Fractional factorial design; Mathematics; Statistics; Split plot; Factorial; Factorial experiment; Combinatorics; Arithmetic; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Data mining; Law","score_opus":0.09048864572351657,"score_gpt":0.37133249024216963,"score_spread":0.2808438445186531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054487197","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023614338,0.0051582735,0.21507074,0.037090965,0.69239676,0.0011098522,0.014261448,0.015464649,0.017085904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05681771,0.013688017,0.4518958,0.053281765,0.061944652,0.0054778084,0.024608389,0.02008484,0.31220105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913476,0.0033031036,0.00097009155,0.0010032178,0.0031095282,0.00026643064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93301713,0.026550984,0.0017767451,0.008365101,0.02933365,0.00095646584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007923337,0.0036516658,0.0031983578,0.0030078043,0.0017967375,0.00196997,0.0041210437,0.0027500365,0.1082317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1167543,0.0019483949,0.0017975852,0.0037404168,0.0016779191,0.0022490143,0.0013888467,0.0035230552,0.04334075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012227951,0.00003842565,0.0001369216,0.0005243919,0.000030588013,0.00016871514,0.00004161807,0.0004731241,0.0006545475,0.0014313555,0.9518409,0.044537105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029645712,0.00048051318,0.0036339283,0.00058351824,0.0003328481,0.0011632402,0.00013231377,0.009004607,0.008284423,0.013227535,0.96266025,0.00020040228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007849354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015962064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1082317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029566123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027876613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3620711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055156195","doi":"10.1080/03610918.2012.687065","title":"On Symmetrizing Transformation of the Sample Coefficient of Variation from a Normal Population","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformation (genetics); Mathematics; Inference; Variation (astronomy); Population; Variance (accounting); Statistics; Sample (material); Applied mathematics; Homogeneity (statistics); Coefficient of variation; Scope (computer science); Econometrics; Computer science; Thermodynamics; Physics; Economics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.2378893196943069,"score_gpt":0.4950773787109019,"score_spread":0.257188059016595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055156195","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054429276,0.00005934,0.9936511,0.00004936476,0.000022153214,0.000041147658,0.000037081576,0.00011458927,0.00058239035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21321958,0.00051900727,0.7816956,0.00024983188,0.00010048125,0.0006015665,0.0004493217,0.00028219685,0.0028822948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930062,0.0044583157,0.00024390759,0.0010003119,0.0011411291,0.00015010955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828468,0.012693267,0.0009994864,0.0021030568,0.0012312495,0.00012603932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011237825,0.0008718083,0.0009062596,0.0011441229,0.00048082907,0.0010609329,0.0009671753,0.00071312836,0.003536755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039047047,0.00034654274,0.001209027,0.0014325358,0.0024284846,0.001522557,0.0012487462,0.0018286592,0.0010904133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026269382,0.000111510424,0.0031891973,0.0003661768,0.00015549052,0.00033531513,0.0007114863,0.2162239,0.018753076,0.46277553,0.0023563786,0.2947593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042118834,0.00025987852,0.002073304,0.00007287518,0.0000515371,0.00022498076,0.0000801929,0.7863659,0.009730137,0.1954836,0.0055536716,0.00006174622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001765883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016159173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011237825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010830124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022977402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05943203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056122055","doi":"10.1080/03610918.2010.533226","title":"Nearly Optimal Orthogonally Blocked Designs for Four Mixture Components Based on F-Squares","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Quadratic equation; Latin square; Least-squares function approximation; Component (thermodynamics); Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Algorithm; Statistics; Geometry; Physics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.4051451671404312,"score_gpt":0.5393336135269894,"score_spread":0.1341884463865582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056122055","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01125454,0.000061554325,0.98744303,0.000050091396,0.00002001554,0.00022238195,0.000062630555,0.000113336515,0.00077245163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08673818,0.00011737353,0.9101665,0.00007243949,0.000022708438,0.0013285985,0.00022321193,0.00008932671,0.0012416941],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.96777767,0.024205804,0.00085400604,0.0023360746,0.0037723824,0.0010541118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724975,0.0188328,0.0015337579,0.003950805,0.0027629083,0.0004222833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023972943,0.0019195435,0.003146202,0.0016069264,0.0010111613,0.0014101752,0.002226245,0.0016439627,0.007359361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043230183,0.0016876743,0.0023162134,0.0014420885,0.0032105974,0.001814146,0.0028534553,0.002172368,0.0015194634],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004382608,0.001039546,0.0036072792,0.00066036294,0.0005123612,0.000083768195,0.00060316257,0.34062624,0.031292666,0.27426353,0.0019853767,0.34094313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006202673,0.001429442,0.002485531,0.00008677084,0.00015164308,0.00007672654,0.0000737556,0.85475636,0.020402476,0.1148381,0.00492499,0.00015387122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020584508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024145918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023972943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018579608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032027725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12678254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058359526","doi":"10.1021/ie900196u","title":"Systematic Statistical-Based Approach for Product Design: Application to Disinfectant Formulations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Set (abstract data type); New product development; Process (computing); Product (mathematics); Product design; Process engineering; Biochemical engineering; Systems engineering; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.37387846103661887,"score_gpt":0.508732729996101,"score_spread":0.1348542689594821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058359526","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013476126,0.0001174813,0.9979081,0.000037812108,0.000012760947,0.00020420436,0.00001896229,0.00011405316,0.00023909318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042615425,0.00029263724,0.95495766,0.00009835399,0.000027192002,0.0015455706,0.0001014013,0.000060976214,0.0003007027],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890003,0.007587065,0.00050253794,0.00070381496,0.0020550734,0.0001511525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98280853,0.013648736,0.00088343414,0.00061012467,0.0019462158,0.00010291054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014836094,0.0020446067,0.0021729202,0.0024262087,0.0006133591,0.0013379622,0.0015576347,0.0011353915,0.0023530559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022667088,0.0010943719,0.0014040084,0.0017875683,0.0012919854,0.00079484476,0.0012120382,0.0015964205,0.00044649027],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003396322,0.00044234336,0.0013484382,0.0012455118,0.00038959843,0.00011198931,0.00016468271,0.66215074,0.008249491,0.03259782,0.0012600962,0.29169965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014699642,0.0011026608,0.00058129785,0.00009029926,0.000106825966,0.00006269664,0.00003978432,0.96604085,0.004259801,0.023154482,0.00437469,0.000039608814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023850368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036339783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014836094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013876732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005104541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07846165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059324920","doi":"10.1002/cjce.5450790314","title":"On the costs of parameter uncertainties. Part 2: Impact of EVOP procedures on the optimization and design of experiments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09256206850110352,"score_gpt":0.35432135954755895,"score_spread":0.26175929104645546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059324920","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05253211,0.0012417963,0.93944776,0.00023292964,0.000035660538,0.00023047955,0.00007791236,0.00007735368,0.006123938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67364454,0.0010921349,0.32142523,0.00015520552,0.000042776755,0.000790532,0.00010809505,0.000074320706,0.0026671323],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968933,0.0020860445,0.00008660281,0.0001726348,0.0006280383,0.00013333214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98397785,0.014265281,0.0006537926,0.00064532616,0.00038648513,0.00007115756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062656556,0.0015280443,0.0011029704,0.00080254115,0.000359113,0.0007954191,0.00088571286,0.0009683914,0.0028164245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015608332,0.0005030202,0.00084654754,0.0005848567,0.001227781,0.0014748387,0.0014797505,0.0015278836,0.0001954161],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010748594,0.00016768616,0.0008993051,0.00066108105,0.000102620594,0.00012450699,0.0000680555,0.7468921,0.009423581,0.07273118,0.00038453212,0.16747047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009417063,0.0013084159,0.0021044004,0.00012434412,0.00011635477,0.000115721436,0.000058170306,0.9167409,0.021288924,0.05449256,0.0035193425,0.000036749327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064282765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006502774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062656556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075422163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010006984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033136368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060230359","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v3n4p67","title":"On the Behaviour of D-Optimal Exact Designs Under Changing Regression Polynomials","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Optimal design; Point (geometry); Orthogonality; Equivalence (formal languages); Applied mathematics; Polynomial; Orthogonal array; Mathematical optimization; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Taguchi methods; Geometry","score_opus":0.14392973343862575,"score_gpt":0.43516434692053674,"score_spread":0.291234613481911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060230359","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09137167,0.00048050855,0.9043045,0.00009622515,0.000019893841,0.0001292513,0.000074319105,0.00016872618,0.003354924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5268323,0.00057505356,0.46983,0.00012171522,0.000026337326,0.00047453007,0.00022396144,0.00012338837,0.0017926948],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810527,0.012427434,0.0007111311,0.0018073182,0.003113004,0.000888324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9087722,0.075272374,0.0068684574,0.0056474907,0.002832242,0.0006071636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025382992,0.0011384913,0.0016280536,0.0018159678,0.0005525018,0.0015005663,0.0010965702,0.0012880549,0.0028749986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0773329,0.0012437168,0.0016099158,0.0010493221,0.0027962918,0.0020383757,0.0023468102,0.0015500394,0.00050111604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008731525,0.00023894587,0.0044181515,0.00054704247,0.00016160618,0.00019762786,0.00042024063,0.69824934,0.014306612,0.17130168,0.00054150523,0.108744055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015932562,0.0016441897,0.003632156,0.00018874969,0.00009615251,0.00023291454,0.00016609115,0.8447707,0.013265896,0.13289614,0.0028311927,0.000116444884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012205975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096000434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025382992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017399795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017839898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13423973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060696278","doi":"10.1080/00949650215868","title":"Random balanced resampling: A new method for estimating variance components in unbalanced designs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Resampling; Statistics; Estimator; Equating; Factorial; Generalized least squares; Variance (accounting); Normality; Set (abstract data type); Restricted maximum likelihood; Ordinary least squares; Least-squares function approximation; Maximum likelihood; Algorithm; Computer science","score_opus":0.28054596940125864,"score_gpt":0.5233086275550208,"score_spread":0.2427626581537622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060696278","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040385503,0.000092066024,0.99880815,0.00003523129,0.000053356955,0.00014529243,0.00003577665,0.00013594219,0.0002903789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008200305,0.00021503173,0.98962027,0.000087357235,0.00006863185,0.001121787,0.00011002633,0.0001111509,0.00046544895],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97926956,0.014705223,0.0006589396,0.0015718447,0.0035607724,0.00023370964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981751,0.0128906835,0.0012062833,0.0019085401,0.0020104654,0.0002330921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017014882,0.0018049163,0.0024695352,0.0033586624,0.00081570906,0.0014796216,0.002456233,0.0013023608,0.005113293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04877114,0.00081571453,0.0021173973,0.0035416686,0.0015994094,0.0022884314,0.00182781,0.0022095912,0.0014239928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005032591,0.00027847412,0.0021824418,0.0011193033,0.00077521964,0.00018090603,0.0007414936,0.047803476,0.00883375,0.15006243,0.010284728,0.77723444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097314,0.0016832836,0.0050947727,0.00068451784,0.00087905023,0.000893859,0.00029845393,0.516051,0.017714044,0.34554818,0.10968454,0.0004951134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016730799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023312366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017014882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010826235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024702873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08998436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061052065","doi":"10.2307/3315853","title":"for misspecified regression models","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Polynomial regression; Regression; Mathematics; Regression analysis; Applied mathematics; Polynomial; Function (biology); Mean squared error; Linear regression; Statistics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science","score_opus":0.29515400096401667,"score_gpt":0.4376875731719163,"score_spread":0.14253357220789964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061052065","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066689714,0.00042753643,0.9913966,0.0003139359,0.000043381548,0.00004892599,0.00006483297,0.00012326709,0.0009125336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3721576,0.0010953682,0.6162026,0.0010653002,0.00027521234,0.00096919056,0.00057211344,0.00019663625,0.00746598],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847819,0.009782724,0.00050498324,0.002332735,0.0021967206,0.00040090768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969927,0.020446878,0.0038524806,0.003960986,0.0015907162,0.00022181845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015596672,0.0015202275,0.0026474292,0.0007849097,0.00040721835,0.0017848153,0.0022741086,0.002729888,0.0061306297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05193666,0.00095024594,0.0015730523,0.0008054521,0.0013610836,0.0022850763,0.0021591196,0.0032883738,0.0011332758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009216775,0.00030537427,0.002810833,0.0011368018,0.00058976526,0.00027902532,0.00025741642,0.45796564,0.012010464,0.3450164,0.0046641016,0.17404255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011822998,0.00041685556,0.001278357,0.00014411887,0.00010127957,0.00012267235,0.000029951978,0.79965705,0.0053038676,0.18529636,0.007471396,0.00005986743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065175135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059081544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015596672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011737747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012799822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08248407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061206455","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2005.11.007","title":"Linear programming bounds for balanced arrays","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Generality; Fractional factorial design; Linear programming; Mathematical optimization; Ingredient; Factorial; Factorial experiment; Key (lock); Applied mathematics; Algorithm; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.13858068401954668,"score_gpt":0.48154932624395025,"score_spread":0.3429686422244036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061206455","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014323102,0.00091725215,0.9932112,0.0007593163,0.000063416424,0.000055865505,0.0002734415,0.00024342853,0.003043803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09362047,0.0030374627,0.8863614,0.0020129478,0.00073012896,0.0027652327,0.0017930518,0.00094846287,0.008730781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772778,0.0147485025,0.0006945246,0.002365823,0.0034719675,0.0014412585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7598185,0.22423798,0.0037840982,0.006573937,0.004426744,0.0011587642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031552788,0.0035215637,0.0041713477,0.0024347028,0.0012617512,0.0054287277,0.0044238186,0.0028395958,0.013856923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12949428,0.002792124,0.0023433252,0.004254379,0.0037396848,0.007701774,0.004527346,0.010010262,0.0025821873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006796512,0.00030990274,0.0010774077,0.00074018183,0.0003617963,0.00009733985,0.00030249674,0.3306691,0.002154622,0.5087815,0.010710621,0.14411533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007977315,0.00008570213,0.00032450267,0.00013041121,0.00007917855,0.00003524434,0.000036419613,0.3327069,0.00089390314,0.66169673,0.0039024446,0.000028806824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003252428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004024196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031552788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042056274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005244625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1668691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064101451","doi":"10.1002/qre.721","title":"Optimal Mean and Tolerance Allocation Using Conformance‐based Design","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality and Reliability Engineering International","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Reliability engineering; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Process capability index; Limit (mathematics); Process capability; Engineering; Work in process; Mathematics; Operations management","score_opus":0.17420414038011733,"score_gpt":0.4444025892382796,"score_spread":0.27019844885816224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064101451","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041155353,0.000074122756,0.95638555,0.00008009301,0.000013077443,0.00009604509,0.00001386699,0.00018475873,0.0019970217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7899572,0.000056990797,0.20876826,0.000071950555,0.000016497306,0.00029745587,0.00003550795,0.00006466913,0.00073144736],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643564,0.0015358997,0.00013589441,0.00045363672,0.0012184442,0.000220452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99605525,0.0021171619,0.00073107355,0.00038983076,0.0006219458,0.000084716485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053874897,0.0007615729,0.0011118598,0.0010080419,0.00039408542,0.0011351991,0.0010539542,0.0007315814,0.0013889797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011022867,0.00057129393,0.0007104367,0.0005157521,0.0012054713,0.001087833,0.0008980412,0.0008002052,0.00016682925],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092563605,0.00007487056,0.00035509325,0.00003830164,0.000026418618,0.000014865504,0.000041516447,0.9535112,0.0030208742,0.01796404,0.0001523401,0.024707872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032582648,0.00015582367,0.00017913143,0.000008668358,0.000011492912,0.000011295551,0.0000057756984,0.98629063,0.0017743394,0.011244408,0.00027575914,0.000010101963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010454103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005947092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053874897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014433641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014535501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028492093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064642572","doi":"10.1016/j.jprocont.2011.12.004","title":"Designing priors for robust Bayesian optimal experimental design","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Process Control","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Prior probability; Process (computing); Computer science; Design of experiments; Bayesian probability; Engineering design process; Process modeling; Machine learning; Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Work in process; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.1733677444323993,"score_gpt":0.451264019980269,"score_spread":0.27789627554786966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064642572","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014510028,0.000065285996,0.9978758,0.000110020774,0.00001598112,0.00010903277,0.000022537659,0.00009965014,0.00025073887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13838007,0.0002360273,0.85780203,0.00030760045,0.00008087651,0.002184122,0.00017959143,0.00014843681,0.000681247],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96166503,0.029736137,0.0010170237,0.0035027622,0.00320667,0.00087231735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87779176,0.10426276,0.0056329435,0.0074667274,0.0037256153,0.0011202308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05443351,0.002993788,0.0037897828,0.002858515,0.0008784307,0.0027472654,0.0043579377,0.004518795,0.00402325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16691224,0.0042059286,0.0022721598,0.0013243053,0.006077173,0.0050381017,0.0055019245,0.0053887595,0.00095314067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024810317,0.00045790835,0.001550732,0.00090974366,0.00060238177,0.0001183617,0.0004209907,0.42006296,0.006193426,0.4114373,0.0016822637,0.15408288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045027694,0.00031458656,0.00048547704,0.00012530143,0.000111829955,0.00003920778,0.000024827092,0.68474025,0.003018239,0.30906016,0.001567429,0.0000624745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010639643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008553491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05443351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025778436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039047047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28787535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065015301","doi":"10.1016/j.csda.2009.03.001","title":"Robustness of design for the testing of lack of fit and for estimation in binary response models","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Statistics & Data Analysis","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Covariate; Mathematics; Statistics; Estimator; Binary data; Test statistic; Regression analysis; Econometrics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Binary number","score_opus":0.6072277121095938,"score_gpt":0.5422912207812377,"score_spread":0.0649364913283561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065015301","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014731724,0.0004731063,0.9814493,0.00045191974,0.00023374695,0.00092246674,0.00040552227,0.00037027634,0.0009619629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49153396,0.000507147,0.49031222,0.00094774144,0.0004191467,0.012758779,0.0014203573,0.00067058,0.0014300836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5818118,0.35354537,0.014060314,0.029262586,0.018125312,0.003194569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.11084256,0.8245436,0.015673323,0.042192597,0.0055832067,0.0011647809],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.31636402,0.0041784663,0.008634519,0.005466951,0.002821137,0.005134647,0.0071169664,0.009402329,0.014154489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7233928,0.002714424,0.009832329,0.0041695335,0.013338415,0.009417126,0.006875164,0.0098374,0.0016073373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025503797,0.0020424218,0.035973925,0.0061414344,0.013685422,0.0017966892,0.0031179916,0.21670803,0.010292381,0.43553016,0.0068563796,0.24235149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033854647,0.0067322934,0.016039738,0.0006333772,0.002107637,0.0006776149,0.00040845515,0.49530783,0.009119925,0.45782223,0.007328224,0.0004371749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011391427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005401356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31636402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032503973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055151163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8430449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067267828","doi":"10.1080/02664760500449170","title":"A note comparing component-slope, Scheffé and Cox parameterizations of the linear mixture experiment model","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Component (thermodynamics); Mixture model; Linear model; Statistics; Mathematics; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.08472300885455115,"score_gpt":0.39775683772838866,"score_spread":0.3130338288738375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067267828","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042171893,0.00095305976,0.9905545,0.0008825982,0.00036979117,0.00035707274,0.000204811,0.00046537814,0.0019956871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08437477,0.0014621642,0.9057274,0.0013047579,0.00034344645,0.002447503,0.0004987913,0.00042919526,0.0034119599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.902621,0.076255664,0.0034328662,0.0048639323,0.011823132,0.0010034046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70376456,0.2631764,0.00420524,0.016625786,0.011609401,0.0006185899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12617992,0.0026373887,0.0030732725,0.002743593,0.0012340735,0.0035782328,0.005890421,0.0037841252,0.004722724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26533642,0.0013870371,0.0038511117,0.004117114,0.0038588627,0.0072591687,0.0027351088,0.00920122,0.0013735245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018352411,0.00035113955,0.008586318,0.0008765338,0.0009657719,0.00030412755,0.001098621,0.16871753,0.0032238406,0.5372735,0.020167084,0.2566004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030171667,0.0009290192,0.006136686,0.00024627135,0.000436765,0.0003636466,0.00034805888,0.58765656,0.004853718,0.35794482,0.040234722,0.00054810225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061570024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007442632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12617992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004050287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052156853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6673112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067883763","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01013.x","title":"Bayesian Estimation of Inverse Dose Response","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Maximum a posteriori estimation; Posterior probability; Bayesian probability; Bayesian inference; Mathematics; Posterior predictive distribution; Statistics; Prior probability; A priori and a posteriori; Computer science; Bayes estimator; Inverse problem; Bayesian linear regression; Algorithm; Maximum likelihood","score_opus":0.26296731177884397,"score_gpt":0.46296430263117344,"score_spread":0.19999699085232947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067883763","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069402237,0.0004622901,0.99045724,0.0003205407,0.000023612156,0.00013511915,0.00009516979,0.00010577834,0.0014601477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35282317,0.001005334,0.6413636,0.00048572902,0.00009307671,0.0011255019,0.0005046442,0.000081937964,0.0025169603],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872722,0.008741596,0.00040697816,0.0015097657,0.0018514802,0.00021794028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97579044,0.020542456,0.0012798032,0.000958166,0.0012696537,0.00015943359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018555662,0.0011776513,0.002353009,0.001796905,0.00051269314,0.00165536,0.0019854712,0.0020404002,0.0038237134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059355922,0.00075300684,0.0016248255,0.0012426511,0.001832348,0.0018829968,0.0015213717,0.0024640488,0.00080041034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067330094,0.0002310511,0.0060588876,0.00070770987,0.0004904277,0.00016130091,0.00026083467,0.6749916,0.00414086,0.11942012,0.0034212498,0.18944268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012904494,0.00021451536,0.0030951684,0.0001576886,0.0001632171,0.00019247767,0.000035543584,0.86919314,0.0028846331,0.1202023,0.003644736,0.000087543965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002739919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002003568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018555662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018847381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001857601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09813285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068276015","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11154","title":"Three‐level regular designs with general minimum lower‐order confounding","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Confounding; Mathematics; Component (thermodynamics); Order (exchange); Econometrics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.2639097558166017,"score_gpt":0.4098164920617417,"score_spread":0.14590673624514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068276015","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018905712,0.0002571423,0.9783432,0.00021104235,0.000051555446,0.00053503044,0.00019895048,0.00022527105,0.0012721147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25633273,0.0001328691,0.7381773,0.00044457449,0.00008626471,0.0029276956,0.00042889116,0.00016916827,0.001300383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8407468,0.13003975,0.0059274766,0.012401801,0.009098037,0.0017861249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6674502,0.2521436,0.0134125035,0.052907366,0.012302302,0.0017840507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0941955,0.0014732041,0.003847221,0.0016516164,0.0012675276,0.0025413372,0.004065239,0.0029142254,0.008519343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22575471,0.0010053263,0.0035783586,0.0022276423,0.0040957825,0.0036002607,0.0031587384,0.0033313895,0.0011264156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008465754,0.00080601516,0.022887848,0.00262905,0.0032756084,0.00068488583,0.001103584,0.14880994,0.013783989,0.4632849,0.0050994465,0.32916895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018783103,0.00430497,0.014677979,0.00033000365,0.0007351782,0.00037348588,0.00015686979,0.41557622,0.009118713,0.538964,0.013608564,0.00027571656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009444998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010152648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0941955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001987411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003775722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49815935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068480341","doi":"10.1007/s00362-013-0569-z","title":"Analyzing supersaturated designs for discrete responses via generalized linear models","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistical Papers","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"National Technical University of Athens","keywords":"Factorial experiment; Design of experiments; Supersaturation; Computer science; Identification (biology); Optimal design; Linear regression; Factorial; Mathematical optimization; Discrete time and continuous time; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.19680439901753044,"score_gpt":0.4569285278511817,"score_spread":0.26012412883365127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068480341","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013875126,0.00029327048,0.98408765,0.00019749596,0.000053125215,0.00051561336,0.00013673534,0.00015460268,0.0006862916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2506471,0.0007171471,0.7398297,0.00057383365,0.00017245903,0.005623393,0.0006690235,0.0001887258,0.0015786071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.8362656,0.1421127,0.002425129,0.010617297,0.007042548,0.0015367003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.51562315,0.45297375,0.009686062,0.015204131,0.005297151,0.0012157006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11111985,0.0026536412,0.005370161,0.0025328142,0.0012184504,0.0035774289,0.0039101704,0.0030593812,0.0074238386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21213773,0.0031017,0.005011573,0.00232606,0.0052377116,0.0049323067,0.0032483619,0.004542535,0.0007460386],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004889416,0.00125886,0.005931196,0.0027045812,0.003934105,0.00017456278,0.0015347789,0.23163162,0.0053797765,0.51184535,0.0022824456,0.22843346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082994666,0.0023155983,0.0024833519,0.00030283595,0.0009009715,0.00005899625,0.0002231198,0.4575675,0.0037931667,0.52782834,0.0035945463,0.00010160541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022214444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029096678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11111985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037876589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007525909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58766496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068618230","doi":"10.1016/s0378-3758(99)00185-8","title":"Crossover designs for two-treatment clinical trials","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Crossover; Crossover study; Mathematics; Repeated measures design; Clinical trial; Statistics; Sample size determination; Design of experiments; Optimal design; Sequential analysis; Treatment and control groups; Clinical study design; Computer science; Medicine; Machine learning","score_opus":0.7098386298084299,"score_gpt":0.672377921310636,"score_spread":0.037460708497793926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068618230","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051458897,0.003316094,0.9767568,0.0006295301,0.0010650427,0.011031263,0.00040774746,0.00080014754,0.0008474211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07763114,0.0014486108,0.8666405,0.0008695799,0.0004420188,0.050992794,0.00039772646,0.00023406386,0.0013435152],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.4187239,0.5509806,0.008352945,0.011207238,0.0092259385,0.0015092772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.41321394,0.5417368,0.01253419,0.026997436,0.0037756865,0.0017419413],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3004776,0.0047039413,0.01357109,0.0045551774,0.0016912395,0.0039353585,0.006296761,0.009015648,0.022163732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4690994,0.004993764,0.008139628,0.0034030522,0.0065713306,0.0049579567,0.003263017,0.013957515,0.0020042325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.09430726,0.0036285517,0.0021398976,0.016363336,0.016720358,0.0005078942,0.0020294408,0.07814213,0.0015234161,0.35997796,0.014791994,0.4098677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.10672933,0.01907749,0.0024191472,0.0029660454,0.0057848017,0.00038493416,0.00015959346,0.21871363,0.0021397849,0.6224734,0.018749824,0.00040205976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009697234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009838359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3004776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035574972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072967173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8626357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069118402","doi":"10.1007/s11336-014-9422-0","title":"On the Asymptotic Relative Efficiency of Planned Missingness Designs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychometrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Missing data; Mathematics; Latent variable; Regression analysis; Efficiency; Sample size determination; Latent variable model; Regression; Set (abstract data type); Linear regression; Econometrics; Variable (mathematics); Computer science","score_opus":0.21779276082377713,"score_gpt":0.44365606500622917,"score_spread":0.22586330418245204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069118402","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010495248,0.00072002516,0.98314893,0.00046446017,0.00009742018,0.0008093746,0.00008123274,0.00016899401,0.004014335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17809516,0.0007726658,0.81183153,0.0005421195,0.00012245166,0.0068706353,0.00019114379,0.00022268834,0.0013515543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5697809,0.3941928,0.0080387,0.009383156,0.016984962,0.0016195215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.19377512,0.7510512,0.011577668,0.032975323,0.010007126,0.00061355263],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.35415933,0.0029377271,0.003975482,0.0035457232,0.0014492252,0.0033186546,0.004017377,0.0032048116,0.007303978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.68110454,0.0019986283,0.0035976188,0.0031080274,0.009591651,0.008579493,0.0067258207,0.005186132,0.0011069203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026200828,0.00051760516,0.010023326,0.0020345687,0.0013883382,0.00029561706,0.0027916129,0.07339054,0.0023870666,0.64059,0.002398609,0.2615627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001277946,0.00413104,0.008387685,0.0015527647,0.00078427943,0.00050948525,0.000591563,0.22467965,0.007376746,0.7387156,0.011776102,0.0002171284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012585261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009194621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35415933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036056377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047345757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79643655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070691432","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2015.02.005","title":"Effective designs based on individual word length patterns","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Aliasing; Fractional factorial design; Column (typography); Rank (graph theory); Measure (data warehouse); Design of experiments; Factorial experiment; Word length; Plackett–Burman design; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Computer science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.3239244489964962,"score_gpt":0.4980734602817696,"score_spread":0.17414901128527338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070691432","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016047537,0.00023447735,0.9803243,0.0002120404,0.0001226579,0.0012874418,0.00013325352,0.00026850292,0.0013697494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2082369,0.0002824213,0.77888393,0.00034383862,0.00013031912,0.010517971,0.0002050706,0.00018224544,0.0012172346],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.88757634,0.08928228,0.004497481,0.009657031,0.007858055,0.00112887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6108315,0.33854154,0.010710543,0.031406883,0.0068128873,0.0016965654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08207627,0.0018116349,0.0037562826,0.0026836365,0.0010898017,0.0031792782,0.0038239257,0.0032667723,0.011054491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28755456,0.0024690174,0.0022867413,0.0019241698,0.0042801225,0.0067272545,0.0029382005,0.0042591225,0.0011813692],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011058869,0.0015046195,0.005800469,0.0023251458,0.0016648142,0.00012516831,0.0010101022,0.059189722,0.0072116232,0.40758696,0.0027839593,0.49973854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037035416,0.0039087567,0.0031461492,0.00033844847,0.001156339,0.0000944844,0.00012624361,0.22068197,0.004756491,0.75738776,0.004564943,0.00013496075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036087958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006422024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08207627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016340526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036282572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.434066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071064599","doi":"10.1016/j.chemolab.2006.08.003","title":"Mixture designs and models for the simultaneous selection of ingredients and their ratios","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Raw material; Process engineering; Selection (genetic algorithm); Product (mathematics); Process (computing); Design of experiments; Computer science; Property (philosophy); Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Mixture model; Biochemical engineering; Materials science; Biological system; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Chemistry; Statistics; Engineering; Thermodynamics; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.11102235451616162,"score_gpt":0.3588083474859413,"score_spread":0.2477859929697797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071064599","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002277412,0.0003408849,0.9968149,0.000061856925,0.000028136245,0.00015572498,0.00007412744,0.000105561296,0.0001414015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12015689,0.0014248205,0.86850494,0.00024130079,0.0001764425,0.0062538874,0.00068301434,0.00013699378,0.0024217258],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9621124,0.030674143,0.00082043884,0.0034610683,0.002283154,0.00064886216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94515353,0.04857918,0.0024826012,0.0022235394,0.0012338114,0.00032726332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04674756,0.0047730226,0.005242685,0.0028787286,0.0010479729,0.0029186613,0.006206516,0.004575445,0.004042673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06149954,0.004071133,0.0062759896,0.0022190784,0.0032548665,0.0040969807,0.0041792206,0.004312857,0.0011912135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045274356,0.0007704902,0.0021428606,0.0015089444,0.0022873655,0.00009014194,0.00033782492,0.57828563,0.0050070425,0.25218856,0.0016259404,0.15122774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004405865,0.00066613464,0.00054851547,0.000082008504,0.00046142304,0.000038256578,0.000019914272,0.8801167,0.0023288897,0.112670735,0.0025139584,0.00011290341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017706174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017970033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04674756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017593364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026495452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24722773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071488757","doi":"10.1002/cjs.5550340405","title":"Some robust designs for polynomial regression models","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Polynomial regression; Polynomial; Optimality criterion; Degree (music); Regression; Applied mathematics; Regression analysis; Polynomial and rational function modeling; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.24069616774055105,"score_gpt":0.39896563257433343,"score_spread":0.15826946483378238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071488757","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049555134,0.00033255783,0.9929912,0.00015603538,0.000038333557,0.00008179182,0.000060185288,0.00009526252,0.0012892473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34423804,0.0010859573,0.64872545,0.00031000146,0.00026357826,0.0011007724,0.00039909675,0.00015956396,0.003717503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.976592,0.0164522,0.0008206742,0.0025282803,0.0028762722,0.00073067046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96897864,0.022941086,0.0028674682,0.001978133,0.00278837,0.00044630474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029221777,0.0017768313,0.002371322,0.0020870047,0.00053898856,0.0015015347,0.0016509537,0.0018128874,0.00562082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059151724,0.0014113688,0.0021174287,0.0012567142,0.0022824872,0.0015085434,0.0020932935,0.0020853856,0.00072212686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005336006,0.00010656869,0.0006187172,0.00042128842,0.0002282496,0.00013644075,0.00014767078,0.13300322,0.004785435,0.77418005,0.0014753368,0.08436331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029422532,0.0010134914,0.0007547822,0.00017335355,0.00017616217,0.00010098806,0.00004415301,0.4767394,0.004665276,0.51072854,0.0052357754,0.000073904455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007034306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049401517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029221777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019095698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019883334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15454137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073055376","doi":"10.1016/s0012-365x(03)00277-2","title":"Some new orthogonal designs in orders 32 and 40","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discrete Mathematics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Combinatorics; Complement (music); Order (exchange); Orthogonal array; Resolution (logic); Discrete mathematics; Orthogonal complement; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.1952039077306143,"score_gpt":0.43652435207368806,"score_spread":0.24132044434307376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073055376","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022639567,0.00060172996,0.9713488,0.00032095725,0.00029791973,0.0003236208,0.00016083033,0.00015943238,0.0041471506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.119995445,0.0006527502,0.87192553,0.0004698773,0.0002527392,0.0015439844,0.00023065669,0.0001090725,0.0048200167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97963434,0.014317059,0.0010194583,0.0018893894,0.0024510834,0.0006885449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97336924,0.018758606,0.0016246893,0.0034106807,0.0021005853,0.00073621154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02771276,0.0015368595,0.002123644,0.0014885411,0.00092947925,0.0015462538,0.0017146408,0.0011964764,0.007342732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033105616,0.0010713955,0.0018743684,0.001575173,0.002846593,0.002396488,0.0022740674,0.002040639,0.00066057686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042499364,0.0007235955,0.0012419896,0.00086291233,0.00026932656,0.00009549206,0.0003941684,0.020933092,0.007845406,0.6483792,0.0032443434,0.31176054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002288011,0.004054055,0.002185859,0.00028618795,0.00050972827,0.00021612874,0.00012660956,0.13767329,0.0121116815,0.81793565,0.022400226,0.00021250035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037248392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079987856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02771276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012808742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026682673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14656085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W207338156","doi":"","title":"Partial Diallel Cross Block Designs.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diallel cross; Mathematics; Block (permutation group theory); Arithmetic; Combinatorics; Horticulture; Biology","score_opus":0.18328870662151253,"score_gpt":0.42360412442249823,"score_spread":0.2403154178009857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W207338156","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014213847,0.000690818,0.97150844,0.00028812277,0.00024297103,0.0016705111,0.00095052365,0.00065815926,0.009776686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25582406,0.0006427378,0.7110695,0.00082130067,0.0002087943,0.013355063,0.0012583942,0.00026166628,0.016558528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96162814,0.031479575,0.0009415066,0.0029873885,0.0022922256,0.00067117886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957566,0.031550728,0.001977936,0.006477281,0.001888995,0.0005391026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027068648,0.0015027205,0.0020775718,0.0012418862,0.00075432373,0.0018763035,0.0020000346,0.0016072225,0.0396604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059365284,0.001057364,0.0012613817,0.0009977586,0.0020160282,0.0022665132,0.0022279741,0.0018160094,0.005626252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010192303,0.0010731601,0.0023652837,0.0028223447,0.00091272633,0.00010693932,0.00036790047,0.04016746,0.006866378,0.5252754,0.0093064755,0.40054366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004455836,0.011919727,0.003242129,0.000821952,0.0009977826,0.00030246188,0.00020802872,0.26654205,0.023469409,0.6091453,0.07871824,0.00017712155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032562762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064151146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0396604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012973222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022042005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14315438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073476612","doi":"10.1287/moor.2014.0682","title":"K -Optimal Design via Semidefinite Programming and Entropy Optimization","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Semidefinite programming; Mathematical optimization; Semidefinite embedding; Mathematics; Computer science; Quadratically constrained quadratic program; Quadratic programming","score_opus":0.08293965647548455,"score_gpt":0.3422714412133001,"score_spread":0.25933178473781554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073476612","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024056456,0.00012697483,0.99648416,0.00013428033,0.000011435454,0.000038836053,0.000027761547,0.000054373704,0.0007164882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29987022,0.0006606682,0.69532067,0.00042073114,0.000104247665,0.0010556753,0.00027812662,0.00014860279,0.0021411509],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99368095,0.0042297775,0.00019306003,0.0009690421,0.0007122328,0.000214847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98819333,0.009561601,0.0009681796,0.00053309,0.0005206407,0.00022309195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009646062,0.0019374331,0.0024232941,0.0011916051,0.0005206664,0.001868134,0.0015432766,0.0016271112,0.0024875232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016875684,0.0011236394,0.0011606379,0.00083430484,0.003714601,0.0020511632,0.0021733285,0.0021968642,0.00050201145],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029995636,0.00016411694,0.00036616242,0.00050988543,0.00014951284,0.000086597276,0.0000921143,0.7169616,0.003828246,0.2407991,0.0008786448,0.035864078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047606463,0.00013111078,0.00008772752,0.000028673225,0.000016610848,0.000020843572,0.00000978597,0.88559985,0.0011457342,0.11231255,0.000578397,0.000021130822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007119336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006790215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009646062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016751688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002812629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051013827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073515716","doi":"10.1002/cjce.20233","title":"Comparison of experimental designs using neural networks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Artificial neural network; Design of experiments; Factor (programming language); Nonlinear system; Mathematics; Computer science; Algorithm; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.18773288497715854,"score_gpt":0.4236921190970609,"score_spread":0.23595923411990236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073515716","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23844193,0.0008515293,0.75233155,0.00015467947,0.00035216016,0.0041490905,0.00041218445,0.0005368078,0.0027700716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56542563,0.0002999253,0.4240785,0.000118297794,0.000045858425,0.008738052,0.00036145496,0.00008707131,0.0008451746],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9461283,0.043126184,0.0037184858,0.0024000565,0.003966736,0.0006602655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8464182,0.12853561,0.0073323785,0.0074662515,0.009683435,0.0005640707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03759109,0.0015370966,0.0015933712,0.0016613101,0.0004946035,0.0014827691,0.0014609443,0.0012449328,0.0043642693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15766226,0.0007167373,0.0016435621,0.0011472147,0.0010667249,0.001192208,0.0010670044,0.0012307374,0.0003628854],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.031784553,0.0027974155,0.006723879,0.002979012,0.0019073668,0.00012704663,0.0003563233,0.51720816,0.01612781,0.016554497,0.0007741259,0.4026597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025683849,0.018654088,0.009975716,0.00032935827,0.0010789442,0.00005876933,0.00016299085,0.90279824,0.04077549,0.02029071,0.0031218797,0.00018543124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009805425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081458664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03759109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020246317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017384886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19880301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076340142","doi":"10.1007/s00170-007-1090-0","title":"Evaluating performance of a fuel nozzle test stand under varying configurations using Taguchi parameter design - An industrial application","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Barrick Gold (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Taguchi methods; Orthogonal array; Nozzle; Design of experiments; Engineering; Noise (video); Transducer; Pressure sensor; Calibration; Process variable; Mechanical engineering; Process (computing); Computer science; Mathematics; Electrical engineering; Statistics","score_opus":0.26429948188824487,"score_gpt":0.4834107795474762,"score_spread":0.21911129765923132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076340142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96763515,0.0002445152,0.031175744,0.00003684048,0.000023245351,0.00010079291,0.000120894285,0.00023742024,0.00042539288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98121566,0.00007928775,0.018054193,0.000016547718,0.0000051038346,0.000050376064,0.00009358645,0.000029004948,0.0004562114],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989839,0.0002736551,0.00009558988,0.000153957,0.0003888166,0.00010397192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751115,0.0012748665,0.0002937193,0.00019842794,0.0005716754,0.00015009526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002176725,0.0011008097,0.0010742561,0.0007070579,0.00089413114,0.000789067,0.0013291758,0.0013377392,0.0010535893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025656694,0.0005289675,0.00068210426,0.00051476347,0.00037201992,0.00083113887,0.00043980917,0.0003455448,0.00033270512],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030146108,0.000426499,0.007095195,0.00021661958,0.000066745255,0.00013948261,0.00015657973,0.017245583,0.94519013,0.00018129233,0.00011687243,0.02615036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010797952,0.0064515774,0.009082246,0.0000087171,0.00011396277,0.000118182346,0.00012724505,0.0362842,0.94720984,0.00009523054,0.0003516224,0.00004922647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011621065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023949381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002176725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006019555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077715935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011511803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076423843","doi":"10.1093/biomet/asr071","title":"Optimal fractions of two-level factorials under a baseline parameterization","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Fractional factorial design; Baseline (sea); Context (archaeology); Isomorphism (crystallography); Factorial experiment; Orthogonal array; Optimal design; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.5168909803614168,"score_gpt":0.48915894728996917,"score_spread":0.027732033071447615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076423843","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06999738,0.00017889212,0.9274255,0.00009382313,0.000017371383,0.00013986218,0.000066338915,0.00015483402,0.0019260438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60976934,0.00028902365,0.38814467,0.000061628954,0.0000306926,0.00062635954,0.00010267677,0.00007448085,0.0009011715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915896,0.005112664,0.00038790095,0.0012035357,0.001080931,0.0006253429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98757476,0.008175483,0.0016613915,0.0014369953,0.00080345967,0.0003478738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008149539,0.0012082729,0.0014741789,0.001200918,0.0005082299,0.0012077487,0.0008838456,0.00085372064,0.00240819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027325831,0.00034821048,0.0008726494,0.0010561801,0.0021752901,0.002460576,0.0014307989,0.00077422033,0.00036456904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004972474,0.00084323675,0.0033820355,0.00072580413,0.00011595358,0.00012039052,0.00034660686,0.19202353,0.05323477,0.392594,0.0007109225,0.3509302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048711148,0.0054072686,0.0054888884,0.00016068887,0.00019412505,0.0001895889,0.00021374148,0.43392804,0.05201481,0.49474826,0.007005157,0.00016237258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039066438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028500718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008149539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013264682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019965835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043099344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076644634","doi":"10.3758/pbr.17.1.135","title":"Revisiting confidence intervals for repeated measures designs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Factorial; Factorial experiment; Value (mathematics); Arithmetic; Statistics; Confidence interval; Relation (database); Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.27839042303392475,"score_gpt":0.4936683544901512,"score_spread":0.21527793145622642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076644634","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029901683,0.018946461,0.97202796,0.0014507909,0.0014952831,0.00037230036,0.00019987405,0.0005351397,0.0019820346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16404955,0.009836695,0.8146342,0.0032303054,0.0022837264,0.0037207159,0.00047009546,0.00065047655,0.0011241612],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.48457053,0.42753378,0.019779421,0.020938735,0.04564403,0.0015335813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.07082385,0.88668394,0.009943716,0.022218784,0.009945546,0.00038418753],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3957055,0.0027870755,0.008556842,0.006608878,0.0013976963,0.0070906687,0.011129604,0.0055482886,0.00556355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7903338,0.0027914273,0.006948433,0.0066786422,0.007237617,0.009652049,0.0041932245,0.013850239,0.00087929575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023919877,0.00037224215,0.003121161,0.015287915,0.008973616,0.00030023957,0.002831471,0.015631588,0.0013449894,0.33248857,0.010755746,0.6065004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001996941,0.0022842076,0.008721269,0.011148574,0.00697596,0.0006496412,0.00061038556,0.09222789,0.00768027,0.8110645,0.056198996,0.00044136375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016472797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011689968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60429454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003618751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004925223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7452027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078249808","doi":"10.1198/jasa.2009.0119","title":"Screening Experiments for Developing Dynamic Treatment Regimes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Statistical Association","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Factorial experiment; Computer science; Treatment effect; Factorial; Design of experiments; Machine learning; Mathematical optimization; Medicine; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.12215089528701961,"score_gpt":0.4961811498570252,"score_spread":0.3740302545700056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078249808","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026308443,0.00021575805,0.9687167,0.00030870712,0.00006852478,0.001842899,0.00015828264,0.0002624875,0.0021182396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27607104,0.00025478672,0.71497375,0.00030114577,0.000057474568,0.007635595,0.00014240674,0.000028379673,0.00053549634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9508997,0.041740447,0.0011797621,0.0028499442,0.0027344073,0.0005956769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7451471,0.22999544,0.011822133,0.009062736,0.0030654965,0.0009071898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.066361904,0.0016926562,0.002140796,0.0021746755,0.00085419137,0.0018542655,0.0017687441,0.0027874878,0.005788237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18838482,0.001000381,0.0017837655,0.0013288524,0.0033195615,0.003306196,0.0021011012,0.0020667256,0.00039931948],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004611243,0.002384952,0.008024557,0.0022508355,0.000737252,0.00024968197,0.0006086573,0.2797318,0.01379547,0.50040233,0.0020277938,0.18517534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002165507,0.0061256485,0.0031653394,0.00029840006,0.0003910087,0.000113433445,0.00014162814,0.585479,0.013586529,0.38267988,0.0056932657,0.0001603621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005901159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005716869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066361904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00223815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003252451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35095948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W207882731","doi":"","title":"Balanced Bipartite Row-Column Designs.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Column (typography); Mathematics; Bipartite graph; Combinatorics; Algorithm; Geometry; Graph","score_opus":0.13705619323265078,"score_gpt":0.4176691317247561,"score_spread":0.28061293849210533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W207882731","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011315336,0.00066792447,0.9745137,0.00036692517,0.00026047716,0.0030582596,0.0016447944,0.0004890946,0.007683553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23421328,0.00081408164,0.7336959,0.0008753693,0.00020277491,0.018744582,0.0017357339,0.00022442034,0.0094939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9510204,0.04184628,0.00095661305,0.0028673566,0.0023551013,0.0009542731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9486212,0.037590798,0.0031215954,0.007497808,0.0023245981,0.0008440095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03103854,0.002265489,0.002810716,0.0012442542,0.0008619669,0.0019450419,0.0022848286,0.0020361189,0.032333285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07267214,0.0013392989,0.0012472384,0.0016561167,0.0020905184,0.0018815706,0.0018894244,0.0018985248,0.0044336873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014122762,0.001756736,0.0023791294,0.0033162273,0.001626664,0.00010126705,0.00025210236,0.06976295,0.009454966,0.5306625,0.016467465,0.3500974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006597382,0.006085115,0.002356641,0.0008480461,0.0013156264,0.00013751678,0.00016438603,0.23269634,0.014208457,0.69571793,0.03971039,0.00016216314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073042884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015433935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032333285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016568037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036205582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16414946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080431129","doi":"10.1111/1755-0998.12303","title":"<i>Q</i><sub>ST</sub>–<i>F</i><sub>ST</sub> comparisons with unbalanced half‐sib designs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Molecular Ecology Resources","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology","score_opus":0.050577434184904284,"score_gpt":0.34199443307018357,"score_spread":0.2914169988852793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080431129","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06907883,0.00026693987,0.91286224,0.00027799237,0.00043718578,0.004047206,0.0067329104,0.001993721,0.00430295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17018963,0.00013095788,0.7986401,0.00024862343,0.00006669998,0.021337938,0.005360511,0.0010949249,0.0029306023],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9607948,0.026708933,0.0023653654,0.006448859,0.0025475693,0.0011343887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9362663,0.048346777,0.0028410514,0.010022938,0.0019151757,0.0006077501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035354663,0.0016866601,0.0030996806,0.001657725,0.0013260242,0.001417925,0.0028994058,0.001737342,0.0411693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0864558,0.0012504809,0.0043386295,0.0018356827,0.0023230286,0.0016597734,0.0020017656,0.0029607785,0.0032183193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03357458,0.003472317,0.03067312,0.006434637,0.008408427,0.00094359467,0.0019516796,0.07986891,0.061153688,0.13096605,0.037670445,0.60488254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006560729,0.012009383,0.047959577,0.0005182942,0.0036635844,0.00060022634,0.0004721729,0.4840403,0.061834883,0.278187,0.103623986,0.000529893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014697635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002185126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0411693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014896678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028091045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18697554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081290294","doi":"10.1016/j.csda.2008.01.014","title":"Approximation of powers of some tests in one-way MANOVA type multivariate generalized linear model","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Statistics & Data Analysis","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pacific Institute for the Mathematical Sciences","keywords":"Mathematics; Multivariate analysis of variance; Multivariate statistics; Generalized linear model; Deviance (statistics); Statistics; Applied mathematics; Sample size determination; Statistic; Test statistic; Linear model; Type I and type II errors; Statistical hypothesis testing","score_opus":0.3767989769850297,"score_gpt":0.48334965061897744,"score_spread":0.10655067363394777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081290294","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074149994,0.00019202812,0.99153155,0.00011429033,0.000027404105,0.00002776066,0.000036548823,0.000106618725,0.00054888765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47385105,0.0008732699,0.5195564,0.00034153904,0.0002824077,0.00071246416,0.00035735514,0.0003742761,0.003651229],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97723585,0.017053552,0.00056515256,0.002166979,0.0019973125,0.0009812379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7715679,0.20922793,0.0049513006,0.009063083,0.003839324,0.0013505162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03517202,0.0023370574,0.0037512043,0.002792278,0.0007692838,0.0025590067,0.004202178,0.0025059865,0.0042328592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17790054,0.001641068,0.0029739623,0.0022895564,0.0054763574,0.005559995,0.003610796,0.0043372307,0.00079072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010619478,0.0002543048,0.006192857,0.0010961698,0.0005318933,0.0007871942,0.0010818751,0.44414955,0.0034987226,0.41955075,0.0029573534,0.11883739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004851575,0.00014522897,0.0007739412,0.00008215092,0.00008897961,0.00022839992,0.00006432695,0.75998646,0.0009883683,0.23676859,0.00079124485,0.000033936998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011661501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008372064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03517202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013940079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025607843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18600965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083828390","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2005.02.018","title":"Constructing non-regular robust parameter designs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Mathematics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Orthogonal array; Variance (accounting); Mathematical optimization; Design of experiments; Rank (graph theory); Optimal design; Noise (video); Word (group theory); Factorial experiment; Algorithm; Statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.25226363154183207,"score_gpt":0.4727185011069364,"score_spread":0.22045486956510435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083828390","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004541194,0.00007747968,0.9947319,0.000060674247,0.000015167347,0.00011958064,0.00004383133,0.00016368213,0.00024645732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10103717,0.0001048851,0.8969982,0.00011520144,0.000039230315,0.0010076995,0.0001861014,0.00012780429,0.00038374157],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9505114,0.041089877,0.0015286474,0.00407514,0.0023596573,0.00043526787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77503467,0.1887535,0.0076458957,0.024079004,0.003692363,0.00079454517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059456244,0.001534356,0.0035155618,0.0021638824,0.0006456988,0.0016959615,0.0039331797,0.002652503,0.0031657084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17642067,0.0026986725,0.0027709603,0.0012023344,0.003870948,0.0029288463,0.003489098,0.0032060395,0.0006949652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002835003,0.0004031886,0.0036890712,0.0014330668,0.0014372721,0.0002482236,0.0005559707,0.39396775,0.0057515614,0.28715813,0.0023443834,0.30017644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047579428,0.00068118545,0.0008650685,0.00010721918,0.00025235434,0.00007858085,0.00004286872,0.5892579,0.0032407204,0.40239692,0.002549843,0.000051513794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047367343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000617884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059456244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010535176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026429712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3144384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083839279","doi":"10.1198/004017007000000038","title":"Incorporating Prior Information in Optimal Design for Model Selection","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technometrics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Interpretability; Bayesian information criterion; Set (abstract data type); Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Prior probability; Bayesian probability; Model selection; Hellinger distance; Machine learning; Identification (biology); Design of experiments; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Statistics","score_opus":0.21412141502088103,"score_gpt":0.4495098550792087,"score_spread":0.23538844005832768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083839279","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017157946,0.00018428093,0.99718636,0.00017799565,0.00001718196,0.00009540268,0.00002791592,0.000105739404,0.000489261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1012451,0.00045801813,0.8958287,0.0002480549,0.00007162986,0.0013729397,0.00018722433,0.00009223403,0.000496118],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95280665,0.04138959,0.0009971466,0.0016188822,0.0026824903,0.0005052302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88511527,0.10639011,0.002179686,0.0035109506,0.0022993844,0.0005046277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04981189,0.003174748,0.004561552,0.004509161,0.0013368598,0.0028125527,0.0025561177,0.0029782944,0.004555586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15636986,0.002120976,0.0025050081,0.0033432518,0.0033500653,0.0038911134,0.004000088,0.0039363643,0.0007078727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004468329,0.00017823605,0.0013342957,0.0005686012,0.00038659183,0.00015850496,0.00026105825,0.62062925,0.0007491873,0.2691615,0.0012666426,0.10485932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016381324,0.00016651231,0.00024101503,0.00012058804,0.00007950841,0.000028461587,0.000025987505,0.74697673,0.0005182485,0.25010267,0.0015291523,0.000047277303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025108664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002858034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04981189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032358295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055189175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26343358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084811700","doi":"10.1002/cjs.10069","title":"Testing for equivalence of variances using Hartley's ratio","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Mathematics; Statistics; Econometrics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.32429380419992876,"score_gpt":0.4553709992244614,"score_spread":0.13107719502453263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084811700","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24053717,0.0012006218,0.73019534,0.0012605782,0.0006133284,0.0015959771,0.0017996699,0.00057596713,0.022221416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90870297,0.00023583963,0.086795785,0.00042002366,0.00023591524,0.0015078047,0.00079189334,0.0001494017,0.0011603099],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8702662,0.06764511,0.008298452,0.020121535,0.0310168,0.0026518707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4855104,0.45173618,0.01820849,0.024169309,0.01775742,0.0026182514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06123962,0.0009779428,0.0031152423,0.004584658,0.0015890147,0.0037830037,0.0026485235,0.0018458036,0.014065809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39686942,0.0005245466,0.0027037852,0.004408581,0.0067639956,0.0056542647,0.003093851,0.0033833925,0.0012926814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064679873,0.0010196215,0.18944481,0.0014151824,0.0058960593,0.0015613023,0.0046700933,0.022970306,0.006370924,0.32179552,0.015356415,0.42303172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015021592,0.008374014,0.20766631,0.0006512607,0.0016347208,0.0017917881,0.003047039,0.14202715,0.012202706,0.594302,0.02619693,0.00060387293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022291234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007398366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06123962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016023353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022010931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32386988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084976008","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11174","title":"D‐optimal minimax fractional factorial designs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Minimax; Fractional factorial design; Mathematics; Factorial experiment; Plackett–Burman design; Factorial; Invariant (physics); Optimal design; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Response surface methodology","score_opus":0.19626501042954558,"score_gpt":0.40383266140906765,"score_spread":0.20756765097952207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084976008","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012327647,0.00020055873,0.98511916,0.00012978914,0.000033246386,0.0002689676,0.00007758236,0.00009996651,0.0017429924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20818862,0.00019885498,0.7870282,0.00025208012,0.00004736725,0.0021343397,0.00017853249,0.00010755941,0.0018643953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779954,0.016674556,0.000799252,0.001714386,0.0022616303,0.00055476837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649829,0.02830322,0.0016400623,0.0021706119,0.002452464,0.00045075463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022887254,0.0013872536,0.0031500314,0.0024239859,0.0010260572,0.0018007667,0.001640005,0.002011973,0.0074926987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056220718,0.00078562624,0.0015111263,0.0015377525,0.0023999698,0.0018451737,0.00223016,0.0018872468,0.000715575],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030416658,0.0004892711,0.0030328657,0.001193729,0.00030913786,0.00018360408,0.0004756527,0.19581248,0.01670546,0.42139998,0.0032774042,0.35407877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007105874,0.0024630541,0.00283804,0.00031437364,0.00011960155,0.00017065193,0.000120034165,0.5737791,0.015555201,0.39080134,0.012977746,0.00015027082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005211117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035165192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022887254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017367069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021942297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12104082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087870069","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2014.01.005","title":"New optimal design criteria for regression models with asymmetric errors","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Statistics; Regression; Regression analysis; Econometrics; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.25324346801563835,"score_gpt":0.49172098730036595,"score_spread":0.2384775192847276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087870069","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00090653094,0.0001426627,0.99841607,0.000077083794,0.000019216459,0.00007306065,0.000026144404,0.000057347486,0.0002818449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0654409,0.00047127192,0.9298845,0.00025426678,0.00019435682,0.0019352749,0.00026717747,0.00030242422,0.0012498357],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9491987,0.039413817,0.0022671444,0.002630281,0.0055787843,0.0009113101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87201935,0.112040766,0.004513922,0.0030572652,0.007192983,0.0011756994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059012253,0.0040904176,0.005580214,0.004289059,0.00091784546,0.0033440334,0.0042069736,0.0038466654,0.0060256207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12979604,0.0030248726,0.0027171257,0.0024341468,0.0032187293,0.0045558545,0.0042839,0.0053844936,0.0007796595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090586464,0.00037926887,0.00097039,0.0011800104,0.0004363408,0.0001441535,0.0003152481,0.49601004,0.0049929367,0.3523132,0.0028858786,0.13946669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025316945,0.0002807043,0.0003072391,0.00016295309,0.00011527004,0.000038514165,0.000027073354,0.82152444,0.0018578919,0.1732138,0.0021614507,0.000057622794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001099064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010708185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059012253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031584664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31209034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087938803","doi":"10.1198/00401700152672555","title":"A Robust Criterion for Experimental Designs for Serially Correlated Observations","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technometrics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Mathematics; Simulated annealing; Algorithm; Variance (accounting); Factorial experiment; Design of experiments; Correlation; Statistics; Interval (graph theory); Mathematical optimization; Computer science","score_opus":0.6859603614227414,"score_gpt":0.4947408768853512,"score_spread":0.19121948453739024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087938803","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00084855786,0.00013307882,0.99826604,0.000068597314,0.00002929798,0.00012758204,0.000051617808,0.000111295376,0.00036391825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027991295,0.00020412344,0.9686775,0.00015951988,0.00006936412,0.0018409388,0.0002134948,0.00014021533,0.0007034775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9264775,0.04704118,0.0038477888,0.006323868,0.0152209485,0.0010886868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8657496,0.09972416,0.008143752,0.008861618,0.016205942,0.001315025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06842377,0.0028553065,0.0038876238,0.0037124942,0.0012698143,0.002738055,0.0033874195,0.0039620386,0.0042830803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1650851,0.0011879586,0.0019848882,0.0023817716,0.004465638,0.0029334284,0.0031425343,0.0038075026,0.0018729861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011908913,0.0002697576,0.0020529556,0.0020096435,0.00054563547,0.00028949298,0.00051368674,0.26806942,0.033258226,0.4407755,0.0044419183,0.2465829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043753017,0.0020820722,0.0021601133,0.0004409392,0.00022855042,0.0003057648,0.00008693587,0.6158044,0.033005588,0.3200455,0.025131162,0.00027148594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009088806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078210584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06842377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030618168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006528831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3618638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088554048","doi":"10.2307/3315953","title":"Minimax A‐ and D‐optimal integer‐valued wavelet designs for estimation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Minimax; Estimator; Gompertz function; Nonparametric statistics; Wavelet; Mathematics; Integer (computer science); Simulated annealing; Heteroscedasticity; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Algorithm; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.27530869357263327,"score_gpt":0.40929619536195033,"score_spread":0.13398750178931707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088554048","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0081500085,0.00016643904,0.9909287,0.00009086171,0.000026588348,0.00008196805,0.000018127148,0.000028016259,0.0005093795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17347813,0.00034405637,0.8232841,0.0001544983,0.000047165442,0.0014845384,0.00007596043,0.000052318082,0.0010792207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98130965,0.015776021,0.0005356233,0.0008415257,0.0012502904,0.00028687407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9568101,0.037103664,0.0018420311,0.0020402798,0.0018353781,0.00036849017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023178823,0.0011859422,0.0017449312,0.0010442387,0.00043628304,0.0011694183,0.0012374311,0.0018015992,0.0036766918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05236401,0.0008581721,0.00093995506,0.0008506779,0.0017376762,0.001199893,0.0013911844,0.0017612502,0.00040837776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022977581,0.00049661857,0.0014056072,0.0005903687,0.00022990427,0.000115588955,0.0003803139,0.2181837,0.012999546,0.55390006,0.0012351768,0.20816529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070596044,0.0018483285,0.0011179989,0.00018601488,0.00008031713,0.00007308021,0.000066797096,0.76335853,0.006693599,0.22260462,0.0031910802,0.00007362643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002368323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014413461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023178823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008470555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009926273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12258285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088655298","doi":"10.1198/004017004000000176","title":"The Design of Blocked Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Experiments","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technometrics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Split plot; Blocking (statistics); Ranking (information retrieval); Plackett–Burman design; Mathematics; Factorial experiment; Restricted randomization; Design of experiments; Statistics; Plot (graphics); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Randomization; Artificial intelligence; Response surface methodology","score_opus":0.30237494260827,"score_gpt":0.4710541812441454,"score_spread":0.16867923863587536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088655298","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01667359,0.00018118991,0.97550666,0.00010496773,0.00015113551,0.004567886,0.00026127475,0.00059613574,0.0019571702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07512078,0.00022852342,0.9063764,0.0001435032,0.000041423464,0.016645497,0.00021547456,0.00007105156,0.0011573464],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785696,0.014953683,0.00076057244,0.0018795155,0.0032413867,0.0005952031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98280865,0.0103155365,0.0022488378,0.002006914,0.0021311778,0.0004888992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018139875,0.0016066679,0.0018353419,0.0014135083,0.0009694966,0.0015625963,0.0017331046,0.0016040273,0.006220408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03353443,0.0010140829,0.0010501342,0.0013827729,0.0015843508,0.00104632,0.0011070927,0.0014385086,0.0017526586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018793827,0.003140708,0.007094207,0.0044448874,0.0005933834,0.00024037153,0.0012581741,0.08482822,0.15499516,0.21311556,0.0066998894,0.5047956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0089786295,0.044080865,0.01337204,0.0006910837,0.0009093443,0.0006311507,0.00039400355,0.41059566,0.19613591,0.2011843,0.12223411,0.00079292856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049816037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058894046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018139875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012521377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003238639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095933914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088703188","doi":"10.2307/3316068","title":"Optimal design for the proportional odds model","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Cancer Institute; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Quantile; Optimal design; Odds; Ordinal data; Mathematics; Construct (python library); Statistics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Econometrics; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.2962670257650652,"score_gpt":0.4255418455873327,"score_spread":0.12927481982226752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088703188","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007059433,0.00019664584,0.9901045,0.00031906355,0.000045591227,0.0002693606,0.000056116634,0.00010805393,0.0018413049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45247453,0.00044688827,0.5380685,0.0006654918,0.00014079986,0.0032076992,0.00023810197,0.00010746215,0.0046505625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94606525,0.044046637,0.0011433347,0.0038704046,0.0034871134,0.0013871818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9413393,0.04854577,0.0028968654,0.003724047,0.0026873797,0.0008065807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03143953,0.0012275606,0.0029307797,0.0014287545,0.00067202933,0.00196431,0.0025038847,0.0023001397,0.01114331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07719451,0.0011382819,0.0017998617,0.00096727535,0.0031518587,0.0025767428,0.0034206763,0.0033432185,0.0011888002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023409282,0.00049623137,0.0028991017,0.0006784011,0.00035056405,0.00013352919,0.0003754868,0.2184669,0.0018956519,0.63211673,0.0026071232,0.13763934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008807068,0.0010639702,0.0009698494,0.00013541694,0.00016143144,0.000089104076,0.00010337565,0.5435413,0.0013509471,0.44674405,0.0048868326,0.0000730461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013801778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007015845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03143953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002119502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030400904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16627008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088944695","doi":"10.1002/cjs.10037","title":"Bayesian optimal design for changepoint problems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Jewish General Hospital; McGill University Health Centre; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal design; Bayesian probability; Measure (data warehouse); Bayesian experimental design; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Function (biology); Prior probability; Mathematics; Bayesian inference; Algorithm; Bayesian statistics; Data mining","score_opus":0.21331821375004886,"score_gpt":0.4045466788676051,"score_spread":0.19122846511755623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088944695","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007758768,0.00045096196,0.9897143,0.00041173544,0.000051678126,0.00047144244,0.000055319735,0.00009194584,0.0009937787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31729576,0.0006230629,0.67506903,0.00064566976,0.00012914898,0.004248401,0.0002438793,0.00011562473,0.0016294759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89666694,0.08831657,0.0020415457,0.0056576207,0.0060475566,0.0012697396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.807804,0.17115428,0.008577867,0.0055069053,0.00551309,0.0014438842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.093691096,0.0021708545,0.005147573,0.0030015693,0.00064305676,0.0025679485,0.0033206125,0.004103332,0.0063341656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.191144,0.0018929034,0.0024281796,0.0015501945,0.005415043,0.0037950994,0.003324437,0.0050953883,0.0007410418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033663088,0.00069285993,0.002672992,0.0014819927,0.0008880244,0.0001650204,0.00040633927,0.35239887,0.0021841784,0.52006274,0.0027476219,0.11293297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001453321,0.0015113235,0.0009556971,0.00029262502,0.00020558908,0.00007205935,0.000054807057,0.527528,0.0017471616,0.46288842,0.0031943517,0.00009657892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083715934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045204643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093691096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028673427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029323644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4954918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091280909","doi":"10.1080/02664760903301127","title":"Bayesian and likelihood inference for cure rates based on defective inverse Gaussian regression models","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Gibbs sampling; Bayesian probability; Statistics; Bayesian inference; Econometrics; Bayesian linear regression; Mathematics; Inference; Regression; Biostatistics; Mixture model; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","score_opus":0.06860073087418259,"score_gpt":0.4269199345563927,"score_spread":0.35831920368221015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091280909","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025324577,0.000264024,0.9732949,0.00027080943,0.000021735996,0.00007064365,0.00015161853,0.00014537179,0.00045636095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5255331,0.001093349,0.4677937,0.00034399703,0.00017026797,0.0008392864,0.0012491035,0.00016320632,0.0028140647],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799104,0.014979806,0.00062222494,0.0021177467,0.0018517906,0.0005180589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81670403,0.16625562,0.005732893,0.00766115,0.0027626352,0.00088367023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04989898,0.0013816389,0.0036013129,0.0035085748,0.0006972094,0.002939799,0.004636011,0.0029518243,0.0025944442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16432442,0.0017022598,0.0025100638,0.0020003696,0.005185591,0.004011594,0.0028638698,0.004901111,0.00054697413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006785782,0.0002287627,0.007930483,0.00024412258,0.00029240688,0.0002371756,0.00064857857,0.6059621,0.001404219,0.3275689,0.0012855127,0.053519096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063758984,0.000056585945,0.0010090027,0.00003740395,0.00004688845,0.00006752722,0.000027329037,0.8271425,0.00046315874,0.17057763,0.00046525206,0.000042964075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00442029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028902914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04989898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002546632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021254637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2638942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091819253","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11226","title":"A semiparametric inverse‐Gaussian model and inference for survival data with a cured proportion","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Inverse Gaussian distribution; Mathematics; Statistics; Applied mathematics; Estimator; Inference; Mixture model; Semiparametric regression; Gaussian process; Econometrics; Gaussian; Distribution (mathematics); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Physics","score_opus":0.23510729598083807,"score_gpt":0.42598170705924726,"score_spread":0.1908744110784092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091819253","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019684006,0.00019655951,0.9789965,0.00028612578,0.000026472746,0.00008885379,0.00020236235,0.00016080386,0.00035827688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6095264,0.0009212055,0.3778943,0.00049030443,0.00020860742,0.0013429556,0.0013031985,0.0001539707,0.008159074],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850796,0.010026158,0.00051563396,0.0023433908,0.0014190495,0.0006162036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9251089,0.06370758,0.0038101247,0.004415194,0.0023004578,0.0006578011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0408214,0.0013707365,0.004142416,0.0030174947,0.0006963365,0.0023530147,0.0046478817,0.0032538567,0.003706816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078673676,0.0017772872,0.0035034504,0.0026338864,0.0046491018,0.002791009,0.0028621259,0.004271695,0.0007603053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005869579,0.00022602217,0.0064396756,0.0002942711,0.00037544177,0.00031753213,0.0005572809,0.61418736,0.0013968123,0.3196283,0.0015206044,0.054469727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005448129,0.000085323714,0.0010355483,0.000027303651,0.00005486018,0.000049327307,0.000031513977,0.9003718,0.0003316151,0.09728174,0.0006346234,0.00004177847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010010489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056376886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0408214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025952614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026956173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21588677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093310116","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2001.tb00308.x","title":"Bayesian Inference and Posterior Simulators","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bayesian probability; Bayesian inference; Presentation (obstetrics); Computer science; Inference; Operations research; Library science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.07104408598911092,"score_gpt":0.2828379342917801,"score_spread":0.21179384830266917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093310116","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041158483,0.00063455425,0.98771286,0.0009634462,0.000067443434,0.00006049178,0.00010810309,0.00010159249,0.006235741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4012867,0.003902311,0.57773054,0.00073596276,0.00046530247,0.0011557452,0.00068752887,0.00019613135,0.013839769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99107856,0.006592099,0.00029716347,0.0006994437,0.0010140408,0.00031874786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95218056,0.043194644,0.0011148276,0.0017732794,0.0013180659,0.00041859993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015458923,0.0011069092,0.0021403458,0.002625411,0.0009347826,0.0036387343,0.0023852647,0.00329928,0.008575494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.083778225,0.0011691767,0.0018065495,0.0018700858,0.0041309283,0.0051917196,0.0028569754,0.0037876791,0.0011820389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003674477,0.000023145702,0.0005415974,0.000078126504,0.000051924788,0.000044357752,0.00013726126,0.1725973,0.00009512671,0.81095684,0.00094646425,0.014491147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022945971,0.000014097978,0.00011158041,0.0000454972,0.000013838859,0.000021897686,0.000022384631,0.34275672,0.0000981475,0.65469635,0.0021796033,0.000016795975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047609215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035915647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015458923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024891994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002467868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08175558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093651162","doi":"10.1080/03610920008832539","title":"A multiple comparisons procedure for detecting differences between treatments and a control in two-factor experiments","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Confidence interval; Statistic; Test (biology); Mathematics; Control (management); Test statistic; Multiple comparisons problem; Factor (programming language); Computer science; Statistical hypothesis testing; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.22477659479494264,"score_gpt":0.5454785967800768,"score_spread":0.3207020019851342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093651162","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004112093,0.0004668986,0.9867806,0.00018606355,0.00082102756,0.0028661327,0.0007308721,0.0011480498,0.002888379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020498611,0.00053219264,0.9598312,0.00025278534,0.00015981394,0.016626135,0.00044480272,0.00022858212,0.001425965],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94551927,0.03155847,0.0031318967,0.006276497,0.012781922,0.00073194015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9357012,0.04739638,0.0047354577,0.008453459,0.003124827,0.0005886746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037547447,0.0040746653,0.0038311696,0.0045582987,0.0018018521,0.0017931713,0.004185848,0.0032152901,0.016223986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078549735,0.0011852421,0.0036230814,0.005200472,0.0036871503,0.0028562162,0.0030081633,0.007776076,0.0026371276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0053699054,0.0024995182,0.002485323,0.009113338,0.0021829605,0.0006609794,0.0015607537,0.010944886,0.107144564,0.15625814,0.032314114,0.66946554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004833077,0.053389173,0.02650398,0.0018698289,0.0028186438,0.0024963277,0.0010534793,0.111416355,0.21529324,0.34424728,0.23425739,0.0018212685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005451899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007163467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037547447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015282204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034417526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19857228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093931098","doi":"10.1007/s00184-011-0373-5","title":"An information theoretical algorithm for analyzing supersaturated designs for a binary response","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Bernoulli's principle; Entropy (arrow of time); Binary number; Measure (data warehouse); Algorithm; Binary data; Information theory; Statistics; Type I and type II errors; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.24055488432725156,"score_gpt":0.4568054255120258,"score_spread":0.21625054118477424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093931098","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012585369,0.000072236784,0.99772483,0.000070331706,0.000011454114,0.0001968403,0.000085269785,0.0001497128,0.00043085613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03686289,0.00014801264,0.959964,0.00014760597,0.00004194019,0.0017698895,0.00024712156,0.00009329273,0.00072524644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98181826,0.013125967,0.00069414644,0.0018394234,0.0020300979,0.0004920832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.899996,0.09179911,0.0020435285,0.002928783,0.0027693112,0.00046327815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027106827,0.002810887,0.0046219965,0.0046748193,0.0015823042,0.002699077,0.0034596422,0.0027118358,0.011347085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06879676,0.002651233,0.0036942672,0.0033107528,0.003576217,0.0037260181,0.0031289714,0.0036577953,0.0015845598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019013643,0.00047986506,0.0015288546,0.0011859079,0.00070811633,0.00012190067,0.00048304835,0.32244655,0.004463826,0.3550757,0.0038821711,0.30772266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032238654,0.0004164892,0.00033505698,0.00013417965,0.00014545783,0.000079712896,0.000052671436,0.71051514,0.0019746565,0.28353247,0.002440406,0.000051424173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002525398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025990028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027106827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033084988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075260587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14335626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093956415","doi":"10.1080/08982110601093679","title":"Imputation of Censored Response Data in a Bivariate Designed Experiment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pacific Institute for the Mathematical Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Bivariate analysis; Imputation (statistics); Bivariate data; Statistics; Multivariate statistics; Econometrics; Multivariate normal distribution; Computer science; Missing data; Data mining; Mathematics","score_opus":0.20312244162418633,"score_gpt":0.4854396034963143,"score_spread":0.28231716187212796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093956415","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017974002,0.00023131607,0.98060554,0.00017560214,0.00007088826,0.00021045023,0.00014579047,0.00014536438,0.0004409895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34607598,0.0005777183,0.65011984,0.00039783967,0.000067898836,0.0016871332,0.0002877452,0.00006116822,0.00072468404],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.90246654,0.08399447,0.002996346,0.0034581465,0.0062518995,0.00083250215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81202525,0.1503958,0.012741354,0.01898269,0.005058407,0.00079653866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.074060366,0.00081094616,0.0030901164,0.0012159363,0.0005646225,0.0016651398,0.002182652,0.0016536919,0.0027266329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1551896,0.00059564656,0.0018918692,0.0018563044,0.0018930204,0.0012274021,0.0016562776,0.002515331,0.00045228223],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009564274,0.0020170035,0.04778463,0.004293773,0.0030125964,0.0013813154,0.00175962,0.20535524,0.031575564,0.20297413,0.004439241,0.48584256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014427352,0.007679929,0.032058172,0.0016967505,0.0019302258,0.0009753283,0.0004277144,0.5772571,0.075051546,0.28627264,0.014743677,0.0004642557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040136007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037765788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074060366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000832043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016683812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39167333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095502480","doi":"10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00824.x","title":"Fractional Simplex Designs for Interaction Screening in Complex Mixtures","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Centroid; Simplex; Simplex algorithm; Computer science; Component (thermodynamics); Factor (programming language); Design of experiments; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Statistics; Combinatorics; Linear programming; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.5679953532525431,"score_gpt":0.54489968650042,"score_spread":0.023095666752123156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095502480","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004805874,0.00018767826,0.9938455,0.000036446956,0.000030332778,0.00031999277,0.00007064296,0.00021020611,0.00049335405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04960978,0.00021018782,0.9471398,0.000055330525,0.00002345198,0.002117591,0.00014321526,0.000062647014,0.00063802436],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9571094,0.036834102,0.0008636744,0.0021057015,0.0026210865,0.00046602826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.945466,0.046337564,0.0022080103,0.0031310632,0.0024278504,0.00042959733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031838845,0.002423375,0.0035056851,0.0028781374,0.0011238696,0.0018882235,0.0020084449,0.0018237706,0.007789251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07341833,0.0014715658,0.0024327207,0.002331768,0.002541505,0.0018249551,0.0024529602,0.0019638108,0.0011567308],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028133846,0.0005050065,0.002173067,0.001103688,0.0005758694,0.00013868198,0.0006671015,0.36079347,0.008197654,0.22379126,0.0021715483,0.39706925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056711567,0.0015085223,0.0014573025,0.00015715887,0.00016622255,0.00008643784,0.00010451201,0.8120085,0.007792627,0.16714753,0.008823965,0.00018021034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013677516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013900469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031838845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017602125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024371871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16838193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095999217","doi":"","title":"Variational bounds for mixed-data factor analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Binary data; Categorical variable; Exponential family; Algorithm; Quadratic equation; Simple (philosophy); Binary number; Missing data; Upper and lower bounds; Exponential function; Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Factor (programming language); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Statistics","score_opus":0.30993787660183986,"score_gpt":0.5271086331942241,"score_spread":0.21717075659238422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095999217","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002635077,0.00017109125,0.9991455,0.00008141079,0.000014550787,0.000014052934,0.000023360288,0.000061966435,0.00022453559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043247275,0.0007656513,0.9528036,0.0002517471,0.00018075119,0.0006569204,0.00041209318,0.00034189963,0.0013400223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846942,0.009790949,0.00065583596,0.0017771996,0.002615869,0.0004658899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9517168,0.039920185,0.0015855682,0.0031269828,0.0030359917,0.00061449286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025931846,0.0034756467,0.0029367607,0.0029814325,0.0013578999,0.0034848,0.005968547,0.0033257564,0.005903282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08130354,0.0021823042,0.0028703217,0.0031269153,0.004128963,0.0061301063,0.006738862,0.0073852492,0.0018425804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017511111,0.00010000889,0.0009069102,0.0004479797,0.00036866465,0.00008839096,0.00023645806,0.40503657,0.0020979743,0.4764699,0.0035044171,0.11056766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021553882,0.000037017773,0.00013518229,0.000051570933,0.000026669488,0.000032092965,0.000014984228,0.8018604,0.0009081251,0.19390388,0.0029796516,0.000028916427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003805725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036512357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025931846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034120006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033102431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13714236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097184733","doi":"10.3758/brm.41.3.664","title":"Randomization tests and the unequal-N/unequal-variance problem","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavior Research Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Variance (accounting); Statistics; Value (mathematics); Analysis of variance; Type I and type II errors; Word error rate; Mathematics; Computer science; Econometrics; Algorithm; Speech recognition; Economics","score_opus":0.5240400499227096,"score_gpt":0.6774203494091746,"score_spread":0.15338029948646503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097184733","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00856667,0.0009412034,0.97632015,0.0023247448,0.0011197305,0.0044712275,0.00045350322,0.00046295123,0.0053397813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11536841,0.00067431293,0.8476082,0.0017030988,0.00064733793,0.030759064,0.00026783592,0.00020949931,0.0027622846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.42166245,0.5301985,0.00895201,0.019109173,0.01766168,0.0024162778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.314367,0.6344628,0.012184663,0.031868637,0.005884018,0.001232878],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.28419727,0.004782096,0.011002441,0.0038659188,0.0034142274,0.004793652,0.008432619,0.010110954,0.024039496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5419312,0.0029667036,0.004719939,0.0044010277,0.01942963,0.01072504,0.0047995904,0.01009003,0.0022416124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009446756,0.0013526266,0.002242648,0.0025691988,0.0017609597,0.0004489811,0.0016612152,0.013018329,0.0011103564,0.7879118,0.009293205,0.16918406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060905013,0.0013769935,0.0013428999,0.0006321283,0.00041736843,0.00024792252,0.0001663153,0.049043886,0.0014205008,0.9298002,0.009275757,0.00018546738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014372051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001286311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28419727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005289868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066806288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8827122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099320460","doi":"10.1002/sim.6523","title":"Adaptive sampling in two‐phase designs: a biomarker study for progression in arthritis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Estimator; Computer science; Sampling (signal processing); Exploit; Adaptive sampling; Optimal design; Sample size determination; Phase (matter); Biomarker; Resource allocation; Statistics; Data mining; Machine learning; Mathematics; Monte Carlo method","score_opus":0.5332255921247048,"score_gpt":0.6223730082861888,"score_spread":0.08914741616148403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099320460","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04723827,0.00053769257,0.9494162,0.0005154008,0.00018249494,0.0011922498,0.00003879651,0.00008029085,0.00079857593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44776958,0.00044226492,0.5466694,0.00040852313,0.0001371501,0.003619292,0.00005923477,0.000023193972,0.0008713572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94425803,0.05155675,0.0005255619,0.0016458187,0.0017228436,0.00029107137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9181011,0.07045214,0.0037327213,0.004854066,0.0021760545,0.0006839235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048335806,0.0011457043,0.0014957471,0.00082375965,0.000621972,0.0010856666,0.0017256646,0.0022205715,0.0022012168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10776352,0.0006418145,0.001704307,0.00076570845,0.0025568036,0.0012166116,0.0016134768,0.0019528423,0.00023070857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019730628,0.0031273714,0.015033323,0.0020976965,0.0014782021,0.000508571,0.0012710196,0.20835947,0.014456812,0.4039982,0.0022854952,0.32765323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00652541,0.02579275,0.005794747,0.0003390126,0.0008386475,0.00026894364,0.0001730419,0.7286752,0.005841655,0.21846639,0.007048763,0.00023538478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045066405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046264284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048335806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007510737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017756892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25562721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101423867","doi":"10.1016/j.spl.2014.07.032","title":"Space-filling Latin hypercube designs based on randomization restrictions in factorial experiments","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics & Probability Letters","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Latin hypercube sampling; Fractional factorial design; Randomization; Factorial; Factorial experiment; Space (punctuation); Statistics; Combinatorics; Econometrics; Monte Carlo method; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Randomized controlled trial","score_opus":0.16819135320109907,"score_gpt":0.4025455546473535,"score_spread":0.2343542014462544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101423867","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029883245,0.00015302621,0.99538666,0.000103830665,0.000053501295,0.0003691711,0.00006022137,0.0001956341,0.0006895133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07421648,0.00031106637,0.9182881,0.00018778631,0.00008239216,0.0056952015,0.00013758749,0.00015259508,0.00092870713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8616956,0.12352913,0.0024640404,0.0045342,0.006421716,0.0013554697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83486915,0.14391626,0.006361345,0.010328978,0.0035452573,0.000979009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06040379,0.002876683,0.0061514173,0.002309439,0.0009991922,0.003154429,0.0036621632,0.003236574,0.008223211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1534339,0.0032330223,0.0025006367,0.0030450746,0.005534558,0.0049634627,0.0039463984,0.0041022683,0.0012479197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006702688,0.0006643674,0.00054159126,0.0020249682,0.00036619906,0.000107193104,0.00062253006,0.22841942,0.004568576,0.57272583,0.0027645968,0.180492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001799841,0.0014962144,0.0004541996,0.00029124477,0.00011579786,0.000055788412,0.00006268931,0.50260675,0.0041673896,0.4848894,0.0039305673,0.00013015245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006149137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005715937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06040379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020782186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005781658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3194496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102267569","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9469.2005.00417.x","title":"Marginal Regression for Binary Longitudinal Data in Adaptive Clinical Trials","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Statistics; Longitudinal data; Regression; Binary data; Marginal model; Binary number; Regression analysis; Econometrics; Data mining; Computer science; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.7341740624007648,"score_gpt":0.640240670026331,"score_spread":0.09393339237443377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102267569","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052013416,0.0008389381,0.99110013,0.0005947734,0.00013496914,0.0014243333,0.00013606327,0.00022386857,0.0003456037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12619409,0.000598152,0.8581516,0.000729867,0.00019060104,0.012407693,0.00034508223,0.0001129108,0.0012699928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5902411,0.3895987,0.0048766844,0.00899786,0.0051492145,0.0011364364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6262443,0.32710776,0.018058784,0.022094462,0.004946748,0.0015478849],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.28811744,0.0025126021,0.0068078316,0.0027882035,0.0008242107,0.0027948485,0.006435705,0.00526082,0.009551285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4018699,0.002770884,0.0036898453,0.0030211362,0.007281301,0.0056581427,0.005594913,0.006526632,0.00160029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008464995,0.00073410955,0.006300523,0.0039324625,0.0032280711,0.0004138039,0.00094709365,0.20487687,0.0019168617,0.5952606,0.0040792753,0.1698454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002994518,0.0019774952,0.0019766705,0.00053541746,0.0004751042,0.00013663377,0.000058277506,0.6326206,0.0012484991,0.3532794,0.004568042,0.00012924903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011216663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007594086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28811744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028847628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039372505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87787795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103104637","doi":"10.1081/sta-120029833","title":"Bayesian Minimally Supported <i>D</i> -Optimal Designs for an Exponential Regression Model","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Heteroscedasticity; Applied mathematics; Prior probability; Optimal design; Exponential function; Bayesian probability; Nonlinear regression; Polynomial regression; Polynomial; Bayesian information criterion; Variance (accounting); Regression analysis; Bayesian linear regression; Variance function; Function (biology); Regression; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Bayesian inference; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.23821428598294192,"score_gpt":0.5421395109583911,"score_spread":0.30392522497544916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103104637","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024305195,0.00010389399,0.9744231,0.00012712288,0.000011678604,0.00017005244,0.000041907726,0.000054111635,0.0007627799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29993486,0.00016668819,0.6977911,0.00017126223,0.00002473972,0.0012895593,0.00012106994,0.000036197467,0.00046451922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97637886,0.019442994,0.00071566727,0.0014930461,0.0015908314,0.0003785537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9545468,0.036524937,0.0034194894,0.0030035942,0.001967768,0.0005372928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023041107,0.0010893729,0.0018903814,0.0010829907,0.0004158635,0.0010786718,0.0014076895,0.0016954965,0.0021227733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07525607,0.0010197024,0.0008528368,0.00068206724,0.0019259306,0.0014545518,0.0022054017,0.0012534204,0.00037286174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041714376,0.0006675197,0.0030030983,0.0007665935,0.0002791873,0.00017699627,0.0005212728,0.18506321,0.0139715,0.5432472,0.0010213669,0.2471105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009338324,0.0021609154,0.0016881701,0.00025113235,0.00013294166,0.000117492134,0.000116507785,0.5762244,0.009015362,0.40576977,0.0034750905,0.00011446459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035579578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030158463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023041107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009314953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017617288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12185454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104082640","doi":"10.1002/pst.483","title":"Additional results for ‘Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs’","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Theratechnologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Bioequivalence; Crossover; Sample size determination; Statistics; Crossover study; Type I and type II errors; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Medicine; Pharmacology; Artificial intelligence; Pharmacokinetics","score_opus":0.8859019112477156,"score_gpt":0.5762477195149607,"score_spread":0.3096541917327549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104082640","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027928895,0.01309426,0.9052243,0.013272235,0.0075499616,0.0017781118,0.0018444968,0.0009258583,0.053517763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05487785,0.013240094,0.8710603,0.012575072,0.0054513817,0.0063033137,0.002574557,0.0010071481,0.032910287],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9185553,0.056944307,0.0033642284,0.0028020283,0.01713886,0.001195305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6730087,0.284691,0.0042459276,0.011139587,0.025820296,0.0010944617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10602961,0.002756048,0.0029662016,0.004615356,0.0014154399,0.001802661,0.0022729782,0.0036649357,0.064219244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2563116,0.0012308664,0.0066641252,0.0058428347,0.0022933085,0.004404686,0.0021623909,0.006972219,0.00974714],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020718528,0.0013412564,0.00087997195,0.006080028,0.00075796206,0.00035381305,0.00055799144,0.010422769,0.002452469,0.32653773,0.16170092,0.48684323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022293348,0.0038827115,0.0040534404,0.0029899355,0.0009985289,0.0008330821,0.00015278335,0.04676232,0.0109756375,0.5031928,0.42353082,0.0003986343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027487564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019402464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10602961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029713644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048500793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5607449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104919849","doi":"10.1007/s10463-006-0033-0","title":"Classification of Three-word Indicator Functions of Two-level Factorial Designs","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Mathematics; Factorial experiment; Factorial; Function (biology); Statistics; Word (group theory); Mathematical analysis; Geometry","score_opus":0.44937214145692117,"score_gpt":0.4780368278204825,"score_spread":0.028664686363561342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104919849","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048327208,0.000756918,0.946464,0.00041782568,0.00015758391,0.00026039465,0.00027799158,0.0006147291,0.002723333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44277376,0.00068377383,0.55039513,0.00045306806,0.00023565485,0.002053779,0.0013559319,0.00039898025,0.0016499211],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9592555,0.025223363,0.0037646357,0.0034718278,0.006548538,0.0017362095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69736385,0.25834242,0.011840585,0.017973661,0.011690294,0.002789177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047498725,0.0018089062,0.0030833185,0.0063345106,0.0013868819,0.00683942,0.0029330547,0.003900386,0.005582106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21061093,0.00070755195,0.0024925892,0.0039893347,0.0046006823,0.0071547837,0.0030290831,0.003971623,0.0011558078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003020985,0.00062401715,0.011780127,0.0014387601,0.0002097325,0.00015425362,0.0013512421,0.013582284,0.0077806683,0.43118712,0.0042253183,0.5246455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033691392,0.0008006644,0.009191835,0.00070097187,0.00018085925,0.00030269916,0.00036312643,0.25261772,0.0057143504,0.7228726,0.0067337756,0.00018449391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044919364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002992033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047498725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030140795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033413453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25120026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104944547","doi":"10.1111/j.1751-5823.2007.00015_11.x","title":"Modern Experimental Design by Thomas P. Ryan","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Statistical Review","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Citation; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.23279022890008683,"score_gpt":0.547922591138043,"score_spread":0.31513236223795615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104944547","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013643974,0.16294783,0.7868431,0.028336927,0.00969493,0.0006656168,0.0005306765,0.00043497482,0.009181448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04483126,0.22613019,0.66370153,0.020800972,0.015049731,0.0067083747,0.0006040368,0.00077858445,0.021395314],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9690465,0.020439357,0.0012121821,0.0028079287,0.0062085683,0.00028550057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.945065,0.044934075,0.0019388339,0.0024603298,0.005008876,0.0005927761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041071136,0.0019202132,0.002772592,0.0028506538,0.00079111,0.0021458769,0.0015528721,0.0022250833,0.005311419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06437394,0.0015993128,0.0017965279,0.0034082797,0.005555839,0.0025933648,0.0017589426,0.00886843,0.0029766369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089462666,0.0001795422,0.0012650028,0.004741762,0.00072806707,0.0001655158,0.0004983119,0.011444316,0.003353652,0.18869579,0.1875586,0.60047483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003296128,0.0009052859,0.0023940962,0.0023145897,0.00045121208,0.00053950126,0.00009496806,0.010143237,0.0029713144,0.33676082,0.6428522,0.00024316994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018156352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013519343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041071136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00196818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005491722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21720749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105936640","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2007.05.025","title":"Robust prediction and extrapolation designs for misspecified generalized linear regression models","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Extrapolation; Mathematics; Regression; Linear regression; Nonlinear regression; Regression analysis; Minimax; Robust regression; Linear model; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Proper linear model; Nonlinear system; Econometrics; Bayesian multivariate linear regression; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.47448533544856053,"score_gpt":0.5029415616939009,"score_spread":0.028456226245340388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105936640","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010855413,0.0001965907,0.98766845,0.00011469177,0.00003939091,0.00041206882,0.00007473521,0.00026081916,0.00037774202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23282368,0.00029124212,0.76064676,0.00026013915,0.00007641832,0.0042028395,0.00040416865,0.00016389482,0.001130863],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8912065,0.09747513,0.0018897224,0.004945045,0.0035805958,0.0009029813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7622874,0.2060446,0.008777773,0.016740223,0.005073755,0.0010763325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10780184,0.0025795824,0.0040277177,0.0015719568,0.00090338907,0.0015637223,0.0051016402,0.003720254,0.005548325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20360799,0.0022216558,0.0027905975,0.0012126473,0.002877255,0.0039947308,0.0042283437,0.0047191395,0.00077252235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020382943,0.0017420233,0.005164854,0.0017776483,0.0021847335,0.00042820285,0.001063307,0.36828852,0.0071798055,0.27069306,0.0023064162,0.31878844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018388154,0.0033780874,0.0019502016,0.00022463291,0.00058648334,0.000105346495,0.000060013404,0.75543946,0.0050255633,0.22915691,0.002115406,0.00011913142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006396009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005337025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10780184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012709536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035370153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5701175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107733460","doi":"10.1080/10691898.2007.11889458","title":"A Bubble Mixture Experiment Project for Use in an Advanced Design of Experiments Class","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistics Education","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Camosun College; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Procter and Gamble","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Design of experiments; Computer science; Focus (optics); Soap bubble; Ideal (ethics); Mathematics education; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.27217178740500675,"score_gpt":0.5405196164625709,"score_spread":0.2683478290575641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107733460","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009047692,0.000105633415,0.9607766,0.00081069383,0.0007593705,0.013167759,0.0015066268,0.007825612,0.006000042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012674168,0.00009312427,0.94893014,0.00030027732,0.00007332147,0.032262355,0.0004603947,0.0008144119,0.004391764],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991452,0.005188377,0.0004350927,0.0009200697,0.0016101379,0.00039440236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9606874,0.026487514,0.0012012834,0.0050610565,0.004297881,0.0022649302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030351968,0.0022791082,0.0019990907,0.0010758358,0.0011773418,0.0018153759,0.0033256158,0.0022291162,0.047128845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043657344,0.0012765876,0.0017421186,0.0007024846,0.0010578134,0.0014256001,0.0029723705,0.004957423,0.007819776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070672026,0.009596749,0.002701702,0.0038148502,0.00058243674,0.0015346417,0.0053922543,0.017383447,0.08737467,0.045980565,0.16660249,0.6519691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072933757,0.018452318,0.0053926324,0.0010551028,0.00039224807,0.0013233538,0.0007144745,0.08580132,0.070215836,0.072106466,0.736881,0.00037181439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030689163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044322418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047128845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007363229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026773785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16051847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108484033","doi":"10.1287/ited.1080.0008","title":"An Interactive Spreadsheet-Based Tool to Support Teaching Design of Experiments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFORMS Transactions on Education","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Factor (programming language); Set (abstract data type); Replication (statistics); Software; Simple (philosophy); Product (mathematics); Programming language; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14078575005690017,"score_gpt":0.470903571447055,"score_spread":0.3301178213901549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108484033","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003442268,0.00039215383,0.91448164,0.00069164037,0.0006127956,0.0036619168,0.007892418,0.05643559,0.0123895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011782041,0.0005205946,0.95554936,0.00073819933,0.00017006003,0.012843754,0.0042685843,0.004472935,0.009654581],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595237,0.0017908522,0.0004573156,0.00043472162,0.0012204518,0.0001443356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92146677,0.06863481,0.0014201839,0.003326394,0.004226193,0.0009255866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010475643,0.003025002,0.001565727,0.0028806154,0.00045350727,0.0014623104,0.0038480435,0.0014895961,0.107643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03924672,0.001302913,0.00091247726,0.0017776019,0.00056933676,0.0015464659,0.0019637079,0.003299534,0.022090174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014658248,0.0016795334,0.0007976087,0.0042969943,0.00025874135,0.000702949,0.00078112044,0.020324634,0.030291537,0.012731546,0.23397182,0.6926977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041364105,0.0015936587,0.0037219315,0.002235262,0.0003747633,0.001042547,0.0002500374,0.14131545,0.055793136,0.052986484,0.73617023,0.00038020234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066040404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080471404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094726105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021104277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36010176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108875588","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2008.016369","title":"Design-for-six-sigma for multiple response systems","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Six Sigma; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Sigma; Design for Six Sigma; Mathematical optimization; Control theory (sociology); Computer science; Control engineering; Control (management); Manufacturing engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.24449466712966555,"score_gpt":0.4820971252253927,"score_spread":0.23760245809572716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108875588","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002521963,0.000384323,0.99423355,0.00007907949,0.000030842446,0.00010392176,0.000015923108,0.00024004262,0.0023904147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23292553,0.00066409097,0.762324,0.00017874652,0.000040429146,0.0007600789,0.00010134926,0.00007586106,0.002929925],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723417,0.0013190198,0.00012354013,0.00024078636,0.0009602733,0.00012224601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987179,0.000672146,0.00017979491,0.00012466245,0.00027836664,0.000027187018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003303237,0.0010434834,0.0009684846,0.00056607794,0.0005204168,0.0010585332,0.0008133352,0.0010444192,0.0044134874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036499766,0.00039857673,0.0008304735,0.00051495485,0.000836586,0.0005468829,0.00089885143,0.0014568099,0.0008045113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035934357,0.00017184514,0.0008037301,0.0012759911,0.00015050807,0.00016799055,0.00032724687,0.5711903,0.01786414,0.12952451,0.0023413682,0.27582306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020469508,0.0008894394,0.0002863579,0.00014256468,0.000056675217,0.00013351023,0.000051276213,0.89540654,0.012831328,0.06911837,0.020831022,0.00004833774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080064114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010782804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044134874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009950423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012753512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017469347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110690304","doi":"","title":"Identification of correlated characteristics in a linear statistical tolerance design","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Allowance (engineering); Computer science; Variance (accounting); Probabilistic logic; Simple (philosophy); Design of experiments; Component (thermodynamics); Identification (biology); Statistical model; Mechanical engineering; Biological system; Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.13028778071775277,"score_gpt":0.45177660681909426,"score_spread":0.3214888261013415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110690304","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056172483,0.00008117464,0.9420018,0.00005960835,0.000009621536,0.0000745454,0.000031300628,0.0002419799,0.001327512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9072136,0.00006300454,0.09131303,0.000044469893,0.000011729957,0.0002569096,0.00007175177,0.000042499563,0.0009830932],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996427,0.0014438545,0.00015435492,0.0005697002,0.0011167398,0.00028844088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919137,0.0048938994,0.001448484,0.00038195585,0.0012317157,0.00013018414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003676912,0.0009505217,0.00082664157,0.001177837,0.00032912914,0.0011409046,0.0010704105,0.0007331843,0.0015518352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009833839,0.0006369025,0.0009647093,0.00069154974,0.0009437581,0.0008465863,0.0009435338,0.0007302538,0.00029354155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011885038,0.000079692,0.001139937,0.00008250147,0.00006018629,0.000042368196,0.00006174368,0.96934265,0.003275919,0.0055298484,0.00007177524,0.020194622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074729005,0.0002029373,0.0002525316,0.000006385434,0.000016570124,0.000015231842,0.0000068218005,0.9964212,0.0016370823,0.0012702574,0.00015695782,0.0000065920703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015903807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097085617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003676912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00120886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012915523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019445598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110742637","doi":"10.1046/j.1467-9876.2003.05029.x","title":"Designing Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Experiments with Few Whole-Plot Factors","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Split plot; Restricted randomization; Plot (graphics); Factorial; Factorial experiment; Mathematics; Design of experiments; Main effect; Statistics; Table (database); Computer science; Algorithm; Arithmetic; Data mining; Randomization","score_opus":0.07178356171609879,"score_gpt":0.369274802522208,"score_spread":0.2974912408061092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110742637","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032664675,0.00009850964,0.96316373,0.00010946668,0.00008098322,0.001875776,0.0001543086,0.00054995064,0.0013025614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1088617,0.00008220976,0.8850255,0.00011318761,0.000026509746,0.0050858827,0.00015567912,0.00011090716,0.0005384313],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9719153,0.02160563,0.0011031611,0.002131885,0.00275346,0.0004905922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9174437,0.061225098,0.005410724,0.009637566,0.005421416,0.00086147507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032405905,0.0010605247,0.0017578447,0.001148529,0.0008056106,0.0012868874,0.0015362215,0.0009828049,0.0051567894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08540112,0.0008435465,0.0012223073,0.00088821654,0.001624919,0.001509282,0.0011419386,0.001495797,0.0011571462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010388012,0.0025255769,0.012622119,0.004433426,0.0008118822,0.00035883568,0.0018117287,0.15420158,0.0990926,0.1597924,0.0084699765,0.54549193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004172916,0.017217657,0.012398235,0.0007321381,0.00057239464,0.00033772446,0.0006469555,0.48072323,0.11974079,0.32369593,0.039355468,0.000406534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027325677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048287874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032405905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010221184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016608111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17138082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111060966","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00763.x","title":"Robustness of Design in Dose–Response Studies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Mean squared error; Mathematics; Quadratic equation; Simulated annealing; Statistics; Mean value; Population; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.5021927126025718,"score_gpt":0.4926546344217619,"score_spread":0.009538078180809928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111060966","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013990485,0.00070383935,0.9817385,0.0005288435,0.00014810989,0.00094197184,0.00025800342,0.00030340455,0.0013867662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42719308,0.0005575328,0.5620697,0.0010345977,0.00017734585,0.007218435,0.000570612,0.00025283595,0.00092589273],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.62009764,0.33594915,0.009982935,0.016851988,0.015537118,0.0015811943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34299985,0.5699993,0.027721724,0.048045505,0.010414999,0.0008186579],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27111602,0.002638535,0.004550058,0.002497141,0.0009991479,0.003775288,0.0035428097,0.0042792405,0.004203611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5093847,0.0013787413,0.0048025567,0.0016721572,0.006269264,0.0031938294,0.0035818405,0.004706056,0.0007306242],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0054476126,0.000556972,0.015171555,0.0039292388,0.0066180956,0.00046577572,0.0008057483,0.5384016,0.010859534,0.27651614,0.0029280703,0.13829963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016252351,0.005759994,0.010045637,0.0008864343,0.0017515767,0.00028158576,0.0002222362,0.46940544,0.015149369,0.47575238,0.018794844,0.00032515454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088004884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041006794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.728884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037473622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002838705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8988437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111591386","doi":"10.1002/mren.201400048","title":"Design of Optimal Experiments for Terpolymerization Reactivity Ratio Estimation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Macromolecular Reaction Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reactivity (psychology); Heuristics; Chemistry; Mathematics; Optimal design; Composition (language); Thermodynamics; Statistics; Mathematical optimization; Physics","score_opus":0.1416078855675469,"score_gpt":0.40260992708605464,"score_spread":0.26100204151850775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111591386","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044744186,0.00025015598,0.95261073,0.000090134425,0.000036907866,0.00065626524,0.00007520542,0.0003065481,0.0012299571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5820654,0.00022186876,0.4142638,0.000098777986,0.000017956294,0.002590322,0.000121050485,0.000051168674,0.0005696251],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684346,0.0018133016,0.0001085712,0.0005534737,0.0003684919,0.000312633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99330986,0.0048780874,0.0008600578,0.00028255233,0.00050169334,0.00016776565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059466083,0.0017014602,0.0022018838,0.0009805135,0.00041389826,0.0013927798,0.0011219387,0.0013670652,0.0020281815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009893504,0.001016537,0.0011288433,0.0004336606,0.0008780892,0.0007559752,0.0009831233,0.0017825646,0.00026191148],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013306423,0.00065076584,0.00075950724,0.0005296479,0.00012233989,0.000067181754,0.00006951499,0.9244941,0.022090595,0.010683496,0.00028709974,0.038915135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018793091,0.00091404264,0.00033797332,0.000024449164,0.000056958615,0.000012751494,0.000022049506,0.9760651,0.01688979,0.0047211256,0.0007439286,0.000023940538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077975466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007899691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059466083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011480149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002703055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03144902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124694383","doi":"10.1002/sim.2329","title":"Interval estimation of the mean response in a log‐regression model","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"National Cancer Institute; American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities","keywords":"Statistics; Regression analysis; Mathematics; Sample size determination; Prediction interval; Confidence interval; Interval estimation; Interval (graph theory); Regression; Inference; Econometrics; Computer science","score_opus":0.15493030895431098,"score_gpt":0.5154423581120995,"score_spread":0.3605120491577885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124694383","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071792887,0.00019457616,0.99187976,0.000085258966,0.000020598774,0.000052349893,0.00005137281,0.00013539968,0.0004014401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36990136,0.000650854,0.62640554,0.00022083455,0.00011716238,0.00093201024,0.00049641903,0.000104896164,0.0011710213],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771752,0.01709473,0.0006081892,0.0021764457,0.0024953217,0.0004502307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8838178,0.106106326,0.0035652362,0.0035292355,0.0025417197,0.00043975151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02637091,0.00091716833,0.0023867255,0.001763965,0.00037892064,0.0013205367,0.0028428545,0.0022207692,0.0028344183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106121354,0.00056489353,0.0013723616,0.0015927675,0.0013804546,0.0021384554,0.0016182346,0.0029668715,0.0005028433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020308513,0.000623097,0.0130162025,0.0010173772,0.0007276587,0.00047534276,0.0009506733,0.4207107,0.007750339,0.20728917,0.0030941807,0.34231436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112477595,0.00041491186,0.0026349206,0.000084180865,0.00011286053,0.0001650599,0.00006259646,0.91565734,0.0022151629,0.07656909,0.001894813,0.00007659946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010185015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005286769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02637091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083002134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011152145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13946438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124704652","doi":"10.1115/1.1829728","title":"A Model-Based Formulation of Robust Design","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mechanical Design","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Design matrix; Probabilistic design; Computer science; Design of experiments; Norm (philosophy); Isotropy; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Engineering design process; Engineering; Machine learning; Regression analysis; Statistics","score_opus":0.384120982725377,"score_gpt":0.4468542260209646,"score_spread":0.0627332432955876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124704652","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018764644,0.00026083348,0.9952114,0.00018844158,0.000037674192,0.000024304925,0.00003980064,0.000042763677,0.0040071895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22853221,0.0043093944,0.74644095,0.0007817315,0.00078452885,0.0015662599,0.00047849654,0.00021279798,0.01689366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981646,0.0006825719,0.0000903931,0.0003726302,0.0006083815,0.00008139985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986625,0.0007456033,0.00016248427,0.00013834408,0.00025581752,0.00003525563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002705142,0.0017103155,0.0012477047,0.00093029434,0.00042442052,0.0021366572,0.002048666,0.0022113759,0.006590365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040091393,0.00068326824,0.0015043468,0.00079801097,0.0018243352,0.0014619771,0.0015171025,0.002392225,0.0020184692],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017610946,0.000022651493,0.00009306732,0.00027049985,0.000044478318,0.00009007242,0.000065031716,0.36271888,0.0018010654,0.6082784,0.0021010442,0.02449721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023646842,0.00013376486,0.000080280384,0.00009611549,0.000040308194,0.000099245895,0.000024385728,0.68139464,0.0010327906,0.29039487,0.0266483,0.0000316192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001866441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001385986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006590365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015364931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016022887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022046983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125878398","doi":"10.1002/mren.200900033","title":"Design of Optimal Sequential Experiments to Improve Model Predictions from a Polyethylene Molecular Weight Distribution Model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Macromolecular Reaction Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Maxima and minima; Design of experiments; Optimal design; Estimation theory; Computer science; Experimental data; Work (physics); Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Mathematics; Statistics; Machine learning; Engineering","score_opus":0.050816237668299624,"score_gpt":0.3529426931396546,"score_spread":0.30212645547135497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125878398","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0919349,0.000093960494,0.9067837,0.00007023123,0.000019508367,0.00019399935,0.000032885022,0.00011052295,0.00076026836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7003426,0.000112428315,0.29827338,0.000041771047,0.000009789179,0.00063209696,0.000057723428,0.000022026828,0.0005081876],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.998228,0.00093455566,0.00009392751,0.00031461284,0.00029762211,0.00013129142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942397,0.0043688733,0.00063525734,0.0002644893,0.00037692423,0.00011478067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005484409,0.00079057686,0.0010466933,0.0006244096,0.00030206112,0.0006770326,0.00076766504,0.00055341574,0.0014544243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008833818,0.0006591659,0.00062459375,0.0003118273,0.00072152604,0.00065777433,0.000833712,0.00084356015,0.00013950751],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010600608,0.00034749205,0.0009568079,0.00020120457,0.000054030344,0.000038337224,0.00005181761,0.9008087,0.030494323,0.013632555,0.00015901921,0.052195594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103892984,0.00055916887,0.00018706926,0.000009086677,0.000014397415,0.000006167886,0.000006887326,0.98014635,0.014496097,0.0041512367,0.00030666206,0.00001295721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009370026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008147524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005484409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082017435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017880193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029004633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129917462","doi":"10.4141/a03-123","title":"The use of MIXED models in the analysis of animal experiments with repeated measures data","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Animal Science","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":534,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeated measures design; Covariance; Akaike information criterion; Mixed model; Statistics; Univariate; Mathematics; Missing data; Linear model; Random effects model; Analysis of covariance; Analysis of variance; Generalized linear mixed model; Bayesian information criterion; Bayesian probability; Multivariate statistics; Econometrics; Medicine","score_opus":0.4737523180852924,"score_gpt":0.44749795533439074,"score_spread":0.02625436275090165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129917462","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015789656,0.0036155519,0.9912913,0.00048450948,0.00046664945,0.00041377975,0.00041241548,0.0004763305,0.0012606014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029526,0.0045960727,0.9583024,0.0005509208,0.0006627026,0.004250515,0.0007434186,0.00031559152,0.0010523205],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.8924826,0.08958675,0.0034739466,0.005871509,0.007970753,0.00061439973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83396226,0.14435504,0.008366985,0.0072197705,0.0054724244,0.0006235208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07855636,0.0033046757,0.0057146433,0.004244281,0.0017663067,0.0051946463,0.0051323604,0.0031479103,0.0042251786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12450459,0.0015959692,0.0066188686,0.0069231964,0.0025885038,0.0035825965,0.003786819,0.0077463677,0.001360413],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010692943,0.0005133202,0.010023195,0.008471839,0.008563389,0.0010381178,0.0029050692,0.11563744,0.00304689,0.4026632,0.019059915,0.4270082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034489296,0.002724755,0.0056192344,0.0028430196,0.0027627416,0.0008464897,0.00072860776,0.36775878,0.0041967225,0.5077343,0.103890784,0.0005497342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002914062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043340735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07855636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002831237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041763876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4154507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131073835","doi":"10.1002/cjs.10041","title":"Testing for order among <i>K</i> populations: theory and examples","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nonparametric statistics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Statistic; Stochastic ordering; Test statistic; Statistics; Econometrics; Test (biology); Mathematics; Limiting; Observational study; Order (exchange); Order statistic; Computer science; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.23722008250568363,"score_gpt":0.4240020428956637,"score_spread":0.18678196038998005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131073835","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05181884,0.0011442291,0.93751085,0.0014295201,0.000054402375,0.00012170229,0.0001131652,0.00019262116,0.007614603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5670585,0.0007774144,0.42923325,0.00042283937,0.00009772881,0.00039311123,0.00018863338,0.000057733287,0.0017706521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946439,0.0033636848,0.00023511949,0.0004634542,0.0011196285,0.00017410952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8663203,0.12553273,0.002042293,0.002304045,0.0030229138,0.0007776883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015538518,0.00051645,0.0013376736,0.0019287254,0.0009945342,0.0013159422,0.0014285545,0.0015804456,0.0027110428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062691934,0.00031693387,0.001021238,0.0016197058,0.004008048,0.0018614393,0.00138859,0.0017960276,0.0002835528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041762073,0.00029350392,0.016601108,0.00043391774,0.00014177871,0.00083963596,0.0007389589,0.1338853,0.0015719321,0.70775115,0.007570184,0.12975483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009339396,0.00015897836,0.0022394315,0.00007522665,0.000035111992,0.00036663294,0.00012934046,0.31049204,0.00091698987,0.68323344,0.0022174465,0.000042021467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024601128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018416204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015538518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014561899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012413001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08217651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132337369","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2011.11.001","title":"A Semi parametric approach to dual modeling","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parametric statistics; Variance (accounting); Nonparametric statistics; Dual (grammatical number); Computer science; Parametric model; Regression analysis; Mathematical optimization; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.1952088514838664,"score_gpt":0.4235144844043999,"score_spread":0.22830563292053352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132337369","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005713935,0.00007663154,0.99794954,0.000090361646,0.000016849344,0.000018346058,0.00003026225,0.000034867997,0.001211871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18656272,0.00079904846,0.8023378,0.0004316298,0.0002484627,0.0008401657,0.00026312505,0.00016043869,0.008356501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924879,0.0046893093,0.0002635873,0.00091188465,0.0013916322,0.00025564843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99188095,0.00517243,0.0008583689,0.000964607,0.00094039284,0.00018337218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008905094,0.0014923946,0.0015386927,0.0017845088,0.0005701276,0.0024404782,0.0027204081,0.0017631658,0.0070075234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01698554,0.00096755504,0.0023579348,0.0014154183,0.001837987,0.0022410953,0.0036001701,0.0031771013,0.0013000409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013484214,0.0001453346,0.0011031849,0.0002719411,0.00017194609,0.00015827475,0.00018636932,0.28819373,0.002873371,0.62972915,0.0023494659,0.074682474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020695416,0.00010428865,0.00017953184,0.000033406614,0.000035993176,0.000086201464,0.000021346616,0.82978725,0.0009881398,0.1619544,0.006760574,0.000028217657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010497046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007462056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008905094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013347549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001879444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04709524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132714854","doi":"10.1139/x00-138","title":"Variance and efficiency of the combined estimator in incomplete block designs of use in forest genetics: a numerical study","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Statistics; Efficiency; Bias of an estimator; Mathematics; Efficient estimator; Minimum-variance unbiased estimator; Stein's unbiased risk estimate; Mean squared error; Variance (accounting); Monte Carlo method","score_opus":0.31459587934654504,"score_gpt":0.47413797042589395,"score_spread":0.1595420910793489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132714854","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071560405,0.0018354704,0.9241027,0.00016815914,0.000034501958,0.00022506085,0.00014009788,0.0001498028,0.0017837982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36440307,0.00079289934,0.6320506,0.000051079478,0.000037582842,0.0009021488,0.00032204873,0.00012271409,0.001317915],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.96518,0.026771097,0.0010083652,0.0017022032,0.0047484892,0.00058985717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59474725,0.37944368,0.0064522782,0.00963151,0.009089674,0.0006356089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.070667244,0.0007280966,0.0020816212,0.0022571578,0.0006113324,0.0015687324,0.0017139913,0.001673879,0.001968374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22430263,0.00060514326,0.0016043955,0.0023492856,0.00169748,0.0022194362,0.001423029,0.0015525861,0.00047478869],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015507007,0.000316564,0.02519076,0.0009287012,0.0007219025,0.00026467134,0.00059815496,0.6839946,0.0032700738,0.10080622,0.0015474271,0.1808103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019605436,0.0005669387,0.0068665757,0.00022525317,0.00024241942,0.0002850029,0.00011463561,0.9483185,0.0025661786,0.038236845,0.0023024532,0.000079171135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024065627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023785343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070667244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018726677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017434551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37372857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132912577","doi":"10.1111/0272-4332.214140","title":"Limitations to Empirical Extrapolation Studies: The Case of BMD Ratios","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Extrapolation; Benchmark (surveying); Computer science; Process (computing); Econometrics; Data mining; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5544835754753674,"score_gpt":0.5725686033294992,"score_spread":0.018085027854131797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132912577","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026015526,0.041857596,0.84693915,0.045554154,0.0018532743,0.0016451859,0.001266976,0.00062183803,0.034246307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5533714,0.025636006,0.387938,0.022325508,0.0028350665,0.0040900363,0.0005763716,0.00040825675,0.002819388],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6340052,0.3140399,0.012198235,0.009265775,0.029536426,0.00095452805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.14778996,0.79433846,0.013595095,0.031057695,0.012668069,0.0005507662],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.38417304,0.002034941,0.0036875096,0.003338852,0.0010467577,0.0044160043,0.006830467,0.004349833,0.0049072984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7626503,0.0011142291,0.002977649,0.0044712,0.0074061644,0.00914036,0.005838327,0.008744826,0.0011403733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017753325,0.00027181424,0.031022852,0.008430441,0.0038818675,0.0007902325,0.0030000068,0.051464487,0.0009191574,0.3053402,0.015662085,0.5774415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005035979,0.001303696,0.009743293,0.006808456,0.0015375699,0.0020027682,0.0012734965,0.069490395,0.0027738952,0.8282412,0.07604945,0.00027212614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031059757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018840554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61582696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022971446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040541263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7594243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133763020","doi":"10.1002/asmb.504","title":"Efficiency measure, modelling and estimation in combined array designs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Weighting; Measure (data warehouse); Mathematics; Variance (accounting); Statistics; Parametric statistics; Minification; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Data mining","score_opus":0.1822536033017244,"score_gpt":0.3617884531755646,"score_spread":0.17953484987384016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133763020","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043962845,0.00010437158,0.99503314,0.000028239958,0.000005095586,0.00002894601,0.000010401986,0.00005810267,0.00033534467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26528928,0.00027255272,0.73129296,0.00008027316,0.0000621678,0.0008915515,0.00016931271,0.0001434032,0.0017984981],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9674297,0.023772905,0.00090203376,0.0022376142,0.0052729016,0.00038485212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9048568,0.07937423,0.005449092,0.0066161156,0.0034346222,0.00026914512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03098538,0.001780431,0.0022470495,0.0022285741,0.00037211107,0.0020019505,0.0022110497,0.001972178,0.0017807906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088859275,0.0011930623,0.001825506,0.0018233072,0.0022123463,0.002696857,0.0023812244,0.001638431,0.0006138971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004158232,0.0001821087,0.0028940518,0.00039303233,0.0006136716,0.00009991771,0.00019656707,0.71899027,0.006391468,0.086951114,0.00062807975,0.18224394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005931378,0.00048469793,0.0015635762,0.000056768098,0.000111988265,0.000063455074,0.000024424993,0.9356222,0.0039752107,0.056142047,0.0018538148,0.000042569558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006824733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057304336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03098538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001294262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012280341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16386831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134387151","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01229.x","title":"On the Role of Baseline Measurements for Crossover Designs under the Self and Mixed Carryover Effects Model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Crossover; Baseline (sea); Optimal design; Crossover study; Design of experiments; Lagrange multiplier; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Medicine; Machine learning","score_opus":0.2673972802127009,"score_gpt":0.4347266216222311,"score_spread":0.16732934140953015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134387151","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023649387,0.001148673,0.9721619,0.00061950047,0.00008510276,0.00033329183,0.00009741626,0.00017284538,0.0017318183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26083773,0.0010575437,0.7335253,0.0006428755,0.00016288577,0.0018475031,0.00014662789,0.00013292993,0.0016466609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.77293503,0.20724216,0.0026839466,0.006903033,0.00909929,0.0011365509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45186576,0.5068075,0.015659198,0.019477613,0.005137843,0.001052048],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.23012392,0.001400615,0.0030540046,0.0017472735,0.0010174424,0.0020366663,0.0022107689,0.0026019264,0.0042756763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34385905,0.0013530505,0.0023283993,0.001724185,0.004067867,0.005172891,0.0024498142,0.0031966541,0.00040568554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048783426,0.00080758496,0.013337305,0.0016638605,0.0011826176,0.00035008756,0.0013653033,0.13731883,0.0043583983,0.56590015,0.00186296,0.26697463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011458842,0.0066563464,0.012307004,0.0006058144,0.000746261,0.00030063753,0.00021635366,0.60624653,0.008261626,0.35565746,0.0076117213,0.00024440515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010059385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009587809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23012392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00221228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038573365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9493943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134800676","doi":"10.1002/pst.1721","title":"Optimal adaptive sequential designs for crossover bioequivalence studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bioequivalence; Sequential analysis; Crossover; Sample size determination; Statistics; Mathematics; Crossover study; Adaptive design; Type I and type II errors; Nominal level; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Confidence interval; Medicine; Machine learning; Clinical trial","score_opus":0.8262700275298006,"score_gpt":0.64127193821718,"score_spread":0.18499808931262063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134800676","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02360701,0.00042669915,0.9738461,0.00007065251,0.000054130775,0.0011976709,0.00004764558,0.00011734753,0.0006327531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21834087,0.00039120545,0.77605134,0.00013468275,0.000055648692,0.0044296696,0.000093135466,0.000041735464,0.000461799],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.96221274,0.03262319,0.0010890348,0.0016460433,0.002105734,0.0003233024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9718292,0.023267727,0.002040635,0.0014107925,0.0012354535,0.00021627858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029748818,0.0011783942,0.0017520047,0.0011951483,0.0003778538,0.00074197387,0.0011546693,0.0008938842,0.0027870568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042258464,0.0007897335,0.0013584975,0.0009099173,0.0011370195,0.00095913355,0.00081932714,0.0016505836,0.00026437594],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011420567,0.0015230463,0.003723551,0.0018268593,0.0010446443,0.00014127212,0.00057033467,0.3275423,0.01652265,0.09446922,0.0013686928,0.53984696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004414033,0.017724797,0.005214215,0.00026697083,0.0004961858,0.00014183813,0.00007060759,0.82915056,0.012644819,0.120374314,0.009316883,0.0001848745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040861845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005003645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029748818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009550123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018348396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15732867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135683075","doi":"10.5267/j.ijiec.2013.04.003","title":"Application of desirability function for optimizing the performance characteristics of carbonitrided bushes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Response surface methodology; Function (biology); Variable (mathematics); Product (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Hardness; Surface (topology); Materials science; Computer science; Process engineering; Mathematics; Statistics; Composite material; Engineering","score_opus":0.11648766625191335,"score_gpt":0.3698494016880249,"score_spread":0.2533617354361115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135683075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51040655,0.00077210355,0.48431242,0.000109902845,0.00002245331,0.00020234131,0.0000407792,0.00017947247,0.0039539523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9132707,0.00020569547,0.085431114,0.00002906338,0.0000044556796,0.00017536976,0.000041096508,0.000026294514,0.00081612554],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910825,0.0003139346,0.000056378747,0.00014645544,0.00029981916,0.00007526574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998909,0.00064884697,0.00019070374,0.00004821129,0.0001800778,0.000023300032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019743792,0.0010137738,0.0007656869,0.0008974749,0.00023936256,0.0006864098,0.000492222,0.00068123837,0.00071364065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026375102,0.0004190177,0.00065118354,0.00042216407,0.000314393,0.00047321315,0.0004022867,0.00041012224,0.00011537018],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041214356,0.00041292614,0.0028614958,0.00040562157,0.00010114558,0.000088228575,0.000104727165,0.800297,0.11370865,0.0014603095,0.00012293455,0.08002482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028073691,0.0013887277,0.0033492558,0.000026778602,0.000067457324,0.00004391474,0.000046233767,0.9440869,0.04933111,0.00075206446,0.0008496659,0.000029883291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089958357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009999798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019743792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055450737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000563519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010441601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135843367","doi":"10.1007/s00184-014-0514-8","title":"Blocked semifoldovers of two-level orthogonal designs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Factorial experiment; Fraction (chemistry); Mathematics; Block (permutation group theory); Blocking (statistics); Factor (programming language); Mathematical optimization; Design of experiments; Econometrics; Computer science; Statistics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.37527729619071154,"score_gpt":0.4833293118572496,"score_spread":0.10805201566653805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135843367","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008891143,0.00014333401,0.98967147,0.00003535984,0.00005023145,0.000214959,0.00011643175,0.0001497856,0.000727242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14809966,0.00024427316,0.844428,0.00013695337,0.000085604544,0.003881474,0.00042493455,0.00015670965,0.0025422978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9357426,0.05287003,0.0019294933,0.004626932,0.0032785588,0.0015523961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9190093,0.062579215,0.0037645593,0.010678835,0.0029596507,0.0010084315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04875816,0.002192003,0.0038438016,0.0014677047,0.00069554197,0.001972701,0.0024672528,0.0015573403,0.012047052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06709173,0.001582168,0.0031098214,0.0012667141,0.0034172125,0.0030295656,0.0036872644,0.002179068,0.001591547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013418832,0.0012597353,0.0027323035,0.0023511422,0.0013969161,0.00015030436,0.00085191434,0.10501077,0.016817134,0.50294507,0.002952999,0.35011286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016236315,0.0060121682,0.0021051927,0.00028414396,0.00048662515,0.00013108284,0.00013371016,0.5720255,0.012810819,0.39375433,0.010473594,0.00015923983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044343254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004902558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04875816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012940032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027638976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2578609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136011484","doi":"10.1111/1539-6924.00283","title":"Optimal Designs for Estimating the Effective Dose in Developmental Toxicity Experiments","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Toxicity; Developmental toxicity; Toxicology; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Biology; Medicine; Genetics; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.2050355976052273,"score_gpt":0.44561177045277023,"score_spread":0.24057617284754293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136011484","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018688632,0.00034200703,0.97956777,0.000068140514,0.000021803018,0.00073961,0.000070610535,0.00009839906,0.0004029701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16787541,0.00046062292,0.8270377,0.0001050226,0.000030882155,0.003955784,0.00018487108,0.0000441292,0.00030561193],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9256212,0.06421105,0.0021294176,0.0032073285,0.003872235,0.00095874217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8642407,0.11604491,0.009523007,0.0062905247,0.0031739771,0.00072694325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07342765,0.0025255927,0.0036295955,0.0025762904,0.0006437789,0.0015982122,0.0017961919,0.002017457,0.0017142752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1088947,0.0019866764,0.002404479,0.0011438287,0.002629851,0.0021128543,0.0021726722,0.0028392286,0.0003065156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00380183,0.0007639858,0.004636434,0.0010485743,0.0007665917,0.000113831215,0.00031705506,0.79178035,0.008627238,0.08766206,0.00048000246,0.10000205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011746754,0.0041738683,0.0028424615,0.0002703506,0.0005057804,0.00008000974,0.00008486596,0.81248885,0.0108842105,0.16374725,0.0035441257,0.00020350792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001008186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010773974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07342765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027381189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036592605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38832718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136520695","doi":"10.1109/iscas.1998.705280","title":"Statistical design of integrated circuits using maximum likelihood estimation of the covariance matrix","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ellipsoid; Covariance matrix; Mathematics; Covariance; Ellipsoid method; Mathematical optimization; Polyhedron; Estimation of covariance matrices; Algorithm; Semidefinite programming; Matrix (chemical analysis); Computer science; Statistics; Convex optimization; Geometry","score_opus":0.20873537854818264,"score_gpt":0.4310086727187494,"score_spread":0.22227329417056674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136520695","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036262415,0.000031951713,0.99937016,0.000020051777,0.00000405499,0.000013436846,0.000009506358,0.00005774193,0.00013042845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.065039806,0.00025841055,0.9329969,0.00008203632,0.00006501656,0.00046700117,0.00021272882,0.00012055144,0.0007574378],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685234,0.0014639235,0.0001413843,0.0004340775,0.0009863889,0.00012182976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944278,0.0037453668,0.0006149686,0.0003817457,0.00074843346,0.00008171471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004305743,0.0017054904,0.0016137135,0.0012497219,0.00045887835,0.0014416422,0.0017204243,0.0009737464,0.0021207985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100031905,0.0011204787,0.0012160266,0.0012472449,0.0015824889,0.0015631462,0.0010104399,0.0017118679,0.0005792039],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100789635,0.00008216174,0.00055199757,0.00021390442,0.0001342845,0.00006432874,0.000064410815,0.80445004,0.007009909,0.075530946,0.0011069919,0.11069022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027297852,0.00007812911,0.00010493458,0.000010643961,0.000014228775,0.000020578242,0.000004222569,0.97906953,0.0017975944,0.017793674,0.0010656156,0.000013483513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012618394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001574442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004305743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013196009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027518284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02277124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137109403","doi":"10.1002/qre.1790","title":"A Prediction Region‐based Approach to Model Uncertainty for Multi‐response Optimization","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality and Reliability Engineering International","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Research Foundation of Korea; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Minimax; Mathematical optimization; Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Dispersion (optics); Variable (mathematics); Process (computing); Mathematics","score_opus":0.3965922080803353,"score_gpt":0.46378172639864923,"score_spread":0.06718951831831393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137109403","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00084565487,0.0000596212,0.9986284,0.00002940815,0.0000048052966,0.000011708858,0.000004933364,0.00003668944,0.00037893947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41427878,0.00050113164,0.58162266,0.00014243674,0.00007690153,0.00065373565,0.00008932244,0.00016323928,0.0024717953],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672556,0.0018891314,0.000106801555,0.00035956534,0.0008097862,0.000109201304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677795,0.002268461,0.000320381,0.00025688598,0.00033453133,0.00004181392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005884864,0.0017478849,0.0016459823,0.0010269153,0.0005344847,0.0012465246,0.0020800587,0.0016909344,0.002086125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074090604,0.0007825952,0.001758212,0.0006884752,0.0011002435,0.00196937,0.002188418,0.0025349667,0.00040154476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036268237,0.00004159312,0.00014253928,0.000077560995,0.00004226525,0.000042117095,0.000046894856,0.95435894,0.0022351746,0.02164282,0.00024020553,0.021093704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033814738,0.000030882315,0.00002974972,0.0000064554624,0.00000689997,0.000011170326,0.0000037572665,0.9940427,0.0007234707,0.004773926,0.00036032815,0.0000072639095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011480898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070145074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005884864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001001782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010456867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031122565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137679700","doi":"10.2307/3315999","title":"Theory of optimal blocking of nonregular factorial designs","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Factorial experiment; Mathematics; Factorial; Blocking (statistics); Block (permutation group theory); Coding theory; Type (biology); Coding (social sciences); Orthogonal array; Block design; Plackett–Burman design; Designtheory; Arithmetic; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Statistics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.18644542258703284,"score_gpt":0.3933985522755768,"score_spread":0.20695312968854396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137679700","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008239917,0.00011816934,0.9867743,0.00010588712,0.000026685582,0.00009043204,0.00009588636,0.0001462575,0.004402418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2918514,0.0003701113,0.69856805,0.00036358982,0.00011269429,0.0014617811,0.0004372963,0.00022447614,0.006610509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791891,0.012237299,0.0008181871,0.0016941795,0.00500111,0.0010602385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594886,0.024575068,0.003896651,0.005757719,0.0054106354,0.00087135215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014323258,0.001170403,0.0015596672,0.0015512465,0.00065596076,0.0019926622,0.002279244,0.0012878237,0.010859573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043267168,0.0010420171,0.0010070715,0.0015736477,0.0032610046,0.0025882057,0.001907033,0.0017160861,0.0019622645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022233644,0.00007297445,0.0006318542,0.00014828566,0.000033000906,0.000037417507,0.00015103105,0.047133155,0.002448749,0.90185374,0.0014359714,0.04583144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009154099,0.00019849146,0.00045106272,0.00004324354,0.000021708745,0.000045011348,0.00003956468,0.23181175,0.0022357958,0.7604317,0.004599638,0.000030443452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009607111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086176535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014323258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028214185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00245492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075749576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138688019","doi":"10.1007/s11336-013-9373-x","title":"Generalized Functional Extended Redundancy Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychometrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Universidade de Santiago de Compostela; National Research Foundation of Korea","keywords":"Generalized linear model; Redundancy (engineering); Computer science; Component (thermodynamics); Exponential family; Algorithm; Function (biology); Data mining; Mathematics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.19418635098283296,"score_gpt":0.452341991218989,"score_spread":0.258155640236156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138688019","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005100708,0.00047367706,0.99279845,0.00012851905,0.000050555653,0.00014048112,0.00025211571,0.00030515052,0.0007503567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19829568,0.0007981945,0.7955352,0.00024848536,0.00014008702,0.0014555131,0.0012315703,0.00030294576,0.0019923602],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855862,0.009988947,0.0005885618,0.001599661,0.0018478796,0.0003887256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875729,0.006509889,0.00093645847,0.002684008,0.0021254458,0.0001713909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01585047,0.002454382,0.002856913,0.0040173656,0.0010218644,0.0016783936,0.0025586563,0.0012827135,0.0053027803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028880615,0.00063502055,0.0037543792,0.0040686247,0.0014273328,0.0018166067,0.0023806738,0.0014838857,0.0011012539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005531232,0.00031610148,0.005453307,0.0019618766,0.0023733457,0.0005277241,0.0007045084,0.21975383,0.010652368,0.1902699,0.008466082,0.55896777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008676719,0.00039643262,0.006507246,0.00018184003,0.00037456717,0.00033412408,0.00014485583,0.7765519,0.0033876814,0.19671446,0.015128621,0.00019149968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027411112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024538168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01585047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014190084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029815445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0838263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138725277","doi":"10.1080/08982110701241293","title":"Probability Constrained Optimization as a Tool for Functional Design for Six Sigma","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Six Sigma; Reliability engineering; Probabilistic design; Mathematical optimization; Design of experiments; Engineering; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering design process; Manufacturing engineering; Statistics","score_opus":0.3031025173730075,"score_gpt":0.45388115307334037,"score_spread":0.1507786357003329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138725277","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017352403,0.00008401547,0.99686974,0.00006448893,0.000013191352,0.00008775774,0.0000111791915,0.00009910361,0.0010353166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18063699,0.0002730572,0.81658375,0.00013162178,0.000030497149,0.0011764014,0.00008103872,0.00010332048,0.0009834063],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944804,0.003829329,0.00018857236,0.00024040602,0.0011302037,0.00013114701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99163204,0.0068559865,0.00045434714,0.0002492995,0.0007379933,0.00007025878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011574166,0.0018329804,0.0016140098,0.0019428171,0.0006044605,0.0012983185,0.0012231837,0.0012489937,0.004353618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012115843,0.0009089317,0.0013132853,0.0011019496,0.001705306,0.0008129896,0.0014710439,0.0019962871,0.00042315098],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077962075,0.0000584232,0.00022930941,0.00016667445,0.00006600025,0.00005129351,0.000056749668,0.91619706,0.0008340079,0.05732115,0.00031100633,0.024630316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034538945,0.00011153669,0.000052127194,0.000033641692,0.000013640311,0.000008183801,0.000010557397,0.97894204,0.0005608096,0.01903937,0.0011831102,0.000010522257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020107601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013200451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011574166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001354948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021795875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06121075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140217706","doi":"10.1348/000711003321645412","title":"Pairwise multiple comparisons: A model comparison approach versus stepwise procedures","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Selection (genetic algorithm); Normality; Model selection; Multiple comparisons problem; Set (abstract data type); Variance (accounting); Mathematics; Statistics; Type I and type II errors; Computer science; Econometrics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.2715206547783738,"score_gpt":0.48669607144257343,"score_spread":0.21517541666419965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140217706","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010269405,0.00040186505,0.9839436,0.0005578181,0.0004892607,0.0026226155,0.00023845256,0.0006039778,0.0008730654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05799088,0.00035858463,0.93199146,0.00026668722,0.00016513538,0.00842938,0.0001482284,0.00020235607,0.00044734302],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.738834,0.22896932,0.0069575016,0.011503419,0.012423693,0.0013119782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63954717,0.3136663,0.013780629,0.025276238,0.0063741775,0.0013554868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16662304,0.0041916836,0.005051565,0.0049515627,0.001600414,0.0025783877,0.007465878,0.003272175,0.008000341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35133398,0.001497655,0.0053083966,0.0069822194,0.0055063227,0.0061197956,0.004459914,0.009498944,0.000989716],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007816106,0.0025267478,0.008332752,0.01017028,0.015723227,0.0013316162,0.005784046,0.061750494,0.013291865,0.25107217,0.019524096,0.6026767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025752431,0.023238705,0.00987979,0.0016195392,0.0029138867,0.0012128042,0.0012432237,0.3451964,0.016278092,0.56724215,0.027886007,0.000714209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006687517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010466195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16662304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014675369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037342242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8811974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141313754","doi":"10.1007/s11222-012-9339-3","title":"Robust model-based sampling designs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics and Computing","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Australian Research Council; Australian National University","keywords":"Mathematics; Minimax; Robustness (evolution); Population; Mean squared error; Sample size determination; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Statistics; Optimal design; Linear model; Mathematical optimization; Population variance; Algorithm","score_opus":0.4559566454812878,"score_gpt":0.4775928154674137,"score_spread":0.02163616998612594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141313754","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012156984,0.00011255752,0.9976222,0.00006298359,0.000038878068,0.0004949243,0.000051615563,0.00016007463,0.00024105264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09667763,0.0003434891,0.89403063,0.00029362028,0.00014666049,0.0072904336,0.00037131849,0.0001409167,0.00070522923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.8366118,0.14376763,0.0031368195,0.007456425,0.007994074,0.0010331583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78404486,0.1734293,0.009988094,0.025204137,0.0063772947,0.000956335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09615674,0.0031791239,0.006415889,0.0027122754,0.0011336284,0.0029940726,0.0053441836,0.0033203175,0.007051535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24635169,0.0023422842,0.00400916,0.0019504998,0.004016547,0.0031441376,0.0033261974,0.0038780575,0.001791147],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005944943,0.001131078,0.0028281114,0.0024941578,0.0023746823,0.0001937746,0.00050279015,0.21773054,0.0048898016,0.48672563,0.0047650253,0.27041954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027024567,0.0023946343,0.0013857527,0.0003404779,0.00078650285,0.00017410937,0.000067652,0.6332341,0.005185095,0.3473796,0.0062124385,0.00013726988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087187847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007697399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09615674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018881678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048134606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5085315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141848375","doi":"10.1002/sim.5951","title":"Multiple‐objective response‐adaptive repeated measurement designs in clinical trials for binary responses","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Binary number; Computer science; Basis (linear algebra); Binary data; Function (biology); Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Mathematics","score_opus":0.716823768290405,"score_gpt":0.608469569222505,"score_spread":0.1083541990679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141848375","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068280385,0.00040015788,0.9892681,0.00027026812,0.00008773075,0.0024685431,0.00004620053,0.00015628066,0.00047470187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12731239,0.0003021806,0.85776395,0.00041560334,0.00008081155,0.013520487,0.00006234606,0.00003746235,0.00050473254],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7095317,0.27616587,0.0037939432,0.004210713,0.0054950584,0.00080256176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8964531,0.08541151,0.007839415,0.0072952243,0.0024930495,0.00050774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13113521,0.0019716085,0.0029991074,0.0022773643,0.00051394495,0.0013185247,0.0024785697,0.003010269,0.003785393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1527485,0.0013244534,0.002669043,0.0016181113,0.0028144056,0.001540545,0.0015936238,0.0035091315,0.0007481463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009793357,0.0021088733,0.003713897,0.004472901,0.0031206398,0.00034747378,0.0013313808,0.19889307,0.008104833,0.32619283,0.0031848014,0.43873587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010178064,0.015325303,0.003740871,0.0008076056,0.0009355273,0.00026479343,0.00011022001,0.639492,0.0128042,0.3058377,0.010184706,0.00031900257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021309043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002640077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13113521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013317524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002212423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69351757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142334108","doi":"10.1016/j.disc.2005.02.022","title":"Detailed wordlength pattern of regular fractional factorial split-plot designs in terms of complementary sets","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discrete Mathematics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematics; Fractional factorial design; Factorial; Split plot; Factorial experiment; Plot (graphics); Arithmetic; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Statistics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.14529886469096281,"score_gpt":0.4207809977068823,"score_spread":0.2754821330159195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142334108","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0570567,0.0004394709,0.9303028,0.00022118624,0.000100489204,0.00031529003,0.0007041073,0.00088602974,0.009973898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44317853,0.00039160936,0.54698193,0.00018958458,0.000059960297,0.0014893272,0.0007450962,0.00041580765,0.0065481453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945825,0.0025127404,0.00044476698,0.0009207813,0.0013270675,0.00021217573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801564,0.013285306,0.0014264779,0.0028029613,0.0021074761,0.00022137465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004010417,0.0008436024,0.0010966915,0.0014577716,0.0004365593,0.0014914981,0.001187324,0.00096682325,0.0134907225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021839662,0.00068947126,0.00071086246,0.0014842722,0.0013345171,0.0016552821,0.00061096775,0.0010585851,0.0016352782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026183242,0.00037787724,0.0023554403,0.0013075201,0.00011530645,0.0003046466,0.00040624273,0.041765485,0.08565255,0.4763215,0.005715102,0.38306013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003664624,0.0012096327,0.0062853717,0.0002696493,0.00011696416,0.00063740916,0.00015035922,0.37500143,0.055394202,0.54566514,0.014753151,0.0001502477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027023608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036852199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0134907225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008429595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009838261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045131028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143379509","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.053","title":"Cross-over design trials in infertility—How much multiplicity is too much?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Fertility and Sterility","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Infertility; Multiplicity (mathematics); Andrology; Gynecology; Medicine; Biology; Mathematics; Pregnancy; Genetics","score_opus":0.4644380845236428,"score_gpt":0.51416713564632,"score_spread":0.04972905112267717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143379509","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001223001,0.014121868,0.02752486,0.9393383,0.015661033,0.0001208854,0.00010820525,0.000097554315,0.0018041795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028527817,0.004906038,0.043271083,0.865668,0.054966316,0.000972737,0.0000399719,0.00010448223,0.0015436121],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.65794176,0.30329576,0.013883945,0.0075447126,0.01614192,0.0011918801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1677667,0.80596215,0.0070113335,0.008208533,0.007477133,0.0035740752],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30263105,0.0017551507,0.007374767,0.0015376667,0.0026856444,0.004863079,0.0049993847,0.039416343,0.005412814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.50681,0.0021308742,0.0033449999,0.0017925655,0.01886083,0.008618669,0.0034605267,0.042930584,0.002267896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005698786,0.00047101598,0.0036524998,0.0035331254,0.0017718599,0.0011906015,0.001255178,0.0028193877,0.0006620578,0.113036945,0.52057457,0.34533402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009184727,0.0019240489,0.004328441,0.005112512,0.0013571928,0.0021410445,0.0005593081,0.016621077,0.0011341759,0.68763024,0.26956072,0.00044652846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017381782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004248549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.697369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005252726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005603916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8599801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144125453","doi":"10.1016/j.jmp.2015.03.003","title":"Bayesian alternatives to null-hypothesis significance testing for repeated-measures designs","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Psychology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Bayes factor; Statistics; Bayesian probability; Sample size determination; Null hypothesis; Statistical hypothesis testing; Mathematics; Posterior probability; Bayesian inference; Repeated measures design; Bayesian average; Econometrics; Bayesian hierarchical modeling","score_opus":0.6247835408792345,"score_gpt":0.5520142874432188,"score_spread":0.0727692534360157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144125453","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061520394,0.00027324006,0.99118173,0.0002535603,0.00018324291,0.000686683,0.00012355269,0.0003217013,0.0008241835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11457121,0.00029958918,0.8748892,0.00043119432,0.00021298758,0.008021301,0.00026996658,0.00027442485,0.0010301705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6167882,0.33550355,0.009423098,0.0152699305,0.020269174,0.0027459825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3647697,0.58564293,0.009428056,0.029255332,0.009063165,0.0018408467],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.24301797,0.0045275786,0.009316819,0.0056848396,0.0026350154,0.0066614365,0.0088325655,0.00956589,0.015410945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5244192,0.0049366406,0.0059401146,0.004104597,0.008843668,0.009540037,0.0058087055,0.012686642,0.0017797481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0101628285,0.0015161709,0.002772779,0.002680969,0.0035969638,0.00038647576,0.002814469,0.049883068,0.0026522742,0.68947375,0.0047465027,0.22931367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019288834,0.0011743576,0.0017251323,0.00050643156,0.00056458334,0.0001684611,0.00015609585,0.22305718,0.0016802984,0.76552624,0.0032935652,0.00021878802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00149377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016637866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24301797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037521466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060877586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9334936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149119822","doi":"10.1002/asmb.455","title":"Minimizing a general loss function in off‐line quality control","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Parametric statistics; Metric (unit); Variance (accounting); Transformation (genetics); Dependency (UML); Computer science; Function (biology); Mathematics; Statistics; Univariate; Mathematical optimization; Econometrics; Multivariate statistics","score_opus":0.20299004800203027,"score_gpt":0.3886543633076745,"score_spread":0.18566431530564423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149119822","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02143149,0.00015707544,0.97775126,0.00008906635,0.000008521214,0.000049349776,0.000012922048,0.000054260323,0.0004460014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6629963,0.00044896663,0.3330607,0.00015689713,0.000049615126,0.00046167,0.00014484896,0.00009879839,0.002582142],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98839056,0.008060616,0.00037341396,0.00085588486,0.0019439744,0.00037555932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851403,0.011027514,0.0017169495,0.00066034816,0.0012781329,0.00017672151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016827038,0.0013488419,0.0018840447,0.00092489395,0.00027799836,0.00158168,0.001443606,0.0016616636,0.0010591157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024927465,0.0005521759,0.000830709,0.00084968633,0.0017716738,0.0019682026,0.0013660372,0.0010480508,0.00020590806],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021662327,0.00018370085,0.0008547688,0.00021093327,0.00011041172,0.000054781238,0.000069636924,0.9135682,0.0037052333,0.018927643,0.00027063428,0.061827533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025661575,0.00031184332,0.00061945716,0.00001774705,0.000026047497,0.000023146144,0.000016139453,0.98169774,0.002682137,0.014115078,0.00045109188,0.000014005922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009087174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044565302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016827038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016166253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016775867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08899093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149957882","doi":"10.1002/asmb.2013","title":"A journey of discovery with George Box","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Madison","keywords":"George (robot); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Data science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09360265058677056,"score_gpt":0.35044180036241046,"score_spread":0.25683914977563993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149957882","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013844399,0.061517935,0.029274415,0.83635473,0.0415156,0.00009770006,0.00022415846,0.0007314065,0.028899591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0570507,0.096979044,0.09428928,0.55212235,0.047658086,0.0007171456,0.00034999684,0.0017828053,0.1490506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98086435,0.008446382,0.00058878347,0.0026520235,0.006434956,0.0010136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94137174,0.029783571,0.0020381387,0.0033999442,0.0074934172,0.015913203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028520312,0.0012280968,0.0020600343,0.0015487102,0.0039776973,0.011616103,0.0019029812,0.00623545,0.017653914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06939556,0.0008341085,0.00095348636,0.0012238643,0.008987216,0.010346983,0.006981591,0.031426445,0.010382527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012586068,0.00008009719,0.0002533616,0.00022412691,0.000040290535,0.00032892975,0.0020827765,0.00035668537,0.00042936383,0.105095334,0.8366814,0.05430173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027977745,0.000049546332,0.000089014145,0.00061496743,0.000007817009,0.00030621118,0.0006951598,0.00024893714,0.00019187854,0.08744108,0.9102857,0.00004177288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019431517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003001465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028520312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003247161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013272208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15083164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150605328","doi":"10.1243/1748006xjrr210","title":"Physical programming and conjoint analysis-based redundancy allocation in multistate systems: A Taguchi embedded algorithm selection and control (TAS&amp;C) approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Particle swarm optimization; Taguchi methods; Redundancy (engineering); Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024271052201691665,"score_gpt":0.3266420823009661,"score_spread":0.3023710300992744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150605328","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00973813,0.00014203852,0.9886929,0.00006042276,0.0000143039615,0.00004225206,0.0000035826981,0.000088161265,0.0012183584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6053474,0.00036538148,0.39133433,0.00009198579,0.000027975535,0.00023495535,0.000018654857,0.00003848243,0.0025408908],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989429,0.0004633986,0.000041879888,0.00012632096,0.00037327423,0.00005218905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992317,0.00042424045,0.00014104102,0.00004829517,0.00013423976,0.000020478405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001509083,0.00077454204,0.00078350597,0.0006565981,0.00043112904,0.0012489794,0.00097560417,0.0008203224,0.0008246448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016973619,0.000493557,0.0008023275,0.00071311544,0.0009149104,0.0007146486,0.0006318553,0.0008788929,0.00014902536],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053806438,0.000067406254,0.00036795597,0.00007821648,0.000043604417,0.000042063006,0.00006175107,0.93097407,0.005984437,0.006134521,0.00015851932,0.056033682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002969392,0.000064048065,0.00007837222,0.000003553219,0.0000074784543,0.000012210703,0.000005023071,0.99797505,0.00089867733,0.00074752275,0.0001996619,0.000005536931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031089229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026573567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031089229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076199503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010735195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007980883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151911004","doi":"10.1002/cjs.5550350303","title":"Optimal designs for calibration of orientations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Queen's University; University of Ottawa; Health Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Optimal design; Rotation (mathematics); Mathematics; Calibration; Point (geometry); Matrix (chemical analysis); Algorithm; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Geometry","score_opus":0.23018122271465527,"score_gpt":0.45164021760137874,"score_spread":0.22145899488672346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151911004","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012202812,0.00014275446,0.9859285,0.00011345768,0.00003374235,0.00023042514,0.000070854374,0.00008797742,0.0011894011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33819667,0.00026830853,0.65803665,0.0002203542,0.00007803258,0.0019829497,0.00027859618,0.000072453426,0.0008658971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9451725,0.042677213,0.0016455189,0.0050397753,0.0042623673,0.0012027203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9107646,0.065583624,0.008385716,0.007993819,0.0063562994,0.00091590564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037011,0.0017148147,0.003260258,0.0018956015,0.0007463725,0.0014468376,0.0020487742,0.002346922,0.004924314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13884944,0.0016433954,0.0015142015,0.0008715833,0.0033291662,0.0022429621,0.002871647,0.0022111728,0.00084979244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004236912,0.00056988705,0.004415317,0.00097331754,0.0003806626,0.000078407495,0.00041974976,0.29697946,0.010056563,0.48965248,0.0020398078,0.19019744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013867173,0.0039717103,0.0043243147,0.0005386803,0.0002215276,0.0001417938,0.0001794246,0.48847595,0.012802222,0.47986242,0.007897059,0.00019814748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006924899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004825281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00164129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028210361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19573522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156197192","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9469.2004.02_101.x","title":"Goodness‐of‐fit Tests for Mixed Models","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Goodness of fit; Mathematics; Allowance (engineering); Normality; Econometrics; Statistics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Engineering","score_opus":0.2841348147446454,"score_gpt":0.47828194534106994,"score_spread":0.19414713059642452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156197192","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075791284,0.002635771,0.9105713,0.0012425485,0.00047069215,0.0006765554,0.0015833211,0.001317381,0.0057112277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.781384,0.0005393747,0.21105133,0.00062133826,0.00033685676,0.0030877404,0.0016456229,0.00048315956,0.0008505393],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.80506,0.16312268,0.006058212,0.008283903,0.016064042,0.0014110651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.33069262,0.6289203,0.0126666315,0.018879112,0.0074008578,0.0014404834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10002393,0.0020288262,0.004340354,0.008195216,0.0014610055,0.0035824245,0.0041356664,0.004109955,0.00995357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47213948,0.00092892774,0.005735087,0.006337333,0.007400744,0.006427052,0.0034682916,0.004531126,0.0017492666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007516766,0.00085228815,0.098249145,0.0053587183,0.014918004,0.0013046621,0.0021643024,0.16532128,0.0032896516,0.3336021,0.015460162,0.35196298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009758088,0.0038101,0.050398543,0.0010332231,0.0015223107,0.0015419711,0.0010072723,0.39182848,0.003959932,0.5320072,0.011487092,0.00042811985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080964743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049426535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10002393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017823898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021161435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5289835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158731372","doi":"10.1093/biomet/ass061","title":"Blocked two-level regular factorial designs with weak minimum aberration","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Factorial experiment; Fractional factorial design; Block (permutation group theory); Block design; Value (mathematics); Arithmetic; Combinatorics; Statistics","score_opus":0.3637872844944415,"score_gpt":0.4581214626095582,"score_spread":0.09433417811511674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158731372","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074926233,0.000050146293,0.9918029,0.000022205031,0.000011428742,0.00012907079,0.000033417633,0.00018225367,0.00027593828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06582576,0.00006662855,0.93250924,0.000055078253,0.000021926799,0.00089254003,0.000111845926,0.000066279725,0.0004507309],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98320884,0.011565017,0.00086783787,0.0017841725,0.0021382032,0.00043597945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97599286,0.014100826,0.0027088101,0.005019507,0.0017082345,0.00046973626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009107438,0.0013941248,0.0018351959,0.0010349054,0.0003849675,0.0007970918,0.0017579248,0.00094744033,0.004013717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032061424,0.00074072863,0.0018275785,0.0009879919,0.0014645123,0.0011961579,0.0014647425,0.0015076975,0.0015563841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007946187,0.0011509119,0.0037093603,0.0024639918,0.0005674855,0.00024017922,0.0006379602,0.111445494,0.14354514,0.13102594,0.00169983,0.5955675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002125647,0.009957729,0.0049079284,0.00021460472,0.0005694385,0.00062291446,0.00011261949,0.64497024,0.15419774,0.16214637,0.019858614,0.00031611012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022005406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030067912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009107438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006477615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013576406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04816532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159016562","doi":"","title":"OPTIMAL FRACTIONAL FACTORIAL SPLIT-PLOT DESIGNS FOR MODEL SELECTION","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Mathematics; Factorial experiment; Split plot; Selection (genetic algorithm); Statistics; Factorial; Plot (graphics); Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.10435496523265804,"score_gpt":0.37380206426952545,"score_spread":0.2694470990368674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159016562","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012312206,0.0005228225,0.9786564,0.00015818671,0.00015897905,0.003882763,0.00065312197,0.0005386805,0.0031168396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10771227,0.0005889101,0.8688775,0.000132787,0.000053946216,0.018105237,0.00083967636,0.00020747732,0.0034822808],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9363451,0.057071228,0.0009944189,0.0025519186,0.0024681159,0.000569188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9625846,0.031354923,0.0014457995,0.002920055,0.0013952163,0.00029938883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037449095,0.002767089,0.0040363655,0.0025735497,0.0011139176,0.0017247037,0.002151245,0.0017676136,0.044770554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084922925,0.0016548391,0.0035798312,0.0025325443,0.0018345664,0.0015648119,0.0025160895,0.0029166513,0.0035997631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015627274,0.0024985378,0.0027268368,0.0040004156,0.002759296,0.00022571665,0.0010151066,0.13751177,0.01041857,0.13540016,0.010413752,0.6774026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053427787,0.0110324845,0.006382144,0.0013099812,0.0015142219,0.00016360288,0.00040414286,0.7466217,0.012549899,0.17860323,0.03580611,0.00026968666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00143198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019009598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044770554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018417167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040765135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19805211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159697589","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2007.05.020","title":"Robust estimators and designs for field experiments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Estimator; Robustness (evolution); Variance (accounting); Kriging; Minimax; Statistics; Correlation; Contrast (vision); Field (mathematics); Regression; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Geometry","score_opus":0.4041987539618632,"score_gpt":0.5366567002772741,"score_spread":0.13245794631541086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159697589","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006202002,0.00027945192,0.99830854,0.000089712514,0.000046432997,0.00023057674,0.00007258257,0.0001352027,0.00021724048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028936986,0.00048247626,0.9647402,0.00017149886,0.00011968692,0.0046333936,0.00024778617,0.0001265481,0.00054140034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7902057,0.18835378,0.004460716,0.008423271,0.0073235705,0.0012328943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5366262,0.39995098,0.015977554,0.0379394,0.008265937,0.001239894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16331834,0.003031953,0.00617447,0.004207327,0.0012584212,0.0036771842,0.006136937,0.0067138984,0.007327553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38763803,0.004609968,0.004084565,0.0028025217,0.006457934,0.0048528514,0.004170181,0.0071505914,0.0016154136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015564691,0.00037751693,0.0018572308,0.0020586306,0.0016923404,0.00011994169,0.000423757,0.12039596,0.0022324582,0.63693696,0.0046721203,0.22767663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012828031,0.00088230317,0.0012448481,0.0004456064,0.0004628708,0.00011781663,0.00005975043,0.18701789,0.0027069417,0.7966372,0.009027765,0.0001141366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010453325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091866835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16331834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028428407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005773307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86372024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167286520","doi":"10.1177/1471082x0700700204","title":"A measure of partial association for generalized estimating equations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistical Modelling","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Stephen's University; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Mathematics; Generalized estimating equation; Statistics; Measure (data warehouse); Estimating equations; Linear regression; Covariate; Regression analysis; Partial correlation; Ordinary least squares; Outcome (game theory); Applied mathematics; Correlation; Estimator","score_opus":0.3184001615592276,"score_gpt":0.5005314592625004,"score_spread":0.1821312977032728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167286520","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011112627,0.0006634849,0.9967069,0.00037721326,0.00009327578,0.00016268005,0.00020815808,0.00019695215,0.000480011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06325335,0.0015530463,0.9284864,0.0006375164,0.00040781262,0.0032837458,0.0010051861,0.000371173,0.0010017843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.82426894,0.15297318,0.0061197034,0.008090795,0.007661029,0.0008863431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6515168,0.30699393,0.012142925,0.020683106,0.008000902,0.00066228455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11846287,0.0032308318,0.0055602035,0.00583256,0.0010695257,0.0040555606,0.0044749603,0.004292076,0.004868487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31729442,0.0016837728,0.005518214,0.009650313,0.0043751583,0.0056926347,0.0048946985,0.007673049,0.0016103021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021259868,0.00014310176,0.01156561,0.0018221774,0.005324231,0.00041544472,0.00095408683,0.10208333,0.0008955571,0.66513366,0.008979942,0.20247021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015452302,0.0004469837,0.0042320034,0.00044830283,0.00065688725,0.0004147122,0.0002376582,0.2682235,0.00084937183,0.69519126,0.028898623,0.00024619026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029737628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021227773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11846287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001890378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004227011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62649906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168158999","doi":"10.1002/sim.3356","title":"Two‐stage design for dose‐finding that accounts for both efficacy and safety","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Stage (stratigraphy); Computer science; Statistics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.34766234225019504,"score_gpt":0.5197216396087865,"score_spread":0.17205929735859143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168158999","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015171904,0.00023203727,0.9582912,0.00030537165,0.00037975784,0.023476174,0.00025576516,0.0002957148,0.0015920519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0955166,0.0002247883,0.7954196,0.00046144548,0.00014319106,0.105677046,0.0002009522,0.00007295831,0.0022833582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9388827,0.048648424,0.0020176289,0.0039144983,0.005103808,0.0014329491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94836116,0.035938844,0.003934215,0.007289604,0.003474448,0.0010016764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06671376,0.003224384,0.0044829333,0.001399469,0.0010946289,0.001723353,0.0033206535,0.0037556116,0.012282545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068638474,0.0020053145,0.0030043013,0.0013844016,0.0025360533,0.0019636406,0.0023489292,0.004101384,0.0016364643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.058586325,0.011056583,0.0105647035,0.004269941,0.0034828912,0.00038098477,0.0013729349,0.1998634,0.024892144,0.35673976,0.0067396243,0.3220507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.036276747,0.07594757,0.009888832,0.0003753021,0.002392761,0.0003781227,0.0001363254,0.60998046,0.015272371,0.21032394,0.03834266,0.00068488304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006638318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008334265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06671376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024608476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051375804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35282028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169366955","doi":"10.4103/0971-6203.94742","title":"Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Physics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Alberta Health Services","funders":"","keywords":"Edema; Medicine; Implant; Prostate; Dosimetry; Nuclear medicine; Surgery; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.11360448094696199,"score_gpt":0.468628439410112,"score_spread":0.35502395846315005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169366955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89738846,0.0013006222,0.099815756,0.000051387407,0.000020747582,0.00007431987,0.000076495344,0.00016494608,0.0011071981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881517,0.00021221886,0.011105839,0.000024276205,0.0000042434845,0.000023924627,0.00003381025,0.00006189518,0.00038204476],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993055,0.00020684257,0.000039542723,0.0001090306,0.0002899854,0.000049147788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985586,0.0009224914,0.00019524292,0.0001787056,0.0000995943,0.00004539475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000974632,0.00029992787,0.00028975366,0.00025092228,0.00016461199,0.00039734357,0.00030591217,0.00022331349,0.0004936219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023422386,0.00020843148,0.00031240427,0.00020178109,0.00050916837,0.00042229446,0.0005263491,0.00031910228,0.00007487228],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021660116,0.00010240515,0.016832305,0.0002826852,0.000052367413,0.00023832217,0.00039882233,0.060462866,0.8722683,0.0011135646,0.0000756913,0.046006564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051755338,0.003034654,0.06872114,0.000032079457,0.00010398266,0.0007531035,0.00015036725,0.091156855,0.8332422,0.0008055762,0.0018969474,0.00005139088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000776583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011884029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.000974632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004750999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039229824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0051543713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2188071017","doi":"10.1080/16843703.2009.11673206","title":"Finding Design Space and a Reliable Operating Region Using a Multivariate Bayesian Approach with Experimental Design","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Technology & Quantitative Management","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Regina","keywords":"Frequentist inference; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Bayesian probability; Reliability (semiconductor); Process (computing); Engineering design process; Product (mathematics); Multivariate statistics; Quality by Design; Grid; Bayesian optimization; Data mining; Reliability engineering; Machine learning; New product development; Bayesian inference; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.38139625710453073,"score_gpt":0.49673563259608566,"score_spread":0.11533937549155493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2188071017","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017610532,0.000074160824,0.9977424,0.000039515755,0.0000024958129,0.0000545372,0.000015706368,0.000058493526,0.00025167988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11539187,0.00023256875,0.88277125,0.00006820485,0.000023935077,0.0010553896,0.00008620651,0.00005467003,0.00031584315],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890126,0.006980146,0.000348092,0.0009438397,0.0024912509,0.00022417132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772857,0.018653098,0.0016304114,0.0009161405,0.0013740483,0.00014061749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017063767,0.0020060292,0.002162424,0.0033316114,0.0008510716,0.0018178532,0.0020622243,0.0018209873,0.0021906567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034909453,0.0013667074,0.0019296702,0.0014082172,0.0027188614,0.0024311743,0.002123256,0.0024074053,0.00039672267],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022319157,0.0001630987,0.0011337122,0.0004968642,0.00014104696,0.00004495089,0.00022187748,0.8540878,0.0041353675,0.059643287,0.00040958164,0.07929914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006639271,0.0002758323,0.0004031677,0.000058393,0.000047976282,0.000027632901,0.000024063513,0.95455205,0.0023828992,0.040949315,0.0011748166,0.0000374693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002349005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022513182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017063767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018388402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032981138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09024292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204833299","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2015.12.007","title":"A note on the construction of blocked two-level designs with general minimum lower order confounding","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Confounding; Order (exchange); Statistics; Combinatorics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.2133840983652915,"score_gpt":0.46344630997915415,"score_spread":0.25006221161386266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204833299","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003284519,0.000110435336,0.99852186,0.00034115667,0.00007055456,0.000102937156,0.00005661498,0.00014755619,0.00032043262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0067715803,0.00017225875,0.9911594,0.0003968482,0.00011240402,0.00075627427,0.00007463646,0.00016196695,0.0003945967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89230335,0.08768489,0.005294817,0.0058409167,0.007839911,0.0010360151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64010453,0.29774946,0.0058018113,0.046516616,0.008362098,0.0014655148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11509826,0.0030541818,0.005836872,0.0026931253,0.001950914,0.0028793132,0.0073630824,0.005037975,0.009066422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.286506,0.003129034,0.0074343868,0.0034911097,0.00835996,0.0058748634,0.007733178,0.012075797,0.002271306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023687994,0.00033666077,0.0022166267,0.001389944,0.00072836195,0.00071330107,0.00092742144,0.031005181,0.010599439,0.70904434,0.012879006,0.22779095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006009578,0.00067641545,0.0011038331,0.00024425943,0.00031634275,0.0003731807,0.000051588275,0.0830061,0.0051811305,0.88647336,0.021789985,0.00018287818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024008993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041975374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11509826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022300442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066328445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60870504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218446173","doi":"10.1080/00401706.2015.1114024","title":"Joint Identification of Location and Dispersion Effects in Unreplicated Two-Level Factorials","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technometrics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Dispersion (optics); Identification (biology); Statistics; Variance (accounting); Selection (genetic algorithm); Mathematics; Model selection; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.35327163915902265,"score_gpt":0.46525957885420266,"score_spread":0.11198793969518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218446173","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034434363,0.00008788958,0.964303,0.000051397314,0.00001065388,0.00018325413,0.000098526885,0.00025152764,0.00057930796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3260849,0.000103842554,0.6716625,0.000049893293,0.000015823343,0.0009813639,0.00024898504,0.00008646138,0.0007662024],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.96817255,0.020961974,0.0015344606,0.0037287325,0.004849371,0.0007529032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8726735,0.104506835,0.0072084144,0.012154652,0.0029120909,0.0005444786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030327238,0.0014602364,0.0029348903,0.002093628,0.00067623076,0.0015302729,0.0021354537,0.0016530465,0.003945165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12703802,0.0011051786,0.0021716023,0.0020358562,0.0024891708,0.0028809633,0.002371974,0.0016187369,0.0005768492],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028854404,0.0011980493,0.015414633,0.0012813361,0.00059266266,0.00042355,0.0012948028,0.26930806,0.03137008,0.10000826,0.001425097,0.57479805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002957152,0.0013855274,0.015085953,0.00013382743,0.00018353306,0.00018993107,0.00015245084,0.73793435,0.02570797,0.21548034,0.0032380621,0.00021236346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014190024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021997802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030327238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013567107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023938266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1603877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290566946","doi":"","title":"A general criterion for factorial designs under model uncertainty","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Generalization; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Limiting; Factorial experiment; Mathematics; Machine learning; Engineering","score_opus":0.3655784518244831,"score_gpt":0.5189059344658788,"score_spread":0.15332748264139573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290566946","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001864852,0.00016328396,0.99657416,0.00014825207,0.000019716861,0.00012494903,0.00008371267,0.00014718187,0.0008738998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06766294,0.00027904467,0.92847365,0.00043766873,0.000072252646,0.0013349117,0.0003371944,0.00025530672,0.0011470574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9360444,0.04218673,0.003123111,0.0041032755,0.013657837,0.00088463415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8818491,0.08731228,0.0056924615,0.007994823,0.01595786,0.0011935115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.068426706,0.0022447587,0.0030682494,0.004324836,0.0012467562,0.0025250185,0.0027051342,0.003125064,0.0048276093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16566932,0.0011498716,0.0017315231,0.003793877,0.0039024279,0.0034304024,0.0037672513,0.002889044,0.0015602302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005803849,0.00015579132,0.0029534618,0.0016528275,0.00032187538,0.00019254674,0.00047882326,0.19926542,0.013101812,0.5620107,0.0058779893,0.21340843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021789724,0.0008554175,0.0022671313,0.00027778413,0.00009309307,0.0002644567,0.0000847108,0.37365437,0.006757687,0.5995519,0.015832033,0.0001435089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018249968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013439193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068426706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032155807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006203452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36187935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295999734","doi":"10.1080/03610926.2014.935433","title":"Construction of minimum aberration blocked two-level regular factorial designs","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Factorial experiment; Mathematics; Algorithm; Computer science; Arithmetic; Mathematical optimization; Combinatorics; Statistics","score_opus":0.38133606300950473,"score_gpt":0.5472235196899693,"score_spread":0.16588745668046456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295999734","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010789394,0.000078418234,0.98810834,0.00003508117,0.000019835195,0.00020448357,0.000055948673,0.00016535235,0.00054323155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050239462,0.00008356998,0.94796973,0.00005370754,0.000023216995,0.00092207827,0.000121905825,0.000050447452,0.0005358125],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98911965,0.0071370257,0.000541147,0.0012933811,0.0015572978,0.00035156234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866362,0.0076118475,0.0017340551,0.002214158,0.0013821084,0.00042162742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007967749,0.0009843127,0.0017042422,0.0011139452,0.00039409086,0.0007031072,0.0017560885,0.0007166274,0.003124878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019704971,0.00078955665,0.0015330783,0.0008068963,0.0012523349,0.0009659013,0.0012098368,0.0015927501,0.00096089195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005023354,0.0009913144,0.003408757,0.0020171579,0.00038150113,0.00022733564,0.0005583394,0.123699166,0.1116922,0.18455346,0.0023324091,0.56511503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026165354,0.011709763,0.005537959,0.00026409668,0.00049994205,0.0006818123,0.00015482638,0.583707,0.12973863,0.22887348,0.03589193,0.00032407985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023537988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029609908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007967749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006765959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017600147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04213804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313674309","doi":"10.5705/ss.2013.322t","title":"Robust sampling designs for a possibly misspecified stochastic process","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistica Sinica","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Sampling (signal processing); Process (computing); Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5440202437885654,"score_gpt":0.5280115648360327,"score_spread":0.016008678952532662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313674309","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00944019,0.0001388795,0.98993903,0.000053770735,0.000014031242,0.00009832276,0.000024529965,0.000047380203,0.00024387994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25823894,0.0003180183,0.7395147,0.00008609121,0.000053466872,0.001029438,0.00013896122,0.000036889942,0.0005834795],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807974,0.0145764435,0.00059969776,0.0018289312,0.00188829,0.00030928463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95447385,0.034873165,0.0055787964,0.0030306699,0.0017929123,0.0002506646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02758706,0.0011471792,0.0016568168,0.001432963,0.0004105655,0.0010717456,0.0017299948,0.0020313333,0.0015907557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057207033,0.0007104564,0.0013218316,0.00085686153,0.0021990573,0.0011791324,0.0012455864,0.0013617008,0.00031532356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007995369,0.00023219659,0.0016733564,0.00048843067,0.00042661166,0.00013111766,0.00028264686,0.7118527,0.0085039595,0.19452573,0.00034542824,0.080738276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002549007,0.001091923,0.0007581811,0.00007737213,0.000110764515,0.00005558839,0.00002997505,0.898898,0.004849061,0.092127696,0.001693479,0.000052991243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006331348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005159311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02758706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010386795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013018635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14589602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316484965","doi":"10.2514/6.2004-2139","title":"Application of DOE for Optimal Turbomachinery Design","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"34th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Turbomachinery; Computer science; Design of experiments; Systems engineering; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08617590373675947,"score_gpt":0.38370269422514053,"score_spread":0.29752679048838104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316484965","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056496556,0.0003505008,0.9909911,0.000060698112,0.000045703004,0.00022434081,0.00014428998,0.00022637824,0.0023073563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.065267704,0.0004194324,0.9318318,0.00004652034,0.000016894583,0.001494431,0.00018128364,0.0001291309,0.00061281567],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964401,0.0020778596,0.00018078592,0.00022750776,0.0009607499,0.00011302488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963062,0.0026191354,0.00021496639,0.000234524,0.0005827126,0.000042526448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007449074,0.0016576675,0.0019600864,0.0018416581,0.00056147575,0.0010833122,0.0007816517,0.0007190997,0.0024145308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070718965,0.000746609,0.0014820208,0.0013708489,0.0007966396,0.0005813207,0.0008024903,0.0013197938,0.0003333506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016519196,0.00013877748,0.0008134477,0.0009697234,0.00023839512,0.00014720514,0.00015378931,0.8094559,0.015395173,0.07554269,0.0018301326,0.0951496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006258649,0.00029343925,0.0003326736,0.00007171677,0.000060539664,0.00005046955,0.00003474293,0.9450741,0.011686784,0.028425397,0.013870798,0.000036811936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015790164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013307343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007449074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010511166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027997459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039394975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321293294","doi":"10.1080/00207543.2016.1154212","title":"Robust optimisation of Nd: YLF laser beam micro-drilling process using Bayesian probabilistic approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Production Research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Machining; Robustness (evolution); Probabilistic logic; Bayesian probability; Laser beam machining; Process (computing); Computer science; Engineering; Mathematical optimization; Laser; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics; Laser beams; Artificial intelligence; Optics; Physics","score_opus":0.4508261617594121,"score_gpt":0.5319701852666353,"score_spread":0.08114402350722322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321293294","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020792963,0.0003707089,0.97728294,0.00012043113,0.000010935693,0.00004916177,0.000036589117,0.00012949842,0.0012067728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7930388,0.0005535613,0.20382789,0.000080074395,0.000021562153,0.00034505074,0.00015771261,0.00006638596,0.0019089916],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901414,0.00031617613,0.00004028052,0.00016037289,0.0003741327,0.000094814575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839044,0.0010859661,0.00024273485,0.000032233485,0.00021635741,0.00003238246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022706448,0.00094427675,0.0014369643,0.0008800091,0.0003220313,0.0009631688,0.0010447601,0.0013632196,0.0010924086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030962832,0.0009215202,0.0010692909,0.000559887,0.00071054266,0.0008981828,0.0008885768,0.000796435,0.00014567355],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043302334,0.000019996452,0.00022667953,0.00008969159,0.000025543482,0.000017444692,0.00001832379,0.98617876,0.0016041353,0.0018164965,0.000083125546,0.009876474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000812054,0.000020118357,0.00012568089,0.000004333859,0.000004532089,0.0000037421892,0.0000027422107,0.9987747,0.00036323574,0.00060538744,0.00008259027,0.0000048169263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056572873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036780564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056572873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089323963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018803978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012008429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2368506875","doi":"","title":"Adjusted empirical likelihood in Cox proportional hazard model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportional hazards model; Hazard ratio; Statistics; Confidence interval; Mathematics; Monte Carlo method; Empirical likelihood; Hazard; Econometrics; Maximum likelihood; Regression analysis; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.26424894235224244,"score_gpt":0.49778225132281684,"score_spread":0.2335333089705744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2368506875","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016364149,0.00014902918,0.9976259,0.00009396921,0.000019572642,0.00007032956,0.000039229097,0.00012970222,0.00023587611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21707696,0.00057674106,0.77792156,0.0002769721,0.00020902047,0.0015403645,0.0005363413,0.00024941153,0.0016125756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9601087,0.032841504,0.00091187906,0.0022915283,0.0031484903,0.0006978769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90813637,0.08100578,0.0025291974,0.004436493,0.0034338774,0.00045829415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04447879,0.0011960834,0.0025982317,0.0026799683,0.0006496948,0.0022999276,0.0038821301,0.0021577976,0.004401358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15149415,0.0010202306,0.0019523128,0.0024089953,0.002399956,0.0030738935,0.0026513832,0.00458594,0.0008939408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011344374,0.00019292066,0.0058675655,0.00071330875,0.0005316246,0.00059277803,0.00058201683,0.36636737,0.0022317222,0.4120085,0.0052002193,0.20457754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018902314,0.00018743538,0.0010528867,0.00008222571,0.000097222946,0.00022649033,0.00003404836,0.8048384,0.0010910105,0.18858197,0.003553708,0.000065505374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015093992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008719375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04447879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013872571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027926033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23522913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2374120850","doi":"","title":"D-optimal Orthogonal Block Designs with Parameter Estimation for the Additive Mixture Models","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Orthogonal array; Block (permutation group theory); Mathematics; Block design; Orthogonal matrix; Orthogonal transformation; Applied mathematics; Optimal design; Mathematical optimization; Orthogonal basis; Combinatorics; Algorithm; Statistics; Taguchi methods","score_opus":0.16519074933164782,"score_gpt":0.4211642392842557,"score_spread":0.25597348995260794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2374120850","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012558217,0.00007223082,0.9983181,0.00001961153,0.000008951316,0.000034362507,0.000025814052,0.00004243826,0.00022268166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06094462,0.00041201495,0.9364005,0.00009460785,0.000048524427,0.0009503426,0.00024276125,0.00008545127,0.00082109333],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98554057,0.010558519,0.0005555782,0.0014361308,0.0014748881,0.00043432397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98898417,0.007871527,0.000753345,0.0010214171,0.0011676179,0.00020193175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011985439,0.0021234744,0.0020197462,0.0014872215,0.00072101946,0.0009747499,0.0016402745,0.0015037534,0.004542136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025374325,0.001458509,0.0020990896,0.0016335656,0.0016158612,0.0020816312,0.0024292264,0.002253308,0.0013057678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011623396,0.000320881,0.0013740496,0.00067481137,0.00028592895,0.00007672831,0.00035114834,0.34908807,0.011332174,0.31152967,0.0026777482,0.3211264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016150605,0.00037457465,0.0005179362,0.00006841708,0.00008615544,0.00005168955,0.000030087627,0.87873083,0.0062348996,0.10978151,0.0038718984,0.00009046553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012626227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013389725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011985439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010936835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002048396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063385785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2396913950","doi":"10.1080/03610926.2014.942434","title":"Robust designs for experiments with blocks","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.5196230109503861,"score_gpt":0.5699451367973264,"score_spread":0.05032212584694029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2396913950","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00077150855,0.000139238,0.99825555,0.00004649603,0.00003181042,0.00025021622,0.00005506873,0.00010689492,0.00034319694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03205063,0.00029329356,0.96153384,0.00014477245,0.00007227562,0.0051170853,0.00016999964,0.00007696165,0.0005410343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91782683,0.06446382,0.0026383642,0.007232597,0.006915907,0.00092238333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87993586,0.09328032,0.0088067455,0.0128275305,0.004507561,0.00064200687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07127758,0.0030458695,0.004601991,0.00239625,0.0008095368,0.0026771342,0.003970966,0.0038443056,0.006723792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14061779,0.0021476992,0.0032972738,0.0019813192,0.004343112,0.0034674348,0.0036587808,0.004353866,0.001809137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012401288,0.00020828577,0.0008420784,0.0016748309,0.00092969934,0.00012393207,0.00040121647,0.20067751,0.00691321,0.67813015,0.002160545,0.10669842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084075227,0.0015525724,0.0007484412,0.00030662626,0.0002870827,0.00008426286,0.00004893345,0.4846314,0.005139619,0.49281424,0.013414148,0.00013193837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006551345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069339795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07127758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024603538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035217027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3769564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399998015","doi":"","title":"First Order Rotatable Designs Incorporating Neighbour Effects.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Order (exchange); Business","score_opus":0.06978905910689037,"score_gpt":0.36284157691097285,"score_spread":0.2930525178040825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399998015","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012561959,0.00041593582,0.98016673,0.000055613178,0.00017311226,0.0012761157,0.0003095861,0.00038117962,0.004659735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14818117,0.00044147726,0.8355594,0.0001717677,0.000098624354,0.0075174486,0.00029595828,0.00018133325,0.007552808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95330757,0.03782835,0.0014951131,0.0040836562,0.0025764264,0.00070894277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92785263,0.057342302,0.0044462928,0.008167197,0.0016201977,0.00057143846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03246785,0.0023860263,0.0039016528,0.001373229,0.000673365,0.0023172826,0.0029260542,0.0021452825,0.023663169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07110509,0.0018398849,0.0025348642,0.0016027571,0.002604613,0.002736523,0.0021995301,0.0023461785,0.0034552587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014832309,0.0013089807,0.002281869,0.0054351813,0.0013853745,0.00026963494,0.00064359116,0.19756529,0.012754246,0.41232166,0.0033323807,0.34786946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056206123,0.02205433,0.0028688502,0.0011924873,0.0017455813,0.00030228405,0.00020304401,0.4641738,0.023403578,0.43779033,0.040253274,0.00039182534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003659539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084190397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03246785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010851212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020523407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17170846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2409250823","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v5n4p22","title":"Alternative Second-Order N-Point Spherical Response Surface Methodology Design and Their Efficiencies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Central composite design; Composite number; Inscribed figure; Point (geometry); Response surface methodology; Mathematics; Optimal design; Design of experiments; RADIUS; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Geometry; Algorithm; Statistics","score_opus":0.20338887857460763,"score_gpt":0.4453104486077617,"score_spread":0.24192157003315407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2409250823","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14076108,0.000514221,0.8483561,0.0000604066,0.000041301035,0.00015636336,0.0000779736,0.0003029166,0.009729715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6149635,0.00033933338,0.3801316,0.00005828695,0.000015252216,0.00035446222,0.00014119298,0.00007328531,0.0039230953],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649006,0.0014767324,0.00016736327,0.0003568816,0.0013435318,0.00016541939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971418,0.0011739667,0.00047691521,0.00043842694,0.0007093026,0.000059595674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003458066,0.0009574431,0.0007532049,0.000889534,0.00018873841,0.001124728,0.0012118102,0.00081821816,0.0037460697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004986522,0.00036190404,0.0009843544,0.00075967674,0.00059180876,0.00063663826,0.000688571,0.00056406093,0.00077288866],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016860685,0.0004906952,0.0032306917,0.0013249168,0.000154233,0.00018827776,0.00030600655,0.4723757,0.11408688,0.040819794,0.0011519995,0.36418474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013091462,0.0033930126,0.005052742,0.000070430775,0.00009805239,0.0003415475,0.00015748695,0.8908535,0.079420194,0.009174511,0.011192788,0.00011478604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005485898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007486794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037460697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000605462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076373434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018288255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2410674143","doi":"10.1002/qre.2022","title":"Using Bayesian Variable Selection to Analyze Regular Resolution IV Two‐level Fractional Factorial Designs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality and Reliability Engineering International","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Selection (genetic algorithm); Bayesian probability; Mathematics; Factorial experiment; Variable (mathematics); Statistics; Aliasing; Feature selection; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.21593583600767408,"score_gpt":0.4599711975242283,"score_spread":0.24403536151655425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2410674143","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060512205,0.00009015664,0.993429,0.000034710712,0.0000073659353,0.000046419544,0.0000179397,0.0000930006,0.00023020768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16526918,0.00018885393,0.8330724,0.00010054281,0.00002841975,0.0005382744,0.00016259975,0.00008600448,0.00055371586],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.981979,0.013654617,0.0003380228,0.0010006396,0.0025736336,0.00045400564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9694909,0.025870461,0.0018502772,0.0012555448,0.0012746479,0.00025819478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018365752,0.0012447307,0.0018535912,0.0024022358,0.0006162731,0.0012391631,0.0011800032,0.0012295246,0.001853115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042140447,0.0007133414,0.0016371664,0.0019021282,0.0018096847,0.0011221274,0.0018828749,0.0014544284,0.000345052],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006809933,0.00024599754,0.0031245656,0.0004166415,0.0004685771,0.00011073765,0.00028158768,0.6345626,0.016874138,0.09847331,0.00079558615,0.24396521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006162749,0.00015832634,0.0005623899,0.00002497803,0.000034747085,0.000021373708,0.000017581731,0.9399206,0.003059799,0.055307727,0.0008016234,0.000029235518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015859312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014263382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018365752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012580275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024463092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09712857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2471086566","doi":"10.1007/s10985-016-9371-2","title":"Association measures for bivariate failure times in the presence of a cure fraction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lifetime Data Analysis","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bivariate analysis; Estimator; Fraction (chemistry); Flexibility (engineering); Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Range (aeronautics); Computer science; Econometrics; Statistics; Materials science","score_opus":0.1340657016613935,"score_gpt":0.44417221815478936,"score_spread":0.3101065164933958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2471086566","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43783075,0.0016282114,0.55481255,0.00071271474,0.00031226914,0.0008139989,0.0018075595,0.0003223674,0.0017595292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9156031,0.00038717876,0.07901768,0.00017058357,0.00013746847,0.0024141567,0.0010852966,0.00005768746,0.0011268851],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90345913,0.07431742,0.0038471408,0.010890087,0.005454838,0.002031402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.43649745,0.50240445,0.02738043,0.026960768,0.0049668644,0.0017901022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14463818,0.001674995,0.0026100916,0.0031712777,0.0009525283,0.0031648127,0.0034152758,0.0036470487,0.005683659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3143374,0.00080917927,0.0043875934,0.0022797554,0.0043313294,0.0044249278,0.0022981667,0.004551823,0.00051961455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.036367558,0.0051108063,0.30408406,0.0034435801,0.014406964,0.0006142265,0.0027752982,0.12292553,0.007963436,0.17127015,0.0033844437,0.3276539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014582163,0.018144283,0.16071208,0.0008487489,0.010483207,0.0008029607,0.0012655142,0.51953965,0.009354129,0.26983663,0.0070399498,0.0005146862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072961976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006164711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14463818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015393477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026114215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76492894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472752992","doi":"10.1080/03610918.2015.1030414","title":"Computing A-optimal and E-optimal designs for regression models via semidefinite programming","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Semidefinite programming; Optimal design; Mathematical optimization; MATLAB; Linear programming; Computer science; Mathematics; Convergence (economics); Semidefinite embedding; Construct (python library); Quadratically constrained quadratic program; Machine learning","score_opus":0.5693965277082369,"score_gpt":0.5724371946419906,"score_spread":0.0030406669337537107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472752992","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004301976,0.00013569088,0.99423003,0.000088516885,0.0000129143,0.00007246135,0.000047504276,0.00009981231,0.0010111077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11788729,0.0003398833,0.87969023,0.00018482025,0.000025142204,0.0008502019,0.00018043509,0.00011569208,0.0007263052],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191564,0.005898899,0.00028560474,0.00078773516,0.0009200257,0.00019210014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728387,0.02346129,0.0015609462,0.0008345396,0.0010186848,0.0002857979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012949093,0.002270256,0.0017211935,0.0016480561,0.0005996681,0.0017112968,0.0011120781,0.0017753713,0.004272969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030349445,0.0013921971,0.0016577068,0.0011695821,0.0021502238,0.0018750374,0.001712674,0.00293692,0.00088442053],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025796768,0.00038605582,0.0008735327,0.0005330986,0.00015375303,0.00009104615,0.00011136946,0.84015125,0.003826716,0.07865188,0.0015850734,0.073378235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088679946,0.000267647,0.00020434421,0.000075305776,0.000024771143,0.000035559584,0.000037739508,0.930408,0.002509806,0.06513024,0.0011895734,0.000028441938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014073083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015767028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012949093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011817501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035122794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06848216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474739796","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v5n4p84","title":"On the Existence Conditions for Balanced Fractional $2^{m}$ Factorial Designs of Resolution $\\mathrm{R}^{\\ast}(\\{1\\}|\\mathrm{\\Omega}_{\\ell})$ with $N&lt;\\nu_{\\ell}(m)$","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Mathematics; Omega; Resolution (logic); Factorial; Combinatorics; Factorial experiment; Order (exchange); Physics; Mathematical analysis; Statistics; Computer science; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.1622880970431732,"score_gpt":0.43520305136846815,"score_spread":0.27291495432529495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474739796","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017966112,0.00049511046,0.9773817,0.00029445178,0.000050086666,0.0004921102,0.00030042027,0.00020506332,0.0028149846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11598714,0.0004950813,0.87706155,0.00047374298,0.00016812867,0.0042332592,0.00040076638,0.00010339848,0.0010769526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9588804,0.027287154,0.0021858613,0.00635431,0.0038584857,0.0014337195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7238988,0.24590857,0.014195854,0.00824055,0.005738701,0.002017365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053461865,0.002721547,0.00407602,0.002134424,0.0013209984,0.0017639878,0.0018924223,0.002968885,0.008639374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16412437,0.0019663086,0.0025684652,0.0016625585,0.0056065395,0.004369577,0.002955769,0.0032078489,0.0015931755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006586743,0.0009838725,0.0056235907,0.003103155,0.00065036106,0.00086323416,0.0016262135,0.062041648,0.050571334,0.71793675,0.0031915796,0.14682153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028753066,0.007375498,0.0064588026,0.0009799283,0.0006522864,0.0009173832,0.0003361582,0.24144682,0.046667248,0.6720203,0.019876823,0.00039344034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046193795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000581293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053461865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016559425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004579906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28273672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483827338","doi":"10.5539/jmr.v8n4p40","title":"Useful Numerical Statistics of Some Response Surface Methodology Designs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematics Research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Plackett–Burman design; Fractional factorial design; Response surface methodology; Optimality criterion; Factorial experiment; Order (exchange); Optimal design; Mathematical optimization; Surface (topology); Factorial; Hypercube; Statistics; Combinatorics; Geometry; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.7972484735417239,"score_gpt":0.6384052529672962,"score_spread":0.15884322057442768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483827338","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01145568,0.0004219485,0.9806178,0.00022634934,0.00013345788,0.00036665026,0.0006811349,0.0006533462,0.0054436303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22097014,0.00061069155,0.77073497,0.00023057603,0.00021890958,0.0032959064,0.0016662413,0.0003597093,0.0019127999],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97160465,0.018535223,0.0019386479,0.0012915449,0.006175923,0.00045401978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8522249,0.12159719,0.0069897887,0.008683987,0.010037305,0.00046684168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023425948,0.0015300172,0.0014679079,0.0041213254,0.0006973559,0.0017877639,0.0012263381,0.0012640505,0.011387899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14256932,0.00038363232,0.0009908023,0.0036459381,0.0019061946,0.0018579052,0.0011220804,0.0019336904,0.0021731837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009262346,0.00026201498,0.0040508755,0.00173566,0.00014291632,0.000606077,0.00056462566,0.11836829,0.009061069,0.36929223,0.014005005,0.48098505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023867025,0.0021672572,0.006858349,0.0007263932,0.00012167077,0.0011688326,0.0005045797,0.6025002,0.020079968,0.33149204,0.033907786,0.0002342433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029740305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000248227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023425948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010207191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014560374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123889744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492791888","doi":"10.1037/10693-007","title":"Effect Size Estimation in Multifactor Designs.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"American Psychological Association eBooks","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Estimation; Econometrics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.0937258832690499,"score_gpt":0.4519220721500317,"score_spread":0.3581961888809818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492791888","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010582033,0.007538519,0.98582274,0.00037565935,0.00036784576,0.0003798563,0.00027961208,0.0007035282,0.0034741634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019748468,0.0029781668,0.9715181,0.00030152313,0.0001909528,0.0022869047,0.00022415868,0.00025627643,0.0024954153],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9261557,0.06516303,0.0015234791,0.0023137652,0.0045382986,0.00030574604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7141469,0.2763714,0.002121616,0.004841052,0.0022188525,0.00030018942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06830389,0.0024339675,0.0028797896,0.0026395516,0.0004043658,0.0016557818,0.0029848616,0.0027819593,0.016054127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21939766,0.0022029434,0.0018662536,0.002340639,0.0021025874,0.0026377034,0.0017825544,0.0038147424,0.0029342973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096031727,0.00023805702,0.0011860089,0.005472955,0.0015167188,0.000089386995,0.00062577834,0.0129588945,0.0035283237,0.11962008,0.025698688,0.8281048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010419979,0.0013944365,0.0067505855,0.002707261,0.0013945296,0.00040684827,0.0002228861,0.11731561,0.010282539,0.77636784,0.081884325,0.00023110451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010250947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017183152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06830389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012353172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017078527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36122984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507592422","doi":"10.1177/0008068320020515","title":"Split Block Designs","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Block (permutation group theory); Mathematics; Class (philosophy); Arithmetic; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Algorithm; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1838751938998208,"score_gpt":0.4101778376903155,"score_spread":0.22630264379049472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507592422","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007902195,0.00065719464,0.96218747,0.00032358526,0.00071282516,0.014838824,0.002131707,0.0005690258,0.010677205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0591805,0.0008884211,0.86128575,0.00065960863,0.00018737112,0.064650565,0.0014233254,0.00027100273,0.01145337],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9633335,0.02806551,0.0016402558,0.0023765047,0.003836391,0.0007478242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96774083,0.019037282,0.0016574559,0.0061109364,0.004685326,0.0007680757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030126758,0.0015264023,0.0024241474,0.0015672513,0.0012830952,0.0015783673,0.0024092682,0.0016019532,0.06288895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0792977,0.0010166493,0.001202611,0.0019046565,0.0015299649,0.0014707196,0.0026756553,0.0024922714,0.009643093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010473097,0.0014884918,0.0035426382,0.0024703855,0.0006172287,0.0001700557,0.002250438,0.009849281,0.0065002437,0.38817868,0.041901898,0.5325576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012309041,0.014847955,0.008155783,0.0016323812,0.0011318426,0.0006589265,0.00072712736,0.057698965,0.0147626735,0.44561717,0.4421003,0.00035777717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008792882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016073679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06288895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011022425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032212515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21038449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508257146","doi":"10.1016/j.jco.2014.10.004","title":"On construction of blocked general minimum lower-order confounding <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" altimg=\"si18.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math> designs with <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" altimg=\"si19.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:math>","year":2014,"lang":"lv","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Complexity","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Order (exchange); Algorithm; Combinatorics; Statistics","score_opus":0.034737542100621216,"score_gpt":0.285277251390713,"score_spread":0.25053970929009184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508257146","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0179985,0.00028548023,0.9539448,0.00020240298,0.00009491097,0.00016584354,0.00045263668,0.001046191,0.025809348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16571598,0.00071864406,0.7837426,0.000583077,0.00010685113,0.00070057955,0.003080797,0.0012228442,0.044128537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998041,0.00051831006,0.00015600426,0.00039100336,0.0006421628,0.00025161862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764854,0.001006524,0.00022364545,0.00055376644,0.000435088,0.0001325499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019434709,0.0014601996,0.0014899408,0.0011595521,0.0010760952,0.0020703468,0.0015231292,0.000942102,0.021040834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005226855,0.001065296,0.0030082015,0.0009520397,0.0014625319,0.0025597431,0.0032728922,0.003077101,0.010575118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005445528,0.00020463462,0.0010305933,0.0006822768,0.00008813051,0.000307785,0.0006522265,0.04584398,0.021489937,0.7339387,0.018675312,0.17654186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017557858,0.0005089379,0.0005054717,0.0001882961,0.00011042492,0.00042941252,0.0001457128,0.124673866,0.01601229,0.7966257,0.060531713,0.00009267618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021095152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035253176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021040834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017148905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016218557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070388556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508662586","doi":"10.1002/qre.2047","title":"Planning and Analyzing Experiments with Models that Distinguish Between Replicates and Repeats","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality and Reliability Engineering International","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Variation (astronomy); Binary number; Value (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Mathematics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.24185350200226333,"score_gpt":0.45400472597203956,"score_spread":0.21215122396977623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508662586","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009555102,0.00015295403,0.98840684,0.00038289433,0.000031190644,0.00070131425,0.0001196296,0.0002048325,0.00044523054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.096998245,0.00034811842,0.8954433,0.00040909808,0.00006636603,0.0054112636,0.00040365424,0.000074767,0.00084521493],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97532755,0.019440832,0.000800048,0.002814248,0.0011729198,0.0004444075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83076876,0.15331016,0.0061729,0.0073901475,0.0016410478,0.0007170031],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056746684,0.0027627228,0.0037106941,0.0015250724,0.0009000632,0.0028429502,0.0033906712,0.0037032973,0.0035243444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080805786,0.0020961901,0.0043540807,0.0013294384,0.0033717137,0.0036430503,0.0021828774,0.005488616,0.00077773054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011638658,0.0006395672,0.0062745535,0.0013342794,0.0007795898,0.00031374756,0.00059998815,0.80897015,0.007016285,0.089078136,0.0016508291,0.082178935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032507873,0.00071767106,0.0018140868,0.00011977622,0.00023106654,0.00008122586,0.00012366014,0.76524514,0.004217979,0.22374815,0.0032455244,0.00013062696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028220573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045203287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94325334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032167626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049480232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30010867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509252776","doi":"10.4153/cmb-2015-073-7","title":"An Existence Theory for Incomplete Designs","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Mathematical Bulletin","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"California Institute of Technology","keywords":"Mathematics; Pairwise comparison; Block (permutation group theory); Combinatorics; Congruence (geometry); Block design; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics; Geometry; Statistics","score_opus":0.4663675317154439,"score_gpt":0.48140845073535726,"score_spread":0.01504091901991339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509252776","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013962161,0.00067052664,0.97021717,0.0008775447,0.000077320285,0.00011188428,0.0001926642,0.00007950006,0.013811149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45928672,0.0014040187,0.525998,0.00090295007,0.00038919374,0.0018926238,0.00045450008,0.0001183448,0.009553639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98125,0.01139797,0.0011058659,0.0024753632,0.0030906505,0.00068006956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88749856,0.091486305,0.006778309,0.005810252,0.006971524,0.001455103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030994829,0.0012578112,0.002007178,0.0030248854,0.0015435221,0.0031686695,0.001997475,0.0024456228,0.012974464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06695416,0.0019169205,0.0017745729,0.0016757614,0.007096311,0.007149126,0.0041910647,0.004241452,0.0008216191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006966482,0.000029085853,0.00030382792,0.00017702953,0.000031751417,0.000029392835,0.00017237327,0.010730751,0.00037083542,0.97650117,0.0006818981,0.01090225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058797526,0.00017352185,0.00027563667,0.00020629451,0.00004777912,0.00009011291,0.00010881703,0.045091055,0.00087724265,0.946599,0.0064487704,0.000022905355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005456221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049155223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030994829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036732263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025377003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16391832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509946706","doi":"10.1177/0008068320050508","title":"Estimation of Residual Effects in Repeated Measurements Designs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Residual; Optimal design; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Design of experiments; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Algorithm; Statistics","score_opus":0.12819508368051005,"score_gpt":0.4314059461789958,"score_spread":0.3032108624984857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509946706","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009058265,0.00016502997,0.98928946,0.000106440755,0.000027534625,0.00020714305,0.0000423927,0.00010237704,0.0010014152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21863116,0.00021604949,0.7784506,0.00017166488,0.000060252627,0.0016390926,0.00013082537,0.00007823526,0.00062205136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8095615,0.15974164,0.0046649748,0.007381745,0.017200382,0.0014498159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82342845,0.13972081,0.009896346,0.01694741,0.009335098,0.00067187677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07309609,0.0011738669,0.002913073,0.0018272194,0.0005667544,0.0015146306,0.0021826667,0.0012821284,0.0035310793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19503945,0.0010348398,0.0019448161,0.0015706164,0.003489486,0.0022437347,0.0016460654,0.0020953096,0.00052616454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022830933,0.0005749214,0.007862671,0.0017805166,0.00092365115,0.00019097564,0.0006776763,0.12398876,0.008260589,0.4446305,0.0021994014,0.40662712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006841816,0.004567011,0.009677587,0.00052492326,0.00059107965,0.00023938097,0.00024375781,0.3102113,0.019324627,0.6441747,0.009569871,0.00019151298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007559842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068828167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07309609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016629242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003930666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38657367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512287401","doi":"10.1177/0008068320130104","title":"A Unified Approach to Factorial Designs with Randomization Restrictions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Factorial experiment; Randomization; Factorial; Mathematics; Restricted randomization; Fractional factorial design; Isomorphism (crystallography); Linear subspace; Contrast (vision); Rank (graph theory); Plackett–Burman design; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Arithmetic; Algorithm; Statistics; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence; Pure mathematics; Clinical trial","score_opus":0.09177858634421168,"score_gpt":0.3715417699575644,"score_spread":0.27976318361335273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512287401","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033959173,0.000022130636,0.9990138,0.000027695476,0.000013884097,0.00012265235,0.000025173022,0.00007352101,0.00036149626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010213469,0.000068433714,0.9876359,0.000061601946,0.000039592156,0.0013604135,0.000057081907,0.00005142006,0.0005120352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9303749,0.052528676,0.0029080117,0.0051230746,0.0081856195,0.0008797035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9432742,0.03883764,0.0033194982,0.00909637,0.004949909,0.0005223898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046835717,0.0024616497,0.0028774873,0.0036599785,0.0011575917,0.0035481516,0.0040080315,0.0019710285,0.011418699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087513946,0.0017181319,0.0029912968,0.0039794454,0.0046093273,0.004789938,0.004495705,0.0053676553,0.0022012186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002547875,0.00013540182,0.00050034863,0.0004354835,0.00012938146,0.00007656202,0.00030258007,0.02544569,0.0030689791,0.8126796,0.0014790772,0.15549214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002550229,0.0010820915,0.00063679647,0.00013521977,0.000106970394,0.00011697276,0.000075141725,0.18165539,0.004025336,0.7891372,0.022671854,0.00010203207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009241632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001087044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046835717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024244979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005655994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2476939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515506909","doi":"10.1177/0008068320060305","title":"Optimal Crossover Designs for Comparing Mixed Carryover Effects","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Actua; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Crossover; Mixed model; Design of experiments; Point (geometry); Treatment effect; Optimal design; Estimation; Mathematics; Unit (ring theory); Identification (biology); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Medicine; Machine learning; Engineering","score_opus":0.08002191894145441,"score_gpt":0.4032220343776169,"score_spread":0.32320011543616245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515506909","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007108297,0.00058279384,0.9906566,0.00006393988,0.00007647785,0.00080892775,0.00008204438,0.00009296545,0.00052794936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08703182,0.00085755985,0.9060645,0.00015667037,0.000114050476,0.0049120076,0.00018342964,0.000055896002,0.00062415196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88195634,0.1022932,0.0025624982,0.0063004545,0.0060810824,0.00080645387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88241196,0.09684162,0.007886034,0.00998428,0.0023746395,0.0005015],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.073157996,0.0016471002,0.0032001187,0.002190168,0.00054942735,0.0016109133,0.0023031498,0.002178786,0.0059439484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13005537,0.0011317106,0.0023147461,0.0019320238,0.0022798402,0.0023281777,0.0018103963,0.0022730215,0.0006024974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052358974,0.00088434934,0.004810663,0.0026049062,0.0022842824,0.00013211048,0.0006545811,0.12109601,0.005425178,0.4372934,0.0013519072,0.4182268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034468772,0.016231338,0.009444164,0.000813247,0.0016361668,0.00034926672,0.00023691056,0.31379053,0.007867451,0.6268174,0.019000338,0.00036625983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038509083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034394354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.926842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011883876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016885052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38690108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524850296","doi":"10.1080/00224065.2006.11918614","title":"Blocked Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Experiments for Robust Parameter Design","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality Technology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Winnipeg","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Split plot; Factorial experiment; Mathematics; Plot (graphics); Ranking (information retrieval); Factorial; Statistics; Design of experiments; Plackett–Burman design; Restricted randomization; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Response surface methodology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.4162652108112608,"score_gpt":0.520613587271537,"score_spread":0.10434837646027617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524850296","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013942523,0.00010770597,0.99684745,0.0000290968,0.00004082502,0.0005073278,0.000099903424,0.00035509787,0.0006182126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015045382,0.00013596531,0.9805131,0.00005172738,0.00002360617,0.0035436417,0.00014108738,0.00012545615,0.00042008926],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730718,0.019348647,0.0011090027,0.0022099093,0.0038634716,0.00039719744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9560272,0.030782545,0.0037297758,0.006352051,0.0028075746,0.00030080444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027149212,0.002324676,0.0031023887,0.0017220925,0.00091198133,0.0015336666,0.0024521449,0.001738784,0.016078582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061299715,0.0010813613,0.0019476848,0.0025001324,0.0016604365,0.001923409,0.0018228784,0.0036567005,0.0029327243],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004574221,0.0015272566,0.001889716,0.0037740439,0.0005186822,0.00026945444,0.00070169463,0.14511007,0.055382095,0.29022256,0.009433125,0.48659703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015901411,0.006495653,0.0027411552,0.0005202713,0.00034836683,0.00035378127,0.0001384038,0.58416,0.07386449,0.24284409,0.08653047,0.00041323493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005042554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006815039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027149212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014382388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023206077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1435805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526674685","doi":"10.1007/s00184-016-0595-7","title":"Blocked factor aliased effect-number pattern and column rank of blocked regular designs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Column (typography); Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Factor (programming language); Combinatorics; Statistics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Fractional factorial design; Factorial experiment; Geometry; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.13119729395925922,"score_gpt":0.4245310810891063,"score_spread":0.2933337871298471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526674685","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005728517,0.00011171579,0.9925546,0.00008966606,0.000036285033,0.00025804088,0.00023777648,0.00029080574,0.000692478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13277926,0.00022777071,0.85987866,0.00016612254,0.000088002314,0.0029101411,0.0004955591,0.00035909956,0.0030954669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89399797,0.081793904,0.0037383775,0.010600628,0.0076688393,0.0022002405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71917266,0.21496387,0.014257009,0.04228612,0.007855746,0.0014646898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.073553465,0.0035142426,0.0056603914,0.002376458,0.0011330249,0.0032590972,0.0051258053,0.0039029429,0.018226782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23867953,0.003264438,0.003533582,0.0028078225,0.005783783,0.0062769745,0.0030085251,0.0038847625,0.0026180085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013612698,0.0015731221,0.004808064,0.003381731,0.0018173471,0.00037352188,0.0009311666,0.13431056,0.015916938,0.45013985,0.0053863013,0.3677486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014926243,0.002655792,0.003301918,0.000318377,0.0006229189,0.00024674885,0.00011810653,0.575275,0.011668664,0.3966697,0.007415223,0.00021487998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011121099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012919522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073553465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020321752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005222987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38899255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2545991974","doi":"10.1109/nsspw.2006.4378829","title":"SMC Samplers for Bayesian Optimal Nonlinear Design","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Software deployment; Monte Carlo method; Bayesian probability; Nonlinear system; Mathematical optimization; Bayesian experimental design; Bayesian network; Machine learning; Bayesian inference; Bayesian statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Software engineering","score_opus":0.21792370910297099,"score_gpt":0.4595369197990576,"score_spread":0.2416132106960866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2545991974","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019033467,0.00024409186,0.9966569,0.00015418894,0.000033359058,0.00007004142,0.000037396305,0.000121211764,0.00077945826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27357078,0.0010635529,0.717655,0.0004974659,0.00027796382,0.0021742813,0.00048154037,0.0001364307,0.0041430555],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995048,0.0035336416,0.00016365966,0.0003958104,0.0006928937,0.00016594326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757042,0.020944174,0.0008959504,0.0008981396,0.0012333413,0.0003241521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012811676,0.0015793886,0.0022395763,0.0014397509,0.00073345925,0.0013151547,0.0018232958,0.0018111978,0.0055822674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03575127,0.0010325419,0.0012557846,0.0012024037,0.002792481,0.0014867774,0.0020776016,0.0024175523,0.0008338304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036987592,0.000121437755,0.0010841212,0.00033059384,0.00016422602,0.000074179916,0.00010431277,0.56781423,0.0007771954,0.36507058,0.0015630109,0.06252625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010560973,0.000066492226,0.00008784083,0.000028946257,0.000017295053,0.000009774176,0.0000042853353,0.90481627,0.00032701428,0.093271226,0.0012545994,0.00001067737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024883458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026348121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012811676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014441038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029339097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0677554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566938964","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2016.11.005","title":"Optimal designs for spline wavelet regression models","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Wavelet; Mathematics; Optimal design; Spline (mechanical); Haar wavelet; Mathematical optimization; Quadratic equation; Regression; Haar; Regression analysis; Set (abstract data type); Algorithm; Construct (python library); Applied mathematics; Statistics; Wavelet transform; Discrete wavelet transform; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.3312389479618946,"score_gpt":0.5110017454229613,"score_spread":0.17976279746106666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566938964","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063489573,0.00017378815,0.9926745,0.00013669541,0.000029723056,0.00012996743,0.00004580352,0.000079015066,0.0003815608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21027264,0.0005979466,0.78452843,0.00018897803,0.00007874088,0.0027728386,0.00027488093,0.00015186433,0.0011337092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9463261,0.04648812,0.0011623806,0.0025736038,0.0024541111,0.0009956895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.883777,0.10231358,0.003972796,0.005557944,0.0033922421,0.0009864981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05691293,0.0015377436,0.0032270963,0.0020227656,0.0006535844,0.0021162783,0.0028075273,0.0028324837,0.0055062757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14604568,0.0030476362,0.002669242,0.0013042272,0.0030699929,0.003770979,0.0031741157,0.004231427,0.0007286053],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032218578,0.0006922938,0.002496393,0.0010634301,0.0006513783,0.000115883944,0.0004291296,0.3110474,0.003351319,0.50323516,0.0018286172,0.1718671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093788176,0.00086507783,0.0007472715,0.0002005929,0.0002481032,0.000037254307,0.00006634803,0.5719919,0.0019837914,0.4207538,0.002104473,0.0000634967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093592156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010266129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05691293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018457833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051409057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30098796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584413285","doi":"10.1111/anzs.12178","title":"Optimal split‐plot orthogonal arrays","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Council","keywords":"Split plot; Mathematics; Plot (graphics); Restricted randomization; Statistics","score_opus":0.18047291145836383,"score_gpt":0.45181526529757227,"score_spread":0.27134235383920846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584413285","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050185278,0.00039746196,0.94514245,0.000112473506,0.000049055507,0.0003117044,0.00022667769,0.00038545276,0.0031893656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40221673,0.00026034133,0.5936242,0.00013632138,0.00003729792,0.0012177686,0.00047280715,0.00014729738,0.001887292],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819187,0.013013047,0.0008021943,0.0015118934,0.0022689195,0.0004852459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9673158,0.021461358,0.002532219,0.0040820525,0.0041614794,0.00044695428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008848522,0.00073853834,0.0014259035,0.00083494623,0.00031840484,0.0011116036,0.0010078163,0.0006961666,0.0077594863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037620354,0.00059529016,0.0010276595,0.00088940945,0.0011797223,0.0013932813,0.0011761698,0.0008765131,0.0011726454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008773938,0.0007322773,0.0059838253,0.0020185197,0.0005193449,0.00013997666,0.0004479997,0.28153202,0.04447989,0.12551987,0.00376097,0.52609134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013087548,0.0080028325,0.0089597525,0.00044233134,0.00034202306,0.00027095035,0.00031678815,0.6736633,0.051762186,0.23734316,0.017378123,0.00020987117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023498859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030651884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008848522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006435096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010508792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046796024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586054978","doi":"10.22237/jmasm/1130803440","title":"Estimation of Process Variances in Robust Parameter Designs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Mathematics; Robustness (evolution); Orthogonal array; Taguchi methods; Design of experiments; Statistics; Noise (video); Factorial experiment; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2510232612297184,"score_gpt":0.5285006607066095,"score_spread":0.2774773994768911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586054978","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010440536,0.00005269456,0.998694,0.000011605104,0.000007672516,0.00002101044,0.000009265765,0.00007057481,0.00008922147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12004253,0.00038852703,0.8775669,0.00006755027,0.0000720182,0.0009690974,0.00022028133,0.0001565687,0.0005165035],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9569065,0.030807596,0.0015436515,0.0041076858,0.0059879213,0.00064666005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93945867,0.048796464,0.0041024997,0.0046311826,0.002785843,0.00022540415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03292051,0.0023241541,0.002943315,0.0026759503,0.00056234637,0.0019251041,0.0024684537,0.002832601,0.0012664003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09455952,0.001732684,0.0031540722,0.0016754335,0.0029476718,0.0023114306,0.002328993,0.0025165034,0.0006844361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056748657,0.00024147268,0.0017310029,0.0009438844,0.0007852033,0.00014351112,0.00034821112,0.5144336,0.013498735,0.20809877,0.0006335973,0.25857443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011843471,0.0007123547,0.0009506505,0.00011389352,0.00017038861,0.000090981106,0.000037733334,0.8250197,0.013762783,0.15624765,0.0026524777,0.00012298067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078998046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004955338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03292051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011395323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022013572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17410237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586752023","doi":"10.1017/s0001924000009027","title":"A multidisciplinary robust optimisation framework for UAV conceptual design","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Aeronautical Journal","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"National Research Foundation of Korea","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Conceptual design; Probabilistic design; Reliability engineering; Monte Carlo method; Engineering design process; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.34113082493421654,"score_gpt":0.4665918349306681,"score_spread":0.12546100999645154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586752023","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014866869,0.00008649603,0.9965789,0.000035479283,0.000008132097,0.000030014175,0.000017923374,0.00005022547,0.0017062237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33058256,0.00040482878,0.66411364,0.00007935098,0.00004496317,0.0007267042,0.00016927224,0.0001464073,0.003732327],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871933,0.000511699,0.00004899012,0.00015952911,0.0004856266,0.000074843425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916697,0.0004577316,0.00010494821,0.00006181148,0.0001819454,0.00002662848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028831463,0.001131122,0.0010705956,0.0011747971,0.00042927658,0.001331781,0.0014208022,0.0011860947,0.0032909848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027660762,0.0007607655,0.001480038,0.00062728906,0.0010029682,0.0007072156,0.0014690364,0.0010674197,0.0004884304],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008202725,0.000009165282,0.0000489019,0.0000362901,0.00001035472,0.000014887904,0.000010596969,0.9851222,0.00067404064,0.008985092,0.00008323263,0.004997033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004327214,0.000017316419,0.000028401428,0.0000070492756,0.0000032942824,0.000005459615,0.000004159283,0.99577785,0.00021298189,0.0033894302,0.0005458993,0.000003823352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027306525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017638828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032909848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010597531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013272498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015247762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592561635","doi":"10.1007/s00362-017-0887-7","title":"Using SeDuMi to find various optimal designs for regression models","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistical Papers","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Optimal design; Semidefinite programming; Mathematics; Estimator; Discretization; Computer science; Focus (optics); Linear programming; Nonlinear programming; Equivalence (formal languages); Nonlinear system; Machine learning","score_opus":0.4964396165725281,"score_gpt":0.5570098859689532,"score_spread":0.06057026939642507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592561635","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032778315,0.00014477484,0.99581957,0.00005632634,0.000031683325,0.00013048992,0.000040434184,0.0002616259,0.0002372296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023840476,0.00008848437,0.97490203,0.000050727424,0.000016348618,0.0007451615,0.00006766047,0.00009822174,0.0001908705],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.982263,0.013852398,0.00063983444,0.0009356421,0.0018291268,0.00047995412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9632987,0.03072842,0.001256695,0.0016936908,0.0025502641,0.00047226262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03868651,0.0026997854,0.003186681,0.0034328145,0.0010808345,0.002021023,0.002486034,0.002124578,0.004062352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06459117,0.0024269095,0.0048600044,0.0017830475,0.0014274794,0.0023077708,0.0023800058,0.0039817654,0.00060169515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020211206,0.0012238472,0.0020372446,0.0018135982,0.0011155542,0.00020434857,0.00055003975,0.48006862,0.011615914,0.11821884,0.0041833105,0.37694746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045221543,0.00083125226,0.00039429637,0.00013255594,0.00025449783,0.000056187546,0.000064675725,0.9229204,0.00641775,0.065519296,0.002872864,0.000084032676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019568792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002380249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03868651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023411023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061454647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20459628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593819367","doi":"10.1142/s0219691317500254","title":"Minimax robust designs for wavelet estimation of nonparametric regression models with autocorrelated errors","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Wavelets Multiresolution and Information Processing","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Minimax; Autocorrelation; Ordinary least squares; Statistics; Wavelet; Generalized least squares; Least-squares function approximation; Mean squared error; Nonparametric statistics; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Algorithm; Computer science; Estimator; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.16130177020043582,"score_gpt":0.4319048563023143,"score_spread":0.27060308610187844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593819367","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046824506,0.000115478586,0.9949079,0.00003610354,0.000010664425,0.00003389629,0.00001590209,0.000028390963,0.00016924273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13293563,0.00040855736,0.86500317,0.000076195145,0.000036077607,0.00086288963,0.00009858965,0.000050199214,0.000528708],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99086493,0.00725565,0.0002564501,0.00061130256,0.00084017566,0.00017146359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818085,0.013698464,0.0021658435,0.001230126,0.00093594386,0.00016116472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017614974,0.0010411965,0.0012146906,0.0010144825,0.00035164287,0.00084984384,0.0011975626,0.0015178713,0.0017323714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032368034,0.0008099936,0.0012978227,0.0007976335,0.0017059419,0.0011031306,0.0013165628,0.0014604485,0.0003678956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006025248,0.00022343511,0.002070705,0.0006862044,0.00025859423,0.0001662548,0.00030371078,0.51962566,0.014365107,0.327922,0.0008839457,0.13289191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011543195,0.0008730936,0.00091018056,0.00011586594,0.000065311106,0.000080226084,0.00003505346,0.87999445,0.007652467,0.10727851,0.0028098144,0.000069637776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024963968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021093413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017614974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007504334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008626904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09315801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605718405","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v6n3p198","title":"Linear Contrasts Based on an Extension of the Wilcoxon--Mann--Whitney Approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Statistics; Extension (predicate logic); Contrast (vision); Generalization; Measure (data warehouse); Random variable; Wilcoxon signed-rank test; Simple (philosophy); Mann–Whitney U test; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.14184048002497512,"score_gpt":0.45139218140162,"score_spread":0.3095517013766449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605718405","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056488267,0.00011827475,0.99149656,0.00009897788,0.00015479121,0.000453791,0.0001899693,0.0003323532,0.0015065735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.116010524,0.00023050961,0.87781453,0.00025473878,0.00021139365,0.0033587657,0.0002518034,0.00023969966,0.001628094],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9731759,0.016649447,0.0012532563,0.0039486364,0.0043080524,0.00066464354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9510337,0.038049642,0.0024091457,0.0050907293,0.0029803573,0.00043640056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028314192,0.0020197683,0.0024103688,0.0025385488,0.0010080765,0.002170336,0.0029979127,0.0014513852,0.010202908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072513536,0.0007099819,0.0026198593,0.0026856293,0.003857261,0.003548292,0.0031057396,0.004847723,0.0010713056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034949614,0.00093906204,0.005423245,0.0020217854,0.0018023947,0.0005640897,0.0013563695,0.024422493,0.03117257,0.38705638,0.0060389386,0.53570765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068716344,0.009340909,0.01817102,0.00027471952,0.0009804964,0.001004715,0.00034312904,0.2175901,0.027462045,0.68248576,0.041184988,0.0004749372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008502708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009240945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028314192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013264378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022527142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14974153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618160794","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11324","title":"Estimation of a generalized linear mixed model for response‐adaptive designs in multi‐centre clinical trials","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Hessian matrix; Estimator; Generalized linear mixed model; Mathematics; Generalized linear model; Generalized estimating equation; Function (biology); Statistics; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.7676137574481702,"score_gpt":0.6015678473685178,"score_spread":0.16604591007965241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618160794","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006048736,0.00060970633,0.98960644,0.00049629936,0.00017766816,0.002322351,0.00014446344,0.00027834615,0.00031583195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.123939686,0.00052534,0.85610116,0.0006761613,0.00015418784,0.01734019,0.0003162954,0.00009110367,0.000855863],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.47277746,0.49989524,0.006411054,0.011214049,0.008339873,0.0013624048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.60021716,0.35423476,0.018180158,0.018209206,0.007988886,0.0011698258],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30489242,0.0032111395,0.007514762,0.0042450987,0.0012474695,0.004320984,0.0061780084,0.0067789266,0.0068588424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36870182,0.0027148523,0.008220152,0.0044916286,0.0050030937,0.0036166853,0.0039629797,0.007007205,0.0012940611],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008012239,0.0009966814,0.012725557,0.005734647,0.009664623,0.0007254692,0.0015547734,0.44235387,0.0020249488,0.2998553,0.0054607806,0.21089113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033483368,0.0031392826,0.0028409339,0.00068759255,0.0013724286,0.00014721621,0.00011995321,0.8028074,0.0014277948,0.17960028,0.0042813243,0.00022746994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002465295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016602625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6951076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004719254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059082145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8571914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618479281","doi":"","title":"An Approximate Design Effect for Unequal Weighting When Measurements May Correlate with Selection Probabilities","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Survey methodology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Weighting; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Physics","score_opus":0.6404714675082755,"score_gpt":0.5156032129815941,"score_spread":0.12486825452668149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618479281","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005492828,0.00014980287,0.99203086,0.0002604938,0.00010841562,0.00048890477,0.00006989925,0.00016788523,0.0012309646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27801597,0.00021097466,0.71101534,0.0014257035,0.00015673567,0.0057843067,0.00023004005,0.00013850525,0.0030225003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6617461,0.2802243,0.008959069,0.026004653,0.020516304,0.0025497791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39391533,0.50630844,0.014308539,0.07486888,0.009607592,0.0009912194],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2339971,0.0019125228,0.0040780837,0.0020631803,0.0017190899,0.0038289789,0.0049735922,0.0065325093,0.012482685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5691213,0.0021940314,0.0037968988,0.0027640436,0.0074775647,0.006055329,0.0046607144,0.0046161776,0.0012881678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0050496566,0.00073271414,0.015513732,0.0016978852,0.0019558386,0.00045254122,0.0022626438,0.05652551,0.004683766,0.61748827,0.005275937,0.2883615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001949377,0.0035498424,0.02278283,0.0010639975,0.00232178,0.001130195,0.0004483631,0.36659226,0.0120907985,0.56219757,0.025580045,0.0002928863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011737344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010952497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7660029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027745082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030609462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9446179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621215411","doi":"10.22237/jmasm/1493597400","title":"Analysis of robust parameter designs","year":2017,"lang":"fa","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Concordia University","keywords":"Mathematics; Statistics; Variance (accounting); Regression analysis; Robust regression; Econometrics; Regression; One-way analysis of variance; Analysis of variance","score_opus":0.35670994284087887,"score_gpt":0.5404252361768767,"score_spread":0.1837152933359978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621215411","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007736312,0.00018787992,0.99820745,0.000048346672,0.000020012256,0.00005931506,0.000044266544,0.000102840975,0.0005562599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15593708,0.0011460226,0.8381136,0.00034212298,0.00023189346,0.0020475937,0.00045779167,0.00029591128,0.0014279555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95573974,0.031002661,0.001426234,0.0036026882,0.007425359,0.0008033721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8911508,0.08624341,0.0072301426,0.008284768,0.0066019245,0.00048903556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0406889,0.0023542081,0.0032801211,0.0027702027,0.00060160336,0.0025464527,0.0026421957,0.0022456152,0.006161323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12198791,0.0012192792,0.0032400985,0.0017953038,0.0025415428,0.0022702827,0.0025456438,0.0027498284,0.0011314626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058532285,0.0001945904,0.0014161918,0.001675513,0.0009296243,0.00019746473,0.00019500624,0.35569105,0.005311507,0.4632797,0.0031610103,0.16736306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015097638,0.00081841333,0.0005240121,0.00022216389,0.00021895027,0.00012484886,0.000038162794,0.60576844,0.0059014903,0.37849227,0.0076696156,0.00007057189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004555636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022073956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0406889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016093411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032070652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21518606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622157825","doi":"10.22237/jmasm/1177992300","title":"Application of a New Procedure for Power Analysis and Comparison of the Adjusted Univariate and Multivariate Tests in Repeated Measures Designs","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Univariate; Multivariate statistics; Statistics; Mathematics; Multivariate analysis; Repeated measures design; Multivariate analysis of variance; Econometrics","score_opus":0.20997651935340306,"score_gpt":0.5204642173940497,"score_spread":0.31048769804064663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622157825","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067613414,0.00005901625,0.99834096,0.000043875098,0.00012961931,0.00027682565,0.000051260715,0.0001845279,0.00023771281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015946312,0.00012489955,0.97900075,0.00012411822,0.00019341701,0.0038709796,0.00009076165,0.00018336438,0.00046531425],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9327636,0.04601008,0.0037552887,0.005285392,0.011593022,0.00059273676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8280768,0.13663322,0.0072034416,0.015571481,0.011910927,0.000604226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0619294,0.0022377146,0.0033261264,0.0042451676,0.0010924231,0.0018607005,0.0028954232,0.0020615894,0.006388856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1975494,0.0010306083,0.0039433143,0.0039747874,0.002658278,0.0021859778,0.0028169253,0.005948102,0.0010042666],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009910004,0.00067786494,0.0052386215,0.0023370278,0.003369109,0.00054120953,0.0013332653,0.023820404,0.02535369,0.19940673,0.010507617,0.7264234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022425596,0.008908494,0.035289023,0.0010446787,0.0037147517,0.0034871995,0.00039538497,0.3743514,0.055480514,0.4045082,0.10958657,0.0009912247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007651191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074208376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0619294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011557015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033259776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32751793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624739645","doi":"10.1016/j.csda.2017.05.012","title":"Special issue on Design of Experiments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Statistics & Data Analysis","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Covariate; Event (particle physics); Event data; Observational error; Data mining; Econometrics; Statistics; Algorithm; Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.41748951280374996,"score_gpt":0.5449631452611435,"score_spread":0.12747363245739357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624739645","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00057360844,0.03881117,0.1348174,0.029425887,0.74520886,0.0011592542,0.0021729001,0.0018797406,0.04595114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006732409,0.040826615,0.058682915,0.02974975,0.7341995,0.0037902512,0.0033559424,0.0025893345,0.12007325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824646,0.0074824323,0.0018247593,0.0024719937,0.0050985264,0.00065769255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9062934,0.062056657,0.0047153626,0.010048661,0.01257936,0.0043065595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023355033,0.0041286102,0.0073831594,0.004767795,0.0014200866,0.005082971,0.004478093,0.010867756,0.14909104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05983236,0.002599863,0.0027748,0.0025024132,0.003410049,0.0034599083,0.0031449744,0.009186685,0.05528437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004181818,0.00016575135,0.00013931292,0.0028796813,0.00018232146,0.00015808294,0.00004375343,0.0011681828,0.0017639262,0.016422052,0.86423624,0.112422556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001822899,0.00023725977,0.00047968424,0.000783038,0.00009824111,0.00038340702,0.000014969032,0.0013817699,0.00062905636,0.039796,0.95596343,0.00005089682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003305896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053771416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14909104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002022395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004453867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4987592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W263390582","doi":"10.24200/jams.vol5iss2pp97-106","title":"Neural Network Assisted Experimental Designs for Food Research","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Marine Sciences [JAMS]","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Factorial experiment; Factorial; Artificial neural network; Box–Behnken design; Design of experiments; Mathematics; Experimental data; Statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Response surface methodology","score_opus":0.3936017160934224,"score_gpt":0.4944129017924242,"score_spread":0.10081118569900177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W263390582","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021283103,0.0006761942,0.97370446,0.00011586602,0.0001560988,0.0018043645,0.00022041106,0.00034830038,0.0016911804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.111376785,0.0006213125,0.87774885,0.000121576144,0.000040765106,0.008820998,0.00025109493,0.00003962773,0.0009789749],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97941214,0.017119328,0.0007491854,0.00092953356,0.0015889294,0.00020087548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96851826,0.025672797,0.002343928,0.0017857896,0.0015176028,0.0001617014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020825595,0.0018271157,0.0015615774,0.0014121783,0.00050841644,0.0012460182,0.0015021431,0.0014386593,0.0036831428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037544828,0.00086708367,0.0013750297,0.0014906661,0.0010390012,0.00097077346,0.0010238098,0.001815134,0.00047095277],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00384942,0.0013625252,0.0035229726,0.003233737,0.0007056402,0.00016875469,0.00022117284,0.62234217,0.0147015955,0.045580905,0.0011118728,0.3031992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073638617,0.004169597,0.00269378,0.00027709425,0.0002230723,0.000058375765,0.000056652676,0.92479485,0.014017794,0.044519003,0.008307154,0.00014619844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013183132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021061301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020825595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018268235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023010855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11013758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2676863892","doi":"10.22237/jmasm/1241137800","title":"A Heteroscedastic, Rank-Based Approach for Analyzing 2 x 2 Independent Groups Designs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Statistics; Type I and type II errors; Heteroscedasticity; Normality; Statistic; Econometrics; Homogeneity (statistics); Monte Carlo method; Rank (graph theory); Analysis of variance; Variance (accounting); Truncated mean; Repeated measures design; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.2227208620892771,"score_gpt":0.4985135099474539,"score_spread":0.2757926478581768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2676863892","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0109958835,0.00028556152,0.9713974,0.00023619736,0.0004675936,0.009686572,0.00089479017,0.00067197677,0.0053640585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049697276,0.00030203737,0.9157115,0.000321982,0.00011219187,0.030647447,0.00032276456,0.00016307608,0.002721744],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87089276,0.08624101,0.006113941,0.010728858,0.024491632,0.0015318058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8681962,0.090270616,0.008481123,0.016810168,0.015498093,0.00074377726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07313516,0.0024194068,0.0040048994,0.004590067,0.0022320165,0.0035897682,0.0040685395,0.0026475806,0.024381531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1950283,0.0011255029,0.0032360477,0.0058440925,0.0035817607,0.003019723,0.0021002416,0.0046108547,0.0035019158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032960826,0.0023959442,0.007080104,0.0062214257,0.0025357534,0.00042254038,0.0062570013,0.017477557,0.010041576,0.28650185,0.024124121,0.633646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004052076,0.029945362,0.03411104,0.0022134895,0.0023130733,0.0015736728,0.0042315046,0.19241515,0.04002117,0.51917326,0.16871281,0.0012374349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016893583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026653113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07313516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035474605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061522336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38678032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734623983","doi":"10.5709/acp-0214-z","title":"Varieties of Confidence Intervals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Multiplicative function; Statistics; Confidence interval; Mathematics; Measure (data warehouse); Population mean; Robust confidence intervals; Sampling (signal processing); Population; Computer science; Econometrics; Data mining; Demography","score_opus":0.31209798918670284,"score_gpt":0.6219433147655263,"score_spread":0.3098453255788235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734623983","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040869447,0.02087214,0.95031303,0.0035068113,0.0022085186,0.0004048306,0.0015515636,0.0013118814,0.015744258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24393255,0.019184321,0.717898,0.0035069927,0.003744806,0.0042565553,0.002089501,0.0014436039,0.003943701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.83944815,0.10200116,0.016813556,0.016141733,0.024223957,0.0013714503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.41848916,0.50204337,0.015544102,0.03706856,0.025597315,0.0012575728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10763778,0.0028725977,0.003956525,0.01170601,0.0017338191,0.0107214525,0.0059496392,0.0043207007,0.00984615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5170044,0.0014221572,0.0036536718,0.011647729,0.00851532,0.009952305,0.006566417,0.009810535,0.0027920296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043278898,0.0000740696,0.0035080689,0.004066178,0.0012736154,0.00035223144,0.0019540915,0.013225672,0.0004523759,0.69153816,0.02231468,0.26080808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009286896,0.00018087325,0.001851288,0.0027722393,0.00049792754,0.0007347994,0.0006450483,0.016483977,0.0012049761,0.9024929,0.072842285,0.00020081154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015693129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063611724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10763778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031790393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002854389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56924975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W274425175","doi":"10.1002/cjs.5550330401","title":"A nonparametric procedure for the analysis of balanced crossover designs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Nonparametric statistics; Combinatorics; Permutation (music); Estimator; Crossover; Statistics; Limiting; Computer science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16500893793671878,"score_gpt":0.4316667355078029,"score_spread":0.2666577975710841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W274425175","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00063821085,0.00008656438,0.9973902,0.000040458657,0.0000908392,0.00041363854,0.00021766372,0.00036688516,0.000755525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013776931,0.00015579916,0.9779259,0.00012419307,0.00010752732,0.0060605486,0.0005203778,0.00023405407,0.0010946667],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787002,0.01249608,0.0009899908,0.0017437692,0.0055728653,0.00049713865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703438,0.020002972,0.0017099169,0.004719978,0.0029047304,0.0003186596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018360192,0.0013455977,0.0021147463,0.0034237744,0.0012811726,0.0015044843,0.0024988223,0.0014505107,0.014061294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062931426,0.0007278767,0.0022491373,0.0036314358,0.0023717866,0.001528403,0.0023461606,0.004202202,0.0023658841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007030358,0.00043349888,0.0018991582,0.0014144243,0.0006826613,0.00034414756,0.0006861261,0.019499592,0.010795556,0.30531466,0.024781628,0.6334454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010785799,0.002322892,0.010025319,0.0006290857,0.000517175,0.0012487916,0.00023676046,0.20504329,0.01686291,0.5534401,0.20811778,0.00047728966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009710843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000869836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018360192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011490383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035142826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097099185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754529490","doi":"10.1016/j.csda.2017.08.012","title":"Optimizing two-level orthogonal arrays for simultaneously estimating main effects and pre-specified two-factor interactions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Statistics & Data Analysis","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Factor (programming language); Orthogonal array; Set (abstract data type); Algorithm; Matrix (chemical analysis); Mathematical optimization; Upper and lower bounds; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Taguchi methods; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.28302554846404343,"score_gpt":0.5167663804318552,"score_spread":0.23374083196781176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754529490","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018400048,0.000045535795,0.9975677,0.000025720416,0.000011902048,0.00006864058,0.000046495195,0.00031251155,0.0000814974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022258598,0.0000536992,0.9761077,0.000050013747,0.00001758597,0.0009515112,0.00022765218,0.00013238272,0.00020094891],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98440784,0.011023934,0.0006835862,0.0020624027,0.0013124835,0.00050982897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9622392,0.031975497,0.0011806099,0.002784485,0.0015012269,0.00031906288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014277302,0.0029507913,0.0031346509,0.00091320433,0.00057483494,0.0015747583,0.0022649027,0.0021434654,0.0036950852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05486094,0.001712128,0.003055213,0.001889517,0.0015975846,0.002128737,0.0025272246,0.0033123232,0.0015824933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042037186,0.001269074,0.0035124437,0.0014680531,0.0011604498,0.0001613926,0.0005203312,0.26166666,0.06217189,0.059281018,0.0040644216,0.60052055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006793335,0.0010698558,0.0028467777,0.00006713137,0.00033950887,0.00014742861,0.00006575155,0.9067012,0.028615933,0.05536853,0.003936202,0.00016238196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001205697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023651044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014277302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087622425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036059234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07550645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756886357","doi":"10.1111/anzs.12195","title":"Optimal designs for minimising covariances among parameter estimators in a linear model","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Estimator; Mathematics; Covariance; Applied mathematics; Linear model; Linear regression; Mathematical optimization; Uncorrelated; Statistics","score_opus":0.29343508942618224,"score_gpt":0.48164265004626494,"score_spread":0.1882075606200827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756886357","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004969917,0.0001153544,0.99443626,0.00007076406,0.00001024479,0.000043324122,0.000015737203,0.00004029427,0.00029811764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19780278,0.00028068863,0.7999764,0.00015795694,0.000045629073,0.00083023915,0.0001545755,0.00008547296,0.0006662198],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754294,0.019207409,0.0007176112,0.0018878981,0.0022168993,0.00054080365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9627798,0.030278644,0.002347679,0.0022025136,0.0020299593,0.00036143322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030152723,0.0013545739,0.0025577717,0.0016236688,0.000457042,0.0015620415,0.0017955627,0.0024072807,0.0022735784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064085536,0.0017310847,0.0016090982,0.00100956,0.0027849544,0.0022870644,0.0025717253,0.0021086691,0.0005547484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062631874,0.00021900004,0.0012559916,0.00048493335,0.00028899076,0.000050689014,0.00019878247,0.74131054,0.005951225,0.15493211,0.00074800535,0.093933456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001269906,0.0004685009,0.0005513213,0.00009449723,0.00006351726,0.000032289056,0.000033109416,0.8881556,0.0021694137,0.10684984,0.0014082651,0.000046780548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009683117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006866467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030152723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014905497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028787903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15946478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771581515","doi":"10.22237/jmasm/1509494760","title":"Robust Measures of Variable Importance for Multivariate Group Designs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Multivariate statistics; Multivariate analysis of variance; Mathematics; Statistics; Multivariate analysis; Variable (mathematics); Estimator; Linear discriminant analysis; Econometrics","score_opus":0.5161443066563941,"score_gpt":0.5322163049779595,"score_spread":0.01607199832156536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771581515","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041765682,0.0004185394,0.99421656,0.00006327463,0.000060253868,0.00026628567,0.00015088593,0.0001826925,0.0004650101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.121825136,0.00059264986,0.8712134,0.00022053921,0.00020889952,0.004232197,0.00074764434,0.00025496286,0.0007045339],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9399261,0.043630958,0.0025266034,0.0041559213,0.009093782,0.00066668115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7084368,0.24507837,0.015467196,0.0186783,0.011119347,0.0012199858],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.075533465,0.0022752902,0.0030682918,0.004921581,0.0008516021,0.0023744476,0.0028062742,0.0022754052,0.004453362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27511707,0.0008727159,0.0024047869,0.0032336677,0.0033736003,0.0032830485,0.0026268235,0.004366518,0.00081828865],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020358986,0.0006391968,0.0076990277,0.002801739,0.0020912816,0.00018138766,0.00068610645,0.11753298,0.009726213,0.32188,0.005164207,0.529562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059439027,0.0035326437,0.013224283,0.00072823855,0.0008304935,0.00029008105,0.00020410889,0.48205647,0.013785895,0.47082585,0.013643159,0.00028439454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039613328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037155952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92446655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001591873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002392333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3994639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788034503","doi":"10.1016/j.jmp.2018.07.005","title":"A better (Bayesian) interval estimate for within-subject designs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Psychology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Credible interval; Bayesian probability; Normalization (sociology); Mathematics; Heteroscedasticity; Interval estimation; Statistics; Confidence interval; Subject (documents); Interval (graph theory); Point estimation; Prior probability; Prediction interval; Tolerance interval; Econometrics; Computer science; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.34467201804378583,"score_gpt":0.5614297589589514,"score_spread":0.2167577409151656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788034503","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011561846,0.00021688791,0.9975338,0.00019880521,0.00010472942,0.00007914504,0.00006630775,0.00032134913,0.00032264407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022354897,0.00016899452,0.97484064,0.0004930367,0.00019037093,0.00059594866,0.00023062846,0.0004008788,0.0007245584],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8742334,0.09619267,0.0049149347,0.01347727,0.010217432,0.00096423295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68125224,0.25285566,0.007947785,0.04227154,0.013765682,0.0019070099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1008669,0.0027082374,0.0058097495,0.003023284,0.001133826,0.0056375843,0.005409401,0.007727443,0.022692427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34920204,0.0028700503,0.0035121627,0.003021307,0.0022312892,0.0102285,0.004684145,0.011413791,0.0042139087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005306842,0.0013059911,0.0032613801,0.0029393823,0.0025043038,0.00020290444,0.0013738757,0.04647596,0.027451348,0.22609852,0.0113527365,0.67172676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002124458,0.0021169893,0.0066877324,0.0011243437,0.0014240701,0.00070563913,0.00014988933,0.43992856,0.016806161,0.5032064,0.025247555,0.00047826485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092791044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012885875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1008669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015802085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025244108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53344154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794752316","doi":"10.1111/anzs.12227","title":"Optimal robust parameter designs with qualitative and quantitative factors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Variance (accounting); Design of experiments; Optimal design; Statistics","score_opus":0.341034175515843,"score_gpt":0.48452145975238553,"score_spread":0.14348728423654256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794752316","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014045784,0.00041479128,0.981739,0.000082543855,0.000026669417,0.0005325284,0.00022156129,0.00019856365,0.0027386933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23674592,0.00040242897,0.75832665,0.000100833204,0.000038431765,0.0025491344,0.00030909842,0.00011758325,0.0014099976],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724875,0.019510021,0.0014679073,0.0018893186,0.003949338,0.00069586653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96120375,0.027997855,0.0036199829,0.0033618675,0.0034607388,0.00035573624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024279146,0.0013149751,0.0020081354,0.002136207,0.00037391466,0.0014246873,0.0013038253,0.0011126428,0.008894247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049064446,0.00069508835,0.0019257353,0.0012865517,0.0017571109,0.0013936369,0.0014692505,0.0013822772,0.0010443481],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037132076,0.00031997,0.0034124402,0.0026186928,0.00042169465,0.00013341794,0.00031902603,0.3384199,0.018992327,0.2203441,0.0026577418,0.4086475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011204141,0.007343583,0.0051951725,0.00095082965,0.00047432343,0.00023456394,0.0002635041,0.3964028,0.03600374,0.5245213,0.027214047,0.0002756563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004792166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041007125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024279146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011423865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002212222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12840194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795596766","doi":"10.1016/j.cor.2018.04.001","title":"","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anet (University of Antwerp)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Integer programming; Blocking (statistics); Symmetry (geometry); Orthogonal array; Integer (computer science); Mathematics; Computer science; Linear programming; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Product (mathematics); Symmetry breaking; Statistics; Geometry","score_opus":0.16652821751323044,"score_gpt":0.4122434320750788,"score_spread":0.24571521456184836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795596766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017316246,0.017225495,0.38253742,0.010580208,0.005800114,0.0009975599,0.009712789,0.007371163,0.548459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13165818,0.020781465,0.23011808,0.0029931113,0.0025322172,0.0014965865,0.016615612,0.0022388622,0.59156585],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679786,0.00052058813,0.00030445887,0.001153234,0.00096316903,0.00026063834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99373674,0.0023258552,0.0008559934,0.0011021565,0.0014289357,0.0005503335],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022897762,0.0016344329,0.001346418,0.0014893188,0.00074739096,0.0060137883,0.00202789,0.0027058844,0.30085677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007529749,0.0004999642,0.0011103029,0.0020861053,0.0015975245,0.0023521157,0.0016042757,0.0020070605,0.17450297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030120093,0.00012739166,0.0018008072,0.0010517198,0.00007365583,0.00045092052,0.00009553741,0.01892722,0.0039990414,0.044870712,0.109243445,0.8190584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007999722,0.00020090843,0.0020618627,0.0009164919,0.000059860427,0.0006914575,0.00023613744,0.045769315,0.0024195826,0.05642029,0.89108306,0.000061092906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030317584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026462385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69914323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001978759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042743995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802818241","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11355","title":"Locally optimal designs for binary dose‐response models","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences; National Institutes of Health; Louisiana Clinical and Translational Science Center","keywords":"Binary number; Optimal design; Nonlinear system; Mathematical optimization; Algebraic number; Computer science; Mathematics; Algorithm; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Arithmetic; Physics","score_opus":0.26585290794277,"score_gpt":0.4335272839070256,"score_spread":0.1676743759642556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802818241","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01387406,0.00021385361,0.9847654,0.00016048257,0.000016246497,0.00019455,0.000039074694,0.000086421394,0.00064987503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36545265,0.00025776363,0.6304782,0.00032636872,0.00006263596,0.0021827498,0.0001467696,0.00007629331,0.0010164456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9445386,0.048237495,0.0011638342,0.0031216238,0.002306188,0.00063219364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8684536,0.11654449,0.006137016,0.0050396887,0.003086642,0.0007385266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04678274,0.0012873434,0.0032677008,0.0018396089,0.0005354129,0.0015747794,0.002138538,0.0022438564,0.003919918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.109629534,0.0012252645,0.0016689426,0.00084512105,0.0038266664,0.0021791032,0.0028797812,0.0031288303,0.0005955084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029409889,0.0005079981,0.00353436,0.0011745946,0.00064496667,0.00019484025,0.00058235193,0.352221,0.008222396,0.5155664,0.0011130621,0.113297015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007392981,0.0016924761,0.0016590309,0.00018962202,0.00017985501,0.000086632455,0.00008962865,0.560823,0.004287808,0.4280824,0.002070387,0.00009983267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005844168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046468744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04678274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020455273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017877206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24741375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804134309","doi":"10.1080/10618600.2018.1476250","title":"Optimal Designs for Multi-Response Nonlinear Regression Models With Several Factors via Semidefinite Programming","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences","keywords":"Semidefinite programming; Optimal design; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Bivariate analysis; Design matrix; Linear model; Nonlinear system; Computation; Linear programming; Computer science; Algorithm; Statistics","score_opus":0.19381600922201345,"score_gpt":0.44673970487015846,"score_spread":0.252923695648145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804134309","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003165432,0.000059331505,0.99581486,0.00006748939,0.00000942275,0.000060561753,0.000044584158,0.000053687494,0.0007245822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15578404,0.00029160496,0.84088516,0.0001916661,0.000030221177,0.0011676854,0.00022860804,0.00012879272,0.0012921192],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99015737,0.0074120956,0.00024061474,0.0009952234,0.00092328934,0.00027150093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98230964,0.014235346,0.0013506853,0.00076012465,0.0010324954,0.0003118024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0124121765,0.002157497,0.0018969995,0.0011848283,0.00042262147,0.001348779,0.0013914739,0.0011209084,0.004310894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021298865,0.0011903096,0.0017880081,0.0011934532,0.0020559456,0.0015432832,0.002015531,0.0023452847,0.00067650824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020489494,0.00027087753,0.0008405043,0.00041978486,0.00012688675,0.00008530156,0.0001511397,0.7822966,0.0023218691,0.14124961,0.0015129978,0.07051948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049950842,0.00019311567,0.0001281646,0.000036487978,0.000020590656,0.000016230122,0.000024889714,0.90352917,0.0008646232,0.09417436,0.000942145,0.00002026186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012301169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001383321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0124121765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013215572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032338398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065642655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808679788","doi":"10.1109/icccbda.2018.8386592","title":"Constrained optimal designs for step-stress accelerated life testing experiments","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Censoring (clinical trials); Stress (linguistics); Accelerated life testing; Optimal design; Computer science; Stress testing (software); Maximum likelihood; Fisher information; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.654074768207559,"score_gpt":0.5387384974516848,"score_spread":0.11533627075587427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808679788","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031540994,0.00027486528,0.9667618,0.000052970427,0.000021629212,0.0004873621,0.00008134104,0.00008985182,0.0006890982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3571729,0.00036370466,0.6387519,0.00010595994,0.000026641512,0.002576563,0.00021769878,0.00004178104,0.0007428691],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877681,0.009910142,0.00026808862,0.000773548,0.00096071267,0.0003193417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728727,0.022944678,0.0018247284,0.0011034261,0.0009319885,0.00032250205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013274993,0.0015037734,0.0015979396,0.000970926,0.00030767912,0.00085397443,0.0012783094,0.00077251205,0.0026927486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024694927,0.00089929136,0.0010832389,0.0007331602,0.00116555,0.0010138777,0.0010208295,0.0012431762,0.00024165197],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025536027,0.0006889639,0.002066483,0.00067187607,0.00031069087,0.00012309226,0.0001380419,0.8207906,0.0063260524,0.06689593,0.0004735399,0.09896118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044762235,0.002511758,0.00197441,0.00005762029,0.00012428203,0.00003078051,0.000043982775,0.93640333,0.004632206,0.052172083,0.0015465092,0.00005534424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008365557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073079683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013274993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010040293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002125925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07020575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810629198","doi":"10.5267/j.ijiec.2018.2.001","title":"Trade-off in robustness, cost and performance by a multi-objective robust production optimization method","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Robust optimization; Mathematical optimization; Multi-objective optimization; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Production (economics); Engineering; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Biology","score_opus":0.11246284113617322,"score_gpt":0.3936420668807403,"score_spread":0.2811792257445671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810629198","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004957442,0.00009184121,0.99405813,0.000026734251,0.00000545458,0.000026875818,0.000008898495,0.00006647251,0.000758161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49658415,0.00033399145,0.50046843,0.000060359253,0.00003586338,0.0005955379,0.00006698431,0.000093798975,0.0017608012],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878424,0.00060110603,0.000047074947,0.00014057547,0.0003602118,0.000066844805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893886,0.000720808,0.00013825706,0.000053496417,0.00013205962,0.000016479256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002840745,0.0011736959,0.0010524538,0.00082566927,0.00025785223,0.0009473157,0.00087619206,0.0010986935,0.0014600251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028706207,0.00047413763,0.0012119152,0.0005591817,0.0005369541,0.00092254527,0.0008246318,0.00087594375,0.00020785654],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042896092,0.000038442606,0.00010536676,0.000085095206,0.000028830402,0.000023757528,0.000015026099,0.9778049,0.004716555,0.0031753,0.00007490114,0.0138888685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003986883,0.000040998442,0.000025962658,0.000003071712,0.0000060893144,0.000004476852,0.0000015197015,0.9986162,0.00076721655,0.00041592855,0.00011194629,0.000002578557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095307844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005618069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002840745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055297464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080773066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01502347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883022650","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2018.07.007","title":"Maximin power designs in testing lack of fit","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Minimax; Cardinality (data modeling); Lebesgue measure; Power (physics); Property (philosophy); Space (punctuation); Measure (data warehouse); Class (philosophy); Discrete mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Lebesgue integration; Computer science","score_opus":0.5897006106323665,"score_gpt":0.5586507683827052,"score_spread":0.03104984224966123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883022650","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0113028735,0.00043365586,0.9856296,0.00048715385,0.00009793096,0.0005636505,0.000090188034,0.00023185488,0.0011630482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26147977,0.0003217238,0.7303115,0.0006477847,0.00015910203,0.005777305,0.0002033167,0.00025625608,0.00084320427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6594239,0.31760854,0.0051883855,0.0088720275,0.0077233464,0.0011837806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.21294263,0.75900596,0.0070755426,0.016770419,0.0032090829,0.000996393],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.24071042,0.003310825,0.0065756803,0.0042739813,0.0021741798,0.0032988868,0.0043551084,0.0060903095,0.008054696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5767548,0.0032684028,0.0042111827,0.002909553,0.011935468,0.009020876,0.0062523684,0.0072412775,0.00067602517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009892408,0.0010611466,0.014005433,0.0030128607,0.0039667455,0.0007993155,0.0023285514,0.14544868,0.0019160938,0.550558,0.003575171,0.2634356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017871473,0.0026157058,0.002506939,0.00046426366,0.0005770627,0.00029764193,0.00022483182,0.24932672,0.001843538,0.73703325,0.0032227808,0.00010007221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063534535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005192853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24071042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019810928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044728047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93633926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884763632","doi":"10.1002/cjce.23296","title":"Using normal probability plots to determine parameters for higher‐level factorial experiments with orthogonal and orthonormal bases","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Orthonormal basis; Factorial; Mathematics; Factorial experiment; Basis (linear algebra); Fractional factorial design; Monte Carlo method; Statistics; Design of experiments; Matrix (chemical analysis); Orthogonal array; Applied mathematics; Taguchi methods; Mathematical analysis; Geometry","score_opus":0.27254984586572456,"score_gpt":0.3809935461924838,"score_spread":0.10844370032675926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884763632","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089043394,0.0001847604,0.9079439,0.00007732679,0.000046207148,0.0004401364,0.00019373253,0.0008038103,0.0012668103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50225806,0.00012811634,0.49580783,0.00006988553,0.0000106634225,0.00082601333,0.00025921446,0.00012549966,0.0005146747],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851407,0.009250304,0.0007476571,0.0013475043,0.003160282,0.00035359233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88757294,0.094275564,0.005606913,0.0053874436,0.006802324,0.00035480602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02741631,0.0012004114,0.001309565,0.0019144007,0.000544412,0.0014782302,0.0009610197,0.00129116,0.0026865131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07802165,0.00061481434,0.0011002272,0.0014126416,0.0013992318,0.0015700071,0.0009474096,0.0016510432,0.00047858004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026171072,0.0014592723,0.024313537,0.00089703995,0.00026364552,0.00028542595,0.00073146116,0.61038005,0.08841153,0.04086714,0.0018407945,0.22793302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013512935,0.0017236386,0.008801614,0.00008526737,0.0000794217,0.00012681473,0.00012269488,0.8852143,0.0820858,0.018381404,0.0030780062,0.00016589569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015305906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011884482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02741631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011222942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012522527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.144993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884878604","doi":"10.1038/s41592-018-0083-2","title":"Optimal experimental design","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Computational biology; Design of experiments; Biology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.22516560416053172,"score_gpt":0.5845820471417642,"score_spread":0.3594164429812325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884878604","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002089836,0.0005548481,0.9907991,0.00026661943,0.00036773452,0.0014630378,0.00031695043,0.00026584478,0.0038759268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1204089,0.00080481294,0.85395914,0.0010963173,0.00036424238,0.016389301,0.00065157906,0.000204446,0.0061211945],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95395553,0.0342683,0.0015702086,0.005372976,0.0038729429,0.000959982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9628395,0.026397174,0.0021446827,0.005547438,0.0025405046,0.00053072145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031213818,0.0024252061,0.0034313856,0.0018823759,0.0008884413,0.0022621008,0.002499135,0.0028047855,0.02146423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06562242,0.0014056573,0.0028580923,0.0010738268,0.0026767869,0.0018692324,0.0022404012,0.0025837142,0.002912512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0059335055,0.0011280827,0.0019599353,0.005534044,0.0012763472,0.00012892862,0.00020060492,0.07031394,0.009336597,0.40776414,0.015235956,0.481188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004099906,0.004060998,0.0027301249,0.0011989488,0.0013704437,0.00020295687,0.00010457582,0.28396168,0.01754772,0.621804,0.06268658,0.00023210143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048115043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005208582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031213818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016345886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050974214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16507643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890155095","doi":"10.1177/0962280218797145","title":"Eliminating systematic bias from case-crossover designs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Government of Alberta; Alberta Health Services","funders":"Health Research Board","keywords":"Crossover; Statistics; Confounding; Calibration; Crossover study; Computer science; Econometrics; Confidence interval; Meta-analysis; Publication bias; Medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.7550744409644745,"score_gpt":0.7229459907852953,"score_spread":0.0321284501791792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890155095","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016135463,0.0014718192,0.9754945,0.00033086105,0.00032987457,0.0051219426,0.00016853327,0.00020880102,0.0007382131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30390394,0.0014391645,0.6767004,0.0008318227,0.0002174729,0.016010497,0.0002791329,0.00005021621,0.00056733063],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.767156,0.2033284,0.010553456,0.00812509,0.009968892,0.00086806336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7412345,0.20399076,0.019505952,0.027801618,0.0068203253,0.00064690836],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23244956,0.001551059,0.0030746637,0.0023172507,0.001303163,0.0016217591,0.0028883654,0.0031481332,0.0033689525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3167954,0.0010829335,0.00405741,0.0021364975,0.0030485783,0.0020036097,0.002232334,0.0024860967,0.0003110144],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01330524,0.0021547568,0.051358182,0.011656995,0.012741637,0.0011138803,0.0041346853,0.10317053,0.0072347946,0.2783121,0.0041196696,0.51069754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024632215,0.022409717,0.03589262,0.003146061,0.012544457,0.0014728981,0.00072732376,0.29670998,0.018391274,0.54758614,0.035822704,0.0006645684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087700103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007259771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76755047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011475245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032388053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94652635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891884894","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-08-100693-1.15002-7","title":"Experimental statistical design","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.27183209914397594,"score_gpt":0.44923442044987344,"score_spread":0.1774023213058975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891884894","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012739256,0.003765694,0.88901204,0.0012137147,0.0019071383,0.0017713823,0.0020505134,0.0033861473,0.095619455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018859314,0.0050962097,0.78841674,0.0020941847,0.0011041906,0.011701463,0.0027457324,0.0015835332,0.16839868],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901371,0.0054694586,0.0005684812,0.0013146162,0.0023185373,0.00019180744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849492,0.00994574,0.000506047,0.0027933274,0.0015849783,0.00022073733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015451739,0.0018661898,0.0016947945,0.0015837301,0.0006784184,0.0022667742,0.001819814,0.0021027136,0.109448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024133796,0.0011894709,0.0009093627,0.0015576102,0.0023089808,0.0014087169,0.0016074902,0.003323197,0.031192817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044566268,0.00019250497,0.00032117838,0.0025537948,0.00009936182,0.000083275394,0.0002358575,0.001909955,0.0070249955,0.132809,0.11355299,0.7407714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038754113,0.0007248678,0.0017581754,0.0014219589,0.00017881335,0.0003720865,0.00010643994,0.007537652,0.011599395,0.19756943,0.77825034,0.00009329601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000578351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012978079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001045003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003003576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36614007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905188466","doi":"10.1007/s00184-018-0702-z","title":"Some properties of foldover designs with column permutations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Column (typography); Mathematics; Column generation; Optimal design; Mathematical optimization; Function (biology); Applied mathematics; Statistics; Geometry","score_opus":0.3358189822527115,"score_gpt":0.4444268068932322,"score_spread":0.10860782464052071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905188466","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011609457,0.0002751476,0.9846236,0.00029027893,0.00003232348,0.00020785898,0.00026236748,0.00012086728,0.0025781197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26579106,0.0010508244,0.7206122,0.0008640318,0.00031933666,0.0049167704,0.00089275645,0.00026777486,0.0052851364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95464915,0.035685994,0.0017785568,0.0035538585,0.0033149163,0.0010175147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7371312,0.23603177,0.008691302,0.012272982,0.004632422,0.0012403348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06519168,0.00226292,0.003750028,0.0023166311,0.0011173236,0.0029003436,0.00286972,0.0026226807,0.01100829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15708621,0.0022778832,0.0033038885,0.0025823778,0.0048339935,0.0052981996,0.0034449399,0.0033762339,0.001152561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011589096,0.0002879481,0.0025309292,0.0008786763,0.00046663114,0.00017113784,0.0005386223,0.060395896,0.0041702306,0.8061016,0.0023470437,0.12095237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003074898,0.0010712328,0.001562067,0.00019382821,0.00016251579,0.00017894444,0.00010620585,0.17743692,0.002604622,0.81302524,0.0032679138,0.000083046114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064900605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065313705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06519168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017128813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004187687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34477067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908775770","doi":"","title":"Robust Model-Based Stratified Sampling Designs.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Stratified sampling; Sampling (signal processing); Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Filter (signal processing)","score_opus":0.5366446408774386,"score_gpt":0.4769825374543436,"score_spread":0.05966210342309497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908775770","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012964839,0.0012292869,0.97052413,0.00033742422,0.0006017905,0.011593473,0.00070294767,0.00065999525,0.0013860975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24205743,0.00065482024,0.71765333,0.00069559825,0.00028872397,0.035942715,0.0010212528,0.00013464277,0.0015515425],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.79632694,0.18859336,0.0031466107,0.00573803,0.005014132,0.0011809934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.818919,0.14519764,0.010049702,0.020339675,0.0044066524,0.0010872957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11564251,0.0025176192,0.004354488,0.0018914102,0.00070135214,0.0017049724,0.004031909,0.0033855555,0.009580704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27017796,0.0015013295,0.004017272,0.0014260773,0.0023153035,0.0016497573,0.002163212,0.002914856,0.0017120905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06207793,0.0038196526,0.008237389,0.009787274,0.016035285,0.00041766788,0.0012805214,0.14327757,0.0071561965,0.28748345,0.017272843,0.4431543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02653166,0.01878796,0.007141191,0.0015966367,0.009065993,0.0003156567,0.00023790442,0.58207166,0.011487257,0.31745416,0.024974465,0.00033547566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013721295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012138365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11564251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016827264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037650757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61158335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908858115","doi":"10.1007/s00362-018-01076-6","title":"Properties of optimal regression designs under the second-order least squares estimator","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistical Papers","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Polynomial regression; Equivalence (formal languages); Estimator; Optimal design; Generalized least squares; Nonlinear regression; Non-linear least squares; Mathematical optimization; Least-squares function approximation; Linear regression; Regression analysis; Statistics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.14110002371706523,"score_gpt":0.41578880930191625,"score_spread":0.274688785584851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908858115","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012744965,0.00028873133,0.98462045,0.00034767945,0.000034303146,0.00016772002,0.00012863637,0.00017347661,0.0014939973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30946937,0.00090958114,0.6828213,0.0005741035,0.0002943094,0.0026137333,0.00065492,0.00029748102,0.0023653107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9071591,0.071754836,0.00369871,0.005547618,0.010177746,0.0016620831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5024901,0.44827926,0.016947845,0.01745984,0.013063388,0.0017596182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09566123,0.0016734933,0.0035894983,0.002591709,0.0007481185,0.0030850265,0.0025459598,0.0035445592,0.0066893017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3182436,0.0022592829,0.0017527421,0.0018572127,0.0038605898,0.0052690883,0.002626284,0.002711445,0.0011051628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024196764,0.0005464236,0.006825714,0.0014875518,0.0007539402,0.00019666785,0.0008333737,0.14545515,0.008997629,0.6630857,0.0030546838,0.16634358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009547514,0.0017311667,0.004548763,0.00028260992,0.00026121296,0.00033259185,0.00016670217,0.4801786,0.0066686342,0.50122726,0.0035224126,0.00012534618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000525394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037184617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09566123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017097237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005006475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.505911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911726748","doi":"10.1002/9781118445112.stat06100","title":"Job‐Exposure Matrices","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Encyclopedia; Library science; Citation; Information retrieval; Computer science; Operations research; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1437139828260724,"score_gpt":0.451835767916533,"score_spread":0.3081217850904606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911726748","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05486124,0.0012072918,0.52456427,0.0018030314,0.0016666037,0.0036812157,0.25032565,0.005250136,0.15664057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32991442,0.0015366472,0.23561168,0.00088364165,0.0004335669,0.007145142,0.13924603,0.001524907,0.28370398],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755114,0.00089768844,0.00013644426,0.00071163266,0.00052547274,0.000177612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953016,0.0022893625,0.0002977631,0.0013565738,0.00054612284,0.00020844524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027516794,0.0011684591,0.00086072646,0.0018367147,0.00054364995,0.0016583817,0.0011639057,0.0010346486,0.19920504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015151869,0.00059762574,0.0011156672,0.0020180158,0.00049544976,0.0010422678,0.0013345592,0.0016039853,0.0614139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017009507,0.0010761931,0.011882464,0.0010303572,0.0004754041,0.00015381961,0.0004057344,0.029345058,0.005679092,0.13526814,0.31134766,0.5016351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054074806,0.001104365,0.06330772,0.00051362097,0.00032931543,0.0003772885,0.00065683166,0.069014564,0.009438556,0.3535217,0.50090384,0.00029135446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028535924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034790852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19920504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058713264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012415242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6664072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913000119","doi":"10.1007/s42519-019-0064-5","title":"Isomorphism Check for $$2^{n}$$ Factorial Designs with Randomization Restrictions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Randomization; Isomorphism (crystallography); Restricted randomization; Factorial; Factorial experiment; Fractional factorial design; Construct (python library); Mathematics; Computer science; Block (permutation group theory); Arithmetic; Statistics; Combinatorics; Randomized controlled trial; Programming language","score_opus":0.22603537522416198,"score_gpt":0.501908425204389,"score_spread":0.2758730499802271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913000119","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03298935,0.00021715548,0.95857614,0.0011398047,0.00015508351,0.0004054707,0.00058424874,0.0012392373,0.0046935207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5151344,0.00031518747,0.47052383,0.0013695031,0.0005426709,0.002305278,0.0020533036,0.00073476846,0.0070210095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9600352,0.025943391,0.0016264139,0.005415933,0.005366759,0.0016123003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6841394,0.27408415,0.006240069,0.029303767,0.0046391147,0.0015934544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036756035,0.001375359,0.003993966,0.002737805,0.0020726249,0.0026012855,0.003955347,0.0041989167,0.023474963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20103762,0.0018619098,0.0030574445,0.0024813877,0.004692801,0.009327115,0.0054835454,0.0046064793,0.0022901383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045095826,0.0010895549,0.005883757,0.0014661822,0.0006784587,0.0007271728,0.0008942077,0.029586697,0.0049980246,0.6867748,0.017880674,0.24551097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006747607,0.0004937295,0.0013796166,0.00010727099,0.00019938318,0.00022532245,0.000109050095,0.12723102,0.0044855275,0.86082065,0.004205369,0.00006835279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011188937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009115717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036756035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020270215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006259801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19438684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914546816","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-44-463782-6.00003-3","title":"Experimental Planning","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Multivariate statistics; Variables; Econometrics; Statistics; Set (abstract data type); Regression analysis; Regression; Computer science; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.19076963495043917,"score_gpt":0.4499048192428757,"score_spread":0.25913518429243654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914546816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017434614,0.0038426025,0.38948992,0.0016682298,0.00082695234,0.0012235739,0.003179062,0.002522457,0.59550375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041213118,0.008649768,0.37521502,0.0019365639,0.00034353253,0.0061334665,0.0048175934,0.0011189986,0.5605719],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986602,0.00044783135,0.00007536915,0.00030850264,0.0004373197,0.00007082694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974872,0.0013392537,0.000083805346,0.0006571966,0.00033189214,0.00010069646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029818562,0.0011366935,0.0008049296,0.0012601616,0.0008268893,0.0020022972,0.0020795292,0.0014191584,0.20354438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059623546,0.00095249346,0.0008140346,0.0013118722,0.0014011126,0.0016857216,0.0014823342,0.0019379135,0.043382972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002488104,0.00017022355,0.00022606921,0.0013344822,0.000029939467,0.000073032046,0.00015933208,0.0061873505,0.004631463,0.20813161,0.10026214,0.6785455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009854293,0.0002126464,0.00058553735,0.000701693,0.00004210509,0.00012095133,0.0001302101,0.0072610397,0.007866968,0.18901172,0.79392374,0.0000446677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002711489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052925656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20354438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001430876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033134478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6809238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916947021","doi":"10.1038/s41592-019-0335-9","title":"Two-level factorial experiments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Factorial experiment; Factorial; Computational biology; Fractional factorial design; Biology; Computer science; Biological system; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.25865839145345765,"score_gpt":0.5964617912588637,"score_spread":0.337803399805406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916947021","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055071693,0.00052908715,0.91098464,0.00034338742,0.0014421416,0.015151238,0.002911104,0.0025447353,0.011022014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14414346,0.00042415844,0.7764961,0.0008723808,0.00019071046,0.06356772,0.0015133813,0.00047188235,0.012320229],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739865,0.011158537,0.0018247665,0.0059268083,0.0054929033,0.0016104644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793102,0.011148552,0.0017580481,0.004765681,0.0022464662,0.0007710587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012044794,0.0027808284,0.003970599,0.0011248994,0.0008722516,0.0027142742,0.0028254127,0.00249996,0.028039223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023425452,0.001324837,0.002126884,0.0012577502,0.0017847294,0.0017038422,0.0019485608,0.002839114,0.004621279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0510338,0.01178804,0.0027744006,0.012909544,0.0010471687,0.00026696865,0.0009928364,0.017221553,0.48591685,0.108071275,0.014039615,0.29393807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03260717,0.07012481,0.016620755,0.0010709307,0.002653728,0.00046215326,0.00035393384,0.08922488,0.49145627,0.13235223,0.1617682,0.0013050017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003021245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056391716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028039223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012514091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003210204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093800545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2928591628","doi":"10.1080/03610918.2019.1588311","title":"Controlling individual and experimentwise error rates in replicated regular two-level factorial experiments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Variance (accounting); Monte Carlo method; Factorial experiment; Statistics; Analysis of variance; Factorial; Type I and type II errors; Fractional factorial design; Main effect; Mathematics; Word error rate; Computer science; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.4922343568183236,"score_gpt":0.5798727002424177,"score_spread":0.08763834342409405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2928591628","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0097075775,0.00018195086,0.98843414,0.00008955853,0.000091465416,0.00064279104,0.00004565429,0.00037971864,0.00042720122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20590967,0.0001543976,0.7885912,0.0002930906,0.00008467321,0.0040704,0.00012358312,0.00018137463,0.0005916142],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.64682597,0.2869057,0.010939114,0.027039757,0.026022071,0.0022674066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42003176,0.4731633,0.02742629,0.06395067,0.014353291,0.0010747861],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2555857,0.0023096092,0.0046179662,0.0020588809,0.0011691761,0.002536005,0.0043032435,0.0038102835,0.0016331862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44011566,0.0019181579,0.0031217292,0.0019986054,0.005925915,0.0034393228,0.0036657874,0.003764516,0.0006489828],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011642789,0.0023877716,0.027707152,0.0030186768,0.0036334177,0.00051864,0.003385407,0.26314706,0.030308682,0.21515837,0.0031117063,0.4359803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027227895,0.006483761,0.018731434,0.0004491273,0.0010446501,0.0003770866,0.00024271775,0.7359144,0.041546598,0.18513902,0.006817333,0.00053101516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012808425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012466914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2555857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00230144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036287145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91799533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940123489","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11494","title":"Design selection for strong orthogonal arrays","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Class (philosophy); Space (punctuation); Computer science; Focus (optics); Design of experiments; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.1751092719048859,"score_gpt":0.40161405568027486,"score_spread":0.22650478377538896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940123489","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02051714,0.0002468354,0.97629446,0.0002579026,0.00007195338,0.00029161887,0.00013660865,0.0001755606,0.0020078784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38578728,0.00030692903,0.6091694,0.00054939656,0.00020089009,0.0023232617,0.0003784881,0.000099110555,0.0011850871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94124544,0.0493649,0.001574466,0.0030906056,0.0037893646,0.0009352426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8901413,0.08920282,0.0049029677,0.00772208,0.006866058,0.001164824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036146954,0.0011978146,0.0020935365,0.0014214809,0.00073491625,0.0016985404,0.0013407941,0.001105297,0.0068135215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09159166,0.00076310977,0.0017431172,0.0014173412,0.0021837677,0.002125925,0.0026990115,0.0019863804,0.00083064876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038713184,0.0005113634,0.008315887,0.001340018,0.0008456886,0.00024246926,0.00045140096,0.13878372,0.008432581,0.47596836,0.0076690316,0.35356835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000905785,0.0027715063,0.0020550685,0.00020556849,0.00020283378,0.00015878437,0.0001793143,0.46318302,0.005793661,0.516799,0.0076420293,0.00010343989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027883955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034865827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036146954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079571665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023653035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19116563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940292305","doi":"10.1038/s41592-019-0405-z","title":"Author Correction: Two-level factorial experiments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Nature Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Column (typography); Table (database); Factorial experiment; Factorial; Fractional factorial design; Computer science; Statistics; Error detection and correction; Mathematics; Algorithm; Data mining; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.2813980481515689,"score_gpt":0.5840002347499562,"score_spread":0.30260218659838733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940292305","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017826278,0.0005515463,0.008729598,0.015076151,0.96653426,0.00009350315,0.0032490299,0.001667777,0.0039199046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023981396,0.0043475577,0.11467565,0.06996276,0.19511102,0.0018505212,0.011427355,0.01402033,0.5646235],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98458374,0.0040825014,0.0022469535,0.0019376233,0.006619297,0.0005298991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86820805,0.03966499,0.0033010228,0.013377632,0.073262505,0.0021858625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011838804,0.0029532504,0.0031124034,0.005579825,0.0038336944,0.0036938551,0.005202757,0.006229851,0.15580252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14493667,0.001914334,0.002325946,0.0033766269,0.0026561234,0.002893165,0.0027320916,0.009648294,0.058864597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006673393,0.00001110871,0.000045299184,0.00027039798,0.000022445454,0.000084588784,0.000027244741,0.00008499384,0.00012982327,0.0014017853,0.98947257,0.008382909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015809917,0.000030541578,0.00060243317,0.0005291547,0.000115179195,0.0003369704,0.00006326727,0.0008343988,0.0012235963,0.0066249743,0.9894058,0.00007562256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008817879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016364496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15580252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003714103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066161985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5212114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941373075","doi":"10.1016/j.csda.2019.03.007","title":"Data-driven multistratum designs with the generalized Bayesian <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\" id=\"d1e3469\" altimg=\"si339.gif\"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math>-<mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\" id=\"d1e3474\" altimg=\"si339.gif\"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math> criterion for highly uncertain models","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Statistics & Data Analysis","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan","keywords":"Bayesian probability; Bayesian information criterion; Optimal design; Computer science; Algorithm; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Plot (graphics); Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.06620302271394407,"score_gpt":0.33799095240569316,"score_spread":0.2717879296917491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941373075","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022855543,0.00013636576,0.9957353,0.0002041497,0.000034377834,0.00045602096,0.00017324244,0.00015732933,0.0008176595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08624896,0.00025941912,0.90671605,0.00034154952,0.00006598694,0.003189285,0.0006460116,0.00012417613,0.002408509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.96199125,0.030029051,0.0011072085,0.0027403138,0.0035281905,0.00060393044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93536544,0.052835744,0.0026439358,0.004566406,0.003744397,0.00084393966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05458308,0.002191621,0.003085921,0.002240964,0.0010863624,0.0025545282,0.0036149432,0.0029308689,0.010915762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09471318,0.0019384956,0.0028887005,0.00161676,0.0024310574,0.0028823595,0.003391053,0.0042412407,0.0020122516],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002559299,0.0003710753,0.0016504154,0.0012415173,0.00063661655,0.000140275,0.0003160606,0.35706386,0.0022263234,0.42681584,0.00489224,0.20208652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006485787,0.001154594,0.00078026793,0.0002459154,0.00019519222,0.00005762217,0.00005286129,0.7350083,0.003089493,0.25143722,0.007233573,0.00009638842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022327683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029691064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05458308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002768803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008270135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28866643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943137452","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11499","title":"CVX‐based algorithms for constructing various optimal regression designs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Optimal design; MATLAB; Flexibility (engineering); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Nonlinear system; Convex optimization; Regular polygon; Algorithm; Mathematics; Machine learning; Statistics","score_opus":0.20324947407372299,"score_gpt":0.4264114287170358,"score_spread":0.22316195464331282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943137452","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010406665,0.00008257093,0.9978125,0.000060406892,0.000015034544,0.00009535385,0.000040970874,0.00018336551,0.0006691834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02245657,0.00012415618,0.9748591,0.00007386267,0.000023963079,0.0011395587,0.00017440635,0.0001646356,0.000983819],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99332607,0.0045783673,0.00031440682,0.0005873128,0.0010197307,0.00017405036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96864945,0.027067821,0.000769471,0.0012660174,0.0019955798,0.00025163023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014315645,0.0013998749,0.0014898599,0.0025921243,0.0007244604,0.0014590626,0.0021476124,0.0016477564,0.014334537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05715118,0.0012269615,0.0013771167,0.0021657993,0.0015233735,0.0013755733,0.0023472982,0.0031071363,0.0021289394],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033347413,0.00019895309,0.0010998792,0.00036230066,0.00011500419,0.000070957656,0.00016517071,0.46451065,0.001568388,0.19091336,0.005865958,0.3347958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015417978,0.00012332654,0.00028500397,0.00010433759,0.000024394925,0.00004711842,0.00002810625,0.9135671,0.0016910818,0.07942738,0.004521467,0.00002641053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028891044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027268287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014334537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018314404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003660551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07570928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947185180","doi":"10.5203/pmuser.201841670","title":"Construction of A-optimal Designs for Linear Models","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Mathematical optimization; Optimal design; Convergence (economics); Variance (accounting); Context (archaeology); Mathematics; Function (biology); Optimality criterion; Efficiency; Design of experiments; Computer science; Applied mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.3952469154709028,"score_gpt":0.5051451164533173,"score_spread":0.10989820098241448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947185180","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027524675,0.00012432507,0.99601597,0.00006442553,0.000023532339,0.00015469022,0.000055570545,0.00008984181,0.00071920553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04648867,0.0002412071,0.9507517,0.00015717486,0.000045363115,0.0016200615,0.00015159215,0.00005777499,0.00048637707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97922415,0.01523545,0.0010410105,0.0020498352,0.001932845,0.000516702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619051,0.029178597,0.0029751447,0.0024329117,0.0028686533,0.00063955586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02238212,0.001582483,0.0018475105,0.0024732794,0.00075882435,0.0013899329,0.0015485252,0.0023635847,0.0037201352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048270583,0.0016289124,0.0015912736,0.001391951,0.0022644417,0.0017302929,0.0031269616,0.0028865545,0.0012701573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005069862,0.00035790968,0.0016819662,0.0007908202,0.00015500365,0.00012781384,0.0002995474,0.10187664,0.008343487,0.6876902,0.0027692257,0.19540037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045426915,0.0012117011,0.00071399845,0.00024854727,0.00007192676,0.00011667509,0.00008019918,0.32844818,0.005924434,0.6515201,0.011127664,0.00008236911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033554714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003079873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02238212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013104684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003067866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1183694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950867586","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1605.08473","title":"Robust designs for experiments with blocks","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Minimax; Estimator; Covariance matrix; Algorithm; Simulated annealing; Covariance; Construct (python library); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Design matrix; Matrix (chemical analysis); Computer science; Least-squares function approximation; Design of experiments; Generalized least squares; Minimax estimator; Applied mathematics; Linear model; Statistics; Minimum-variance unbiased estimator","score_opus":0.5308108886623619,"score_gpt":0.340477567155548,"score_spread":0.19033332150681392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950867586","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009443082,0.00013420692,0.9980654,0.00005622733,0.000027955615,0.0002541726,0.000055539997,0.00009096132,0.0003712487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039611258,0.00030032828,0.9543509,0.00014253156,0.00007836608,0.00461636,0.00017937645,0.000072176044,0.0006487072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.91931,0.06333009,0.0025200825,0.0076840157,0.006289539,0.0008664127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8802534,0.093981564,0.008919575,0.012198523,0.003990441,0.0006565533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07371297,0.003204656,0.004387743,0.0025775984,0.00085426215,0.0027826182,0.0039054335,0.0041234926,0.006825468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14147256,0.0021706757,0.003348604,0.002013952,0.004760038,0.0035433488,0.004065982,0.0046412335,0.001726529],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087586645,0.00017623462,0.000899161,0.0012260368,0.0008118255,0.00010747292,0.00039813228,0.19832568,0.004491031,0.70044976,0.0015761749,0.090662636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058597635,0.0010512954,0.0006296041,0.00023213298,0.0002089722,0.00006237172,0.000040962615,0.4382947,0.0032104435,0.5468174,0.008768853,0.00009722392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007548012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007236045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07371297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027774968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033011592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38983607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952791551","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1305.0182","title":"Space-filling Latin Hypercube Designs based on Randomization Restrictions in Factorial Experiments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Orthogonality; Latin hypercube sampling; Class (philosophy); Minimax; Space (punctuation); Computer science; Factorial experiment; Factorial; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics; Algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Geometry; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.3911098360711547,"score_gpt":0.33307722437880205,"score_spread":0.05803261169235263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952791551","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0080872215,0.00017922565,0.98991233,0.00007293977,0.00003089236,0.00043971118,0.00014006646,0.00015273377,0.0009849311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16481385,0.00044573803,0.8275608,0.0002028459,0.00009570017,0.005322538,0.0003313783,0.000090479305,0.0011366352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.93395215,0.057119854,0.0014940809,0.0038268685,0.002899892,0.0007071444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90202814,0.08099071,0.006528492,0.007121064,0.0026227827,0.00070887565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03263575,0.0023618145,0.0031567719,0.0015132121,0.00059410266,0.0019616485,0.0020312974,0.0015963886,0.0045938506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07543446,0.0013722557,0.0020243658,0.0019704548,0.003977733,0.0029754287,0.002645554,0.0026206507,0.0006871865],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023548012,0.00031119768,0.0016730224,0.0009490012,0.00040249724,0.000118179356,0.00050915976,0.30639088,0.004635223,0.5531323,0.0014914004,0.1280323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008550289,0.0024162112,0.00085059635,0.0001698262,0.00011786976,0.0000730814,0.000081641796,0.5767685,0.0052383062,0.40753725,0.005784025,0.000107695756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044875022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037113822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03263575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001697669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027373896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1725964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961162542","doi":"10.1002/sim.8316","title":"Bayesian consensus‐based sample size criteria for binomial proportions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Prior probability; Frequentist inference; Sample size determination; Bayesian probability; Statistics; Econometrics; Credible interval; Sample (material); Mathematics; Point estimation; Bayes' theorem; Computer science; Bayesian inference","score_opus":0.14867597247685566,"score_gpt":0.5096998485410166,"score_spread":0.3610238760641609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961162542","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027388628,0.00064422784,0.99019486,0.00067809905,0.00014710907,0.00082802656,0.00017406655,0.00020885516,0.004385878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08269298,0.0005907317,0.9069695,0.0009392407,0.0003239064,0.0062389034,0.0004314012,0.0002701744,0.0015430811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8813911,0.08357892,0.006062664,0.0074232984,0.020179532,0.0013645237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6058661,0.34820652,0.009350507,0.013694951,0.021018075,0.0018638907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13537778,0.0019105133,0.0042254897,0.005732763,0.0018206318,0.0037934338,0.005676676,0.00488353,0.009482085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44442594,0.0011322016,0.0028188133,0.0030120842,0.005406072,0.006454331,0.005125268,0.006381859,0.0020561246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010787896,0.00018247265,0.004375207,0.0017906321,0.00042314373,0.0002260496,0.0012080078,0.07158306,0.002233431,0.68881905,0.010630622,0.21744958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051361625,0.00046171164,0.0018205475,0.00094778417,0.00017660914,0.00032914698,0.00021994358,0.19203305,0.0035631473,0.7817197,0.018066555,0.0001481944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011204894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009622111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13537778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029667036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003913818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71595466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973746593","doi":"10.1093/biomet/asz043","title":"Column-orthogonal strong orthogonal arrays of strength two plus and three minus","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Orthogonality; Orthogonal array; Mathematics; Column (typography); Property (philosophy); Orthogonal functions; Combinatorics; Orthogonal basis; Space (punctuation); Algorithm; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Statistics; Computer science; Connection (principal bundle); Taguchi methods","score_opus":0.11845592230210818,"score_gpt":0.4147318128645278,"score_spread":0.29627589056241965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973746593","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0371099,0.00008784377,0.9588636,0.000113565824,0.000090039866,0.00040485302,0.00028556623,0.0003317261,0.0027129387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25775656,0.00012581839,0.73733544,0.00023310413,0.0000947639,0.0022310598,0.00036923782,0.000104989536,0.0017490766],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98447096,0.010872336,0.0009134436,0.0013337551,0.0018638541,0.0005457408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9704813,0.01714293,0.0028001505,0.0040535885,0.004767457,0.0007545975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009487989,0.00088134996,0.0012736958,0.0006826177,0.00047572004,0.0011910116,0.0007420074,0.0005981426,0.009800595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027200878,0.00050190714,0.0007951693,0.0008729829,0.001660808,0.0008915437,0.0012636629,0.001163188,0.0013656567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008163904,0.0009024686,0.0076548057,0.0015467831,0.00046722926,0.00016997155,0.00042163974,0.080982395,0.13119486,0.2832494,0.0062620407,0.4789845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020449394,0.014853945,0.011770549,0.00043447793,0.0004921308,0.00038378686,0.00036237374,0.36759582,0.15460801,0.3995191,0.047431763,0.0005030596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024477177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043579174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009800595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049740524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001438775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050177872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979956400","doi":"10.1177/0962280219881032","title":"Time-stratified case-crossover design applied with conditional logistic regression is not free from overlap bias","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health Services","funders":"","keywords":"Logistic regression; Crossover; Statistics; Crossover study; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.6160523859351099,"score_gpt":0.6265387992108831,"score_spread":0.010486413275773154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979956400","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04847004,0.01026921,0.6535801,0.23751387,0.032750137,0.0040991525,0.0011459999,0.001177812,0.010993686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3277472,0.0028788531,0.4733837,0.16313523,0.015577691,0.010036796,0.00038131,0.00029241433,0.006566824],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6886546,0.2808269,0.009785715,0.00722953,0.012232109,0.001271151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.37934345,0.58060265,0.010384183,0.021151887,0.0072212582,0.0012965921],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2496505,0.00077953807,0.0044527445,0.001438945,0.0012741921,0.0023491639,0.002798395,0.012724905,0.0047040414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44455153,0.0011523245,0.002442089,0.0019005049,0.004812997,0.002617153,0.0014653102,0.008389671,0.001284379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.047443923,0.001375128,0.019470682,0.004034567,0.0045140237,0.002428995,0.0017841683,0.0052890247,0.002033727,0.13324125,0.12936255,0.6490219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.051443893,0.012974922,0.04062823,0.0032475323,0.005987258,0.0064825304,0.00071321335,0.12435753,0.0061472366,0.5836201,0.16375962,0.00063804054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009771512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019636275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7503495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014213306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030428374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92531455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986495668","doi":"10.1002/qre.2589","title":"Integrated multiresponse parameter and tolerance design with model parameter uncertainty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality and Reliability Engineering International","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Mathematical optimization; Tolerance analysis; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Reliability engineering; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.10957677726956226,"score_gpt":0.3960173430410653,"score_spread":0.286440565771503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986495668","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0100221215,0.00006101351,0.9890316,0.000022464848,0.000009430093,0.000053257245,0.00000718106,0.00007995691,0.0007129571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72453296,0.00010078308,0.2736824,0.00009488456,0.000019215462,0.00047821354,0.000044749697,0.000041643416,0.0010052175],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944043,0.0024075555,0.00022602949,0.00083322515,0.0017917131,0.0003371165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965863,0.0016692136,0.0006466034,0.00031363207,0.00069246086,0.000091695714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050887424,0.0011647979,0.0015901497,0.0012566946,0.0004426866,0.0011440847,0.0017531384,0.001284655,0.0019006676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054976055,0.00069378625,0.0013200565,0.0010352697,0.0009529178,0.0011148943,0.0015693398,0.0011142689,0.00019723465],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000209374,0.00020064416,0.0005843482,0.00014060998,0.00008557022,0.000037259073,0.00005224999,0.93714523,0.011926861,0.0067835567,0.00018143692,0.0426528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004380012,0.00030117665,0.00026114454,0.00001340591,0.000029192814,0.000015457972,0.000011514658,0.99233854,0.004168176,0.0023679691,0.00043184767,0.000017702992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013965919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009930208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050887424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010384609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014109798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026912212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988095348","doi":"10.1007/s42519-019-0071-6","title":"Power Considerations in Designed Experiments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Design of experiments; Statistical power; Mathematics; Power analysis; Distribution (mathematics); Reliability engineering; Statistics; Computer science; Algorithm; Engineering","score_opus":0.13381475264786238,"score_gpt":0.5078732818791895,"score_spread":0.3740585292313271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2988095348","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026210272,0.0016813412,0.9861222,0.0034202295,0.0005862972,0.000843008,0.00009239495,0.00012039925,0.004513115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23769934,0.0014980563,0.73760355,0.0063045816,0.0015669162,0.01121502,0.00015763265,0.0003950745,0.0035597726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5214413,0.42727602,0.0123791,0.013101378,0.024089966,0.0017122241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1361444,0.8278568,0.0063379854,0.021458525,0.0074012885,0.00080106035],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.33129,0.0032355618,0.0064879004,0.0030645835,0.0022796916,0.0055369446,0.00499154,0.008620469,0.008978612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6736954,0.0033920538,0.0035862462,0.0019296189,0.013169149,0.007924907,0.0047823954,0.0126353325,0.0013971645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043606046,0.00045103708,0.0031814706,0.0043497826,0.0018898749,0.00083376846,0.0025860872,0.021578733,0.00231263,0.748825,0.0073677474,0.2022633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013782043,0.0012745869,0.0020080006,0.0010484225,0.00065718504,0.0006185245,0.0001922592,0.04324498,0.0033730522,0.931702,0.0144172,0.00008555796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064172974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005743691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029216907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056632287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8246385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992636254","doi":"10.1002/sim.8414","title":"Optimizing interim analysis timing for Bayesian adaptive commensurate designs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Xenon Pharmaceuticals (Canada)","funders":"Sanofi","keywords":"Interim; Bayesian probability; Interim analysis; Computer science; Adaptive design; Econometrics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Medicine; Clinical trial; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.2877791635705335,"score_gpt":0.511439466930051,"score_spread":0.22366030335951753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992636254","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071202773,0.0002906604,0.99036634,0.00025853372,0.000052673746,0.0006994635,0.00006239077,0.00022353222,0.00092609477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16520758,0.00033122397,0.82887787,0.00037973025,0.00007493908,0.0037479673,0.00017472397,0.00014034352,0.0010655884],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.95928943,0.03473224,0.0013303959,0.0019489459,0.0022579469,0.0004410124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9175348,0.06864009,0.004986262,0.005132742,0.0027022874,0.0010037496],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059426658,0.0016631879,0.0022573296,0.001437695,0.0006296439,0.0018904543,0.002467409,0.0021514834,0.005359083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14370102,0.0013362933,0.0015820151,0.0011318258,0.0017488935,0.0027207343,0.0025758336,0.0037020044,0.0011581635],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004431246,0.00071391976,0.0071628243,0.0009167575,0.00061061967,0.00023574421,0.00055719184,0.3401378,0.0055885655,0.2721179,0.0029203217,0.36460713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018916321,0.0034603556,0.0025111379,0.00037471286,0.0003366344,0.00023799781,0.0000749733,0.6797807,0.006694012,0.29451457,0.009947698,0.0001754854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049715687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080450287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94057333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015538201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003654566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31428194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993579411","doi":"10.21423/jrs-v07hannel","title":"An Approach for Predicting Mainstream Cigarette Smoke Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituent (HPHC) Yields","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Regulatory Science","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Repeatability; Quality (philosophy); Portfolio; Process engineering; Computer science; Biochemical engineering; Environmental science; Mathematics; Statistics; Engineering; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0760355844758024,"score_gpt":0.38523782247646976,"score_spread":0.3092022380006674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993579411","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07625833,0.00027069298,0.9207232,0.00014358158,0.000025318144,0.0007703163,0.0004649799,0.00033811107,0.0010055518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3327594,0.00022934235,0.6631285,0.00015768707,0.00002229266,0.0022532586,0.00058423483,0.000041356943,0.00082391023],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99405825,0.0034217201,0.0003157122,0.001165752,0.0008532054,0.00018541259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99227095,0.0060628997,0.00068735704,0.00033259465,0.0005329356,0.00011324881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009918126,0.0014353367,0.0014656472,0.002553085,0.00055483513,0.0016821625,0.0014990153,0.0013542558,0.0014520468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017125554,0.0010669368,0.0016144095,0.0013204626,0.000768799,0.0009852166,0.0010031908,0.0015084522,0.00031076453],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013025636,0.0017197364,0.030998137,0.0005650181,0.00068321894,0.0001153999,0.00022546957,0.76161957,0.015815763,0.012147673,0.000873737,0.17393376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009348386,0.0008423217,0.0045742574,0.000028743952,0.00010616714,0.000032552158,0.000043487467,0.9791814,0.0052954084,0.008646356,0.0011082337,0.000047623278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055381707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053681745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009918126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020455488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039578783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052452683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995390831","doi":"","title":"The LP Relaxation Orthogonal Array Polytope and its Permutation Symmetries","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polytope; Birkhoff polytope; Permutation (music); Mathematics; Homogeneous space; Characterization (materials science); Combinatorics; Symmetry (geometry); Orthogonal array; Permutation group; Factorial; Relaxation (psychology); Geometry; Regular polygon; Mathematical analysis; Statistics","score_opus":0.04581368736529833,"score_gpt":0.35564317030539083,"score_spread":0.3098294829400925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995390831","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008034849,0.00025019876,0.98595756,0.00035849027,0.00004650471,0.00011934227,0.0003717382,0.000073687,0.0047875894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3110555,0.0014130415,0.67382497,0.0007087657,0.00045791472,0.0025553906,0.0012563393,0.00018325176,0.008544842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932968,0.0034892075,0.00021183376,0.0013456674,0.0011843669,0.00047210505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986161,0.010671212,0.0009832857,0.0009925659,0.00089467986,0.00029730613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007313955,0.0014081126,0.0018847828,0.0010600459,0.00062160695,0.00208986,0.0013084873,0.001178199,0.00706788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013711418,0.00090612745,0.001537442,0.0012756967,0.0026119098,0.0020237167,0.0016505349,0.0038794244,0.0009304699],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043816888,0.0002333273,0.0007975757,0.0005871192,0.0001343844,0.0003049312,0.00014436439,0.32737023,0.0058625843,0.5882669,0.005584241,0.07027615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011084557,0.00061100104,0.00061110884,0.000056177443,0.000042507192,0.00022874158,0.00007555285,0.54791653,0.0032604083,0.43934113,0.0076896637,0.0000562811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078763673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004178482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007313955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014282281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022436695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038680315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004949560","doi":"10.1080/00949655.2020.1722669","title":"Beta approximation and its applications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Gumbel distribution; Beta distribution; Approximation theory; Distribution (mathematics); BETA (programming language); Applied mathematics; Matching (statistics); Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Extreme value theory","score_opus":0.19230507724041207,"score_gpt":0.47879685527151833,"score_spread":0.28649177803110626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004949560","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028517395,0.0029029364,0.98782957,0.00054302055,0.00014896602,0.000030504933,0.000067964495,0.00016974368,0.0054556034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34690258,0.015512007,0.6181299,0.0015684882,0.0012670922,0.00076110306,0.00068425917,0.0006345103,0.014539975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99503386,0.002729837,0.00017850735,0.0006775407,0.001159867,0.00022043052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854183,0.011119908,0.00069667504,0.00086743635,0.0016008886,0.0002966901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010787356,0.0013623831,0.001913343,0.0030512419,0.0008804036,0.0019931262,0.0021692591,0.0018977381,0.0058643846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03661531,0.000724525,0.0018395134,0.0025804855,0.0021371655,0.002534876,0.0025329406,0.0039967117,0.0021320414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001984858,0.00009098406,0.0029802867,0.00043045657,0.00018955837,0.0002488684,0.00034564367,0.16151871,0.001631225,0.7033428,0.0067552393,0.12226776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034606837,0.00011316702,0.0007500524,0.00017758243,0.000046264617,0.0002814242,0.00007191318,0.53499985,0.0008232633,0.44683498,0.015823064,0.000043786255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002403163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010066729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010787356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014460249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014174411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057049632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006514018","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2020.106357","title":"Bayesian modeling and optimization for multi-response surfaces","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Bayesian probability; Robustness (evolution); Bayesian linear regression; Covariate; Bayesian inference; Multivariate statistics; Computer science; Posterior probability; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.30615563783757793,"score_gpt":0.3930521525893101,"score_spread":0.08689651475173216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006514018","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018649151,0.0003157056,0.996759,0.00020167136,0.000019769364,0.000037521997,0.00004532517,0.0000833873,0.00067275733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35975626,0.0018336803,0.6248663,0.0003881716,0.00019628162,0.0017097079,0.00066581176,0.00040624946,0.010177446],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99177164,0.005485286,0.0002540405,0.00081547094,0.0013412781,0.0003322365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97961754,0.017306048,0.0010418191,0.0007339014,0.0010838739,0.00021689864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012300526,0.0017864702,0.0039499463,0.002080821,0.0008785349,0.0027399436,0.0030625372,0.0035973864,0.004393836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030015923,0.0031328038,0.002811312,0.0016660262,0.0027477501,0.0028966006,0.0025855755,0.0034791597,0.00085536053],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070027265,0.00006127794,0.0002251519,0.00016868887,0.000091720234,0.000022226355,0.000057879617,0.9003213,0.00059747446,0.08353013,0.00058939157,0.014264725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014749348,0.00001491281,0.000094280265,0.000013779604,0.0000103895245,0.000004928615,0.0000052025084,0.97071505,0.00017266814,0.0284251,0.0005163635,0.000012647806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008896664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071234386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012300526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029180523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029385025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06505215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007714545","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v9n2p30","title":"D-Optimal Slope Design for Second Degree Kronecker Model Mixture Experiment With Three Ingredients","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kronecker delta; Kronecker product; Mathematics; Simplex; Degree (music); Matrix (chemical analysis); Centroid; Product (mathematics); Applied mathematics; Function (biology); Homogeneous space; Pure mathematics; Combinatorics; Geometry","score_opus":0.2158157521981118,"score_gpt":0.41038123483203026,"score_spread":0.19456548263391846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007714545","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020124188,0.00009201549,0.97887814,0.000030508418,0.0000104399505,0.000108159365,0.000035855737,0.00007332618,0.0006473713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42921513,0.00024339482,0.5676806,0.000098113145,0.000014970766,0.0010107036,0.00012214477,0.000050150258,0.0015646889],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929114,0.0046571866,0.00026649793,0.001074333,0.0008210296,0.00026960438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99372417,0.0038938737,0.00073247356,0.0007920441,0.000655698,0.00020178534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008502937,0.0011328452,0.00165503,0.0007554812,0.00043571158,0.0013842487,0.001289927,0.0012319084,0.002132572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013125564,0.0007820924,0.0013728164,0.0006796865,0.001317934,0.0016813908,0.0014842319,0.0013413203,0.00060174096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035757767,0.00090890756,0.003060823,0.0013679224,0.00036166245,0.0001500041,0.0004305843,0.5074252,0.07832207,0.21458027,0.00073288317,0.189084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023585811,0.0029970258,0.0022602887,0.000083146806,0.00012195558,0.00010534244,0.00007141135,0.9040216,0.023957562,0.06276007,0.003275906,0.000109720306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005398248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005681528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008502937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008514188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015341332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044968307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007895650","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v9n2p7","title":"D-optimal Design in Linear Model With Different Heteroscedasticity Structures","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Optimal design; Mathematics; Function (biology); Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Statistics","score_opus":0.1546272628039724,"score_gpt":0.4163377342000365,"score_spread":0.26171047139606407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007895650","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008397179,0.00017291663,0.9908503,0.00004522218,0.00002864779,0.00016712506,0.000036305555,0.00008620288,0.00021622887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20497766,0.00031955176,0.79165184,0.00012852668,0.000042234708,0.0018011277,0.00026873872,0.00006284917,0.00074749027],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.955748,0.036314167,0.001391785,0.003791503,0.0018742728,0.0008801441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.949848,0.04442343,0.0014819612,0.0017924142,0.0021572695,0.00029695386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034584146,0.0017341436,0.0034549942,0.0017111273,0.00083286676,0.0015524996,0.0015902368,0.0019315106,0.0035473595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044625673,0.0015005841,0.0034009796,0.0011936397,0.0017321645,0.0015176776,0.001829198,0.002328355,0.00048982864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002533882,0.0006242299,0.0071741366,0.0016348788,0.0012036925,0.0002654427,0.0005125291,0.72542167,0.0050171823,0.09035236,0.0012078275,0.1640521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032155486,0.001320982,0.0014273906,0.00006555982,0.00017596917,0.00005384941,0.00005882565,0.9648949,0.00348874,0.026179248,0.0019464669,0.00006651247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019458021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012107048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034584146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014804545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031344348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18290067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011367055","doi":"10.1002/bimj.201900005","title":"On a class of non‐linear transformation cure rate models","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrical Journal","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformation (genetics); Mathematics; Inflation (cosmology); Applied mathematics; Maximum likelihood; Class (philosophy); Generalization; Cure rate; Binary data; Statistics; Binary number; Computer science; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.29297819451056173,"score_gpt":0.4656604519769179,"score_spread":0.17268225746635618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011367055","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021687476,0.00033688347,0.9750963,0.00040109272,0.000056360655,0.0002334721,0.00025149464,0.0001244851,0.0018124242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6379686,0.0018415392,0.3433861,0.0008039202,0.0003374145,0.0022264835,0.0015138881,0.00014944689,0.011772477],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889637,0.007334793,0.00034370628,0.0017268149,0.0011712891,0.00045977722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781979,0.017234728,0.0016860246,0.0018155294,0.0008423963,0.00022339892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018626342,0.0017588063,0.0022601848,0.0014756718,0.00047460516,0.0022760213,0.0036341008,0.0024162843,0.0044592046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032114472,0.0007360258,0.0022722029,0.0014631246,0.002065014,0.0033408154,0.0022492507,0.004506403,0.0012732508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006552579,0.00037159564,0.003044634,0.00043689605,0.00028652183,0.00022904383,0.0004014247,0.56039196,0.0025150615,0.359328,0.0018699548,0.07046971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006327721,0.00027038355,0.0009357694,0.000044675173,0.000060776838,0.0000944607,0.00004857433,0.89222175,0.00061178964,0.10298939,0.0026142572,0.000044885284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016124346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011065097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018626342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013021401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015720738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09850669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016830834","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11549","title":"Optimal balanced block designs for correlated observations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Correlation; Block (permutation group theory); Binary number; Mathematics; Value (mathematics); Optimal design; Constant (computer programming); Construct (python library); Block size; Statistics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Algorithm; Combinatorics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.362038590917151,"score_gpt":0.40760848188996734,"score_spread":0.04556989097281633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016830834","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007046678,0.0002972072,0.990593,0.000105561354,0.0000427465,0.00046426404,0.00020872166,0.00012207773,0.0011197394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09531407,0.0004892012,0.8978404,0.00017133758,0.00006398511,0.003863714,0.00056893984,0.00010077173,0.001587617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95790297,0.03333103,0.0013594998,0.0037806677,0.0025079804,0.0011179788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9188478,0.06567306,0.004406086,0.006844537,0.003226957,0.0010016037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043587316,0.001629139,0.003833771,0.0022151088,0.0010932195,0.0019184365,0.0022383777,0.0021361155,0.009872712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09335299,0.001650483,0.0016762568,0.0019544463,0.0030553248,0.003247474,0.0030828493,0.0024004881,0.001697635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030007537,0.00033778258,0.0026198663,0.0009894861,0.00042031522,0.00012268116,0.00045283357,0.116394065,0.0047254246,0.6530759,0.0037513825,0.21410948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014094409,0.0014642029,0.0017243117,0.00033201528,0.00021675,0.00009811615,0.00009278047,0.36998016,0.003965726,0.6113089,0.009278239,0.00012946567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010970801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012777031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043587316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020868964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043944744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23051447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022034773","doi":"10.1016/j.cam.2022.114676","title":"Power divergence approach for one-shot device testing under competing risks","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Robustness (evolution); Divergence (linguistics); Mathematics; One shot; Context (archaeology); Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.4421324131294275,"score_gpt":0.4589655974754331,"score_spread":0.01683318434600556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022034773","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034228342,0.00016979425,0.9950014,0.0002921728,0.000049332804,0.00011423204,0.00007146911,0.00010048211,0.00077822147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39252698,0.0007959287,0.5917738,0.0008335905,0.00041618082,0.0027092728,0.0005712067,0.0003599401,0.010013064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9554275,0.033226,0.0012236784,0.0042737587,0.0046310676,0.0012179306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7374474,0.24658796,0.0031810636,0.007016929,0.0042661047,0.0015005171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06801633,0.0036605056,0.0073098917,0.003281217,0.0010696979,0.00396281,0.008067248,0.005880887,0.009390279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15808882,0.0026162448,0.003261631,0.0020386842,0.01019041,0.006982573,0.0064699417,0.0076236376,0.00090339605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010904835,0.00039301682,0.001990184,0.0007851844,0.00093930814,0.0005537253,0.00050385395,0.27335024,0.0016458351,0.63932925,0.0021346353,0.07728431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017797557,0.00025533923,0.0004248209,0.000061320236,0.000112690876,0.00010543115,0.000042630876,0.6358286,0.00048057945,0.36176303,0.0006969122,0.000050662413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023837255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015307574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06801633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031355408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048886775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35970902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027736642","doi":"10.22237/jmasm/1571745720","title":"On Statistical Significance of Discriminant Function Coefficients","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Discriminant; Discriminant function analysis; Linear discriminant analysis; Statistics; Multivariate statistics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Optimal discriminant analysis; Statistical significance; Function (biology); Applied mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.19653101442433668,"score_gpt":0.48602676480000656,"score_spread":0.2894957503756699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027736642","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12730949,0.009752955,0.8418301,0.0031549572,0.0013097983,0.0006408205,0.0009155441,0.00066577655,0.014420498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8203234,0.003612541,0.16871876,0.0013356176,0.0013405548,0.0014463598,0.0010474134,0.00036602642,0.0018094522],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8701565,0.09212923,0.0035318919,0.0119514335,0.020090582,0.0021403835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34125733,0.62175477,0.0061774156,0.014894246,0.014286304,0.0016299305],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12557466,0.002023939,0.003613853,0.0085302405,0.0022722452,0.0040458036,0.0026818146,0.0026816349,0.0054025427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43751565,0.00088673335,0.002570962,0.0072356304,0.01260018,0.0051382654,0.003859697,0.008194294,0.00092577597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005258236,0.00050850067,0.065957315,0.0029098243,0.0037450192,0.0017789815,0.0024320942,0.07436909,0.011729176,0.29626194,0.011305196,0.5237447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010756709,0.0027546575,0.069876544,0.0017599856,0.0013879976,0.0011892503,0.0013662045,0.27231792,0.01170199,0.6104265,0.025750285,0.00039295165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018720735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008041143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87442535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002483512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004723231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66411024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029583566","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2020.03.007","title":"Minimax D-optimal designs for multivariate regression models with multi-factors","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Minimax; Mathematics; Covariance; Covariance matrix; Mathematical optimization; Optimal design; Matrix (chemical analysis); Convex optimization; Applied mathematics; Regular polygon; Algorithm; Statistics","score_opus":0.47817906207246336,"score_gpt":0.5087787140387374,"score_spread":0.030599651966274066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029583566","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029121719,0.00029092113,0.9959681,0.00013791533,0.000026251058,0.00019740354,0.00004419897,0.00009324123,0.00032981028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.099867225,0.00047866986,0.8948674,0.0002742619,0.00007121017,0.0033095288,0.0001953897,0.00011183388,0.0008244363],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9447995,0.04864722,0.0012191633,0.0029685686,0.0017327319,0.0006328572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84690726,0.14109053,0.0036607187,0.005118453,0.002301804,0.0009212881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05793997,0.003249123,0.0058468306,0.00277392,0.0010244128,0.00231363,0.0037619686,0.0034877073,0.005108024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12604977,0.0038556838,0.0036404063,0.0018137324,0.0048755123,0.0032359816,0.0045462605,0.0047928127,0.00054174766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052166595,0.0007680017,0.0024391373,0.001954787,0.0014417476,0.00015185899,0.00048241037,0.47191474,0.0035236068,0.33638224,0.0025066773,0.17321828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013245668,0.0014739927,0.0007691361,0.0002908482,0.00024554634,0.000069516536,0.00005549493,0.670433,0.00226364,0.32050243,0.0024899803,0.00008191401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011562614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011571143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05793997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023431513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005369863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3064195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042988590","doi":"10.1177/0962280220938418","title":"Random effects models for complex designs","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Grains Research and Development Corporation","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Variance (accounting); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Row; Table (database); Block (permutation group theory); Algorithm; Data mining; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.7962302970634183,"score_gpt":0.7196117283011839,"score_spread":0.07661856876223438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042988590","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009059846,0.0015727303,0.9914198,0.00056430156,0.00063932006,0.0019594992,0.0006190189,0.00046654887,0.001852849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02774936,0.0019680834,0.9435075,0.0007568663,0.0005346383,0.021073507,0.0007270789,0.00018624024,0.0034967952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8198647,0.15107125,0.0053461455,0.0112501765,0.0107029565,0.0017648151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7057664,0.2647509,0.0103267515,0.01218871,0.0062849005,0.00068238867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.142043,0.006511052,0.007207597,0.005528948,0.001707787,0.0055373334,0.008133709,0.0080484925,0.034393676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20870595,0.0029521103,0.007046172,0.00583368,0.0058250693,0.0062208497,0.0046042562,0.010770079,0.0051777894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006736229,0.0003014384,0.0014255524,0.003356022,0.0015333041,0.00033828046,0.0008611689,0.1067618,0.00045023847,0.7824966,0.011702518,0.090099454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010443616,0.0008701869,0.00075843115,0.0008672193,0.00046614138,0.00016103624,0.00013918568,0.2526851,0.00044984865,0.70534605,0.037025727,0.00018673194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049535763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004928042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.142043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005605184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005732999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75120413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048504327","doi":"10.1002/aic.17021","title":"Using prior parameter knowledge in <scp>model‐based</scp> design of experiments for pharmaceutical production","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIChE Journal","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Eli Lilly and Company","keywords":"Fisher information; Computation; Computer science; Bayesian probability; Selection (genetic algorithm); Bayesian information criterion; Invertible matrix; Prior information; Sequential analysis; Design of experiments; Algorithm; Process (computing); Mathematical optimization; Model selection; Matrix (chemical analysis); Mathematics; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.6399688166531778,"score_gpt":0.5589323547005753,"score_spread":0.0810364619526025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048504327","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011069115,0.00015640867,0.98774135,0.0000913249,0.000012127168,0.00025581772,0.00004870364,0.00015410996,0.00047100504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39109716,0.00023574334,0.60617805,0.00020813465,0.000025273206,0.0016189283,0.00018017588,0.00006497215,0.0003916428],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806465,0.015366875,0.00048870954,0.0010023868,0.002251384,0.00024408437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9604024,0.031903937,0.0027379973,0.0028437236,0.0017945945,0.00031736813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030282775,0.0015135148,0.0020501602,0.0012937364,0.0004272914,0.001376846,0.0012073853,0.0011634761,0.0020419543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045768358,0.0012500517,0.0014919882,0.00068373134,0.0012769033,0.0016042588,0.0012437801,0.0018324554,0.00028299025],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017898341,0.0009836027,0.0028883251,0.0010065868,0.00069001626,0.000080350546,0.00012236582,0.7511785,0.02253835,0.024615861,0.0008663086,0.1932399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031437445,0.0018254222,0.0021506033,0.00010757298,0.00022717605,0.000038204093,0.000021964013,0.94016016,0.014252988,0.0383513,0.0024885498,0.000061638144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013571073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019350648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030282775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013989873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003377699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16015255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3067784497","doi":"10.1177/0962280220948159","title":"Model-robust designs for nonlinear quantile regression","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Quantile regression; Quantile; Statistics; Computer science; Nonlinear regression; Nonlinear system; Econometrics; Regression; Regression analysis; Mathematics","score_opus":0.7951379235756372,"score_gpt":0.7090320201533811,"score_spread":0.0861059034222561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3067784497","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017764646,0.00008200552,0.99744165,0.000054028933,0.000022324162,0.00024016076,0.0000470362,0.00008183911,0.00025439655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08263521,0.00020785099,0.91267693,0.00013515168,0.000059017948,0.0033153384,0.00015669856,0.000077241435,0.000736542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9404145,0.049959812,0.0011641281,0.0032031373,0.0046288576,0.00062964554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9481903,0.034884494,0.0061796163,0.007105464,0.0031962818,0.00044393164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05255911,0.0017807472,0.0021938612,0.0014190206,0.0005140746,0.0014274496,0.0028645534,0.0021847426,0.005639582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10325348,0.0010923279,0.002278046,0.0012609505,0.0024466224,0.0016952795,0.00281105,0.0027566813,0.0015975572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018572354,0.00048660772,0.0033413568,0.0012823531,0.0008247289,0.00013522792,0.0004939717,0.27780607,0.0077830846,0.53235185,0.0027445413,0.17089288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00113912,0.0022702813,0.0018975197,0.00020520278,0.0002589303,0.000093820556,0.00006515938,0.6929358,0.005333241,0.28701186,0.008653299,0.00013581029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063605903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067122345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05255911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015169805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00247673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27796245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085503933","doi":"","title":"Sequential design for microarray experiments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.13647528988949462,"score_gpt":0.39069065083519466,"score_spread":0.2542153609457001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085503933","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010523364,0.00025149118,0.9971322,0.00016263603,0.00015242891,0.0002942353,0.0001518225,0.00026905801,0.0005337435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061770998,0.000947794,0.9229255,0.0005643502,0.00062492007,0.006827658,0.00073645136,0.00020925973,0.005393088],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9631569,0.0270376,0.0009853826,0.004733308,0.0034084355,0.0006783465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95801866,0.03377792,0.0020162244,0.003448084,0.002179997,0.0005590815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030155247,0.002667284,0.004435776,0.0013080164,0.0007081098,0.0014658184,0.0023308673,0.0021411842,0.022342509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046692356,0.001831525,0.002277009,0.001959439,0.002097016,0.0012939268,0.0016832879,0.003677247,0.0038519094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00437117,0.0005291265,0.0012490655,0.0033077446,0.0008742957,0.00024056241,0.00025189502,0.18635905,0.021619888,0.3209683,0.015720429,0.44450846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018814486,0.0020407988,0.001499779,0.00018695729,0.00025061684,0.00016996278,0.00002752523,0.6111261,0.0070122094,0.3479525,0.02776579,0.00008619096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008923932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011099376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030155247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020145453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003913864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15947807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092132750","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11571","title":"An efficient algorithm for Elastic I‐optimal design of generalized linear models","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Science and Health; DePaul University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Algorithm; Equivalence (formal languages); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Multiplicative function; Generalized linear model; Convergence (economics); Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.2169637399370339,"score_gpt":0.404329584293057,"score_spread":0.18736584435602308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092132750","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012138579,0.000033773533,0.99833775,0.000021170341,0.0000072198595,0.00004172229,0.000007036555,0.00007459631,0.00026288073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07299192,0.00007879331,0.9252091,0.00008463387,0.000019627107,0.0006547297,0.00007583102,0.00007855741,0.0008068384],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968714,0.001773799,0.0001805314,0.0005019622,0.0004820359,0.00019033434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952916,0.0036429153,0.00029656274,0.000229322,0.00043756334,0.00010195531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055566425,0.0015566234,0.0019081342,0.001474857,0.0006552922,0.0010385559,0.0015264701,0.0014157735,0.0051904614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0122344205,0.0011429279,0.0013469356,0.0011301505,0.0012330144,0.0010871574,0.0024836536,0.0018636272,0.00083142315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039428036,0.0001744728,0.00088890246,0.0003403158,0.00014223742,0.000095712676,0.00015172287,0.6506133,0.0048197224,0.07156939,0.0015616801,0.2692482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085904234,0.00015320747,0.00011893818,0.00002415362,0.000019601972,0.000030356336,0.000015373693,0.97625357,0.0013339266,0.020858001,0.0010922581,0.000014763953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021448734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001923225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055566425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010829056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031123548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0293867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097065132","doi":"10.1093/biomet/asaa089","title":"A method of constructing maximin distance designs","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Distance measures; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Measure (data warehouse); Construct (python library); Class (philosophy); Computer experiment; Optimal design; Computer science; Algorithm; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.41460356532027726,"score_gpt":0.49876673991261505,"score_spread":0.0841631745923378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097065132","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010135914,0.000051309762,0.99757284,0.000040736762,0.000025273248,0.00011735953,0.00002951475,0.000115081246,0.0010343252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02880849,0.00007346124,0.96877074,0.0000952197,0.00003763734,0.000766377,0.00006284917,0.0001092768,0.0012760343],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807421,0.013773795,0.00076863775,0.0017933021,0.002592702,0.00032957317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98015803,0.014612704,0.00092954084,0.0019284519,0.002058033,0.00031328844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016608505,0.0017587602,0.001756462,0.003002961,0.00096496305,0.0012892779,0.0018976732,0.0016560506,0.011949866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033930264,0.0010937252,0.0017308424,0.0013525145,0.002672265,0.0017468501,0.0026165321,0.002688773,0.0019791177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009967098,0.00035544686,0.0008637614,0.0011376664,0.00024958467,0.00014736156,0.00044725236,0.09025448,0.015654428,0.41960838,0.004349543,0.46593553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005852899,0.001969419,0.0010020419,0.0003571332,0.00018030415,0.0003871909,0.00012554793,0.3983467,0.027661122,0.5204769,0.04873448,0.00017397721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038423107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033811366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016608505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012586369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002206615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08783525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097165355","doi":"10.1080/00207543.2020.1836420","title":"A novel approach for non-normal multi-response optimisation problems","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Production Research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Normality; Bayesian probability; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Normal distribution; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.6027455265248953,"score_gpt":0.5750842144902224,"score_spread":0.027661312034672925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097165355","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040534805,0.00010368917,0.9988462,0.000029205174,0.00001548279,0.00003134716,0.000007783417,0.00003748045,0.0005235498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0629117,0.0004255149,0.9332262,0.00015264274,0.00007380144,0.0006587971,0.00007890746,0.000111422516,0.0023610967],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960634,0.0018895363,0.00019164899,0.00061974477,0.0010770191,0.00015873676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971775,0.0020576515,0.00020842683,0.00013630292,0.00035500614,0.00006521251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062081753,0.0020596508,0.0024153786,0.0022625346,0.0005951852,0.0015720542,0.0026462323,0.0023191252,0.004305185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006321507,0.001089564,0.0032530758,0.0018648205,0.0013533308,0.0013724563,0.002644671,0.0024211959,0.0008514898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011473282,0.00016997213,0.00042471057,0.0010033124,0.00027639396,0.00020067874,0.00020901227,0.77274626,0.008250509,0.06525832,0.0012993794,0.15004672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021286514,0.000102867685,0.00009534041,0.00002905825,0.000031977645,0.000053246058,0.000016201126,0.9763014,0.0009062009,0.019046325,0.0033772564,0.000018738245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013516936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013618583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062081753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009974198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016479801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032832384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3101287979","doi":"","title":"EXISTENCE AND CONSTRUCTION OF RANDOMIZATION DEFINING CONTRAST SUBSPACES FOR REGULAR FACTORIAL DESIGNS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Burnaby Hospital; Acadia University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Fractional factorial design; Factorial; Factorial experiment; Restricted randomization; Randomization; Linear subspace; Statistics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.2150164648240925,"score_gpt":0.44667812055141404,"score_spread":0.23166165572732153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3101287979","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050002285,0.00010246909,0.9936232,0.000050365168,0.000009748772,0.00007502778,0.000047502635,0.000050107992,0.0010414008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10826088,0.0002047491,0.8898169,0.0001108316,0.000041670042,0.00081785413,0.000108278444,0.000044070297,0.0005947602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9738758,0.02075334,0.00085090345,0.0018571125,0.0022806488,0.00038213882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95862365,0.032376885,0.003552188,0.003169854,0.0018252821,0.00045217114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015563874,0.0009838421,0.0012354625,0.0015069706,0.00054832164,0.0013879278,0.0010466101,0.00095991377,0.0039782664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036418542,0.0007170769,0.0012795915,0.0010604959,0.0038622208,0.00222304,0.0022577066,0.0019732108,0.00068673765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003973257,0.0001125748,0.0012904273,0.000501074,0.00007772266,0.00012221289,0.0003419062,0.02263782,0.010281127,0.8515319,0.0007952245,0.11191056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002361036,0.0015991308,0.0016891168,0.00026284732,0.00008061715,0.0003846429,0.000105526015,0.116248764,0.01822982,0.8466222,0.014428161,0.000113021626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013580435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014354182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015563874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009099962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012651562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08231062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108522401","doi":"10.1137/21m1389845","title":"Multi-experiment Parameter Identifiability of ODEs and Model Theory","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SIAM Journal on Applied Algebra and Geometry","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Identifiability; Ode; Mathematics; Context (archaeology); Applied mathematics; Polynomial; Algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Theoretical computer science; Statistics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.07830093866502531,"score_gpt":0.3879804277715685,"score_spread":0.3096794891065432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108522401","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028634518,0.000060987455,0.9963288,0.00012677188,0.000009968774,0.000046471607,0.00005315952,0.00010718853,0.00040311884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28241566,0.00031386493,0.7139169,0.00028826244,0.000051776486,0.0010391539,0.0003222629,0.0001024971,0.0015495876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98997986,0.005037164,0.0005773294,0.002604169,0.0014780895,0.00032335048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9420839,0.045991205,0.0037315805,0.0063608913,0.0013948219,0.00043761477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016909745,0.0014742919,0.002427533,0.0013005659,0.000991615,0.0019685014,0.0023911598,0.0022718615,0.004006109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04844091,0.0011087582,0.002888908,0.00085197913,0.004745441,0.0047545405,0.0038666497,0.00401931,0.00069174456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063157565,0.0001870996,0.0025216509,0.00065262284,0.00026202973,0.00020819837,0.00029330378,0.38056976,0.012691961,0.5411657,0.00066472683,0.060151424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065344924,0.00019555051,0.00044018007,0.00004809207,0.000041236905,0.00009400951,0.000034137727,0.57052517,0.008772191,0.41819984,0.0015287792,0.000055509692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010461425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008049453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016909745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022935092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025593329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089428365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114356518","doi":"10.12697/acutm.2011.15.05","title":"On approximating the distribution of indefinite quadratic expressions in singular normal vectors","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta et Commentationes Universitatis Tartuensis de Mathematica","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Quadratic equation; Definite quadratic form; Isotropic quadratic form; Quadratic form (statistics); Distribution (mathematics); Quadratic function; Binary quadratic form; Moment (physics); Applied mathematics; Quadratic programming; Mathematical analysis; Combinatorics; Mathematical optimization; Geometry; Physics","score_opus":0.1513518693766131,"score_gpt":0.382392578907339,"score_spread":0.23104070953072592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114356518","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030171426,0.000092431415,0.9963844,0.000030440062,0.0000071375584,0.000018358714,0.000010405796,0.000040413273,0.00039921634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26209363,0.0012271379,0.7310193,0.00013099198,0.000085053616,0.00039421578,0.00021006832,0.0001582464,0.0046813525],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976762,0.0013441296,0.00008484399,0.00025356372,0.0004940666,0.00014732718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883498,0.009568412,0.0006896375,0.0004891936,0.000788099,0.0001149159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008863761,0.001296542,0.0011726012,0.0017566428,0.0004079986,0.0015945573,0.0015993888,0.0010236293,0.0018661744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02295566,0.0006177094,0.0008162915,0.0018940611,0.002381723,0.0021800078,0.0012745217,0.0018799827,0.0005020402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010111481,0.000061594576,0.00069247826,0.0002302628,0.000033869896,0.00007488518,0.00020258337,0.7594697,0.0029636198,0.18074247,0.00053527113,0.054892074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005111414,0.000026738688,0.00011296748,0.000016392816,0.000005203556,0.000026641355,0.000013757348,0.9738139,0.0007241198,0.024880078,0.0003643218,0.000010743743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029518718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023930045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008863761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014846425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016108672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04687661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123495936","doi":"","title":"Empirical Likelihood for Regression Discontinuity Design","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Regression discontinuity design; Empirical likelihood; Nonparametric regression; Covariate; Inference; Mathematics; Regression; Econometrics; Causal inference; Statistics; Nonparametric statistics; Regression analysis; Parametric statistics; Local regression; Computer science; Polynomial regression; Confidence interval; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.27433309297858915,"score_gpt":0.5212791377135418,"score_spread":0.24694604473495269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123495936","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003611458,0.00045392686,0.9941831,0.00025881355,0.00003683304,0.0001095825,0.00009446583,0.0001476575,0.0011041474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36916792,0.0010802476,0.6233256,0.0006426874,0.0002944913,0.0023766716,0.00070031424,0.00029320197,0.0021188408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93183565,0.054380756,0.002082812,0.004390004,0.006348406,0.00096237607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6018034,0.36322615,0.0101947645,0.01640111,0.0071275434,0.0012470082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.096478276,0.0015965407,0.0028704065,0.004126319,0.0008106889,0.004778743,0.0055917357,0.005177391,0.006348684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3757088,0.0013966019,0.002415813,0.00242702,0.0055316277,0.006043748,0.0043340875,0.0069521847,0.0008760869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005443121,0.00014970396,0.0042924364,0.0006125758,0.00032755814,0.00016676796,0.0005050086,0.08082049,0.00058998994,0.83634984,0.0013952814,0.07424592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000301316,0.00033771034,0.0015618063,0.00030953388,0.0001357441,0.00016466113,0.00008102613,0.33596465,0.0014425383,0.6548064,0.0048062997,0.00008839568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008730407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002907593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096478276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023510777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017954541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.510232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127481972","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v10n2p36","title":"A- Optimal Slope Design for Second Degree Kronecker Model Mixture Experiment With Four Ingredients With Application in Selected Fruits Blending","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kronecker delta; Kronecker product; Mathematics; Centroid; Simplex; Degree (music); Matrix (chemical analysis); Class (philosophy); Function (biology); Product (mathematics); Applied mathematics; Pure mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Geometry","score_opus":0.1251633926486471,"score_gpt":0.39461566673063586,"score_spread":0.2694522740819888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127481972","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05553821,0.000104090075,0.94307536,0.000029232468,0.000011868129,0.00015524469,0.000046771613,0.0001025067,0.0009367402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57683986,0.00016705488,0.42055935,0.000045916135,0.00000926949,0.0007112848,0.000094496165,0.00003633513,0.0015364009],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960296,0.0023853264,0.00016118858,0.00061454106,0.0006261776,0.00018307244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669003,0.0018620945,0.0005133753,0.00041427955,0.00042084642,0.00009933136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053003985,0.0008332688,0.0011666963,0.0005181545,0.00033835648,0.001006764,0.00095489086,0.00087029196,0.0019008974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008535122,0.0005138617,0.0010223531,0.00047775867,0.00079388154,0.0010985635,0.0008144528,0.0008942028,0.00039234388],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028924928,0.00090278103,0.0038481534,0.0010729422,0.00027125978,0.00012084202,0.00038407254,0.59046906,0.10405107,0.09525323,0.00042859098,0.20030549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016233444,0.0039960975,0.003992388,0.000061554594,0.00013666203,0.0000819276,0.000082037695,0.9264742,0.037130926,0.024795765,0.0029920887,0.00009396129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074999477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009353626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053003985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006486594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011429226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028031528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128335591","doi":"10.1080/24754269.2020.1867795","title":"Selecting baseline designs using a minimum aberration criterion when some two-factor interactions are important","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistical Theory and Related Fields","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Baseline (sea); Optimal design; Class (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Factor (programming language); Mathematics; Algorithm; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1384077182270826,"score_gpt":0.45168840872861005,"score_spread":0.31328069050152746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128335591","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022278266,0.00053405546,0.9752196,0.00016024902,0.00004007112,0.0005454768,0.00011152214,0.00026335721,0.00084741705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.092828855,0.0002291306,0.9047444,0.00014039785,0.000029672705,0.001339558,0.00017057739,0.00008784231,0.00042953284],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96813345,0.02279214,0.0018519477,0.00332342,0.0033718918,0.00052710215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9220041,0.06390635,0.004770911,0.00406577,0.0045391778,0.0007137204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03477188,0.0014638124,0.0025014242,0.0021703204,0.0009779041,0.0014623654,0.0011991479,0.0016693829,0.0040779077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09990442,0.00074085465,0.0018358198,0.0015992967,0.001452822,0.0016781107,0.0015785249,0.0017201639,0.00088881125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0071213874,0.00069491763,0.014582042,0.003682581,0.0012169252,0.00042422945,0.0011305052,0.08376923,0.062205892,0.06863872,0.0031216573,0.75341195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051794564,0.024162795,0.038978934,0.0013429255,0.0016746985,0.0010216623,0.0010136527,0.3573907,0.07954031,0.4448688,0.044014923,0.00081116427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073762855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011234023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03477188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011038191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035023899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18389344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140762921","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11596","title":"Optimal design under complete class with ancillary functions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Extension (predicate logic); Nonlinear system; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Logit; Poisson distribution; Mathematics; Algorithm; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.23451173477753795,"score_gpt":0.37321062531664906,"score_spread":0.1386988905391111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140762921","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022508739,0.00007899541,0.9745409,0.00017512731,0.000027931072,0.00024108062,0.0001007852,0.00011860346,0.0022078352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5853332,0.00026740792,0.4076392,0.00034005192,0.00013344886,0.0027298355,0.0002933808,0.00012425904,0.0031390938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97720575,0.017326439,0.00055402156,0.0017697092,0.0023829774,0.0007611236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691031,0.02157002,0.003245528,0.0030082627,0.0023071112,0.00076611596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024460167,0.0021673692,0.0030606147,0.0013561874,0.000546928,0.0017809557,0.0021719402,0.0018537819,0.0066271923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04322585,0.0010783585,0.001382929,0.0008281482,0.0022528856,0.003087123,0.0027851798,0.002254836,0.0007614219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012765542,0.0006201415,0.0011988778,0.00035569727,0.00018729796,0.000104269384,0.00014024196,0.23802462,0.004024112,0.65446687,0.0018560119,0.09774535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031352564,0.0015414446,0.0006342803,0.0000654048,0.00004137329,0.000050941435,0.000035797606,0.6759331,0.00216907,0.31662357,0.0025258325,0.00006562423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049225974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035058946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024460167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001376269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024333852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12935925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148502279","doi":"","title":"A grouping genetic algorithm for joint stratification and sample allocation designs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Survey methodology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Cartesian product; Selection (genetic algorithm); Genetic algorithm; Algorithm; Population stratification; Population; Sample size determination; Multivariate statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.6926526353938932,"score_gpt":0.5259590208262171,"score_spread":0.16669361456767606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148502279","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00503424,0.00013219599,0.99388367,0.00006445372,0.0000174196,0.00012397979,0.000020547846,0.00014260435,0.000580935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07941688,0.00015070381,0.91818875,0.000105435116,0.000021624235,0.0008966181,0.000119569144,0.000041820687,0.0010585993],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518764,0.0033783396,0.00013546959,0.00050646905,0.0005946989,0.0001973593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951865,0.0036252928,0.00032956246,0.0002680556,0.00048387557,0.000106634594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071863607,0.0013356552,0.0020377752,0.0023776474,0.00090946746,0.00090685126,0.0013004415,0.0018976398,0.0025938277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012178009,0.0008356379,0.0016265234,0.0020006686,0.0013599803,0.0009794082,0.0011442585,0.0013498187,0.0004877683],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024495574,0.00013558351,0.0016224723,0.00015312064,0.00021116847,0.00006411314,0.00019199844,0.74222976,0.002045918,0.036977403,0.0014230531,0.21470048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008718467,0.0001902239,0.0003583825,0.000030410352,0.00004068749,0.000029230067,0.0000214249,0.97528684,0.000644591,0.02141511,0.0018813437,0.000014420614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042962274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033785452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071863607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015628538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028093422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03800559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151692440","doi":"10.6000/1927-5951.2013.03.02.7","title":"Comparison of Outlier Detection Methods in Crossover Design Bioequivalence Studies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pharmacy and Nutrition Sciences","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outlier; Bioequivalence; Crossover; Identification (biology); Principal component analysis; Statistics; Anomaly detection; Test (biology); Computer science; Logarithm; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","score_opus":0.6076415696690599,"score_gpt":0.6589908163347381,"score_spread":0.051349246665678194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151692440","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24701624,0.0039583575,0.74551713,0.00029578822,0.00030585265,0.0010155981,0.00029725136,0.0005201721,0.001073547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66020447,0.0010490926,0.3360535,0.0001292875,0.0000901031,0.0013995586,0.0004901877,0.00010862406,0.00047522158],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.88212425,0.10507481,0.003728518,0.0030224193,0.0054815286,0.000568401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64571303,0.32998937,0.0085507585,0.0072370027,0.0077199987,0.00078979984],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09222967,0.0011110234,0.0023710513,0.0027595535,0.0004999954,0.0012624478,0.0014967225,0.0018250862,0.0015789572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17165658,0.0005117576,0.0028244697,0.0019334749,0.001251169,0.0016734129,0.0013536189,0.0022693833,0.00019128514],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.049395435,0.0036064885,0.048704408,0.0036510492,0.005974395,0.00036249933,0.0019924701,0.2133698,0.009359115,0.018856207,0.0016971469,0.64303106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025624344,0.022405138,0.04115714,0.00031792023,0.001395911,0.00037371911,0.0004487491,0.90018106,0.012180899,0.014590596,0.0040823943,0.00030420013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010078615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006248537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90777034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008846152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011678827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48776293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153502698","doi":"10.1002/aic.17394","title":"Model‐based design of experiments for polyether production from bio‐based 1,3‐propanediol","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIChE Journal","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Design of experiments; Monte Carlo method; Process engineering; Production (economics); Catalysis; Biological system; Environmental science; Computer science; Nuclear engineering; Simulation; Mathematics; Chemistry; Statistics; Engineering; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.38997501257917133,"score_gpt":0.48286713365762685,"score_spread":0.09289212107845551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153502698","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33673328,0.00044101523,0.66001153,0.000108241285,0.000038744012,0.00065525185,0.00013090066,0.00021752321,0.001663491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90925723,0.00010382834,0.08939499,0.000026059322,0.0000044104213,0.00071228197,0.0000737324,0.000007896662,0.0004195206],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865544,0.00078540656,0.00005682184,0.00018692724,0.00021463733,0.00010080776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967411,0.0024394586,0.000387866,0.00010506109,0.00024622097,0.00008035709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043191584,0.000915732,0.001091687,0.00054668455,0.00028823438,0.0008190119,0.00068715337,0.0006017356,0.0009981071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045472295,0.0006197814,0.0008877961,0.00024793728,0.00048833754,0.00036852006,0.000519173,0.00077470334,0.00008140777],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011134548,0.00040057505,0.0009038271,0.00021175925,0.000074393414,0.000020833899,0.000021387557,0.9668483,0.014869004,0.0015455427,0.000054199172,0.013936608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016136348,0.0011498032,0.00066798343,0.000007798346,0.000034970995,0.0000055350833,0.000008032168,0.985897,0.010723263,0.0011098735,0.00022157286,0.000012769231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017537661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018539046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043191584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008851274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016728371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022842169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162447044","doi":"10.1101/2021.05.15.21257266","title":"Two-phase sample selection strategies for design and analysis in post-genome wide association fine-mapping studies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sinai Health System; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos; Oulun Yliopisto; Government of Ontario; Broad Institute; Compute Canada; University of Toronto; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research","keywords":"Genome-wide association study; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Inference; Sampling (signal processing); Genetic association; Sample size determination; Statistical power; Data mining; Computational biology; Statistics; Mathematics; Biology; Genetics; Artificial intelligence; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Filter (signal processing)","score_opus":0.22947150803477032,"score_gpt":0.47840054487732114,"score_spread":0.24892903684255083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162447044","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065145795,0.000078696736,0.99198556,0.00007739808,0.000032401163,0.00092846964,0.000025492964,0.00013003648,0.00022733423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11017657,0.00007475519,0.885268,0.00016198095,0.000031543528,0.0036914328,0.00009776358,0.000047447098,0.0004505461],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.95335555,0.041280136,0.00076149486,0.0017462655,0.002451245,0.00040527203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94711477,0.04211762,0.0025481207,0.00403498,0.0035901186,0.0005943201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045156725,0.0014963477,0.00129341,0.0014250368,0.0005042136,0.0010853503,0.0022454828,0.002065948,0.0037693263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08233472,0.00090018805,0.0013352043,0.00089582853,0.001580885,0.0012206185,0.0018009414,0.0018306394,0.0007646664],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00479186,0.0017252521,0.007469977,0.0011405346,0.00092569477,0.0003000031,0.00078635185,0.3839246,0.01422036,0.18907732,0.0032258844,0.3924122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002477568,0.0037600123,0.00238436,0.00014370846,0.0001925577,0.0001266231,0.00009039633,0.9091889,0.0072914315,0.068497054,0.0057535735,0.00009383098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005633971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071529485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045156725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009467207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002944877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23881447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162849139","doi":"10.1287/inte.2021.1080","title":"Theory-Driven Practical Approach to Integrate R&amp;D and Production Planning for Portfolio Management in Agribusiness","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Flexibility (engineering); Modern portfolio theory; Portfolio; Computer science; Function (biology); Operations research; Population; Agribusiness; Yield (engineering); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Agriculture; Geography; Statistics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.20873042411796147,"score_gpt":0.4650840388606759,"score_spread":0.25635361474271445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162849139","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017054683,0.00008079227,0.9863898,0.001450674,0.00003470163,0.00014511895,0.000031268857,0.00016195427,0.0100001525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14063835,0.00034187845,0.85232687,0.0005408511,0.000094172996,0.0006424104,0.00009372447,0.000108437525,0.0052133054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936427,0.0033101335,0.00034292994,0.0008159668,0.0015649591,0.0003232816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914483,0.005151867,0.0005717656,0.0015593438,0.0009906178,0.00027809455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010159329,0.0014753634,0.0008095256,0.0017693251,0.0012854855,0.0054519423,0.0033129642,0.0030120239,0.008332413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015157867,0.0013500269,0.001432982,0.0013861648,0.0044470644,0.0047205016,0.0036646747,0.004101146,0.0015875704],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018039142,0.00012736823,0.000683077,0.00011464643,0.0000467571,0.00013243227,0.0001600204,0.2471748,0.00097392284,0.70970047,0.0019801345,0.038888346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002735968,0.000067733105,0.00012460163,0.000058298723,0.000014402477,0.000053660304,0.00010697875,0.5569253,0.0011377598,0.42913514,0.012324149,0.000024577928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004630764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006070101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010159329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051163333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071887528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053728282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163288341","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/3qzhp","title":"Tutorial: Artificial Neural Networks to Analyze Single-Case Experimental Designs","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal; Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Artificial neural network; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Replication (statistics); Machine learning; Monte Carlo method; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5074276768181737,"score_gpt":0.48136149394804745,"score_spread":0.026066182870126242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163288341","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047974862,0.0079350965,0.9804113,0.0014363779,0.0009171172,0.0003354221,0.0017351953,0.002051071,0.00469857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00739772,0.014309918,0.96171486,0.0011459828,0.0011340001,0.0025320053,0.0023284396,0.0008352626,0.008601769],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773055,0.0013838693,0.00017144273,0.00020641185,0.00046740676,0.00004031064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98732495,0.011009017,0.00033436797,0.0004610187,0.0007629393,0.00010772161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063889716,0.0027641407,0.0011924788,0.0018818743,0.0002512153,0.0010994435,0.0013419535,0.0016940847,0.028085161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023014532,0.0010344086,0.0015007742,0.0017237909,0.0004511446,0.0014927768,0.0010072946,0.0039678067,0.008667328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010662833,0.00027062994,0.001080119,0.0049875067,0.00048809135,0.00039654426,0.0002383875,0.066420764,0.0030779664,0.122175485,0.19929504,0.6014628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001478177,0.00020927124,0.0023157403,0.0021178613,0.0001846511,0.0006092258,0.0000781294,0.20988086,0.003451611,0.35594472,0.4248998,0.00016026972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016787666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002897617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028085161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085912365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015737705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093954265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W316531273","doi":"10.1007/s00362-015-0688-9","title":"D-optimal designs based on the second-order least squares estimator","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistical Papers","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Optimal design; Estimator; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Least-squares function approximation; Univariate; Polynomial; Polynomial regression; Regression analysis; Statistics; Multivariate statistics","score_opus":0.23009796809667618,"score_gpt":0.4446194924701144,"score_spread":0.21452152437343822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W316531273","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024005861,0.00023584659,0.9962404,0.00015004337,0.00007482309,0.00021381096,0.000053893713,0.00013130934,0.0004993153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.066472836,0.00030384996,0.9300174,0.00032151496,0.00011113008,0.0016341227,0.00015025622,0.00009002902,0.00089899934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9264427,0.060606282,0.002283075,0.004981442,0.0047667827,0.0009196542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8618279,0.11675793,0.004537368,0.010439372,0.005412706,0.0010245888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053880412,0.0019559304,0.0040340545,0.0028887899,0.0008557115,0.0022269175,0.0026863432,0.0033026764,0.0074031465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1414634,0.0019458197,0.0026542863,0.0020068027,0.0031376935,0.0028501768,0.002689919,0.0027381552,0.0011671298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00511403,0.0008397825,0.0037952703,0.0025052596,0.0016031184,0.00015845607,0.0004305989,0.122471206,0.008102324,0.43688008,0.005092732,0.41300702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002127997,0.002169226,0.0027744994,0.00037495006,0.0005538629,0.0002325965,0.00010714281,0.5459872,0.007488692,0.4283346,0.009680502,0.00016872912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077207084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084617495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053880412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017894019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005517214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28495026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168146613","doi":"10.1002/cjs.70004","title":"Optimal relevant subset designs in nonlinear models","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nonlinear system; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.17923569708139178,"score_gpt":0.4174536109789767,"score_spread":0.23821791389758493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168146613","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017266147,0.00031556614,0.9802522,0.0001793045,0.000032287786,0.00046124318,0.000103417806,0.00009571893,0.0012941327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40949586,0.0005886429,0.584608,0.00021629164,0.00011122691,0.0030329148,0.00037820305,0.00008164089,0.0014871102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9665123,0.02963213,0.00048820282,0.0015362416,0.0014306345,0.00040042712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9547667,0.0383191,0.0020017156,0.00257342,0.0017740661,0.0005649669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027409496,0.0018202898,0.0035017873,0.0013769658,0.0006652643,0.0011796425,0.001738468,0.0014188369,0.0034959142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04813174,0.0012921343,0.0014324841,0.0007761617,0.0021767179,0.0016828937,0.0025533899,0.0019177865,0.00044678999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034837427,0.0012100015,0.002401428,0.001275342,0.00069443695,0.00020946725,0.0005815065,0.3663739,0.0068235598,0.4209125,0.0022432625,0.19379069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054080895,0.0016241794,0.0009918046,0.00016738189,0.00018557088,0.000045694862,0.000067113375,0.698556,0.0029805733,0.29158118,0.0031926911,0.000066928274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070301205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064438785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027409496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010205524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023804281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.144957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185479023","doi":"10.1002/sim.9135","title":"Optimal design of cluster randomized trials allowing unequal allocation of clusters and unequal cluster size between arms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Medical Research Council Canada","keywords":"Cluster (spacecraft); Variance (accounting); Range (aeronautics); Sample size determination; Statistics; Cluster size; Statistical power; Computer science; Cluster randomised controlled trial; Mathematics; Randomized controlled trial; Medicine; Physics; Engineering","score_opus":0.22106253953040395,"score_gpt":0.4884150912243174,"score_spread":0.2673525516939135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185479023","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049895165,0.0011908194,0.9847943,0.0005850724,0.00020686263,0.005751492,0.0001473436,0.00022817585,0.0021063902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0854411,0.0009539129,0.8864659,0.00054597034,0.00012479276,0.025555085,0.00017157092,0.00010868511,0.00063300546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7875746,0.19102041,0.005128389,0.006965064,0.00772144,0.001590125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8630456,0.114827655,0.0076095825,0.008202544,0.0050878953,0.0012267717],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09977196,0.0025693572,0.0046201097,0.003142007,0.001080224,0.0032362523,0.0031746922,0.0031051831,0.004136187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2030751,0.0019236414,0.0027628476,0.0025487877,0.005410612,0.0026689642,0.003347177,0.0039484925,0.0008183214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008946451,0.0006416702,0.0027835506,0.0061574257,0.0020827441,0.0002562739,0.0011135121,0.19035748,0.0025757952,0.5168596,0.008115599,0.26010996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0078000473,0.004839096,0.0019136096,0.0017447742,0.0011877374,0.00022406835,0.0001791125,0.3038446,0.004743527,0.6535648,0.01967381,0.00028481294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071888085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007250192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.900228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032998996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008331471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52765083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190223951","doi":"10.1016/j.jim.2021.113122","title":"Interval estimation for concentration in the ELISA setting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Immunological Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Interval estimation; Interval (graph theory); Point estimation; Statistics; Estimation; Confidence interval; Mathematics; Maximum likelihood; Estimation theory; Prediction interval; Engineering; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.277197518063798,"score_gpt":0.5750951929862936,"score_spread":0.29789767492249564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190223951","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028981199,0.00035532253,0.9962328,0.00010937875,0.000028324772,0.000050563514,0.00003667113,0.000065818764,0.00022299755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34340274,0.0017816615,0.6498045,0.00046339995,0.00040448015,0.0013551367,0.00055560074,0.00016433474,0.0020682146],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9558507,0.035490785,0.0010045886,0.0034552747,0.0030058448,0.0011928463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74282664,0.24167223,0.006178131,0.004175728,0.003876576,0.0012707548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053024687,0.0027697114,0.0050612804,0.0025530753,0.0006259254,0.003128497,0.0045706043,0.0035423422,0.0031672975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12038902,0.0017013865,0.0029866418,0.0016910633,0.003084478,0.0035827598,0.003130132,0.0055868616,0.0005068364],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019107726,0.00078078004,0.0037394096,0.0013962389,0.001086569,0.0003168071,0.0003488162,0.66004485,0.004417887,0.21986541,0.0017424558,0.10435006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101932645,0.00043813832,0.00054491276,0.00007442383,0.00012804766,0.00006563828,0.000029440793,0.9037023,0.0015164459,0.09265564,0.0006946653,0.000048401038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001971554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077629555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053024687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001981352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027825322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2804247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194781842","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v10n5p85","title":"Control of Weekly Time Trend in Time-Stratified Case-Crossover Design","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Logistic regression; Crossover; Statistics; Crossover study; Time series; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Medicine; Machine learning","score_opus":0.08930711638578459,"score_gpt":0.41020047898353,"score_spread":0.3208933625977454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194781842","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098553814,0.0011923476,0.88985413,0.0003320657,0.00069625076,0.0077007613,0.00048088675,0.00048179927,0.00070791686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64084893,0.0005248464,0.33726448,0.00044479268,0.00016240674,0.01915397,0.000514056,0.000056728968,0.0010297728],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9342315,0.051876184,0.0042156195,0.0054383795,0.0031655119,0.001072646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95157784,0.024663722,0.007671341,0.012560665,0.0028581626,0.00066827453],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.092752516,0.0013163227,0.0025545023,0.0013037564,0.0008665366,0.00091297115,0.0022065635,0.0026379433,0.003324949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09778467,0.00075560354,0.0031082737,0.0013744694,0.001459396,0.0010126902,0.001062688,0.0015813427,0.00035076082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.1276099,0.007894703,0.10715552,0.0053426814,0.013029311,0.0014621137,0.0034382292,0.14937612,0.027874094,0.1131911,0.00543954,0.43818662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.042754,0.061631028,0.08718199,0.0007861981,0.011926586,0.0010518888,0.00048446376,0.6066472,0.03511189,0.12292356,0.029034596,0.00046660635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008776581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066880655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9072475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008007513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019366089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49052805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198850522","doi":"10.1080/00224065.2021.1963199","title":"Bayesian analysis and follow-up experiments for supersaturated multistratum designs","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality Technology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Bayesian probability; Computer science; Ambiguity; Design of experiments; Supersaturation; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.28396530967039196,"score_gpt":0.5227176254558292,"score_spread":0.23875231578543726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198850522","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014112363,0.0000722557,0.9844824,0.00006054181,0.000017383178,0.00060265395,0.000041867912,0.000102373764,0.00050815893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10655539,0.00012141147,0.88886297,0.00015020094,0.000015963387,0.0035878865,0.00011742638,0.000048295857,0.00054045377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9456284,0.042269297,0.0017408986,0.0041798404,0.005542379,0.0006392558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86738485,0.10527377,0.0089374995,0.010325114,0.00706423,0.0010145514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061033584,0.0015859054,0.0022329926,0.0021861526,0.0013494908,0.0018524412,0.0024017927,0.0027265484,0.003962276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15066627,0.0011923125,0.0023842982,0.0016075798,0.0024374954,0.0029283394,0.0022180185,0.0030496276,0.0004418285],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0065305587,0.0023334355,0.009601462,0.0018826189,0.001033191,0.0003014368,0.0022099689,0.13823842,0.06558341,0.3936665,0.0014161696,0.37720293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008160733,0.004754619,0.007480854,0.00032085588,0.0004267522,0.00012032129,0.00020011126,0.6692025,0.04142606,0.26891765,0.006082959,0.0002512942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011727298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019144069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061033584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020121865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038874794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32278037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212178720","doi":"10.1007/s42519-021-00215-x","title":"Optimal Incomplete-Block Designs with Low Replication: A Unified Approach Using Graphs","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences","keywords":"Mathematics; Graph; Mathematical optimization; Block design; Block (permutation group theory); Combinatorics","score_opus":0.22138377466980186,"score_gpt":0.4770341172452323,"score_spread":0.25565034257543046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212178720","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073957383,0.00012447032,0.9914513,0.000094461044,0.000017010228,0.0001643068,0.00005634607,0.000060711765,0.0006356149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22318336,0.0003805548,0.7727792,0.00022172894,0.00009050311,0.0020726803,0.0002162807,0.00012730624,0.00092832244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9607446,0.031531148,0.0012472081,0.0030083167,0.0027902895,0.0006784187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89278454,0.08534738,0.006289552,0.010474563,0.004263367,0.0008405193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039740168,0.001574209,0.0043868516,0.0030664094,0.00086886476,0.0024964584,0.0031948981,0.0018120825,0.0032591003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08675787,0.0014968537,0.0021146808,0.0017944494,0.003916955,0.0035077147,0.0024956816,0.0021387872,0.00034000172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006633087,0.00018561582,0.0013608512,0.00050085405,0.00031533482,0.00009237193,0.00021636237,0.27894148,0.003496645,0.6546155,0.00073750643,0.058874093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002044296,0.0004998348,0.00057291944,0.00008582329,0.00012692597,0.00003556386,0.000037868944,0.5177464,0.0016115742,0.4772547,0.0017774589,0.00004664236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017244221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014668055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039740168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027916247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046528634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21016854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216140741","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2021.11.004","title":"A systematic construction of compromise designs under baseline parameterization","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Compromise; Mathematics; Baseline (sea); Class (philosophy); Factor (programming language); Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","score_opus":0.21962148667157078,"score_gpt":0.47046168891290385,"score_spread":0.2508402022413331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216140741","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019085516,0.000038054066,0.997332,0.000031289022,0.000006504803,0.00013809749,0.000038614824,0.00019289524,0.00031405833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032987103,0.000049517177,0.96585697,0.00003437083,0.000010312125,0.0006671108,0.00008947738,0.000062554456,0.00024258885],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9715083,0.01954431,0.0013066919,0.0026332985,0.004329768,0.0006775364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9449637,0.040277686,0.0024284995,0.0071241623,0.004466366,0.00073963864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03099509,0.001803732,0.0033892533,0.0035142542,0.0010378141,0.0017795805,0.0028862555,0.002574136,0.004916796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09466748,0.0026640997,0.0023843627,0.0020505134,0.0023857958,0.0031232268,0.00520609,0.0042054355,0.0013644211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019416863,0.00046608312,0.0024210752,0.0010485781,0.00037921593,0.00031510787,0.000746126,0.1784926,0.028688725,0.23245847,0.0029928181,0.55004954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036378836,0.0015742223,0.0010835808,0.00026645968,0.00018098741,0.0002893743,0.00012396094,0.5951304,0.015436125,0.3781824,0.0072725387,0.00009613286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003787991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006226832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03099509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014474535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046997014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16391963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217612029","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11719","title":"Let's practice what we preach: Planning and interpreting simulation studies with design and analysis of experiments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Acadia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Fractional factorial design; Factorial experiment; Computer science; Taguchi methods; Main effect; Design of experiments; Variance (accounting); Factorial analysis; Variety (cybernetics); Population; Management science; Industrial engineering; Mathematics; Statistics; Machine learning; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2990031300577587,"score_gpt":0.4902431970378035,"score_spread":0.1912400669800448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217612029","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066385395,0.0044840835,0.72083145,0.23265134,0.00845525,0.0039038428,0.00064664555,0.0044618845,0.017927077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03745906,0.0025876113,0.93089586,0.022729876,0.0010471708,0.002433914,0.00012574914,0.00086847664,0.0018522703],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.82881653,0.1406568,0.008682004,0.0048388853,0.015330169,0.0016755521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47751445,0.37901473,0.019445006,0.05388469,0.06405883,0.006082316],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18828234,0.0035428805,0.0045334664,0.0051833456,0.005033877,0.016375782,0.0065077,0.011811763,0.014523727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46305847,0.002243993,0.003969226,0.0033989053,0.017365677,0.019851519,0.005968654,0.020317908,0.008266944],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011033413,0.0011436078,0.009615029,0.01026587,0.0015959962,0.0013896346,0.021817334,0.033437286,0.006739643,0.21944651,0.22397636,0.4694694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068355486,0.0012379892,0.0023974217,0.012712597,0.0005138289,0.00058211945,0.012017928,0.025281958,0.007197195,0.6056969,0.33097294,0.00070558715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007502307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008406937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8117176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005919082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020568373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W34343354","doi":"10.1002/cncr.33796","title":"Proportionally balanced designs: Some further results and general constructions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas Mathematica","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"MorphoSys","keywords":"Mathematics; Property (philosophy); Arithmetic; Gray (unit); Core (optical fiber); Unit (ring theory); Test (biology); Mathematics education; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1728849121065833,"score_gpt":0.4317869108608392,"score_spread":0.2589019987542559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W34343354","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002032694,0.001319007,0.99109787,0.0010631704,0.0003062471,0.0008311966,0.00031822556,0.0001541078,0.002877577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.065141276,0.003408299,0.9120239,0.0015986896,0.0009418008,0.010884091,0.00067728385,0.00020853228,0.0051160236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88545763,0.09742196,0.0044243564,0.0054052784,0.005833977,0.0014567454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64609045,0.32313648,0.005661912,0.016943112,0.007334021,0.0008341111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16115019,0.004990361,0.007443862,0.0036675397,0.0016110383,0.003413924,0.0036839128,0.0031816005,0.01845721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25783688,0.0020314897,0.008293312,0.0056230966,0.0054495465,0.007990217,0.005063307,0.006847522,0.0017595934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012095993,0.00025186868,0.0009877528,0.0018047331,0.0007866038,0.00023977617,0.0005188353,0.025821993,0.0004221979,0.86436164,0.0067090783,0.09688601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072345533,0.00047322383,0.00036199664,0.00022864454,0.00030914106,0.00011194532,0.00006705886,0.06541246,0.00046056305,0.921548,0.010241028,0.00006246122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028724927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015446161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16115019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003887555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048372243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85225385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W38677103","doi":"10.1007/978-3-7908-1952-6_5","title":"Optimal Three-Treatment Response-Adaptive Designs for Phase III Clinical Trials with Binary Responses","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Contributions to statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal design; Adaptive design; Computation; Binary number; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Clinical trial; Phase (matter); Algorithm; Mathematics; Medicine; Machine learning; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.6096584639607404,"score_gpt":0.6179857379436275,"score_spread":0.008327273982887129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W38677103","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008156098,0.0006216684,0.99646413,0.00016563437,0.00006524222,0.00017338296,0.00004562379,0.00008312891,0.0015655922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030869609,0.0010120538,0.96420085,0.00038586202,0.00012027603,0.0014067285,0.00011284006,0.000084108615,0.0018077479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788294,0.017517412,0.00067264517,0.0011251196,0.0016067101,0.000248584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97722334,0.019638794,0.00086098094,0.0011880653,0.0009068067,0.00018207933],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02778614,0.0015102194,0.0015920216,0.0014815998,0.00034041345,0.001103733,0.0018587708,0.0018860014,0.008085408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03695491,0.0009025008,0.0020114044,0.0015251167,0.002024702,0.0016841585,0.0011937681,0.0028615217,0.0014716443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005808172,0.0002149769,0.0006915,0.0010595934,0.0002548161,0.00008389683,0.0002035011,0.06806634,0.0019272602,0.6464987,0.008237375,0.27218127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005568943,0.0006177464,0.0007007504,0.00029703067,0.0001519863,0.00015435649,0.00004122079,0.19646512,0.002834634,0.7760171,0.0220859,0.000077131255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030458657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044340483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97221386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015933363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024296746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14694887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200345827","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11674","title":"Minimax A‐, c‐, and I‐optimal regression designs for models with heteroscedastic errors","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Minimax; Heteroscedasticity; Optimal design; Mathematical optimization; Variance (accounting); Mathematics; Class (philosophy); Computer science; Focus (optics); Construct (python library); Econometrics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2645952701138097,"score_gpt":0.41250841492005336,"score_spread":0.14791314480624368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200345827","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004344797,0.0003040709,0.9941292,0.00012057974,0.000015469057,0.000103947226,0.000034500383,0.00004618374,0.0009013148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20601688,0.00090693013,0.7882407,0.00026623474,0.00005534805,0.002220816,0.00018242812,0.00010765291,0.002003086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98798454,0.009258234,0.00037679778,0.0011968917,0.0008865949,0.00029691003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772983,0.01863119,0.0018727682,0.0009569812,0.00095986715,0.00028085333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020132663,0.0016339234,0.0024257796,0.0015817905,0.00072313374,0.0014921927,0.0016339226,0.002302164,0.0043085506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043935183,0.0014079844,0.0016131235,0.0012541799,0.0025590567,0.0022757333,0.002540322,0.0025314484,0.0006432646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069239986,0.00027955094,0.0014626442,0.0008347286,0.00021471865,0.00011454435,0.0002990925,0.39259276,0.0041498397,0.46011138,0.0018838826,0.13736443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027846204,0.0008813273,0.00084523787,0.00025546522,0.00006939372,0.000078658515,0.000068380315,0.6548748,0.0033122567,0.3358136,0.0034448938,0.00007745291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048471388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004091739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020132663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012704742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026422057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10647297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200472720","doi":"10.5705/ss.202021.0024","title":"On Construction of Nonregular Two-Level Factorial Designs With Maximum Generalized Resolutions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistica Sinica","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Fractional factorial design; Factorial; Statistics; Factorial experiment; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.29358897282061996,"score_gpt":0.47063372037859424,"score_spread":0.17704474755797428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200472720","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051186774,0.00015424185,0.9937448,0.000042714426,0.00002075421,0.0000892336,0.000051950024,0.000079359575,0.00069821713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07262109,0.00031813324,0.9247495,0.00017699877,0.00006186398,0.0008572253,0.00020570296,0.00008800438,0.00092145725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96428406,0.028657485,0.0010837296,0.0025602006,0.0028946374,0.0005199295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94836026,0.041394,0.0030364213,0.0048640426,0.0018140068,0.00053123984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022195825,0.0012462,0.0020158142,0.0020321975,0.00055782316,0.0011843374,0.001799819,0.0010391858,0.004923443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05136493,0.0008805203,0.0027526477,0.0017506033,0.0024641403,0.0018416449,0.0025079383,0.0026030988,0.0008619255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008573205,0.00021366705,0.0016733528,0.0012993675,0.0002496092,0.00020881342,0.0005166344,0.059190247,0.016336113,0.6712276,0.0015589637,0.24666844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039954795,0.002020638,0.0022154232,0.0003723749,0.00016506443,0.00041653728,0.00011392362,0.28555483,0.015756404,0.6794354,0.013411248,0.00013856619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021325385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024979253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022195825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007459124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016131495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117384195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205685297","doi":"10.1002/0470013192.bsa239","title":"Functional Data Analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1304,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Functional data analysis; Flexibility (engineering); Computer science; Functional principal component analysis; Functional analysis; Data mining; Algorithm; Mathematics; Statistics; Biology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.20961765085941922,"score_gpt":0.4953812503248293,"score_spread":0.2857635994654101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205685297","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009734617,0.0015038095,0.8723293,0.0018012992,0.0010077409,0.004100225,0.052902855,0.0062088724,0.050411317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21128935,0.0025796408,0.66193104,0.0023159229,0.0006242701,0.023683755,0.05495673,0.005470039,0.037149336],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862759,0.005479615,0.0013191202,0.0025489042,0.0040112,0.0003651006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9509829,0.024394533,0.0026066895,0.010254881,0.011197805,0.0005630769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018404033,0.0019967507,0.001615729,0.0046485392,0.0010033442,0.0033026892,0.0027113843,0.0014685945,0.10483969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10524841,0.0005509292,0.0025311282,0.0041163713,0.0015402986,0.0021606435,0.0026482756,0.0022214497,0.017152488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016906614,0.00037100562,0.009659118,0.005205916,0.0009791728,0.00035365124,0.00089588563,0.013888728,0.0037550926,0.147201,0.16164076,0.6543589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005970762,0.0013338152,0.022202361,0.0032605212,0.0010690739,0.0013574037,0.0009081173,0.0732161,0.015623443,0.35458216,0.52547956,0.00037042453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020860059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017985735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10483969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017907481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003249656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35072368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205853537","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v11n1p1","title":"D-Optimal Split-plot Designs With Random Whole Plot Factor and Fixed Sub-plot Factor","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Restricted randomization; Plot (graphics); Estimator; Statistics; Split plot; Variance (accounting)","score_opus":0.1227747019828963,"score_gpt":0.4012446365417039,"score_spread":0.2784699345588076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205853537","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0647776,0.00045491615,0.9318617,0.000063680294,0.000045049157,0.0008737731,0.00013865509,0.00017050671,0.0016141434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27352706,0.0002974397,0.723144,0.00014749011,0.00001541728,0.0019795578,0.00016508596,0.000049813458,0.0006741487],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97980267,0.014228022,0.0011074382,0.0026435172,0.0017898972,0.00042856557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97522247,0.017766869,0.0025086827,0.0024605312,0.0016064773,0.0004350051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016227655,0.0010009329,0.0022579073,0.001210868,0.00039569737,0.0011572532,0.0013947668,0.0009855776,0.0028458461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033008747,0.0007827515,0.0014084211,0.0009496282,0.001234063,0.001396532,0.0013406408,0.0010024622,0.000507033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01659081,0.0029339395,0.012280538,0.005308206,0.0009738414,0.00023040494,0.0007854568,0.24915011,0.08375833,0.13861854,0.0016380406,0.48773178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026030499,0.020906989,0.012966647,0.00051490223,0.00070449675,0.0004889796,0.00056001864,0.71782887,0.06983238,0.1579925,0.015304214,0.00029689792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034026243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044658754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016227655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009358815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016408118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08582103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212780544","doi":"10.1007/978-981-16-9170-6_10","title":"Data with Designed Structure","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Behaviormetrics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Row; Extension (predicate logic); Data structure; Computer science; Row and column spaces; Context (archaeology); Column (typography); Space (punctuation); Data mining; Algorithm; Theoretical computer science; Database; Programming language; Geography","score_opus":0.37916313067099466,"score_gpt":0.4645155050292597,"score_spread":0.08535237435826504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212780544","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008248642,0.00075410417,0.7967766,0.002550047,0.000985813,0.0030620252,0.097623765,0.00894254,0.0810565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.067683525,0.0009354194,0.7498498,0.002302935,0.00046234732,0.008739802,0.10565902,0.0021228828,0.062244292],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98985416,0.0033675646,0.0009783158,0.0023494542,0.0032313145,0.00021913838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97075516,0.013160451,0.0012309945,0.012347293,0.002266537,0.00023953842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008279331,0.0011677998,0.0015808466,0.0018581508,0.0008442522,0.0033768131,0.002090742,0.0016551946,0.091624655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051437482,0.0008533831,0.0013362628,0.0028840648,0.0018465092,0.0032385078,0.0027481385,0.0019754807,0.04342344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010151032,0.00037644684,0.004009349,0.0027725336,0.00015404035,0.00017148329,0.00040303974,0.0074619516,0.011001788,0.2227906,0.165528,0.5843157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031689098,0.00053501374,0.005018716,0.00076651864,0.00015212044,0.00061603787,0.00035431518,0.03346721,0.03359062,0.27138847,0.65367573,0.00011830352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062731834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092270615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091624655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092026417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022435435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30651498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225429113","doi":"10.1007/s00362-022-01317-9","title":"Constructing K-optimal designs for regression models","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistical Papers","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Multicollinearity; Polynomial regression; Design matrix; Applied mathematics; Optimal design; Estimator; Regression analysis; Mathematical optimization; Convexity; Regression; Linear regression; Statistics","score_opus":0.25308950876934433,"score_gpt":0.47460593235966464,"score_spread":0.2215164235903203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225429113","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006076915,0.0003783301,0.9919343,0.00018450263,0.0000797376,0.00046834003,0.00007431184,0.0002238528,0.0005797458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0912156,0.00034734837,0.90401506,0.00021207682,0.000088519904,0.0033826444,0.000207236,0.00012498566,0.00040656235],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8075904,0.17025183,0.005263396,0.009033101,0.0059321956,0.0019290572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6661684,0.29224616,0.009412239,0.023551987,0.0070474986,0.0015738239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.114095405,0.0025110934,0.0056942836,0.003905634,0.0017130238,0.0034213413,0.003987734,0.0044058445,0.006983394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27884403,0.004135629,0.005673824,0.0025677704,0.004866431,0.0053927735,0.0047071837,0.0048680156,0.0011582876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00819161,0.0014904073,0.00682336,0.0042669396,0.0026965637,0.00029795157,0.0013850438,0.13098188,0.004136709,0.3675187,0.004378316,0.4678324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027453136,0.0021762943,0.0024923312,0.0007079406,0.0009147167,0.0001835436,0.0002628078,0.2537921,0.0040339124,0.7261421,0.0063698106,0.00017907565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007240094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010093243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114095405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031012075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007737918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6034014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226017130","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4070650","title":"Multi-Stage Online Robust Parameter Design Based on Bayesian Gp Model","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Stage (stratigraphy); Bayesian probability; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Data mining; Geology","score_opus":0.23745104516131404,"score_gpt":0.42951019720395656,"score_spread":0.1920591520426425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226017130","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046083047,0.00008036558,0.9945333,0.000051574592,0.000009708941,0.00006602747,0.000026840655,0.00014531398,0.00047863933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54847795,0.00025534822,0.44729853,0.00016080216,0.000042881984,0.0011165071,0.00022342357,0.000136955,0.0022876328],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962174,0.001795569,0.000143943,0.00093934726,0.00059663027,0.00030703712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99153227,0.0062819696,0.0008112249,0.00045696244,0.00073766004,0.00017993202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006429991,0.0018347909,0.004284982,0.0011438745,0.00062323356,0.0018268498,0.0029683923,0.0029294633,0.003932285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014038195,0.0016575111,0.001951928,0.0011046086,0.0013735632,0.0025586088,0.0022248249,0.00275026,0.0007103251],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063305924,0.00017035591,0.00041942118,0.00027380034,0.00017260287,0.00006747844,0.00006938679,0.93069667,0.00424117,0.01826974,0.0003571152,0.044629168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050749502,0.00012127196,0.00014781268,0.000010858061,0.000036065117,0.000011745693,0.000003874368,0.9925248,0.0009295907,0.0059614126,0.00018374652,0.000018095483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028908728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022522502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006429991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011982836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002341382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034005404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230811037","doi":"10.24200/jams.vol5iss2pp79-84","title":"Neural Network Assisted Experimental Designs for Food Research","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Marine Sciences [JAMS]","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Factorial; Factorial experiment; Artificial neural network; Box–Behnken design; Design of experiments; Mathematics; Experimental data; Statistics; Computer science; Applied mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Response surface methodology","score_opus":0.3936017160934224,"score_gpt":0.4944129017924242,"score_spread":0.10081118569900177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230811037","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021283103,0.0006761942,0.97370446,0.00011586602,0.0001560988,0.0018043645,0.00022041106,0.00034830038,0.0016911804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.111376785,0.0006213125,0.87774885,0.000121576144,0.000040765106,0.008820998,0.00025109493,0.00003962773,0.0009789749],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97941214,0.017119328,0.0007491854,0.00092953356,0.0015889294,0.00020087548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96851826,0.025672797,0.002343928,0.0017857896,0.0015176028,0.0001617014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020825595,0.0018271157,0.0015615774,0.0014121783,0.00050841644,0.0012460182,0.0015021431,0.0014386593,0.0036831428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037544828,0.00086708367,0.0013750297,0.0014906661,0.0010390012,0.00097077346,0.0010238098,0.001815134,0.00047095277],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00384942,0.0013625252,0.0035229726,0.003233737,0.0007056402,0.00016875469,0.00022117284,0.62234217,0.0147015955,0.045580905,0.0011118728,0.3031992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073638617,0.004169597,0.00269378,0.00027709425,0.0002230723,0.000058375765,0.000056652676,0.92479485,0.014017794,0.044519003,0.008307154,0.00014619844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013183132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021061301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020825595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018268235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023010855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11013758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234356797","doi":"10.1002/9781118445112.stat04084","title":"<scp>L</scp> atin Hypercube Designs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Latin hypercube sampling; Orthogonality; Hypercube; Computer science; Stratification (seeds); Class (philosophy); Space (punctuation); Computer experiment; Strengths and weaknesses; Univariate; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Parallel computing; Simulation; Geometry; Statistics; Operating system; Artificial intelligence; Multivariate statistics; Monte Carlo method","score_opus":0.22721201081274833,"score_gpt":0.44994346414642594,"score_spread":0.2227314533336776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234356797","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004793817,0.001868261,0.7059256,0.005757905,0.0035904066,0.0069269366,0.010522603,0.0029517463,0.25766283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08722289,0.003978317,0.7245992,0.005463787,0.0022420653,0.03722376,0.0071652443,0.0025287964,0.12957603],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768,0.015161297,0.0012767975,0.0013339747,0.005043527,0.00038436626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95351386,0.029340748,0.0024405352,0.0054555633,0.008682445,0.0005668335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01681281,0.0013321623,0.0015460683,0.003297667,0.0012539494,0.0034326857,0.0021439295,0.0019149455,0.17245558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060211886,0.00079806277,0.0009476777,0.005662821,0.0029886516,0.0016225715,0.00200086,0.0025282768,0.031869207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087735144,0.00026401054,0.0012550591,0.0021632207,0.00011723292,0.00026921113,0.00040085343,0.015527449,0.0015576755,0.31318128,0.29542115,0.36896548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062900543,0.00056729687,0.0022344256,0.0016063527,0.00007424438,0.00030194694,0.00020028555,0.0586273,0.005272511,0.24423581,0.6861221,0.0001287123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027462086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039609005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17245558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025746368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055775526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57692134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236908534","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4613-0049-6_3","title":"Optimal Regression Designs in Asymmetric Domains","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Quadratic equation; Inverse; Regression; Linear regression; Polynomial regression; Optimality criterion; Minification; Reduction (mathematics); Regression analysis; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Geometry","score_opus":0.16339756209150985,"score_gpt":0.42620436567210607,"score_spread":0.2628068035805962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236908534","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024443672,0.0004827863,0.9942345,0.0001737203,0.000056327717,0.00006613775,0.0000485335,0.00008488393,0.0024088402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12541184,0.0014967922,0.8640291,0.00043531772,0.00030507764,0.0015525669,0.00033561199,0.00018655995,0.0062471707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98063505,0.015119313,0.0005513668,0.0014170941,0.0018916919,0.00038544115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722621,0.02234968,0.0014509964,0.002703352,0.0009350031,0.00029890763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023388557,0.0015303304,0.0027585889,0.001145516,0.0004196807,0.00139083,0.0022760297,0.0020504557,0.0076293685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040992625,0.0015316323,0.0012617367,0.0011361148,0.0018634072,0.0027163262,0.0021343739,0.0030056057,0.0017035624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009434449,0.0002884578,0.0006131234,0.0008023484,0.00028376456,0.000088750785,0.000121236815,0.08763262,0.004065042,0.63433146,0.0052857897,0.26554394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036776185,0.0003559721,0.00043574368,0.0001714162,0.000122054575,0.00009531436,0.000026607393,0.25048777,0.0032918225,0.73639345,0.00821905,0.000033081807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000120579476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017657602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023388557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076245336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011208433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123691976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237127189","doi":"10.1002/0471667196.ess3198","title":"Precedence Testing","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Encyclopedia; Information retrieval; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14496001568713834,"score_gpt":0.4646128452832503,"score_spread":0.31965282959611196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237127189","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008522538,0.0010107352,0.66923654,0.0012529481,0.0018107663,0.0010367723,0.005207393,0.0072388216,0.30468345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17795418,0.0009842268,0.59548515,0.0011292547,0.0008461237,0.001585009,0.0120136,0.0039320686,0.20607035],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99309075,0.0023503653,0.00047851834,0.0012481505,0.00237438,0.00045782473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97539675,0.01184529,0.0007663547,0.005955334,0.0051438874,0.0008924187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064136344,0.001822646,0.0014734358,0.0027697918,0.0016520891,0.002777209,0.003173253,0.001215021,0.16904972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044039324,0.0006312675,0.0013116972,0.0023868845,0.0014067978,0.002776175,0.002518556,0.0021028856,0.03789733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004434745,0.00034325116,0.00253492,0.00045763372,0.0000472598,0.00020338198,0.00013676667,0.0035510133,0.0016818009,0.12827699,0.10567505,0.75664854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038058413,0.00057079835,0.0038735282,0.00048402985,0.00012982887,0.0014363972,0.0004016505,0.06583277,0.01379478,0.5604545,0.35253075,0.000110448615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028903668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050907223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16904972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093167054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050296835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5655277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238551536","doi":"10.1002/9781119214656.index","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Wiley series in probability and statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Library science; Statistics; Series (stratigraphy); Probability and statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Geology","score_opus":0.10898075716528334,"score_gpt":0.42219224488609297,"score_spread":0.31321148772080964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238551536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002914933,0.008380812,0.1001336,0.0058710366,0.01584863,0.0012061034,0.041647516,0.004669431,0.81932795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023607364,0.010214528,0.031278823,0.002188729,0.006554787,0.0011870703,0.051424306,0.0032779938,0.87026644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813074,0.0002890647,0.00013534797,0.00026880167,0.0010897542,0.00008621648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99371296,0.0016004755,0.00032209745,0.000862932,0.0032170021,0.00028447836],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010761967,0.001434719,0.0010211583,0.0038929621,0.0008543525,0.0033566933,0.0016142965,0.0010407225,0.44636884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014764835,0.00030362603,0.00068531826,0.005376343,0.00042902643,0.0029445677,0.0011921648,0.0009269163,0.3449893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099592406,0.00009841917,0.00042895952,0.00047426642,0.000014126124,0.000035231296,0.000031201056,0.0017987334,0.0006499142,0.026709132,0.7513023,0.21835811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024560852,0.0000682387,0.0009886061,0.00032943292,0.000023093322,0.00010344568,0.00004511258,0.00418521,0.0012617724,0.041573048,0.9513701,0.000027325133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025362342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027794484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5536312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019927467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015759112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243037178","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_103553","title":"Response Rate","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.22419330054434053,"score_gpt":0.4581927232231468,"score_spread":0.23399942267880627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243037178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0333723,0.0027212156,0.34016088,0.0040743058,0.0051896297,0.009055619,0.022887703,0.0075521125,0.57498616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32989728,0.0027706916,0.14852402,0.0050698617,0.0016242915,0.026408568,0.015208077,0.005176891,0.46532038],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791931,0.010598789,0.0012107522,0.0023406462,0.0060139894,0.00064284715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541399,0.02887218,0.0016503565,0.0074729756,0.006844789,0.0010197493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019652799,0.001186045,0.0015988004,0.0018157113,0.00068666175,0.0019425147,0.0017515537,0.0015466698,0.14261882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10606203,0.0003726787,0.0012016984,0.0013457887,0.00058634614,0.0014309005,0.0017437895,0.00210324,0.09059594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040102815,0.00078343076,0.0031345002,0.0013644622,0.00012111209,0.000050812785,0.00044893668,0.003220857,0.006604372,0.05472012,0.16763292,0.75790817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013616026,0.003899599,0.021370439,0.0019478942,0.0005279891,0.00076603517,0.0008755849,0.02629653,0.036184035,0.122801475,0.7836522,0.00031666315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046145494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030305862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14261882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012571801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001585442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47710747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245844465","doi":"10.22541/au.161792041.14901274/v1","title":"Model-based Design of Experiments for Polyether Production from Bio-based 1,3-Propanediol","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Monte Carlo method; Design of experiments; Batch reactor; Catalysis; Process engineering; Production (economics); Biological system; Bayesian probability; Nuclear engineering; Materials science; Chemistry; Computer science; Simulation; Environmental science; Mathematics; Engineering; Statistics; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.4147161210013667,"score_gpt":0.4825162292812129,"score_spread":0.06780010827984623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245844465","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2364089,0.0004159775,0.76009005,0.00010593024,0.000040667383,0.0006787703,0.00014801598,0.00027465657,0.0018370048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8582021,0.0001423795,0.13996315,0.000035170793,0.0000065293507,0.0010162265,0.00010836756,0.000013324702,0.0005127479],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982948,0.0009967159,0.000067612375,0.00024582894,0.00027589357,0.00011929633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969156,0.0022426627,0.00041472752,0.000110414796,0.0002487154,0.00006782901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043451576,0.0010307939,0.0010689384,0.00048842176,0.00027726675,0.00088349485,0.0007195683,0.0007378932,0.00089376327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052406983,0.0006352766,0.00096624315,0.00027545265,0.00057991507,0.0003493893,0.00055236917,0.00084968767,0.00008789589],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096327916,0.00035980906,0.0007935198,0.00030722035,0.000091064554,0.000022539283,0.00004026455,0.96359265,0.014936929,0.0023839218,0.00007225968,0.016436428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021134054,0.0012337405,0.0007902124,0.000011514557,0.000050802573,0.000009002284,0.000013494542,0.98197055,0.013741402,0.0016196541,0.00033225297,0.000016084665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017669146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020324064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043451576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010059222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018714329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022979677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246135378","doi":"10.1002/9781118445112.stat06634","title":"Design Effects","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Cancer Care Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Sample size determination; Cluster sampling; Sampling design; Sampling (signal processing); Sample (material); Computer science; Cluster (spacecraft); Management science; Statistics; Mathematics; Geography; Sociology; Engineering; Political science; Physics; Programming language","score_opus":0.1878789604205307,"score_gpt":0.4605545715467135,"score_spread":0.27267561112618277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246135378","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028323965,0.013594848,0.38016415,0.011200206,0.024377938,0.20896375,0.024749784,0.0047662277,0.30385908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23551477,0.0028267815,0.24471185,0.016155489,0.0022027164,0.41970846,0.004511864,0.0016452515,0.07272284],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8810185,0.072685614,0.01281829,0.010756661,0.018484196,0.004236808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8852851,0.072606966,0.007028197,0.019807547,0.011896621,0.0033755763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08053956,0.0029558884,0.003433575,0.002625018,0.0017778802,0.003791679,0.003439897,0.005312107,0.17599231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18798491,0.0013613072,0.004733133,0.001524176,0.0029175389,0.0035513141,0.0062093083,0.0055153538,0.02494941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.040243465,0.0027373738,0.0059350594,0.01943095,0.0025938246,0.00023300071,0.0013921171,0.0030722928,0.0019815206,0.26347482,0.09204431,0.5668613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0320097,0.016801946,0.012409069,0.011480695,0.004197535,0.00054280966,0.00047173369,0.004280267,0.008029252,0.2385172,0.670923,0.00033678563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066716626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009272979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17599231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003581133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007220229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5887529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248569092","doi":"10.1002/asmb.739","title":"Robust designs for misspecified exponential regression models","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Homoscedasticity; Heteroscedasticity; Mathematics; Nonlinear regression; Exponential function; Statistics; Minimax; Context (archaeology); Mean squared error; Applied mathematics; Optimal design; Variance function; Function (biology); Mathematical optimization; Regression analysis","score_opus":0.3525976592181178,"score_gpt":0.4021451797838638,"score_spread":0.04954752056574602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248569092","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006501177,0.00014748363,0.99257505,0.000068332556,0.000016452856,0.00012711604,0.000041276173,0.000070979564,0.00045212227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19753954,0.0003456556,0.79786694,0.0001714185,0.000057841087,0.0023063945,0.00023295559,0.00007022519,0.0014090575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95358837,0.037646975,0.0012571858,0.0032627336,0.0035448298,0.0007000554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93432885,0.04675267,0.0087982835,0.005814348,0.0038454563,0.00046045746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049569942,0.001698525,0.0026851515,0.0013568766,0.0003889205,0.0014451349,0.0031019475,0.0023531243,0.0042438293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10632454,0.0013828798,0.001642274,0.0010776503,0.0018556614,0.0024036705,0.0032684696,0.0021444755,0.00088995404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021746643,0.00040381472,0.0016945705,0.0010406219,0.000584264,0.00011076459,0.00030831905,0.39975616,0.007218727,0.42371565,0.0013112621,0.16168115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009136009,0.0016029013,0.0012726252,0.00022372276,0.0002023709,0.00006850752,0.00004686699,0.7183631,0.0064000133,0.2659941,0.0048088985,0.00010334398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040480375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037030768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049569942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013732747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018128107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2621541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252037630","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_967","title":"Experimental Design","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Geology","score_opus":0.3281369811954554,"score_gpt":0.4584861129229134,"score_spread":0.130349131727458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252037630","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00557433,0.0021438184,0.8131391,0.0007165152,0.0024264976,0.027100883,0.005617359,0.003568684,0.13971277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04870142,0.0030901562,0.6363258,0.0031944327,0.0008138372,0.12633534,0.0049591865,0.001560336,0.17501947],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892692,0.0048918175,0.0007166254,0.0020180808,0.0026854717,0.00041876722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920135,0.003974962,0.00040528292,0.0020287165,0.0013402376,0.00023740175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010159223,0.0021162038,0.0016996395,0.0012978882,0.0008999217,0.0017236088,0.002484839,0.0018393575,0.14485596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018390164,0.0011146755,0.0009528366,0.0010578623,0.001627573,0.0011486915,0.0018494178,0.0022792825,0.034908507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005315264,0.0014869379,0.0006022555,0.007445279,0.00022452392,0.00011909613,0.0003407201,0.0055463654,0.03714656,0.12663497,0.09541711,0.719721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002964831,0.0067021577,0.0023685384,0.0014714368,0.0004825643,0.00028596603,0.00012875383,0.008151583,0.044791944,0.08639732,0.84607476,0.00018020076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039961023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000694607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14485596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009794179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029210115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48459148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252816699","doi":"10.1002/9781118445112.stat06533.pub2","title":"Within‐Case Designs: Distribution‐Free Methods","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Bootstrapping (finance); Nonparametric statistics; Univariate; Multivariate statistics; Statistics; Parametric statistics; Missing data; Econometrics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.37290841146743414,"score_gpt":0.5510677845579196,"score_spread":0.17815937309048546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252816699","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015354017,0.00047736597,0.98032653,0.0003857442,0.00049291906,0.011681256,0.00047969204,0.00042514413,0.0041959938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035782315,0.0005424986,0.8893398,0.0006587921,0.00031473467,0.06863031,0.0004270756,0.00044324485,0.003861294],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6684936,0.28660965,0.007501295,0.013497361,0.022439796,0.0014583969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5770868,0.32998687,0.018302657,0.0544118,0.017895006,0.0023167913],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.23447986,0.0029946794,0.004986959,0.004165795,0.0020777597,0.004058734,0.005783541,0.0040393993,0.060390893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36734053,0.0024575288,0.0044507347,0.0035620842,0.0055330866,0.004110501,0.0050985,0.008365966,0.009291638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006133544,0.0020009053,0.0030681267,0.006295165,0.0023823485,0.0003856778,0.0017788599,0.018920721,0.0013550196,0.3298859,0.025810419,0.60198325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056687114,0.0044403938,0.0036387895,0.0039526555,0.00167699,0.0003877191,0.00045378006,0.117085695,0.0049363053,0.7451595,0.11226188,0.000337508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082279154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010998652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23447986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003004143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067988588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9440226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252970442","doi":"10.1002/9781118445112.stat07335","title":"Nested Experimental Designs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nested set model; Differential (mechanical device); Subclass; Pollution; Environmental science; Computer science; Engineering; Data mining; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.29179061056081645,"score_gpt":0.49028302741641494,"score_spread":0.19849241685559849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252970442","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0284293,0.0014293414,0.9147516,0.00091141154,0.003042305,0.03129834,0.0031200682,0.001038684,0.01597896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13233843,0.00075645495,0.7442591,0.0013872476,0.00053792715,0.11324813,0.0011599341,0.00018980178,0.0061228084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8782899,0.09216996,0.005263096,0.011662867,0.010833326,0.0017809069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81209624,0.1427033,0.013839366,0.020325525,0.008687052,0.0023484451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08162384,0.00287988,0.004635956,0.0015282736,0.0019119568,0.0029059502,0.0044272407,0.0034209592,0.03344818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17902607,0.0015486437,0.0029459835,0.0015371975,0.004081769,0.0026747354,0.0034484647,0.0048947893,0.0035705448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03198481,0.007750098,0.010266199,0.011617496,0.004244205,0.00057776814,0.004606852,0.027659362,0.008803025,0.5682447,0.027612148,0.29663336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0209148,0.034373015,0.006913803,0.0035056164,0.0026064436,0.00055521674,0.000698557,0.09259053,0.011950839,0.69959015,0.12571017,0.0005909446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088229397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001367512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08162384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021724943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004088586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4316733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253629597","doi":"10.1002/1521-4036(200102)43:1<63::aid-bimj63>3.3.co;2-s","title":"Dose Response Analysis Using Robust Covariance Estimation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrical Journal","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Jackknife resampling; Mathematics; Monte Carlo method; Covariance; Statistics; Robustness (evolution); Analysis of covariance; Delta method; Variance (accounting); Statistic; Nonlinear regression; Regression analysis; Applied mathematics; Estimator","score_opus":0.3927318620297389,"score_gpt":0.5171799684373057,"score_spread":0.12444810640756682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253629597","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002797397,0.00013526372,0.9962327,0.00003310879,0.000022225497,0.00009615236,0.000120800076,0.00028267328,0.00027971942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1279953,0.00051147176,0.86806583,0.00012641802,0.000068935384,0.0012278232,0.00070106727,0.00027121813,0.001031994],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833287,0.009396902,0.00082061393,0.0026154274,0.0033787321,0.00045955705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97881407,0.012045468,0.0021709693,0.0046064053,0.0022326533,0.00013042135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020995032,0.001702793,0.003094207,0.002810534,0.00043123588,0.0014948986,0.0022877662,0.0016546005,0.0032560534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05353232,0.00067213306,0.0034331896,0.0023373375,0.0011002545,0.0017101916,0.0017681001,0.0022551431,0.0010251137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014809641,0.0009510867,0.0051377593,0.0017140618,0.0033265513,0.00023881192,0.00025333083,0.3539847,0.053292114,0.10992454,0.004057163,0.46563897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001589393,0.0014695902,0.0050400593,0.000096346055,0.00072650774,0.00019184945,0.000054736774,0.83703005,0.036076948,0.110338196,0.008600356,0.00021651149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011784014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007729325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020995032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010125696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017069522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11103368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253857795","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_982","title":"Factorial Design","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Factorial experiment; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.39426346481649804,"score_gpt":0.4613500265654087,"score_spread":0.06708656174891064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253857795","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032776622,0.0023574254,0.8491765,0.00028811468,0.0012482911,0.0025396356,0.002106794,0.0032575098,0.13574804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04431061,0.0028021813,0.6832052,0.0012123497,0.00039379526,0.009057066,0.0023147601,0.0011126584,0.2555914],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962567,0.0013569007,0.00019739936,0.0007538823,0.0012631397,0.0001719298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859136,0.0006992884,0.00008589008,0.00029368536,0.00027129642,0.000058365968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00252937,0.0022919124,0.002017288,0.0012080122,0.0007732714,0.0016166954,0.002078636,0.0013081353,0.12560444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004469776,0.0008227947,0.001061722,0.0013697025,0.0007513826,0.0012994002,0.0013302896,0.0016670062,0.03451403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013572902,0.00052272214,0.00025071274,0.0033120573,0.00010716028,0.00008102177,0.00013129864,0.0048343274,0.034888893,0.11552518,0.064084165,0.77490526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068714545,0.0022840719,0.0014280494,0.0005048292,0.00027871956,0.00039116465,0.000049887665,0.01228431,0.046069346,0.074650325,0.86123896,0.00013318383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000336039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084030785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12560444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008436241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015842007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42018872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281559236","doi":"10.5772/intechopen.104694","title":"Practical and Optimal Crossover Designs for Clinical Trials","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IntechOpen eBooks","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Crossover; Sample size determination; Computer science; Statistical power; Crossover study; Adaptive design; Optimal design; Mathematical optimization; Clinical trial; Statistics; Mathematics; Machine learning; Medicine","score_opus":0.8203676719140467,"score_gpt":0.6616420322207063,"score_spread":0.15872563969334041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281559236","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006857585,0.009614109,0.9805017,0.0005566671,0.0003794504,0.0008025847,0.00016563937,0.0001632058,0.007130831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018976629,0.010008424,0.9618324,0.0006789388,0.00042788294,0.004422532,0.0001976128,0.0001031361,0.0033525475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96639174,0.02815565,0.00082215696,0.0014684487,0.0029556057,0.00020626519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97675145,0.020045659,0.0011560017,0.0012162452,0.0006607218,0.000170012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025056802,0.0016669568,0.0017329479,0.0012194024,0.00035917942,0.0015710532,0.001958408,0.0024023661,0.012227018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045042396,0.00089094933,0.0012634197,0.0020353042,0.0015816197,0.0016545958,0.0012104282,0.0035600269,0.0024754533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047746865,0.00017732229,0.00027945577,0.0038268901,0.00023657757,0.00010680323,0.00022345642,0.02753319,0.0012150245,0.5498861,0.019710293,0.39632756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010687085,0.0011743155,0.00090823753,0.0020557328,0.00023525131,0.00035857828,0.00008330316,0.06855685,0.0014392288,0.7780454,0.1459804,0.000094002186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034586957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057602784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025056802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013111146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023180388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1325146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281676701","doi":"10.1080/24725854.2022.2067915","title":"Modeling and optimization for multiple correlated responses with distribution variability","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IISE Transactions","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Copula (linguistics); Joint probability distribution; Smoothing; Nonparametric statistics; Multivariate statistics; Parametric statistics; Multivariate normal distribution; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Marginal distribution; Semiparametric model; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics; Machine learning; Random variable","score_opus":0.10504898542697239,"score_gpt":0.3866190691078836,"score_spread":0.2815700836809112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281676701","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012267985,0.00011809032,0.98685396,0.000067867775,0.0000075972976,0.0000512036,0.000022466278,0.000048747526,0.00056211674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6855677,0.0005337825,0.30930933,0.0001397707,0.000032670825,0.0010696829,0.0001499721,0.000083161045,0.0031139],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944312,0.0035071452,0.00019015727,0.0008383677,0.00067618216,0.0003568912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919475,0.006549803,0.00077248405,0.00025306264,0.00037628732,0.000100940895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010392953,0.0015120296,0.0019698865,0.0011769896,0.00036600113,0.0013509819,0.0013559381,0.0014972485,0.0016695084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011739732,0.0012501195,0.0019971738,0.0012403724,0.0014365593,0.0011380184,0.0015309025,0.0015989747,0.0002131022],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074281576,0.0000740827,0.0006332338,0.00010857255,0.00008136122,0.000057678342,0.000059864215,0.9736458,0.001293379,0.012954178,0.000099851786,0.010917769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001283128,0.000055853816,0.00022792279,0.0000071571194,0.000016517284,0.000008456665,0.000012348681,0.9928973,0.00043660522,0.0061268643,0.00019056741,0.0000075326107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00247579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018407255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010392953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013320156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020670334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054963827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284697950","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/akcnd","title":"The exact distribution of the Cohen’s d p in repeated-measure designs","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Sampling (signal processing); Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.2088293543379032,"score_gpt":0.44905196595205704,"score_spread":0.24022261161415384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284697950","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011904781,0.0046540317,0.9656669,0.0018728687,0.0013489799,0.0017515189,0.0016874251,0.00053500925,0.010578586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2763335,0.005049919,0.68720174,0.002442475,0.0013717541,0.020499134,0.0012650497,0.0005828932,0.005253559],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7739708,0.1457072,0.012310977,0.026454085,0.040032323,0.0015247101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.505528,0.41091406,0.020616286,0.038532767,0.023357965,0.0010509677],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15503712,0.0016580209,0.0032512285,0.004503251,0.0014457206,0.0029299716,0.0035386176,0.0045877034,0.012846213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46326438,0.0010744085,0.0024354036,0.0040745065,0.008483121,0.005423012,0.0039036942,0.004102907,0.0027267013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012450555,0.00033331808,0.013448786,0.0073902607,0.0031294005,0.0006719491,0.0032213754,0.009833875,0.0038332015,0.4106017,0.027119948,0.5191711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008512702,0.0024132815,0.031080658,0.002865292,0.0009037718,0.0014679419,0.0011732391,0.031446032,0.009029069,0.83897185,0.079422325,0.00037522404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000923727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006847013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8449629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025392664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043667373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8199245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286608159","doi":"10.1080/10618600.2022.2104858","title":"Using CVX to Construct Optimal Designs for Biomedical Studies with Multiple Objectives","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Optimal design; Computer science; Construct (python library); MATLAB; Mathematical optimization; Code (set theory); Software; Machine learning; Mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.2339448673563404,"score_gpt":0.4839443142539315,"score_spread":0.24999944689759107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286608159","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026428725,0.00020057765,0.9957451,0.000060082006,0.00003098664,0.00028828857,0.00006501583,0.0002907975,0.0006762698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039668866,0.00020177345,0.9571074,0.00009234436,0.000019065079,0.0021695897,0.00014560597,0.0002146266,0.00038077103],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833935,0.013342815,0.00055562065,0.00094827,0.0015004405,0.0002593947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9529123,0.041021615,0.0020103867,0.0020652045,0.0017708425,0.00021961323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031718977,0.0022215396,0.0020337182,0.0031373654,0.00057011785,0.0017239667,0.0015263538,0.0018092608,0.007582299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07465026,0.0013361851,0.0021482327,0.0016372995,0.0017723603,0.0012207715,0.0022831191,0.0030336876,0.00093479734],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011353389,0.00035198894,0.0030163769,0.0025883506,0.0008071207,0.00026692133,0.00038871198,0.52020353,0.009365677,0.17348287,0.004836867,0.28355622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048132293,0.0013442126,0.0015562779,0.00048118454,0.00020769465,0.00016077464,0.00009887135,0.8101972,0.01195609,0.16005728,0.01334514,0.00011407057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010173105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009390331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031718977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012746771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002957429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16774803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292056390","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2022.108551","title":"Multi-stage online robust parameter design based on Bayesian GP model","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Computer science; Hyperparameter; Robust optimization; Mathematical optimization; Robustness (evolution); Cluster analysis; Data mining; Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.43584653665836154,"score_gpt":0.4000761011655973,"score_spread":0.03577043549276426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292056390","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051319757,0.00009388759,0.9939184,0.000053897373,0.000008765757,0.000040407092,0.000023369645,0.00017124596,0.00055798254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6749096,0.00026640669,0.32109758,0.00015838555,0.00004072226,0.0006712564,0.00023411048,0.00014063611,0.0024813667],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792683,0.0007434046,0.000088951136,0.0006041719,0.000422913,0.00021366595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952988,0.0032757001,0.00049308344,0.00024488254,0.000577785,0.000109682034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037669863,0.0015244198,0.0037130925,0.0010116152,0.0006430442,0.0016411305,0.0025124396,0.0024275607,0.003138256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008436759,0.0015093761,0.001781874,0.0009124506,0.0011988311,0.0023289167,0.0017202998,0.002295555,0.00059450604],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028908273,0.00008673548,0.0003320877,0.00016230227,0.000097156364,0.00005099149,0.00004909293,0.95474225,0.0032437462,0.008412378,0.0002998792,0.03223433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023880513,0.0000466057,0.000103791295,0.0000061082615,0.00001945236,0.0000082854685,0.0000025758357,0.9964954,0.0006008183,0.0025586744,0.00012373833,0.000010599601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004667417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036413907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004667417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011383432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020071159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019921958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298218231","doi":"10.1287/moor.2014.0682","title":"<i>K</i>-Optimal Design via Semidefinite Programming and Entropy Optimization","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics of Operations Research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Semidefinite programming; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Semidefinite embedding; Convex optimization; Minification; Entropy maximization; Dual (grammatical number); Entropy (arrow of time); Linear programming; Positive-definite matrix; Regular polygon; Quadratically constrained quadratic program; Principle of maximum entropy; Quadratic programming","score_opus":0.29742725395388764,"score_gpt":0.5002663857463289,"score_spread":0.20283913179244123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298218231","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037539671,0.00009193089,0.99494815,0.0001465749,0.000009513242,0.000052125353,0.00002597797,0.000051830808,0.0009199505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37916988,0.00038647823,0.6173415,0.00031410978,0.00006453771,0.0009486664,0.00016774039,0.00007568161,0.0015314264],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950623,0.0032632074,0.00016646665,0.0007310084,0.00060981687,0.00016722517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926272,0.0055515976,0.000884723,0.00033936562,0.00044709447,0.0001500972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007945864,0.0014262035,0.0017188207,0.00095667766,0.00038617826,0.0015479082,0.001281161,0.0011773832,0.0019428346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012468569,0.0007417985,0.00086635904,0.00058884587,0.0028365026,0.0015784499,0.0014007511,0.0015837121,0.00036307485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003670607,0.00023482075,0.00046406046,0.00050563517,0.00013823976,0.000090112146,0.000082895334,0.7490479,0.0075677224,0.1932882,0.0008047624,0.04740864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043938322,0.0001759423,0.000120226425,0.000023581733,0.000016972203,0.000020315314,0.000008463065,0.9291957,0.0017734336,0.06813042,0.00047251536,0.000018412982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006065467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005371246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007945864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001274092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023392998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04202223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301813752","doi":"","title":"Batch sequential designs for computer experiments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Los Alamos National Laboratory; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.09920601683024739,"score_gpt":0.3816435283657692,"score_spread":0.2824375115355218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301813752","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027556273,0.0002324022,0.9927193,0.00011529787,0.00016997349,0.0027190817,0.00015037533,0.00044406738,0.0006939185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038449176,0.00023688318,0.94298184,0.00016402613,0.000117605465,0.01652365,0.00024000759,0.00010983309,0.0011770164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.91363704,0.07187058,0.0021438447,0.0058530895,0.005673282,0.00082201837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8792978,0.09361273,0.0075456486,0.013708937,0.004921181,0.0009137504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09091251,0.0037262146,0.0051300745,0.0023976476,0.0011250929,0.0024606215,0.0038778344,0.003329245,0.0143853435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12987593,0.0020643224,0.002506679,0.0028553104,0.0038442656,0.0032227782,0.002632614,0.004797801,0.0023560545],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007617675,0.0011599045,0.0029732306,0.0027669992,0.0014203067,0.0002301879,0.0005784071,0.24388902,0.005696111,0.43999058,0.0058892793,0.2877883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023034015,0.0045322557,0.0011420186,0.00028362815,0.00028505383,0.00008434336,0.000077265955,0.74168324,0.004433965,0.23428763,0.010746986,0.00014019493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015924643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013463469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09091251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003541403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004218425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48079705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307356996","doi":"10.1214/22-aos2215","title":"A study of orthogonal array-based designs under a broad class of space-filling criteria","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Annals of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Orthogonal array; Orthogonality; Mathematics; Partition (number theory); Class (philosophy); Space (punctuation); Orthogonal basis; Computer experiment; Orthogonal transformation; Design of experiments; Algorithm; Combinatorics; Geometry; Computer science; Statistics; Taguchi methods; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.5178728409424104,"score_gpt":0.5247503710326535,"score_spread":0.006877530090243167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307356996","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02645679,0.00021824791,0.9711275,0.00011103914,0.000022670903,0.00012668183,0.00008470929,0.00009632126,0.0017560392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3061965,0.00049359613,0.690208,0.0002321448,0.00009781264,0.0010864383,0.00020476354,0.0000719411,0.0014087232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887096,0.0079547195,0.00046976728,0.001090801,0.0014794909,0.00029547937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94946235,0.038195606,0.0043075155,0.0046371566,0.0027378537,0.0006596503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01552831,0.0014200683,0.0014173533,0.0011707379,0.00049207587,0.0012142193,0.0008237459,0.00088447955,0.0023945202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049426544,0.0005727586,0.00082848716,0.0012775584,0.0021096768,0.0023292012,0.0017269102,0.0014046791,0.00046010586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006884808,0.00017856495,0.0038515374,0.0005962346,0.00018218202,0.00012536038,0.00030918338,0.18399532,0.023898263,0.5854616,0.0012614055,0.19945192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023391593,0.0029169903,0.0025003066,0.0001677722,0.000102364014,0.00024375238,0.00011724324,0.5791809,0.017903704,0.3886918,0.007831744,0.000109453664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015357968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014568187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01552831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007402121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011800291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082122505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309199057","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11744","title":"General minimum lower‐order confounding three‐level split‐plot designs when the whole plot factors are important","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Fractional factorial design; Statistics; Split plot; Ranking (information retrieval); Plot (graphics); Factorial experiment; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.28392338757740637,"score_gpt":0.39454191338269723,"score_spread":0.11061852580529086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309199057","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043334384,0.00010247741,0.9539894,0.00006818945,0.000026417854,0.0005528292,0.00021122085,0.0001444437,0.0015706582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28568286,0.00010623778,0.709115,0.00012846683,0.000031646025,0.0031694712,0.0004516873,0.000059927508,0.0012547348],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95136523,0.036712486,0.0021801495,0.0036805095,0.0050987583,0.0009628856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94935155,0.034996036,0.0041855182,0.006046323,0.004687167,0.00073346373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027680837,0.0014086324,0.0021315385,0.00096962077,0.0006755627,0.0012297062,0.0018042859,0.0012991348,0.008671996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061114695,0.0006902872,0.0014135756,0.0016195825,0.0020492657,0.0016259226,0.0017473343,0.0013386244,0.00071793055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014391959,0.0018237588,0.020061059,0.002878554,0.0010265101,0.00050444674,0.0012431374,0.12644568,0.09815469,0.3000715,0.003476443,0.42992222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024607242,0.016301174,0.025596008,0.00039703073,0.0005386985,0.00043402708,0.00036708047,0.5095556,0.05876791,0.36515456,0.020106528,0.00032058806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040789126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049042125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027680837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088779733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001971719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14639199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315797072","doi":"10.17615/63ad-p767","title":"Analysis of survival data with cure fraction and variable selection: A pseudo-observations approach","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UNC Libraries","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Fraction (chemistry); Statistics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Variable (mathematics); Mathematics; Computer science; Chemistry; Artificial intelligence; Chromatography; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.28369269118736984,"score_gpt":0.4086968479530062,"score_spread":0.12500415676563637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315797072","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010814462,0.00019077201,0.9882665,0.00009017889,0.000024610757,0.00014679655,0.00011742222,0.00012460885,0.00022453669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2723434,0.0006952398,0.722004,0.00021968558,0.00012748313,0.0019481346,0.0010549917,0.00010133373,0.0015057828],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826927,0.01378789,0.00046868136,0.0013224867,0.0014987201,0.00022941474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9558848,0.035941843,0.0024480624,0.0038489376,0.0015484814,0.00032781603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02127456,0.0008939447,0.0015309382,0.0019234291,0.00067573105,0.00129851,0.0018244054,0.0013335135,0.0032051222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057971783,0.0006462806,0.0020512696,0.0019185843,0.001955759,0.0015628738,0.0018601215,0.0017873487,0.00040364603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017851476,0.00069983094,0.024947794,0.00096951926,0.0006949207,0.00039762497,0.000894422,0.20558585,0.0068014525,0.18800683,0.0025866907,0.56662995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022463157,0.0011367073,0.009502378,0.00013752485,0.0002141494,0.00021661486,0.00016779118,0.82164514,0.0049806684,0.15495281,0.0067116274,0.00010995569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010812954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010332774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02127456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006304071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016663324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11251193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317869010","doi":"10.1002/sim.9666","title":"Two‐phase designs with current status data","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Current (fluid); Phase (matter); Computer science; Statistics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.5036974145021728,"score_gpt":0.6117296971940839,"score_spread":0.10803228269191112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317869010","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050863907,0.0016613008,0.8945648,0.0011984573,0.002418367,0.044531904,0.0012764327,0.0004736599,0.0030110946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22546461,0.00092961336,0.63511837,0.0013073887,0.00052939117,0.13107659,0.0010408635,0.000082724895,0.0044503976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9095797,0.076847605,0.0024907559,0.0060458793,0.0036900577,0.0013459357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8782189,0.08272252,0.010614136,0.021222105,0.0053695957,0.0018526623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.091586284,0.0027117713,0.004806522,0.0016983907,0.0011837009,0.0027453627,0.0043581612,0.0046800785,0.013425665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14710987,0.0019285263,0.004217674,0.0016418385,0.0036092713,0.0028503798,0.0030586934,0.0043067858,0.0019491174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10126368,0.011382325,0.020001784,0.006497334,0.0066041797,0.00065752835,0.0016288857,0.107213356,0.005322697,0.44707093,0.00902652,0.2833308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.055772614,0.05504646,0.006312516,0.0009520504,0.0033211575,0.00035980257,0.00039323198,0.32293248,0.0049077114,0.51388305,0.03555059,0.00056837115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007615827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006284746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091586284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016662318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042357463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48436034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318457182","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1045436","title":"Analysis of proportions using arcsine transform with any experimental design","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2240579974239774,"score_gpt":0.5027118910303702,"score_spread":0.2786538936063928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318457182","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012570742,0.00014681222,0.9934562,0.00022186594,0.00031047588,0.00065813144,0.0003358521,0.0005944659,0.003019043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02229857,0.00028964327,0.9674027,0.00023177694,0.00021638813,0.0070121125,0.00025624782,0.0004269172,0.0018656359],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90673256,0.05802884,0.005543764,0.010487275,0.018086677,0.0011209841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80693597,0.14759183,0.009376871,0.02388552,0.011525788,0.00068397896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054674644,0.0027340685,0.003425563,0.0036675015,0.0016418166,0.005182802,0.003725147,0.0031685624,0.043744806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25209737,0.0012344721,0.0035083115,0.005503686,0.0077166096,0.0064190514,0.0044908207,0.009001765,0.0070562074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013935793,0.00033197002,0.0021389304,0.003436468,0.0004572267,0.00042582807,0.0028113564,0.010742059,0.0052669826,0.44653118,0.018046927,0.5084175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038072458,0.0021859047,0.003921607,0.0012363885,0.00023876292,0.0006504389,0.00068759825,0.062460914,0.014179595,0.7425368,0.17121248,0.00030879953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007733934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043896312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054674644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020641112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044922084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2891506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323718577","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2303.04746","title":"Necessary and sufficient conditions for multiple objective optimal regression designs","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Minimax; Optimal design; Mathematical optimization; Construct (python library); Computer science; Linear programming; Optimality criterion; Function (biology); Mathematics; Algorithm; Machine learning","score_opus":0.4495448281470336,"score_gpt":0.3700793063775778,"score_spread":0.07946552176945582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323718577","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00795861,0.00032126965,0.9830042,0.00063963735,0.000045843946,0.0005822079,0.0005068966,0.00017049084,0.006770888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22059177,0.0010955397,0.76557004,0.0009368484,0.00021619906,0.00771322,0.0009515363,0.0003061049,0.0026187594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9515343,0.028263498,0.0035929687,0.0064842347,0.0079232985,0.0022017567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6832081,0.2743599,0.020116923,0.008456873,0.011786687,0.0020715122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061016515,0.0033269455,0.0043591815,0.0032789162,0.0010983386,0.0026829613,0.002688153,0.0038647237,0.0153404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18801203,0.0026080627,0.0025762573,0.0019440944,0.0063072746,0.0052650813,0.0038437175,0.0055737137,0.0022889574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080750574,0.00058843405,0.0035619144,0.0014043835,0.0003019867,0.00029289618,0.000447245,0.14605013,0.006217838,0.7972413,0.0032154613,0.03987084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075689645,0.0010121142,0.0022904475,0.0005694153,0.00014373078,0.00024733302,0.00018700906,0.28137416,0.008621183,0.6969218,0.0077742343,0.00010170795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007992457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008005007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061016515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028360903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007821796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361215490","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11761","title":"A class of space‐filling designs with low‐dimensional stratification and column orthogonality","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Key Research and Development Program of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Orthogonality; Fractional factorial design; Stratification (seeds); Orthogonal array; Mathematics; Class (philosophy); Column (typography); Space (punctuation); Factorial experiment; Algorithm; Computer science; Geometry; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Taguchi methods","score_opus":0.16567345518021082,"score_gpt":0.38838616936196885,"score_spread":0.22271271418175803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361215490","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01590159,0.00016692653,0.98174506,0.0000669511,0.000036251648,0.00034332013,0.00019442978,0.0002654326,0.0012801216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14818174,0.0002929524,0.84676296,0.00017036508,0.00009457823,0.0028403848,0.00038125936,0.000077588025,0.0011982166],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856074,0.010069745,0.00070374616,0.0016278028,0.0015465143,0.00044470408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813705,0.011664536,0.0019232458,0.0027036243,0.0019637377,0.00037423495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012809782,0.0013979478,0.0014918965,0.0013820522,0.0006421709,0.0011135691,0.0010057167,0.00080239325,0.0042646104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024127688,0.0006272054,0.001817804,0.0012040886,0.0022286621,0.0010689197,0.0013703182,0.0012953534,0.0008280543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019113488,0.00058090925,0.0041479995,0.0012992797,0.00043488265,0.00017578842,0.0004441888,0.086643144,0.036913916,0.3678693,0.0044628703,0.49511635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010982673,0.0062308074,0.006224197,0.000344516,0.0002935246,0.00038422213,0.00012265061,0.4583004,0.022980208,0.473136,0.030617703,0.00026743335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037618613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037241378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012809782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006626706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019240252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06774545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362591564","doi":"10.1007/s12561-023-09369-7","title":"Evaluation of Designs and Estimation Methods Under Response-Dependent Two-Phase Sampling for Genetic Association Studies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Biosciences","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Statistics; Covariate; Sampling (signal processing); Computer science; Robustness (evolution); Sample size determination; Trait; Econometrics; Mathematics; Data mining; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.6738625109802414,"score_gpt":0.6789437062369973,"score_spread":0.005081195256755877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362591564","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009029052,0.00042060655,0.98908,0.00017581209,0.000052831576,0.0006552652,0.00010016936,0.00021867234,0.00026757419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0883312,0.00034135501,0.90718937,0.0001900195,0.00006836196,0.0030536063,0.0002788786,0.00014095998,0.00040617556],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.59578997,0.3844157,0.0046727527,0.006523788,0.007600462,0.0009974468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.23253909,0.7360655,0.008146002,0.01435013,0.0075618066,0.0013374689],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27439848,0.002736665,0.004828193,0.0027841337,0.0012239662,0.0028891894,0.0045927996,0.0051221857,0.0048488965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.51320946,0.0024480773,0.004351043,0.001964208,0.0037106923,0.004694146,0.0038403084,0.004027999,0.00063331553],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018216934,0.0016611416,0.009601997,0.0037742602,0.0041086683,0.00026651187,0.001352243,0.35037258,0.004382939,0.20614673,0.0026145217,0.39750153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004334723,0.0048881327,0.002949732,0.0005441017,0.0011382955,0.00019155002,0.000119959965,0.8640748,0.0038943458,0.11474443,0.002949708,0.00017017877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017486421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011193953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72560155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002934469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00729651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8947959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367624121","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-21-2023-40","title":"Random and Fixed Effects Selection for Weighted Ridge","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Random effects model; Selection (genetic algorithm); Model selection; Fixed effects model; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Maximum likelihood; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Panel data","score_opus":0.05133078806435695,"score_gpt":0.45658732526441,"score_spread":0.40525653720005306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367624121","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013489897,0.00010290253,0.99792707,0.00007472231,0.000013235894,0.00011690213,0.000043666598,0.00015606369,0.00021645137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05816838,0.00018309681,0.93793064,0.00023352423,0.00005194411,0.0017181591,0.0002465214,0.00020021875,0.0012674264],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9667253,0.028258221,0.000594811,0.0023720325,0.0017000737,0.0003496403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97491294,0.019276848,0.0011787477,0.0032184059,0.0011748977,0.00023825406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03651909,0.0016040609,0.0022613883,0.0018082983,0.00071190647,0.0015573218,0.0033894,0.0022458045,0.006137426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05569642,0.0011376478,0.003081251,0.001860719,0.0021125297,0.0021864073,0.0027183199,0.003008708,0.0013923554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013955255,0.00044925482,0.00496756,0.0012293855,0.0011162363,0.0005826458,0.0005617823,0.23225698,0.0073428974,0.26784858,0.007169182,0.47507983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029138598,0.0003441036,0.0016241838,0.00017364688,0.00021914253,0.0001962804,0.000044853576,0.83378226,0.0035678127,0.1520209,0.0076576537,0.000077772194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012690393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015995016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03651909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009605373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025177212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19313377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383742371","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2023.06.005","title":"Optimal designs for comparing curves in regression models with asymmetric errors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Optimal design; Equivalence (formal languages); Particle swarm optimization; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Optimality criterion; Regression; Statistics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.39553916756623175,"score_gpt":0.5122542929729154,"score_spread":0.1167151254066836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383742371","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0078998385,0.00020503905,0.9897508,0.00014922471,0.000071067094,0.0011622431,0.000082014165,0.0002311804,0.00044870574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.100260705,0.00020932178,0.8874772,0.00021238689,0.00006250669,0.01101338,0.00017536002,0.00016894794,0.00042003507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.72694236,0.24594325,0.006155852,0.01069069,0.008011211,0.0022566034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5626751,0.38902324,0.011793705,0.025547437,0.008638366,0.0023221106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1760871,0.0030559376,0.0063100457,0.003909836,0.0014244248,0.0034163003,0.004603142,0.006472155,0.0075294576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3746616,0.00417431,0.0046487227,0.002249499,0.0073311646,0.0055414415,0.0052247555,0.0072259563,0.0009628651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.031154364,0.0024265924,0.005515127,0.0028619554,0.0022914473,0.00022708034,0.0011870764,0.16887827,0.008127276,0.4008635,0.0024767013,0.37399068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010851952,0.008502146,0.0032288975,0.0008290332,0.0013841316,0.00015793927,0.00019899111,0.3732334,0.009921098,0.58563524,0.005772765,0.00028440487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082474935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064614386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1760871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031595116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006024413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9312487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385324378","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v12n4p40","title":"An Approximate Confidence Interval for the Variance of Random Effects of One-Way Analysis of Variance in the Completely Randomized Design","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variance (accounting); Confidence interval; Mathematics; Statistics; Monte Carlo method; Coverage probability; Variance-based sensitivity analysis; One-way analysis of variance; Interval (graph theory); Analysis of variance; CDF-based nonparametric confidence interval; Robust confidence intervals; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.1477719726789253,"score_gpt":0.442113446215026,"score_spread":0.29434147353610074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385324378","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027113,0.00050938263,0.9960748,0.00008418033,0.00004184448,0.00011386991,0.00004751265,0.00016233133,0.0002547615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12037814,0.00044408033,0.8767041,0.00023318295,0.00008791319,0.0016044283,0.0001962897,0.00011744356,0.00023439493],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9072519,0.06854207,0.0037531254,0.0073824,0.012107678,0.00096275145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67358446,0.28035486,0.012054478,0.015919909,0.016973881,0.0011124497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07658372,0.0016051655,0.0038077594,0.0042669517,0.00079139584,0.0028388682,0.0047204094,0.0034420078,0.0033057341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.304283,0.0008996959,0.0037386655,0.002843372,0.0029522397,0.0031778777,0.0024796028,0.0037446164,0.00044979606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030559825,0.000482614,0.010161779,0.0039055385,0.0026685935,0.00047460102,0.001514058,0.24695717,0.008352265,0.2505141,0.003738256,0.4681751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011962139,0.0016716848,0.0060383077,0.0013888278,0.0013093466,0.0007119864,0.00023975805,0.78419304,0.012782225,0.18058455,0.009519951,0.00036407768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015629564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008755261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07658372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018087968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036959366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40501827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385800516","doi":"10.1007/s42519-023-00340-9","title":"Robust Optimal Design When Missing Data Happen at Random","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Missing data; Statistics; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.4908837358598463,"score_gpt":0.5233044670330016,"score_spread":0.032420731173155304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385800516","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002404792,0.00024095591,0.9960813,0.0002374194,0.00009671379,0.0002629976,0.000089354835,0.000175733,0.0004105956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.161112,0.00037984605,0.8328609,0.0005638683,0.00022310222,0.003517881,0.00032571188,0.00015947239,0.00085719384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.83603966,0.13909218,0.004620436,0.011162609,0.0071986346,0.0018865099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7245809,0.23346204,0.011436093,0.024040904,0.0052890116,0.001191041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.120882146,0.002639351,0.0062659523,0.0021733958,0.001062932,0.003113827,0.0050168303,0.0056801727,0.006960248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25999445,0.0034182991,0.0032871126,0.0020118752,0.006148602,0.004010952,0.003983982,0.0041866573,0.001065262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011009531,0.0010835645,0.0033045828,0.0030962843,0.003492974,0.00042350503,0.0006276138,0.21777877,0.0039999527,0.49764773,0.0050843945,0.25245112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002525263,0.0016588669,0.0014494893,0.00037781405,0.0009053453,0.00021797483,0.000088706285,0.42090434,0.0039314334,0.5619614,0.005861129,0.000118168675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072428136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005210054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120882146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015319363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055986624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63929355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385884614","doi":"10.1007/978-981-99-2240-6_8","title":"Propositions for Quantification Theory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Behaviormetrics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Management science; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.5321277403936201,"score_gpt":0.5207459977069897,"score_spread":0.011381742686630392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385884614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017774823,0.00710404,0.48201522,0.010498942,0.0007480608,0.0000934571,0.0004625295,0.00037727345,0.49692294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26825953,0.012115395,0.3518398,0.009206005,0.0038768426,0.0016573556,0.0010886082,0.0012012062,0.35075518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583626,0.0022449358,0.00014272695,0.0005683708,0.0010737515,0.00013399519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99535984,0.0034319512,0.00014296414,0.00053840096,0.00044153738,0.00008530651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005001504,0.00151064,0.0013703671,0.002836921,0.0026472318,0.006358019,0.0018208537,0.0022125167,0.028429985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00991543,0.0010937492,0.001118339,0.0032229268,0.015525767,0.0146583365,0.0032337354,0.005527642,0.005754801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010447318,0.0000023201076,0.0000054288976,0.000016311991,0.0000013174594,0.000002029459,0.000037945545,0.00010996915,0.000011619849,0.9936697,0.0026564132,0.0034859001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.098286e-7,9.116434e-7,0.0000094157695,0.000012681389,9.520678e-7,0.0000039873325,0.000011274114,0.000255826,0.000017359589,0.9901198,0.0095653655,0.0000015190979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017675968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014869233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028429985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050684917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001542183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095107794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386421016","doi":"10.1007/s00362-023-01469-2","title":"Bayesian and maximin A-optimal designs for spline regression models with unknown knots","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistical Papers","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Minimax; Optimal design; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Bayesian probability; Optimality criterion; Prior probability; Quadratic equation; Algorithm; Statistics","score_opus":0.18987846769652303,"score_gpt":0.4530553777483672,"score_spread":0.2631769100518442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386421016","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067560296,0.00030987363,0.9913741,0.0002424586,0.00004579581,0.00024846385,0.000066400586,0.00015382342,0.00080296467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15358202,0.0005056987,0.8404916,0.00029543386,0.00011651231,0.0029183996,0.00019466325,0.00016194207,0.0017337435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.8869795,0.10039016,0.0019495244,0.0048974543,0.0044906354,0.0012926494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78486353,0.1876987,0.009183381,0.011328492,0.0050199316,0.0019059217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.081291154,0.0027360036,0.004235429,0.0031527698,0.001207988,0.0028398267,0.0035986104,0.0051315883,0.006576961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19467977,0.0036590344,0.0031786633,0.0021342277,0.0044784667,0.0047271284,0.0045095873,0.0045994576,0.0009827329],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064013456,0.0010473155,0.0029558432,0.0014875308,0.0009278471,0.00015886404,0.00070770865,0.17941447,0.004042128,0.59667164,0.0026591797,0.20352623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013382202,0.00150121,0.001688616,0.00033381738,0.00025667596,0.0000910033,0.00007439481,0.3791436,0.0020476105,0.609852,0.003558738,0.00011405991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009377809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010736842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081291154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024816107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054021403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42991388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387641884","doi":"10.1111/stan.12328","title":"Asymptotic comparison of negative multinomial and multivariate normal experiments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistica Neerlandica","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Multinomial distribution; Mathematics; Multivariate statistics; Multivariate normal distribution; Statistics; Logarithm; Hellinger distance; Covariance; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.19219449486733747,"score_gpt":0.504022000913631,"score_spread":0.31182750604629356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387641884","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05348424,0.000615921,0.9422972,0.00028060065,0.00005281736,0.000081343955,0.000044134173,0.00025843584,0.0028852017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7241922,0.00061869575,0.26935282,0.0003649196,0.000121640864,0.000478379,0.00020934579,0.0002040383,0.004458022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98810554,0.0076942826,0.00031893692,0.0015458866,0.0020071545,0.0003281507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8754904,0.11022242,0.0034003453,0.0076809777,0.002294918,0.00091087166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03427379,0.00076957047,0.0013453945,0.001276561,0.00042896857,0.0013034764,0.002263706,0.00094524655,0.003197189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14030387,0.00047368833,0.0007122108,0.000608246,0.0041672233,0.0033749796,0.0025762622,0.0021497142,0.00028500037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021856073,0.00033180584,0.0073540183,0.0007264582,0.00021450769,0.00023771173,0.00069639756,0.21947035,0.022039339,0.5910355,0.0011575328,0.15455085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089111134,0.00072904106,0.0051669325,0.000110212735,0.00007656138,0.00021644603,0.000097262586,0.71233535,0.009026531,0.26968884,0.0023876198,0.00007599057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010062668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009262282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03427379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023464742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012790558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18125927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388429898","doi":"10.2991/978-94-6463-258-3_79","title":"RS3 Feasibility Modelling of a Semi-Circular Notched Sample Spalling Experiment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Atlantis highlights in engineering/Atlantis Highlights in Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Spall; Sample (material); Materials science; Structural engineering; Composite material; Forensic engineering; Engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.11414915261832694,"score_gpt":0.33099698328898713,"score_spread":0.2168478306706602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388429898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7687015,0.00027751,0.19052902,0.00040562914,0.00009265616,0.0004240996,0.0025902288,0.0010147608,0.035964537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702794,0.00013751443,0.02422107,0.000033019645,0.000004562061,0.0002531546,0.0004359539,0.000045407945,0.004589842],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967086,0.000053904227,0.00001835115,0.00007516964,0.00012846447,0.000053214728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993748,0.0002831009,0.000065440094,0.000083619605,0.00014879636,0.000044248376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007805679,0.00044041438,0.00044406744,0.00040722126,0.00032860806,0.0008360134,0.00093752093,0.0012377859,0.0058155498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011275101,0.00026510996,0.0006386026,0.00031733752,0.0006503214,0.00047751577,0.00046226193,0.0004434587,0.00077255775],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040225068,0.0001336453,0.0025374338,0.00018342558,0.000014306978,0.00033420595,0.00007142425,0.95424503,0.029504165,0.0044535133,0.00059153466,0.0075290776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003120126,0.000296355,0.0010372443,0.000015743386,0.000013046748,0.00004083512,0.000047853086,0.98561203,0.010561519,0.0008485909,0.0014796499,0.000016025444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006009845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036557694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006009845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007483991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013661751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019454896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389063115","doi":"10.51387/23-nejsds13edi","title":"Editorial. Design and Analysis of Experiments for Data Science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Statistical analysis; New england; Library science; Computer science; Statistics; Political science; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.39248641983575977,"score_gpt":0.5391577650210972,"score_spread":0.14667134518533748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389063115","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021824384,0.0025675418,0.0004786335,0.005563515,0.99064493,0.0000485972,0.00014295163,0.000089447974,0.00044261044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005605885,0.0050819195,0.0010835463,0.010317617,0.97584593,0.00021624166,0.0001645309,0.00012903122,0.006600507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98478645,0.0039733336,0.0031557325,0.0017203771,0.0058128,0.0005513225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8495863,0.086545676,0.0076120365,0.0038873935,0.046178374,0.00619025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025328891,0.006058188,0.007888233,0.0069229803,0.0040324396,0.008460451,0.0046132933,0.011933264,0.027720766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11718929,0.0026307344,0.0046017133,0.0034327284,0.0033421286,0.004147632,0.0011059628,0.019964915,0.022760695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012074539,0.00001855415,0.000022873788,0.0006802916,0.00004770113,0.00005493729,0.000009095814,0.00005854428,0.00007686244,0.0003280338,0.99153346,0.007048923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066101627,0.00020939998,0.00091155025,0.001887754,0.00038825342,0.00054593245,0.00007126276,0.0010041004,0.0004948307,0.004587024,0.9891545,0.00008447334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011782949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023890052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027720766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024063853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005247454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13395357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391052357","doi":"10.1093/biomet/asae001","title":"A note on minimax robustness of designs against correlated or heteroscedastic responses","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrika","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Minimax; Heteroscedasticity; Robustness (evolution); Econometrics; Statistics; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.3303164790836578,"score_gpt":0.4982238210605573,"score_spread":0.1679073419768995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391052357","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007869119,0.00055539253,0.9867589,0.0008099125,0.000071280796,0.00009486245,0.00010906331,0.00017154761,0.0035599621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.469112,0.0017146468,0.5195241,0.0022929525,0.00056379737,0.0020671643,0.00034785067,0.0005557522,0.0038216424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94424105,0.04109268,0.0017851597,0.0057939626,0.006039872,0.0010472942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.652819,0.31781366,0.008083346,0.015063131,0.005347904,0.0008729681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10622863,0.0022118578,0.004034043,0.002136574,0.001049806,0.0028831954,0.003003215,0.0035088297,0.0054305578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28112778,0.0013530407,0.0026020228,0.0017236507,0.008957202,0.004394992,0.0047052563,0.0053941556,0.0008586768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001652344,0.0001823685,0.002502599,0.0008861858,0.0007831571,0.00043610673,0.0007015403,0.21595873,0.013277354,0.66028285,0.0032884753,0.1000482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023057147,0.0011934453,0.0020148929,0.00034952018,0.00018952317,0.00032264873,0.00010498733,0.33164805,0.012211853,0.6474119,0.0041714585,0.00015110809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059566787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002555114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10622863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019709188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022969292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5617974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391714737","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_208","title":"Binary Response","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.37127820127617145,"score_gpt":0.48908975759177586,"score_spread":0.11781155631560442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391714737","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031421408,0.0013143758,0.7058685,0.0016333556,0.0014909134,0.0006448951,0.0013876507,0.0012932598,0.28322497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10183896,0.0018270095,0.3248432,0.0032801947,0.00061495823,0.0030307432,0.0019808356,0.0006974629,0.56188667],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741733,0.0013131497,0.00007939584,0.00039400824,0.0007000577,0.00009595214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975655,0.0015934734,0.0001035494,0.0003683114,0.00030440436,0.00006471674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022444243,0.0010130014,0.0009090001,0.0006412611,0.00050333317,0.0014502606,0.0011711445,0.0014648066,0.12328302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008366999,0.00040622734,0.000485578,0.0007612718,0.00087616494,0.0011185787,0.0011076782,0.0016278187,0.035723906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062628865,0.00022482577,0.00020538416,0.000984277,0.000044553668,0.00004934657,0.000111914254,0.006336364,0.009283478,0.3620505,0.104399115,0.515684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002796593,0.0006330869,0.0011626029,0.00057546626,0.00007297286,0.00036286897,0.00017557426,0.05283301,0.023904398,0.4497038,0.47020566,0.0000909678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002798124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045250304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12328302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006485951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065338914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41242284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391727415","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_982","title":"Factorial Design","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Factorial experiment; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.5905598012494433,"score_gpt":0.49456100081554016,"score_spread":0.09599880043390313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391727415","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047995755,0.002191835,0.77721256,0.0002756506,0.0013775066,0.0035103143,0.0032554546,0.004764094,0.20261298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0464108,0.0020032157,0.58880657,0.0012021444,0.00033338534,0.010122651,0.0029338652,0.0012990844,0.34688833],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967325,0.0010625728,0.00017156875,0.00064917083,0.0012185846,0.00016560567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861324,0.00066448643,0.0000815923,0.00030306514,0.00027765374,0.000060063616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020985873,0.0021928938,0.001912077,0.001235905,0.00081802823,0.0016136856,0.0019464727,0.001323739,0.15216999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00400081,0.0008617411,0.00095721777,0.0013420882,0.00063420733,0.0011948217,0.0012312563,0.0016053268,0.044205114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017725016,0.0006818308,0.0003137283,0.003441631,0.000099630786,0.00010770644,0.0001593423,0.0046143583,0.04896261,0.10085242,0.08162326,0.757371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007078909,0.0026128471,0.0016853432,0.00041593928,0.0002456086,0.00042879244,0.000051361425,0.010751155,0.053288158,0.046614368,0.8830829,0.0001156567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035472316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009149458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15216999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074885174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014152998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5090593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391727538","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_967","title":"Experimental Design","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.49280400042793965,"score_gpt":0.48754331427103403,"score_spread":0.005260686156905614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391727538","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060921665,0.0019172365,0.7715946,0.00062787405,0.0023639437,0.02829884,0.007115393,0.0049414975,0.17704843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044591054,0.0023117042,0.600855,0.003046916,0.0006662525,0.12086548,0.005947596,0.0017953771,0.21992071],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99030775,0.003890499,0.00065366284,0.0019516313,0.0027759776,0.00042045224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930219,0.0031656325,0.00034354112,0.0019276674,0.001322234,0.00021905154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008488161,0.0021636598,0.0016764627,0.0014730274,0.0010345599,0.0018723016,0.0025025571,0.001986765,0.16279174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014377476,0.0013046111,0.00096323574,0.0011140413,0.0015672924,0.0011467105,0.0018371161,0.002337421,0.04611015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005573276,0.0017659001,0.00069138146,0.007409179,0.0001979759,0.00015043124,0.00036256263,0.005680075,0.058780316,0.11844124,0.11736123,0.6835865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024415012,0.006168639,0.0022644943,0.0011151271,0.0003877002,0.00029430317,0.00011703981,0.007820236,0.05608645,0.05570855,0.8674369,0.00015907473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046564985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008414665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16279174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097273017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027403268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5445926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391729267","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2866","title":"Statistical Experimental Design","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.4801238961375549,"score_gpt":0.5028730631552649,"score_spread":0.022749167017710015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391729267","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006116422,0.0018455284,0.91540486,0.0009602105,0.0015128951,0.0016138495,0.0021454808,0.0026751217,0.07323032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014412224,0.002675897,0.84891886,0.0028267188,0.001007237,0.011573835,0.003195655,0.0016131315,0.113776505],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859132,0.009028456,0.00047817137,0.0012054312,0.0031646807,0.0002099243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791621,0.015162484,0.0005432753,0.0027830314,0.0020790847,0.0002700842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01610159,0.0016411375,0.001549101,0.0014771579,0.00058988703,0.001938466,0.0019088972,0.0016126788,0.08130592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025344724,0.0009859726,0.0008570432,0.0012393638,0.0016347419,0.0011065123,0.0013849977,0.0032588374,0.03231362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004039743,0.00022190328,0.00029991832,0.002257711,0.00012651917,0.000064258325,0.00016611151,0.0028401017,0.004560432,0.19194247,0.2207053,0.57641137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003057275,0.0006438137,0.0009925803,0.0007352695,0.00013116976,0.00024998243,0.0000679054,0.010328789,0.007741378,0.24707544,0.7316631,0.00006485427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039903464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010729735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08130592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010080318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030799636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27199543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392435127","doi":"10.1016/j.jmva.2024.105299","title":"Variable selection in multivariate regression models with measurement error in covariates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multivariate Analysis","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Covariate; Spurious relationship; Mathematics; Multivariate statistics; Observational error; Feature selection; Statistics; Errors-in-variables models; Regression analysis; Regression; Variable (mathematics); Penalty method; Variables; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.16308878658946238,"score_gpt":0.4417963584206746,"score_spread":0.2787075718312122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392435127","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012034407,0.00050864194,0.9864064,0.00038243143,0.00007757394,0.00019225881,0.00005167711,0.00014348855,0.00020325586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29988328,0.0010652877,0.6937784,0.00044347788,0.00031994068,0.0026408867,0.00033983306,0.00019643677,0.0013324437],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7844762,0.20163421,0.0025502408,0.0059091337,0.003961834,0.0014683972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57494,0.40521953,0.0076354,0.0084061045,0.0029665309,0.0008324552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14209257,0.00284626,0.0049915994,0.0021789903,0.001097732,0.002961332,0.004233286,0.003703266,0.0033542502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2708463,0.0028713564,0.003452019,0.0029585385,0.0053948998,0.0036942882,0.0034059612,0.0043947916,0.00045579596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068846224,0.0016599068,0.014046991,0.0023701566,0.003346314,0.000405802,0.0009239046,0.38046888,0.002438856,0.3148628,0.0031018832,0.26948994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001391363,0.0009703511,0.0023069838,0.00020000183,0.0004977924,0.00007639713,0.000062925326,0.76381415,0.0016858903,0.2274544,0.0014585496,0.00008116085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017753883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013439116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14209257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016562956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75146633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392565704","doi":"10.1093/biomtc/ujad038","title":"Two-phase designs with failure time processes subject to nonsusceptibility","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Covariate; Accelerated failure time model; Bivariate analysis; Proportional hazards model; Computer science; Logistic regression; Statistics; Fraction (chemistry); Phase (matter); Multivariate statistics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.1900245702038443,"score_gpt":0.48801193031734763,"score_spread":0.29798736011350335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392565704","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018113745,0.00035901813,0.9722224,0.00029372206,0.00035853585,0.007483162,0.00022546777,0.00020292244,0.000741086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2412147,0.000570923,0.71710086,0.0006352885,0.00026625601,0.036966927,0.0004087977,0.00008111678,0.0027551444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92173123,0.0684993,0.001676187,0.004019628,0.0030076148,0.0010660414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9154654,0.061215367,0.006922266,0.011829795,0.0033490432,0.0012181224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09746495,0.0028697816,0.0041294023,0.0018837989,0.0010379114,0.0018034384,0.0037938228,0.0038973673,0.009622503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11832572,0.0017837844,0.003741631,0.0014619025,0.003165078,0.0030782924,0.0028714163,0.0044623176,0.0010425742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020886399,0.0033112771,0.010061775,0.002054583,0.002008915,0.0005233463,0.0011856154,0.18397903,0.0052267695,0.5602733,0.004353266,0.2061357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012061352,0.015624016,0.0031870278,0.00038764192,0.0010757322,0.00026032224,0.00016724666,0.60772127,0.0040097493,0.3446191,0.010574074,0.00031249467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069833215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073045434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09746495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015893452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00408708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5154501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393065619","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113697","title":"A Multicountry Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) to Understand Patients’ Preferences for HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer (EBC) Treatments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Cancer","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Canadian Breast Cancer Network; Jewish General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Breast cancer; Medicine; Oncology; Internal medicine; Cancer","score_opus":0.13649237935061648,"score_gpt":0.4587046145328622,"score_spread":0.32221223518224573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393065619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86640394,0.00042947254,0.12331788,0.0014782739,0.00046356439,0.004603455,0.0006438566,0.00009298587,0.0025665727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91251165,0.00011960719,0.07959524,0.0006290339,0.00009774072,0.0056401594,0.00017605447,0.000015485015,0.0012149445],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9705034,0.026172364,0.0005619392,0.0014293888,0.00073098624,0.00060194946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85829616,0.13368356,0.0034175252,0.0030065577,0.0006976739,0.0008985515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031032346,0.0011425915,0.0019231627,0.00042103912,0.00072873937,0.0013299431,0.0013566215,0.002041318,0.007665635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059762064,0.0008033365,0.0017823788,0.0004145911,0.0017834787,0.0015539126,0.0011248275,0.002682613,0.0003238583],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.3174882,0.06244019,0.039770532,0.005089691,0.006513716,0.0004969429,0.0059757633,0.17180055,0.017765263,0.11696088,0.004446232,0.25125214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04813714,0.12841244,0.019443465,0.00034573066,0.0021620751,0.00031339875,0.0009946408,0.68956226,0.008316311,0.09454309,0.0073463595,0.00042314504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009437383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001331145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031032346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016037433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024578003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16411668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399322744","doi":"10.1007/s11222-024-10436-2","title":"Jittering and clustering: strategies for the construction of robust designs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics and Computing","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cluster analysis; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Mathematics","score_opus":0.22412019715494208,"score_gpt":0.4466583959822138,"score_spread":0.22253819882727172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399322744","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003139698,0.000057586003,0.99941075,0.000022957809,0.00000872774,0.000026925258,0.000011463735,0.00007184212,0.000075766875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024590975,0.00018121145,0.974045,0.00008477228,0.00005830782,0.00047652764,0.00009116934,0.0001560239,0.00031609324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9710305,0.021609217,0.0012679747,0.0024452894,0.0032356025,0.0004114529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9094947,0.07211402,0.0044710403,0.008845027,0.004342435,0.00073282263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0409693,0.0031736617,0.0035185232,0.0050099916,0.0014421674,0.002396561,0.0043572467,0.002737188,0.004002207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14955907,0.0024493576,0.0036181684,0.0032436377,0.0038454195,0.003247045,0.0033881841,0.0041243974,0.0011562537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068951095,0.00019997444,0.0009881579,0.0008199178,0.0006670915,0.00013220051,0.00047443298,0.27616933,0.0047695646,0.36829534,0.0030089973,0.34378543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015615365,0.0003143525,0.00042237708,0.000147697,0.00016936503,0.000070877904,0.000045330762,0.67797047,0.004369679,0.31170967,0.004534512,0.000089491994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002041729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019781215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0409693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022239836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040132753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21666896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399330943","doi":"10.52933/jdssv.v4i3.83","title":"An Efficient Way to Find Optimal Crossover Designs Using CVX for Precision Medicine","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Data Science Statistics and Visualisation","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Ontario Medical Association","funders":"National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; National Institute of General Medical Sciences; National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Crossover; Crossover study; Optimal design; Mathematical optimization; Regular polygon; Construct (python library); Computer science; Convex optimization; Algorithm; Mathematics; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.5004361897846052,"score_gpt":0.6208016945122043,"score_spread":0.1203655047275991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399330943","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022600137,0.00034218832,0.9960444,0.0001507395,0.000032092088,0.00013807869,0.000038016136,0.00012785973,0.0008666881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04799136,0.0003675532,0.9496778,0.00014616827,0.00004042058,0.00081932975,0.0001020384,0.00011829144,0.0007370435],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99125624,0.0062414315,0.00038819606,0.00073442166,0.001205469,0.00017431928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97944874,0.016831473,0.0010926168,0.0013997069,0.0010437493,0.00018380395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015791252,0.0014550013,0.0026100234,0.0029420545,0.0007282267,0.0016582018,0.0015216412,0.0021053767,0.00829729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050394878,0.0015001976,0.0020237127,0.0022813147,0.0019106369,0.001701265,0.0022249424,0.0033354629,0.0010225207],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070403074,0.00026357858,0.0015037295,0.0012321841,0.00036423656,0.0002270461,0.00039050129,0.32641482,0.008739108,0.26694965,0.0051367376,0.3880743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005366297,0.000789929,0.00081945857,0.00042959984,0.00016054597,0.00028448566,0.00009903607,0.6668191,0.0061053857,0.31163645,0.012235625,0.00008375692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009503251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087542355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015791252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012963593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024255428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08351314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402146830","doi":"10.28924/2291-8639-22-2024-150","title":"Finding Robust Response Surface Designs With Blocking Using a Model-Weighted A-Optimality Criterion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Analysis and Applications","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya","keywords":"Mathematics; Blocking (statistics); Response surface methodology; Mathematical optimization; Statistics","score_opus":0.22823889434991934,"score_gpt":0.4875128794081905,"score_spread":0.25927398505827115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402146830","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057245493,0.000046736848,0.99379104,0.000017309134,0.0000057903017,0.00005528885,0.000010229846,0.000068939386,0.00028022885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09839398,0.00009312721,0.9003246,0.00005851967,0.000013682606,0.00059787364,0.000069781265,0.00008087476,0.00036752838],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897361,0.0065413592,0.00049100886,0.0011136079,0.0018621433,0.00025577075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878983,0.008957037,0.0011563811,0.0007795902,0.0010963673,0.00011230172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013425723,0.0016636844,0.0022932389,0.0020549693,0.0004782827,0.0011002597,0.0013535543,0.0015511697,0.0013436505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020366536,0.00095636,0.0021809207,0.0010422663,0.0013361152,0.0014569076,0.0014951498,0.0015046349,0.00039417844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005988959,0.00038337815,0.0015936604,0.00060874724,0.00043866687,0.000074716445,0.00019746607,0.7268475,0.043463334,0.056995414,0.00047055513,0.16832756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009359105,0.00088112795,0.0006744451,0.0000375273,0.00008562832,0.000041079395,0.000022837909,0.9639286,0.009661906,0.02282186,0.0017020402,0.000049368144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007565132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000602326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013425723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007422868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002098679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07100284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402412381","doi":"10.1214/24-ejs2284","title":"Selecting strong orthogonal arrays by linear allowable level permutations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Orthogonal array; Combinatorics; Statistics; Applied mathematics; Taguchi methods","score_opus":0.1282196979000005,"score_gpt":0.448128365770885,"score_spread":0.31990866787088446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402412381","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030087959,0.00012774841,0.96705407,0.00010833898,0.000031624746,0.0001881864,0.0001131839,0.00016996605,0.0021188927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24295327,0.0003074831,0.7530946,0.00021147016,0.00007374318,0.0017780752,0.0003674294,0.00008371504,0.0011301244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895796,0.0073331688,0.0004984251,0.0009293012,0.0012578199,0.00040173365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98287576,0.012593285,0.0012457106,0.0019527597,0.0010451736,0.00028729683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006836554,0.00096806174,0.0011234623,0.0013507677,0.0007127115,0.0011696522,0.00086249976,0.0008917983,0.002925043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020839956,0.00057178584,0.0010549703,0.0014920932,0.0019383646,0.0016216811,0.0016797115,0.0012016051,0.00089102064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011148221,0.00043309407,0.004769897,0.0006446111,0.00016171146,0.00024874107,0.00043097505,0.114859805,0.03009521,0.42577258,0.0033458779,0.41812262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031669243,0.0019481663,0.0017337905,0.00011164282,0.00009254826,0.0003022455,0.00017391816,0.46627408,0.01910315,0.49929148,0.010528376,0.00012393387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020058126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036223992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006836554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042435736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013066684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03615558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402438503","doi":"10.1080/08982112.2024.2381005","title":"On the construction of saturated split-plot designs for quadratic response surface models","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Response surface methodology; Plot (graphics); Mathematics; Quadratic equation; Surface (topology); Statistics; Econometrics; Geometry","score_opus":0.3980598917181631,"score_gpt":0.4867958580602684,"score_spread":0.08873596634210534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402438503","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026589609,0.00006287503,0.9967283,0.00002452961,0.0000055765754,0.00008128668,0.00003095704,0.00010741379,0.0002999717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14350861,0.00025731119,0.8535885,0.00013008383,0.000023028375,0.0012360816,0.00026446048,0.0001246109,0.0008673],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889544,0.008313618,0.0003655366,0.00096847204,0.0011666601,0.00023125691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96789294,0.026375385,0.001670613,0.001571296,0.002226457,0.00026332898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014953758,0.0015216259,0.0014204957,0.0013497312,0.00036615226,0.00093949575,0.0011760886,0.0012256369,0.0050088246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037652913,0.0010582014,0.0016136949,0.0010362575,0.0014276862,0.0014634514,0.0020507055,0.001647955,0.0011376104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011098748,0.00030373526,0.0027227497,0.0011341216,0.000223409,0.00017548565,0.00038028567,0.6613807,0.020717865,0.105152056,0.0015914424,0.20510827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010658017,0.0008149084,0.0007188288,0.00008240143,0.000041091334,0.000054648674,0.000030434383,0.9460058,0.004143018,0.045438934,0.0025290088,0.000034360677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007658395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008349491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014953758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007187839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014995708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07908398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404960182","doi":"10.3390/s24237632","title":"Radar Sensor Data Fitting for Accurate Linear Sprint Modelling","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sensors","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Sport Centre Pacific; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sprint; Radar; Computer science; Linear model; Remote sensing; Data mining; Telecommunications; Machine learning; Geography","score_opus":0.4893269840653866,"score_gpt":0.5202498308642206,"score_spread":0.030922846798834003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404960182","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21671006,0.00052472576,0.7781234,0.00016561268,0.00008840218,0.0003038244,0.0005146434,0.0012382666,0.002331054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7673204,0.00040834642,0.22997732,0.00006455682,0.000015859545,0.00033825322,0.0007008262,0.00023871828,0.0009357499],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824643,0.0006404114,0.00018862299,0.0002708266,0.00055318227,0.00010055633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99453753,0.0032678286,0.0004979487,0.00044283262,0.0011945487,0.00005924438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00448651,0.0012137566,0.0008233112,0.0009843952,0.00038559778,0.001156648,0.0008921441,0.000843311,0.0021428769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018397031,0.00042967885,0.0011158772,0.0011983543,0.0003147373,0.0011599499,0.0008191051,0.0009955278,0.00089220155],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010538867,0.0005710966,0.06130021,0.0021279263,0.0004249207,0.00032164526,0.0016315384,0.44911858,0.08959707,0.0022962017,0.0024585407,0.38909844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031982363,0.00059814,0.040586937,0.00024158008,0.00012168151,0.00027391608,0.0003740301,0.9155061,0.03486111,0.0012880161,0.005999456,0.000117071315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005002873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006081219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005002873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048470372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012029107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023727238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405951691","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11836","title":"A new class of asymptotic maximin distance Latin hypercube designs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Minimax; Latin hypercube sampling; Class (philosophy); Hypercube; Combinatorics; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Monte Carlo method","score_opus":0.17522472695890867,"score_gpt":0.3926225213818179,"score_spread":0.21739779442290924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405951691","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018632518,0.00044615145,0.9750772,0.00012144361,0.00006415333,0.00030693648,0.00019237769,0.00023591971,0.0049233045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23922016,0.0004184431,0.75439715,0.00030918745,0.00012182069,0.0019508493,0.0003783682,0.00012271597,0.003081405],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899142,0.0072410814,0.00039080903,0.00097118405,0.0012217856,0.00026084617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98719203,0.0076091257,0.0012668767,0.001790707,0.0018201212,0.00032115896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00921582,0.0011019527,0.001280834,0.0013327955,0.000518575,0.0010066393,0.0013182153,0.00077555614,0.005167491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017344445,0.00051894045,0.000867511,0.0010520547,0.0014110672,0.001283391,0.0015352118,0.0012981032,0.000895593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018419706,0.00041672267,0.004629634,0.00078365725,0.00031848592,0.00021183834,0.00044153127,0.17120782,0.026384136,0.356831,0.005141627,0.43179163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091290916,0.0037547145,0.004339086,0.00025113169,0.0001476541,0.0005947768,0.00016290475,0.53928393,0.017547129,0.3901594,0.042650685,0.00019569256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029069165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035757112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00921582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008054955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012110261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04873848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406143287","doi":"10.1137/1.9781611978315.33","title":"Experimental Design Using Interlacing Polynomials","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Interlacing; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.3898590081219434,"score_gpt":0.41936578054783946,"score_spread":0.029506772425896055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406143287","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049584,0.000097716984,0.9984291,0.000032277032,0.000016936658,0.000027832239,0.000015255812,0.00007670852,0.0008083064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06341295,0.00055244385,0.93250793,0.00020402797,0.000070112816,0.00048433561,0.00007683441,0.00009436906,0.0025969937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99367565,0.0030617565,0.0003377559,0.0011267714,0.0015204843,0.00027756015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992282,0.004677107,0.0009645867,0.0014381541,0.00045863134,0.00017963737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00668043,0.0018915028,0.0011951129,0.0013989833,0.0005705968,0.0015356548,0.0023312133,0.0016794214,0.0058920346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013343272,0.001081793,0.0013778553,0.0016349395,0.0018998219,0.00213411,0.0024426791,0.003794104,0.0016364262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028342174,0.00017869979,0.0005024521,0.0005845254,0.00010001729,0.00012161851,0.00010157974,0.21615365,0.021692319,0.5216038,0.0024580024,0.23621991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008894357,0.00056442723,0.00020794645,0.00008541555,0.000053459742,0.00016772686,0.00002712512,0.6694008,0.016321763,0.2952549,0.01777876,0.000048741706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005952485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006287864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00668043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017281529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019915057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03532988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406164450","doi":"10.61091/ars161-07","title":"A New Series of Affine Resolvable PBIB(4) Designs in Two Replicates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Indian Agricultural Research Institute; Indian Council of Agricultural Research","keywords":"Mathematics; Series (stratigraphy); Affine transformation; Combinatorics; Pure mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.12324048761226183,"score_gpt":0.4414839682629218,"score_spread":0.31824348065066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406164450","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012631506,0.00044226096,0.9832734,0.000078534504,0.00010013507,0.0006233439,0.00030987797,0.00027376774,0.0022670995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1489663,0.0007992142,0.83934736,0.00025613455,0.0001375248,0.004436094,0.00071329233,0.00011457581,0.005229502],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851216,0.010086494,0.0006165441,0.0020223684,0.0017011416,0.00045184785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890435,0.005049689,0.0017744885,0.0024200317,0.00123019,0.000482192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011917936,0.0016671672,0.0028800813,0.0013865347,0.0006581487,0.0013929424,0.004044219,0.0013543972,0.007483874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016757246,0.0010775154,0.0019950194,0.0016627985,0.001561718,0.001527189,0.0014496559,0.0023382995,0.001367628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045402646,0.0008260751,0.0016872797,0.0018130954,0.0006801533,0.00016119862,0.0003254929,0.14790304,0.026420908,0.28491423,0.0043947767,0.5263335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040514716,0.012407114,0.003933328,0.00044908296,0.0008652929,0.0004786106,0.00010759156,0.6237229,0.038376402,0.25179875,0.06340452,0.00040485925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064620544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008715592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011917936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013506621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027980984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06302881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406808516","doi":"10.1002/sim.10321","title":"Bioequivalence Design With Sampling Distribution Segments","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bioequivalence; Sampling (signal processing); Sample size determination; Computer science; Statistics; Sampling distribution; Sampling design; Mathematics; Econometrics; Medicine","score_opus":0.22427735462934364,"score_gpt":0.5229092611377446,"score_spread":0.298631906508401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406808516","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055742334,0.00015022451,0.99237084,0.00013428053,0.00002924378,0.00069181283,0.00008562475,0.00031899978,0.00064478576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20399776,0.00035198175,0.7862203,0.000433586,0.00009165051,0.0061839153,0.0006735022,0.00024611744,0.0018011997],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97353506,0.021472313,0.00070968195,0.0018772993,0.0020240434,0.00038171106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92507756,0.06447046,0.0027501709,0.005209549,0.0020503558,0.00044184772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037092462,0.0014848044,0.0026351218,0.0018736334,0.0007107259,0.0020074474,0.0022346408,0.0027083342,0.0075302906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09793398,0.0011921972,0.0026545501,0.0016142619,0.0021856064,0.003627513,0.0027917165,0.004328813,0.001260071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004760281,0.0007463434,0.007810885,0.0010187814,0.000597153,0.00037774647,0.0011140158,0.4499034,0.004385897,0.21457118,0.004848245,0.30986616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051480316,0.00095160014,0.0011567535,0.0001483459,0.00012482212,0.000114467766,0.00006134747,0.8365654,0.0029661017,0.1500424,0.0072929375,0.00006112334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016169039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010522512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037092462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001740301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028220506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19616604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407762147","doi":"10.1037/met0000730","title":"Evaluating statistical fit of confirmatory bifactor models: Updated recommendations and a review of current practice.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Psychological Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Current (fluid); Confirmatory factor analysis; Psychology; Econometrics; Statistics; Statistical analysis; Psychometrics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Clinical psychology; Structural equation modeling; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.8475355186061376,"score_gpt":0.7654928065091957,"score_spread":0.08204271209694192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407762147","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015096138,0.98501325,0.0048871622,0.007223485,0.0009242595,0.0002753437,0.0003180868,0.00012323436,0.0010842644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025780625,0.95597434,0.036549103,0.002498843,0.00051779865,0.0008770864,0.00059674756,0.00007391107,0.00033408232],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9483415,0.027921245,0.010437397,0.0022195287,0.010554087,0.0005262042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67228997,0.23601925,0.021162268,0.007020057,0.061280284,0.0022282065],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13766028,0.0034420404,0.005865119,0.030811891,0.0013476176,0.006539445,0.007032696,0.0045272023,0.0071676937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29093593,0.0020986553,0.007042063,0.025560148,0.0033267,0.01023048,0.0035150074,0.005448502,0.0040695174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007773474,0.00006564814,0.0017640892,0.089693844,0.0010295396,0.00010238611,0.000409063,0.0004299191,0.000116283634,0.006322838,0.063405275,0.83658344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016838223,0.00019978234,0.0069037178,0.44492808,0.00529206,0.0006280825,0.0011052233,0.0019198192,0.00052861735,0.02504937,0.5130259,0.00025099338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016474703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030647406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86233974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008547854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03403855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72802585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407764960","doi":"10.1016/j.jmaa.2025.129897","title":"On noncentral Wishart mixtures of noncentral Wisharts and their use for testing random effects in factorial design models","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université de Sherbrooke; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université de Sherbrooke; Canada Research Chairs; McGill University; Pennsylvania State University; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Wishart distribution; Factorial experiment; Mathematics; Fractional factorial design; Statistics; Econometrics; Multivariate statistics","score_opus":0.17534155226186163,"score_gpt":0.41806343923283384,"score_spread":0.24272188697097222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407764960","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002048892,0.00027893105,0.99711907,0.00005207653,0.000017691571,0.000032505108,0.00002776271,0.00006659032,0.0003565207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13153942,0.0014603895,0.86270833,0.00032392787,0.00021805473,0.0012002783,0.00030114604,0.0002578016,0.0019907253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95660883,0.03320589,0.0014248833,0.0026090718,0.0053148754,0.0008364575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7848929,0.19524866,0.0061576753,0.006854868,0.0059662657,0.00087955466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046595592,0.003009525,0.0035647016,0.004666011,0.0012901488,0.0037681423,0.0030406453,0.0033615031,0.0034157482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14545423,0.001954079,0.0036553736,0.0044501307,0.0081933215,0.0050569577,0.004171825,0.005060582,0.0012178522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006577876,0.00022137423,0.0020653256,0.00063268404,0.00045716867,0.00046211254,0.0006697079,0.22727504,0.005078119,0.67191607,0.0011929228,0.08937175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005960087,0.0003288177,0.0008341192,0.00013510721,0.00009648368,0.00017426473,0.00005717908,0.5720146,0.0031754815,0.42099586,0.0019923917,0.000136177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019732576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014455224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046595592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001726012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024389846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24642396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407950092","doi":"10.1109/cdc56724.2024.10886446","title":"Generalizing Better Response Paths and Weakly Acyclic Games","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Directed acyclic graph; Theoretical computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.14539225863276836,"score_gpt":0.46754895710693223,"score_spread":0.32215669847416384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407950092","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060059123,0.00015206487,0.92689496,0.0007207887,0.000033501714,0.00021243091,0.00020165833,0.00013079453,0.011594647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82589257,0.00047760207,0.16776328,0.0006499921,0.000083910476,0.0005993024,0.00025818654,0.00006334161,0.0042118663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974462,0.0012599337,0.00015118763,0.0005942593,0.00037944393,0.00016898433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99070567,0.0060574855,0.0010745272,0.0014183414,0.00041709543,0.00032693078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036646817,0.00096209336,0.000504891,0.0009228583,0.0005645665,0.0009952569,0.0013587693,0.0011301113,0.0035166529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015705604,0.0004360539,0.0010658873,0.00068309926,0.003566152,0.004373819,0.0023033952,0.0024914676,0.00019834981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032550524,0.000035562665,0.00056238245,0.000064489395,0.000024915333,0.00008318253,0.00019932866,0.041767094,0.001318226,0.94625473,0.00033805595,0.009319539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015392741,0.000037303274,0.00027791073,0.000014158445,0.000010091187,0.00004323993,0.00004095026,0.08121493,0.0003320277,0.915799,0.0022042536,0.00001071686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003024933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002556333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036646817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015456731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011116682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019380927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409023558","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v14n1p45","title":"Algorithmic Construction of Bayesian Optimal Block Designs Using the Linear Mixed Effects Model","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bayesian probability; Mathematics; Block (permutation group theory); Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Computer science; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.08904698293725741,"score_gpt":0.4315362966326311,"score_spread":0.3424893136953737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409023558","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006660989,0.000042858665,0.9988937,0.000024451196,0.000007980717,0.00007656657,0.00001600635,0.00006906094,0.00020340808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011824124,0.00007452394,0.9868932,0.00003686494,0.000010672256,0.00083777413,0.000054395063,0.00004273098,0.00022572266],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98404086,0.012213267,0.0005075439,0.00094379875,0.0019668299,0.0003275931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97669774,0.019508557,0.0010136438,0.0011944054,0.0012434155,0.00034226145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018275553,0.0013227799,0.0027444034,0.0019554975,0.0007570978,0.0012493334,0.0023399643,0.0015117056,0.006569121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040931102,0.0016488151,0.0018203919,0.0012090822,0.001652524,0.001582049,0.0033854286,0.0026524186,0.0014419772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009098392,0.00035462723,0.0009714011,0.0009828325,0.0002763671,0.00011836751,0.00035518574,0.3158784,0.00646147,0.31705943,0.002168263,0.35446382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045452698,0.00056943996,0.00038269185,0.00015428057,0.000085759915,0.00008115026,0.00003904084,0.71344036,0.0033697318,0.27488503,0.006456574,0.00008149616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012807515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016876517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018275553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013725079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00426339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096651554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409109035","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v14n1p50","title":"Algorithmic Construction of Bayesian Optimal Block Designs Using the Linear Mixed Effects Model","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Bayesian probability; Block (permutation group theory); Mathematical optimization; Mixed model; Linear model; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Algorithm; Statistics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.08904698293725741,"score_gpt":0.4315362966326311,"score_spread":0.3424893136953737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409109035","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006660989,0.000042858665,0.9988937,0.000024451196,0.000007980717,0.00007656657,0.00001600635,0.00006906094,0.00020340808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011824124,0.00007452394,0.9868932,0.00003686494,0.000010672256,0.00083777413,0.000054395063,0.00004273098,0.00022572266],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98404086,0.012213267,0.0005075439,0.00094379875,0.0019668299,0.0003275931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97669774,0.019508557,0.0010136438,0.0011944054,0.0012434155,0.00034226145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018275553,0.0013227799,0.0027444034,0.0019554975,0.0007570978,0.0012493334,0.0023399643,0.0015117056,0.006569121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040931102,0.0016488151,0.0018203919,0.0012090822,0.001652524,0.001582049,0.0033854286,0.0026524186,0.0014419772],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009098392,0.00035462723,0.0009714011,0.0009828325,0.0002763671,0.00011836751,0.00035518574,0.3158784,0.00646147,0.31705943,0.002168263,0.35446382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045452698,0.00056943996,0.00038269185,0.00015428057,0.000085759915,0.00008115026,0.00003904084,0.71344036,0.0033697318,0.27488503,0.006456574,0.00008149616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012807515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016876517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018275553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013725079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00426339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096651554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410790021","doi":"10.1002/wics.70029","title":"Orthogonal Arrays: A Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Computer science; Orthogonal array; Mathematics; Statistics; Taguchi methods","score_opus":0.24005325499900423,"score_gpt":0.5504337736566163,"score_spread":0.31038051865761207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410790021","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015010218,0.9962972,0.0008606894,0.00034900365,0.00032278636,0.0000103323355,0.00006576428,0.000018208157,0.0019259277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001176293,0.99663866,0.0007021579,0.00029520833,0.00030520963,0.000017106191,0.000076178294,0.0000065290587,0.0007826361],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995859,0.00008488156,0.000050594594,0.0000914356,0.0001541128,0.00003310195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861085,0.0008480997,0.00011019426,0.000045254914,0.00032361652,0.000061964114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011223295,0.0008474636,0.0013841749,0.00316009,0.00040025797,0.0014429347,0.001120419,0.0009866195,0.007754191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002424146,0.00046433054,0.00063089764,0.0036646624,0.000645644,0.001813767,0.0007893487,0.0014039796,0.004417374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006282813,0.000071950286,0.00022201447,0.021293834,0.000091342146,0.00014549113,0.000052808093,0.00066818966,0.0013734376,0.014574408,0.042841747,0.918602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009786077,0.00008285033,0.00040452013,0.0036585361,0.00007971447,0.00071033277,0.000036159614,0.00016452951,0.0005266835,0.005289752,0.9890115,0.000025619176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010786435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012647538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007754191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000583249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015417491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025940299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411442155","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-69359-9_447","title":"Optimal Approximate Design","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0848798311340984,"score_gpt":0.42093849448073245,"score_spread":0.33605866334663403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411442155","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005907124,0.0005749062,0.9819695,0.00012303505,0.00010256451,0.000048510323,0.00006935052,0.00019047374,0.01633102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09261254,0.0018942608,0.852426,0.0006177296,0.00030984002,0.0007215004,0.00054786954,0.0003539711,0.050516248],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979672,0.0009268819,0.000072076364,0.0002777193,0.00067227037,0.000083823776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855834,0.0008078889,0.000074151925,0.00032987114,0.00019562698,0.000034188226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00176494,0.0011329694,0.0015391308,0.0007770257,0.00045847372,0.0015892007,0.0012372165,0.0014404702,0.027237834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059523275,0.00069048186,0.0008413727,0.0009277743,0.0010493571,0.001274404,0.0014029479,0.0016889009,0.0060463436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024874866,0.000107391905,0.00026197796,0.00049796794,0.00007375435,0.00004336758,0.000060407714,0.09385428,0.0045880275,0.3930774,0.02399112,0.48319548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000916925,0.0002465719,0.0003259472,0.00020997404,0.000068581125,0.00022553591,0.00003544797,0.37841332,0.006096152,0.52169347,0.09255828,0.0000350511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004910511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075584085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027237834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008488763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011564752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09111965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412792815","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5374371","title":"Potential Outcome Modeling and Estimation in Did Designs with Staggered Treatments","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Estimation; Econometrics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Mathematical economics; Systems engineering","score_opus":0.11339549607505722,"score_gpt":0.4400589084767011,"score_spread":0.32666341240164387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412792815","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010548258,0.00016706753,0.98686117,0.00021190025,0.00008772552,0.0010707418,0.00025156102,0.00015819097,0.00064337184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22041744,0.00025355627,0.7625974,0.00032181802,0.00009866333,0.012183836,0.0005480193,0.00008526946,0.0034940045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9007611,0.08088788,0.00303135,0.009667068,0.0037264824,0.001926124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7145209,0.24430464,0.008895986,0.027703827,0.0034933526,0.0010811947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.114816725,0.003187837,0.005613908,0.002169063,0.0013692459,0.0039005892,0.0066635413,0.0059870007,0.010922358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22919108,0.004744076,0.0039091045,0.0026083186,0.005525553,0.0056245658,0.00495955,0.0052356967,0.0015387498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012664079,0.001748064,0.007935045,0.00320816,0.0031784542,0.00033028828,0.0012966465,0.23534213,0.0025575694,0.5458725,0.0028965417,0.18297058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017870022,0.0017231695,0.0018286967,0.00018743907,0.00063105597,0.00007128266,0.00009259866,0.41536692,0.0022549317,0.572185,0.0037801624,0.00009178872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009532774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010843647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114816725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024592737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004134575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6072161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413457979","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5394370","title":"Correntropy Meets Cross-Entropy: A Robust Loss Against Noisy Labels","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cross entropy; Artificial intelligence; Entropy (arrow of time); Computer science; Mathematics; Pattern recognition (psychology); Physics","score_opus":0.07808477875120536,"score_gpt":0.4289299879324521,"score_spread":0.35084520918124673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413457979","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01050426,0.00029606835,0.9872236,0.00042985886,0.00005058007,0.0000891348,0.0001882273,0.0003758876,0.00084235467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49796176,0.0007200289,0.49263954,0.0007261379,0.00036919254,0.0009617269,0.001152838,0.0007073279,0.004761593],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97868514,0.013888293,0.00084154727,0.0031103832,0.0028324293,0.00064217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9465591,0.039004724,0.0032136017,0.00824308,0.002304223,0.00067525596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034974948,0.0028109965,0.0036406037,0.002165217,0.00093293993,0.00374031,0.003868959,0.0055317953,0.0032404144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082106754,0.001317838,0.0017093591,0.0018471183,0.005176674,0.005835157,0.0061366316,0.0036504343,0.0010916558],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029288996,0.00058770756,0.004373966,0.0013282445,0.0008968028,0.0003145895,0.00026958066,0.43162462,0.018909523,0.23987703,0.00719669,0.2916924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091540496,0.00054467155,0.0017542326,0.00007551555,0.00012227926,0.00017960557,0.000027748603,0.8522479,0.008638219,0.13455734,0.0016890856,0.00007194476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006514057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005302037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034974948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017452786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025141095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1849674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413463495","doi":"10.1080/00224065.2025.2534385","title":"Bayesian sequential I-optimal designs for split-plot experiments under model uncertainty","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality Technology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Bayesian probability; Econometrics; Statistics; Plot (graphics); Split plot; Bayesian inference; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.37045238201098957,"score_gpt":0.5594290052043334,"score_spread":0.1889766231933438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413463495","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0080930395,0.00014873783,0.9906,0.000036285033,0.000019278796,0.00037783274,0.000052971125,0.00013710294,0.0005346941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19557592,0.0002445547,0.8006671,0.00014259949,0.000027997918,0.0022852307,0.00019835886,0.00008634352,0.0007719224],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98541105,0.009608953,0.0005931893,0.0019612818,0.0019079138,0.0005176002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743928,0.017298516,0.0038915183,0.0020827195,0.0018112642,0.00052324316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02360749,0.002020751,0.002819249,0.001510753,0.0006999153,0.0015048584,0.0021202103,0.0017735217,0.005659407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042147182,0.001352251,0.0019250382,0.0010915826,0.0019490395,0.0018602684,0.0022508416,0.0020583284,0.0008463878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005177827,0.0014217667,0.006260268,0.0022317949,0.0006734113,0.00026472865,0.00058864086,0.42971164,0.03672637,0.21043396,0.0020822978,0.3044273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079896906,0.0038702944,0.0027325717,0.00014890061,0.00024192338,0.00010688966,0.00007010208,0.8743722,0.016440062,0.09739957,0.0036707632,0.00014777538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007347419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009473157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02360749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013214948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029351918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124849856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413859066","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v14n3p23","title":"Sequential Tests Based on F-Distribution for Detecting Active Effects in Unreplicated Two-Level Factorial Designs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Factorial experiment; Factorial; Statistics; Distribution (mathematics); Fractional factorial design; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.16235869691602423,"score_gpt":0.4788398377701344,"score_spread":0.31648114085411017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413859066","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01773605,0.00026644545,0.97950953,0.00006800105,0.00013111996,0.0005889226,0.00016301624,0.00050467195,0.0010321786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18941215,0.00035218045,0.80465645,0.00017422729,0.00012588412,0.004236072,0.00028224135,0.00012520728,0.0006355947],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9618116,0.020454833,0.0018756049,0.0055017117,0.009671131,0.00068527623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8864427,0.09745817,0.006110696,0.004450986,0.0048881886,0.00064922613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029789826,0.0018747769,0.0035617559,0.0045286063,0.0011973794,0.0011456497,0.0028459367,0.0018230467,0.006368466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10611962,0.00065395137,0.0024404074,0.0028882502,0.003300566,0.0029844178,0.0014001429,0.002942428,0.00063892954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042710993,0.0014580603,0.020541985,0.003974547,0.0014028174,0.0006332499,0.0015469487,0.055342853,0.036979116,0.08471246,0.0036910127,0.7854459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023953577,0.016275268,0.036614746,0.0006929436,0.0011688166,0.0011303361,0.00060120475,0.6729034,0.07137281,0.17261297,0.02352315,0.0007089867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013114455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010856454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029789826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015629445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029561329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1575455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414441757","doi":"10.1016/j.orp.2025.100355","title":"Development of a robust design optimization algorithm for hierarchical time series pharmaceutical problems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research Perspectives","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nexen (Canada)","funders":"National Research Foundation of Korea","keywords":"Quality by Design; Quality (philosophy); Optimization problem; Optimization algorithm; Hierarchical database model; Design of experiments; Optimal design; Development (topology)","score_opus":0.3568773472423729,"score_gpt":0.5492687362278529,"score_spread":0.19239138898547997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414441757","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005583893,0.000035105306,0.99903154,0.000030471785,0.0000059169965,0.000022392014,0.000008713767,0.00005858782,0.000248849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0855904,0.00021443235,0.91218805,0.000098697456,0.00004099169,0.0005532045,0.000119049015,0.00007482979,0.0011203476],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981845,0.0007661681,0.00012851824,0.00040914078,0.00040441888,0.00010713735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995955,0.0029307501,0.00035861827,0.0001638462,0.0005231435,0.00006870558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004921943,0.0015823428,0.0016413173,0.0010961487,0.0004600528,0.0011424355,0.0015491644,0.0019448985,0.0032277636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007903806,0.0008259062,0.0016654887,0.00086860935,0.0008915599,0.0011392181,0.0014988575,0.0024307973,0.00065955933],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004807536,0.00003447278,0.00016248925,0.000093364644,0.000037781985,0.000023316043,0.000022331886,0.9525189,0.0013052911,0.01115779,0.0003700734,0.034226213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071317672,0.000022120961,0.000019392737,0.000004046107,0.000004150793,0.0000042068164,0.0000022782415,0.99759656,0.00032838012,0.0017275289,0.00028121076,0.0000029562116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003472675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023306445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004921943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010700811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026089102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026030004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414534411","doi":"10.1002/pst.70031","title":"Adjustment for Inconsistency in Adaptive Phase 2/3 Designs With Dose Optimization","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Michael Smith Health Research BC","keywords":"Phase (matter); Selection (genetic algorithm); Maximum tolerated dose; Computerized adaptive testing; Adaptive design; Cutoff","score_opus":0.34858204789850666,"score_gpt":0.5624556527276947,"score_spread":0.21387360482918805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414534411","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022763526,0.00060679007,0.96911734,0.0004804371,0.0002534366,0.004570592,0.0001262189,0.00033979362,0.0017418301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24035518,0.00024449534,0.7452295,0.0010589799,0.00011268208,0.011675184,0.00016317047,0.0001339287,0.0010268019],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.82941663,0.14591081,0.006685346,0.007567842,0.00916469,0.0012546683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74678385,0.1996362,0.019312814,0.025855826,0.007371148,0.0010402284],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1775388,0.0022179657,0.0028097965,0.0016264204,0.0011139314,0.0024865933,0.0034814372,0.0035486342,0.005700283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28753266,0.0012958662,0.0036198052,0.0015220918,0.0032573103,0.0029580859,0.0027431848,0.004639824,0.0006159369],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025346039,0.0023733685,0.027854191,0.0029147505,0.0060427007,0.0005198927,0.0026956892,0.18499821,0.015355828,0.27201027,0.005659786,0.4542292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008395298,0.017925795,0.014196308,0.00093522476,0.0030233334,0.0003646462,0.00033778982,0.4597661,0.019159691,0.45212927,0.023255998,0.0005105754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052636693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073184015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8224612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020028509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037306764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9389261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416046466","doi":"10.54117/ijps.v2i2.14","title":"Transforming Unreplicated Factorial Designs into Replicated Structures through Factor Projection","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"IPS Journal of Physical Sciences","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Factorial experiment; Plackett–Burman design; Factorial; Fractional factorial design; Main effect; Projection (relational algebra); Inference; Reliability (semiconductor)","score_opus":0.20772159382845312,"score_gpt":0.5064120970185956,"score_spread":0.29869050319014245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416046466","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014379462,0.00008606626,0.984098,0.00003340203,0.000047002235,0.00038249957,0.00011205444,0.0004277438,0.00043375898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060572073,0.00011639475,0.93684465,0.000051400977,0.000019027015,0.0017341536,0.00018903962,0.000089526984,0.00038366468],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858312,0.007608321,0.00077883864,0.0027658918,0.0026931749,0.0003225979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97425914,0.0142324325,0.0025674046,0.00604169,0.0025998491,0.00029952647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015587487,0.0018431585,0.002088971,0.0013785633,0.00067866896,0.0015325148,0.0017511718,0.0010271373,0.004787736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03639242,0.0010625675,0.0027710502,0.0014607378,0.001894292,0.0016467371,0.0021460687,0.0026055088,0.0013838678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024957259,0.0013926337,0.007982821,0.0028223542,0.00081252365,0.00044420199,0.001576316,0.121650234,0.17770447,0.078017004,0.002352232,0.60274947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074841874,0.0074769114,0.01342966,0.0003735218,0.00061136024,0.00047669373,0.00042424575,0.5490523,0.17957926,0.2193095,0.02802622,0.0004919643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069672614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011481538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015587487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009422344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026029896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08243555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417152517","doi":"10.1002/cjce.70192","title":"The critical role of central point replication in response surface methodology: Implications for error estimation and statistical power in chemical engineering applications","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Surface (topology); Power (physics); Point (geometry); Estimation theory; Control theory (sociology); Estimation","score_opus":0.06433871603478379,"score_gpt":0.414921140400472,"score_spread":0.3505824243656882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417152517","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019639615,0.0017197176,0.9716439,0.0029911941,0.00080980355,0.0004469725,0.00009292504,0.00027967585,0.0023761918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53465474,0.0008716984,0.45647028,0.002055662,0.0009158184,0.0017966285,0.00015952054,0.0005740869,0.0025015948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5863545,0.33675554,0.0155468015,0.029369073,0.029796254,0.002177843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.086651035,0.8224996,0.012950509,0.05785576,0.01898033,0.0010628753],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.412842,0.0023829432,0.0053123436,0.0020542576,0.004506993,0.006704073,0.0069221375,0.0077702613,0.004431457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.81378484,0.0024451995,0.0040862025,0.0029525906,0.017328857,0.013447213,0.006371665,0.011378179,0.0009809695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006186078,0.0008548327,0.03739867,0.0029593394,0.0028812138,0.0015824123,0.0066431104,0.10157649,0.011484059,0.53496957,0.0060299113,0.28743434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011219226,0.0019412824,0.011006027,0.0007072227,0.00089583715,0.00086728117,0.00073042914,0.36810765,0.017917205,0.5885124,0.0077482862,0.00044442923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004766752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026903667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.412842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032239228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009992722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7240703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W5392957","doi":"10.1007/978-1-84800-113-8_18","title":"Present Worth Design of Engineering Systems with Degrading Components","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer series in reliability engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Warranty; Time to market; Quality (philosophy); Product (mathematics); Function (biology); Key (lock); Reliability engineering; Quality function deployment; Computer science; New product development; Risk analysis (engineering); Systems engineering; Engineering; Business; Marketing; Computer security","score_opus":0.09188461467966202,"score_gpt":0.30565571188393026,"score_spread":0.21377109720426823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W5392957","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021737805,0.002264226,0.94283676,0.00044877362,0.00026017957,0.00009073381,0.00008565178,0.00076084473,0.031514972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59893864,0.0038218177,0.30668855,0.00027408893,0.0004307499,0.00032706535,0.0003260062,0.0004791236,0.08871396],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975544,0.00006286607,0.00000760289,0.000049245613,0.000107726664,0.000017091012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977225,0.000088377456,0.000023645429,0.000057609086,0.00004360763,0.000014569804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006304411,0.0008257043,0.0006609411,0.00026147885,0.00037601744,0.001355061,0.0009631004,0.00085866905,0.012242174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010442914,0.00044914804,0.00046506515,0.00018916036,0.00049096526,0.0013244144,0.0007282378,0.00090273214,0.002123339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007460161,0.00019689229,0.0005267945,0.0010695781,0.00011928451,0.00019405264,0.00017774374,0.36122066,0.12174968,0.16110991,0.008951067,0.3439383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010181468,0.00081642705,0.0006403854,0.00010569056,0.00013279391,0.0002580941,0.00005972877,0.7258778,0.070857674,0.13239244,0.06871733,0.00003980825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010478261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021718051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012242174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004748414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029665485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040954113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W57323835","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4613-0049-6_6","title":"Designs in the Presence of Trends","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Block (permutation group theory); Class (philosophy); Block size; Optimal design; Block design; Degree (music); Matrix (chemical analysis); Binary number; Term (time); Combinatorics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Arithmetic; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2325307607797628,"score_gpt":0.4434055247947282,"score_spread":0.2108747640149654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W57323835","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033644047,0.0015073714,0.9883577,0.00045459656,0.00028331354,0.00031612694,0.00016781082,0.00024893935,0.0052998103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07509367,0.001919858,0.909879,0.00086078705,0.00029681667,0.0035719352,0.00032245915,0.0001766046,0.007878732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.94158053,0.047169544,0.0015955176,0.0041034003,0.005045731,0.000505134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8812483,0.10400341,0.003691461,0.008258165,0.0024208222,0.00037781527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.065146476,0.001537584,0.0027632955,0.0012489086,0.0006415292,0.0025748757,0.0027114153,0.0029272132,0.010615347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11496299,0.0018355016,0.0016885326,0.0014208285,0.00214272,0.0036370473,0.0015394628,0.0036287848,0.002144093],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015606511,0.00029737267,0.002531728,0.002036331,0.0010453797,0.00018995948,0.0005717887,0.0301529,0.0033421072,0.53838235,0.009857789,0.41003156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074243883,0.0013778283,0.0019814405,0.00042175758,0.0005471733,0.00024226245,0.00011864868,0.08764253,0.004834587,0.87111676,0.030887881,0.00008672563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035801213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008548126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065146476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012578825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019956573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3445316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6929954253","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10236082","title":"Découverte du Riccia beyrichiana Hampe ex Lehm. (Ricciaceae – Marchantiophyta) au Québec","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Context (archaeology); Limiting","score_opus":0.12160227156376252,"score_gpt":0.365097331834727,"score_spread":0.24349506027096446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6929954253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95895493,0.005191459,0.01290411,0.0006051735,0.00016852826,0.00035576048,0.0014561716,0.0003547255,0.020009125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96431154,0.0011777753,0.00774839,0.00033311854,0.00002336983,0.00018402985,0.0008332409,0.00010903367,0.025279487],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986853,0.00027483006,0.00003018445,0.00040356262,0.0004173409,0.00018866919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980546,0.00062413514,0.00015559097,0.00015948256,0.00076238636,0.00024375747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022902035,0.0007576011,0.0012157109,0.00077343616,0.0022613711,0.0018401492,0.0009045096,0.0007152383,0.0035422172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017248038,0.00027597658,0.00084236375,0.0007401649,0.000917908,0.00040810165,0.00047015568,0.0014889856,0.0007986279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033801512,0.0009637473,0.0683837,0.0009334681,0.0006084504,0.0018278136,0.003277205,0.02307771,0.6245858,0.0045624212,0.004807214,0.2635923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039965418,0.0017942003,0.76629657,0.00016098491,0.00027469912,0.00034121858,0.0020535795,0.017829904,0.056723855,0.0007317716,0.15325403,0.00013954903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8351904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87797886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16480958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018961895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008085136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3315603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931424524","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4096547","title":"Assistir Possessor (2020) Dublado Filme Online Grátis zkc","year":2020,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taxonomy (biology); Star trek","score_opus":0.18568459047544786,"score_gpt":0.38341416386582367,"score_spread":0.1977295733903758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931424524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011451378,0.00017677905,0.00026616987,0.00048646357,0.0007085763,0.000104102975,0.0042522326,0.001932621,0.990928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026053095,0.00013632643,0.00022538441,0.0001696034,0.000119337725,0.000032591444,0.0015316913,0.0006501117,0.99452966],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999845,0.00001148187,0.0000058919354,0.000025582225,0.000061457125,0.00005051942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991223,0.000057870817,0.000031591244,0.00008803442,0.00026923916,0.0004309082],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023503564,0.00056527567,0.00030788072,0.00086433726,0.0016074236,0.0028033934,0.0005159466,0.00072077726,0.91549504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013098227,0.00030383628,0.00030102534,0.00068478845,0.0002399077,0.0023849597,0.0022942165,0.00072738295,0.7936705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030446707,0.000016717839,0.00020852635,0.000068775116,0.0000010223099,0.00007837275,0.00012252893,0.00000931523,0.00035145273,0.00082033157,0.9718774,0.026415074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004855532,0.000012792953,0.00096074387,0.000031141997,0.0000011762329,0.000077458295,0.0002049324,0.00001951286,0.00016388542,0.00009006759,0.9984295,0.0000038635335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00426159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018657394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08450496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005826756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044152513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12053597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931766968","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7448708","title":"*oFfIcIaL*!LIVE!sTREAMs!* Jesse Smith vs. Matt Speciale Live Free Tv BROADCAST 12/16/2022","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Promotion (chess); Broadcasting (networking)","score_opus":0.0981428991384819,"score_gpt":0.34410667914792625,"score_spread":0.24596378000944435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931766968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001404338,0.00037783335,0.00014893296,0.0031459911,0.004023223,0.00003737758,0.002456519,0.00074534805,0.9876604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004103943,0.00020803153,0.00006414954,0.0006454866,0.00047775693,0.000014690721,0.001216788,0.0004950389,0.9927741],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997036,0.000020316269,0.0000056496624,0.00004654234,0.00012933977,0.000094649295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925834,0.000031028223,0.000019890851,0.00003462122,0.00024777226,0.00040829746],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000266312,0.0004726451,0.0002455745,0.0006087274,0.002634806,0.0045458633,0.00039391904,0.0009050157,0.7211139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000874964,0.00026249397,0.00024190324,0.0006600177,0.00033837452,0.0019158408,0.0022303285,0.0018078209,0.47466126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023043947,0.000008656582,0.000106604144,0.00001726144,7.333121e-7,0.000017210616,0.00005647418,0.0000049051087,0.00011501531,0.00074773195,0.99031395,0.008588436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037822804,0.000007997288,0.00059732754,0.000018218929,7.717202e-7,0.000015504673,0.00016189554,0.000013112582,0.00006860183,0.000055565633,0.99905473,0.000002626208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02008623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050959736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27888608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010752918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097353867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3977971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931861974","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7602522","title":"The Effect of Home Exercise Program on Motor Developmental Delay and Parental Satisfaction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rehabilitation; Patient satisfaction; Quality of life (healthcare); Motor skill; Scale (ratio); Gross motor skill; Outpatient clinic","score_opus":0.07725563708995277,"score_gpt":0.37077366026944786,"score_spread":0.2935180231794951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931861974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988329,0.00029291242,0.000040162366,0.000087662374,0.000009270465,0.000010938153,0.00004727033,0.0000032655992,0.000675564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994832,0.00011439366,0.000075458825,0.000027552154,0.0000069298057,0.000013474426,0.000056881952,7.8053966e-7,0.00022129755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995716,0.00022926154,0.000034128985,0.000024715704,0.000071781906,0.000068556335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988649,0.0005049131,0.00022640661,0.00002678302,0.00008989229,0.00028718196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057188584,0.000114314294,0.00015857315,0.00016166507,0.0001518803,0.00018153005,0.00012483857,0.00018620305,0.002600959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024408184,0.000047333437,0.00041491335,0.00016880142,0.000103186125,0.00013238566,0.00018628081,0.00029993328,0.000107431086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005290699,0.0054529645,0.8531553,0.00027215568,0.00034197015,0.00062633696,0.00077583746,0.00031861218,0.0019977842,0.000085657026,0.0010267856,0.13065585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009790644,0.005711102,0.9918751,0.000030161751,0.00009623121,0.00028893643,0.0005645788,0.00027008896,0.00051249185,0.000013211295,0.0005342562,0.000005972246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013208681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001503061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002600959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015300917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018591617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008701086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990033152","doi":"","title":"Construction of Optimal Foldover Designs with the General Minimum Lower-Order Confounding","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; Diafiltration; TSG101; Proteogenomics; Dysgeusia; Fusible alloy; Demotion; Liquation","score_opus":0.06134818838081948,"score_gpt":0.33500365785222436,"score_spread":0.2736554694714049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990033152","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021027576,0.00024756862,0.9769383,0.000045980618,0.000018249299,0.00038245574,0.0001154058,0.00015627872,0.0010681143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09561237,0.00030248176,0.900948,0.000076264434,0.000021175121,0.0018551569,0.00024312233,0.000072713134,0.00086865487],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98899907,0.007658614,0.0005876797,0.0010116483,0.0012839815,0.00045896348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98471004,0.010680213,0.001514821,0.0014969901,0.0013493091,0.00024853012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015160253,0.0013754613,0.0020306741,0.0015272216,0.00053253275,0.000977186,0.0010528584,0.0011261625,0.003489516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027133675,0.0008369962,0.0020729692,0.0011863773,0.0011888999,0.0012114634,0.0016805473,0.0012038035,0.0005503477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042128307,0.0008213051,0.006806394,0.0017604635,0.00035479278,0.000255109,0.0006323288,0.1558823,0.064601526,0.18152419,0.0022103514,0.5809384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012677271,0.012319908,0.01318425,0.0004672417,0.000440313,0.00056443404,0.0003470213,0.43442172,0.1023511,0.4050365,0.029270865,0.00032890338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032907457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039040283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015160253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094484014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019744958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080175996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999346864","doi":"","title":"Construction of optimal designs for nonlinear models","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal design; Nonlinear system; Cluster analysis; Bayesian probability; Fisher information; Discretization; Bayesian inference; Linear model; Optimality criterion","score_opus":0.1279659062739854,"score_gpt":0.35700656275986786,"score_spread":0.22904065648588245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999346864","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033070121,0.00017512923,0.9951043,0.0000898645,0.000014682854,0.00017577845,0.00006027317,0.00005973834,0.0010132135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057917014,0.0004306572,0.9386585,0.00012610783,0.000026803906,0.0020536252,0.00017115322,0.00007045985,0.00054562784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791869,0.015239367,0.0009014288,0.002270096,0.001973351,0.00042883356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662483,0.026894996,0.0022938172,0.002798231,0.0014414194,0.0003232699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027918322,0.0015606639,0.0025846765,0.0026045314,0.0005834144,0.0017064811,0.0017129243,0.0017082903,0.0038691352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05706203,0.0017857398,0.0025118326,0.0014973141,0.0023666385,0.002182652,0.002804161,0.0027394865,0.0007239494],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048428585,0.00022905874,0.0018365533,0.0015285402,0.00044578142,0.00011504871,0.0004014737,0.21514088,0.0047594747,0.59171486,0.0017934118,0.18155073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002706186,0.0006040209,0.00062724255,0.00030177538,0.00017998842,0.000057865323,0.00009858593,0.31854218,0.0033551438,0.6690569,0.00685152,0.00005415294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004177377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004943779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027918322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016848055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035702582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14764798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024608355","doi":"","title":"Selecting optimal follow-up split-plot designs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal design; Selection (genetic algorithm); Design of experiments; Sequential analysis; Point (geometry)","score_opus":0.11285263140965615,"score_gpt":0.35204765760385676,"score_spread":0.2391950261942006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024608355","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04131014,0.00039482556,0.9529238,0.00008183578,0.00007664481,0.002564473,0.00020240879,0.00046138573,0.0019844577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14791262,0.00027047156,0.84344673,0.00014169027,0.000022375296,0.005971713,0.00029588948,0.00016768243,0.0017708829],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840463,0.011657791,0.0007057617,0.0015631003,0.0016607142,0.00036641402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97259057,0.018812971,0.0022970466,0.0026286538,0.003284846,0.00038590614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022895642,0.0014111411,0.0020150621,0.001939904,0.00072987675,0.0016067544,0.0016918547,0.0016989092,0.0090081785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049872164,0.0007729414,0.0017984152,0.0012706268,0.0008738475,0.0012635587,0.0014207595,0.001673463,0.0018824537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009372966,0.0025283548,0.011454706,0.002987657,0.0006491105,0.00036418292,0.0011142042,0.09016167,0.06296302,0.057967708,0.0053448197,0.75509167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005520501,0.034086887,0.028729819,0.0014512002,0.0013874733,0.0005923087,0.0012202653,0.55232507,0.16541311,0.1584286,0.050439503,0.0004053237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002634786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039867777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022895642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073184643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014950045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12108523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030727082","doi":"","title":"NRC - Model Based Field Calibration for the NRC 3D Auto-Synchronized Laser Range Sensor","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"NPARC","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Calibration; Laser; Field (mathematics); Range (aeronautics); Metrology","score_opus":0.2053255701102702,"score_gpt":0.44874335377994684,"score_spread":0.24341778366967665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030727082","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029727608,0.00009906431,0.96317625,0.00009728379,0.000054609103,0.00014762777,0.00028653402,0.0022097344,0.004201231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63122076,0.0001124662,0.36403677,0.00010564567,0.000012800882,0.00037069063,0.000549694,0.00022552857,0.0033656948],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981918,0.00034030539,0.00004399356,0.0002918188,0.0010621698,0.0000699861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985518,0.0003300899,0.00016454197,0.00031508514,0.00060878735,0.0000298139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015587712,0.00057826174,0.0006693683,0.0006224553,0.00045712787,0.00081105594,0.0011161391,0.0008600738,0.00413847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029764983,0.00064873666,0.0006558679,0.00056170276,0.00048128783,0.0011026852,0.0006734912,0.00066932465,0.0012337093],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084227894,0.0003554122,0.0038977682,0.00041221752,0.0001257338,0.00006847604,0.00016566888,0.4914102,0.2288704,0.006220531,0.006366188,0.26126522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059662034,0.00021821655,0.00315199,0.000015997137,0.000033126013,0.000055479388,0.00002192442,0.91464746,0.07733555,0.000964952,0.0034491478,0.000046475474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005367523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010084463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005367523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012737366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024482417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01384455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7033432302","doi":"","title":"Rangeland Health Assessments of NCC Properties in Saskatchewan","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rangeland; Exclosure; Forest health; Population; Vegetation (pathology)","score_opus":0.11670410099194412,"score_gpt":0.4275477039146987,"score_spread":0.3108436029227546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7033432302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94886994,0.0003560653,0.0036208183,0.00019741867,0.000017629023,0.00033529964,0.01579473,0.0000596468,0.030748414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765978,0.0002844229,0.0040699528,0.0001306812,0.0000053387353,0.00029693404,0.0074741,0.00002087711,0.011119927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986499,0.0004068629,0.00006673754,0.00026526937,0.00041682454,0.00019447837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978759,0.00035214543,0.0002534182,0.00023748542,0.0011472879,0.00013369795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001066426,0.00037674236,0.0002741662,0.0013668336,0.00071228103,0.0007656694,0.00059589813,0.00031911442,0.0029521063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019122735,0.00020801753,0.00035411044,0.00305915,0.00054952136,0.00045996136,0.00090880226,0.00032154017,0.00067533064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048029306,0.00022650967,0.9142224,0.00017074741,0.00037836115,0.0003166236,0.0015417632,0.010537436,0.0056356187,0.0010063122,0.0058600046,0.05962389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014527692,0.000107955646,0.9864428,0.000069817026,0.000042750642,0.000023642582,0.0027659507,0.0025368202,0.0014272853,0.00029120294,0.0062575587,0.000019643616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7955779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94765705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20442212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063491417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073587694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41125196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7033729863","doi":"","title":"Search for a heavy Standard Model Higgs boson in the channel H -> ZZ -> l(+)l(-) q(q)over-bar using the ATLAS detector","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules; Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; H. Lundbeck A/S; Services Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et Culturelles; Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Forschung; Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technique; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Israel Science Foundation; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft; Lundbeckfonden; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; TRIUMF; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung; Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki; CERN; Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS); Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; National Natural Science Foundation of China; European Commission; General Secretariat for Research and Technology","keywords":"Higgs boson; Large Hadron Collider; Standard Model (mathematical formulation); Atlas (anatomy); ATLAS experiment; Luminosity; Boson; Atlas detector","score_opus":0.2219801864271945,"score_gpt":0.4006784341307305,"score_spread":0.178698247703536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7033729863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646308,0.00036662322,0.03173848,0.00012189225,0.0000117125455,0.00009346953,0.0009522996,0.00020842897,0.0018762624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619701,0.00018974721,0.035744287,0.00007639549,0.000008447757,0.000045503595,0.0010980939,0.000014084196,0.000853365],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871266,0.00064195885,0.00005769101,0.00021837343,0.0002689302,0.000100385936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975575,0.0015639969,0.00045452875,0.00011104512,0.00015569244,0.00015719183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027123052,0.00042066665,0.0008516954,0.0007395155,0.00038513064,0.0009331209,0.0005293288,0.00032153065,0.0024972765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018049619,0.00024253374,0.0005489429,0.0010011514,0.00037341917,0.00024484927,0.00039426,0.00019936153,0.00029191253],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013681971,0.0013091969,0.42340267,0.0012092282,0.0019138508,0.0012323991,0.00017199364,0.036877424,0.32825235,0.009632465,0.0026407526,0.17967564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002127198,0.012082071,0.24829103,0.000063749336,0.0025779742,0.0014945199,0.00052357645,0.33638313,0.36983573,0.018011305,0.008287751,0.0003219757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018932032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00504828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027123052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051059556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013580854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014344215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098029336","doi":"","title":"Sequential Design for Computer Experiments with a Flexible Bayesian Additive Model.” Canadian","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bayesian probability; Design of experiments; Sequential analysis; Sequential estimation; Bayesian experimental design","score_opus":0.29490751558984385,"score_gpt":0.455892094913676,"score_spread":0.16098457932383214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098029336","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030120919,0.0004510128,0.99187696,0.00034433827,0.00019686809,0.0013136843,0.0001301509,0.00034083836,0.0023340036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046571277,0.00033029562,0.9460576,0.00023541407,0.000085896776,0.0048079505,0.00010884683,0.00007225443,0.0017305064],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9064818,0.084180534,0.0013623919,0.0026898768,0.004571157,0.0007142059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92735636,0.06075067,0.0028904364,0.005469534,0.0028795411,0.00065344584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.067875154,0.001848851,0.0023807453,0.0012918985,0.0010160679,0.0018161122,0.002481363,0.002120308,0.01363254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10341565,0.0024255891,0.002146653,0.0014141505,0.0028147267,0.0020523642,0.0022774716,0.0031877672,0.0016204802],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00836558,0.0008615847,0.0024317729,0.0025380163,0.0017374995,0.00014185384,0.0008482748,0.13568708,0.004589751,0.37059388,0.015285171,0.4569195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036341313,0.0025534206,0.0033368166,0.00045636893,0.0008388675,0.00010765034,0.00008871525,0.6310575,0.005155224,0.31700596,0.035557486,0.00020791627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064109643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009416449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067875154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033281397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006692354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35896242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100261528","doi":"","title":"N: Medical statistics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Permission; Simple (philosophy); Genetic algorithm; Particle swarm optimization","score_opus":0.18699701784725473,"score_gpt":0.5272646146969973,"score_spread":0.3402675968497425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100261528","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015206159,0.078740336,0.14038125,0.043112274,0.029954286,0.002902637,0.4076734,0.005017993,0.27701172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2317992,0.0785184,0.10410369,0.023739193,0.021293472,0.014475271,0.19117992,0.0028717048,0.33201912],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942133,0.0020531085,0.00056389376,0.0012504165,0.0016138679,0.00030536923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98158973,0.009681403,0.002013752,0.00274424,0.0032253712,0.0007455702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055390117,0.0013843792,0.0026321483,0.0051903822,0.00071384263,0.0026057384,0.0019512111,0.0018692841,0.14356884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0483975,0.00043312606,0.0010315797,0.0063172313,0.001463574,0.0016621698,0.0014646406,0.0038532324,0.04743703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005627103,0.0000812067,0.009212471,0.003080008,0.00040835884,0.0002109192,0.00010581981,0.002784651,0.00029163278,0.02779101,0.7703,0.18517137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025836818,0.0002508404,0.023330538,0.0026702844,0.00032998208,0.0010667791,0.00026069002,0.008394121,0.0003462958,0.07967548,0.8832932,0.00012345849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01051718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008117464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14356884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023719943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48028564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7108440019","doi":"10.1080/03610926.2025.2596123","title":"Orthogonal-array composite minimaxloss designs for third-order models","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Composite number; Component (thermodynamics); Work (physics); Welding","score_opus":0.22006699062714818,"score_gpt":0.5516383631028189,"score_spread":0.3315713724756707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7108440019","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014097836,0.00016875088,0.9846224,0.000030618226,0.000039433766,0.00031461008,0.00011367288,0.00020372002,0.0004089105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13821954,0.0003025518,0.85578525,0.00008376574,0.000045505225,0.0041150297,0.00038416113,0.000086093074,0.0009781318],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96734625,0.02342269,0.0012090841,0.0036657224,0.0037335367,0.0006227275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9571905,0.032389972,0.0042850105,0.003521545,0.0023526375,0.0002603648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029272871,0.0023834705,0.0034004562,0.0016571633,0.00079156435,0.0015831641,0.0020493232,0.0017402173,0.0054514436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05073084,0.0010668229,0.0028826087,0.001642019,0.0020071608,0.001536506,0.0015324266,0.0024803658,0.0007401715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006556792,0.0010374559,0.0064853462,0.002603976,0.0015777391,0.00021523869,0.00079147465,0.45950645,0.030990709,0.1503678,0.0018726988,0.33799446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010387108,0.0064711063,0.0057516117,0.00021481466,0.00040152986,0.00012009374,0.00010548725,0.8864386,0.024354957,0.06677194,0.008071502,0.0002596309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007123924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008501829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029272871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014559153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026386045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15481156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117899418","doi":"10.5979/cha.2023.136_9","title":"Local Case of Making a Yield and Quality Predictive Model for Development of Plucking Plan System","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chagyo Kenkyu Hokoku (Tea Research Journal)","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Coast Mountain College","funders":"","keywords":"Plucking; Yield (engineering); Plan (archaeology); Quality (philosophy); Preventive maintenance","score_opus":0.7253552610965381,"score_gpt":0.5982834395439376,"score_spread":0.12707182155260055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117899418","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3323369,0.00017643589,0.6568854,0.00069933775,0.000047338945,0.00011390981,0.00017453839,0.00026156902,0.009304618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827266,0.000044502252,0.0139396135,0.000027261154,0.000009243035,0.00008346512,0.000054505857,0.000013472118,0.003101261],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915004,0.00020293047,0.000034636952,0.00029345258,0.00014453218,0.00017449178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984598,0.000987109,0.00016436371,0.00007146279,0.0002389146,0.00007835071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019648138,0.00065094925,0.0010376367,0.0006340593,0.0009782503,0.0014774173,0.0011447803,0.0021830976,0.0051191906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003678951,0.0005565865,0.0010860132,0.0005309286,0.0011799632,0.0014725842,0.0011661674,0.0013997508,0.00022699531],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110110544,0.00003485276,0.0011274477,0.000040344636,0.00002388989,0.0002605582,0.00007456807,0.98807585,0.0011422109,0.004044071,0.0001573721,0.00490858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006000566,0.000025360247,0.00017184256,0.0000020552704,0.0000103661705,0.000008450187,0.00001963877,0.9983765,0.00036501433,0.0009498011,0.00006082087,0.000004106225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016393773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008879006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016393773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001538468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015485487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032596707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164841587","doi":"10.22271/maths.2025.v10.i1c.2392","title":"Resolving design of experiments for factorial layouts with applications to fraser valley dairy farm productivity","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fractional factorial design; Factorial experiment; Productivity; Matching (statistics); Factorial; Matrix (chemical analysis); Linear programming; Moment (physics); Function (biology); Weibull distribution","score_opus":0.10320062955310616,"score_gpt":0.43076714942661276,"score_spread":0.3275665198735066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164841587","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005319885,0.0016268293,0.9900074,0.00050519727,0.00008502242,0.00035986496,0.000479591,0.0007064209,0.0009097926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05649626,0.00072791177,0.9386525,0.00038858777,0.00016814422,0.0020914476,0.0006795931,0.0003016899,0.00049395364],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.94252676,0.04702385,0.0014724022,0.004732046,0.003516556,0.0007282454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6981637,0.28067878,0.00906534,0.0074075502,0.0034817562,0.0012029059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06366202,0.0033092063,0.004269718,0.0027290015,0.0016909111,0.0040789885,0.0041677207,0.0034987887,0.007914462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17861858,0.0029081672,0.005202999,0.003831526,0.004506681,0.0025656656,0.0048730355,0.0062621734,0.0008889786],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012458295,0.00041565407,0.009937105,0.0026985062,0.0013635196,0.0005353368,0.0014900008,0.6317223,0.004381754,0.15918846,0.0062615033,0.18075994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007084404,0.00071447867,0.0023574266,0.0002544254,0.0002090258,0.000117495525,0.00014221488,0.7341025,0.0016235102,0.24602626,0.013636864,0.000107330285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058583054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008380116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005315003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006012774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33668095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W810039741","doi":"10.4314/jagst.v4i1.31673","title":"A Bayesian Test for Equality of Scale Parameters of Several Exponential Distributions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agriculture Science and Technology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Chi-square test; Mathematics; Statistics; Pearson's chi-squared test; Likelihood-ratio test; Statistic; Test statistic; Bayesian probability; Likelihood principle; Applied mathematics; Monte Carlo method; Exponential distribution; Statistical hypothesis testing; Maximum likelihood; Likelihood function","score_opus":0.04623470849258032,"score_gpt":0.3927533099285435,"score_spread":0.3465186014359632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W810039741","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04182137,0.00022916646,0.95422095,0.0002664164,0.000033785425,0.00013628557,0.000118618176,0.00017413078,0.0029992035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.583417,0.00034309644,0.413468,0.00034960656,0.00011460895,0.00062302244,0.00039670756,0.00010698511,0.0011809157],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97869706,0.011951218,0.00091680547,0.0021017944,0.0058485684,0.00048459473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8926233,0.09246523,0.005545072,0.0032625664,0.005318436,0.00078537426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024956422,0.000606612,0.0016374135,0.0026924273,0.00089454104,0.0020044022,0.0017139561,0.0017959191,0.003804167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1539542,0.0005720769,0.00092496484,0.0017685562,0.0026347933,0.0038893283,0.0023335977,0.0018724584,0.0006979074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013924871,0.0005110124,0.04551974,0.0005697304,0.0007175679,0.00048423363,0.0008030006,0.10340935,0.010373997,0.39078605,0.0027328236,0.4427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047601515,0.0011359272,0.02666762,0.0003095191,0.00021737278,0.0010246687,0.00040226436,0.5588029,0.0054798205,0.3980248,0.0072024353,0.00025669258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009891329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073716545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024956422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010631239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025757796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13198376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85037577","doi":"","title":"Use of complementary property of block designs in PBIB designs.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Property (philosophy); Block (permutation group theory); Arithmetic; Combinatorics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.30908903331026544,"score_gpt":0.43611893173867033,"score_spread":0.1270298984284049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W85037577","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00500433,0.00026496168,0.9881521,0.00007936813,0.00005390955,0.00026100012,0.00012370656,0.00015419244,0.0059064557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18844245,0.0005103313,0.80422074,0.00026388545,0.00009861573,0.0028249556,0.00023303182,0.00014881529,0.0032571633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97090334,0.02372686,0.0007096082,0.0016462656,0.0025301196,0.000483779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94388413,0.045845136,0.0024048677,0.0051922263,0.002168148,0.0005054254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019708151,0.0013991705,0.0020014988,0.0019800267,0.0007796936,0.0018592735,0.0013679178,0.001319636,0.013679651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053318158,0.001052577,0.0013503368,0.0018704811,0.0026964406,0.0023585418,0.0023222044,0.001981306,0.0019715691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019826523,0.00041197898,0.0018962288,0.001348626,0.00037113237,0.00012837624,0.00020518865,0.0677272,0.009281089,0.65526736,0.0027342746,0.25864595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084909465,0.0031110023,0.0014545385,0.00044819713,0.00043475776,0.00025685297,0.0001032018,0.34079325,0.01889003,0.60867363,0.024894528,0.00009093164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004848826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000812703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019708151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010801649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030888563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10422796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}